Rectal cancer patients younger than 50 years lack a survival benefit from NCCN guideline-directed treatment for stage II and III disease

Use of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab and Subsequent Therapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Age-Stratified Analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment recommendations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) do not differ by age group; nevertheless, aggressive multiagent chemotherapy comprising FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab (triplet+bev) is routinely administered in younger patients. This study analyzed real-world data on index triplet+bev use and subsequent systemic therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years with mCRC, who were initiated on triplet+bev. Data were derived from the Optum de-identified electronic health record dataset.

RESULTS

Of 36,056 patients, 14%, 36%, and 50% were aged 18-49, 50-64, and ≥ 65 years, respectively. During the study period (2010-2021), triplet+bev use increased in patients aged 18-49 years (1%-4%) but remained at approximately 3% and 1% in patients aged 50-64 and ≥ 65 years, respectively. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics varied slightly; of patients receiving triplet+bev (n = 921) versus nontriplet+bev (n = 35,132) most were male (57% vs. 52%), resided in the Midwest (54% vs. 49%) and Northeast (18% vs. 14%) US regions, and had secondary malignancies (86% vs. 73%). Following triplet+bev, most patients received subsequent therapies (including continued triplet component therapies; 97%) or subsequent "new" therapies (therapies that did not include any agents comprising triplet+bev; 57%), most frequently EGFR inhibitors (28%) and regorafenib (21%), with a similar trend among all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study shows that younger patients with mCRC are more likely to receive first-line triplet+bev. These results also reveal that nonchemotherapy options are often used beyond first-line triplet chemotherapy for patients with mCRC.

Do treatment patterns differ in those with early-onset colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing. International guidelines state that treatment should not differ from that of older patients. Several studies have shown that patients under 50 years are receiving more aggressive treatment, without any survival benefit. We aim to determine if treatment for stages 2 and 3 EOCRC differs from those of late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of the treatment patterns of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Canterbury, New Zealand, from 2010 to 2021 age <50 years, compared to those aged 60-74 years.

RESULTS

A total of 3263 patients were diagnosed with CRC between 2010 and 2021. Following exclusions, we identified 130 EOCRC and 668 LOCRC patients. Stage 2 EOCRC patients are more likely to be offered adjuvant chemotherapy (p = <0.001). Furthermore, EOCRC patients with either stage 2 or 3 disease are more likely to receive multi-agent therapy (p =  <0.01), without any associated increase in survival.

CONCLUSION

EOCRC patients are given more adjuvant chemotherapy, without a corresponding improvement in outcomes, highlighting a potential for increased treatment-related harms, particularly in stage 2 disease. Clinicians should be mindful of these biases when treating young cancer patients and need to carefully consider treatment-related harms.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is noninferior to chemoradiotherapy for early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer in the FOWARC trial

BACKGROUND

The early-onset rectal cancer with rapidly increasing incidence is considered to have distinct clinicopathological and molecular profiles with high-risk features. This leads to challenges in developing specific treatment strategies for early-onset rectal cancer patients and questions of whether early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) needs aggressive neoadjuvant treatment.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of FOWARC trial, we investigated the role of preoperative radiation in early-onset LARC by comparing the clinicopathological profiles and short-term and long-term outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs.

RESULTS

We revealed an inter-tumor heterogeneity of clinical profiles and treatment outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs. The high-risk features were more prevalent in early-onset LARC. The neoadjuvant radiation brought less benefits of tumor response and more risk of complications in early-onset group (pCR: OR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.37-10.27; complications: HR = 11.35, 95% CI = 1.46-88.31) compared with late-onset group (pCR: OR = 5.33, 95% CI = 1.83-15.58; complications: HR = 5.80, 95% CI = 2.32-14.49). Furthermore, the addition of radiation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy didn't improve long-term OS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.49-3.87) and DFS (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.58-1.90) for early-onset patients.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiation plus chemotherapy may not be superior to the chemotherapy alone in the early-onset LARC. Our findings provide insight into the treatment of early-onset LARC by interrogating the aggressive treatment and alternative regimens.

Nomogram model for predicting cancer-specific mortality in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer: a competing risk analysis insight from the SEER database and an external validation cohort

Background

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing in incidence and poses a growing threat. Urgent research is needed, especially in survival analysis, to enhance comprehension and treatment strategies. This study aimed to explore the risk factors associated with cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) in patients with EOCRC. Additionally, the study aimed to develop a nomogram predicting CSM using a competitive risk model and validate its accuracy through the use of training, using internal and external cohorts.

Methods

Data from EOCRC patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2008-2017). EOCRC patients who were treated at a tertiary hospital in northeast China between 2014 and 2020 were also included in the study. The SEER data were divided into the training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. A univariate Cox regression model was employed to identify prognostic factors. Subsequently, multivariate Cox regression models were applied to ascertain the presence of independent risk factors. A nomogram was generated to visualize the results, which were evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), and calibration curves. The clinical utility was assessed via decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that factors such as race, tumor differentiation, levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), marital status, histological type, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and surgical status were independent risk factors for CSM in EOCRC patients. In addition, age, gender, chemotherapy details, CEA levels, marital status, and AJCC stage were established as independent risk factors for OCM in individuals diagnosed with EOCRC. A nomogram was developed using the identified independent risk factors, demonstrating excellent performance with a C-index of 0.806, 0.801, and 0.810 for the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves and AUC further confirmed the accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram. Furthermore, the DCA results indicated that the model had good clinical value.

Conclusions

In this study, a competing risk model for CSM was developed in EOCRC patients. The model demonstrates a high level of predictive accuracy, providing valuable insights into the treatment decision-making process.

Symptom Burden and Time from Symptom Onset to Cancer Diagnosis in Patients with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is decreasing in individuals >50 years due to organised screening but has increased for younger individuals. We characterized symptoms and their timing before diagnosis in young individuals. Methods: We identified all patients diagnosed with CRC between 1990-2017 in British Columbia, Canada. Individuals <50 years (n = 2544, EoCRC) and a matched cohort >50 (n = 2570, LoCRC) underwent chart review to identify CRC related symptoms at diagnosis and determine time from symptom onset to diagnosis. Results: Across all stages of CRC, EoCRC presented with significantly more symptoms than LoCRC (Stage 1 mean ± SD: 1.3 ± 0.9 vs. 0.7 ± 0.9, p = 0.0008; Stage 4: 3.3 ± 1.5 vs. 2.3 ± 1.7, p < 0.0001). Greater symptom burden at diagnosis was associated with worse survival in both EoCRC (p < 0.0001) and LoCRC (p < 0.0001). When controlling for cancer stage, both age (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.8-1.0, p = 0.008) and increasing symptom number were independently associated with worse survival in multivariate models. Conclusions: Patients with EoCRC present with a greater number of symptoms of longer duration than LoCRC; however, time from patient reported symptom onset was not associated with worse outcomes.

NCCN Guideline Concordance Improves Survival in Pediatric and Young Adult Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although management guidelines in adult rectal cancer are widely studied, no consensus guidelines exist for the management of pediatric and young adult rectal cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2004-2018) was queried for pediatric (age 0-21) and young adult (age 22-40) patients with rectal cancer. Patients were analyzed for receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-concordant therapy. Impact on survival was evaluated using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

6655 patients (108 pediatric and 6547 young adult patients) with rectal cancer were included. Similar to previously published NCCN quality measures with overall guideline concordance approaching 90 % in adults, 89.6 % of pediatric and 84.6 % of young adult patients were classified as receiving pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy. However, pediatric patients were significantly less likely to receive post-operative guideline-concordant therapy than young adult patients (65.3 % verse 76.7 %, respectively, p = 0.008). Risk of death was significantly lower for pediatric patients who received post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.313; CI, 0.168-0.581; p < 0.001). In young adult patients, risk of death was significantly lower for those who received pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.376, CI 0.338-0.417, p < 0.001), and post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.456; CI 0.413-0.505; p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

NCCN-based guidelines may reasonably guide peri-operative management decisions and improve survival in pediatric and young adult rectal cancer. Given the rarity of this cancer in young patients, employment of an experienced surgical and oncologic multidisciplinary team, along with discussion and involvement of the patient and family, are keys for balancing risks and benefits to offering the best therapeutic strategy.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Distinct clinical characteristics in stage III rectal cancer among different age groups and treatment outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

There is a rapidly increasing incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) which threatens the survival of young people, while aging also represents a challenging clinical problem.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the differences in the clinical characteristics and prognosis in stage III rectal cancer (RC), to help optimize treatment strategies.

