Consequences of long-term oral corticosteroid therapy and its side-effects in severe asthma in adults: a focused review of the impact data in the literature

Severe asthma assessment, management and the organisation of care in Australia and New Zealand: expert forum roundtable meetings

Severe asthma imposes a significant burden on individuals, families and the healthcare system. Treatment is complex, due to disease heterogeneity, comorbidities and complexity in care pathways. New approaches and treatments improve health outcomes for people with severe asthma. However, emerging multidimensional and targeted treatment strategies require a reorganisation of asthma care. Consensus is required on how reorganisation should occur and what areas require further research. The Centre of Excellence in Severe Asthma convened three forums between 2015 and 2018, hosting experts from Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The forums were complemented by a survey of clinicians involved in the management of people with severe asthma. We sought to: (i) identify areas of consensus among experts; (ii) define activities and resources required for the implementation of findings into practice; and (iii) identify specific priority areas for future research. Discussions identified areas of unmet need including assessment and diagnosis of severe asthma, models of care and treatment pathways, add-on treatment approaches and patient perspectives. We recommend development of education and training activities, clinical resources and standards of care documents, increased stakeholder engagement and public awareness campaigns and improved access to infrastructure and funding. Further, we propose specific future research to inform clinical decision-making and develop novel therapies. A concerted effort is required from all stakeholders (including patients, healthcare professionals and organisations and government) to integrate new evidence-based practices into clinical care and to advance research to resolve questions relevant to improving outcomes for people with severe asthma.

How I Do It: Managing Corticosteroid-Related Comorbidities in Severe Asthma

Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in severe asthma remains all too common despite advances in asthma treatment. Use of OCS is associated with significant toxicity that can have a lasting adverse impact on a patient's overall health. Monoclonal antibodies have been developed that reduce both the rate of occurrence of OCS-treated exacerbations and the OCS requirements in patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. This article describes strategies to prevent and best manage endocrine complications associated with OCS use and provides guidance on OCS dose management after the introduction of steroid-sparing therapies. (1) We identify OCS-dependent patients and assess for comorbidities including bone health, glycemic control, and adrenal function; (2) we begin attempts at OCS dose optimization before or soon after introducing a steroid-sparing biologic therapy; (3) we taper OCS, using explicit criteria for asthma control; (4) we assess hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis integrity once a physiologic dose of OCS is achieved to guide further the rate of OCS taper; and (5) we manage corticosteroid-related comorbidities as detailed in this article.

Overcoming Barriers to the Effective Management of Severe Asthma in Italy

Introduction

People with severe asthma (SA) often have poor disease control and quality of life, and are at high risk of exacerbations, lung function decline and asthma-related death. The present expert opinion article aimed to identify unmet needs in the management of SA in Italy, and propose possible solutions to address these needs.

Methods

At five multidisciplinary events in Italy, attendees identified factors that interfered with the effective management of SA and suggested how these barriers could be overcome. A core group of 12 Italian experts (pulmonologists, general practitioners, allergists, payers and patients) identified the main issues and proposed possible solutions based on the results from the meetings and relevant articles from the literature.

Results and Conclusions

We reviewed the gap between real-world practice and guidelines, oral corticosteroid overuse, SA-related mortality, and barriers to effective SA treatment. Common themes were lack of awareness about SA among both patients and clinicians, and lack of networking/information exchange between those involved in the treatment of SA. Participants agreed on the need to implement patient education and create multidisciplinary groups of specialists to improve SA management through multidisciplinary educational initiatives, meetings with local experts, development of a flow chart for referral/connection with local experts and specialized centers. Clinical instruments that might help specialists improve SA management included referral networks, integrated care pathways, phenotyping and treatment algorithms, exacerbation tracking, and examination of electronic medical records for patients with uncontrolled asthma. The following actions need to be implemented in Italy: i) maximize the use of advanced therapies, eg, biologics; ii) increase/improve education for physicians and patients; iii) improve multidisciplinary communication and care coordination; iv) introduce regional and local protocols for SA diagnosis and treatment; and v) change the structure of healthcare services to reduce specialist waiting times and facilitate access to biologic therapies.

Long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with allergic asthma: A real-life study

Background: The efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma have been established in both randomized controlled trials and real-life studies. Objective: To evaluate the sustained effectiveness and safety of long-term treatment with omalizumab in a real-world setting. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients treated with omalizumab for at least 8 years in four asthma clinics in Greece. Pulmonary function, asthma control, oral corticosteroids (OCS) dose, and exacerbations were recorded before treatment, 6 months later, and annually thereafter. Adverse events were also recorded. Results: Forty-five patients (66.7% women), mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 55.3 ± 12.2 years, were included. The duration of treatment with omalizumab was 10.6 ± 1.2 years. The annual exacerbation rate decreased from 4.1 before omalizumab initiation to 1.1 after 1 year of treatment and remained low up to the 8th year of treatment (p < 0.001). From the 19 patients who were receiving OCS at baseline, 21.1% patients discontinued after 6 months, 47.4% were still on OCS after 4 years of therapy, and 31.6% were on OCS after 8 years. With regard to the OCS dose, 36.8% of the patients reduced the dose ≥ 50% after 6 months and 68.4% achieved 50% reduction after 2 years. The mean daily OCS dose before omalizumab initiation was 7.8 mg of prednisolone or the equivalent, reduced to 4.7 mg/day after 6 months, which reached 1.6 mg/day after 8 years (p < 0.001). Treatment with omalizumab resulted in significant improvements of asthma control and lung function. No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: In this real-life study, omalizumab resulted in significant and sustained improvements in asthma exacerbations, asthma control, and lung function, and had a steroid sparing effect and a good safety profile.

Demographic and clinical patterns of severe asthma in the Middle East

BACKGROUND:

Severe asthma is a major burden on health-economic resources; hence, knowing the epidemiology of these patients is important in planning and provision of asthma care. In addition, identifying and managing the comorbidities helps improve symptoms and reduce associated morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES:

Epidemiology of difficult asthma has not been well studied in the Middle East, so in this study, we present the demographic and clinical characteristics of severe asthma in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the notes of severe asthma patients attending three tertiary care hospitals between May 2015 and December 2019. Data on baseline demographics, asthma characteristics, treatment, and comorbidities were collected.

RESULTS:

We reviewed the notes of 458 patients (271 females and 187 males) that fulfilled the 2019 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines for the diagnosis of severe asthma. The mean age was 47.7 (standard deviation 17.2) years. Males had significantly higher asthma control test scores (17.9 vs. 16, P = 0.01) and mean blood eosinophils (0.401 vs. 0.294, P <0.01) than females. The most common comorbidity observed was allergic rhinitis (52.2%) followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease (27.1%). In total, 109 (23.8%) patients were on biological therapies with most patients being on omalizumab and dupilumab (29 and 18 patients, respectively). Most patients were nonsmokers (97.2%), and majority were of TH2-high phenotype (75.7%).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this first report of severe asthma characteristics in the UAE, we found a pattern of female preponderance and most patients having a Th2-high phenotype. The findings are likely to help optimize asthma care in the region in the era of biologic therapies.

Real-world treatment and health care resource use among severe asthma patients in Japan

BACKGROUND

There are limited studies on healthcare resource use (HCRU) among adult asthma patients in Japan using real-world evidence, and analysis on acute treatment and associated costs stratified by disease severity is further limited. This study aimed to characterize the disease burden of severe asthma patients in Japan in terms of HCRU and comorbid medical conditions, with particular interest in oral corticosteroid (OCS) dependency.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of asthma patients used data from a claims database of diagnosis procedure combination hospitals in Japan. The severe asthma cohort included patients treated with OCS for more than 180 days in one year before the index date, with at least one asthma diagnosis claim. Comorbidity and drug use in the look-back period, HCRU, assumed OCS-related adverse events, and asthma exacerbations in the follow-up period were analyzed.

