The Spectrum of Serious Infections Among Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Melanoma

Severe pulmonary infections complicating nivolumab treatment for lung cancer: a report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy represents a recent milestone in the treatment of lung cancer, particularly with the rapidly expanding development of monoclonal antibodies targeting checkpoint inhibitors in the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway, such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Classical auto-immune side effects of these treatments, often called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), can affect multiple organs, including the lungs in which potentially life-threatening pneumonitis may require rapid treatment with high doses of corticosteroids. Nevertheless, the occurrence of severe infections in cancer patients treated with nivolumab, outside the context of immunosuppressive therapy, is a complication that has rarely been reported in the literature.

CLINICAL CASES

We report two cases of severe pulmonary infection with unusual microbes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Aspergillus fumigatus, in patients treated with nivolumab for non-small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

Ruling out pulmonary infections may require extensive investigation, as these may have an atypical presentation due to immunomodulation. Furthermore, treating the patient with corticosteroids for immune-related pneumonia could lead to a fatal outcome in this context. This report highlights the importance of excluding the presence of opportunistic infections and tuberculosis before considering immune-related pulmonary toxicity with or without a history of prior corticosteroid use. These cases also emphasize the potential value of tuberculosis screening in patients treated with PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors.

Severe cytomegalovirus gastritis after pembrolizumab in a patient with melanoma

Immunotherapy has emerged as a standard of cancer treatment, with an increasing number of indications. Recently, opportunistic infections have been reported in several cases in which immunotherapy has led to an increased susceptibility to infection. The present case is the first report of cytomegalovirus (cmv) gastritis occurring in a patient with melanoma during immunotherapy without immune-related adverse events (iraes) and without the use of immunosuppressant agents. A 43-year-old woman presented with stage iii malignant melanoma. She underwent wide excision of skin, with lymph node dissection, and she started immunotherapy with a 3-week cycle of pembrolizumab. The patient demonstrated stable disease response, and no iraes were observed during her initial treatment courses. However, after the 9th treatment cycle, she began to experience epigastric pain that worsened significantly, requiring a visit to the emergency centre. Imaging by computed tomography (ct) and integrated positron-emission tomography/ct revealed severe diffuse gastroduodenitis with acute pancreatitis. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed diffuse oozing, hemorrhagic, edematous, and exfoliative mucosa involving the entire gastric wall, defined as acute hemorrhagic gastritis. Biopsies of the gastric wall revealed cmv infection. Those findings were consistent with a diagnosis of cmv gastritis, and the patient received antiviral therapy with ganciclovir. After treatment, she recovered enough to resume immunotherapy. This case report presents a rare occurrence of cmv gastritis related to immunotherapy. As more patients are treated with immunotherapy, incidences of cmv infections are expected to increase; a high index of clinical suspicion is therefore needed in symptomatic patients.

Critical Care Management of Toxicities Associated With Targeted Agents and Immunotherapies for Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe the most common serious adverse effects and organ toxicities associated with emerging therapies for cancer that may necessitate admission to the ICU.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

PubMed and Medline search of relevant articles in English on the management of adverse effects of immunotherapy for cancer.

DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS

Targeted therapies including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors, and immune effector cell therapy have improved the outcome and quality of life of patients with cancer. However, severe and life-threatening side effects can occur. These toxicities include infusion or hypersensitivity reactions, cytokine release syndrome, pulmonary, cardiac, renal, hepatic, and neurologic toxicities, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, opportunistic infections, and endocrinopathies. Cytokine release syndrome is the most common serious toxicity after administration of monoclonal antibodies and immune effector cell therapies. Most of the adverse events from immunotherapy results from an exaggerated T-cell response directed against normal tissue, resulting in the generation of high levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Toxicities from targeted therapies are usually secondary to "on target toxicities." Management is largely supportive and may include discontinuation of the specific agent, corticosteroids, and other immune suppressing agents for severe (grade 3 or 4) immune-related adverse events like neurotoxicity and pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of toxicities associated with modern targeted and immunotherapeutic agents for cancer require a multidisciplinary approach among ICU staff, oncologists, and organ specialists and adoption of standardized treatment protocols to ensure the best possible patient outcomes.

Fungal infection risks associated with the use of cytokine antagonists and immune checkpoint inhibitors

IMPACT STATEMENT

The risk of opportunistic infections due to fungi is relatively less well addressed in patients receiving biologic agents, compared with other opportunistic bacterial and viral infections. There is a lack of consensus guideline on the screening, prophylaxis, and management of fungal infection in patients anticipated to receive or actively receiving biologic therapy. In addition, invasive mycosis in immunocompromised patients is associated with high mortality and morbidity. This review highlighted the risk of fungal infection in patients receiving cytokine antagonists and immune checkpoint inhibitors, two big categories of biologic agents that are widely used in the treatment of various autoimmune and malignant conditions, often in combination with other immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive agents but also as standalone therapy. The adverse outcomes of opportunistic fungal infection in these patients can be reduced by heightened awareness, active case finding, and prompt treatment.

