Role of Polygenic Risk Score in the Familial Transmission of Bipolar Disorder in Youth

Psychiatric Polygenic Risk Scores and Week-by-Week Symptomatic Status in Youth with Bipolar Disorder: An Exploratory Study

Introduction: Prior studies have demonstrated that, in both adults and youth, bipolar disorder (BD) is a polygenic illness. However, no studies have examined polygenic risk scores (PRSs) in relation to the longitudinal course of mood symptoms in youth with BD. Methods: This study included 246 youth of European ancestry with BD (7-20 years old at intake) from the Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth study and Centre for Youth Bipolar Disorder. Mood symptom severity was assessed at intake and, for 168 participants, prospectively for a median of 8.7 years. PRSs for BD, schizophrenia (SCZ), major depressive disorder (MDD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were constructed using genome-wide summary statistics from independent adult cohorts. Results: Higher BD-PRS was significantly associated with lower most severe lifetime depression score at intake (β = -0.14, p = 0.03). Higher SCZ-PRS and MDD-PRS were associated with significantly less time spent in euthymia (SCZ-PRS: β = -0.21, p = 0.02; MDD-PRS: β = -0.22, p = 0.01) and more time with any subsyndromal mood symptoms (i.e., any mania, mixed, or depression symptoms; SCZ-PRS: β = 0.15, p = 0.04; MDD-PRS: β = 0.17, p = 0.01) during follow-up. PRSs for BD and ADHD were not significantly associated with any longitudinal mood variable. Conclusions: This exploratory analysis was the first to examine psychiatric PRSs in relation to the prospective course of mood symptoms among youth with BD. Results from the current study can serve to guide future youth BD studies with larger sample sizes on this topic.

Beyond the Window of Risk? The Dutch Bipolar Offspring Study: 22-Year Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

Adolescent offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (BD) are at high risk to develop BD and other psychopathology, yet how this risk continues into middle adulthood remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the window of risk for BD and other psychopathology in offspring of parents with BD followed from adolescence into adulthood.

METHOD

This study reported on the 22-year follow-up assessment of the Dutch Bipolar Offspring Study, a fixed cohort study of 140 participants established in 1997. Offspring (n = 100; mean [SD] age = 38.28 [2.74] years) of parents with bipolar I disorder or bipolar II disorder were assessed at baseline and 1-, 5-, 12-, and 22-year follow-up.

RESULTS

No new BD onsets occurred since the 12-year follow-up (lifetime prevalence = 11%-13%; bipolar I disorder = 4%; bipolar II disorder = 7%). Lifetime prevalence of any mood disorder was 65%; for major depressive disorder, prevalence was 36%; and for recurrent mood episodes, prevalence was 37%. Prevalence of major depressive disorder more than doubled in the past decade. Point prevalence of any psychopathology peaked between 20 and 25 years (38%-46%), subsiding to 29% to 35% per year after age 30. Overall, 71% of offspring contacted mental health services since the last assessment.

CONCLUSION

The risk for homotypic transmission of BD in offspring of parents with BD is highest during adolescence. The heterotypic risk for mood disorder onset and recurrences continues over the life course. Severe mood disorders are often preceded by milder psychopathology, emphasizing the need for early identification and interventions. This study allows for better understanding of the onset and course of mood disorders and specific windows of risk in a familial high-risk population.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This longitudinal study followed 100 offspring of parents with bipolar disorder, finding that they are at increased risk to develop mood and other disorders themselves. The window of risk, in terms of age of onset for mood disorders is still unclear. The 22-year follow-up of the Dutch Bipolar Offspring Study shows the highest risk for occurences of bipolar disorder was during late adolescence (11-13%) while the risk for onset and recurrences of other mood disorders continues into middle adulthood (65% and 37%, respectively).

Is Theta Burst Stimulation Ready as a Clinical Treatment for Bipolar Disorder?

BACKGROUND

To date, no studies have investigated the efficacy of theta burst stimulation (TBS) in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD), and the results are inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to systematically review the existing literature related to the efficacy of TBS in BD and synthesize the results through meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched for PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of science, PsycINFO, CNKI, and Wan fang databases without language restriction through July 30, 2023, and included randomized-controlled trials that assessed the treatment effect of TBS in patients with BD. We used a random-effects model to pool effect sizes, which were expressed as Cohen's d (or Odds ratio) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The outcome measures include changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores, response and remission rates of depression, and dropout rates.

RESULT

Eight randomized sham-controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size of the outcome measures, including changes in MARDS scale scores, response rate, and remission rates, were -0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.07 to 2.44), 1.07 (95% CI: 0.47 to 2.44) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.38 to 1.45), respectively. Notably, the TBS group showed favorable efficacy without major adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Current studies indicate that TBS does not show significant antidepressant efficacy in patients with BD, although it is very well tolerated.

Polygenic Scores and Mood Disorder Onsets in the Context of Family History and Early Psychopathology

Importance

Bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) aggregate within families, with risk often first manifesting as early psychopathology, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and anxiety disorders.

Objective

To determine whether polygenic scores (PGS) are associated with mood disorder onset independent of familial high risk for BD (FHR-BD) and early psychopathology.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data from 7 prospective cohorts enriched in FHR-BD from Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Spain, and the US. Participants with FHR-BD, defined as having at least 1 first-degree relative with BD, were compared with participants without FHR for any mood disorder. Participants were repeatedly assessed with variable follow-up intervals from July 1992 to July 2023. Data were analyzed from August 2023 to August 2024.

