1
|
Opotowsky AR, Khairy P, Diller G, Kasparian NA, Brophy J, Jenkins K, Lopez KN, McCoy A, Moons P, Ollberding NJ, Rathod RH, Rychik J, Thanassoulis G, Vasan RS, Marelli A. Clinical Risk Assessment and Prediction in Congenital Heart Disease Across the Lifespan: JACC Scientific Statement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:2092-2111. [PMID: 38777512 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) comprises a range of structural anomalies, each with a unique natural history, evolving treatment strategies, and distinct long-term consequences. Current prediction models are challenged by generalizability, limited validation, and questionable application to extended follow-up periods. In this JACC Scientific Statement, we tackle the difficulty of risk measurement across the lifespan. We appraise current and future risk measurement frameworks and describe domains of risk specific to CHD. Risk of adverse outcomes varies with age, sex, genetics, era, socioeconomic status, behavior, and comorbidities as they evolve through the lifespan and across care settings. Emerging technologies and approaches promise to improve risk assessment, but there is also need for large, longitudinal, representative, prospective CHD cohorts with multidimensional data and consensus-driven methodologies to provide insight into time-varying risk. Communication of risk, particularly with patients and their families, poses a separate and equally important challenge, and best practices are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander R Opotowsky
- Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
| | - Paul Khairy
- Adult Congenital Heart Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gerhard Diller
- Department of Cardiology III, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Nadine A Kasparian
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Heart and Mind Wellbeing Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Heart Institute and Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - James Brophy
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kathy Jenkins
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Keila N Lopez
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital & Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alison McCoy
- Vanderbilt Clinical Informatics Core, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Philip Moons
- KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Nicholas J Ollberding
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Rahul H Rathod
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jack Rychik
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - George Thanassoulis
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ramachandran S Vasan
- School of Public Health, University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, USA; Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ariane Marelli
- McGill Adult Unit for Congenital Heart Disease Excellence, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Loft LH, Pedersen LH, Bigaard J, Bojesen SE. Attitudes towards risk-stratified breast cancer screening: a population-based survey among 5,001 Danish women. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:347. [PMID: 38504201 PMCID: PMC10949660 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12083-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The individual woman's risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer can now be estimated more precisely, and screening can be stratified accordingly. The risk assessment requires that women are willing to provide a blood test, additional personal information, to know their risk, and alter screening intervals. This study aimed to investigate Danish women's attitudes towards risk-stratified breast cancer screening. METHODS An online, cross-sectional survey was conducted among Danish women aged 52-67 years. We used logistic regression analyses to assess how personal characteristics were associated with the women's attitudes. RESULTS 5,001 women completed the survey (response rate 44%) of which 74% approved of risk estimation to potentially alter their screening intervals. However, only 42% would accept an extended screening interval if found to have low breast cancer risk, while 89% would accept a reduced interval if at high risk. The main determinants of these attitudes were age, education, screening participation, history of breast cancer, perceived breast cancer risk and to some extent breast cancer worry. CONCLUSION This study indicates that women are positive towards risk-stratified breast cancer screening. However, reservations and knowledge among subgroups of women must be carefully considered and addressed before wider implementation of risk-stratified breast cancer screening in a national program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Hougaard Loft
- Prevention and Information Dept, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Line Hjøllund Pedersen
- Prevention and Information Dept, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Science to Society Dept, Danish Cancer Institute, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Janne Bigaard
- Prevention and Information Dept, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Stig Egil Bojesen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Plys E, Bulliard JL, Chaouch A, Durand MA, van Duuren LA, Brändle K, Auer R, Froehlich F, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Corley DA, Selby K. Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Based on Predicted Risk: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e46865. [PMID: 37676720 PMCID: PMC10514773 DOI: 10.2196/46865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) can be effectively reduced by screening with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or colonoscopy. Individual risk to develop CRC within 15 years varies from <1% to >15% among people aged 50 to 75 years. Communicating personalized CRC risk and appropriate screening recommendations could improve the risk-benefit balance of screening test allocations and optimize the use of limited colonoscopy resources. However, significant uncertainty exists regarding the feasibility and efficacy of risk-based screening. OBJECTIVE We aim to study the effect of communicating individual CRC risk and a risk-based recommendation of the FIT or colonoscopy on participants' choice of screening test. We will also assess the feasibility of a larger clinical trial designed to evaluate the impact of personalized screening on clinical outcomes. METHODS We will perform a pilot randomized controlled trial among 880 residents aged 50 to 69 years eligible to participate in the organized screening program of the Vaud canton, Switzerland. Participants will be recruited by mail by the Vaud CRC screening program. Primary and secondary outcomes will be self-assessed through questionnaires. The risk score will be calculated using the open-source QCancer calculator that was validated in the United Kingdom. Participants will be stratified into 3 groups-low (<3%), moderate (3% to <6%), and high (≥6%) risk-according to their 15-year CRC risk and randomized within each risk stratum. The intervention group participants will receive a newly designed brochure with their personalized risk and screening recommendations. The control group will receive the usual brochure of the Vaud CRC screening program. Our primary outcome, measured using a self-administered questionnaire, is appropriate screening uptake 6 months after the intervention. Screening will be defined as appropriate if participants at high risk undertake colonoscopy and participants at low risk undertake the FIT. We will also measure the acceptability of the risk score and screening recommendations and the psychological factors influencing screening behavior. We will also assess the feasibility of a full-scale randomized controlled trial. RESULTS We expect that a total sample of 880 individuals will allow us to detect a difference of 10% (α=5%) between groups. The main outcome will be analyzed using a 2-tailed chi-squared test. We expect that appropriate screening uptake will be higher in the intervention group. No difference in overall screening uptake is expected. CONCLUSIONS We will test the impact of personalized risk information and screening recommendations on participants' choice of screening test in an organized screening program. This study should advance our understanding of the feasibility of large-scale risk-based CRC screening. Our results may provide insights into the optimization of CRC screening by offering screening options with a better risk-benefit balance and optimizing the use of resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05357508; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05357508. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/46865.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Plys
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Luc Bulliard
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Aziz Chaouch
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Center for Epidemiology and Research in Population Health, UMR1295 Inserm, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Luuk A van Duuren
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karen Brändle
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Reto Auer
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Florian Froehlich
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Douglas A Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Kevin Selby
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miller CA, Lafata JE, Thomson MD. The Effects of Personalizing Colorectal Cancer Risk Communication on Risk Perceptions and Health Behavior Intentions: a Randomized Trial of Average-Risk Adults. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:719-727. [PMID: 31997146 PMCID: PMC7387146 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01694-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Risk assessment tools may help individuals gauge cancer risk and motivate lifestyle and screening behavior changes. Despite the evermore common availability of such tools, little is known about their potential utility in average-risk population approaches to cancer prevention. We evaluated the effects of providing personalized (vs. generic) information concerning colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors on average-risk individuals' risk perceptions and intentions to engage in three risk-reducing behaviors: CRC screening, diet, and physical activity. Further, we explored whether the receipt of CRC-specific risk assessment feedback influenced individuals' breast cancer risk perceptions and mammography intentions. Using an online survey, N = 419 survey respondents aged 50-75 with no personal or family history of CRC were randomized to receive an average estimate of CRC lifetime risk and risk factor information that was either personalized (treatment) or invariant/non-personalized (control). Respondent risk perceptions and behavioral intentions were ascertained before and after risk assessment administration. No differences were observed in risk perceptions or behavioral intentions by study arm. However, regardless of study arm, CRC screening intentions significantly increased after risk assessment feedback was provided. This occurred despite a significant reduction in risk perceptions. Results support the role simple cancer risk assessment information could play in promoting screening behaviors while improving the accuracy of cancer risk perceptions. Providing cancer risk assessment information may decrease individuals' perceptions of cancer risk to more realistic levels while simultaneously facilitating screening intentions among an average-risk population, regardless of whether provided risk information is personalized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie A Miller
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Jennifer Elston Lafata
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Maria D Thomson
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rawl SM, Christy SM, Perkins SM, Tong Y, Krier C, Wang HL, Huang AM, Laury E, Rhyant B, Lloyd F, Willis DR, Imperiale TF, Myers LJ, Springston J, Skinner CS, Champion VL. Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial. Prev Med 2021; 145:106449. [PMID: 33549682 PMCID: PMC8091507 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although African Americans have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates of any racial group, their screening rates remain low. STUDY DESIGN/PURPOSE This randomized controlled trial compared efficacy of two clinic-based interventions for increasing CRC screening among African American primary care patients. METHODS African American patients from 11 clinics who were not current with CRC screening were randomized to receive a computer-tailored intervention (n = 335) or a non-tailored brochure (n = 358) designed to promote adherence to CRC screening. Interventions were delivered in clinic immediately prior to a provider visit. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models analyzed predictors of screening test completion. Moderators and mediators were determined using multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Significant effects of the computer-tailored intervention were observed for completion of a stool blood test (SBT) and completion of any CRC screening test (SBT or colonoscopy). The colonoscopy screening rate was higher among those receiving the computer-tailored intervention group compared to the nontailored brochure but the difference was not significant. Predictors of SBT completion were: receipt of the computer-tailored intervention; being seen at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center clinic; baseline stage of adoption; and reason for visit. Mediators of intervention effects were changes in perceived SBT barriers, changes in perceived colonoscopy benefits, changes in CRC knowledge, and patient-provider discussion. Moderators of intervention effects were age, employment, and family/friend recommendation of screening. CONCLUSION This one-time computer-tailored intervention significantly improved CRC screening rates among low-income African American patients. This finding was largely driven by increasing SBT but the impact of the intervention on colonoscopy screening was strong. Implementation of a CRC screening quality improvement program in the VA site that included provision of stool blood test kits and follow-up likely contributed to the strong intervention effect observed at that site. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00672828.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Rawl
