Clinical and Histologic Features of Lichenoid Mucocutaneous Eruptions Due to Anti-Programmed Cell Death 1 and Anti-Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Immunotherapy

Cutaneous Hypersensitivity Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the management of various malignancies. Alongside their therapeutic success, the widespread application of ICIs has unveiled a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), most often affecting the skin. Cutaneous irAEs (cirAEs) encompass a range from common morbilliform and lichenoid rashes to more severe conditions such as bullous dermatoses and psoriasiform eruptions, each presenting distinct clinical challenges. Moreover, less common but clinically severe cutaneous reactions like toxic epidermal necrolysis have also been observed. cirAEs are frequently observed, with an incidence ranging from 37% to 70% for anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 antibodies and 17% to 40% for anti- programmed death-1/anti-programmed death ligand-1 antibodies. Recognizing the critical need for effective therapeutic strategies, this review carefully examines current approaches and guidelines for managing cirAEs.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. Maculopapular exanthema and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially aminopenicillins and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and iodinated contrast media. Pathophysiology is related to immediate or delayed "idiosyncratic" immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced lichenoid drug eruption-sparing scar burns

The authors present a striking case of a patient experiencing a lichenoid drug eruption secondary to immunotherapy, curiously sparing scarred skin from past burns. We observed vastly higher amounts of inflammatory lymphoid cells staining for PD-1; 70% in skin with a lichenoid drug reaction and 50% in scarred skin. The lack of a lichenoid reaction at sites of scarred skin may indicate that a basement membrane component may be causative for a lichenoid drug eruption.

Camrelizumab-induced oral lichenoid reaction with subepithelial CD4+ T-cell infiltration

INTRODUCTION

Camrelizumab is a novel anti-programed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody that has been investigated for the treatment of various malignancies. Increasing immune-related adverse events have been reported in clinical practice, with CD4+ T-cell-mediated-reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation being the most common. Camrelizumab-induced oral lichenoid reaction (OLR) appears to be a rare adverse effect compared with other anti-PD therapies induced OLR, with the main pathogenesis of activated CD8+ T cells mediating autoimmune reactions. Herein, we report a rare case of camrelizumab-induced OLR and a possible pathogenic mechanism of subepithelial CD4+ T-cell infiltration.

CASE REPORT

A 57-year-old male patient, who was diagnosed with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma three years prior, presented with a two-month history of oral erosion that developed while under camrelizumab therapy. Diffuse erythematous and erosive lesions surrounded by bilateral white lesions on the buccal mucosa were detected in his physical examination. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the lesions revealed the presence of basal keratinocyte degeneration and band-like subepithelial T-cell infiltration. The immunostaining for CD4 on T-cell was positive, while CD8 were sporadically positive. Flow cytometry showed a gradual increase in the CD4+ T-cell proportion in the peripheral blood, with the CD8+ T-cell percentage almost unchanged and in the normal range. We obtained a score of 6 based on the Naranjo algorithm, which means a probable adverse drug reaction.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient exhibited notable improvement after two weeks of treatment with topical glucocorticoid without regulating his immunotherapy, and remained in stable condition in the follow-up.

DISCUSSION

This case may offer new insight to clinicians on the pathogenesis of anti-PD-1-induced OLR. More critically, it may provide some ideas for a more precise anti-PD therapy or corresponding combination therapy for patients becoming resistant to immunotherapy due to exhausted CD4+ T-cell responses in the tumor microenvironment.

Lichenoid mucocutaneous reactions associated with sintilimab therapy in a non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma patient: case report and review

The immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), anti-programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) antibody, has gained widespread approval for treating various malignancies. Among the immune-related adverse reactions (irAEs) during ICI treatment, the lichenoid reaction is noteworthy. Sintilimab, a new PD-1 inhibitor, has secured approval in China for treating refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and phase I/II clinical trials for other solid tumors are ongoing both domestically and abroad. This paper presents a case of a mucocutaneous lichenoid reaction associated with sintilimab therapy, its diagnosis, and management. Our study, using multiplex immunofluorescence staining, reveals localized infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in the subepithelial lamina propria region with upregulated PD-1 expression, implying an association between PD-1 expression upregulation and lichenoid reactions provoked by PD-1 monoclonal antibody. We provide a summary of clinical characteristics and treatment guidelines for lichenoid reactions induced by ICIs from previous reports, highlighting the success of a combined therapeutic regimen of oral antihistamines and topical corticosteroids in controlling symptoms without interrupting ICI treatment.

Diagnosing Beyond Bias: Differentiating Topical Steroid Withdrawal Syndrome From irAE-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency

Confirmation bias can impede accurate diagnosis. Since the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), physicians are on high alert for newly developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Therefore, when patients present irAE-like symptoms, there is a risk of confirmation bias leading to overlooked diagnoses. This paper discusses a case of a patient with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab and topical dexamethasone ointment for an extended period due to oral mucocutaneous irAE. The patient developed adrenal insufficiency, initially considered to be a likely case of pituitary irAE. However, further investigation and the patient's clinical course revealed an unexpected diagnosis more in line with topical steroid withdrawal syndrome.

How to recognize and manage skin toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a practical approach

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment strategies in the field of oncology. Their favourable outcomes in terms of efficacy and side-effect profile can be thwarted by the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Cutaneous irAEs are relatively common in patients undergoing immunotherapy and include common inflammatory dermatoses (e.g. eczematous, psoriasiform and lichenoid phenotypes), maculopapular eruptions, pruritus and immunobullous disorders. Most of these reactions can be managed without ICIs having to be stopped completely; however, there are some life-threatening toxicities that dermatologists and oncologists should be aware of. In this review, we focus on how to recognize the commonly associated cutaneous irAEs, touching upon rarer reactions and red flags; finally, we provide guidance on their management.