Hepatotoxicity From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Management Recommendation

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoint molecules. ICIs are an immunotherapy for the treatment of many advanced malignancies. The advent of ICIs has been a major breakthrough in the field of oncology, a fact recognized by the 2018 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine being awarded for the discovery. The Food and Drug Administration approved the first ICI, ipilimumab, in 2011 for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Seven ICIs are now used in clinical practice, including nivolumab and pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. ICIs are increasingly used across the spectrum of hepatobiliary neoplasia. The utility of ICI therapy has been limited by immune-related adverse reactions (irAEs) affecting multiple organ systems. Hepatotoxicity is an important irAE, occurring in up to 16% of patients receiving ICIs. Optimizing outcomes in patients receiving ICI therapy requires awareness of and familiarity with diagnosing and management of ICI-induced immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (IMH), including approaches to treatment and ICI dose management. The aim of this review article is to (1) provide a comprehensive, evidence-based review of IMH; (2) perform a systematic review of the management of IMH; and (3) present algorithms for the diagnosis and management of IMH.

British Society of Gastroenterology endorsed guidance for the management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a novel class of cancer treatment that have improved outcomes for a subset of cancer patients. They work by antagonising inhibitory immune pathways, thereby augmenting immune-mediated antitumour responses. However, immune activation is not cancer-specific and often results in the activation of immune cells in non-cancer tissues, resulting in off-target immune-mediated injury and organ dysfunction. Diarrhoea and gastrointestinal tract inflammation are common and sometimes serious side-effects of this type of therapy. Prompt recognition of gastrointestinal toxicity and, in many cases, rapid institution of anti-inflammatory or biologic therapy (or both) is required to reverse these complications. Management of organ-specific complications benefits from multidisciplinary input, including engagement with gastroenterologists for optimal management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis. In this British Society of Gastroenterology endorsed guidance document, we have developed a consensus framework for the investigation and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis.

Five-year review of corticosteroid duration and complications in the management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related diarrhoea and colitis in advanced melanoma

BACKGROUND

Immune-related diarrhoea/colitis (ir-D/C) is a common adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Guidelines recommend corticosteroid (CS) treatment; however, the average treatment duration for ir-D/C remains poorly defined.

METHODS

All advanced melanoma patients treated with ICI therapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed to identify ir-D/C cases alongside clinical variables.

RESULTS

117 any-grade ir-D/C episodes occurred in 109 (21%) patients out of a total of 519 patients treated (ipilimumab=77 episodes, anti-PD1=17 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), ipilimumab and nivolumab=23 (ipi+nivo)) (seven patients had ir-D/C more than once on different lines of treatment) and >/=grade 3 ir-D/C occurred most frequently (63/519 patients (12%) vs 29/519 (5%) grade 1, and 25/519 (5%) grade 2). Median onset (days) of all-grade ir-D/C after starting ICI therapy was 41 for ipilimumab (IQR 24 to 59, n=77), 91 for anti-PD1 (IQR 46 to 355, n=17) and 45 for ipi+nivo (IQR 24 to 67, n=23). In 71/117 (61%) patients, ir-D/C episodes were treated with CS (17% grade 2; 79% grade 3/4): 54 being steroid-responsive; 17 being steroid-refractory and received additional anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment. Median grade 3 ir-D/C CS duration was similar across treatments, averaging 58 days. Median overall CS duration (days) was longer in the grade 3/4 D/C steroid-refractory group (94 vs 45 days). Infection developed in 11/71 (15%) CS recipients and in 6/17 (35%) anti-TNF recipients. In 65/117 (55%) patients, ir-D/C episodes were investigated with flexible sigmoidoscopy. Of these patients, 38/65 (58%) had macroscopic colitis and 12/65 (18%) had microscopic colitis. The steroid-refractory group had more macroscopic changes, 13/17 (76%), than the steroid-responsive group, 22/41 (54%).

CONCLUSION

Rates of grade 3 ir-D/C were higher than reported in clinical trials. The 58-day median duration of CS therapy for grade 3 ir-D/C places a significant number of patients at risk of complications. We demonstrate that microscopic colitis is an important subgroup, advocating biopsies in ir-D/C even with macroscopically normal bowel.

