Differentiating members of the thiazolidinedione class: a focus on efficacy

Synthesis, in vitro potency of inhibition, enzyme kinetics and in silico studies of quinoline-based α-glucosidase inhibitors

Diabetes mellitus is a multifactorial global health disorder that is rising at an alarming rate. One effective therapeutic approach for controlling hyperglycemia associated with type-2 diabetes is to target α-glucosidase, which catalyzes starch hydrolysis in the intestine. In an attempt to find potential α-glucosidase inhibitors, a series of twenty new quinoline linked benzothiazole hybrids (8a-t) were synthesized in good yields from suitable reaction procedures and their chemical structures were analyzed by 1HNMR, 13CNMR, IR, and ESI-MS analysis. The synthesized derivatives further screened for their activity against α-glucosidase. Among them, compounds 8b, 8h, 8n and 8o exhibited remarkable α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with IC50 values ranging from 38.2 ± 0.3 to 79.9 ± 1.2 µM compared with standard drug acarbose (IC50 = 750.0 ± 2.0 µM). Enzyme kinetic studies of the most active compound (8h) indicated a non-competitive inhibition with Ki value of 38.2 µM. Moreover, the homology modeling, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies were conducted to reveal key interactions between the most active compound 8h and the targeted enzyme. These results are complementary to the experimental observations. In order to predict the druggability of the novel derivatives, the pharmacokinetic properties were also applied. These findings could be useful for the design and development of new α-glucosidase inhibitors.

Fish oil prevents excessive accumulation of subcutaneous fat caused by an adverse effect of pioglitazone treatment and positively changes adipocytes in KK mice

Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione (TZD), is widely used as an insulin sensitizer in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, body weight gain is frequently observed in TZD-treated patients. Fish oil improves lipid metabolism dysfunction and obesity. In this study, we demonstrated suppression of body weight gain in response to pioglitazone administration by combination therapy of pioglitazone and fish oil in type 2 diabetic KK mice. Male KK mice were fed experimental diets for 8 weeks. In safflower oil (SO), safflower oil/low-dose pioglitazone (S/PL), and safflower oil/high-dose pioglitazone (S/PH) diets, 20% of calories were provided by safflower oil containing 0%, 0.006%, or 0.012% (wt/wt) pioglitazone, respectively. In fish oil (FO), fish oil/low-dose pioglitazone (F/PL), and fish oil/high-dose pioglitazone (F/PH) diets, 20% of calories were provided by a mixture of fish oil and safflower oil. Increased body weight and subcutaneous fat mass were observed in the S/PL and S/PH groups; however, diets containing fish oil were found to ameliorate these changes. Hepatic mRNA levels of lipogenic enzymes were significantly decreased in fish oil-fed groups. These findings demonstrate that the combination of pioglitazone and fish oil decreases subcutaneous fat accumulation, ameliorating pioglitazone-induced body weight gain, through fish oil-mediated inhibition of hepatic de novo lipogenesis.

Cytotoxicity of thiazolidinedione-, oxazolidinedione- and pyrrolidinedione-ring containing compounds in HepG2 cells

Liver damage occurred in some patients who took troglitazone (TGZ) for type II diabetes. The 2,4-thiazolidinedione (TZD) ring in TGZ's structure has been implicated in its hepatotoxicity. To further examine the potential role of a TZD ring in toxicity we used HepG2 cells to evaluate two series of compounds containing different cyclic imides. N-phenyl analogues comprised 3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione (DCPT); 3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-2,4-oxazolidinedione (DCPO) and N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)succinimide (NDPS). Benzylic compounds, which closely resemble TGZ, included 5-(3,5-dichlorophenylmethyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione (DCPMT); 5-(4-methoxyphenylmethyl)-2,4-thiazolidinedione (MPMT); 5-(4-methoxyphenylmethylene)-2,4-thiazolidinedione (MPMT-I); 5-(4-methoxyphenylmethyl)-2,4-oxazolidinedione (MPMO); 3-(4-methoxyphenylmethyl)succinimide (MPMS) and 3-(4-methoxyphenylmethylene)succinimide (MPMS-I). Cytotoxicity was assessed using the MTS assay after incubating the compounds (0-250μM) with HepG2 cells for 24h. Only certain TZD derivatives (TGZ, DCPT, DCPMT and MPMT-I) markedly decreased cell viability, whereas MPMT had low toxicity. In contrast, analogues without a TZD ring (DCPO, NDPS, MPMO, MPMS and MPMS-I) were not cytotoxic. These findings suggest that a TZD ring may be an important determinant of toxicity, although different structural features, chemical stability, cellular uptake or metabolism, etc., may also be involved. A simple clustering approach, using chemical fingerprints, assigned each compound to one of three classes (each containing one active compound and close homologues), and provided a framework for rationalizing the activity in terms of structure.