Design and methods

This study included 757 patients with stage III RC, all of whom received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. The whole cohort was categorized as very early onset (VEO, ⩽30 years old), early onset (EO, >30 years old, ⩽50 years old), intermediate onset (IO, >50 years, ⩽70 years), or late onset (LO, >70 years old).

Results

There were more female VEO patients than males, more mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cell carcinoma, pre-treatment cT4 stage, and higher pre-treatment serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 compared with the other three groups. VEO patients had the worst survival with the highest RC-related mortality (34.5%), recurrence (13.8%), and metastasis (51.7%). LO patients had the highest non-RC-related mortality rate (16.6%). The Cox regression model showed VEO was a negative independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival [DFS, hazard ratio (HR): 2.830, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.633-4.904, p < 0.001], distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, HR: 2.969, 95% CI: 1.720-5.127, p < 0.001), overall survival (OS, HR: 2.164, 95% CI: 1.102-4.249, p = 0.025), and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR: 2.321, 95% CI: 1.145-4.705, p = 0.020). LO was a negative independent factor on DFS (HR: 1.800, 95% CI: 1.113-2.911, p = 0.017), DMFS (HR: 1.903, 95% CI: 1.150-3.149, p = 0.012), OS (HR: 2.856, 95% CI: 1.745-4.583, p < 0.001), and CSS (HR: 2.248, 95% CI: 1.282-3.942, p = 0.005). VEO patients had better survival in the total neoadjuvant therapy-like (TNT-like) pattern on DFS (p = 0.039). IO patients receiving TNT-like patterns had better survival on DFS, OS, and CSS (p = 0.006, p = 0.018, p = 0.006, respectively).

Conclusion

In stage III RC, VEO patients exhibited unique clinicopathological characteristics, with VEO a negative independent prognostic factor for DFS, DMFS, OS, and CSS. VEO and IO patients may benefit from a TNT-like treatment pattern.

Factors Associated With Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Outcomes

Importance

Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) achieve less favorable clinical outcomes than non-Hispanic White patients, but the source of this disparity is incompletely understood.

Objective

To assess whether racial and ethnic disparities in treatment outcomes among patients with LARC could be accounted for by social determinants of health and demographic, clinical, and pathologic factors known to be associated with treatment response.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The National Cancer Database was interrogated to identify patients with T3 to T4 or N1 to N2 LARC treated with neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. Patients were diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2017. Data were culled from the National Cancer Database from July 1, 2022, through December 31, 2023.

Exposure

Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer followed by surgical resection.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy. Secondary outcomes were rate of tumor downstaging and achievement of pN0 status.

Results

A total of 34 500 patient records were reviewed; 21 679 of the patients (62.8%) were men and 12 821 (37.2%) were women. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 59.7 (12.0) years. In terms of race and ethnicity, 2217 patients (6.4%) were Hispanic, 2843 (8.2%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 29 440 (85.3%) were non-Hispanic White. Hispanic patients achieved tumor downstaging (48.9% vs 51.8%; P = .01) and pN0 status (66.8% vs 68.8%; P = .02) less often than non-Hispanic White patients. Non-Hispanic Black race, but not Hispanic ethnicity, was associated with less tumor downstaging (odds ratio [OR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78-0.94]), less frequent pN0 status (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.83-0.99]), and less frequent pCR (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72-0.92]). Other factors associated with reduced rate of pCR included rural location (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69-0.93]), lack of or inadequate insurance (OR for Medicaid, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.98]; OR for no insurance, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.54-0.78]), and treatment in a low-volume center (OR for first quartile, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.62-0.87]; OR for second quartile, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.70-0.90]; OR for third quartile, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78-0.94]). Clinical and pathologic variables associated with a decreased pCR included higher tumor grade (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49-0.70]), advanced tumor stage (OR for T3, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.42-0.76]; OR for T4, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.22-0.42]), and lymph node-positive disease (OR for N1, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.77-0.89]; OR for N2, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.65-0.82]).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that disparate treatment outcomes for Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients are likely multifactorial in origin. Future investigation into additional social determinants of health and biological variables is warranted.

Comprehensive Analysis of Early-onset Colorectal Cancer: A Review

Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), which refers to CRC diagnosed in individuals below the age of 50 years, is a growing health concern that presents unique challenges in diagnosis, treatment, and long-term outcomes. Although approximately 70% of early-onset CRC cases are sporadic, with no apparent family history, approximately 25% have a familial component, and up to 20% may be associated with germline mutations, indicating a higher prevalence compared with the general population. Despite the progress in identifying the environmental, molecular, and genetic risk factors of early-onset CRC, the underlying causes for the global increase in its incidence remain unclear. This comprehensive review aims to provide a thorough analysis of early-onset CRC by examining the trends associated with its incidence, clinical and pathological characteristics, risk factors, molecular and genetic profiles, prognosis and screening strategies. By deepening our understanding of early-onset CRC, significant advances related to improving the outcomes and alleviating the burden of this disease on individuals, families, and healthcare systems can be achieved.

Guideline- Versus Non-Guideline-Based Neoadjuvant Management of Clinical T4 Rectal Cancer

(1) Background: Practice guidelines recommend neoadjuvant treatment for clinical T4 rectal cancer. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to assess whether compliance with guidelines correlates with patient outcomes. Secondarily, we evaluated predictors of adherence to guidelines and mortality. (2) Methods: A total of 397 qualified rectal cancer (RC) patients from 2017 to 2020 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included. Patients were divided into two groups depending on adherence to neoadjuvant treatment guidelines. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease special survival (DSS). We analyzed factors associated with guideline adherence and mortality. (3) Results: Compliance with guidelines was only 39.55%. Patients' neoadjuvant therapy treated not according to the guidelines for clinical T4 RC was not associated with an overall survival (95.7% vs. 88.9%) and disease special survival (96.3% vs. 91.1%) benefit. Patients were more likely to get recommended therapy with positive patient compliance. Staging Ⅲ, medium/high differentiation and objective compliance were associated with increased risk of mortality. (4) Conclusions: Guideline adherence for clinical T4 RC in our system is low. Compliance with the relevant guidelines for neoadjuvant therapy seems not to lead to better overall survival for patients with clinical T4 RC.

Biological and clinical implications of early-onset cancers: A unique subtype

In recent years, the incidence of cancers is continuously increasing in young adults. Early-onset cancer (EOC) is usually defined as patients with cancers under the age of 50, and may represent a unique subgroup due to its special disease features. Overall, EOCs often initiate at a young age, present as a better physical performance but high degree of malignancy. EOCs also share common epidemiological and hereditary risk factors. In this review, we discuss several representative EOCs which were well studied previously. By revealing their clinical and molecular similarities and differences, we consider the group of EOCs as a unique subtype compared to ordinary cancers. In consideration of EOC as a rising threat to human health, more researches on molecular mechanisms, and large-scale, prospective clinical trials should be carried out to further translate into improved outcomes.

Age-related trends in the incidence of metastatic colorectal cancer from 2010 to 2019 in the USA

Aim: To evaluate temporal changes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), incidence, and use of chemotherapy treatment by age group using real-world data (RWD) from the USA. Methods: A retrospective, observational study describing temporal trends in mCRC incidence and FOLFOXIRI treatment by age group using a nationwide database of commercially and Medicare Advantage-insured patients from 2010 to 2019. Results: Incidence of mCRC increased by 22.1 and 14.9% in the 18-49 and 50-64 years cohorts, respectively, and decreased by 21.6% in the ≥65 years cohort. Overall, younger patients were more likely to receive FOLFOXIRI treatment versus older patients. Conclusion: The shifting age distribution of mCRC should be considered when recommending screening and treatment. Further research is needed to inform age-specific treatment guidelines.

