Pioglitazone together with imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: A proof of concept study

How to improve treatment-free remission eligibility in chronic myeloid leukaemia?

The achievement of treatment-free remission (TFR) has become a significant clinical end-point in the management of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), providing an opportunity to discontinue therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) while maintaining deep molecular response (DMR). Early studies, such as the French STIM trial, have demonstrated that a portion of patients can maintain DMR after treatment cessation, with rates ranging from 40% to 50%, and most relapses occurring within the first 6 months. Key prognostic factors for successful TFR, including treatment duration, duration of DMR, risk scores, and transcript type, have been identified. Optimal patient selection for TFR remains a challenge, but recent research provides insights into potential strategies to increase TFR eligibility. Evidence suggests that early intervention switching to achieve optimal response, treatment combinations, proactive switch in the case of absence of DMR, dose-optimization and induction-maintenance approach can improve molecular responses and, consequently, enhance TFR eligibility. In this review, we report and discuss all the potential therapeutic strategies that may enhance eligibility for a first attempt at TFR, with a particular emphasis on potential future approaches.

Pharmacotherapeutic advances for chronic myelogenous leukemia: beyond tyrosine kinase inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Despite the notable success of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in treating chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a subset of patients experiences resistance, or relapse after discontinuation. This challenge is attributed to the Ph+ leukemia stem cells (LSCs) pool not fully involved in the inhibition process due to the current therapeutic approach.

AREAS COVERED

Current pharmacological advancements in CML therapy focus on targeting LSCs, intervening in self-renewal pathways, and exploiting biological vulnerabilities. Beyond BCR::ABL1 inhibition, innovative approaches include immunotherapy, epigenetic modulation, and interference with microenvironmental mechanisms.

EXPERT OPINION

Diverse therapeutic strategies beyond TKIs are under investigation. Immunotherapy with interferon-α (IFN-α) shows some biological effects, although further research is needed for optimal application in enhancing discontinuation rates. Other compounds were able to mobilize Ph+ LSCs from the bone marrow niche (DPP-IV inhibitor vildagliptin or PAI-1 inhibitor TM5614) increasing the LSC clearance or target the CD26, a Ph+ specific surface receptor. It is noteworthy that the majority of these alternative strategies still incorporate TKIs. In conclusion, novel therapeutic perspectives are emerging for CML, holding the potential for substantial advancements in disease treatment.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorα/γ agonist pioglitazone for rescuing relapsed or refractory neoplasias by unlocking phenotypic plasticity

A series of seven clinical trials on relapsed or refractory (r/r) metastatic neoplasias followed the question: Are networks of ligand-receptor cross-talks that support tumor-specific cancer hallmarks, druggable with tumor tissue editing approaches therapeutically exploiting tumor plasticity? Differential recombinations of pioglitazone, a dual peroxisome-proliferator activated receptorα/γ (PPARα/γ) agonist, with transcriptional modulators, i.e., all-trans retinoic acid, interferon-α, or dexamethasone plus metronomic low-dose chemotherapy (MCT) or epigenetic modeling with azacitidine plus/minus cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition initiated tumor-specific reprogramming of cancer hallmarks, as exemplified by inflammation control in r/r melanoma, renal clear cell carcinoma (RCCC), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis (mLCH) or differentiation induction in non-promyelocytic acute myeloid leukemia (non-PML AML). Pioglitazone, integrated in differentially designed editing schedules, facilitated induction of tumor cell death as indicated by complete remission (CR) in r/r non-PML AML, continuous CR in r/r RCCC, mLCH, and in HL by addition of everolimus, or long-term disease control in melanoma by efficaciously controlling metastasis, post-therapy cancer repopulation and acquired cell-resistance and genetic/molecular-genetic tumor cell heterogeneity (M-CRAC). PPARα/γ agonists provided tumor-type agnostic biomodulatory efficacy across different histologic neoplasias. Tissue editing techniques disclose that wide-ranging functions of PPARα/γ agonists may be on-topic focused for differentially unlocking tumor phenotypes. Low-dose MCT facilitates targeted reprogramming of cancer hallmarks with transcriptional modulators, induction of tumor cell death, M-CRAC control and editing of non-oncogene addiction. Thus, pioglitazone, integrated in tumor tissue editing protocols, is an important biomodulatory drug for addressing urgent therapeutic problems, such as M-CRAC in relapsed or refractory tumor disease.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor agonists and antagonists: an updated patent review (2020-2023)

INTRODUCTION

The search for novel compounds targeting Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) is currently ongoing, starting from the previous successfully identification of selective, dual or pan agonists. In last years, researchers' efforts are mainly paid to the discovery of PPARγ and δ modulators, both agonists and antagonists, selective or with a dual-multitarget profile. Some of these compounds are currently under clinical trials for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatic, and renal diseases.

AREAS COVERED

A critical analysis of patents deposited in the range 2020-2023 was carried out. The novel compounds discovered were classified as selective PPAR modulators, dual and multitarget PPAR agonists. The use of PPAR ligands in combination with other drugs was also discussed, together with novel therapeutic indications proposed for them.

EXPERT OPINION

From the analysis of the patent literature, the current emerging landscape sees the necessity to obtain PPAR multitarget compounds, with a balanced potency on three subtypes and the ability to modulate different targets. This multitarget action holds great promise as a novel approach to complex disorders, as metabolic, inflammatory diseases, and cancer. The utility of PPAR ligands in the immunotherapy field also opens an innovative scenario, that could deserve further applications.

Peripheral lymphocyte subsets as predicting factors for molecular recurrence after imatinib discontinuation in a phase 2 imatinib discontinuation trial in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Treatment-free remission (TFR) is successful in half of the patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who discontinue Imatinib (IM) after sustained molecular response.

METHODS

In a prospective trial, we used pioglitazone for 3 months before stopping IM in 30 patients. Percentages of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were assessed before and after treatment. The relation of these data with duration of IM treatment and TRF were examined.

RESULTS

The median time of IM treatment was 117.6 months. After discontinuation, 11 patients had molecular recurrence after 5.2 months (2.4 - 30). The observation time for those remaining in TFR was 46 (26 - 56) months. The independent factors for the maintenance of TFR were the duration of IM treatment and the percentage of double-positive T cells at IM stop.

CONCLUSION

A longer treatment with imatinib was associated with a longer TFR after discontinuation. Pioglitazone could act as an immunomodulator, increasing DP T cells which may contribute to prevent relapse.

