Randomized, controlled trial of entecavir versus placebo in children with hepatitis B envelope antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

Entecavir for children and adults with chronic hepatitis B

RATIONALE

Chronic hepatitis B is a major worldwide public health concern. Entecavir, one nucleos(t)ide analogue antiviral therapy option, is recommended as the first-line drug for chronic hepatitis B in many clinical guidelines. However, none of the guideline recommendations are based on the findings of a systematic review with meta-analysis, where entecavir versus no treatment or placebo are compared directly.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of entecavir versus no treatment or placebo in children and adults with chronic hepatitis B, who are either hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive or HBeAg-negative.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, three other databases, online trial registries, and reference lists, and contacted authors. The latest search was on 19 July 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials comparing entecavir versus no treatment or placebo in children or adults, or both, with chronic hepatitis B, and irrespective of treatment history with other antiviral drugs and other viral co-infections. We allowed co-interventions when administered equally to all intervention groups.

OUTCOMES

The outcomes reported in this abstract and in the summary of findings table are all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life, and proportion of people with serious adverse events at the longest follow-up.

RISK OF BIAS

We used the Cochrane RoB 2 tool to assess risk of bias in the included trials.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

We used a random-effects model to meta-analyse outcome results, where possible, and presented the results as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Where there was considerable heterogeneity, we performed a narrative analysis. We used a fixed-effect model for sensitivity analysis. We used GRADE to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We included 22 randomised clinical trials (published from 2005 to 2022) with 2940 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B. All trials had a parallel-group design. The experimental intervention was oral entecavir, with a follow-up duration of 5 weeks to 228 weeks. The comparator in 12 trials was no treatment, and in 10 trials was placebo. Fourteen trials equally administered co-interventions to the trial participants in the entecavir and no treatment and placebo groups. One trial included participants between 14 years and 55 years of age, one trial included only children, 19 trials included only adults, and one trial did not provide the age of participants.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Twenty trials contributed data to the quantitative analysis. Ten trials (1379 participants) reported all-cause mortality with a mean follow-up duration of 48.9 weeks (range 5 to 100 weeks). The result was not estimable because no deaths occurred in any of the entecavir and no treatment or placebo groups. None of the trials provided data on health-related quality of life. We are very uncertain about the effect of entecavir versus no treatment or placebo on the proportion of people with serious adverse events (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.32; absolute risk difference 22 fewer per 1000 (from 44 fewer to 21 more); 15 trials, 1676 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The mean follow-up duration was 58.4 weeks (range 5 weeks to 228 weeks). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for these outcomes to very low, mainly because the overall risk of bias in most trials was with some concerns or high, and serious imprecision (no events or few events).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given the issues of risk of bias and insufficient power of the included trials and the very low certainty of the available evidence, we could not determine the effect of entecavir versus no treatment or placebo on critical outcomes such as all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. There is a lack of data on health-related quality of life. Given the first-line recommendation and wide usage of entecavir in people with chronic hepatitis B, further evidence on clinically important outcomes, analysed in this review, is needed.

FUNDING

This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

REGISTRATION

Registration: Entecavir for children and adults with chronic hepatitis B, CD015536 via DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD015536.

Hepatitis B Virus Treatment in Children: Common Challenges and Management Options in a Case-Based Format

The management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in pediatrics presents many challenges, given the potential sequelae of untreated infection including hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, and malignancy, and a lack of clear guidance on the timing of treatment initiation. The goal of this review is to feature common clinical scenarios that occur in the evaluation and treatment of HBV infection in children. Each vignette presents an opportunity to discuss guidelines and evidence-based practices as well as review landmark studies and evolving practices.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) resistance in people treated with entecavir or tenofovir

BACKGROUND

As nucleos/tide analogue (NA) therapy (e.g. entecavir and tenofovir) for chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection becomes more widely indicated and available, understanding drug resistance is essential. A systematic review to quantify resistance to these agents has not previously been undertaken.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the risk of HBV resistance to entecavir and tenofovir. We searched nine databases up to 29-Aug-23. We included studies of HBV infection featuring >10 individuals, written in English, reporting treatment ≥48 weeks, with assessment of HBV resistance based on viral sequence data. Data were analysed according to prior exposure history to NA, and choice of NA agent. Analyses were performed in R.

FINDINGS

62 studies involving a total of 12,358 participants were included. For entecavir, in treatment-naive individuals (22 studies; 4326 individuals), resistance increased over time to 0.9 % at ≥5 years (95 %CI 0.1-2.3 %), and resistance was increased in NA-experienced individuals (18 studies; 1112 individuals), to 20.1 % (95 %CI 1.6-50.1 %) at ≥5 years. For tenofovir, pooled resistance risk was 0.0 % at all time points, whether previously NA naive (11 studies; 3778 individuals) or experienced (19 studies; 2059 individuals). There was a lack of consistent definitions, poor global representation and insufficient metadata to support subgroup analysis.

INTERPRETATION

We have generated the first pooled estimates of HBV entecavir and tenofovir resistance over time. HBV resistance to entecavir in treatment-experienced groups in particular may represent a clinical and public health challenge. To date, tenofovir appears to have an excellent resistance profile, but due to data gaps, we caution that existing studies under-estimate the true real-world risk of resistance. Robust prospective data collection is crucial to reduce health inequities and reduce blind-spots in surveillance as treatment is rolled out more widely.

Determinants of HBeAg loss during follow-up of a multiethnic pediatric cohort

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss is a key event in the natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. The rate and determinants of HBeAg loss depend upon cohort characteristics at baseline. Few studies have examined the age-dependent rate, and none have examined the effect of patient sex and ethnicity on the age-dependant rate. The study of age-dependent rates requires the identification and long-term follow-up of a pediatric cohort. We have studied the age-dependent rate of HBeAg loss, and the rate of HBeAg loss measured from baseline, in a multi-ethnic cohort of 454 pediatric patients. During observation, HBeAg loss was observed in 121/303 (39.9%) HBeAg-positive patients. The rate of HBeAg loss was greater in the second versus the first and third decades of life. The age-related rate of HBeAg loss was clearly affected by patient sex and ethnicity, with earlier loss observed for males and for White versus both South Asian and Chinese ethnicities. When measured from baseline, Chinese patients had a slower rate of HBeAg loss in comparison with White patients. In multivariate analysis of HBeAg loss during prolonged follow-up, male sex, older age, and White ethnicity were associated with HBeAg loss, but antiviral treatment was not.

