101
|
Mandrik OL, Severens JLH, Bardach A, Ghabri S, Hamel C, Mathes T, Vale L, Wisløff T, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD. Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews With Costs and Cost-Effectiveness Outcomes: An ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:463-472. [PMID: 33840423 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Olena Lena Mandrik
- Health Economic and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - J L Hans Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ariel Bardach
- Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Economic Evaluations Department, IECS - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria Asociación Civil, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Salah Ghabri
- French National Authority for Health (HAS), Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
| | - Candyce Hamel
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Tim Mathes
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NBL, England, UK
| | - Torbjørn Wisløff
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert
- Centers for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research (CHP/PCOR), Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Abstract
Health care economics has become an essential topic for all clinicians. Rising health care costs and continued limited resources force hospitals, health networks, and payers to make difficult choices. Economic studies range from those that only focus on costs to those that include costs and outcomes in a single metric, allowing for an assessment of incremental benefit gained from the incremental investment made. This article takes a step by step approach to interpreting the results of an economic evaluation, allowing the reader to critically appraise the results and to understand the implications for their specific patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Yieh
- Fetal and Neonatal Medicine Institute, Division of Neonatal Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles; Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, MS #31, Los Angeles, CA 90027, United States; Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Dmitry Dukhovny
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Sitagliptin/Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cost-Effectiveness Study. Value Health Reg Issues 2021; 26:33-39. [PMID: 33798907 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of sitagliptin/metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to those of glibenclamide/metformin in a semiprivate hospital and to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of sitagliptin/metformin in a semiprivate hospital to those in the public health system (PHS) of Ecuador in 2019. METHODS A cost-effectiveness study considering the probability of cardiovascular death as the outcome and quality-adjusted life-year as a measure of utility, estimating direct medical costs in US dollars by a model case from the perspective of the third payer. The results will be presented as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. One-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses with tornado diagrams were performed. RESULTS Direct medical costs were lower at the hospital than from the PHS in Ecuador. Considering the drugs metformin/sitagliptin, the total cost was $35.69 less in the hospital ($880.38) than from the comparator ($916.07). The highest percentage of direct medical costs corresponded to drugs (between 63.94% and 84.65%). An ICER of -$19 131.61 was obtained at the Hospital Un Canto a la Vida and -$1621.85 at PHS. In addition, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year earned was $611.11. Sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of drug use and the relative risk of cardiovascular death associated with such prescription were parameters that most affected the model. CONCLUSIONS The combination therapy metformin/sitagliptin compared to metformin/glibenclamide was shown not to be cost-effective in the Hospital Un Canto a la Vida, and highly cost-effective in the PHS.
Collapse
|
104
|
Gáspár K, Hunor Gergely L, Jenei B, Wikonkál N, Kinyó Á, Szegedi A, Remenyik É, Kiss N, Jin X, Sárdy M, Beretzky Z, Péntek M, Gulácsi L, Bánvölgyi A, Brodszky V, Rencz F. Resource utilization, work productivity and costs in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a cost-of-illness study. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2021; 22:399-408. [DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1895753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Krisztián Gáspár
- Departments of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- Department of Dermatological Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, . Debrecen, Hungary
| | - L. Hunor Gergely
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Jenei
- Quality of Life Statistics Department, Earnings Statistics Section, Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Norbert Wikonkál
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ágnes Kinyó
- Medical School Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Oncodermatology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Andrea Szegedi
- Departments of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- Department of Dermatological Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, . Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Éva Remenyik
- Departments of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Norbert Kiss
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Xiang Jin
- Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
- School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London, London, The United Kingdom
| | - Miklós Sárdy
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsanna Beretzky
- Doctoral School of Business and Management, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Márta Péntek
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
- Health Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - László Gulácsi
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
- Health Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - András Bánvölgyi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Valentin Brodszky
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Fanni Rencz
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Premium Postdoctoral Research Programme, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Iskandar K, Rizk R, Matta R, Husni-Samaha R, Sacre H, Bouraad E, Dirani N, Salameh P, Molinier L, Roques C, Dimassi A, Hallit S, Abdo R, Hanna PA, Yared Y, Matta M, Mostafa I. Economic Burden of Urinary Tract Infections From Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli Among Hospitalized Adult Patients in Lebanon: A Prospective Cohort Study. Value Health Reg Issues 2021; 24:38-46. [PMID: 33494034 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The rising incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) attributable to Escherichia coli resistant isolates is becoming a serious public health concern. Although global rates of infection vary considerably by region, the growing prevalence of this uropathogen has been associated with a high economic burden and health strain. This study aims: (1) to estimate the differences in clinical and economic outcomes between 2 groups of adult hospitalized patients with UTIs from E. coli resistant and susceptible bacteria and (2) to investigate drivers of this cost from a payer's perspective. METHODS A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in 10 hospitals in Lebanon. The cost analysis followed a bottom-up microcosting approach; a linear regression was constructed to evaluate the predictors of hospitalization costs and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the impact of resistance on length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS Out of 467 inpatients, 250 cases were because of resistant E. coli isolates. Results showed that patients with resistant uropathogens had 29% higher mean total hospitalization costs ($3429 vs $2651; P = .004), and an extended median LOS (6 days vs 5 days; P = .020) compared with susceptible cohorts. The selection of resistant bacteria and the Charlson comorbidity index predicted higher total hospitalization costs and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION In an era of increased pressure for cost containment, this study showed the burden of treating UTIs resulting from resistant bacteria. The results can inform cost-effectiveness analyses that intend to evaluate the benefit of a national action plan aimed at decreasing the impact of antibiotic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katia Iskandar
- Department of Mathématiques Informatique et Télécommunications, Université Toulouse III, Paul Sabatier, INSERM, UMR, Toulouse, France; INSPECT-LB: Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon; Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - Rana Rizk
- INSPECT-LB: Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rola Husni-Samaha
- School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon; Infection Control Department, Lebanese American University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hala Sacre
- INSPECT-LB: Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon; Drug Information Center, Order of Pharmacists of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Etwal Bouraad
- School of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice Department, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Natalia Dirani
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Dar El Amal University Hospital, Baalbeck, Lebanon
| | - Pascale Salameh
- INSPECT-LB: Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon; Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurent Molinier
- Department of Medical Information, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, INSERM, UMR, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | - Christine Roques
- Department of Bioprocédés et Systèmes Microbiens, Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, UMR, Toulouse, France; Department of Bactériologie-Hygiène, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Souheil Hallit
- INSPECT-LB: Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon; Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon
| | - Rachel Abdo
- INSPECT-LB: Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Medical Information, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, INSERM, UMR, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Yasmina Yared
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Geitaoui Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Matta Matta
- Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Infectious Diseases, Bellevue Medical Center, Mount Lebanon, Lebanon; Department of Infectious Diseases, Mounla Hospital, Tripoli, Lebanon
| | - Inas Mostafa
- Quality and Safety Department, Nabatieh Governmental Hospital, Nabatieh, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Lenk EJ, Moungui HC, Boussinesq M, Kamgno J, Nana-Djeunga HC, Fitzpatrick C, Peultier ACMM, Klion AD, Fletcher DA, Nutman TB, Pion SD, Niamsi-Emalio Y, Redekop WK, Severens JL, Stolk WA. A Test-and-Not-Treat Strategy for Onchocerciasis Elimination in Loa loa-coendemic Areas: Cost Analysis of a Pilot in the Soa Health District, Cameroon. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 70:1628-1635. [PMID: 31165855 PMCID: PMC7146010 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe adverse events after treatment with ivermectin in individuals with high levels of Loa loa microfilariae in the blood preclude onchocerciasis elimination through community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) in Central Africa. We measured the cost of a community-based pilot using a test-and-not-treat (TaNT) strategy in the Soa health district in Cameroon. Methods Based on actual expenditures, we empirically estimated the economic cost of the Soa TaNT campaign, including financial costs and opportunity costs that will likely be borne by control programs and stakeholders in the future. In addition to the empirical analyses, we estimated base-case, less intensive, and more intensive resource use scenarios to explore how costs might differ if TaNT were implemented programmatically. Results The total costs of US$283 938 divided by total population, people tested, and people treated with 42% coverage were US$4.0, US$9.2, and US$9.5, respectively. In programmatic implementation, these costs (base-case estimates with less and more intensive scenarios) could be US$2.2 ($1.9–$3.6), US$5.2 ($4.5–$8.3), and US$5.4 ($4.6–$8.6), respectively. Conclusions TaNT clearly provides a safe strategy for large-scale ivermectin treatment and overcomes a major obstacle to the elimination of onchocerciasis in areas coendemic for Loa loa. Although it is more expensive than standard CDTI, costs vary depending on the setting, the implementation choices made by the institutions involved, and the community participation rate. Research on the required duration of TaNT is needed to improve the affordability assessment, and more experience is needed to understand how to implement TaNT optimally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edeltraud J Lenk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam.,Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henri C Moungui
- Centre for Research on Filariasis and Other Tropical Diseases, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | - Michel Boussinesq
- Unité Mixte Internationale, TransVIHMI, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, University of Montpellier, France
| | - Joseph Kamgno
- Centre for Research on Filariasis and Other Tropical Diseases, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | | | | | | | - Amy D Klion
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Thomas B Nutman
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sébastien D Pion
- Unité Mixte Internationale, TransVIHMI, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, University of Montpellier, France
| | | | - William K Redekop
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam
| | - Johan L Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam
| | - Wilma A Stolk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
van Dongen JM, Jornada Ben Â, Finch AP, Rossenaar MMM, Biesheuvel-Leliefeld KEM, Apeldoorn AT, Ostelo RWJG, van Tulder MW, van Marwijk HWJ, Bosmans JE. Assessing the Impact of EQ-5D Country-specific Value Sets on Cost-utility Outcomes. Med Care 2021; 59:82-90. [PMID: 33201085 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the impact of EQ-5D country-specific value sets on cost-utility outcomes. METHODS Data from 2 randomized controlled trials on low back pain (LBP) and depression were used. 3L value sets were identified from the EuroQol Web site. A nonparametric crosswalk was employed for each tariff to obtain the likely 5L values. Differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) between countries were tested using paired t tests, with United Kingdom as reference. Cost-utility outcomes were estimated for both studies and both EQ-5D versions, including differences in QALYs and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS For the 3L, QALYs ranged between 0.650 (Taiwan) and 0.892 (United States) in the LBP study and between 0.619 (Taiwan) and 0.879 (United States) in the depression study. In both studies, most country-specific QALY estimates differed statistically significantly from that of the United Kingdom. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged between &OV0556;2044/QALY (Taiwan) and &OV0556;5897/QALY (Zimbabwe) in the LBP study and between &OV0556;38,287/QALY (Singapore) and &OV0556;96,550/QALY (Japan) in the depression study. At the NICE threshold of &OV0556;23,300/QALY (≈£20,000/QALY), the intervention's probability of being cost-effective versus control ranged between 0.751 (Zimbabwe) and 0.952 (Taiwan) and between 0.230 (Canada) and 0.396 (Singapore) in the LBP study and depression study, respectively. Similar results were found for the 5L, with extensive differences in ICERs and moderate differences in the probability of cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that the use of different EQ-5D country-specific value sets impacts on cost-utility outcomes. Therefore, to account for the fact that health state preferences are affected by sociocultural differences, relevant country-specific value sets should be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna M van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam
| | - Ângela Jornada Ben
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
| | - Aureliano P Finch
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
| | - Milou M M Rossenaar
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
| | - Karolien E M Biesheuvel-Leliefeld
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam
| | - Adrie T Apeldoorn
- Rehabilitation Department, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar
- Department of Epidemiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond W J G Ostelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam
- Department of Epidemiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits W van Tulder
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam
| | - Harm W J van Marwijk
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK
| | - Judith E Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Dymond A, Holmes H, McMaster J, Craig J, Davies H, Mealing S, Perard R. Economic Evaluation of Senshio ® (Ospemifene) for the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Atrophy in Scotland. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2021; 19:123-132. [PMID: 32390072 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00589-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local oestrogens, the current treatment for vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA), are not suitable for all women. Standard of care (SoC) consists of over-the-counter lubricants and moisturisers. Senshio® (ospemifene) provides a treatment option for postmenopausal women who are not candidates for local vaginal oestrogen therapy who would otherwise have an unmet clinical need. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ospemifene, a selective oestrogen receptor modulator, for the treatment of moderate to severe symptomatic VVA in postmenopausal women who are not candidates for local vaginal oestrogen therapy. METHODS The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) recently evaluated the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence of ospemifene plus SoC compared with SoC alone. A cost-effectiveness study, from a National Health Service (NHS) Scotland perspective over a lifetime time horizon, was submitted to the SMC. The cohort-based Markov model used robust clinical evidence from two large pivotal phase III randomised controlled studies and included four health states classified by dyspareunia symptom severity: none, mild, moderate and severe. The movement of women between health states was dependent on the effectiveness of treatment in reducing dyspareunia. Extensive sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess the level of confidence associated with the base-case results. RESULTS Treatment with ospemifene was associated with an additional cost of £847 per patient and an increase in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) of 0.06 per patient. Ospemifene had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £14,138 per QALY. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, there was a probability of 89% that ospemifene was cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained. Ospemifene remained cost-effective under all scenario analyses. The SMC reviewed the clinical and economic evidence and judged that the evidence demonstrated a robust case to support prescribing ospemifene in NHS Scotland. CONCLUSION Ospemifene is a cost-effective intervention that has recently been accepted by the SMC for the treatment of postmenopausal women with moderate to severe VVA who are not candidates for local oestrogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Dymond
- York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5NQ, UK.
