201
|
Funt SA, Rosenberg JE. Systemic, perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and future horizons. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017; 14:221-234. [PMID: 27874062 PMCID: PMC6054138 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Many patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) will develop distant metastatic disease. Over the past three decades, perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been investigated for its ability to reduce the number of deaths from bladder cancer. Insufficient evidence is available to fully support the use of such chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting; however, neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy has become a standard of care for eligible patients based on the improved disease-specific and overall survival demonstrated in two randomized phase III trials, compared with surgery alone. For patients with disease downstaging to non-MIBC at the time of radical cystectomy as a result of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, outcomes are outstanding, with 5-year overall survival of 80-90%. Nevertheless, the inability to define before treatment the patients who will and those who will not achieve such a response has impeded the achievement of better outcomes for patients with MIBC. High-throughput DNA and RNA profiling technologies might help to overcome this barrier and enable a more-personalized approach to the use of cytotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the past 2 years, trial results have demonstrated the unprecedented ability of immune- checkpoint blockade to induce durable remissions in patients with metastatic disease that has progressed after chemotherapy; studies are now urgently needed to determine how best to incorporate this powerful therapeutic modality into the care of patients with MIBC. Herein, we review the evolution of chemotherapy and immunotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Funt
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, USA
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
202
|
Abstract
Systemic chemotherapy is essential for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and metastatic bladder cancer (BCa). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is key to the management of MIBC with many cisplatin-based regimens. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered for selected patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. Systemic chemotherapy with radiotherapy is a critical component of a trimodal bladder-preserving approach and is superior to radiotherapy alone. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the mainstay for metastatic BCa. Immunotherapy in the form of checkpoint inhibitors is a promising new drug for the treatment of BCa. Molecular characterization of each individual BCa is likely to lead to a target-directed therapeutic revolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian G. Pinto
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Sir H. N. Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
203
|
Zhu C, Liu J, Zhang J, Li Q, Lian Q, Xu J, Ma X. Efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy in urothelial carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017; 8:71117-71127. [PMID: 29050347 PMCID: PMC5642622 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with urothelial carcinoma. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Collaboration's Central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) for relevant articles. Data was obtained from 10 trials with a total of 1093 patients. The pooled pathologic complete response (pCR) was 27.8% in the ten studies with a full cohort of 684 patients who received dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin (dd-MVAC). In the controlled trials, although the difference was not significant, the pCR rate in the dd-MVAC group has a trend of increase (odds ratio (OR) 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-2.98, P = 0.22) compared with classic MVAC group. A significant improvement of overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.61–0.97, p = 0.03) was also observed. Hematologic toxicities were the most frequent grade ≥ 3 toxicities including neutropenia/febrile neutropenia (17.5%), anemia (9.4%) and thrombocytopenia (6.1%). Compared with the classic MVAC group, dd-MVAC was associated with significantly decreased risks of all-grade adverse events (AEs) such as anemia (OR 0.457, 95% CI 0.249–0.840, p = 0.012), febrile neutropenia (OR 0.398 95% CI 0.233–0.681, p = 0.001), and neutropenia (OR 0.373, 95% CI 0.201–0.691, p = 0.002). In conclusion, dose-dense chemotherapy was effective and tolerable in patients with urothelial carcinoma, which could be considered as a reasonable therapeutic option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenjing Zhu
- Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiaming Liu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qingfang Li
- Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qisi Lian
- West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jing Xu
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xuelei Ma
- Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
204
|
[When is surgical treatment indicated in metastatic urothelial carcinoma and what is the scientific rationale?]. Urologe A 2017; 56:585-590. [PMID: 28321462 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0362-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma have a poor prognosis. Standard of care is a systemic chemotherapy but surgical excision of metastasis can be performed in individual approaches. OBJECTIVES To evaluate treatment options and study results and to identify and discuss advantages and disadvantages of metastasectomy in urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Database analysis and discussion of clinical trials concerning metastasectomy in urothelial carcinoma. RESULTS In individual cases, metastasectomy can be a reasonable additional therapeutic approach to systemic chemotherapy. Especially patients suffering from symptomatic metastatic disease benefit from extended surgical effort but further effects on survival cannot be expected. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing metastasetomy should be well selected concerning general physical condition. Metastasectomy in urothelial carcinoma remains an individual therapeutic approach and should be performed in combination with systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
205
|
Abstract
Administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy preceding radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer remains a matter of debate. Results of prospective, randomized studies have demonstrated an overall absolute survival benefit of 5% at 5 years, provided cisplatin-based combination regimens are used. Owing to the perception of a modest survival benefit, the medical community has been slow to adopt the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Other reasons for the underuse of neoadjuvant chemotherapy range from patient ineligibility to fear of delaying potentially curative surgery in nonresponders. Instead, several institutions have adopted an individualized, risk-adapted approach, in which the decision to administer chemotherapy is based on clinical stage and patient comorbidity profile. The development of new cytotoxic and targeted therapies, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors, warrants well-designed prospective studies to test their efficacy alone or in combination in the neoadjuvant setting. Moving forward, genomic characterization of muscle-invasive bladder cancer could offer information that aids clinicians in selecting the appropriate chemotherapy regimen. Following neoadjuvant therapy, every effort should be made to ensure optimal surgery, as surgical margins and the number of removed lymph nodes are prognostic factors; thus, radical cystectomy and a meticulous extended pelvic lymph node dissection should be performed by expert surgeons.
Collapse
|
206
|
Pham MN, Apolo AB, De Santis M, Galsky MD, Leibovich BC, Pisters LL, Siefker-Radtke AO, Sonpavde G, Steinberg GD, Sternberg CN, Tagawa ST, Weizer AZ, Woods ME, Milowsky MI. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma topical issue 2016: treatment of metastatic cancer. World J Urol 2017; 35:367-378. [PMID: 27342991 PMCID: PMC6777567 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1885-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the management of metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) including recent advances in targeted and immune therapies as an update to the 2014 joint international consultation on UTUC, co-sponsored by the Société Internationale d'Urologie and International Consultation on Urological Diseases. METHODS A PubMed database search was performed between January 2013 and May 2016 related to the treatment of metastatic UTUC, and 54 studies were selected for inclusion. RESULTS The management of patients with metastatic UTUC is primarily an extrapolation from evidence guiding the management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. The first-line therapy for metastatic UTUC is platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Standard second-line therapies are limited and ineffective. Patients with UTUC who progress following platinum-based chemotherapy are encouraged to participate in clinical trials. Recent advances in genomic profiling present exciting opportunities to guide the use of targeted therapy. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated extremely promising results. Retrospective studies provide support for post-chemotherapy surgery in appropriately selected patients. CONCLUSIONS The management of metastatic UTUC requires a multi-disciplinary approach. New insights from genomic profiling using targeted therapies, novel immunotherapies, and surgery represent promising avenues for further therapeutic exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M N Pham
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - A B Apolo
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - M De Santis
- Cancer Research Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - M D Galsky
- The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - B C Leibovich
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - L L Pisters
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - G Sonpavde
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - G D Steinberg
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - S T Tagawa
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Z Weizer
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - M E Woods
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - M I Milowsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3rd Floor Physician's Office Building, 170 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
207
|
Lin YC, Lin JF, Wen SI, Yang SC, Tsai TF, Chen HE, Chou KY, Hwang TIS. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine inhibit bladder cancer cell growth by targeting basal autophagy and enhancing apoptosis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2017; 33:215-223. [PMID: 28433067 DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Revised: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), two antimalarial drugs, are suggested to have potential anticancer properties. in the present study, we investigated the effects of CQ and HCQ on cell growth of bladder cancer with emphasis on autophagy inhibition and apoptosis induction in vitro. The results showed that CQ and HCQ inhibited the proliferation of multiple human bladder cell lines (including RT4, 5637, and T24) in a time- and dose-dependent fashion, especially in advanced bladder cancer cell lines (5637 and T24) compared to immortalized uroepithelial cells (SV-Huc-1) or other reference cancer cell lines (PC3 and MCF-7). We found that 24-hour treatment of CQ or HCQ significantly decreased the clonogenic formation in 5637 and T24 cells compared to SV-Huc-1. As human bladder cancer tumor exhibits high basal level of autophagic activities, we detected the autophagic flux in cells treated with CQ and HCQ, showing an alternation in LC3 flux in CQ- or HCQ-treated cells. Moreover, bladder cancer cells treated with CQ and HCQ underwent apoptosis, resulting in increased caspase 3/7 activities, increased level of cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), caspase 3, and DNA fragmentation. Given these results, targeting autophagy with CQ and HCQ represents an effective cancer therapeutic strategy against human bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chia Lin
- Department of Urology, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ji-Fan Lin
