Durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide alone in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): updated results from a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

Identification of Ferroptosis-Related Biomarkers for Prognosis and Immunotherapy in Patients With Glioma

Ferroptosis is a novel type of iron- and ROS-dependent cell death and is involved in various diseases. LncRNAs are involved and play important roles in the occurrence and development of several cancers. However, researches about the role of ferroptosis-related lncRNAs in glioma are relatively rare. Here, we identified nine ferroptosis-related lncRNAs and then constructed a prognostic model by the LASSO and Cox analysis. The model could predict overall survival with high sensitivity and specificity according to ROC curves. In addition, the cell cycle, p53 signaling, apoptosis, and oxidative phosphorylation pathways were obviously enriched in the pathogenesis of glioma by gene set enrichment analysis. A nomogram was constructed by integrating several independent prognostic clinicopathological features, and it could provide a valuable predictive tool for overall survival. Furthermore, a strong correlation between these nine lncRNAs and immunotherapy was found. Glioma patients in the high-risk group had higher TMB using somatic mutation data, different immune infiltration, and higher expression of immune checkpoints, indicating these patients might benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In summary, these nine ferroptosis-related lncRNAs were promising biomarkers for predicting overall survival and guiding immunotherapy or future immune checkpoint inhibitor development for glioma patients.

CCL5 as a Prognostic Marker for Survival and an Indicator for Immune Checkpoint Therapies in Small Cell Lung Cancer

The standard treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has not changed in decades. Recently, important advances have been made in immunotherapy. However, analysis of these trials suggests that only a small proportion of patients benefit from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Identifying these patients is a clinical challenge. In this study, we applied the ESTIMATE calculation to calculate immune scores in 159 cases of SCLC from two published cohorts. COX regression analysis was used to analyze the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with high and low immune score. We found that CCL5 expression was positively correlated with survival in SCLC patients. In addition, we verified the effect of CCL5 on survival and response to treatment in another cohort that received immunotherapy. Meanwhile, Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that genes with high expression of CCL5 were mainly enriched in immune-related activities. The result of Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) demonstrated that CCL5 was a potential biomarker to predict response to ICB for SCLC, which is correspondent with the result in verified cohort. These results suggest that CCL5 may be the reason for TME to maintain its immune dominance, making it a favorable factor for ICB. Therefore, CCL5 levels may help to outline the prognosis of patients with SCLC.

Comparison of Immune Checkpoint Molecules PD-1 and PD-L1 in Paired Primary and Recurrent Glioma: Increasing Trend When Recurrence

Purpose: This study aims to investigate PD-1/PD-L1 expression patterns in paired primary and recurrent gliomas. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2014, 42 patients who underwent surgical resections of primary and recurrent gliomas were retrospectively included. PD-1/PD-L1 protein expression in tumors was evaluated through immunohistochemistry. Results: In primary gliomas, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression was evident in 9 (22.0%) and 14 (33.3%) patients. In the paired recurrent glioma, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression was evident in 25 (61.0%) and 31 (74.0%) lesions. Both PD-1 and PD-L1 showed significantly enhanced expression after recurrence (p < 0.005; p < 0.005). For PD-L1 expression in recurrent gliomas, the adjuvant therapy group showed significantly increased expression compared to primary gliomas (p < 0.005). For PD-1- primary gliomas, if the matched recurrent gliomas showed PD-1+, the PFS became worse than the remaining recurrent gliomas PD-1- (12.7 vs. 25.9 months, p = 0.032). Interestingly, for PD-L1- primary gliomas, if the matched recurrent gliomas showed PD-L1+, the OS became better than the remaining recurrent gliomas PD-L1- (33.8 vs. 17.5 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In the study, we found the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 increased significantly in recurrent gliomas and the elevated level of PD-L1 was tightly associated with adjuvant treatment, suggesting the potential therapeutic and predictive value of PD-1 and PD-L1 in the treatment of recurrent gliomas.

Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions

Antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 rescue T cells from exhausted status and revive immune response against cancer cells. Based on the immense success in clinical trials, ten α-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, toripalimab, tislelizumab, zimberelimab, prolgolimab, and dostarlimab) and three α-PD-L1 antibodies (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) have been approved for various types of cancers. Nevertheless, the low response rate of α-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy remains to be resolved. For most cancer patients, PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is not the sole speed-limiting factor of antitumor immunity, and it is insufficient to motivate effective antitumor immune response by blocking PD-1/PD-L1 axis. It has been validated that some combination therapies, including α-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy, radiotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, targeted therapy, other immune checkpoint inhibitors, agonists of the co-stimulatory molecule, stimulator of interferon genes agonists, fecal microbiota transplantation, epigenetic modulators, or metabolic modulators, have superior antitumor efficacies and higher response rates. Moreover, bifunctional or bispecific antibodies containing α-PD-1/PD-L1 moiety also elicited more potent antitumor activity. These combination strategies simultaneously boost multiple processes in cancer-immunity cycle, remove immunosuppressive brakes, and orchestrate an immunosupportive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we summarized the synergistic antitumor efficacies and mechanisms of α-PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with other therapies. Moreover, we focused on the advances of α-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunomodulatory strategies in clinical studies. Given the heterogeneity across patients and cancer types, individualized combination selection could improve the effects of α-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunomodulatory strategies and relieve treatment resistance.

First-Line Treatments for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy: A Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy were unlikely to be considered cost-effective compared with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in China due to its high costs. However, the cost-effectiveness of the comparison between the regimens of ICIs plus chemotherapy were remained unclear yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ICIs plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for ES-SCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

Methods

A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to indirect compare the clinical benefits between the ICIs plus chemotherapy regimens. A decision-analytic model was established to evaluate the cost-effectiveness from the Chinese healthcare system, the clinical efficacy and safety data were obtained from the clinical trials and the results of NMA. Cost and utility values were gathered from the local charges and previously studies. Key outputs of the NMA were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the robustness of the model outcomes.

Results

Five clinical trials (IMpower133, CASPIAN, KEYNOTE-604, CA184-156, and EA5161) of 1,255 patients received first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy strategies were analyzed in the NMA. NMA showed that nivolumab plus chemotherapy was ranked higher than other strategies. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that atezolizumab plus chemotherapy achieved relatively higher health benefits and lower costs. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the cost of ICIs had the substantial impact on model outcomes. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested that the probability of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy could be considered cost-effective was more than 50% at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $31,313/QALY in China. In scenario analyses, when the price of nivolumab reduced 80%, the probability of nivolumab plus chemotherapy being cost-effective was more than 50%.

Conclusions

The NMA and cost-effectiveness revealed that atezolizumab plus chemotherapy is the most favorable first-line treatment for previously untreated ES-SCLC patients compared other ICIs plus chemotherapy regimens in China. The price reduction of nivolumab would make nivolumab plus chemotherapy be the most cost-effective option in future possible context.

Molecular subtypes of small cell lung cancer transformed from adenocarcinoma after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment

Background

A certain proportion of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations showed resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) by transforming their histology into small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In this study, we evaluated the molecular characteristics of transformed SCLCs.

Methods

Eighteen SCLC tissue samples transformed after EGFR TKI treatment were used for the analysis. Immunohistochemistry was conducted to evaluate the molecular subtype using antibodies representative of the major transcriptional factor-based molecular subtypes, ASCL1 (SCLC-A), NEUROD1 (SCLC-N), POU2F3 (SCLC-P), and YAP1. Subtypes were categorized based on a predefined criteria.