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America; Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States of America; Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Susan M Perkins
- Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Yan Tong
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Connie Krier
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Hsiao-Lan Wang
- College of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Amelia M Huang
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Esther Laury
- Villanova University M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova, PA, United States of America
| | - Broderick Rhyant
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Frank Lloyd
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Deanna R Willis
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Thomas F Imperiale
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America; Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Laura J Myers
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America; Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey Springston
- Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center & Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Victoria L Champion
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America; Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Usher-Smith JA, Mills KM, Riedinger C, Saunders CL, Helsingen LM, Lytvyn L, Buskermolen M, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Bretthauer M, Guyatt G, Griffin SJ. The impact of information about different absolute benefits and harms on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A think-aloud study and online randomised experiment. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0246991. [PMID: 33592037 PMCID: PMC7886213 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is considerable heterogeneity in individuals' risk of disease and thus the absolute benefits and harms of population-wide screening programmes. Using colorectal cancer (CRC) screening as an exemplar, we explored how people make decisions about screening when presented with information about absolute benefits and harms, and how those preferences vary with baseline risk, between screening tests and between individuals. METHOD We conducted two linked studies with members of the public: a think-aloud study exploring decision making in-depth and an online randomised experiment quantifying preferences. In both, participants completed a web-based survey including information about three screening tests (colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and faecal immunochemical testing) and then up to nine scenarios comparing screening to no screening for three levels of baseline risk (1%, 3% and 5% over 15 years) and the three screening tests. Participants reported, after each scenario, whether they would opt for screening (yes/no). RESULTS Of the 20 participants in the think-aloud study 13 did not consider absolute benefits or harms when making decisions concerning CRC screening. In the online experiment (n = 978), 60% expressed intention to attend at 1% risk of CRC, 70% at 3% and 77% at 5%, with no differences between screening tests. At an individual level, 535 (54.7%) would attend at all three risk levels and 178 (18.2%) at none. The 27% whose intention varied by baseline risk were more likely to be younger, without a family history of CRC, and without a prior history of screening. CONCLUSIONS Most people in our population were not influenced by the range of absolute benefits and harms associated with CRC screening presented. For an appreciable minority, however, magnitude of benefit was important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet A. Usher-Smith
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Katie M. Mills
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Christiane Riedinger
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine L. Saunders
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lise M. Helsingen
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lyubov Lytvyn
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Maaike Buskermolen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Simon J. Griffin
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Riley V, Ellis NJ, Cowap L, Grogan S, Cottrell E, Crone D, Chambers R, Clark-Carter D, Fedorowicz S, Gidlow C. A qualitative exploration of two risk calculators using video-recorded NHS health check consultations. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:250. [PMID: 33272217 PMCID: PMC7716424 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01315-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to explore practitioner-patient interactions and patient responses when using QRISK®2 or JBS3 cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk calculators. Data were from video-recorded NHS Health Check (NHSHC) consultations captured as part of the UK RIsk COmmunication (RICO) study; a qualitative study of video-recorded NHSHC consultations from 12 general practices in the West Midlands, UK. Participants were those eligible for NHSHC based on national criteria (40-74 years old, no existing diagnoses for cardiovascular-related conditions, not on statins), and practitioners, who delivered the NHSHC. METHOD NHSHCs were video-recorded. One hundred twenty-eight consultations were transcribed and analysed using deductive thematic analysis and coded using a template based around Protection Motivation Theory. RESULTS Key themes used to frame the analysis were Cognitive Appraisal (Threat Appraisal, and Coping Appraisal), and Coping Modes (Adaptive, and Maladaptive). Analysis showed little evidence of CVD risk communication, particularly in consultations using QRISK®2. Practitioners often missed opportunities to check patient understanding and encourage risk- reducing behaviour, regardless of the risk calculator used resulting in practitioner verbal dominance. JBS3 appeared to better promote opportunities to initiate risk-factor discussion, and Heart Age and visual representation of risk were more easily understood and impactful than 10-year percentage risk. However, a lack of effective CVD risk discussion in both risk calculator groups increased the likelihood of a maladaptive coping response. CONCLUSIONS The analysis demonstrates the importance of effective, shared practitioner-patient discussion to enable adaptive coping responses to CVD risk information, and highlights a need for effective and evidence-based practitioner training. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN ISRCTN10443908 . Registered 7th February 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Riley
- Staffordshire University, Brindley Building, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF UK
| | - Naomi J. Ellis
- Staffordshire University, Brindley Building, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF UK
| | - Lisa Cowap
- Staffordshire University, Brindley Building, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF UK
| | - Sarah Grogan
- Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester Campus, Bonsall Street, Manchester, M15 6GX UK
| | | | - Diane Crone
- Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cyncoed Campus, Cyncoed Road, Cardiff, CF23 6XD UK
| | - Ruth Chambers
- Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group, Smithfield One Building, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 4FA UK
| | - David Clark-Carter
- Staffordshire University, Brindley Building, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF UK
| | - Sophia Fedorowicz
- Staffordshire University, Brindley Building, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF UK
| | - Christopher Gidlow
- Staffordshire University, Brindley Building, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carroll JC, Permaul JA, Semotiuk K, Yung EM, Blaine S, Dicks E, Warner E, Rothenmund H, Esplen MJ, Moineddin R, McLaughlin J. Hereditary colorectal cancer screening: A 10-year longitudinal cohort study following an educational intervention. Prev Med Rep 2020; 20:101189. [PMID: 33117641 PMCID: PMC7581973 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Family history (FH) of a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with two to fourfold increased risk, yet screening uptake is suboptimal despite proven mortality reduction. We developed a FH-based CRC Risk Triage/Management tool for family physicians (FPs), and educational booklet for patients with CRC FH. This report describes physician referral and patient screening behavior 5 and 10 years post-educational intervention, and factors associated with screening. Longitudinal cohort study. FPs/patients in Ontario and Newfoundland, Canada were sent questionnaires at baseline (2005), 5 and 10 years (2015) following tool/booklet receipt. FPs were asked about CRC screening, patients about FH, screening type and timing. "Correct" screening was concordance with tool recommendations. Results reported for 29/121 (24%) FPs and 98/297 (33%) patients who completed all 3 questionnaires. Over 10 years 2/3 patients received the correct CRC screening test at appropriate timing (baseline 75%, 5-year 62%, 10-year 65%). About half reported their FP recommended CRC screening (5-year 51%, 10-year 63%). Fewer than half the patients correctly assessed their CRC risk (44%, 40%, 41%). Patients were less likely to have correct screening timing if female (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.61, 0.99; p = 0.045). Patients were less likely to have both correct test and timing if moderate/high CRC risk (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47, 0.93; p = 0.017) and more likely if their physician recommended screening (RR1.69; 95% CI 1.15, 2.49; p = 0.007). Physician discussion of CRC risk and screening can positively impact patient screening behavior. Efforts are particularly needed for women and patients at moderate/high CRC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June C. Carroll
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne A. Permaul
- Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kara Semotiuk
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric M. Yung
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sean Blaine
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Dicks
- Craig L. Dobbin Centre for Genetics Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Ellen Warner
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mary Jane Esplen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John McLaughlin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boivin J, Sandhu A, Brian K, Harrison C. Fertility-related knowledge and perceptions of fertility education among adolescents and emerging adults: a qualitative study. HUM FERTIL 2018; 22:291-299. [PMID: 29989473 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2018.1486514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Research shows that young people do not know much about their fertility. In the present study, we examined fertility knowledge and perceptions of a fertility educational brochure (i.e. 'A Guide to Fertility') in five focus groups with adolescents (16-18 years, n = 19) and emerging adults (21-24 years, n = 14) who were childless, not currently pregnant (or for men partner not pregnant) or trying to conceive but intending to have a child in the future. Participants (n = 33) reported having poor knowledge of a range of fertility topics and feelings of surprise, fear and concern in response to the brochure, despite perceiving benefits of the provision of fertility education and feasibility of 'A Guide to Fertility'. Comparison between age groups showed that adolescents lacked confidence in their fertility knowledge and emerging adults more frequently referred to gender and family planning issues when considering the fertility information. The findings show the need and importance of ensuring fertility education is tailored to different age groups for it to be integrated at specific stages of the life course and optimize its benefits over costs. Results point to educators and researchers working together to determine how best to disseminate fertility information to relevant age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacky Boivin
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Amea Sandhu
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Kate Brian
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
| | - China Harrison
