Comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and real-time PCR in the detection of EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF mutations on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor material of non-small cell lung carcinoma-superiority of NGS

Case report: Single gene testing and comprehensive genomic profiling in non-small cell lung cancer-a case series of divergent results from a large reference laboratory

Clinical management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires accurate identification of tumor-specific genetic alterations to inform treatment options. Historically, providers have relied on single-gene testing (SGT) for actionable variants due to a perception of cost-effectiveness and/or efficient turnaround time compared to next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, not all actionable variants may be evaluated through SGT modalities, and an SGT approach can exhaust valuable tissue needed for more comprehensive analyses. In contrast, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests employ NGS to sequence megabases of DNA and RNA to evaluate all relevant molecular alterations, providing a broader genetic profile to identify actionable alterations that SGT may not accurately or efficiently assess. Here, we briefly describe four cases from a large reference laboratory in which actionable alterations were identified by CGP but not SGT. The discussion highlights the utility and advantages of using CGP to provide complete and timely treatment options and clinical trial opportunities for patients with NSCLC.

Implementation of circulating tumour DNA multi-target mutation testing in plasma: a perspective from an external quality assessment providers' survey

Demand for large-scale tumour profiling across cancer types has increased in recent years, driven by the emergence of targeted drug therapies. Analysing alternations in plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for cancer detection can improve survival; ctDNA testing is recommended when tumour tissue is unavailable. An online survey of molecular pathology testing was circulated by six external quality assessment members of IQN Path to registered laboratories and all IQN Path collaborative corporate members. Data from 275 laboratories across 45 countries were collected; 245 (89%) perform molecular pathology testing, including 177 (64%) which perform plasma ctDNA diagnostic service testing. The most common tests were next-generation sequencing-based (n = 113). Genes with known stratified treatment options, including KRAS (n = 97), NRAS (n = 84), and EGFR (n = 130), were common targets. The uptake of ctDNA plasma testing and plans to implement further testing demonstrates the importance of support from a well-designed EQA scheme.

Diagnostic accuracy of ESR1 mutation detection by cell-free DNA in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

BACKGROUND

Estrogen receptors express in nearly 70% of breast cancers (ER-positive). Estrogen receptor alpha plays a fundamental role as a significant factor in breast cancer progression for the early selection of therapeutic approaches. Accordingly, there has been a surge of attention to non-invasive techniques, including circulating Cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) or Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA), to detect and track ESR1 genotype. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the diagnosis accuracy of ESR1 mutation detection by cell-free DNA in breast cancer patientsthrough a systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up to 6 April 2022. Diagnostic studies on ESR1 measurement by cfDNA, which was confirmed using the tumour tissue biopsy, have been included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were considered to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Out of 649 papers, 13 papers with 15 cohorts, including 389 participants, entered the meta-analyses. The comprehensive meta-analysis indicated a high sensitivity (75.52, 95% CI 60.19-90.85), specificity (88.20, 95% CI 80.99-95.40), and high accuracy of 88.96 (95% CI 83.23-94.69) for plasma ESR1. We also found a moderate PPV of 56.94 (95% CI 41.70-72.18) but a high NPV of 88.53 (95% CI 82.61-94.44). We also found an NLR of 0.443 (95% CI 0.09-0.79) and PLR of 1.60 (95% CI 1.20-1.99).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis reveal that plasma cfDNA testing exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in detecting ESR1 mutations in breast cancer patients. This suggests that the test could be a valuable diagnostic tool. It may serve as a dependable and non-invasive technique for identifying ESR1 mutations in breast cancer patients. However, more extensive research is needed to confirm its prognostic value.

Nationwide data from comprehensive genomic profiling assays for detecting driver oncogenes in non-small cell lung cancer

Driver oncogenes are investigated upfront at diagnosis using multi-CDx systems with next-generation sequencing techniques or multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays. Additionally, from 2019, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assays have been available in Japan for patients with advanced solid tumors who had completed or were expected to complete standard chemotherapy. These assays are expected to comprehensively detect the driver oncogenes, especially for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are no reports of nationwide research on the detection of driver oncogenes in patients with advanced NSCLC who undergo CGP assays, especially in those with undetected driver oncogenes at diagnosis. In this study, we investigated the proportion of driver oncogenes detected in patients with advanced NSCLC with undetectable driver oncogenes at initial diagnosis and in all patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent CGP assays. We retrospectively analyzed data from 986 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent CGP assays between August 2019 and March 2022, using the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database. The proportion of driver oncogenes newly detected in patients with NSCLC who tested negative for driver oncogenes at diagnosis and in all patients with NSCLC were investigated. Driver oncogenes were detected in 451 patients (45.7%). EGFR was the most common (16.5%), followed by KRAS (14.5%). Among the 330 patients with undetected EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF V600E mutations at diagnosis, 81 patients (24.5%) had newly identified driver oncogenes. CGP assays could be useful to identify driver oncogenes in patients with advanced NSCLC, including those initially undetected, facilitating personalized treatment.

KRAS and BRAF genetic alterations in lung cancer: A case - control study

CONTEXT

Lung cancer (LC) is one of the most critical neoplastic abnormalities, having globally a high mortality rate. Knowledge about its genetic mutations and their association with clinically pathological features of LC is very important. Here, we describe the epidemiological molecular study of genetic mutations in KRAS and BRAF genes and their relationship with the demographic and clinical characteristics of Pakistani patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

AIM

To analyze the mutations of KRAS and BRAF in LC patients among Pakistani population.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

The study has been carried out at universities and health institutes of Islamabad, Pakistan.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from the patient samples by using the standard protocol and amplified by using the specific primers. Later on, the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) products were examined with the help of single stranded conformational polymorphism (SSCP).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Relationship between KRAS, BRAF mutations, and LC risk was accessed by conditional logistic regression using SPSS version 24.0. Results were illustrated by odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P value.

RESULTS

LC is more common in male population and smoking is one of the leading risk factors for (p < 0.0001) LC. KRAS and BRAF mutations were found to be contributing factors toward LC development and showed statistically significant results along with conformation through computational analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that smoking is lethal and cancer causing. The concomitant mutations found in KRAS and BRAF were infrequent, and they probably have a very unusual effect on the clinical management of Pakistani patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Oncogenic alterations in advanced NSCLC: a molecular super-highway

Lung cancer ranks among the most common cancers world-wide and is the first cancer-related cause of death. The classification of lung cancer has evolved tremendously over the past two decades. Today, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly lung adenocarcinoma, comprises a multitude of molecular oncogenic subsets that change both the prognosis and management of disease.Since the first targeted oncogenic alteration identified in 2004, with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), there has been unprecedented progress in identifying and targeting new molecular alterations. Almost two decades of experience have allowed scientists to elucidate the biological function of oncogenic drivers and understand and often overcome the molecular basis of acquired resistance mechanisms. Today, targetable molecular alterations are identified in approximately 60% of lung adenocarcinoma patients in Western populations and 80% among Asian populations. Oncogenic drivers are largely enriched among non-smokers, east Asians, and younger patients, though each alteration has its own patient phenotype.The current landscape of druggable molecular targets includes EGFR, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1), Kirstin rat sarcoma virus (KRAS), human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2), c-MET proto-oncogene (MET), neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK), rearranged during transfection (RET), neuregulin 1 (NRG1). In addition to these known targets, others including Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) have garnered significant attention and are the subject of numerous ongoing trials.In this era of personalized, precision medicine, it is of paramount importance to identify known or potential oncogenic drivers in each patient. The development of targeted therapy is mirrored by diagnostic progress. Next generation sequencing offers high-throughput, speed and breadth to identify molecular alterations in entire genomes or targeted regions of DNA or RNA. It is the basis for the identification of the majority of current druggable alterations and offers a unique window into novel alterations, and de novo and acquired resistance mechanisms.In this review, we discuss the diagnostic approach in advanced NSCLC, focusing on current oncogenic driver alterations, through their pathophysiology, management, and future perspectives. We also explore the shortcomings and hurdles encountered in this rapidly evolving field.