RESULTS

Costs associated with the treatment of severe asthma were approximately twice that of mild/moderate asthma, and the annual median cost of patients hospitalized due to asthma reached ¥448,000 (USD $4073). Annual asthma exacerbation rate was higher in the severe asthma cohort than in the mild/moderate cohort. Patients with longer OCS use in the previous year had higher risks of secondary adrenal insufficiency, osteoporosis, and pneumonia in the following year.

CONCLUSIONS

OCS use among asthma patients in Japan incurred greater medical and economic burden. Better understanding of the disease characteristics including the severity of asthma and appropriate management of disease burden will lead to more optimal use of healthcare resources in Japan.

German regional variation of acute and high oral corticosteroid use for asthma

OBJECTIVE: 

To improve understanding of real-world asthma treatment and inform physician education, we evaluated regional variation in asthma prevalence and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use across Germany.

METHODS: 

We developed a machine learning gradient-boosted tree model with IMS® Disease Analyzer electronic medical records, which cover 3% of German patients. This model had a 91% accuracy in predicting the presence of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We applied the model to the IMS^® Longitudinal Prescription database, with 82% national coverage, to classify patients receiving treatment for airflow obstruction from October 2017-September 2018 in 63 regions in Germany.

RESULTS: 

Of 2.4 million individuals under statutory health insurance predicted to have asthma, 13.7%, 18.7%, 36.5%, 29.4%, and 1.7% received treatment classified as Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Steps 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Approximately 7-15% of those at GINA Steps 1-4 and 35% at Step 5 treatment received ≥1 acute OCS prescription (duration <10 days). Of patients receiving GINA Steps 1-4 and Step 5 treatments, 1-3% and 86%, respectively, received ≥1 high-dosage OCS prescription. Cumulative OCS dosage and percentages of patients receiving OCS differed substantially across regions, and regions with lower OCS use had greater use of biologic therapies.

CONCLUSIONS: 

Both acute and high OCS use varied regionally across Germany, with overall use suggesting patients are considerable risk of adverse effects and long-term health consequences.

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at publisher's website.

Essential role of smooth muscle Rac1 in severe asthma-associated airway remodelling

Background

Severe asthma is a chronic lung disease characterised by inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airway remodelling. The molecular mechanisms underlying uncontrolled airway smooth muscle cell (aSMC) proliferation involved in pulmonary remodelling are still largely unknown. Small G proteins of the Rho family (RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42) are key regulators of smooth muscle functions and we recently demonstrated that Rac1 is activated in aSMC from allergic mice. The objective of this study was to assess the role of Rac1 in severe asthma-associated airway remodelling.

Methods and results

Immunofluorescence analysis in human bronchial biopsies revealed an increased Rac1 activity in aSMC from patients with severe asthma compared with control subjects. Inhibition of Rac1 by EHT1864 showed that Rac1 signalling controlled human aSMC proliferation induced by mitogenic stimuli through the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling pathway. In vivo, specific deletion of Rac1 in SMC or pharmacological inhibition of Rac1 by nebulisation of NSC23766 prevented AHR and aSMC hyperplasia in a mouse model of severe asthma. Moreover, the Rac1 inhibitor prevented goblet cell hyperplasia and epithelial cell hypertrophy whereas treatment with corticosteroids had less effect. Nebulisation of NSC23766 also decreased eosinophil accumulation in the bronchoalveolar lavage of asthmatic mice.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that Rac1 is overactive in the airways of patients with severe asthma and is essential for aSMC proliferation. It also provides evidence that Rac1 is causally involved in AHR and airway remodelling. Rac1 may represent as an interesting target for treating both AHR and airway remodelling of patients with severe asthma.

Economic impact of mepolizumab in uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma, in real life

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Severe asthma is burdened by frequent exacerbations and use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) which worsen patients' health and increase healthcare spending. Aim of this study was to assess the clinical and economic effect of adding mepolizumab (MEP) for the treatment of these patients.

METHODS

Patients >18 years old, referred to 8 asthma clinics, starting MEP between May 2017 and December 2018, were enrolled and followed-up for 12 months. Information in the 12 months before mepolizumab were collected retrospectively. The evaluation parameters included: OCS use, number of exacerbations/hospitalizations, concomitant therapies, comorbidity, and annual number of working days lost due to the disease. The primary objective was to compare the annual total cost per patient pre- and post-MEP. Secondary outcomes included rates of exacerbations and number of OCS-dependent patients.

RESULTS

106 patients were enrolled in the study: 46 male, median age 58 years. Mean annual cost pre- and post-MEP (cost of biologic excluded) was €3996 and €1,527, respectively. Total savings due to MEP resulted in €2469 (95%CI 1945-2993), 62% due to exacerbations reduction and 33% due to productivity increase. Such savings could fund about 22% of the total cost of MEP for one year. The introduction of MEP induced a clinical benefit by reducing both OCS-dependent patients (OR = 0.12, 95%CI 0.06-0.23) and exacerbation rate (RR = 0.19, 95%CI 0.15-0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma experienced a clinical benefit in asthma control adding MEP to standard therapy. Biologic therapy can be, partially, funded by the savings produced by patients' improvement.

Poor outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with severe asthma on biologic therapy

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether asthma and asthma medications increase or decrease the risk of severe COVID-19, and this is particularly true for patients with severe asthma receiving biologics.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess incidence and disease course of COVID-19 in patients with severe asthma on biologic therapy (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab), as compared with COVID-19 data from the general Dutch population.

METHODS

COVID-19 cases were identified through a prospective ongoing survey between March 17 and April 30, 2020 among all severe asthma specialists from 15 hospitals of the Dutch Severe Asthma Registry RAPSODI. From these cases, data was collected on patient characteristics, including co-morbidities, COVID-19 disease progression and asthma exacerbations. Findings were then compared with COVID-19 data from the general Dutch population.

RESULTS

Of 634 severe asthma patients who received biologic therapy in RAPSODI, 9 (1.4%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Seven patients (1.1%) required hospitalization for oxygen therapy, of which 5 were admitted to the intensive care for intubation and mechanical ventilation. One patient died (0.16%). All intubated patients had ≥1 co-morbidities. Odds (95%CI) for COVID-19 related hospitalization and intubations were 14 (6.6-29.5) and 41 (16.9-98.5) times higher, respectively, compared to the Dutch population. One patient presented with an asthma exacerbation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe asthma using biologic therapy showed to have a more severe course of COVID-19 compared to the general population. This may be due to co-morbidities, the severity of asthmatic airway inflammation, the use of biologics, or a combination of these.

Testosterone attenuates pulmonary epithelial inflammation in male rats of COPD model through preventing NRF1-derived NF-κB signaling

Testosterone deficiency is common in male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and may correlate with the deterioration of COPD. Clinical research suggests that testosterone replacement therapy may slow the COPD progression, but the specific biological pathway remains unclear. In this study, we explored the effect of testosterone on pulmonary inflammation in male COPD rats. The animals were co-treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and cigarette to induce COPD. In COPD rats, nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF1) and NF-κB p65 were upregulated. In cigarette smoke extract (CSE)-, LPS-, or the combination of CSE and LPS-treated L132 cells, NRF1 and p65 were also upregulated. Silencing NRF1 resulted in the downregulation of p65. ChIP‒seq, ChIP‒qPCR, and luciferase results showed that NRF1 transcriptionally regulated p65. Both male and female COPD rats showed an upregulated NRF1 level and similar pulmonary morphology. But NRF1 was further upregulated in male castrated rats. Further supplementing testosterone in castrated male rats significantly reduced NRF1, pulmonary lesions, and inflammation. Supplementation of testosterone also reduced the phosphorylation of p65 and IKKβ induced by LPS or CSE in L132 cells. Our results suggest that testosterone plays a protective role in pulmonary epithelial inflammation of COPD through inhibition of NRF1-derived NF-κB signaling and the phosphorylation of p65.