Modulating retinoid-X-receptor alpha (RXRA) expression sensitizes chronic myeloid leukemia cells to imatinib in vitro and reduces disease burden in vivo

Introduction: The ligand-activated transcription factors, nuclear hormone receptors (NHRs), remain unexplored in hematological malignancies except for retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA). Methods: Here we profiled the expression of various NHRs and their coregulators in Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cell lines and identified a significant differential expression pattern between inherently imatinib mesylate (IM)-sensitive and resistant cell lines. Results: Retinoid-X-receptor alpha (RXRA) was downregulated in CML cell lines inherently resistant to IM and in primary CML CD34⁺ cells. Pre-treatment with clinically relevant RXRA ligands improved sensitivity to IM in-vitro in both CML cell lines and primary CML cells. This combination effectively reduced the viability and colony-forming capacity of CML CD34⁺ cells in-vitro. In-vivo, this combination reduced leukemic burden and prolonged survival. Overexpression (OE) of RXRA inhibited proliferation and improved sensitivity to IM in-vitro. In-vivo, RXRA OE cells showed reduced engraftment of cells in the bone marrow, improved sensitivity to IM, and prolonged survival. Both RXRA OE and ligand treatment markedly reduced BCR::ABL1 downstream kinase activation, activating apoptotic cascades and improving sensitivity to IM. Importantly, RXRA OE also led to the disruption of the oxidative capacity of these cells. Conclusion: Combining IM with clinically available RXRA ligands could form an alternative treatment strategy in CML patients with suboptimal response to IM.

Synergistic effects of PI3K inhibition and pioglitazone against acute promyelocytic leukemia cells

BACKGROUND

Although pioglitazone, a well-known anti-diabetic agent, has recently established itself as a pillar of cancer treatment, its therapeutic value could be attenuated by the aberrant activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway.

AIM

To evaluate whether the PI3K/Akt suppression in leukemic cells could potentiate the anti-leukemic effects of pioglitazone.

METHODS

To assess the anti-leukemic effects of PI3K/Akt inhibitors on anti-leukemic effects of pioglitazone, we used MTT and trypan blue assays. Flow cytometric analysis and qRT-PCR were also applied to evaluate cell cycle and apoptosis.

RESULT

The resulting data revealed that upon PPARγ stimulation in different leukemic cell lines using pioglitazone, the survival and the proliferative capacity of the cells were significantly halted. Then, we evaluated the impact of the PI3K/Akt axis on the effectiveness of the drug in the most sensitive leukemic cell line; NB4 cells. Our results showed that treatment of NB4 cells with the PI3K inhibitors increased the sensitivity of leukemic cells to pioglitazone to the degree that even lower concentrations of the agent succeeded to induce apoptotic as well as the anti-proliferative effects. Moreover, it seems that PI3K inhibition could potentiate the anti-leukemic effect of pioglitazone through induction of p21-mediated sub-G1 cell cycle arrest and altering the balance between the pro-and anti-apoptotic genes.

CONCLUSION

This study sheds light on the significance of the PI3K/Akt pathway in APL cell sensitivity to pioglitazone and proposed that the presence of the PI3K inhibitor in the therapeutic regimen containing pioglitazone could be promising in the treatment of this malignancy.

Deep molecular response in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 inhibitor TM5614 combined with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor

BACKGROUND

We recently showed that pharmacological inhibition of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity, based on TM5614, increases cell motility and induces the detachment of hematopoietic stem cells from their niches. In this TM5614 phase II clinical trial, we investigated whether the combination of a PAI-1 inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) would induce a deep molecular response (DMR) in patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) by quantifying BCR-ABL1 transcripts.

METHODS

Patients with chronic phase CML treated with a stable daily dose of TKIs for at least 1 year and yielding a major molecular response (MMR) but not achieving MR^4.5 were eligible for this study. After inclusion, patients began to receive TM5614 as well as a TKI. The primary objective was an evaluation of the cumulative incidence of patient progression from an MMR/MR⁴ to MR^4.5 by 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 59.0 years and 58% were male. No Sokal high-risk patients were enrolled in this trial. The median TKI treatment duration was 4.8 years. At the start of this study, seven patients and 26 patients received imatinib and second-generation TKIs, respectively. The cumulative MR^4.5 incidence by 12 months was 33.3% (95% confidence interval, 18.0%-51.8%). The cumulative MR^4.5 spontaneous conversion over 12 months was estimated as 8% with TKIs alone based on historical controls. The halving time of BCR-ABL1 at 2 months was significantly shorter for patients who achieved an MR^4.5 , by 12 months than for the other patients (cutoff value: 48 days; sensitivity: 0.80; specificity: 0.91; ROC-AUC: 0.83). During this study, bleeding events and abnormal coagulation related to the drug were not reported, and TM5614 was found to be highly safe.

CONCLUSION

TM5614 combined with TKI was well tolerated and induced MR^4.5 in more patients than stand-alone TKI treatment.

Supplemental Pioglitazone to Patients of CML with Suboptimal TKI Response: A Pragmatic Pilot Study

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, 20-30% of patients require second-line TKIs following suboptimal response. The cost and adverse events limit their use in resource-constraint settings. We conducted a pilot study to ascertain the benefit of adding pioglitazone to TKIs with suboptimal response in real-world resource-constraint settings. In this pragmatic pilot study from 01 Jan 2017 to 31 July 2021, CML patients from a tertiary care center in North India with sub-optimal response to TKIs were additionally given pioglitazone after ruling out imatinib resistance mutation (n - 31). Pioglitazone was stopped if there was disease progression on follow-up, and second-line TKI was started. The data were analyzed with the intention-to-treat principle using JMP Ver.15.1.1. The median age of the study population was 54y (27-82), who were followed up for a median duration of 1023.5d (59-1117). Pioglitazone showed the benefit of one-log reduction in BCR-ABL in 89.7% of the study participants. 1y, 2y and 3y-PFS were 92.57%, 76.5%, and 68.3% respectively. During follow-up period, the disease progressed in 38.7%, of which two succumbed. No adverse events to Pioglitazone were documented. This study proved that adding Pioglitazone to the existing TKI regime in CML with sub-optimal response can benefit. The addition of Pioglitazone was well tolerated.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-022-01561-x.

From bench to bedside: bridging the gaps in best practices for real-world chronic myeloid leukemia care

INTRODUCTION

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) determined an improvement of responses and overall survival (OS) in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients, some patients still fail the achievement of important milestones.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we focus on the need of appropriate molecular and mutational monitoring during TKI treatment with new laboratory tools and on new compounds developed to counteract the unmet clinical need in CP-CML.

EXPERT OPINION

The appropriate identification of BCR::ABL1 dependent and independent mechanisms of resistance with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) can allow to improve the therapeutic strategies and prevent the onset of a failure to treatment. New compounds have been recently approved or are still in investigational trials to improve the response in some critical forms of resistance and/or intolerance to available TKIs.

