Indium-111 monoclonal antibody B72.3 scintigraphy in colorectal cancer. Correlation with computed tomography, surgery, histopathology, immunohistology, and human immune response

Monoclonal immunoscintigraphy for detection of metastasis and recurrence of colorectal cancer

AIM: To assess the clinical role of monoclonal immunoscintigraphy for the detection of metastasis and recurrence of colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Monoclonal immunoscintigraphy was performed in patients operated on for colorectal adenocarcinoma suspected of local recurrence and metastatic disease. The results were compared with conventional diagnostics.

RESULTS: Immunoscintigraphic investigation was done in 53 patients. Tumor recurrence occurred in 38 patients, and was confirmed by other diagnostic modalities in 35. In 15 patients, immunoscintigraphic findings were negative, and confirmed in 14 with other diagnostic methods. Comparative analysis confirmed good correlation of immunoscintigraphic findings and the results of conventional diagnostics and the level of tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen. Statistical analysis of parameters of radiopharmaceutical groups imacis, indimacis and oncoscint presented homogenous characteristics all of three radiopharmaceuticals. The analysis of immunoscintigraphic target focus was clearly improved using tomography.

CONCLUSION: Immunoscintigraphy is highly specific and has a good predictive value in local recurrence of colorectal cancer.

Immunogenicity of engineered antibodies

Administration of a therapeutic antibody can lead to an anti-antibody response (AAR). Much effort has been applied to engineering antibodies with as little as possible non-human structure to minimize such responses. Here, we review reported AAR to murine, mouse-human chimeric, and humanized antibodies. Replacement of mouse immunoglobulin constant regions with human ones effects the largest immunogenicity reduction. Humanization of variable domains effects a further decrease.

Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a meta-analysis to compare current noninvasive imaging methods (ultrasonography [US], computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance [MR] imaging, and (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG] positron emission tomography [PET]) in the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE literature search and review of article bibliographies and our institutional charts of patients with colorectal cancer identified data with histopathologic correlation or at least 6 months of patient follow-up. Two authors independently abstracted data sets and excluded data without contingency tables or data published more than once. Summary-weighted estimates of sensitivity were obtained and stratified according to specificity of less than 85% or 85% and higher. A covariate analysis was used to evaluate the influence of patient- or study-related factors on sensitivity.

RESULTS

Among 111 data sets, nine US (509 patients), 25 CT (1,747 patients), 11 MR imaging (401 patients), and nine PET (423 patients) data sets met the inclusion criteria. In studies with a specificity higher than 85%, the mean weighted sensitivity was 55% (95% CI: 41, 68) for US, 72% (95% CI: 63, 80) for CT, 76% (95% CI: 57, 91) for MR imaging, and 90% (95% CI: 80, 97) for FDG PET. Results of pairwise comparison between imaging modalities demonstrated a greater sensitivity of FDG PET than US (P =.001), CT (P =.017), and MR imaging (P =.055).

CONCLUSION

At equivalent specificity, FDG PET is the most sensitive noninvasive imaging modality for the diagnosis of hepatic metastases from colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers.

Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of malignancy: basic concepts and recent developments

Antibodies have long been considered to be potential anticancer agents because of their specificity for cell-membrane antigens. Applications of hybridoma and recombinant DNA technology have led to the production of unlimited quantities of clinical-grade murine, chimeric, and humanized monoclonal antibodies for clinical use. Whole antibodies may produce anticancer effects in conjunction with the immune system by interaction with complement proteins and/or effector cells via the Fc portion of the antibody molecule. Antibodies may also neutralize circulating ligands or block cell membrane receptors and thus interrupt ligand/receptor interactions and signal transduction that are associated with proliferative or anti-apoptotic effects. The anti-idiotype network cascade provides a rationale for antibodies as vaccine therapy. Antibodies may also serve as the guiding or targeting system for other cytotoxic pharmaceutical products such as (i) radiolabeled antibodies for radioimmunodetection and radioimmunotherapy; (ii) immunotoxins; (iii) chemotherapy/antibody conjugates; (iv) cytokine/antibody conjugates; and (v) immune cell/antibody conjugates. After years of anticipation, as of late 1999 there were four monoclonal antibodies that had been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration based on activity against human malignancy, all of which are in widespread clinical use. Several other products are in various stages of clinical trial testing. Monoclonal antibodies have joined interferon-alpha, interleukin-2 (IL-2), and various hematopoietic growth factors as well-established components of biological therapy, the fourth modality of cancer treatment.

