Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial

Matched-pair Analysis for Survival Endpoints Between Women With Early-stage Uterine Carcinosarcoma and Uterine Serous Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare survival endpoints between women with uterine carcinosarcoma and those with uterine serous carcinoma utilizing matching analysis.

METHODS

Patients with stages I to II who underwent hysterectomy at our institution were included in this analysis. Patients with carcinosarcoma were then matched to patients with serous carcinoma based on stage, and adjuvant management received (observation, radiation treatment alone, chemotherapy alone, or combined modality with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were calculated for the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 134 women were included (67 women with carcinosarcoma and 67 with serous carcinoma, matched 1:1). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding 5-year recurrence-free survival (59% vs. 62%), disease-specific survival (66% vs. 67%), or overall survival (53% vs. 57%), respectively. The only independent predictor of shorter recurrence-free survival for the entire cohort was the lack of adjuvant combined modality therapy, while lower uterine segment involvement was the only independent predictor for shorter disease-specific survival. Lack of lymph node dissection and lack of adjuvant combined modality therapy were independent predictors of shorter overall survival.

DISCUSSION

When matched based on stage and adjuvant treatment, our study suggests that there is no statistically significant difference in survival endpoints between women with early-stage carcinosarcoma and serous carcinoma. Adjuvant combined modality treatment is an independent predictor of longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival.

Refining Adjuvant Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: New Standards and Perspectives

Endometrial carcinoma is the most frequent cancer of the reproductive female organs. Most endometrial cancers are diagnosed at early stage (75%). Treatment options depend on pathogenetic, histopathologic and clinical characteristic at the diagnosis. To improve patient management in the near future, recent research has focused on new molecular features; evidence has shown that these give a better definition of patient prognosis and can help in tailoring adjuvant treatments by identifying specific subgroups of patients whose tumors may benefit from specific therapeutic approaches. In this review, we will focus on current knowledge of adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma, using a prognostic-risk group stratification based on pathogenetic, clinical and molecular features, and will take a look at the ongoing trials that will further change the therapeutic approach in coming years.

Ultrasound Measurement of Tumor-Free Distance from the Serosal Surface as the Alternative to Measuring the Depth of Myometrial Invasion in Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Endometrial Cancer

Background: Ultrasonography’s usefulness in endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis consists in its roles in staging and prediction of metastasis. Ultrasound-measured tumor-free distance from the tumor to the uterine serosa (uTFD) is a promising marker for these diagnostic and prognostic variables. The aim of the study was to determine the usefulness of this biomarker in locoregional staging, and thus in the prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Methods: We conducted a single-institutional, prospective study on 116 consecutive patients with EC who underwent 2D transvaginal ultrasound examination. The uTFD marker was compared with the depth of ultrasound-measured myometrial invasion (uMI). Univariable and multivariable logit models were evaluated to assess the predictive power of the uTFD and uMI in regard to LNM. The reference standard was a final histopathology result. Survival was assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: LNM was found in 17% of the patients (20/116). In the univariable analysis, uMI and uTFD were significant predictors of LNM. The accuracy was 70.7%, and the NPV was 92.68% (OR 4.746, 95% CI 1.710–13.174) for uMI (p = 0.002), and they were 63.8% and 89.02% (OR 0.842, 95% CI 0.736–0.963), respectively, for uTFD (p = 0.01). The cutoff value for uTFD in the prediction of LNM was 5.2 mm. The association between absence of LNM and biomarker values of uMI < 1/2 and uTFD ≥ 5.2 mm was greater than that between the presence of metastases and uMI > 1/2 and uTFD values <5.2 mm. In the multivariable analysis, the accuracy of the uMI–uTFD model was 74%, and its NPV was 90.24% (p = non-significant). Neither uMI nor uTFD were surrogates for overall and recurrence-free survivals in endometrial cancer. Conclusions: Both uMI and uTFD, either alone or in combination, were valuable tools for gaining additional preoperative information on expected lymph node status. Negative lymph nodes status was better described by ultrasound biomarkers than a positive status. It was easier to use the uTFD rather than the uMI measurement as a biomarker of EC invasion, and the former still maintained a similar predictive value for lymph node metastases to the latter at diagnosis.

HER2 Testing in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma: Time for Standardized Pathology Practice to Meet the Clinical Demand

CONTEXT.—

Endometrial serous carcinoma is an aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer with the highest rate of recurrence and mortality among all histotypes. A recent clinical trial showed prolonged progression-free survival in advanced-stage and recurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive endometrial serous carcinoma when trastuzumab was added to the standard chemotherapy regimen. This targeted therapeutic approach was recently endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical guidelines. There is a growing interest among clinicians to obtain HER2 testing in endometrial serous carcinoma, and pathologists need to be prepared to recognize the unique characteristics of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification in these tumors and apply specific HER2 scoring criteria.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a historical overview of targeted HER2 therapy in endometrial serous carcinoma and to summarize key findings from recent studies on the specific features of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification relative to other tumor types. Endometrial carcinoma-specific HER2 testing criteria are proposed based on evidence in the existing literature.

DATA SOURCES.—

Sources comprise review of the literature and personal experience of the author.

CONCLUSIONS.—

HER2 protein overexpression and/or gene amplification is present in approximately 25% to 30% of endometrial serous carcinomas, providing an opportunity for targeted therapy. Pathologists play a key role in tumor HER2 testing and scoring to ensure appropriate patient selection and successful clinical outcome.

Endometrial Cancer Molecular Characterization: The Key to Identifying High-Risk Patients and Defining Guidelines for Clinical Decision-Making?

Endometrial carcinomas (EC) are the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide and the most prevalent in the developed world. ECs have been historically sub-classified in two major groups, type I and type II, based primarily on histopathological characteristics. Notwithstanding the usefulness of such classification in the clinics, until now it failed to adequately stratify patients preoperatively into low- or high-risk groups. Pieces of evidence point to the fact that molecular features could also serve as a base for better patients' risk stratification and treatment decision-making. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), back in 2013, redefined EC into four main molecular subgroups. Despite the high hopes that welcomed the possibility to incorporate molecular features into practice, currently they have not been systematically applied in the clinics. Here, we outline how the emerging molecular patterns can be used as prognostic factors together with tumor histopathology and grade, and how they can help to identify high-risk EC subpopulations for better risk stratification and treatment strategy improvement. Considering the importance of the use of preclinical models in translational research, we also discuss how the new patient-derived models can help in identifying novel potential targets and help in treatment decisions.

The role of molecular tests for adjuvant and post-surgical treatment in gynaecological cancers

The adjuvant and post-surgical treatment of gynaecological cancers has historically been guided by the estimation of relapse risk based on clinicopathological factors determined at the time of cancer diagnosis. The recent advancement of genomic and molecular characterisation of gynaecological cancers has begun to shift paradigms in the selection of adjuvant treatment strategy. Recent data regarding the predictive and/or prognostic value of molecular tests in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer as well as early stage endometrial cancer have been the first such examples to enter adjuvant treatment guidelines for these diseases. In this article, we discuss the current state and future development of molecular assays for gynaecological cancers and how they impact upon treatment selection for ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers in the post-surgical setting.

Uterine serous carcinoma: key advances and novel treatment approaches

The incidence and mortality rates from endometrial cancer continue to increase worldwide, while rates in most other cancers have either plateaued or declined considerably. Uterine serous carcinoma represents a fraction of all endometrial malignancies each year, yet this histology is responsible for nearly 40% of all endometrial cancer-related deaths. These deaths disproportionately affect black women, who have higher rates of advanced disease at diagnosis. Molecular genetic analyses reveal major alterations including TP53 mutation, PIK3CA mutation/amplification, ERBB2 amplification, CCNE1 amplification, FBXW7 mutation/deletion, PPP2R1A mutation, and somatic mutations involving homologous recombination genes. Clinical risk factors for uterine serous carcinoma include advancing age, a history of breast cancer, tamoxifen usage, and the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Recent advances in our understanding of uterine serous carcinoma molecular drivers have led to development of targeted therapeutics that promise improved outcomes for patients. Overexpression or amplification of HER2 in uterine serous carcinoma carries a poor prognosis; yet this actionable target has led to the incorporation of several anti-HER2 therapies, including trastuzumab which, when added to conventional chemotherapy, is associated with improved survival for women with advanced and recurrent HER2-positive disease. The combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is also a promising targeted treatment strategy for women with uterine serous carcinoma, with a recent phase II study suggesting a 50% response rate in women with recurrent disease. Several trials examining additional targeted agents are ongoing. Despite years of stalled progress, meaningful, tailored treatment options are emerging for patients with this uncommon and biologically aggressive endometrial cancer subtype.

