Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of monoclonal antibodies: concepts and lessons for drug development

Pharmacokinetics of biologics and the role of therapeutic monitoring

Biologic therapies, including the anti-tumor necrosis factor-α and cell adhesion molecule inhibitor drugs, have revolutionized the treatment of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease. Since the introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies, the strategy of empiric dose-escalation, either increasing the dose or frequency of administration, has been used to recapture clinical response in inflammatory bowel disease. Disparate clinical outcomes have been linked to serum drug and antidrug antibody levels. Therapeutic drug monitoring has emerged as a framework for understanding and responding to the variability in clinical response and remission.

Dashboard systems: implementing pharmacometrics from bench to bedside

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the development of medical decision-support tools, including dashboard systems. Dashboard systems are software packages that integrate information and calculations about therapeutics from multiple components into a single interface for use in the clinical environment. Given the high cost of medical care, and the increasing need to demonstrate positive clinical outcomes for reimbursement, dashboard systems may become an important tool for improving patient outcome, improving clinical efficiency and containing healthcare costs. Similarly the costs associated with drug development are also rising. The use of model-based drug development (MBDD) has been proposed as a tool to streamline this process, facilitating the selection of appropriate doses and making informed go/no-go decisions. However, complete implementation of MBDD has not always been successful owing to a variety of factors, including the resources required to provide timely modeling and simulation updates. The application of dashboard systems in drug development reduces the resource requirement and may expedite updating models as new data are collected, allowing modeling results to be available in a timely fashion. In this paper, we present some background information on dashboard systems and propose the use of these systems both in the clinic and during drug development.

Resting energy expenditure and the clearance of therapeutic proteins in pediatric subjects

The effect of age on the clearance (CL) of therapeutic proteins has not been explored extensively in pediatric subjects. Recently, resting energy expenditure (REE) has been proposed to link age-dependent CL with developmental changes. Allometric relationship was explored to assess the impact of REE on the CL of therapeutic proteins in pediatric subjects. The CL of a therapeutic protein estimated from allometric scaling using REE was approximately 2-fold higher than that using body weight (BW) in younger children. For some monoclonal antibodies, REE was a better predictor than BW to estimate CL in pediatric subjects. Overall results suggest that the relationship of CL with REE and its clinical importance in therapeutic proteins need to be investigated further for pediatric subjects.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer--are we missing a trick?

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be defined as the measurement of drug in biological samples to individualise treatment by adapting drug dose to improve efficacy and/or reduce toxicity. The cytotoxic drugs are characterised by steep dose-response relationships and narrow therapeutic windows. Inter-individual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability is often substantial. There are, however, a multitude of reasons why TDM has never been fully implemented in daily oncology practice. These include difficulties in establishing appropriate concentration target, common use of combination chemotherapies and the paucity of published data from pharmacological trials. The situation is different with targeted therapies. The large interindividual PK variability is influenced by the pharmacogenetic background of the patient (e.g. cytochrome P450 and ABC transporters polymorphisms), patient characteristics such as adherence to treatment and environmental factors (drug-drug interactions). Retrospective studies have shown that targeted drug exposure correlates with treatment response in various cancers. Evidence for imatinib currently exists, others are emerging for compounds including nilotinib, dasatinib, erlotinib, sunitinib, sorafenib and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Applications for TDM during oral targeted therapies may best be reserved for particular situations including lack of therapeutic response, severe or unexpected toxicities, anticipated drug-drug interactions and concerns over adherence treatment. There are still few data with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in favour of TDM approaches, even if data showed encouraging results with rituximab and cetuximab. TDM of mAbs is not yet supported by scientific evidence. Considerable effort should be made for targeted therapies to better define concentration-effect relationships and to perform comparative randomised trials of classic dosing versus pharmacokinetically-guided adaptive dosing.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Thiopurine analogs and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have dramatically changed the therapeutics of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), improving short and long-term outcomes. Unfortunately some patients do not respond to therapy and others lose response over time. The pharmacokinetic properties of these drugs are complex, with high inter-patient variability. Thiopurine analogs are metabolized through a series of pathways, which vary according to the patients' pharmacogenetic profile. This profile largely determines the ratios of metabolites, which are in turn associated with likelihoods of clinical efficacy and/or toxicity. Understanding these mechanisms allows for manipulation of drug dose, aiming to reduce the development of toxicity while improving the efficacy of treatment. The efficacy of anti-TNF drugs is influenced by many pharmacodynamic variables. Several factors may alter drug clearance, including the concomitant use of immunomodulators (thiopurine analogs and methotrexate), systemic inflammation, the presence of anti-drug antibodies, and body mass. The treatment of IBD has evolved with the understanding of the pharmacologic profiles of immunomodulating and TNF-inhibiting medications, with good evidence for improvement in patient outcomes observed when measuring metabolic pathway indices. The role of routine measurement of metabolite/drug levels and antibodies warrants further prospective studies as we enter the era of personalized IBD care.

Tailoring anti-TNF therapy in IBD: drug levels and disease activity

The treatment of IBD with anti-TNF agents has substantially evolved since their first introduction more than a decade ago. The robust efficacy witnessed in many patients has raised new questions pertaining to the observation of subgroups of patients who fail to respond or who lose response to these otherwise very effective drugs. Conversely, the exorbitant cost of biologic agents coupled with their efficacy in inducing lasting remission has introduced new concepts addressing the possibility of therapy cessation in some patients after deep remission has been achieved. Measuring drug and anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels which develop in some patients has emerged as a valuable tool in understanding the mechanisms responsible for some of these clinical scenarios. However, knowledge on how to use these measurements to guide clinical decisions in daily practice is still in its nascency and awaits prospective validation trials. Furthermore, as described in this Review, knowledgeable interpretation of drug and ADA test results mandates understanding the interplay between the technical profile of the assay used, the timing of the measurement in the drug cycle, assessment of disease activity, and the profoundly different pharmaco-clinical scenarios that can culminate in a similar test result.