The pharmacoeconomics of the state-of-the-art drug treatments for asthma: a systematic review

Asthma is a chronic disease characterized by significant morbidities and mortality, with a large impact on socio-economic resources and a considerable burden on health-care systems. In the standard care of asthma, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) associated with long-acting β-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA) are a reliable and often cost-effective choice, especially if based on the single inhaler therapy (SIT) strategy; however, in a subset of patients it is not possible to reach an adequate asthma control. In these cases, it is possible to resort to other pharmacologic options, including corticosteroids (OCS) or biologics. Unfortunately, OCS are associated with important side effects, whilst monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) allow excellent results, even if far more expensive. Up to now, the economic impact of asthma has not been compared with equivalent indicators in several studies. In fact, a significant heterogeneity of the cost analysis is evident in literature, for which the assessment of the real cost-effectiveness of asthma therapies is remarkably complex. To maximize the cost-effectiveness of asthma strategies, especially of biologics, attention must be paid on phenotyping and identification of predictors of response. Several studies were included, involving comparative analysis of drug treatments for asthma, comparative analysis of the costs and consequences of therapies, measurement and evaluation of direct drug costs, and the reduction of health service use. The initial research identified 389 articles, classified by titles and abstracts. A total of 311 articles were excluded as irrelevant and 78 articles were selected. Pharmacoeconomic studies on asthma therapies often report conflicting data also due to heterogeneous indicators and different populations examined. A careful evaluation of the existing literature is extremely important, because the scenario is remarkably complex, with an attempt to homogenize and interpret available data. Based on these studies, the improvement of prescriptive appropriateness and the reduction of the use of healthcare resources thanks to controller medications and to innovative therapies such as biologics partially reduce the economic burden of these treatments. A multidisciplinary stakeholder approach can also be extremely helpful in deciding between the available options and thus optimizing healthcare resources.

Efficacy and Safety of Biologic Agents in Chronic Urticaria, Asthma and Atopic Dermatitis - A Real-life Experience

Introduction:

Several biologic agents have been approved for the treatment of asthma, chronic urticaria and atopic dermatitis. These therapeutic agents are especially useful for patients with severe or refractory symptoms. We present the real-life experience of four of the commonly used biologic agents in the United Arab Emirates.

Methods:

In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed the demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment parameters for all patients treated with biologic agents.

Results:

270 patients received biologics at our centre between May 2015 and December 2019 with a median age of 36.5 years. Omalizumab was the most prescribed agent (n=183, 67.8%) followed by dupilumab (n=54, 20%), benralizumab (n=22, 8.1%) and mepolizumab (n=11, 4.1%). Urticaria was the commonest treatment indication (n=148, 55%) followed by asthma (n=105, 39%) and atopic dermatitis (n=13, 5%). All chronic urticaria patients were treated with omalizumab and showed improvement in the mean urticaria control test score from 6.7±4.47 to 12.02±4.17, with a p-value of 0.001. Dupilumab was found to be the most commonly prescribed drug for asthma (37%), followed by omalizumab (32%), benralizumab (21%) and mepolizumab (10%). The mean Asthma control test score for all asthmatics combined increased from 17.06 ± 5.4 to 19.44 ± 5.6, with p-value 0.0012 with treatment; FeNO reduced from 60.02 ± 45.74 to 29.11 ± 27.92, with p-value 0.001 and mean FEV1 improved from 2.38L ± 0.8 to 2.67L ± 0.78, with p-value 0.045. Only 4 patients in the entire cohort reported adverse events.

Conclusion:

Our study demonstrated that biological agents are a safe and effective treatment for atopic asthma, chronic urticaria and atopic dermatitis.

Patient perspectives on living with severe asthma in Denmark and Sweden

Background: Severe asthma has an acknowledged impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and is associated with substantial health care costs. This study aimed to investigate the patients' own experiences of the disease, perceptions of HRQOL, and awareness of disease management. Methods: This study included severe asthma patients in Sweden and Denmark. A quantitative Web-based survey and qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted. The survey included St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), and a study-specific questionnaire on quality of care and disease awareness. Telephone-based IDIs were conducted by medical interviewers following a semi-structured interview guide. Results: A total of 93 patients participated in the Web survey, and 33 participated in the IDIs. In the survey, the vast majority (77%; 72/93) had uncontrolled asthma (ACT<20). Mean total SGRQ score was 47.4 (59.7 symptom, 53.7 activity, 39.9 impact scores). Nearly 60% were treated in primary care. The IDIs revealed a long path to diagnosis, substantial and constant need for adaptations because of disease limitations, high burden on family members, social restrictions, and sick leaves and income losses. Patient awareness about guidelines, treatment goals, and available therapies was poor, and a low level of satisfaction by primary health care was seen. Conclusions: The vast majority of this severe asthma population had uncontrolled asthma and poor access to lung expert physicians. Impaired HRQOL despite patients' adaptations was indicated. These findings highlight the need for structured patient education and greater access to units with disease-specific knowledge.

Potential Severe Asthma Hidden in UK Primary Care

BACKGROUND

Severe asthma may be underrecognized in primary care.

OBJECTIVE

Identify and quantify patients with potential severe asthma (PSA) in UK primary care, the proportion not referred, and compare primary care patients with PSA with patients with confirmed severe asthma from UK tertiary care.

METHODS

This was a historical cohort study including patients from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (aged ≥16 years, active asthma diagnosis pre-2014) and UK patients in the International Severe Asthma Registry (UK-ISAR aged ≥18 years, confirmed severe asthma in tertiary care). In the OPCRD, PSA was defined as Global INitiative for Asthma 2018 step 4 treatment and 2 or more exacerbations/y or at Global INitiative for Asthma step 5. The proportion of these patients and their referral status in the last year were quantified. Demographic and clinical characteristics of groups were compared.

RESULTS

Of 207,557 Optimum Patient Care Research Database patients with asthma, 16,409 (8%) had PSA. Of these, 72% had no referral/specialist review in the past year. Referred patients with PSA tended to have greater prevalence of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist add-ons (54.1 vs 39.8%), and experienced significantly (P < .001) more exacerbations per year (median, 3 vs 2/y), worse asthma control, and worse lung function (% predicted postbronchodilator FEV₁/forced vital capacity, 0.69 vs 0.72) versus nonreferred patients. Confirmed patients with severe asthma (ie, UK patients in the International Severe Asthma Registry) were younger (51 vs 65 years; P < .001), and significantly (P < .001) more likely to have uncontrolled asthma (91.4% vs 62.5%), a higher exacerbation rate (4/y [initial assessment] vs 3/y), use inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist add-ons (67.7% vs 54.1%), and have nasal polyposis (24.2% vs 6.8) than referred patients with PSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Large numbers of patients with PSA in the United Kingdom are underrecognized in primary care. These patients would benefit from a more systematic assessment in primary care and possible specialist referral.

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab as add-on therapy to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma in Singapore

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab added to standard of care (SOC) compared with SOC alone among patients with severe uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma in the Singapore setting.

METHODS

A Markov model with three health states (asthma on mepolizumab and SOC, asthma on SOC alone, and death) was developed from a healthcare system perspective over a lifetime horizon. During each 4-week cycle, patients in the non-death health states could experience asthma exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroid burst, emergency department visit, or hospitalization. Asthma-related mortality following an exacerbation or all-cause mortality could also occur at each cycle. The model was populated using local costs while utilities were derived from international literature. Transition probabilities were obtained from a mixture of Singapore-specific and internationally published data.

RESULTS

The base-case analysis comparing mepolizumab plus SOC with SOC alone resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SGD335 486 (USD238 195) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the ICER was most sensitive to the price of mepolizumab, followed by the proportion of exacerbations which required hospital intensive care. Despite restricting mepolizumab use to patients with a higher baseline exacerbation rate (3 in the past year) in a scenario analysis, the ICER remained high at SGD238 876 (USD 169 602) per QALY gained.

CONCLUSION

At its current price, mepolizumab is not considered a cost-effective use of healthcare resources in Singapore. Substantial price reductions for mepolizumab are required to improve its cost-effectiveness to an acceptable range. These results will be useful to inform national funding decisions.