Lichenoid dermatitis following PD-1 inhibitor-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case report and literature review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 receptor antibodies have been shown to be effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, there is a growing concern about immune-related adverse events. A case of a patient with gastric adenocarcinoma who developed toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) induced by sintilimab and subsequently developed lichenoid dermatitis is reported. TEN was diagnosed according to a history of sintilimab use, clinical symptoms and physical examination. During hospitalization, the patient developed recurrent fever caused by bacteremia and recovered from TEN after anti-infection and anti-inflammatory treatments. However, when TEN was controlled, the patient developed the lesional manifestations of lichenoid dermatitis. To date, no cases of lichenoid dermatitis after TEN have been reported following the use of PD-1 inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced cutaneous toxicities: a review of histopathologic and clinical features

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent an emerging treatment option for a variety of cancer types. Through inhibition of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and/or cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), ICIs activate the host's immune system causing a heightened anti-tumor response. However, off-target effects of ICIs can result in numerous different immune-related cutaneous adverse events (irCAEs). Beyond impacting quality of life, irCAEs can lead to dose limitations or discontinuation of anti-cancer therapies. Correct diagnosis is necessary for expedient and appropriate management. Skin biopsies are often performed to increase diagnostic accuracy and guide clinical management. An extensive literature review was performed using the PubMed database to identify the reported clinical and histopathologic features of irCAEs. This comprehensive review primarily details the histopathologic features of various irCAEs reported to date. Clinical presentation and immunopathogenesis are also discussed in relation to histopathology.

Successful treatment of immune-related lichenoid dermatitis by Weiling decoction in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a revolutionary therapy in advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) and ushered a new era of immunotherapy. Despite of remarkable outcomes, a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was reported, among which cutaneous reactions were the most common. Cutaneous irAEs were mainly managed by glucocorticoids, whereas prolonged use of glucocorticoids may cuase kinds of side effects, especially in elderly paitients, and diminish the anti-tumor efficacy of ICIs, thus finding a safe and effective alternative approach to managing cutaneous irAEs is imperative.

CASE SUMMARY

A 71-year-old man who was diagnosed with advanced sqNSCLC suffered from sporadic maculopapulars one week later after the fifth cycle of sintilimab treatment, and the skin lesions had been deteriorating rapidly. Skin biopsy revealed epidermal parakeratosis with a dense band-like lymphocytic infiltrate and acanthosis, indicating a diagnosis of immune-induced lichenoid dermatitis. Oral administration of traditional Chinese herbal formula modified Weiling decoction significantly alleviated the symptoms of the patient. The dosage of Weiling decoction were maintained for about three months without recurrence of cutaneous adverse reactions and any other side effects. The patient refused to receive further anti-tumor medication and stayed alive without disease progression at follow up.

CONCLUSION

We present modified Weiling decoction successfully ameliorates immune-induced lichenoid dermatitis in a patient with sqNSCLC for the first time. This report indicates that Weiling decoction may be an effective and safe complementary or alternative approach for the treatment of cutaneous irAEs. Further investigation of the underling mechanism is required in the future.

Pembrolizumab-Induced Eruptive Keratoacanthomas and Lichen Planus in a Lung Cancer Patient

Reports of pembrolizumab-induced lichen planus and eruptive keratoacanthomas are limited in the literature. Here, we describe the unique concurrence of both lichen planus and eruptive keratoacanthomas in a patient who received pembrolizumab for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although several therapies have been proposed, we show that pembrolizumab-induced lichen planus and keratoacanthomas can be controlled with the conservative management of topical corticosteroids and intralesional corticosteroids, respectively, allowing patients to continue pembrolizumab therapy.

Molecular Mechanisms of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Over the past few decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as promising therapeutic options for the treatment of various cancers. These novel treatments effectively target key mediators of immune checkpoint pathways. Currently, ICIs primarily consist of monoclonal antibodies that specifically block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and lymphocyte activation gene 3 protein (LAG-3). Despite the notable efficacy of ICIs in cancer treatment, they can also trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which present as autoimmune-like or inflammatory conditions. IrAEs have the potential to affect multiple organ systems, with cutaneous toxicities being the most commonly observed. Although cutaneous irAEs are typically of low-grade severity and can usually be managed effectively, there are cases where severe irAEs can become life-threatening. Therefore, early recognition and a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying cutaneous irAEs are crucial for improving clinical outcomes in cancer patients. However, the precise pathogenesis of cutaneous irAEs remains unclear. This review focuses on the skin manifestations induced by ICIs, the prognosis related to cutaneous irAEs, and the exploration of potential mechanisms involved in cutaneous irAEs.

PD-1 maintains CD8 T cell tolerance towards cutaneous neoantigens

The peripheral T cell repertoire of healthy individuals contains self-reactive T cells1,2. Checkpoint receptors such as PD-1 are thought to enable the induction of peripheral tolerance by deletion or anergy of self-reactive CD8 T cells3-10. However, this model is challenged by the high frequency of immune-related adverse events in patients with cancer who have been treated with checkpoint inhibitors11. Here we developed a mouse model in which skin-specific expression of T cell antigens in the epidermis caused local infiltration of antigen-specific CD8 T cells with an effector gene-expression profile. In this setting, PD-1 enabled the maintenance of skin tolerance by preventing tissue-infiltrating antigen-specific effector CD8 T cells from (1) acquiring a fully functional, pathogenic differentiation state, (2) secreting significant amounts of effector molecules, and (3) gaining access to epidermal antigen-expressing cells. In the absence of PD-1, epidermal antigen-expressing cells were eliminated by antigen-specific CD8 T cells, resulting in local pathology. Transcriptomic analysis of skin biopsies from two patients with cutaneous lichenoid immune-related adverse events showed the presence of clonally expanded effector CD8 T cells in both lesional and non-lesional skin. Thus, our data support a model of peripheral T cell tolerance in which PD-1 allows antigen-specific effector CD8 T cells to co-exist with antigen-expressing cells in tissues without immunopathology.