- Central Laboratory, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Sheng-I Wen
- Central Laboratory, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shan-Che Yang
- Central Laboratory, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Te-Fu Tsai
- Department of Urology, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Hung-En Chen
- Department of Urology, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Yu Chou
- Department of Urology, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Thomas I-Sheng Hwang
- Department of Urology, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
208
|
Zhou L, Xu L, Chen L, Fu Q, Liu Z, Chang Y, Lin Z, Xu J. Tumor-infiltrating neutrophils predict benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Oncoimmunology 2017; 6:e1293211. [PMID: 28507798 PMCID: PMC5414863 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2017.1293211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Revised: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Growing evidence shows tumor-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) involvement in tumorigenesis. The objective of this study is to assess the prognostic effect of TINs and its impact on adjuvant chemotherapy benefits in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). A total of 142 MIBC patients from Zhongshan Hospital, 119 MIBC patients from FUSCC, and 405 MIBC patients from TCGA cohort were enrolled in the study. TINs were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining of CD66b or the CIBERSORT method. Patients with high TINs had a significantly poorer overall survival (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively) in the three sets. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of high TINs (HR = 2.122, p = 0.007; HR = 3.807, p < 0.001; HR = 2.104, p = 0.001; respectively) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in the three sets. More importantly, Low TINs patients had significantly longer overall survival in patients without ACT in the three sets. Gene set enrichment analysis showed that lymphocyte activation (p < 0.001) and T cell activation (p = 0.008) were significantly enriched in the low TINs group. In addition, TINs were negatively correlated with CD8+ T cells, suggesting that the status of high-TINs was linked to the status of immunosuppression in MIBC. TINs could be used as independent prognostic factor. Low TINs identified a subgroup of MIBC patients who appeared to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Incorporation of TINs into TNM system could further stratify patients with different prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhou
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Le Xu
- Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lingli Chen
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Fu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Chang
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zongming Lin
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiejie Xu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
209
|
Systemic Immunotherapy for Urothelial Cancer: Current Trends and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2017; 9:cancers9020015. [PMID: 28134806 PMCID: PMC5332938 DOI: 10.3390/cancers9020015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial cancer of the bladder, renal pelvis, ureter, and other urinary organs is the fifth most common cancer in the United States, and systemic platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Until recently, there were very limited options for patients who are refractory to chemotherapy, or do not tolerate chemotherapy due to toxicities and overall outcomes have remained very poor. While the role of immunotherapy was first established in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in the 1970s, no systemic immunotherapy was approved for advanced disease until the recent approval of a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, atezolizumab, in patients with advanced/metastatic UC who have progressed on platinum-containing regimens. This represents a significant milestone in this disease after a void of over 30 years. In addition to atezolizumab, a variety of checkpoint inhibitors have shown a significant activity in advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma and are expected to gain Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in the near future. The introduction of novel immunotherapy agents has led to rapid changes in the field of urothelial carcinoma. Numerous checkpoint inhibitors are being tested alone or in combination in the first and subsequent-line therapies of metastatic disease, as well as neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. They are also being studied in combination with radiation therapy and for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer refractory to BCG. Furthermore, immunotherapy is being utilized for those ineligible for firstline platinum-based chemotherapy. This review outlines the novel immunotherapy agents which have either been approved, or are currently being investigated in clinical trials in UC.
Collapse
|
210
|
Assessing Cancer Progression and Stable Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Organ-confined Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Urology 2017; 102:148-158. [PMID: 28104421 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Revised: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To propose and validate a new approach to stratify clinically staged, organ-confined, muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients (cT2N0M0) who are pathologic non-responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to better characterize NAC non-response. METHODS We retrospectively identified radical cystectomy patients with cT2N0M0 disease at our institution (2005-2014) and in the National Cancer Database (2004-2012) for external validation. Patients were stratified as stable (pT2N0M0) or progressors (>pT2 or pN+). The primary end points were cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS In the institutional cohort, NAC stable patients (n = 17) had better OS (P = .05) and RFS (P = .04) than NAC progressors (n = 50), and had comparable OS (P = .7) and CSS (P = .09) with non-NAC stable patients (n = 27). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models showed that larger tumor size predicted worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.20 per centimeter, 95% confidence interval [CI: 1.07, 1.35]), CSS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI [1.11, 1.45]), and RFS (HR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.09, 1.42]). Similarly, in the National Cancer Database, NAC stable patients (n = 223) had improved OS (P < .0001) compared with NAC progressors (n = 232) and comparable (P = .4) OS with non-NAC stable patients (n = 950). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model showed that larger tumor size (HR = 1.03 per centimeter, 95% CI [1.02, 1.03]) and progression (HR = 2.69, 95% CI [2.40, 3.01]) predicted worse OS. CONCLUSION Distinct survival outcomes suggest that NAC non-responders should be further stratified into stable disease and progressors. Comparable survival between non-NAC and NAC stable disease patients suggests that NAC stable disease may represent a chemoresistant but more indolent phenotype on the disease spectrum. Moreover, tumor size is an important prognostic biomarker in NAC non-responders. Clinical predictors of disease progression on NAC were not identified, highlighting the need to explore molecular and genomic subtyping determinants of disease progression.
Collapse
|
211
|
Zibelman M, Ramamurthy C, Plimack ER. Emerging role of immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma—Advanced disease. Urol Oncol 2016; 34:538-547. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2016] [Revised: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
212
|
Faltas BM, Prandi D, Tagawa ST, Molina AM, Nanus DM, Sternberg C, Rosenberg J, Mosquera JM, Robinson B, Elemento O, Sboner A, Beltran H, Demichelis F, Rubin MA. Clonal evolution of chemotherapy-resistant urothelial carcinoma. Nat Genet 2016; 48:1490-1499. [PMID: 27749842 PMCID: PMC5549141 DOI: 10.1038/ng.3692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 220] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/09/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Chemotherapy-resistant urothelial carcinoma has no uniformly curative therapy. Understanding how selective pressure from chemotherapy directs the evolution of urothelial carcinoma and shapes its clonal architecture is a central biological question with clinical implications. To address this question, we performed whole-exome sequencing and clonality analysis of 72 urothelial carcinoma samples, including 16 matched sets of primary and advanced tumors prospectively collected before and after chemotherapy. Our analysis provided several insights: (i) chemotherapy-treated urothelial carcinoma is characterized by intra-patient mutational heterogeneity, and the majority of mutations are not shared; (ii) both branching evolution and metastatic spread are very early events in the natural history of urothelial carcinoma; (iii) chemotherapy-treated urothelial carcinoma is enriched with clonal mutations involving L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) and integrin signaling pathways; and (iv) APOBEC-induced mutagenesis is clonally enriched in chemotherapy-treated urothelial carcinoma and continues to shape the evolution of urothelial carcinoma throughout its lifetime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bishoy M. Faltas
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - Davide Prandi
- Centre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento. Trento, Italy
| | - Scott T. Tagawa
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - Ana M. Molina
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - David M. Nanus
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - Cora Sternberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals. Rome, Italy
| | - Jonathan Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. New York, NY
| | - Juan Miguel Mosquera
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - Brian Robinson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - Olivier Elemento
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics. Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - Andrea Sboner
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - Francesca Demichelis
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Centre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento. Trento, Italy
- Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| | - Mark A. Rubin
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. Weill Cornell Medicine. New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
213
|
Lázaro M, Gallardo E, Doménech M, Pinto Á, González-del-Alba A, Del Alba AG, Puente J, Fernández O, Font A, Lainez N, Vázquez S. SEOM Clinical Guideline for treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (2016). Clin Transl Oncol 2016; 18:1197-1205. [PMID: 27900539 PMCID: PMC5138255 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-016-1584-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this article is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. The diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer is made by pathologic evaluation after transurethral resection. Recently, a molecular classification has been proposed. Staging of muscle-invasive bladder cancer must be done by computed tomography scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis and classified on the basis of UICC system. Radical cystectomy and lymph node dissection are the treatment of choice. In muscle-invasive bladder cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended in patients with good performance status and no renal function impairment. Although there is insufficient evidence for use of adjuvant chemotherapy, its use must be considered when neoadjuvant therapy had not been administered in high-risk patients. Multimodality bladder-preserving treatment in localized disease is an alternative in selected and compliant patients for whom cystectomy is not considered for clinical or personal reasons. In metastatic disease, the first-line treatment for patients must be based on cisplatin-containing combination. Vinflunine is the only drug approved for use in second line in Europe. Recently, immunotherapy treatment has demonstrated activity in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lázaro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro-Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Estrada Clara Campoamor, 34136312, Vigo, Spain.