An observational study of the effect of two thiazolidinediones on blood lipid levels: Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Rosiglitazone maleate and pioglitazone hydrochloride are established antihyperglycemic agents that are effective when used as monotherapy or in combination with other medications. However, the data regarding the effects of these agents on blood lipid levels are contradictory.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in clinical practice is associated with any changes in blood lipid levels.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review using electronic medical record data was conducted of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were newly treated with either rosiglitazone or pioglitazone and had 1 lipid measurement within 6 months prior to and 12 months following initial thiazolidinedione (TZD) therapy. Outcome measures were mean changes in low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C and HDL-C, respectively). To control for differences in baseline characteristics and/or selection bias, the treatment cohorts were compared using multivariate statistical techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 371 patients were included in the study; the pioglitazone cohort comprised 148 patients (82 women, 66 men; mean [SD] age, 64.9 [10.8] years) and the rosiglitazone cohort comprised 223 patients (113 men, 110 women; mean [SD] age, 66.1 [11.9] years). Pioglitazone-treated patients had a statistically higher mean baseline LDL-C compared with rosiglitazone-treated patients (125.0 mg/dL vs 116.6 mg/dL; P = 0.04). On average, LDL-C levels decreased over the study period, with no significant differences between the 2 cohorts (9.9 mg/dL vs 4.3 mg/dL for pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, respectively), although changes in both cohorts were statistically significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TZD therapy appears to be associated with a small decrease in LDL-C within the first 6 months after initiation. No differences in changes in LDL-C or HDL-C could be discerned between patients treated with rosiglitazone compared with pioglitazone.

Can an oral antidiabetic (rosiglitazone) be of benefit in leukemia treatment?

PPARs are ligand-regulated transcription factors and regulate expression of several gene products. Therefore, PPARs are being studied for their possible contribution to the treatment of cancer, atherosclerosis, inflammation, infertility and demyelinating diseases. Primary AML patients were observed to have significantly elevated PPARγ mRNA expression compared to normal peripheral blood or bone marrow mononuclear cells. This study investigated the cytotoxic effects of rosiglitazone maleate, a pure PPARγ agonist, in vitro in HL-60 cell line. This study obtained results which can provide guidance for future studies. Whether the PPARy agonist rosiglitazone maleate may provide additive effects in refractory or relapsing cases of acute leukemia may be set as an objective for the future studies.

Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II regulates nuclear receptor, myogenic, and metabolic gene expression in skeletal muscle cells

We demonstrate that chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II (COUP-TFII) mRNA is more abundantly expressed (than COUP-TFI mRNA) in skeletal muscle C2C12 cells and in (type I and II) skeletal muscle tissue from C57BL/10 mice. Consequently, we have utilized the ABI TaqMan Low Density Array (TLDA) platform to analyze gene expression changes specifically attributable to ectopic COUP-TFII (relative to vector only) expression in muscle cells. Utilizing a TLDA-based platform and 5 internal controls, we analyze the entire NR superfamily, 96 critical metabolic genes, and 48 important myogenic regulatory genes on the TLDA platform utilizing 5 internal controls. The low density arrays were analyzed by rigorous statistical analysis (with Genorm normalization, Bioconductor R, and the Empirical Bayes statistic) using the (integromics) statminer software. In addition, we validated the differentially expressed patho-physiologically relevant gene (identified on the TLDA platform) glucose transporter type 4 (Glut4). We demonstrated that COUP-TFII expression increased the steady state levels of Glut4 mRNA and protein, while ectopic expression of truncated COUP-TFII lacking helix 12 (COUP-TFΔH12) reduced Glut4 mRNA expression in C2C12 cells. Moreover, COUP-TFII expression trans-activated the Glut4 promoter (-997/+3), and ChIP analysis identified selective recruitment of COUP-TFII to a region encompassing a highly conserved SP1 binding site (in mouse, rat, and human) at nt positions -131/-118. Mutation of the SpI site ablated COUP-TFII mediated trans-activation of the Glut4 promoter. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that in skeletal muscle cells, COUP-TFII regulates several nuclear hormone receptors, and critical metabolic and muscle specific genes.

