Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

The antioncogenic effect of Beclin-1 and FOXP3 is associated with SKP2 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma

An overexpression of S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (SKP2) is frequently observed in human cancer progression and metastasis, and evidence suggests that SKP2 plays a proto-oncogenic role both in vitro and in vivo. However, the function of SKP2 in gastric adenocarcinoma remains largely obscure. We investigated SKP2 expression in human gastric carcinomas.Tissue samples were acquired from 182 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma that were surgically resected from 2006 to 2012. Immunohistochemical staining for SKP2, Beclin-1, and forkhead box protein P3 (FOXP3) was performed. Pearson chi-square test was used to evaluate the associations among clinicopathological variables. The Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test, and the Cox proportional-hazards model were used in the analysis of the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).As a result, SKP2 overexpression in gastric adenocarcinomas showed a significant correlation with several favorable clinical factors, including the tumor size, T category, N category, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, OS, and DFS. SKP2 expression was positively correlated with the tumoral FOXP3, Beclin-1 expression, and regulatory T cell (Treg) infiltration. The difference in DFS between the SKP2 positive and negative group was attenuated by FOXP3 high expression, Beclin-1 high expression, and Tregs infiltration. Attenuation of the difference in OS by FOXP3 high expression, Beclin-1 high expression, and Tregs infiltration was not significant. In multivariable analysis, SKP2 expression was not correlated with OS and DFS.Our study showed a complex interrelationship between SKP2 and Beclin-1 and FOXP3 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma. The antioncogenic effect of Beclin-1 and FOXP3 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma is related to SKP2 expression.

Rapidly Evolving Treatment Landscape for Metastatic Esophagogastric Carcinoma: Review of Recent Data

Esophagogastric cancer (EGC) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that collectively represent the 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. While surgery in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy represents the primary curative treatment for early stage disease, survival outcomes for the majority of patients with later-stage disease remain poor. Cytotoxic chemotherapy with platinum doublets such as 5-FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin is the mainstay of treatment with incremental benefits provided by targeted therapy (trastuzumab, trastuzumab deruxtecan, ramucirumab) and immunotherapy (pembrolizumab, nivolumab). In this article, we provide an updated review and perspectives on the management of advanced EGC. We examine the distinct epidemiological, etiological and molecular features of each disease entity comprising EGC. After reviewing the critical studies that established conventional systemic cytotoxic and targeted therapeutics, we elaborate on recent promising and complex data with immune checkpoint inhibition focusing on implications of tumor histology and PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment. We also highlight novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to build on these recent advances.

TAS-102: A resurrected novel Fluoropyrimidine with expanding role in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies

TAS-102 is an orally administered fixed-dose formulation consisting of trifluorothymidine (TFT), a fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite, and tipiracil (TPI), an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase (TP) that prevents rapid degradation of TFT and ensures its bioavailability. The novelty of TAS-102 lies in its antitumor activity against 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) resistant tumors, demonstrated both in the in vitro models and xenografts. The cytotoxic activity of TFT relies primarily on extensive incorporation of the TFT metabolite into the cellular DNA inducing DNA dysfunction and cell death. In contrast, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) interferes with DNA biosynthesis by inhibiting thymidylate synthase(TS), which partly explains the absence of cross-resistance between TAS-102 and 5-FU. TAS-102 is currently approved in the third-line setting for patients with metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer based on phase III randomized clinical trial data confirming an overall survival benefit with TAS-102. The preliminary data from recently reported studies suggest a potential expanding role of TAS-102 in a variety of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. The current article presents an overview of the pharmacology, clinical development of TAS-102, and its emerging role in the treatment of GI cancers. In addition, we discussed the rationale underlying the ongoing clinical trials investigating various combinations of TAS-102 with other anticancer agents, including targeted therapies, in a wide range of GI tumors.

Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study

BACKGROUND

Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of the TAGS study aimed to clarify outcomes when FTD/TPI was used as third-line (3L) treatment and fourth- or later-line (4L+) treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were divided into a 3L group (126 and 64 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively) and 4L+ group (211 and 106 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively). Endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration to ≥2, and safety.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between FTD/TPI and placebo for 3L and 4L+ treatment. Median OS (mOS) for FTD/TPI versus placebo was: 6.8 versus 3.2 months {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.68 (0.47-0.97), P = 0.0318} in the 3L group; and 5.2 versus 3.7 months [0.73 (0.55-0.95), P = 0.0192] in the 4L+ group. Median PFS for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 3.1 versus 1.9 months [0.54 (0.38-0.77), P = 0.0004] in the 3L group; and 1.9 versus 1.8 months [0.57 (0.44-0.74), P < 0.0001] in the 4L+ group. Time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 4.8 versus 2.0 months [HR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42-0.86), P = 0.0049] in the 3L group; and 4.0 versus 2.5 months [0.75 (0.57-0.98), P = 0.0329] in the 4L+ group. The safety of FTD/TPI was consistent in all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in patients with GC/EGJ in third and later lines with a survival benefit that seems slightly superior in 3L treatment. When FTD/TPI is taken in 3L as recommended in the international guidelines, physicians can expect to provide patients with an mOS of 6.8 months.

Advanced Gastric Cancer: Current Treatment Landscape and a Future Outlook for Sequential and Personalized Guide: Swiss Expert Statement Article

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Several treatment possibilities have been investigated, but only a few show clinically meaningful results.

SUMMARY

Systemic treatment options for advanced gastric cancer (aGC) have evolved over the recent years, implementing the growing molecular knowledge of this heterogeneous disease. Molecular profiling (at least for HER-2-expression, microsatellite instability status, Epstein-Barr virus expression, and programmed death ligand-1 expression/combined positive score [CPS]) is recommended for all therapy-fit patients prior to the start of a systemic treatment and is crucial for decisions on treatment strategy and drug selection. Various examples like the application of trastuzumab in the HER-2-positive subgroup underline the benefits of this approach starting from the first-line setting. A combination of platinum and fluoropyrimidine remains the first-line chemotherapy backbone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Triplet combinations adding taxanes to the doublet regimen are reserved for certain scenarios. Unfortunately, almost all patients who receive first-line treatment (with or without anti-HER-2 blockade) progress and <70% are eligible for a second-line therapy. The addition of monoclonal antibodies has substantially improved outcomes in this setting. As such, ramucirumab has led to significant and clinically meaningful advancements in the second-line treatment. Furthermore, immuno-oncology with checkpoint inhibition and immune stimulation has evolved in the field of aGC. Recent first-line data show a significant survival benefit in aGC patients with a CPS ≥ 5 under immunochemotherapy. Nonetheless, the impact of immunotherapy combinations and immunochemotherapy remains an area of investigation. Key Message: In this review, we highlight recent improvements in the treatment landscape of advanced gastric cancer, the heterogeneity of this disease, and possible personalized targets.