Reducing oral corticosteroids in severe asthma (ROSA Project): a nationwide Portuguese consensus

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to build a national consensus to optimize the use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) in severe asthma in Portugal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A modified 3-round Delphi including 65 statements (topics on chronic systemic corticotherapy, therapeutic schemes, asthma safety and monitoring) was performed via online platform (October-November 2019). A five-point Likert-type scale was used (1-'strongly disagree'; 5-'strongly agree'). Consensus threshold was established as a percentage of agreement among participants ≥90% in the 1st round and ≥85% in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. The level of consensus achieved by the panel was discussed with the participants (face-to-face meeting).

RESULTS

Forty-eight expert physicians in severe asthma (specialists in allergology and pulmonology) participated in the study. Almost half of the statements (28/65; 43.1%) obtained positive consensus by the end of round one. By the end of the exercise, 12 (18.5%) statements did not achieve consensus. Overall, 87% of physicians agree that further actions for OCS cumulative risk assessment in acute asthma exacerbations are needed. The vast majority (91.7%) demonstrated a favorable perception for using biological agents whenever patients are eligible. Most participants (95.8%) are more willing to accept some degree of lung function deterioration compared to other outcomes (worsening of symptoms, quality of life) when reducing OCS dose. Monitoring patients' comorbidities was rated as imperative by all experts.

CONCLUSIONS

These results can guide an update on asthma management in Portugal and should be supplemented by studies on therapy access, patients' adherence, and costs.

Tiotropium in asthma - perspectives for the primary care physician

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by airway inflammation resulting from complex interactions between multiple hosts as well as environmental factors. As a chronic respiratory condition, asthma exerts a significant impact on patients and the healthcare system. Per the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with/without long-acting beta₂-agonists (LABAs) should be used as the preferred controllers for the management of asthma. Despite a range of therapeutic options, many patients with asthma remain uncontrolled, resulting in an increased risk of hospitalization and emergency room visits and a worsened quality of life. Tiotropium (Spiriva®, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 1.25 µg, two puffs, once daily), delivered via the Respimat® inhaler (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), was the first long-acting muscarinic antagonist to be approved as an add-on maintenance treatment option for patients with asthma aged ≥6 years at GINA steps 4 and 5. By binding to the muscarinic receptors M1 and M3 in the bronchial airways, tiotropium antagonizes the action of acetylcholine, leading to smooth muscle relaxation and reduced mucus secretion.The efficacy and safety of tiotropium add-on to ICS±LABA maintenance treatment have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with a range of asthma severities (mild, moderate, and severe) and across age groups (children, adolescents, and adults). Add-on tiotropium was found to be well tolerated and efficacious in all RCTs. Moreover, the findings from real-world studies complement results from RCTs, showing beneficial effects of tiotropium in reducing exacerbations, hospitalization, emergency room visits, and asthma worsening.In this review article, we discuss the pathophysiology of asthma and the role of tiotropium in the management of asthma from the perspective of a primary care physician.

Risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in asthma due to oral and inhaled corticosteroids: two population-based nested case-control studies

BACKGROUND

Inhaled (ICS) and oral (OCS) corticosteroids are used widely in asthma; however, the risk of osteoporosis and fragility fracture (FF) due to corticosteroids in asthma is not well-established.

METHODS

We conducted two nested case-control studies using linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) databases. Using an asthma cohort, we separately identified patients with osteoporosis or FF and gender-, age- and practice-matched controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine the association between ICS and OCS exposure, and the risk of osteoporosis or FF. The prevalence of patients receiving at least one bisphosphonate was also calculated.

RESULTS

There was a dose-response relationship between both cumulative dose and number of OCS/ICS prescriptions within the previous year, and risk of osteoporosis or FF. After adjusting for confounders, people receiving more OCS prescriptions (≥9 vs 0) had a 4.50 (95% CI 3.21 to 6.11) and 2.16 (95% CI 1.56 to 3.32) increased risk of osteoporosis and FF, respectively. For ICS (≥11 vs 0) the ORs were 1.60 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.10) and 1.31 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.68). The cumulative dose had a similar impact, with those receiving more OCS or ICS being at greater risk. The prevalence of patients taking ≥9 OCS and at least one bisphosphonate prescription was just 50.6% and 48.4% for osteoporosis and FF, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that exposure to OCS or ICS is an independent risk factors for bone health in patients with asthma. Steroid administration at the lowest possible level to maintain asthma control is recommended.

Comparative efficacy of glucocorticoid receptor agonists on Th2 cell function and attenuation by progesterone

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids (CS)s suppress cytokine production and induce apoptosis of inflammatory cells. Prednisone and dexamethasone are oral CSs prescribed for treating asthma exacerbations. While prednisone is more commonly prescribed, dexamethasone is long acting and a more potent glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonist. It can be administered as a one or two dose regime, unlike the five to seven days required for prednisone, a feature that increases compliance. We compared the relative ability of these two oral CSs to suppress type 2 inflammation. Since progesterone has affinity for the GR and women are more likely to relapse following an asthma exacerbation, we assessed its influence on CS action.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone suppressed the level of IL-5 and IL-13 mRNA within Th2 cells with ~ 10-fold higher potency than prednisolone (the active form of prednisone). Dexamethasone induced a higher proportion of apoptotic and dying cells than prednisolone, at all concentrations examined. Addition of progesterone reduced the capacity of both CS to drive cell death, though dexamethasone maintained significantly more killing activity. Progesterone blunted dexamethasone-induction of FKBP5 mRNA, indicating that the mechanism of action was by interference of the CS:GR complex.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone is both more potent and effective than prednisolone in suppressing type 2 cytokine levels and mediating apoptosis. Progesterone attenuated these anti-inflammatory effects, indicating its potential influence on CS responses in vivo. Collectively, our data suggest that when oral CS is required, dexamethasone may be better able to control type 2 inflammation, eliminate Th2 cells and ultimately lead to improved long-term outcomes. Further research in asthmatics is needed.

Long-Term Therapy Response to Anti-IL-5 Biologics in Severe Asthma-A Real-Life Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma show different responses to various anti-IL-5 biologics, ranging from super response to nonresponse. Residual disease manifestations observed in partial responders may prompt physicians to switch between biologics. More data on response, switches, and residual disease manifestations are needed to improve personalized treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To assess (1) prevalences and predictors of super, partial, and nonresponders to long-term anti-IL-5 treatment, (2) frequency and reasons for switches between anti-IL-5 biologics, and (3) nature of residual disease manifestations.

METHODS

In this 2-year follow-up study, patients with severe asthma were included who initiated an anti-IL-5 biologic (mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab) (n = 114). Patient characteristics (clinical, functional, inflammatory) and comorbidities were collected at baseline and 2-year follow-up. "Super responders" showed no residual disease manifestations at 2-year follow-up, "partial responders" experienced residual disease manifestations, and "nonresponders" discontinued anti-IL-5 treatment after less than 2 years because of clinical worsening.

RESULTS

After 2-year anti-IL-5 treatment, 14% of patients were super responders, 69% partial responders, and 11% nonresponders. Super response was predicted by shorter asthma duration and higher FEV₁, and tended to be associated with adult-onset asthma, absence of nasal polyps, and lower body mass index. Switches between anti-IL-5 biologics occurred frequently (41%). After 2-year treatment, most common residual disease manifestations included impaired lung function (59%), uncontrolled sinonasal disease (58%), and uncontrolled asthma symptoms (48%).

CONCLUSIONS

After 2 years of anti-IL-5 treatment, a favorable response was found in 83% of patients with severe asthma, including a super response in 14%. Most partial responders show impaired lung function or uncontrolled sinonasal disease, causing physicians to switch between biologics.