Determinants of COVID-19 disease severity in patients with cancer

As of 10 April 2020, New York State had 180,458 cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and 9,385 reported deaths. Patients with cancer comprised 8.4% of deceased individuals¹. Population-based studies from China and Italy suggested a higher coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) death rate in patients with cancer^2,3, although there is a knowledge gap as to which aspects of cancer and its treatment confer risk of severe COVID-19⁴. This information is critical to balance the competing safety considerations of reducing SARS-CoV-2 exposure and cancer treatment continuation. From 10 March to 7 April 2020, 423 cases of symptomatic COVID-19 were diagnosed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (from a total of 2,035 patients with cancer tested). Of these, 40% were hospitalized for COVID-19, 20% developed severe respiratory illness (including 9% who required mechanical ventilation) and 12% died within 30 d. Age older than 65 years and treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were predictors for hospitalization and severe disease, whereas receipt of chemotherapy and major surgery were not. Overall, COVID-19 in patients with cancer is marked by substantial rates of hospitalization and severe outcomes. The association observed between ICI and COVID-19 outcomes in our study will need further interrogation in tumor-specific cohorts.

Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Primarily Pembrolizumab on Infection Risk in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer: A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the risk of infections are not well studied. To assess the infectious risk of CPIs, we evaluated the incidence of infections in lung cancer patients treated with CPIs plus conventional chemotherapy (CC) versus CC alone.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective comparative study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received CPIs combined with CC and those treated with CC alone at our institution during January 2016 to February 2019. We compared clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes including infection rate and mortality between the groups.

RESULTS

We identified 123 patients for the CPI group and 147 patients for the control (CC) group. Eighteen patients (15%) in the CPI group and 33 patients (22%) in the control group developed infections (P=0.1). Pneumonia was the most common infection encountered in both groups. Urinary tract infection (UTIs) was higher in CC group (40%) compared to CPI group (9%) (P=0.01). On multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P=0.024), prior use of corticosteroids (P=0.021), and neutropenia (P<0.001) were independent risk factors for infection and severe infection requiring hospital admission. Chronic kidney disease (P=0.02), prior cancer treatment (P=0.023), and neutropenia (P<0.0001) were identified as independent risk factors for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer patients treated with CPIs combined with CC have a comparable risk of infection to those treated with CC alone, although there is a trend towards fewer infections in those given CPIs, particularly when it comes to UTIs.

Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies

The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.

Determinants of neurological syndromes caused by varicella zoster virus (VZV)

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is a pathogenic human herpes virus which causes varicella as a primary infection, following which it becomes latent in peripheral autonomic, sensory, and cranial nerve ganglionic neurons from where it may reactivate after decades to cause herpes zoster. VZV reactivation may also cause a wide spectrum of neurological syndromes, in particular, acute encephalitis and vasculopathy. While there is potentially a large number of coding viral mutations that might predispose certain individuals to VZV infections, in practice, a variety of host factors are the main determinants of VZV infection, both disseminated and specifically affecting the nervous system. Host factors include increasing age with diminished cell-mediated immunity to VZV, several primary immunodeficiency syndromes, secondary immunodeficiency syndromes, and drug-induced immunosuppression. In some cases, the molecular immunological basis underlying the increased risk of VZV infections has been defined, in particular, the role of POL III mutations, but in other cases, the mechanisms have yet to be determined. The role of immunization in immunosuppressed individuals as well as its possible efficacy in preventing both generalized and CNS-specific infections will require further investigation to clarify in such patients.

Systemic immunobiological, immunosuppressant, and oncologic agents for the treatment of dermatologic diseases during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic emergency: A quick review for a quick consultation

The precision medicine era has helped to better manage patients with immunological and oncological diseases, improving the quality of life of this class of patients. Regarding the management of these patients and positivity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), currently, limited data are available and information is evolving. In this quick review, we have analyzed the mechanisms of action and related infective risk of drugs used for the treatment of immune‐mediated and oncologic skin conditions during the daily clinical practice. In general, immunosuppressant and antineoplastic agents for dermatologic treatments do not require suspension and do not require special measures, if not those commonly observed. In the case of a coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) patient with complications (such as pneumonia, respiratory failure), treatment suspension should always be considered after taking into account the general condition of the patient, the risk‐benefit ratio, and the pathophysiology of COVID‐19 infection. The COVID‐19 emergency pandemic does not imply undertreatment of existing skin conditions, which together with the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection may jeopardize the patient's life.

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) in infection

Exhausted and dysfunctional T cells triggered by infection and cancer render the immune system unable to eliminate these pathogens. Pharmacologic blockade of the surface receptors that inhibit T-cell function has shown remarkable success in patients with various malignancies. In this Review, we discuss the emerging evidence of inhibiting checkpoint pathways as a potential role in controlling or clearing infectious diseases. Though interesting tendencies, much work is still needed in order to develop safe strategies that can be translated into clinically relevant outcomes in patients with infections.

Immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors

Cancer immunotherapies have changed the landscape of cancer treatment during the past few decades. Among them, immune checkpoint inhibitors, which target PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4, are increasingly used for certain cancers; however, this increased use has resulted in increased reports of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These irAEs are unique and are different to those of traditional cancer therapies, and typically have a delayed onset and prolonged duration. IrAEs can involve any organ or system. These effects are frequently low grade and are treatable and reversible; however, some adverse effects can be severe and lead to permanent disorders. Management is primarily based on corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory agents, which should be prescribed carefully to reduce the potential of short-term and long-term complications. Thoughtful management of irAEs is important in optimizing quality of life and long-term outcomes.