Selective therapeutic strategy for p53-deficient cancer by targeting dysregulation in DNA repair

Breast carcinomas commonly carry mutations in the tumor suppressor p53, although therapeutic efforts to target mutant p53 have previously been unfruitful. Here we report a selective combination therapy strategy for treatment of p53 mutant cancers. Genomic data revealed that p53 mutant cancers exhibit high replication activity and express high levels of the Base-Excision Repair (BER) pathway, whereas experimental testing showed substantial dysregulation in BER. This defect rendered accumulation of DNA damage in p53 mutant cells upon treatment with deoxyuridine analogues. Notably, inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) greatly enhanced this response, whereas normal cells responded with activation of the p53-p21 axis and cell cycle arrest. Inactivation of either p53 or p21/CDKN1A conferred the p53 mutant phenotype. Preclinical animal studies demonstrated a greater anti-neoplastic efficacy of the drug combination (deoxyuridine analogue and PARP inhibitor) than either drug alone. This work illustrates a selective combination therapy strategy for p53 mutant cancers that will improve survival rates and outcomes for thousands of breast cancer patients.

History and emerging trends in chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Chemotherapy is indispensable for gastric cancer. For unresectable and/or recurrent gastric cancer, first-line chemotherapy consists of multidrug regimens including oral 5-FU agents such as S1/Xeloda and platinum preparations, as well as Trastuzumab, which is effective in HER2-positive cases. Second- and third-line chemotherapy regimens include taxanes, Ramucirumab (R-mab), and Nivolumab (N-mab), which have different mechanisms of action from first-line chemotherapy. R-mab is molecularly targeted to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in the host cells, but its indication is not conditional. For resectable gastric cancer, in Eastern countries, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has been successful, including S1, Docetaxel/S1 (DS), and Xeloda/Oxaliplatin (Xelox) regimens, whereas, in Western countries, the 5-FU/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatin/Docetaxel (FLOT) regimen was recently shown to be effective in the perioperative chemotherapy setting. Most recently, however, in Eastern countries, perioperative SOX was demonstrated to be effective in specific advanced gastric cancer. For stage IV gastric cancer, new therapeutic strategies have been proposed such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conversion surgery, and cures can be conditionally obtained. Recent genomic understanding of gastric cancer proposed a diversity of molecular targets by molecular profiling. Such optimized chemotherapy regimens, according to the specific clinical situations, have been rigorously established for the best survival of advanced gastric cancer.

An observational study on nutrition status in gastric cancer patients receiving ramucirumab plus taxane: BALAST study

Limited data are available regarding the efficacy of nutrition support in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients receiving a standard second-line combination chemotherapy. The BALAST study is conducted as a prospective, multicenter observational study to evaluate the efficacy of nutrition support for patients with AGC treated with ramucirumab plus taxane as second-line treatment. As part of the routine care, patients who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition will receive nutrition support from dietitians. We will enroll a total of 26 patients to estimate weight control rate at 12 weeks as primary end point. This study will generate valuable data reinforcing the role of nutrition support therapy for AGC patients receiving second-line chemotherapy.

Synchronous peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer origin: incidence, treatment and survival of a nationwide Dutch cohort

INTRODUCTION

The peritoneum is a predilection site for gastric cancer metastases. Current standard treatment for gastric cancer patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases is palliative systemic therapy. However, its efficacy is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, treatment and survival patterns of gastric cancer patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases in the Netherlands.

METHODS

All newly diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases between 1999 and 2017 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Incidence, treatment and survival patterns were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 3,773 patients were identified from the NCR. The incidence of synchronous peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients increased from 18% in 2008 to 27% in 2017. The use of systemic therapy increased from 15% in 1999-2002 to 43% in 2013-2017 (p < 0.001). The median survival of the entire cohort did not significantly increase over time. Median survival of patients treated with systemic therapy increased from 7.4 months in 1999-2002 to 9.4 months in 2013-2017 (p = 0.005). In contrast, median survival of patients not treated with systemic therapy decreased from 3.3 months in 1999-2002 to 2.1 months in 2013-2017 (p < 0.001). Some clinical and pathological data such as the extent of the peritoneal metastases were not available.

CONCLUSION

Synchronous peritoneal metastases are increasingly diagnosed in gastric cancer patients. In recent years, more patients were treated with systemic treatment and survival of these patients increased. However, as survival of the entire group did not improve over time, the effect of systemic therapy remains unknown.

Changes in the therapeutic landscape of oesophago-gastric cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews recent randomised clinical trials on systemic treatment of oesophago-gastric cancers in the perioperative and metastatic setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Adding nivolumab to first-line chemotherapy improved survival in patients with metastatic gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction/oesophageal adenocarcinoma with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ five in a global trial and progression-free survival in metastatic gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction cancers in an Asian trial. The addition of pembrolizumab to first-line chemotherapy improved survival in metastatic oesophageal cancer patients, with the most benefit in oesophageal squamous cancer and tumours with high PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 10). Adjuvant nivolumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) in resectable oesophageal cancer patients with residual pathologic disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma, a phase II trial showed improved DFS when pertuzumab and trastuzumab were added to perioperative FLOT (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel). Another phase II trial showed improved response rates and survival in pretreated metastatic HER2-positive gastric and gastrooesophageal junction cancer patients who received the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan compared to physician's choice of chemotherapy.

SUMMARY

Chemo-immunotherapy combinations will become the new standard of care for some patients with metastatic oesophago-gastric cancers. Adjuvant nivolumab is a new option for oesophageal cancer patients with poor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan

Objective

Nivolumab and trifluridine/tipiracil have significantly improved the overall survival of patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in different placebo-controlled phase III trials. Accordingly, nivolumab and trifluridine/tipiracil have been approved and recommended for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab.

Methods

A partitioned survival model, which consisted of three health states, namely, ‘pre-progression,’ ‘post-progression,’ and ‘death,’ was constructed. Efficacy and safety data were derived from the TAGS and ATTRACTION-2 trials. Costs were estimated based on the standard clinical pathway and national insurance fee schedules. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The threshold value was set to JPY 7 500 000 (USD 68 182) for each quality-adjusted life-year.

Results

The expected median overall survival and progression-free survival were 5.59 and 1.99 months for trifluridine/tipiracil and 5.26 and 1.55 months for nivolumab, respectively. The quality-adjusted life-year and expected costs per patient were 0.4379 and JPY 2 054 625 (USD 18 678) for trifluridine/tipiracil and 0.5295 and JPY 5 018 148 (USD 45 620) for nivolumab, respectively. The expected median progression-free survival and overall survival were equivalent with trifluridine/tipiracil and nivolumab, whereas the expected quality-adjusted life-year with trifluridine/tipiracil was slightly lower than that with nivolumab. However, trifluridine/tipiracil reduced the total treatment cost by JPY 2 963 523 (USD 26 996) compared with that of nivolumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of nivolumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil was JPY 32 352 489 (USD 294 113) per quality-adjusted life-year gained.

Conclusions

Trifluridine/tipiracil was more cost-effective than nivolumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer.

Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer

Background

Nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) are standard treatments for refractory advanced gastric cancer (AGC); however, it is unclear which drug should be administered first or in which cases. The tumor growth rate (TGR) during preceding treatment is reported to be associated with tumor response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil, suggesting that TGR may be useful for drug selection. Therefore, we evaluated the association between TGR during preceding treatment and the tumor response to NIVO or IRI.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive AGC patients treated with NIVO or IRI and divided them into slow-growing (Slow) and rapid-growing (Rapid) groups according to TGR and the presence or absence of new lesions (NL+/NL−, respectively) during preceding treatment (Slow group: NL− with low TGR <0.30%/day; Rapid group: NL+ or high TGR ≥0.30%/day).