Early Age of Onset Is an Independent Predictor for a Worse Response to Neoadjuvant Therapies in Sporadic Rectal Cancer Patients

The incidence of rectal cancer (RC) is increasing in the population aged ≤ 49 (early-onset RC-EORC). EORC patients are more likely to present with locally advanced disease at diagnosis than late-onset RC (LORC; aged ≥ 50) patients. As a consequence, more EORC patients undergo neoadjuvant therapies. The response to treatment in EORC patients is still unknown. This study aims to explore the effect of age of onset on the pathological response to neoadjuvant therapies in sporadic locally advanced RC (LARC) patients. Based on an institutional prospectively maintained database, LARC patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapies and radical surgery between January 2010 and December 2022 were allocated to the EORC and LORC groups. The primary endpoint was the rate of incomplete response (Dworak 0-2). A total of 326 LORC and 79 EORC patients were included. Pre-neoadjuvant tumor features were comparable. A significantly higher rate of incomplete response was observed in EORC patients (49% vs. 35%; p = 0.028). From multivariable analysis, early age of onset, smoking and extramural invasion presented as independent risk factors for a worse response. This study demonstrates that an early age of onset is related to a worse response and calls for different multimodal strategies in this group of patients.

Log odds of positive lymph nodes show better predictive performance on the prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

As the incidence of colorectal cancer tends to be younger, early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) has attracted more attention in recent years. We aimed to assess the optimal lymph node staging system among EOCRC patients, and then, establish informative assessment models for prognosis prediction.

METHODS

Data of EOCRC were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Survival prediction ability of three lymph node staging systems including N stage of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) was assessed and compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC), Harrell's concordance index (C-index), and likelihood ratio (LR) test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic predictors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Effectiveness of the model was demonstrated by receiver operative curve and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 17,535 cases were finally included in this study. All three lymph node staging systems showed significant performance in survival prediction (p < 0.001). Comparatively, LODDS presented a better ability of prognosis prediction with lower AIC (OS: 70,510.99; CSS: 60,925.34), higher C-index (OS: 0.6617; CSS: 0.6799), and higher LR test score (OS: 998.65; CSS: 1103.09). Based on independent factors identified from Cox regression analysis, OS and CSS nomograms for EOCRC were established and validated.

CONCLUSIONS

LODDS shows better predictive performance than N stage or LNR among patients with EOCRC. Novel validated nomograms based on LODDS could effectively provide more prognostic information than the TNM staging system.

Ultra-high b-Value DWI in predicting progression risk of locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparative study with routine DWI

BACKGROUND

The prognosis prediction of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) was important to individualized treatment, we aimed to investigate the performance of ultra-high b-value DWI (UHBV-DWI) in progression risk prediction of LARC and compare with routine DWI.

METHODS

This retrospective study collected patients with rectal cancer from 2016 to 2019. Routine DWI (b = 0, 1000 s/mm²) and UHBV-DWI (b = 0, 1700 ~ 3500 s/mm²) were processed with mono-exponential model to generate ADC and ADCuh, respectively. The performance of the ADCuh was compared with ADC in 3-year progression free survival (PFS) assessment using time-dependent ROC and Kaplan-Meier curve. Prognosis model was constructed with ADCuh, ADC and clinicopathologic factors using multivariate COX proportional hazard regression analysis. The prognosis model was assessed with time-dependent ROC, decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curve.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients with LARC (TNM-stage II-III) were evaluated. ADCuh performed better than ADC for 3-year PFS assessment (AUC = 0.754 and 0.586, respectively). Multivariate COX analysis showed that ADCuh and ADC were independent factors for 3-year PFS (P < 0.05). Prognostic model 3 (TNM-stage + extramural venous invasion (EMVI) + ADCuh) was superior than model 2 (TNM-stage + EMVI + ADC) and model 1 (TNM-stage + EMVI) for 3-year PFS prediction (AUC = 0.805, 0.719 and 0.688, respectively). DCA showed that model 3 had higher net benefit than model 2 and model 1. Calibration curve demonstrated better agreement of model 1 than model 2 and model 1.

CONCLUSIONS

ADCuh from UHBV-DWI performed better than ADC from routine DWI in predicting prognosis of LARC. The model based on combination of ADCuh, TNM-stage and EMVI could help to indicate progression risk before treatment.

Comparison of the short- and long-term prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer compared with later-onset colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aims

The annual incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing at an alarming rate. The prognosis of EOCRC remains controversial, and whether the early onset is a risk factor for colorectal cancer remains unclear.

Methods

We searched four electronic bibliographic databases from database inception to April 25, 2022 for studies that included both early- and later-onset patients and performed a prognostic analysis. Random-effects models were used to summarize the prognostic information extracted by the investigators, including overall survival (OS), cancer-special survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to compare patients' long-term prognoses in different age subgroups.

Results

After 694 reports were screened, 13 studies were included in the final analysis, with a total of 448,781 CRC cases. In the meta-analysis of the 5-year OS, EOCRC had a better prognosis compared to LOCRC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.99; relative risk [RR] 0.83, 95% CI, 0.78-0.89). No difference in prognosis was found between the two groups in terms of 5-year CSS (RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.93-1.05), 5-year DFS (RR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.74-1.09), and short-term OS. In the NMA, patients aged <30 years had the worst outcome (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 15.8%) in 5-year OS; consistent results were observed in the analysis of 5-year CSS (<30 years, SUCRA 4.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Although patients with early-onset CRC had better OS than those with later-onset CRC, there was no difference in the CSS. Meanwhile, the trend for survival was worse in younger patients, especially in those ages 18-29 years. Thus, more attention should be paid to early diagnosis and treatment of EOCRC.

Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Registration

The systematic review and Meta-analysis protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022334697).

Colorectal Cancer in the Young: Research in Early Age Colorectal Cancer Trends (REACCT) Collaborative

Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the young (under 50). Defining the clinicopathological features and cancer-specific outcomes of patients with early-onset CRC is important to optimize screening and treatment strategies. This study evaluated disease-specific features and oncological outcomes of patients with early-onset CRC. Methods: Anonymized data from an international collaboration were analyzed. The inclusion criteria for this study were patients aged <50 years with stage I-III disease surgically resected with curative intent. Overall and disease-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 3378 patients were included, with a median age of 43 (18-49) and a slight male preponderance (54.3%). One-third had a family history of colorectal cancer. Almost all (>95%) of patients were symptomatic at diagnosis. The majority (70.1%) of tumors were distal to the descending colon. Approximately 40% were node positive. Microsatellite instability was demonstrated in one in five patients, representing 10% of rectal and 27% of colon cancers. A defined inherited syndrome was diagnosed in one-third of those with microsatellite instability. Rectal cancer displayed a worse prognosis stage for stage. Five-year disease-free survival for stage I, II, and III colon cancer was 96%, 91%, and 68%, respectively. The equivalent rates for rectal cancer were 91%, 81%, and 62%. Conclusions and relevance: The majority of EOCRC would be captured with flexible sigmoidoscopy. Extending screening to young adults and public health education initiatives are potential interventions to improve survivorship.

Prognostic value of multi b-value DWI in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the potential of multi b-value DWI in predicting the prognosis of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

From 2015 to 2019, a total of 161 patients with LARC were enrolled and randomly sampled into a training set (n = 113) and validation set (n = 48). Multi b-value DWI (b = 0~1500 s/mm²) scans were postprocessed to generate functional parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), Dt, Dp, f, distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC), and α. Histogram features of each functional parameter were submitted into Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and stepwise multivariate COX analysis to generate DWI_score based on the training set. The prognostic model was constructed with functional parameter, DWI_score, and clinicopathologic factors by using univariate and multivariate COX analysis on the training set and verified on the validation set.