Advances in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease: challenges and uncertainties

Over the past two decades, several advances have been made in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from both evaluative and therapeutic perspectives. This review discusses the medical advancements that have recently been made as the standard of care for managing patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD) and to identify the challenges associated with implementing their use in clinical practice. A comprehensive literature search of the major databases (PubMed and Embase) was conducted for all recent scientific papers (1990-2013) giving the recent updates on the management of IBD and the data were extracted. The reported advancements in managing IBD range from diagnostic and evaluative tools, such as genetic tests, biochemical surrogate markers of activity, endoscopic techniques, and radiological modalities, to therapeutic advances, which encompass medical, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. There are limited studies addressing the cost-effectiveness and the impact that these advances have had on medical practice. The majority of the advances developed for managing IBD, while considered instrumental by some IBD experts in improving patient care, have questionable applications due to constraints of cost, lack of availability, and most importantly, insufficient evidence that supports their role in improving important long-term health-related outcomes.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses of trastuzumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to characterize trastuzumab population pharmacokinetics (PKs) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and the relationship of trastuzumab PK with patient response.

METHODS

A nonlinear mixed effects PK model was built using data from the ToGA study. Patients were randomized to intravenous trastuzumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. The influence of demographic, laboratory, and disease characteristics on PK parameters was assessed. An exploratory exposure-response analysis compared various PK parameters at steady state with best overall tumor response and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Trastuzumab PK was best described by a two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear (Michaelis-Menten) elimination from the central compartment. Total clearance (and half-life) of trastuzumab was concentration-dependent. Body weight, prior gastrectomy, and serum albumin had the greatest influence on trastuzumab PK; increasing weight and decreasing albumin levels were associated with increased clearance, while prior gastrectomy correlated with decreased clearance. Median values for AUC, Cmax, and Cmin were lower in patients with progressive disease (PD) than other response categories, although the 1.5 interquartile ranges overlapped. Patients with the lowest Cmin had the highest PD rate and a shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In the advanced gastric cancer population, trastuzumab PK was best described by a two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination. Predicted PK exposure was lower than previously reported for breast cancer. Patients with the lowest Cmin had a shorter OS and the highest PD rate, but a distinct correlation was not observed for tumor response.

High C-reactive protein in Crohn's disease patients predicts nonresponse to infliximab treatment

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (IFX) is effective in treating Crohn's disease (CD) and C-reactive protein (CRP) is a useful biomarker in assessing inflammatory activity.

AIM

Correlate CRP levels before beginning of IFX, at week 14 and CRP delta within the first year of IFX treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective study of CD patients undergoing treatment with IFX. Primary nonresponse (PNR) was defined as no symptomatic improvement and CRP persistently elevated; sustained response (SR) as symptomatic improvement for at least 1 year without therapeutic adjustment; response after therapeutic adjustment (RTA) as analytic and clinical response but requiring IFX dose/frequency adjustment or association with another drug.

RESULTS

Baseline CRP levels were higher in PNR compared with SR (26.2mg/L vs 9.6 mg/L, p=0.015) and RTA (26.2mg/L vs 7.6 mg/L, p=0.007). CRP levels greater than 15 mg/L at baseline predict PNR with 67% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Lower CRP levels at week 14 were more likely to predict SR relative to RTA (3.1mg/L vs 7.6 mg/L p=0.019) and PNR (3.1mg/L vs 9.1mg/L; p=0.013). CRP levels greater than 4.6 mg/L at week 14 predict PNR with 67% sensitivity and 62% specificity. A higher CRP delta between beginning of treatment and week 14 is more likely to predict SR relative to RTA (5.2mg/L vs 0.6 mg/L p=0.027).

CONCLUSION

CRP levels at week 14 were associated with SR in patients treated with IFX, independently of baseline CRP serum levels. High inflammatory burden at beginning of IFX treatment was correlated with a worse response.

A strategy for risk mitigation of antibodies with fast clearance

A majority of human therapeutic antibody candidates show pharmacokinetic properties suitable for clinical use, but an unexpectedly fast antibody clearance is sometimes observed that may limit the clinical utility. Pharmacokinetic data in cynomolgus monkeys collected for a panel of 52 antibodies showed broad distribution of target-independent clearance values (2.4-61.3 mL/day/kg), with 15 (29%) having clearance > 10 mL/day/kg. Alteration in the interaction with the recycling FcRn receptor did not account for the faster than expected clearance observed for the antibodies; off-target binding was presumed to account for the fast clearance. We developed an assay based on ELISA detection of non-specific binding to baculovirus particles that can identify antibodies having increased risk for fast clearance. This assay can be used during lead generation or optimization to identify antibodies with increased risk of having fast clearance in both humans and cynomolgus monkeys, and thus increase the likelihood of obtaining a suitable drug candidate.

A comprehensive review of the pharmacokinetics of approved therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in Japan: Are Japanese phase I studies still needed?