| | - E Gallardo
- Medical Oncology Department, Parc Taulí Sabadell Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, Spain
| | - M Doménech
- Medical Oncology Department, Althaia, Xarxa Assisencial i Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Spain
| | - Á Pinto
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-Idipaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - A González Del Alba
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - J Puente
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - O Fernández
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Badalona, Spain
| | - A Font
- Medical Oncology Department, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain
| | - N Lainez
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - S Vázquez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
214
|
Zhou L, Chang Y, Xu L, Hoang STN, Liu Z, Fu Q, Lin Z, Xu J. Prognostic value of vascular mimicry in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder after radical cystectomy. Oncotarget 2016; 7:76214-76223. [PMID: 27776348 PMCID: PMC5342808 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Vascular mimicry (VM) refers to the plasticity of aggressive cancer cells forming de novo vascular networks, which promoted tumor metastasis. The aim of this study was evaluate the impact of VM on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Records from 202 patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for UCB at Zhongshan Hospital between 2002 and 2014 were reviewed. The presence of VM was identified by CD31-PAS double staining. Positive VM staining occurred in 19.3% (39 of 202) UCB cases, and it was associated with increased risks of recurrence (Log-Rank p<0.001). VM was identified as an independent prognostic factor (p=0.002). In the cohort with MIBC, patients with VM negative got CSS benefit from the use of ACT (p = 0.048). As for lung metastasis, the combination of VM and TNM stage (AUC 0.792) showed a better prognostic value than TNM stage alone (AUC 0.748, p = 0.008) or VM alone (AUC 0.714, p = 0.023). Vascular mimicry could be a potential prognosticator for recurrence-free survival in patients with UCB after RC. Vascular mimicry seems to predict risk of developing lung metastases after RC. The presence of VM identified a subgroup of patients with MIBC who appeared to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhou
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Chang
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Le Xu
- Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Fu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zongming Lin
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiejie Xu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
215
|
Rouprêt M, Neuzillet Y, Masson-Lecomte A, Colin P, Compérat E, Dubosq F, Houédé N, Larré S, Pignot G, Puech P, Roumiguié M, Xylinas E, Méjean A. Recommandations en onco-urologie 2016-2018 du CCAFU : Tumeurs de la vessie. Prog Urol 2016; 27 Suppl 1:S67-S91. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(16)30704-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
216
|
Morales-Barrera R, Suárez C, de Castro AM, Racca F, Valverde C, Maldonado X, Bastaros JM, Morote J, Carles J. Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of advanced bladder cancer: New direction and New Hope. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 50:208-216. [PMID: 27743530 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 09/17/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the leading causes of death in Europe and the United States. About 25% of patients with bladder cancer have advanced disease (muscle-invasive or metastatic disease) at presentation and are candidates for systemic chemotherapy. In the setting of metastatic disease, use of cisplatin-based regimens improves survival. However, despite initial high response rates, the responses are typically not durable leading to recurrence and death in the vast majority of these patients with median overall survival of 15months and a 5-year survival rate of ⩽10%. Furthermore, unfit patients for cisplatin have no standard of care for first line therapy in advance disease Most second-line chemotherapeutic agents tested have been disappointing. Newer targeted drugs and immunotherapies are being studied in the metastatic setting, their usefulness in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings is also an intriguing area of ongoing research. Thus, new treatment strategies are clearly needed. The comprehensive evaluation of multiple molecular pathways characterized by The Cancer Genome Atlas project has shed light on potential therapeutic targets for bladder urothelial carcinomas. We have focused especially on emerging therapies in locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma with an emphasis on immune checkpoints inhibitors and FGFR targeted therapies, which have shown great promise in early clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Suárez
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Martínez de Castro
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabricio Racca
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claudia Valverde
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Maldonado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Juan Morote
- Department of Urology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Carles
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
217
|
Zibelman M, Plimack ER. Systemic therapy for bladder cancer finally comes into a new age. Future Oncol 2016; 12:2227-42. [PMID: 27402371 PMCID: PMC5066115 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Systemic therapy for bladder cancer, both localized muscle-invasive disease and metastatic disease, has seen minimal progress over the past two decades. Current approaches rely upon cytotoxic chemotherapy combinations aimed at increasing cure rates or achieving palliation and disease control, but these regimens are fraught with short- and long-term toxicities and outcomes remain suboptimal. The emergence of systemic immunotherapies that can provide durable remissions in subsets of patients with other malignancies has the potential to transform the field, and early phase trials have begun to demonstrate activity in some patients with metastatic bladder cancer. In this article, we review the current state of systemic therapy for bladder cancer and discuss the current literature and ongoing trials utilizing various immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Zibelman
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health. 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Plimack
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health. 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
218
|
Anantharaman A, Friedlander T, Lu D, Krupa R, Premasekharan G, Hough J, Edwards M, Paz R, Lindquist K, Graf R, Jendrisak A, Louw J, Dugan L, Baird S, Wang Y, Dittamore R, Paris PL. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in muscle invasive and metastatic bladder cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:744. [PMID: 27658492 PMCID: PMC5034508 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2758-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors have activity in a proportion of patients with advanced bladder cancer, strongly predictive and prognostic biomarkers are still lacking. In this study, we evaluated PD-L1 protein expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) isolated from patients with muscle invasive (MIBC) and metastatic (mBCa) bladder cancer and explore the prognostic value of CTC PD-L1 expression on clinical outcomes. Methods Blood samples from 25 patients with MIBC or mBCa were collected at UCSF and shipped to Epic Sciences. All nucleated cells were subjected to immunofluorescent (IF) staining and CTC identification by fluorescent scanners using algorithmic analysis. Cytokeratin expressing (CK)+ and (CK)−CTCs (CD45−, intact nuclei, morphologically distinct from WBCs) were enumerated. A subset of patient samples underwent genetic characterization by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and copy number variation (CNV) analysis. Results CTCs were detected in 20/25 (80 %) patients, inclusive of CK+ CTCs (13/25, 52 %), CK−CTCs (14/25, 56 %), CK+ CTC Clusters (6/25, 24 %), and apoptotic CTCs (13/25, 52 %). Seven of 25 (28 %) patients had PD-L1+ CTCs; 4 of these patients had exclusively CK−/CD45−/PD-L1+ CTCs. A subset of CTCs were secondarily confirmed as bladder cancer via FISH and CNV analysis, which revealed marked genomic instability. Although this study was not powered to evaluate survival, exploratory analyses demonstrated that patients with high PD-L1+/CD45−CTC burden and low burden of apoptotic CTCs had worse overall survival. Conclusions CTCs are detectable in both MIBC and mBCa patients. PD-L1 expression is demonstrated in both CK+ and CK−CTCs in patients with mBCa, and genomic analysis of these cells supports their tumor origin. Here we demonstrate the ability to identify CTCs in patients with advanced bladder cancer through a minimally invasive process. This may have the potential to guide checkpoint inhibitor immune therapies that have been established to have activity, often with durable responses, in a proportion of these patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2758-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Anantharaman
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, 1825 4th Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Terence Friedlander
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, 1825 4th Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| | - David Lu
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Gayatri Premasekharan
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Hough
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, 1825 4th Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Matthew Edwards
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, 1825 4th Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Rosa Paz
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, 1825 4th Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Karla Lindquist
- Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pamela L Paris
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, 1825 4th Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.,Department of Urology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