Molecular testing in non-small cell lung cancer: A consensus recommendation

Introduction

Lung cancer remains an important cause of cancer-related mortality in Singapore, with a greater proportion of non-smokers diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the past 2 decades. The higher prevalence of targetable genomic alterations in lung cancer diagnosed in Singapore compared with countries in the West, as well as the expanding therapeutic landscape for NSCLC in the era of precision medicine, are both factors that underscore the importance of efficient and effective molecular profiling.

Method

This article provides consensus recommendations for biomarker testing for early-stage to advanced NSCLC. These recommendations are made from a multidisciplinary group of lung cancer experts in Singapore with the aim of improving patient care and long-term outcomes.

Results

The recommendations address the considerations in both the advanced and early-stage settings, and take into account challenges in the implementation of biomarker testing as well as the limitations of available data. Biomarker testing for both tumour tissue and liquid biopsy are discussed.

Conclusion

This consensus statement discusses the approaches and challenges of integrating molecular testing into clinical practice for patients with early- to late-stage NSCLC, and provides practical recommendations for biomarker testing for NSCLC patients in Singapore.

Liquid Biopsy Snapshots of Key Phosphoproteomic Pathways in Lung Cancer Patients for Diagnosis and Therapy Monitoring

Phosphorylation is a post-translational modification in proteins that changes protein conformation and activity for regulating signal transduction pathways. This mechanism is frequently impaired in lung cancer, resulting in permanently active constitutive phosphorylation to initiate tumor growth and/or reactivate pathways in response to therapy. We developed a multiplexed phosphoprotein analyzer chip (MPAC) that enables rapid (detection time: 5 min) and sensitive (LOD: 2 pg/μL) detection of protein phosphorylation and presents phosphoproteomic profiling of major phosphorylation pathways in lung cancer. We monitored phosphorylated receptors and downstream proteins involved in mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways in lung cancer cell line models and patient-derived extracellular vesicles (EV). Using kinase inhibitor drugs in cell line models, we found that the drug can inhibit the phosphorylation and/or activation of the kinase pathway. We then generated a phosphorylation heatmap by EV phosphoproteomic profiling of plasma samples isolated from 36 lung cancer patients and 8 noncancer individuals. The heatmap showed a clear difference between the noncancer and cancer samples and identify the specific proteins that are activated in the cancer samples. Our data also showed that MPAC could monitor immunotherapy responses by assessment of the phosphorylation states of the proteins, particularly for PD-L1. Finally, with a longitudinal study, we found that the phosphorylation levels of the proteins were indicative of a positive response to therapy. We believe that this study will lead to personalized treatment by providing a better understanding of the active and resistant pathways and will provide a tool for selecting combined and targeted therapies for precision medicine.

Targeting the EGFR signaling pathway in cancer therapy: What's new in 2023?

INTRODUCTION

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently amplified, overexpressed, and mutated in multiple cancers. In normal cell physiology, EGFR signaling controls cellular differentiation, proliferation, growth, and survival. During tumorigenesis, mutations in EGFR lead to increased kinase activity supporting survival, uncontrolled proliferation, and migratory functions of cancer cells. Molecular agents targeting the EGFR pathway have been discovered, and their efficacy has been demonstrated in clinical trials. To date, 14 EGFR-targeted agents have been approved for cancer treatments.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the newly identified pathways in EGFR signaling, the evolution of novel EGFR-acquired and innate resistance mechanisms, mutations, and adverse side effects of EGFR signaling inhibitors. Subsequently, the latest EGFR/panEGFR inhibitors in preclinical and clinical studies have been summarized. Finally, the consequences of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors and EGFR inhibitors have also been discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

As new mutations are threatened against EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), we suggest the development of new compounds targeting specific mutations without inducing new mutations. We discuss potential future research on developing EGFR-TKIs specific for exact allosteric sites to overcome acquired resistance and reduce adverse events. The rising trend of EGFR inhibitors in the pharma market and their economic impact on real-world clinical practice are discussed.

The genetic profile and molecular subtypes of human pseudomyxoma peritonei and appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare, progressive, slowly growing neoplastic condition which is poorly understood, with a 5-year progression-free survival rate as low as 48%. PMP is most commonly caused by appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMN), and understanding their genetic biology and pathogenicity may allow for the development of better novel systemic treatments to target key deleterious mutations and the implicated pathways. The primary aim of this systematic review was to identify the genetic profile of histologically confirmed human PMP or AMN samples. The secondary aim was to identify whether genetic marks could be used to predict patient survival. Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies investigating the genetic profile of histologically-confirmed human PMP or AMN samples. We review findings of 46 studies totalling 2181 tumour samples. The most frequently identified somatic gene mutations in patients with PMP included KRAS (38-100%), GNAS (17-100%), and TP53 (5-23%); however, there were conflicting results of their effect on survival. Three studies identified molecular subtypes based on gene expression profiles classifying patients into oncogene-enriched, immune-enriched, and mixed molecular subtypes with prognostic value. This review summarises the current literature surrounding genetic aberrations in PMP and AMNs and their potential utility for targeted therapy. Given the recent advances in clinical trials to directly target KRAS and GNAS mutations in other cancers, we propose a rationale to explore these mutations in future pre-clinical studies in PMP with a view for a future clinical trial.

Biomarker-Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Perspectives

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignancies and the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite many therapeutic advances in the past decade, NSCLC remains an incurable disease for the majority of patients. Molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies have significantly improved the prognosis of NSCLC. However, the vast majority of advanced NSCLC develop resistance to current therapies and eventually progress. In this review, we discuss current and potential therapies for NSCLC, focusing on targeted therapies and immunotherapies. We highlight the future role of metabolic therapies and combination therapies in NSCLC.

Early Warning Measurement of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern in Wastewaters by Mass Spectrometry

Wastewater surveillance has rapidly emerged as an early warning tool to track COVID-19. However, the early warning measurement of new SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) in wastewaters remains a major challenge. We herein report a rapid analytical strategy for quantitative measurement of VOCs, which couples nested polymerase chain reaction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (nPCR-LC-MS). This method showed a greater selectivity than the current allele-specific quantitative PCR (AS-qPCR) for tracking new VOC and allowed the detection of multiple signature mutations in a single measurement. By measuring the Omicron variant in wastewaters across nine Ontario wastewater treatment plants serving over a three million population, the nPCR-LC-MS method demonstrated a better quantification accuracy than next-generation sequencing (NGS), particularly at the early stage of community spreading of Omicron. This work addresses a major challenge for current SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance by rapidly and accurately measuring VOCs in wastewaters for early warning.