PPARγ activation by pioglitazone enhances the anti-proliferative effects of doxorubicin on pro-monocytic THP-1 leukemia cells via inducing apoptosis and G2/M cell cycle arrest

PURPOSE

Doxorubicin (DOX) is a common chemotherapeutic agent, with toxic side effects, and chemoresistance. Combination chemotherapy is a successful approach to overcome these limitations. Here, we investigated the effects of pioglitazone (PGZ), a PPARγ agonist, and/or DOX on the viability, cell cycle, apoptosis on THP-1 cells and normal human monocytes (NHMs).

METHODS

MTT assay was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of DOX and/or PGZ. Cell cycle progression and apoptosis induction were examined by PI or Annexin V-PI double staining, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to evaluate the changes in the mRNA expression of cell cycle progression or apoptosis-associated genes including P27, P21, CDK2, P53, BCL2 and FasR.

RESULTS

DOX, PGZ and DOX + PGZ exerted their cytotoxic effects in a dose- and time-dependent manner with low toxicity on NHMs. The cell growth inhibitory effects of DOX were in association with G2/M arrest, while PGZ executed S phase arrest. PGZ treatment enhanced G2/M among DOX-treated combinations with moderate elevation in the S phase. DOX, PGZ and combined treatments induced apoptosis (mostly late phase) in a dose-dependent manner. All treatments resulted in the significant overexpression of p21, p27, p53 and FasR genes and downregulation of CDK2. DOX + PGZ combined treatments exhibited the most significant changes in mRNA expression.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that the antiproliferative, cell cycle regulation and apoptosis-inducing capacity of DOX was enhanced by PGZ in THP-1 leukemia cells in a dose-dependent manner. Therefore, the combination of DOX + PGZ could be used as a novel combination to target AML.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and the Hallmarks of Cancer

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) function as nuclear transcription factors upon the binding of physiological or pharmacological ligands and heterodimerization with retinoic X receptors. Physiological ligands include fatty acids and fatty-acid-derived compounds with low specificity for the different PPAR subtypes (alpha, beta/delta, and gamma). For each of the PPAR subtypes, specific pharmacological agonists and antagonists, as well as pan-agonists, are available. In agreement with their natural ligands, PPARs are mainly focused on as targets for the treatment of metabolic syndrome and its associated complications. Nevertheless, many publications are available that implicate PPARs in malignancies. In several instances, they are controversial for very similar models. Thus, to better predict the potential use of PPAR modulators for personalized medicine in therapies against malignancies, it seems necessary and timely to review the three PPARs in relation to the didactic concept of cancer hallmark capabilities. We previously described the functions of PPAR beta/delta with respect to the cancer hallmarks and reviewed the implications of all PPARs in angiogenesis. Thus, the current review updates our knowledge on PPAR beta and the hallmarks of cancer and extends the concept to PPAR alpha and PPAR gamma.

Drug Repurposing by Tumor Tissue Editing

The combinatory use of drugs for systemic cancer therapy commonly aims at the direct elimination of tumor cells through induction of apoptosis. An alternative approach becomes the focus of attention if biological changes in tumor tissues following combinatory administration of regulatorily active drugs are considered as a therapeutic aim, e.g., differentiation, transdifferentiation induction, reconstitution of immunosurveillance, the use of alternative cell death mechanisms. Editing of the tumor tissue establishes new biological ‘hallmarks’ as a ‘pressure point’ to attenuate tumor growth. This may be achieved with repurposed, regulatorily active drug combinations, often simultaneously targeting different cell compartments of the tumor tissue. Moreover, tissue editing is paralleled by decisive functional changes in tumor tissues providing novel patterns of target sites for approved drugs. Thus, agents with poor activity in non-edited tissue may reveal new clinically meaningful outcomes. For tissue editing and targeting edited tissue novel requirements concerning drug selection and administration can be summarized according to available clinical and pre-clinical data. Monoactivity is no pre-requisite, but combinatory bio-regulatory activity. The regulatorily active dose may be far below the maximum tolerable dose, and besides inhibitory active drugs stimulatory drug activities may be integrated. Metronomic scheduling often seems to be of advantage. Novel preclinical approaches like functional assays testing drug combinations in tumor tissue are needed to select potential drugs for repurposing. The two-step drug repurposing procedure, namely establishing novel functional systems states in tumor tissues and consecutively providing novel target sites for approved drugs, facilitates the systematic identification of drug activities outside the scope of any original clinical drug approvals.

AB186 Inhibits Migration of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells and Interacts with α-Tubulin

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death among females worldwide. A major challenge is to develop innovative therapy in order to treat breast cancer subtypes resistant to current treatment. In the present study, we examined the effects of two Troglitazone derivatives Δ2-TGZ and AB186. Previous studies showed that both compounds induce apoptosis, nevertheless AB186 was a more potent agent. The kinetic of cellular events was investigated by real-time cell analysis system (RTCA) in MCF-7 (hormone dependent) and MDA-MB-231 (triple negative) breast cancer (TNBC) cells, followed by cell morphology analysis by immuno-localization. Both compounds induced a rapid modification of both impedance-based signals and cellular morphology. This process was associated with an inhibition of cell migration measured by wound healing and transwell assays in TNBC MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T cells. In order to identify cytoplasmic targets of AB186, we performed surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and pull-down analyses. Subsequently, 6 cytoskeleton components were identified as potential targets. We further validated α-tubulin as one of the direct targets of AB186. In conclusion, our results suggested that AB186 could be promising to develop novel therapeutic strategies to treat aggressive forms of breast cancer such as TNBC.

Impact of metformin on tyrosine kinase inhibitor response in chronic myeloid leukemia

Objective

Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are first line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) correlates with increased overall survival, however only 66%–88% of patients achieve CCyR after one year of TKI treatment. Because TKI therapy alone cannot eliminate CML stem cells, strategies aimed at achieving faster and deeper responses are needed to improve long-term survival. Metformin is a widely prescribed glucose-lowering agent for patients with diabetes and in preclinical studies, has been shown to suppress cell viability, induce apoptosis, and downregulate the mTORC1 signaling pathway in imatinib resistant CML cell lines (K562R). This study aims to investigate the utility of metformin added to TKI therapy in patients with CML.

Data Sources

An observational study at an academic medical center (Salt Lake City, UT) was performed for adults with newly diagnosed, chronic-phase CML to evaluate attainment of CCyR from TKI therapy with or without concomitant metformin use. Descriptive analyses were used to describe baseline characteristics and attainment of response to TKI therapy.

Data Summary

Fifty-nine patients were evaluated. One hundred percent (5 of 5) in the metformin group and 73.6% (39 of 54) in the non-metformin group achieved CCyR. Approximately 20% of patients in both groups relapsed (defined by a loss of CCyR during study) after a median 34.5 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

Future research is warranted to validate these findings and determine the utility of metformin added to TKI therapy.