Results

Among the study population (n=18), most of the patients were initially diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (n=17), and one patient was diagnosed with adenosquamous histology. Eight patients (44.4%) were never-smokers, and nine patients were women (50.0%). Staining of pre-transformation sample was conducted in six patients, and five of them showed no discernible expression for ASCL1, NEUROD1, or POU2F3. However, the proportion of molecular subtypes after SCLC transformation was predominantly SCLC-N (n=9, 50.0%), followed by SCLC-Triple Negative (SCLC-TN; n=5, 27.8%) and SCLC-A (n=4, 22.2%). The median overall survival from TKI initiation was longer in patients who transformed to SCLC-A (P=0.009) than in those who transformed to either SCLC-N or SCLC-TN. However, the overall survival difference since SCLC transformation was not significant (P=0.370).

Conclusions

In our series, SCLC-N subtype was prevalent in SCLC transformed after EGFR TKI treatment. In addition, overall survival and the time to SCLC transformation from the EGFR TKI treatment were longer in patients who transformed to the SCLC-A type. Large-scale data will be required to confirm our findings.

Immune-Related Pneumonitis Was Decreased by Addition of Chemotherapy with PD-1/L1 Inhibitors: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

PURPOSE

Immune-related pneumonitis (IRP) has attracted extensive attention, owing to its increased mortality rate. Conventional chemotherapy (C) has been considered as an immunosuppressive agent and may thus reduce IRP's risk when used in combination with PD-1/L1 inhibitors. This study aimed to assess the risk of IRP with PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (I+C) versus PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone (I) in solid cancer treatment.

METHOD

Multiple databases were searched for RCTs before January 2021. This NMA was performed among I+C, I, and C to investigate IRP's risk. Subgroup analysis was carried out on the basis of different PD-1/L1 inhibitors and cancer types.

RESULTS

Thirty-one RCTs (19,624 patients) were included. The I+C group exhibited a lower risk of IRP in any grade (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95) and in grade 3-5 (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.92) as opposed to the I group. The risk of any grade IRP with PD-1 plus chemotherapy was lower than that with PD-1 monotherapy (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.89), although grade 3-5 IRP was similar. There was no statistically meaningful difference in the risk of any grade IRP between PD-L1 plus chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.43-2.09) or grade 3-5 IRP (RR, 0.71;95% CI, 0.24-2.07). In addition, compared with the I group, the I+C group was correlated with a decreased risk in IRP regardless of cancer type, while a substantial difference was only observed in NSCLC patients for grade 3-5 IRP (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-0.98).

CONCLUSION

In comparison to PD-1/L1 inhibitor treatment alone, combining chemotherapy with PD-1/L1 inhibitors might reduce the risk of IRP in the general population. Furthermore, PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy were correlated with a decreased risk of IRP compared to PD-1 inhibitor treatment alone. In contrast to the I group, the I+C group exhibited a lower risk of IRP, especially for NSCLC patients.

Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Are the Promises of Long-Term Benefit Finally Met?

Over the last few years, agents targeting immune checkpoints have shown potential to improve therapeutic outcomes in patients with lung cancer in multiple clinical settings. Inhibitors of PD-1/PD-L1 have been approved for the treatment of different types of lung cancer by the FDA either alone or in combination with chemotherapy or other immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-CTLA-4 agents. The introduction of these agents in clinical practice has revolutionized the therapeutic approach to lung cancer, keeping the promises of long-term benefit in selected patient populations. The therapeutic indications of immunotherapy in lung cancer are rapidly growing, and multiple combinations entered clinical practice or are under active development. Furthermore, the quest for a reliable predictive biomarker is still ongoing to overcome the limits of currently approved tests for patients' selection. In this review, we summarized the current status and progress of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents in lung cancer treatment.

Efficacy and safety of amrubicin monotherapy after atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer

This study examined the activity and safety of amrubicin monotherapy among relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who had previously been treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (AteCE). This retrospective study evaluated patients with relapsed SCLC who were treated with previously AteCE combination therapy followed by amrubicin monotherapy between August 2019 and May 2021. Clinical efficacy and toxicity were analyzed. Overall, 40 patients were included: 12 and 28 patients had sensitive and refractory relapse, respectively. The response rate was 32.5% (25.0% in the sensitive group and 35.7% in the refractory group). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the first amrubicin treatment was 3.4 months (95% CI: 1.9-4.9 months) and 9.9 months (95% CI: 4.5-11.5 months), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in median PFS (3.6 months vs. 3.2 months, p = 0.42) or median OS (11.2 months vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.78). Grade ≥ 3 hematological adverse events occurred as follows: decreased white blood cells in 52.5% of patients; decreased neutrophil count in 57.5%; and febrile neutropenia in 10.0%. Grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in one patient. There were no treatment-related deaths. Amrubicin is feasible and effective for relapsed SCLC patients previously treated with AteCE therapy. Although immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (ICI) does not improve the effect of amrubicin, the toxicity is not increased, suggesting that amrubicin remains effective even after ICI administration. Thus, amrubicin after AteCE could be the preferred standard chemotherapeutic choice in patients with relapsed SCLC.

Peripheral Tumor Location Predicts a Favorable Prognosis in Patients with Resected Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy. Surgical resection is currently only recommended for clinical stage I patients who have been carefully staged. The clinical outcomes of patients with resected SCLCs vary because the disease is highly heterogeneous, suggesting that selected patients could be considered for surgical resection depending on their clinical and/or molecular characteristics.

METHODS

We collected data on a retrospective cohort of 119 limited-stage SCLC patients who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection from March 2013 to March 2020 at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. Correlations were derived using Fisher's exact test. Models of 2-year and 3-year survival were evaluated by deriving the area under receiver operating characteristic curves. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate significant differences between the survival curves and hazard ratios.

RESULTS

The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 35.9 months (range 0.9-105.3 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 45.2 months (range 4.8-105.3 months). Univariate analysis showed that TNM stage was significantly correlated with DFS and OS. The 2-year disease-free rates of patients with stage I, II, and III disease were 76.4%, 50.5%, and 36.1%, respectively, and the 3-year OS rates were 75.9%, 57.7%, and 34.4%, respectively. In pN + patients, multiple (or multiple-station) lymph node involvement significantly increased recurrence and reduced survival compared with patients with single or single-station metastases. Patients with peripheral SCLCs evidenced significantly better DFS and OS than did patients with central tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that TNM stage and tumor location were independently prognostic in Chinese patients with resected limited-stage SCLC. A combination of TNM stage and tumor location was helpful for prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

TNM stage and tumor location were independently prognostic in Chinese patients with resected SCLCs. Patient stratification by tumor location should inform the therapeutic strategy. The role of surgical resection for limited-stage SCLC patients must be reevaluated, as this may be appropriate for some patients.

Treatment of small cell lung cancer: recent advances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we aimed to summarize the recent progress being made in treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

RECENT FINDINGS

SCLC is characterized by strong invasiveness, easy recurrence and early metastasis. In recent years, the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy has broken the deadlock in the treatment field of SCLC. Combination strategies, such as the addition of ICIs to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, are actively underway. Some of these strategies have yielded significant survival benefits and tolerable adverse events, whereas several of them have failed with no significant improvement. In addition, the new classification of SCLC based on genomic analysis has deepened the understanding of SCLC and suggested new therapeutic directions. Similarly, the discovery of some new therapeutic targets, such as DDL3, CDK7 and PARP, also brings new hope for improving the survival of patients with SCLC.