Ethnic evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and safety of new drugs is required in Japan before implementing bridging or joining global studies. As therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) show limited ethnic differences, their pharmacokinetics and safety in Japanese individuals could be estimated from prior non-Japanese studies. Therefore, there is potential to re-evaluate the development program for mAbs in Japan. We reviewed the pharmacokinetics of mAbs approved in Japan. Although some differences had been observed in pharmacokinetics of mAbs between Japanese and non-Japanese populations (mainly Caucasians), these differences were attributed to differences of body weight and/or antigen levels. Moreover, the influential factors can be estimated without conducting regional pharmacokinetic/safety studies. The pharmacokinetics of some mAbs is presumably non-linear and show differences between healthy volunteers and patients because of differences in antigen levels. However, for 10/24 mAbs approved in Japan, Japanese healthy volunteer studies were conducted before the patient studies. Additionally, for the mAbs that showed ethnic differences in pharmacokinetics, the doses selected in subsequent patient studies were the same as the doses approved in the United States. In this review, we discuss new drug development strategies in various regions, and assess the need for regional pharmacokinetics/safety studies before joining global studies.

Population pharmacokinetics of sifalimumab, an investigational anti-interferon-α monoclonal antibody, in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sifalimumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G1κ monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes a majority of the subtypes of human interferon-α. Sifalimumab is being evaluated as a treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The primary objectives of this analysis were (a) to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for sifalimumab in SLE; (b) to identify and quantitate the impact of patient/disease characteristics on pharmacokinetic variability; and (c) to evaluate fixed versus body weight (WT)-based dosing regimens.

METHODS

Sifalimumab serum concentration-time data were collected from a phase Ib study (MI-CP152) designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of sifalimumab in adult patients with SLE. Sifalimumab was administered every 14 days as a 30- to 60-minute intravenous infusion with escalating doses of 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 10 mg/kg and serum concentrations were collected over 350 days. A total of 120 patients provided evaluable pharmacokinetic data with a total of 2,370 serum concentrations. Sifalimumab serum concentrations were determined using a validated colorimetric enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a lower limit of quantitation of 1.25 μg/mL. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of sifalimumab was performed using a non-linear mixed effects modeling approach with NONMEM VII software. Impact of patient demographics, clinical indices, and biomarkers on pharmacokinetic parameters were explored using a stepwise forward selection and backward elimination approach. The appropriateness of the final model was tested using visual predictive check (VPC). The impact of body WT-based and fixed dosing of sifalimumab was evaluated using a simulation approach. The final population model was utilized for phase IIb dosing projections.

RESULTS

Sifalimumab pharmacokinetics were best described using a two-compartment linear model with first order elimination. Following intravenous dosing, the typical clearance (CL) and central volume of distribution (V 1) were estimated to be 176 mL/day and 2.9 L, respectively. The estimates (coefficient of variation) of between-subject variability for CL and V 1 were 28 and 31 %, respectively. Patient baseline body WT, interferon gene signature from 21 genes, steroid use, and sifalimumab dose were identified as significant covariates for CL, whereas only baseline body WT was a significant covariate for V 1 and peripheral volume of distribution (V 2). Although the above-mentioned covariates were statistically significant, they did not explain variability in pharmacokinetic parameters to any relevant extent (<7 %). Thus, no dosing adjustments are necessary. VPC confirmed good predictability of the final population pharmacokinetic model. Simulation results demonstrate that both fixed and body WT-based dosing regimens yield similar median steady state concentrations and overall variability. Fixed sifalimumab doses of 200, 600, and 1,200 mg monthly (with a loading dose at Day 14) were selected for a phase IIb clinical trial.

CONCLUSION

A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model adequately described sifalimumab pharmacokinetics. The estimated typical pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to other monoclonal antibodies without target mediated elimination. Although the population pharmacokinetic analysis identified some statistically significant covariates, they explained <7 % between-subject variability in pharmacokinetic parameters indicating that these covariates are not clinically relevant. The population pharmacokinetic analysis also demonstrated the feasibility of switching to fixed doses in phase IIb clinical trials of sifalimumab.

Role of RANKL/RANK in primary and secondary breast cancer

Bone is one of the most preferential metastatic target sites of breast cancer. Bone possesses unique biological microenvironments in which various growth factors are stored and continuously released through osteoclastic bone resorption, providing fertile soil for circulating breast cancer cells. Bone-disseminated breast cancer cells in turn produce osteotropic cytokines which modulate bone environments. Under the influences of breast cancer-produced cytokines, osteoblasts express elevated levels of Ligand for receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANKL) and stimulate osteoclastogenesis via binding to the receptor receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) and activating its downstream signaling pathways in hematopoietic osteoclast precursors, which causes further osteoclastic bone destruction. Establishment of crosstalk with bone microenvironments (so called vicious cycle) is an essential event for metastatic breast cancer cells to develop bone metastasis. RANKL and RANK play a central role in this crosstalk. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that RANKL and RANK are involved in tumorigenesis and distant metastasis independent of bone microenvironments. Pharmacological disruption of the RANKL/RANK interplay should be an effective therapeutic intervention for primary breast tumors and bone and non-bone metastasis. In this context, denosumab, which is neutralizing monoclonal antibody against RANKL, is a mechanism-based drug for the treatment of bone metastases and would be beneficial for breast cancer patients with bone metastases and potentially visceral organ metastases.