Cutaneous Side Effects of Modern Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Patients with Dermatological Malignancies

The advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapies in treating dermatological malignancies has dramatically changed the landscape of dermato-oncology in recent years. Their superior efficacy compared to previous therapeutic options, such as chemotherapy, has resulted in their use in treating devastating malignancies, such as melanoma or unresectable/metastatic basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma. Skin toxicity is a critical safety consideration, among other adverse reactions, that can occur under treatment with these agents. This article aims to summarize the cutaneous side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted dermato-oncological therapies. Although the skin side effects of these agents are primarily mild, they can occasionally affect the decision for treatment continuation and the quality of life of the affected patients. Therefore, physicians must be acquainted with the specific cutaneous toxicity profile of such treatments to mitigate their impact on the patients and optimize the overall outcome of dermato-oncological therapy.

An epulis-like camrelizumab related reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) in the oral cavity: A case report

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy, especially anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies, have observably improved the overall survival of patients with advanced solid tumors following the unavoidable immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Camrelizumab is a novel anti-PD-1 agent with the reported most common irAEs of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP). Despite it is widely occurred in the skin, oral RCCEP is rarely reported.

CASE SUMMARY

A 59-year-old man complained about a painless nodule on left mandibular gingiva for two weeks. He started to inject Camrelizumab because of the recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma two month ago. An 8 mm lesion was observed on his mucosa. Several disseminated bright purple red papules were then found on his skins. The oral lesion and one lesion on his face was removed by surgery. After the final diagnosis of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation was confirmed by histological examination. Other operable lesions on his face were removed by ligation. All the removed lesions had a good prognosis without recurrence within the follow-up visit.

CONCLUSION

With the widespread use of Camrelizumab in other solid tumors, the occurrence of oral RCCEP will increase. Surgery and ligation are both effective treatment for RCCEP with a good prognosis.

Pembrolizumab-Induced Lichen Planus: A Rare Immune-Related Adverse Side Effect

Pembrolizumab is the first anti-programmed death protein-1 agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. It has demonstrated efficacy in melanoma, lung cancer, and other advanced solid tumours and hematologic malignancies. Various dermatological side effects including pruritus, maculopapular rash, vitiligo, lichenoid skin reactions, psoriasis, and rarely life-threatening conditions like bullous pemphigoid, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms have been reported. We report a case of pembrolizumab-induced lichen planus in a 54-year-old female who was receiving pembrolizumab for management of lung metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. The lichen planus responded to acitretin and pembrolizumab was continued safely.

Immune-Checkpoint Induced Skin Toxicity Masked as Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Case Report on Mimickers of Dermatological Toxicity with PD-1 Inhibition

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly the mainstay of oncology treatment. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from ICI therapy differ from cytotoxic adverse events. Cutaneous irAEs are one of the most common irAEs and require careful attention to optimize the quality of life for oncology patients.

PATIENT AND METHODS

These are two cases of patients with advanced solid-tumour malignancies treated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy.

RESULTS

Both patients developed multiple pruritic hyperkeratotic lesions, which were initially diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma from skin biopsies. The presentation as squamous cell carcinoma was atypical and, upon further pathology review, the lesions were more in keeping with a lichenoid immune reaction stemming from the immune checkpoint blockade. With the use of oral or topical steroids and immunomodulators, the lesions resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases emphasize that patients on PD-1 inhibitor therapy who develop lesions resembling squamous cell carcinoma on initial pathology may require an additional pathology review to assess for immune-mediated reactions, allowing appropriate immunosuppressive therapy to be initiated.

Immune Profiling of Dermatologic Adverse Events from Checkpoint Blockade using Tissue Cyclic Immunofluorescence

In this study, we demonstrate the utility of whole-slide CyCIF (tissue-based cyclic immunofluorescence) imaging for characterizing immune cell infiltrates in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced dermatologic adverse events (dAEs). We analyzed six cases of ICI-induced dAEs, including lichenoid, bullous pemphigoid, psoriasis, and eczematous eruptions, comparing immune profiling results obtained using both standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) and CyCIF. Our findings indicate that CyCIF provides more detailed and precise single-cell characterization of immune cell infiltrates than IHC, which relies on semi-quantitative scoring by pathologists. This pilot study highlights the potential of CyCIF to advance our understanding of the immune environment in dAEs by revealing tissue-level spatial patterns of immune cell infiltrates, allowing for more precise phenotypic distinctions and deeper exploration of disease mechanisms. By demonstrating that CyCIF can be performed on friable tissues, such as bullous pemphigoid, we provide a foundation for future studies to examine the drivers of specific dAEs using larger cohorts of phenotyped toxicity and suggest a broader role for highly multiplexed tissue imaging in phenotyping the immune mediated disease that they resemble.