Potential Approaches Versus Approved or Developing Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Therapy

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, continued use of these inhibitors has contributed to the increase in clinical resistance and the persistence of resistant leukemic stem cells (LSCs). So, there is an urgent need to introduce additional targeted and selective therapies to eradicate quiescent LSCs, and to avoid the relapse and disease progression. Here, we focused on emerging BCR-ABL targeted and non-BCR-ABL targeted drugs employed in clinical trials and on alternative CML treatments, including antioxidants, oncolytic virus, engineered exosomes, and natural products obtained from marine organisms that could pave the way for new therapeutic approaches for CML patients.

Future Directions in Chronic Phase CML Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will focus on recent and emerging treatment paradigms in chronic phase CML. The discussion of each novel treatment or drug combination will include a brief overview of scientific rational and pre-clinical data, followed by recently published or ongoing clinical trial efforts. The review will be divided into three focus areas in CML treatment: new frontline approaches and approaches to deepen remission, second treatment-free remission studies, and the treatment of refractory disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The section on new frontline approaches will highlight several strategies of combination therapy. These can be grouped into immunomodulatory approaches with interferons and immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeting of leukemia stem cells with compounds such as venetoclax and pioglitazone, and BCR-ABL1-intrinsic combination therapy with asciminib. The chance at a second treatment-free remission is an important emerging clinical trial concept, and again combination approaches are under investigation. Lastly, in advanced disease, the development of novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors remains a major focus. This review will provide an overview and perspective of treatment strategies on the horizon for chronic phase CML. Despite the already excellent clinical outcomes for most patients, challenges remain with regard to deepening initial responses, prolonging treatment-free remission, and providing efficacious and tolerable options for patients with refractory disease and resistance mutations.

Statins Enhance the Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia when Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Simple Summary

Approximately 50–60% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) achieve a stable deep molecular response (DMR) after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The achievement of DMR is a prerequisite for treatment-free remission. Repurposing statins is a straightforward strategy for enhancing molecular response in CML treatment. Second-generation TKIs have been reported to exhibit cardiovascular toxicity. Thus, statins have been widely prescribed for patients with CML undergoing second-generation TKI therapy for modifying cardiovascular risk factors, such as hyperlipidemia. Furthermore, the results of this study support the therapeutic benefit of the concomitant use of statins in TKI therapy for patients with CML. Additionally, the potential additive effects of statins and TKIs enhance the DMR rate in patients with CML, rendering these effects clinically relevant in these patients. In particular, this combination is a strong candidate for the achievement of DMR in patients with CML who have not achieved DMR with TKI therapy alone.

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that statins can be repurposed for cancer treatment. However, the therapeutic efficacy of statins in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has not yet been demonstrated. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 408 CML patients who underwent imatinib therapy. The deep molecular response rates in patients treated with the statin/TKI combination were significantly higher than those in patients treated with TKI alone (p = 0.0016). The statin/TKI combination exerted potent cytotoxic effects against wild-type and ABL1 mutant CML, BaF3, and K562/T315I mutant cells. Furthermore, the statin/TKI combination additively inhibited the colony-forming capacity of murine CML-KLS⁺ cells in vitro. In addition, we examined the additive growth-inhibitory effects of the statin/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination against CML patient-derived CD34⁺ cells. The growth-inhibitory effects of the statin/imatinib combination against CD34⁺/CML primary cells were higher than those against CD34⁺/Norm cells (p = 0.005), suggesting that the combination of rosuvastatin and imatinib exerted growth-inhibitory effects against CML CD34⁺ cells, but not against normal CD34⁺ cells. Furthermore, results from RNA sequencing of control and statin-treated cells suggested that statins inhibited c-Myc-mediated and hematopoietic cell differentiation pathways. Thus, statins can be potentially repurposed to improve treatment outcomes in CML patients when combined with TKI therapy.

Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and New Approaches by Targeting Leukemia Stem Cells

The therapeutic landscape for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has improved significantly with the approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for therapeutic use. Most patients with optimal responses to TKIs can have a normal life expectancy. Treatment-free remission (TFR) after discontinuing TKI has increasingly become a new goal for CML treatment. However, TKI only "control" CML, and relapse after discontinuation has become a key factor hindering patient access to attempt TFR. In this study, we reviewed studies on TKI discontinuation, including both first and second-generation TKI. We also reviewed predictors of relapse, new monitoring methods, and strategies targeting leukemic stem cells.

Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Relevance

Simple Summary

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasia associated with a molecular alteration, the fusion gene BCR-ABL1, that encodes the tyrosine kinase oncoprotein BCR-ABL1. This led to the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), with Imatinib being the first TKI approved. Although the vast majority of CML patients respond to Imatinib, resistance to this targeted therapy contributes to therapeutic failure and relapse. Here we review the molecular mechanisms and other factors (e.g., patient adherence) involved in TKI resistance, the methodologies to access these mechanisms, and the possible therapeutic approaches to circumvent TKI resistance in CML.

Abstract

Resistance to targeted therapies is a complex and multifactorial process that culminates in the selection of a cancer clone with the ability to evade treatment. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was the first malignancy recognized to be associated with a genetic alteration, the t(9;22)(q34;q11). This translocation originates the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, encoding the cytoplasmic chimeric BCR-ABL1 protein that displays an abnormally high tyrosine kinase activity. Although the vast majority of patients with CML respond to Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), resistance might occur either de novo or during treatment. In CML, the TKI resistance mechanisms are usually subdivided into BCR-ABL1-dependent and independent mechanisms. Furthermore, patients’ compliance/adherence to therapy is critical to CML management. Techniques with enhanced sensitivity like NGS and dPCR, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, and the development of mathematical modeling and computational prediction methods could reveal the underlying mechanisms of drug resistance and facilitate the design of more effective treatment strategies for improving drug efficacy in CML patients. Here we review the molecular mechanisms and other factors involved in resistance to TKIs in CML and the new methodologies to access these mechanisms, and the therapeutic approaches to circumvent TKI resistance.

Alteration of PPAR-GAMMA (PPARG; PPARγ) and PTEN gene expression in acute myeloid leukemia patients and the promising anticancer effects of PPARγ stimulation using pioglitazone on AML cells

Background

In the new era of tailored cancer treatment strategies, finding a molecule to regulate a wide range of intracellular functions is valuable. The unique property of nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐γ (PPARγ; PPARG) in transmitting the anti‐survival signals of the chemotherapeutic drugs has fired the enthusiasm into the application of this receptor in cancer treatment.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the expression of PPARγ and one of its downstream targets PTEN in non‐M3 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. We also investigated the therapeutic value of PPARγ stimulation using pioglitazone in the AML‐derived U937 cell line.

Methods

The blood samples from 30 patients diagnosed with non‐M3 AML as well as 10 healthy individuals were collected and the mRNA expression levels of PPARγ and PTEN were evaluated. Additionally, we used trypan blue assay, MTT assay, and flow cytometry analysis to evaluate the anti‐leukemic effects of pioglitazone on U937 cells.