219
|
Massard C, Gordon MS, Sharma S, Rafii S, Wainberg ZA, Luke J, Curiel TJ, Colon-Otero G, Hamid O, Sanborn RE, O'Donnell PH, Drakaki A, Tan W, Kurland JF, Rebelatto MC, Jin X, Blake-Haskins JA, Gupta A, Segal NH. Safety and Efficacy of Durvalumab (MEDI4736), an Anti-Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Bladder Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:3119-25. [PMID: 27269937 PMCID: PMC5569690 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.67.9761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 675] [Impact Index Per Article: 75.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety and efficacy of durvalumab, a human monoclonal antibody that binds programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and the role of PD-L1 expression on clinical response in patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). METHODS A phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label study is being conducted in patients with inoperable or metastatic solid tumors. We report here the results from the UBC expansion cohort. Durvalumab (MEDI4736, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) was administered intravenously for up to 12 months. The primary end point was safety, and objective response rate (ORR, confirmed) was a key secondary end point. An exploratory analysis of pretreatment tumor biopsies led to defining PD-L1-positive as ≥ 25% of tumor cells or tumor-infiltrating immune cells expressing membrane PD-L1. RESULTS A total of 61 patients (40 PD-L1-positive, 21 PD-L1-negative), 93.4% of whom received one or more prior therapies for advanced disease, were treated (median duration of follow-up, 4.3 months). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were fatigue (13.1%), diarrhea (9.8%), and decreased appetite (8.2%). Grade 3 treatment-related AEs occurred in three patients (4.9%); there were no treatment-related grade 4 or 5 AEs. One treatment-related AE (acute kidney injury) resulted in treatment discontinuation. The ORR was 31.0% (95% CI, 17.6 to 47.1) in 42 response-evaluable patients, 46.4% (95% CI, 27.5 to 66.1) in the PD-L1-positive subgroup, and 0% (95% CI, 0.0 to 23.2) in the PD-L1-negative subgroup. Responses are ongoing in 12 of 13 responding patients, with median duration of response not yet reached (range, 4.1+ to 49.3+ weeks). CONCLUSION Durvalumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and evidence of meaningful clinical activity in PD-L1-positive patients with UBC, many of whom were heavily pretreated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Massard
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael S Gordon
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sunil Sharma
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Saeed Rafii
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zev A Wainberg
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jason Luke
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Tyler J Curiel
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gerardo Colon-Otero
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Omid Hamid
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rachel E Sanborn
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter H O'Donnell
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Winston Tan
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - John F Kurland
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marlon C Rebelatto
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Xiaoping Jin
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - John A Blake-Haskins
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ashok Gupta
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Neil H Segal
- Christophe Massard, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Villejuif, France; Michael S. Gordon, Pinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, AZ; Sunil Sharma, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; Saeed Rafii, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; Zev A. Wainberg and Alexandra Drakaki, University of California, Los Angeles; and Omid Hamid, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Jason Luke and Peter H. O'Donnell, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; Tyler J. Curiel, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Gerardo Colon-Otero and Winston Tan, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Rachel E. Sanborn, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; John F. Kurland, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Xiaoping Jin, John A. Blake-Haskins, and Ashok Gupta, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD; and Neil H. Segal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
220
|
Mullane SA, Werner L, Guancial EA, Lis RT, Stack EC, Loda M, Kantoff PW, Choueiri TK, Rosenberg J, Bellmunt J. Expression Levels of DNA Damage Repair Proteins Are Associated With Overall Survival in Platinum-Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2016; 14:352-9. [PMID: 26778300 PMCID: PMC5508512 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2015] [Revised: 12/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combination platinum chemotherapy is standard first-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Defining the platinum response biomarkers for patients with mUC could establish personalize medicine and provide insights into mUC biology. Although DNA repair mechanisms have been hypothesized to mediate the platinum response, we sought to analyze whether increased expression of DNA damage genes would correlate with worse overall survival (OS) in patients with mUC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified a clinically annotated cohort of patients with mUC, who had been treated with first-line platinum combination chemotherapy. A tissue microarray was constructed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary tumor before treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis of the following DNA repair proteins was performed: ERCC1, RAD51, BRCA1/2, PAR, and PARP-1. Nuclear and cytoplasmic expression was analyzed using multispectral imaging. Nuclear staining was used for the survival analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations between the percentage of positive nuclear staining and OS in multivariable analysis, controlling for known prognostic variables. RESULTS In a cohort of 104 patients with mUC, a greater percentage of nuclear staining of ERCC1 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-4.9; P = .0007), RAD51 (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7-18.3; P = .005), and PAR (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.4; P = .026) was associated with worse OS. BRCA1, BRCA2, and PARP-1 expression was not associated with OS (P = .76, P = .38, and P = .09, respectively). A greater percentage of combined ERCC1 and RAD51 nuclear staining was strongly associated with worse OS (P = .005). CONCLUSION A high percentage of nuclear staining of ERCC1, RAD51, and PAR, assessed by immunohistochemistry, correlated with worse OS for patients with mUC treated with first-line platinum combination chemotherapy, supporting the evidence of the DNA repair pathways' role in the prognosis of mUC. We also report new evidence that RAD51 and PAR might play a role in the platinum response. Additional prospective studies are required to determine the prognostic or predictive nature of these biomarkers in mUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Mullane
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lillian Werner
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth A Guancial
- Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Rosina T Lis
- Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Edward C Stack
- Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Massimo Loda
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Philip W Kantoff
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
221
|
Pouessel D, Bastuji-Garin S, Houédé N, Vordos D, Loriot Y, Chevreau C, Sevin E, Beuzeboc P, Taille ADL, Le Thuaut A, Allory Y, Culine S. Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Outcome and Prognostic Factors for Survival in a French Multicenter, Contemporary Cohort. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2016; 15:e45-e52. [PMID: 27554584 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Revised: 07/01/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the past decade, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after radical cystectomy (RC) was preferred worldwide for patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. In this study we aimed to determine the outcome of patients who received AC and evaluated prognostic factors associated with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 226 consecutive patients treated in 6 academic hospitals between 2000 and 2009. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for center to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were used. RESULTS The median age was 62.4 (range, 35-82) years. Patients had pT3/pT4 and/or pN+ in 180 (79.6%) and 168 patients (74.3%), respectively. Median lymph node (LN) density was 25% (range, 3.1-100). Median time between RC and AC was 61.5 (range, 18-162) days. Gemcitabine with cisplatin, gemcitabine with carboplatin, and MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimens were delivered in 161 (71.2%), 49 (21.7%), and 12 patients (5.3%) of patients, respectively. The median number of cycles was 4 (range, 1-6). Thirteen patients (5.7%) with LN metastases also received adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (ART). After a median follow-up of 4.2 years, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 40.7%. In multivariate analysis, pT ≥3 stage (HR, 1.73; P = .05), LN density >50% (HR, 1.94; P = .03), and number of AC cycles <4 (HR, 4.26; P = .001) were adverse prognostic factors for OS. ART (HR, 0.30; P = .05) tended to provide survival benefit. CONCLUSION Classical prognostic features associated with survival are not modified by the use of AC. Patients who derived benefit from AC had a low LN density and received at least 4 cycles of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Pouessel
- Inserm U955 Hôpital Henri Mondor, Team 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, Créteil, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France.
| | - Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
- CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing), Unit EA 4393, Paris Est University, Créteil, France; Public Health Department, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Nadine Houédé
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Dimitri Vordos
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine and INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, Villejuif, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-O, Toulouse, France
| | - Emmanuel Sevin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Alexandre de la Taille
- Inserm U955 Hôpital Henri Mondor, Team 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, Créteil, France; Department of Urology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France; Paris Est University, Créteil, France
| | - Aurélie Le Thuaut
- CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing), Unit EA 4393, Paris Est University, Créteil, France; Public Health Department, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Yves Allory
- Inserm U955 Hôpital Henri Mondor, Team 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, Créteil, France; Paris Est University, Créteil, France; Department of Pathology and Tissue Biobank Unit, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Stéphane Culine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France; Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Bruins HM, Hernández V, Espinós EL, Dunn J, Rouanne M, Neuzillet Y, Veskimäe E, van der Heijden AG, Gakis G, Ribal MJ. Updated 2016 EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2016; 71:462-475. [PMID: 27375033 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1103] [Impact Index Per Article: 122.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Invasive bladder cancer is a frequently occurring disease with a high mortality rate despite optimal treatment. The European Association of Urology (EAU) Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer (MIBC) Guidelines are updated yearly and provides information to optimise diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of this patient population. OBJECTIVE To provide a summary of the EAU guidelines for physicians and patients confronted with muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An international multidisciplinary panel of bladder cancer experts reviewed and discussed the results of a comprehensive literature search of several databases covering all sections of the guidelines. The panel defined levels of evidence and grades of recommendation according to an established classification system. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Epidemiology and aetiology of bladder cancer are discussed. The proper diagnostic pathway, including demands for pathology and imaging, is outlined. Several treatment options, including bladder-sparing treatments and combinations of treatment modalities (different forms of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) are described. Sequencing of these modalities is discussed. Potential indications and contraindications, such as comorbidity, are related to treatment choice. There is a new paragraph on organ-sparing approaches, both in men and in women, and on minimal invasive surgery. Recommendations for chemotherapy in fit and unfit patients are provided including second-line options. Finally, a follow-up schedule is provided. CONCLUSIONS The current summary of the EAU Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer Guidelines provides an up-to-date overview of the available literature and evidence dealing with diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with metastatic and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY Bladder cancer is an important disease with a high mortality rate. These updated guidelines help clinicians refine the diagnosis and select the appropriate therapy and follow-up for patients with metastatic and muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Thierry Lebret
- Hôpital Foch, Department of Urology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital La Pitié Salpetrière, UPMC, Paris, France
| | - Nigel C Cowan
- Radiology Department, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Maria De Santis
- University of Warwick, Cancer Research Unit, Coventry, UK; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Harman Maxim Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Virginia Hernández
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - James Dunn
- Department of Urology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Mathieu Rouanne
- Hôpital Foch, Department of Urology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Hôpital Foch, Department of Urology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Erik Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
Smith TJ, Hillner BE. Real-World Conundrums and Biases in the Use of White Cell Growth Factors. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016; 35:e524-7. [PMID: 27249762 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_156062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
We present the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) white cell growth factors, or colony-stimulating factor (CSF), guidelines, updated from 2006. One new indication has been added-dose-intense chemotherapy for bladder cancer-to accompany the existing use for dose-dense breast cancer chemotherapy. Colony-stimulating factors remain appropriate for any regimen where the risk of febrile neutropenia is about 20% per cycle and dose reduction is not appropriate. Based on new evidence from multiple trials, CSF use is no longer indicated in treatment of lymphoma unless there are special risk factors. The United States accounts for 78% of the sales of CSF. The panel approved the use of all biosimilars, but the cost savings will be small as the price is about 80% of the branded CSFs. More biosimilars at lower cost are awaited. Methods to reduce use without harm to patients, by requiring justification according to accepted guidelines, are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Smith
- From the Harry J. Duffey Family Palliative Care Program of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Hillner Consulting, LLC, Richmond, VA; Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Bruce E Hillner
- From the Harry J. Duffey Family Palliative Care Program of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Hillner Consulting, LLC, Richmond, VA; Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| |
Collapse
|
224
|
Treatment of relapsed urothelial bladder cancer with vinflunine: real-world evidence by the Hellenic Genitourinary Cancer Group. Anticancer Drugs 2016; 27:48-53. [PMID: 26421462 PMCID: PMC4885529 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Relapsed urothelial cancer represents an unmet medical need. Vinflunine is a third-generation antimicrotubuline inhibitor and is currently the only approved drug for second-line treatment across the European Union. We conducted a retrospective analysis assessing the efficacy and safety of vinflunine in 71 Greek patients with relapsed urothelial cancer who were treated between 2005 and 2014. An overall 84% of our patients received vinflunine as second-line treatment, 77% had a performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale 0 or 1, and 30% had liver metastasis at the time of vinflunine administration. A median of four cycles of vinflunine were administered (range 1–16). The most common reported adverse events were constipation, fatigue, and anemia. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval: 4.4–8.8) and overall survival was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval: 7.4–21). Two patients (3%) achieved a complete remission, seven a partial remission (10%), and 22 (31%) had stable disease according to an intention-to-treat analysis. Hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dl and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 1 were independent adverse prognostic factors. Stratification according to the Bellmunt risk model was also associated with progression-free survival and overall survival in our population. Vinflunine appears to be a safe and effective treatment modality for relapsed urothelial cancer. More effective therapies and more accurate prognostic algorithms should be sought.