Exposures

PGS indexed genetic liability for MDD, BD, anxiety, neuroticism, subjective well-being, ADHD, self-regulation, and addiction risk factor. Semistructured diagnostic interviews with relatives established FHR-BD. ADHD or anxiety disorder diagnoses before mood disorder onset constituted early psychopathology.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcome of interest, mood disorder onset, was defined as a consensus-confirmed new diagnosis of MDD or BD. Cox regression examined associations of PGS, FHR-BD, ADHD, and anxiety with mood disorder onset. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests evaluated the probability of onset by PGS quartile and familial risk status.

Results

A total of 1064 participants (546 [51.3%] female; mean [SD] age at last assessment, 21.7 [5.1] years), including 660 with FHR-BD and 404 without FHR for any mood disorder, were repeatedly assessed for mental disorders. A total of 399 mood disorder onsets occurred over a variable mean (SD) follow-up interval of 6.3 (5.7) years. Multiple PGS were associated with onset after correcting for FHR-BD and early psychopathology, including PGS for ADHD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.34), self-regulation (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.34), neuroticism (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32), MDD (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.31), addiction risk factor (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30), anxiety (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.28), BD (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.28), and subjective well-being (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99). High PGS for addiction risk factor, anxiety, BD, and MDD were associated with increased probability of onset in the control group. High PGS for ADHD and self-regulation increased rates of onset among participants with FHR-BD. PGS for self-regulation, ADHD, and addiction risk factors showed stronger associations with onsets of BD than MDD.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, multiple PGS were associated with mood disorder onset independent of family history of BD and premorbid diagnoses of ADHD or anxiety. The association between PGS and mood disorder risk varied depending on family history status.

Incorporating Polygenic Liability and Family History for Predicting Psychiatric Diseases in the Taiwan Biobank

BACKGROUND

In this study, we investigated the interplay between molecular measures of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and conventional measures of family history (FH) on the risk of 4 psychiatric disorders: schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BPD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in community samples of East Asian populations. We examined the individual and joint associations and the relative contributions of PRS and FH and evaluated the potential of combining transdiagnostic PRSs and FHs to improve risk prediction.

METHODS

The genotyping of 106,581 unrelated participants from the Taiwan Biobank was linked to the National Health Insurance Research Database to retrieve information on ICD-defined diseases and FH. A logistic regression model was used to examine the association between PRS and FH in fathers, mothers, and siblings with a risk of psychiatric disorders.

RESULTS

The PRSs for SCZ, BPD, MDD, and OCD explained 2.0%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.6%, respectively, and FH explained 1.3%, 1.4%, 2.3%, and 3.4%, respectively, of the variance in the corresponding disease. Incorporating PRS and FH increased the explained variance in SCZ, BPD, MDD, and OCD by 3.2%, 1.7%, 2.8%, and 4.1%, respectively. The effect sizes for PRS and FH in the PRS-/FH-alone and PRS-FH combined models were generally similar. Simultaneously incorporating the 4 PRSs and FHs increased the explained variance of SCZ, BPD, MDD, and OCD to 4.7%, 4.7%, 3.3%, and 7.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PRS and FH provide independent and complementary information for the identification of psychiatric disorders. The incorporation of transdiagnostic PRSs and FHs improved risk identification.

MIR218 polygenic risk score is associated with cognitive function and neurochemical metabolites among patients with depressed bipolar disorders

BACKGROUNDS

Evidence from animal and population studies has consistently revealed that microRNA 218 (MIR218) is involved in susceptibility to depression and cognitive functions. Nevertheless, few studies have evaluated the association between MIR218 and clinical features in patients with depressed bipolar disorder (BD).

METHODS

A total of 66 patients with depressed BD and 49 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited for this study. MIR218 polygenic risk score (PRS) was used to assess the addictive effects of the MIR218 regulated genes. We compared the MIR218 PRS between patients with depressed BD and HCs to investigate whether it can be used to predict the risk of BD, and further explored the association between MIR218 PRS and cognitive performance as well as neurochemical metabolites among depressed BD.

RESULTS

We found that there was a significant difference in MIR218 PRS between patients with depressed BD and HCs. The correlation analysis indicated that MIR218 PRS was negative associated with the number of disease onset (r = -0.311, P = 0.033) and choline (Cho)/creatine (Cr) in right thalamus (r = -0.285, P = 0.021). Additionally, as supported by previous findings, patients with lower MIR218 PRS presented more domains of impaired cognitive function than those with higher scores.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggested MIR218 PRS might be useful in differentiating patients with depressed BD from HCs. Moreover, depressed BD with lower MIR218 PRS showed more pronounced cognitive impairment than those with higher scores, which may be associated with disease recurrence and Cho metabolism in right thalamus.