A thousand points of light or just dim bulbs? Radiolabeled antibodies and colorectal cancer imaging

Radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) is coming into its own as an imaging modality in clinical oncology. Early experience with indium-111-labeled intact murine monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) in colorectal cancer suggested that RIS images hepatic metastases poorly. Moreover, an antimurine immune response was frequently provoked, precluding multiple follow-up RIS studies in individual patients due to reticuloendothelial sequestration of the radioimmunoconjugate before tumor targeting could occur. Recent trials of technetium-99m-labeled antibody fragments and human MoAbs have demonstrated significant improvement in imaging efficacy, and repeated or serial imaging is possible because of the absence of associated immunogenicity. RIS is demonstrably more sensitive than conventional diagnostic modalities (CDM) such as computed tomography (CT) for detection of extrahepatic abdominal and pelvic colorectal carcinoma and is complementary to CDM in imaging liver metastases. In a surgical decision-making analysis comparing CT, RIS (IMMU-4 99mTc-Fab'; CEA-Scan), and CT plus RIS in patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer, CT plus RIS improved correct prediction of resectability by 40% and correct prediction of unresectability by 100% compared with CT alone. At the present time, RIS used in combination with CDM contributes an incremental improvement in diagnostic accuracy in colorectal cancer patients with known or suspected recurrent disease. Basic and clinical research currently in progress promises to yield agents and methods that provide rapid high-resolution imaging, high tumor-to-background ratios in all organs at risk for tumor recurrence or metastasis, negligible immunogenicity and toxicity, and a significant further improvement in the accuracy of clinical decision making in oncology patients.

Immunotherapy for colorectal cancer

Immunologic approaches to therapy for colorectal cancer have evolved substantially. In the past, patients were treated with nonspecific immune stimulants such as bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). The current focus lies in targeting tumor-associated antigens. This is done either through passive immune therapy, with antibodies targeted directly to tumor cells, or by active immune therapy through vaccination with tumor cells, tumor cell lysates, peptides, carbohydrates, gene constructs encoding proteins, or anti-idiotype antibodies that mimic tumor-associated antigens. These different approaches to immunotherapy are reviewed.

Preoperative clinical radioimmunodetection of pancreatic cancer by 111 In-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody Nd2

The present study was carried out with the purpose of evaluating the clinical usefulness of radioimmunodetection (RAID) with 111In-labeled murine/human chimeric monoclonal antibody, Nd2 (c-Nd2) in patients with pancreatic cancer. Nineteen patients suspected to have pancreatic cancer were administered intravenously 74 MBq/2 mg 111In-labeled c-Nd2 in 100 ml of saline containing 2% albumin over 30 min. A scintigram was obtained on the 3rd day after infusion by using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. Of the 14 patients finally diagnosed as having pancreatic cancer on the basis of surgical specimens or progress of disease, specific focal uptake at the site of the tumor was detected in 12 (true positive cases), representing a sensitivity of 85.7% (12/14), and liver metastasis was found in one case with metastasis. Of the 5 patients diagnosed with tumor-forming pancreatitis (TFP), 4 patients demonstrated true negative imaging, but one patient whose tumor demonstrated interesting findings in histology and immunostaining, showed false positive imaging. Of patients investigated for human anti-chimeric antibody (HACA) response, none showed HACA response, and no allergic reaction was seen in any of the patients administered c-Nd2. These results suggest that RAID with 11In-labeled c-Nd2 is useful for differential preoperative diagnosis between invasive pancreatic cancer and TFP.

Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The development of treatment modalities for rectal cancer, including local excision, total mesorectal excision and preoperative radiotherapy, has increased the importance of accurate preoperative staging to allow the optimum treatment to be selected.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken of methods of preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma and the evidence for each was evaluated critically.

RESULTS

Clinical assessment of rectal carcinoma may give an indication of fixity but is not accurate for staging. Endoanal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radioimmunoscintigraphy and positron emission tomography have all been used for staging. The extent of tumour spread through the bowel wall (T stage) is most accurately assessed by endoanal ultrasonography, although this technique is poor at assessing tumour extension into adjacent organs for which both CT and MRI are more accurate. No method accurately determines lymph node involvement, but endoanal ultrasonography is the best available. Liver metastases may be assessed by abdominal ultrasonography, CT, MRI and CT portography (with increasing sensitivity and cost in that order).

CONCLUSION

Endoanal ultrasonography is the most effective method of local tumour staging, with the addition of either CT or MRI if adjacent organ involvement is suspected. Abdominal ultrasonography or CT is recommended for routine preoperative assessment of the liver.

Novel clinical approaches in monoclonal antibody-based management in colorectal cancer patients: radioimmunoguided surgery and antigen augmentation

Surgery, the most effective treatment for colon and rectal cancer, is based on empirical knowledge of the patterns of tumor spread, gross findings at laparotomy, and histologic confirmation of tumor-free margins. In spite of the many technical improvements in surgery, there has not been a significant change in cure rates for colon and rectal cancers. In fact, one-half of affected patients will not survive 5 years. It is in this arena of treatment for primary colon and rectal cancer patients that radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS) technology may provide the most benefit. RIGS is an intraoperative procedure for detection of carcinoma lesions that are targeted with a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody (MAb) to provide the surgeon with immediate intraoperative definition of tumor margins and identification of occult disease. To optimize this technique, our studies were designed to increase tumor uptake by higher affinity CC-49 (a second-generation MAb) and to increase tumor antigen expression using biological response modifiers (BRMs). The ability of BRMs, such as interferons (IFNs), to enhance the expression of tumor-associated antigens, may play an important role in an adjuvant setting for MAb-based treatment. Preclinical and clinical data provided evidence for the use of IFN as an adjuvant to enhance MAb-targeting of human carcinoma lesions. A combination protocol with IFN and RIGS is ongoing at our institution.

Impact of radioimmunoscintigraphy on the management of colorectal and ovarian cancer patients: a retrospective study

Noninvasive differentiation of benign from malignant disease has emerged as an important diagnostic challenge in the current age of health-care cost containment. Most physicians today acknowledge that early and accurate detection of cancer is important in successful treatment. Antibodies have been developed, labeled with radioactive isotopes, and used to detect and treat malignant tumors. During the past few years, several radiolabeled antibodies have received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for imaging colorectal, lung, ovarian, and prostate carcinomas, thus expanding and improving the physician's ability to detect and follow cancer in patients. At present, there is ample evidence in the literature to suggest that imaging with the 111In-labeled monoclonal antibody B72.3 is clinically useful for detecting primary/recurrent colorectal and recurrent ovarian carcinomas. In this article, we present a retrospective review of 136 patients from 10 moderate-sized hospitals who underwent a study with radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS), using the 111In B72.3 antibody and standard diagnostic examinations for the detection of recurrent colorectal or ovarian carcinoma. The resulting data were analyzed in an effort to determine if (and how) information obtained from this radioimmunoscintigraphic procedure is being used by referring physicians. Our findings suggest a gradually increasing use of scan findings with the 111In B72.3 antibody in making patient-management decisions.

Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The study contained herein was undertaken to review and summarize the current literature on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Limitations of traditional imaging techniques have encouraged development of targeted imaging strategies using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. Diagnostic immunoscintigraphy can detect lesions not identified by conventional imaging modalities, although it has not proven useful in the management of primary colorectal cancers and in hepatic metastases. Immunoscintigraphy shows promise in cases of local recurrence and rising carcinoembryonic antigen values; however, the impact of immunoscintigraphy on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness remains unproven. Radioimmunoguided surgery has been advocated as a method of more accurately detecting tumor extension and accomplishing radical resection. The technique remains controversial, and its use is not widespread. With respect to therapeutic applications, immunotherapy has most often been investigated in the setting of advanced stage disease. Results in this setting have been poor. In contrast, adjuvant immunotherapy after resection of Dukes C carcinoma has achieved convincing results, with improvements in survival comparable with that of adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant trials are now under way to examine the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies in the postoperative treatment of early-stage (II) tumors and the combination of monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy in advanced-stage (III) tumors. Bispecific antibodies, or immunoconjugates with cytokines or toxins, represent additional areas of interest and future investigations.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, immunoscintigraphy is not sufficient to determine, by itself, resectability of colorectal tumor and has limited usefulness in select cases of recurrent cancer and possibly in cases of rising carcinoembryonic antigen values. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies as a postoperative adjuvant treatment shows promise and is currently being investigated in national trials.

Radioimmunodetection with 111In-labeled monoclonal antibody Nd2 in patients with pancreatic cancer

This report summarizes results from an initial clinical evaluation of radioimmunodetection (RAID) in patients with pancreatic cancer using murine monoclonal antibody Nd2, directed against mucins from pancreatic cancer. Nd2 (2 mg) was labeled with 111In (2 mCi) and injected into 19 patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer. Planar scintigrams were taken 3 days post-infusion. As for final diagnoses after surgery, 14 cases were pancreatic cancer, and one case each was chronic pancreatitis, neurilemmoma, islet cell carcinoma, cholangioma, and apparent absence of suspected recurrent lesion of pancreatic cancer. Of 14 patients with pancreatic cancer, RAID was positive in 10 cases (71.4%). Cases other than pancreatic cancer were all negative, so the specificity was 100%. These results demonstrate that RAID using 111In-Nd2 can be useful in differentiating exocrine pancreatic cancer from benign conditions and other types of carcinomas in the pancreatoduodenal regions.

New methods for the staging of colorectal cancer using noninvasive techniques

Noninvasive differentiation of benign from malignant disease has emerged as an important diagnostic challenge in this age of health-care cost containment. Most physicians today acknowledge that early and accurate detection of cancer is the key to successful treatment. Antibodies have been developed and used to detect and treat tumors. In the next few years, several radiolabeled antibodies will likely receive FDA approval for imaging colorectal, lung, and prostate carcinomas, thus expanding and improving the physician's ability to detect and follow cancer in patients. There is ample evidence in the literature that suggests that imaging with labeled antibodies is clinically useful for detecting colorectal cancer in patients with suspected recurrence, in patients with presumed isolated resectable liver metastasis, and in those at high risk of the development of recurrence. This paper reviews these studies, and also discusses some data obtained from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in colorectal patients.

B72.3 immunoreactivity in benign abdominal lymph nodes associated with gastrointestinal disease

PURPOSE

Immunolocalization of the tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 antigen with the monoclonal antibody B72.3 has been used as a "cancer marker" in radioimmunoscintigraphy and radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS). Radioimmunoscintigraphy and RIGS have been used to detect occult metastatic deposits from colorectal adenocarcinoma. It has been suggested that RIGS is superior to histologic examination in detecting lymph node metastases from colorectal cancer. To determine the specificity of immunodetection of the tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 antigen as a marker for metastatic adenocarcinoma, we studied benign intra-abdominal lymph nodes with B72.3 and an immunohistochemical technique.