Results

A total of 117 patients (Rapid/Slow groups, 72/45; NIVO/IRI groups, 32/85) were eligible. All baseline characteristics except peritoneal metastases were similar between patients treated with NIVO and IRI in the Rapid and Slow groups. The response rate was significantly higher in patients treated with NIVO compared with IRI [31%/3%; odds ratio (OR), 13.8; P = 0.01; adjusted OR, 52; P = 0.002] in the Slow group, but there was no difference between patients treated with NIVO and IRI (5%/8%; OR, 0.68; P = 0.73; adjusted OR, 0.94; P = 0.96) in the Rapid group. Disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were consistent with these results.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that NIVO treatment is a more favorable option for patients with slow-growing tumors, and NIVO and IRI are similarly recommended for patients with rapid-growing tumors in refractory AGC. TGR and NL emergence during preceding treatment may be helpful for drug selection and warrant further investigation.

•

NIVO and IRI are standard treatments for refractory AGC, although it is unclear which should be administered first.

•

TGR may be useful for drug selection, therefore we evaluated the association between TGR and the tumor response to NIVO or IRI.

•

In the Slow group, the response rate (RR) was significantly higher in patients treated with NIVO compared with IRI.

•

In the Rapid group, there was no significant difference in RR between the NIVO and IRI groups.

•

TGR and NL emergence during preceding treatment may be useful for drug selection.

A phase I, open-label study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of renal impairment

PURPOSE

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved for advanced colorectal and gastric/gastroesophageal cancer; however, data in patients with renal impairment (RI) are limited. This phase I study evaluated FTD/TPI in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of RI to develop dosing guidance.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled into normal renal function (CrCl ≥ 90 mL/min), mild RI (CrCl 60-89 mL/min), or moderate RI (CrCl 30-59 mL/min) cohorts and administered the recommended FTD/TPI dose (35 mg/m² twice daily, days 1-5 and 8-12; 28-day cycle). Based on interim pharmacokinetics/safety data, patients with severe RI (CrCl 15-29 mL/min) were enrolled and received FTD/TPI 20 mg/m² twice daily.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (normal renal function [n = 12]; mild RI [n = 12]; moderate RI [n = 11]; severe RI [n = 8]) were enrolled and treated. At steady state, compared to values in patients with normal renal function, FTD area under the curve (AUC) was not significantly different in patients with RI, but TPI AUC was significantly higher and increased with RI severity. FTD/TPI safety profile was consistent with prior experience, but grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the RI cohorts (83.3% [mild], 90.9% [moderate], 75.0% [severe], and normal [50.0%]). Hematologic AEs (anemia and neutropenia) were more frequent with RI. Overall, seven patients discontinued because of unrelated, nonhematologic AEs.

CONCLUSION

FTD/TPI is safe and tolerable at the recommended 35 mg/m² dose in patients with mild/moderate RI and at the reduced 20 mg/m² dose in patients with severe RI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02301117, registration date: November 21, 2014.

Comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear which treatment is the most effective for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer. We conducted a network meta-analysis to address this important issue.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome of interest, which was reported as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs involving 3372 patients and evaluating 15 treatments were included in this network meta-analysis. Ramucirumab+chemotherapy (CT) (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.77) and use of programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, including camrelizumab (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.88), sintilimab (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.98), nivolumab (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.94), and pembrolizumab (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98), conferred better OS than CT; however, this OS benefit was not observed for PD-L1 inhibitor (avelumab) and other target agents (trastuzumab, everolimus, gefitinib, and anlotinib). In subgroup analysis, ramucirumab+CT and pembrolizumab showed significant improvement in OS, when compared to CT, in esophageal/EGJ adenocarcinoma (AC) cases; moreover, all PD-1 inhibitors had significant OS advantage over CT in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Based on treatment ranking in terms of OS, ramucirumab+CT and camrelizumab were ranked the best treatments for patients with AC and SCC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ramucirumab+CT and PD-1 inhibitors were superior to CT for previously treated cases of advanced esophageal/EGJ cancer. Ramucirumab+CT seemed to be the most effective treatment in patients with esophageal/EGJ AC, while use of PD-1 inhibitors, especially camrelizumab, was likely to be the optimal treatment in patients with esophageal SCC.

Long-term response on letrozole for gastric cancer: A case report

RATIONALE

Hormone therapies, particularly those targeting estrogen and its receptors, are a key treatment modality for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast or ovarian cancer. Some gastric cancers (GCs) express ERs, and preclinical studies suggest the potential of estrogen-targeting hormone therapy on GC; however, the clinical relevance of this hormone therapy on GC treatment has not been well elucidated.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 80-year-old female was admitted to our department with hypogastric pain and vomiting. Computed tomography demonstrated small bowel obstruction, and laparotomy after bowel decompression revealed peritoneal dissemination consisting of a poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Intestinal bypass between the ileum and transverse colon was performed.

DIAGNOSES

The tumor was ER- and mammaglobin-positive, indicating that it originated from a breast cancer. Diagnostic imaging revealed no evidence of breast cancer; however, right axillary ER- and mammaglobin-positive lymphadenopathy was found.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient received hormone therapy using letrozole based on a clinical diagnosis of occult breast cancer with peritoneal dissemination and right axillary lymph node metastasis.

OUTCOMES

The patient remained disease free until 37 months but deceased at 53 months from the onset of disease. An autopsy revealed no tumor cells in the right breast tissue; however, there was a massive invasion of cancer cells in the stomach.

LESSONS

A patient with ER positive GC with peritoneal dissemination and right axillary lymph node metastasis presented remarkable response to letrozole. The long-term survival obtained using letrozole for a patient with GC with distant metastasis suggests the potential of estrogen targeting hormone therapies for GC.

A Phase I study of pevonedistat plus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to platinum (NCCH-1811)

Based on synergistic anti-tumor effects between blockades of NEDD8 activating enzyme and a platinum in preclinical studies, this Phase I study is designed to investigate the safety and tolerability of pevonedistat in combination with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as third-line or later treatment in patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer who were previously treated with fluoropyrimidines and platinum (cisplatin or oxaliplatin) as the first-line treatment and paclitaxel (including nab-paclitaxel) as the second-line treatment. The aim of this trial is to determine the recommended dose of pevonedistat and to see its pharmacokinetics in combination with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in the dose-finding part and explore its efficacy and safety in the expansion part. Trial registration number: jRCT2031190020 (jRCTs: the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials).

Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the gastrohesophageal junction, among patients previously treated in Greece

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) compared with best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer(mGC), including gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma(GEJ), who have received at least two prior therapies for metastatic disease and are eligible for third-line treatment, in Greece.Methods: A partitioned survival model was locally adapted from a public payer perspective over a 10-year time horizon. Clinical, safety and utility data were extracted from literature. Resource consumption data obtained from a panel of local experts using a questionnaire developed for the study was combined with unit costs obtained from official sources. All costs reflect the year 2020 (€). Outcomes of the model were patients' life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY and LY gained.Results: The total cost per patient was estimated to be €6,965 for FTD/TPI and €1,906 for BSC, while FTD/TPI was associated with 0.180 and 0.107 increments in LYs and QALYs, respectively, compared with BSC, resulting in an ICER of €47,144 per QALY gained and €28,112 per LY gained.Conclusion: FTD/TPI was estimated to be a cost-effective treatment option for eligible third line mGC patients, including GEJ in Greece.