Oncologic outcomes of endometrial cancer in patients with low-volume metastasis in the sentinel lymph nodes: An international multi-institutional study

OBJECTIVE

To assess oncologic outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with low-volume metastasis (LVM) in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs).

METHODS

Patients with endometrial cancer and SLN-LVM (≤2 mm) from December 3, 2009, to December 31, 2018, were retrospectively identified from 22 centers worldwide. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV, adnexal involvement, or unknown adjuvant therapy (ATx) were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 247 patients included, 132 had isolated tumor cell (ITC) and 115 had micrometastasis (MM). Overall 4-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 77.6% (95% CI, 70.2%-85.9%); median follow-up for patients without recurrence was 29.6 (interquartile range, 19.2-41.5) months. At multivariate analysis, Non-endometrioid (NE) (HR, 5.00; 95% CI, 2.50-9.99; P < .001), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.45-7.31; P = .004), and uterine serosal invasion (USI) (HR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.44-9.54; P = .007) were independent predictors of recurrence. Among 47 endometrioid ITC patients without ATx, 4-year RFS was 82.6% (95% CI, 70.1%-97.2). Considering 18 ITC patients with endometrioid grade 1 disease, without LVSI, USI, or ATx, only 1 had recurrence (median follow-up, 24.8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with SLN-LVM, NE, LVSI, and USI were independent risk factors for recurrence. Patients with any risk factor had poor prognosis, even when receiving ATx. Patients with ITC and grade 1 endometrioid disease (no LVSI/USI) had favorable prognosis, even without ATx. Further analysis (with more patients and longer follow-up) is needed to assess whether ATx can be withheld in this low-risk subgroup.

Treatment outcomes and complications in FIGO stage IIIC and IVB endometrioid endometrial cancer patients presenting as nodal spreads following systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the treatment outcomes and complications of patients with FIGO stage IIIC and IVB endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) presenting primarily as nodal spreads following systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four FIGO stage IIIC and IVB endometrioid EC patients between July 2003 and March 2020 received staging procedures including systematic lymphadenectomy. The survival outcomes and late treatment-related complications were compared between adjuvant chemoradiation-based group and chemotherapy-based group.

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients, 16 (36.4%) had stage IIIC1, 26 (59.1%) had stage IIIC2, and 2 (4.5%) had stage IVB disease. The median follow-up time was 54 months (range, 10-185 months). There was no statistical difference in mortality between the microscopic and macroscopic nodal groups (6.2% vs 4.3%, p > 0.999). Eleven patients (25.0%) and 33 patients (75.0%) received adjuvant chemoradiation and chemotherapy, respectively. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were not different between the two groups (disease-free survival, 81.8% vs 82.1%, p = 0.743; overall survival, 90.9% vs 95.8%, p = 0.537). The incidence rates of grade 2 lymphedema (36.4% vs 9.1%, p = 0.032) and grade 2/3 gastrointestinal complications (36.4% vs 0.0%, p < 0.001) were higher in the chemoradiation-based group than those in the chemotherapy-based group.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy might be the preferred treatment for FIGO stage IIIC and IVB endometrioid EC patients presenting as nodal spreads given that no difference in patient survival was found, but a higher incidence of treatment-related complications was observed in the chemoradiation-based group.

Factors associated with an increased risk of recurrence in patients diagnosed with high-grade endometrial cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery: A study of the society of gynecologic oncology of Canada (GOC) community of practice (CoP)

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a standard surgical approach for comprehensive surgical staging in women with endometrial cancer. As rates and complexity of MIS are steadily increasing, it is important to identify potential risk factors which may be associated with this approach. This study evaluates the impact of local factors on the risk of disease recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients diagnosed with high grade endometrial cancer (HGEC) who underwent MIS between 2012 and 2016 at eight Canadian centers. Data was collected from medical records. The 75th percentile was calculated for estimated uterine volume and weight. All recurrences were categorized into two groups; intra-abdominal vs. extra-abdominal. To search for significant covariates associated with recurrence-free survival a Cox proportional hazard model was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 758 patients were included in the study. Intra-uterine manipulator was used in 497 (35.8%) of patients. Vaginal lacerations were documented in 9.1%. Median follow-up was 30.5 months (interquartile range 20-47). There were 157 who had disease recurrence (20.71%), including 92 (12.14%) intra-abdominal and 60 (7.92%) extra-abdominal only recurrences. In univariate analysis myometrial invasion, LVI, stage, uterine volume and weight > 75th percentile and chemotherapy were associated with increased risk of intra-abdominal recurrence. In multivariable analysis only stage, and specimen weight > 75th percentile (OR 2.207, CI 1.123-4.337) remained significant. Uterine volume, and weight were not associated with increased risk of extra-abdominal recurrences.

CONCLUSION

For patients diagnosed with HGEC undergoing MIS, extracting a large uterus is associated with a significantly increased risk for intra-abdominal recurrence.

Innovative Follow-up Strategies for Endometrial Cancer

Increasing recognition of the heterogeneous nature of endometrial cancer, the excellent prognosis of low-risk cases and improvements in risk stratification offer opportunities for innovative, personalised follow-up strategies. This review article outlines the evidence base for alternative follow-up strategies in the different risk categories of endometrial cancer, cancer survivorship programmes and considers future directions in endometrial cancer follow-up, including emerging new techniques, such as the liquid biopsy, and opportunities for combining molecular and clinicopathological features to personalise endometrial cancer follow-up.

Controversies in the Management of Early-stage Serous Endometrial Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Early-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has one of the highest recurrence rates and mortality among early-stage uterine epithelial cancers. Research into the clinical management of USC has begun to progress, guided by surgical and pathological advances. This article summarizes the available literature regarding diagnosis, management, and possible future uses of molecular analysis of women with early-stage USC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed was searched for all pertinent English language research articles published from January 1, 2006 through March 1, 2020 which included a study population of women diagnosed with stage 1 USC. Due to the scarcity of prospective or large-scale data, studies were not limited by design or numbers of patients. Studies performed at earlier dates were incorporated to provide context.

RESULTS

A total of 86 studies were included in the review. Multiple well-designed studies have confirmed the safety of a minimally invasive surgical approach for surgical management of USC. The role of sentinel node biopsy has been validated with both prospective and retrospective multi-center data. Stage I USC is associated with a highly variable risk of recurrence, even following completion of adjuvant chemoradiation. This aggressive phenotype has been linked to high numbers of somatic copy number alterations, tumor protein 53, and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase mutations, which have been shown to be predictive of prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Early-stage USC demonstrates a lack of predictable recurrence patterns, with reports noting distant recurrence in patients with disease confined to polyps. Unless no residual tumor is found on hysterectomy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be discussed and individualized by stage and treatment goals.

Adjuvant Therapy for High-risk Endometrial Carcinoma

About one-fifth of endometrial cancers are 'high risk', which carries a poorer prognosis. Management strategies to optimise their survival have been under investigation for many years. Despite recent advances, their overall survival remains relatively poor. The definition of high risk in endometrial cancers has been based on clinicopathological factors until recently, when molecular profiling has shown greater discrimination. There is, however, poor correlation between traditional clinicopathological factors and their molecular profile. This is the subject of ongoing trials to better individualise adjuvant post-hysterectomy treatment. The management of high-risk tumours is traditionally based on surgery followed by radiotherapy, despite no proven overall survival benefit in early stages. The place of chemotherapy remains under investigation, with recent trials showing benefit in more advanced stages. The Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC) and Gynecologic Oncology Group trials support the use of chemoradiation and chemotherapy for stage III and adverse histological subgroups. In addition, there is now early evidence of correlation between benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy based on molecular alterations in the tumour cells. In this review, we look at the current evidence on management strategies in the evolving era of molecular diagnosis and stratification.