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ellen ME, Wilson MG, Vélez M, Shach R, Lavis JN, Grimshaw JM, Moat KA. Addressing overuse of health services in health systems: a critical interpretive synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:48. [PMID: 29907158 PMCID: PMC6003114 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0325-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Health systems are increasingly focusing on the issue of ‘overuse’ of health services and how to address it. We developed a framework focused on (1) the rationale and context for health systems prioritising addressing overuse, (2) elements of a comprehensive process and approach to reduce overuse and (3) implementation considerations for addressing overuse. Methods We conducted a critical interpretive synthesis informed by a stakeholder-engagement process. The synthesis identified relevant empirical and non-empirical articles about system-level overuse. Two reviewers independently screened records, assessed for inclusion and conceptually mapped included articles. From these, we selected a purposive sample, created structured summaries of key findings and thematically synthesised the results. Results Our search identified 3545 references, from which we included 251. Most articles (76%; n = 192) were published within 5 years of conducting the review and addressed processes for addressing overuse (63%; n = 158) or political and health system context (60%; n = 151). Besides negative outcomes at the patient, system and global level, there were various contextual factors to addressing service overuse that seem to be key issue drivers. Processes for addressing overuse can be grouped into three elements comprising a comprehensive approach, including (1) approaches to identify overused health services, (2) stakeholder- or patient-led approaches and (3) government-led initiatives. Key implementation considerations include the need to develop ‘buy in’ from stakeholders and citizens. Conclusions Health systems want to ensure the use of high-value services to keep citizens healthy and avoid harm. Our synthesis can be used by policy-makers, stakeholders and researchers to understand how the issue has been prioritised, what approaches have been used to address it and implementation considerations. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42014013204.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moriah E Ellen
- Department of Health Systems Management, Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, PO Box 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.,Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th Floor, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.,McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, MML-417, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada
| | - Michael G Wilson
- McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, MML-417, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada. .,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. .,Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Marcela Vélez
- McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, MML-417, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada.,Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Cra. 51d #62-29, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
| | - Ruth Shach
- Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, 1 Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO, 63130, United States of America
| | - John N Lavis
- McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, MML-417, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Department of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Kaelan A Moat
- McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, MML-417, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.,Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gilbert H, Sutton S, Morris R, Petersen I, Wu Q, Parrott S, Galton S, Kale D, Magee MS, Gardner L, Nazareth I. Start2quit: a randomised clinical controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using personal tailored risk information and taster sessions to increase the uptake of the NHS Stop Smoking Services. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-206. [PMID: 28121288 DOI: 10.3310/hta21030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The NHS Stop Smoking Services (SSSs) offer help to smokers who want to quit. However, the proportion of smokers attending the SSSs is low and current figures show a continuing downward trend. This research addressed the problem of how to motivate more smokers to accept help to quit. OBJECTIVES To assess the relative effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness, of an intervention consisting of proactive recruitment by a brief computer-tailored personal risk letter and an invitation to a 'Come and Try it' taster session to provide information about the SSSs, compared with a standard generic letter advertising the service, in terms of attendance at the SSSs of at least one session and validated 7-day point prevalent abstinence at the 6-month follow-up. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention with follow-up 6 months after the date of randomisation. SETTING SSSs and general practices in England. PARTICIPANTS All smokers aged ≥ 16 years identified from medical records in participating practices who were motivated to quit and who had not attended the SSS in the previous 12 months. Participants were randomised in the ratio 3 : 2 (intervention to control) by a computer program. INTERVENTIONS Intervention - brief personalised and tailored letter sent from the general practitioner using information obtained from the screening questionnaire and from medical records, and an invitation to attend a taster session, run by the local SSS. Control - standard generic letter from the general practice advertising the local SSS and the therapies available, and asking the smoker to contact the service to make an appointment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES (1) Proportion of people attending the first session of a 6-week course over a period of 6 months from the receipt of the invitation letter, measured by records of attendance at the SSSs; (2) 7-day point prevalent abstinence at the 6-month follow-up, validated by salivary cotinine analysis; and (3) cost-effectiveness of the intervention. RESULTS Eighteen SSSs and 99 practices within the SSS areas participated; 4384 participants were randomised to the intervention (n = 2636) or control (n = 1748). One participant withdrew and 4383 were analysed. The proportion of people attending the first session of a SSS course was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group [17.4% vs. 9.0%; unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75 to 2.57; p < 0.001]. The validated 7-day point prevalent abstinence at the 6-month follow-up was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (9.0% vs. 5.6%; unadjusted OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.15; p < 0.001), as was the validated 3-month prolonged abstinence and all other periods of abstinence measured by self-report. Using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence decision-making threshold range of £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, the probability that the intervention was more cost-effective than the control was up to 27% at 6 months and > 86% over a lifetime horizon. LIMITATIONS Participating SSSs may not be representative of all SSSs in England. Recruitment was low, at 4%. CONCLUSIONS The Start2quit trial added to evidence that a proactive approach with an intensive intervention to deliver personalised risk information and offer a no-commitment introductory session can be successful in reaching more smokers and increasing the uptake of the SSS and quit rates. The intervention appears less likely to be cost-effective in the short term, but is highly likely to be cost-effective over a lifetime horizon. FUTURE WORK Further research could assess the separate effects of these components. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN76561916. FUNDING DETAILS This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazel Gilbert
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Sutton
- Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard Morris
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Irene Petersen
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Qi Wu
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Simon Galton
- Smokefree Camden (Public Health), NHS Camden, London, UK
| | - Dimitra Kale
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Molly Sweeney Magee
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Leanne Gardner
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Usher-Smith JA, Silarova B, Sharp SJ, Mills K, Griffin SJ. Effect of interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information on intentions and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e017717. [PMID: 29362249 PMCID: PMC5786113 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a comprehensive review of the impact on intention to change health-related behaviours and health-related behaviours themselves, including screening uptake, of interventions incorporating information about cancer risk targeted at the general adult population. DESIGN A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2017. INCLUSION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of interventions including provision of a personal estimate of future cancer risk based on two or more non-genetic variables to adults recruited from the general population that include at least one behavioural outcome. RESULTS We included 19 studies reporting 12 outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes between studies. There is evidence that interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information do not affect intention to attend or attendance at screening (relative risk 1.00 (0.97-1.03)). There is limited evidence that they increase smoking abstinence, sun protection, adult skin self-examination and breast examination, and decrease intention to tan. However, they do not increase smoking cessation, parental child skin examination or intention to protect skin. No studies assessed changes in diet, alcohol consumption or physical activity. CONCLUSIONS Interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information do not affect uptake of screening, but there is limited evidence of effect on some health-related behaviours. Further research, ideally including objective measures of behaviour, is needed before cancer risk information is incorporated into routine practice for health promotion in the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet A Usher-Smith
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Barbora Silarova
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen J Sharp
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katie Mills
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon J Griffin
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ratcliff CL, Kaphingst KA, Jensen JD. When Personal Feels Invasive: Foreseeing Challenges in Precision Medicine Communication. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 23:144-152. [PMID: 29279048 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1417514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Precision medicine (PM) draws upon individual biological and psychosocial factors to create a personalized approach to healthcare. To date, little is known about how healthcare consumers will respond to such highly personalized guidance and treatment. The assumption is that responses will generally be favorable; yet in the media and in online public discussions about PM, concerns have been raised about invasions of privacy and autonomy. Findings from the tailoring literature-relevant because PM is, in a sense, "hypertailoring"-similarly suggest a potential for provoking unintended consequences such as personalization reactance, wherein perceived threat to one's privacy or freedom can lead to rejection of the personalized message or its source. Here, we review extant tailoring and other relevant research to identify challenges that could arise in PM communication. We then draw upon a patient-centered communication perspective to highlight elements of the communication process wherein resistance could be mitigated. This review aims to provide preliminary guidance for practitioners when communicating with patients and healthcare consumers about PM, as well as point scholars toward fruitful topics for research in this emerging health communication area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea L Ratcliff
- a Department of Communication , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- a Department of Communication , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
- b Huntsman Cancer Institute , Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | - Jakob D Jensen
- a Department of Communication , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
- b Huntsman Cancer Institute , Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Semwal M, Taylor G, Car J. Personalised information for improving the uptake of smoking cessation programs. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2017; 5:260. [PMID: 28706928 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.04.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Semwal
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Gemma Taylor
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Josip Car
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.,Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Prevention of bleeding in hemophilia requires that plasma levels of the deficient factor exceed the desired minimum target level. Large interindividual variability suggests that knowledge of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) would help to achieve this goal, simultaneously minimizing infusion frequency and the amount of concentrate used. Population PK (PopPK) allows for the incorporation of determinants of interpatient variability and eliminates the need for extensive postinfusion plasma sampling. Barriers to implementation of PopPK are the need for concentrate specific models, Bayesian calculation power, specific expertise for validation and appraisal of forecasted estimates. The Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service – Hemophilia ( www.wapps-hemo.org ), developed by an international research network of hemophilia centers will test if PK-guided dose individualization can improve patient important outcomes in hemophilia.