Real-life safety and efficacy of omalizumab in Japanese patients with severe allergic asthma who were subjected to dosing table revision or expansion: A post-marketing surveillance

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab is an anti-immunoglobulin E monoclonal antibody approved for patients with severe allergic asthma in Japan. With regard to omalizumab dosage in Japanese adults with severe allergic asthma in clinical practice settings, this post-marketing surveillance evaluated safety and efficacy of the dosing table revision (DTR) based on a dosing regimen of omalizumab administration every 4 weeks dosing regimen and dosing table expansion (DTE) for patients with baseline IgE levels >700 IU/mL.

METHODS

This 52-week, multicenter study, conducted from September 2013 to November 2018, evaluated omalizumab safety outcomes including adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), efficacy outcomes including Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE), change in oral corticosteroid dose, and asthma exacerbation-related events such as hospitalization, emergency room visits, and worsening of symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the 405 patients registered in the study, safety was evaluated in 392 and efficacy in 390. The mean age of patients was 58.5 years and 58.7% were women. In total, 41.3% of the patients were subjected to DTE and 58.7% to DTR. In the safety dataset, 6.6% experienced an ADR, 32.9% experienced an AE, and 16.1% experienced an SAE. In the efficacy dataset, 63.3% of patients at Week 16 and 63.5% at Week 52 had an 'effective' or 'good' GETE score. Omalizumab was associated with a reduction in worsening of asthma symptoms requiring systemic corticosteroids and frequency of hospitalization. All outcomes were comparable among the DTE and DTR subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this study support the safety and efficacy of omalizumab administered based on the revised and expanded dosing table in Japanese patients with severe allergic asthma.

The effects of oral corticosteroids on lung function, type-2 biomarkers and patient-reported outcomes in stable asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have investigated the physiological effect of OCS in stable asthma, however these have included heterogeneous populations and outcomes. This paper is the first to combine their results.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases for studies reporting the impact of OCS on FEV₁, FVC, blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score or Asthma Quality Of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score in stable asthma. We extracted data on the correlates of OCS response.

RESULTS

61 studies, comprising 1608 patients, were included. FEV₁ was improved by 9% (95% CI: 7, 11). There were stronger increases in FEV₁ among those with a mean baseline FEV₁<60% predicted (19%, 95% CI: 13, 24). Despite these improvements, substantial residual impairment remained after treatment. Blood eosinophils were reduced by 76% (95% CI: 63, 88) with larger decreases in studies of corticosteroid-naïve patients (93%, 95% CI: 73,100). Sputum eosinophils were reduced by 89% (95% CI: 79, 98) while FeNO was decreased by 35% (95% CI: 28, 41). ACQ scores were reduced by 20% (95% CI: 11, 29). Patients with higher baseline lung function impairment, sputum eosinophils, blood eosinophils and FeNO had improved OCS response.

INTERPRETATION

OCS consistently improves lung function, reduces markers of type-2 inflammation, and alleviates asthma symptoms. However, substantial residual impairment remained following treatment and mean improvements were below the minimally important clinically difference. Patients with increased markers of type-2 inflammation are more responsive to treatment, suggesting these should be used to better target OCS use.

Trends in long-term glucocorticoid use and risk of 5-year mortality: a historical cohort study in South Korea

PURPOSE

This study investigated trends in chronic glucocorticoid (GC) use in South Korea, and determined the association between chronic GC use and 5-year all-cause mortality.

METHODS

A sample cohort was extracted from the South Korean National Health Insurance database. Patients prescribed a continuous dose of GC for ≥30 days were defined as chronic GC users. Time-dependent Cox regression was used for statistical analysis, and chronic GC exposure was considered a time-varying variable.

RESULTS

The prevalence of chronic GC use gradually increased from 0.16% in 2002 to 0.54% in 2015. In the 2010 cohort (n = 822,097), chronic GC users had a significantly 1.41-fold higher 5-year all-cause mortality compared with controls [hazard ratio: 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-1.55, P < 0.001]. On sensitivity analysis, chronic high-dose GC users showed 1.52-fold (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.32-1.76; P < 0.001) and low-dose GC users showed 1.34-fold (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.18-1.51; P < 0·001) higher 5-year all-cause mortality, compared with controls; the disease-specific 5-year mortality risk in chronic GC users was highest due to musculoskeletal disease (HR: 9.50), followed by infectious and parasitic diseases (HR: 2.43), and respiratory disease (HR: 2.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Numbers of chronic GC users gradually increased during 2002-2015; chronic GC use increased risks of 5-year all-cause mortality in the general adult South Korean population. This association was more evident among high-dose GC users (>5 mg/day of prednisolone). The risk of disease-specific mortality among chronic GC users was increased in those with musculoskeletal, infectious and parasitic, and respiratory diseases.

Association Between Oral Corticosteroid Bursts and Severe Adverse Events : A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Long-term use of oral corticosteroids has known adverse effects, but the risk from brief oral steroid bursts (≤14 days) is largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the associations between steroid bursts and severe adverse events, specifically gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, sepsis, and heart failure.

DESIGN

Self-controlled case series.

SETTING

Entire National Health Insurance Research Database of medical claims records in Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged 20 to 64 years with continuous enrollment in the National Health Insurance program from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2015.

MEASUREMENTS

Incidence rates of severe adverse events in steroid burst users and non-steroid users, as well as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for severe adverse events within 5 to 30 and 31 to 90 days after initiation of steroid therapy.

RESULTS

Of 15 859 129 adult participants, 2 623 327 who received a single steroid burst were included. The most common indications were skin disorders and respiratory tract infections. The incidence rates per 1000 person-years in steroid bursts were 27.1 (95% CI, 26.7 to 27.5) for GI bleeding, 1.5 (CI, 1.4 to 1.6) for sepsis, and 1.3 (CI, 1.2 to 1.4) for heart failure. Rates of GI bleeding (IRR, 1.80 [CI, 1.75 to 1.84]), sepsis (IRR, 1.99 [CI, 1.70 to 2.32]), and heart failure (IRR, 2.37 [CI, 2.13 to 2.63]) significantly increased within 5 to 30 days after steroid therapy initiation and attenuated during the subsequent 31 to 90 days.

LIMITATION

Persons younger than 20 years or older than 64 years were not included.

CONCLUSION

Oral corticosteroid bursts are frequently prescribed in the general adult population in Taiwan. The highest rates of GI bleeding, sepsis, and heart failure occurred within the first month after initiation of steroid therapy.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Health Research Institutes, Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Quantification of Glucocorticoid-Associated Morbidity in Severe Asthma Using the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoid (GC)-associated morbidity in severe asthma (SA) is well recognized but varies in individual patients; systematic measurement of GC toxicity is important to measure improvement with steroid-sparing monoclonal antibodies.

OBJECTIVE

To describe for the first time individual patient GC toxicity in steroid-dependent SA using the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI).

METHODS

An observational consecutive patient cohort study was performed at a UK Regional SA Specialist clinic for systematic assessment of GC-associated morbidity using the GTI in routine clinical care. GTI was correlated with commonly used patient-reported outcome measures. An approach to GTI scoring, calculation of minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and development of digital GTI application in routine clinical care are described.

RESULTS

All patients had significant oral GC exposure (cumulative prednisolone/prior year, 4280 [3083, 5475] mg) with wide distribution of toxicity in individual patients (mean GTI score, 177.5 [73.7]). GTI score had only modest correlation with recent prednisolone exposure: maintenance prednisolone dose (rho = 0.26, P = .01), cumulative exposure/prior year (rho = 0.38, P < .001), and GC boosts/prior year (rho = 0.25, P = .01). GTI toxicity demonstrated stronger associations with asthma-related quality of life (mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [mini-AQLQ] r = -0.50, P < .001 and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire r = 0.42, P < .001). GTI MCID was calculated as 10 points. Multiple linear regression demonstrated that age and mini-AQLQ were strongest predictors of GC toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The GTI is a useful tool to systematically capture and quantify GC toxicity at the individual patient level. GC toxicity varies widely between individual patients with SA and correlated only modestly with GC exposure over the preceding year. Age and mini-AQLQ are better predictors of GC toxicity. The GTI and MCID will facilitate assessment of individual SA response to steroid-sparing agents in clinical trials and routine care.