Reproducibility of scoring criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry in endometrial serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional interobserver agreement study

Targeted anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy has recently been proven to improve progression-free and overall survival of patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial serous carcinoma. To date, no specific pathology HER2 testing or scoring guidelines exist for endometrial cancer. However, based on evidence from the recent successful clinical trial and comprehensive pre-trial pathologic studies, a new set of HER2 scoring criteria have been proposed for endometrial serous carcinoma-distinct from the existing breast and gastric cancer-specific criteria. We present the first study assessing interobserver agreement of HER2 scores using the proposed serous endometrial cancer-specific scoring system. A digitally scanned set of 40 HER2-immunostained slides of endometrial serous carcinoma were sent to seven gynecologic pathologists, who independently assigned HER2 scores for each slide following a brief tutorial. Follow-up fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 gene amplification was performed on cases with interobserver disagreement when a 2+ HER2 score was assigned by at least one observer. Complete agreement of HER2 scores among all 7 observers was achieved on 15 cases, and all but one case had an agreement by at least 4 observers. The overall agreement was 72.3% (kappa 0.60), 77.5% (kappa 0.65), and 83.3% (kappa 0.65), using four (0 to 3+ ), three (0/1+ , 2+ , 3+ ), or two (0/1+ , 2/3+ ) HER2 scoring categories, respectively. Based on the combination of HER2 immunostaining scores and FISH, the interobserver disagreement may have potentially resulted in a clinically significant difference in HER2 status only in three tumors. We conclude, that the proposed serous endometrial cancer-specific HER2 scoring criteria are reproducible among gynecologic pathologists with moderate to substantial interobserver agreement rates comparable to those of previously reported in breast and gastric carcinomas. Our findings significantly strengthen the foundation for establishing endometrial cancer-specific HER2 scoring guidelines in the future.

Predictive and Prognostic Value of Microsatellite Instability in Gynecologic Cancer (Endometrial and Ovarian)

For endometrial cancer, a new classification is now available from ESMO, ESGO, and ESTRO based on clinical and molecular characteristics to determine adjuvant therapy. The contribution of molecular biology is major for this pathology mainly by the intermediary of deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability. Detection techniques for this phenotype have many peculiarities in gynecologic cancers (endometrial and ovarian) because it has been initially validated in colorectal cancer only. Endometrial cancer is the most common tumor with deficient mismatch repair, which is an important prognostic factor and a predictor of the benefit of adjuvant treatments. Concerning advanced stages, this phenotype is a theragnostic marker for using immunotherapy. Among ovarian cancer, microsatellite instability is less described in literature but exists, particularly in endometrioid type ovarian cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the publications concerning deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability in endometrial and ovarian cancers, detection techniques, and clinical implications of these molecular characteristics.

Advanced uterine papillary serous cancer: Could there be a role for newer targeted therapeutic approaches or immune checkpoint inhibitors?

BACKGROUND

Although now available in oncology clinics, comprehensive germline mutation testing is being performed only in a minority of patients with advanced uterine papillary serous cancer (UPSC). Some of these patients might harbor various targetable mutations, either heritable or acquired.Data sources: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving all consecutive patients with UPSC treated at our institution from 2009-2019. Data on epidemiology, with an accent on personal and family history of cancer, clinical presentation, disease stage, employed treatment modalities and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was sought.

FINDINGS

Thirteen patients were seventy years of age or younger (≤70) while 15 were older than seventy (>70), and the two arbitrary patient cohorts were well-balanced for the TNM stage. Four UPSC patients >70 had a personal history of metachronous breast cancer. We also identified five cases of breast cancer, two cases of colon cancer, and one of each ovarian and uterine cancer in the first-degree relatives of UPSC patients >70. More than 90% of patients had surgical excision/debulking, and nearly half of the patients in each group received systemic chemotherapy. The most common chemotherapy regimen was carboplatin-paclitaxel every three weeks. Compared to patients ≤70, the UPSC patients >70 were less likely to undergo postoperative radiation therapy (6% vs 61.5%; p = 0.001) and had a worse CSS (21.8 vs. 27.4 months; HR 0.61, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Personal and family history in a cohort of older UPSC patients identified an excess of second primary cancers, and these patients displayed a shorter CSS. Comprehensive germline and tumor mutation analysis might identify optimal candidates for various targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and ultimately improve survival. This may represent an unmet need in the UPSC patients, and further studies are needed to confirm the significance of our findings.

Role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB grade 3 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma treated with surgery and post-operative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of patients with FIGO stage IB grade 3 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare overall survival following treatment with a hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in this group of patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between January 2004 and January 2016 with FIGO stage IB grade 3 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma treated with hysterectomy and postoperative radiotherapy with or without adjuvant concurrent chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Overall survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounding variables. A logistic regression model was used to reveal predictors of chemotherapy use.

RESULTS

A total of 2173 patients were included. The receipt of chemotherapy was associated with an increased 5-year overall survival from 67.6% to 75.6% (p=0.0313). This association trended toward statistical significance on multivariate analysis (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.80; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.01; p=0.0653). Other factors associated with improved survival were undergoing a lymphadenectomy, absence of lymphovascular space invasion, younger age, smaller tumor size, non-black race, and absence of comorbidities. Patients who underwent brachytherapy, had lymphovascular space invasion, were younger, were diagnosed in the more recent years, and were treated in higher volume centers were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy were associated with an increase in survival in patients with FIGO stage IB grade 3 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma compared with those treated with adjuvant radiotherapy alone.

Does Specimen Type Have an Impact on HER2 Status in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma? Discordant HER2 Status of Paired Endometrial Biopsy and Hysterectomy Specimens in the Presence of Frequent Intratumoral Heterogeneity

A recent clinical trial showed prolonged progression-free survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced stage and recurrent endometrial serous carcinomas when trastuzumab was added to traditional chemotherapy. Approximately one third of these tumors are HER2-positive and have been described to show unique characteristics of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification, including significant intratumoral heterogeneity, in recent studies. However, currently, there are no standard protocols for the selection of optimal specimen type or algorithm for HER2 testing in endometrial serous carcinomas. The current study aimed to evaluate the concordance of HER2 status between endometrial biopsy/curettage and subsequent hysterectomy specimens in endometrial serous carcinoma. A total of 57 patients with endometrial serous carcinoma with available HER2 status were identified during the study period, 14 of which (14/57, 25%) were HER2-positive by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). The final study cohort consisted of 40 paired endometrial biopsies/curettings and hysterectomies to include all 14 HER2-positive tumors and 26 selected HER2-negative tumors to represent an equal distribution of HER2 immunohistochemical scores. HER2 FISH was performed on all tumors with an immunohistochemical score of 2+. HER2 immunohistochemical scores, heterogeneity of HER2 expression, FISH results, and the overall HER2 status were compared between the 2 specimen types. HER2 status was successfully assigned in both specimen types in 37 cases, as three specimens showed inadequate FISH signals. Concordant HER2 status was observed in 84% of cases (31/37), with identical HER2 immunohistochemical scores in 65% (26/40) of tumors. Among the 6 tumors with a discordant HER2 status, 2 were HER2 negative in the biopsy and positive in the hysterectomy, and 4 were HER2-positive in the biopsy and negative in the hysterectomy. The false-negative rate would be 15.4% and 26.7% if only the biopsy or only the hysterectomy would be the basis for the result, respectively. Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 protein expression was present in 22 tumors (55%), including all cases with a discordant HER2 status. The concordance rate of HER2 status between paired endometrial biopsies/curettings and hysterectomies of endometrial serous carcinoma is lower than the reported rates of breast cancer, and comparable to those of gastric carcinomas. Frequent heterogeneity of HER2 protein expression combined with the possibility of a spatially more heterogenous sampling of endometrial cavity in biopsies and curettings, and the potential differences in specimen handling/fixation between the 2 specimen types may explain our findings. HER2 testing of multiple specimens may help identify a greater proportion of patients eligible for targeted trastuzumab therapy and should be taken into account in future efforts of developing endometrial cancer-specific HER2 testing algorithm.