Pustular Lichenoid Eruptions Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Two Case Reports and a Review of the Literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard treatment for many types of cancer. After several years of using these therapies, many adverse events related to ICIs have been observed. Dermatologic toxicities such as nonspecific morbilliform rash, vitiligo, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, and more rarely, lichenoid eruptions have been described in the literature. We report 2 cases of pustular lichenoid eruptions, 1 in a patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and 1 in a patient with metastatic melanoma, induced by pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively. The 2 patients were treated with topical corticosteroids, and complete healing of lesions was slowly obtained. Due to the severity of the cutaneous eruptions, pembrolizumab and nivolumab were discontinued. We identified 6 cases of pustular lichenoid eruptions induced by ICIs in the published literature and in the French Pharmacovigilance Database and reviewed their main clinical features and courses.

Immune-related adverse events in checkpoint blockade: Observations from human tissue and therapeutic considerations

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are monoclonal antibodies which, by disrupting interactions of immune checkpoint molecules with their ligands, block regulatory immune signals otherwise exploited by cancers. Despite revolutionary clinical benefits, CPI use is associated with an array of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that mirror spontaneous autoreactivity. Severe irAEs necessitate pausing or stopping of CPI therapy and use of corticosteroids and/or other immunomodulatory interventions. Despite increasingly widespread CPI use, irAE pathobiology remains poorly understood; its elucidation may point to targeted mitigation strategies and uncover predictive biomarkers for irAE onset in patients, whilst casting new light on mechanisms of spontaneous immune-mediated disease. This review focuses on common CPI-induced irAEs of the gut, skin and synovial joints, and how these compare to immune-mediated diseases such as ulcerative colitis, vitiligo and inflammatory arthritis. We review current understanding of the immunological changes reported following CPI therapy at the level of peripheral blood and tissue. Many studies highlight dysregulation of cytokines in irAE-affected tissue, particularly IFNγ and TNF. IrAE-affected tissues are also predominantly infiltrated by T-cells, with low B-cell infiltration. Whilst there is variability between studies, patients treated with anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PDL-1 therapies seem to exhibit CD8+ T-cell dominance, with CD4+ T-cells dominating in those treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) monotherapy. Interestingly, CD8+CXCR3+ T-cells have been reported to be elevated in gastrointestinal, dermatological and musculoskeletal -irAE affected tissues. These findings may highlight potential opportunities for therapeutic development or re-deployment of existing therapies to prevent and/or improve the outcome of irAEs.

Cutaneous lichenoid drug eruptions: A narrative review evaluating demographics, clinical features and culprit medications

Cutaneous lichenoid drug eruptions (LDE) are adverse drug reactions (ADR) characterized by symmetric, erythematous, violaceous papules reminiscent but rarely fully characteristic of lichen planus (LP). We aimed to analyse the literature describing cases of LDE within the last 20 years to provide additional insight into culprit drugs, typical latency to onset of the eruption, the spectrum of clinical presentations, severity and management. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE between January 2000 and 27 January 2021. The keywords 'lichenoid drug rash' and 'lichenoid drug eruption' were used. Cases were included if LDE diagnosis was made, and culprit drugs were identified. A total of 323 cases with LDE were identified from 163 published case reports and studies. The mean patient age was 58.5 years (1 month to 92 years), and 135 patients (41.8%) were female. Checkpoint inhibitors (CKI) were the most frequently reported culprit drugs (136 cases; 42.1%), followed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (39 cases; 12.0%) and anti-TNF-α-monoclonal antibodies (13 cases; 4.0%). The latency between initiation of the drug and manifestation was 15.7 weeks (range: 0.1-208 weeks). After discontinuing the culprit drug, the median time to resolution was 14.2 weeks (range: 0.71-416 weeks). One hundred thirty-six patients (42.1%) were treated with topical, and 54 patients (16.7%) with systemic glucocorticoids. Overall, we conclude that, albeit rare, LDE is challenging to diagnose ADR induced by mostly CKI, TKI, and biologics. Treatment modalities resemble that of lichen planus, and the culprit drugs had to be discontinued in only 26%, which is low compared with other types of adverse drug reactions. This is probably due to the low risk of aggravation (e.g. toxic epidermal necrolysis) if the drug is continued and the benefit/risk ratio favouring the drug, as is often the case in cancer therapy.

Cutaneous manifestations associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that block key mediators of tumor-mediated immune evasion. The frequency of its use has increased rapidly and has extended to numerous cancers. ICIs target immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), PD ligand 1 (PD-L1), and T cell activation, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4). However, ICI-driven alterations in the immune system can induce various immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that affect multiple organs. Among these, cutaneous irAEs are the most common and often the first to develop. Skin manifestations are characterized by a wide range of phenotypes, including maculopapular rash, psoriasiform eruption, lichen planus-like eruption, pruritus, vitiligo-like depigmentation, bullous diseases, alopecia, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. In terms of pathogenesis, the mechanism of cutaneous irAEs remains unclear. Still, several hypotheses have been proposed, including activation of T cells against common antigens in normal tissues and tumor cells, increased release of proinflammatory cytokines associated with immune-related effects in specific tissues/organs, association with specific human leukocyte antigen variants and organ-specific irAEs, and acceleration of concurrent medication-induced drug eruptions. Based on recent literature, this review provides an overview of each ICI-induced skin manifestation and epidemiology and focuses on the mechanisms underlying cutaneous irAEs.