Hepatitis B Management in the Middle East: A Narrative Review of Current Antiviral Treatments

Introduction: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a significant public health issue worldwide, especially in the Middle East region. Around 8% to 20% of patients with CHB develop cirrhosis, which may progress to hepatocellular carcinoma. The significant morbidity and mortality associated with CHB denote the importance of high-quality treatment. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases from inception to January 2024 to identify relevant studies. Search terms were generated using established treatment guidelines for CHB. We also manually searched the bibliographies of relevant literature to obtain additional papers. Results: In this narrative review, we evaluated the seven currently licensed antiviral therapies for chronic Hepatitis B treatment, including nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) and pegylated interferon-alpha (PEG-IFNα). NAs can be divided into two categories: high barrier to resistance and low barrier to resistance. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, tenofovir alafenamide, and entecavir are NAs with a high barrier to resistance. Telbivudine has shown promise in providing high efficacy with low viral resistance rates; however, it is not recommended because of insufficient evidence and lack of cost-effectiveness. Lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, despite being efficacious, have a low barrier to resistance, the primary reason they are no longer recommended. PEG-IFNα has high efficacy and can be completed in 48 weeks. It is not associated with resistance; however, it has been reported to have several systemic adverse effects. Conclusions: Current first-line NA treatments in the Middle East include entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide. These drugs are favored over other NAs because of their low rates of resistance. PEG-IFNα has superiority over NAs in inducing a more durable antiviral response and having a finite treatment duration. The main drawback of PEG-IFNα is an unfavorable safety profile.

Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association, Group of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Pediatric Society, Chinese Medical Association, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases (Beijing). Expert Consensus on the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in Children

The aim of this consensus is to standardize the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in children and to achieve the goal of “eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030” issued by the World Health Organization. Formulated by organized experts of the Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases and Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association; Group of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Pediatric Society, Chinese Medical Association; and the National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases (Beijing), the consensus provides the latest evidence and recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in children.

Functional cure is associated with younger age in children undergoing antiviral treatment for active chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Functional cure is difficult to achieve using current antiviral therapies; moreover, limited data are available regarding treatment outcomes in children. This retrospective study aimed to assess the frequency of functional cure among children undergoing antiviral treatment for active chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

A total of 372 children aged 1-16 years, with active CHB were enrolled and underwent either nucleos(t)ide analog monotherapy or combination therapy with interferon-α (IFN-α) for 24-36 months. All children attended follow-up visits every 3 months. Functional cure was defined as evidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA loss, circulating hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss/seroconversion, and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss.

RESULTS

After 36 months of antiviral treatment and/or follow-up visits, children with CHB aged 1- < 7 years exhibited higher rates of HBV DNA clearance, HBeAg seroconversion, and HBsAg loss than CHB children ≥ 7-16 years of age (93.75% versus [vs.] 86.21% [p < 0.0001]; 79.30% vs. 51.72% [p < 0.0001]; and 50.78% vs. 12.93% [p < 0.0001], respectively). Longitudinal investigation revealed more rapid dynamic reduction in HBV DNA, HBeAg, and HBsAg levels in children aged 1-7 years than in those aged ≥ 7-16 years with CHB. According to further age-stratified analysis, HBsAg loss rates were successively decreased in children with CHB who were 1- < 3, 3- < 7, 7- < 12, and 12-16 years of age (62.61% vs. 41.13% vs. 25.45% vs. 1.64%, respectively; p < 0.0001) at 36 months. In addition, baseline HBsAg level < 1,500 IU/mL was found to favor disease cure among these pediatric patients. No serious adverse events were observed throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

Results of the present study demonstrated that children aged 1- < 7 years, with active CHB can achieve a high functional cure rate by undergoing antiviral therapy compared to those aged ≥ 7 years, who undergo antiviral therapy. These data support the use of antiviral treatment at an early age in children with CHB. However, future prospectively randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate the findings of this study.

Letter: Baseline age on antiviral treatment may significantly influence the clinical response of children with chronic hepatitis B

This article is linked to Wu et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17667 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17843

Efficacy of pegylated interferon α-2b plus entecavir therapy and predictors of treatment success in children with chronic hepatitis B

Introduction

Interferon therapy, used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), is one of the means by which patients can achieve a functional cure. Pegylated interferon is currently used in the treatment of CHB. There are two main types of pegylated interferon: α-2b and α-2a.

Methods

This study explored the efficacy, safety, and predictors of treatment response for α-2b plus entecavir among children in a real-world setting.

Results

The study included 76 patients aged 3-18 years, all of whom were treated with interferon α-2b plus entecavir. The mean duration of treatment was 401.99 days, and 31.6% (24/76) of patients achieved HBsAg clearance. Competing risk model analyses showed that children with baseline HBsAg <1500 IU/mL (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]=2.643, P=0.022) and a higher baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (sHR=1.005, P=0.000) had a higher probability of achieving HBsAg clearance during treatment. Conversely, children with a higher hepatitis B virus loading level (sHR=0.835, P=0.043) and age ≥10 years (sHR=0.243, P=0.002) had a lower probability of achieving HBsAg clearance during treatment. A decrease of >1 log10 in HBsAg level (sHR=3.479, P=0.001) at 12 weeks of treatment was associated with a higher probability of achieving surface antigen clearance.

Discussion

These results indicated that interferon plus entecavir therapy is a promising means of achieving HBsAg clearance in children with CHB. Moreover, HBsAg, ALT, virus loading, and age are indicators of treatment success probability.

The Efficacy of Antiviral Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Normal ALT Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Context: When nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) were applied clinically to manage chronic hepatitis B virus infection, the prognosis of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients greatly improved. However, certain CHB patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were not used to be considered as the population with the need for antiviral treatment. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis collected and analyzed data from clinical trials to assess and compare the efficacy of antiviral treatment among patients with elevated and normal ALT levels. Methods: A systematic search was performed to gather studies published from 1990.01 to 2022.08 in PubMed and Web of Science databases. The quality of the literature was assessed, and 16 studies were included for further analysis. Basic information on included studies and study populations was collected. A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate three major outcomes of viral response, hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) loss, and HBeAg seroconversion after NAs treatment based on data extracted from these studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes were calculated using fixed-effects models. Results: In the 16 relevant studies, 5,345 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 3,687 patients receiving NAs treatment. All patients were grouped into one with elevated ALT and another with normal ALT based on whether their pretreatment ALT levels > 1*upper limit of normal (ULN). For patients receiving lamivudine, the viral response showed no significant difference between the groups with elevated and normal ALT levels (pooled log OR: 0.51 [-0.23 - 1.26], P = 0.79); the pooled log OR for HBeAg loss was 1.19 (0.63 - 1.76, P = 0.03) and pooled log OR for HBeAg seroconversion was 2.19 (0.91 - 3.47, P = 0.40). For patients receiving first-line therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV), the viral response showed no significant difference between the two groups: Pooled log OR (0.38 [-0.22 - 0.97], P = 0.10). The pooled log OR for HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion was (-0.07 [-0.81 - 0.67], P = 0.68) and (0.40 [-0.84 - 1.63], P = 0.88), respectively. Conclusions: The efficacies of first-line therapy with TDF and ETV treatments were similar in groups with elevated and normal ALT levels for the outcomes of viral response and HBeAg loss. These findings may support further treatment of CHB patients with normal ALT levels.