Sequencing chemotherapy before radiotherapy for women with stage IIIC endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

It is unclear how to best sequence adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer. We studied the outcomes for women treated with chemotherapy before radiotherapy in a chemotherapy-first (chemotherapy for 6 cycles followed radiotherapy) or 'sandwich' approach (chemotherapy for 3 cycles followed by radiotherapy and subsequently chemotherapy for 3 cycles).

METHODS

Women with stage IIIC endometrial cancer and no gross residual disease treated with chemotherapy before radiotherapy between April 2003 and April 2016 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate recurrence and survival. We performed a meta-analysis of endometrial cancer trials comparing chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included. The mean (SD) age was 63.8 (10.6) years; 84 patients received the chemotherapy-first approach and 18 patients received the 'sandwich' approach. Pelvic and para-aortic nodes were removed in 99% and 88.2%, respectively. Among all the patients, we observed 1 pelvic (1%), 1 para-aortic (1%), and 5 vaginal (4.9%) recurrences. At 3 years, for the 'sandwich' and chemotherapy-first approaches, the vaginal recurrence was 11.8% and 4.2%, pelvic recurrence was 0% and 1.5%, para-aortic recurrence was 0% and 1.2%, distant recurrence was 42.9% and 24.4%, and overall survival was 70.3% and 81.7%, respectively. With 'chemotherapy before radiotherapy' 94.9% completed 4+ chemotherapy cycles (vs 71-90% reported in the literature for 'radiotherapy before chemotherapy'). In a meta-analysis of endometrial cancer trials, distant recurrence rates were reduced with 4+ chemotherapy cycles but not with 3 cycles (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy before radiation sequencing for stage IIIC endometrial cancer was associated with a high proportion of patients completing 4+ chemotherapy cycles and low locoregional lymphatic recurrence rate, despite delaying radiotherapy until after 3-6 cycles of chemotherapy and not administering concurrent cisplatin.

Combination radiation and immunotherapy in gynecologic malignancies-a comprehensive review

Definitive and adjuvant radiation and chemoradiation have been mainstays in the management of multiple gynecologic malignancies for decades. However, despite these treatments, the prognosis of patients with locally advanced, recurrent, refractory, and metastatic disease continues to be poor. Over the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic modality, but response rates to monotherapy are low. Mounting basic science and translational research suggests that immunotherapy and radiation may act synergistically with the potential to improve clinical outcomes across multiple disease sites relative to monotherapy with either radiation or immunotherapy alone. Results from early clinical trials in other disease sites, and burgeoning trials within the gynecologic malignancies space hold promise for combined modality treatment. With increasing clinical data supporting combined modality therapy, there is interest in reevaluating treatment paradigms in gynecologic malignancies to improve the current standards of care. In this review, current proposed mechanisms, rationale, and evidence for treatment of gynecologic malignancies with combined radiation and immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors, will be discussed. Additionally, although currently early and limited, existing clinical data will be summarized as it applies to cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and vulvar cancers. The status of current clinical trials investigating the sequencing, dosing, and fractionation of combined radiation and immunotherapy in these disease sites will also be reviewed.

Development of a surgical competency assessment tool for sentinel lymph node dissection by minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node dissection is widely used in the staging of endometrial cancer. Variation in surgical techniques potentially impacts diagnostic accuracy and oncologic outcomes, and poses barriers to the comparison of outcomes across institutions or clinical trial sites. Standardization of surgical technique and surgical quality assessment tools are critical to the conduct of clinical trials. By identifying mandatory and prohibited steps of sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection in endometrial cancer, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a competency assessment tool for use in surgical quality assurance.

METHODS

A Delphi methodology was applied, included 35 expert gynecological oncology surgeons from 16 countries. Interviews identified key steps and tasks which were rated mandatory, optional, or prohibited using questionnaires. Using the surgical steps for which consensus was achieved, a competency assessment tool was developed and subjected to assessments of validity and reliability.

RESULTS

Seventy percent consensus agreement standardized the specific mandatory, optional, and prohibited steps of SLN dissection for endometrial cancer and informed the development of a competency assessment tool. Consensus agreement identified 21 mandatory and three prohibited steps to complete a SLN dissection. The competency assessment tool was used to rate surgical quality in three preselected videos, demonstrating clear separation in the rating of the skill level displayed with mean skills summary scores differing significantly between the three videos (F score=89.4; P<0.001). Internal consistency of the items was high (Cronbach α=0.88).

CONCLUSION

Specific mandatory and prohibited steps of SLN dissection in endometrial cancer have been identified and validated based on consensus among a large number of international experts. A competency assessment tool is now available and can be used for surgeon selection in clinical trials and for ongoing, prospective quality assurance in routine clinical care.

Uterine serous carcinoma

Serous endometrial cancer represents a relative rare entity accounting for about 10% of all diagnosed endometrial cancer, but it is responsible for 40% of endometrial cancer-related deaths. Patients with serous endometrial cancer are often diagnosed at earlier disease stage, but remain at higher risk of recurrence and poorer prognosis when compared stage-for-stage with endometrioid subtype endometrial cancer. Serous endometrial cancers are characterized by marked nuclear atypia and abnormal p53 staining in immunohistochemistry. The mainstay of treatment for newly diagnosed serous endometrial cancer includes a multi-modal therapy with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Unfortunately, despite these efforts, survival outcomes still remain poor. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network classified all endometrial cancer types into four categories, of which, serous endometrial cancer mostly is found within the "copy number high" group. This group is characterized by the increased cell cycle deregulation (e.g., CCNE1, MYC, PPP2R1A, PIKCA, ERBB2 and CDKN2A) and TP53 mutations (90%). To date, the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is an effective treatment modality in second-line therapy, with a response rate of 50% in advanced/recurrent serous endometrial cancer. Owing to the unfavorable outcomes of serous endometrial cancer, clinical trials are a priority. At present, ongoing studies are testing novel combinations of various targeted and immunotherapeutic agents in newly diagnosed and advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer - an important strategy for serous endometrial cancer, whereby tumors are usually p53+ and pMMR, making response to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy unlikely. Here, the rare tumor working group (including members from the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO), Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG), and Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG)), performed a narrative review reporting on the current landscape of serous endometrial cancer and focusing on standard and emerging therapeutic options for patients affected by this difficult disease.

A retrospective study for investigating the outcomes of endometrial cancer treated with radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the role of radiotherapy for endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Data were analyzed for 39 247 patients with endometrial cancer registered with the Gynecologic Cancer Registry of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology from 2004 to 2011.

RESULTS

The rates of 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) in the radiotherapy and surgery groups were 53.6% and 94.5% in stage I or II, and 15.5% and 67.5% in stage III or IV, respectively. The prognosis in the radiotherapy group was significantly poorer than that in the surgery group. In multivariate analysis, age, advanced stage, histological type, risk of recurrence, and initial radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors. The rates of 5y-OS with no adjuvant therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy were 95.3%, 92.9%, and 87.1% for stage I or II, respectively, with significant differences among all groups (P < 0.001), and 60.0%, 70.4%, and 55.5% for stage III or IV, respectively, with significant differences of adjuvant chemotherapy with no adjuvant therapy (P < 0.001) and with adjuvant radiotherapy (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, age, advanced stage, histological type, lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with radiotherapy had a significantly poorer prognosis and the appropriate indication of radiotherapy for endometrial cancer requires further study.

Evaluation of Survival, Recurrence Patterns and Adjuvant Therapy in Surgically Staged High-Grade Endometrial Cancer with Retroperitoneal Metastases

BACKGROUND

We seek to evaluate the difference in recurrence patterns and survival among stage IIIC high-grade endometrial cancer treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy alone, radiation therapy alone, or both (chemoradiation).