Second-generation minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for monoclonal antibodies

Minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) models provide a sensible modeling approach when fitting only plasma (or blood) data yielding physiologically-relevant PK parameters that may provide more practical value than parameters of mammillary models. We propose a second-generation mPBPK model specifically for monoclonal antibodies (mAb) by including (lumping) several essential components of mAb PK used in full PBPK models. These components include convection as the primary mechanism of antibody movement from plasma into tissues and return to plasma with interstitial fluid as the major extravascular distribution space. The model divides tissue spaces into two groups according to their vascular endothelial structure, leaky and tight, which consequently allows discernment of two types and general sites of distribution. This mPBPK model was applied to two mAbs in mice and ten mAbs with linear kinetics in humans. The model captured their plasma PK profiles well with predictions of concentrations in interstitial fluid for two types of tissues. Predictions of tissue concentrations for mAb 7E3 and 8C2 were consistent with actual measurements in mice, indicating the feasibility of this model in assessing extravascular distribution in the two categories of tissues. The vascular reflection coefficients (σ₁) of tight tissues (V(tight)) ranged 0.883-0.987 and coefficients (σ₂) for leaky tissues (V(leaky)) ranged 0.311 to 0.837. The plasma clearance (CL(p)) varied among the mAbs in humans from 0.0054 to 0.03 L/h. In addition, applying this model generates parameters for mAb transcapillary escape rates and assesses major sites of elimination. Four of ten mAbs exhibited better fitting statistics premised on elimination from interstitial fluid than from plasma. This approach allows comparisons of mAb PK when only plasma data are available, provides more realistic parameters and predictions than mammillary models, and may provide an intermediate step towards utilizing full PBPK models for mAbs.

Monitoring monoclonal antibody delivery in oncology: the example of bevacizumab

Developing therapeutic monoclonal antibodies paves the way for new strategies in oncology using targeted therapy which should improve specificity. However, due to a lack of biomarkers, a personalized therapy scheme cannot always be applied with monoclonal antibodies. As a consequence, the efficacy or side effects associated with this type of treatment often appear to be sporadic. Bevacizumab is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). It is used to limit tumor vascularization. No prognosis or response biomarker is associated with this antibody, we therefore assessed whether the administration protocol could be a possible cause of heterogeneous responses (or variable efficacy). To do this, we developed a bevacizumab assay with a broad sensitivity range to measure blood bevacizumab concentrations. We then analyzed bevacizumab concentrations in 17 patients throughout the first quarter of treatment. In line with previously published data, average blood concentrations were 88+/−27 mg/L following the first dose administered, and 213+/−105 mg/L after the last (6^th) dose administered. However, the individual values were scattered, with a mean 4-fold difference between the lowest and the highest concentration for each dose administered. We demonstrated that the bevacizumab administration schedule results in a high inter-individual variability in terms of blood concentrations. Comparison of assay data with clinical data indicates that blood concentrations above the median are associated with side effects, whereas values below the median favor inefficacy. In conclusion, bevacizumab-based therapy could benefit from a personalized administration schedule including follow-up and adjustment of circulating bevacizumab concentrations.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling of monoclonal antibodies

Development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their functional derivatives represents a growing segment of the development pipeline in the pharmaceutical industry. More than 25 mAbs and derivatives have been approved for a variety of therapeutic applications. In addition, around 500 mAbs and derivatives are currently in different stages of development. mAbs are considered to be large molecule therapeutics (in general, they are 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than small chemical molecule therapeutics), but they are not just big chemicals. These compounds demonstrate much more complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour than small molecules. Because of their large size and relatively poor membrane permeability and instability in the conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, parenteral administration is the most usual route of administration. The rate and extent of mAb distribution is very slow and depends on extravasation in tissue, distribution within the particular tissue, and degradation. Elimination primarily happens via catabolism to peptides and amino acids. Although not definitive, work has been published to define the human tissues mainly involved in the elimination of mAbs, and it seems that many cells throughout the body are involved. mAbs can be targeted against many soluble or membrane-bound targets, thus these compounds may act by a variety of mechanisms to achieve their pharmacological effect. mAbs targeting soluble antigen generally exhibit linear elimination, whereas those targeting membrane-bound antigen often exhibit non-linear elimination, mainly due to target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD). The high-affinity interaction of mAbs and their derivatives with the pharmacological target can often result in non-linear pharmacokinetics. Because of species differences (particularly due to differences in target affinity and abundance) in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mAbs, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of mAbs has been used routinely to expedite the development of mAbs and their derivatives and has been utilized to help in the selection of appropriate dose regimens. Although modelling approaches have helped to explain variability in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these drugs, there is a clear need for more complex models to improve understanding of pharmacokinetic processes and pharmacodynamic interactions of mAbs with the immune system. There are different approaches applied to physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling of mAbs and important differences between the models developed. Some key additional features that need to be accounted for in PBPK models of mAbs are neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn; an important salvage mechanism for antibodies) binding, TMDD and lymph flow. Several models have been described incorporating some or all of these features and the use of PBPK models are expected to expand over the next few years.

Comprehensive review: antitumor necrosis factor agents in inflammatory bowel disease and factors implicated in treatment response

Antitumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) agents have dramatically influenced management of refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, not all patients respond to treatment and some lose response or become intolerant over time. Immunogenicity, a well established phenomenon with anti-TNF agents, may have important clinical implications in patients with IBD. A comprehensive review of available evidence demonstrating how drug concentrations, immunogenicity, and other factors influence outcomes with anti-TNF agents was performed. PubMed, EMBASE, Biosis, Dialog, and Conference Papers Index were searched from 1 January 1995 to 7 April 2012 to identify clinical trials in adult and pediatric patients with IBD treated with anti-TNF agents for Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. Data on serum drug levels and immunogenicity and their relationship with clinical efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted and examined. Serum infliximab concentrations correlated with clinical efficacy and treatment outcomes in patients with IBD; this relationship is less well characterized with adalimumab and certolizumab pegol concentrations. In multiple studies, the presence and level of antibodies to infliximab correlated with loss of clinical efficacy and increased risk of infusion reactions. The incidence and clinical impact of antibody formation with adalimumab or certolizumab in IBD is becoming evident as more data become available. Current, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based anti-TNF antibody assays are suboptimal in that results are often inconclusive and comparisons between agents cannot be made. Measurement of anti-TNF agent drug concentrations and assessment of immunogenicity has the potential to positively impact clinical decision making during anti-TNF therapy for IBD. As assays are optimized, it is expected that the clinical impact of these determinations will be better characterized.