Collapse
|
225
|
Hsieh MC, Su YL, Chiang PH, Rau KM, Chen YY, Huang CH. Prognostic model to predict survival in patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Int J Urol 2016; 23:385-9. [PMID: 26992082 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2015] [Accepted: 01/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To create a novel prognostic model to predict survival in metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS After institutional review board approval, patients who had metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma and were treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy from 2000 to 2012 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Significantly predictive factors were identified by multivariate Cox regress analyses. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to estimate overall survival. Several prognostic models were validated by using our cohort, and Harrell's c-index was calculated to evaluate their predicting performances. RESULTS The present study consisted of 136 patients with a median age of 62 years and a median follow-up visit of 13.6 months. Multivariate analyses showed that renal function, performance status, liver metastasis and number of metastatic sites was independently related to survival. Based on these four variables, we constructed a prognostic model "renal function, performance status, liver metastasis, number of metastatic sites" with significantly different survival (P < 0.001). C-index results were renal function, performance status, liver metastasis, number of metastatic sites model 0.80 (0.69-0.90), Bajorin model 0.72 (0.61-0.83), Taguchi model 0.77 (0.67-0.87) and Tanaka model 0.78 (0.69-0.88). Our renal function, performance status, liver metastasis, number of metastatic sites prognostic model achieved the highest c-index in this study. CONCLUSIONS Our renal function, performance status, liver metastasis, number of metastatic sites prognostic model could be useful for providing prognostic information on survival in patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng-Che Hsieh
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Li Su
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hui Chiang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ming Rau
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Yang Chen
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hua Huang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
226
|
|
227
|
Bellmunt J, Mottet N, De Santis M. Urothelial carcinoma management in elderly or unfit patients. EJC Suppl 2016; 14:1-20. [PMID: 27358584 PMCID: PMC4917740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Revised: 01/18/2016] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquim Bellmunt
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, CHU de Saint-Etienne, University Jean Monnet, St Etienne, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
228
|
Mandalapu RS, Matin SF. Contemporary Evaluation and Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer. Urology 2016; 94:17-23. [PMID: 26850816 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2015] [Revised: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy with en bloc bladder cuff excision and regional lymphadenectomy is the gold standard for the management of high-grade and high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinomas. There are a few prospective randomized controlled studies in this uncommon and often aggressive disease to support level-1 management guidelines. However, recent developments in imaging, minimally invasive techniques, lymphatic dissemination, and bladder cancer prevention raise the hope for improved risk stratification and treatments without compromising, and hopefully improving, oncological outcomes. Multimodality approaches in terms of neoadjuvant, adjuvant topical, and systemic chemotherapeutic regimens are promising, with 2 prospective trials either open or in development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Standard or accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced urothelial bladder cancer: Does dose intensity matter? Eur J Cancer 2016; 54:69-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Revised: 11/02/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
230
|
Sonpavde G, Gordetsky JB, Lockhart ME, Nix JW. Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Better Late Than Never? J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:780-5. [PMID: 26786922 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.65.4442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.A 64-year-old man with a history of cigarette smoking but no significant comorbidities presented with hematuria and dysuria. Computed tomography scans demonstrated a mass and thickening of the bladder wall and no evidence of metastasis. His laboratory evaluation showed normal blood cell counts and comprehensive metabolic panel with a calculated creatinine clearance of more than 60 mL per minute. A transurethral resection of the bladder tumor and biopsy identified transitional cell carcinoma or urothelial carcinoma invading the muscularis propria of the bladder. On the basis of the bladder-confined mass on computed tomography scan, the tumor was assigned a clinical stage of cT2N0. The patient was advised to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC). The patient had multiple concerns regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy, particularly toxicities, especially the possibility of chronic neurologic and renal toxicities, and the potential harm from delay of RC, especially if the bladder cancer was resistant to chemotherapy. After a discussion of approximately 1 hour, he elected to proceed with upfront RC and extended lymph node dissection in conjunction with construction of a neobladder. Pathology revealed pathologic extravesical urothelial carcinoma, with disease in one of 25 lymph nodes removed (ypT3N1). Four weeks after RC, he returned to discuss further management with the medical oncologist. He exhibited an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, normal blood cell counts, and a calculated creatinine clearance of more than 60 mL per minute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guru Sonpavde
- University of Alabama, Birmingham, School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Mark E Lockhart
- University of Alabama, Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Jeffrey W Nix
- University of Alabama, Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
231
|
Knollman H, Godwin JL, Jain R, Wong YN, Plimack ER, Geynisman DM. Muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: an update on systemic therapy. Ther Adv Urol 2015; 7:312-30. [PMID: 26622317 PMCID: PMC4647143 DOI: 10.1177/1756287215607418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma is a common malignancy that carries a poor prognosis when the disease includes muscle invasion. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma is almost uniformly fatal. The evidence behind treatment options in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings are discussed in this manuscript, with a focused review of standard and investigational cytotoxic, targeted, and immunotherapy approaches. We have focused especially on neoadjuvant cisplatin-based therapy (supported by level one evidence) and on novel immunotherapy agents such as checkpoint inhibitors, which have shown great promise in early clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Knollman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J. Luke Godwin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rishi Jain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yu-Ning Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth R. Plimack
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel M. Geynisman
- Assistant Professor of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
232
|
Stensland KD, Galsky MD. Current approaches to the management of bladder cancer in older patients. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2015:e250-6. [PMID: 24857110 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2014.34.e250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Bladder cancer is largely a disease of older adults, with nearly half of diagnoses occurring in those older than age 75. This has led to a disconnect between the efficacy and effectiveness of various treatment strategies. For example, surgical removal of the bladder is a potentially curative approach to muscle-invasive disease, although the large single-center and multicenter series that have established the efficacy of this approach include only a small proportion of older patients. Similarly, clinical trials that have established optimal chemotherapeutic regimens for use in the perioperative and metastatic settings comprise largely younger patients. Extrapolating the available evidence to the population of older patients with bladder cancer requires careful assessment of an individual patient's functional status and comorbidities to estimate the likelihood of treatment-related harms. This should be coupled with an understanding of an individual patient's goals of therapy, independence, estimated longevity, and social support to facilitate a shared medical decision regarding treatment. The use of validated approaches to geriatric assessment may refine risk stratification in older adults, although practical challenges have prevented uniform adoption in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian D Stensland
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
233
|
Shi Z, Zhuang Q, You R, Li Y, Li J, Cao D. Clinical and computed tomography imaging features of renal medullary carcinoma: A report of six cases. Oncol Lett 2015; 11:261-266. [PMID: 26870200 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) have a poor prognosis, usually due to late diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) analysis may aid the differentiation between RMC and other types of renal cell carcinoma, in order to establish an accurate early diagnosis. There is a limited number of reports in the literature focusing on clinical and multi-slice CT (MSCT) imaging findings of RMC. Consequently, the present study aimed to characterize the clinical and MSCT imaging features of RMC. For this purpose, the MSCT imaging findings of 6 patients with RMC were retrospectively studied. The patients were subjected to MSCT in order to investigate the characteristics of the tumors, including location, size, density, calcification, cystic or solid appearance, capsule sign, enhancement pattern and presence of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. The tumors in the current study presented a mean diameter of 7.48±3.25 cm, and were observed to be solitary and heterogeneous with necrotic components. The majority of the tumors did not contain calcifications (5/6); displayed an ill-defined margin (4/6); were centered in the medulla; extended into the renal pelvis or peripelvic tissues (6/6); and did not exhibit a fibrous capsule. Localized caliectasis was observed in 3 of the 6 cases. The attenuation of the solid region of the RMC on unenhanced CT was equal to that of the renal cortex or medulla (42.3±2.7 vs. 40.7±3.6 and 41.2±3.9 Hounsfield units, respectively; P>0.05) while, on enhanced CT, the enhancement of the tumor was lower than that of the normal renal cortex and medulla during all phases (cortical phase, 52.6±4.8 vs. l99.5±9.7 and 72.7±6.4; medullary phase, 58.6±5.7 vs. 184.6±10.8 and 93.5±7.8; delayed phase, 56.8±6.1 vs. 175.7±8.5 and 96.5±7.9, respectively; P<0.05). In conclusion, RMC tends to be an infiltrative, ill-defined heterogeneous mass with intratumoral necrosis, which arises from the renal medulla, and displays lower enhancement than the renal cortex and medulla during all phases on enhanced CT. Despite its rarity in adults, RMC should be included in a differential diagnosis when CT imaging reveals these features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenshan Shi
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| | - Qian Zhuang
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
| | - Ruixiong You
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| | - Yueming Li
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| | - Dairong Cao
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
234
|
Cisplatin- Versus Non-Cisplatin-based First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Previously Treated With Perioperative Cisplatin. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 14:331-40. [PMID: 26589729 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 10/07/2015] [Accepted: 10/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal choice of first-line chemotherapy for patients with relapse of urothelial carcinoma (UC) after perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy (PCBC) is unclear. We investigated the outcomes with cisplatin rechallenge versus a non-cisplatin regimen in patients with recurrent metastatic UC after PCBC in a multicenter retrospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual patient-level data were collected for patients who had received various first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced UC after previous PCBC. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the prognostic ability of the type of perioperative and first-line chemotherapy to independently affect overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after accounting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS Data were available for 145 patients (12 centers). The mean age was 62 years; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was > 0 for 42.0% of the patients. Of the 145 patients, 63% had received cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. The median time from previous chemotherapy (TFPC) was 6.2 months (range, 1-154 months). The median OS was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-27 months), and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5-7 months). A better ECOG PS and a longer TFPC (> 12 months vs. ≤ 12 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.52; P < .001) was prognostic for OS and PFS. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with poor OS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.13-3.06; P = .015), which appeared to be pronounced in those patients with a TFPC of ≤ 12 months. Retreatment with cisplatin in the first-line setting was associated with worse OS (HR, 3.38; P < .001). CONCLUSION The results of the present retrospective analysis suggest that for patients who have undergone previous PCBC for UC, rechallenging with cisplatin might confer a poorer OS, especially for those with progression within < 1 year.