Infectious Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The clearance of both tumors and microbes depends on highly coordinated immune responses that are sufficiently potent to kill malignant or microbial cells while avoiding immunopathology from an overly exuberant inflammatory response. A molecular understanding of the immune pathways that regulate these responses paved the way for the development of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) as a therapeutic strategy to boost endogenous antitumor immunity. CPIs have demonstrated survival benefits across a wide spectrum of cancers. While infectious complications of CPIs are uncommon, immune-related adverse events occur frequently and often require immunosuppressive therapies that increase the risk of infection.

Fungal Infections Potentiated by Biologics

Biologic therapies including monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and other agents represent a notable expansion in the pharmacotherapy armamentarium in treatment of a variety of diseases. Many of these therapies possess direct or indirect immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effects, which have been associated with bacterial, viral, and fungal opportunistic infections. Careful screening of baseline risk factors before initiation, targeted preventive measures, and vigilant monitoring while on active biologic therapy mitigate these risks as use of biologics becomes more commonplace. This review compiles reported evidence of fungal infections associated with these agents with a focus on the tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor class.

Opportunistic infections complicating immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy has produced durable responses in numerous advanced and metastatic cancers, especially advanced non‐small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, opportunistic infection has become a major risk for patients who have received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Early diagnosis of infection is difficult due to an acute disease course and heterogeneity in clinical manifestation. We retrospectively analyzed four cases with NSCLC who received ICIs and developed opportunistic infections. Two of our cases received antecedent glucocorticoids to treat immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), whereas immunosuppressive agents were not used beforehand in the other cases. We highlight that opportunistic infections complicating immunotherapy can be severe and even fatal. When patients deteriorate after initial remission from irAEs by glucocorticoids, infections should be thoroughly investigated and carefully distinguished from an irAE flare. Bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) are essential. In patients where limited results from traditional microbiological tests have been obtained, next‐generation sequencing (NGS) of BAL fluid is beneficial in guiding a precise antimicrobial treatment. An antipneumocystis prophylaxis may also be considered in selected patients.

Infection risk with PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced solid tumours in phase I clinical trials

Background

Patients undergoing chemotherapy are known to be at risk for infection from myelosuppression by cytotoxic agents (CTAs) or immunosuppressive effects from mTOR inhibitors. The infection risk of newly developed anticancer agents has not been fully evaluated. It remains unknown how T-cell activation induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) relates to infection.

Methods

We retrospectively examined infection risk in patients with cancer treated with investigational agents in a phase I study. The investigational agents were classified into four groups: CTA, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (PAM), molecular targeted agent (MTA) and ICI. All infection-related adverse events (AEs) during treatment were recorded. We compared the CTA, PAM and ICI with MTA, because MTA are already considered low risk and were used in the largest number of patients.

Results

A total of 641 patients were enrolled: 35 CTAs (5.5%), 61 PAMs (9.5%), 445 MTAs (69.4%) and 100 ICIs (15.6%). Among all patients, 132 (20.6%) experienced infection-related AEs and 46 (7.2%) developed 50 ≥grade 3 infection-related AEs. In any infection-related AEs, the ORs compared with MTAs were 2.19 (95% CI 1.03 to 4.66) for CTAs, 3.55 (95% CI 2.02 to 6.24) for PAMs and 1.05 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.85) for ICIs, respectively. In time to the first infection-related AE analysis, the risks for any infection-related AE from CTAs and PAMs were higher than those from MTAs (HR 1.84 (95% CI 0.82 to 4.11); p=0.05 and 3.96 (95% CI 2.18 to 7.22); p<0.001). The risk from ICIs was not significantly different from that of MTAs (HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.10); p=0.19).

Conclusion

Our results validate that PAMs and CTAs carry a higher infection risk in patients with advanced solid tumours compared with MTAs. We suggest that the infection risk of ICIs is a similar infection risk to MTAs.

Checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of JC virus-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a frequently fatal brain infection caused by the JC polyomavirus (JCV). PML occurs in people with impaired cellular immunity, and the only effective treatment is restoration of immune function. Infection in immunocompromised hosts is often associated with immune exhaustion, which is mediated by inhibitory cell surface receptors known as immune checkpoints, leading to loss of T cell effector function. Blockade of immune checkpoints can reinvigorate host responses to fight infection. Recently, there have been several reports of checkpoint blockade to treat PML in patients in whom immune reconstitution is otherwise not possible, with some evidence for positive response. Larger studies are needed to better understand efficacy of checkpoint blockade in PML and factors that determine response.

