Serum chromogranin A: early detection of hormonal resistance in prostate cancer patients

Comparison of two chromogranin A assays and investigation of nonlinear specimens

Background

As a marker for functional and non-functional neuroendocrine tumors, serum chromogranin A (CgA) concentrations have shown value for detecting and monitoring disease. Here we describe a comparison between an established micro-titer plate assay (Cisbio CgA ELISA) and an analyzer-based assay (B·R·A·H·M·S CgA II KRYPTOR). Reference limits were established along with a performance evaluation of the KRYPTOR assay. Nonlinearity observed in approximately 0.03% of patients was also investigated.

Methods

Samples were tested according to kit manufacturer's protocols. Reference limits were established for both assays testing the same cohort of healthy volunteers. Potential causes of nonlinearity investigated were HAMA, macromolecule effects and elevated serum creatinine.

Results

KRYPTOR vs. Cisbio: slope=0.692, y-intercept=−40.0 (r²=0.967, n=186). Upper reference limits were 160 and 103 ng/mL for the Cisbio and KRYPTOR assays, respectively. Linearity: slope=1.012 (r²=0.998) with 95.0–105.5% recoveries. Precision: repeatability ≤2.4%, within-laboratory ≤3.1% (79 and 738 ng/mL). Limit of detection: 8 ng/mL. Strong nonlinear specimens (n=6) retested for HAMA interference generated differences (block-no block) ranging −3.2–4.2%. Polyethylene glycol precipitation recoveries ranged from 157 to >5714% for affected specimens versus 71–79% for normal specimens. Eight of 14 nonlinear specimens (57%) had elevated serum creatinine results (>1.20 mg/dL).

Conclusions

The CgA II KRYPTOR assay performs acceptably for quantifying CgA in human serum. While adequate correlation is observed against the Cisbio ELISA, there is significant disagreement overall. Efforts to identify a cause of the nonlinearity observed in a small percentage of patients were inconclusive, but neither HAMA interference, macromolecule effects nor renal failure appear as major factors.

•

The Cisbio Chromoa® ELISA is a well-established assay for measuring chromogranin A.

•

The CgA II KRYPTOR® performs acceptably for quantifying chromogranin A in serum.

•

Studies of the CgA II KRYPTOR vs. the established Cisbio Chomoa ELISA are lacking.

•

Agreement between the Cisbio Chromoa CgA ELISA and the CgA II KRYPTOR is suboptimal.

•

Causes for the nonlinearity in approximately 0.02–0.03% of specimens remain unclear.

Xenografts on nude mouse diaphragm of human DU145 prostate carcinoma cells: mesothelium removal by outgrowths and angiogenesis

Human prostate carcinoma DU145 cells, androgen-independent malignant cells, implanted in the athymic nu/nu male mouse, developed numerous tumors on peritoneal and retro-peritoneal organs whose growth aspects and vascular supply have yet to be investigated with fine structure techniques. A series of necropsies from moribund implanted mice diaphragms were examined with light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy. DU145 xenografts installations, far away from the implanted site, were described as the smallest installation to large diaphragm outgrowths in moribund mice. Carcinomas did not show extracellular matrix and, reaching more than 0.15 mm in thickness, they revealed new structures in these outgrowths. Voids to be gland-like structures with mediocre secretion and, unexpectedly, intercellular spaces connected with fascicles of elongated DU145 cells that merged with a vascular supply originated from either the tumor cells and/or some perimysium vessels. In the largest carcinomas, most important vascular invasions coincidently accompanied the mouse lethality, similarly to human cancers. This androgen-independent model would be useful to study tumor outgrowth's changes related to testing anticancer strategy, including anti-angiogenic therapies involving toxicity, simultaneously with those of other vital organs with combined biomolecular and fine structure techniques.

Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Prostatic Malignancy

Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic malignancy is receiving considerable attention; this occurs commonly as a “focal” histological variant and, most rarely, in the form of small cell carcinoma (“oat cell carcinoma”) and carcinoid tumor. In prostate cancer, neuroendocrine differentiation may be the response to androgen deprivation and neuroendocrine products, either biogenic amines or peptides, have been shown to stimulate proliferation of androgen-ablation refractory cancer cells. Serum chromogranins, neuron-specific enolase and other neuroendocrine products as well as 111-In-chromogranin A “three step” immunoscintigraphy and somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy may be useful for predicting tumor behaviour and patient prognosis.