METHODS

Formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of 276 benign abdominal lymph nodes, resected with 35 cases of colonic adenocarcinoma and 33 cases of benign gastrointestinal disorders, were evaluated for B72.3 immunoreactivity using an avidin-biotin complex immunohistochemical technique. Lymph nodes from cases of colonic carcinoma were also studied with cytokeratin immunostaining to help eliminate occult micrometastases.

RESULTS

B72.3 immunoreactivity was seen in the germinal centers of benign lymph nodes associated with 49 percent of the cases of colonic adenocarcinoma and 12 percent of the cases of benign gastrointestinal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

B72.3 immunoreactivity can be seen in benign abdominal lymph nodes associated with gastrointestinal disease. We advise caution in the use of diagnostic techniques that equate B72.3 immunoreactivity with the presence of adenocarcinoma.

Radio-immunotargeting in colorectal carcinoma

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequently studied diseases for investigating cancer detection using radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies. From many clinical studies it has become clear that with radio-immunotargeting (RIT) it is possible to visualise approximately 70% of known sites of colorectal cancer and to find otherwise occult tumour deposits in approximately 10% of patients. The intra-operative use of a gamma detection probe increases the detection rate of clinical occult intra-abdominal tumour sites to 30-40%. However, this clinical experience has also disclosed the many difficulties and pitfalls connected with this technique, with respect to antibody-, tumour-, patient- and isotope-related factors. Upstaging or early disclosure of disseminated disease by RIT has not proven to be beneficial in terms of improved survival, but might be of use in the management of an individual patient. The laborious and costly RIT technique, difficult scan interpretation and the lack of proven survival benefit precludes its routine use in clinical practice. However, the promising results warrant further study to improve the technique, and to validate the clinical usefulness of radio-immunotargeting.

Will immunogenicity limit the use, efficacy, and future development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies?

While monoclonal antibodies show promise for use in the treatment of a variety of disease states, including cancer, autoimmune disease, and allograft rejection, generation of anti-antibody responses still remains a problem. For example, 50% of the patients who receive OKT3 produce blocking antibodies that interfere with its binding to T cells, thus decreasing the therapeutic effect (51). HAMA responses have also interfered with tumor imaging (39,40) and radioimmunotherapy (56). The generation of an anti-antibody response is dependent on many factors. These include the dose of antibody, the number of injections of antibody, the immunogenicity of the antibody, the form of the antibody, and the immunocompetence of the recipient. Predictably, both the number of injections of antibody and the dosage are influential in the generation of an anti-antibody response. It is apparent that human antibodies, chimeric antibodies, and mouse Fab fragments are much less likely to induce anti-antibody responses than intact mouse monoclonal antibodies or mouse F(ab')2 fragments when one injection is administered. Injections of human or chimeric antibodies appears to reduce immunogenicity, but the probability that anti-antibody responses can still be induced on multiple injections must be considered and appropriately evaluated. Several areas demand extensive investigation to enhance the clinical utility of monoclonal antibodies. First, results of thorough clinical trials with human or chimeric antibodies need to be evaluated for the induction of anti-antibodies after multiple injections of antibodies. Second, less immunogenic forms of antibodies (Fab, Fv) need to be studied for their clinical efficacies and for their abilities to induce anti-antibody responses.

Radioimmunodetection of colorectal carcinoma using technetium-99m-labeled Fab' fragments of the IMMU-4 anti-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody

BACKGROUND

Radioimmunodetection of cancer using monoclonal antibody fragments offers certain potential advantages over that with whole monoclonal antibodies, including the ability to image early (i.e., to provide images at an early time after injection of the radioantibody) while minimizing the incidence of human anti-mouse antibody response. This paper reports a prospective trial comparing radioimmunodetection with IMMU-4 (a murine anti-CEA monoclonal antibody) 99mTc-labeled Fab' fragments to conventional imaging in 35 colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

All patients were investigated by conventional diagnostic methods (CDM) within 4 weeks of radioimmunodetection. Surgical corroboration of findings was obtained in 26 patients (15 with evidence of disease on CDM [CDM+] and 11 with abnormal serum CEA [CDM-] as the only evidence for recurrence). After 1 mg IMMU-4 99mTc-Fab' was injected (19.3 mCi on average), patients underwent planar/SPECT radioimmunodetection 2-5 hours later and planar radioimmunodetection 18-24 hours later. Three patients underwent a second radioimmunodetection study 16, 20 and 23 months after the first.