Precision medicine in the clinical management of respiratory tract infections including multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: learning from innovations in immuno-oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the light of poor management outcomes of antibiotic-resistant respiratory tract infection (RTI)-associated sepsis syndrome and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), new management interventions based on host-directed therapies (HDTs) are warranted to improve morbidity, mortality and long-term functional outcomes. We review developments in potential HDTs based on precision cancer therapy concepts applicable to RTIs including MDR-TB.

RECENT FINDINGS

Immune reactivity, tissue destruction and repair processes identified during studies of cancer immunotherapy share common pathogenetic mechanisms with RTI-associated sepsis syndrome and MDR-TB. T-cell receptors (TCRs) and chimeric antigen receptors targeting pathogen-specific or host-derived mutated molecules (major histocompatibility class-dependent/ major histocompatibility class-independent) can be engineered for recognition by TCR γδ and natural killer (NK) cells. T-cell subsets and, more recently, NK cells are shown to be host-protective. These cells can also be activated by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or derived from allogeneic sources and serve as potential for improving clinical outcomes in RTIs and MDR-TB.

SUMMARY

Recent developments of immunotherapy in cancer reveal common pathways in immune reactivity, tissue destruction and repair. RTIs-related sepsis syndrome exhibits mixed immune reactions, making cytokine or ICI therapy guided by robust biomarker analyses, viable treatment options.

Do checkpoint inhibitors compromise the cancer patients' immunity and increase the vulnerability to COVID-19 infection?

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) has been declared a pandemic by the WHO that claimed the lives of thousands of people within a few months. Cancer patients represent a vulnerable population due to the acquired immunodeficiency associated with anti-cancer therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have largely impacted the prognosis of a multitude of malignancies with significant improvement in survival outcomes and a different, tolerable toxicity profile. In this paper, we assess the safety of ICI administration in cancer patients during the coronavirus pandemic in order to guide the usage of these highly efficacious agents.

Post-shingles granulomatous dermatosis related to anti-programmed cell death 1

The most recent progress in the oncology field has led to a paradigm shift in the management of cancer with the tsunami of immune checkpoint inhibitors that are associated with a particular pattern of immunological adverse events. This is a case of a 54-year-old woman that demonstrated a granulomatous reaction in the same dermatomal distribution of a previously treated shingles infection during treatment with an anti-programmed death 1 agent (pembrolizumab) for a newly diagnosed stage IV Hodgkin lymphoma. The purpose of this case is to increase the awareness of oncologists dealing with a new pattern of side effects taking into account the patient's background and recent exposures to latent viruses such as herpes zoster to prevent unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic measures.

Recognition and management of the gastrointestinal and hepatic immune-related adverse events

Immunotherapy is revolutionizing the treatment paradigm for a broad spectrum of malignancies. However, the immune checkpoint inhibitors also cause a unique set of toxicities. In the digestive system, this has consisted for the most part as colitis and hepatotoxicity, but also include less-common manifestations. Baseline screening, early identification, timely diagnosis, rapid and adequate treatment can significantly minimize the toxicity of immunotherapy and improve prognosis. This article provides a comprehensive review of gastrointestinal and hepatic immune-related toxicities, including incidence, mechanism, clinical manifestation, diagnosis, treatment, and guidelines for resumption of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Fatal Adverse Events Associated with Pembrolizumab in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Pembrolizumab as an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has emerged as an effective treatment for many cancers. It has unique immune-related adverse events (irAE) and little is known about its risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs). We conducted a meta-analysis of clinical trials to determine the incidence and risk of FAEs with pembrolizumab.Methods: A systematic search for phase I-III clinical trials of pembrolizumab was conducted using databases including PUBMED and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conferences until October 2018. Eligible studies included prospective clinical trials of pembrolizumab with available data on FAE. Data on FAE was extracted from each study and pooled for calculations. Incidence, relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by employing fixed or random-effects models.Results: A total of 11 clinical trials with 3713 patients were included for analysis. The overall incidence of FAE with pembrolizumab was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.5-2.8%). The incidence of FAE significantly varied among different tumor types (p = .02), ranging from 0.2% in melanoma to 3.1% in breast cancer, and with its combination with chemotherapy (0.7%, 95% CI: 0.4-1.2% versus 7.0%, 95% CI: 4.9-10%; p<.01). Chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab 7.0% (95%CI: 4.9-10) as compared to pembrolizumab alone 0.7%, (95% CI: 0.4-1.2; p < .001). There was no significant difference in the risk of FAEs when pembrolizumab was compared with chemotherapy with RR = 1.24 (95% CI: 0.8-1.89; p = .31). The most common FAEs were due to infectious complication (26.5%), cardiac toxicity (14.7%) and pneumonitis (13.2%).Conclusions: The risk of FAEs with pembrolizumab may be similar to chemotherapy in cancer patients and may vary with tumor types and its combination with chemotherapy.