Several of the neuroendocrine products, particularly somatostatin analogues, are candidates for new therapeutic approaches. The paper aims to outline the advances in this field on the basis of the review of the literature.

Prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate adenocarcinoma

Much progress has been made toward an understanding of the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC) and the factors that drive the development of androgen independence. Neuroendocrine (NE) cells may provide an intriguing link between NE cell differentiation (NED) and tumor progression in PC. NED in PC generally confers a more aggressive clinical behavior and less favorable prognosis than conventional PC. In this article, we review the known functions of NE cells in PC and discuss the current knowledge on stimulation of cancer proliferation, invasion, apoptosis resistance, serum and immunohistochemical markers, and the prognostic significance of NED in human PC.

Dual blockade of PKA and NF-κB inhibits H2 relaxin-mediated castrate-resistant growth of prostate cancer sublines and induces apoptosis

We previously demonstrated that H2 relaxin (RLN2) facilitates castrate-resistant (CR) growth of prostate cancer (CaP) cells through PI3K/Akt/β-catenin-mediated activation of the androgen receptor (AR) pathway. As inhibition of this pathway caused only ~50% reduction in CR growth, the goal of the current study was to identify additional RLN2-activated pathways that contribute to CR growth. Next-generation sequencing-based transcriptome and gene ontology analyses comparing LNCaP stably transfected with RLN2 versus LNCaP-vector identified differential expression of genes associated with cell proliferation (12.7% of differentially expressed genes), including genes associated with the cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A (cAMP/PKA) and nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) pathways. Subsequent molecular analyses confirmed that the cAMP/PKA and NF-κB pathways play a role in facilitating H2 relaxin-mediated CR growth of CaP cells. Inhibition of PKA-attenuated RLN2-mediated AR activity inhibited proliferation and caused a small but significant increase in apoptosis. Combined inhibition of the PKA and NF-κB signaling pathways via inhibition of PKA and Akt induced significant apoptosis and dramatically reduced clonogenic potential, outperforming docetaxel, the standard of care treatment for CR CaP. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays in combination with multispectral quantitative imaging comparing RLN2 levels in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and CaP determined that RLN2 is significantly upregulated in CaP vs BPH (p = 0.002). The combined data indicate RLN2 overexpression is frequent in CaP patients and provides a growth advantage to CaP cells. A near-complete inhibition of RLN2-induced CR growth can be achieved by simultaneous blockade of both pathways.

[Current diagnostic procedure on neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer]

Chromogranin A (CgA) is considered as a major specific neuroendocrine tumor marker. It belongs to the secretogranin family, which is present in the gastrointestinal tract, respiratory system, endocrine glands and in a group of endocrine cells such us pancreas and thyroid. Serum levels of CgA could reflect the neuroendocrine activity and could be used when evaluating advance prostate carcinoma. Moreover, there are also several factors that may increase the serum level of CgA: treatment with proton-pump inhibitors or H2-receptor blockers, chronic atrophic gastritis, rheumatoid arthritis, liver and renal failure. Another method to evaluate NE differentiation is scintigraphy with the 111In-labeled somatostatin analogue (DTPA-D-Phe)-octrotide, (Octreoscan). This method takes advantage of the overexpression of type II somatostatin receptors on the cell surface of NE tumors. With this technique the presence of NE differentiation can be detected both at the primary (prostate) and the metastatic sites. A more specific system to detect NE cell activity is obtained by analyzing CgA gene expression in prostate tissue by a semi-quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Neuroendocrine differentiation in the progression of prostate cancer

Neuroendocrine (NE) cells originally exist in the normal prostate acini and duct, regulating prostatic growth, differentiation and secretion. Clusters of malignant NE cells are found in most prostate cancer (PCa) cases. NE differentiation (NED) is the basic character of the prostate, either benign or malignant. NE cells hold certain peptide hormones or pro-hormones, which affect the target cells by endocrine, paracrine, autocrine and neuroendocrine transmission in an androgen-independent fashion due to the lack of androgen receptor. NED is accessed by immunohistochemical staining or measurement of serum levels of NE markers. The extent of NED is associated with progression and prognosis of PCa. Chromogranin A (CGA) is the most important NE marker. In metastatic PCa, pretreatment serum CGA levels can be a predictor for progression and survival after endocrine therapy. It is recommended to measure longitudinal change in serum CGA. The NE pathway can also be a therapeutic target.