Neurocognitive correlates of polygenic risk for bipolar disorder among youth with and without bipolar disorder

INTRODUCTION

There is well-established evidence of reduced neurocognitive performance in adults and youth with bipolar disorder (BD). However, little is known about the polygenic underpinnings of neurocognition in individuals with BD, particularly in youth. The current study aimed to examine the association between polygenic risk score for BD (BD-PRS) and neurocognition among youth with BD and healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

129 youth of European ancestry (72 BD, 57 HC), ages 13-20 years, were included. Six neurocognitive tasks within the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery were assessed. General linear models were used to examine the association between BD-PRS and neurocognitive composite scores, controlling for age, sex, IQ, and two genetic principal components.

RESULTS

In the overall sample, higher BD-PRS was associated with significantly poorer affective processing (β = -0.25, p = 0.01), decision-making (β = -0.23, p = 0.02), and sustained attention (β = -0.28, p = 0.002). Secondary analyses revealed that higher BD-PRS was associated with significantly poorer sustained attention within the BD group (β = -0.27, p = 0.04), and with significantly poorer affective processing within the HC group (β = -0.29, p = 0.04).

LIMITATIONS

Cross-sectional design. Modest sample size may have reduced power to detect smaller effect sizes.

CONCLUSION

The current study found that higher BD-PRS generated based on adult GWAS was associated with poorer neurocognitive performance in youth with BD and HC. Future longitudinal studies incorporating repeated neurocognitive assessments would further inform whether the associations of BD-PRS with neurocognition vary from youth to adulthood, and whether BD-PRS is associated with differential neurodevelopmental trajectories in individuals with and without BD.

Person-level contributions of bipolar polygenic risk score to the prediction of new-onset bipolar disorder in at-risk offspring

BACKGROUND

Previous work indicates that polygenic risk scores (PRS) for bipolar disorder (BD) are elevated in adults and youth with BD, but whether BD-PRS can inform person-level diagnostic prediction is unknown. Here, we test whether BD-PRS improves performance of a previously published risk calculator (RC) for BD.

METHODS

156 parents with BD-I/II and their offspring ages 6-18 were recruited and evaluated with standardized diagnostic assessments every two years for >12 years. DNA was extracted from saliva samples, genotyping performed, and BD-PRS calculated based on a 2021 meta-analysis. Using a bootstrapped and cross-validated penalized Cox regression, we assessed whether BD-PRS (alone and interacting with clinical variables) improved RC performance.

RESULTS

Of 227 offspring, 38 developed BD during follow-up. The penalized regression selected BD-PRS and interactions between BD-PRS and parental age at mood disorder onset (AAO), depression, and anxiety. The resulting RC discriminated offspring who developed BD (vs. those that did not) with good accuracy (AUC = 0.81); removing BD-PRS and its interaction terms was associated with a significant decrement to the AUC (decrement = 0.07, p = 0.039). Further exploration of selected interaction terms indicated that all were significant (p-values<0.02), indicating that BD-PRS has a larger effect on the outcome in offspring with depression and anxiety, whose affected parent had a younger AAO.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of BD-PRS to clinical/demographic predictors in the RC significantly improved its accuracy. BD-PRS predicted BD on the person-level, particularly in offspring of parents with earlier AAO who already had symptoms of anxiety and depression at intake.

Psychiatric Polygenic Risk Scores Across Youth With Bipolar Disorder, Youth at High Risk for Bipolar Disorder, and Controls

OBJECTIVE

There is a pronounced gap in knowledge regarding polygenic underpinnings of youth bipolar disorder (BD). This study aimed to compare polygenic risk scores (PRSs) in youth with BD, youth at high clinical and/or familial risk for BD (HR), and controls.

METHOD

Participants were 344 youths of European ancestry (13-20 years old), including 136 youths with BD, 121 HR youths, and 87 controls. PRSs for BD, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were constructed using independent genome-wide summary statistics from adult cohorts. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the association between each PRS and diagnostic status (BD vs HR vs controls). All genetic analyses controlled for age, sex, and 2 genetic principal components.

RESULTS

The BD group showed significantly higher BD-PRS than the control group (odds ratio = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.13-2.10, p = .006), with the HR group numerically intermediate. BD-PRS explained 7.9% of phenotypic variance. PRSs for schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were not significantly different among groups. In the BD group, BD-PRS did not significantly differ in relation to BD subtype, age of onset, psychosis, or family history of BD.

CONCLUSION

BD-PRS derived from adult genome-wide summary statistics is elevated in youth with BD. Absence of significant between-group differences in PRSs for other psychiatric disorders supports the specificity of BD-PRS in youth. These findings add to the biological validation of BD in youth and could have implications for early identification and diagnosis. To enhance clinical utility, future genome-wide association studies that focus specifically on early-onset BD are warranted, as are studies integrating additional genetic and environmental factors.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Polygenic risk scores estimate an individual's genetic susceptibility to develop a disorder, such as bipolar disorder (BD). In this study, the authors constructed polygenic risk scores from previous adult studies. Youth with BD had elevated polygenic risk scores for BD compared to youth without bipolar disorder. Youth at high risk for BD had intermediate polygenic risk scores. To evaluate the specificity of polygenic risk scores for BD, the authors estimated risk scores for other mental health disorders including schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. These other polygenic risk scores did not differ between youth with and without BD. These findings support the biological validation of BD in youth, with potential implications for early identification and diagnosis.

DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT

We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.

Association of healthy lifestyle factors and genetic liability with bipolar disorder: Findings from the UK Biobank

BACKGROUND

The interplay between genetic and lifestyle factors in the development of bipolar disorder (BD) remains unclear.