Real-World Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma

BACKGROUND

Benralizumab is an IL5-receptor monoclonal antibody licensed for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). It has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials in reducing asthma exacerbation rates and maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCSs).

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the real-world effectiveness of benralizumab and what baseline characteristics are associated with response to therapy?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We assessed outcomes in all SEA patients who began benralizumab treatment at our specialist center. At each dosing visit, exacerbation history, mOCS dose, spirometry, and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6) and Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mAQLQ) scores were recorded. Response to treatment was defined as a reduction of ≥ 50% in annualized exacerbation rate (AER) or in mOCS dose after 48 weeks of treatment. Super response was defined as zero exacerbations and no mOCSs for asthma.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty patients were included in the analysis. At 48 weeks, a 72.8% reduction in AER was noted, from 4.92 ± 3.35 per year in the year preceding biologic treatment to 1.34 ± 1.71 per year (P < .001), including 57 patients (43.8%) who were exacerbation-free with benralizumab. In those receiving mOCSs (n = 74 [56.9%]), the median daily prednisolone dose fell from 10 mg (interquartile range, 5-20 mg) to 0 mg (interquartile range, 0-5 mg; P < .001), and 38 of 74 patients (51.4%) were able to discontinue mOCS therapy. Clinically and statistically significant improvements were found in ACQ6 scores, mAQLQ scores, and FEV₁. Overall, 51 patients (39%) met the super responder definition and 112 patients (86%) met the responder definition. The optimal regression model of super responders vs other responders included baseline characteristics associated with a strongly eosinophilic phenotype and less severe disease. Eighteen patients (13.8%) were nonresponders to benralizumab. Evidence of chronic airway infection was observed in 6 of 18 patients, and an increase in the blood eosinophil count consistent with the development of anti-drug antibodies was observed in 5 of 18 patients.

INTERPRETATION

In a large real-world SEA cohort, benralizumab led to significant improvements in all clinical outcome measures. A lack of response was seen in a minority of patients and should be a focus for future investigation.

Advances with glucocorticoids in the treatment of asthma: state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is one of the most frequent chronic diseases all over the world. Glucocorticoids (GCs), both inhaled (ICSs) and oral (OCSs), are the most effective treatment in asthma because they control symptoms and prevent exacerbations.

AREAS COVERED

The present article reviews the new therapeutic indications of GCs for the treatment of asthma and focuses on new molecules and safety issues.

EXPERT OPINION

Most patients with asthma benefit from corticosteroid-based treatments. Side effects are mainly due to prolonged use of oral GCs, while they are minor with inhaled GCs. Interesting insights come from the new ICSs, which are characterized by lower oral bioavailability and higher lipophilicity and are more effective with less side effects. Recent trials have shown the efficacy of early use of ICSs in mild asthma. Furthermore, the possibility to prescribe targeted therapies using specific biomarkers in steroid-sensitive asthma can reduce doses and duration of treatment, while biological agents should be reserved for non-responding patients. All this evidence confirm the need to continue on the path toward precision medicine, in which the treatments are based on clinical and molecular traits.

Association of low-dosage systemic corticosteroid use with disease burden in asthma

There is an ongoing debate about the benefit-risk balance of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) in asthma treatment. We investigated the associations between SCS use and disease burden in a database cohort of asthmatics, categorized into SCS and non-SCS prescription at baseline and quartiles (Q) by cumulative SCS dosage. Of the 10,579 patients, the SCS cohort comprised 3103 patients (29.3%). Mean SCS dosages at baseline were 0.08, 0.29, 0.79, and 4.58 mg/day in Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, respectively. Similar SCS dosages were used within each quartile throughout the study period. No remarkable changes in asthma severity or control status were observed. All SCS cohorts had a higher risk of intermittent SCS exposure during the observation period. SCS use was associated with osteoporosis, diabetes, anxiety/neurosis, and depression. SCS-dependent treatment does not necessarily lead to the future improvement of asthma control; rather, it may negatively impact systemic health, even at mean dosages <5 mg/day.

Bergenin-activated SIRT1 inhibits TNF-α-induced proinflammatory response by blocking the NF-κB signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Bergenin, a type of polyphenol compound, exhibits antiulcerogenic, anti-inflammatory, antitussive, and burn wound-healing properties. However, its therapeutic effect on tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)-induced proinflammatory responses in the airway and potential mechanisms of actions are still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory effects and mechanism of bergenin in TNF-α-stimulated human bronchial epithelial (16-HBE) cells.

METHODS

Cell Counting Kit-8 was used to evaluate cytotoxicity. Cytokine expression was analyzed by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immunofluorescence, western blot, and sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) activity assays were employed to investigate potential molecular mechanisms.

RESULTS

Bergenin obviously decreased both mRNA and protein expression levels of interleukins 6 and 8 (IL-6 and IL-8) in TNF-α-stimulated 16-HBE cells. Bergenin blocked TNF-α-mediated activation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling and NF-κB nuclear translocation. Interestingly, RT-qPCR and western blotting results revealed that bergenin did not affect SIRT1 expression, but significantly increased its activity. Bergenin-mediated SIRT1 activation was further confirmed by results indicating decreased acetylation levels of NF-κB-p65 and p53. Moreover, the inhibitory effects of bergenin on mRNA and protein expression levels of IL-6 and IL-8 were reversed by a SIRT1 inhibitor. In addition, combining bergenin and dexamethasone (DEX) yielded additive effects on the reduction of IL-6 and IL-8 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that bergenin could suppress TNF-α-induced proinflammatory responses by augmenting SIRT1 activity to block the NF-κB signaling pathway, which may provide beneficial effects for the treatment of airway inflammation associated with asthma.

Oral Corticosteroid Treatment Patterns of Patients in the United States with Persistent Asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with poor asthma control may receive oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy despite the risk for adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed OCS use frequency and treatment patterns in patients with persistent asthma in the United States (US).

METHODS

We used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters, Medicare Supplemental, and Medicaid Multistate Claims research databases to identify patients from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, who were ≥12 years old, met the 2-year Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set criteria for persistent asthma, and were continuously enrolled ≥6 months before (baseline) and ≥24 months after (follow-up) the persistent asthma index date. Patients were classified as high OCS use (defined as ≥450 mg of OCS prescribed within a 90-day period during follow-up), low use (use OCS but not meeting high use criteria), or no OCS use.

RESULTS

We identified 435,675 patients, of whom 65% used OCS and 19% were classified as high OCS users at some point during follow-up. The annual prevalence of high OCS use ranged from 5.3% in 2013 to 7.6% in 2017. During the entire follow-up, high and low OCS users filled an average of 2.2 and 0.8 OCS prescriptions and received an average daily dosage of 2.2 and 0.3 mg, respectively. Once the patients became high OCS users, the average daily OCS dosage was relatively stable (5.1-7.1 mg) over 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with persistent asthma in the US have substantial exposure to OCS. OCS therapy should be considered carefully to avoid associated adverse effects.

Reducing the hidden burden of severe asthma: recognition and referrals from primary practice

Since their introduction many decades ago, systemic corticosteroids have become a mainstay treatment for asthma. Despite being a highly effective therapy, corticosteroids can cause significant adverse effects in patients. This results in a "double hit" for some patients as they suffer the burden of disease as well as the burden of treatment-induced morbidity.This article aims to raise awareness of the potential, harmful side effects of prolonged or repeated exposure to systemic corticosteroids in asthma. It also highlights the importance of referral of the appropriate patients with asthma from primary care for specialist assessment once other considerations such as adherence, inhaler technique and co-morbidity have been evaluated. We propose a simple decision step that may help busy primary care physicians and general practitioners to identify patients who could benefit from specialist assessment.Our decision step suggests that a patient with asthma should be reviewed at least once by an asthma specialist if he/she (i) has received ≥2 courses of oral corticosteroids in the previous year; asthma remains uncontrolled despite good adherence and inhaler technique; or (ii) has attended an emergency department or was hospitalized for asthma care.Such referral could facilitate wider access to diagnostic tools, in-depth assessment of confounding comorbidities, and non-corticosteroid-based therapies as needed, which may be unavailable in primary practice.