Collapse
|
16
|
Gilbert H, Sutton S, Morris R, Petersen I, Galton S, Wu Q, Parrott S, Nazareth I. Effectiveness of personalised risk information and taster sessions to increase the uptake of smoking cessation services (Start2quit): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 389:823-833. [PMID: 28129989 PMCID: PMC5357975 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32379-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National Health Service Stop Smoking Services (SSSs) offer help to smokers motivated to quit; however, attendance rates are low and recent figures show a downward trend. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a two-component personalised intervention on attendance at SSSs. METHODS We did this randomised controlled trial in 18 SSSs in England. Current smokers (aged ≥16 years) were identified from medical records in 99 general practices and invited to participate by their general practitioner. Individuals who gave consent, were motivated to quit, and had not attended the SSS within the past 12 months, were randomly assigned (3:2), via computer-generated randomisation with permuted blocks (block size of five), to receive either an individually tailored risk letter and invitation to attend a no-commitment introductory session run by the local SSS (intervention group) or a standard generic letter advertising the local SSS (control group). Randomisation was stratified by sex. Masking of participants to receipt of a personal letter and invitation to a taster session was not possible. The personal letter was generated by a research assistant, but the remainder of the research team were masked to group allocation. General practitioners, practice staff, and SSS advisers were unaware of their patients' allocation. The primary outcome was attendance at the first session of an SSS course within 6 months from randomisation. We did analysis by intention to treat. This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN 76561916. FINDINGS Recruitment, collection of baseline data, delivery of the intervention, and follow up of participants took place between Jan 31, 2011, and July 12, 2014. We randomly assigned 4384 smokers to the intervention group (n=2636) or the control group (n=1748); 4383 participants comprised the intention-to-treat population. Attendance at the first session of an SSS course was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (458 [17·4%] vs 158 [9·0%] participants; unadjusted odds ratio 2·12 [95% CI 1·75-2·57]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION Delivery of personalised risk information alongside an invitation to an introductory session more than doubled the odds of attending the SSS compared with a standard generic invitation to contact the service. This result suggests that a more proactive approach, combined with an opportunity to experience local services, can reduce patient barriers to receiving treatment and has high potential to increase uptake. FUNDING National Institutes of Health Research Health Technology Assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazel Gilbert
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
| | - Stephen Sutton
- Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard Morris
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK
| | - Irene Petersen
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK
| | - Simon Galton
- Smokefree Camden (Public Health), NHS Camden, London, UK
| | - Qi Wu
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bould K, Daly B, Dunne S, Scott S, Asimakopoulou K. A Systematic Review of the Effect of Individualized Risk Communication Strategies on Screening Uptake and Its Psychological Predictors: The Role of Psychology Theory. Health Psychol Res 2016; 4:6157. [PMID: 28058289 PMCID: PMC5178819 DOI: 10.4081/hpr.2016.6157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 09/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
People might be more likely to attend for health screening if they are told their individual risk of an illness. The way this risk of ill-health is communicated might have an effect on screening uptake or its psychological proxies. It is possible that the format, presentation, and details of the information as well as the complexity of an intervention and use of psychological theory to inform the intervention may impact the effectiveness of individual risk communication. This systematic review collates, analyses and synthesizes the evidence for effectiveness of these aspects of individual risk communication. The synthesis indicated that written, individualized risk scores or categories are effective at supporting screening uptake and its psychological proxies. Complex, or theory-based interventions, surprisingly, are no more effective than simpler or atheoretical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Bould
- Division of Population and Patient Health, King's College London , UK
| | - Blanaid Daly
- Division of Population and Patient Health, King's College London , UK
| | - Stephen Dunne
- Division of Population and Patient Health, King's College London , UK
| | - Suzanne Scott
- Division of Population and Patient Health, King's College London , UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Simon ST, Higginson IJ, Booth S, Harding R, Weingärtner V, Bausewein C. Benzodiazepines for the relief of breathlessness in advanced malignant and non-malignant diseases in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 10:CD007354. [PMID: 27764523 PMCID: PMC6464146 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007354.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 1, 2010, on 'Benzodiazepines for the relief of breathlessness in advanced malignant and non-malignant diseases in adults'. Breathlessness is one of the most common symptoms experienced in the advanced stages of malignant and non-malignant disease. Benzodiazepines are widely used for the relief of breathlessness in advanced diseases and are regularly recommended in the literature. At the time of the previously published Cochrane review, there was no evidence for a beneficial effect of benzodiazepines for the relief of breathlessness in people with advanced cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to determine the efficacy of benzodiazepines for the relief of breathlessness in people with advanced disease. Secondary objectives were to determine the efficacy of different benzodiazepines, different doses of benzodiazepines, different routes of application, adverse effects of benzodiazepines, and the efficacy in different disease groups. SEARCH METHODS This is an update of a review published in 2010. We searched 14 electronic databases up to September 2009 for the original review. We checked the reference lists of all relevant studies, key textbooks, reviews, and websites. For the update, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE and registers of clinical trials for further ongoing or unpublished studies, up to August 2016. We contacted study investigators and experts in the field of palliative care asking for further studies, unpublished data, or study details when necessary. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) assessing the effect of benzodiazepines compared with placebo or active control in relieving breathlessness in people with advanced stages of cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic heart failure (CHF), motor neurone disease (MND), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed identified titles and abstracts. Three review authors independently performed assessment of all potentially relevant studies (full text), data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality. We carried out meta-analysis where appropriate. MAIN RESULTS Overall, we identified eight studies for inclusion: seven in the previous review and an additional study for this update. We also identified two studies awaiting classification in this update. The studies were small (a maximum number of 101 participants) and comprised data from a total of 214 participants with advanced cancer or COPD, which we analysed. There was only one study of low risk of bias. Most of the studies had an unclear risk of bias due to lack of information on random sequence generation, concealment, and attrition. Analysis of all studies did not show a beneficial effect of benzodiazepines for the relief of breathlessness (the primary outcome) in people with advanced cancer and COPD (8 studies, 214 participants) compared to placebo, midazolam, morphine, or promethazine. Furthermore, we observed no statistically significant effect in the prevention of episodic breathlessness (breakthrough dyspnoea) in people with cancer (after 48 hours: risk ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.09; 2 studies, 108 participants)) compared to morphine. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated no statistically significant differences regarding type of benzodiazepine, dose, route and frequency of delivery, duration of treatment, or type of control. Benzodiazepines caused statistically significantly more adverse events, particularly drowsiness and somnolence, when compared to placebo (risk difference 0.74 (95% CI 0.37, 1.11); 3 studies, 38 participants). In contrast, two studies reported that morphine caused more adverse events than midazolam (RD -0.18 (95% CI -0.31, -0.04); 194 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Since the last version of this review, we have identified one new study for inclusion, but the conclusions remain unchanged. There is no evidence for or against benzodiazepines for the relief of breathlessness in people with advanced cancer and COPD. Benzodiazepines caused more drowsiness as an adverse effect compared to placebo, but less compared to morphine. Benzodiazepines may be considered as a second- or third-line treatment, when opioids and non-pharmacological measures have failed to control breathlessness. There is a need for well-conducted and adequately powered studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen T Simon
- Institute of Palliative Care (ipac)Jägerstr. 64‐66OldenburgGermany26121
- University Hospital of CologneDepartment of Palliative MedicineCologneGermany
- King's College LondonDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders InstituteLondonUK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- King's College LondonDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders InstituteLondonUK
| | - Sara Booth
- Cambridge University HospitalsDepartment of Palliative CareCambridgeUK
| | - Richard Harding
- King's College LondonDepartment of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders InstituteLondonUK
| | - Vera Weingärtner
- University Hospital of CologneDepartment of Palliative MedicineCologneGermany
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- LMU MunichDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Munich University HospitalMarchioninistr. 15MunichGermany81377
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barley EA, Borschmann RD, Walters P, Tylee A. Interventions to encourage uptake of cancer screening for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9:CD009641. [PMID: 27668891 PMCID: PMC6457619 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009641.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with severe mental illness (i.e. schizophrenia or other related psychotic disorders and bipolar disorder) can be at greater risk of cancer than those without severe mental illness (SMI). Early detection of cancer through screening is effective in improving patient outcomes including death. However, people with SMI are less likely than others to take up available cancer screening. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of interventions targeted at adults with SMI, or their carers or health professionals, and aimed at increasing the uptake of cancer screening tests for which the adults with SMI are eligible. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register (October 25, 2012; December 19, 2014; April 07, 2015; July 04, 2016). SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions, targeted towards adults with SMI or their carers or health professionals, to encourage uptake of cancer screening tests for which the adults with SMI were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed these against the inclusion criteria. MAIN RESULTS We did not find any trials that met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS A comprehensive search showed that currently there is no RCT evidence for any method of encouraging cancer screening uptake in people with SMI. No specific approach can therefore be recommended. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed urgently to help address the disparity between people with SMI and others in cancer screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Barley
- University of West LondonCollege of Nursing, Midwifery and HealthcareParagon HouseBoston Manor RoadBrentfordMiddlesexUKTW8 9GA
| | - Rohan D Borschmann
- Royal Children's HospitalCentre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteFlemington RoadParkvilleMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3052
| | - Paul Walters
- Dorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust and Bournemouth UniversityDepartment of Mental HealthC/o Weymouth & Portland CMHTRadipole LaneWeymouthUKDT4 0QE
| | - Andre Tylee
- King's College LondonHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of PsychiatryDe Crespigny ParkLondonUKSE5 8AF
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Carey M, Sanson-Fisher R, Macrae F, Cameron E, Hill D, D'Este C, Simmons J, Doran C. Can a print-based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Public Health 2016; 40:582-587. [PMID: 27625308 PMCID: PMC5157779 DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Revised: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To test the effectiveness of a targeted print‐based intervention to improve screening adherence in first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: People with CRC and their adult first degree relatives were identified through a population‐based cancer registry and randomly allocated as a family unit to the intervention or control condition. The control group received general information about CRC screening. The intervention group received printed advice regarding screening that was targeted to their risk level. Screening adherence was assessed at baseline and at 12 months via self report. Results: 752 (25%) index cases and 574 (34%) eligible first degree relatives consented to take part in the trial and completed baseline interviews. At 12 months, 58% of first degree relatives in the control group and 61% in the intervention group were adherent to screening guidelines (mixed effects logistic regression group by time interaction effect =2.7; 95%CI=1.2–5.9; P=0.013). Subgroup analysis indicated that the intervention was only effective for those with the lowest risk. Conclusions: Provision of personalised risk information may have a modest effect on adherence to CRC screening recommendations among first degree relatives of people diagnosed with CRC. Implications: Improved strategies for identifying and engaging first degree relatives are needed to maximise the population impact of the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Carey
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales.,Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New South Wales
| | - Robert Sanson-Fisher
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales.,Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New South Wales
| | - Finlay Macrae
- University of Melbourne, Victoria.,Cancer Council Victoria.,Department of Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria
| | - Emilie Cameron
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales.,Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New South Wales
| | - David Hill
- University of Melbourne, Victoria.,Cancer Council Victoria
| | - Catherine D'Este
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory
| | | | - Christopher Doran
- School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chowdhury S, Henneman L, Dent T, Hall A, Burton A, Pharoah P, Pashayan N, Burton H. Do Health Professionals Need Additional Competencies for Stratified Cancer Prevention Based on Genetic Risk Profiling? J Pers Med 2015; 5:191-212. [PMID: 26068647 PMCID: PMC4493496 DOI: 10.3390/jpm5020191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2015] [Revised: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 05/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
There is growing evidence that inclusion of genetic information about known common susceptibility variants may enable population risk-stratification and personalized prevention for common diseases including cancer. This would require the inclusion of genetic testing as an integral part of individual risk assessment of an asymptomatic individual. Front line health professionals would be expected to interact with and assist asymptomatic individuals through the risk stratification process. In that case, additional knowledge and skills may be needed. Current guidelines and frameworks for genetic competencies of non-specialist health professionals place an emphasis on rare inherited genetic diseases. For common diseases, health professionals do use risk assessment tools but such tools currently do not assess genetic susceptibility of individuals. In this article, we compare the skills and knowledge needed by non-genetic health professionals, if risk-stratified prevention is implemented, with existing competence recommendations from the UK, USA and Europe, in order to assess the gaps in current competences. We found that health professionals would benefit from understanding the contribution of common genetic variations in disease risk, the rationale for a risk-stratified prevention pathway, and the implications of using genomic information in risk-assessment and risk management of asymptomatic individuals for common disease prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, The Netherlands.