| | - Hayden Holmes
- York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5NQ, UK
| | - Jessica McMaster
- York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5NQ, UK
| | - Joyce Craig
- York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5NQ, UK
| | - Heather Davies
- York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5NQ, UK
| | - Stuart Mealing
- York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5NQ, UK
| | - Rodolphe Perard
- Health Economics and Market Access, Shionogi B.V., 33 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6UF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Bekele M, Norheim OF, Hailu A. Cost-Effectiveness of Saxagliptin Compared With Glibenclamide as a Second-Line Therapy Added to Metformin for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Ethiopia. MDM Policy Pract 2021; 6:23814683211005771. [PMID: 34104781 PMCID: PMC8111283 DOI: 10.1177/23814683211005771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Metformin is a widely accepted first-line pharmacotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Treatment of T2DM with glibenclamide, saxagliptin, or one of the other second-line treatment agents is recommended when the first-line treatment (metformin) cannot control the disease. However, there is little evidence on the additional cost and cost-effectiveness of adding second-line drugs. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin and glibenclamide as second-line therapies added to metformin compared with metformin only in T2DM in Ethiopia. Methods. This cost-effectiveness study was conducted in Ethiopia using a mix of primary data on cost and best available data from the literature on the effectiveness. We measured the interventions' cost from the providers' perspective in 2019 US dollars. We developed a Markov model for T2DM disease progression with five health states using TreeAge Pro 2020 software. Disability-adjusted life year (DALY) was the health outcome used in this study, and we calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per DALY averted. Furthermore, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed. Results. The annual unit cost per patient was US$70 for metformin, US$75 for metformin + glibenclamide, and US$309 for metformin + saxagliptin. The ICER for saxagliptin + metformin was US$2259 per DALY averted. The ICER results were sensitive to various changes in cost, effectiveness, and transition probabilities. The ICER was driven primarily by the higher cost of saxagliptin relative to glibenclamide. Conclusion. Our study revealed that saxagliptin is not a cost-effective second-line therapy in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy based on a gross domestic product per capita per DALY averted willingness-to-pay threshold in Ethiopia (US$953).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengistu Bekele
- Bergen Center for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Oromia Regional Health Bureau, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Ole Frithjof Norheim
- Bergen Center for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alemayehu Hailu
- Bergen Center for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Gong J, Han J, Lee D, Bae S. A Meta-Regression Analysis of Utility Weights for Breast Cancer: The Power of Patients' Experience. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17249412. [PMID: 33333997 PMCID: PMC7765456 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
To summarize utility estimates of breast cancer and to assess the relative impacts of study characteristics on predicting breast cancer utilities. We searched Medline, Embase, RISS, and KoreaMed from January 1996 to April 2019 to find literature reporting utilities for breast cancer. Thirty-five articles were identified, reporting 224 utilities. A hierarchical linear model was used to conduct a meta-regression that included disease stages, assessment methods, respondent type, age of the respondents, and scale bounds as explanatory variables. The utility for early and late-stage breast cancer, as estimated by using the time-tradeoff with the scales anchored by death to perfect health with non-patients, were 0.742 and 0.525, respectively. The severity of breast cancer, assessment method, and respondent type were significant predictors of utilities, but the age of the respondents and bounds of the scale were not. Patients who experienced the health states valued 0.142 higher than did non-patients (P <0.001). Besides the disease stage, the respondent type had the highest impact on breast cancer utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiryoun Gong
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea; (J.G.); (J.H.)
| | - Juhee Han
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea; (J.G.); (J.H.)
| | - Donghwan Lee
- Department of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea;
| | - Seungjin Bae
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea; (J.G.); (J.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Eregata GT, Hailu A, Geletu ZA, Memirie ST, Johansson KA, Stenberg K, Bertram MY, Aman A, Norheim OF. Revision of the Ethiopian Essential Health Service Package: An Explication of the Process and Methods Used. Health Syst Reform 2020; 6:e1829313. [DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2020.1829313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Getachew Teshome Eregata
- Office of the Minister, Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Alemayehu Hailu
- Office of the Minister, Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Zelalem Adugna Geletu
- Office of the Minister, Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Solomon Tessema Memirie
- Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Kjell Arne Johansson
- Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Karin Stenberg
- Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Melanie Y. Bertram
- Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Amir Aman
- Office of the Minister, Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Ole Frithjof Norheim
- Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Chi YL, Blecher M, Chalkidou K, Culyer A, Claxton K, Edoka I, Glassman A, Kreif N, Jones I, Mirelman AJ, Nadjib M, Morton A, Norheim OF, Ochalek J, Prinja S, Ruiz F, Teerawattananon Y, Vassall A, Winch A. What next after GDP-based cost-effectiveness thresholds? Gates Open Res 2020; 4:176. [PMID: 33575544 PMCID: PMC7851575 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13201.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Public payers around the world are increasingly using cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) to assess the value-for-money of an intervention and make coverage decisions. However, there is still much confusion about the meaning and uses of the CET, how it should be calculated, and what constitutes an adequate evidence base for its formulation. One widely referenced and used threshold in the last decade has been the 1-3 GDP per capita, which is often attributed to the Commission on Macroeconomics and WHO guidelines on Choosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE). For many reasons, however, this threshold has been widely criticised; which has led experts across the world, including the WHO, to discourage its use. This has left a vacuum for policy-makers and technical staff at a time when countries are wanting to move towards Universal Health Coverage
. This article seeks to address this gap by offering five practical options for decision-makers in low- and middle-income countries that can be used instead of the 1-3 GDP rule, to combine existing evidence with fair decision-rules or develop locally relevant CETs. It builds on existing literature as well as an engagement with a group of experts and decision-makers working in low, middle and high income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y-Ling Chi
- Center for Global Development, London, SW1P 3SE, UK
| | | | - Kalipso Chalkidou
- Center for Global Development, London, SW1P 3SE, UK.,Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Anthony Culyer
- Centre for Health Economics, Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Karl Claxton
- Centre for Health Economics, Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Ijeoma Edoka
- School of Public Health, Wits University, Parktown, 2193, South Africa
| | | | - Noemi Kreif
- Centre for Health Economics, Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Iain Jones
- Sightsavers, Haywards Health, RH16 3BW, UK
| | - Andrew J Mirelman
- Centre for Health Economics, Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Mardiati Nadjib
- Faculty of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Administration, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
| | | | - Ole Frithjof Norheim
- BCEPS, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jessica Ochalek
- Centre for Health Economics, Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Shankar Prinja
- Department of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Francis Ruiz
- Center for Global Development, London, SW1P 3SE, UK.,Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Yot Teerawattananon
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand
| | - Anna Vassall
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Alexander Winch
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
García-Pérez L, Linertová R, Serrano-Pérez P, Trujillo-Martín M, Rodríguez-Rodríguez L, Valcárcel-Nazco C, Del Pino-Sedeño T. Interventions to improve medication adherence in mental health: the update of a systematic review of cost-effectiveness. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2020; 24:416-427. [PMID: 32609024 DOI: 10.1080/13651501.2020.1782434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Medication non-adherence in mental health problems has social and economic costs. The objective of the study was to review the cost-effectiveness of interventions to enhance medication adherence in patients with mental health problems. METHODS The update of a previous systematic review was performed. Databases were searched in June 2019: MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, CRD, WOS. Cost-effectiveness studies comparing an intervention to improve the medication adherence with other interventions/usual care in adults with mental health problems were included. Data were extracted, methodological quality of the studies was assessed and a narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS Nine studies were included in the review. The interventions that showed medication adherence increase were: a financial incentive when depot injection was taken by patients with psychotic disorders, a value-based benefit design policy including copayment and counselling in a company setting, and a medication treatment decision supported by a pharmacogenetic test. The other studies (coaching by pharmacists; a psychological and educational intervention at health care centres) did not find differences between groups. No study found cost differences between alternatives. CONCLUSIONS Interventions to improve medication adherence in adults with mental health problems could be cost-effective, especially those based on financial incentives, although more research is needed. KEYPOINTS There are several types of interventions designed to enhance medication adherence in patients with mental health problems. Few of them have demonstrated cost-effectiveness. Two studies found that a financial incentive per depot injection in patients with psychotic disorders improved the medication adherence. Two other studies found improvement in adherence due to two specific interventions: a value-based benefit design policy in a company setting and a pharmacogenetic test supporting the medication treatment decision. No study found differences in costs between the intervention and the comparator. More research is needed to implement cost-effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia García-Pérez
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), El Rosario, Spain.,Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), El Rosario, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Spain.,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), La Laguna, Spain.,Instituto Universitario de Desarrollo Regional (IUDR), Universidad de La Laguna, Spain
| | - Renata Linertová
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), El Rosario, Spain.,Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), El Rosario, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Spain.,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), La Laguna, Spain
| | - Pedro Serrano-Pérez
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Psychiatry and Legal Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mar Trujillo-Martín
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), El Rosario, Spain.,Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), El Rosario, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Spain.,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), La Laguna, Spain
| | - Leticia Rodríguez-Rodríguez
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), El Rosario, Spain.,Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), El Rosario, Spain
| | - Cristina Valcárcel-Nazco
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), El Rosario, Spain.,Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), El Rosario, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Spain.,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), La Laguna, Spain
| | - Tasmania Del Pino-Sedeño
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), El Rosario, Spain.,Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), El Rosario, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Assessing the capacity of Ghana to introduce health technology assessment: a systematic review of economic evaluations conducted in Ghana. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2020; 36:500-507. [PMID: 32981532 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462320000689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ghana is in the process of formally introducing health technology assessment (HTA) for health decision making. Similar to other low- and middle-income countries, evidence suggests that the lack of data and human capacity is a major barrier to the conduct and use of HTA. This study assessed the current human and data capacity available in Ghana to undertake HTA. METHODS As economic evaluation (EE) forms an integral part of HTA, a systematic review of EE studies undertaken in Ghana was conducted to identify the quality and number of studies available, methods and source of data used, and local persons involved. The literature search was undertaken in EMBASE (including MEDLINE), PUBMED, and Google Scholar. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economics Evaluation Reporting Standards. The number of local Ghanaians who contributed to authorship were used as a proxy for assessing human capacity for HTA. RESULTS Thirty-one studies were included in the final review. Overall, studies were of good quality. Studies derived their effectiveness, resource utilization and cost data mainly from Ghana. The most common source of cost data was from the National Health Insurance Scheme pricing list for medicines and tariffs. Effectiveness data were mostly derived from either single study or intervention programs. Sixty out of 199 authors were Ghanaians (30 percent); these authors were mostly involved in data collection and study conceptualization. CONCLUSIONS Human capacity for HTA in Ghana is limited. To introduce HTA successfully in Ghana, policy makers would need to develop more local capacity to undertake Ghanaian-specific HTA.