Incidence and Predictors of Relapse After Stopping Antiviral Therapy in Pediatric Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

There are no definite end-points for stopping therapy in pediatric chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The study objective was to evaluate the incidence of relapse after stopping antiviral therapy and to identify its predictors.

METHODS

All hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive children presenting to our hospital, who had been on antivirals for at least 2 years with undetectable hepatitis B virus-deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV-DNA) and normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) on 3 consecutive occasions over last 12 months were included. Antivirals were stopped if liver biopsy showed histological activity index <5 and fibrosis (Ishak) <3. Virological relapse was defined as the elevation of HBV-DNA (>2000 IU/mL) and biochemical relapse as a rise in ALT levels to >2 times the upper limit of normal. Those having biochemical relapse were started on pegylated interferon alpha-2b-based sequential therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 114 children with CHB screened, 31 HBsAg-positive children fulfilled inclusion criteria and antivirals were stopped in them. Virological and biochemical relapse was seen in 12 (38.7%) and 5 (16.1%) children within 12 months of stopping antiviral treatment. On Cox regression, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive status at the time of stopping antiviral therapy (HR: 6.208, 95% CI: 1.630-23.638) and longer time taken for HBV-DNA to become undetectable while on antivirals (HR: 1.027, 95% CI: 1.000-1.055) were the independent predictors of relapse.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation of antiviral treatment in children with CHB resulted in relapse in one-third of the patients. Relapse was frequent in those who were HBeAg-positive at the time of stopping therapy and in those who required longer therapy for HBV-DNA to become undetectable.

Frequent alanine aminotransferase flares and promising antiviral therapy efficacy during the preschool age: An opportunity to achieve HBsAg loss in children with mother-to-child transmitted hepatitis B

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare remains one of the determinants of initiating antiviral therapy in children with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Insufficient data exist regarding children with CHB attributed to mother-to-child transmission. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of spontaneous ALT flares and identify factors affecting therapy-induced hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss in the flare cohort. We retrospectively included untreated children with mother-to-child transmitted CHB. The primary outcomes were spontaneous ALT flares and therapy-induced HBsAg loss. Among 83 untreated children, 73.5% (61/83) experienced spontaneous ALT flares during the median follow-up of 14.6 months (range, 0.1-177.1 months), with 54.1% of the first ALT flares and 44.3% of ALT peaks occurring within 6 years of age. Thirty-six of 61 children with ALT flares received antiviral therapy, nine (25.0%) of whom achieved therapy-induced HBsAg loss with a median duration of 19.3 months (range, 6.5-56.2 months). The age of initiation of antiviral therapy was the sole predictor of therapy-induced HBsAg loss (HR = 0.544, 95% CI 0.353-0.838, p = 0.006). The restricted cubic spline showed a negative relationship between the age of initiation of antiviral therapy and HBsAg loss and identified that 6.2 years of age discriminated children with therapy-induced HBsAg loss. Kaplan-Meier estimations suggested a higher probability of HBsAg loss in children who started antiviral therapy before 6.2 years old (p = 0.03). In conclusion, asymptomatic ALT flares were frequent in preschool-aged children with mother-to-child transmitted CHB, and early initiation of antiviral therapy showed promising effects in those children with ALT flares.

Evolution of Hepatitis B Virus Infection Under Antiviral Treatment in Children in the Registry of the Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases Constanta

Hepatitis B virus infection is one of the most common diseases diagnosed and treated in infectious disease hospitals around the world, with about 5% of the world’s population infected with this virus. In 2020, 21 cases of acute hepatitis B were registered in Romania and no case of perinatal transmission or chronic hepatitis B, the maximum incidence rate in women was among those aged between 45 and 54 years, and in men between 20 and 24 years.

This study is a retrospective on the response to antiviral treatment of children with hepatitis B, which is on the records of the Clinical Hospital for Infectious Diseases between 2010 and 2021. Although the treatment was good and the disease is practically non-clinical, ongoing biochemical and imaging monitoring is required to detect a possible increase in HBV-DNA levels, as well as to prevent liver damage and complications.

In the case of patients in our group, Entecavir had a beneficial effect, due to the fact that HBV-DNA became undetectable in 7 of the 9 patients, and the values of transaminases were within normal limits.

Should Treatment Indications for Chronic Hepatitis B Be Expanded?

BACKGROUND & AIM

Antiviral therapy has greatly improved the outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and active liver disease or advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. However, current treatment does not eradicate HBV and long-term treatment is needed in most patients to maintain clinical benefit. Thus, professional society guidelines do not recommend treatment of all patients with chronic HBV infection. This review article will examine evidence for and against expansion of treatment to patients in whom treatment is not recommended based on current guidelines.

RESULTS

Available data support expanding treatment to immune tolerant patients and patients in the grey zones who have evidence of active/advanced liver disease based on liver biopsy or non-invasive tests and those who remain in the immune tolerant phase after age 40. Evidence supporting treatment expansion to confirmed inactive carriers and other immune tolerant patients is lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV treatment indications can be more liberal when new therapies that can achieve HBsAg loss safely in a high percentage of patients after a finite course of treatment are available.

Treatment of hepatitis B virus infection in children and adolescents

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Most children acquire the infection perinatally or during early childhood and develop a chronic hepatitis characterized by a high viral replication and a low-inflammation phase of infection, with normal or only slightly raised aminotransferases. Although a conservative approach in children is usually recommended, different therapies exist and different therapeutic approaches are possible. The main goals of antiviral treatment for children with chronic HBV infection are to suppress viral replication and to warn the disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, although these complications are rare in children. Both United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have approved interferon alfa-2b for children aged 1 year and older, pegylated interferon alfa-2a and lamivudine for children aged 3 years and older, entecavir for use in children aged 2 years and older, and adefovir for use in those 12 years of age and older. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is approved by EMA for children aged 2 years and older and by US-FDA for treatment in children aged 12 years and older. Finally, EMA has approved the use of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of children aged 12 years and older or for children weighing more than 35 kg independent of age. This narrative review will provide the framework for summarizing indications to antiviral therapy in the management of chronic HBV infection in children and adolescents.

On-treatment HBV RNA dynamic predicts entecavir-induced HBeAg seroconversion in children with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion is an important intermediate outcome in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. This study aimed to explore whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA serum levels can predict HBeAg seroconversion treated with entecavir.

METHODS

Serum samples from HBeAg-positive children previously treated with entecavir were retrospectively analyzed. HBV RNA levels were measured at baseline, weeks 12, 24, 48, 72 of therapy. Ability of individual biomarkers to predict HBeAg seroconversion was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyzes.