SUMMARY

In this article, we will review the recent advances of therapeutic regimen for patients with SCLC. Following the revolutionary success of adding ICIs to chemotherapy, more varieties of combination strategies have been explored in recent trials. In addition, therapeutic drug research and efficacy evaluation against for new targets are under investigation. Altogether, progress on genomic analysis, investigation of biological pathways and treatment regimen combination are providing renewed hope for patients with SCLC.

Monoclonal Antibodies to CTLA-4 with Focus on Ipilimumab

The immune checkpoint cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4 or CD152) is a negative regulator of T-cell-mediated immune responses which plays a critical role in suppressing autoimmunity and maintaining immune homeostasis. Because of its inhibitory activity on T cells, CTLA-4 has been investigated as a drug target to induce immunostimulation, blocking the interaction with its ligands. The antitumor effects mediated by CTLA-4 blockade have been attributed to a sustained active immune response against cancer cells, due to the release of a brake on T cell activation. Ipilimumab (Yervoy, Bristol-Myers Squibb) is a fully human anti-CTLA-4 IgG1κ monoclonal antibody (mAb) that represents the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved as monotherapy by FDA and EMA in 2011 for the treatment of unresectable/metastatic melanoma. In 2015, FDA also granted approval to ipilimumab monotherapy as adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma to reduce the risk of tumour recurrence. The subsequent approved indications of ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma, regardless of BRAF mutational status, and other advanced/metastatic solid tumours always involve its use in association with the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) mAb nivolumab. Currently, ipilimumab is evaluated in ongoing clinical trials for refractory/advanced solid tumours mainly in combination with additional immunostimulating agents.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic model for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study over an 8-year period

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumor with a short replication time and a rapid growth rate. Prognostic factors for SCLC in clinical practice are scarce. Retrospective analysis of 8‐year extensive‐stage SCLC data from the Department Respiratory and Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Beijing, China) was performed to develop a risk prediction model that can facilitate the identification of extensive‐stage SCLC with differing prognosis in clinical practice.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of data from patients with extensive‐stage SCLC at a single‐center from January 2013 to January 2021, including age, sex, ECOG physical score, immunohistochemistry (CgA, Syn, CD56, TTF1, and Ki67), staging, treatment regimen, laboratory examinations, and survival period, was performed. Clinical variables with potential prognostic significance were screened by univariate Cox analysis. Next, multifactor Cox risk prediction regression analysis was performed to establish an extensive‐stage SCLC risk prognostic model. Survival curves and ROC curves for high and low risk groups were plotted according to risk scores. Nomogram and calibration curves were developed to assess the accuracy of the risk prediction model.

Results

This study included 300 patients who were diagnosed with extensive‐stage SCLC at our center from January 2013 to January 2021. The most common first presentation was respiratory symptoms, especially cough (162, 54%). The most common extra‐thoracic metastatic organs were bone (36.3%), liver (24.7%), brain (15.7%), and adrenal glands (15.7%). A total of 99% of patients received first‐line systemic therapy, with 86.3% of patients treated with platinum‐etoposide and 10.7% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with platinum‐etoposide backbone. First‐line progression‐free survival was up to 198 days, and the median OS was 439 days. After Cox regression screening and backward stepwise selection, “time from initial therapy to relapse or progression (PFS1), liver metastases, adrenal metastases, M stage and first‐line treatment pattern” were retained to establish a prognostic model with an AUC value of 0.763. The prognostic model was shown as a nomogram with good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes.

Conclusions

The first‐line treatment of SCLC patients admitted to our hospital in the past 8 years was relatively standardized, and the progression‐free survival and OS were slightly longer than those reported in the literature. We developed a prognostic risk score model for extensive‐stage SCLC to calculate individual survival in clinical practice.

Progression and metastasis of small cell lung carcinoma: the role of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and metabolic alterations

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is characterized by high metastatic rate and poor prognosis. The platinum-based chemotherapy still represents the backbone of the therapy; however, acquired resistance develops almost in all patients. Although SCLC has been formerly considered a homogeneous disease, recent advances in SCLC research have highlighted the importance of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity and have resulted in the subclassification of SCLC. The newly described SCLC subtypes are characterized by distinct biological behavior and vulnerabilities that can be therapeutically exploited. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is frequently affected in SCLC, and its activation represents a promising therapeutic target. Since the mTOR pathway is a master regulator of cellular metabolism, its alterations may also influence the bioenergetic processes of SCLC cells. Despite the encouraging preclinical results, both mTOR and metabolic inhibitors have met limited clinical success so far. Patient selection for personalized therapy, the development of rational drug combinations, and a better understanding of heterogeneity and spatiotemporal evolution of the tumor cells may improve efficacy and can help to overcome acquired resistance. Here we provide a summary of current investigations regarding the role of the mTOR pathway and metabolic alterations in the progression and metastasis formation of SCLC.

A Network Comparison on Safety Profiling of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Cancer

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the standard treatment options for advanced lung cancer. However, adverse events (AEs), particularly immune–related AEs (irAEs), caused by these drugs have aroused public attention. The current network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the risk of AEs across different ICI–based regimens in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases (from inception to 19 April 2021) for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared two or more treatments, with at least one ICI administered to patients with advanced lung cancer. The primary outcomes were treatment–related AEs and irAEs, including grade 1–5 and grade 3–5. The secondary outcomes were grade 1–5 and grade 3–5 irAEs in specific organs. Both pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted for chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy, ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy, dual ICIs therapy, and dual ICIs + chemotherapy for all safety outcomes. Node–splitting analyses were performed to test inconsistencies in network. Sensitivity analyses were adopted by restricting phase III RCTs and studies that enrolled patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

Results

Overall, 38 RCTs involving 22,178 patients with advanced lung cancer were enrolled. Both pooled incidence and NMA indicated that treatments containing chemotherapy increased the risk of treatment–related AEs when compared with ICI-based regimens without chemotherapy. As for grade 1–5 irAEs, dual ICIs + chemotherapy was associated with the highest risk of irAEs (probability in ranking first: 50.5%), followed by dual-ICI therapy (probability in ranking second: 47.2%), ICI monotherapy (probability in ranking third: 80.0%), ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy (probability in ranking fourth: 98.0%), and finally chemotherapy (probability in ranking fifth: 100.0%). In grade 3–5 irAEs, subtle differences were observed; when ranked from least safe to safest, the trend was dual ICIs therapy (60.4%), dual ICIs + chemotherapy (42.5%), ICI monotherapy (76.3%), ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy (95.0%), and chemotherapy (100.0%). Furthermore, detailed comparisons between ICI–based options provided irAE profiles based on specific organ/system and severity.

Conclusions

In consideration of overall immune–related safety profiles, ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy might be a better choice among ICI–based treatments for advanced lung cancer. The safety profiles of ICI–based treatments are various by specific irAEs and their severity.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42021268650

Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The "Summary of the Guidelines Updates" section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.

A Real-World Evaluation of Atezolizumab Plus Platinum-Etoposide Chemotherapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC in Canada

Introduction

The real-world data evaluating treatment outcomes of atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide chemotherapy (atezolizumab) for extensive-stage SCLC (ESCLC) are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate real-world outcomes of ESCLC treated with atezolizumab.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of provincial patients with ESCLC who started first-line (1L) systemic treatment was conducted. We primarily evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in association with atezolizumab compared with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy (chemotherapy) while adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical factors. Adverse events (AEs) during 1L were evaluated.

Results

A total of 67 patients were identified. Of the 34 patients who received atezolizumab, 24% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2, approximately 50% were more than or equal to 65 years, 21% received cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy before atezolizumab, and 12% had thoracic radiation (tRT).