A multicenter phase 1 study of EMD 525797 (DI17E6), a novel humanized monoclonal antibody targeting αv integrins, in progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases after chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

EMD 525797 (DI17E6) is a deimmunized, humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G2 antibody against the αv subunit of human integrins. Blocking αv integrins may be an effective strategy for inhibiting prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate EMD 525797 safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) in castration-resistant PCa patients. Secondary objectives included antitumor activity assessments.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A phase 1 open-label study in 26 patients (four European centers). Eligible patients (≥ 18 yr) had histologically proven PCa with bone metastases after prior chemotherapy and evidence of progressive disease (PD) based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values.

INTERVENTION

Patients received three intravenous EMD 525797 infusions (250, 500, 1000, or 1500 mg every 2 wk).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed. PK parameters were calculated according to noncompartmental standard methods. Antitumor activity measures were response after 6 wk, changes in PSA levels, and pain interference total score. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Patients were treated for a mean of 16.8 ± 16.7 wk. No DLTs were reported in any of the cohorts. All patients experienced TEAEs, which were considered drug-related in 11 patients. Four deaths occurred during the trial and were considered not related to EMD 525797. EMD 525797 showed dose-dependent, nonlinear PK. Eighteen of 26 patients did not show PD for ≥ 18 wk. Two patients (500-mg cohort), treated for 42.4 and 76.3 wk, had clinically significant PSA reductions and pain relief, including one patient with confirmed partial response. This trial was not specifically designed to assess clinical activity, and further investigations are needed in randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

No DLTs were reported in any of the evaluated cohorts. There was evidence of clinical activity. For the currently ongoing phase 2 trial, EMD 525797 doses of 750 and 1500 mg every 3 wk were chosen.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00958477 (EMR 62242-002).

Application of knockout mouse models to investigate the influence of FcγR on the pharmacokinetics and anti-platelet effects of MWReg30, a monoclonal anti-GPIIb antibody

This work evaluates the influence of FcγR on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a rat anti-integrin-αIIb IgG1 monoclonal antibody, MWReg30, in mice. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MWReg30 were investigated in C57BL/6 control mice, FcγRI/RIII knockout mice, and FcγRIIb knockout mice, following intravenous doses of 0.04-0.4mg/kg. MWReg30 treatment resulted in a dose-dependent induction of thrombocytopenia in all strains, but sensitivity to MWReg30 was increased in FcγRIIb knockout mice and decreased in FcγRI/RIII knockout mice, relative to results found in control mice. Expressed as a percentage of pre-treatment platelet counts, nadir platelet counts were 28.6±5.0, 88.7±16.6 and 25.3±6.1% at 0.05mg/kg, 28.4±13.7, 56.7±5.1, and 20.6±9.5% at 0.2mg/kg, and 24.9±7.2, 38.7±7.5, and 7.4±2.2% at 0.4mg/kg in control, FcγRI/RIII(-/-) and FcγRIIb(-/-) mice. However, knocking out FcγR did not affect MWReg30 pharmacokinetics. Plasma areas under the concentration vs. time curves (AUC0-10 days) ±SD for MWReg30 were: 5.24±0.68, 5.51±0.24, and 5.39±1.05 nM×d at 0.04mg/kg, and 12.7±0.5, 13.6±1.1, and 14.5±2.0nM×d at 0.1mg/kg in control, FcγRI/RIII(-/-) and FcγRIIb(-/-) mice. The findings further emphasize the role of activating vs. inhibitory FcγR in processing immune complexes (i.e., MWReg30-platelets), while also providing an example where monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics are not substantially influenced by FcγR expression.

Pharmacokinetics and ADME characterizations of antibody-drug conjugates

Pharmacokinetic and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) characterization of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) reflects the dynamic interactions between the biological system and ADC, and provides critical assessments in lead selection, optimization, and clinical development. Understanding the pharmacokinetics (PK), ADME properties and consequently the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic properties of ADCs is critical for their successful development. This chapter discusses the PK properties of ADCs, types of PK and ADME studies in supporting different stages of development, general design of PK/ADME studies with a focus on ADC-specific characteristics, and interpretation of PK parameters.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in inflammatory bowel disease

Although tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists have shown clear benefits over conventional treatments for inducing and maintaining clinical remission in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, a high proportion of patients lose response over time. Given the scarce alternative of treatments when treatment failure occurs, it is highly desirable to optimize both initial response and long-term continuation of TNF antagonists. One of the most well-characterized factors associated with loss of response to these agents is the development of immunogenicity, whereby the production of neutralizing antidrug antibodies accelerates drug clearance, leading to subtherapeutic drug concentrations and, ultimately, to treatment failure. However, other patient-related factors, such as sex and/or body size, and disease severity, including TNF burden and serum albumin concentration among others, also may influence the pharmacokinetics of these agents. Nevertheless, the evidence generated to date about these complex interactions is scarce, and further prospective studies evaluating their influence on the pharmacokinetics of TNF antagonists are needed. Drug adjustment empirically based on clinical symptoms often is inaccurate and may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Recent evidence shows that maintenance of an optimal therapeutic drug concentration is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Therefore, incorporation of therapeutic drug monitoring into clinical practice may allow clinicians to optimize treatment by maintaining effective drug concentrations over time.