Risk of Lichen Sclerosus and Lichen Planus in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended for various types of cancer. On the other hand, these ICIs may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Lichen sclerosus (LS) and lichen planus (LP) are two distinct phenotypes of irAEs that occur in a subset of patients treated with ICIs. These adverse effects have a detrimental effect on the patient's quality of life and treatment phases; however, the clinical evaluation and assessment of LS and LP remain uncertain. This study aims to assess and evaluate the risk of LS and LP associated with the use of ICIs via a systematic review of the literature and the USA FDA Adverse Events FAERS database.

METHOD

The study searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for case reports on immune-checkpoint-inhibitor-associated lichen sclerosus and lichen planus published in English between inception and 31 December 2021. The FDA's adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight case reports and two retrospective studies with a total of 101 patients, in addition to the FAERS data, were evaluated. More cases involved lichen planus (78.9%) than lichen sclerosis (21%). Nivolumab and pembrolizumab were most frequently reported with LS and LP, among other ICIs. Thirty-six out of thirty-eight patients with LS or LP experienced complete remission, while two patients experienced partial remission. Most of the cases had an excellent response to corticosteroids (92.1%), while the remainder had moderate (5.2%) and poor (2.6%) responses. Additionally, the reporting odds ratio (ROR) of the FAERS database indicated a favorable association for ICIs, the risk of LP, and LS. A stronger association was uniquely found between nivolumab and pembrolizumab.

CONCLUSION

There have been published case reports for these adverse events. Healthcare providers should be aware of the possibility of lichen sclerosis and lichen planus developing in patients receiving ICIs which could necessitate hospitalization or discontinuation. Regulatory agencies are advised to monitor the risks as a potential safety signal.

To treat or not to treat: PD-L1 inhibitor-induced keratoacanthoma and squamous cell carcinoma

Keratoacanthoma (KA) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are rare side effects of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors that can disrupt therapy. There is no consensus on optimal treatment. We investigated the management strategy and factors influencing pathophysiology. An institutional cancer registry and literature search were used for this retrospective study. Only PD-L1-induced KA and SCC cases were included. Pathology specimens were stained with immune markers and management strategies were analyzed. Four cases were identified at our institution. Immunohistochemistry of atypical keratinocytes revealed PD-1/PD-L1 positivity, high p53, and low bcl-2 for all cases with differential expression of CD44 and beta-catenin for KA versus SCC. Nivolumab was continued or temporarily held with complete resolution. In addition, a literature search identified 30 additional cases of KA/SCC after PDL-1 inhibitor use. The most common treatment was excision/destruction followed by topical and/or intralesional corticosteroids. Therapy was definitely withheld in 22% of KA patients and in 9% of SCC cases. The expression of PD-L1 by atypical keratinocytes helps to explain the effects of nivolumab on the development of cutaneous neoplasms. The expression of immune markers provides mechanistic insights into pathophysiology. Management may be achieved with conservative therapy and without treatment interruption.

A Retrospective, Single-Institution Experience of Bullous Pemphigoid as an Adverse Effect of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Simple Summary

This article investigates the cutaneous adverse immune effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. These drugs target proteins expressed on cancer cells that aid in the avoidance of immune system detection and destruction. Immune checkpoint inhibitors inadvertently cause other immune-mediated adverse effects. Cutaneous toxicities are the commonest adverse effect from immunotherapy; furthermore, they are usually developed early in the course of treatment. A rare and severe cutaneous adverse event is Bullous Pemphigoid. This article investigates the average and median onset of these drug toxicities, as well as treatments. We found these side effects to be negatively skewed, indicating most cases occur several months into treatment.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a class of cancer treatment drugs that stimulate the immune system’s ability to fight tumor cells. These drugs are monoclonal antibodies targeting im-mune-inhibiting proteins on cancer cells, such as CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors cause many immune-related adverse events. Cutaneous toxicities are of the most common adverse effects and occur with a range of severity. Bullous Pemphigoid is a rare adverse event with a high impact on quality of life that may occur after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. In this article, we investigate current research on immune checkpoint inhibitors, cutaneous adverse events, and common presentations and treatments, with a specific focus on Bullous Pemphigoid, its characteristics, onset timing, and treatment. Significant findings include a negative skew in the onset of presentation. Furthermore, we describe exclusive cases.

Occult squamous cell carcinoma within lichenoid dermatitis: three examples of cryptic cancer detection

Lichenoid dermatitis can be a perplexing entity encompassing an array of cutaneous disorders. Two hundred forty-three (243) cases of otherwise unclassifiable lichenoid dermatitis were examined histologically employing a special cytokeratin stain. Occult squamous cell carcinoma was detected in three of the 243 cases, uncovered by special immunohistochemistry staining within histologic specimens of lichenoid dermatitis. We recommend staining for cutaneous cancer becoming a routine practice in evaluating cutaneous lichenoid dermatitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy: Review of orofacial adverse events and role of the oral healthcare provider

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a revolutionary class of antineoplastic therapy that restore anti-tumor immunity. Consequences of this enhanced immune response include a multitude of immune related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any body system, including the mouth. Orofacial irAEs reproduce features of numerous immune-mediated conditions, including oral lichen planus, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and Sjögren syndrome, among others. The aim of this review is to summarize known orofacial irAEs and to familiarize oral healthcare providers with how to identify and manage these toxicities as part of the care team for patients treated with ICIs.