METHODS

A cohort study was carried out on 365,517 participants from the UK Biobank. Lifestyle scores, based on smoking, physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption, sedentary behavior, sleep duration, and social contact, were grouped as favorable (scores 6-7), intermediate (scores 4-5), or unfavorable (scores 0-3). The BD polygenic risk score (PRS) was also categorized into high, intermediate, and low-risk groups using PRS tertiles. Cox regression models determined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for BD.

RESULTS

During the 12.9-year follow-up, 529 individuals developed BD. Comparing those with favorable lifestyles to those with unfavorable participants, the HR of developing BD was 3.28 (95 % CI, 2.76-3.89). Similarly, individuals with a high PRS had a risk of 3.20 (95 % CI, 2.83-3.63) compared to those with a low PRS. Notably, individuals with both a high PRS and an unfavorable lifestyle had a significantly higher risk of BD (HR = 6.31, 95 % CI, 4.14-9.63) compared to those with a low PRS and a favorable lifestyle. Additionally, the interaction between PRS and lifestyle contributed an additional risk, with a relative excess risk of 1.74 (95 % CI, 0.40-3.07) and an attributable proportion due to the interaction of 0.37 (95 % CI, 0.16-0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that genetic liability for BD, measured as PRS, and lifestyle have an additive effect on the risk of developing BD. A favorable lifestyle was associated with a reduced risk of developing BD.

Putative Risk Biomarkers of Bipolar Disorder in At-risk Youth

Bipolar disorder is a highly heritable and functionally impairing disease. The recognition and intervention of BD especially that characterized by early onset remains challenging. Risk biomarkers for predicting BD transition among at-risk youth may improve disease prognosis. We reviewed the more recent clinical studies to find possible pre-diagnostic biomarkers in youth at familial or (and) clinical risk of BD. Here we found that putative biomarkers for predicting conversion to BD include findings from multiple sample sources based on different hypotheses. Putative risk biomarkers shown by perspective studies are higher bipolar polygenetic risk scores, epigenetic alterations, elevated immune parameters, front-limbic system deficits, and brain circuit dysfunction associated with emotion and reward processing. Future studies need to enhance machine learning integration, make clinical detection methods more objective, and improve the quality of cohort studies.

A review of disease risk prediction methods and applications in the omics era

Risk prediction and disease prevention are the innovative care challenges of the 21st century. Apart from freeing the individual from the pain of disease, it will lead to low medical costs for society. Until very recently, risk assessments have ushered in a new era with the emergence of omics technologies, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and so on, which potentially advance the ability of biomarkers to aid prediction models. While risk prediction has achieved great success, there are still some challenges and limitations. We reviewed the general process of omics-based disease risk model construction and the applications in four typical diseases. Meanwhile, we highlighted the problems in current studies and explored the potential opportunities and challenges for future clinical practice.

Aberrant brain network topology in youth with a familial risk for bipolar disorder: a task-based fMRI connectome study

BACKGROUND

Youth with a family history of bipolar disorder (BD) may be at increased risk for mood disorders and for developing side effects after antidepressant exposure. The neurobiological basis of these risks remains poorly understood. We aimed to identify biomarkers underlying risk by characterizing abnormalities in the brain connectome of symptomatic youth at familial risk for BD.

METHODS

Depressed and/or anxious youth (n = 119, age = 14.9 ± 1.6 years) with a family history of BD but no prior antidepressant exposure and typically developing controls (n = 57, age = 14.8 ± 1.7 years) received functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during an emotional continuous performance task. A generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI) analysis was performed to compare their brain connectome patterns, followed by machine learning of topological metrics.

RESULTS

High-risk youth showed weaker connectivity patterns that were mainly located in the default mode network (DMN) (network weight = 50.1%) relative to controls, and connectivity patterns derived from the visual network (VN) constituted the largest proportion of aberrant stronger pairs (network weight = 54.9%). Global local efficiency (Elocal, p = .022) and clustering coefficient (Cp, p = .029) and nodal metrics of the right superior frontal gyrus (SFG) (Elocal: p < .001; Cp: p = .001) in the high-risk group were significantly higher than those in healthy subjects, and similar patterns were also found in the left insula (degree: p = .004; betweenness: p = .005; age-by-group interaction, p = .038) and right hippocampus (degree: p = .003; betweenness: p = .003). The case-control classifier achieved a cross-validation accuracy of 78.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings of abnormal connectome organization in the DMN and VN may advance mechanistic understanding of risk for BD. Neuroimaging biomarkers of increased network segregation in the SFG and altered topological centrality in the insula and hippocampus in broader limbic systems may be used to target interventions tailored to mitigate the underlying risk of brain abnormalities in these at-risk youth.