Within the atezolizumab versus chemotherapy group, the median PFS equals to 6.0 versus 4.3 months (p = 0.03) whereas OS = 12.8 versus 7.1 months (p = 0.01). Relative to chemotherapy, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for PFS was 0.53 (0.28–1.02) and OS was 0.42 (0.20–0.88) with atezolizumab. tRT compared with no tRT receipt correlated with reduced death risk (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.33 [0.13–0.88]).

AE-related treatment withdrawal with atezolizumab was 32% and 15% with chemotherapy (p = 0.02). Within the tRT subgroup, 25% versus 20% in atezolizumab versus chemotherapy group, respectively, discontinued 1L owing to AE.

Conclusions

This is the first real-world study revealing comparable survival with that in the IMpower133 trial. Treatment discontinuation from AEs was higher with atezolizumab among Canadian patients with ESCLC. Our data suggest safe use of tRT and chemoimmunotherapy, but its efficacy for ESCLC warrants further study.

Clinical experience with CTLA-4 blockade for cancer immunotherapy: From the monospecific monoclonal antibody ipilimumab to probodies and bispecific molecules targeting the tumor microenvironment

The immune checkpoint cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) is an inhibitory regulator of T-cell mediated responses that has been investigated as target of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for cancer immunotherapy. The anti-CTLA-4 mAb ipilimumab represents the first immune checkpoint inhibitor that significantly improved overall survival in patients with unresectable/metastatic melanoma. The subsequent approved indications (often in the first-line setting) for melanoma and other advanced/metastatic solid tumors always require ipilimumab combination with nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) mAb. However, the improved clinical efficacy of the mAb combination is associated with increased immune-related adverse events, which might require treatment discontinuation even in responding patients. This drawback is expected to be overcome by the recent development of anti-CTLA-4 probodies proteolitycally activated in the tumor microenvironment and bispecific molecules targeting both CTLA-4 and PD-1, whose co-expression is characteristic of tumor-infiltrating T cells. These molecules would preferentially stimulate immune responses against the tumor, reducing toxicity toward normal tissues.

[Clinical Trial Progress and Application of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer]

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a neuroendocrine tumor with fast progression, high malignancy, easy recurrence, and extremely poor prognosis. In the past 30 years, the clinical treatment strategy of SCLC has been mainly chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but the curative effect is not significant; the current immunotherapy of SCLC has gradually entered the clinic and has made certain progress. Tumor immunotherapy includes immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor vaccines, cytokines, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy (CAR-T) therapy, etc. Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most widely used. This article summarizes the principles of immune checkpoint inhibitors and related drugs, summarizes their domestic and foreign clinical trials progress in SCLC treatment, reviews the biomarkers used in the therapy, and discusses its future development direction.
.

"Highly Exposed Chinese Herbal Medicine" Combined With Apatinib as Maintenance Treatment Following First-Line or Second-Line Chemotherapy for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Arm, Prospective Study

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of “highly exposed Chinese herbal medicine” combined with apatinib as maintenance treatment following first-line or second-line chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. A total of 23 patients with ES-SCLC were included in this single-arm prospective study (ChiCTR2100045255). “Highly exposed Chinese herbal medicine” combined with apatinib was administered each day after the chemotherapy for maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint of the study was median PFS, while the secondary endpoints included median OS, DCR, ORR, AE, and the association of “highly exposed Chinese herbal medicine” with PFS and OS. Three and 16 patients achieved partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD), respectively, and four patients were with disease progression (PD). The ORR of the patients was 13.0%, DCR was 83.0%, median PFS was 5.0 months, and median OS was 18.0 months. The major AE included secondary hypertension and hand-foot syndrome. Oral intake of Chinese herbal medicine for ≥ 6 months was associated with longer PFS. Hand-foot syndrome was an independent predictive factor for PFS. The statistical analysis suggested no independent influencing factors for OS. “Highly exposed Chinese herbal medicine” combined with apatinib is effective and relatively safe as the maintenance treatment for ES-SCLC patients who undergo first-line or second-line chemotherapy.

PIV and PILE Score at Baseline Predict Clinical Outcome of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Combined With Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Objectives

The objective of this study is to evaluate whether PIV (Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value) and PILE [a score derived from PIV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)] can predict clinical outcome of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods

A total of 53 patients with ES-SCLC in the control group of clinical trial (NCT03041311) were included in this study. PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The PILE scores were composited based on PIV, LDH levels, and ECOG PS. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. Moreover, the predictive ability of PIV and PILE was validated in an independent real-world group consisting of 84 patients.

Results

Patients in the low PIV group (PIV < median) had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those in the high PIV group (PIV ≥ median), along with the HR, which was 2.157 and 2.359, respectively (PFS HR 95% CI: 1.181–3.940, p = 0.012; OS HR 95% CI: 1.168–4.762, p = 0.020). High PILE score was observed relating to worse treatment efficacy (disease control rate (DCR): 84.21% vs. 100%, p = 0.047; durable clinical benefit (DCB) rate: 10% vs. 48.5%, p = 0.060) and poor clinical outcome (median PFS: 4.75 vs. 5.53 m, p = 0.043; median OS: 7.13 vs. 15.93 m, p = 0.002). Similar results were obtained about the predictive and prognostic abilities of PIV and PILE scores in the validation group.

Conclusions

High PIV and high PILE were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in ES-SCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy, reflecting that PIV and PILE might be useful to identify patients unlikely to benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Update 2021: Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Accounting for 14% of lung cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy with rapid proliferation, early spread, and poor survival.

AIM AND METHODS

We provide an overview of recent advances regarding SCLC pathogenesis, subtypes, and treatment development through literature review of key trials.

RESULTS

There are no validated biomarkers or approved targeted treatments for this overly heterogeneous disease, but recent analyses have identified some promising targets and four major subtypes which may carry unique therapeutic vulnerabilities in SCLC. Treatment wise, only a third of patients present with limited stage SCLC, which can be managed with a combined modality approach with curative intent (usually chemo-radiotherapy, but in some eligible patients, surgery followed by systemic treatment). For advanced or extensive stage SCLC, combined chemotherapy (platinum-etoposide) and immunotherapy (atezolizumab or durvalumab during and after chemotherapy) has become the new standard front-line treatment, with modest improvement in overall survival. In the second-line setting, for disease relapse ≤ 6 months, topotecan, lurbinectedin, and clinical trials are reasonable treatment options; for disease relapse > 6 months, original regimen, topotecan or lurbinectedin can be considered. Moreover, Trilaciclib, a CD4/CD6 inhibitor, was recently FDA-approved to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-related myelosuppression in SCLC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

While modest improvements in survival have been made especially in the metastatic setting with chemo-immunotherapy, further research in understanding the biology of SCLC is warranted to develop biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies and combinational approaches for this aggressive disease.