RESULTS

Radioimmunodetection was superior to CDM, accurately predicting disease distribution in six nonsurgical and ten CDM+ surgical patients, and was complementary to computed tomography in two nonsurgical and two CDM+ surgical patients. Radioimmunodetection would have directed or changed management decisions in 6 of the 15 (40%) CDM+ surgical patients. Radioimmunodetection correctly identified all recurrent tumor in 8 of 11 CDM- surgical patients and was negative in one patient with cirrhosis and no recurrence, representing a potential clinical benefit of 82%. Analyzed on a regional basis, radioimmunodetection was found to be superior to CDM in extrahepatic abdomen and pelvis imaging and was complementary to (although not as accurate as) CDM in the liver. Human anti-mouse antibody did not develop in any of the patients, including three who were injected twice.

CONCLUSIONS

IMMU-4 99mTc-Fab' radioimmunodetection shows promise as a clinically useful diagnostic tool in patients with colorectal cancer, detecting disease often missed by conventional imaging. IMMU-4 99mTc-Fab' may prove useful for serial radioimmunodetection studies, because human anti-mouse antibody response does not appear to be a problem with this radioimmunoconjugate. It also has the advantage of permitting same-day imaging.

Immunoscintigraphy with 111In-satumomab pendetide in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma: performance and impact on clinical management

PURPOSE

The role of immunoscintigraphy with 111In-satumomab pendetide in the medical and/or surgical management of colorectal cancer patients was evaluated in a multicenter trial.

METHODS

This 103 patient study population included 46 individuals with rising serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels and otherwise negative diagnostic evaluation, 29 patients with known recurrence, presumed to be isolated and resectable, and 28 patients for whom standard diagnostic tests provided equivocal information.

RESULTS

No adverse reactions were noted following intravenous administration of 1 mg of satumomab pendetide radiolabeled with approximately 5 mCi of 111In. Thirty percent of patients developed human anti-mouse antibodies postinfusion. In the 84 patients for whom correlation with histopathologic, diagnostic, and/or clinical findings was available, antibody imaging demonstrated a sensitivity of 73 percent in patients with confirmed tumor (36/49) and negative results for all 35 patients with no evidence of malignancy. Occult disease was detected in 18 patients.

CONCLUSION

111In-satumomab pendetide immunoscintigraphy was helpful in the medical and/or surgical management of 45 (44 percent) patients and provided information unavailable from other diagnostic modalities.

Antibody-targeted drugs for the therapy of cancer

The advent of monoclonal antibodies has revitalised the concept of magic bullets and various agents (eg. drugs, toxins and isotopes) have been conjugated to monoclonal antibodies for selective delivery to tumours. Preclinical studies in mouse tumour models have been impressive and have lead to several clinical trials. These phase I trials have been less impressive. However, keeping in mind the aim of Phase I trials, the safety of using these conjugates in humans have been established. Several, major problems still remain to be overcome before these agents may be useful for the treatment of cancer. These problems stem from the nature of tumour vasculature, cytotoxic activity of the moiety linked to antibody and the targeted tumour antigen expressed on the cell surface. This review will deal with these various aspects described above and possible approaches to overcome these obstacles with a definite bias towards drug-monoclonal antibody conjugates. However, these concepts are equally applicable for improved targeting of other agents.