RESULTS

Multivariate COX analysis revealed that DWI_score was an independent indicator for 5-year progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 5.573, p < 0.001), but not for overall survival (OS, HR = 2.177, p = 0.051). No mean value of functional parameters was correlated with PFS or OS. Prognostic model for 5-year PFS based on DWI_score, TNM-stage, mesorectal fascia (MRF), and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) showed good performance both in the training set (AUC = 0.819) and validation set (AUC = 0.815).

CONCLUSIONS

The DWI_score based on histogram features of multi b-value DWI functional parameters was an independent factor for PFS of LARC and the prognostic model with a combination of DWI_score and clinicopathologic factors could indicate the progression risk before treatment.

KEY POINTS

• Mean value of functional parameters obtained from multi b-value DWI might not be useful to assess the prognosis of LARC. • The DWI_score based on histogram features of multi b-value DWI functional parameters was an independent prognosis factor for PFS of LARC. • Prognostic model based on DWI_score and clinicopathologic factors could indicate the progression risk of LARC before treatment.

A Race-Specific, DNA Methylation Analysis of Aging in Normal Rectum: Implications for the Biology of Aging and Its Relationship to Rectal Cancer

Approximately 90% of colorectal cancer (CRC) develop over the age of 50, highlighting the important role of aging in CRC risk. African Americans (AAs) shoulder a greater CRC burden than European Americans (EA) and are more likely to develop CRC at a younger age. The effects of aging in AA and EA normal rectal tissue have yet to be defined. Here, we performed epigenome-wide DNA methylation analysis in the first, large-scale biracial cohort of normal rectum (n = 140 samples). We identified increased epigenetic age acceleration in EA than AA rectum (p = 3.91 × 10^-4) using linear regression. We also identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with chronological aging in AA and EA, separately using DMRcate. Next, a consensus set of regions associated with cancer was identified through DMR analysis of two rectal cancer cohorts. The vast majority of AA DMRs were present in our analysis of aging in rectum of EA subjects, though rates of epigenetic drift were significantly greater in AA (p = 1.94 × 10^-45). However, 3.66-fold more DMRs were associated with aging in rectum of EA subjects, many of which were also associated with rectal cancer. Our findings reveal a novel relationship between race, age, DNA methylation and rectal cancer risk that warrants further investigation.

Different Oncologic Outcomes in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: A Regression Analysis on 2073 Patients

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the population aged ≤ 49 (early-onset CRC-EOCRC). Recent studies highlighted the biological and clinical differences between EOCRC and late-onset CRC (LOCRC-age ≥ 50), while comparative results about long-term survival are still debated. This study aimed to investigate whether age of onset may impact on oncologic outcomes in a surgical population of sporadic CRC patients. Patients operated on for sporadic CRC from January 2010 to January 2022 were allocated to the EOCRC and LOCRC groups. The primary endpoint was the recurrence/progression-free survival (R/PFS). A total of 423 EOCRC and 1650 LOCRC was included. EOCRC had a worse R/PFS (p < 0.0001) and cancer specific survival (p < 0.0001) compared with LOCRC. At Cox regression analysis, age of onset, tumoral stage, signet ring cells, extramural/lymphovascular/perineural veins invasion, and neoadjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for R/P. The analysis by tumoral stage showed an increased incidence of recurrence in stage I EOCRC (p = 0.014), and early age of onset was an independent predictor for recurrence (p = 0.035). Early age of onset was an independent predictor for worse prognosis, this effect was stronger in stage I patients suggesting a potentially—and still unknown—more aggressive tumoral phenotype in EOCRC.

A Transcriptome and Methylome Study Comparing Tissues of Early and Late Onset Colorectal Carcinoma

There is an increase in the incidence of early onset colorectal carcinoma (EOCRC). To better understand if there is any difference in molecular pathogenesis of EOCRC and late onset colorectal carcinoma (LOCRC), we compared the clinical, histological, transcriptome, and methylome profile of paired CRC and healthy colonic tissue from 67 EOCRC and 98 LOCRC patients. The frequency of stage 3 CRC, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion was higher in the EOCRC group. Many of the cancer related pathways were differentially expressed in CRC tissue in both EOCRC and LOCRC patients. However, the magnitude of differential expression for some groups of genes, such as DNA damage repair genes and replication stress genes, were significantly less pronounced in the EOCRC group, suggesting less efficient DNA damage repair to be associated with EOCRC. A more marked methylation of "growth factor receptor" genes in LOCRC correlated with a more pronounced down-regulation of those genes in that group. From a therapeutic point of view, more over-expression of fatty acid synthase (FASN) among the LOCRC patients may suggest a better response of FASN targeted therapy in that group. The age of onset of CRC did not appear to modify the response of cis-platin or certain immune checkpoint inhibitors. We found some differences in the molecular pathogenesis in EOCRC and LOCRC that may have some biological and therapeutic significance.

Early onset colorectal cancer: Challenges across the cancer care continuum

Early Onset Colorectal cancer (EOCRC) incidence is increasing at an alarming pace. An increase of 90% in colon cancer and 124% in rectal cancer is expected by 2030. Patients with EOCRC are not receiving additional attention compared to older patients despite having a unique molecular pattern, majority of cases are sporadic, and related short- and long-term treatment and disease complications. The current management and screening guidelines have been constructed from studies on late onset CRC. Plethora of studies are ongoing to understand this disease entity in order to construct a tailored prevention, detection and management plans. While waiting for a better understanding of the disease, efforts should be directed toward improving the quality of care across the cancer continuum. Here we aim to address the challenges faced by EOCRC patients across the cancer continuum. This will facilitate directing future efforts and research toward construction of a personalized and precise guidelines.

•

Studies showed that Ealy onset colorectal cancer is caused by an accumulative risk exposure.

•

Indirect cost of premature death and reduced productivity due to EOCRC exceeds direct costs.

•

Patients, system and physicians related diagnosis delays should be improved.

•

Young cancer patients have unique survivorship concerns different from old patients.

Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancers in Resource-Constrained Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICS) Scenario-Outcomes, Practice Patterns, and Commentary on Treatment Costs

Anant RamaswamyIntroduction  The overall survival (OS) of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) in clinical practice and resource-constrained low- and middle-income countries (LMICS) like India is not known. Materials and Methods  Data of patients with mCRC treated between January 2013 and August 2017 were accessed from a prospectively maintained database. Demographics, disease characteristics, chemotherapeutic regimens, use of monoclonal antibodies, and survival outcomes in treated patients were collected and analyzed. Costs of treatment options as off 2017 were also interpreted. Results  The data of 403 patients satisfied prespecified inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The median age of the cohort was 48 years (range: 17-86) with a predominance of rectal cancers (63.3%), liver alone metastases (47.1%), and resected primary (69.7%). Signet ring histology was present in 82 patients (20.3%). The most commonly used first-line regimen (CT1) was modified capecitabine-oxaliplatin (53.3%). Two hundred and nineteen patients (54.3%) received second-line systemic therapy (CT2). Patients received a median of two lines of therapy (range: 1-6). MoAbs were used by 48 patients (13.4%) with CT1 and 34 patients (15.5%) with CT2. Median OS of the entire cohort was 17.61 months (95% confidence interval: 15.48-19.74), which was within the predicted range, as per investigator hypothesis. The presence of signet ring histology ( p <0.001), raised carcinoembryonic antigen at baseline ( p =0.017), and the absence of a resected primary ( p <0.001) predicted inferior median OS. Conclusions  Survival of patients with mCRC in a resource-constrained LMIC scenario like India is approximately 12 to 15 months lower than published trial data. Limited access to targeted therapy and newer expensive treatment options due to financial constraints may contribute to this disparity.

Clinical spectrum of rectal cancer identifies hallmarks of early-onset patients and next-generation treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing among young adults and more rectal cancers are reported. This study aimed to identify the clinical features specific for early-onset rectal cancer and provide insights on cancer management.