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective analysis of surgically staged IIIC HGEC receiving adjuvant therapy was conducted. HGEC was defined as grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, serous, clear cell and carcinosarcoma. Differences in the frequency of recurrence sites and treatment delays were identified using Pearson's χ² test. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were evaluable: 41.9% carcinosarcoma, 36.8% serous, 17.4% grade 3 and 3.9% clear cell. Of these, 67.1% received chemoradiation, 25.8% received chemotherapy and 7.1% received radiation therapy. There was no difference in the frequency of treatment delays between regimens (p = 0.571). There was a trend towards greater retroperitoneal recurrence with chemotherapy (25.9%) versus chemoradiation (8.4%) and radiation therapy (7.7%) (p = 0.252). Grade 3 tumors had improved progression-free and overall survival (26 and 42 months, respectively) versus serous (17 and 30 months, respectively), carcinosarcoma (14 and 24 months, respectively) and clear cell (24 and 30 months respectively) (p = 0.002, p < 0.001). Overall, chemoradiation was superior to chemotherapy and radiation therapy in PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). Upon multivariate analysis, only histology and receipt of chemoradiation were independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSION

The majority of stage IIIC high-grade endometrial carcinomas recurred. Chemoradiation was associated with improved survival and less retroperitoneal recurrence. Grade 3 tumors demonstrated improved survival versus other histologies regardless of adjuvant treatment modality.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

Adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy in surgically treated endometrial carcinoma patients - in view of the recent evidence

Vaginal cuff brachytherapy is an essential component of adjuvant post-operative therapy in endometrial carcinoma. Brachytherapy boost, as a part of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy, including concomitant chemoradiotherapy combined with four cycles carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, is used in early-stage high-risk and advanced stage disease. This strategy is widely accepted and recommended by international guidelines, despite the fact that combined therapy has never been verified in randomized trials. Brachytherapy alone is the adjuvant treatment of choice for many patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, with high-intermediate features, replacing external beam pelvic radiotherapy. It provides equivalent vaginal control with a lower risk of toxicity, and minimal impact on health-related quality of life. Available evidence did not demonstrate the superiority of sole vaginal brachytherapy combined with three cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, over the standard pelvic irradiation for patients with early-stage, high-intermediate-, and high-risk endometrial cancer. This article summarized the available evidence on the role of post-operative vaginal cuff brachytherapy in endometrial cancer patients. Additionally, the risk groups definition, some aspects of brachytherapy technique, and the importance of pathological and molecular risk factors for endometrial cancer risk stratification were presented. Furthermore, the role of brachytherapy according to the European Society of Gynecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology 2021 guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma was presented.

Pembrolizumab with or without enzalutamide in selected populations of men with previously untreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harbouring programmed cell death ligand-1 staining: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the survival outcomes of pembrolizumab (PEM) plus enzalutamide (ENZ) versus PEM alone in selected populations of men with previously untreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harbouring programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) staining.

METHODS

Consecutive men with previously untreated mCRPC harbouring PD-L1 staining who underwent treatment with PEM plus ENZ (PE) or PEM alone (PA) at our medical centre from January 1, 2017, to January 31, 2021, were retrospectively identified. Follow-up was conducted monthly during the first year and then every 1 month thereafter. The primary outcomes of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were the frequency of key adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In total, 302 men were retrospectively reviewed, 96 of whom were deemed to be ineligible per the exclusion criteria, leaving 206 men (PE: n = 100, median age 64 years [range, 43-85] and PA: n = 106, 65 years [range, 45-82]) who were eligible for the study. The median follow-up for both groups was 34 months (range, 2-42). At the final follow-up, the median OS was 25.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.3-27.6) in the PE group versus 18.3 months (95% CI, 16.5-20.9) in the PA group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.80; p = 0.001). A marked distinction was also observed in the median PFS (6.1 months [95% CI, 4.7-7.8] for PE vs. 4.9 months for PA (95% CI, 3.2-6.4) for PA; HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.41-0.75; p = 0.001). There were noteworthy differences in the rate of the key AEs between the two groups (72.0% for PE vs. 45.3% for PA, p < 0.001). Noteworthy differences were also detected for fatigue events (7.0% in the PE group vs. 0.9% in the PA group, p = 0.025) and musculoskeletal events (9.0% for PE vs. 0.9% for PA, p = 0.007), but these events tended to be manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

Among selected populations of men with previously untreated mCRPC harbouring PD-L1 staining, PEM added to ENZ treatment may significantly increase the survival benefits compared with PEM treatment alone regardless of tumor mutation status. The safety profile for PE plus ENZ tends to be manageable.

Immunohistochemical biomarkers are prognostic relevant in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pre-operative immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers are not incorporated in endometrial cancer (EC) risk classification. We aim to investigate the added prognostic relevance of IHC biomarkers to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and lymph node (LN) status in EC.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC), analyzing pre-operative IHC expression of p53, L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), and relate to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk groups, LN status and outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 763 EC patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.5-years. Abnormal IHC expression was present for p53 in 112 (14.7%), L1CAM in 79 (10.4%), ER- in 76 (10.0%), and PR- in 138 (18.1%) patients. Abnormal expression of p53/L1CAM/ER/PR was significantly related with higher risk classification groups, and combined associated with the worst outcome within the 'high and advanced/metastatic' risk group. In multivariate analysis p53-abn, ER/PR- and ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 'high and advanced/metastatic' were independently associated with reduced disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients with abnormal IHC expression and lymph node metastasis (LNM) had the worst outcome. Patients with LNM and normal IHC expression had comparable outcome with patients without LNM and abnormal IHC expression.

CONCLUSION

The use of pre-operative IHC biomarkers has important prognostic relevance in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and in addition to LN status. For daily clinical practice, p53/L1CAM/ER/PR expression could serve as indicator for surgical staging and refine selective adjuvant treatment by incorporation into the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification.

Performance of a HER2 testing algorithm specific for p53-abnormal endometrial cancer

Aims

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification in endometrial cancer (EC) is almost completely confined to the p53‐abnormal (p53abn) molecular subtype and independent of histological subtype. HER2 testing should therefore be molecular subtype‐directed. However, the most optimal approach for HER2 testing in EC has not been fully established. Therefore, we developed an EC‐specific HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring method and evaluated its reproducibility and performance to establish an optimal diagnostic HER2 testing algorithm for p53abn EC.

Methods and results

HER2 IHC slides of 78 p53abn EC were scored by six gynaecopathologists according to predefined EC‐specific IHC scoring criteria. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Fleiss’ kappa and the first‐order agreement coefficient (AC1). The consensus IHC score was compared with HER2 dual in‐situ hybridisation (DISH) results. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A substantial interobserver agreement was found using three‐ or two‐tiered scoring [κ = 0.675, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.633–0.717; AC1 = 0.723, 95% CI = 0.643–0.804 and κ = 0.771, 95% CI = 0.714–0.828; AC1 = 0.774, 95% CI = 0.684–0.865, respectively]. Sensitivity and specificity for the identification of HER2‐positive EC was 100 and 97%, respectively, using a HER2 testing algorithm that recommends DISH in all cases with moderate membranous staining in >10% of the tumour (IHC+). Performing DISH on all IHC‐2+ and ‐3+ cases yields a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

Conclusions

Our EC‐specific HER2 IHC scoring method is reproducible. A screening strategy based on IHC scoring on all cases with subsequent DISH testing on IHC‐2+/‐3+ cases has perfect test accuracy for identifying HER2‐positive EC.

Concordance between preoperative ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and final histology in early-stage endometrial cancer

Objective

To evaluate the concordance between preoperative European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)-European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) risk classification in early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) assessed by biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with this classification based on histology of surgical specimen.