Monitoring FTD in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer administered FTD plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally administrated anticancer drug with efficacy validated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or gastric cancer. FTD, a key component of FTD/TPI, exerts antitumor effects via its incorporation into DNA. Using specific antibodies against bromodeoxyuridine, FTD incorporation into DNA is detected in tumors and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of patients with mCRC who are administered FTD/TPI. The proportion of FTD‐positive PBMC fluctuates according to the schedule of treatment, although the association between the proportion of FTD‐positive PBMC and the clinical outcomes of patients is unknown. To answer this question, here we monitored the FTD‐positive PBMC of 39 elderly patients with mCRC enrolled in KSCC1602, a single‐arm phase 2 trial of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab as a first‐line treatment, for 1 month, during the first cycle of treatment. The median values and interquartile ranges of the percentage of FTD‐positive PBMC on days 8, 15, and 29 were 39.3% (30.7%‐52.2%), 66.9% (40.0%‐75.3%), and 13.5% (5.7%‐26.0%), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the percentage of FTD‐positive PBMC on day 8 (the end of the first week of treatment) had moderate ability to accurately diagnose the occurrence of severe neutropenia and leukopenia within 1 month (area under the curve = 0.778 [95% confidence interval, 0.554‐0.993]). This result suggests that excess FTD incorporation into PBMC at the initial phase of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab treatment is a risk factor for early onset of severe hematological adverse events.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: a clinical perspective

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer is a subtype for which new drugs and specific treatment strategies should be developed. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate containing topoisomerase I inhibitor as a payload. In the randomized phase 2 study (DESTINY-Gastric01) for HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (AGC), patients treated with T-DXd showed a significantly higher response rate compared with the chemotherapy of physician's choice, associated with remarkably prolonged progression-free and overall survival. T-DXd also exhibits anti-tumor activity to HER2-negative tumor cells close to HER2-positive cells (so-called bystander killing effect). T-DXd was effective even for HER2-low expressing breast and gastric cancer in several clinical studies. Taking advantage of these strong points and synergism with other cytotoxic, molecular-targeted and immunological agents, it is expected that T-DXd will bring further progression in treatment both for strongly and weakly HER2 positive AGC in various treatment settings including perioperative chemotherapy.

Evolving treatment paradigms in esophageal cancer

A heterogenous disease with a dismal prognosis, esophageal cancer poses a major health challenge worldwide. In recent years, the treatment landscape for esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has undergone major evolution, with the elucidation of underlying biologic pathways and predispositions. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation has emerged as a leading approach for the management of locoregional esophageal cancer, while perioperative chemotherapy has shown promising outcomes specifically in adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Studies also explore the implementation of chemoradiation in various sequential preoperative strategies, as well as in the adjuvant setting. Definitive chemoradiation is considered a valid alternative for non-surgical candidates with SCC. Clinical trials currently evaluating the potential benefits of different approaches may shed light on existing controversies regarding optimal management of locoregional disease. For patients with metastatic cancer, chemotherapy remains the backbone of antineoplastic treatment alongside palliative care, moreover the discovery of novel biological targets has led to the initiation of targeted and immune therapy for specific subpopulations. Taken together, an era of burgeoning clinical trials and changing paradigms has evolved in esophageal oncology. Multidisciplinary collaboration is key to effective combination and sequencing of treatment modalities tailored per patient and per tumor histology. This work aims to provide a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art oncological management of esophageal cancer, with consideration of new challenges and obstacles to be overcome.

Real‑world challenge for clinicians treating advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (Review)

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GOA) is a disease of older people. Incidence is rising in the developed world and the majority of patients present with advanced disease. Based on clinical trial data, systemic chemotherapy in the advanced setting is associated with improvements in quality of life and survival. However, there is a recognised mismatch between trial populations and the patients encountered in clinical practice in terms of age, comorbidity and fitness. Appropriate patient selection is essential to safely deliver effective treatment. In this narrative review, we discuss the challenges faced by clinicians when assessing real‑world patients with advanced GOA for systemic therapy. We also highlight the importance of frailty screening and the current available evidence we can use to guide our management.

Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is not a top-10 malignancy in the United States but represents one of the most common causes of cancer death worldwide. Biological differences between tumors from Eastern and Western countries add to the complexity of identifying standard-of-care therapy based on international trials. Systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy all have proven efficacy in gastric adenocarcinoma; therefore, multidisciplinary treatment is paramount to treatment selection. Triplet chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer is now accepted and could represent a plateau of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy for localized disease. Classification of gastric cancer based on molecular subtypes is providing an opportunity for personalized therapy. Biomarkers, in particular microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), tumor mutation burden, and Epstein-Barr virus, are increasingly driving systemic therapy approaches and allowing for the identification of populations most likely to benefit from immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Significant research opportunities remain for the less differentiated histologic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma and those without markers of immunotherapy activity.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan: Changing the Destiny of HER2 Expressing Solid Tumors

HER2 targeted therapies have significantly improved prognosis of HER2-positive breast and gastric cancer. HER2 overexpression and mutation is the pathogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer, however, to date, there are no approved HER2-targeted therapies with these indications. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a novel HER2-directed antibody drug conjugate showing significant anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated HER2-positive breast and gastric cancer patients. Preliminary data have shown promising objective response rates in patients with HER2-positive NSCLC and colorectal cancer. T-DXd has an acceptable safety profile, however with concerns regarding potentially serious treatment-emergent adverse events. In this review we focus on the pharmacologic characteristics and toxicity profile of T-Dxd, and provide an update on the most recent results of clinical trials of T-DXd in solid tumors. The referenced papers were selected through a PubMed search performed on 16 March 2021 with the following searching terms: T-DXd and breast cancer, or gastric cancer, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or colorectal cancer. Oral presentation, abstracts, and posters presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO, Alexandria, VA, USA) 2020 and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO, Lugano, Switzerland) 2020 annual meetings were retrieved for data on T-DXd. We also overview ongoing research and data of combination therapies currently under investigation, which will impact on future therapeutic strategies. Clinicaltrials.gov was searched to identify ongoing clinical trials of T-DXd alone or in combination in solid tumors.

Bone Metastases from Gastric Cancer: What We Know and How to Deal with Them

Gastric cancer (GC) is the third cause of cancer-related death worldwide; the prognosis is poor especially in the case of metastatic disease. Liver, lymph nodes, peritoneum, and lung are the most frequent sites of metastases from GC; however, bone metastases from GC have been reported in the literature. Nevertheless, it is unclear how the metastatic sites may affect the prognosis. In particular, knowledge about the impact of bone metastases on GC patients’ outcome is scant, and this may be related to the rarity of bone lesions and/or their underestimation at the time of diagnosis. In fact, there is still a lack of specific recommendation for their detection at the diagnosis. Then, the majority of the evidences in this field came from retrospective analysis on very heterogeneous study populations. In this context, the aim of this narrative review is to delineate an overview about the evidences existing about bone metastases in GC patients, focusing on their incidence and biology, the prognostic role of bone involvement, and their possible implication in the treatment choice.