SEOM clinical guideline for the management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (2019)

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has emerged as an effective treatment option for patients with several tumor types. By increasing the activity of the immune system, they can induce inflammatory side effects, which are often termed immune-related adverse events. These are pathophysiologically unique toxicities, compared with those from other anticancer therapies. In addition, the spectrum of the target organs is very broad. Immune-inflammatory adverse events can be life threatening. Prompt diagnosis and pharmacological intervention are instrumental to avoid progression to severe manifestations. Consequently, clinicians require new skills to successfully diagnose and manage these events. These SEOM guidelines have been developed with the consensus of ten medical oncologists. Relevant studies published in peer-review journals were used for the guideline elaboration. The Infectious Diseases Society of America grading system was used to assign levels of evidence and grades of recommendation.

Recommendation for the diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor related infections

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely used in the management of malignant tumors. Programmed death 1 (PD‐1)/PD‐1 ligand (PD‐L1) inhibitors have been introduced to treat non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years. Currently, PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors are considered to have minor side effects and do not independently increase the risk of infection. However, they may cause immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) that require immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants, leading to opportunistic infections. Furthermore, there have been reports describing reactivation of chronic/latent infections without irAEs or having received immunosuppressants. Thus, immune checkpoint inhibitor related infections have received more attention worldwide. In this paper, we review available clinical data, describe the potential mechanism, and propose recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitor‐related infections.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and endocrine side effects, a narrative review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) are novel drugs in the field of oncology however carry the risk of immune-related dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and endocrine side effects which can be fatal. These new innovative immunoregulatory drugs have intertwined the fields of oncology and endocrinology. CTLA-4 and PD-1 are co-inhibitory receptors on T cells that turn the T cell 'off' when binding to receptors on APCs. Tumor cells can also carry receptors for CTLA- and PD-1. By rendering T cells inactive, tumor cells can evade immune attack. Antibodies that bind to CTLA-4 and PD-1 lead to T cell activation and destruction of both tumor and normal host cells. ICPIs have been used in a variety of malignancies including melanoma, kidney cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. A unique underrecognized side effect of the autoimmune response is hypophysitis leading to central adrenal insufficiency which can be fatal. Additional immune-related adverse events (irAEs) include hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, diabetes, and hypoparathyroidism.

Acute cerebellar ataxia due to Epstein-Barr virus under administration of an immune checkpoint inhibitor

A 71-year-old male patient with adenocarcinoma of the lung and contralateral lung metastasis under administration of pembrolizumab had symptoms of cerebellar ataxia. We suspected that the symptoms were immune-related adverse events (irAE), but the patient was subsequently diagnosed as cerebellitis due to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. After steroid pulse therapy, the symptoms of cerebellar ataxia improved immediately. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can induce neurological adverse events and cause acute cerebellar ataxia. Initially, irAEs were suspected in this case. His clinical data suggested that reactivation of the virus had occurred because the ICI affected his immune system. This is the first report of a case of acute cerebellar ataxia due to EBV under administration of an ICI.

Severe Immune-Related Pneumonitis With PD-1 Inhibitor After Progression on Previous PD-L1 Inhibitor in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Objective: Combination therapy with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors might be viewed as a promising therapeutic strategy for resistant lung cancer, and it is becoming common that a second PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor might be used following progression on previous PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. However, a subgroup of patients will experience various autoimmune toxicities, termed as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), that occur as a result of on-target and off-tumor inflammation. Materials and Methods: In this report, we presented a patient with small cell lung cancer who received different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors during the course of disease progression. This patient experienced radiation-related pneumonitis, immune-related pneumonitis, as well as concomitant bacterial pneumonia. Results: In particular, this patient developed immune-related pneumonitis with a second PD-1 inhibitor when she had a progressive disease on previous PD-L1 inhibitor. This patient was initially responsive to steroid treatment, but rapidly develop more severe pneumonitis and concomitant bacterial pneumonia with no response to antibiotics and steroid treatment. Finally, this patient got a good clinical response when receiving additional immunosuppressive medications infliximab and mycophenolate mofetil. Conclusions: Patients with a history of radiation-induced pneumonitis and treated with sequential different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have a relative high risk to develop high-grade or steroid-resistant pneumonitis, and additional immunosuppressive medications should be used earlier when severe pulmonary toxicity occurs.

Clinical Features of Liver Injury Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Japanese Patients

AIM

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the survival rate of patients carrying various malignant neoplasms. Despite their efficacy, ICIs occasionally induce liver injury as an immune-related adverse event (irAE). This study aimed to reveal the clinical features of the hepatic irAE in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Among 387 patients treated with ICIs, those who developed drug-induced liver injury were investigated. We also describe the histological findings and clinical courses of four patients with hepatic irAE who underwent liver biopsy.