Collapse
|
235
|
Galsky MD, Hahn NM, Wong B, Lee KM, Argiriadi P, Albany C, Gimpel-Tetra K, Lowe N, Shahin M, Patel V, Tsao CK, Oh WK. Phase 2 trial of the topoisomerase II inhibitor, amrubicin, as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2015; 76:1259-65. [DOI: 10.1007/s00280-015-2884-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
236
|
Kurtoglu M, Davarpanah NN, Qin R, Powles T, Rosenberg JE, Apolo AB. Elevating the Horizon: Emerging Molecular and Genomic Targets in the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 13:410-20. [PMID: 25862322 PMCID: PMC4561017 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2015] [Revised: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Despite recent advances in the identification of genomic alterations that lead to urothelial oncogenesis in vitro, patients with advanced urothelial carcinomas continue to have poor clinical outcomes. In the present review, we focus on targeted therapies that have yielded the most promising results alone or combined with traditional chemotherapy, including the antiangiogenesis agent bevacizumab, the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody trastuzumab, and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib. We also describe ongoing and developing clinical trials that use innovative approaches, including dose-dense scheduling of singular chemotherapy combinations, prospective screening of tumor tissues for mutational targets and biomarkers to predict chemosensitivity before the determination of the therapeutic regimen, and novel agents that target proteins in the immune checkpoint regulation pathway (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] and anti-PD-ligand 1) that have shown significant potential in preclinical models and early clinical trials. New agents and targeted therapies, alone or combined with traditional chemotherapy, will only be validated through accrual to developing clinical trials that aim to translate these therapies into individualized treatments and improved survival rates in urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Metin Kurtoglu
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Nicole N Davarpanah
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Rui Qin
- Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Thomas Powles
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrea B Apolo
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
237
|
Kim YS, Lee SI, Park SH, Park S, Hwang IG, Lee SC, Sun JM, Lee J, Lim HY. A Phase II Study of Weekly Docetaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 14:76-81. [PMID: 26454620 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Revised: 08/13/2015] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The present multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Weekly docetaxel was well tolerated but demonstrated modest activity, with a response rate of 6%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 1.4 months, and a median overall survival (OS) of 8.3 months. The dichotomy between PFS and OS was likely associated with subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy received by 58% of the patients. BACKGROUND Docetaxel is commonly used for second-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, myelosuppression is a substantial concern when the traditional 3-week docetaxel cycle is used. The present multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with progression after previous platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease were treated with docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the response rate. RESULTS The study enrolled 31 patients. Their median age was 64 years (range, 40-79 years). An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1, liver metastasis, and a hemoglobin level < 10 g/dL were observed in 100%, 32%, and 23% of patients, respectively. Previous platinum-based chemotherapy had been administered for metastatic disease in 29 patients (94%). Although fatigue (13%) and anorexia (6%) were the most frequently observed grade 3 to 4 toxicities, the safety profiles were generally mild and manageable. Two patients (6%) achieved an objective response, which was maintained for 3.0 to 7.8 months. Eight patients experienced disease stabilization (disease control rate, 32%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.6) and 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.9-10.6), respectively. A relatively long OS was associated with further salvage platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 18, 58%) showing an encouraging activity (response rate, 44%; median PFS, 4.0 months). CONCLUSION Second-line chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel was well tolerated but demonstrated modest activity in patients with metastatic UC. A platinum-based combination as second-line treatment might be considered for selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Saing Kim
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon Il Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Silvia Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In Gyu Hwang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Cheol Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Mu Sun
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeeyun Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Yeong Lim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
238
|
Bamias A, Peroukidis S, Stamatopoulou S, Tzannis K, Koutsoukos K, Andreadis C, Bozionelou V, Pistalmatzian N, Papatsoris A, Stravodimos K, Varthalitis I, Karamouzis M, Milaki G, Agorastos A, Kentepozidis N, Androulakis N, Bompolaki I, Kalofonos H, Mavroudis D, Dimopoulos MA. Utilization of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Collaborative Study by the Hellenic Genitourinary Cancer Group (HGUCG). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 14:e153-9. [PMID: 26437909 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Revised: 09/02/2015] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced urothelial cancer (AUCa) is associated with poor long-term survival. Two major concerns are related to nonexposure to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and poor outcome after relapse. Our purpose was to record patterns of practice in AUCa in Greece, focusing on first-line treatment and management of relapsed disease. METHODS Patients with AUCa treated from 2011 to 2013 were included in the analysis. Fitness for cisplatin was assessed by recently established criteria. RESULTS Of 327 patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, 179 (55%) did not receive cisplatin. Criteria for unfitness for cisplatin were: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥ 2, 21%; creatinine clearance ≤ 60 mL/min, 55%; hearing impairment, 8%; neuropathy, 1%; and cardiac failure, 5%. Forty-six patients (27%) did not fulfill any criterion for unfitness for cisplatin. The main reasons for these deviations were comorbidities (28%) and advanced age (32%). Seventy-four (68%) of 109 patients who experienced a relapse received second-line chemotherapy. The most frequent reason for not offering second-line chemotherapy was poor PS or limited life expectancy (66%). CONCLUSION In line with international data, approximately 50% of Greek patients with AUCa do not receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, although 27% of them were suitable for such treatment. In addition, about one third of patients with relapse did not receive second-line chemotherapy because of poor PS or short life expectancy. Enforcing criteria for fitness for cisplatin and earlier diagnosis of relapse represent 2 targets for improvement in current treatment practice for AUCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotle Bamias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Stavros Peroukidis
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Kimon Tzannis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Charalambos Andreadis
- 3rd Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenion Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Bozionelou
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, and Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Georgia Milaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Venizelio Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Antonios Agorastos
- 3rd Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenion Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikos Kentepozidis
- Medical Oncology Department, 251 General Air Force Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikos Androulakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Venizelio Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Iliada Bompolaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital of Chania, Chania, Greece
| | - Haralampos Kalofonos
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, and Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
239
|
Scarpato KR, Morgans AK, Moses KA. Optimal management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer - a review. Res Rep Urol 2015; 7:143-51. [PMID: 26380230 PMCID: PMC4567228 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s73566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer is a complex disease requiring aggressive management. Patients are often older with comorbid conditions that impact treatment options. This review describes the available therapies for invasive urothelial carcinoma, including chemotherapy, radical extirpative surgery, and bladder-preserving strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen R Scarpato
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kelvin A Moses
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
240
|
Contemporary radical cystectomy outcomes in patients with invasive bladder cancer: a population-based study. BJU Int 2015; 116 Suppl 3:18-25. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.13152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
241
|
Treatment of poor risk patients. Bladder Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118674826.ch28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
242
|
Quinn DI, Sternberg CN. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118674826.ch25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
243
|
Iyer G, Calabró F, Bajorin DF. Treatment of metastatic bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118674826.ch27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
244
|
Sundararajan S, Vogelzang NJ. Anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 therapy for bladder cancer: what is on the horizon? Future Oncol 2015; 11:2299-306. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncologic therapeutics has evolved enormously as we entered the 21st century. Unfortunately, the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer has remained unchanged over the last two decades despite a better understanding of the genetic alterations in bladder cancer. Pathways such as the PI3K/AKT3/mTOR and FGFR have been implicated in urothelial bladder cancer. However, targeted therapies have not shown proven benefit yet and are still considered investigational. Recently, researchers have been successful in manipulating the systemic immune response to mount antitumor effects in melanoma, lung cancer and lymphoma. Historically, intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guérin immunotherapy has been highly active in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Early data suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors will soon prove to be another cornerstone in the treatment armamentarium of advanced bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas J Vogelzang