Bioanalysis of target biomarker and PK/PD relevancy during the development of biotherapeutics

The majority of biotherapeutic drugs act on specific targets, which may serve as biomarkers to be evaluated for target engagement and validation. Together with subsequent pathway biomarkers, these data can provide proof-of-mechanism and understanding of the biological drug affect. A major task during early development is to predict, for the first first time in human clinical trials, the starting dose and simulate the PK/PD relationship. However, determinations of the biotherapeutic drug and target concentrations are not straightforward due to temporal changes of drug–target binding and challenges in developing reliable methods to measure the free and total drug and target. Herein, the bioanalysis of the target biomarker and the biotherapeutics in the context of PK/PD relevancy during drug development is reviewed. Binding of the target to the biotherapeutic will affect target clearance and drug disposition, resulting in nonlinear PK. Reliable and specific methods are crucial for the correct PK/PD modeling and interpretation.

Application of pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics/clinical response modeling and simulation for biologics drug development

Biologics, specifically monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs, have unique pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics as opposed to small molecules. Under the paradigm of model-based drug development, PK-PD/clinical response models offer critical insight in guiding biologics development at various stages. On the basis of the molecular structure and corresponding properties of biologics, typical mechanism-based [target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD)], physiologically based PK, PK-PD, and dose-response meta-analysis models are summarized. Examples of using TMDD, PK-PD, and meta-analysis in helping starting dose determination in first-in-human studies and dosing regimen optimization in phase II/III trials are discussed. Instead of covering the entirety of model-based biologics development, this review focuses on the guiding principles and the core mathematical descriptions underlying the PK or PK-PD models most used.

Application of knockout mouse models to investigate the influence of FcγR on the tissue distribution and elimination of 8C2, a murine IgG1 monoclonal antibody

The current work examines the role of Fcγ-receptors on the elimination and tissue distribution of 8C2, a model murine IgG1 monoclonal antibody. The plasma pharmacokinetics of (125)Iodine-labeled 8C2 were investigated in C57BL/6 control mice, FcγRI/RIII knockout mice, and FcγRIIb knockout mice, following intravenous doses of 0.04, 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg. Plasma samples were collected and radioactivity was counted. Concentration data were analyzed with a population pharmacokinetic model. Additionally, the tissue disposition of 8C2 was investigated using whole body autoradioluminography (WBAL) and via counting excised tissues. Areas under the plasma concentration vs. time curves AUC(0-10 days) ±SD (nM×days) were: 12.3±0.3, 12.5±1.3 and 15.1±1.2 at 0.04 mg/kg; 39.3±2.0, 28.9±2.7 and 42.0±9.4 at 0.1 mg/kg; and 225±19, 158±19 and 204±26 at 0.4 mg/kg in C57BL/6, FcγRI/RIII(-/-) and FcγRIIb(-/-) mice. Strain was not a statistically significant predictor for any of the parameters of the population model. 8C2 plasma clearance, distribution clearance, and central compartment volume were 0.00543 L/days/kg, 0.0598 L/days/kg, and 0.057 L/kg. No substantial differences in 8C2 tissue uptake were identified by analysis of excised tissues or by WBAL. In conclusion, FcγR knockout is associated with only minor effects on the plasma and tissue disposition of 8C2, a model murine IgG1 mAb.

Compartmental tissue distribution of antibody therapeutics: experimental approaches and interpretations

Monoclonal antibodies have provided many validated and potential new therapeutic candidates for various diseases encompassing the realms of neurology, ophthalmology, immunology, and especially oncology. The mechanism of action for these biological molecules typically involves specific binding to a soluble ligand or cell surface protein in order to block or alter a molecular pathway, induce a desired cellular response, or deplete a target cell. Many antigens reside within the interstitial space, the fluid-filled compartment that lies between the outer endothelial vessel wall and the plasma membranes of cells. This mini-review examines the concepts relevant to the kinetics and behavior of antibodies within the interstitium with a special emphasis on radiometric measurement of quantitative pharmacology. Molecular probes are discussed to outline chemical techniques, selection criteria, data interpretation, and relevance to the study of antibody pharmacokinetics. The importance of studying the tissue uptake of antibodies at a compartmental level is highlighted, including a brief overview of receptor occupancy and its interpretation in radiotracer studies. Experimental methods for measuring the spatial composition of tissues are examined in terms of relative vascular, interstitial, and cellular volumes using solid tumors as a representative example. Experimental methods and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling are introduced as distinct approaches to distinguish between free and bound fractions of interstitial antibody. Overall, the review outlines the available methods for pharmacokinetic measurements of antibodies and physiological measurements of the compartments that they occupy, while emphasizing that such approaches may not fully capture the complexities of dynamic, heterogeneous tumors and other tissues.

A guide to rational dosing of monoclonal antibodies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Dosing of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is often based on body size, with the perception that body size-based dosing would reduce inter-subject variability in drug exposure. However, most mAbs are target specific with a relatively large therapeutic window and generally a small contribution of body size to pharmacokinetic variability. Therefore, the dosing paradigm for mAbs should be assessed in the context of these unique characteristics. The objective of this study was to review the current dosing strategy and to provide a scientific rationale for dosing of mAbs using a modelling and simulation approach.

METHODS

In this analysis, the body weight-based or body weight-independent (fixed) dosing regimens for mAbs were systematically evaluated. A generic two-compartment first-order elimination model was developed. Individual or population pharmacokinetic profiles were simulated as a function of the body weight effects on clearance (θ(BW_CL)) and on the central volume of distribution (θ(BW_V1)). The variability in exposure (the area under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC], trough serum concentration [C(min)] and peak serum concentration [C(max)]) was compared between body weight-based dosing and fixed dosing in the entire population. The deviation of exposure for light and heavy subjects from median body weight subjects was also measured. The simulation results were then evaluated with clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of various mAbs that were given either by body weight-based dosing or by fixed dosing in the case study.