Durvalumab: A Review in Extensive-Stage SCLC

Durvalumab (IMFINZI^®), a fully human monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), is approved for use in combination with etoposide and either carboplatin or cisplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). In the pivotal phase III CASPIAN trial in previously untreated adults with ES-SCLC, the addition of durvalumab to chemotherapy for up to 4 cycles followed by maintenance durvalumab was associated with a significantly longer overall survival and a favourable hazard ratio for progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone for up to 6 cycles. A higher proportion of patients in the durvalumab plus chemotherapy group had an objective response compared with the chemotherapy alone group. The efficacy of durvalumab was also sustained with longer follow-up. Durvalumab in combination with etoposide and either carboplatin or cisplatin had a manageable tolerability profile in patients with ES-SCLC. Given the available evidence, durvalumab in combination with etoposide and either carboplatin or cisplatin represents a valuable treatment option for the first-line treatment of patients with ES-SCLC, and is an accepted standard of care option in this setting.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive form of lung cancer; extensive-stage (ES) disease, which accounts for about two-thirds of all SCLC, is associated with high relapse rates and a poor prognosis. Expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on both tumour cells and tumour-associated immune cells is an adaptive immune response that helps tumour cells avoid detection and subsequent elimination by the immune system. Durvalumab (IMFINZI^®) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against PD-L1, which blocks the interaction of PD-L1 with its receptors, thus enhancing anti-tumour immune responses. When used in combination with chemotherapy (etoposide and either carboplatin or cisplatin) in adults with untreated ES-SCLC, durvalumab prolonged overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone; the improvements in overall survival were also maintained with additional follow-up. The tolerability profile of durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy was manageable in patients with ES-SCLC. Durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy is an effective and valuable treatment option for previously untreated patients with ES-SCLC.

The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for treating small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the efficacy and safety profile of ICIs for relapsed SCLC remains under investigation. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ICIs in the treatment of relapsed SCLC patients.

METHODS

The databases, including Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library, were systematically searched to retrieve potential eligible studies from the establishment of the database to May 2021. The primary outcomes were survival, treatment responses, and safety. Randomized controlled trials and real-world studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. The RevMan 5.4 and R software were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of eight articles involving 653 patients was included. Meta-analyses results showed that the overall response rate (objective response rate [ORR]) of the ICIs group was 0.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.18). The median overall survival was 7.97 (95% CI: 5.94-9.47) months, while the progression-free survival was 1.70 (95% CI: 1.40-2.28) months. Although chemotherapy showed a favourable ORR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.39-1.41; p = 0.36) and a significantly better disease control rate (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11-0.70; p = 0.007), patients treated with ICIs had a reduced risk of mortality (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.73-1.03; p = 0.10). With regards to adverse events (AEs), the rates of any AEs and ≥grade 3 AEs were 0.56 (95% CI: 0.52-0.60) and 0.13 (95%CI: 0.06-0.20), respectively.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

For relapsed SCLC patients, the administration of ICIs resulted in a similar survival outcome and acceptable safety compared with chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to explore potential biomarkers for relapsed SCLC patients who may benefit from immunotherapy.

Advances in Treatment of Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): Insights for Optimizing Patient Outcomes from an Expert Roundtable Discussion

Second-line treatment options for patients with relapsed, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are limited, and even with currently available treatments, prognosis remains poor. Until recently, topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) was the only drug approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of ES-SCLC following progression after first-line treatment with etoposide plus a platinum derivative (EP; carboplatin preferred). With the most recent approval of EP plus a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, there are now more therapeutic options for managing ES-SCLC. A number of novel agents have emerging data for activity in relapsed ES-SCLC, and single-agent lurbinectedin (an alkylating drug and selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription and DNA repair machinery in tumor cells) has conditional FDA approval for use in this patient population. Trilaciclib, a short-acting cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitor, has also been recently approved as a supportive intervention for use prior to an EP or a topotecan-containing regimen to diminish the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. The current review is based on a recent expert roundtable discussion and summarizes current therapeutic agents and emerging data on newer agents and biomarkers. It also provides evidence-based clinical considerations and a treatment decision tool for oncologists treating patients with relapsed ES-SCLC. This paper discusses the importance of various factors to consider when selecting a second-line treatment option, including prior first-line treatment, available second-line treatment options, tumor platinum sensitivity, and patient characteristics (such as performance status, comorbidities, and patient-expressed and perceived values).

Review of the recent clinical trials for PD-1/PD-L1 based lung cancer immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is known for its high mortality rate and prevalence in the world today. For decades, chemotherapy has been used as the main treatment for this cancer, but this has changed over time. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blocking agents have been assessed in numerous clinical trials as single or combination therapy and have shown overall promising results. Nevertheless, various challenges have been encountered, which cast doubts over this method.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an introduction to the mechanisms underlying the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Then, we discuss the latest results from the most leading-edge studies evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in different lines of lung cancer therapy (some of which have gained FDA approval), potential biomarkers, and major challenges of ICI therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, the standard of care (SoC) for lung cancer consists mostly of chemotherapeutics. With further studies and ongoing trials evaluating novel ICI therapy, FDA has been approving specific ICI therapeutics, including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, for particular types of lung cancer. However, for ICIs to play a key role in SoC, we need to overcome the major challenges of ICI therapy.

A Novel Strategy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumor

Correctly diagnosing a histologic type of lung cancer is important for selecting the appropriate treatment because the aggressiveness, chemotherapy regimen, surgical approach, and prognosis vary significantly among histologic types. Pulmonary NETs, which are characterized by neuroendocrine morphologies, represent approximately 20% of all lung cancers. In particular, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (small cell lung cancer and large cell neuroendocrine tumor) are highly proliferative cancers that have a poorer prognosis than other non-small cell lung cancers. The combination of hematoxylin and eosin staining, Ki-67, and immunostaining of classic neuroendocrine markers, such as chromogranin A, CD56, and synaptophysin, are normally used to diagnose high-grade neuroendocrine tumors; however, they are frequently heterogeneous. This article reviews the diagnostic methods of lung cancer diagnosis focused on immunostaining. In particular, we describe the usefulness of immunostaining by Stathmin-1, which is a cytosolic phosphoprotein and a key regulator of cell division due to its microtubule depolymerization in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, for the diagnosis of high-grade neuroendocrine tumors.

Is there any room for PD-1 inhibitors in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as frontline treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis with indirect comparisons among subgroups and landmark survival analyses

Background:

The addition of PD-L1 inhibitors to platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) has newly received United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in extensive stage-small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). PD-1 agents similarly improved survival rates, even if not yet supported by international regulatory agencies. The current work aims to assess different efficacy and safety profiles among chemoimmunotherapy plus immuno-oncology (CT+IO) approaches according to different immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) subtypes.

Material & Methods:

We included in our meta-analysis six first-line randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the association of single-agent ICI with CT versus CT alone in ES-SCLC. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORR), 12-month duration of response rate (DORR), disease control rate (DCR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and discontinuation rates (DRs) were obtained. Moreover, we performed indirect comparisons according to ICI subtypes, also among subgroups and landmark survival analyses.

Results:

Although no ORR benefit was observed, our results showed how CT+IO significantly improved DORR, resulting in improved PFS and OS with no differences in TRAEs; however, CT+IO led to a significant increase in DR. Interestingly, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1, the use of cisplatin, and the absence of brain metastases seem to be associated with a survival gain using CT+IO in ES-SCLC. Indirect comparisons suggested a slight advantage in favour of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) over anti-CTLA-4 agents in terms of efficacy with no additional safety concerns. No further differences were observed between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors among subgroups and landmark survival analyses with benefit trends towards anti-PD-1 in terms of DORR and DR.

Conclusion:

While confirming a survival advantage of CT+IO in selected patients, these results suggested the association of PD-1 inhibitors with CT as a viable option for novel therapeutic approaches in the frontline management of ES-SCLC. Further trials evaluating anti-CTLA-4 agents should be carefully studied in biomarker-selected patients.

Immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a poorly understood disease with aggressive features, high relapse rates, and significant morbidity as well as mortality, yet persistently limited treatment options. For three decades, the treatment algorithm of SCLC has been stagnant despite multiple attempts to find alternative therapeutic options that could improve responses and increase survival rates. On the other hand, immunotherapy has been a thriving concept that revolutionized treatment options in multiple malignancies, rendering previously untreatable diseases potentially curable. In extensive stage SCLC, immunotherapy significantly altered the course of disease and is now part of the treatment algorithm in the first-line setting. Nevertheless, the important questions that arise are how best to implement immunotherapy, who would benefit the most, and finally, how to enhance responses.

Current state of the art and future perspectives with immunotherapy in the management of small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor with a severe prognosis. At the time of diagnosis, most patients present with extensive-stage (ES) disease. For decades, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the only pillar of SCLC treatment, but now, the clinical management of this disease is rapidly evolving thanks to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we describe the most recent advances in the treatment of SCLC and discuss the emerging challenges associated with ICI treatments. Meaningful data were collected from the currently available literature on PubMed and in international oncology meetings.

EXPERT OPINION

Recently, meaningful improvements in outcomes of SCLC patients have been achieved with anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab or durvalumab combined with chemotherapy in first line. Results of studies evaluating the role of ICIs in limited-stage (LS) SCLC patients are awaited. Further efforts are required to better understand the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of SCLC and to identify patients most likely to benefit from this treatment strategy.

Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab, in combination with etoposide and carboplatin regimen, in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have a dismal prognosis with limited overall survival (OS) despite a high response rate to chemotherapy. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors, combined with chemotherapy, as the first-line treatment for extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC have shown improvement in clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Real-world data from 68 Korean ES-SCLC patients, treated with atezolizumab, etoposide, and carboplatin at Yonsei Cancer Center between June 2019 and November 2020, were retrospectively analyzed to determine safety and efficacy using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 11.6 months. The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-5.2), and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI 7.4-16.6). Baseline bone metastasis, immune-related adverse events (IRAEs), and elevated LDH were related to OS (hazard ratio 2.18, 0.33, and 4.64; P = 0.05, 0.02, and 0.003, respectively). Among the 42 patients with disease progression, liver metastasis progression and baseline bone metastasis were associated with inferior OS, but without statistical significance (hazard ratio 2.47 and 1.97; P = 0.25 and 0.26, respectively). Overall, 61 (89.7%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with hematologic toxicities as the most common grade 3-4 TRAEs. Twenty-two (32.4%) patients experienced IRAEs, with skin rash as the most common, and five (7.4%) patients had grade-3 IRAEs (pneumonitis, hyperglycemia, and aspartate aminotransferase elevation).

CONCLUSION

Atezolizumab, combined with etoposide and carboplatin, showed efficacy and safety in our real-world data. Further studies are needed to predict the response to immunotherapy in SCLC.

Cardiac Toxicity Associated with Cancer Immunotherapy and Biological Drugs

Cancer immunotherapy significantly contributed to an improvement in the prognosis of cancer patients. Immunotherapy, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T), share the characteristic to exploit the capabilities of the immune system to kill cancerous cells. Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 that prevents HER2-mediated signaling; it is administered mainly in HER2-positive cancers, such as breast, colorectal, biliary tract, and non-small-cell lung cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) inhibit the binding of CTLA-4 or PD-1 to PDL-1, allowing T cells to kill cancerous cells. ICI can be used in melanomas, non-small-cell lung cancer, urothelial, and head and neck cancer. There are two main types of T-cell transfer therapy: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (or TIL) therapy and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T) cell therapy, mainly applied for B-cell lymphoma and leukemia and mantle-cell lymphoma. HER2-targeted therapies, mainly trastuzumab, are associated with left ventricular dysfunction, usually reversible and rarely life-threatening. PD/PDL-1 inhibitors can cause myocarditis, rare but potentially fulminant and associated with a high fatality rate. CAR-T therapy is associated with several cardiac toxic effects, mainly in the context of a systemic adverse effect, the cytokines release syndrome.

Consolidation nivolumab and ipilimumab versus observation in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer after chemo-radiotherapy - results from the randomised phase II ETOP/IFCT 4-12 STIMULI trial

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is the standard treatment in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), with 5-year overall survival (OS) of only 25% to 33%.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

STIMULI is a 1:1 randomised phase II trial aiming to demonstrate superiority of consolidation combination immunotherapy versus observation after chemo-radiotherapy plus PCI (protocol amendment-1). Consolidation immunotherapy consisted of four cycles of nivolumab [1 mg/kg, every three weeks (Q3W)] plus ipilimumab (3 mg/kg, Q3W), followed by nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg, Q2W) for up to 12 months. Patient recruitment closed prematurely due to slow accrual and the statistical analyses plan was updated to address progression-free survival (PFS) as the only primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Of the 222 patients enrolled, 153 were randomised (78: experimental; 75: observation). Among the randomised patients, median age was 62 years, 60% males, 34%/65% current/former smokers, 31%/66% performance status (PS) 0/1. Up to 25 May 2020 (median follow-up 22.4 months), 40 PFS events were observed in the experimental arm, with median PFS 10.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0-not estimable (NE)] versus 42 events and median 14.5 months (8.2-NE) in the observation, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02 (0.66-1.58), two-sided P = 0.93. With updated follow-up (03 June 2021; median: 35 months), median OS was not reached in the experimental arm, while it was 32.1 months (26.1-NE) in observation, with HR = 0.95 (0.59-1.52), P = 0.82. In the experimental arm, median time-to-treatment-discontinuation was only 1.7 months. CTCAE v4 grade ≥3 adverse events were experienced by 62% of patients in the experimental and 25% in the observation arm, with 4 and 1 fatal, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The STIMULI trial did not meet its primary endpoint of improving PFS with nivolumab-ipilimumab consolidation after chemo-radiotherapy in LD-SCLC. A short period on active treatment related to toxicity and treatment discontinuation likely affected the efficacy results.

Current Strategies for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Beyond First-line Therapy

Extensive stage small cell lung cancer carries extremely poor prognosis and adding immune checkpoint inhibitor to platinum etoposide combination in first line only improved outcomes modestly. Once disease recurs, treatment response is only transient in nature. Various strategies that are being explored include dual checkpoint blockade, BiTE and CAR-T cell approaches. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are being combined with PARP inhibitors. Other approaches currently being investigated include liposomal irinotecan and combining known active agents for SCLC in relapsed setting such as newly approved lurbinectedin with doxorubicin, paclitaxel, irinotecan or topotecan with ATR inhibitor (Berzosertib). Temozolomide has also been tested in combination with a Parp inhibitor. New antibody or small molecule drug conjugates are being actively investigated, so is a biomarker based approach. Better understanding of small cell lung cancer disease biology via high through-put genomic, proteomic and methylation profiling offer glimpse of hope in our efforts to contain this deadly disease. A table of representative molecular targets under investigation is provided in the end.

Comparing strategy of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on six RCTs incorporating 2800 participants

OBJECTIVES

The project is designed to compare the clinical efficacy and adverse events resulting from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

PubMed Database and ClinicalTrials.gov were both searched to identify randomized controlled clinical trials for assessing ICIs in all-stage SCLC. After screening in strict accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eligible studies were evaluated in regard to the population, intervention, comparator, outcome as well as study design (PICOS) pattern. Furthermore, primary endpoints of these randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and complete/objective response rate (CRR/ORR). Statistical analyses were realized via Review Manager Version 5.3 Software.