Results

While PTEN was significantly downregulated in AML patients as compared to the control group, the expression of PPARγ was increased in the patients’ group. The expression level of PPARγ was also negatively correlated with PTEN; however, it was not statistically significant. Besides, PPARγ stimulation using pioglitazone reduced survival and proliferative capacity of U937 cells through inducing apoptosis and suppression of cell transition from the G1 phase of the cell cycle.

Conclusion

The results of the present study shed more light on the importance of PPARγ and its stimulation in the therapeutic strategies of AML.

Metabolic shift of chronic myeloid leukemia patients under imatinib-pioglitazone regimen and discontinuation

The Estudo de Descontinuação de Imatinibe após Pioglitazona (EDI-PIO) is a single-center, longitudinal, prospective, phase 2, non-randomized, open, clinical trial (NCT02852486, August 2, 2016 retrospectively registered) for the discontinuation of imatinib after concomitant use of pioglitazone, being the first of its kind in a Brazilian population with chronic myeloid leukemia. Due to remaining of leukemic quiescent cells that are not affected by tyrosine kinase inhibitors, it has been suggested the use of pioglitazone, a PPARγ agonist, together with imatinib as a strategy for the maintenance of deep molecular response. The clinical benefit to this association is still controversial, and the metabolic alteration along this process remains unclear. Therefore, we applied a metabolomic protocol using high-resolution mass spectrometry to profile plasmatic metabolic response of a prospective cohort of ten individuals under discontinuation of imatinib and pioglitazone protocol. By comparing patients under pioglitazone and imatinib treatment with imatinib monotherapy and discontinuation phase, we were able to annotate 41 and 36 metabolites, respectively. The metabolic alterations observed during imatinib-pioglitazone combined therapy are associated with an extensive lipid remodeling, with activation of β-oxidation pathway, in addition to the presence of markers that suggest mitochondrial dysfunction.

Targeting Leukemic Stem Cells in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Is It Worth the Effort?

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a classical example of stem cell cancer since it arises in a multipotent hematopoietic stem cell upon the acquisition of the t(9;22) chromosomal translocation, that converts it into a leukemic stem cell (LSC). The resulting BCR-ABL1 fusion gene encodes a deregulated tyrosine kinase that is recognized as the disease driver. Therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) eliminates progenitor and more differentiated cells but fails to eradicate quiescent LSCs. Thus, although many patients obtain excellent responses and a proportion of them can even attempt treatment discontinuation (treatment free remission [TFR]) after some years of therapy, LSCs persist, and represent a potentially dangerous reservoir feeding relapse and hampering TFR. Over the past two decades, intensive efforts have been devoted to the characterization of CML LSCs and to the dissection of the cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms sustaining their persistence, in an attempt to find druggable targets enabling LSC eradication. Here we provide an overview and an update on these mechanisms, focusing in particular on the most recent acquisitions. Moreover, we provide a critical appraisal of the clinical relevance and feasibility of LSC targeting in CML.

PPARγ agonists promote the resolution of myelofibrosis in preclinical models

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a non-BCR-ABL myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with poor outcomes. Current treatment has little effect on the natural history of the disease. MF results from complex interactions between (a) the malignant clone, (b) an inflammatory context, and (c) remodeling of the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. Each of these points is a potential target of PPARγ activation. Here, we demonstrated the therapeutic potential of PPARγ agonists in resolving MF in 3 mouse models. We showed that PPARγ agonists reduce myeloproliferation, modulate inflammation, and protect the BM stroma in vitro and ex vivo. Activation of PPARγ constitutes a relevant therapeutic target in MF, and our data support the possibility of using PPARγ agonists in clinical practice.

Combination Therapies in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia for Potential Treatment-Free Remission: Focus on Leukemia Stem Cells and Immune Modulation

Although tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), patients are not cured with the current therapy modalities. Also, the more recent goal of CML treatment is to induce successful treatment-free remission (TFR) among patients achieving durable deep molecular response (DMR). Together, it is necessary to develop novel, curative treatment strategies. With advancements in understanding the biology of CML, such as dormant Leukemic Stem Cells (LSCs) and impaired immune modulation, a number of agents are now under investigation. This review updates such agents that target LSCs, and together with TKIs, have the potential to eradicate CML. Moreover, we describe the developing immunotherapy for controlling CML.

Chronic myeloid leukemia-from the Philadelphia chromosome to specific target drugs: A literature review

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm and was the first neoplastic disease associated with a well-defined genotypic anomaly - the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome. The advances in cytogenetic and molecular assays are of great importance to the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and monitoring of CML. The discovery of the breakpoint cluster region (BCR)-Abelson murine leukemia (ABL) 1 fusion oncogene has revolutionized the treatment of CML patients by allowing the development of targeted drugs that inhibit the tyrosine kinase activity of the BCR-ABL oncoprotein. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (known as TKIs) are the standard therapy for CML and greatly increase the survival rates, despite adverse effects and the odds of residual disease after discontinuation of treatment. As therapeutic alternatives, the subsequent TKIs lead to faster and deeper molecular remissions; however, with the emergence of resistance to these drugs, immunotherapy appears as an alternative, which may have a cure potential in these patients. Against this background, this article aims at providing an overview on CML clinical management and a summary on the main targeted drugs available in that context.

Tackling resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia: Novel cell death modulators with improved efficacy

The development of resistance poses a serious problem in the therapy of cancer due to the necessity of a multiple-drug and unlimited treatment of affected patients. In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the introduction of imatinib has revolutionized the therapy. The persistence of an untreatable cancer stem cell pool and other resistance-causing factors, however, also impede the cure of this malignancy. New therapeutic approaches are therefore essential to overcome current treatment drawbacks. In this regard, an intervention in the STAT5 signaling pathway can significantly improve drug response, as this central signaling node induces the formation of highly resistant CML cells. In the present study, we continued the design of efficient chemosensitizers derived from the partial PPARγ agonist telmisartan. The developed 2-carbonitriles or 2-carboxymethyl esters showed improved potency in sensitizing K562-resistant cells to imatinib treatment, even at concentrations, which are considered patient-relevant. At 5 μM, for instance, 2d sensitized the cells in such a manner that the resistance was fully overcome and the recovered efficacy of imatinib resulted in >76% cell death. Importantly, all compounds were non-cytotoxic per se. A transactivation experiment showed that only the carbonitriles are partial agonists of PPARγ, which does not seem to be involved in the mode of action. Yet, immunoassays revealed a suppression of the STAT5 phosphorylation status by co-application of the most active derivatives with imatinib. This mechanism consequently resulted in reduced cell proliferation and induction of cell death in resistant CML cells.