Demystifying the Discussion of Sequencing Panel Size in Oncology Genetic Testing

Clinical laboratories worldwide are implementing next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify cancer genomic variants and ultimately improve patient outcomes. The ability to massively sequence the entire genome or exome of tumour cells has been critical to elucidating many complex biological questions. However, the depth of information obtained by these methods is strenuous to process in the clinical setting, making them currently unfeasible for broader adoption. Instead, targeted sequencing, usually on a selection of clinically relevant genes, represents the predominant approach that best balances accurate identification of genomic variants with high sensitivity and a good cost-effectiveness ratio. The information obtained from targeted sequencing can support diagnostic classification, guide therapeutic decisions, and provide prognostic insights. The use of targeted gene panels expedites sample processing, including data analysis, results interpretation, and medical reports generation, directly affecting patient management. The key decision factors for selecting sequencing methods and panel size in routine testing should include diagnostic yield and clinical utility, sample availability, and processing turnaround time. Profiling by default all patients with late-stage cancer with large panels is not affordable for most healthcare systems and does not provide substantial clinical benefit at present. Balancing between understanding cancer biology, including patients in clinical trials, maximising testing, and ensuring a sustainable financial burden for society requires thorough consideration. This review provides an overview of the advantages and drawbacks of different sizes NGS panels for tumour molecular profiling and their clinical applicability.

A dual identification strategy based on padlock ligation and CRISPR/Cas14a for highly specific detection of BRAF V600E mutation in clinical samples

BRAF V600E mutation is a single-nucleotide variation (SNV) that is widely found in various cancers and has been demonstrated to have a strong association with the prognosis and development of some diseases. Thus, we developed a strategy based on rolling circle amplification (RCA) and CRISPR/Cas14a to meet the great need for detecting highly specific BRAF V600E mutation in fine-needle biopsy samples. In this study, a padlock probe was designed to recognize and trigger subsequent ligase chain reactions (LCR). And due to the Taq DNA ligase, a great number of ligated annular padlock probes were generated in the presence of BRAF V600E mutation, subsequently generating long repeated single-strand DNA by RCA. The obtained amplicons were activators triggering the trans-cleavage of CRISPR/Cas14a. CRISPR/Cas14a shows outstanding performance in identifying ssDNA with single base mutation, which significantly increases the specificity of mutation discrimination. Under the optimal conditions, our strategy can identify BRAF V600E mutation down to 0.307 fM with a wide linear range from 1 fM to 10 pM. On the other hand, the dual identification strategy endows the method with terrific specificity for the detection of SNV. Furthermore, our method has been successfully employed to identify BRAF V600E mutation in clinical fine-needle aspiration samples, proving great potential for ultra-specific identification of low abundance BRAF V600E mutation and providing a novel method for diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

CRISPR/Cas9 and next generation sequencing in the personalized treatment of Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer is caused by a combination of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities. Current cancer therapies are limited due to the complexity of their mechanism, underlining the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. Interestingly, combining the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR/Cas9) system with next-generation sequencing (NGS) has the potential to speed up the identification, validation, and targeting of high-value targets.

MAIN TEXT

Personalized or precision medicine combines genetic information with phenotypic and environmental characteristics to produce healthcare tailored to the individual and eliminates the constraints of "one-size-fits-all" therapy. Precision medicine is now possible thanks to cancer genome sequencing. Having advantages over limited sample requirements and the recent development of biomarkers have made the use of NGS a major leap in personalized medicine. Tumor and cell-free DNA profiling using NGS, proteome and RNA analyses, and a better understanding of immunological systems, are all helping to improve cancer treatment choices. Finally, direct targeting of tumor genes in cancer cells with CRISPR/Cas9 may be achievable, allowing for eliminating genetic changes that lead to tumor growth and metastatic capability.

CONCLUSION

With NGS and CRISPR/Cas9, the goal is no longer to match the treatment for the diagnosed tumor but rather to build a treatment method that fits the tumor exactly. Hence, in this review, we have discussed the potential role of CRISPR/Cas9 and NGS in advancing personalized medicine.

Next-Generation Sequencing in Lung Cancer Patients: A Comparative Approach in NSCLC and SCLC Mutational Landscapes

Background: Lung cancer remains one of the most diagnosed malignancies, being the second most diagnosed cancer, while still being the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Late diagnosis remains a problem, alongside the high mutational burden encountered in lung cancer. Methods: We assessed the genetic profile of cancer genes in lung cancer using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets for mutations and validated the results in a separate cohort of 32 lung cancer patients using tumor tissue and whole blood samples for next-generation sequencing (NGS) experiments. Another separate cohort of 32 patients was analyzed to validate some of the molecular alterations depicted in the NGS experiment. Results: In the TCGA analysis, we identified the most commonly mutated genes in each lung cancer dataset, with differences among the three histotypes analyzed. NGS analysis revealed TP53, CSF1R, PIK3CA, FLT3, ERBB4, and KDR as being the genes most frequently mutated. We validated the c.1621A>C mutation in KIT. The correlation analysis indicated negative correlation between adenocarcinoma and altered PIK3CA (r = −0.50918; p = 0.0029). TCGA survival analysis indicated that NRAS and IDH2 (LUAD), STK11 and TP53 (LUSC), and T53 (SCLC) alterations are correlated with the survival of patients. Conclusions: The study revealed differences in the mutational landscape of lung cancer histotypes.

What do we know about inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors? - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are rare intermediate-grade neoplasms that have a high recurrence rate after excision and exhibit low metastatic potential. These tumors contain proliferating neoplastic, fibroblastic and myofibroblastic cells, and are also characterized by chronic inflammatory infiltration by lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils, and histiocytes. They belong to the group of inflammatory spindle cell lesions. Some reactive lesions, such as inflammatory pseudotumors, may appear to be IMTs, which makes their differential diagnosis extremely difficult. The aim of this article is to compile the recent information on IMTs to aid in their diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed articles published between 2017 and 2021, which were selected from online medical databases. In addition, some earlier articles and latest scientific monographies were analyzed.

RESULTS

The terminology used for inflammatory spindle cell lesions seems to be confusing. The terms "inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors" and "inflammatory pseudotumors" are interchangeably used by many scientists. However, a detailed analysis of the development of terminology suggests that the term "inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors" should be used to refer to a neoplastic lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

IMTs are rare neoplasms, which have not been investigated in detail due to the difficulty in collecting a large number of cases. Thus, our knowledge about this disease remains unsatisfactory. Recently developed techniques such as next-generation sequencing and computer-aided histopathological diagnosis may be useful in understanding the etiopathology of IMTs, which will help in the selection of the most appropriate therapy for patients.

Targeted Therapies for Lung Cancer Patients With Oncogenic Driver Molecular Alterations

Lung cancer has traditionally been classified by histology. However, a greater understanding of disease biology and the identification of oncogenic driver alterations has dramatically altered the therapeutic landscape. Consequently, the new classification paradigm of non-small-cell lung cancer is further characterized by molecularly defined subsets actionable with targeted therapies and the treatment landscape is becoming increasingly complex. This review encompasses the current standards of care for targeted therapies in lung cancer with driver molecular alterations. Targeted therapies for EGFR exon 19 deletion and L858R mutations, and ALK and ROS1 rearrangements are well established. However, there is an expanding list of approved targeted therapies including for BRAF V600E, EGFR exon 20 insertion, and KRAS G12C mutations, MET exon 14 alterations, and NTRK and RET rearrangements. In addition, there are numerous other oncogenic drivers, such as HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations, for which there are emerging efficacy data for targeted therapies. The importance of diagnostic molecular testing, intracranial efficacy of novel therapies, the optimal sequencing of therapies, role for targeted therapies in early-stage disease, and future directions for precision oncology approaches to understand tumor evolution and therapeutic resistance are also discussed.

EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions in solid tumours: from biology to treatment

Protein tyrosine kinases of the human epidermal growth factor receptor family, including EGFR and HER2, have emerged as important therapeutic targets in non-small-cell lung, breast and gastroesophageal cancers, and are of relevance for the treatment of various other malignancies (particularly colorectal cancer). Classic activating EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 mutations, and HER2 amplification and/or overexpression, are predictive of response to matched molecularly targeted therapies, translating into favourable objective response rates and survival outcomes. By comparison, cancers with insertion mutations in exon 20 of either EGFR or HER2 are considerably less sensitive to the currently available tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibodies targeting these receptors. These exon 20 insertions are structurally distinct from other EGFR and HER2 mutations, providing an explanation for this lack of sensitivity. In this Review, we first discuss the prevalence and pan-cancer distribution of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions, their biology and detection, and associated responses to current molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies. We then focus on novel approaches that are being developed to more effectively target tumours driven by these non-classic EGFR and HER2 alterations.

Comparison between Fluorimetry (Qubit) and Spectrophotometry (NanoDrop) in the Quantification of DNA and RNA Extracted from Frozen and FFPE Tissues from Lung Cancer Patients: A Real-World Use of Genomic Tests

Background and Objectives: Panel-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been carried out in daily clinical settings for the diagnosis and treatment guidance of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The success of genomic tests including NGS depends in large part on preparing better-quality DNA or RNA; however, there are no established operating methods for preparing genomic DNA and RNA samples. Materials and Methods: We compared the following two quantitative methods, the QubitTM and NanoDropTM, using 585 surgical specimens, 278 biopsy specimens, and 82 cell block specimens of lung cancer that were used for genetic tests, including NGS. We analyzed the success rate of the genomic tests, including NGS, which were performed with DNA and RNA with concentrations that were outliers for the Qubit Fluorometer. Results: The absolute value for DNA concentrations had a tendency to be higher when measured with NanoDropTM regardless of the type of specimen; however, this was not the case for RNA. The success rate of DNA-based genomic tests using specimens with a concentration below the lower limit of QubitTM detection was as high as approximately 96%. At less than 60%, the success rate of RNA-based genomic tests, including RT-PCR, was not as satisfactory. The success rates of the AmpliSeqTM DNA panel sequencing and RNA panel sequencing were 77.8% and 91.5%, respectively. If at least one PCR amplification product could be obtained, then all RNA-based sequencing was performed successfully. Conclusions: The concentration measurements with NanoDropTM are reliable. The success rate of NGS with samples at concentrations below the limit of detection of QubitTM was relatively higher than expected, and it is worth performing PCR-based panel sequencing, especially in cases where re-biopsy cannot be performed.

Multicenter real-world data of patients harboring rare mutations other than EGFR or ALK in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Studies on the application of targeted therapies for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor rare genetic mutations are ongoing. In the present study, we investigated the real‐world data of NSCLC patients who harbor rare mutations.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC aged >20 years with confirmed rare mutations (BRAF, ROS1, MET, RET, HER2, FGFR, and NTRK) from January 2015 to September 2020 at nine tertiary hospitals. In addition, we validated the lung cancer PCR panel kit in patients with confirmed mutations by NGS.

Results

Among 118 patients included, 88 received platinum‐based chemotherapy as first‐line chemotherapy. The progression‐free survival of patients with BRAF, ERBB2, MET, RET, and ROS1 mutations was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–20.5), 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.0–7.5), 7.2 months (95% CI: 3.6–10.9), 11.4 months (95% CI: 9.2–13.6), and 10.0 months (95% CI: 3.7–16.4) respectively (p = 0.041). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in patients with ROS1 mutations; however, in BRAF, ERBB2, MET, and RET mutant patients, median OS was 14.1 months (95% CI: 10.1–14.1), 34.5 months (95% CI: 13.2–36.9), 22.7 months (95% CI: 1.7–24.0), and 29.8 months (95% CI: 28.9–61.3), respectively (p = 0.006). Of the 27 tissue samples, 26 (96.3%) showed the same PCR panel kit result with NGS.

Conclusions

First‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy showed durable benefit in patients with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC harboring rare genetic mutation other than EGFR or ALK.

The storm of NGS in NSCLC diagnostic-therapeutic pathway: How to sun the real clinical practice

The increasing number of approved drugs along with next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies look out as potential revolution of biomolecular characterization of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, several aspects impact on success rate of NGS in clinical practice: a multidisciplinary approach and thorough knowledge of strengths and limits of each technologic diagnostic tool are required. Crucial preliminary step is the selection of the best available sample before testing, aware of clinical condition and setting of disease. Genomic data should be than integrated in the clinical context and matched with available therapeutic options; Molecular Tumor Boards (MTB) are worldwide emerging interdisciplinary groups implemented to transfer the impact of precision medicine in clinical practice. In order to guarantee equity in treatment, these considerations should find their application widely and rapidly. Aim of this review is offering an overview of emerging biomarkers, relative upcoming targeted drugs, and new diagnostic chances with an authors' perspective about a real-life diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm useful for daily clinical practice.

Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion variants in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions occur rarely among different cancer types, with the highest frequency reported among non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, particularly adenocarcinomas (ADCs). Exon 20 insertions fall back in the tyrosine kinase domain, and can be clustered into two principal groups represented by in frame insertions and three to 21 bp (corresponding to 1-7 amino acids) duplications within amino acids 762 and 774. The identification of these alterations is key for an adequate management of NSCLC patients due to the possibility to treat these patients with specific targeted therapies. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology, able to detect several hotspot gene mutations for different patients simultaneously, is the best detection approach due to its higher sensitivity and specificity compared to other techniques. Here we reviewed the principal biological characteristics, the main detection technologies and treatment options for NSCLC patients harbouring EGFR exon 20 insertions.

Next Generation Sequencing Technology in Lung Cancer Diagnosis

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is still one of the most commonly diagnosed and deadliest cancers in the world. Its diagnosis at an early stage is highly necessary and will improve the standard of care of this disease. The aim of this article is to review the importance and applications of next generation sequencing in lung cancer diagnosis. As observed in many studies, next generation sequencing has been proven as a very helpful tool in the early detection of different types of cancers, including lung cancer, and has been used in the clinic, mainly due to its many advantages, such as low cost, speed, efficacy, low quantity usage of biological samples, and diversity.

Abstract

Lung cancer is still one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers, and one of the deadliest. The high death rate is mainly due to the late stage of diagnosis and low response rate to therapy. Previous and ongoing research studies have tried to discover new reliable and useful cbiomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer. Next generation sequencing has become an essential tool in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluation of the treatment response. This article aims to review the leading research and clinical applications in lung cancer diagnosis using next generation sequencing. In this scope, we identified the most relevant articles that present the successful use of next generation sequencing in identifying biomarkers for early diagnosis correlated to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. This technique can be used to evaluate a high number of biomarkers in a short period of time and from small biological samples, which makes NGS the preferred technique to develop clinical tests for personalized medicine using liquid biopsy, the new trend in oncology.

A gentle introduction to understanding preclinical data for cancer pharmaco-omic modeling

A central goal of precision oncology is to administer an optimal drug treatment to each cancer patient. A common preclinical approach to tackle this problem has been to characterize the tumors of patients at the molecular and drug response levels, and employ the resulting datasets for predictive in silico modeling (mostly using machine learning). Understanding how and why the different variants of these datasets are generated is an important component of this process. This review focuses on providing such introduction aimed at scientists with little previous exposure to this research area.