Pharmacogenetics of Anti-Diabetes Drugs

A variety of treatment modalities exist for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). In addition to dietary and physical activity interventions, T2D is also treated pharmacologically with nine major classes of approved drugs. These medications include insulin and its analogues, sulfonylureas, biguanides, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), meglitinides, α-glucosidase inhibitors, amylin analogues, incretin hormone mimetics, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors. Pharmacological treatment strategies for T2D are typically based on efficacy, yet favorable responses to such therapeutics are oftentimes variable and difficult to predict. Characterization of drug response is expected to substantially enhance our ability to provide patients with the most effective treatment strategy given their individual backgrounds, yet pharmacogenetic study of diabetes medications is still in its infancy. To date, major pharmacogenetic studies have focused on response to sulfonylureas, biguanides, and TZDs. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of pharmacogenetics investigations of these specific anti-diabetes medications. We focus not only on the results of these studies, but also on how experimental design, study sample issues, and definition of 'response' can significantly impact our interpretation of findings. Understanding the pharmacogenetics of anti-diabetes medications will provide critical baseline information for the development and implementation of genetic screening into therapeutic decision making, and lay the foundation for "individualized medicine" for patients with T2D.

Late-Onset Rosiglitazone-Associated Acute Liver Failure in a Patient with Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Objective:

To report a case of rosiglilazone-associated hepatotoxicity in a patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Case Summary:

A 52-year-old man presented with low-grade fever and fatigue that had been present for 4 months. He had been receiving insulin for 5 years and rosiglitazone 4 mg/day for 11 months for control of type 2 diabetes; he was receiving no other drug therapy. During hospitalization, hepatotoxicity was shown, with abnormal liver function test results including alanine aminotransferase 488 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase 344 U/L, alkaline phosphatase B32 U/L, total bilirubin 4.61 mg/dL, and direct bilirubin 3.63 mg/dL. Rosiglitazone was discontinued after further elevation of bilirubin (total 14.67 mg/dL, direct 12.10 mg/dL) occurred. Other causes for hepatotoxicity were ruled out, Hodgkin's lymphoma was diagnosed during the workup; however, liver imaging and biopsy also excluded this as the direct cause of acute liver failure. Despite discontinuation of rosiglitazone, the bilirubin level continued to increase to 49.29 mg/dL (direct >20 mg/dL). The patient died 3 months after admission.

Discussion:

Rosiglitazone maleate is a thiazolidinedione approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The first member of this drug class, troglitazone, was withdrawn from the market due to reports of acute liver failure. Rosiglitazone has been shown to be much safer than troglitazone, despite some reported cases of early-onset nonfatal hepatotoxicity. Use of the Naranjo probability scale indicated that rosiglitazone was the probable cause of acute liver failure in our patient.

Conclusions:

We conclude that rosiglitazone may be associated with late-onset acute liver failure. Clinicians should be aware of such a complication and monitor liver function in patients receiving the drug.

S 26948: a new specific peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma modulator with potent antidiabetes and antiatherogenic effects

OBJECTIVE

Rosiglitazone displays powerful antidiabetes benefits but is associated with increased body weight and adipogenesis. Keeping in mind the concept of selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma modulator, the aim of this study was to characterize the properties of a new PPARgamma ligand, S 26948, with special attention in body-weight gain.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used transient transfection and binding assays to characterized the binding characteristics of S 26948 and GST pull-down experiments to investigate its pattern of coactivator recruitment compared with rosiglitazone. We also assessed its adipogenic capacity in vitro using the 3T3-F442A cell line and its in vivo effects in ob/ob mice (for antidiabetes and antiobesity properties), as well as the homozygous human apolipoprotein E2 knocking mice (E2-KI) (for antiatherogenic capacity).