Aberrant activation of androgen receptor in a new neuropeptide-autocrine model of androgen-insensitive prostate cancer

Treatment of advanced prostate cancer with androgen deprivation therapy inevitably renders the tumors castration-resistant and incurable. Under these conditions, neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer (CaP) cells is often detected and neuropeptides released by these cells may facilitate the development of androgen independence. Exemplified by gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), these neuropeptides transmit their signals through G protein-coupled receptors, which are often overexpressed in prostate cancer, and aberrantly activate androgen receptor (AR) in the absence of androgen. We developed an autocrine neuropeptide model by overexpressing GRP in LNCaP cells and the resultant cell line, LNCaP-GRP, exhibited androgen-independent growth with enhanced motility in vitro. When orthotopically implanted in castrated nude mice, LNCaP-GRP produced aggressive tumors, which express GRP, prostate-specific antigen, and nuclear-localized AR. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies of LNCaP-GRP clones suggest that GRP activates and recruits AR to the cognate promoter in the absence of androgen. A Src family kinase (SFK) inhibitor, AZD0530, inhibits androgen-independent growth and migration of the GRP-expressing cell lines, and blocks the nuclear translocation of AR, indicating the involvement of SFK in the aberrant activation of AR and demonstrating the potential use of SFK inhibitor in the treatment of castration-resistant CaP. In vivo studies have shown that AZD0530 profoundly inhibits tumor metastasis in severe combined immunodeficient mice implanted with GRP-autocrine LNCaP cells. This xenograft model shows autocrine, neuropeptide- and Src kinase-mediated progression of androgen-independent CaP postcastration, and is potentially useful for testing novel therapeutic agents.

Detection of carcinomas in an asymptomatic Chinese population: advantage of screening with multiple tumor markers

A total of 73,443 asymptomatic individuals were screened on a voluntary basis for cancer at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan using a panel of tumor markers, including alpha fetoprotein (AFP), CA 125, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), prostate specific antigen (PSA), chromogranin A (CgA), and squamous cell specific antigen (SCC). The results are derived from data collected from January 1998 to October 2003. A total of 210 cancers (approximately 0.3%) were detected, including cancers of the liver, lung, colon, prostate, stomach, pancreas, breast, cervix, ovary, and bladder. Of the tumor markers monitored, elevated CA 19-9, CEA, and CA 125 were the most frequently detected in a variety of cancers. It was surprising to find that many cancers were not detected by their dominant markers but by the elevation of tumor markers not recommended for monitoring their tumor activity. Screening with multiple circulating tumor markers provides improved sensitivity for cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals before they reach the fatal advanced stage. Screening with multiple tumor markers also allows cancers to be detected in the absence of their dominant markers. If we had not measured the multiple tumor markers, these cancers would have gone undetected.

Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: a sheep in wolf's clothing?

Neuroendocrine differentiation of the prostate is often associated with a dismal prognosis. Whilst it is relatively rare compared with other forms of prostate cancer, it nevertheless remains difficult to treat these cancers effectively and to maintain a durable response. Research aimed at understanding the complexity of neuroendocrine differentiation of the prostate has been conducted for some time. The cells involved in this process secrete a variety of factors that can influence growth patterns and regulatory pathways. Many of these factors can be monitored serologically, but the relationship between the biology of the tumor and clinical response is often discordant. This review outlines the difficulties in treating this disease, both at the time of diagnosis and in the metastatic setting, and focuses on an area of research that remains challenging to both the researcher and clinician.

New perspective in the management of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate adenocarcinoma

In this review, we will present some of the information that is known about neuroendocrine (NE) cells and differentiation in the prostate. We will then speculate on the potential role that NE differentiation in prostate carcinoma may play and how this differentiation may be clinically analysed and treated. The androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer can be caused by different mechanisms; one of these is receptor-specific paracrine or autocrine growth modulation of human prostatic cancer cells by neuropeptides secreted by NE cells. Our results affirm that different methods of androgen deprivation can influence the serum chromogranin A (CgA) levels to different extents in prostate cancer. In particular, bicalutamide produces a significantly lower increase in serum CgA compared with castration therapy. In the light of other evidence that supports a significant relationship between serum CgA levels, tissue CgA expression and NE activity, we hypothesise that bicalutamide may reduce the risk of NE cell hyperactivation in prostate cancer. It is important to determine whether increases in CgA levels and NE cell activation are associated with progression towards hormone-independent prostate cancer. We recently proposed as therapy of NE activation in hormone-independent prostate cancer, a combination of oestrogens and somatostatin analogues. The combination of ethinyl estradiol and lanreotide had a favourable toxicity profile, offered objective and symptomatic responses in patients with limited treatment options and refractoriness to conventional hormonal therapy strategies and, in particular, offered a median overall survival that was superior to the 10-month median survival in patients with hormone refractory disease. This combination therapy also sustains the novel concept in cancer treatment in which therapies may target not only cancer cells but also its microenvironment in combination, which can confer protection from apoptosis.