Adherence to corticosteroids and clinical outcomes in mepolizumab therapy for severe asthma

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) achieve disease control in the majority of asthmatic patients, although adherence to prescribed ICS is often poor. Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma may require treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS) and/or biologic agents such as mepolizumab. It is unknown if ICS adherence changes on, or alters clinical response to, biologic therapy.

METHODS

We examined ICS adherence and clinical outcomes in OCS-dependent severe eosinophilic asthma patients who completed 1 year of mepolizumab therapy. The ICS medicines possession ratio (MPR) was calculated (the number of doses of ICS issued on prescription/expected number) for the year before and the year after biologic initiation. Good adherence was defined as MPR >0.75, intermediate 0.74-0.51 and poor <0.5. We examined outcomes after 12 months of biologic therapy, including OCS reduction and annualised exacerbation rate (AER), stratified by adherence to ICS on mepolizumab.

RESULTS

Out of 109 patients commencing mepolizumab, 91 who had completed 12 months of treatment were included in the final analysis. While receiving mepolizumab, 68% had good ICS adherence, with 16 (18%) having poor ICS adherence. ICS use within the cohort remained similar before (MPR 0.81±0.32) and during mepolizumab treatment (0.82±0.32; p=0.78). Patients with good adherence had greater reductions in OCS dose (median (interquartile range) OCS reduction 100 (74-100)% versus 60 (27-100)%; p=0.031) and exacerbations (AER change -2.1±3.1 versus 0.3±2.5; p=0.011) than those with poor adherence. Good ICS adherence predicted the likelihood of stopping maintenance OCS (adjusted OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.02-9.94; p=0.045).

CONCLUSION

ICS nonadherence is common in severe eosinophilic asthma patients receiving mepolizumab, and is associated with a lesser reduction in OCS requirements and AER.

Systematic Literature Review of Systemic Corticosteroid Use for Asthma Management

Systemic corticosteroid use to manage uncontrolled asthma and its associated healthcare burden may account for important health-related adverse effects. We conducted a systematic literature review to investigate the real-world extent and burden of systemic corticosteroid use in asthma. We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify English-language articles published in 2010–2017, using search terms for asthma with keywords for oral corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids. Observational studies, prescription database analyses, economic analyses, and surveys on oral/systemic corticosteroid use in children (>5 yr old), adolescents (12–17 yr old), and adults with asthma were included. We identified and reviewed 387 full-text articles, and our review included data from 139 studies. The included studies were conducted in Europe, North America, and Asia. Overall, oral/systemic corticosteroids were commonly used for asthma management and were more frequently used in patients with severe asthma than in those with milder disease. Long-term oral/systemic corticosteroid use was, in general, less frequent than short-term use. Compared with no use, long-term and repeated short-term oral/systemic corticosteroid use were associated with an increased risk of acute and chronic adverse events, even when doses were comparatively low. Greater oral/systemic corticosteroid exposure was also associated with increased costs and healthcare resource use. This review provides a comprehensive overview of oral/systemic corticosteroid use and associated adverse events for patients with all degrees of asthma severity and exposure duration. We report that oral/systemic corticosteroid use is prevalent in asthma management, and the risks of acute and chronic complications increase with the cumulative oral corticosteroid dosage.

Perception of oral corticosteroids in adult patients with asthma in France

OBJECTIVE

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are frequently used as relievers for acute asthma and controllers for severe asthma. However, the relief offered by OCS is counterbalanced by adverse effects. We aimed to describe how patients perceive OCS treatment benefits and risks, and how this could affect their adherence to the treatment.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with asthma registered with Carenity, an online patient community, were invited to respond to a questionnaire containing 35 closed and 3 open questions to assess their asthma and perceptions of OCS.

RESULTS

268/300 respondents were receiving or had received OCS for asthma (58 for long-term use and 107 for short-term use). The mean age at diagnosis was 21.3 years. 66% had uncontrolled asthma (GINA control score 3 or 4). Although 42% perceived OCS to be efficacious, 46% mentioned adverse effects. Respondents were mostly satisfied with OCS (median = 7.0/10), particularly for efficacy (median = 8.0/10). Respondents reported having strategies to avoid OCS, mainly because of adverse effects. 26% of respondents had previously reduced or stopped OCS; this proportion was 22% for short-term OCS users and 36% for long-term users. 15% of the respondents not receiving long-term OCS would take the treatment without doing anything else if long-term OCS were prescribed; 42% would seek an alternative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

OCS for asthma is perceived efficient but associated with adverse effects. Patients seek alternative treatment.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps impact in severe asthma patients: Evidences from the Severe Asthma Network Italy (SANI) registry

BACKGROUND

The clinical and laboratory features of patients enrolled in the Severe Asthma Network in Italy (SANI) registry, a web-based observatory collecting demographic, clinical, functional and inflammatory data of patients with severe asthma were evaluated, with a special emphasis to chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP).

METHODS

For each eligible patients the following information has been collected: demographic data, clinical features, asthma control in the previous month according to the GINA (Global INitiative for Asthma) Guidelines and standardized questionnaires, concomitant regular and on demand treatments and inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

695 patients with severe asthma enrolled in 66 SANI centers were analyzed. The prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis was 40.6%. Atopic dermatitis and bronchiectasis was significantly more frequent in patients with CRSwNP than in subjects without nasal polyposis; similarly, FeNO values are significantly higher in subject with CRSwNP than in patients without nasal polyposis. Finally, patients with CRSwNP had a significantly higher number of asthma exacerbations per year, more days on oral corticosteroids and were more likely to be OCS long term users.

CONCLUSION

OCS sparing is needed in patients with severe asthma, mainly in subjects with CRSwNP, adopting adequate strategies such as a better adherence to the treatment with inhaled therapy according to the GINA recommendations, the use of biologic agents and a multidisciplinary approach of the patient.

[The management of asthma as a chronic inflammatory disease and global health problem: A position paper from the scientific societies]

Asthma is the most prevalent respiratory disease worldwide and it can affect people of all ages and is potentially fatal. Today, maintenance treatments are available that are effective in most patients, yet a significant proportion have poorly controlled disease, despite the resources on offer. This document, endorsed by members of the Spanish medical societies involved in the treatment of asthma, is intended to draw the attention of society and professionals to this problem in Spain. It focuses on the clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of asthma, and proposes some actions for improvement as regards patients and healthcare professionals which, in view of the current results arising from inadequate asthma control, might be beneficial to improve outcomes for both patients and public health.

Systematic Assessment of Difficult-to-Treat Asthma: Principles and Perspectives

Difficult-to-treat asthma affects a minority of adults and children with asthma but represents a challenging mix of misdiagnosis, multimorbidity, inadequate self-management, severe airway pathobiology, and treatment complications. Management of these patients extends beyond asthma pharmacotherapy, because multiple other patient-related domains need to be addressed as well. Such complexity can hinder adequate clinical assessment even when performed in specialist practice. Systematic assessment undertaken by specialized multidisciplinary teams brings a broad range of resources to bear on patients with difficult-to-treat asthma. Although the concept of systematic assessment is not new, practices vary considerably and implementation is not universal. Nevertheless, assessment protocols are already in place in several institutions worldwide, and outcomes after such assessments have been highly encouraging. This review discusses the rationale, components, and benefits of systematic assessment, outlining its clinical utility and the available evidence for improved outcomes. It describes a range of service configurations and assessment approaches, drawing examples from severe asthma centers around the world to highlight common essential elements. It also provides a framework for establishing such services and discusses practical considerations for implementation.