RESULTS

S 26948 displayed pharmacological features of a high selective ligand for PPARgamma with low potency in promoting adipocyte differentiation. It also displayed a different coactivator recruitment profile compared with rosiglitazone, being unable to recruit DRIP205 or PPARgamma coactivator-1 alpha. In vivo experiments showed that S 26948 was as efficient in ameliorating glucose and lipid homeostasis as rosiglitazone, but it did not increase body and white adipose tissue weights and improved lipid oxidation in liver. In addition, S 26948 represented one of the few molecules of the PPARgamma ligand class able to decrease atherosclerotic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings establish S 26948 as a selective PPARgamma ligand with distinctive coactivator recruitment and gene expression profile, reduced adipogenic effect, and improved biological responses in vivo.

Paradoxical HDL-C reduction during rosiglitazone and fibrate treatment

AIMS

Dyslipidaemia in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the major contributors in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thiazolidinediones (TZD), a class of drugs used in the treatment of T2DM, also modify lipids, especially lowering serum triglycerides and raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C).

METHODS

We describe five patients taking rosiglitazone and a fibrate who showed a paradoxical fall in HDL-C, which would have been missed if HDL-C had not been routinely monitored. This could have had a major impact in increasing the cardiovascular risk in these patients.

RESULTS

Our five patients showed marked variation in both the decrease in serum HDL-C (50-89%) and also in the time taken for recovery of HDL-C after withdrawal of rosiglitazone (between 5 and 20 weeks). Apolipoprotein A1 mirrored the drop in HDL-C in four of the five patients but in one subject this was not seen, suggesting the possibility of multiple mechanisms leading to the phenomenon described, perhaps involving HDL metabolism. Improvements in glycaemic control with rosiglitazone (absolute HbA(1c) reduction between 0.6 and 3.0%) were seen in four of our patients. This suggests that the peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma signalling pathways relevant to glucose homeostasis were intact.

CONCLUSION

As atherosclerosis is associated with a decrease in the HDL-C level, our observations reinforce the message that HDL-C should be measured before and after the commencement of rosiglitazone and also on increasing the dosage

Thiazolidinediones, insulin resistance and obesity: Finding a balance

The clinical efficacy of currently available thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in improving glycaemic control and ameliorating several risk factors for cardiovascular disease (linked to their insulin-sensitising actions as well as direct vascular effects) is well established. Treatment-associated weight gain, however, which has been identified as a class effect of the TZDs, is seen in a number of patients. The magnitude of weight gain correlates in part with improved metabolic control, i.e. better responders are more prone to increases in body weight. The cardiovascular risk associated with obesity appears to be depot specific; while peripheral obesity is associated with a low risk of cardiovascular complications, central obesity confers a greater degree of risk. Evidence is reviewed that increases in body weight associated with TZD treatment are associated with neutral effects (or even, decreases) in visceral fat, the adipose depot that is associated with central obesity.

Sequence variation in PPARG may underlie differential response to troglitazone

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARG) agonists used to treat type 2 diabetes. TZDs can also be used to reduce rates of type 2 diabetes in at-risk individuals. However, a large fraction of TZD-treated patients (30-40%) do not respond to TZD treatment with an improvement in insulin sensitivity (Si). We hypothesized that variation within the gene encoding PPARG may underlie this differential response to TZD therapy. We screened approximately 40 kb of PPARG in 93 nondiabetic Hispanic women (63 responders and 30 nonresponders) with previous gestational diabetes who had participated in the Troglitazone In the Prevention Of Diabetes study. TZD nonresponse was defined as the lower tertile in change in Si after 3 months of treatment. Baseline demographic and clinical measures were not different between responders and nonresponders. We identified and genotyped 131 variants including 126 single nucleotide polymorphisms and 5 insertion-deletion polymorphisms. Linkage disequilibrium analysis identified five haplotype blocks. Eight variants were associated with TZD response (P < 0.05). Three variants were also associated with changes in Si as a continuous variable. Our results suggest that PPARG variation may underlie response to TZD therapy in women at risk for type 2 diabetes.

Fenofibrate prevents Rosiglitazone-induced body weight gain in ob/ob mice

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Fibrates and thiazolidinediones are commonly used for the treatment of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects on body weight as well as on glucose and lipid homeostasis of ligands for PPARalpha and PPARgamma, Fenofibrate and Rosiglitazone, alone or in association.