Constitutive activation of gp130 leads to neuroendocrine differentiation in vitro and in vivo

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation in prostate tumors has been correlated with androgen independent disease and increased risk of death. In vitro, IL-6 initiates NE differentiation utilizing the signal transduction initiated by the interaction with IL-6R alpha and gp130. In this study we analysed the NE differentiation process in vitro and in vivo using the LNCaP androgen dependent cell line via ligand independent induction of NE differentiation.

METHODS

LNCaP cells were transfected with a constitutively active gp130 subunit, gp130act. Cell proliferation rate was determined and clones were examined for neuroendocrine differentiation by morphological change, upregulation of CgA and serotonin and formation of dense core vesicles with LNCaP parental cells as the control. Xenograft formation was examined and compared in immunocompromised mice.

RESULTS

Gp130act expression promoted significant neuroendocrine differentiation in vitro as determined by a NE like morphology change (increased neurite like extension formation), elevated CgA expression and the formation of dense core vesicles (DCV). These measures concurred with those examined in LNCaP cells following 100 ng/ml IL-6 treatment. Further investigation of the LNCaP gp130act cells in vivo, in immunocompromised androgen intact mice, confirmed that the NE like morphology, as determined by histological and high resolution transmission electron microscopy, was maintained.

CONCLUSIONS

NE differentiation was initiated by the expression of gp130act in a ligand independent manner, highlighting the importance of gp130 in the neuroendocrine differentiation process. Further investigation of upregulated/downregulated gene expression in these cells may provide valuable insight into the NE differentiation process.

Augmented expression of chromogranin A and serotonin in peri-malignant benign prostate epithelium as compared to adenocarcinoma

There is a growing body of evidence that the occurrence of neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation in prostate carcinoma correlates with poor prognosis, tumor progression, and androgen-independence. In the present study, the expression of common NE markers, i.e., chromogranin A (ChGA), serotonin (5HT), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and adrenomedullin (AM), was retrospectively examined in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded prostate tissue samples obtained from patients with adenocarcinoma and from patients with nodular hyperplasia of the prostatic gland (NHPG) (33 and 28, respectively). The statistical analysis of the results (tested the equality of matched pairs of observations using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test) revealed a more prominent expression of ChGA in benign epithelial cells adjacent to adenocarcinomatic lesions (Peri-PAC) than in the adenocarcinoma (PAC) (p = 0.0049). A similar pattern of expression was detected for 5HT (p = 0.000). When comparing the expression of ChGA and 5HT in tissue samples originating in cancer patients with those obtained from NHPG samples, more ChGA and 5HT were expressed in Peri-PAC than in NHPG (p = 0.0004 and 0.002, respectively). The results obtained raise the possibility that adenocarcinoma cells urge some adjacent benign epithelial cells to differentiate into NE cells, which, in turn, may promote tumor growth and invasion.

Detection of Prostate Cancer and Predicting Progression

Carcinoma of the prostate is the second leading cause of male cancer-related death in the United States. Better indicators of prostate cancer presence and progression are needed to avoid unnecessary treatment, predict disease course, and develop more effective therapy. Numerous molecular markers have been described in human serum, urine, seminal fluid, and histological specimens that exhibit varying capacities to detect prostate cancer and predict disease course. However, to date, few of these markers have been adequately validated for clinical use. The purpose of this review is to examine the current status of these markers in prostate cancer and to assess the diagnostic potential for future markers from identified genes and molecules that display loss, mutation, or alteration in expression between tumor and normal prostate tissues. In this review we cite 91 molecular markers that display some level of correlation with prostate cancer presence, disease progression, cancer recurrence, prediction of response to therapy, and/or disease-free survival. We suggest criteria to consider when selecting a marker for further development as a clinical tool and discuss five examples of markers (chromogranin A, glutathione S-transferase pi 1, prostate stem cell antigen, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and telomerase reverse transcriptase) that fulfill some of these criteria. Finally, we discuss how to conduct evaluations of candidate prostate cancer markers and some of the issues involved in the validation process.