Feasibility of next-generation sequencing (Oncomine™ DX Target Test) for the screening of oncogenic mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The Oncomine™ Dx Target Test based on next-generation sequencing has been approved for the screening of oncogenic mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

METHODS

We assessed the tissue sample factors that affect the success rate of Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics and the feasibility of using biopsy specimens for Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine biopsy samples were subjected to genetic testing using the Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics to detect v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 mutations (Cohort 1), and 136 biopsy samples were examined using Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics for the detection of multiple oncogenic mutations (Cohort 2) between July 2018 and April 2020. We retrospectively collected clinical and pathological data, including tissue size and tumour cell content. The success rate was 77% (76/99) in Cohort 1 and 93% (127/136) in Cohort 2. In Cohort 1, the success rate was significantly associated with the tumour cell content: the success rate was 63% for samples with a tumour cell content of <20%, whereas it was 83% for samples with a tumour cell content of 20% or higher (P = 0.0446). The tissue size also affected the success rate: a success rate of 57% was obtained for tissue sizes <4 mm2, whereas a success rate of 95% was obtained for tissue sizes of 4 mm2 or larger (P < 0.0001). In Cohort 2, the success rate was 100% when tumour specimens with a tissue size of 4 mm2 or larger were used.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue size and tumour cell content were significantly associated with the success rate of Oncomine™ Dx Target Test companion diagnostics.

Frequently used quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based methods overlook potential clinically relevant genetic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor compared with next-generation sequencing: a retrospective clinical comparison of 1839 lung adenocarcinomas

AIMS

The aim of the study was to investigate the advantage of implementing next-generation sequencing (NGS) compared with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) when performing routine molecular diagnostics in adenocarcinomas of the lung.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective cross-sectional observational study of 1839 cytological and histological adenocarcinoma biopsies investigated for gene mutations from 2016 to 2018 at the Department of Pathology at Aarhus University Hospital. A total of 1169 samples were analyzed by qPCR for the presence of EGFR hotspot mutations from 2016 to 2017. A total of 670 samples were analyzed with NGS for the presence of EGFR mutations and other gene mutations in 2018.

RESULTS

The average frequency of EGFR mutations in the study population was 11.5%, with the highest frequency found in 2018, where NGS was implemented (10.8% in 2016, 11.5% in 2017, and 12.2% in 2018). Possible therapy resistance markers such as EGFR exon 20 mutations were found more commonly after NGS implementation, the difference being statistically significant (P = .015). In addition, NGS (2018) showed that 40.6% of the samples had KRAS mutations and 6.0% had BRAF mutations, mutations not commonly investigated in lung adenocarcinomas when qPCR is the method of choice. Among the EGFR-mutated samples analyzed with NGS, 13 contained a concurrent EGFR mutation, whereas three and two contained a concurrent KRAS and BRAF mutations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

With the implementation in a clinical setting, NGS identifies more uncommon but potentially clinically important EGFR mutations, unique combinations of EGFR mutations, and concurrent mutations in KRAS and BRAF.

Clinical Application of Next-Generation Sequencing of Plasma Cell-Free DNA for Genotyping Untreated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Plasma ctDNA is a material source for molecular analysis particularly useful when tissue is not available or sufficient. NGS-based plasma genotyping should be integrated into the clinical workup of newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC.

Abstract

Background: Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has remarkable potential as a non-invasive lung cancer molecular diagnostic method. This prospective study addressed the clinical value of a targeted-gene amplicon-based plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to detect actionable mutations in ctDNA in patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: ctDNA test performance and concordance with tissue NGS were determined, and the correlation between ctDNA findings, clinical features, and clinical outcomes was evaluated in 115 patients with paired plasma and tissue samples. Results: Targeted-gene NGS-based ctDNA and NGS-based tissue analysis detected 54 and 63 genomic alterations, respectively; 11 patients presented co-mutations, totalizing 66 hotspot mutations detected, 51 on both tissue and plasma, 12 exclusively on tissue, and 3 exclusively on plasma. NGS-based ctDNA revealed a diagnostic performance with 81.0% sensitivity, 95.3% specificity, 94.4% PPV, 83.6% NPV, test accuracy of 88.2%, and Cohen’s Kappa 0.764. PFS and OS assessed by both assays did not significantly differ. Detection of ctDNA alterations was statistically associated with metastatic disease (p = 0.013), extra-thoracic metastasis (p = 0.004) and the number of organs involved (p = 0.010). Conclusions: This study highlights the potential use of ctDNA for mutation detection in newly diagnosed NSCLC patients due to its high accuracy and correlation with clinical outcomes.

Occurence of RAS reversion in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab

Background: A disappearance of RAS mutations in the plasma of about 50% of mCRCs (metastatic colorectal cancers) treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy has been reported. Our aim was to evaluate the same issue at tissue level.

Materials and Methods: Using next-generation sequencing and real-time PCR approaches, we characterized the primary tumor (PT) and paired liver metastases in 28 RAS mutant mCRCs. Patients were subdivided into 3 treatment groups: 1) bevacizumab plus chemotherapy; 2) chemotherapy alone; 3) any systemic therapy (control group). In groups 1 and 2, liver metastases were resected after removal of PT and subsequent neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Results: RAS mutant alleles are at the same percentage in PT and liver metastases in the control group, while a significant reduction of the level of RAS mutations was detected in 57.1% of cases in group 1 and in 8.3% of cases in group 2. Differences among groups are statistically significant (p = 0.038).

Conclusions: Most of mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens experience a strong reduction of RAS mutant cells, suggesting bevacizumab as particularly active against RAS mutant cells. This finding might have potential therapeutic implications, as anti-EGFR could be reconsidered in primarily RAS mutant patients reverted to a wild-type status after bevacizumab exposure.

Advanced NSCLC Patients With EGFR T790M Harboring TP53 R273C or KRAS G12V Cannot Benefit From Osimertinib Based on a Clinical Multicentre Study by Tissue and Liquid Biopsy

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) almost always acquire resistance, and the development of novel techniques analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have made it possible for liquid biopsy to detect genetic alterations from limited amount of DNA with less invasiveness. While a large amount of patients with EGFR exon 21 p.Thr790 Met (T790M) benefited from osimertinib treatment, acquired resistance to osimertinb has subsequently become a growing challenge.

Methods

We performed tissue and liquid rebiopsy on 50 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Plasma samples underwent droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) examinations. Corresponding tissue samples underwent NGS and Cobas^® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Cobas) examinations.

Results

Of the 50 patients evaluated, the mutation detection rates of liquid biopsy group and tissue biopsy group demonstrated no significant differences (41/48, 85.4% vs. 44/48, 91.7%; OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.15 to 1.95). Overall concordance, defined as the proportion of patients for whom at least one identical genomic alteration was identified in both tissue and plasma, was 78.3% (36/46, 95% CI=0.39 to 2.69). Moreover, our results showed that almost half of the patients (46%, 23/50) resistant to first-generation EGFR-TKI harbored p.Thr790 Met (T790M) mutation. 82.6% (19/23) of the T790M positive patients were analyzed by liquid biopsy and 60.9% (14/23) by tumor tissue sequencing. Meanwhile, a wide range of uncommon mutations was detected, and novel mechanisms of osimertinib resistance were discovered. In addition, 16.7% (2/12) of the T790M positive patients with either TP53 R237C or KRAS G12V failed to benefit from the subsequent osimertinib treatment.

Conclusion

Our results emphasized that liquid biopsy is applicable to analyze the drug resistance mechanisms of NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, we discovered two uncommon mutations, TP53 R273C and KRAS G12V, which attenuates the effectiveness of osimertinib.

The prognostic impact of RAS on overall survival following liver resection in early versus late-onset colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of molecular aberrations on survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in patients with early-age-onset (EOCRC) versus late-age-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) is unknown.