| | - Tom Dent
- PHG Foundation, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
| | - Alison Hall
- PHG Foundation, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
| | - Alice Burton
- UCL Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, Cruciform Building, 90 Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Departments of Oncology and of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
| | - Nora Pashayan
- UCL Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Hilary Burton
- PHG Foundation, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Willis A, Rivers P, Gray LJ, Davies M, Khunti K. The effectiveness of screening for diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk factors in a community pharmacy setting. PLoS One 2014; 9:e91157. [PMID: 24690919 PMCID: PMC3972156 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2013] [Accepted: 02/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Risk factors for cardiovascular disease including diabetes have seen a large rise in prevalence in recent years. This has prompted interest in prevention through the identifying individuals at risk of both diabetes and cardiovascular disease and has seen increased investment in screening interventions taking place in primary care. Community pharmacies have become increasingly involved in the provision of such interventions and this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to gather and analyse the existing literature assessing community pharmacy based screening for risk factors for diabetes and those with a high cardiovascular disease risk. Methods We conducted systematic searches of electronic databases using MeSH and free text terms from 1950 to March 2012. For our analysis two outcomes were assessed. They were the percentage of those screened who were referred for further assessment by primary care and the uptake of this referral. Results Sixteen studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria comprising 108,414 participants screened. There was significant heterogeneity for all included outcomes. Consequently we have not presented summary statistics and present forest plots with I2 and p values to describe heterogeneity. We found that all included studies suffered from high rates of attrition between pharmacy screening and follow up. We have also identified a strong trend towards higher rates for referral in more recent studies. Conclusions Our results show that pharmacies are feasible sites for screening for diabetes and those at risk of cardiovascular disease. A significant number of previously unknown cases of cardiovascular disease risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes are identified, however a significant number of referred participants at high risk do not attend their practitioner for follow up. Research priorities should include methods of increasing uptake to follow up testing and early intervention, to maximise the efficacy of screening interventions based in community pharmacies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Willis
- Diabetes Research Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Peter Rivers
- DeMontford University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Laura J. Gray
- Diabetes Research Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie Davies
- Diabetes Research Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jørgensen JM, Hedley PL, Gjerris M, Christiansen M. Including ethical considerations in models for first-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 28:638-43. [PMID: 24631382 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2012] [Revised: 11/01/2013] [Accepted: 01/22/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Recent efforts to develop reliable and efficient early pregnancy screening programmes for pre-eclampsia have focused on combining clinical, biochemical and biophysical markers. The same model has been used for first-trimester screening for fetal aneuploidies i.e. prenatal diagnosis (PD), which is routinely offered to all pregnant women in many developed countries. Some studies suggest combining PD and pre-eclampsia screening, so women can be offered testing for a number of conditions at the same clinical visit. A combination of these tests may be practical in terms of saving time and resources; however, the combination raises ethical issues. First-trimester PD and pre-eclampsia screening entail qualitative differences which alter the requirements for disclosure, non-directedness and consent with regard to the informed consent process. This article explores the differences related to the ethical issues raised by PD and pre-eclampsia in order to elucidate which factors are relevant to deciding the type of information and consent required in each context from the perspective of the ethical principles of beneficence and autonomy. Furthermore, it argues that ensuring respect for patient autonomy is context dependent and, consequently, pre-eclampsia screening and PD should be performed independently of one another.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Jørgensen
- Department of Biochemistry, Immunology and Genetics, Statens Serums Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - P L Hedley
- Department of Biochemistry, Immunology and Genetics, Statens Serums Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - M Gjerris
- Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Institute of Food and Resource Economics, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - M Christiansen
- Department of Biochemistry, Immunology and Genetics, Statens Serums Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Barley E, Borschmann R, Walters P, Tylee A. Interventions to encourage uptake of cancer screening for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD009641. [PMID: 23857563 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009641.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with severe mental illness (i.e. schizophrenia or other related psychotic disorders and bipolar disorder) can be at greater risk of cancer than those without severe mental illness (SMI). Early detection of cancer through screening is effective in improving patient outcomes including death. However, people with SMI are less likely than others to take up available cancer screening. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of interventions targeted at adults with SMI, or their carers or health professionals, and aimed at increasing the uptake of cancer screening tests for which the adults with SMI are eligible. SEARCH METHODS We searched electronically the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (25th October 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions, targeted towards adults with SMI or their carers or health professionals, to encourage uptake of cancer screening tests for which the adults with SMI were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed these against the inclusion criteria. MAIN RESULTS We did not find any trials that met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS A comprehensive search showed that currently there is no RCT evidence for any method of encouraging cancer screening uptake in people with SMI. No specific approach can therefore be recommended. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed urgently to help address the disparity between people with SMI and others in cancer screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Barley
- Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chowdhury S, Dent T, Pashayan N, Hall A, Lyratzopoulos G, Hallowell N, Hall P, Pharoah P, Burton H. Incorporating genomics into breast and prostate cancer screening: assessing the implications. Genet Med 2013; 15:423-32. [PMID: 23412607 PMCID: PMC3941015 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2012] [Accepted: 11/13/2012] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Individual risk prediction and stratification based on polygenic profiling may be useful in disease prevention. Risk-stratified population screening based on multiple factors including a polygenic risk profile has the potential to be more efficient than age-stratified screening. In this article, we summarize the implications of personalized screening for breast and prostate cancers. We report the opinions of multidisciplinary international experts who have explored the scientific, ethical, and logistical aspects of stratified screening. We have identified (i) the need to recognize the benefits and harms of personalized screening as compared with existing screening methods, (ii) that the use of genetic data highlights complex ethical issues including discrimination against high-risk individuals by insurers and employers and patient autonomy in relation to genetic testing of minors, (iii) the need for transparency and clear communication about risk scores, about harms and benefits, and about reasons for inclusion and exclusion from the risk-based screening process, and (iv) the need to develop new professional competences and to assess cost-effectiveness and acceptability of stratified screening programs before implementation. We conclude that health professionals and stakeholders need to consider the implications of incorporating genetic information in intervention strategies for health-care planning in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susmita Chowdhury
- Department of Public Health Genomics, PHG Foundation, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Camilloni L, Ferroni E, Cendales BJ, Pezzarossi A, Furnari G, Borgia P, Guasticchi G, Giorgi Rossi P. Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:464. [PMID: 23663511 PMCID: PMC3686655 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2012] [Accepted: 04/26/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Community recommends the implementation of population-based screening programmes for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers. This recommendation is supported by many observational studies showing that organised programmes effectively reduce mortality and control the inappropriate use of screening tests. We conducted a systematic review of studies assessing the efficacy of interventions to increase participation in organised population-based screening programs. METHODS We included all studies on interventions aimed at increasing screening participation published between 1/1999 and 7/2012. For those published before 1999, we considered the Jepson et al. (2000) review (Health Technol Assess 4:1-133, 2000). RESULTS Including studies from the Jepson review, we found 69 with quantitative information on interventions in organised screening: 19 for cervical, 26 for breast, 20 colorectal cancers, and 4 for cervical and breast cancer together.Effective interventions were: postal (breast RR = 1,37 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 1.25-1.51; cervical RR = 1.71 95% CI: 1.60-1.83; colorectal RR = 1.33 95% CI: 1.17-1.51) and telephone reminders (with heterogeneous methods for implementation); GP's signature on invitation letter (breast RR = 1.13 95% CI: 1.11-1.16; cervical RR = 1.20 95% CI: 1.10-1.30; colorectal RR = 1.15 95% CI: 1.07-1.24); scheduled appointment instead of open appointment (breast RR = 1.26 95% CI: 1.02-1.55; cervical RR = 1.49 95% CI: 1.27-1.75; colorectal RR = 1.79 95% CI: 1.65-1.93). Mailing a kit for self-sampling cervical specimens increased participation in non-responders (RR = 2.37 95% CI: 1.44-3.90). CONCLUSION Although some interventions did prove to be effective, some specific variables may influence their effectiveness in and applicability to organised population-based screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Camilloni
- Laziosanità – Agency for Public Health, Lazio Region, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Steele JR, Wall M, Salkowski N, Mitby P, Kawashima T, Yeazel MW, Hudson MM, Robison LL, Mertens AC. Predictors of risk-based medical follow-up: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Cancer Surviv 2013; 7:379-91. [PMID: 23568405 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-013-0280-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2013] [Accepted: 03/08/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to conduct an intervention study designed to assess the effectiveness of using a newsletter to increase medical follow-up in pediatric cancer survivors at risk of selected treatment complications. METHODS Survivors participating in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study who were at least 25 years of age and at risk of cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, or osteoporosis related to previous cancer treatment were randomly assigned to receive a newsletter featuring brief health risk information or a newsletter including an insert providing more comprehensive health risk information. A follow-up survey distributed 24 months after the newsletter intervention assessed predictors of medical follow-up. RESULTS Overall, there were no differences found among the groups in terms of access to a treatment summary, medical follow-up, discussion of childhood cancer health risks, and medical screening for the targeted health behaviors. One exception, indicating borderline significance was that women at risk for osteoporosis who received the newsletter insert were more likely to have discussed their risk with a doctor than those who only received the brief information (10.1 % vs. 4.0 % p = 0.05). Discussion of breast cancer (OR = 2.15; 95 % CI = 1.74-2.66), heart disease (OR = 5.54; 95 % CI = 4.67-6.57) and osteoporosis (OR = 10.6; 95 % CI = 8.34-13.47) risk with physician significantly predicted report of undergoing screening for targeted behavior in previous 2 years as did physician access to treatment summary. CONCLUSIONS More detailed content in a newsletter had minimal effect on recommended screening. However, survivor's discussion of cancer-related risks with one's doctor significantly influenced participation in health screening. These results highlight the integral role of communication in health behavior. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This study is designed to assess communication strategies that increase medical follow-up in pediatric cancer survivors at risk of selected treatment complications. The results are of great importance not only to the pediatric oncology community but also the broad range of adult oncology medical specialties who are directly involved in the long-term medical care of this ever increasing population of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne R Steele
- Office of Statewide Health Improvement Initiatives, Minnesota Dept. of Health, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Newton JT. Interdisciplinary health promotion: a call for theory-based interventions drawing on the skills of multiple disciplines. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2013; 40 Suppl 2:49-54. [PMID: 22998305 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00720.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Promoting the health of populations demands the adoption of a perspective exploring the societal, political, community, family and individual determinants of health. I will argue that to develop interventions to modify health-related behaviours and health risks requires collaboration with a range of disciplines, in order to draw upon their theoretical, empirical and oftentimes political knowledge. To illustrate this thesis, I will draw upon research in three areas: improving oral health-related behaviours in individuals with periodontal disease and childhood caries; encouraging early recognition in head and neck cancer; and managing dental anxiety. Reviews of oral health education in the early 1990 s suggested that approaches based on education were largely ineffective in the absence of the provision of fluoride supplementation. More recently, high-quality research has identified simple, theory-based interventions that can improve adherence to specific oral hygiene-related behaviours. Similarly, a range of studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of motivational interviewing for targeting caries-related behaviours in targeted groups. Dental anxiety remains a significant barrier to the uptake of dental services, and again, by working in multi-disciplinary teams, a proportionate and comprehensive range of interventions can be adopted to alleviate the burden of dental fear. Finally, head and neck cancer has potentially serious effects for sufferers, but often presents late for a variety of reasons. Through developing a theoretical model of help-seeking behaviour, psychologists have been able to identify targets for interventions and work together with the healthcare team to develop these.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathon Timothy Newton