Collapse
|
115
|
Ruiz-Moreno JM, de Andrés-Nogales F, Oyagüez I. Cost-consequence analysis of extended loading dose of anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema patients. BMC Ophthalmol 2020; 20:371. [PMID: 32943041 PMCID: PMC7500029 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01637-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The DRCR.net Protocol T clinical trial assessed the comparative efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF treatments including aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME). Post -hoc analyses showed that after a 12-week induction period, there was still DME resolution in an increasing number of patients through week 24. PURPOSE To assess clinical and cost consequences of extending the anti-VEGF loading dose from 3 to 6 monthly injections in patients with persistent DME in Spain. METHODS From a hospital pharmacy perspective, a cost-consequence analysis model was developed to estimate the incremental cost needed to obtain an additional response at month 6. To estimate drug treatment costs, ex-factory prices (€, 2019) were considered for aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Response/nonresponse rates at 3/6 months were obtained from the Protocol T 24-week post hoc analysis (n = 546). Persistent DME was present in 50.8 and 31.6% of the 190 aflibercept-treated patients at month 3 and month 6, respectively. Of the 176 ranibizumab- and 180 bevacizumab-treated patients, 53.2 and 72.9%, respectively, had persistent DME at month 3, and 41.5 and 65.6%, respectively, had persistent DME at month 6. Sensitivity analysis considered the split of bevacizumab vials. RESULTS Extending the loading dose in nonresponder patients would cost €214,862.57, €208,488.98 and €134,483.16 to obtain 37, 21 and 13 additional aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab responder patients, respectively. The total number of extended injections (months 3-6) used in patients with persistent DME at month 6 was 180, 219 and 354 for aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS To extend the anti-VEGF loading dose from 3 to 6 injections necessitates investing €5882.77 (8 injections), €10,091.03 (14 injections) and €10,198.59 (30 injections) per additional responder patient (3-month nonresponders and 6-month responders) to aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab, respectively. For the total of patients treated, on average €7927.02 (14 injections) per additional responder patient would be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. M. Ruiz-Moreno
- Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain
- Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Calle Manuel de Falla, 1, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain
- Vissum Corporación, Madrid, Spain
| | - F. de Andrés-Nogales
- Health Economics Department, Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia, Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4 I, 28224, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - I. Oyagüez
- Health Economics Department, Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia, Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4 I, 28224, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Automated generation of decision-tree models for the economic assessment of interventions for rare diseases using the RaDiOS ontology. J Biomed Inform 2020; 110:103563. [PMID: 32931923 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The development of decision models to assess interventions for rare diseases require huge efforts from research groups, especially regarding collecting and synthesizing the knowledge to parameterize the model. This article presents a method to reuse the knowledge collected in an ontology to automatically generate decision tree models for different contexts and interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS We updated the reference ontology (RaDiOS) to include more knowledge required to generate a model. We implemented a transformation tool (RaDiOS-MTT) that uses the knowledge stored in RaDiOS to automatically generate decision trees for the economic assessment of interventions on rare diseases. RESULTS We used a case study to illustrate the potential of the tool, and automatically generate a decision tree that reproduces an actual study on newborn screening for profound biotinidase deficiency. CONCLUSIONS RaDiOS-MTT allows research groups to reuse the evidence collected, and thus speeding up the development of health economics assessments for interventions on rare diseases.
Collapse
|
117
|
Lartey S, Si L, Lung T, Magnussen CG, Boateng GO, Minicuci N, Kowal P, Hayes A, de Graaff B, Blizzard L, Palmer AJ. Impact of overweight and obesity on life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years and lifetime costs in the adult population of Ghana. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e003332. [PMID: 32994229 PMCID: PMC7526271 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior studies have revealed the increasing prevalence of obesity and its associated health effects among ageing adults in resource poor countries. However, no study has examined the long-term and economic impact of overweight and obesity in sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, we quantified the long-term impact of overweight and obesity on life expectancy (LE), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and total direct healthcare costs. METHODS A Markov simulation model projected health and economic outcomes associated with three categories of body mass index (BMI): healthy weight (18.5≤BMI <25.0); overweight (25.0≤BMI < 30.0) and obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2) in simulated adult cohorts over a 50-year time horizon from age fifty. Costs were estimated from government and patient perspectives, discounted 3% annually and reported in 2017 US$. Mortality rates from Ghanaian lifetables were adjusted by BMI-specific all-cause mortality HRs. Published input data were used from the 2014/2015 Ghana WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health data. Internal and external validity were assessed. RESULTS From age 50 years, average (95% CI) remaining LE for females were 25.6 (95% CI: 25.4 to 25.8), 23.5 (95% CI: 23.3 to 23.7) and 21.3 (95% CI: 19.6 to 21.8) for healthy weight, overweight and obesity, respectively. In males, remaining LE were healthy weight (23.0; 95% CI: 22.8 to 23.2), overweight (20.7; 95% CI: 20.5 to 20.9) and obesity (17.6; 95% CI: 17.5 to 17.8). In females, QALYs for healthy weight were 23.0 (95% CI: 22.8 to 23.2), overweight, 21.0 (95% CI: 20.8 to 21.2) and obesity, 19.0 (95% CI: 18.8 to 19.7). The discounted total costs per female were US$619 (95% CI: 616 to 622), US$1298 (95% CI: 1290 to 1306) and US$2057 (95% CI: 2043 to 2071) for healthy weight, overweight and obesity, respectively. QALYs and costs were lower in males. CONCLUSION Overweight and obesity have substantial health and economic impacts, hence the urgent need for cost-effective preventive strategies in the Ghanaian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella Lartey
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Ministry of Health, Accra, GAR, Ghana
| | - Lei Si
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Lung
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Costan G Magnussen
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Godfred O Boateng
- Department of Kinesiology, College of Nursing and Health Innovations, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA
| | - Nadia Minicuci
- National Research Council, Neuroscience Institute, Padova, Italy
| | - Paul Kowal
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison Hayes
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Barbara de Graaff
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Leigh Blizzard
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Andrew J Palmer
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Akgul O, Bodur H, Ataman S, Yurdakul FG, Capkin E, Gurer G, Sezer I, Duruoz MT, Melikoglu MA, Cay HF, Rezvani A, Yagci I, Gogus F, Kamanli A, Cevik R. Clinical performance of ASAS Health Index in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: real-world evidence from Multicenter Nationwide Registry. Rheumatol Int 2020; 40:1793-1801. [PMID: 32814986 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04680-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) is used as a new instrument in measuring the function, disability and health of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, the real-world evidence of ASAS HI is very limited. In the present study, our objective is to evaluate the psychometric properties and performance of ASAS HI in the real-world setting as well as comparing ASAS HI with the current instruments to assess the construct validity and determine the cut-off points in patients with both ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). A total of 991 patients with axSpA who fulfilled either the ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA (axSpA) or the Modified New York Criteria (mNY) for AS were recruited from the Biologic and targeted Synthetic antirheumatic drugs Registry (BioStaR) SpA. The construct validity of ASAS HI against the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activities Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional index (BASFI) was performed. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis, the cut-off points were calculated. Of all the recruited patients, 851 (85.9%) were AS and 140 (14.1%) were nr-axSpA. The difference in the mean ASAS HI scores of the patients with AS and the ones with nr-axSpA were not statistically significant (6.12 ± 4.29 and 6.42 ± 4.86, respectively). The mean ASAS HI score was significantly higher in females and small city residents. The ASAS HI had a strong construct validity against ASDAS-CRP, BASDAI and BASFI. A cut-off point of ≤ 4 was determined to discriminate good and moderate, as well as ≥ 12 to discriminate moderate and poor health status. In conclusion, ASAS HI is a reliable instrument to evaluate health and functioning for both patients with AS and nr-axSpA in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozgur Akgul
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey.