METHODS

Patients who underwent liver resection for CLM with known RAS, BRAF and MSI status were retrospectively studied. The prognostic impact of RAS mutations by age was analysed with age as a categorical variable and a continuous variable.

RESULTS

The study included 573 patients, 192 with EOCRC and 381 with LOCRC. The younger the age of onset of CRC, the greater the negative impact on overall survival of RAS mutations in the LOCRC, EOCRC, and ≤40 years (hazard ratio (HR), 1.64 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-2.20), 2.03 (95% CI, 1.30-3.17), and 2.97 (95% CI, 1.44-6.14), respectively. Age-specific mortality risk and linear regression analysis also demonstrated that RAS mutations had a greater impact on survival in EOCRC than in LOCRC (slope: -4.07, 95% CI -8.10 to 0.04, P = 0.047, R² = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing CLM resection, RAS mutations have a greater negative influence on survival in patients with EOCRC, more so in patients ≤40 years, than in patients with LOCRC and should be considered as a prognostic factor in multidisciplinary treatment planning.

EGFR and BRAF mutations in inverted sinonasal papilloma - a more complex landscape?

Inverted (Schneiderian) sinonasal papilloma (ISP) is a neoplasm derived from mucosa of the sinonasal tract characterized by local aggressive growth, a tendency to recur and an association with sinonasal carcinoma. The etiology of ISP remains unclear. Recently, identical mutations in exons 19 and 20 of the oncogene EGFR were reported in ISP and ISP-associated sinonasal carcinoma. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether recurring ISPs show identical EGFR mutations at different time points or whether these mutations are identical throughout the respective ISP sample. We used Sanger sequencing to test 60 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded ISP samples from 40 patients regarding mutations in exons 19 and 20 of EGFR—together with exon 15 of BRAF. Overall, 32 samples of 22 patients showed a mutation in EGFR exon 20, whereas 28 samples of 18 patients showed none. No mutation in EGFR exon 19 was found in any sample. Four samples of four patients showed a BRAF exon 15 mutation. Interestingly, samples of four patients exhibited genetic heterogeneity, enabling us to report this in ISP for the first time.

Comparison of Large, Medium, and Small Solid Tumor Gene Panels for Detection of Clinically Actionable Mutations in Cancer

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing of gene panels has supplanted single-gene testing for cancer molecular diagnostics in many laboratories. Considerations for the optimal number of genes to assess in a panel depend on the purpose of the testing.

OBJECTIVE

To address the optimal size for the identification of clinically actionable variants in different-sized solid tumor sequencing panels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sequencing results from 480 patients with a large, 315 gene, panel were compared against coverage of a medium, 161 gene, and small, 50 gene, panel.

RESULTS

The large panel detected a total of 2072 sequence variants in 480 patient specimens; 61 (12.7%) contained variants for which there is therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 89 (18.5%) had variants associated with an off-label therapy, and 312 (65.0%) contained variants eligible for a genomically matched clinical trial. The small panel covered only 737 of the 2072 variants (35.5%) and somewhat fewer therapy-related variants (on-label 88.5%, off-label 60.7%). The medium-size panel included 1354 of the 2072 (65.3%) variants reported by the large panel. All 318 patients with a clinically actionable variant would have been identified by the medium panel.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that a carefully designed medium size gene panel is as effective as a large panel for the detection of clinically actionable variants and can be run by most molecular pathology laboratories.

The regulatory landscape of precision oncology laboratory medicine in the United States - Perspective on the past 5 years and considerations for future regulation

The regulatory landscape for precision oncology in the United States is complicated, with multiple governmental regulatory agencies with different scopes of jurisdiction. Several regulatory proposals have been introduced since the Food and Drug Administration released a draft guidance to regulate laboratory-developed tests in 2014. Key aspects of the most recent proposals and discussion of central arguments related to the regulation of precision oncology laboratory tests provides insight to stakeholders for future discussions related to regulation of laboratory tests.

Clinical and Economic Value of Genetic Sequencing for Personalized Therapy in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Two recent studies examining the clinical and economic value of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based diagnostic testing (multi-gene panel examining ≥ 30 genes) for non-small-cell lung cancer therapy compared with single gene ALK, EGFR testing to select therapy demonstrated statistically insignificant improvement in population-level overall survival and only a moderate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with the NGS testing approach. The data, however, revealed a key practice gap: many patients with actionable mutations did not receive targeted therapies. This gap is attributed, in part, to limitations in the availability and interpretation of NGS results, sample processing constraints, limited access to targeted therapies, and lagging awareness of the rapidly evolving field of personalized medicine, all of which result in "clinical inertia," (ie, suboptimal use of targeted therapy against an actionable driver alteration identified by NGS testing). Additional analysis estimated that cost-effectiveness would improve significantly if a higher percentage of patients received testing and if all patients who were eligible for targeted therapies received them. Strategies to address implementation barriers will help to realize the full value of NGS testing in cancer care.

Differential responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors of melanoma cell lines BRAF V600E-mutated

Background

Most mutations in melanoma affect one critical amino acid on BRAF gene, resulting in the V600E substitution. Patient management is often based on the use of specific inhibitors targeting this mutation.

Methods

DNA and RNA mutation status was assessed in 15 melanoma cell lines by Sanger sequencing and RNA-seq. We tested the cell lines responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib and PLX4720, BRAF-specific and sorafenib, BRAF non-specific). Cell proliferation was assessed by MTT colorimetric assay. BRAF V600E RNA expression was assessed by qPCR. Expression level of phosphorylated-ERK protein was assessed by Western Blotting as marker of BRAF activation.

Results

Three cell lines were discordant in the mutation detection (BRAF V600E at DNA level/Sanger sequencing and BRAF WT on RNA-seq). We initially postulated that those cell lines may express only the WT allele at the RNA level although mutated at the DNA level. A more careful analysis showed that they express low level of BRAF RNA and the expression may be in favor of the WT allele. We tested whether the discordant cell lines responded differently to BRAF-specific inhibitors. Their proliferation rate decreased after treatment with vemurafenib and PLX4720 but was not affected by sorafenib, suggesting a BRAF V600E biological behavior. Yet, responsiveness to the BRAF specific inhibitors was lower as compared to the control. Western Blot analysis revealed a decreased expression of p-ERK protein in the BRAF V600E control cell line and in the discordant cell lines upon treatment with BRAF-specific inhibitors. The discordant cell lines showed a lower responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors when compared to the BRAF V600E control cell line. The results obtained from the inhibition experiment and molecular analyses were also confirmed in three additional cell lines.

Conclusion

Cell lines carrying V600E mutation at the DNA level may respond differently to BRAF targeted treatment potentially due to a lower V600E RNA expression.

ALK detection in lung cancer: identification of atypical and cryptic ALK rearrangements using an optimal algorithm

PURPOSE

IHC, FISH, and NGS are common methods of ALK evaluation in NSCLC. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether ALK false positives or false negatives occurred more often in daily routines. An approach to identify ALK fusion was then proposed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 1815 cases of NSCLC, including 83 (4.6%) ALK IHC positives. Total 182 samples (62 ALK+ and 120 ALK-) were examined via FISH, RT-ddPCR, NGS, RT-qPCR and RNAscope to confirm ALK status.