Methods

This bicentric retrospective study included women diagnosed with early-stage EC (≤stage II) who had a complete preoperative assessment and underwent a surgical management from January 2011 to December 2018. Patients were preoperatively classified into 3 degrees of risk of lymph node (LN) involvement based on biopsy and MRI. Based on final histological report, patients were re-classified using the preoperative classification. Concordance between the preoperative assessment and definitive histology was calculated with weighted Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results

A total of 333 women were included and kappa coefficient of preoperative risk classification was 0.49. The risk was underestimated and overestimated in 37% and 10% of cases, respectively. Twenty-nine percent of patients had an incomplete LN staging according to the degree of risk of re-classification. The observed discordance in the risk classification was attributed to MRI in 75% of cases, to biopsy in 18% and in 7% to both (p<0.001). Kappa coefficient for concordance was 0.25 for MRI and 0.73 for biopsy.

Conclusion

Concordance between preoperative ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and final histology is weak. Given that the risk was underestimated in the majority of patients wrongly classified, sentinel LN procedure instead of no LN dissection could be an option offered to preoperative low-risk patients to decrease the indication of second surgery for re-staging and/or to avoid toxicity of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Association Between Adjuvant Therapy and Survival in Stage II-III Endometrial Cancer: Influence of Malignant Peritoneal Cytology

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the survival effect of adjuvant therapy in stage II-III endometrial cancer based on peritoneal cytology results.

METHODS

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was retrospectively queried to examine 7467 women with stage II-III endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy, and with available peritoneal cytology results, from 2010 to 2016. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was fitted to assess the association between adjuvant therapy and all-cause mortality stratified by peritoneal cytology results.

RESULTS

Malignant peritoneal cytology was reported in 1662 (22.3%) women and was associated with non-endometrioid histology, higher tumor stage, and nodal metastasis (p < 0.05). In a propensity score-weighted model, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with increased all-cause mortality compared with negative peritoneal cytology (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.23-1.48). Adjuvant therapy types varied based on histology and peritoneal cytology results. In non-endometrioid histology, the combination of chemotherapy and whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) was associated with improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy or WPRT alone irrespective of the peritoneal cytology results (p < 0.05). The combination of chemotherapy and WPRT was also associated with improved overall survival in women with endometrioid histology and malignant peritoneal cytology (p = 0.026). Women with endometrioid histology and negative peritoneal cytology represented the most common subpopulation (46.5%), and overall survival was similar regardless of which of the three adjuvant therapy modalities was used (p = 0.319).

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant peritoneal cytology is prevalent and prognostic in stage II-III endometrial cancer. This study found that the surgeon's choice and benefit of adjuvant therapy for women with stage II-III endometrial cancer differed depending on the status of peritoneal cytology.

Adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer in the era of molecular classification: radiotherapy, chemoradiation and novel targets for therapy

Endometrial cancer is primarily treated with surgery. Adjuvant treatment strategies for endometrial cancer, such as external beam pelvic radiotherapy, vaginal brachytherapy, chemotherapy, and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, have been studied in several randomized trials. Adjuvant treatment is currently based on the presence of clinico-pathological risk factors. Low-risk disease is adequately managed with surgery alone. In high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy is recommended to maximize local control, with only mild side effects and without impact on quality of life. For high-risk endometrial cancer, recent large randomized trials support the use of pelvic radiotherapy, especially in stage I-II endometrial cancer with risk factors. For women with serous cancers and those with stage III disease, chemoradiation increased both recurrence-free and overall survival, while GOG-258 showed similar recurrence-free survival compared with six cycles of chemotherapy alone, but with better pelvic and para-aortic nodal control with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Recent molecular studies, most notably the work from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, have shown that four endometrial cancer molecular classes can be distinguished; POLE ultra-mutated, microsatellite instable hypermutated, copy-number-low, and copy-number-high. Subsequent studies, using surrogate markers to identify groups analogous to TCGA sub-classes, showed that all four endometrial cancer sub-types are found across all stages, histological types, and grades. Moreover, the molecular sub-groups have proved to have a stronger prognostic impact than histo-pathological tumor characteristics. This introduces an new era of molecular classification based diagnostics and treatment approaches. Integration of the molecular factors and new therapeutic targets will lead to molecular-integrated adjuvant treatment including targeted treatments, which are the rationale of new and ongoing trials. This review presents an overview of current adjuvant treatment strategies in endometrial cancer, highlights the development and evaluation of a molecular-integrated risk profile, and briefly discusses ongoing developments in targeted treatment.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer with >50% myometrial invasion and negative lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy as an addition or alternative to radiotherapy for early-stage high-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage high-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We identified patients with stage I or II endometrioid grade 2 or 3 endometrial cancer with myometrial invasion >50% and negative lymph nodes after pelvic with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy at four institutions (USA and Italy). Associations between chemotherapy and cause-specific and recurrence-free survival were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. Hematogenous, peritoneal, and lymphatic recurrences were defined as 'non-vaginal'.

RESULTS

We identified 329 patients of mean (SD) age 66.4 (9.8) years. The median follow-up among those alive was 84 (IQR 44-133) months. The 5-year cause-specific survival was 86.1% (95% CI 82.0% to 90.4%) and the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 82.2% (95% CI 77.9% to 86.8%). Stage II (vs stage IB) was associated with poorer cause-specific and recurrence-free survival. A total of 58 (90.6%) of 64 patients who had chemotherapy had 4-6 cycles of platinum-based regimen. In adjusted analysis, we did not observe a statistically significant improvement in cause-specific survival (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.11 to 1.03; p=0.06) or non-vaginal recurrence-free survival (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.12 to 1.08; p=0.07) with adjuvant chemotherapy. Sixteen of 18 lymphatic recurrences (88.9%; 3/5 pelvic, all 13 para-aortic) were observed in the 265 patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Among stage II patients, no deaths (100% 5-year recurrence-free survival) were observed in the eight patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 66% 5-year recurrence-free survival in the 34 patients who did not.

CONCLUSION

Although we observed that adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved oncologic outcomes in early-stage high-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer, the associations did not meet conventional levels of statistical significance. Further research is warranted in this relatively uncommon subgroup of patients.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

Role of brachytherapy in stage III endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: Identifying factors predictive of a survival benefit

OBJECTIVES

To determine which patients with stage III endometrial cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy derive benefit from the addition of vaginal brachytherapy, as stage III is a highly heterogeneous population with substantial variations in practice.

METHODS

Patients with FIGO stage III endometrial carcinoma diagnosed 2004-2016 who underwent at least total hysterectomy and adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival according to receipt of brachytherapy, stratified by histologic type, pathological features, and status of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariable regression.

RESULTS

In total, 9369 patients were identified (24% stage IIIA, 5% stage IIIB, 71% stage IIIC; 61% endometrioid, 39% nonendometrioid histology), and 28% received brachytherapy. In the endometrioid cohort, brachytherapy was associated with a 5% absolute increase in 3-year overall survival (87% vs. 82%, p < 0.0001), which persisted in multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.84, p < 0.0001). The benefit of brachytherapy was greater in patients not also receiving EBRT, and in patients with vaginal/parametrial extension, grade 3 disease, lymphovascular invasion, and/or deep myometrial invasion. In the nonendometrioid cohort, brachytherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in univariable but not multivariable analysis, regardless of EBRT status or pathological features.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors predictive of brachytherapy benefit were endometrioid histology and pathological risk factors for local recurrence. Additionally, brachytherapy appeared more beneficial in patients not already receiving pelvic EBRT. Further research is warranted to determine which stage III patients may be best served by brachytherapy, EBRT, or both.

Salvage Radiation for Pelvic Relapse after Surgically Treated Endometrial Cancer

(1) Background: This study evaluated the clinical outcome after salvage radiotherapy for first pelvic relapse after endometrial cancer (EC). (2) Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included EC patients with first central pelvic relapse without lymph node involvement treated with curative intent. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and possible predictive factors for risk of relapse and mortality were identified using the Cox model. (3) Results: We included 139 patients with median EQD2 (Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy fractions) to the clinical target volume of 70.0 Gy. During follow up of median 6.66 years, 39.6% patients developed a second relapse. Risk group classification at primary diagnosis based on histology, grading and FIGO stage and how the pelvic tumor boost was administered were independently associated with PFS and OS. Five-year OS was 68% (95% CI (59-75)) for the whole cohort. Five-year OS was 88% (95% CI (75-94)), 72% (95% CI (55-84)) and 38% (95% CI (15-60)) for the stage I low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The majority of central pelvic recurrences in RT-naive EC women can be successfully salvaged with radiotherapy. However, survival in patients with high-risk disease remains poor and warrants a more individualized approach to optimize outcome.