RESULTS

Results from this analysis demonstrated that exposure variability was dependent on the magnitude of the body weight effect on pharmacokinetics. In contrast to the conventional assumption, body weight-based dosing does not always offer advantages over fixed dosing in reducing exposure variability. In general, when the exponential functions of θ(BW_CL) and θ(BW_V1) in the population pharmacokinetic model are <0.5, fixed dosing results in less variability and less deviation than body weight-based dosing; when both θ(BW_CL) and θ(BW_V1) are >0.5, body weight-based dosing results in less variability and less deviation than fixed dosing. In the scenarios when either θ(BW_CL) or θ(BW_V1) is >0.5, the impact on exposure variability is different for each exposure measure. The case study demonstrated that most mAbs had little effect or a moderate body weight effect (θ(BW_CL) and θ(BW_V1) <0.5 or ∼0.5). The difference of variability in exposure between body weight-based and fixed dosing is generally less than 20% and the percentages of deviation for light and heavy subpopulations are less than 40%.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis provided insights into the conditions under which either fixed or body weight-based dosing would be superior in reducing pharmacokinetic variability and exposure differences between light and heavy subjects across the population. The pharmacokinetic variability introduced by either dosing regimen is moderate relative to the variability generally observed in pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety. Therefore, mAb dosing can be flexible. Given many practical advantages, fixed dosing is recommended to be the first option in first-in-human studies with mAbs. The dosing strategy in later stages of clinical development could then be determined based on combined knowledge of the body weight effect on pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy from the early clinical trials.

Pharmacokinetics and toxicology of therapeutic proteins: Advances and challenges

Significant progress has been made in understanding pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), as well as toxicity profiles of therapeutic proteins in animals and humans, which have been in commercial development for more than three decades. However, in the PK arena, many fundamental questions remain to be resolved. Investigative and bioanalytical tools need to be established to improve the translation of PK data from animals to humans, and from in vitro assays to in vivo readouts, which would ultimately lead to a higher success rate in drug development. In toxicology, it is known, in general, what studies are needed to safely develop therapeutic proteins, and what studies do not provide relevant information. One of the major complicating factors in nonclinical and clinical programs for therapeutic proteins is the impact of immunogenicity. In this review, we will highlight the emerging science and technology, as well as the challenges around the pharmacokinetic- and safety-related issues in drug development of mAbs and other therapeutic proteins.

Minipig as a potential translatable model for monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics after intravenous and subcutaneous administration

Subcutaneous (SC) delivery is a common route of administration for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) properties requiring long-term or frequent drug administration. An ideal in vivo preclinical model for predicting human PK following SC administration may be one in which the skin and overall physiological characteristics are similar to that of humans. In this study, the PK properties of a series of therapeutic mAbs following intravenous (IV) and SC administration in Göttingen minipigs were compared with data obtained previously from humans. The present studies demonstrated: (1) minipig is predictive of human linear clearance; (2) the SC bioavailabilities in minipigs are weakly correlated with those in human; (3) minipig mAb SC absorption rates are generally higher than those in human and (4) the SC bioavailability appears to correlate with systemic clearance in minipigs. Given the important role of the neonatal Fc-receptor (FcRn) in the PK of mAbs, the in vitro binding affinities of these IgGs against porcine, human and cynomolgus monkey FcRn were tested. The result showed comparable FcRn binding affinities across species. Further, mAbs with higher isoelectric point tended to have faster systemic clearance and lower SC bioavailability in both minipig and human. Taken together, these data lend increased support for the use of the minipig as an alternative predictive model for human IV and SC PK of mAbs.

Anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: pharmacokinetics-based dosing paradigms

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic inflammatory disorders resulting from immune dysregulation. Patients who fail conventional medical therapy require biological treatment with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Although mAbs are highly effective for induction and maintenance of clinical remission, not all patients respond, and a high proportion of patients lose response over time. One factor associated with loss of response is immunogenicity, whereby the production of antidrug antibodies accelerates mAb clearance. However, other factors related to patient and disease characteristics also influence the pharmacokinetics of mAbs. These factors include gender, body size, concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents, disease type, serum albumin concentration, and the degree of systemic inflammation. Because it is important to maintain clinically effective concentrations to provide optimal clinical response and drug exposure is affected by patient factors, a better understanding of the pharmacology of mAbs will ultimately result in better patient care.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics for inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Although tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are effective for the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, lack and loss of clinical response is a clinical challenge. Accordingly, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed as a means to optimize treatment. This article reviews the mechanisms of and factors which influence clearance of biologics, the relationship between serum drug concentrations and antidrug antibody presence and treatment efficacy, and identifies areas for future research needs regarding the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice.

METHODS

Publications regarding these topics were identified from literature searching and supplemented by review of gastroenterology meeting presentations and reference lists.

RESULTS

The clearance of monoclonal antibodies and pegylated antibody fragments is complex, and may be affected by demographic variables, concomitant medications, inflammatory burden, and immunogenicity, leading to high interpatient variability in plasma concentration of drug and clinical response. Several observational studies have demonstrated a relationship between anti-TNF agent serum drug concentrations and/or antidrug antibody presence and various symptomatic and objective clinical endpoints. However, these relationships are not absolute, and although some algorithms for the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice have been proposed, none have yet been validated in a prospective clinical trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research to identify the most appropriate use of therapeutic drug monitoring is needed.