The Activity of Crizotinib in Chemo-Refractory MET-Amplified Esophageal and Gastric Adenocarcinomas: Results from the AcSé-Crizotinib Program

Background

The AcSé-crizotinib program provides extensive screening of crizotinib-targeted genomic alteration in several malignancies. We here report the results in patients with esogastric MET-amplified adenocarcinomas.

Objective

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of crizotinib in patients with pretreated esogastric MET-amplified adenocarcinoma who have no alternative treatment options.

Patients and Methods

MET expression was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization in tumor samples with immunohistochemistry scores ≥ 2+. Patients with chemo-refractory tumors showing ≥ 6 MET copies were eligible for crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy outcome was the objective response rate after two cycles of crizotinib.

Results

MET was prospectively analyzed in 570 esogastric adenocarcinomas. Amplifications were found in 35/570 adenocarcinomas (29/523 gastric and 6/47 esophageal). Nine patients were treated with crizotinib. The objective response rate after two cycles was 33.3% (95% CI 7.5–70), the best overall response rate was 55.6% (95% CI 21.2–86.3), with median progression-free survival of 3.2 months (95% CI 1.0–5.4), and overall survival of 8.1 months (95% CI 1.7–24.6). Safety was consistent with that previously reported for crizotinib.

Conclusions

Large-scale screening for MET-amplified esogastric adenocarcinomas is feasible. MET amplification was observed in 5.5% of gastric and 12.8% of esophageal adenocarcinomas. Crizotinib shows encouraging results in selected patients. Thus, c-MET inhibition for MET-amplified tumors deserves further evaluation.

Trial Registration Number

NCT02034981.

Date of Registration

14 January 2014.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer

Introduction: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate with a humanized anti-HER2 antibody, cleavable peptide-based linker, and topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. The phase II trial DESTINY-Gastric01 has demonstrated that T-DXd exhibits antitumor activity in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who had received at least two previous therapies, including trastuzumab.Area covered: T-DXd was approved for previously treated HER2-positive AGC in Japan. The US Food and Drug Administration also approved on 15 January 2021. In this article, we review the development of T-DXd, its pharmacology, and its safety profile in patients with HER2-positive AGC.Expert opinion: T-DXd has demonstrated a significantly higher objective response rate and a longer overall survival in HER2-positive AGC patients with two or more previous lines of systemic chemotherapy, including trastuzumab. Safety profile was acceptable. Currently, there are several ongoing clinical trials of T-DXd in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy or an immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Optimal Avapritinib Treatment Strategies for Patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Avapritinib, a novel inhibitor of KIT/PDGFRA, is approved in the U.S. for the treatment of adults with PDGFRA exon 18-mutant unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (U/M GISTs). We assessed the safety of avapritinib and provide evidence-based guidance on management of avapritinib-associated adverse events (AEs), including cognitive effects and intracranial bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of data from a two-part, single-arm dose escalation/expansion phase I study (NAVIGATOR; NCT02508532) in patients with U/M GISTs treated with oral avapritinib 30-600 mg once daily. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; the impact of dose modification (interruption and/or reduction) on progression-free survival (PFS) was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were limited to patients who started avapritinib at 300 mg (approved dose).

RESULTS

Of 250 patients enrolled in the study, 74.0% presented with KIT mutation and 24.8% presented with PDGFRA exon 18-mutation; 66.8% started avapritinib at 300 mg. The most common treatment-related AEs (any grade) were nausea (59.2%), fatigue (50.0%), periorbital edema (42.0%), anemia (39.2%), diarrhea (36.0%), vomiting (36.0%), and increased lacrimation (30.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Among 167 patients starting on 300 mg avapritinib, all-cause cognitive effects rate (grade 1-2) was 37.0% in all patients and 52.0% in patients ≥65 years. Cognitive effects improved to a lower grade more quickly with dose modification (1.3-3.1 weeks) than without (4.9-7.6 weeks). Median PFS was 11.4 months with dose modification and 7.2 months without.

CONCLUSION

Tolerability-guided dose modification of avapritinib is an effective strategy for managing AEs in patients with GISTs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Early recognition of adverse events and tailored dose modification appear to be effective approaches for managing treatment-related adverse events and maintaining patients on avapritinib. Dose reduction does not appear to result in reduced efficacy. Patients' cognitive function should be assessed at baseline and monitored carefully throughout treatment with avapritinib for the onset of cognitive adverse events. Dose interruption is recommended at the first sign of any cognitive effect, including grade 1 events.

How to Best Exploit Immunotherapeutics in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Between Biomarkers and Novel Cell-Based Approaches

Despite extensive research efforts, advanced gastric cancer still has a dismal prognosis with conventional treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for many solid tumors. Amongst gastric cancer subtypes, tumors with microsatellite instability and Epstein Barr Virus positive tumors provide the strongest rationale for responding to immunotherapy. Various predictive biomarkers such as mismatch repair status, programmed death ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, assessment of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and circulating biomarkers have been evaluated. However, results have been inconsistent due to different methodologies and thresholds used. Clinical implementation therefore remains a challenge. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer is emerging with data from monotherapy in the heavily pre-treated population already available and studies in earlier disease settings with different combinatorial approaches in progress. Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations with chemotherapy (CT), anti-angiogenics, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-Her2 directed therapy, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or dual checkpoint inhibitor strategies are being explored. Moreover, novel strategies including vaccines and CAR T cell therapy are also being trialed. Here we provide an update on predictive biomarkers for response to immunotherapy with an overview of their strengths and limitations. We discuss clinical trials that have been reported and trials in progress whilst providing an account of future steps needed to improve outcome in this lethal disease.

Where to Start and What to Do Next: The Sequencing of Treatments in Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer

Esophagogastric cancer is associated with rising incidence and high mortality. Nearly 40% of patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis with poor 5-year overall survival. The treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma has started to bifurcate in recent years, owing to the evolving understanding of the biologic and genomic characteristics of these tumors. Incorporation of HER2-directed therapy in the form of monoclonal antibody and antibody-drug conjugate is now standard of care for patients with HER2-positive disease. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to the therapeutic landscape of metastatic esophagogastric cancer is associated with modest improvement in overall survival, and definition of predictive biomarkers of response to checkpoint inhibition remains imprecise. A number of therapeutic targets including FGFR2b, Claudin 18.2, DKK-1, and DNA repair defects are being explored in clinical trials. Similarly, combination immunotherapy and novel HER2-targeting agents, such as bispecific antibody and small-molecule inhibitors, are at various stages of clinical development. Despite the progress made in the field of targeted therapies and checkpoint inhibition, chemotherapy remains an integral part of treatment of metastatic esophagogastric cancer but is associated with considerable toxicity. Clinical trials focusing on minimizing toxicity of currently available therapeutic agents, development of novel biomarker-driven treatment strategies, and overcoming resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition will define the future of this traditionally indelible disease.