RESULTS

Among the 56 patients with all-grade liver injury, only 11 (19.6%) showed hepatocellular-type liver injury, which resembled autoimmune hepatitis. Thirty-four patients (60.7%) developed cholestatic or mixed-type liver injury, although only one patient showed abnormal image findings in the bile duct. Most patients with grade ≤2 liver injury improved spontaneously, while two patients with biliary dysfunction required ursodeoxycholic acid or prednisolone. Among eight patients with grade ≥3 liver injury, three required no immunosuppressants and five were treated with prednisolone (three of five patients required other types of immunosuppressants). Four patients in the case series showed diverse clinical features in terms of hepatotoxic pattern, symptoms, and the interval time between the initiation of immunotherapy and the onset of the hepatic irAE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ICIs could cause microscopic biliary disorder without any abnormal image finding. Because the hepatic irAE presents diverse clinical features, liver biopsy is recommended to provide appropriate treatments.

Ramsay-Hunt syndrome and subsequent sensory neuropathy as potential immune-related adverse events of nivolumab: a case report

Background

Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and is used for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several immune-mediated neurological adverse events associated with ICIs have been reported to date, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome. Nivolumab-associated neurological adverse events can vary, and their etiology remains unclear.

Case presentation

A 72-year-old man with NSCLC was treated with nivolumab as a second-line therapy. After 13 rounds of nivolumab therapy, he presented with Ramsay-Hunt syndrome (RHS) followed by acute ataxic sensory neuropathy. Antiviral therapy for Varicella-Zoster virus and prednisolone resulted in partial improvement of RHS, while almost no recovery was observed in the sensory neuropathy. However, the sensory ataxia significantly improved after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy, and interestingly, the facial palsy associated with RHS also improved. The neurological manifestations, nerve conduction study result, and imaging findings supported that dorsal root ganglia were the primary lesion site of acute ataxic sensory neuropathy.

Conclusions

Our case presented with the comorbidity of RHS and subsequent ataxic sensory neuropathy after nivolumab therapy to whom IVIg was effective. Our case suggested the wide variability of possible neurological symptoms, and the potential usefulness of IVIg to sensory ataxic neuropathy, seen in cancer patients with ICI treatment.

Checkpoint inhibitors in AML: are we there yet?

Immunotherapy is distinct from traditional chemotherapy in that it acts on immune cells rather than cancer cells themselves. Monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints on T cells - CTLA-4 and PD-1 - and PD-L1 on the cells of immune microenvironment are now approved for clinical use in several solid tumors and hematological malignancies. This article provides a general overview of the use of checkpoint inhibitors in hematologic malignancies with a special focus in acute myeloid leukemia.

[Recommendation of Diagnosis and Management for the Infections Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors]

免疫检查点抑制剂（immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs）已成功应用于多种恶性肿瘤治疗，其中程序化细胞死亡蛋白（programmed death 1, PD-1）/程序化细胞死亡配体-1（programmed death ligand 1, PD-L1）抑制剂近年来开始用于非小细胞肺癌中。目前认为PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂具有较小的副作用，并不会增加感染风险。但目前出现了免疫治疗相关不良事件（immune-related adverse events, irAEs）使用糖皮质激素和免疫抑制剂后出现机会性感染，及未出现irAEs的情况下发生潜伏/慢性感染重新激活的病案报道，使得免疫检查点抑制剂相关感染开始受到重视。本文将针对PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂相关感染的现有临床数据、可能机制及诊治建议进行叙述。

Pulmonary complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-P) during cancer treatment is rarely observed (<5%). ICI-P is more often observed in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than in those with other cancers. Likewise, it is more common in those receiving programmed cell death (PD)-1/PD-1 ligand inhibitors rather than cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 inhibitors alone. The frequency of ICI-P is higher when anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 are administered concomitantly. Despite the low fatality rate (≈13%), ICI-P is the leading cause of ICI-related deaths. This narrative review focuses on the epidemiology, clinical and radiological presentation and prognosis of ICI-P occurring in patients, especially those with advanced NSCLC. Emphasis is placed on the differences in terms of frequency or clinical picture observed depending on whether the ICI is used as monotherapy or in combination with another ICI or chemotherapy. Other pulmonary complications observed in cancer patients, yet not necessarily immune-related, are reviewed, such as sarcoid-like granulomatosis, tuberculosis or other infections. A proposal for pragmatic management, including differential diagnosis and therapeutic strategies, is presented, based on the ICI-P series reported in the literature and published guidelines.