Pioglitazone modulates doxorubicin resistance in a in vivo model of drug resistant osteosarcoma xenograft

Osteosarcoma has been reported with treatment failure in up to 40% of cases. Our laboratory had identified genes involved in the PPARγ pathway to be associated with doxorubicin (DOX) resistance. We hence used PPARγ agonist pioglitazone (PIO) to modulate DOX resistance. DOX-resistant cell line (143B-DOX) was developed by gradient exposure to DOX. The cytotoxicity to PIO and in combination with DOX was assayed in vitro, followed by HPLC to estimate the metabolites of PIO in the presence of microsomes (HLMs). Gene expression studies revealed the mechanism behind the cytotoxicity of PIO. Further, the effects were evaluated in mice bearing 143B-DOX tumors treated either with PIO (20 mg/kg/p.o or 40 mg/kg/p.o Q1D) alone or in combination with DOX (0.5 mg/kg/i.p Q2W). 143B-DOX was 50-fold resistant over parental cells. While PIO did not show any activity on its own, the addition of HLMs to the cells in culture showed over 80% cell kill within 24 h, possibly due to the metabolites of PIO as determined by HPLC. In combination with DOX, PIO had shown synergistic activity. Additionally, cytotoxicity assay in the presence of HLMs revealed that PIO on its own showed promising activity compared to its metabolites-hydroxy pioglitazone and keto pioglitazone. In vivo studies demonstrated that treatment with 40 mg/kg/p.o PIO alone showed significant activity, followed by a combination with DOX. Gene expression studies revealed that PIO could modulate drug resistance by downregulating MDR1 and IL8. Our study suggests that PIO can modulate DOX resistance in osteosarcoma cells.

PPAR Gamma: From Definition to Molecular Targets and Therapy of Lung Diseases

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily that regulate the expression of genes related to lipid and glucose metabolism and inflammation. There are three members: PPARα, PPARβ or PPARγ. PPARγ have several ligands. The natural agonists are omega 9, curcumin, eicosanoids and others. Among the synthetic ligands, we highlight the thiazolidinediones, clinically used as an antidiabetic. Many of these studies involve natural or synthetic products in different pathologies. The mechanisms that regulate PPARγ involve post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, sumoylation and ubiquitination, among others. It is known that anti-inflammatory mechanisms involve the inhibition of other transcription factors, such as nuclear factor kB(NFκB), signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) or activator protein 1 (AP-1), or intracellular signaling proteins such as mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases. PPARγ transrepresses other transcription factors and consequently inhibits gene expression of inflammatory mediators, known as biomarkers for morbidity and mortality, leading to control of the exacerbated inflammation that occurs, for instance, in lung injury/acute respiratory distress. Many studies have shown the therapeutic potentials of PPARγ on pulmonary diseases. Herein, we describe activities of the PPARγ as a modulator of inflammation, focusing on lung injury and including definition and mechanisms of regulation, biological effects and molecular targets, and its role in lung diseases caused by inflammatory stimuli, bacteria and virus, and molecular-based therapy.

Inhibition of the Lipid Droplet-Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α Axis Suppresses Cancer Stem Cell Properties

Cancer stem cells (CSCs), having both self-renewal and tumorigenic capacity, utilize an energy metabolism system different from that of non-CSCs. Lipid droplets (LDs) are organelles that store neutral lipids, including triacylglycerol. Previous studies demonstrated that LDs are formed and store lipids as an energy source in some CSCs. LDs play central roles not only in lipid storage, but also as a source of endogenous lipid ligands, which are involved in numerous signaling pathways, including the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway. However, it remains unclear whether LD-derived signal transduction is involved in the maintenance of the properties of CSCs. We investigated the roles of LDs in cancer stemness using pancreatic and colorectal CSCs and isogenic non-CSCs. PPARα was activated in CSCs in which LDs accumulated, but not in non-CSCs, and pharmacological and genetic inhibition of PPARα suppressed cancer stemness. In addition, inhibition of both re-esterification and lipolysis pathways suppressed cancer stemness. Our study suggested that LD metabolic turnover accompanying PPARα activation is a promising anti-CSC therapeutic target.

Targeting Abnormal Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Classical Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are unique hematopoietic stem cell disorders sharing mutations that constitutively activate the signal-transduction pathways involved in haematopoiesis. They are characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation. The key MPNs comprise chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). CML is defined by the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome and BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. Despite effective cytoreductive agents and targeted therapy, complete CML/MPN stem cell eradication is rarely achieved. In this review article, we discuss the novel agents and combination therapy that can potentially abnormal hematopoietic stem cells in CML and MPNs and the CML/MPN stem cell-sustaining bone marrow microenvironment.

Hypertriglyceridemia in Newly Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

The primary aim of the present retrospective study was to investigate lipid profiles and kinetics in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients. We analyzed 402 newly diagnosed APL patients and 201 non-APL patients with acute myeloid leukemia (as control). Incidence of hypertriglyceridemia in APL patients and non-APL patients was 55.82% and 28.4% (p = 0.0003). The initial levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were higher in APL patients than in control (all p < 0.0001). In APL patients, triglyceride levels were significantly increased during induction treatment with all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic. Multivariable analysis showed that age, being overweight (body mass index ≥25) and APL were independent risk factors for hypertriglyceridemia in all patients before treatment. High triglyceride levels were not significantly associated with disease-free survival or overall survival in the APL patients. In summary, in the current study triglyceride levels were significantly elevated in APL patients before treatment, and they increased during induction treatment, but there were no significant corresponding effects on survival.

On the road to treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia: what about 'the others'?

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been drastically changed by the approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). CML is now managed as a chronic disease requiring both long-term treatment and close molecular monitoring in the majority of patients.

AREAS COVERED

Evidence suggests that in a substantial number of patients who have achieved a stable deep molecular response (DMR), TKI treatment can be safely discontinued without loss of response. Therefore, treatment-free remission (TFR), through the achievement of a DMR, is increasingly regarded as a feasible treatment goal in about 20% to 40% CML patients. Nevertheless, a proportion of patients with chronic-phase CML treated with TKIs remain in stable MMR and do not achieve a DMR.

EXPERT OPINION

We provide prospective views on how it is possible to optimize treatment for patients in stable MMR but not in DMR in order to finalize the therapeutic strategy.

Ponatinib and other CML Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Thrombosis

Abl1 kinase has important biological roles. The Bcr-Abl1 fusion protein creates undesired kinase activity and is pathogenic in 95% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and 30% of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Targeted therapies to these diseases are tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The extent of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor’s targets determines the degree of biologic effects of the agent that may influence the well-being of the patient. This fact is especially true with tyrosine kinase inhibitor effects on the cardiovascular system. Thirty-one percent of ponatinib-treated patients, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor with the broadest inhibitory spectrum, have thrombosis associated with its use. Recent experimental investigations have indicated the mechanisms of ponatinib-associated thrombosis. Further, an antidote to ponatinib is in development by re-purposing an FDA-approved medication.