Preclinical pharmacokinetics of MFGR1877A, a human monoclonal antibody to FGFR3, and prediction of its efficacious clinical dose for the treatment of t(4;14)-positive multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

MFGR1877A is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) and is being investigated as a potential therapy for relapsed/refractory FGFR3+ multiple myeloma. The purpose of these studies was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of MFGR1877A in mouse, rat, and monkey and predict its human PK and efficacious dose.

METHODS

PK of MFGR1877A was determined in athymic nude mice, Sprague-Dawley rats and cynomolgus monkeys after administration of single intravenous doses. Human PK profiles were projected from monkey PK profiles using a species-invariant time method, and human population PK parameters were estimated using a non-linear, two-compartment model comprising specific (target-mediated) and non-specific clearance pathways. The anti-tumor efficacy in mice bearing human tumor xenografts was used in conjunction with inhibitory activity in cell proliferation assays and human PK projections to estimate clinical efficacious dose.

RESULTS

The PK of MFGR1877A in mice was non-linear in the dose range of 1-50 mg/kg, while in rats and monkeys, PK was non-linear in the dose range of 1-10 mg/kg and linear at doses ≥ 10 mg/kg. The predicted non-specific clearance range in humans was 2.6-4.4 mL/day/kg. Doses ranging from 2 to 3 mg/kg weekly to 6-10 mg/kg every 4 weeks were predicted to achieve the target exposure in ≥ 90% of multiple myeloma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The predicted non-specific clearance of MFGR1877A in humans is similar to typical human IgG1 antibodies and will be verified in a Phase 1 study. The projected human efficacious dose and regimen appear to be achievable in patients.

Preclinical safety evaluations supporting pediatric drug development with biopharmaceuticals: strategy, challenges, current practices

Evaluation of pharmaceutical agents in children is now conducted earlier in the drug development process. An important consideration for this pediatric use is how to assess and support its safety. This article is a collaborative effort of industry toxicologists to review strategies, challenges, and current practice regarding preclinical safety evaluations supporting pediatric drug development with biopharmaceuticals. Biopharmaceuticals include a diverse group of molecular, cell-based or gene therapeutics derived from biological sources or complex biotechnological processes. The principles of preclinical support of pediatric drug development for biopharmaceuticals are similar to those for small molecule pharmaceuticals and in general follow the same regulatory guidances outlined by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. However, many biopharmaceuticals are also inherently different, with limited species specificity or immunogenic potential which may impact the approach taken. This article discusses several key areas to aid in the support of pediatric clinical use, study design considerations for juvenile toxicity studies when they are needed, and current practices to support pediatric drug development based on surveys specifically targeting biopharmaceutical development.

A phase 1, single-dose study of fresolimumab, an anti-TGF-β antibody, in treatment-resistant primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a disease with poor prognosis and high unmet therapeutic need. Here, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of single-dose infusions of fresolimumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inactivates all forms of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), in a phase I open-label, dose-ranging study. Patients with biopsy-confirmed, treatment-resistant, primary FSGS with a minimum estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25  ml/min per 1.73  m(2), and a urine protein to creatinine ratio over 1.8  mg/mg were eligible. All 16 patients completed the study in which each received one of four single-dose levels of fresolimumab (up to 4  mg/kg) and was followed for 112 days. Fresolimumab was well tolerated with pustular rash the only adverse event in two patients. One patient was diagnosed with a histologically confirmed primitive neuroectodermal tumor 2 years after fresolimumab treatment. Consistent with treatment-resistant FSGS, there was a slight decline in eGFR (median decline baseline to final of 5.85 ml/min per 1.73  m(2)). Proteinuria fluctuated during the study with the median decline from baseline to final in urine protein to creatinine ratio of 1.2  mg/mg with all three Black patients having a mean decline of 3.6  mg/mg. The half-life of fresolimumab was ∼14 days, and the mean dose-normalized Cmax and area under the curve were independent of dose. Thus, single-dose fresolimumab was well tolerated in patients with primary resistant FSGS. Additional evaluation in a larger dose-ranging study is necessary.

Monoclonal antibodies: interspecies scaling with minimal preclinical information

Interspecies scaling for predicting human pharmacokinetics with information from multiple animal species is an established approach for small-molecule drugs. However, in general, the strategy is not a viable approach for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, since relevant preclinical information is often limited due to highly specific biological activity and unique disposition mechanisms of these biologic agents. Existing data from a limited database indicates that applying minimal but relevant preclinical information and an appropriate approach; for example, fixed-exponent, provides a pragmatic and reasonably accurate prediction of human pharmacokinetics. This article briefly reviews the factors that affect the disposition of monoclonal antibodies and reiterates the importance of biological similarities between animal species and humans when selecting preclinical information for interspecies scaling. The article outlines the rationalization for utilizing the one-species with fixed-exponent approach, with discussions focused on the assumptions in allometry and monoclonal antibodies disposition mechanisms, and provides specific considerations related to practically applying such an approach.

Therapeutic options for rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disorder primarily targeting the synovium. Unchecked disease activity is associated with significant morbidity and an increased mortality. Recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of RA and the capability of biologically engineered treatments for RA have expanded the armamentarium of antirheumatic agents.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted through PubMed.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

At present, a common strategy for the treatment of RA uses methotrexate either as monotherapy or in combination with a variety of conventional and/or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), with the goal of inducing remission of active disease. The choice of which agent(s) to use is based upon patient-specific criteria (activity of disease, comorbidities, patient preferences, costs etc.). Emerging therapies that target specific cytokines and growth factors in the inflammatory cascade of RA offer a potent new means of modifying disease activity, but many questions regarding their use remain unanswered.