| | - Hatice Bodur
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara City Hospital, Universiteler Mah. 1604. Cad. Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sebnem Ataman
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitaton, Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Gul Yurdakul
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara City Hospital, Universiteler Mah. 1604. Cad. Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Erhan Capkin
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Gulcan Gurer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine, Aydin, Turkey
| | - Ilhan Sezer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Tuncay Duruoz
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meltem Alkan Melikoglu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Hasan Fatih Cay
- Department of Rheumatology, Saglik Bilimleri University, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Aylin Rezvani
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medipol University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ilker Yagci
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Feride Gogus
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ayhan Kamanli
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Sakarya University School of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Remzi Cevik
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Comans TA, Nguyen KH, Ratcliffe J, Rowen D, Mulhern B. Valuing the AD-5D Dementia Utility Instrument: An Estimation of a General Population Tariff. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:871-881. [PMID: 32314315 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00913-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper reports on the valuation of quality-of-life states in the Alzheimer's Disease Five Dimensions (AD-5D) instrument in a representative sample of the general population in Australia using the discrete-choice experiment with duration (DCETTO) elicitation technique. METHOD A DCE with 200 choice sets of two quality-of-life (QoL) state-duration combinations blocked into 20 survey versions, with ten choice sets in each version, was designed and administered online to a sample representative of the Australian population. Two additional choice sets comprising internal consistency and dominance checks were included in each survey version. A range of model specifications investigating preferences with respect to duration and interactions between AD-5D dimension levels were estimated. Utility weights were developed, with estimated coefficients transformed to the 0 (being dead) to 1 (full health) scale, suitable for the calculation of quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) weights for use in economic evaluation. RESULTS In total, 1999 respondents completed the choice experiment. Overall, respondents were slightly better educated and had higher annual incomes than the Australian general population. The estimation results from different specifications and models were broadly consistent with the monotonic nature of the AD-5D: utility increased with increased life expectancy and decreased as the severity level for each dimension worsened. A utility value set was generated for the calculation of utilities for all QoL states defined by the AD-5D descriptive system. CONCLUSION The DCE-based utility value set is now available to use to generate QALYs for the economic evaluation of treatments and interventions targeting people with dementia and/or their family caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy A Comans
- The Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- NHMRC Partnership Centre on Dealing with Cognitive and Related Functional Decline in Older People, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Kim-Huong Nguyen
- The Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- NHMRC Partnership Centre on Dealing with Cognitive and Related Functional Decline in Older People, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Donna Rowen
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Brady OJ, Kharisma DD, Wilastonegoro NN, O'Reilly KM, Hendrickx E, Bastos LS, Yakob L, Shepard DS. The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study. BMC Med 2020; 18:186. [PMID: 32641039 PMCID: PMC7346418 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01638-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Release of virus-blocking Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes is an emerging disease control strategy that aims to control dengue and other arboviral infections. Early entomological data and modelling analyses have suggested promising outcomes, and wMel Wolbachia releases are now ongoing or planned in 12 countries. To help inform government, donor, or philanthropist decisions on scale-up beyond single city releases, we assessed this technology's cost-effectiveness under alternative programmatic options. METHODS Using costing data from existing Wolbachia releases, previous dynamic model-based estimates of Wolbachia effectiveness, and a spatially explicit model of release and surveillance requirements, we predicted the costs and effectiveness of the ongoing programme in Yogyakarta City and three new hypothetical programmes in Yogyakarta Special Autonomous Region, Jakarta, and Bali. RESULTS We predicted Wolbachia to be a highly cost-effective intervention when deployed in high-density urban areas with gross cost-effectiveness below $1500 per DALY averted. When offsets from the health system and societal perspective were included, such programmes even became cost saving over 10-year time horizons with favourable benefit-cost ratios of 1.35 to 3.40. Sequencing Wolbachia releases over 10 years could reduce programme costs by approximately 38% compared to simultaneous releases everywhere, but also delays the benefits. Even if unexpected challenges occurred during deployment, such as emergence of resistance in the medium-term or low effective coverage, Wolbachia would remain a cost-saving intervention. CONCLUSIONS Wolbachia releases in high-density urban areas are expected to be highly cost-effective and could potentially be the first cost-saving intervention for dengue. Sites with strong public health infrastructure, fiscal capacity, and community support should be prioritised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver J Brady
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Dinar D Kharisma
- Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University,, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Nandyan N Wilastonegoro
- Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Kathleen M O'Reilly
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Emilie Hendrickx
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Leonardo S Bastos
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Laith Yakob
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Donald S Shepard
- Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University,, Waltham, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Németh B, Goettsch W, Kristensen FB, Piniazhko O, Huić M, Tesař T, Atanasijevic D, Lipska I, Kaló Z. The transferability of health technology assessment: the European perspective with focus on central and Eastern European countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2020; 20:321-330. [PMID: 32500749 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1779061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lower-income European countries have a worse health status and less funds for health care compared to Western Europe. Despite their limited human and financial capacities for conducting Health Technology Assessment (HTA), the need for evidence-based decision-making is growing. Two main approaches emerged as potential solutions: joint clinical assessments on the European level, and simplified procedures relying on the judgments of well-established HTA agencies of Western countries. AREAS COVERED Based on considerations of transferability, the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) was built up to harmonize HTA methodologies across the European Union, and to develop an HTA Core Model by focusing on joint production of relative effectiveness assessment, which can be used as a basis for national value assessments. The second approach has been suggested in various forms without considering transferability issues. EXPERT OPINION Joint clinical assessments reduce duplication of efforts based on appropriate scientific rationale. On the other hand, recent examples show that relying on judgments of HTA agencies from wealthier countries with potentially different health-care priorities can lead to suboptimal allocation decisions. In the short term, some stakeholders may benefit from ignoring transferability, but it will ultimately lead to limited access in other disease areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wim Goettsch
- WHO CollaboratingUtrecht Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.,National Health Care Institute , Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Finn Børlum Kristensen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Public Health, Research Unit of User Perspectives, University of Southern Denmark , Odense, Denmark.,Department of Strategy and Innovation, Copenhagen Business School , Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Oresta Piniazhko
- Health Technology Assessment Department, State Expert Centre of Ministry of Health of Ukraine , Kyiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Tomáš Tesař
- Department of Organisation and Management in Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University , Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | - Iga Lipska
- Departament of Health Care Services, National Health Fund HQ , Warsaw, Poland
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research Institute , Budapest, Hungary.,Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University , Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Németh B, Kaló Z. European cooperation in health technology assessment implementation: the perspective of Central and Eastern European countries. J Comp Eff Res 2020; 9:599-602. [PMID: 32501106 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2020-0062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.,Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Monahan M, Jowett S, Pinkney T, Brocklehurst P, Morton DG, Abdali Z, Roberts TE. Surgical site infection and costs in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the economic burden. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232960. [PMID: 32497086 PMCID: PMC7272045 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infection (SSI) is a worldwide problem which has morbidity, mortality and financial consequences. The incidence rate of SSI is high in Low- and Middle-Income countries (LMICs) compared to high income countries, and the costly surgical complication can raise the potential risk of financial catastrophe. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to critically appraise studies on the cost of SSI in a range of LMIC studies and compare these estimates with a reference standard of high income European studies who have explored similar SSI costs. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken using searches of two electronic databases, EMBASE and MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, up to February 2019. Study characteristics, comparator group, methods and results were extracted by using a standard template. RESULTS Studies from 15 LMIC and 16 European countries were identified and reviewed in full. The additional cost of SSI range (presented in 2017 international dollars) was similar in the LMIC ($174-$29,610) and European countries ($21-$34,000). Huge study design heterogeneity was encountered across the two settings. DISCUSSION SSIs were revealed to have a significant cost burden in both LMICs and High Income Countries in Europe. The magnitude of the costs depends on the SSI definition used, severity of SSI, patient population, choice of comparator, hospital setting, and cost items included. Differences in study design affected the comparability across studies. There is need for multicentre studies with standardized data collection methods to capture relevant costs and consequences of the infection across income settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Monahan
- NIHR Global Health and Global Surgery Unit, Institute of Translational Medicine, Heritage Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Jowett
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Pinkney
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Brocklehurst
- NIHR Global Health and Global Surgery Unit, Institute of Translational Medicine, Heritage Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Dion G. Morton
- NIHR Global Health and Global Surgery Unit, Institute of Translational Medicine, Heritage Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Zainab Abdali
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Tracy E. Roberts
- NIHR Global Health and Global Surgery Unit, Institute of Translational Medicine, Heritage Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Schmidt M, Werbrouck A, Verhaeghe N, De Wachter E, Simoens S, Annemans L, Putman K. A model-based economic evaluation of four newborn screening strategies for cystic fibrosis in Flanders, Belgium. Acta Clin Belg 2020; 75:212-220. [PMID: 31007159 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2019.1604472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The most cost-effective newborn screening strategy for cystic fibrosis (CF) for Flanders, Belgium, is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of four existing newborn screening strategies for CF: IRT-DNA (immunoreactive trypsinogen, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutation analysis), IRT-PAP (pancreatitis-associated protein), IRT-PAP-DNA, and IRT-PAP-DNA-EGA (extended CFTR gene analysis).Methods: Using data from published literature, the cost-effectiveness of the screening strategies was calculated for a hypothetical cohort of 65,606 newborns in Flanders, Belgium. A healthcare payer perspective was used, and the direct medical costs associated with screening were taken into account. The robustness of the model outcomes was assessed in sensitivity analyses.Results: The IRT-PAP strategy was the most cost-effective strategy in terms of costs per CF case detected (€9314 per CF case detected). The IRT-DNA strategy was more costly (€13,966 per CF case detected), but with an expected sensitivity of 93.4% also the most effective strategy, and was expected to detect 2.2 more cases of CF than the IRT-PAP strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of IRT-DNA vs. IRT-PAP was €54,180/extra CF case detected. The IRT-PAP-DNA strategy and the IRT-PAP-DNA-EGA strategy were both strongly dominated by the IRT-PAP strategy.Conclusion: The IRT-PAP strategy was the most cost-effective strategy in terms of costs per CF case detected. However, the strategy did not fulfil the European Cystic Fibrosis Society guidelines for sensitivity and positive predictive value. Therefore, the more costly and more effective IRT-DNA strategy may be the most appropriate newborn screening strategy for Flanders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masja Schmidt
- Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Amber Werbrouck
- Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nick Verhaeghe
- Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elke De Wachter
- CF Clinic, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieven Annemans
- Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Putman
- Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Dakin HA, Leal J, Briggs A, Clarke P, Holman RR, Gray A. Accurately Reflecting Uncertainty When Using Patient-Level Simulation Models to Extrapolate Clinical Trial Data. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:460-473. [PMID: 32431211 PMCID: PMC7323001 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20916442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. Patient-level simulation models facilitate extrapolation of clinical trial data while allowing for heterogeneity, prior history, and nonlinearity. However, combining different types of uncertainty around within-trial and extrapolated results remains challenging. Methods. We tested 4 methods to combine parameter uncertainty (around the regression coefficients used to predict future events) with sampling uncertainty (uncertainty around mean risk factors within the finite sample whose outcomes are being predicted and the effect of treatment on these risk factors). We compared these 4 methods using a simulation study based on an economic evaluation extrapolating the AFORRD randomized controlled trial using the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model version 2. This established type 2 diabetes model predicts patient-level health outcomes and costs. Results. The 95% confidence intervals around life years gained gave 25% coverage when sampling uncertainty was excluded (i.e., 25% of 95% confidence intervals contained the “true” value). Allowing for sampling uncertainty as well as parameter uncertainty widened confidence intervals by 6.3-fold and gave 96.3% coverage. Methods adjusting for baseline risk factors that combine sampling and parameter uncertainty overcame the bias that can result from between-group baseline imbalance and gave confidence intervals around 50% wider than those just considering parameter uncertainty, with 99.8% coverage. Conclusions. Analyses extrapolating data for individual trial participants should include both sampling uncertainty and parameter uncertainty and should adjust for any imbalance in baseline covariates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen A Dakin
- Nuffield Department of Population, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - José Leal
- Nuffield Department of Population, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Andrew Briggs
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Philip Clarke
- Nuffield Department of Population, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Rury R Holman
- Diabetes Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Alastair Gray
- Nuffield Department of Population, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Werner K, Risko N, Burkholder T, Munge K, Wallis L, Reynolds T. Cost-effectiveness of emergency care interventions in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2020; 98:341-352. [PMID: 32514199 PMCID: PMC7265944 DOI: 10.2471/blt.19.241158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review and appraise the quality of cost-effectiveness analyses of emergency care interventions in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed®, Scopus, EMBASE®, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for studies published before May 2019. Inclusion criteria were: (i) an original cost-effectiveness analysis of emergency care intervention or intervention package, and (ii) the analysis occurred in a low- and middle-income setting. To identify additional primary studies, we hand searched the reference lists of included studies. We used the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards guideline to appraise the quality of included studies. RESULTS Of the 1674 articles we identified, 35 articles met the inclusion criteria. We identified an additional four studies from the reference lists. We excluded many studies for being deemed costing assessments without an effectiveness analysis. Most included studies were single-intervention analyses. Emergency care interventions evaluated by included studies covered prehospital services, provider training, treatment interventions, emergency diagnostic tools and facilities and packages of care. The reporting quality of the studies varied. CONCLUSION We found large gaps in the evidence surrounding the cost-effectiveness of emergency care interventions in low- and middle-income settings. Given the breadth of interventions currently in practice, many interventions remain unassessed, suggesting the need for future research to aid resource allocation decisions. In particular, packages of multiple interventions and system-level changes represent a priority area for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalin Werner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, F51-62, Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa
| | - Nicholas Risko
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, United States of America (USA)
| | - Taylor Burkholder
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kenneth Munge
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Lee Wallis
- Department of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, F51-62, Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa
| | - Teri Reynolds
- Department for Clinical Services and Systems, Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Lakhotia B, Mahon R, Gutzwiller FS, Danyliv A, Nikolaev I, Thokala P. Modelling the Cost-Effectiveness of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone Using a Novel Markov Exacerbation-Based Approach. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2020; 15:787-797. [PMID: 32368025 PMCID: PMC7174156 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s247156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Exacerbations drive outcomes and costs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). While patient-level (micro) simulation cost-effectiveness models have been developed that include exacerbations, such models are complex. We developed a novel, exacerbation-based model to assess the cost-effectiveness of indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) versus salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) in COPD, using a Markov structure as a simplification of a previously validated microsimulation model. Methods The Markov model included three health states: infrequent or frequent exacerbator (IE or FE; ≤1 or ≥2 moderate/severe exacerbations in prior 12 months, respectively), or death. The model used data from the FLAME study and was run over a 10-year horizon. Cycle length was 1 year, after which patients remained in the same health state or transitioned to another. Analysis was conducted from a Swedish payer's perspective (Swedish healthcare costs, converted into Euros), with incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) calculated (discounted 3% annually). Results At all post-baseline timepoints, IND/GLY was associated with more patients in the IE health state and fewer patients in the FE and dead states relative to SFC. Over a 10-year period, IND/GLY was associated with a cost saving of €1,887/patient, an incremental benefit of 0.142 QALYs, and an addition of 0.057 life-years, compared with SFC. Conclusion This Markov model represents a novel cost-effectiveness analysis for COPD, with simpler methodology than prior microsimulation models, while retaining exacerbations as drivers of disease progression. In patients with COPD with a history of exacerbations in the previous year, IND/GLY is a cost-effective treatment option compared with SFC.
Collapse
|
128
|
Mariño R, Zaror C. Economic evaluations in water-fluoridation: a scoping review. BMC Oral Health 2020; 20:115. [PMID: 32299417 PMCID: PMC7164347 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01100-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community water fluoridation (CWF) is considered one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the twentieth century and has been a cornerstone strategies for the prevention and control of dental caries in many countries. However, for decision-makers the effectiveness and safety of any given intervention is not always sufficient to decide on the best option. Economic evaluations (EE) provide key information that managers weigh, alongside other evidence. This study reviews the relevant literature on EE in CWF. METHODS A systematic database search up to August 2019 was carried out using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Paediatric Economic Database Evaluation and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. The review included full economic evaluations on CWF programs, written in English, Spanish or Portuguese. The selection process and data extraction were carried out by two researchers independently. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed. RESULTS Of 498 identified articles, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria; 11 corresponded to cost-benefit analysis; nine were cost-effectiveness analyses; and four cost-utility studies. Two cost-utility studies used Disability-Adjusted Life Years,, one used Quality-Adjusted Tooth Years, and another Quality-Adjusted Life Years. EEs were conducted in eight countries. All studies concluded that water fluoridation was a cost-effective strategy when it was compared with non-fluoridated communities, independently of the perspective, time horizon or discount rate applied. Four studies adopted a lifetime time horizon. The outcome measures included caries averted (n = 14) and savings cost of dental treatment (n = 4). Most of the studies reported a caries reduction effects between 25 and 40%. CONCLUSION Findings indicated that CWF represents an appropriate use of communities' resources, using a range of economic evaluation methods and in different locations. These findings provide evidence to decision-makers which they could use as an aid to deciding on resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Mariño
- Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carlos Zaror
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics; Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de La Frontera, Manuel Montt #112, Temuco, Chile
- Center for Research in Epidemiology, Economics and Oral Public Health (CIEESPO), Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Malone DC, Ramsey SD, Patrick DL, Johnson FR, Mullins CD, Roberts MS, Willke RJ, Marshall DA. Criteria and Process for Initiating and Developing an ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:409-415. [PMID: 32327155 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)'s "Good Practices Task Force" reports are highly cited, multistakeholder perspective expert guidance reports that reflect international standards for health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) and their use in healthcare decision making. In this report, we discuss the criteria, development, and evaluation/consensus review and approval process for initiating a task force. The rationale for a task force must include a justification, including why this good practice guidance is important and its potential impact on the scientific community. The criteria include: (1) necessity (why is this task force required?); (2) a methodology-oriented focus (focus on research methods, approaches, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination); (3) relevance (to ISPOR's mission and its members); (4) durability over time; (5) broad applicability; and 6) an evidence-based approach. In addition, the proposal must be a priority specifically for ISPOR. These reports are valuable to researchers, academics, students, health technology assessors, medical technology developers and service providers, those working in other commercial entities, regulators, and payers. These stakeholder perspectives are represented in task force membership to ensure the report's overall usefulness and relevance to the global ISPOR membership. We hope that this discussion will bring transparency to the process of initiating, approving, and producing these task force reports and encourage participation from a diverse range of experts within and outside ISPOR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Malone
- Skaggs College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Scott D Ramsey
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Donald L Patrick
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - F Reed Johnson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Mark S Roberts
- Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Deborah A Marshall
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Adv Ther 2020; 37:847-859. [PMID: 31902066 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-01214-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The NCT00339183 trial demonstrated that adding panitumumab to fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as a second-line therapy of wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) increases the median progression-free survival (PFS). Nevertheless, panitumumab is not yet approved in China, and the costs and outcomes of the therapy are still unclear. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of this intervention from the perspective of Chinese health care systems by constructing two pricing scenarios for panitumumab. Scenario 1: Pricing is based on the price of a similar product (cetuximab) in China. Scenario 2: We estimated the value-based price. METHODS A partitioned survival model was created based on the results of the NCT00339183 trial, which evaluated panitumumab plus FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI. The model simulated the disease progression. We calculated medical costs from the perspectives of the Chinese health care systems. The primary outcome measures were costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS In scenario 1, compared with FOLFIRI alone, FOLFIRI with panitumumab arm had an ICER of ¥1,539,988/QALY. The most influential factors were the mean overall survival (OS), utility before progression and cost of panitumumab. The probability of panitumumab plus FOLFIRI being cost-effective in China was 0% when the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was ¥193,932/QALY. In scenario 2, when the cost of panitumumab was assumed to be ¥4032.61 or ¥5218.96 per cycle, the ICERs approximated the WTP thresholds of ¥193,932/QALY or ¥420,633/QALY, respectively. In this value-based pricing scenario, panitumumab plus FOLFIRI is estimated to be cost-effective. CONCLUSION We construct two pricing scenarios in China. In scenario 1, panitumumab plus FOLFIRI as a second-line therapy of mCRC provided an incremental benefit, but simultaneously increased costs (at the current price) even further. In scenario 2, when the value-based price was adopted, panitumumab plus FOLFIRI was estimated to be cost-effective. Our study establishes a pricing framework for new anticancer drugs to reflect the economics of drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00339183.