RESULTS

Serum HBV RNA was detectable in 51 children with a median of 6.05 (4.04-8.29) log₁₀ IU/mL at baseline. Patients with subsequent HBeAg seroconversion showed a significantly larger decline in median HBV RNA levels during treatment from baseline to week 12 of 1.96 (0.30-3.38) and to week 24 of 2.27 (1.20-3.38) log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively, in comparison to HBeAg-positive patients without HBeAg seroconversion (P < 0.001). Levels of HBV RNA at treatment weeks 12 and 24 showed good ability to predict HBeAg seroconversion (area under ROC scores > 0.85, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

On-treatment HBV RNA dynamic predicts entecavir-induced HBeAg seroconversion in children with chronic hepatitis B living in China.

Prevention and treatment of new hepatitis B after living donor liver transplantation in children

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the prevention and treatment of new hepatitis B in children after liver transplantation with livers positive for HBcAg and to examine the treatment of new hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 22 children who received livers positive for HBcAg between January 2013 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. After their operations, the children were given lamivudine for anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment, a hepatitis B vaccine or intermittent supplements of hepatitis B immunoglobulins to prevent recurrence of the infection, and entecavir for anti-hepatitis B treatment. The children were categorized into two groups: one group of children stopped taking lamivudine one year after operation (n=7) by themselves, while the other group did not (n=15).

RESULTS

Of the seven children who stopped lamivudine anti-HBV treatment, six developed hepatitis B at 24.33±13.95 months after operation. Of these children, five were treated with entecavir, resulting in their HBV DNA decreasing to undetectable levels (<50 IU/mL). HBsAg turned negative in four of these patients, but in one patient it did not. The other patient with new hepatitis B continued to use lamivudine, resulting in their HBV DNA decreasing to normal levels (<50 IU/mL) but without their HBsAg turning negative. No new cases of hepatitis B were found in the 15 children who did not stop anti-HBV treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term prophylactic therapy of nucleoside analogues combined with hepatitis B immunoglobulins should be used for a long time after liver transplantation with a liver positive for HBcAg. Discontinuation of nucleoside analogues is associated with a higher risk of the new onset of hepatitis B. Entecavir has a significant effect on the treatment of postoperative new hepatitis B in children.

Breakthroughs and challenges in the management of pediatric viral hepatitis

Chronic infections by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) major causes of advanced liver disease and mortality worldwide. Although regarded as benign infections in children, their persistence through adulthood is undoubtedly of concern. Recent advances in HCV treatment have restored the visibility of these conditions and raised expectations for HBV treatment, which is currently far from being curative. Herein we describe direct-acting antivirals available for pediatric HCV (sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir) and their real-world use. A critical review of the HBV pediatric classification is provided. Anti-HBV investigational compounds are reviewed in light of the pathophysiology in the pediatric population, including capsid assembly modulators, antigen secretion inhibitors, silencing RNAs, and immune modifiers. Recommendations for screening and management of immunosuppressed children or those with other risk factors or comorbidities are also summarized.

Spontaneous loss of chronic HBV infection markers in treatment-naïve children: a systematic review and pooled meta-analyses

Objectives: Chronicity could be a serious threat to hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected children. The necessity of antiviral treatment to HBV-infected children has caused much controversy. The authors aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of synthesized evidence regarding the spontaneous loss of chronic HBV infection markers in treatment-naïve children for exploring their long-term management.Methods: Observational cohort studies and non-treatment arms of randomized controlled trials were searched that reported the spontaneous loss of chronic HBV infection markers in untreated children (characterized by the presence of HBsAg ≥6-month), via the rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, and HBV DNA suppression with random-effects model.Results: Of 7,427 studies screened, 20 were included in meta-analysis. With cumulative 23,153 person-years of follow-up, the pooled annual incidences of HBsAg and HBeAg loss, HBV DNA suppression were 1, 6, 7%, respectively. Rates within HBeAg loss and HBV DNA suppression did differ by the transmission modes and ALT levels, not in HBsAg.Conclusion: Spontaneous HBsAg loss (function cure) occurs infrequently in treatment-naïve children with chronic HBV infection. Design of practically applicable programs aiming at therapeutics of children may be necessary to support the goal of eliminating HBV infection worldwide.

Management of Hepatitis-B Virus Infection in Immunocompromised Children: A Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study was to expand the pediatric experience on hepatitis-B virus (HBV) reactivation, a known complication in patients with hematologic malignancies or on immunosuppression.

METHODS

Retrospective appraisal of HBV therapy/prophylaxis in immunocompromised children, studied from April 2006 to March 2020.

RESULTS

Eighteen HBV-positive patients, 5 girls, median age 11.1 (4.1--17.9) years were included. Seventeen of 18 were immunosuppressed at HBV-infection diagnosis. Seventeen were at high risk of reactivation, 1 at moderate risk. Five of 18 had acute hepatitis B as first infection or reactivation, 6 had HBeAg-positive infection, 1 an HBeAg-negative infection and 6 HBsAg-negative infection. Median follow-up was 2.7 (0.7--12.5) years. No HBV-related mortality was observed. Prophylaxis had to be repeated in 1. Lamivudine was used in 6/12 viremic patients and HBV-DNA negativization obtained in 2/6 (33%). Tenofovir-DF was used in 2/12 and entecavir in 4/12: 100% attained HBV-DNA negativization. Therapy had to be switched from tenofovir-DF to entecavir in 1 patient because of renal impairment. Virological breakthroughs were observed in 1 lamivudine-treated patient, leading to a hepatitis flare; 1 patient on entecavir had a hepatitis flare at immunoreconstitution. Mortality was 33% in the HBsAg-positive group. Seven prophylactic treatments were administered to 6 patients with HBsAg-negative infection: tenofovir-DF in 2 HBV-DNA-positive, lamivudine in 5 HBV-DNA-negative, without reverse HBsAg seroconversion, morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a residual risk of acute hepatitis B in immunocompromised children, mortality rate was substantial, potentially related to the delays in commencing chemotherapy caused by liver dysfunction. Tenofovir-DF or entecavir are the drugs of choice for HBV treatment in immunocompromised children.

Pharmacotherapy options for managing hepatitis B in children

INTRODUCTION

To eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the first global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis, with particular focus given to hepatitis B and C in 2016. To achieve the reduction of mortality in children, it is indispensable to know which children should be treated and how to treat them.

AREA COVERED

In this article, the authors review the antiviral treatment of children with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection including antivirals available for children with chronic HBV infection.

EXPERT OPINION

The approvals of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for children have lowered a hurdle to the initiation of antiviral treatment in children. The international guidelines use nearly the same criteria of antiviral treatment for children with chronic HBV infection, but the WHO guidelines provide a cautious stance on the antiviral treatment of children. Not only PEG-IFN but also NAs with a high genetic barrier to drug resistance should be the first-line treatment for children. In settings with limited medical resources, NAs can be the first-line treatment for children. Although the concept of an 'immune-tolerant phase' is challenged, evidence is not sufficient to recommend the treatment of HBeAg-positive immune-tolerant children.