Kutane Nebenwirkungen unter Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibitor-Therapie

Moderne Immuntherapeutika wie Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab oder Ipilimumab, die sogenannte Immun-Checkpoints blockieren, haben die onkologische Therapie in den letzten Jahren revolutioniert. Mit dem neuen Wirkmechanismus der Blockade wichtiger Kontrollpunkte im Immunsystem zeigen sich jedoch auch eine Vielzahl an unterschiedlichen Nebenwirkungen. Diese treten nicht selten an der Haut auf. Zu den häufigsten dermalen Reaktionen unter Immuntherapie zählen die Vitiligo, Exantheme, blasenbildende Reaktionen oder der Lichen planus. Ausgeprägter Juckreiz kann Patienten stark beeinträchtigen. Der Verlauf bei auf die Haut beschränkten Nebenwirkungen ist häufig mild und gut zu behandeln oder selbstlimitierend. Hauterscheinungen können jedoch auch als Symptom systemischer Reaktionen auftreten. Eine frühe Diagnosestellung, die Einleitung einer adäquaten Therapie sowie eine interdisziplinäre Betreuung bei komplexen Erkrankungen sind entscheidend, um dauerhafte Einschränkungen für die Patienten zu verhindern und eine sichere Behandlung der zugrundeliegenden Tumorerkrankung gewährleisten zu können.

Pembrolizumab-Induced Acute Skin Reaction: A Case Report and Review of Literature

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors is considered to be one of the most important advances in cancer treatment. Pembrolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) receptor that has demonstrated antineoplastic activity against various malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer. Pembrolizumab has been associated with significant dermatological adverse reactions, referred to as immune-related adverse events. The cutaneous adverse effects can affect the quality of life of the patient and can result in dose reduction or even discontinuation of the treatment. Hence it is of utmost importance to have a comprehensive understanding of the cutaneous toxicities for prompt initiation of treatment.

We present the case of a 49-year-old male with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with 100% PD-L1 expression, who suffered a severe cutaneous reaction involving more than 95% of body surface area, following the first dose of pembrolizumab. He was treated with low-dose systemic steroids (prednisone 10 mg), to which he responded well. Since the patient showed excellent symptomatic and clinical response to pembrolizumab, it was not discontinued. The patient has not developed a rash with subsequent doses of pembrolizumab, and the steroids were tapered off.

High Grade Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Cancer

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) improves survival in many types of cancers including melanoma, non-small cell lung, renal cell, breast, and cervical cancers. However, many of these therapies are also associated with high grade dermatologic adverse events (DAEs), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), SJS/TEN-like reactions, high grade maculopapular and psoriasiform rashes, autoimmune bullous eruptions, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), which may limit their tolerability and use. It is important to properly identify and treat DAEs to ICB because these DAEs may be associated with positive anti-tumor response and patients may have limited options for alternative anti-cancer therapeutics. In this review, we describe high grade DAEs to increasingly used ICB agents, which target CTLA-4 and PD-1 or its ligand, PD-L1 and enable the immune system to target cancer cells. We further differentiate life-threatening adverse reactions from mimickers and report cases of serious DAEs which have been recorded in association with ICB through the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), which is an archive of adverse events associated with various drugs and therapeutic biologic products reported voluntarily by consumers and healthcare professionals as well as mandatorily by manufacturers. Lastly, we summarize management recommendations for these adverse events and discuss knowledge and evidence gaps in this area.

Skin Manifestation Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

In accordance with recent therapeutic progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors for certain cancers, various disorders are induced as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affecting the skin, gut, thyroid gland, lung, and liver. Among such irAEs, mucocutaneous manifestation is the most common. Cutaneous manifestations are categorized into several groups, ie, inflammatory reactions, immunobullous reactions, alterations of epidermal keratinocytes, and alterations of epidermal melanocytes; however, there are additionally various cutaneous toxicities, unclassified into those groups. Blocking of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1(PDL1) can lead to the induction of autoimmune reaction, via activation of cytotoxic T cells, inhibition of regulatory T cell function, and alteration of cytokine balance. Similarly, blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) reduces the suppressive function of regulatory T cells. Due to those mechanisms, various autoimmune conditions can be induced, in addition to nonspecific drug eruptions. Dermatologists should be aware of various types of those mucocutaneous manifestations, either common or rare, as well as the management of such conditions. Herein, various mucocutaneous manifestations of irAEs and cases involving Japanese patients have been described, based on a single institute's experience.

Cutaneous adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: incidence and types of reactive dermatoses

BACKGROUND

Dermatoses are common and potentially serious complications of programmed cell death receptor PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-1 ICI) therapy. Understanding their incidence is necessary to support clinical awareness, diagnosis, and management.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the incidence and odds of reported non-cancerous dermatoses in the setting of anti-PD-1 ICI therapy.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) treated patients at a tertiary healthcare institution. Selected dermatologic events following immunotherapy were identified in the electronic medical record. Comparator arm were patients that developed these same dermatoses without receiving anti-PD-1 ICI therapy.

RESULTS

There were 13.7% (254/1857) patients that developed one of 28 dermatoses. Compared with the general population, patients treated with anti-PD-1 had a greater risk for development of mucositis (OR 65.7, 95% CI 35.0-123.3), xerostomia (OR 11.9, 95% CI 8.4-16.8), pruritus (11.3, 95% CI 8.9-14.3), and lichen planus/lichenoid dermatitis (OR 10.7, 95% CI 5.6-20.7).

CONCLUSIONS

We report the frequency of dermatoses encountered in the setting of ICI therapy, both common (pruritus, rash, vitiligo) and uncommon (scleroderma, urticaria).