Collapse
|
131
|
Reed SD, Li Y, Dakin HA, Becker F, Leal J, Gustavson SM, Kartman B, Wittbrodt E, Mentz RJ, Pagidipati NJ, Bethel MA, Gray AM, Holman RR, Hernandez AF. Within-Trial Evaluation of Medical Resources, Costs, and Quality of Life Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Participating in the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL). Diabetes Care 2020; 43:374-381. [PMID: 31806653 PMCID: PMC7210004 DOI: 10.2337/dc19-0950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare medical resource use, costs, and health utilities for 14,752 patients with type 2 diabetes who were randomized to once-weekly exenatide (EQW) or placebo in addition to usual diabetes care in the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Medical resource use data and responses to the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) instrument were collected at baseline and throughout the trial. Medical resources and medications were assigned values by using U.S. Medicare payments and wholesale acquisition costs, respectively. Secondary analyses used English costs. RESULTS Patients were followed for an average of 3.3 years, during which time those randomized to EQW experienced 0.41 fewer inpatient days (7.05 vs. 7.46 days; relative rate ratio 0.91; P = 0.05). Rates of outpatient medical visits were similar, as were total inpatient and outpatient costs. Mean costs for nonstudy diabetes medications over the study period were ∼$1,600 lower with EQW than with placebo (P = 0.01). Total within-study costs, excluding study medication, were lower in the EQW arm than in the placebo arm ($28,907 vs. $30,914; P ≤ 0.01). When including the estimated cost of EQW, total mean costs were significantly higher in the EQW group than in the placebo group ($42,697 vs. $30,914; P < 0.01). With English costs applied, mean total costs, including exenatide costs, were £1,670 higher in the EQW group than the placebo group (£10,874 vs. £9,204; P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in EQ-5D health utilities between arms over time. CONCLUSIONS Medical costs were lower in the EQW arm than the placebo arm, but total costs were significantly higher once the cost of branded exenatide was incorporated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelby D Reed
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Yanhong Li
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Helen A Dakin
- Oxford Health Economic Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Frauke Becker
- Oxford Health Economic Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Jose Leal
- Oxford Health Economic Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | | | | | | | - Robert J Mentz
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Neha J Pagidipati
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Alastair M Gray
- Oxford Health Economic Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Rury R Holman
- Diabetes Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
132
|
Fahr P, Buchanan J, Wordsworth S. A Review of Health Economic Studies Comparing Traditional and Massively Parallel Sequencing Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Genetic Disorders. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:143-158. [PMID: 31741314 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00856-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Genetic disorders are clinically diverse and genetically heterogeneous, and are traditionally diagnosed based on an iterative phenotype-guided genetic assessment. However, such diagnostic approaches are long (diagnostic odysseys are common), misdiagnoses occur frequently, and diagnostic rates are low. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies may improve diagnostic rates and reduce the time to diagnosis for patients with suspected genetic disorders; however, MPS technologies are expensive and the health economic evidence base to support their use is limited. Several studies have compared the costs of traditional and MPS diagnostic pathways for patients with suspected genetic disorders, however costing methods and diagnostic scenarios are heterogeneous across studies. We conducted a literature review to identify and summarise information on these costing methods and diagnostic scenarios. Relevant studies were identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and the Cochrane Library, from 2010 to 2018. Twenty-four articles were included in the review. We observed considerable heterogeneity across studies with respect to the selection of items of resource use used to derive total diagnostic pathway cost estimates. We also observed structural differences in the diagnostic scenarios used to compare the traditional and MPS diagnostic pathways. There is a need for guidelines on the costing of diagnostic pathways to encourage the use of consistent methods. More micro-costing studies that evaluate diagnostic service delivery are also required. Greater homogeneity in costing approaches would facilitate more reliable comparisons between studies and improve the transferability of cost estimates across countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Fahr
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 2020; 41:111-188. [PMID: 31504418 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5083] [Impact Index Per Article: 1016.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
134
|
Mandrik O, Ekwunife OI, Meheus F, Severens JL(H, Lhachimi S, Uyl‐de Groot CA, Murillo R. Systematic reviews as a "lens of evidence": Determinants of cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening. Cancer Med 2019; 8:7846-7858. [PMID: 31568702 PMCID: PMC6912065 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Systematic reviews with economic components are important decision tools for stakeholders seeking to evaluate technologies, such as breast cancer screening (BCS) programs. This overview of systematic reviews explores the determinants of the cost-effectiveness of BCS and assesses the quality of secondary evidence. The search identified 30 systematic reviews that reported on the determinants of the cost-effectiveness of BCS, including the costs of breast cancer and BCS. While the quality of the reviews varied widely, only four out of 30 papers were considered to be of a high quality. We did not identify publication bias in the original evidence on the cost-effectiveness of mammography screening; however, we highlight a need for improved clarity in both reporting and data verification. The reviews consisted mainly of studies from high-income countries. Breast cancer costs varied widely among the studies. Factors leading to higher costs included: time (diagnosis and last months before death), later stage or metastases, recurrence of the disease, age below 64 years and type of follow-up (more intensive or more specialized). Overall, screening with mammography was considered cost-effective in the age range 50-69 years in Western European and Northern American countries but not for older or younger women. Its cost-effectiveness was questionable for low-income settings and Asia. Mammography screening was more cost-effective with biennial screening compared to annual screening and single reading using computer-aided detection vs double reading. No information on the cost-effectiveness of ultrasonography was found, and there is much uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness of CBE because of methodological limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olena Mandrik
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & ManagementErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Health Economic and Decision Science (HEDS)School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- The section of Early Detection and PreventionInternational Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| | - Obinna Ikechukwu Ekwunife
- Collaborative Research Group for Evidence‐Based Public HealthDepartment of Prevention and EvaluationLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and EpidemiologyBIPS/University of BremenBremenGermany
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy ManagementNnamdi Azikiwe UniversityAwkaNigeria
| | - Filip Meheus
- The section of Early Detection and PreventionInternational Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| | - Johan L. (Hans) Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & ManagementErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA)Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Stefan Lhachimi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy ManagementNnamdi Azikiwe UniversityAwkaNigeria
- Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research—IPPHealth Sciences BremenUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
| | - Carin A. Uyl‐de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & ManagementErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA)Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Raul Murillo
- The section of Early Detection and PreventionInternational Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
- Centro Javeriano de OncologíaHospital Universitario San IgnacioBogotáColombia
- Faculty of MedicinePontificia Universidad JaverianaBogotáColombia
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O, Windecker S, Aboyans V, Baigent C, Collet JP, Dean V, Delgado V, Fitzsimons D, Gale CP, Grobbee D, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Iung B, Jüni P, Katus HA, Landmesser U, Leclercq C, Lettino M, Lewis BS, Merkely B, Mueller C, Petersen S, Petronio AS, Richter DJ, Roffi M, Shlyakhto E, Simpson IA, Sousa-Uva M, Touyz RM, Nibouche D, Zelveian PH, Siostrzonek P, Najafov R, van de Borne P, Pojskic B, Postadzhiyan A, Kypris L, Špinar J, Larsen ML, Eldin HS, Viigimaa M, Strandberg TE, Ferrières J, Agladze R, Laufs U, Rallidis L, Bajnok L, Gudjónsson T, Maher V, Henkin Y, Gulizia MM, Mussagaliyeva A, Bajraktari G, Kerimkulova A, Latkovskis G, Hamoui O, Slapikas R, Visser L, Dingli P, Ivanov V, Boskovic A, Nazzi M, Visseren F, Mitevska I, Retterstøl K, Jankowski P, Fontes-Carvalho R, Gaita D, Ezhov M, Foscoli M, Giga V, Pella D, Fras Z, Perez de Isla L, Hagström E, Lehmann R, Abid L, Ozdogan O, Mitchenko O, Patel RS. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis 2019; 290:140-205. [PMID: 31591002 DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 653] [Impact Index Per Article: 108.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
136
|
García-Pérez L, Ramos-García V, Serrano-Aguilar P, Pais-Brito JL, Aciego de Mendoza M, Martín-Fernández J, García-Maroto R, Arenaza JC, Bilbao A. EQ-5D-5L utilities per health states in Spanish population with knee or hip osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:164. [PMID: 31666071 PMCID: PMC6822337 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1230-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to obtain utilities by means of EQ-5D-5L for different health states in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) or hip osteoarthritis (HOA) in Spain, and to compare these values with those used in foreign studies with the aim of discussing their transferability for their use in economic evaluations conducted in Spain. METHODS Primary study: Observational prospective study of KOA or HOA patients in Spain. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected to characterize the sample. Utilities were elicited using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. ANOVA and bivariable analyses were conducted to identify differences between health states. LITERATURE REVIEW Using the bibliographic databases NSH EED and CEA Registry, we conducted searches of model-based cost utilities analyses of technologies in KOA or HOA patients. Health states and utilities were extracted and compared with values obtained from the Spanish sample. RESULTS Three hundred ninety-seven subjects with KOA and 361 subjects with HOA were included, with average utilities of 0.544 and 0.520, respectively. In both samples, differences were found in utilities according to level of pain, stiffness and physical function (WOMAC) and severity of symptoms (Oxford scales), so that the worst the symptoms, the lower the utilities. The utilities after surgery were higher than before surgery. Due to limitations from our study related to sample size and observational design, it was not possible to estimate utilities for approximately half the health states included in the published models because they were directly related to specific technologies. For almost 100% of health states of the selected studies we obtained very different utilities from those reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge this is the first article with detailed utilities estimated using the EQ-5D-5L in Spain for KOA and HOA patients. In both populations, utilities are lower for worse health states in terms of level of pain, stiffness and physical function according to WOMAC, and according to the Oxford scales. Most utilities obtained from the Spanish sample are lower than those reported in the international literature. Further studies estimating utilities from local populations are required to avoid the use of foreign sources in economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia García-Pérez
- Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (FUNCANIS), Camino Candelaria No 44, 1a planta. 38109 El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
- Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Camino Candelaria No 44, 1a planta. 38109 El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Spain
- Instituto Universitario de Desarrollo Regional (IUDR), University of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
- Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | - Vanesa Ramos-García
- Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (FUNCANIS), Camino Candelaria No 44, 1a planta. 38109 El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
- Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Camino Candelaria No 44, 1a planta. 38109 El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
- Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Camino Candelaria No 44, 1a planta. 38109 El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Spain
- Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | - José Luis Pais-Brito
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital of Canary Islands, Ctra. Ofra S/N La Cuesta, 38320 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | - María Aciego de Mendoza
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital of Canary Islands, Ctra. Ofra S/N La Cuesta, 38320 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Jesús Martín-Fernández
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Spain
- Multiprofessional Teaching Unit of Primary and Community Care “Oeste”, Health Service, c/ Alonso Cano 8, Móstoles, 28933 Madrid, Madrid Spain
- Health Sciences Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Roberto García-Maroto
- Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, C/ Profesor Martín Lagos S/N, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Arenaza
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Spain
- Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery Service, Basurto University Hospital (Osakidetza), Avda. Montevideo, 18, 48013 Bilbao, Bizkaia Spain
| | - Amaia Bilbao
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Spain