Present and future management of viral hepatitis B and C in children

Having a hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection places a child at higher risk for subsequent chronic hepatitis B (CHB) or chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection. The risk of mother-to-child transmission is higher for HBV (20% to 90%) than for HCV (<5%). Perinatal HBV infection generally causes CHB infection while perinatal HCV infection has a certain rate of spontaneous viral clearance (around 20% to 30%). Of the two, only HBV infection can benefit from passive/active perinatal immunoprophylaxis. The risk of CHB in children with HBV horizontal transmission decreases with age, whereas HCV transmission among teenagers commonly results into a long-life infection and CHC infection. Children with CHB or CHC should be carefully assessed for the need for antiviral treatment. When treatment cannot be deferred, pediatric CHB infection has different first-line treatment options: standard interferon (for children aged≥1 year), pegylated interferon (for children aged≥3 years), and the oral nucleotide analogues entecavir (for children aged≥2 years) and tenofovir (for children aged≥12 years). The choice of treatment depends on the child's age, virus genotypes, previous treatment failure and presence of contraindications. Expected responsiveness rate is 25% of hepatitis B e-antigen clearance, with both standard interferon and nucleotide analogues. Direct antiviral agents are first-line treatment for CHC infection in children aged 3 years or older. Hepatitis C virus sustained virus response is as high as 97%. Therefore, if direct antiviral agents can be proven to be safe and well tolerated in very young children, HCV eradication could be planned after the first screening.

Are Published Health Economic Models for Chronic Hepatitis B Appropriately Capturing the Benefits of HBsAg Loss? A Systematic Literature Review

OBJECTIVES

Sustained hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss or 'functional cure' (FC) is considered an optimal treatment endpoint by international clinical guidelines for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), yet rarely is this achieved with current standard of care (SoC). This leads to an under-reporting of FC in clinical trials, observational studies and health economic (HE) models. This paper systematically identifies and assesses how FC is incorporated in published HE models of CHB.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed and Embase (conducted February 2019) to review how HBsAg loss is captured in HE models. The following items were extracted: rate of (and transition probabilities to) HBsAg loss, HBsAg loss health state costs, and HBsAg loss health state utilities.

RESULTS

Sixty-five economics evaluations were identified, and < 50% of these (27/65) incorporated HBsAg loss in their models. Only 15/27 stated HBsAg loss health state costs, 15/27 stated HBsAg loss health state utilities, and 11/27 mentioned treatment-specific transition probabilities to HBsAg loss. The majority of sources these inputs were derived from are not transparent.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of FC in current HE models are not well captured, as FC is often not reported or not directly related to modelled treatments. This has the potential for novel agents with higher efficacy compared with SoC to be overlooked and undervalued if their worth is not appropriately communicated. In order to ensure optimal access for patients to new and effective therapies, it is important that the benefits of FC are better assessed and captured within HE models.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Children With Acquired Immunodeficiencies or Undergoing Immune Suppressive, Cytotoxic, or Biological Modifier Therapies

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a known complication of immune-suppressive, cytotoxic, and biological modifier therapies in patients currently infected with HBV or who have had past exposure to HBV. Nowadays, newer and emerging forms of targeted biologic therapies are available for the management of rheumatologic conditions, malignancies, inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologic conditions and solid-organ, bone marrow, or haematologic stem cell transplant but there is currently a lack of a systematic approach to the care of patients with or at risk of HBV reactivation. The Hepatology Committee of the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) together with a working group of ESPGHAN members with clinical and research expertise in viral hepatitis developed an evidence-based position paper on reactivation of HBV infection in children identifying pertinent issues addressing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of this condition. Relevant clinical questions were formulated and agreed upon by all the members of the working group. Questions were answered and positions were based on evidence resulting from a systematic literature search on PubMed and Embase from their inception to July 1, 2019. A document was produced and the working group and ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee members voted on each recommendation, using a formal voting technique. A recommendation was accepted provided upon agreement by at least 75% of the working group members. This position paper provides a comprehensive update on the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of HBV reactivation in children.

Entecavir is Safe and Effective in Long Term for the Treatment of Hepatitis B in Immunocompromised Children

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis B infection is common in patients with cancer, and prompt treatment is necessary; otherwise, it can result in life-threatening complications. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of entecavir in immunocompromised children with hepatitis B.

METHODS

This single-center prospective study was conducted on children with different malignancies referred to our department with evidence of hepatitis B infection. Only those children were included in the study who had HBsAg positive and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) more than 2 times the upper limit of normal and whose hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA was more than 20,000IU/ml. These children were put on entecavir and prospectively observed upto 192 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients who achieved undetectable HBV DNA at 48 weeks of treatment. Other efficacy end points were the proportion of patients with HBeAg seroconversion, undetectable HBV DNA, and ALT normalization at weeks 48 and 96 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 41 children met the inclusion criteria, of which 5 children died because of malignancy and 5 were lost to follow-up. Mean log DNA was 7.67 at the start which after starting entecavir reduced to 4.1, 2.8, 1.19, 1.09, and 0.84 at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 weeks, respectively (P value < 0.0001). Mean ALT decreased from 332.5 which reduced to 190, 115, 63, and 46 at 4, 12, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively (P < 0.0001). 67.7% achieved the primary outcome and had undetectable DNA at 48 weeks which increased to 26 (83.9%) at 96 weeks. At 48 weeks, 80.6% patients achieved ALT normalization. Thirty percent developed HBeAg seroconversion. Two patients developed virological breakthrough, one at 96 weeks and another at 192 weeks. No significant adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Entecavir is safe and effective in long term for the treatment of hepatitis B in immunocompromised children.

Updates in the management of hepatitis B in children

Introduction: Universal infant hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination program has reduced HBV infection dramatically in vaccinated young generations. Management of chronically infected children is still challenging concerning high viral load with mostly mild diseases, yet with a nonnegligible proportion of advanced diseases, and long-term effect of antivirals. However, with more potent antivirals approved for pediatric patients, to start antivirals earlier in eligible patients may benefit their outcomes. This review aimed to update the current management of chronic hepatitis B in children.Areas covered: This review covered the natural history of chronic HBV infection, management of chronic hepatitis B in children from the past to the present, current consensus on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in children, controversies in cessation of oral antivirals, and management of special populations such as pregnancy and co-infections.Expert opinions: Without contraindication, peginterferon is recommended for immune-active children ≥ 3 years old. For those intolerant, decompensating or preferring oral therapy, first-line Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC), Entecavir or Tenofovir, may be applied. For immune-tolerant or inactive carriers, close monitoring is crucial. When to stop NUCs and novel therapies for HBV cure await further research.