Physcion-Matured Dendritic Cells Induce the Differentiation of Th1 Cells

In addition to their use as colorants, anthraquinone derivatives have numerous medical applications, for example, as antibacterial and antiinflammatory agents. We confirmed that physcion (an anthraquinone derivative) induces TNF-alpha production by macrophages and increased the expressions of surface molecules (CD40, CD80, and CD86) and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II. Based on these results, we hypothesized that physcion might induce the maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) to antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and decided to conduct in vitro experiments using bone-marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs). Physcion was not toxic to DCs and increased the expression of surface molecules (e.g., CD40, CD80, CD86, and MHC II) and the production of cytokines (e.g., IL-12p70, IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha), but not of IL-10. To confirm that DCs matured by physcion induce T-cell-immune responses, naive CD4⁺ T cells were treated with physcion-treated DCs or their supernatants. Physcion induced the maturation of DCs, which promoted the polarization of Th1 cells. Our results show physcion-induced DC maturation via TLR4, and that mature DCs promote the differentiation of Th1 cells without affecting the differentiation of Th2 cells. These findings show that physcion has potential use as a treatment for inflammatory diseases associated with Th1/Th2 cell imbalance.

How can we minimise the use of regular oral corticosteroids in asthma?

Options to achieve oral corticosteroid (OCS)-sparing have been triggering increasing interest since the 1970s because of the side-effects of OCSs, and this has now become achievable with biologics. The Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française workshop on OCSs aimed to conduct a comprehensive review of the basics for OCS use in asthma and issue key research questions. Pharmacology and definition of regular use were reviewed by the first working group (WG1). WG2 examined whether regular OCS use is associated with T2 endotype. WG3 reported on the specificities of the paediatric area. Key “research statement proposals” were suggested by WG4. It was found that the benefits of regular OCS use in asthma outside episodes of exacerbations are poorly supported by the existing evidence. However, complete OCS elimination couldn’t be achieved in any available studies for all patients and the panel felt that it was too early to conclude that regular OCS use could be declared criminal. Repeated or prolonged need for OCS beyond 1 g·year⁻¹ should indicate the need for referral to secondary/tertiary care. A strategic sequential plan aiming at reducing overall exposure to OCS in severe asthma was then held as a conclusion of the workshop.

A yearly cumulative OCS dose above 1 g should be considered unacceptable in severe asthma and should make the case for referralhttp://bit.ly/34GAYLX

Trajectory Analyses of Adherence Patterns in a Real-Life Moderate to Severe Asthma Population

BACKGROUND

Global Initiative for Asthma step 5 therapies (GINA-5), other than inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists in fixed dose combinations (ICS/LABA FDC), often entail more expensive (eg, monoclonal biologics) or less safe (eg, maintenance oral corticosteroids [OCS]) treatments. It is therefore important to assess poor inhaler adherence as a possible cause of suboptimal response to ICS/LABA FDC before additional GINA-5.

OBJECTIVE

To determine rates of, and time to, additional GINA-5 after first-year ICS/LABA FDC use, and their association with inhaler adherence.

METHODS

Patients initiating ICS/LABA FDC between 2013 and 2017 were identified from Australian national dispensing data. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to estimate medication adherence patterns. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between adherence trajectories and GINA-5 addition during 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 3062 new ICS/LABA FDC users were identified, of whom 120 (3.9%) received additional GINA-5 (OCS: 89; long-acting muscarinic antagonists: 39; biologics: <3). Mean time to commencing additional GINA-5 was 705.2 (standard deviation, 1.7) days. Adherence trajectories were nonpersistent use (20%), seasonal use (8%), poor adherence (58%), and good adherence (13%). Although poor adherence was associated with longer time to additional GINA-5 (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.95), over 80% of additional GINA-5 was commenced in poorly adherent patients. Use of ≥2 OCS/antibiotic courses also predicted additional GINA-5.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 1 in 20 people with asthma commenced additional GINA-5 after ICS/LABA initiation, most of whom (>80%) were poorly adherent to inhaled preventers. There is a substantial unmet need for inhaler adherence to be addressed before prescribing additional GINA-5.

T Follicular Helper Cell Subsets and the Associated Cytokine IL-21 in the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Asthma

For many decades, T helper 2 (TH2) cells have been considered to predominantly regulate the pathogenic manifestations of allergic asthma, such as IgE-mediated sensitization, airway hyperresponsiveness, and eosinophil infiltration. However, recent discoveries have significantly shifted our understanding of asthma from a simple TH2 cell-dependent disease to a heterogeneous disease regulated by multiple T cell subsets, including T follicular helper (TFH) cells. TFH cells, which are a specialized cell population that provides help to B cells, have attracted intensive attention in the past decade because of their crucial role in regulating antibody response in a broad range of diseases. In particular, TFH cells are essential for IgE antibody class-switching. In this review, we summarize the recent progress regarding the role of TFH cells and their signature cytokine interleukin (IL)-21 in asthma from mouse studies and clinical reports. We further discuss future therapeutic strategies to treat asthma by targeting TFH cells and IL-21.

Characterization of Severe Asthma Worldwide: Data From the International Severe Asthma Registry

BACKGROUND

Clinical characteristics of the international population with severe asthma are unknown. Intercountry comparisons are hindered by variable data collection within regional and national severe asthma registries. We aimed to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated in severe asthma services in the United States, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.

METHODS

The International Severe Asthma Registry retrospectively and prospectively collected data in patients with severe asthma (≥ 18 years old), receiving Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Step 5 treatment or with severe asthma remaining uncontrolled at GINA Step 4. Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected from the United States, United Kingdom, South Korea, Italy, and the Severe Asthma Web-based Database registry (including Australia, Singapore, and New Zealand) from December 2014 to December 2017.

RESULTS

We included 4,990 patients. Mean (SD) age was 55.0 (15.9) years, and mean (SD) age at asthma onset was 30.7 (17.7) years. Patients were predominantly female (59.3%) and white (72.6%), had never smoked (60.5%), and were overweight or obese (70.4%); 34.9% were at GINA Step 5; and 57.2% had poorly controlled disease. A total of 51.1% of patients were receiving regular intermittent oral corticosteroids, and 25.4% were receiving biologics (72.6% for those at GINA Step 5). Mean (SD) exacerbation rate was 1.7 (2.7) per year. Intercountry variation was observed in clinical characteristics, prescribed treatments, and biomarker profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a common data set and definitions, this study describes severe asthma characteristics of a large patient cohort included in multiple severe asthma registries and identifies country differences. Whether these are related to underlying epidemiological factors, environmental factors, phenotypes, asthma management systems, treatment access, and/or cultural factors requires further study.

Oral corticosteroid use, morbidity and mortality in asthma: A nationwide prospective cohort study in Sweden

Background

Patterns and determinants of long‐term oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in asthma and related morbidity and mortality are not well‐described. In a nationwide asthma cohort in Sweden, we evaluated the patterns and determinants of OCS use and risks of OCS‐related morbidities and mortality.

Methods

Data for 217 993 asthma patients (aged ≥ 6 years) in secondary care were identified between 2007 and 2014 using Swedish national health registries. OCS use at baseline was categorized: regular users (≥5 mg/d/y; n = 3299; 1.5%); periodic users (>0 but <5 mg/d/y; n = 49 930; 22.9%); and nonusers (0 mg/d/y; n = 164 765; 75.6%). Relative risks of becoming a regular OCS user and for morbidity and mortality were analysed using multivariable Cox regression.

Results

At baseline, 24% of asthma patients had used OCS during the last year and 1.5% were regular users. Of those not using OCS at baseline, 26% collected at least one OCS prescription and 1.3% became regular OCS users for at least 1 year during the median follow‐up of 5.3 years. Age at asthma diagnosis, increasing GINA severity and Charlson Comorbidity Index were associated with regular OCS use. Compared to periodic and non‐OCS use, regular use was associated with increased incidence of OCS‐related morbidities and greater all‐cause mortality, adjusted HR 1.34 (95% CI 1.24‐1.45).

Conclusions

Oral corticosteroids use is frequent for asthma patients, and many are regular users. Regular OCS use is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. These findings indicate that there is a need of other treatment options for patients with severe asthma who are using regular OCS.