RESULTS

Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the ICIs plus chemotherapy group significantly improved with respect to such indicators as OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90, P < 0.0001), PFS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, P < 0.00001) and ORR (64.7% versus 59.1%). According to the safety analysis, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) at all grades was higher in ICIs plus chemotherapy group (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.20-2.10, P = 0.001), bearing no statistical significance at grade 3 or above (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.99-1.49, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ICIs and chemotherapy witnessed better anti-neoplastic efficacy for SCLC. Moreover, the incidence of trAEs at all grades was elevated in ICIs plus chemotherapy group, with little discrepancy in both groups at grade 3 or above.

Risk of Infection with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The relative risk (RR) of infection for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the risk of infection for patients with solid tumors undergoing ICI therapy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Pubmed databases were searched up to 1 December 2020. Randomized trials comparing any ICI alone, with chemotherapy (CT), or with other agents versus placebo, CT, or other agents were included. Three independent reviewers extracted the data. The primary outcome was the RR of all-grade (G) and G3-5 infections for patients receiving ICI-based treatments. Random or fixed-effect models were used according to statistical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 21,451 patients from N = 36 studies were eligible. ICIs were associated with a similar risk of all-grade infections (RR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.84-1.24; P = 0.85) versus non-ICI treatments (G1-5 events: 9.6 versus 8.3%). When the ICIs alone were compared to CT, their use was associated with 42% less risk of all-grade infections (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.4-0.85; P = 0.01). Compared to CT, the combination of ICIs and CT increased the risk of all-grade (RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.53; P < 0.01) and severe infections (RR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.17-1.96; P < 0.01). In anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, monotherapy, and combination trials, the RR of all-grade infections was 0.72 (95% CI 0.49-1.05; P = 0.09), 1.18 (95% CI 0.95-1.46; P = 0.13), 1.74 (95% CI 1.13-2.67; P = 0.01), 0.97 (95% CI 0.79-1.19; P = 0.75) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.34-3.8; P < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to CT alone, ICIs were safer and are recommended for frail patients. Conversely, CT + ICIs or ICIs combinations increased infection risk. Further studies are required to identify high-risk patients and evaluate the need for CT dose reduction or prophylactic myeloid growth factors.

The landscape of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced lung cancer

Background

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy has resulted in significant survival benefits in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without increasing toxicity. However, the utilisation of immunotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear, with a scarcity of systematic comparisons of therapeutic effects and safety of immunotherapy in these two major lung cancer subtypes. Herein, we aimed to provide a comprehensive landscape of immunotherapy and systematically review its specific efficacy and safety in advanced lung cancer, accounting for histological types.

Methods

We identified studies assessing immunotherapy for lung cancer with predefined endpoints, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), from PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane library. A random-effects or fixed-effect model was adopted according to different settings.

Results

Overall, 38 trials with 20,173 patients with lung cancer were included in this study. ICI therapy resulted in a significantly prolonged survival in both patients with NSCLC and SCLC when compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70–0.79] and [HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75–0.90], respectively). The magnitude of disease control and survival benefits appeared superior with ICI plus standard of care (SOC) when compared with SOC alone. OS and PFS advantages were observed only when immunotherapy was employed as the first-line treatment in patients with SCLC.

Conclusion

ICI therapy is a promising therapeutic option in patients with NSCLC and SCLC. ICI plus SOC can be recommended as the optimal first-line treatment for patients with SCLC, and double-target ICIs combined with SOC are recommended in patients with NSCLC as both the first and subsequent lines of treatment. Additionally, non-first-line immunotherapy is not recommended in patients with SCLC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08662-2.

Reporting quality of randomized, controlled trials evaluating immunotherapy in lung cancer

BACKGROUND

With the improvement of therapeutic strategies from cytotoxic chemotherapy to immunotherapy, the possibility of achieving timely intervention for lung cancer has dramatically increased. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCT) on immunotherapy in lung cancer.

METHODS

The RCTs evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer published up to 2021 were searched and collected from PUBMED and EMBASE by two investigators. The 2010 Consolidated Standards for Test Reports (CONSORT) statement-based 28-point overall quality score (OQS) and the 2001 CONSORT statement-based 19-point OQS was utilized for assessing the overall quality of each report.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two related RCTs were retrieved in this study, including 81,931 patients. The average OQS in 2010 was 17.89 (range, 7.5-24.5). Overall, studies have sufficiently reported the eligibility criteria (143/152; 94.07%), described the scientific background (150/152; 98.7%) and discussed interventions (147/152; 96.7%). However, the RCTs did not consistently report the changes to trial after commencement (48/152; 31.6%), allocation, enrollment and assignment personnel (34/152; 22.4%), blinding (48/152; 31.6%), or randomization method (58/152; 38.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall reporting quality of RCTs on immunotherapy in lung cancer was found to be unsatisfactory despite the fact that the CONSORT statement was issued more than a decade ago. Furthermore, there was virtual selectivity and heterogeneity in reporting some key issues in these trials. This is the first study to enlighten lung cancer researchers especially focusing on immunotherapy, and also to remind editors and peer reviewers to strengthen their due diligence.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: a new landscape for extensive stage small cell lung cancer treatment

Introduction: Landscape of Extensive Stage (ES)-SCLC treatment has been unchanged over the years. Chemotherapy, mostly based on cisplatin and etoposide, remained the standard-of-care for patients with ES-SCLC for almost 40 years. Recently, immune check points inhibitors have emerged marking a turning point for ES-SCLC treatmentAreas covered: Aim of the paper is to discuss ICIs impact on ES-SCLC treatment algorithms, review current clinical trials, and explore future perspectives.Expert opinion: A growing body of evidence supports ICI-containing regimens as a new mainstay of ES-SCLC treatment. Whether subgroups of SCLC patients may have greater survival benefits from ICIs treatment needs to be better defined. Understanding the impact of tumor microenvironment and identifying reliable predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers will be fundamental to move toward a personalized treatment approach leading to improved survival.

Risk for COVID-19 infection in patients with tobacco smoke-associated cancers of the upper and lower airway

PURPOSE

Cancer patients are regarded as a group at risk for both COVID-19 infection and severe clinical course because of advanced age, comorbidities and iatrogenic immune impairment. Among them, patients with cancer of the upper and lower airways share other risk factors, mostly related to tobacco-smoke exposure, including male gender, airway epithelial damages, chronic obstructive respiratory disease (COPD), cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Clinical and pathophysiological factors shared by these conditions are reviewed.

METHODS

Review of the published literature since the beginning of 2020.

RESULTS

COVID-19 is a respiratory infectious disease and SARS-CoV-2 replication and shedding occurs in nasal and bronchial epithelial respiratory cells through the interaction with ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptors, both overexpressed in smokers and former smokers. Tobacco-smoke airway exposure is also characterized by a chronic inflammation with activation of inflammatory cells and cytokine release including interleukin-6 (IL-6). A high release of cytokine in response to viral infection is documented in COVID-19 patients with adverse clinical outcomes and IL-6 is a key element of the cytokine storm syndrome leading to multi-organ damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancers of the upper and lower airways might be at increased risk of infection, morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 also because of tobacco exposure, a key factor in triggering inflammation, immunity and cancer.

Arginase Pathway Markers of Immune-Microenvironment in Thymic Epithelial Tumors and Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Key regulators of antitumor immunity such as arginase-1 and the adenosine pathway may have an important role in modulating the effect of immunotherapy. Here, we investigated the expression profile of these immune-related biomarkers in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), 2 solid tumors where immune checkpoint inhibitors have activity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining was performed using tissue microarrays of 123 TET (110 thymoma and 13 thymic carcinoma) and 125 SCLC cases. The expression profile of the following immune-related biomarkers was assessed: arginase-1, CD39, CD73, A2AR, PD-L2, and CD15. The expression profile was also correlated with clinical data.