METHODS

Early-onset (<50 years) and late-onset (≥50 years) rectal cancer patients from a referral tertiary care center (SYSU cohort) and Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER cohort) were included to perform a comprehensive comparison on clinical information.

RESULTS

A total of 552 and 80,341 patients with stages I-III rectal cancer were included in the SYSU and SEER cohorts, respectively. In the SYSU cohort, early-onset diseases had significantly higher prevalence of family history of cancer and history of HBV infection and lower incidence of comorbidities (p < 0.05). In addition, early-onset patients presented more frequently with advanced node stage (N2 stage: 16.9 vs. 9.3%, p = 0.017) and high-risk features, including mucinous or signet cell carcinomas (21.8 vs. 12.9%, p = 0.014), poorly differentiated tumors (28.8 vs. 15.4%, p = 0.002), and perineural invasion (14.5 vs. 7.9%, p = 0.027) compared with late-onset patients. However, early-onset patients received more neoadjuvant (18.5 vs. 11.2%, p = 0.032) and adjuvant treatments (71.0 vs. 45.8%, p < 0.001), and they had better overall survival in both SYSU (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.95; p = 0.029) and SEER (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.37-0.40; p < 0.001) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Early-onset rectal cancers are distinct from late-onset cases in clinicopathological features, treatment modalities, and outcomes. The clinical trials and studies that are specific for young populations are needed to develop optimal strategies for cancer screening, treatment, and surveillance.

An assessment of left-digit bias in the treatment of older patients with potentially curable rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patient age is associated with poorer rectal cancer treatment compliance. However, it is unknown whether left-digit bias (disproportionate influence of leftmost age digit) influences this association.

METHODS

The patients diagnosed with stage I-III rectal cancer between 2006 to 2017 in the National Cancer Database were identified. The association between age and receipt of guideline-adherent care was assessed using mixed-effects multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Among 97,960 patients, 46.2% received guideline-adherent overall treatment and 73.3% underwent guideline-adherent surgical resection. Of those who underwent guideline-adherent surgery, 86.4% received guideline-adherent radiotherapy and 56.6% received guideline-adherent chemotherapy. After risk-adjustment, each decade increase in age was associated with 36% decreased odds of guideline-adherent therapy (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.65). Patients aged 58 to 59 (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.27) and 78 to 79 (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.08-1.51) had higher odds of guideline-adherent overall treatment compared with patients aged 60 and 80, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in the receipt of guideline-adherent treatment between patients aged 60 vs 61-62 and 80 vs 81-82.

CONCLUSION

Older patients with rectal cancer are less likely to receive guideline-adherent care, and a left-digit bias is present. Geriatric assessment-guided treatment decisions could help mitigate this bias.

Early-onset colorectal cancer: why it should be high on our list of differentials

Background

Early‐onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) (<50 years) incidence has increased in Australia and worldwide. However, the diagnosis of EOCRC is often delayed. Recent research has discovered some differences from later‐onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) (>50 years). An awareness of the unique features of EOCRC is crucial to reduce time from symptom onset to diagnosis.

Methods

A literature search was conducted on electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) using the search terms “early onset colorectal cancer” or “young onset colorectal cancer.”

Results

The American Cancer Society has reduced the colorectal cancer screening initiation age to 45 for average‐risk adults whilst screening programmes in the United Kingdom and Australia remain unchanged with initiation at 60 and 50, respectively. Exposures resulting in dysbiosis (obesity, westernised diet, alcohol, antibiotic and sugar‐sweetened beverage consumption) have been linked with increased EOCRC risk. EOCRC is often left‐sided presenting with rectal bleeding, altered bowel habit and constitutional symptoms. EOCRC is more commonly sporadic than hereditary, harbouring different genetic mutations than LOCRC. Comparative survival outcomes of EOCRC and LOCRC are conflicting with studies suggesting either better or poorer survival. Young patients better tolerate treatment‐related toxicities, which may account for their improved survival despite comparatively advanced stages and poorer histopathological features at diagnosis.

Conclusion

Current EOCRC literature is limited by American‐focused datasets and heterogenous EOCRC definitions and study designs (the greatest strength of evidence exists for EOCRC risk factor studies comprised of large retrospective cohorts). There is minimal research into the quality of life and surgical outcomes of EOCRC patients, and this area warrants further investigation.

Identifying the long-term survival beneficiary of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer in the TME era

This study was to verify the long-term survival efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (preRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients and identify potential long-term survival beneficiary. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 7582 LARC patients were eligible for this study between 2011 and 2015 including 6066 received preRT and 1516 received surgery alone. Initial results showed that preRT prolonged the median overall survival (OS) of LARC patients (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.98, P < 0.05), and subgroup analysis revealed that patients with age > 65 years, stage III, T3, T4, N2, tumor size > 5 cm, tumor deposits, and lymph nodes dissection (LND) ≥ 12 would benefit more from preRT (all P < 0.05). A prognostic predicting nomogram was constructed using the independent risk factors of OS identified by multivariate Cox analysis (all P < 0.05), which exhibited better prediction of OS than the 8th American Joint Cancer Committee staging system on colorectal cancer. According to the current nomogram, patients in the high-risk subgroup had a shorter median OS than low-risk subgroup (HR 2.62, 95% CI 2.25–3.04, P < 0.001), and preRT could benefit more high-risk patients rather than low-risk patients. Hence, we concluded that preRT might bring long-term survival benefits to LARC patients, especially those with high risk.

Benchmarking Outcomes for Definitive Treatment of Young-Onset, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

There has been an increase in the incidence of rectal cancer diagnosed in young adults (age < 50 years). We evaluated outcomes among young adults treated with pre-operative long course chemoradiation (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME).

METHODS

The medical records of 219 patients, age 18-49, with non-metastatic, cT3-4, or cN1-2 rectal adenocarcinoma treated from 2000 to 2017 were reviewed for demographic and treatment characteristics, as well as pathologic and oncologic outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier test, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 44 years. CRT followed by TME and post-operative chemotherapy was the most frequent treatment sequence (n = 196), with FOLFOX (n = 115) as the predominant adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no difference in sex, stage, MSS/pMMR, or pCR by age (< 45 years [n = 111] vs. ≥ 45 years [n = 108]). The 5-year rates of DFS were 77.2% for all patients, 69.8% for age < 45 years and 84.7% for age ≥ 45 years (P = .01). The 5-year rates of OS were 89.6% for all patients, 85.1% for patients with age < 45 years and 94.3% for patients with age ≥ 45 years (P = .03). Age ≥ 45 years was associated with a lower risk of disease recurrence or death on multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.97, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Among young adults, patients with age < 45 years had lower rates of DFS and OS, compared to those with age ≥ 45 years. These outcomes could serve as a benchmark by which to evaluate newer treatment approaches.

Effects of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes in early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-weighted cohort study

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials have been unable to demonstrate noninferiority of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess oncologic resection success, short- and long-term morbidity, and overall survival by operative approach in a homogenous early-stage rectal cancer cohort.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, propensity score-weighted cohort study utilizing deidentified data from the National Cancer Database. Individuals who underwent a formal proctectomy for early-stage rectal cancer (T1-2, N0, M0) from 2010 to 2015 were included. The primary outcome was a composite variable indicating successful oncologic resection stratified by operative approach, defined as negative margins with at least 12 lymph nodes evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 3649 proctectomies for rectal adenocarcinoma, 1660 (45%) were approached open, 1461 (40%) laparoscopically, and 528 (15%) robotically. After propensity score weighting, compared to open approach, there were no differences in odds of successful oncologic resection (OR_adj = 1.07, 95% CI 0.9, 1.28 and OR_adj = 1.28, 95% CI 0.97, 1.7). Open approach was associated with longer mean (± SD) length of stay compared to laparoscopic (7.7 ± 0.18 vs. 6.5 ± 0.25 days, p < 0.001) and robotic (7.7 ± 0.18 vs. 6.3 ± 0.35 days, p < 0.001) approaches. In regard to 90-day mortality, compared to open approach, laparoscopic (OR_adj = 0.56, 95% CI 0.36, 0.88) and robotic (OR_adj = 0.45, 95% CI 0.22, 0.94) approaches were associated with a reduced odd of 90-day mortality. This mortality benefit persists in the long-term for laparoscopic approach (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

For individuals with early-stage rectal cancer treated with proctectomy, successful oncologic resection can be achieved irrespective of technical approach. Minimally invasive approaches provide short-term reduction in morbidity. Surgical approach must be tailored to each patient based on surgeon experience and judgement in collaboration with a multi-disciplinary team.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival in young non-metastatic rectal cancer patients after curative resection: a population-based analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish and validate a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in young non-metastatic rectal cancer (RC) patients after curative resection.