Polygenic scores for psychiatric traits mediate the impact of multigenerational history for depression on offspring psychopathology

A family history of depression is a well-documented risk factor for offspring psychopathology. However, the genetic mechanisms underlying the intergenerational transmission of depression remain unclear. We used genetic, family history, and diagnostic data from 11,875 9-10 year-old children from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. We estimated and investigated the children's polygenic scores (PGSs) for 30 distinct traits and their association with a family history of depression (including grandparents and parents) and the children's overall psychopathology through logistic regression analyses. We assessed the role of polygenic risk for psychiatric disorders in mediating the transmission of depression from one generation to the next. Among 11,875 multi-ancestry children, 8,111 participants had matching phenotypic and genotypic data (3,832 female [47.2%]; mean (SD) age, 9.5 (0.5) years), including 6,151 [71.4%] of European ancestry). Greater PGSs for depression (estimate = 0.129, 95% CI = 0.070-0.187) and bipolar disorder (estimate = 0.109, 95% CI = 0.051-0.168) were significantly associated with higher family history of depression (Bonferroni-corrected P < .05). Depression PGS was the only PGS that significantly associated with both family risk and offspring's psychopathology, and robustly mediated the impact of family history of depression on several youth psychopathologies including anxiety disorders, suicidal ideation, and any psychiatric disorder (proportions mediated 1.39%-5.87% of the total effect on psychopathology; FDR-corrected P < .05). These findings suggest that increased polygenic risk for depression partially mediates the associations between family risk for depression and offspring psychopathology, showing a genetic basis for intergenerational transmission of depression. Future approaches that combine assessments of family risk with polygenic profiles may offer a more accurate method for identifying children at elevated risk.

A Plea for Nuance: Should People with a Family History of Bipolar Disorder Be Excluded from Clinical Trials of Psilocybin Therapy?

Background

As the field of psychedelic therapy grows, it is vital to consider who can safely engage with psilocybin therapy. In most modern clinical trials of psilocybin therapy, individuals with a family history of bipolar disorder (BD) have been excluded from participation because of their genetic predisposition for developing BD.

Review

Case studies and survey data shed light on the risks of psilocybin therapy among those with a family history of BD in the absence of data from modern clinical trials. We review existing evidence that could inform risk stratification for these individuals, including genetic proximity to the affected relative, BD type, age at onset in the relative, and participant age. Hypothesizing that the risk of developing BD may predict the risk of developing serious adverse events when engaging with psilocybin therapy, we propose a risk stratification tool to be utilized when determining the relative risks of psilocybin therapy to those with a family history of BD in the context of clinical trials.

Conclusion

Balancing the need for effective treatments against the potential for serious adverse events in those undergoing psilocybin therapy with a family history of BD, we argue for caution in psychedelic clinical trials but not outright exclusion of these individuals. Our risk stratification tool allows for more nuanced inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Annual Research Review: 'There, the dance is - at the still point of the turning world' - dynamic systems perspectives on coregulation and dysregulation during early development

During development we transition from coregulation (where regulatory processes are shared between child and caregiver) to self-regulation. Most early coregulatory interactions aim to manage fluctuations in the infant's arousal and alertness; but over time, coregulatory processes become progressively elaborated to encompass other functions such as sociocommunicative development, attention and executive control. The fundamental aim of coregulation is to help maintain an optimal 'critical state' between hypo- and hyperactivity. Here, we present a dynamic framework for understanding child-caregiver coregulatory interactions in the context of psychopathology. Early coregulatory processes involve both passive entrainment, through which a child's state entrains to the caregiver's, and active contingent responsiveness, through which the caregiver changes their behaviour in response to behaviours from the child. Similar principles, of interactive but asymmetric contingency, drive joint attention and the maintenance of epistemic states as well as arousal/alertness, emotion regulation and sociocommunicative development. We describe three ways in which active child-caregiver regulation can develop atypically, in conditions such as Autism, ADHD, anxiety and depression. The most well-known of these is insufficient contingent responsiveness, leading to reduced synchrony, which has been shown across a range of modalities in different disorders, and which is the target of most current interventions. We also present evidence that excessive contingent responsiveness and excessive synchrony can develop in some circumstances. And we show that positive feedback interactions can develop, which are contingent but mutually amplificatory child-caregiver interactions that drive the child further from their critical state. We discuss implications of these findings for future intervention research, and directions for future work.

The Mood and Resilience in Offspring (MARIO) project: a longitudinal cohort study among offspring of parents with and without a mood disorder

BACKGROUND

One of the most robust risk factors for developing a mood disorder is having a parent with a mood disorder. Unfortunately, mechanisms explaining the transmission of mood disorders from one generation to the next remain largely elusive. Since timely intervention is associated with a better outcome and prognosis, early detection of intergenerational transmission of mood disorders is of paramount importance. Here, we describe the design of the Mood and Resilience in Offspring (MARIO) cohort study in which we investigate: 1. differences in clinical, biological and environmental (e.g., psychosocial factors, substance use or stressful life events) risk and resilience factors in children of parents with and without mood disorders, and 2. mechanisms of intergenerational transmission of mood disorders via clinical, biological and environmental risk and resilience factors.

METHODS

MARIO is an observational, longitudinal cohort study that aims to include 450 offspring of parents with a mood disorder (uni- or bipolar mood disorders) and 100-150 offspring of parents without a mood disorder aged 10-25 years. Power analyses indicate that this sample size is sufficient to detect small to medium sized effects. Offspring are recruited via existing Dutch studies involving patients with a mood disorder and healthy controls, for which detailed clinical, environmental and biological data of the index-parent (i.e., the initially identified parent with or without a mood disorder) is available. Over a period of three years, four assessments will take place, in which extensive clinical, biological and environmental data and data on risk and resilience are collected through e.g., blood sampling, face-to-face interviews, online questionnaires, actigraphy and Experience Sampling Method assessment. For co-parents, information on demographics, mental disorder status and a DNA-sample are collected.