RESULTS

One ALK FISH false negative was found, which harbored two genomic rearrangements involved in EML4-ALK (exon 13:exon 20) fusion. One ALK IHC false negative was confirmed depending on a rare ALK FISH-positive pattern and ALK RNAscope positive but ALK fusion was not found via NGS. In addition, an atypical ALK FISH-positive pattern was observed in an IHC-positive case with chromosome 2 inversion leading to EML4-ALK (exon 6:exon 20) fusion. EML4-ALK fusion was determined in one case with an atypical FISH patterns by RT-qPCR. Rare complicated genomic rearrangements involved in a novel ALK fusion of EML4-ALK (exon 7:exon 14) were distinguished in an ALK IHC and FISH double-positive case.

CONCLUSION

False negative of ALK IHC, FISH and NGS results were found in our cohort, but none was false ALK positive. False ALK negatives should be more concerned than false positives. ALK rearrangements with cryptic ALK fusion patterns could be identified using our algorithm. Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer was recommended for priority detection.

Detection of Targetable Genetic Alterations in Korean Lung Cancer Patients: A Comparison Study of Single-Gene Assays and Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing

PURPOSE

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) are 'must-test' biomarkers in the molecular diagnostics of advanced-stage lung cancer patients. Although single-gene assays are currently considered the gold standard for these genes, next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests are being introduced to clinical practices. We compared the results of current diagnostics and aimed to suggest timely effective guidance for their clinical use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with lung cancer who received both conventional single-gene assays and subsequent targeted NGS testing were enrolled, and the results of their tests were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients were enrolled, and the EGFR real-time polymerase chain reaction, ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and ROS1 FISH assays exhibited 92.9%, 99.6%, and 99.5% concordance with the NGS tests, respectively. The discordant cases were mostly false-negatives of the single-gene assays, probably due to technical limitation. Of 158 cases previously designated as wild-type, EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 alterations were identified in 10.1%, 1.9%, and 1.3%, respectively, and other targetable alterations were identified in 36.1% of the cases. Of patients with additionally identified actionable alterations, 32.6% (31/95) received matched therapy with a clinical benefit of 48.4% (15/31).

CONCLUSION

Even though the conventional and NGS methods were concordant in the majority of cases, NGS testing still revealed a considerable number of additional EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 alterations, as well as other targetable alterations, in Korean advanced-stage lung cancer patients. Given the high frequency of EGFR and other targetable mutations identified in the present study, NGS testing is highly recommended in the diagnosis of Korean lung cancer patients.

Genomic profiling in oncology clinical practice

The development of high-throughput technologies such as next-generation sequencing for DNA sequencing together with the decrease in their cost has led to the progressive introduction of genomic profiling in our daily practice in oncology. Nowadays, genomic profiling is part of genetic counseling, cancer diagnosis, molecular characterization, and as a biomarker of prognosis and response to treatment. Furthermore, germline or somatic genomic characterization of the tumor may provide new treatment opportunities for patients with cancer. In this review, we will summarize the clinical applications and limitations of genomic profiling in oncology clinical practice, focusing on next-generation sequencing.

Detection of bladder cancer using urinary cell-free DNA and cellular DNA

Background

The present study sought to identify a panel of DNA markers for noninvasive diagnosis using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from urine supernatant or cellular DNA from urine sediments of hematuria patients. A panel of 48 bladder cancer-specific genes was selected. A next-generation sequencing-based assay with a cfDNA barcode-enabled single-molecule test was employed. Mutation profiles of blood, urine, and tumor sample from 16 bladder cancer patients were compared. Next, urinary cellular DNA and cfDNA were prospectively collected from 125 patients (92 bladder cancer cases and 33 controls) and analyzed using the 48-gene panel. The individual gene markers and combinations of markers were validated according to the pathology results. The mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) obtained with the various modeling approaches were calculated and compared.

Results

This pilot study of 16 bladder cancer patients demonstrated that gene mutations in urine supernatant and sediments had better concordance with cancer tissue as compared with plasma. Logistic analyses suggested two powerful combinations of genes for genetic diagnostic modeling: five genes for urine supernatant (TERT, FGFR3, TP53, PIK3CA, and KRAS) and seven genes for urine sediments (TERT, FGFR3, TP53, HRAS, PIK3CA, KRAS, and ERBB2). The accuracy of the five-gene panel and the seven-gene panel in the validation cohort yielded AUCs of 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–0.97] and 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.96), respectively. With the addition of age and gender, the diagnostic power of the urine supernatant five-gene model and the urine sediment seven-gene model improved as the revised AUCs were 0.9656 (95% CI 0.9368–0.9944) and 0.9587 (95% CI 0.9291–0.9883).

Conclusions

cfDNA from urine bears great diagnostic potential. A five-gene panel for urine supernatant and a seven-gene panel for urine sediments are promising options for identifying bladder cancer in hematuria patients.

Comparison of next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry analysis for targeted therapy-related genomic status in lung cancer patients

Background

Some drugs that target molecular pathways are available for the targeted treatment of lung cancer. Multiple tests are needed to detect the status of the known molecular targets to determine whether the patients can respond to the drugs. An integrated platform for various gene alteration detection including both mutations and rearrangements is necessary for patients, especially those without enough tissue.

Methods

In our study, detections of EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangement, ROS1 rearrangement, and alterations of other nine important lung cancer-related genes were integrated into a single next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. The NGS analysis was performed in 107 cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Meanwhile, hot spots such as EGFR L858R, EGFR E746-A750Del mutations and gene rearrangement of ALK and ROS1 were detected by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining.

Results

NGS could explore various gene mutations and gene rearrangements with a reduced experiment time and lower amounts of tumor tissues than multiple IHC staining experiments. NGS results were more informative and reliable than IHC staining for EGFR gene alterations, especially for the exon 19 region. NGS could also increase the positive rate of ALK rearrangement and decrease the false positive results of ROS1 rearrangements detected by IHC staining.

Conclusions

NGS is effective for confirmation the status of various important lung cancer-related gene alterations. Furthermore, NGS is necessary for the confirmation of the IHC results of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements.

Targeted Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Panel in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: Paving the Way for Clinical Implementation

Identification of targetable molecular changes is essential for selecting appropriate treatment in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: In this study, a Sanger sequencing plus Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) sequential approach was compared with a Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based approach for the detection of actionable genomic mutations in an experimental cohort (EC) of 117 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Its applicability was assessed in small biopsies and cytology specimens previously tested for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutational status, comparing the molecular changes identified and the impact on clinical outcomes. Subsequently, an NGS-based approach was applied and tested in an implementation cohort (IC) in clinical practice. Using Sanger and FISH, patients were classified as EGFR-mutated (n = 22, 18.8%), ALK-mutated (n = 9, 7.7%), and unclassifiable (UC) (n = 86, 73.5%). Retesting the EC with NGS led to the identification of at least one gene variant in 56 (47.9%) patients, totaling 68 variants among all samples. Still, in the EC, combining NGS plus FISH for ALK, patients were classified as 23 (19.7%) EGFR; 20 (17.1%) KRAS; five (4.3%) B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF); one (0.9%) Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 (ERBB2); one (0.9%) STK11; one (0.9%) TP53, and nine (7.7%) ALK mutated. Only 57 (48.7%) remained genomically UC, reducing the UC rate by 24.8%. Fourteen (12.0%) patients presented synchronous alterations. Concordance between NGS and Sanger for EGFR status was very high (κ = 0.972; 99.1%). In the IC, a combined DNA and RNA NGS panel was used in 123 patients. Genomic variants were found in 79 (64.2%). In addition, eight (6.3%) EML4-ALK, four (3.1%), KIF5B-RET, four (3.1%) CD74-ROS1, one (0.8%) TPM3-NTRK translocations and three (2.4%) exon 14 skipping MET Proto-Oncogene (MET) mutations were detected, and 36% were treatable alterations. Conclusions: This study supports the use of NGS as the first-line test for genomic profiling of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (EMERGING-CTONG 1103): A Randomized Phase II Study