- Research Unit, Basurto University Hospital (Osakidetza), Avda. Montevideo, 18, 48013 Bilbao, Bizkaia Spain
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Teerawattananon Y, Teo YY, Dabak S, Rattanavipapong W, Isaranuwatchai W, Wee HL, Luo N, Morton A. Tackling the 3 Big Challenges Confronting Health Technology Assessment Development in Asia: A Commentary. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 21:66-68. [PMID: 31655465 PMCID: PMC7267777 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
There has been continuous development in the field of health technology assessment (HTA) owing to the added value of HTA in supporting healthcare reimbursement decisions. Collaboration and engagement among countries in Asia has been carried out to share experiences and learning on the barriers and factors facilitating the implementation and use of HTA in policy making. A symposium on the topic of Health Technology Assessment (HTA): Selecting the Highest Value Care was held on January 10, 2019 at the National University of Singapore, during which 3 major challenges confronting HTA development in Asia were identified. The symposium also offered possible ways to overcome the challenges. Countries in Asia increasingly recognize and adopt health technology assessment (HTA) in setting priorities for healthcare. Nevertheless, 2 common challenges can be identified, namely, lack of infrastructure and technical capacity to cope with the increasing demand for HTA, and the inadequate involvement of stakeholders in the HTA process. Solutions identified at the HTA symposium in Singapore to overcome these challenges were that countries should implement a tailored and transparent mechanism for using HTA, promote existing HTA capacity, and strengthen the understanding of HTA among the stakeholders. Health technology assessment symposia such as the one organized in Singapore provide a platform for countries to share knowledge and challenges, and bring different views to build into something greater and overcome the challenges. Such symposia should be organized regularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yot Teerawattananon
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yik Ying Teo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Saudamini Dabak
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Waranya Rattanavipapong
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
| | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hwee-Lin Wee
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alec Morton
- Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Herman PM, Lavelle TA, Sorbero ME, Hurwitz EL, Coulter ID. Are Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Chronic Low Back Pain More Cost Effective Than Usual Care? Proof of Concept Results From a Markov Model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44:1456-1464. [PMID: 31095119 PMCID: PMC6779140 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Markov model. OBJECTIVE Examine the 1-year effectiveness and cost-effectiveness (societal and payer perspectives) of adding nonpharmacologic interventions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) to usual care using a decision analytic model-based approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Treatment guidelines now recommend many safe and effective nonpharmacologic interventions for CLBP. However, little is known regarding their effectiveness in subpopulations (e.g., high-impact chronic pain patients), nor about their cost-effectiveness. METHODS The model included four health states: high-impact chronic pain (substantial activity limitations); no pain; and two others without activity limitations, but with higher (moderate-impact) or lower (low-impact) pain. We estimated intervention-specific transition probabilities for these health states using individual patient-level data from 10 large randomized trials covering 17 nonpharmacologic therapies. The model was run for nine 6-week cycles to approximate a 1-year time horizon. Quality-adjusted life-year weights were based on six-dimensional health state short form scores; healthcare costs were based on 2003 to 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data; and lost productivity costs used in the societal perspective were based on reported absenteeism. Results were generated for two target populations: (1) a typical baseline mix of patients with CLBP (25% low-impact, 35% moderate-impact, and 40% high-impact chronic pain) and (2) high-impact chronic pain patients. RESULTS From the societal perspective, all but two of the therapies were cost effective (<$50,000/quality-adjusted life-year) for a typical patient mix and most were cost saving. From the payer perspective fewer were cost saving, but the same number was cost-effective. Assuming all patients in the model have high-impact chronic pain increases the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of most, but not all, therapies indicating that substantial benefits are possible in this subpopulation. CONCLUSION Modeling leverages the evidence produced from clinical trials to provide more information than is available in the published studies. We recommend modeling for all existing studies of nonpharmacologic interventions for CLBP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute of Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
- RAND Corporation, Boston, MA
| | | | - Eric L Hurwitz
- Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawaii, Mānoa, Honolulu, HI
| | | |
Collapse
|
139
|
Winser SJ, Paul LF, Magnus LKL, Yan S, Shenug TP, Sing YM, Cheing G. Economic Evaluation of Exercise-Based Fall Prevention Programs for People with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. J Altern Complement Med 2019; 25:1225-1237. [PMID: 31556689 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2019.0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Falls are common in Parkinson's disease (PD). Exercise interventions can prevent falls. This review aims to (1) explore the existing evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of exercise-based fall prevention programs for people with PD and (2) discuss the implications of the review findings for future research and clinical practice. Design: Databases AMED Allied and Complementary Medicine, CINAHL, CRD, EBSCO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from their inception until June 2019. Randomized and nonrandomized trials that included an economic evaluation of fall prevention programs for people with PD were considered. Quality of the economic evaluation was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list (CHEC-list), and the methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: Nine hundred and sixty-five studies were screened to include three studies involving 556 participants. Quality of economic evaluation assessed using CHEC-list was high. The methodological quality was high for two studies and low for one study. Tested interventions included Tai Ji Quan, physiotherapist-led, supervised, weekly and monthly balance, and strengthening exercises. The duration of the interventions ranged from 10 weeks to 6 months, while the intervention frequency ranged from two sessions per week to one session per month. Treatment sessions lasted for 60 min in all three studies. One high economic and methodological quality study comparing Tai Ji Quan with resistance and stretching exercises reported least cost resource use among Tai Ji Quan group (USD 80,441) and greater incremental number of falls prevented. All three tested interventions had an 80% probability of being cost-effective with the corresponding country-specific threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values. Conclusions: The findings provide some evidence for exercise-based intervention as a cost-effective treatment option for preventing falls in PD; however, due to the limited number of available studies, heterogeneity of the interventions, and diversity of assessment settings, a firm conclusion cannot be established. Additional studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fall prevention programs involving larger samples and using different treatment parameters in various settings are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley John Winser
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | - Li Francis Paul
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | - Leung Ka Long Magnus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | - Szeto Yan
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | - Tsui Pui Shenug
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | - Yuen Man Sing
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | - Gladys Cheing
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Kadu M, Ehrenberg N, Stein V, Tsiachristas A. Methodological Quality of Economic Evaluations in Integrated Care: Evidence from a Systematic Review. Int J Integr Care 2019; 19:17. [PMID: 31565040 PMCID: PMC6743034 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this review is to systematically assess the methodological quality of economic evaluations in integrated care and to identify challenges with conducting such studies. THEORY AND METHODS Searches of grey-literature and scientific papers were performed, from January 2000 to December 2018. A checklist was developed to assess the quality of economic evaluations. Authors' statements of challenges encountered during their evaluations were qualitatively coded. RESULTS Forty-four articles were eligible for inclusion. The review found that study design, measurement of cost and outcomes, statistical analysis and presentation of data were the areas with most quality variation. Authors identified challenges mostly related to time horizon of the evaluation, inadequate or lack of comparator group, contamination bias, and a post-hoc evaluation culture. DISCUSSION Our review found significant differences in quality, with some studies showing poor methodological rigor; challenging conclusions on the cost-effectiveness of integrated care. CONCLUSION It is essential for evaluators to use best-practice standards when planning and conducting economic evaluations, in order to build a reliable evidence base for decision-making in integrated care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mudathira Kadu
- International Foundation for Integrated Care, Oxford, UK
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CA
| | | | - Viktoria Stein
- International Foundation for Integrated Care, Oxford, UK
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Ahumada-Canale A, Quirland C, Martinez-Mardones FJ, Plaza-Plaza JC, Benrimoj S, Garcia-Cardenas V. Economic evaluations of pharmacist-led medication review in outpatients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidaemia: a systematic review. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2019; 20:1103-1116. [PMID: 31218580 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01080-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the health economics evidence based on randomized controlled trials of pharmacist-led medication review in pharmacotherapy managed cardiovascular disease risk factors, specifically, hypertension, type-2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia in ambulatory settings and to provide recommendations for future evaluations. METHODS A systematic review was carried out according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Web of Science, National Health System Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), Cochrane Library, and Econlit were searched and screened by two independent authors. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was the main outcome. Risk of bias was assessed with the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care tool by the Cochrane Collaboration. Economic evaluation quality was assessed with the he Consensus Health Economic Criteria list (CHEC list). RESULTS 5636 records were found, and 174 were retrieved for full-text review yielding 11 articles. Eight articles deemed the intervention as cost effective and two as dominant. Two cost-utility analyses were performed yielding ICERs of $612.7 and $59.8 per QALY. Four articles were considered to perform a high-quality economic evaluation and four had a low risk of bias. Future economic evaluations should consider cost-utility analysis, to describe usual care thoroughly, and use time horizons that capture the effect of cardiovascular disease prevention, a societal perspective and uncertainty analysis. CONCLUSION Pharmacist-led medication review has proven to be cost effective in various studies in different settings. Policy decision makers are advised to undertake local economic evaluations reflecting the gaps observed in this systematic review and published literature. If this is not possible, a transferability assessment should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Ahumada-Canale
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| | - Camila Quirland
- Oncology Institute, Arturo López Pérez Foundation, Santiago, Chile
| | | | | | - Shalom Benrimoj
- Emeritus Professor University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Victoria Garcia-Cardenas
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study. J Cancer Surviv 2019; 13:558-569. [PMID: 31286387 PMCID: PMC6677707 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-00775-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a supervised 18-week high-intensity exercise program compared with usual care in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. Methods One hundred nine patients were randomly assigned to the exercise intervention (n = 54) or the usual care control group (n = 55). Data on cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak), handgrip strength, general fatigue, and health-related quality of life (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) were collected at baseline (T0), after completion of the exercise intervention or at a similar time point in the control group (T1) and 12 months later (T2). Cost questionnaires were used to assess societal costs. Long-term effectiveness (at T2) was evaluated using linear mixed model analyses. For the economic evaluation, missing data were imputed using multiple imputation, and data were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results At T2, no statistically significant differences were found between the intervention and control group for VO2peak (0.12; 95%CI − 1.89; 2.14 ml/min/kg), handgrip strength (− 1.08; 95%CI− 2.47; 2.31), and general fatigue (− 0.69; 95%CI − 2.52; 1.14). During 12-months follow-up, no significant between-group differences in QALYs and societal costs were found (QALYs − 0.07; 95%CI − 0.17; 0.04; costs 529; 95%CI − 3205;4452). Intervention costs were €1340 per patient. For all outcomes, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective was low at reasonable values of willingness-to-pay. Conclusion We found no evidence for the exercise intervention being effective on physical fitness and fatigue, nor cost-effective from a societal perspective. Trial registration The study was prospectively registered on 27 May 2010 at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR2341). Implications for Cancer Survivors The current exercise intervention should not be recommended to patients recently treated with autologous stem cell transplantation.