METHODS

Ob/ob mice were divided into four groups: control, and mice daily injected (intraperitoneally), either with 10 mg/kg Rosiglitazone, 100 mg/kg Fenofibrate or both molecules. Body weight and food intake were monitored daily. After 13 days of treatment, mice were killed, and blood samples were collected for posterior metabolite quantification. The liver and adipose tissues were dissected and weighed.

RESULTS

Body weight was significantly reduced or increased by Fenofibrate and Rosiglitazone, respectively. The effect of Rosiglitazone was prevented by coadministration of Fenofibrate. This was accompanied by a normalization of the daily food efficiency. Compared to those treated with Rosiglitazone, animals treated with Fenofibrate alone or in combination presented a decreased white adipose tissue mass. Fenofibrate or Rosiglitazone alone significantly reduced the levels of plasma lipid parameters. Surprisingly, Fenofibrate also decreased blood glucose levels in ob/ob mice, despite having no effect on insulin levels. By contrast, both glucose and insulin levels were decreased by Rosiglitazone treatment. Coadministration of both drugs improved all parameters as with Rosiglitazone. Fenofibrate restored almost normal hepatocyte morphology and significantly reduced the triglyceride content of the liver. This was accompanied by an increase in fatty acid oxidation in the liver in all groups receiving Fenofibrate.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

These biological effects suggest that combined therapy with a PPARalpha and a PPARgamma ligand is more effective in ameliorating, specifically, lipid homeostasis than in activating any of this receptor separately. Furthermore, Fenofibrate prevents one of the most undesirable effects of Rosiglitazone, namely increased adiposity and body weight gain.

Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe co-administered with simvastatin in thiazolidinedione-treated type 2 diabetic patients

AIM

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), combination therapy is usually required to optimize glucose metabolism as well as to help patients achieve aggressive targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other lipid parameters associated with cardiovascular risk. The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are increasingly being used for both their blood glucose-lowering properties and their modest beneficial effects on triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, has a mechanism of action that differs from that of statins, which inhibit hepatic cholesterol synthesis. We compared the lipid-modifying efficacy and safety of adding ezetimibe to simvastatin, vs. doubling the dose of simvastatin, in TZD-treated T2DM patients.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study in T2DM patients, 30-75 years of age, who had been on a stable dose of a TZD for at least 3 months and had LDL-C > 2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) prior to study entry. Other antidiabetic medications were also allowed. Following 6 weeks of open-label simvastatin 20 mg/day, patients were randomized to the addition of either blinded ezetimibe 10 mg/day (n = 104) or an additional blinded simvastatin 20 mg/day (total simvastatin 40 mg/day; n = 110) for 24 weeks. Patients were stratified according to TZD type and dose (pioglitazone 15-30 vs. 45 mg/day; rosiglitazone 2-4 vs. 8 mg/day).

RESULTS

LDL-C was reduced more (p < 0.001) by adding ezetimibe 10 mg to simvastatin 20 mg (-20.8%) than by doubling the dose of simvastatin to 40 mg (-0.3%). Ezetimibe plus simvastatin 20 mg also produced significant incremental reductions in non-HDL-C (p < 0.001), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.05) and apolipoprotein B (p < 0.001) relative to simvastatin 40 mg. There were no differences between the groups with respect to changes in TG and HDL-C levels, and both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of ezetimibe with simvastatin, a dual inhibition treatment strategy targeting both cholesterol synthesis and absorption, is well tolerated and provides greater LDL-C-lowering efficacy than increasing the dose of simvastatin in T2DM patients taking TZDs.

Lack of efficacy of troglitazone at clinically achievable concentrations, with or without 9-cis retinoic acid or cytotoxic agents, for hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines

Although the PPARγ agonist troglitazone has been shown to induce growth inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells at high concentration, this study indicates troglitazone does not significantly inhibit the growth of HCC cells at clinically achievable concentrations (1–10 μM), and this lack of activity could not be improved by the addition of 9-cis-retinoic acid. Furthermore, no synergistic effect was found between troglitazone and cytotoxic anticancer agents.