Phase III Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Andecaliximab With mFOLFOX6 as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Gastric or GEJ Adenocarcinoma (GAMMA-1)

PURPOSE

Andecaliximab (ADX) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits matrix metalloproteinase 9, an extracellular enzyme involved in matrix remodeling, tumor growth, and metastases. A phase I and Ib study of modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (mFOLFOX6) with ADX revealed encouraging antitumor activity in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This phase III, randomized, double-blinded, placebo (PBO)-controlled multicenter study investigated the efficacy and safety of mFOLFOX6 with and without ADX in patients with untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Random assignment was 1:1 to mFOLFOX6 + ADX or mFOLFOX6 + PBO. ADX/PBO 800 mg was infused on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Protocol therapy was given until disease progression or intolerance. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (RECIST 1.1), and safety.

RESULTS

Between September 2015 and May 2017, 432 patients were randomly assigned, 218 to ADX and 214 to PBO. The median OS was 12.5 versus 11.8 months in the ADX and PBO groups, respectively. The median PFS was 7.5 versus 7.1 months in the ADX and PBO groups, respectively. The objective response rate was 51% in the ADX group and 41% in the PBO group. Among the subgroup analyses, patients of age ≥ 65 years had an improved OS and PFS with ADX versus PBO; the P values and CIs were not adjusted for multiplicity. There were no meaningful differences in the safety profile of the ADX versus PBO groups.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ADX to mFOLFOX6 did not improve OS in unselected patients with untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Beyond the Guidelines: The Grey Zones of the Management of Gastric Cancer. Consensus Statements from the Gastric Cancer Italian Network (GAIN)

BACKGROUND

Management of gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains challenging, because of the heterogeneity in tumor biology within the upper gastrointestinal tract. Daily clinical practice is full of grey areas regarding the complexity of diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic procedures. The aim of this paper is to provide a guide for clinicians facing challenging situations in routine practice, taking a multidisciplinary consensus approach based on available literature.

METHODS

The GAIN (GAstric cancer Italian Network) group was established with the aims of reviewing literature evidence, discussing key issues in prevention, diagnosis, and management of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, and offering a summary of statements. A Delphi consensus method was used to obtain opinions from the expert panel of specialists.

RESULTS

Forty-nine clinical questions were identified in six areas of interest: role of multidisciplinary team; risk factors; diagnosis; management of early gastric cancer and multimodal approach to localized gastric cancer; treatment of elderly patients with locally advanced resectable disease; and treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The statements presented may guide clinicians in practical management of this disease.

Conversion surgery for metastatic gastric cancer at 2 years after initial diagnosis of cancer of unknown primary with metastasis of cervical lymph nodes and ovary: a case report

Background

Patients with stage IV gastric cancer have a poor prognosis despite improvements in intensive treatment regimens, including chemotherapy. Recently, conversion surgery has received much attention as it can provide long-term survival in stage IV gastric cancer patients who are responsive to chemotherapy. Herein, we describe the case of a patient who underwent conversion surgery for metastatic gastric cancer that was performed over 2 years after an initial diagnosis of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) with metastasis of the cervical lymph nodes and the ovary.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old woman with cervical lymphadenopathy was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography showed left cervical lymphadenopathy and bilateral ovarian enlargement. Endoscopic survey revealed no signs of malignancy in the upper or the lower gastrointestinal tract. Pathological findings after cervical lymphadenectomy revealed a signet-ring cell carcinoma and were suggestive of gastric cancer metastases. However, multiple evaluations yielded no evidence of gastric cancer and the patient was diagnosed with CUP. She was prescribed chemotherapy for gastric cancer and underwent bilateral oophorectomy after undergoing chemotherapy for 18 months. Pathologic analysis of oophorectomy tissue revealed findings identical to those seen in the cervical lymph nodes. At about 2 years after the initial diagnosis, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed evidence of gastric cancer. We performed a distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Her postoperative course was uneventful and she remains alive with no signs of disease recurrence at 3 months post-surgery.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing successful conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer in a patient whose cancer was definitively diagnosed 2 years after an initial diagnosis of CUP.

Safety and activity of trifluridine/tipiracil and ramucirumab in previously treated advanced gastric cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Findings of preclinical and clinical trials in colorectal cancer have shown promising antitumour effects of the co-formulation trifluridine/tipiracil and VEGF inhibition. We aimed to investigate the safety and activity of trifluridine/tipiracil and ramucirumab for previously treated advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

We did an open-label, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 study at eight centres in Japan. We enrolled patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Cohort A included patients previously treated with one line of chemotherapy without ramucirumab and cohort B included patients previously treated with two to four lines of chemotherapy, including ramucirumab. Patients received trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m2) orally twice daily on days 1-5 and days 8-12 of each 28-day treatment cycle, plus intravenous ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate, assessed by investigators and defined as the proportion of patients with a confirmed best overall response, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. This trial is registered on JapicCTI (JapicCTI-194596) and is ongoing but not recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between April 8 and Oct 11, 2019, 64 patients were enrolled and included in the safety and activity analyses, 33 in cohort A and 31 in cohort B. In cohort A, the disease control rate was 85% (95% CI 68-95; 28 of 33 patients) and in cohort B it was 77% (59-90; 24 of 31 patients). Common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutrophil count decreased (27 [82%] in cohort A and 23 [74%] in cohort B), white blood cell count decreased (eight [24%] and seven [23%]), and platelet count decreased (eight [24%] and four [13%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were recorded in three patients in cohort A (fatigue and neutrophil count decreased; large intestine perforation; and febrile neutropenia, platelet count decreased, and anaemia). No patients in cohort B had a serious treatment-related adverse event, and no treatment-related deaths were reported in either cohort.

INTERPRETATION

Trifluridine/tipiracil and ramucirumab showed an acceptable safety profile and clinical activity in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer regardless of previous ramucirumab exposure.

FUNDING

Taiho Pharmaceutical and Eli Lilly.

REVIVE study: a prospective observational study in chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy for advanced gastric cancer

Nivolumab is an increasingly used standard care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, with increasing clinical use in Japan. Data from retrospective studies on various tumors have shown the objective response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy potentially improves after an exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Based on these data, we conducted the multicenter observational REVIVE study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy in nivolumab-refractory or nivolumab-intolerant patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients who are refractory or intolerant to nivolumab and scheduled to receive irinotecan monotherapy, oxaliplatin combination treatment or oral trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride therapy will be included. The primary end point is overall survival of nivolumab-pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer after the cytotoxic chemotherapy. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000032182 (umin.ac.jp).

