1
|
Hoffmann E, Masthoff M, Kunz WG, Seidensticker M, Bobe S, Gerwing M, Berdel WE, Schliemann C, Faber C, Wildgruber M. Multiparametric MRI for characterization of the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:428-448. [PMID: 38641651 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00891-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Our understanding of tumour biology has evolved over the past decades and cancer is now viewed as a complex ecosystem with interactions between various cellular and non-cellular components within the tumour microenvironment (TME) at multiple scales. However, morphological imaging remains the mainstay of tumour staging and assessment of response to therapy, and the characterization of the TME with non-invasive imaging has not yet entered routine clinical practice. By combining multiple MRI sequences, each providing different but complementary information about the TME, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) enables non-invasive assessment of molecular and cellular features within the TME, including their spatial and temporal heterogeneity. With an increasing number of advanced MRI techniques bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical applications, mpMRI could ultimately guide the selection of treatment approaches, precisely tailored to each individual patient, tumour and therapeutic modality. In this Review, we describe the evolving role of mpMRI in the non-invasive characterization of the TME, outline its applications for cancer detection, staging and assessment of response to therapy, and discuss considerations and challenges for its use in future medical applications, including personalized integrated diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Hoffmann
- Clinic of Radiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Max Masthoff
- Clinic of Radiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Bobe
- Gerhard Domagk Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Mirjam Gerwing
- Clinic of Radiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | - Cornelius Faber
- Clinic of Radiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jun Y, Arefeen Y, Cho J, Fujita S, Wang X, Ellen Grant P, Gagoski B, Jaimes C, Gee MS, Bilgic B. Zero-DeepSub: Zero-shot deep subspace reconstruction for rapid multiparametric quantitative MRI using 3D-QALAS. Magn Reson Med 2024; 91:2459-2482. [PMID: 38282270 PMCID: PMC11005062 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and evaluate methods for (1) reconstructing 3D-quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with T2 preparation pulse (3D-QALAS) time-series images using a low-rank subspace method, which enables accurate and rapid T1 and T2 mapping, and (2) improving the fidelity of subspace QALAS by combining scan-specific deep-learning-based reconstruction and subspace modeling. THEORY AND METHODS A low-rank subspace method for 3D-QALAS (i.e., subspace QALAS) and zero-shot deep-learning subspace method (i.e., Zero-DeepSub) were proposed for rapid and high fidelity T1 and T2 mapping and time-resolved imaging using 3D-QALAS. Using an ISMRM/NIST system phantom, the accuracy and reproducibility of the T1 and T2 maps estimated using the proposed methods were evaluated by comparing them with reference techniques. The reconstruction performance of the proposed subspace QALAS using Zero-DeepSub was evaluated in vivo and compared with conventional QALAS at high reduction factors of up to nine-fold. RESULTS Phantom experiments showed that subspace QALAS had good linearity with respect to the reference methods while reducing biases and improving precision compared to conventional QALAS, especially for T2 maps. Moreover, in vivo results demonstrated that subspace QALAS had better g-factor maps and could reduce voxel blurring, noise, and artifacts compared to conventional QALAS and showed robust performance at up to nine-fold acceleration with Zero-DeepSub, which enabled whole-brain T1, T2, and PD mapping at 1 mm isotropic resolution within 2 min of scan time. CONCLUSION The proposed subspace QALAS along with Zero-DeepSub enabled high fidelity and rapid whole-brain multiparametric quantification and time-resolved imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohan Jun
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yamin Arefeen
- Chandra Family Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jaejin Cho
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Shohei Fujita
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Xiaoqing Wang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - P. Ellen Grant
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Borjan Gagoski
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Camilo Jaimes
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michael S. Gee
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Berkin Bilgic
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard/MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boudreau M, Karakuzu A, Cohen-Adad J, Bozkurt E, Carr M, Castellaro M, Concha L, Doneva M, Dual SA, Ensworth A, Foias A, Fortier V, Gabr RE, Gilbert G, Glide-Hurst CK, Grech-Sollars M, Hu S, Jalnefjord O, Jovicich J, Keskin K, Koken P, Kolokotronis A, Kukran S, Lee NG, Levesque IR, Li B, Ma D, Mädler B, Maforo NG, Near J, Pasaye E, Ramirez-Manzanares A, Statton B, Stehning C, Tambalo S, Tian Y, Wang C, Weiss K, Zakariaei N, Zhang S, Zhao Z, Stikov N. Repeat it without me: Crowdsourcing the T 1 mapping common ground via the ISMRM reproducibility challenge. Magn Reson Med 2024. [PMID: 38730562 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE T1 mapping is a widely used quantitative MRI technique, but its tissue-specific values remain inconsistent across protocols, sites, and vendors. The ISMRM Reproducible Research and Quantitative MR study groups jointly launched a challenge to assess the reproducibility of a well-established inversion-recovery T1 mapping technique, using acquisition details from a seminal T1 mapping paper on a standardized phantom and in human brains. METHODS The challenge used the acquisition protocol from Barral et al. (2010). Researchers collected T1 mapping data on the ISMRM/NIST phantom and/or in human brains. Data submission, pipeline development, and analysis were conducted using open-source platforms. Intersubmission and intrasubmission