Nuclear Receptors as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Myeloid Leukemia

The nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily has been studied extensively in many solid tumors and some receptors have been targeted to develop therapies. However, their roles in leukemia are less clear and vary considerably among different types of leukemia. Some NRs participate in mediating the differentiation of myeloid cells, making them attractive therapeutic targets for myeloid leukemia. To date, the success of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in treating acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) remains a classical and unsurpassable example of cancer differentiation therapy. ATRA targets retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and forces differentiation and/or apoptosis of leukemic cells. In addition, ligands/agonists of vitamin D receptor (VDR) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) have also been shown to inhibit proliferation, induce differentiation, and promote apoptosis of leukemic cells. Encouragingly, combining different NR agonists or the addition of NR agonists to chemotherapies have shown some synergistic anti-leukemic effects. This review will summarize recent research findings and discuss the therapeutic potential of selected NRs in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia, focusing on RAR, VDR, PPAR, and retinoid X receptor (RXR). We believe that more mechanistic studies in this field will not only shed new lights on the roles of NRs in leukemia, but also further expand the clinical applications of existing therapeutic agents targeting NRs.

Ponatinib treatment promotes arterial thrombosis and hyperactive platelets

Ponatinib therapy heightens arterial thrombosis and platelet reactivity. Concurrent pioglitazone treatment reverses heightened thrombosis risk and platelet reactivity induced by ponatinib.

Synthesis and Characterization of Telmisartan-Derived Cell Death Modulators to Circumvent Imatinib Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

New strategies to eradicate cancer stem cells in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) include a combination of imatinib with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) ligands. Recently, we identified the partial PPARγ agonist telmisartan as effective sensitizer of resistant K562 CML cells to imatinib treatment. Here, the importance of the heterocyclic core on the cell death-modulating effects of the telmisartan-derived lead 4'-((2-propyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid (3 b) was investigated. Inspired by the pharmacodynamics of HYL-6d and the selective PPARγ ligand VSP-51, the benzimidazole was replaced by a carbazole or an indole core. The results indicate no correlation between PPARγ activation and sensitization of resistant CML cells to imatinib. The 2-COOH derivatives of the carbazoles or indoles achieved low activity at PPARγ, while the benzimidazoles showed 60-100 % activation. Among the 2-CO2 CH3 derivatives, only the ester of the lead (2 b) slightly activated PPARγ. Sensitizing effects were further observed for this non-cytotoxic 2 b (80 % cell death), and to a lesser extent for the lead 3 b or the 5-Br-substituted ester of the benzimidazoles (5 b).

Current Strategies and Future Directions to Achieve Deep Molecular Response and Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been radically changed by the approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target BCR-ABL1 kinase activity. CML is now managed as a chronic disease requiring long-term treatment and close molecular monitoring. It has been shown that in a substantial number of patients who have achieved a stable deep molecular response (DMR), TKI treatment can be safely discontinued without loss of response. Therefore, treatment-free remission (TFR), through the achievement of a DMR, is increasingly regarded as a feasible treatment goal in many CML patients. However, only nilotinib has approval in this setting and a number of controversial aspects remain regarding treatment choices and timings, predictive factors, patient communication, and optimal strategies to achieve successful TFR. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview on how to optimize the path to DMR and TFR in patients with CML, and discusses recent data and future directions.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Children: Challenges and Opportunities : Based on 7th Dr. I. C. Verma Excellence Award for Young Pediatricians Delivered as Oration on 29th Sept. 2019

Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is an effective therapy for children and adolescents with chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). For the majority of patients with CML in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), imatinib is the TKI of choice for reasons of cost, availability, and experience. Children are exposed to therapy for a greater proportion of their lifetime as compared to adults. The adverse effects of prolonged administration of TKI is a subject of ongoing research, as more experience is collected. Therapy with TKI is currently considered to be life-long. Trials on stopping treatment are ongoing to explore if it may be feasible in selected patients, as reported in adults. Growth-failure is a concerning adverse effect. Currently, it seems unclear if the final height attained is within the expected range of the mid-parenteral height and growth standards. Whether the children will achieve a normal height at the end of their growth potential or remain below the predicted range is critical to decide if therapeutic interventions (E.g., growth hormone therapy, or interruption in TKI) should be considered during the period of growth potential. Research on CML in children is at a relatively slow pace, largely due to the rarity of the disease. This provides a unique opportunity for research in population-dense LMICs, as several tertiary centers tend to have a sizable cohort of children and adolescents with CML on follow-up. This narrative summarises the challenges and opportunities in dealing with CML in children, particularly in reference to a center in LMIC.

Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells

4'-((2-Propyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid derived from telmisartan was identified as lead for the design of cell death modulators. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of telmisartan itself and other sartans in combination with imatinib against K562-resistant cells. The findings were directly used to further optimize the lead structure. Telmisartan and candesartan cilexetil represented the most effective sartans, thus the influence of carboxyl/methyl carboxylate groups at positions 7 (compounds 6, 7) or 4 (compounds 12-14) at the benzimidazole core was studied. Additionally, according to the results of a former structure-activity study, telmisartan was transformed to the related amide (1). Telmisartan amide 1, as well as the esters 6 and 12 markedly sensitized the resistant CML cells to imatinib treatment. Correlation with their potency to activate PPARγ is not given. Candesartan cilexetil, telmisartan and 1 showed the profile of partial agonists at PPARγ with EC₅₀ values of 4.2, 4.3 and 9.1 μM, respectively, while 6 and 12 caused only marginal intrinsic activation at 10 μM (A_max = 22% and 13%). However, the repression of the STAT5 phosphorylation relates with the possibility to sensitize K562-resistant CML cells to imatinib treatment. It is worth mentioning that all compounds were per se non-cytotoxic at relevant concentrations.

The leukaemia stem cell: similarities, differences and clinical prospects in CML and AML

For two decades, leukaemia stem cells (LSCs) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have been advanced paradigms for the cancer stem cell field. In CML, the acquisition of the fusion tyrosine kinase BCR-ABL1 in a haematopoietic stem cell drives its transformation to become a LSC. In AML, LSCs can arise from multiple cell types through the activity of a number of oncogenic drivers and pre-leukaemic events, adding further layers of context and genetic and cellular heterogeneity to AML LSCs not observed in most cases of CML. Furthermore, LSCs from both AML and CML can be refractory to standard-of-care therapies and persist in patients, diversify clonally and serve as reservoirs to drive relapse, recurrence or progression to more aggressive forms. Despite these complexities, LSCs in both diseases share biological features, making them distinct from other CML or AML progenitor cells and from normal haematopoietic stem cells. These features may represent Achilles' heels against which novel therapies can be developed. Here, we review many of the similarities and differences that exist between LSCs in CML and AML and examine the therapeutic strategies that could be used to eradicate them.