Checkpoint inhibitors for gastroesophageal cancers: dissecting heterogeneity to better understand their role in first-line and adjuvant therapy

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and squamous esophageal cancer (ESCC) are responsible for >1 million deaths annually globally. Until now, patients with metastatic GEA and ESCC could anticipate survival of <1 year. Anti- programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy has demonstrated modest efficacy in previously treated GEA and ESCC. In 2020, four pivotal trials have established anti-PD-1 therapy as a new standard of care for selected GEA and ESCC patients as first-line advanced and adjuvant therapy. In this review, we discuss the recent results of the CheckMate 649, ATTRACTION-4, KEYNOTE-590 and CheckMate 577 trials. We consider these results in the context of current standards of care and historical trials of immune checkpoint blockade in GEA and ESCC. We explore biomarker selection for anti-PD-1 therapy and appraise the future of combination therapies. In CheckMate 649, treatment with oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy plus nivolumab in patients with combined positive score ≥5 GEA tumors provided a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in overall survival. The ATTRACTION-4 trial did not see a similar overall survival benefit, despite a clear improvement in progression-free survival. We review potential explanations for this result. KEYNOTE-590 showed profoundly improved survival when pembrolizumab was added to cisplatin-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in ESCC patients with combined positive score ≥10 tumors; this benefit was less convincing in unselected ESCC. Finally, CheckMate 577 provides proof-of-concept for the improvement in disease-free survival with adjuvant nivolumab in high-risk resected GEA and ESCC following trimodality therapy. Immune checkpoint blockade has come of age in GEA and ESCC, and will now be integrated into first-line and earlier lines of therapy, providing benefit for a larger proportion of patients. Biomarker standardization will be critical to select the patients most likely to benefit from treatment. For patients with immune evasive tumors, novel combinations under development show promise; however, global trials are needed.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Oesophago-Gastric Carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors enrich the therapeutic landscape in oesophago-gastric carcinoma. With regard to oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the selective PD-1 (programmed cell death receptor 1)-inhibitor nivolumab improves disease-free survival in the adjuvant therapy setting (CHECKMATE-577). In first-line treatment, ESCC patients (pts) benefit in overall survival (OS) from the PD-1-inhibitor pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-590). In the second-line setting, nivolumab (ATTRACTION-03) and pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-181) demonstrate a benefit in OS compared with chemotherapy. These data resulted in the approval of nivolumab for the second-line treatment of advanced ESCC pts regardless of PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand 1) status in Europe, Asia, and the USA, and pembrolizumab for pts with PD-L1 CPS (combined positivity score) ≥ 10 in Asia and the USA. Further approvals can be expected. In gastro-oesophageal junction and gastric cancer, the addition of nivolumab to chemotherapy in first-line treatment improves OS in pts with advanced disease with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 (CHECKMATE-649). Additionally, pembrolizumab was non-inferior to chemotherapy for OS in PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 pts (KEYNOTE-062). In third-line treatment, nivolumab shows benefits in OS regardless of PD-L1 expression (ATTRACTION-02) with approval in Asia, and pembrolizumab prolonged the duration of response in PD-L1 positive pts (KEYNOTE-059) with approval in the USA. We discuss the recent results of the completed phase II and III clinical trials.

Molecular targeted treatment and drug delivery system for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is still a major cancer worldwide. The early diagnosis rate of gastric cancer in most high incidence countries is low. At present, the overall treatment effect of gastric cancer is poor, and the median overall survival remains low. Most of the patients with gastric cancer are in an advanced stage when diagnosed, and drug treatment has become the main means. Thus, new targeted drugs and therapeutic strategies are the hope of improving the therapeutic effect of gastric cancer. In this review, we summarize the new methods and advances of targeted therapy for gastric cancer, including novel molecular targeted therapeutic agents and drug delivery systems, with a major focus on the development of drug delivery systems (drug carriers and targeting peptides). Elaborating these new methods and advances will contribute to the management of gastric cancer.

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The most effective agent for the third-line treatment of advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (AGC) has not yet been determined. The aim of this network meta-analysis is to compare the relative efficacy and tolerability of third-line treatments for AGC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) using four electronic databases. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) were used as efficacy or tolerability outcomes. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs involving 2601 patients and nine treatments were included. The results suggested that 1 mg/kg nivolumab (nivolumab1) + 3 mg/kg ipilimumab (ipilimumab3) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% credible interval [Crl] 0.38-0.91) was the most effective treatment, followed by nivolumab (HR 0.63, 95% Crl 0.50-0.79), for prolonging OS. Regorafenib (HR 0.40, 95% Crl 0.28-0.58) was most likely to improve PFS, followed by apatinib (HR 0.45, 95% Crl 0.33-0.60). Nivolumab1 + ipilimumab3 and nivolumab were better at improving ORR, whereas nivolumab1 + ipilimumab3 had the highest toxicity based on the AEs. For benefit-risk ratio, nivolumab, apatinib or regorafenib appeared to be the best options. Chemotherapy or two different dose combinations of nivolumab and ipilimumab were ranked as the next options because of poor tolerability, despite good efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Immunotherapy (nivolumab) or antiangiogenic agents (regorafenib and apatinib) are associated with benefits for benefit-risk ratio as third-line monotherapy. This study might serve as a guideline to aid in the selection of third-line treatments for AGC.

The effect of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is a global health problem with high incidence rate and mortality rate. Due to the limitations of traditional chemotherapy drugs, such as patient intolerance, low efficacies and serious adverse effects, trifluridine/tipiracil has been considered to be a promising treatment for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer. However, the relevant systematic review has not been occurring. The presentation of this protocol is to scientifically evaluate the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with highly pretreated metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

The protocol followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. We will systematically search MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), Wan Fang Database up to November 1, 2020 to identify published articles. Using the Cochrane risk assessment tool to assess the methodological quality of the RCTs, and all included studies will be analyzed according to the criteria in the Cochrane Handbook. Review Manager 5.3 software will be used for literature quality evaluation and data analysis.

RESULTS

Objective to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer by analyzing the eligible data extracted under limited conditions.

CONCLUSION

This study provides clear evidence to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with highly pretreated metastatic gastric cancer, and the findings will also be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical statement will be required for this study because there is no direct involvement of human. This review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal as a conference report or an article.

REGISTRATION

OSF registration number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6MF5U.

Evolving therapies in advanced oesophago-gastric cancers and the increasing role of immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Esophagogastric cancers remain a considerable health burden and among the top causes of global cancer-related deaths. Chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for patients with advanced disease. Doublet platinum/fluoropyrimidine therapy is established as first-line treatment with the option of adding a taxane in selected patients. Irinotecan, taxanes, and ramucirumab are approved as second-line treatments. Results from the trials KEYNOTE-059, ATTRACTION-2, and TAGS have established the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment. High PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, and Epstein-Barr virus status may also be used to enrich for responses to immunotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the outcome of recent trials in the later lines of therapy for esophagogastric cancer and place these in the context of current treatment paradigms. We also discuss the biology of esophagogastric cancers and how this might inform the development of new treatments. Finally, we comment on promising new drugs in development.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent advances in the treatment of chemo-refractory esophagogastric cancer add to the improving survival of patients with this disease. Further research is needed to improve patient selection to therapies and the earlier incorporation of these agents in the treatment journey.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody–drug conjugate composed of a monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody and a topoisomerase I inhibitor, DX-8951 derivative (an exatecan derivative). T-DXd showed potential anti-tumor activities in HER2-positive gastric cancer cell lines and xenograft models. In the randomized, phase II trial DESTINY-Gastric01, T-DXd demonstrated a significantly higher objective response rate as a primary endpoint and a longer overall survival as a secondary endpoint in patients with pretreated HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Although adverse events caused by T-DXd were generally manageable, approximately 10% of patients experienced treatment-related interstitial lung disease. Based on the results of the DESTINY-Gastric01 trial, T-DXd was approved for HER2-positive pretreated AGC in Japan. This study reviews the preclinical and clinical data of T-DXd for treating HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal junction cancer: a subgroup analysis from the phase 3 TAGS study

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) have poor survival outcomes, and GEJC-specific data from trials evaluating agents in gastric cancers (GCs) as a whole are lacking. Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) was approved for previously treated metastatic GC or GEJC (mGC/mGEJC) based on results of the phase 3 TAGS trial. Subgroup analyses by primary tumor type (GC or GEJC) in TAGS are reported here.