Long-term efficacy and safety of peginterferon in the treatment of children with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

Achieving 'clinical cure' in children with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with safe and effective antiviral treatment is an unmet medical need. Peginterferon (PegIFN) has higher hepatitis B s antigen (HBsAg) clearance than nucleoside analogs (NUC). Currently, studies on interferon (IFN) in the treatment of Chinese children with CHB are relatively rare. This study aimed to further explore the efficacy of PegIFNα-2a as an antiviral treatment in Chinese children and analyse the long-term follow-up after drug discontinuation. We enrolled 118 patients with CHB (2-16 years old, 79 cases are males) treated with PegIFNα-2a by the author in the Third People's Hospital of Kunming City from February 2009 to February 2015. The course of treatment was 52 weeks, with a follow-up period of 104 weeks. All the patients completed at least 1 dose, of which 104 completed at least 36 weeks of treatment and 104 weeks of follow-up. During treatment and follow-up, indicators such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and HBV serological markers were monitored, and the efficacy and safety of PegIFNα-2a in the treatment of CHB patients were observed. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) clearance and seroconversion rates were 53.8% and 49%, respectively, when the drug was discontinued; 72.1% and 72.1%, respectively, at the end of the follow-up; and 98.2% and 98%, respectively, for sustained response. HBsAg clearance and seroconversion rates were 48.1% and 47.1%, respectively, when the drug was discontinued; 53.8% and 52.9%, respectively, at the end of the follow-up; and 94% and 95.9%, respectively, for sustained response. The HBV DNA suppression rate was 89.4% when the drug was discontinued, 90.4% at the end of the follow-up and 97.8% for sustained response. Two patients had virological relapse (2.3%) during follow-up; however, no clinical relapse occurred. Multivariate regression analysis showed that genotype B, weight < 25 kg or between 25 and 45 kg, and reduction of HBsAg by more than 1 log following 24 weeks of treatment were independent predictors of HBsAg clearance at the end of follow-up. Adverse events that occurred during treatment were similar to those reported in previous clinical studies on PegIFN. The results of this study showed that PegIFN was safe and effective in the treatment of children with CHB, and sustained response could be achieved after treatment. PegIFN treatment of children with CHB helps more achieve 'clinical cure'.

Hepatitis B virus infection in children and adolescents

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major cause of acute and chronic liver disease and associated morbidity and mortality worldwide. Vertical (mother-to-child) and horizontal early childhood transmission are the main routes of HBV transmission and are responsible for most chronic infections, including among adults who bear the greatest burden of morbidity and mortality. Universal hepatitis B immunisation at birth and in infancy is the key strategy for global elimination of HBV infection, and has been highly effective in reducing new vertical infections. However, global progress in scale-up of HBV testing and treatment has been slow in adults and children. In this Series paper, we summarise knowledge on the epidemiology, natural history, and treatment of chronic HBV infection in adolescents and children, and we highlight key differences from HBV infection in adults. The estimated global prevalence of HBV infection in children aged 5 years or younger is 1·3%. Most children are in the high-replication, low-inflammation phase of infection, with normal or only slightly raised aminotransferases; cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma are rare. Although entecavir is approved and recommended for children aged 2-17 years, and tenofovir for those aged 12-18 years, a conservative approach to treatment initiation in children is recommended. Key actions to address current policy gaps include: validation of non-invasive tests for liver disease staging; additional immunopathogenesis studies in children with HBV infection; long-term follow-up of children on nucleoside or nucleotide analogue regimens to inform guidance on when to start treatment; evaluation of different treatment strategies for children with high rates of HBV replication; and establishment of paediatric treatment registries and international consortia to promote collaborative research.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection: 2018 Guidelines from the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease and Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important public health problem in Canada. In keeping with evolving evidence and understanding of HBV pathogenesis, the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease periodically publishes HBV management guidelines. The goals of the 2018 guidelines are to (1) highlight the public health impact of HBV infection in Canada and the need to improve diagnosis and linkage to care, (2) recommend current best-practice guidelines for treatment of HBV, (3) summarize the key HBV laboratory diagnostic tests, and (4) review evidence on HBV management in special patient populations and include more detail on management of HBV in pediatric populations. An overview of novel HBV tests and therapies for HBV in development is provided to highlight the recent advances in HBV clinical research. The aim and scope of these guidelines are to serve as an up-to-date, comprehensive resource for Canadian health care providers in the management of HBV infection.

INASL Guidelines on Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Patients receiving Chemotherapy, Biologicals, Immunosupressants, or Corticosteroids

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving chemotherapy, biologicals, immunosupressants, or corticosteroids is emerging to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with current or prior exposure to HBV infection. These patients suffer a dual onslaught of illness: one from the primary disease for which they are receiving the culprit drug that led to HBV reactivation, and the other from HBV reactivation itself. The HBV reactivation not only leads to a compromised liver function, which may culminate into hepatic failure; it also adversely impacts the treatment outcome of the primary illness. Hence, identification of patients at risk of reactivation before starting these drugs, and starting treatment aimed at prevention of HBV reactivation is the best strategy of managing these patients. There are no Indian guidelines on management of HBV infection in patients receiving chemotherapy, biologicals, immunosupressants, or corticosteroids for the treatment of rheumatologic conditions, malignancies, inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologic conditions, or solid-organ or bone marrow transplantation. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) had set up a taskforce on HBV in 2016, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines for management of various aspects of HBV infection, relevant to India. In 2017 the taskforce had published the first INASL guidelines on management of HBV infection in India. In the present guidelines, which are in continuation with the previous guidelines, the issues on management of HBV infection in patients receiving chemotherapy, biologicals, immunosupressants, or corticosteroids are addressed.

Efficacy and Safety of Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40KD) in Children With Chronic Hepatitis B: The PEG-B-ACTIVE Study

Children with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) represent an area of unmet medical need, attributed to increased lifetime risk of CHB sequelae and limited therapeutic options compared with adult CHB patients. The PEG-B-ACTIVE (NCT01519960) phase III study evaluated peginterferon (PegIFN) alfa-2a treatment in children aged 3 to <18 years with CHB. A total of 161 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive immune-active patients without advanced fibrosis (AF)/cirrhosis were randomized (2:1) to PegIFN alfa-2a (Group A, n = 101) or no treatment (Group B, n = 50); patients with AF were assigned to PegIFN alfa-2a (Group C, n = 10). PegIFN alfa-2a was administered for 48 weeks by body surface area (BSA) category, based on 180 μg/1.73 m² . HBeAg seroconversion rates at 24 weeks posttreatment were significantly higher in Group A (25.7% vs. 6%; P = 0.0043), as were the rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance (8.9% vs. 0%; P = 0.03), hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <2,000 IU/mL (28.7% vs. 2.0%; P < 0.001) or undetectable (16.8% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.0069), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization (51.5% vs. 12%; P < 0.001). Safety, including incidence of ALT flares and neutropenia, was comparable to the established PegIFN alfa-2a profile in HBV-infected adults or hepatitis C virus-infected children. Changes in growth parameters were minimal during treatment and comparable to those in untreated patients. Safety and efficacy outcomes in Group C were in line with Group A. Conclusion: PegIFN alfa-2a treatment of children in the immune-active phase of CHB was efficacious and well tolerated, and associated with higher incidence of HBsAg clearance than in adults. This represents an important advance to the treatment options for children with CHB.