Severe hypo-alpha-lipoproteinemia during treatment with rosiglitazone

Thiazolidinedione drugs are in widespread use for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In addition to improving insulin sensitivity, they generally result in a modest elevation of plasma HDL cholesterol. We report three patients, all of whom had preexisting diabetic dyslipidemia, who showed a profound reduction in plasma HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein AI levels soon after the initiation of rosiglitazone therapy. In all three patients, HDL cholesterol levels returned to normal following drug withdrawal. The fact that this phenomenon was not seen in >1,400 patients studied in clinical trials indicates that it is likely to be rare and idiosyncratic. Until the frequency of this adverse reaction is clearer, it would seem advisable to ensure that plasma HDL cholesterol is documented before and rechecked after commencement of thiazolidinedione therapy.

Achieving Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: A Practical Guide for Clinicians on Oral Hypoglycemics

Type 2 diabetes mellitus has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are particularly high in this patient population. Improved glucose control, especially early in the course of diabetes, can slow or prevent complications, preserve beta-cell function, and improve long-term outcomes. Within the last decade, new treatments and glycemic goals have created an opportunity to better manage this prevalent, chronic disease. Defects of insulin resistance and deficiency leading to type 2 diabetes can now be directly targeted with available therapies. In addition to diet and exercise, oral treatment options have been broadened, with both insulin secretagogues and insulin sensitizers. These advances in treatment options make glycemic control an obtainable target, and therefore should improve overall morbidity and mortality for patients. This paper will review currently available oral therapies, with a focus on the unique attributes of the insulin sensitizers for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Pioglitazone is Effective Therapy for Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

Pioglitazone as monotherapy and in combination with sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin has consistently demonstrated improved glycaemic and lipid parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a subanalysis to examine the effect of pioglitazone on glycaemia and lipids in patients <65 and > or =65 years of age in two double-blind, placebo-controlled monotherapy studies and in three separate multi-centre trials.

METHOD

In Study 1, 197 patients were randomised to receive pioglitazone 30 mg/day or placebo for 16 weeks. Study 2 was a forced dose-titration trial in patients randomised to receive pioglitazone 7.5/15/30 mg/day, pioglitazone 15/30/45 mg/day, or placebo daily for 26 weeks. Each of the lower dosages was given for at least 4 weeks and the highest dosage for 16 weeks. The three combination studies evaluated efficacy of pioglitazone 30 or 45 mg/day over a 24-week period in combination with sulfonylureas, metformin, or insulin.

RESULTS

In both placebo-controlled monotherapy studies, at 16 weeks, and at maximum pioglitazone dosage, 0.53-0.55% and 0.57-1.27% mean reductions from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were seen in patients aged <65 (n = 225) and > or =65 (n = 45) years, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the placebo and pioglitazone groups in each age cohort. Similar effects were observed in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, with 2.03-2.59 mmol/L and 3.20-4.44 mmol/L mean reductions from baseline, respectively, which were significantly different from the changes in the placebo group, but there was no difference between pioglitazone groups. At treatment endpoint in combination trials, pioglitazone added to sulfonylurea produced a mean decrease in HbA(1c) of 0.78-1.61%, and 1.64-1.96% in patients aged <65 (n = 557) and > or =65 (n = 115) years, respectively. Pioglitazone added to metformin produced a mean decrease in HbA(1c) of 0.78-1.03% and 0.78-0.98% in patients aged <65 (n = 686) and > or =65 (n = 112) years, respectively. Pioglitazone added to insulin produced a mean decrease in HbA(1c) of 1.13-1.37% and 1.39-1.66% in patients aged <65 (n = 500) and > or =65 (n = 156) years, respectively. In patients aged > or =65 years, hypoglycaemia was observed in 1 of 14 patients and in 0 of 13 patients in the two monotherapy studies. In the combination studies, the incidence of hypoglycaemia among patients aged > or =65 years was as follows: 26.7-28.8% combined with sulfonylurea; 0-4.4% combined with metformin; and 53.4-56.4% combined with insulin.

CONCLUSION

Pioglitazone monotherapy, or added to a sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin demonstrated no significant differences in effectiveness while exhibiting similar adverse events in patients aged > or =65 years compared with patients aged <65 years. Well-controlled randomised clinical trials are recommended to confirm the impact of pioglitazone therapy on the glycaemic and lipid control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.