RESULTS

No sample was positive for arginase-1. In the adenosine pathway, the prevalence of positive staining for CD39, CD73, and A2AR was 4.9%, 2.5%, and 69.2%, in TETs and 0%, 1.7%, and 50.8%, in SCLC. The multivariate analysis showed that CD39 expression was significantly associated with worse disease related survival (hazard ratio [HR], 10.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.01-53.47; P= .005) and a shorter time-to progression (HR, 11.35; 95% CI, 2.11-61.23; P = .005) in TETs. Other biomarkers were not associated with disease related survival or time to progression in TETs. No biomarker was associated with survival in SCLC.

CONCLUSION

Arginase-1 was not detectable in TETs and SCLC. Expression of markers in the adenosine pathway were present in both TETs and SCLC. CD39 expression in tumor cells may identify subsets of patients with TETs with an unfavorable prognosis.

Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 monoclonal antibody quavonlimab in combination with pembrolizumab: Safety and efficacy from a phase I study in previously treated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This first-in-human phase I study (NCT03179436) investigated anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 monoclonal antibody quavonlimab and anti-programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. The study was conducted in two parts: dose-escalation (part 1) and dose-confirmation (part 2). First-line treatment with quavonlimab + pembrolizumab conferred encouraging antitumor activity (objective response rate [ORR], 28%-40%) and was generally well tolerated (grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events [TRAEs] were lowest with quavonlimab 25 mg every 6 weeks [Q6W] at 30% and highest with quavonlimab 75 mg Q3W at 57%) in non-small cell lung cancer. We present data from patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving second-line or later therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III/IV SCLC received quavonlimab 75 mg Q6W plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≤ 2 years. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; ORRs as assessed by blinded independent central review per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumorsv1.1 was a secondary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the correlation of response with PD-L1 expression were exploratory endpoints.

RESULTS

Forty patients with extensive-stage SCLC received treatment; median follow-up was 13 months. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 4 patients (10%). TRAEs occurred in 80% of patients; grade 3 events occurred in 33% of patients and no grade 4/5 events were reported. Confirmed ORRs (95% CI) were 18% (7-33) among all patients, 7% (<1-34) for PD-L1-positive tumors (n = 14), and 19% (5-42) for PD-L1-negative tumors (n = 21). Response duration ranged from 2.9 to 19.1+ months. Median PFS was 2.0 months; 6-month PFS rate was 26%. Median OS was 11.0 months; 6-month OS rate was 66%.

CONCLUSIONS

Encouraging antitumor activity was observed with quavonlimab + pembrolizumab in patients with extensive-stage SCLC; responses were observed in PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors. The combination was tolerable with manageable toxicities.

Chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer - a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis investigated the clinical benefits of chemo-immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Seven randomized controlled trials with a total of 2862 patients were analyzed. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemo-immunotherapy provided a better progression-free survival (PFS) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81, p < 0.00001, and overall survival (OS) with a HR of 0.82, p < 0.0001; however, the incidence of treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) was significantly increased. Subgroup analyses showed that good performance status, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, without brain metastases at baseline and non-Asian populations were associated with greater benefits in OS from chemo-immunotherapy. Chemo-immunotherapy demonstrated better PFS and OS compared with chemotherapy alone as first line treatment in ES-SCLC, but additional TRAEs should be closely monitored.

Consideration of Surrogate Endpoints for Overall Survival Associated With First-Line Immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy is known to improve overall survival (OS) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). ICIs have different response patterns and survival kinetics characteristics from those of the traditional chemotherapy. In first-line treatment for ES-SCLC, there is an urgent need for surrogate endpoints for the early and accurate prediction of OS. This study aimed to assess progression-free survival (PFS), milestone OS rate, milestone restricted mean survival time (RMST), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) as proposed surrogate endpoints for OS in ES-SCLC for first-line immunotherapy trials.

Methods

Between January 1, 2013, and December 2020, published articles on randomized clinical trials of ICIs plus chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC as first-line therapy were searched in PubMed. Abstracts from the ESMO, ASCO, and WCLC, reported from 2018 onwards, were also searched. A weighted regression analysis based on the weighted least squares method was performed on log-transformed estimates of treatment effect, and the determination coefficient (R²) was calculated to evaluate the association between treatment effect on the surrogate endpoint and OS.

Results

Seven trials, representing 3,009 patients, were included to make up a total of 16 analyzed arms. The ratio of the 12-month OS milestone rate (r = −0.790, P = 0.011, R² = 0.717) and 12-month OS milestone RMST (r = 0.798, P = 0.010, R² = 0.702) was strongly correlated with the hazard ratio (HR) for OS. The strongest association was observed between the ratio of the 24-month OS milestone RMST and the HR for OS (r = 0.922, P = 0.001, R² = 0.825). No associations were observed between the HR for OS and PFS and the RR for ORR and DCR.

Conclusions

The results suggested a strong correlation among the ratio of OS milestone rates at 12 months, ratios of OS milestone RMSTs at 12 and 24 months, and HR for OS. The results indicate that OS milestone rates and OS milestone RMSTs could be considered surrogate endpoints of OS in future first-line immunotherapy trials for ES-SCLC.

Myocarditis Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Prospects

Under physiological conditions, immune checkpoint molecules downregulate the activation and effector function of myocardial antigen-reactive T cells through an immunosuppressive pathway, thus enabling myocardial T cells to maintain immune homeostasis under the action of central and peripheral tolerance mechanisms. The PD-1/PD-L1 signalling pathway is particularly important for limiting the ability of T cells to attack the heart. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) specifically block this PD-1/PD-L1-mediated restriction of T cell activation and other immunosuppressive pathways by targeting immune checkpoints. In recent years, with the wide use of ICIs in cancer treatment, even though the incidence of immunomyocarditis is low, it has attracted increasing attention because of its complex clinical symptoms, rapid progression of disease and high mortality rates. The pathogenesis, genetic susceptibility factors and predictive biomarkers of immunomyocarditis still need to be understood, and multidisciplinary cooperation in the clinical treatment of this complication is necessary.

Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Cancer immunotherapy represents one of the most important innovations in modern medicine. Durvalumab is an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL-1) agent which is currently under investigation in several studies in combination with the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) drug tremelimumab. The aim of this review was to systematically identify and revise the current scientific literature investigating the combination of these two drugs in solid tumors.

METHODS

A digital search on the Medline (PubMed interface) and Scopus databases for articles published from inception to 26 February 2021 was performed. The terms used for the search were durvalumab AND tremelimumab. Trials reported in English involving adult patients with solid cancers treated with the combination durvalumab plus tremelimumab were retrieved; the references of the articles were cross-checked to identify missing papers.

RESULTS

The electronic search produced 267 results; after exclusion of duplicates, irrelevant articles, reviews, and papers not in English or missing data, 19 articles were included for revision. The total number of patients treated with the combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab in the studies retrieved was 2052.

CONCLUSION

The combination of durvalumab plus tremelimumab showed some oncological advantages in comparison with traditional chemotherapies in some subsets of tumors, but generally has not shown consistent advantages in comparison with the employment of durvalumab monotherapy. A number of the studies examined had intrinsic methodological limitations; therefore, future well-designed studies involving larger cohorts are warranted.