Collapse
|
143
|
Essers I, Hiligsmann M, Kiltz U, Bansback N, Braun J, van der Heijde D, Boonen A. Development of one general and six country-specific algorithms to assess societal health utilities based on ASAS HI. RMD Open 2019; 5:e000872. [PMID: 31245046 PMCID: PMC6560676 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Health utilities represent preference values that persons attach to health states. This study aims to develop one general and six country-specific algorithms to calculate societal preference values for health of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), as assessed by the disease-specific Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI). Methods A survey was performed in random population samples from six European countries. In a best-worst choice experiment, subjects were asked to indicate repeatedly which of 4 random aspects of the 17-item ASAS HI was were most and least important. Bayesian analysis provided the relative importance of each of the 17 items. To rescale the relative importance scores on the absolute utility scale between 0 and 1, participants additionally completed two lead time trade-off experiments, one for 'severe SpA' and one for 'best health' without SpA. Six country-specific algorithms and one general algorithm were derived. The general algorithm was tested in 199 patients with axial SpA (axSpA). Results 3039 subjects, mean age 47 years (SD 15) and 52% female completed the experiments. The population's health utility value for SpA varied between - 0.24 for 'worst' SpA (country range -0.35 to 0.03), and 0.88 for 'best' health (country range 0.81 to 0.90). Among 199 patients with axSpA, the mean utility was 0.36 (SD 0.30, range -0.24 to 0.88) and discriminated well between patients having high (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≥ 4) or low (BASDAI < 4) disease activity (0.18 (SD 0.24) vs 0.51(SD 0.27), p<0.01). Conclusion One general and six country-specific algorithms are available to convert scores from the ASAS HI into disease-specific societal utility values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivette Essers
- Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Uta Kiltz
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Nick Bansback
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, and the Caphri Research Institute Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Alshreef A, MacQuilkan K, Dawkins B, Riddin J, Ward S, Meads D, Taylor M, Dixon S, Culyer AJ, Ruiz F, Chalkidou K, Edoka I. Cost-Effectiveness of Docetaxel and Paclitaxel for Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Adaptation of a Model-Based Economic Evaluation From the United Kingdom to South Africa. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 19:65-74. [PMID: 31096179 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Revised: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Transferability of economic evaluations to low- and middle-income countries through adaptation of models is important; however, several methodological and practical challenges remain. Given its significant costs and the quality-of-life burden to patients, adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer was identified as a priority intervention by the South African National Department of Health. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of docetaxel and paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy regimens (taxanes) compared with standard (non-taxane) treatments. METHODS A cost-utility analysis was undertaken based on a UK 6-health-state Markov model adapted for South Africa using the Mullins checklist. The analysis assumed a 35-year time horizon. The model was populated with clinical effectiveness data (hazard ratios, recurrence rates, and adverse events) using direct comparisons from clinical trials. Resource use patterns and unit costs for estimating cost parameters (drugs, diagnostics, consumables, personnel) were obtained from South Africa. Uncertainty was assessed using probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS The incremental cost per patient for the docetaxel regimen compared with standard treatment was R6774. The incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.24, generating an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R28430 per QALY. The cost of the paclitaxel regimen compared with standard treatment was estimated as -R578 and -R1512, producing an additional 0.03 and 0.025 QALYs, based on 2 trials. Paclitaxel, therefore, appears to be a dominant intervention. The base case results were robust to all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Based on the adapted model, docetaxel and paclitaxel are predicted to be cost-effective as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer in South Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abualbishr Alshreef
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Kim MacQuilkan
- SAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Priority Setting, PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciencess, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Bryony Dawkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Jane Riddin
- Essential Drugs Programme, National Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Sue Ward
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - David Meads
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Matthew Taylor
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, England, UK
| | - Simon Dixon
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Anthony J Culyer
- Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, England, UK
| | - Francis Ruiz
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, England, UK
| | - Kalipso Chalkidou
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, England, UK; Centre for Global Development Europe, London, England, UK
| | - Ijeoma Edoka
- SAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Priority Setting, PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciencess, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
The Clinical and Economic Burden of Colorectal Anastomotic Leaks: Middle-Income Country Perspective. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2019; 2019:2879049. [PMID: 31065261 PMCID: PMC6466886 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2879049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Anastomotic leaks (AL) present a significant source of clinical and economic burden on patients undergoing colorectal surgeries. This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical and economic consequences of AL and its risk factors. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2013 based on the billing information of 337 patients who underwent low anterior resection (LAR). The outcomes evaluated were the development of AL, use of antibiotics, 30-day readmission and mortality, and total hospital costs, including readmissions and length of stay (LOS). The risk factors for AL, as well as the relationship between AL and clinical outcomes, were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression. Generalized linear models (GLM) were employed to evaluate the association between AL and continuous outcomes (LOS and costs). Results AL was detected in 6.8% of the patients. Emergency surgery (aRR 2.56; 95% CI: 1.15-5.71, p = 0.021), blood transfusion (aRR 4.44; 95% CI: 1.86-10.64, p = 0.001), and cancer diagnosis (aRR 2.51; 95% CI: 1.27-4.98, p = 0.008) were found to be independent predictors of AL. Patients with AL showed higher antibiotic usage (aRR 1.69; 95% CI: 1.37-2.09, p < 0.001), 30-day readmission (aRR 3.34; 95% CI: 1.53-7.32, p = 0.003) and mortality (aRR 13.49; 95% CI: 4.10-44.35, p < 0.001), and longer LOS (39.6 days, as opposed to 7.5 days for patients without AL, p < 0.001). Total hospital costs amounted to R$210,105 for patients with AL in comparison with R$34,270 for patients without AL (p < 0.001). In multivariable GLM, the total hospital costs for AL patients were 4.66 (95% CI: 3.38-6.23, p < 0.001) times higher than those for patients without AL. Conclusions AL leads to worse clinical outcomes and increases hospital costs by 4.66 times. The risk factors for AL were found to be emergency surgery, blood transfusion, and cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|
146
|
Franklin M, Lomas J, Walker S, Young T. An Educational Review About Using Cost Data for the Purpose of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2019; 37:631-643. [PMID: 30746613 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00771-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
This paper provides an educational review covering the consideration of costs for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), summarising relevant methods and research from the published literature. Cost data are typically generated by applying appropriate unit costs to healthcare resource-use data for patients. Trial-based evaluations and decision analytic modelling represent the two main vehicles for CEA. The costs to consider will depend on the perspective taken, with conflicting recommendations ranging from focusing solely on healthcare to the broader 'societal' perspective. Alternative sources of resource-use are available, including medical records and forms completed by researchers or patients. Different methods are available for the statistical analysis of cost data, although consideration needs to be given to the appropriate methods, given cost data are typically non-normal with a mass point at zero and a long right-hand tail. The choice of covariates for inclusion in econometric models also needs careful consideration, focusing on those that are influential and that will improve balance and precision. Where data are missing, it is important to consider the type of missingness and then apply appropriate analytical methods, such as imputation. Uncertainty around costs should also be reflected to allow for consideration on the impacts of the CEA results on decision uncertainty. Costs should be discounted to account for differential timing, and are typically inflated to a common cost year. The choice of methods and sources of information used when accounting for cost information within CEA will have an effect on the subsequent cost-effectiveness results and how information is presented to decision makers. It is important that the most appropriate methods are used as overlooking the complicated nature of cost data could lead to inaccurate information being given to decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Franklin
- Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, West Court, 1 Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK.
| | - James Lomas
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Simon Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Tracey Young
- Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, West Court, 1 Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Seleznova Y, Brass P, Hellmich M, Stock S, Müller D. Cost-effectiveness-analysis of ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization compared with landmark method: a decision-analytic model. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19:51. [PMID: 30967124 PMCID: PMC6456944 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0719-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization is a commonly used alternative to the conventional landmark method. Because from the German perspective, the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound guidance is unclear, this study examined the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound guidance versus the landmark method for adults undergoing a central venous catheterization. METHODS A decision-tree based model was built to estimate the costs of averted catheter-related complications. Clinical data (e.g. arterial puncture, failed attempts) were obtained from a Cochrane review and a randomized controlled trial, whilst information about cost parameters were taken from a German hospital of maximum care. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. To assess the parameter uncertainty, several sensitivity analyses were performed (deterministic, probabilistic and with regard to the model structure). RESULTS Our analysis revealed that ultrasound guidance resulted in fewer complications per person (0.04 versus 0.17 for the landmark method) and was less expensive (€51 versus €230 for the landmark method). Results were robust to changes in the model parameters and in the model structure. Whilst our model population reflected approximately 49% of adults undergoing a central venous catheterization cannulation per year, structural sensitivity analyses (e.g. extending the study cohort to patients at higher baseline risk of complications, pediatric patients, or using real-time/indirect catheterization) indicated the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound guidance for a broader spectrum of patients. The results should be interpreted by considering the assumptions (e.g. target population) and approximations (e.g. cost parameters) underpinning the model. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization averts more catheter-related complications and may save the resources of the German Statutory Health Insurance compared with landmark method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yana Seleznova
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, The University Hospital of Cologne (AöR), Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Patrick Brass
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy, Helios Hospital Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Bachemer Str. 86, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, The University Hospital of Cologne (AöR), Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, The University Hospital of Cologne (AöR), Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Lo K, Stephenson M, Lockwood C. The economic cost of robotic rehabilitation for adult stroke patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 17:520-547. [DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
149
|
Murphy A, Redmond S. To HTA or Not to HTA: Identifying the Factors Influencing the Rapid Review Outcome in Ireland. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:385-390. [PMID: 30975388 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Reimbursement systems are evolving and endeavor to balance access and affordability. One such evolution in Ireland is the compulsory rapid review (RR) process, the outcome from which is a recommendation for a health technology assessment (HTA) or no HTA. For drugs that avoid an HTA, evaluation times are shorter, lengthy price negotiations are avoided, and access is faster. In the absence of formal decision-making criteria around the requirement of an HTA, this study examines the factors influencing the outcome of the RR process in Ireland. METHODS A database was developed combining data from publicly available sources for drug evaluations conducted by the National Centre for PharmacoEconomics (NCPE) (January 2010-June 2017, n = 296). Because Irish cost data were not publicly available for all drugs, cost data from the Scottish Medicines Consortium were employed as a proxy. Employing logistic regressions, the factors influencing the RR outcome are revealed. RESULTS After an RR, an HTA was recommended for 55% of drugs. The regression results revealed therapeutic area (endocrine, musculoskeletal, and neoplasm), first-in-class and orphan disease increased the probability of an HTA. Furthermore, when proxy costs were included, results revealed that every €1000 increase in annual drug costs per patient increased the probability of an HTA being required by 1% and that an HTA was more likely than no HTA when annual drug costs exceeded €15 000. CONCLUSION Given the current focus on access and affordability, this study identifies the factors influencing the requirement of an HTA in Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen Murphy
- Department of Economics, Cork University Business School, University College, Cork, Ireland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
150
|
Luhnen M, Prediger B, Neugebauer EAM, Mathes T. Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: A structured analysis of characteristics and methods applied. Res Synth Methods 2019; 10:195-206. [PMID: 30761762 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of systematic reviews of health economic evaluations (SR-HEs) is increasing. We aimed at providing a detailed overview of the characteristics and applied methods in recently published SR-HEs. METHODS We searched MEDLINE (03/2017) for SR-HEs published since 2015 using validated search filters. We included studies that performed a systematic review of full economic evaluations and searched at least one electronic database. We extracted data in a standardized, beforehand piloted form that was deduced from the items of the PRISMA and CHEERS checklists. Data were extracted by one reviewer, and a 10% random sample was verified by a second. We prepared descriptive statistical measures to describe the SR-HEs. RESULTS We included 202 SR-HEs. We identified similarities especially in the methods for information retrieval. Study selection, data extraction, and assessment of quality and transferability were frequently not reported or performed without taking measures to reduce errors (eg, independent study selection). A wide range of different tools was applied for critical appraisal. Moreover, the reporting of included economic evaluations and the synthesis of their results showed strong variations. CONCLUSIONS Overall, we identified few common features in the applied methods for SR-HEs. The information retrieval processes are largely standardized, but many studies did not use validated search filters. For the other systematic review steps, the methodological approaches varied. In particular, important challenges seem to be the methodological quality and transferability assessment as well as presentation and (quantitative) synthesis of results. Efforts are needed for increasing standardization, quality of applied methods, and reporting of SR-HEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Luhnen
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.,International Affairs Unit, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Barbara Prediger
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Edmund A M Neugebauer
- Brandenburg Medical School - Theodor Fontane, Faculty of Health, Neuruppin, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Services Research, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Tim Mathes
- International Affairs Unit, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|