METHODS

Young RC patients (under 50 years of age) from 2010 to 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Those patients randomly assigned to a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. The independent prognostic factors for OS were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. A nomogram model was built based on the independent prognostic variables and was evaluated by concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total number of 3026 young RC patients were extracted from SEER database. OS nomogram was constructed based on race, histological type, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and number of lymph nodes (LN) examined. C-index, ROC curves, calibration plot, and DCA curves presented satisfactory performance of the above nomogram in predicting the prognosis of young non-metastatic RC patients after curative resection. The nomogram can identify three subgroups of patients at different risks, which showed different prognostic outcomes both in the training cohort and validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

We successfully established a reliable and insightful nomogram to predict OS for young non-metastatic RC patients after curative resection. The nomogram may provide accurate prognosis prediction to guide individualized follow-up and treatment plans.

Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database

Background

Data suggests there are demographic and biological differences in colon cancer between young and typical-onset patients. However, it is unclear if these differences persist in rectal cancer patients, exclusive of colon cancer. This is a retrospective review of a large national database to evaluate age-based differences in demographics, tumor features, and treatment among patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

The National Cancer Database from 2004-2014 was queried for rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were grouped by age at diagnosis: early-onset, defined as <40 years, mid-onset 40-49, and late-onset ≥50. Propensity matching controlled for demographic variation among cohorts. Pairwise Chi-square with Bonferroni correction was used for analysis.

Results

Thirty thousand nine hundred seventy-eight patients were included: 1,249 (4%) early-onset, 4,156 (13%) middle-onset, and 25,573 (83%) late-onset. Significant differences existed between all three cohorts in nearly all demographic and pathologic metrics. Control for demographic variation revealed early-onset and middle-onset cohorts differed only with respect to the stage at presentation, while early-onset and late-onset cohorts differed more significantly on the basis of stage, histology, and oncologic management.

Conclusion

The demographic differences observed demonstrate that patients under 50 should not be considered one cohort. Propensity matching led to a decrease in tumor trait differences among cohorts, suggesting that demographics other than age drive variation in tumor biology. Young patients received more aggressive management, implying the presence of an age bias. Age-based screening is likely insufficient and may exclude the rising proportion of young patients at risk for disease, while age-based management may lead to under- or overtreatment of patients at either end of the age spectrum.

Early age of onset is an independent predictor for worse disease-free survival in sporadic rectal cancer patients. A comparative analysis of 980 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

while interest on early-onset colorectal cancer (age ≤49) is on the rise, studies on early-onset rectal cancer (EORC) are limited. The aim of this study was to compare predictors for disease progression/recurrence between sporadic EORC and late-onset RC patients (LORC).

METHODS

163 EORC and 830 LORC operated between January 1st^, 2010 and April 30th^, 2021 at a tertiary center were included. Demographics, tumor characteristics, microsatellite status, gene mutations (KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PI3Kca) and oncologic outcomes were compared. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to ascertain the effect of variables on recurrence/progression and death. Recurrence/Progression free survival (R/PFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

Mean age of EORC was 42.16, (46% aged 45-49). A majority of EORC patients had a family history for CRC (p = 0.01) and underwent total neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.01). EORC patients showed a higher rate of low-grade tumor differentiation (p < 0.0001), stage III-IV (p = 0.001), microsatellite instability (p = 0.02), locoregional nodal (p = 0.001) and distant metastases (p < 0.0001). Accordingly, more EORC patients underwent adjuvant treatment (p < 0.0001). Mutations were mostly reported among LORC cases (p = 0.04), whereas EORC patients showed a worse R/PFS (p = 0.02), even at stage I (p = 0.04). CSS did not differ (p = 0.11) across groups. Multivariate analysis indicated age of onset (p = 0.04) was an independent predictor for progression/recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Age of onset was shown to be an independent unfavorable predictor. Delayed diagnosis could explain this effect in the more advanced stages, while the worse outcomes in stage I may suggest a more aggressive disease behavior.

Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Review

Importance

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (younger than 50 years) is rising globally, the reasons for which are unclear. It appears to represent a unique disease process with different clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics compared with late-onset colorectal cancer. Data on oncological outcomes are limited, and sensitivity to conventional neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy regimens appear to be unknown. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available literature on early-onset colorectal cancer.

Observations

Within the next decade, it is estimated that 1 in 10 colon cancers and 1 in 4 rectal cancers will be diagnosed in adults younger than 50 years. Potential risk factors include a Westernized diet, obesity, antibiotic usage, and alterations in the gut microbiome. Although genetic predisposition plays a role, most cases are sporadic. The full spectrum of germline and somatic sequence variations implicated remains unknown. Younger patients typically present with descending colonic or rectal cancer, advanced disease stage, and unfavorable histopathological features. Despite being more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, patients with early-onset disease demonstrate comparable oncological outcomes with their older counterparts.

Conclusions and Relevance

The clinicopathological features, underlying molecular profiles, and drivers of early-onset colorectal cancer differ from those of late-onset disease. Standardized, age-specific preventive, screening, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies are required to optimize outcomes.

Young-onset colorectal cancer: A review

Despite the general decrease in overall incidence of colorectal cancer since the early 1990s, the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients less than 50 years old has nearly doubled. A systematic review was performed using the PubMed database (2011-2020) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011-2021) to identify studies (published in English) evaluating epidemiologic, clinical, hereditary, and molecular features; as well as evaluation, management, and prognosis of young-onset colorectal cancer patients. Our search yielded a total of 3401 articles, after applying our inclusion criteria. We fully reviewed 94 full-length studies. This systematic review demonstrates the increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer and highlights the importance of being hypervigilant for the differential diagnosis colorectal cancer when evaluating a young adult who presents with gastrointestinal symptoms.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in the ColoCare Study: Differences by Age of Onset

Early-onset colorectal cancer has been on the rise in Western populations. Here, we compare patient characteristics between those with early- (<50 years) vs. late-onset (≥50 years) disease in a large multinational cohort of colorectal cancer patients (n = 2193). We calculated descriptive statistics and assessed associations of clinicodemographic factors with age of onset using mutually-adjusted logistic regression models. Patients were on average 60 years old, with BMI of 29 kg/m², 52% colon cancers, 21% early-onset, and presented with stage II or III (60%) disease. Early-onset patients presented with more advanced disease (stages III-IV: 63% vs. 51%, respectively), and received more neo and adjuvant treatment compared to late-onset patients, after controlling for stage (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 2.30 (1.82-3.83) and 2.00 (1.43-2.81), respectively). Early-onset rectal cancer patients across all stages more commonly received neoadjuvant treatment, even when not indicated as the standard of care, e.g., during stage I disease. The odds of early-onset disease were higher among never smokers and lower among overweight patients (1.55 (1.21-1.98) and 0.56 (0.41-0.76), respectively). Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage disease, to have received systemic treatments regardless of stage at diagnosis, and were less likely to be ever smokers or overweight.