Somatostatin receptors: from basic science to clinical approach. Unlabeled somatostatin analogues-1: Prostate cancer

Neuroendocrine cells have been found in all the stages of prostate cancer, but their clinical significance is not completely understood. Neuroendocrine cells are androgen receptor- and prostate-specific antigen-negative, do not proliferate, and secrete many neuropeptides, such as chromogranin A. Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer correlates with an advancing tumour stage, poor prognosis and tumour progression after androgen deprivation. Furthermore, neuroendocrine phenotype is associated with the increased expression of neo-angiogenesis and vascular endothelial growth factor and with an over-expression of survivin, a new anti-apoptosis protein. Chromogranin A is the quantitatively major secretory protein of the vesicles inside neuroendocrine prostate cells and it is the marker most frequently used to detect neuroendocrine features, both in tissues and in general circulation. Tumours displaying neuroendocrine phenotype tend to be more aggressive and resistant to hormone-therapy. Neuroendocrine differentiation seems to be a dynamic phenomenon: in vitro and in vivo data suggest that it can be induced by androgen suppression. Moreover, the differences in the expression of somatostatin receptors between primary and hormone-refractory prostate cancer are likely to be related to the changes in neuroendocrine phenotype during androgen deprivation. Circulating chromogranin A levels seem to be scarcely affected by endocrine- and chemotherapy, while they significantly decreased after treatment with somatostatin analogs.

Elevated serum progastrin-releasing peptide (31-98) in metastatic and androgen-independent prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Increases in neuroendocrine phenotype and secretory products are closely correlated with tumor progression and androgen independence in prostate cancer. In this study, we explored this correlation using serum progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), a carboxy-terminal region common to three subtypes of precursors for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), which is released from the neuroendocrine phenotype to act as a growth factor.

METHODS

In 60 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 200 with prostate cancer, serum ProGRP levels were determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit and evaluated in relation to clinical stage, hormonal treatment, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. Fourteen randomly selected patients were entered in the follow-up study. Additionally, expression of ProGRP as determined by immunohistochemical analysis was compared to that of chromogranin-A (CgA) in tissue samples from several subjects.

RESULTS

We found a positive correlation between PSA and ProGRP in patients with untreated prostate cancer; no correlation was found in the treated groups. The increases in the ProGRP value and in the percentage of patients with higher than normal values were significant (P < 0.0001), especially in the androgen-independent group (P < 0.0001). A longitudinal study showed that, in a subset of patients, the ProGRP values tended to increase transiently when the cancer became androgen independent, but remained unchanged or decreased at the androgen-dependent stage. Positive staining for ProGRP occurred in a different distribution in neuroendocrine tissues than that of staining for CgA.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical results demonstrated the existence of a regulatory mechanism for GRP, which to date had only been observed in cell lines. These findings suggest that GRP is a growth factor potentially upregulated by androgen but that does not rely principally on androgen modulation. The large overlap in levels of ProGRP among the groups limits the use of this value as a monitoring tool. Measurement of ProGRP, however, does have potential as an independent parameter to evaluate androgen-independent progression and to facilitate a new therapeutic strategy that may compensate for current limitations of diagnosis based on PSA alone.

Potential clinical value of circulating chromogranin A in patients with prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation of prostate adenocarcinoma has received increasing attention in recent years as a result of possible implications for prognosis and therapy. The presence of NE tumor subpopulation can be gauged non invasively by measuring circulating levels of secretory products, primarily chromogranin A (CgA).

METHODS

This article provides a review on published papers evaluating circulating CgA in prostate cancer patients.

RESULTS

Circulating CgA levels were found to be higher in prostate cancer patients than in patients with benign or pre-malignant prostatic diseases. In patients with malignancy, they correlated either to the stage of disease or to the condition of hormone refractoriness. CgA levels did not correlate with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and were supranormal in the majority of advanced patients with PSA within normality. In hormone refractory cases, elevated CgA was a significant predictor of poor prognosis, independently from serum PSA. CgA values were not substantially affected by either endocrine therapy or chemotherapy. They were found to increase during androgen deprivation in some cases and this trend preceded that of PSA. The administration of a somatostatin analog in hormone refractory cases was able to reduce plasma CgA values consistently.