- University of Nevada School of Medicine & US Oncology/Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89014, USA
| |
Collapse
|
245
|
Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, Carson KR, Crawford J, Cross SJ, Goldberg JM, Khatcheressian JL, Leighl NB, Perkins CL, Somlo G, Wade JL, Wozniak AJ, Armitage JO. Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:3199-212. [PMID: 26169616 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.3488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 615] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To update the 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs). METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Update Committee and conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews from October 2005 through September 2014. Guideline recommendations were based on the review of the evidence by the Update Committee. RESULTS Changes to previous recommendations include the addition of tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz, moderation of the recommendation regarding routine use of CSFs in older patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma, and addition of recommendations against routine dose-dense chemotherapy in lymphoma and in favor of high-dose-intensity chemotherapy in urothelial cancer. The Update Committee did not address recommendations regarding use of CSFs in acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes in adults. RECOMMENDATIONS Prophylactic use of CSFs to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia is warranted when the risk of febrile neutropenia is approximately 20% or higher and no other equally effective and safe regimen that does not require CSFs is available. Primary prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients who are at high risk on the basis of age, medical history, disease characteristics, and myelotoxicity of the chemotherapy regimen. Dose-dense regimens that require CSFs should only be used within an appropriately designed clinical trial or if supported by convincing efficacy data. Current recommendations for the management of patients exposed to lethal doses of total-body radiotherapy, but not doses high enough to lead to certain death as a result of injury to other organs, include the prompt administration of CSFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Smith
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Kari Bohlke
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Kenneth R Carson
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Jeffrey Crawford
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Scott J Cross
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - John M Goldberg
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - James L Khatcheressian
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Natasha B Leighl
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Cheryl L Perkins
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - George Somlo
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - James L Wade
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Antoinette J Wozniak
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - James O Armitage
- Thomas J. Smith, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kari Bohlke, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; Scott J. Cross, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk; James L. Khatcheressian, Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Kenneth R. Carson, Washington University, St Louis, MO; Jeffrey Crawford, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC; John M. Goldberg, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Natasha B. Leighl, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cheryl L. Perkins, patient representative, Dallas, TX; George Somlo, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; James L. Wade, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL; Antoinette J. Wozniak, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; and James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | | |
Collapse
|
246
|
Rudzinski JK, Basappa NS, North S. Perioperative chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2015; 9:249-54. [PMID: 26125306 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radical cystectomy with or without systemic chemotherapy is considered a standard of care for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The purpose of this review is to provide an update on current and recent literature published within the last 12 months reviewing the evidence for use of perioperative chemotherapy for patients with MIBC. RECENT FINDINGS In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) setting, the evidence demonstrates clinical efficacy and lower rate of toxicity with the use of high-dose methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (MVAC) compared with standard MVAC. Higher quality evidence for the use of gemcitabine with cisplatin is not yet available. Meta-analysis of cisplatin-based regimens in the adjuvant setting demonstrates significant benefit in overall survival and disease-free survival specifically in patients with lymph-node-positive disease. SUMMARY The available evidence suggests that along with radical cystectomy, cisplatin-based perioperative chemotherapy should be the standard of care in patients with MIBC with a higher quality and quantity of literature in support of the NAC approach. Adoption of perioperative chemotherapy for MIBC is on the rise in North America, which is reassuring. Novel therapeutic approaches for cisplatin-ineligible patients are currently being investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan K Rudzinski
- aDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery bDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
247
|
Beyond conventional chemotherapy: Emerging molecular targeted and immunotherapy strategies in urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41:699-706. [PMID: 26138514 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Advanced urothelial carcinoma is frequently lethal, and improvements in cytotoxic chemotherapy have plateaued. Recent technological advances allows for a comprehensive analysis of genomic alterations in a timely manner. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study revealed that there are numerous genomic aberrations in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, such as TP53, ARID1A, PIK3CA, ERCC2, FGFR3, and HER2. Molecular targeted therapies against similar genetic alterations are currently available for other malignancies, but their efficacy in urothelial carcinoma has not been established. This review describes the genomic landscape of malignant urothelial carcinomas, with an emphasis on the potential to prosecute these tumours by deploying novel targeted agents and immunotherapy in appropriately selected patient populations.
Collapse
|
248
|
Mazzola CR, Chin J. Targeting the VEGF pathway in metastatic bladder cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2015; 24:913-27. [DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2015.1041588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Clarisse R Mazzola
- Western University, Division of Urology and Division of Surgical Oncology, London, Ontario, Canada ;
| | - Joseph Chin
- Western University, Division of Urology and Division of Surgical Oncology, London, Ontario, Canada ;
| |
Collapse
|
249
|
Kim YR, Lee JL, You D, Jeong IG, Song C, Hong B, Hong JH, Ahn H. Gemcitabine plus split-dose cisplatin could be a promising alternative to gemcitabine plus carboplatin for cisplatin-unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2015; 76:141-53. [PMID: 26001531 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-015-2774-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2015] [Accepted: 05/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cisplatin-based chemotherapies are standard treatment regimens of advanced urothelial cell carcinoma. But a significant proportion of patients are unsuitable for cisplatin due to impaired renal function. Carboplatin-based regimens such as gemcitabine and carboplatin regimen (GCb) were applied due to less nephrotoxicity and side effects in these patients. However, it is known that clinical outcome of carboplatin-based regimens was unsatisfactory compared to cisplatin-based regimens. We compared the nephrotoxicity and response to treatment between GCb and gemcitabine plus split-dose cisplatin regimen (GC-S). METHODS GC-S consists of cisplatin 35 mg/m(2) given on day 1, 2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on day 1, 8 every 3 weeks. GCb consists of carboplatin (AUC 4.5) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on day 1, 8 every 3 weeks. Patient demographics, serum creatinine and calculated GFR, adverse events, and radiologic response were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Forty-four patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with GCb (n = 22) or GC-S (n = 22) in our institution. There was no difference at deterioration of serum creatinine or GFR between GCb and GC-S (p = 0.442, p = 0.345). For patients who had GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) subgroup, similar results were produced (p = 0.292, p = 0.186). In addition, GC-S (68.4 %) showed improved response compared to GCb (31.6 %) (p = 0.023). Both treatments were well tolerated, and there were no unexpected serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Based on preserved renal function, favorable response, and tolerability, GC-S could be a promising alternative to GCb for cisplatin-unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Rang Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
250
|
Activity of CEP-9722, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in urothelial carcinoma correlates inversely with homologous recombination repair response to DNA damage. Anticancer Drugs 2015; 25:878-86. [PMID: 24714082 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
As loss of DNA-repair proteins is common in urothelial carcinoma (UC), a rationale can be made to evaluate the activity of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to exploit synthetic lethality. We aimed to preclinically evaluate a PARP inhibitor, CEP-9722, and its active metabolite, CEP-8983, in UC. The activity of CEP-8983 was evaluated using a 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay against human UC cell lines. Flow cytometry, COMET assay, and western blot were performed to assess apoptosis, DNA damage, and DNA-repair proteins, respectively. RT4 xenografts received placebo or CEP-9722 (100 or 200 mg/kg/day) orally. Xenografts were subjected to immunohistochemistry for apoptosis [cleaved caspase (cc)-3] and angiogenesis (CD31). CEP-8983 (1 μmol/l) reduced the viability of RT4 and T24 cells by 20%, but did not reduce the viability of 5637 and TCC-SUP cells. Apoptosis and necrosis occurred in 9.7 and 9.1% of RT4 and 5637 cells, respectively. RT4 cells showed greater DNA damage compared with 5637 cells. Increased DNA damage occurred with combination versus CEP-8983 or cisplatin alone in RT4 and 5637 cells. T24 and RT4 showed the least RAD51 foci 8 h following radiation, whereas TCC-SUP and 5637 robustly induced RAD51 foci. CEP-9722 showed dose-dependent antitumor activity in RT4 xenografts; 200 mg/kg daily was better than control (P=0.04) and 100 mg/kg was not (P=0.26). Immunohistochemistry of xenografts showed a significant increase in cc-3 and decrease in CD31 with both doses (P<0.05). Biomarker-driven evaluation of PARP inhibitors in UC is justified as the activity of CEP-9722 correlated inversely with homologous recombination repair response to DNA damage.
Collapse
|