The Survival Effect of Radiotherapy on Stage II/III Rectal Cancer in Different Age Groups: Formulating Radiotherapy Decision-Making Based on Age

Introduction

Total mesorectal excision (TME), chemotherapy (CT), and radiotherapy (RT) are usually integrated into the comprehensive treatment of stage II/III rectal cancer (RC). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) has become the standard treatment for stage II/III RC patients to help reduce the size of a tumor or kill cancer cells that have spread. Adjuvant RT is delivered after the resection to destroy remaining cancer cells and used mainly in stage II/III RC patients who have not received preoperative radiotherapy, such as those who suffered from a bowel obstruction before surgery. It is controversial whether radiotherapy can improve the survival of stage II/III RC patients. An increasing number of studies have reported that rectal cancer exhibited mismatched biology, epidemiology, and therapeutic response to current treatment strategy in different age groups. It is necessary to investigate whether radiotherapy exhibits disparate effects in different age groups of patients with stage II/III RC.

Methods

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was extracted to identify stage II/III RC diagnosed in the periods of 2004-2016. The statistical methods included Pearson's chi-square test, log-rank test, Cox regression model, and propensity score matching.

Results

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) cannot improve the prognosis, and postoperative RT may even reduce the survival time for early onset stage II/III RC. Postoperative RT was not able to improve the overall survival (OS), while nRT may provide limited survival improvement for middle-aged stage II/III RC patients. In addition, radiotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis for elderly stage II/III RC.

Conclusions

This study indicated the inconsistent survival effect of radiotherapy on stage II/III rectal cancer patients in different age groups. Hence, we formulated a novel flow chart of radiotherapy decision-making based on age in stage II/III RC patients.

Incidence Rates, Treatment, and Survival of Rectal Cancer Among Young Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing among young adults in the United States. We aim to investigate the incidence rate, the effect of multimodal therapy, and survival outcomes of rectal cancer in patients under 45 years of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on young-onset (under 45 y) rectal cancer between 2000 and 2016 was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry (SEER).

RESULTS

A total of 10,375 patients with young-onset rectal cancer were identified where 54.7% were male. The median age at diagnosis was 40±5.7 years. The overall age-adjusted incidence of rectal cancer between 2000 and 2016 was 1.24 per 100,000 per year. Incidence increased with age, with the highest incidence occurring in the 40- to 44-year age group. Over the 16-year study period, rectal cancer increased by ∼2.29%. Most tumors on presentation were moderately differentiated (30.8%) while the most common stage at presentation was stage 4 (48.3%). One- and 5-year cause-specific survival for rectal cancer was 93% and 72%, respectively. According to Cox proportional hazard models, chemotherapy was associated with increased mortality in patients with localized cancer [hazard ratio (HR)=2.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.04-4.08, P<0.001], did not significantly improve mortality outcomes in patients with regional cancer (HR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.70-1.04, P=0.116), but reduced mortality in patients with distant cancer (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.56-0.70, P<0.001), though this effect was largely seen in patients 35 years and older. Surgery was associated with improved survival across all cancer stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of regional and distant rectal cancer is increasing in young patients. While patient age is an important prognostic indicator of survival, chemotherapy does not appear to improve survival in younger patients with localized and regional disease.

Neoadjuvant radiation above NCCN guidelines for rectal cancer is associated with age under 50 and early clinical stage

INTRODUCTION

Recent data suggest patients with early-onset rectal cancer (EORC) receive neoadjuvant radiation above recommended doses without oncologic benefit. The use of excessive radiation may lead to worse outcomes and patient harm. We sought to evaluate predictors of aggressive neoadjuvant radiation (A-XRT) use in EORC patients and compare this to late-onset rectal cancer (LORC) patients.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014 was queried for rectal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing surgical resection. Patients with stage 0 or IV disease, positive margins, and incomplete data were excluded. Standard neoadjuvant radiation (S-XRT) was based upon NCCN guidelines: 25-50.4 Gray for stage II/III patients and none for stage I. Excess radiation was considered A-XRT. Patients diagnosed at age < 50 years were labeled EORC; those ≥ 50 years were LORC. Categorical data were analyzed with chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to analyze clinicodemographic associations with A-XRT.

RESULTS

45,403 patients were included: 7999 (17.6%) EORC and 37,404 (82.4%) LORC. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that A-XRT use among stage I patient was associated with male gender, age under 50, urban location, mucinous histology, and poor tumor differentiation. Among stage II and III patients, A-XRT use was associated with male gender, age under 50, higher education and income, and urban location. Cox hazards did not demonstrate a significant association of A-XRT use with survival.

CONCLUSION

Our data reaffirm that EORC patients more frequently receive A-XRT and that use is based on demographic features independent of tumor characteristics. Reasons for A-XRT, particularly in EORC patients, should be clarified to promote adherence to guidelines and minimize patient harm.

Analysis of Survival Among Adults With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the National Cancer Database

IMPORTANCE

While increased adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines in the US has been associated with significant reductions in cancer incidence in US individuals aged 50 years and older, the incidence of CRC among those aged younger than 50 years has been steadily increasing. Understanding the survival among individuals with early-onset CRC compared with those aged 50 years and older is fundamental to informing treatment approaches and understanding the unique biological distinctiveness within early-onset CRC.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the overall survival for individuals with early-onset CRC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database. Included individuals were ages 0 to 90 years and diagnosed with primary CRC from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2015. Individuals diagnosed at ages 51 through 55 years were selected as the reference group and defined as later-onset CRC for this study. Individuals diagnosed at age 50 years were excluded to minimize an apparent screening detection bias at that age in our population, given that these individuals disproportionately presented with earlier stage. All statistical analyses were conducted from January 4, 2020, through December 26, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Early-onset CRC was defined as age younger than 50 years at diagnosis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Among 769 871 individuals with CRC (377 890 [49.1%] women; 636 791 White individuals [82.7%]), 353 989 individuals (46.0%) died (median [range] follow-up: 2.9 [0-14.0] years), 102 168 individuals (13.3%) had early-onset CRC, and 78 812 individuals (10.2%) had later-onset CRC. Individuals with early-onset CRC, compared with those diagnosed with CRC at ages 51 through 55 years, had a lower 10-year survival rate (53.6% [95% CI, 53.2%-54.0%] vs 54.3% [95% CI, 53.8%-54.8%]; P < .001) in unadjusted analysis. However, after adjustment for other factors associated with mortality, most notably stage, individuals with early-onset CRC had a lower risk of death compared with individuals diagnosed from ages 51 through 55 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.96]; P < .001). In the model adjusted for stage, the HR for individuals with early-onset CRC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.88-0.90; P < .001). The survival advantage was greatest for individuals diagnosed at ages 35 through 39 years (adjusted HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]; P < .001) and stages I (adjusted HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.93]; P < .001) and II (adjusted HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.90]; P < .001) and was absent among those diagnosed at ages 25 years or younger and stages III through IV.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that there is a survival benefit for individuals with early-onset CRC compared with those diagnosed with CRC at later ages. Further study is needed to understand the underlying heterogeneity of survival among individuals with early-onset CRC by age and stage.

Care Patterns and Overall Survival in Patients With Early-Onset Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in patients younger than 50 years of age, commonly defined as early-onset (EO-CRC), is rising. EO-CRC often presents with distinct clinicopathologic features. However, data on prognosis are conflicting and outcomes with modern treatment approaches for metastatic disease are still limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) to a biobanking and clinical data collection protocol from 2014 to 2018. We grouped the cohort based on age at initial diagnosis: < 40 years, 40-49 years, and ≥ 50 years. We used regression models to examine associations among age at initial diagnosis, treatments, clinicopathologic features, and survival.

RESULTS

We identified 466 patients with mCRC (45 [10%] age < 40 years, 109 [23%] age 40-49 years, and 312 [67%] age ≥ 50 years). Patients < 40 years of age were more likely to have received multiple metastatic resections (odds ratio [OR], 3.533; P = .0066) than their older counterparts. Patients with EO-CRC were more likely to receive triplet therapy than patients > 50 years of age (age < 40 years: OR, 6.738; P = .0002; age 40-49 years: OR, 2.949; P = .0166). Patients 40-49 years of age were more likely to have received anti-EGFR therapy (OR, 2.633; P = .0016). Despite differences in care patterns, age did not predict overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Despite patients with EO-CRC receiving more intensive treatments, survival was similar to the older counterpart. However, EO-CRC had clinical and molecular features associated with worse prognoses. Improved biologic understanding is needed to optimize clinical management of EO-CRC. The cost-benefit ratio of exposing patients with EO-CRC to more intensive treatments has to be carefully evaluated.