Novel therapeutic approaches in chronic myeloid leukemia

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and BCR-ABL1 inhibitors form the mainstay of CML treatment. Although patients with CML generally do well under TKI therapy, there is a subgroup of patients who are resistant and/or intolerant to TKIs. In these group of patients, there is the need of additional treatment strategies. In this review, we provide an update on the current knowledge of these novel treatment approaches that can be used alone and/or in combination with TKIs.

Pharmacological Inhibition of Oncogenic STAT3 and STAT5 Signaling in Hematopoietic Cancers

Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) 3 and 5 are important effectors of cellular transformation, and aberrant STAT3 and STAT5 signaling have been demonstrated in hematopoietic cancers. STAT3 and STAT5 are common targets for different tyrosine kinase oncogenes (TKOs). In addition, STAT3 and STAT5 proteins were shown to contain activating mutations in some rare but aggressive leukemias/lymphomas. Both proteins also contribute to drug resistance in hematopoietic malignancies and are now well recognized as major targets in cancer treatment. The development of inhibitors targeting STAT3 and STAT5 has been the subject of intense investigations during the last decade. This review summarizes the current knowledge of oncogenic STAT3 and STAT5 functions in hematopoietic cancers as well as advances in preclinical and clinical development of pharmacological inhibitors.

Anakoinosis: Correcting Aberrant Homeostasis of Cancer Tissue-Going Beyond Apoptosis Induction

The current approach to systemic therapy for metastatic cancer is aimed predominantly at inducing apoptosis of cancer cells by blocking tumor-promoting signaling pathways or by eradicating cell compartments within the tumor. In contrast, a systems view of therapy primarily considers the communication protocols that exist at multiple levels within the tumor complex, and the role of key regulators of such systems. Such regulators may have far-reaching influence on tumor response to therapy and therefore patient survival. This implies that neoplasia may be considered as a cell non-autonomous disease. The multi-scale activity ranges from intra-tumor cell compartments, to the tumor, to the tumor-harboring organ to the organism. In contrast to molecularly targeted therapies, a systems approach that identifies the complex communications networks driving tumor growth offers the prospect of disrupting or "normalizing" such aberrant communicative behaviors and therefore attenuating tumor growth. Communicative reprogramming, a treatment strategy referred to as anakoinosis, requires novel therapeutic instruments, so-called master modifiers to deliver concerted tumor growth-attenuating action. The diversity of biological outcomes following pro-anakoinotic tumor therapy, such as differentiation, trans-differentiation, control of tumor-associated inflammation, etc. demonstrates that long-term tumor control may occur in multiple forms, inducing even continuous complete remission. Accordingly, pro-anakoinotic therapies dramatically extend the repertoire for achieving tumor control and may activate apoptosis pathways for controlling resistant metastatic tumor disease and hematologic neoplasia.

PPARγ Agonists in Combination Cancer Therapies

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor acting as a transcription factor involved in the regulation of energy metabolism, cell cycle, cell differentiation, and apoptosis. These unique properties constitute a strong therapeutic potential that place PPARγ agonists as one of the most interesting and widely studied anticancer molecules. Although PPARγ agonists exert significant, antiproliferative and tumoricidal activity in vitro, their anticancer efficacy in animal models is ambiguous, and their effectiveness in clinical trials in monotherapy is unsatisfactory. However, due to pleiotropic effects of PPARγ activation in normal and tumor cells, PPARγ ligands interact with many antitumor treatment modalities and synergistically potentiate their effectiveness. The most spectacular example is a combination of PPARγ ligands with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In this setting, PPARγ activation sensitizes leukemic stem cells, resistant to any previous form of treatment, to targeted therapy. Thus, this combination is believed to be the first pharmacological therapy able to cure CML patients. Within the last decade, a significant body of data confirming the benefits of the addition of PPARγ ligands to various antitumor therapies, including chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, has been published. Although the majority of these studies have been carried out in vitro or animal tumor models, a few successful attempts to introduce PPARγ ligands into anticancer therapy in humans have been recently made. In this review, we aim to summarize shines and shadows of targeting PPARγ in antitumor therapies.

Meeting the needs of CML patients in resource-poor countries

Subsequent to the development and global availability of BCR/ABL-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), at least those in the chronic phase, has markedly improved, and in the developed world, the average lifespan of these patients is now close to that of age- and sex-matched subjects without the disease. However, the situation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) may not be so rosy. Many important differences in hematological cancers, including CML, have been highlighted in various publications in LMICs vs developed countries. These include differences in incidence and prevalence rates, age and stage of disease at diagnosis, response rates, and survival. Some of the possible reasons proposed for these are varying socioeconomic milieu (impacting availability of effective drugs and essential monitoring), environmental factors (mainly exposure to viral infections and pesticides), nutritional factors with interplay of malnutrition and diet on drug absorption and blood levels, and possible unknown genetic factors. Although generic first-generation TKIs (imatinib) are available in many parts of the world, several challenges remain in providing optimal treatment to patients with CML in resource-poor countries. Some of these include availability of optimal and high-quality BCR/ABL testing, availability and expense related to use of second- and third-generation TKIs (nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, issues with compliance and toxicities of drugs, and ensuring a minimal standard-of-care treatment and monitoring for every patient diagnosed with CML. For the purpose of this article, the more objective country label-LMIC-coined by the World Bank will be used (gross national income per capita between $1026 and $3995; World Bank, June 2019). Some of these issues will be discussed in this article in greater detail by experts in the field in 3 different but interconnected sections.

Mechanisms of Disease Progression and Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, which encodes a constitutive active tyrosine kinase considered to be the pathogenic driver capable of initiating and maintaining the disease. Despite the remarkable efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting BCR-ABL1, some patients may not respond (primary resistance) or may relapse after an initial response (secondary resistance). In a small proportion of cases, development of resistance is accompanied or shortly followed by progression from chronic to blastic phase (BP), characterized by a dismal prognosis. Evolution from CP into BP is a multifactorial and probably multistep phenomenon. Increase in BCR-ABL1 transcript levels is thought to promote the onset of secondary chromosomal or genetic defects, induce differentiation arrest, perturb RNA transcription, editing and translation that together with epigenetic and metabolic changes may ultimately lead to the expansion of highly proliferating, differentiation-arrested malignant cells. A multitude of studies over the past two decades have investigated the mechanisms underlying the closely intertwined phenomena of drug resistance and disease progression. Here, we provide an update on what is currently known on the mechanisms underlying progression and present the latest acquisitions on BCR-ABL1-independent resistance and leukemia stem cell persistence.