DISCUSSION

The MARIO cohort study is a large longitudinal cohort study among offspring of parents with and without mood disorders. A unique aspect is the collection of granular data on clinical, biological and environmental risk and resilience factors in offspring, in addition to available parental data on many similar factors. We aim to investigate the mechanisms underlying intergenerational transmission of mood disorders, which will ultimately lead to better outcomes for offspring at high familial risk.

Polygenic Risk in Families With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Importance

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a poorly understood cause of acute coronary syndrome that predominantly affects women. Evidence to date suggests a complex genetic architecture, while a family history is reported for a minority of cases.

Objective

To determine the contribution of rare and common genetic variants to SCAD risk in familial cases, the latter via the comparison of a polygenic risk score (PRS) with those with sporadic SCAD and healthy controls.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This genetic association study analyzed families with SCAD, individuals with sporadic SCAD, and healthy controls. Genotyping was undertaken for all participants. Participants were recruited between 2017 and 2021. A PRS for SCAD was calculated for all participants. The presence of rare variants in genes associated with connective tissue disorders (CTD) was also assessed. Individuals with SCAD were recruited via social media or from a single medical center. A previously published control database of older healthy individuals was used. Data were analyzed from January 2022 to October 2023.

Exposures

PRS for SCAD comprised of 7 single-nucleotide variants.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Disease status (familial SCAD, sporadic SCAD, or healthy control) associated with PRS.

Results

A total of 13 families with SCAD (27 affected and 12 unaffected individuals), 173 individuals with sporadic SCAD, and 1127 healthy controls were included. A total of 188 individuals with SCAD (94.0%) were female, including 25 of 27 with familial SCAD and 163 of 173 with sporadic SCAD; of 12 unaffected individuals from families with SCAD, 6 (50%) were female; and of 1127 healthy controls, 672 (59.6%) were female. Compared with healthy controls, the odds of being an affected family member or having sporadic SCAD was significantly associated with a SCAD PRS (where the odds ratio [OR] represents an increase in odds per 1-SD increase in PRS) (affected family member: OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.78-2.50; adjusted P = 1.96 × 10-4; sporadic SCAD: OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.37-1.89; adjusted P = 5.69 × 10-4). This association was not seen for unaffected family members (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.46-1.61; adjusted P = .91) compared with controls. Further, those with familial SCAD were overrepresented in the top quintile of the control PRS distribution (OR, 3.70; 95% CI, 2.93-4.47; adjusted P = .001); those with sporadic SCAD showed a similar pattern (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.98-3.04; adjusted P = .001). Affected individuals within a family did not share any rare deleterious variants in CTD-associated genes.

Conclusions and Relevance

Extreme aggregation of common genetic risk appears to play a significant role in familial clustering of SCAD as well as in sporadic case predisposition, although further study is required.

Aberrant Neurofunctional Responses During Emotional and Attentional Processing Differentiate ADHD Youth With and Without a Family History of Bipolar I Disorder

OBJECTIVE

To compare neurofunctional responses in emotional and attentional networks of psychostimulant-free ADHD youth with and without familial risk for bipolar I disorder (BD).

METHODS

ADHD youth with (high-risk, HR, n = 48) and without (low-risk, LR, n = 50) a first-degree relative with BD and healthy controls (n = 46) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a continuous performance task with emotional distracters. Region-of-interest analyses were performed for bilateral amygdala (AMY), ventrolateral (VLPFC) and dorsolateral (DLPFC) prefrontal cortex, and anterior (ACC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC).

RESULTS

Compared with HC, HR, but not LR, exhibited predominantly left-lateralized AMY, VLPFC, DLPFC, PCC, and rostral ACC hyperactivation to emotional distractors, whereas LR exhibited right VLPFC and bilateral dorsal ACC hypoactivation to attentional targets. Regional responses correlated with emotional and attention symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Aberrant neurofunctional responses during emotional and attentional processing differentiate ADHD youth with and without a family history of BD and correlate with relevant symptoms ratings.

Association of polygenic risk for bipolar disorder with resting-state network functional connectivity in youth with and without bipolar disorder

Little is known regarding the polygenic underpinnings of anomalous resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in youth bipolar disorder (BD). The current study examined the association of polygenic risk for BD (BD-PRS) with whole-brain rsFC at the large-scale network level in youth with and without BD. 99 youth of European ancestry (56 BD, 43 healthy controls [HC]), ages 13-20 years, completed resting-state fMRI scans. BD-PRS was calculated using summary statistics from the latest adult BD genome-wide association study. Data-driven independent component analyses of the resting-state fMRI data were implemented to examine the association of BD-PRS with rsFC in the overall sample, and separately in BD and HC. In the overall sample, higher BD-PRS was associated with lower rsFC of the salience network and higher rsFC of the frontoparietal network with frontal and parietal regions. Within the BD group, higher BD-PRS was associated with higher rsFC of the default mode network with orbitofrontal cortex, and altered rsFC of the visual network with frontal and occipital regions. Within the HC group, higher BD-PRS was associated with altered rsFC of the frontoparietal network with frontal, temporal and occipital regions. In conclusion, the current study found that BD-PRS generated based on adult genetic data was associated with altered rsFC patterns of brain networks in youth. Our findings support the usefulness of BD-PRS to investigate genetically influenced neuroimaging markers of vulnerability to BD, which can be observed in youth with BD early in their course of illness as well as in healthy youth.