- Unit of Social and Behavioural Sciences, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Edwards AGK, Naik G, Ahmed H, Elwyn GJ, Pickles T, Hood K, Playle R. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD001865. [PMID: 23450534 PMCID: PMC6464864 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001865.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a trend towards greater patient involvement in healthcare decisions. Although screening is usually perceived as good for the health of the population, there are risks associated with the tests involved. Achieving both adequate involvement of consumers and informed decision making are now seen as important goals for screening programmes. Personalised risk estimates have been shown to be effective methods of risk communication. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of personalised risk communication on informed decision making by individuals taking screening tests. We also assess individual components that constitute informed decisions. SEARCH METHODS Two authors searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2012), MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), CINAHL (EbscoHOST) and PsycINFO (OvidSP) without language restrictions. We searched from 2006 to March 2012. The date ranges for the previous searches were from 1989 to December 2005 for PsycINFO and from 1985 to December 2005 for other databases. For the original version of this review, we also searched CancerLit and Science Citation Index (March 2001). We also reviewed the reference lists and conducted citation searches of included studies and other systematic reviews in the field, to identify any studies missed during the initial search. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials incorporating an intervention with a 'personalised risk communication element' for individuals undergoing screening procedures, and reporting measures of informed decisions and also cognitive, affective, or behavioural outcomes addressing the decision by such individuals, of whether or not to undergo screening. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed each included trial for risk of bias, and extracted data. We extracted data about the nature and setting of interventions, and relevant outcome data. We used standard statistical methods to combine data using RevMan version 5, including analysis according to different levels of detail of personalised risk communication, different conditions for screening, and studies based only on high-risk participants rather than people at 'average' risk. MAIN RESULTS We included 41 studies involving 28,700 people. Nineteen new studies were identified in this update, adding to the 22 studies included in the previous two iterations of the review. Three studies measured informed decision with regard to the uptake of screening following personalised risk communication as a part of their intervention. All of these three studies were at low risk of bias and there was strong evidence that the interventions enhanced informed decision making, although with heterogeneous results. Overall 45.2% (592/1309) of participants who received personalised risk information made informed choices, compared to 20.2% (229/1135) of participants who received generic risk information. The overall odds ratios (ORs) for informed decision were 4.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.62 to 5.53 for fixed effect) and 3.65 (95% CI 2.13 to 6.23 for random effects). Nine studies measured increase in knowledge, using different scales. All of these studies showed an increase in knowledge with personalised risk communication. In three studies the interventions showed a trend towards more accurate risk perception, but the evidence was of poor quality. Four out of six studies reported non-significant changes in anxiety following personalised risk communication to the participants. Overall there was a small non-significant decrease in the anxiety scores. Most studies (32/41) measured the uptake of screening tests following interventions. Our results (OR 1.15 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.29)) constitute low quality evidence, consistent with a small effect, that personalised risk communication in which a risk score was provided (6 studies) or the participants were given their categorised risk (6 studies), increases uptake of screening tests. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is strong evidence from three trials that personalised risk estimates incorporated within communication interventions for screening programmes enhance informed choices. However the evidence for increasing the uptake of such screening tests with similar interventions is weak, and it is not clear if this increase is associated with informed choices. Studies included a diverse range of screening programmes. Therefore, data from this review do not allow us to draw conclusions about the best interventions to deliver personalised risk communication for enhancing informed decisions. The results are dominated by findings from the topic area of mammography and colorectal cancer. Caution is therefore required in generalising from these results, and particularly for clinical topics other than mammography and colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian G K Edwards
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School ofMedicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Giguere A, Légaré F, Grad R, Pluye P, Haynes RB, Cauchon M, Rousseau F, Alvarez Argote J, Labrecque M. Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: the user experience. Implement Sci 2012; 7:72. [PMID: 22862935 PMCID: PMC3533695 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2011] [Accepted: 06/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This project engages patients and physicians in the development of Decision Boxes, short clinical topic summaries covering medical questions that have no single best answer. Decision Boxes aim to prepare the clinician to communicate the risks and benefits of the available options to the patient so they can make an informed decision together. METHODS Seven researchers (including four practicing family physicians) selected 10 clinical topics relevant to primary care practice through a Delphi survey. We then developed two one-page prototypes on two of these topics: prostate cancer screening with the prostate-specific antigen test, and prenatal screening for trisomy 21 with the serum integrated test. We presented the prototypes to purposeful samples of family physicians distributed in two focus groups, and patients distributed in four focus groups. We used the User Experience Honeycomb to explore barriers and facilitators to the communication design used in Decision Boxes. All discussions were transcribed, and three researchers proceeded to thematic content analysis of the transcriptions. The coding scheme was first developed from the Honeycomb's seven themes (valuable, usable, credible, useful, desirable, accessible, and findable), and included new themes suggested by the data. Prototypes were modified in light of our findings. RESULTS Three rounds were necessary for a majority of researchers to select 10 clinical topics. Fifteen physicians and 33 patients participated in the focus groups. Following analyses, three sections were added to the Decision Boxes: introduction, patient counseling, and references. The information was spread to two pages to try to make the Decision Boxes less busy and improve users' first impression. To try to improve credibility, we gave more visibility to the research institutions involved in development. A statement on the boxes' purpose and a flow chart representing the shared decision-making process were added with the intent of clarifying the tool's purpose. Information about the risks and benefits according to risk levels was added to the Decision Boxes, to try to ease the adaptation of the information to individual patients. CONCLUSION Results will guide the development of the eight remaining Decision Boxes. A future study will evaluate the effect of Decision Boxes on the integration of evidence-based and shared decision making principles in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anik Giguere
- Health Information Research Unit, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, CRL-139 1280 Main Street, West Hamilton, ON L8S 4 K1, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Willis A, Davies M, Yates T, Khunti K. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease using validated risk scores: a systematic review. J R Soc Med 2012; 105:348-56. [PMID: 22907552 PMCID: PMC3423129 DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.110193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the increased cost of treatment have prompted strategies for the primary prevention of CVD in the UK to move towards the use of validated CVD risk scores to identify individuals at the highest risk. There are no reviews evaluating the effectiveness of this strategy as a means of reducing CVD risk or mortality. This review summarizes current evidence for and against the use of validated CVD risk scores for the primary prevention of CVD. DESIGN We utilized an in depth search strategy to search MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database of clinical trials, expert opinions were sought and reference lists of identified studies and relevant reviews were checked. Due to a lack of homogeneity in outcomes and risk scores used it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis of the identified studies. SETTING The majority of included trials were carried out in a primary care setting. 2 trials were carried out in North America, 2 in Scandinavia and 1 in the UK. PARTICIPANTS 31,651 participants in total were recruited predominantly from a primary care setting. Participants were aged 18-65 years old and were free from CVD at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures used in the included studies were change in validated CVD risk score and CVD/All-cause mortality. RESULTS We identified 16 papers which matched the inclusion criteria reporting 5 unique trials. Due to a lack of homogeneity in outcomes and risk scores used it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis of the identified studies. Only one study reported a significant difference in risk score at follow up and one study reported a significant difference in total mortality, however significant differences in individual risk factors were reported by the majority of identified studies. CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrates the potential for multifactorial interventions aimed at individuals selected by CVD risk scores for lowering CVD risk and mortality. However, the majority of studies in this area do not provide an intensity of intervention which is sufficient in significantly reducing CVD mortality or validated CVD risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Willis
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 2012; 7:50. [PMID: 22651257 PMCID: PMC3462671 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1331] [Impact Index Per Article: 110.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2011] [Accepted: 05/31/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the most consistent findings from clinical and health services research is the failure to translate research into practice and policy. As a result of these evidence-practice and policy gaps, patients fail to benefit optimally from advances in healthcare and are exposed to unnecessary risks of iatrogenic harms, and healthcare systems are exposed to unnecessary expenditure resulting in significant opportunity costs. Over the last decade, there has been increasing international policy and research attention on how to reduce the evidence-practice and policy gap. In this paper, we summarise the current concepts and evidence to guide knowledge translation activities, defined as T2 research (the translation of new clinical knowledge into improved health). We structure the article around five key questions: what should be transferred; to whom should research knowledge be transferred; by whom should research knowledge be transferred; how should research knowledge be transferred; and, with what effect should research knowledge be transferred? DISCUSSION We suggest that the basic unit of knowledge translation should usually be up-to-date systematic reviews or other syntheses of research findings. Knowledge translators need to identify the key messages for different target audiences and to fashion these in language and knowledge translation products that are easily assimilated by different audiences. The relative importance of knowledge translation to different target audiences will vary by the type of research and appropriate endpoints of knowledge translation may vary across different stakeholder groups. There are a large number of planned knowledge translation models, derived from different disciplinary, contextual (i.e., setting), and target audience viewpoints. Most of these suggest that planned knowledge translation for healthcare professionals and consumers is more likely to be successful if the choice of knowledge translation strategy is informed by an assessment of the likely barriers and facilitators. Although our evidence on the likely effectiveness of different strategies to overcome specific barriers remains incomplete, there is a range of informative systematic reviews of interventions aimed at healthcare professionals and consumers (i.e., patients, family members, and informal carers) and of factors important to research use by policy makers. SUMMARY There is a substantial (if incomplete) evidence base to guide choice of knowledge translation activities targeting healthcare professionals and consumers. The evidence base on the effects of different knowledge translation approaches targeting healthcare policy makers and senior managers is much weaker but there are a profusion of innovative approaches that warrant further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Box 711, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Martin P Eccles
- Newcastle University, Institute of Health and Society, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - John N Lavis
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics; and Department of Political Science, McMaster Health Forum, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sophie J Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, Australian Institute for Primary Care & Ageing, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Janet E Squires
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Patient follow-up after participating in a beach-based skin cancer screening program. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2012; 9:1836-45. [PMID: 22754476 PMCID: PMC3386590 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9051836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2012] [Revised: 04/25/2012] [Accepted: 05/02/2012] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Many skin cancer screenings occur in non-traditional community settings, with the beach being an important setting due to beachgoers being at high risk for skin cancer. This study is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial of a skin cancer intervention in which participants (n = 312) had a full-body skin examination by a clinician and received a presumptive diagnosis (abnormal finding, no abnormal finding). Participants’ pursuit of follow-up was assessed post-intervention (n = 283). Analyses examined: (1) participant’s recall of screening results; and (2) whether cognitive and behavioral variables were associated with follow-up being as advised. Just 12% of participants (36/312) did not correctly recall the results of their skin examination. One-third (33%, 93/283) of participants’ follow-up was classified as being not as advised (recommend follow-up not pursued, unadvised follow-up pursued). Among participants whose follow-up was not as advised, 71% (66/93) did not seek recommended care. None of the measured behavioral and cognitive variables were significantly associated with recall of screening examination results or whether follow-up was as advised. Research is needed to determine what factors are associated with follow-up being as advised and to develop messages that increase receipt of advised follow-up care.