Immune cell subsets in interface cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) associated with anti-PD-1 therapy resemble acute graft vs host disease more than lichen planus

Background

Checkpoint immunotherapy is frequently associated with cutaneous immune‐related adverse events (cirAEs), and among those, the most common subtype shows interface reaction patterns that have been likened to lichen planus (LP); however, cutaneous acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) may be a closer histopathologic comparator. We used quantitative pathology to compare the immunologic composition of anti‐PD‐1‐associated interface reactions to LP and aGVHD to assess for similarities and differences between these cutaneous eruptions.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry for CD4, CD8, CD68, PD‐1, and PD‐L1 was performed on formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue from patients with anti‐PD‐1 interface cirAEs (n = 4), LP (n = 9), or aGVHD (n = 5). Densities of immune cell subsets expressing each marker were quantified using the HALO image analysis immune cell module. Plasma cell and eosinophil density were quantified on routine H&E slides.

Results

Specimens from patients with anti‐PD‐1 interface cirAEs showed equivalent total cell densities and immune cell composition to those with aGVHD. Patients with LP showed higher total immune cell infiltration, higher absolute T‐cell densities, increased CD8 proportion, and reduced histiocytic component. The cases with the highest plasma cell counts were all anti‐PD‐1 interface cirAEs and aGVHD.

Conclusion

The composition of immune cell subsets in anti‐PD‐1 interface cirAEs more closely resembles the immune response seen in aGVHD than LP within our cohort. This warrants a closer look via advanced analytics and may have implications for shared pathogenesis and potential treatment options.

Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review Article

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as novel options that are effective in treating various cancers. They are monoclonal antibodies that target cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, activation of the immune systems through ICIs may concomitantly trigger a constellation of immunologic symptoms and signs, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with the skin being the most commonly involved organ. The dermatologic toxicities are observed in nearly half of the patients treated with ICIs, mainly in the form of maculopapular rash and pruritus. In the majority of cases, these cutaneous irAEs are self-limiting and manageable, and continuation of the ICIs is possible. This review provides an overview of variable ICI-mediated dermatologic reactions and describes the clinical and histopathologic presentation. Early and accurate diagnosis, recognition of severe toxicities, and appropriate management are key goals to achieve the most favorable outcomes and quality of life in cancer patients.

Drug allergy and non-HIV immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

Non-HIV immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (non-HIV IRIS) is associated with the recovery from an immunocompromised condition. It is defined as inflammatory disorders caused by antigens, including drugs or pathogenic microorganisms present prior to immune recovery, or by the exacerbation of an inflammatory disorder that was already present. Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome is a prototype of IRIS, and the pathophysiology of non-HIV IRIS can be recognized in several disorders treated with corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, molecular-targeted drugs, TNF-α antibody drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. This review focuses on the relationship between the immune mechanism of non-HIV IRIS and drug allergies, especially severe drug eruption. The antigen recognition mechanism in drug allergy varies depending on the clinical type and the causative drug. The p-i concept is the main mechanism in severe drug eruption such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, and drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Lymphocytes activated by an antigen other than a drug, such as a virus, can also develop drug allergy by the loose binding of drugs with immune receptors of T cells or human leukocyte antigen. Therefore, fluctuations in the immune environment affect the onset of severe drug eruption. Novel agents that cause major changes in immunity have been marketed mainly for autoimmune diseases and malignant tumors; therefore, it is necessary to consider their effects when treating severe drug eruptions. Moreover, although a list of diagnostic criteria for this syndrome has been drafted, predictive and diagnostic biomarkers for this syndrome needs to be urgently developed.

Immune-related adverse events in various organs caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors

Current cancer immunotherapies target immune checkpoint molecules such as the inhibitory receptor programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), one of its ligands, programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), a competitive ligand for CD28 binding to stimulatory receptors CD80 and CD86. Multiple biological drugs use monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 as cancer immunotherapies. These are termed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, activation of the immune system by ICIs can induce the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can affect multiple organ systems. The most frequent irAEs are cutaneous and mimic various types of spontaneous skin disorders. Most irAEs are classified as autoimmune conditions mediated by ICI-activated CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells, some of which are also related to activated B cells and production of pathogenic antibodies. Interestingly, blockade of CTLA-4 mainly induces activation of T cells and inhibition of T_reg cells. On the other hand, the mechanisms underlying anti-PD-1/PD-L1 ICI-induced irAEs are more complicated. PD-1 is a receptor expressed on T and B cells, which binds not only PD-L1, but also PD-L2. The role of PD-L1 is dominant in Th1 and Th17 immunity, while PD-L2 works mainly in Th2 immunity. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying irAEs will allow for better management of irAEs and improve outcomes and quality of life in cancer patients.

Lichen Planus Pemphigoides: a unique form of bullous and lichenoid eruptions secondary to nivolumab

The widespread use of PD‐1 inhibitors to treat various solid tumors has brought certain challenges for the clinician, including immune‐related adverse events (irAEs). Cutaneous toxicities are among the most observed irAEs. Bullous and lichenoid dermatoses following PD‐1 inhibitor therapy have been described. Here we report a novel case of lichen planus pemphigoides, featuring characteristics of both bullous pemphigoid and lichen planus, in a patient treated with nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma. We subsequently review all three cutaneous conditions which may arise in the context of PD‐1 inhibitor therapy.

French guidelines for the management of oral lichen planus (excluding pharmacological therapy)

INTRODUCTION

Oral lichen is a chronic inflammatory disease for which diagnostic management and follow-up are heterogeneous given the absence of specific guidelines in France. Our objective was to develop French multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of oral lichen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Working groups from the Groupe d'Etude de la Muqueuse Buccale (GEMUB) formulated a list of research questions and the corresponding recommendations according to the "formal consensus" method for developing practice guidelines. These recommendations were submitted to a group of experts and the degree of agreement for each recommendation was assessed by a scoring group.