Efficacy and Adverse Events of Immunotherapy with Checkpoint Inhibitors in Older Patients with Cancer

The number of older patients with cancer is increasing as a result of the ageing of Western societies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved cancer treatment and are associated with lower rates of treatment-related toxicity compared with chemotherapy in the general population. Nonetheless, immune checkpoint inhibitors have potentially serious immune-related adverse events, which might have a greater impact on older and more vulnerable patients and potentially influence treatment efficacy and quality of life. Previous clinical trials have shown no major increase in immune-related adverse events; however, older patients are underrepresented and relatively healthy in these trials. Observational studies suggest that older and more vulnerable patients may be at a higher risk of immune-related adverse events and early treatment discontinuation. Geriatric assessment could help identify older patients who will benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Knowledge Gaps and Research Priorities in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-related Pneumonitis. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Rationale: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer care but are associated with unique adverse events, including potentially life-threatening pneumonitis. The diagnosis of ICI-pneumonitis is increasing; however, the biological mechanisms, clinical and radiologic features, and the diagnosis and management have not been well defined.Objectives: To summarize evidence, identify knowledge and research gaps, and prioritize topics and propose methods for future research on ICI-pneumonitis.Methods: A multidisciplinary group of international clinical researchers reviewed available data on ICI-pneumonitis to develop and refine research questions pertaining to ICI-pneumonitis.Results: This statement identifies gaps in knowledge and develops potential research questions to further expand knowledge regarding risk, biologic mechanisms, clinical and radiologic presentation, and management of ICI-pneumonitis.Conclusions: Gaps in knowledge of the basic biological mechanisms of ICI-pneumonitis, coupled with a precipitous increase in the use of ICIs alone or combined with other therapies, highlight the importance in triaging research priorities for ICI-pneumonitis.

Checkpoint Inhibition and Infectious Diseases: A Good Thing?

The mammalian immune system has evolved the capacity to detect and destroy tumor cells. Tumors utilize multiple strategies to evade host immune surveillance, including the induction of the checkpoint molecules cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) to suppress antitumor immunity. Pharmacologic blockade of these molecules with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) restores T cell function and prolongs survival in patients with various malignancies. Emerging evidence suggests that the same checkpoint pathways may play a crucial role during infections. Indeed, CPIs appear promising as immunotherapeutic agents in infectious diseases, although their efficacy varies depending on pathogen-, cell-, and organ-specific factors. More research will be necessary to clarify the effects and safety of CPIs on clinically relevant outcomes of human infection.

Reactivation of tuberculosis in cancer patients following administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors: current evidence and clinical practice recommendations

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) have revolutionized cancer treatment producing remarkable and durable responses for a range of malignancies. However, the additional modulation of immune response by ICBs may rarely cause immune-related infectious complications, including re-activation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBC) with detrimental effects on those patients’ outcome. Here, we present two “real-world” melanoma cases that were treated in our department with blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 and developed active Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) during immunotherapy. In view of these cases, we review the literature for ICB-associated MTB reactivation and discuss our considerations about the possible interactions of immunotherapy and the underlying co-existent mycobacterial infection. Based on the current evidence from preclinical findings prior to this experience, we raise questions regarding cancer patients who are at higher risk for developing MTB infection, whether ICB-treated patients should be considered immunocompromised, and how they should be managed for latent and/or active tuberculosis. Aside from the well-established clinical benefit of immunotherapy, the blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 axis may concurrently disrupt the immune control of specific opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis that should be carefully and expectantly managed in order to avoid compromising the outcome of cancer treatment and the affected patient’s survival.

Invasive Aspergillosis in a Patient with Stage III (or 3a or 3b) Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Durvalumab

Durvalumab is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody that blocks the checkpoint inhibitor, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), resulting in T-cell activation and an antitumor response. Durvalumab is approved for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which has not progressed following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. A 63-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 15-day history of increasing shortness of breath. Several months previously, he had been diagnosed with a poorly differentiated stage IIIB NSCLC. He had completed six cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin and four cycles of immunotherapy with durvalumab 13 days before his emergency hospital admission. Computed tomography (CT) imaging showed a large left-sided loculated hydropneumothorax suggestive of empyema, patchy opacification of the left lung, and a left upper lobe lung mass. Histology of the cell block from the pleural fluid and decorticated lung tissue showed hyphae suggestive of invasive Aspergillus fumigatus. Treatment with voriconazole resulted in clinical improvement. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of pleural aspergillosis in a patient treated with durvalumab. However, the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncology requires increased awareness by clinicians of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to opportunistic infection.

Harnessing immune checkpoints for cancer therapy

Immunomodulatory antibodies that directly trigger and reawaken suppressed T-cell effector function are termed 'checkpoint inhibitors'. CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 molecules are the most studied inhibitory immune check points against cancer and because of this therapeutic property have entered the clinic for treating a variety of tumor types. The results so far demonstrate a positive impact on cancer remission. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that targeting a number of other T-cell surface molecules including both positive and negative immune regulators, also possesses strong antitumor activity. Some of these molecules have already entered clinical trials. In this report, we briefly highlight the status of these immune checkpoint inhibitors and discuss their side effects and future directions for their use.