Collapse
|
34
|
[How can early detection programs become a men's health topic? Survey of urology practices]. Urologe A 2012; 50:1600-5. [PMID: 22009256 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2705-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various statistics demonstrate the importance of medical prevention in men. METHOD As one example, overall survival is increased with the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. In this article information from 212 consecutive patients with an appointment in a urology practice is presented and discussed. Of special interest are factors that motivate men to participate in early detection programs for prostate cancer. The data give an insight into reasoning and motivation for men to participate in such programs and criteria to select a specific urology practice. RESULTS The results, which also include diagnostic methods that are not covered by the general German health insurance and have to be paid by the patient himself, can help the urologist promote diagnostic tools and identify areas of deficit. A key role is played by the family physician. Our results show that he is the primary source for health-related questions. He has the best opportunity to draw the attention of the mature and critical patient to measures of precaution and emphasize their importance. This is especially true for the large group of men who so far have not participated in early detection programs since they apparently are not aware of their own personal health risk.
Collapse
|
35
|
Howard K, Salkeld G, Pignone M, Hewett P, Cheung P, Olsen J, Clapton W, Roberts-Thomson IC. Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2011; 14:1146-52. [PMID: 22152186 PMCID: PMC3466595 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2011] [Revised: 05/16/2011] [Accepted: 07/03/2011] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is an alternative diagnostic test to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer and polyps. The aim of this study was to determine test characteristics important to patients and to examine trade-offs in attributes that patients are willing to accept in the context of the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. METHODS A discrete choice study was used to assess preferences of patients with clinical indications suspicious of colorectal cancer who experienced both CTC and colonoscopy as part of a diagnostic accuracy study in South Australia. Results were analyzed by using a mixed logit model and presented as odds ratios (ORs) for preferring CTC over colonoscopy. RESULTS Colonoscopy was preferred over CTC as the need for a second procedure after CTC increased (OR of preferring CTC to colonoscopy = 0.013), as the likelihood of missing cancers or polyps increased (OR of preferring CTC to colonoscopy = 0.62), and as CTC test cost increased (OR of preferring CTC to colonoscopy = 0.65-0.80). CTC would be preferred to colonoscopy if a minimal bowel preparation was available (OR = 1.7). Some patients were prepared to trade off the diagnostic and therapeutic advantage of colonoscopy for a CTC study with a less intensive bowel preparation. Preferences also varied significantly with sociodemographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Despite CTC's often being perceived as a preferred test, this may not always be the case. Informed decision making for diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer should include discussion of the benefits, downsides, and uncertainties associated with alternative tests, as patients are willing and able to make trade-offs between what they perceive as the advantages and disadvantages of these diagnostic tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Howard
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rubinstein WS, Acheson LS, O'Neill SM, Ruffin MT, Wang C, Beaumont JL, Rothrock N. Clinical utility of family history for cancer screening and referral in primary care: a report from the Family Healthware Impact Trial. Genet Med 2011; 13:956-65. [PMID: 22075527 PMCID: PMC3425444 DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e3182241d88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness of computerized familial risk assessment and tailored messages for identifying individuals for targeted cancer prevention strategies and motivating behavior change. METHODS We conducted a randomized clinical trial in primary care patients aged 35-65 years using Family Healthware, a self-administered, internet-based tool that collects family history for six common diseases including breast cancer, colon cancer, and ovarian cancer, stratifies risk into three tiers, and provides tailored prevention messages. Cancer screening adherence and consultation were measured at baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS Of 3283 participants, 34% were at strong or moderate risk of at least one of the cancers. Family Healthware identified additional participants for whom earlier screening (colon cancer, 4.4%; breast cancer, women ages: 35-39 years, 9%) or genetic assessment (colon cancer, 2.5%; breast cancer, 10%; and ovarian cancer, 4%) may be indicated. Fewer than half were already adherent with risk-based screening. Screening adherence improved for all risk categories with no difference between intervention and control groups. Consultation with specialists did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION Family Healthware identified patients for intensified cancer prevention. Engagement of clinicians and patients, integration with clinical decision support, and inclusion of nonfamilial risk factors may be necessary to achieve the full potential of computerized risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy S Rubinstein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois 60201, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rotthoff T, Baehring T, David DM, Bartnick C, Linde F, Willers R, Schäfer RD, Scherbaum WA. The value of training in communication skills for continuing medical education. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2011; 84:170-5. [PMID: 20888726 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2009] [Revised: 06/30/2010] [Accepted: 07/23/2010] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Question arises as to what extent communication skills are considered in continuing medical education (CME). METHODS Analysis for CME-courses in communication skills in the area of the Chamber of Physicians North Rhine (ÄkNo), Germany. Supply Arm(A): CME events (n = 19,320) certified in 2007 were evaluated. Demand Arm(B): course participation of 850 family physicians in the period 2002-2007 was analyzed (n = 37,724). Tests were calculated to the level 0.05 using Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS (A) 388 (2.0%) events were concerned with the topic communications. 59.3% involved active cooperation of the participants. 0.5% events devoted more than 50% of their duration to the topic communication. Proportions in the subjects of internal medicine, general medicine and pediatrics amounted to 0.2%. (B) 803 (2.1%) events with a focus on communication were identified. Women took part in significantly more events than men (p<0.002) and selected more interactive courses. CONCLUSION Content on communication training was small. Increasing experience does not automatically improve communication skills but an extent of deliberate praxis seems to be necessary and must be sought and developed. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Communication skills are still insufficiently provided in CME-courses and should be more directed to focus as treatment strategies and scientifically investigated for outcome improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Rotthoff
- Department for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Rheumatology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dirmaier J, Härter M. Stärkung der Selbstbeteiligung in der Rehabilitation. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2011; 54:411-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00103-011-1243-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
39
|
Quillin JM, Bodurtha JN, McClish D, Wilson DB. Genetic risk, perceived risk, and cancer worry in daughters of breast cancer patients. J Genet Couns 2011; 20:157-64. [PMID: 21132457 PMCID: PMC4870590 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9336-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2010] [Accepted: 11/08/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
This study explored relationships between worry, perceived risk for breast cancer, consulting a genetic counselor, having genetic testing, and genetic risk for women whose mothers had breast cancer. Analyses involved data from a community-based phone survey of women whose mothers had breast cancer. Participants were categorized as having low, intermediate, or high genetic risk based on their reported family history, in accordance with an accepted classification scheme. The Lerman Breast Cancer Worry Scale measured worry, and participants reported their perceived lifetime likelihood of breast cancer, risk compared to others, and chance from 1 to 100. ANOVA, chi-square, and multiple regression analyses were conducted as appropriate. One hundred-fifty women participated. Mean age was 38 years, and 81% were Caucasian. Fifty-two women had low, 74 had intermediate, and 24 had high genetic risk for breast cancer. There were no significant differences in worry or perceived risk by hereditary risk category. Most high-risk women (91%) had not spoken with a genetic counselor, and no one had previous genetic testing. These findings suggest perceived risk, worry about breast cancer, and use of expert consultation do not match the genetic contribution to risk. There is a need for effectively stratifying and communicating risk in the community and providing tailored reassurance or referral for high-risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Quillin
- Department of Human & Molecular Genetics and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 E. Marshall St, Richmond, VA 23298-0033, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schroll JB, Moustgaard R, Gøtzsche PC. Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11:22. [PMID: 21349195 PMCID: PMC3056846 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2010] [Accepted: 02/24/2011] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses is often tricky, and there is only limited advice for authors on what to do. We investigated how authors addressed different degrees of heterogeneity, in particular whether they used a fixed effect model, which assumes that all the included studies are estimating the same true effect, or a random effects model where this is not assumed. METHODS We sampled randomly 60 Cochrane reviews from 2008, which presented a result in its first meta-analysis with substantial heterogeneity (I2 greater than 50%, i.e. more than 50% of the variation is due to heterogeneity rather than chance). We extracted information on choice of statistical model, how the authors had handled the heterogeneity, and assessed the methodological quality of the reviews in relation to this. RESULTS The distribution of heterogeneity was rather uniform in the whole I2 interval, 50-100%. A fixed effect model was used in 33 reviews (55%), but there was no correlation between I2 and choice of model (P = 0.79). We considered that 20 reviews (33%), 16 of which had used a fixed effect model, had major problems. The most common problems were: use of a fixed effect model and lack of rationale for choice of that model, lack of comment on even severe heterogeneity and of reservations and explanations of its likely causes. The problematic reviews had significantly fewer included trials than other reviews (4.3 vs. 8.0, P = 0.024). The problems became less pronounced with time, as those reviews that were most recently updated more often used a random effects model. CONCLUSION One-third of Cochrane reviews with substantial heterogeneity had major problems in relation to their handling of heterogeneity. More attention is needed to this issue, as the problems we identified can be essential for the conclusions of the reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe B Schroll
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rasmus Moustgaard
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter C Gøtzsche
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Boult M, Fitzpatrick K, Barnes M, Maddern G, Fitridge R. Developing tools to predict outcomes following cardiovascular surgery. ANZ J Surg 2011; 81:768-73. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05644.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
42
|