RESULTS

Twenty-two research questions, divided into 3 themes (nosological classification and initial assessment, induced oral lichenoid lesions, and follow-up) resulted in 22 recommendations. Initial biopsy for histology is recommended in the absence of reticulated lesions. Biopsy for direct immunofluorescence is recommended for ulcerated, erosive, bullous types and for diffuse erythematous gingivitis. Management should include a periodontal and dental check-up, and investigation for extra-oral lesions. Hepatitis C testing is recommended only if risk factors are present. Definitions, triggering factors and the management of "induced oral lichenoid lesions" were clarified. Oral lichen must be monitored by a practitioner familiar with the disease at least once a year, using objective tools.

CONCLUSION

This formalised consensus of multidisciplinary experts provides clinical practice guidelines on the management and monitoring of oral lichen.

Nivolumab‑induced lichenoid granulomatous stomatitis in a patient with advanced melanoma: A case report

Lichenoid granulomatous reactions (LGR) are granulomatous inflammations of the skin and oral mucosa, also sharing features of lichenoid lesions. Thus, the present study refers to lichenoid granulomatous dermatitis (LGD) and lichenoid granulomatous stomatitis (LGS). LGR is a condition that can be triggered by drugs, diseases or environmental causes. In the present case study, anti-PD1 (nivolumab) medication had a detrimental effect on the oral mucosa, which clinicaly and histologicaly proved to be LGS. Checkpoint inhibitors consitute a cornerstone in the current treatment of several types of cancer, of which cutaneous melanoma is the best example. Oral lichenoid responses following anti-PD-1 therapy have been recorded in few case reports and small case series. To the best of our knowledhe, this is the first case of LGS being reported as a side effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Oral Immune-Related Adverse Events Caused by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Salivary Gland Dysfunction and Mucosal Diseases

Conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapies have limited efficacy against advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 interrupt the co-inhibitory pathway of T cells and enhance the ability of CD8+ T cells to destroy tumors. Even in advanced HNSCC patients with recurrent diseases and distant metastasis, ICI therapy shows efficiency and become an effective alternative to conventional chemotherapy. However, as this therapy releases the immune tolerance state, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells can also attack organs and tissues expressing self-antigens that cross-react with tumor antigens and induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). When patients with HNSCC are treated with ICIs, autoimmune diseases occur in multiple organs including the skin, digestive tract, endocrine system, liver, and respiratory tract. Treatment of various malignancies, including HNSCC, with ICIs may result in the appearance of oral irAEs. In the oral cavity, an oral lichenoid reaction (OLR) and pemphigoid develop. Sicca syndrome also occurs in association with ICIs, affecting the salivary glands to induce xerostomia. It is necessary to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms of these intractable diseases that are not seen with conventional therapy. Early diagnosis and appropriate approaches to irAEs are needed for efficient treatment of advanced HNSCC by ICIs.

An overview of the efficacy of phototherapy in oncodermatology

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous adverse events (AEs) following cancer immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy have been well-documented in the literature. A number of case reports have identified phototherapy, a form of light therapy that mimics sunlight exposure, as a noninvasive treatment modality for these cutaneous toxicities. By inducing local suppression of the immune system, phototherapy is a skin-directed treatment with minimal effect on tumor response. Phototherapy may therefore be a viable treatment option for cutaneous AEs from cancer therapies.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature for patients treated with phototherapy for cutaneous AEs following cancer immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or chemotherapy. We also included three previously unpublished cases from our own institution.

RESULTS

We identified 24 patients (80% male, mean age 67 years, range 49-75 years). Patients received the following phototherapy types: NB-UVB (n = 17), PUVA (n = 6), or PDT (n = 1). A topical steroid was used in conjunction with phototherapy in seven patients. At phototherapy onset, cancer treatment was either continued, temporarily discontinued, or discontinued (n = 9, 6, 7, respectively; in two cases, the cancer treatment course was unknown). Improvement of cutaneous AEs was observed in 96% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Phototherapy resulted in full or partial improvement in all but one patient. A topical steroid was used in nearly a third of patients, suggesting some oncodermatologists co-administer topicals to further boost response. Continuation of cancer therapy in the majority of patients highlights an additional advantage of phototherapy. We believe phototherapy may be an effective adjunctive treatment to topical steroids when treating these cutaneous toxicities.

Management of adverse events associated with cabozantinib plus nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma: A review

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been successfully developed in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), further advancing treatment. While safety profiles are generally manageable with combination regimens, overlapping adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs can make treatment more complex. The CheckMate 9ER study evaluated the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in combination with the anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody nivolumab in patients with previously untreated advanced RCC. Cabozantinib + nivolumab demonstrated superiority over sunitinib for progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate. These outcomes supported the approval of cabozantinib + nivolumab as a first-line therapy for advanced RCC. The safety profile was manageable with prophylaxis, supportive care, dose holds and reductions for cabozantinib, and dose holds and immunosuppressive therapy for nivolumab. This review discusses the safety results of CheckMate 9ER and provides guidance on managing some of the more clinically relevant AEs with a focus on overlapping AEs, including diarrhea, elevated amylase/lipase, hepatotoxicity, dermatologic reactions, fatigue, endocrine disorders, and nephrotoxicity. We discuss AE management strategies (prophylaxis, supportive care, dose modification, and immunosuppressive therapy), and provide recommendations for identifying the causative agent of overlapping AEs and for consulting specialists about organ-specific immune-related AEs. Optimizing AE management can maintain tolerability and should be a priority with cabozantinib + nivolumab treatment.