METHODS

Pa tients with mGC/mGEJC treated with  ≥ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized (2:1) to receive FTD/TPI or placebo, plus best supportive care. A pre-planned sub-analysis was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes by primary tumor type (GEJC or GC).

RESULTS

Of 507 randomized patients, 145 (29%) had GEJC and 360 (71%) had GC as the primary disease site. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the GEJC and GC subgroups, except that more patients in the GEJC subgroup had received  ≥ 3 prior regimens (72 vs. 59% in the GC subgroup). Survival benefit with FTD/TPI was observed in both subgroups. The overall survival hazard ratio for FTD/TPI vs placebo was 0.75 (95% CI 0.50-1.11) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.52-0.87) in the GEJC and GC subgroups, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events of any cause were reported in 75 (77%) and 192 (81%) FTD/TPI-treated patients in the GEJC and GC subgroups, respectively. No new safety concerns were noted with FTD/TPI.

CONCLUSION

As in patients with GC, FTD/TPI showed an efficacy benefit in patients with GEJC in the TAGS trial, along with demonstrating a manageable safety profile.

A multicenter phase II study of TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in patients with pretreated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1604)

BACKGROUND

This is a phase 2 study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of TAS-114, a novel deoxyuridine triphosphatase inhibitor, combined with S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Eligible patients had AGC with measurable lesions, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, v1.1), with two or more previous chemotherapy regimens including fluoropyrimidines, platinum agents, and taxanes or irinotecan. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to the RECIST, v1.1. Twenty-nine patients were required according to Simon's optimal two-stage design, with one-sided a = 5% and power = 80%. Threshold and expected ORRs were 5% and 25%. Patients received TAS-114 (400 mg/body, twice a day) and S-1 (30 mg/m², twice a day) for 14 days, followed by 7 days of rest in one 3-week cycle. Protein expression levels of dUTPase and BRCA1 in tumor samples were determined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Accrual was terminated in June 2018 because meeting the predefined efficacy criteria was considered difficult. ORR and disease control rate were 5.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1-24.9%] and 70.0% (95% CI, 45.7-88.1%), respectively, for all 20 patients enrolled. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.2-3.3 months) and 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.2-9.4 months), respectively. Median PFS in the groups with high and low dUTPase protein expression in the cytoplasm was 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.9) and 1.6 months (95% CI, 0.6-2.4), respectively [hazard ratio, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.16-1.04), log-rank test two-sided p = 0.047]. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included anemia (20%), leucopenia (15%), neutropenia (10%), rash (10%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and lymphopenia (5%) CONCLUSIONS: TAS-114 with S-1 showed only modest antitumor activity with acceptable safety profiles for patients heavily pretreated with AGC.

Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial)

BACKGROUND

In East Asia, S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) is one of the standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC). Oxaliplatin is generally less toxic and more convenient to administer than cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, phase III study assessing whether S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) was non-inferior/superior to SP in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with MRGC were randomized 1:1 to receive either SOX (S-1 80 mg/m²/day on days 1-14; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day 1; every 3 weeks) or SP (S-1 80 mg/m²/day on days 1-14; cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 1; every 3 weeks [SP3]).

RESULTS

Between October 2012 and October 2014, 338 patients were randomized. The median age was 56 years, and 51% of patients had measurable lesions. SOX was significantly non-inferior but not superior to SP3 in terms of PFS [median 5.6 versus 5.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.07]. In patients with measurable disease, objective response rates were similar between SOX and SP3 (58% versus 60%). Overall, the survival in both groups did not differ (median 12.9 versus 11.4 months; HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66-1.11). Treatment was well tolerated in both arms. Anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and oral mucositis were more common with SP3. In contrast, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with SOX.

CONCLUSIONS

SOX was non-inferior to SP3. The two regimens were well tolerated with different toxicity profiles. The SOX regimen can be recommended as a first-line treatment for MRGC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01671449.

Nivolumab in previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ATTRACTION-2): 3-year update and outcome of treatment beyond progression with nivolumab

BACKGROUND

ATTRACTION-2 demonstrated that nivolumab improved overall survival (OS) vs placebo in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with ≥ 2 chemotherapy regimens. However, its long-term efficacy and outcome of treatment beyond progression (TBP) with nivolumab have not been clarified.

METHODS

The 3-year follow-up data were collected. A subset analysis was performed to explore the efficacy of TBP by assessing postprogression survival (PPS) after the first event of disease progression.

RESULTS

Overall, 493 patients were randomized (2:1) to receive nivolumab (n = 330) or placebo (n = 163). With a median follow-up of 38.5 (range 36.1-47.5) months, OS of the nivolumab group was significantly longer compared to the placebo group (median 5.3 vs 4.1 months; 3-year survival rate, 5.6% vs 1.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.75], P < 0.0001). The median OS of responders (n = 32) who achieved complete response or partial response was 26.7 months and the 3-year survival rate was 35.5% in the nivolumab group. Overall, 109 patients in the nivolumab group and 37 patients in the placebo group received TBP. PPS tended to be longer in the nivolumab group vs placebo group (median 5.8 vs 4.5 months; HR [95% CI], 0.69 [0.47-1.01], P = 0.057). In contrast, PPS was similar between both treatment groups in non-TBP patients (median 2.3 vs 2.2 months; HR 0.90, P = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term efficacy of nivolumab was confirmed at the 3-year follow-up, and a survival benefit of TBP with nivolumab was suggested. Biomarkers for selecting patients suitable for TBP with nivolumab should be identified in the future.

Efficacy of Combination Chemotherapy Using a Novel Oral Chemotherapeutic Agent, FTD/TPI, with Ramucirumab Murine Version DC101 in a Mouse Syngeneic Cancer Transplantation Model

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) (a.k.a. TAS-102) is a combination drug for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and severely pretreated metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers, comprising FTD, a thymidine-based antineoplastic nucleoside analog, and TPI, which enhances FTD bioavailability. Herein, in KRAS mutant murine colorectal cancer CT26 syngeneic models, we investigate whether combination therapy with DC101 (a surrogate ramucirumab antibody, rat antimouse vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb)) improves FTD/TPI efficacy. Tumor growth inhibition (TGI) on day 15 was 38.0% and 30.6% upon DC101 monotherapy and FTD/TPI monotherapy respectively, and 60.3% upon combination therapy. Tumor volume was significantly lower (p < 0.001) upon combination treatment than upon FTD/TPI or DC101 monotherapy, indicating the additive effects of FTD/TPI and DC101. DNA-incorporated FTD levels on Day 8 were significantly higher in combination therapy with FTD/TPI (for 5 consecutive days) and DC101 (on alternate days for 7days) than in FTD/TPI monotherapy. Furthermore, vascular endothelial cell-specific marker CD31 was downregulated in DC101-treated tumors on day 8. These results indicate that combination therapy with FTD/TPI and DC101 is a promising treatment alternative regardless of KRAS mutations.