The Health Care Transition of Youth With Liver Disease Into the Adult Health System: Position Paper From ESPGHAN and EASL

BACKGROUND

Medical advances have dramatically improved the long-term prognosis of children and adolescents with once-fatal hepatobiliary diseases. However, there is no generally accepted optimal pathway of care for the transition from paediatric care to the adult health system.

AIM

The purpose of this position paper is to propose a transition process for young people with paediatric onset hepatobiliary diseases from child-centred to adult-centred healthcare services.

METHODS

Seventeen ESPGHAN/EASL physicians from 13 countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and United Kingdom) formulated and answered questions after examining the currently published literature on transition from childhood to adulthood. PubMed and Google Scholar were systematically searched between 1980 and January 2018. Quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Expert opinions were used to support recommendations whenever the evidence was graded weak. All authors voted on each recommendation, using the nominal voting technique.

RESULTS

We reviewed the literature regarding the optimal timing for the initiation of the transition process and the transfer of the patient to adult services, principal documents, transition multi-professional team components, main barriers, and goals of the general transition process. A transition plan based on available evidence was agreed focusing on the individual young people's readiness and on coordinated teamwork, with transition monitoring continuing until the first year of adult services.We further agreed on selected features of transitioning processes inherent to the most frequent paediatric-onset hepatobiliary diseases. The discussion highlights specific clinical issues that will probably present to adult gastrointestinal specialists and that should be considered, according to published evidence, in the long-term tracking of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfer of medical care of individuals with paediatric onset hepatobiliary chronic diseases to adult facilities is a complex task requiring multiple involvements of patients and both paediatric and adult care providers.

INASL Position Statements on Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in India: The Andaman Statements

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infection is one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure in India. There are no Indian consensus guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and management of HBV infection. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) set up a taskforce on HBV in 2016, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of HBV infection, relevant to disease patterns and clinical practices in India. The taskforce first identified contentious issues on various aspects of HBV management, which were allotted to individual members of the taskforce who reviewed them in detail. A 2-day round table discussion was held on 11th and 12th February 2017 at Port Blair, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The members of the taskforce reviewed and discussed the existing literature threadbare at this meeting and formulated the 'INASL position statements' on each of the issues. The evidence and recommendations in these guidelines have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system with minor modifications. The strength of recommendations (strong: 1, weak: 2) thus reflects the quality (grade) of underlying evidence (A, B, C, D). We present here the INASL position statements on prevention, diagnosis and management of HBV in India.

A Multicenter Study of the Antiviral Efficacy of Entecavir Monotherapy Compared to Lamivudine Monotherapy in Children with Nucleos(t)ide-naïve Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy of entecavir (ETV) and lamivudine (LAM) therapy in children with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had not received nucleoside analogue treatment.

METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective study, we included pediatric CHB patients younger than 20 years who received ETV or LAM treatment for at least 12 months and had no concomitant diseases. All of the patients were followed up every 1 to 3 months. At each visit, the patients underwent clinical evaluation and biochemical testing.

RESULTS

Eight (53.3%), 14 (93.3%), and 2 (15.4%) of the ETV-treated patients achieved virologic suppression, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, respectively, at 1 year. In the ETV group, the cumulative rate of virologic suppression at 3 years was 91.7%, which was significantly higher than that in the LAM group (P < 0.001). The mean duration of treatment before virologic suppression was shorter in the ETV group than in the LAM group (P = 0.040). The cumulative rate of seroconversion in the ETV group at 3 years was 39.4%, which was not significantly different from that in the LAM group (P = 0.439). The ETV group showed lower cumulate rates of virologic breakthrough (33.3% at 6 years) and genotypic mutation than the LAM group (P = 0.033 and P = 0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ETV is superior to LAM in pediatric CHB treatment because of its higher virologic suppression rate and lower cumulative rates of virologic breakthrough and genotypic mutation.

Antiviral Efficacy of Tenofovir Monotherapy in Children with Nucleos(t)ide-naive Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to compare the efficacy between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and lamivudine (LMV) in children with nucleos(t)ide-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Patients with CHB were treated with TDF in the immune-reactive phase and compared with a historical control group of patients treated with LMV before the TDF era.

METHODS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA titer decrements (> 3 log₁₀ IU/mL) were monitored after treatment initiation. The treatment duration for HBV DNA clearance (< 357 IU/mL) and complete response (HBeAg loss and HBV DNA clearance) were analyzed. The follow-up period was 96 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were treated with TDF and compared with a historical control group of 24 patients treated with LMV. HBV DNA decrement (> 3 log₁₀ IU/mL) was achieved in 100% (16/16) of the TDF group but in only 62.5% (15/24) of the LMV group (P = 0.005) at 48 weeks. The HBV DNA clearance (< 357 IU/mL) in the TDF and LMV groups was, respectively, as follows: 62.5% (10/16) and 25.0% (6/24) at 12 weeks (P = 0.018), 81.3% (13/16) and 37.5% (9/24) at 24 weeks (P = 0.006), 93.8% (15/16) and 50.0% (12/24) at 48 weeks (P = 0.004), and 100% (16/16) and 54.2% (13/24) at 96 weeks (P = 0.001). Complete response occurred in 41.7% (5/12) of HBeAg-positive patients in the TDF group and 28.6% (6/21) of the LMV group at 96 weeks (P = 0.443).

CONCLUSION

TDF monotherapy for 96 weeks produced a significantly more effective virologic response than LMV monotherapy in children with nucleos(t)ide-naive CHB.

Using Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analyses of Entecavir in Pediatric Subjects to Simplify Dosing Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Entecavir is an orally administered guanosine nucleoside analog with activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase, which is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection in adults and children ≥2 years old (USA and EU).

OBJECTIVE

To develop simplified entecavir dosing recommendations for young children infected with CHB.

METHODS

Data from recent clinical trials were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model, which allowed us to estimate entecavir exposures in children and compare them to ranges known to be efficacious in adults. A population pharmacodynamic (PPD) model was generated to describe the concentration/effect relationship for entecavir in lamivudine treatment-naïve children. The PPK dataset comprised three pediatric cohorts: 2 to <6 years (n = 36); 6 to <12 years (n = 43); and 12 to <18 years (n = 74). Data from 177 adults were also included to enhance model stability and to aid in the covariate search.

RESULTS

Entecavir concentration-time profiles were well-described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination. Age was not a statistically significant covariate after accounting for weight. For the PPD model, the HBV DNA concentration following entecavir exposure was adequately described using a direct effect inhibitory maximum effect (E _max) model with additive residual error.

CONCLUSION

Model-estimated, steady-state entecavir area under the concentration-time curve, in both the original (15 weight groups) and simplified (eight weight groups) pediatric dosing regimens, provided entecavir exposures consistent with those observed to be efficacious in adults, and resulted in the simplified dose algorithm for pediatric patients that is approved for the current entecavir label.

EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health problem with changing epidemiology due to several factors including vaccination policies and migration. This Clinical Practice Guideline presents updated recommendations for the optimal management of HBV infection. Chronic HBV infection can be classified into five phases: (I) HBeAg-positive chronic infection, (II) HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis, (III) HBeAg-negative chronic infection, (IV) HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis and (V) HBsAg-negative phase. All patients with chronic HBV infection are at increased risk of progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), depending on host and viral factors. The main goal of therapy is to improve survival and quality of life by preventing disease progression, and consequently HCC development. The induction of long-term suppression of HBV replication represents the main endpoint of current treatment strategies, while HBsAg loss is an optimal endpoint. The typical indication for treatment requires HBV DNA >2,000IU/ml, elevated ALT and/or at least moderate histological lesions, while all cirrhotic patients with detectable HBV DNA should be treated. Additional indications include the prevention of mother to child transmission in pregnant women with high viremia and prevention of HBV reactivation in patients requiring immunosuppression or chemotherapy. The long-term administration of a potent nucleos(t)ide analogue with high barrier to resistance, i.e., entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil or tenofovir alafenamide, represents the treatment of choice. Pegylated interferon-alfa treatment can also be considered in mild to moderate chronic hepatitis B patients. Combination therapies are not generally recommended. All patients should be monitored for risk of disease progression and HCC. Treated patients should be monitored for therapy response and adherence. HCC remains the major concern for treated chronic hepatitis B patients. Several subgroups of patients with HBV infection require specific focus. Future treatment strategies to achieve 'cure' of disease and new biomarkers are discussed.

Hepatitis B: changing epidemiology and interventions

Hepatitis B virus infection is still a major public health problem worldwide, since more than 350 million people have chronic, lifelong infection and nearly 1 million deaths occur each year owing to complications. Most infections are acquired at birth or during early childhood. Nowadays, low- and middle-income countries bear the majority of the burden of hepatitis B-related liver cancer deaths despite the availability of an effective vaccine and antiviral treatments. In this review the epidemiology, strategies of prevention and the recent advances in therapy, genotype diversity and resistance are discussed.

Recommendations for the treatment of hepatitis B in 2017

The therapeutic goal which is currently unfrequent but realistic in HBV infected patients is sustained HBsAg clearance. It is preceded by the loss or significant suppression of HBV replication and leads to inhibition of the progression of liver fibrosis, normalization of biochemical indicators of liver damage, reduction in the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, prolongation of survival, prevention of HBV infection in the transplanted organ in post-transplant patients, enhancement of the quality of life, inhibition or reversal of extrahepatic changes associated with HBV infection, and halting of the spread of HBV infections. Recommendations of Polish Group of Experts for HBV for 2017 provide guidelines to assess treatment eligibility, choice of the first-line drug, monitoring and duration of treatment, management of treatment failure as well as therapy of HBV associated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover it contains advice for treatment of HBV infection in children, females planning pregnancy or pregnant. We also included recommendations for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis, prevention of HBV transmission from mother to infant, after liver transplantation, on immunosuppressive therapy and during HCV treatment.

Vitamin E for the treatment of children with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To assess vitamin E efficacy, defined as its ability to induce hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, in children with HBeAg-positive persistent hepatitis.

METHODS

In July 2016, we extracted articles published in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library using the following search terms: "chronic hepatitis B", "children", "childhood", "therapy", "treatment", "vitamin E", "tocopherols", "tocotrienols". Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English language were collected.

RESULTS

Three RCTs met inclusion criteria and were considered in the present meta-analysis. Overall, 23/122 children in the treatment group underwent HBeAg seroconversion vs 3/74 in the control group (OR = 3.96, 95%CI: 1.18-13.25, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Although our meta-analysis has several limits, including the very small number of available studies and enrolled children with HBeAg positivity-related hepatitis, it suggests that vitamin E use may enhance the probability to induce HBeAg seroconversion in these patients. Further well designed and adequately sized trials are required to confirm or deny these very preliminary results.

Adverse effects of oral antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B

Oral nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs) are currently the backbone of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection treatment. They are generally well-tolerated by patients and safe to use. To date, a significant number of patients have been treated with NAs. Safety data has accumulated over the years. The aim of this article is to review and update the adverse effects of oral NAs. NAs can cause class adverse effects (i.e., myopathy, neuropathy, lactic acidosis) and dissimilar adverse effects. All NAs carry a "Black Box" warning because of the potential risk for mitochondrial dysfunction. However, these adverse effects are rarely reported. The majority of cases are associated with lamivudine and telbivudine. Adefovir can lead to dose- and time-dependent nephrotoxicity, even at low doses. Tenofovir has significant renal and bone toxicity in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, bone and renal toxicity in patients with CHB are not as prominent as in HIV infection. Entecavir and lamivudine are not generally associated with renal adverse events. Entecavir has been claimed to increase the risk of lactic acidosis in decompensated liver disease and high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores. However, current studies reported that entecavir could be safely used in decompensated cirrhosis. An increase in fetal adverse events has not been reported with lamivudine, telbivudine and tenofovir use in pregnant women, while there is no adequate data regarding entecavir and adefovir. Further long-term experience is required to highlight the adverse effects of NAs, especially in special patient populations, including pregnant women, elderly and patients with renal impairment.

Pediatric hepatitis B treatment

Although the introduction of hepatitis B vaccine has been contributing to the reduction in the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers worldwide, the treatment of children with chronic HBV infection is a challenge to be addressed. HBeAg seroconversion, which induces low replication of HBV, is widely accepted as the first goal of antiviral treatment in children with chronic hepatitis B. However, spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion is highly expected in children with chronic HBV infection. Therefore, the identification of children who need antiviral treatment to induce HBeAg seroconversion is essential in the management of chronic HBV infection. Guidelines and experts' opinion show how to identify children who should be treated and how to treat them. If decompensated cirrhosis is absent, interferon-alpha is the first-line antiviral treatment. Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), such as lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir and tenofovir, are also available for the treatment of children, although the approval age differs among them. If decompensated cirrhosis is present, NAs are the first-line antivirals. When the emergence of drug-resistant HBV variants is taken into consideration, entecavir (approved for age 2 years or older) and tenofovir (age 12 years or older), which have high genetic barriers, will play a central role in the treatment of HBV infection. However, the optimal duration of NA treatment and adverse events of long-term NA treatment remain unclear in children. In resource-constrained countries and regions, the financial burden of visiting hospitals, receiving routine blood examination and purchasing antiviral drugs is heavy. Moreover, there is no clear evidence that the induction of HBeAg seroconversion by antiviral treatment prevents the progression of liver disease to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in children with chronic HBV infection. It is thus imperative to clarify the clinical impact of antiviral treatment in children with HBV infection.