Real-World Evaluation of Modern Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Women with Stage IB Endometrial Cancer

The optimal adjuvant treatment for stage IB endometrial cancer remains undefined. We investigated the benefit of modern adjuvant radiotherapy for women with stage IB endometrial cancer. We retrospectively reviewed patients with surgically staged, pure stage IB endometrioid adenocarcinoma (2010 to 2018). Adjuvant modern radiotherapy consists of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) by intensity, volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy, or image-guided vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). The study included 180 stage IB patients. Patients with grade 3 diseases had frequent aggressive histology patterns (lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI); low uterine segment involvement) and experienced significantly shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with grade 1/2 diseases. Adjuvant modern radiotherapy decreased the incidence of acute/chronic grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity. In IB grade 1/2 patients, EBRT significantly lengthened survival (RFS/OS); patients with age >60 years, myometrial invasion beyond the outer third, or LVSI benefited the most from EBRT. EBRT also significantly improved survival (RFS/OS) in IB grade 3 patients, where patients with bulky tumors or LVSI benefited the most from EBRT. Therefore, EBRT may be beneficial for all stage IB patients.

Patients' and clinicians' preferences in adjuvant treatment for high-risk endometrial cancer: Implications for shared decision making

BACKGROUND

Decision making regarding adjuvant therapy for high-risk endometrial cancer is complex. The aim of this study was to determine patients' and clinicians' minimally desired survival benefit to choose chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy alone. Moreover, influencing factors and importance of positive and negative treatment effects (i.e. attribute) were investigated.

METHODS

Patients with high-risk endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and multidisciplinary gynaecologic oncology clinicians completed a trade-off questionnaire based on PORTEC-3 trial data.

RESULTS

In total, 171 patients and 63 clinicians completed the questionnaire. Median minimally desired benefit to make chemoradiotherapy worthwhile was significantly higher for patients versus clinicians (10% vs 5%, p = 0.02). Both patients and clinicians rated survival benefit most important during decision making, followed by long-term symptoms. Older patients (OR 0.92 [95%CI 0.87-0.97]; p = 0.003) with comorbidity (OR 0.34 [95% CI 0.12-0.89]; p = 0.035) had lower preference for chemoradiotherapy, while patients with better numeracy skills (OR 1.2 [95%CI 1.05-1.36], p = 0.011) and chemoradiotherapy history (OR 25.0 [95%CI 8.8-91.7]; p < 0.001) had higher preference for chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a considerable difference in minimally desired survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy in high-risk endometrial cancer among and between patients and clinicians. Overall, endometrial cancer patients needed higher benefits than clinicians before preferring chemoradiotherapy.

Urologic, lymphedema, pelvic pain and gastrointestinal symptoms increase after radiotherapy in patients with primary uterine tumors: a prospective longitudinal Swedish cohort study

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy (RT) causes an inflammatory reaction of the tissue which leads to fibrosis and reduced functioning of the pelvic organs. Few studies have shown significant relationships between side effects and RT in uterine tumors. Here, the urological, lymphedema, pelvic pain and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were studied before and after RT in patients with primary uterine tumors using the EORTC QLQ-EN24, specifically designed for uterine cancer patients.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study comprised patients with primary uterine tumors who received pelvic radiotherapy (RT). A total of 43 patients were included from May 2014 to February 2019. Patients completed the questionnaires for global health status and functioning before the start of RT and at 3 and 12 months after RT.

RESULTS

We found a significant worsening of the urological symptoms 3 months after RT which persisted up to 12 months after RT compared to baseline values prior to start of RT (p = 0.007). An exacerbation of the urinary symptoms was seen in patients with vaginal brachytherapy/boost compared to patients with pelvic RT at 12 months after RT (p = 0.053). The severity of lymphedema symptoms increased from RT start to 12 months after RT (p = 0.019) and the pelvic pain were higher at 3 months after RT compared to before RT (p = 0.004). Also, the level of GI symptoms was significantly higher 12 months after RT compared to the RT start (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The urologic, lymphedema, pelvic pain and GI symptoms all increase after RT.

Prevalence and Prognosis of Lynch Syndrome and Sporadic Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard screening of endometrial cancer (EC) for Lynch syndrome (LS) is gaining traction, however the prognostic impact of an underlying hereditary etiology is unknown. We established the prevalence, prognosis and subsequent primary cancer incidence of patients with LS-associated EC in relation to sporadic mismatch repair deficient (MMRd)-EC in the large combined PORTEC-1,-2 and -3 trial cohort.

METHODS

After MMR-immunohistochemistry, MLH1-promoter methylation testing, and next-generation sequencing, tumors were classified into three groups according to the molecular cause of their MMRd-EC. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox model were used for survival analysis. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate the subsequent cancer probability. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Among the 1336 ECs, 410 (30.7%) were MMRd. A total of 380 (92.7%) were fully triaged 275 (72.4%) were MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-ECs; 36 (9.5%) LS MMRd-ECs, and 69 (18.2%) MMRd-ECs due to other causes. Limiting screening of EC patients to ≤ 60 or ≤ 70 years would have resulted in missing 18 (50.0%) and 6 (16.7%) LS diagnoses. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83.1-100%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45, 95%CI =0.16-1.24, p = .12) for LS, 95.5% (95% CI = 90.7-100%; HR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.05-0.55, p = .003) for 'other' versus 78.6% (95% CI = 73.8-83.7%) for MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-EC. The probability of subsequent LS-associated cancer at 10 years was 11.6% (95%CI = 0.0-24.7%), 1.5% (95%CI = 0.0-4.3%) and 7.0% (95%CI = 3.0-10.9%) within the LS, 'other' and MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-EC groups.

CONCLUSION

The LS prevalence in the PORTEC-trial population was 2.8%, and among MMRd-ECs 9.5%. Patients with LS-associated ECs showed a trend towards better RFS and higher risk for second cancers compared to patients with MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-EC.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in otherwise stage I/II endometrioid endometrial cancer: To treat or not to treat?

OBJECTIVES

To assess associations between treatment and recurrence-free survival (RFS) among patients with isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) and otherwise stage I/II endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with SLN ITCs (<200 cells and < 0.2 mm) was performed. Only patients with otherwise stage I/II EC, endometrioid histology, and no evidence of micro-or macrometastases were included. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate associations between treatment, tumor characteristics, and RFS.

RESULTS

175 patients were included. Median follow up time was 31 months. 39% stage IB and 12% stage II disease. 76 (43%) received no adjuvant therapy or vaginal brachytherapy only (NAT/VBT), 21 (12%) had external beam radiation (EBRT), and 78 (45%) received chemotherapy +/- radiation. Patients who received chemotherapy more often had tumors with deep myoinvasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and higher grade. Nine (5.1%) patients recurred; 5 distant, 3 retroperitoneal, and 1 vaginal. Extra-vaginal recurrences were similar in patients with or without chemotherapy (5.2% vs 3.8%, p = 0.68). After controlling for stage, LVSI and grade, chemotherapy and EBRT were not associated with RFS (HR = 0.63, 95%CI 0.11-3.52, and HR = 0.90, 95%CI 0.22-3.61, respectively). Type of lymph node dissection and ITC detection method were not associated with RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of retroperitoneal and/or distant recurrence is low (4.6%) for patients with stage I/II endometrioid EC and ITCs in SLNs regardless of treatment. Our preliminary data suggests that adjuvant therapy may not be significantly associated with RFS. However, longer follow-up time and a larger sample size are needed before definitive recommendations regarding adjuvant therapy for patients with EC and only ITCs in SLN can be made.