Effects of simvastatin on the lipid profile and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals when added to thiazolidinedione therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease is the major cause of mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM). Given the increasingly aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for patients with DM set by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and the American Diabetes Association, many patients remain above target. Treatment with thiazolidinediones (TZDs) improves glycemic control but does not lower (and may raise) LDL-C concentrations.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability of adding the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A-reductase inhibitor simvastatin to existing TZD therapy in patients with type 2 DM.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients with type 2 DM who were taking a stable dose of pioglitazone or rosiglitazone and had a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value < or =9.0% and an LDL-C concentration > 100 mg/dL were randomized to receive simvastatin 40 mg (the recommended initial dose for patients with DM) or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the effect of treatment on LDL-C concentrations. Other lipid, lipoprotein, and safety measures were also assessed.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-three patients (127 [50.2%] men, 126 [49.8%] women; mean age, 56 years) were randomized to treatment (123 simvastatin, 130 placebo). At the end of the study, mean LDL-C concentrations were reduced 34.)% from baseline (from 134.3 to 89.5 mg/dL) in the simvastatin group and were unchanged in the placebo group (P<0.001). Simvastatin produced significant reductions in concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein (apo) B compared with placebo (all, P<0.001 ) and significant increases in concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ( P=0.002 ) and apo A-I ( P=0.006 ). In patients who had not attained target concentrations of LDL-C (<100 mg/dL), TG (<150 mg/dL), or HDL-C (>45 mg/dL) at baseline, significantly more simvastatin recipients had achieved these goals at the end of the study compared with placebo recipients (LDL-C: 67.3% vs 5.2%, respectively, P<0.001; HDL-C: 95.3% vs 83.6%, P<0.05; TG: 40.8% vs 11.0%, P<0.001 ). Simvastatin was well tolerated, and no clinically meaningful differences in the incidence of serious adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events were observed between groups. There were no significant between-group differences in glycemic control (HbA1c) or concentrations of fasting insulin, creatine phosphokinase, or hepatic transaminases.

CONCLUSION

Simvastatin was an effective and generally well tolerated treatment for hyperlipidemia when used in combination with TZD therapy in this population of patients with type 2 DM.

Insulin sensitizers

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an increasingly prevalent disorder associated with multiple metabolic derangements. Insulin resistance is the most prominent feature common in both type 2 diabetes and its associated metabolic abnormalities. Until 1995, the only therapeutic interventions available in the United States were the insulin secretagogues sulfonylureas and insulin. With the introduction of metformin in the United States in the mid-1990s and the subsequent advent of thiazolidinediones, an opportunity exists to address and directly reverse, at least in part, the defects in insulin action seen in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Evidence shows that insulin sensitizers not only have beneficial effects on glycemic control but also have multiple effects on lipid metabolism and atherosclerotic vascular processes that could prove to be beneficial. We discuss safety issues of these agents, their potential use in preventing onset and progression of diabetes, and their use in other related metabolic conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand troglitazone induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines

BACKGROUND

Ligand activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) results in the inhibition of proliferation of various cancer cells. The aim of this study is to investigate the mechanisms of cell growth inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines by the PPARgamma ligand, troglitazone.

METHODS

Six HCC cell lines were used to study the effects of troglitazone on cell growth by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, on cell cycle by flow cytometry, and on the cell cycle-regulating factors of late G1 phase by Western blotting. Apoptosis assays were performed by flow cytometry using membrane, nuclear, cytoplasmic, and mitochondrial markers. Caspase inhibitors were used to analyze the mechanisms of apoptosis induced by troglitazone.

RESULTS

Troglitazone showed a potent dose-dependent effect on the growth inhibition of all six HCC cell lines, which were suppressed to under 50% of control at the concentration of 10 micromol/L. The growth inhibition was linked to the G1 phase cell cycle arrest through the up-expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p21 and p27 proteins, and the hypophosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein. Troglitazone induced apoptosis by caspase-dependent (mitchondrial transmembrane potential decrease, cleavage of poly [adenosine diphosphate ribose] polymerase, 7A6 antigen exposure, Bcl-2 decrease, and activation of caspase 3) and caspase-independent (phosphatidylserine externalization) mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that ligand activation of PPARgamma by troglitazone or modified analogs of the thiazolidinedione class of drugs is a novel target for effective therapy against HCC, because of the significant antiproliferative and programmed cell death induction capabilities demonstrated by troglitazone.