Dent T. Educating About Risk Scores in Primary Care. EDUCATION FOR PRIMARY CARE 2011; 22:291-2. [DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2011.11494020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
43
|
Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63:620-6. [PMID: 20434024 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2009] [Revised: 11/12/2009] [Accepted: 12/22/2009] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We randomized participants in an evidence-based practice workshop (randomized controlled trial [RCT] I) and a Cochrane Collaboration entities meeting (RCT II) to receive a Cochrane review with or without an SoF table. In RCT I, we measured user satisfaction. In RCT II, we measured correct comprehension and time spent finding key results. RESULTS RCT I: Participants with the SoF table (n=47) were more likely to "agree" or "strongly agree" that it was easy to find results for important outcomes than (n=25) participants without the SoF table-68% vs. 40% (P=0.021). RCT II: Participants with the SoF table (n=18) were more likely to correctly answer two questions regarding results than (n=15) those without the SoF table: 93% vs. 44% (P=0.003) and 87% vs. 11% (P<0.001). Participants with the SoF table spent an average of 90 seconds to find key information compared with 4 minutes for participants without the SoF table (P=0.002). CONCLUSION In two small trials, we found that inclusion of an SoF table in a review improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key findings compared with reviews with no SoF table.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Rosenbaum
- Department of Communication, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hay J, DiBonaventura M, Baser R, Press N, Shoveller J, Bowen D. Personal attributions for melanoma risk in melanoma-affected patients and family members. J Behav Med 2010; 34:53-63. [PMID: 20809355 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-010-9286-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2009] [Accepted: 07/28/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Personal attributions for cancer risk involve factors that individuals believe contribute to their risk for developing cancer. Understanding personal risk attributions for melanoma may dictate gene-environment melanoma risk communication strategies. We examined attributions for melanoma risk in a population-based sample of melanoma survivors, first degree family members, and family members who are also parents (N = 939). We conducted qualitative examination of open-ended risk attributions and logistic regression examining predictors (demographics, family member type, perceived risk) of the attributions reported (ultraviolet radiation [UVR] exposure, heredity/genetics, phenotype, personal melanoma history, miscellaneous). We found a predominance of risk attributions to UVR and heredity/genetics (80 and 45% of the sample, respectively). Those reporting higher education levels were more likely to endorse attributions to heredity/genetics, as well as to phenotype, than those of lower education levels. First-degree relatives and parent family members were more likely to endorse heredity/genetic attributions than melanoma survivors; melanoma survivors were more likely to endorse personal history of melanoma attributions compared to first-degree relatives and parent family members. These findings inform the development of risk communication interventions for melanoma families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hay
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, Seventh Floor, New York, NY 10022, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mazza D, Harris MF. Improving implementation of evidence‐based prevention in primary care. Med J Aust 2010; 193:101-2. [DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03814.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2010] [Accepted: 06/07/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Mark F Harris
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lee SJC. Uncertain Futures: Individual Risk and Social Context in Decision-Making in Cancer Screening. HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY 2010; 12:101-117. [PMID: 20563321 DOI: 10.1080/13698571003637048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
A core logic of cancer control and prevention, like much in public health, turns on the notion of decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Population-level data are increasingly used to develop risk profiles, or estimates, that clinicians and the consumer public may use to guide individual decisions about cancer screening. Individual risk perception forms a piece of a larger social economy of decision-making and choice that makes population screening possible. Individual decision-making depends on accessing and interpreting available clinical information, filtered through the lens of personal values and both cognitive and affective behavioral processes. That process is also mediated by changing social roles and interpersonal relationships. This paper begins to elucidate the influence of this "social context" within the complexity of cancer screening. Reflecting on current work in risk and health, I consider how ethnographic narrative methods can enrich this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon J Craddock Lee
- Department of Clinical Sciences Division of Ethics & Health Policy University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Newton JT. Reactions to cancer: communicating with patients, family and carers. Oral Oncol 2010; 46:442-4. [PMID: 20381407 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2010] [Accepted: 03/11/2010] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Effective communication has benefits for both patients and members of the health care team. Five main communication tasks in head and neck cancer are identified: Screening for head and neck cancer and communicating risk; Communicating the diagnosis of head and neck cancer; Providing information about treatment and pre-treatment; Communicating following treatment and dealing with fear of recurrence; Discussing the end of life. For each specific aspects of the communication situation are discussed. Underpinning each is the use of core communication skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Tim Newton
- King's College London, Oral Health Services Research and Dental Public Health, Denmark Hill Campus, London SE5 9RW, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hill S, Spink J, Cadilhac D, Edwards A, Kaufman C, Rogers S, Ryan R, Tonkin A. Absolute risk representation in cardiovascular disease prevention: comprehension and preferences of health care consumers and general practitioners involved in a focus group study. BMC Public Health 2010; 10:108. [PMID: 20199692 PMCID: PMC2845101 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2009] [Accepted: 03/04/2010] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Communicating risk is part of primary prevention of coronary heart disease and stroke, collectively referred to as cardiovascular disease (CVD). In Australia, health organisations have promoted an absolute risk approach, thereby raising the question of suitable standardised formats for risk communication. Methods Sixteen formats of risk representation were prepared including statements, icons, graphical formats, alone or in combination, and with variable use of colours. All presented the same risk, i.e., the absolute risk for a 55 year old woman, 16% risk of CVD in five years. Preferences for a five or ten-year timeframe were explored. Australian GPs and consumers were recruited for participation in focus groups, with the data analysed thematically and preferred formats tallied. Results Three focus groups with health consumers and three with GPs were held, involving 19 consumers and 18 GPs. Consumers and GPs had similar views on which formats were more easily comprehended and which conveyed 16% risk as a high risk. A simple summation of preferences resulted in three graphical formats (thermometers, vertical bar chart) and one statement format as the top choices. The use of colour to distinguish risk (red, yellow, green) and comparative information (age, sex, smoking status) were important ingredients. Consumers found formats which combined information helpful, such as colour, effect of changing behaviour on risk, or comparison with a healthy older person. GPs preferred formats that helped them relate the information about risk of CVD to their patients, and could be used to motivate patients to change behaviour. Several formats were reported as confusing, such as a percentage risk with no contextual information, line graphs, and icons, particularly those with larger numbers. Whilst consumers and GPs shared preferences, the use of one format for all situations was not recommended. Overall, people across groups felt that risk expressed over five years was preferable to a ten-year risk, the latter being too remote. Conclusions Consumers and GPs shared preferences for risk representation formats. Both groups liked the option to combine formats and tailor the risk information to reflect a specific individual's risk, to maximise understanding and provide a good basis for discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, Australian Institute for Primary Care, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Routh JC, Gong EM, Cannon GM, Yu RN, Gargollo PC, Nelson CP. Variation among internet based calculators in predicting spontaneous resolution of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 2010; 183:1568-72. [PMID: 20172550 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2005] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE An increasing number of parents and practitioners use the Internet for health related purposes, and an increasing number of models are available on the Internet for predicting spontaneous resolution rates for children with vesicoureteral reflux. We sought to determine whether currently available Internet based calculators for vesicoureteral reflux resolution produce systematically different results. MATERIALS AND METHODS Following a systematic Internet search we identified 3 Internet based calculators of spontaneous resolution rates for children with vesicoureteral reflux, of which 2 were academic affiliated and 1 was industry affiliated. We generated a random cohort of 100 hypothetical patients with a wide range of clinical characteristics and entered the data on each patient into each calculator. We then compared the results from the calculators in terms of mean predicted resolution probability and number of cases deemed likely to resolve at various cutoff probabilities. RESULTS Mean predicted resolution probabilities were 41% and 36% (range 31% to 41%) for the 2 academic affiliated calculators and 33% for the industry affiliated calculator (p = 0.02). For some patients the calculators produced markedly different probabilities of spontaneous resolution, in some instances ranging from 24% to 89% for the same patient. At thresholds greater than 5%, 10% and 25% probability of spontaneous resolution the calculators differed significantly regarding whether cases would resolve (all p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Predicted probabilities of spontaneous resolution of vesicoureteral reflux differ significantly among Internet based calculators. For certain patients, particularly those with a lower probability of spontaneous resolution, these differences can significantly influence clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan C Routh
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Re-conceptualizing risk in genetic counseling: implications for clinical practice. J Genet Couns 2010; 19:228-34. [PMID: 20119700 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9279-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2009] [Accepted: 01/12/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Risk communication is an important component of genetic counseling. However, many authors have noted that after genetic counseling, subjective risk frequently does not match the objective risk provided by the counselor. This inevitably leads to the conclusion that the risk communication process was not "effective". There has been much discussion about how this problem can be better addressed, such that our clients recall numeric risks more accurately after genetic counseling. This article draws on the risk and probability literature from other fields (including psychology, economics, philosophy and climate change) to deconstruct the concepts of "risk" and risk perception to attempt to expand upon and develop thought and discussion about and investigation of the risk communication process in genetic counseling.
Collapse
|