CONCLUSIONS

Present data suggest a potential role of circulating CgA in the management of prostate cancer patients. CgA determination may be useful diagnostically and prognostically and could offer complementary information with respect to PSA. Serial evaluation of circulating CgA could provide information on changes in the NE phenotype expression as a consequence of tumor progression and/or treatment administration.

Chromogranin a concentration as a serum marker to predict prognosis after endocrine therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Chromogranin A is gaining acceptance as a serum marker of neuroendocrine tumors and the concentration is thought to be elevated in relation to neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer. We examined the significance of the chromogranin A level as a serum marker for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum chromogranin A values were determined by monoclonal immunoradiometric assay in 108 patients with prostate cancer before treatment and in 66 with benign prostatic hyperplasia. In those with prostate cancer clinicopathological parameters, the response to endocrine therapy and the prognosis were evaluated in relation to serum chromogranin A.

RESULTS

Mean serum chromogranin A plus or minus standard deviation in prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia cases was 59.4 +/- 52.5 and 59.3 +/- 44.3 ng./ml., respectively (not significant). Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was associated with higher chromogranin A than well differentiated disease (p = 0.044). Of the stage D cases with a median prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 172.1 ng./ml. or less those with higher chromogranin A had a poorer prognosis than those with lower chromogranin A. In contrast, in stage D cases with a PSA of greater than 172.1 ng./ml. there was no difference in the prognosis between the higher and lower chromogranin A groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum chromogranin A tends to be elevated in patients with high grade prostate cancer. When combined with PSA, this marker may effectively predict a poor prognosis after endocrine therapy.

Serum chromogranin-A in advanced prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the value of serum chromogranin A (CgA), a marker of neuroendocrine differentiation, for monitoring prostate cancer: CgA levels were related to three other tumour markers, i.e. total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), neurone-specific enolase (NSE), and to testosterone, to assess the importance of hormone withdrawal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serum samples (218) were obtained from 118 patients with prostate cancer, including 111 patients with advanced prostate cancer: 103 presented to our centre for systemic radionuclide therapy of painful skeletal metastases. CgA concentrations were measured using a new immunoradiometric assay (IRMA: Cis Bio International, Gif sur Yvette, France) and a threshold of 70 ng/mL was determined after receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Testosterone was also measured with an IRMA assay; tPSA, PAP and NSE were assayed using the time-resolved amplified cryptate emission.

RESULTS

Serum marker levels were high in 64% of the patients for CgA, 24% for NSE, 89% for tPSA and 81% for PAP. Patients resistant to endocrine treatments and with elevated tPSA (i.e. hormone-independent) showed increased CgA and NSE in 62% and 29%, respectively. Patients with hormone-dependent prostate cancer (i.e. with a normal tPSA level) had elevated CgA in 59% but no abnormal NSE. All patients of the latter group except one showed clinical progression of their disease. However, the mean (SD) concentrations of CgA in hormone-independent (146) or hormone-dependent (22) patients, at 185.3 (449.1) and 160.9 (293.9) ng/mL, respectively, were not statistically different (P=0.8, Mann-Whitney U-test). For 30 patients, blood samples were drawn and markers measured before and after systemic radionuclide therapy. There was a significant increase in the CgA and tPSA concentrations after treatment (P=0.0146 and 0.0025, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In association with tPSA, serum CgA appears to be a promising marker for monitoring patients with prostate cancer.

Prostate carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: case report and literature review

Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic carcinomas generally confers a more aggressive clinical behavior and less favorable prognosis than usual prostatic carcinomas. In this manuscript, we report a case of a 58-year-old man with prostatic carcinoma who died 1 year after initial diagnosis. Autopsy showed a disseminated prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. There were metastasis to the spleen, an organ infrequently involved by disseminated epithelial neoplasms. Neuroendocrine differentiation was demonstrated by immunohistochemical studies in the biopsy and autopsy material.