Fertility preservation in patients with BRCA mutations or Lynch syndrome

Guidelines and expert consensus are lacking on fertility preservation in BRCA mutation carriers and in patients with Lynch syndrome. The safety of fertility preservation in this setting is still a topic of debate and multiple factors need to be carefully considered. The aim of this review was to analyze the reproductive potential of women harboring a genetic mutation affecting the DNA repair system and explore the efficacy and safety of existing fertility preservation strategies in these patients.

The Impact of Adjuvant Management Strategies on Outcomes in Women With Early Stage Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Objective To determine the impact of different adjuvant strategies on outcomes in women with early-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Methods Our retrospective database for women with endometrial carcinoma was queried for women with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-II USC who underwent surgical staging between January 1991 and April 2019 followed by adjuvant management (observation, radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT), or combined modality treatment (CRT)). Chi-square tests were performed to compare differences in outcome by type of adjuvant management. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to identify statistically significant predictors of survival endpoints. Results We identified 171 women who met our inclusion criteria. The median follow-up time was 70.5 months. Seventy-five percent of the study cohort was FIGO stage IA, 13% were stage IB, and 12% were stage II. All women underwent pelvic lymph node dissection with a median number of dissected lymph nodes of 14. Omentectomy was performed in 64% of patients. Adjuvant RT was utilized in 56% of women (65 patients received vaginal brachytherapy alone, 10 patients received pelvic RT, and 21 patients received a combination of both). The most commonly used chemotherapy regimen was carboplatin and paclitaxel with a median number of cycles of six. A total of 44% of the cohort received CRT, 12% received RT alone, 19% received chemo alone, and 25% were observed. Five-year RFS was 73% for those who received CRT, 84% for those who received RT alone, 68% for those who received CT alone, and 55% for those who were observed (p=0.13). Five-year DSS was 81%, 94%, 71%, and 60%, respectively (p=0.02). Five-year OS was 76%, 70%, 60%, and 56%, respectively (p=0.11). On MVA of OS and DSS, a higher percentage of myometrial invasion, the presence of lower uterine segment involvement, positive peritoneal cytology, and receipt of chemotherapy alone/observation were independent predictors of worse outcomes. The sole independent predictor of worse RFS on MVA was the presence of positive peritoneal cytology. Conclusion In this cohort of women with early-stage USC who underwent surgical staging, adjuvant radiation treatment with or without chemotherapy was associated with improved survival endpoints and trended toward improved recurrence rates.

Prognostic value of serum HE4 level in the management of endometrial cancer: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) has shown promising utility as a prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer. Increased serum HE4 levels may be associated with deeper myometrial invasion, extrauterine disease and poorer prognosis.

AIM

To evaluate the use of serum HE4 level, compared to and alongside other investigations, to accurately guide management in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-site prospective study of 100 patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer. All patients underwent preoperative measurements of HE4 and CA125 levels and a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the depth of invasion, nodal status and tumour size. Correlation was sought between serum HE4 level, CA125 level, MRI findings and intra-operative frozen section with tumour type, grade and stage.

RESULTS

While both median HE4 and CA125 levels were higher with worsening clinicopathological features, serum HE4 level showed a more consistent association with high-risk features. Patients with a low-grade biopsy preoperatively and a low HE4 level (<70 pmol/L) demonstrated an 86.8% likelihood of having low-risk disease on final histopathology. In comparison, preoperative MRI or intraoperative frozen section alongside a low-grade biopsy demonstrated a similar likelihood of 86.2 and 87.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

When used in conjunction with an initial low-grade endometrial biopsy, serum HE4 level demonstrated a similar likelihood to both preoperative MRI and intraoperative frozen section in identifying low-risk disease on final histopathology. As a triaging tool this may be significant given that a preoperative, serum-based assay would likely be the least invasive, least resource-intensive and most cost-effective approach.

Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs Lymphadenectomy for Intermediate- and High-Grade Endometrial Cancer Staging

Question

What is the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) compared with lymphadenectomy in women with intermediate- and high-grade endometrial cancer?

Findings

In this cohort study of 156 patients with endometrial cancer (126 with high-grade histologic subtypes), SLNB had a sensitivity of 96% and a negative predictive value of 99% for the detection of nodal metastasis. A total of 26% of patients with node-positive cancer were identified outside lymphadenectomy boundaries or required immunohistochemistry for diagnosis.

Meaning

In this study, SLNB had similar diagnostic accuracy and prognostic ability as lymphadenectomy in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer at greatest risk for nodal metastasis.

Importance

Whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can replace lymphadenectomy for surgical staging in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer (EC) is unclear.

Objective

To examine the diagnostic accuracy of, performance characteristics of, and morbidity associated with SLNB using indocyanine green in patients with intermediate- and high-grade EC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this prospective, multicenter cohort study (Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs Lymphadenectomy for Intermediate- and High-Grade Endometrial Cancer Staging [SENTOR] study), accrual occurred from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2019, with early stoppage because of prespecified accuracy criteria. The study included patients with clinical stage I grade 2 endometrioid or high-grade EC scheduled to undergo laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy with an intent to complete staging at 3 designated cancer centers in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Exposures

All patients underwent SLNB followed by lymphadenectomy as the reference standard. Patients with grade 2 endometrioid EC underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) alone, and patients with high-grade EC underwent PLND and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALND).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was sensitivity of the SLNB algorithm. Secondary outcomes were additional measures of diagnostic accuracy, sentinel lymph node detection rates, and adverse events.

Results

The study enrolled 156 patients (median age, 65.5 years; range, 40-86 years; median body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 27.5; range, 17.6-49.3), including 126 with high-grade EC. All patients underwent SLNB and PLND, and 101 patients (80%) with high-grade EC also underwent PALND. Sentinel lymph node detection rates were 97.4% per patient (95% CI, 93.6%-99.3%), 87.5% per hemipelvis (95% CI, 83.3%-91.0%), and 77.6% bilaterally (95% CI, 70.2%-83.8%). Of 27 patients (17%) with nodal metastases, 26 patients were correctly identified by the SLNB algorithm, yielding a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 81%-100%), a false-negative rate of 4% (95% CI, 0%-19%), and a negative predictive value of 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%). Only 1 patient (0.6%) was misclassified by the SLNB algorithm. Seven of 27 patients with node-positive cancer (26%) were identified outside traditional PLND boundaries or required immunohistochemistry for diagnosis.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this prospective cohort study, SLNB had acceptable diagnostic accuracy for patients with high-grade EC at increased risk of nodal metastases and improved the detection of node-positive cases compared with lymphadenectomy. The findings suggest that SLNB is a viable option for the surgical staging of EC.

Endometrial cancer: A society of gynecologic oncology evidence-based review and recommendations

INTRODUCTION

In 2014, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Committee published a clinical update reviewing the treatment of women with endometrial cancer. At that time, there had been significant advances in the diagnosis, work-up, surgical management, and available treatment options allowing for more optimal care of affected women. Despite these advances, the incidence of endometrial cancer as well as the deaths attributable to the disease have continued to rise; from 1987 to 2014 there has been a 75% increase in cases and almost 300% increase in endometrial cancer deaths. Fortunately, since then, there has been progress in the treatment of patients with endometrial cancer with increased utilization of molecular pathology, greater understanding of genetic predisposition, enhanced methods for lymph node assessment, a broader understanding of the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy, and a more efficient approach to survivorship and surveillance. The purpose of this document is to present a comprehensive review of this progress.

MANUSCRIPT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

The authors reviewed the available evidence, contributed to the development of this manuscript, provided critical review of the guidelines, and finalized the manuscript recommendations. The review was also presented to and approved by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice Committee, SGO Publications Committee, and the SGO board members prior to submission for publication. The recommendations for this manuscript were developed by a panel of gynecologic oncologists who were members of the SGO Clinical Practice and Education Committees. Panelists reviewed and considered evidence from current uterine cancer literature. The terminology used in these guidelines was adopted from the ASCCP management guidelines [1] using a two-part rating system to grade the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence (Table 1). The rating for each recommendation is given in parentheses.