New radiopharmaceuticals and new applications in medicine

All areas of radiology are constantly evolving. At times rapid advances are made because new equipment or pharmaceuticals are introduced. At others the evolution is gradual as established procedures and techniques are refined. The following review of selected areas in nuclear medicine includes both dramatic changes due to new developments and evolutionary changes in established techniques. The first section reviews the development of monoclonal antibodies for use in radioscintigraphy of neoplastic disease. Although many articles have been written about this topic over the years, the clinical applications have suddenly expanded because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved one monoclonal antibody for use in the imaging of colorectal and ovarian cancer. It is anticipated that a number of other antibodies will be approved for clinical scintigraphy of both malignant and benign disease and immunotherapy. It is advised that the radiologist performing nuclear medicine procedures become knowledgeable about this expanding area of clinical application. The second section reviews several new radiopharmaceuticals that are being used with increasing frequency for myocardial imaging. The behavior of these tracers is different from that of thallium, and specialized imaging techniques are required. Although the clinical value of these agents is still questioned by some, they are widely used. Familiarity with this topic is recommended. The last section reviews some of the radiopharmaceuticals available for renal imaging and functional evaluation. The relatively new technetium-labeled pharmaceutical that approximates the behavior of hippuran is emphasized. New applications with the renal cortical imaging agent technetium DMSA are also reviewed. A thorough knowledge of the biologic behavior of these tracers and appropriate imaging and measurement techniques is extremely important for their appropriate clinical use.

Reactivity of B72.3 with adenocarcinomas. An immunohistochemical study of 476 cases

BACKGROUND

The monoclonal antibody B72.3 has been shown to react with several common types of adenocarcinoma. However, the distribution of B72.3 reactivity in adenocarcinomas has not been well-enough defined to determine whether B72.3 immunostaining would be helpful in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of unknown origin.

METHODS

Formaldehyde fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from 476 adenocarcinomas from a variety of primary sites were studied using B72.3 and an avidin-biotin complex immunohistochemical technique.

RESULTS

B72.3 immunoreactivity was seen in 75-100% of the adenocarcinomas from the ovary, endocervix, endometrium, distal esophagus/stomach, colon, lung, breast, prostate, pancreas, and bile ducts. Positive reactions were unusual in thyroid carcinomas (7%) and renal cell carcinomas (11%). B72.3 reactivity was not seen in the 20 hepatocellular carcinomas or 4 adrenal cortical carcinomas studied.

CONCLUSIONS

B72.3 reacts with a wide variety of adenocarcinomas. Immunostaining with B72.3 may be helpful in excluding hepatocellular carcinoma in certain clinical settings.

Immunoscintigraphy in primary colorectal cancer

Immunoscintigraphy is an experimental diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging technique that targets tumor sites with radiolabeled antibodies reactive with tumor-associated antigens. Primary tumors, regional lymph node metastases, and distant metastases have been imaged in patients with colorectal cancer, and United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a commercial preparation of radiolabeled murine monoclonal antibodies for diagnostic use in such patients is expected soon. Immunoscintigraphy is complementary to computed tomography (CT) scanning in the evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis in patients with colorectal cancer, and it has the additional capability of serial whole body imaging for detection of distant metastases. However, the clinical utility of immunoscintigraphy is being investigated, and its precise diagnostic role in patients with primary colorectal cancer has not been adequately defined. The management of selected patients at increased risk of regional or distant spread of tumor likely would benefit from detection of occult disease and a change in clinical staging, but the routine use of immunoscintigraphy in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary colorectal cancer is more problematic. More studies are required to determine whether it should be used to stage all patients before operation or merely be reserved for selected patients at increased risk for metastatic disease.

Staging and surgery for colorectal cancer

Staging of colorectal cancer has become increasingly important to select groups of patients for limited or more extensive surgery, and for adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The main treatment is still surgery, but subgroups may benefit from adjuvant therapy, even accepting additional side effects. Accurate staging is necessary to define different treatment groups. A critical review is given of the present methods of clinicopathological staging.