Polygenic Risk Scores for Bipolar Disorder: Progress and Perspectives

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a common and highly heritable psychiatric disorder, the study of BD genetic characteristics can help with early prevention and individualized treatment. At the same time, BD is a highly heterogeneous polygenic genetic disorder with significant genetic overlap with other psychiatric disorders. In recent years, polygenic risk scores (PRS) derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data have been widely used in genetic studies of various complex diseases and can be used to explore the genetic susceptibility of diseases. This review discusses phenotypic associations and genetic correlations with other conditions of BD based on PRS, and provides ideas for genetic studies and prevention of BD.

Regional microstructural differences in ADHD youth with and without a family history of bipolar I disorder

BACKGROUND

Having a first-degree relative with bipolar I disorder (BD) in conjunction with prodromal attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may represent a unique phenotype that confers greater risk for developing BD than ADHD alone. However, underlying neuropathoetiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. This cross-sectional study compared regional microstructure in psychostimulant-free ADHD youth with ('high-risk', HR) and without ('low-risk', LR) a first-degree relative with BD, and healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

A total of 140 (high-risk, n = 44; low-risk, n = 49; and HC, n = 47) youth (mean age: 14.1 ± 2.5 years, 65 % male) were included in the analysis. Diffusion tensor images were collected and fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated. Both tract-based and voxel-based analyses were performed. Correlations between clinical ratings and microstructural metrics that differed among groups were examined.

RESULTS

No significant group differences in major long-distance fiber tracts were observed. The high-risk ADHD group exhibited predominantly higher FA and lower MD in frontal, limbic, and striatal subregions compared with the low-risk ADHD group. Both low-risk and high-risk ADHD groups exhibited higher FA in unique and overlapping regions compared with HC subjects. Significant correlations between regional microstructural metrics and clinical ratings were observed in ADHD groups.

LIMITATIONS

Prospective longitudinal studies will be required to determine the relevance of these findings to BD risk progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychostimulant-free ADHD youth with a BD family history exhibit different microstructure alterations in frontal, limbic, and striatal regions compared with ADHD youth without a BD family history, and may therefore represent a unique phenotype relevant to BD risk progression.

Developmental manifestations of polygenic risk for bipolar disorder from infancy to middle childhood

Knowledge on how genetic risk for bipolar disorder manifests in developmental, emotional or behavioral traits during childhood is lacking. This issue is important to address to inform early detection and intervention efforts. We investigated whether polygenic risk for bipolar disorder is associated with developmental outcomes during early to middle childhood in the general population, and if associations differ between boys and girls. Our sample consisted of 28 001 children from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort study, a prospective pregnancy cohort with available genotype and developmental data. Mothers reported on a range of developmental outcomes in their children at 6 and 18 months, 3, 5 and 8 years. Polygenic risk scores reflecting common variant liability to bipolar disorder were calculated. Linear regression models were used in a multi-group framework to investigate associations between polygenic risk score and developmental outcomes, using sex as a grouping variable. We found robust evidence for an association between polygenic risk scores for bipolar disorder and conduct difficulties (β = 0.041, CI = 0.020-0.062) and oppositional defiant difficulties (β = 0.032, CI = 0.014-0.051) at 8 years. Associations with most other outcomes were estimated within the region of practical equivalence to zero (equivalence range D = -0.1 to 0.1), with the exceptions of negative association for activity levels (β = -0.028, CI = -0.047- -0.010) at age 5 and benevolence (β = -0.025, CI = -0.043 to -0.008) at age 8, and positive association for motor difficulties (β = 0.025, CI = 0.008-0.043) at age 3, inattention (β = 0.021, CI = 0.003-0.041) and hyperactivity (β = 0.025, CI = 0.006-0.044) at age 8. Our results suggest that genetic risk for bipolar disorder manifests as disruptive behaviors like oppositional defiant and conduct difficulties in childhood in the general population.

Early Family Intervention for Youth at Risk for Bipolar Disorder: Psychosocial and Neural Mediators of Outcome

BACKGROUND

The impairing neurodevelopmental course of bipolar disorder (BD) suggests the importance of early intervention for youth in the beginning phases of the illness.

OBJECTIVE

We report the results of a 3-site randomized trial of family-focused therapy for youth at high-risk (FFT-HR) for BD, and explore psychosocial and neuroimaging variables as mediators of treatment effects.

METHODS

High-risk youth (<18 years) with major depressive disorder or other specified BD, active mood symptoms, and a family history of BD were randomly assigned to 4 months of FFT-HR (psychoeducation, communication and problem-solving skills training) or 4 months of enhanced care psychoeducation. Adjunctive pharmacotherapy was provided by study psychiatrists. Neuroimaging scans were conducted before and after psychosocial treatments in eligible participants. Independent evaluators interviewed participants every 4-6 months over 1-4 years regarding symptomatic outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 127 youth (mean 13.2 ± 2.6 years) over a median of 98 weeks, FFT-HR was associated with longer intervals prior to new mood episodes and lower levels of suicidal ideation than enhanced care. Reductions in perceived family conflict mediated the effects of psychosocial interventions on the course of mood symptoms. Among 34 participants with pre-/post-treatment fMRI scans, youth in FFT-HR had (a) stronger resting state connectivity between ventrolateral PFC and anterior default mode network, and (b) increased activity of dorsolateral and medial PFC in emotion processing and problem-solving tasks, compared to youth in enhanced care.