Characterization of serum and urinary chromogranin A by size exclusion chromatography: impact on calibrator selection and urinary assay

Serum chromogranin A (CgA) is a useful marker for neuroendocrine tumors and is detectable in carcinomas at advanced stages. Elevated serum CgA is also an indicator of poor prognosis in prostate cancer and is useful for predicting the failure of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer patients. We found that CgA molecules with three different sizes could be detected in normal human serum. However, only the largest CgA molecule appears in patients with liver disease. Serum taken from cancer patients is composed predominantly of the middle-sized molecule, whereas the smallest CgA molecule was elevated in serum drawn from renal patients. Moreover, only the smallest CgA molecule was found in urine. We believe that the largest CgA molecule is metabolized by the liver, whereas the smallest CgA molecule is removed from the blood circulation via the kidney. Because the medium-sized CgA is the dominant molecule in both the cell medium of the tumor cell line SK-N-AS and sera from patients with malignant diseases, CgA from the cell medium was selected as the calibrator for the CgA ELISA assay. Our findings also suggest that it would not be possible to measure the urinary CgA to reflect the serum CgA concentration in order to detect pheochromocytoma among patients with hypertension.

Neuroendocrine cells in human prostate over-express the anti-apoptosis protein survivin

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation may be related to the growth and progression of prostate cancer, especially androgen-insensitive tumors. Recently the over-expression of a new anti-apoptosis protein, survivin, has attracted attention for its potential implication in many human cancers. The fact that NE cells in prostate are bcl-2 negative prompted us to investigate if the prostatic NE cells over-express survivin.

METHODS

Double immunohistochemical staining and immunofluorescence of chromogranin A (CgA) and survivin were performed in 57 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TDT)-mediated dUTP-digoxigenin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) method was used for apoptosis detection in three prostate cancer specimens with NE differentiation. The relationship between NE differentiation and clinicopathological characteristics, disease progression as well as patient survival, were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

It was found that NE cells in both benign and malignant prostate tissues over-expressed the anti-apoptosis protein survivin. While apoptosis was detected in non-NE epithelial cells, all NE cells were negative for apoptosis detection. During the period of follow-up, 17 (63%) of 27 patients with NE differentiation had prostate cancer progression, while 12 (40%) of 30 patients without NE differentiation had systemic prostate cancer progression. 10 (37%) of 27 patients with NE differentiation died from prostate cancer during the period of follow up, while 6 (20%) of 30 patients without NE differentiation died from prostate cancer. However, none of these characteristics reached statistical significance, probably because of the small number of cases enrolled.

CONCLUSIONS

This study discovers that all the prostatic NE cells express the new anti-apoptosis protein survivin. This provides a strong molecular basis for the hypothesis that NE cells may endure stressful conditions and escape from apoptosis. While our results suggest a trend of NE differentiation with poorer prognosis, the prognosis implication cannot be concluded due to our small sample size.

Circulating neuroendocrine markers in patients with prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Circulating neuroendocrine markers were measured in patients with prostate carcinoma (PC), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) with the goal to: 1) evaluate the differences in the expression of these markers in patients with benign, premalignant, and primary or metastatic PC; 2) evaluate their prognostic significance; 3) compare values in patients with hormone-naive and hormone-refractory disease; and 4) assess changes after androgen deprivation or chemotherapy.

METHODS

Serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) (immunoradiometric assay) and plasma chromogranin A (CgA) (enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay) were evaluated in 141 patients with BPH, 54 patients with PIN, and 159 patients with PC; 119 patients were bearing hormone-naive disease and 40 were bearing hormone-refractory disease. CgA was monitored in 31 patients submitted to androgen deprivation and in 24 patients receiving chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Supranormal CgA was observed more frequently in patients with American Urologic Association (AUA) Stage D2 disease (45.5%) compared with those with Stage D1 disease (33.3%), Stage C disease (16.7%), Stage A/B disease (18.8%), PIN (25.9%), and BPH (17.0%) (P < 0.02). Supranormal NSE did not change in any of the patient subgroups. Elevated CgA was observed in 36.0% of patients with metastases who had hormone-naive disease and in 45.0% of patients with hormone-refractory disease (P value not significant). Supranormal NSE and CgA values were predictors for poor prognosis in patients with hormone-refractory disease. Elevated baseline CgA values decreased > 50% in 1 of 12 patients who received luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs and in 2 of 12 patients who underwent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

CgA appears to reflect the neuroendocrine activity of PC better than NSE. Elevated CgA values correlate with poor prognosis and are scarcely influenced by either endocrine therapy or chemotherapy.