Different disease characteristics in young patients with colorectal cancer: a large retrospective study in a city in Romania

OBJECTIVE

In 2018, colorectal cancer (CRC) was the second most frequent malignancy in Romania after lung cancer. Although CRC is typically encountered in patients >50 years old, CRC's global incidence among younger adults has been increasing. We aimed to compare the disease characteristics of patients with CRC aged ≤50 years with those >50 years old.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data from patients with CRC who underwent standard surgery at "Pius Brinzeu" Emergency County Hospital, Timisoara, Romania. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (patients ≤50 years old) and Group 2 (patients >50 years old). Six parameters were analyzed (sex, residence location, age, tumor localization, microscopic findings, pathological staging).

RESULTS

Data on age-related CRC were available for 1380 patients treated from January 2012 to December 2018. Group 1 included 120 patients while group 2 included 1260 patients. Significantly more Group 1 patients presented with advanced CRC compared with Group 2 patients (94.2% vs. 87.4%). Furthermore, CRC in younger adults was more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring the CRC incidence in younger adults is essential to assess whether screening practices require changes and to raise awareness among clinicians of the increasing CRC incidence among younger patients.

Prognostic risk factors and survival models for T3 locally advanced rectal cancer: what can we learn from the baseline MRI?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the baseline MRI characteristics for predicting survival outcomes and construct survival models for risk stratification to facilitate personalized treatment and follow-up strategies in patients with MRI-defined T3 (mrT3) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 256 mrT3 LARC patients evaluated between 2008 and 2012 in our institution, with an average follow-up period of 6.8 ± 1.2 years. The baseline MRI characteristics, clinical data, and follow-up information were evaluated. The patients were randomized into a training cohort (TC, 186 patients) and validation cohort (VC, 70 patients). The TC dataset was used to develop multivariate nomograms for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), while the VC dataset was used for independent validation of the models. Harrell concordance (C) indices and Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration were used to evaluate the performances of the models.

RESULTS

Baseline mrT3 substage, extramural venous invasion (EMVI) grading, mucinous adenocarcinoma, mesorectal fascia involvement, elevated pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) were independent predictors of DFS. T3 substage, EMVI grading, and NCRT were also independent predictors of OS. The nomograms constructed permitted the individualized prediction of 3-year and 5-year DFS and 5-year OS with high discrimination (C-index range, 0.833-0.892) and good calibration in the TC and VC.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified baseline MRI characteristics that help independently predict survival outcomes in patients with mrT3 LARC. The survival models based on these characteristics allow for the individualized pretreatment risk stratification in patients with mrT3 LARC.

KEY POINTS

• Baseline MRI characteristics can independently stratify risk and predict survival outcomes in patients with mrT3 LARC. • The nomograms built using selected baseline MRI characteristics facilitate the individualized pretreatment risk stratification and help with clinical decision-making in patients with mrT3 LARC. • MR-defined risk factors should, therefore, be carefully reported in the baseline MRI evaluation.

The effect of marital status on stage at diagnosis and survival in Saudis diagnosed with colorectal cancer: cancer registry analysis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer in males and third in females in Saudi Arabia, with the majority (66%) diagnosed at a late stage. We evaluated the effect of marital status on stage at diagnosis and CRC survival. We hypothesized that married patients would be more likely to present at an early stage and have higher survival than unmarried patients. The Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs (MNG-HA) cancer registry was used to identify patients diagnosed with CRC from 2009 to 2017. A competing risk analysis was performed to assess the 5-year CRC-specific survival, adjusting for potential confounders. The Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox regressions were used to assess survival. Two-thirds (76.50%) of the 936 CRC patients were married, 11.64% were unmarried, and 11.86% had an unknown marital status. With multiple imputation-based analysis, the multivariate analysis indicated that unmarried patients were 52% more likely to present at an advanced stage [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.52; 95% CI 1.33–1.73], and had a 30% higher risk of death due to CRC compared to the married patients (aHR 1.30; CI 1.17, 1.44). Future CRC screening and survivorship programs should assess the needs of the vulnerable unmarried population. Interventions supporting the early detection of CRC in this population may be beneficial in the long term and lead to improved cancer outcomes.

Rising incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer - a call to action

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), which occurs in individuals <50 years of age, has been increasing worldwide and particularly in high-income countries. The reasons for this increase remain unknown but plausible hypotheses include greater exposure to potential risk factors, such as a Western-style diet, obesity, physical inactivity and antibiotic use, especially during the early prenatal to adolescent periods of life. These exposures can not only cause genetic and epigenetic alterations in colorectal epithelial cells but also affect the gut microbiota and host immunity. Early-onset CRCs have differential clinical, pathological and molecular features compared with later-onset CRCs. Certain existing resources can be utilized to elucidate the aetiology of early-onset CRC and inform the development of effective prevention, early detection and therapeutic strategies; however, additional life-course cohort studies spanning childhood and young adulthood, integrated with prospective biospecimen collections, omics biomarker analyses and a molecular pathological epidemiology approach, are needed to better understand and manage this disease entity. In this Perspective, we summarize our current understanding of early-onset CRC and discuss how we should strategize future research to improve its prevention and clinical management.

A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer

Rectal cancer (RC) appears to behave differently compared with colon cancer. We aimed to analyze existence of different subtypes of RC depending on distinct features (age of onset and the presence of synchronous primary malignant neoplasms). We compared the clinicopathological, familial and molecular features of three different populations diagnosed with RC (early-onset RC [EORC], late-onset RC, and synchronous RC [SRC]). Eighty-five RCs were identified and were evaluated according to their microsatellite instability, CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) and chromosomal instability, as assessed by Next Generation Sequencing and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization approaches. The results were subjected to cluster analysis. SRCs displayed the most specific characteristics including a trend for the development of multiple malignant neoplasms, a greater proportion of CIMP-High tumors (75%) and more frequent genomic alterations. These findings were confirmed by a clustering analysis that stratified RCs according to their genomic alterations. We also found that EORCs exhibited their own features including an important familial cancer component and a remarkable rate of mutations in TP53 (53%). Together, heterogeneity in RC characteristics by age of disease-onset and SRC warrants further study to optimize tailored prevention, detection and intervention strategies-particularly among young adults.

Rectal cancer in young patients: incidence and outcome disparities

Background

There is an alarming rise in incidence among young patients with rectal cancer. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis (SEER) databases may help identify population level disparities in incidence and cancer-related outcomes.

Methods

A total of 197,178 patients within the SEER 18 registry and 221,886 patients from the NCDB database with rectal cancer were evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. The analyzed cohort consisted of young (<50), white or African American patients. Indication bias was mitigated by conducting inverse probability of treatment weighted analysis using binary logistic regression modeling to determine propensity score for being white or African American.

Results

A total of 6,144 young patients were identified from the SEER 18 registry and a total of 17,819 young patients were identified from the NCDB. From 1990 to 2016, there was a significant change in rectal cancer incidence, with a steadily increasing APC of 3.06 (P<0.05). The was no overall change in age-adjusted APC among young African American patients (APC 0.00, P=1); however, there was a significant increase among young white patients (APC 2.97, P<0.05). There was an increased incidence for both stage III and IV among young rectal cancer patients, with an age-adjusted APC of 5.35 and 3.83, respectively (P<0.05). After propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting, young African Americans had worse overall survival in both the NCDB and SEER (HR 1.1-1.3, P<0.05) databases. This disparity was also seen for cancer-specific survival (HR 1.5, P=0.002).

Conclusions

The current study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating an alarming increase in incidence of rectal cancer among young patients. Moreover, the incidence appears to be increasing particularly among young white patients and driven by stage III disease.