PURPOSE

To assess the benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies in locally advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter (17 centers in China), open-label, phase II, randomized controlled trial of erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC chemotherapy) as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations in exon 19 or 21 (EMERGING). Patients received erlotinib 150 mg/d (neoadjuvant therapy, 42 days; adjuvant therapy, up to 12 months) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m² plus cisplatin 75 mg/m² (neoadjuvant therapy, two cycles; adjuvant therapy, up to two cycles). Assessments were performed at 6 weeks and every 3 months postsurgery. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; secondary end points were pathologic complete response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

Of 386 patients screened, 72 were randomly assigned to treatment (intention-to-treat population), and 71 were included in the safety analysis (one patient withdrew before treatment). The ORR for neoadjuvant erlotinib versus GC chemotherapy was 54.1% versus 34.3% (odds ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.87 to 5.84; P = .092). No pathologic complete response was identified in either arm. Three (9.7%) of 31 patients and zero of 23 patients in the erlotinib and GC chemotherapy arms, respectively, had a major pathologic response. Median PFS was significantly longer with erlotinib (21.5 months) versus GC chemotherapy (11.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.67; P < .001). Observed adverse events reflected those most commonly seen with the two treatments.

CONCLUSION

The primary end point of ORR with 42 days of neoadjuvant erlotinib was not met, but the secondary end point PFS was significantly improved.

Significant benefits of osimertinib in treating acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs in lung squamous cell cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Lung squamous cell cancer (LSCC) rarely harbors epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, even much rarer for acquired T790M mutation. Although clinical trials of AURA series illustrated that non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR T790M mutation can benefit from osimertinib, only five LSCC patients were enrolled in total; moreover, the efficacy for LSCC was not shown in the results. Therefore, the response of LSCC to osimertinib is still unclear to date.

CASE SUMMARY

We report an LSCC case with T790M-related acquired resistance after treatments with first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and benefited from osimertinib significantly. A 63-year-old Chinese man was diagnosed with stage IV (cT2N2M1b) LSCC harboring an EGFR exon 19-deletion mutation. Following disease progression after gefitinib and multi-line chemotherapy, re-biopsy was conducted. Molecular testing of EGFR by amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction detected the exon 19-deletion without T790M mutation. Therefore, the patient was given erlotinib, but progression developed only 3 mo later. Then the frozen re-biopsy tissue was tested by next-generation sequencing (NGS), which detected an EGFR T790M mutation. However, he was very weak with symptoms of dysphagia and cachexia. Fortunately, osimertinib was started, leading to alleviation from the symptoms. Four months later, normal deglutition was restored and partial response was achieved. Finally, the patient achieved an overall survival time period of 29 mo.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight that EGFR T790M mutation may also be an important acquired drug resistance mechanism for LSCC and offer direct evidence of the efficacy of osimertinib in LSCC with T790M mutation. NGS and better preservation conditions may contribute to higher sensitivity of EGFR T790M detection.

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Methods Show Superior or Equivalent Performance to Non-NGS Methods on BRAF, EGFR, and KRAS Proficiency Testing Samples

Context.—

There has been a rapid expansion of next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based assays for the detection of somatic variants in solid tumors. However, limited data are available regarding the comparative performance of NGS and non-NGS assays using standardized samples across a large number of laboratories.

Objective.—

To compare the performance of NGS and non-NGS assays using well-characterized proficiency testing samples provided by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Molecular Oncology Committee. A secondary goal was to compare the use of preanalytic and postanalytic practices.

Design.—

A total of 17 343 responses were obtained from participants in the BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, and the Multigene Tumor Panel surveys across 84 different proficiency testing samples interrogating 16 variants and 3 wild-type sequences. Performance and preanalytic/postanalytic practices were analyzed by method.

Results.—

While both NGS and non-NGS achieved an acceptable response rate of greater than 95%, the overall performance of NGS methods was significantly better than that of non-NGS methods for the identification of variants in BRAF (overall 97.8% versus 95.6% acceptable responses, P = .001) and EGFR (overall 98.5% versus 97.3%, P = .01) and was similar for KRAS (overall 98.8% and 97.6%, P = .10). There were specific variant differences, but in all discrepant cases, NGS methods outperformed non-NGS methods. NGS laboratories also more consistently used preanalytic and postanalytic practices suggested by the CAP checklist requirements than non-NGS laboratories.

Conclusions.—

The overall analytic performance of both methods was excellent. For specific BRAF and EGFR variants, NGS outperformed non-NGS methods and NGS laboratories report superior adherence to suggested laboratory practices.

Detection of EGFR mutations using target capture sequencing in plasma of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE : Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for detection of non-invasive epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the existing methods have limitations in sensitivity or in availability. The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of capture target sequencing for detecting EGFR mutations in ctDNA. METHODS : A total of 79 patients with NSCLC and available plasma and matched tissue specimens were enrolled. Through capture target sequencing, mutations were searched in over 20 000 reads obtained from each exon region. Parameters corresponding to the limit of detection and limit of quantification were used as the thresholds for mutation detection. To evaluate the accuracy, detection of EGFR mutations in matched tissue samples was performed by target capture sequencing and the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). RESULTS:   : EGFR mutations were discovered in 32.9 % (26/79) of the patients with NSCLC, the overall rate of consistency for the 79 paired plasma and tissue samples was 86.1 % (68/79). The sensitivity and specificity of detecting EGFR mutations in the plasma were 72.7 % and 95.7 %. In terms of the EGFR mutations identified by ARMS, the overall consistency was 78.5 % (62/79) in three groups. Of 21 patients with EGFR sensitive mutation defined by next generation sequencing in ctDNA, 20 (95.2%) showed long-term disease control with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) treatment; the median progression-free survival was 10.8 months (95% CI 9.1 to 16.8). CONCLUSIONS: Target capture sequencing of ctDNA can be used for genotyping of EGFR in patients with NSCLC, which may enable a direct recommendation for EGFR TKI on the basis of positive results with plasma DNA.

Simultaneous detection of target CNVs and SNVs of thalassemia by multiplex PCR and next‑generation sequencing

Thalassemia is caused by complex mechanisms, including copy number variants (CNVs) and single nucleotide variants (SNVs). The CNV types of α‑thalassemia are typically detected by gap‑polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The SNV types are detected by Sanger sequencing. In the present study, a novel method was developed that simultaneously detects CNVs and SNVs by multiplex PCR and next‑generation sequencing (NGS). To detect CNVs, 33 normal samples were used as a cluster of control values to build a baseline, and the A, B, C, and D ratios were developed to evaluate‑SEA, ‑α4.2, ‑α3.7, and compound or homozygous CNVs, respectively. To detect other SNVs, sequencing data were analyzed using the system's software and annotated using Annovar software. In a test of performance, 128 patients with thalassemia were detected using the method developed and were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and gap‑PCR. Four different CNV types were clearly distinguished by the developed algorithm, with ‑SEA, ‑α3.7, ‑α4.2, and compound or homozygous deletions. The sensitivities for each CNV type were 96.72% (59/61), 97.37% (37/38), 83.33% (10/12) and 95% (19/20), and the specificities were 93.94% (32/33), 93.94% (32/33), 100% (33/33) and 100% (33/33), respectively. The SNVs detected were consistent with those of the Sanger sequencing.