CONCLUSION

FFT-HR may delay new mood episodes in symptomatic youth with familial liability to BD. Putative treatment mechanisms include neural adaptations suggestive of improved emotion regulation.

Characteristics and Correlates of Metabolic Syndrome in Adolescents with Unipolar and Bipolar Depression: Results from a Cross-National Inpatient Case-Control Study

Abstract Objectives: To assess characteristics and correlates of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder-depressive episode (BP-d). Methods: Case-control study, using national inpatient sample data, including adolescents (age, 12-18 years) with a primary diagnosis of MDD or BP-d. Using propensity score matching (based on age, sex, and race/ethnicity), we extracted cases with MetS (≥3 of the following conditions: obesity, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension) and controls without MetS. We used a multivariable logistic regression model calculating adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for potential correlates of MetS, focusing on primary mood disorders and psychiatric comorbidities. Results: In 607 age-/sex-/race/ethnicity-matched adolescents (MDD = 83.5%, BP-d = 16.5%), comparing those with (N = 332) versus without MetS (N = 275), MetS was most prevalent in later-age adolescents (mean age 16.3 years), females (58.1%), Whites (40.3%), and Blacks (31.5%). MetS was characterized by obesity (84.9% vs. 3.6%), hypertension (81% vs. 1.8%), diabetes (72.8% vs. 9.1%), and hypercholesterolemia (67.2% vs. 3.6%) (all p < 0.001). MetS was associated with a primary diagnosis of BP-d versus MDD (aOR 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-3.97) and comorbid disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) (aOR 4.45, 95% CI 1.55-12.78), while comorbid substance use disorder reduced MetS risk (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19-0.50). Conclusion: In adolescents with MDD or BP-d, MetS was associated with a primary BP-d diagnosis, and comorbid DBD. MetS-related parameters should be screened for early in adolescents with depression-spectrum disorders aiming to prevent the development or effects of MetS.

The U-shaped relationship between parental age and the risk of bipolar disorder in the offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Parenthood age may affect the risk for the development of different psychiatric disorders in the offspring, including bipolar disorder (BD). The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the relationship between paternal age and risk for BD and to explore the eventual relationship between paternal age and age at onset of BD. We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO online databases for original studies from inception, up to December 2021. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Sixteen studies participated in the qualitative synthesis, of which k = 14 fetched quantitative data encompassing a total of 13,424,760 participants and 217,089 individuals with BD. Both fathers [adjusted for the age of other parent and socioeconomic status odd ratio - OR = 1.29(95%C.I. = 1.13-1.48)] and mothers aged ≤ 20 years [(OR = 1.23(95%C.I. = 1.14-1.33)] had consistently increased odds of BD diagnosis in their offspring compared to parents aged 25-29 years. Fathers aged ≥ 45 years [adjusted OR = 1.29 (95%C.I. = 1.15-1.46)] and mothers aged 35-39 years [OR = 1.10(95%C.I. = 1.01-1.19)] and 40 years or older [OR = 1.2(95% C.I. = 1.02-1.40)] likewise had inflated odds of BD diagnosis in their offspring compared to parents aged 25-29 years. Early and delayed parenthood are associated with an increased risk of BD in the offspring. Mechanisms underlying this association are largely unknown and may involve a complex interplay between psychosocial, genetic and biological factors, and with different impacts according to sex and age range. Evidence on the association between parental age and illness onset is still tentative but it points towards a possible specific effect of advanced paternal age on early BD-onset.

A Double-Blind Randomized Trial to Investigate Mechanisms of Antidepressant-Related Dysfunctional Arousal in Depressed or Anxious Youth at Familial Risk for Bipolar Disorder

Antidepressants are standardly used to treat moderate to severe symptoms of depression and/or anxiety in youth but may also be associated with rare but serious psychiatric adverse events such as irritability, agitation, aggression, or suicidal ideation. Adverse events are especially common in youth with a family history of bipolar disorder (BD) who are at heightened risk for dysfunction in neurobiological systems that regulate emotion and arousal. To further understand this phenomenon, this study will examine (a) baseline risk factors associated with dysfunctional arousal in a sample of youth at high-risk for BD treated with or without an antidepressant, (b) whether antidepressant-related changes in arousal are mediated by changes in prefrontal-limbic circuitry, and (c) whether pharmacogenetic factors influence antidepressant-related changes in arousal. High-risk youth (aged 12-17 years with moderate to severe depressive and/or anxiety symptoms and at least one first-degree relative with bipolar I disorder) will be randomized to receive psychotherapy plus escitalopram or psychotherapy plus placebo. Neuroimaging and behavioral measures of arousal will be collected prior to randomization and at 4 weeks. Samples for pharmacogenetic analysis (serum escitalopram concentration, CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype, and HTR2A and SLC6A4 genotypes) will be collected at 8 weeks. Youth will be followed for up to 16 weeks to assess change in arousal measures.