comparisons were performed. RESULTS Eighteen submissions (39 phantom and 56 human datasets) on scanners by three MRI vendors were collected at 3 T (except one, at 0.35 T). The mean coefficient of variation was 6.1% for intersubmission phantom measurements, and 2.9% for intrasubmission measurements. For humans, the intersubmission/intrasubmission coefficient of variation was 5.9/3.2% in the genu and 16/6.9% in the cortex. An interactive dashboard for data visualization was also developed: https://rrsg2020.dashboards.neurolibre.org. CONCLUSION The T1 intersubmission variability was twice as high as the intrasubmission variability in both phantoms and human brains, indicating that the acquisition details in the original paper were insufficient to reproduce a quantitative MRI protocol. This study reports the inherent uncertainty in T1 measures across independent research groups, bringing us one step closer to a practical clinical baseline of T1 variations in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Boudreau
- NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Agah Karakuzu
- NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Unité de Neuroimagerie Fonctionnelle, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Mila-Quebec AI Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ecem Bozkurt
- Magnetic Resonance Engineering Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Madeline Carr
- Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centers, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Marco Castellaro
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Luis Concha
- Institute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, Mexico
| | | | - Seraina A Dual
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alex Ensworth
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexandru Foias
- NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Véronique Fortier
- Department of Medical Imaging, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Refaat E Gabr
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Carri K Glide-Hurst
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Matthew Grech-Sollars
- Center for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Siyuan Hu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Oscar Jalnefjord
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jorge Jovicich
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Kübra Keskin
- Magnetic Resonance Engineering Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Anastasia Kolokotronis
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Simran Kukran
- Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nam G Lee
- Magnetic Resonance Engineering Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ives R Levesque
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Bochao Li
- Magnetic Resonance Engineering Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dan Ma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Nyasha G Maforo
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Physics and Biology in Medicine IDP, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jamie Near
- Douglas Brain Imaging Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erick Pasaye
- Institute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, Mexico
| | | | - Ben Statton
- Medical Research Council, London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Stefano Tambalo
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Ye Tian
- Magnetic Resonance Engineering Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chenyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology-CNS Service, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kilian Weiss
- Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niloufar Zakariaei
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Shuo Zhang
- Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ziwei Zhao
- Magnetic Resonance Engineering Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nikola Stikov
- NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Center for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Schelt AS, Wassenaar NPM, Runge JH, Nelissen JL, van Laarhoven HWM, Stoker J, Nederveen AJ, Schrauben EM. Free-breathing motion corrected magnetic resonance elastography of the abdomen. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024; 14:3447-3460. [PMID: 38720850 PMCID: PMC11074737 DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Background Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a non-invasive method to measure the viscoelastic properties of tissue and has been applied in multiple abdominal organs. However, abdominal MRE suffers from detrimental breathing motion causing misalignment of structures between repeated acquisitions for different MRE dimensions (e.g., motion encoding directions and wave phase offsets). This study investigated motion correction strategies to resolve all breathing motion on sagittal free-breathing MRE acquisitions in a phantom, in healthy volunteers and showed feasibility in patients. Methods First, in silico experiments were performed on a static phantom dataset with simulated motion. Second, eight healthy volunteers underwent two sagittal MRE acquisitions in the pancreas and right kidney. The multi-frequency free-breathing spin-echo echo-planar-imaging (SE-EPI) MRE consisted of four frequencies (30, 40, 50, 60 Hz), eight wave-phase offsets, with 3 mm3 isotropic voxel size. Following data re-sorting in different number of motion states (4 till 12) based on respiratory waveform signal, three intensity-based registration methods (monomodal, multimodal, and phase correlation) and non-rigid local registration were compared. A ranking method was used to determine the best registration method, based on seven signal-to-noise and image quality measures. Repeatability was assessed for no motion correction (Original) and the best performing method (Best) using Bland-Altman analysis. Lastly, the best motion correction method was compared to no motion correction on patient MRE data [pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, n=5) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (n=1)]. Results In silico experiments showed a deviation of shear wave speed (SWS) with simulated motion to the ground truth, which was (partially) resolved using motion correction. In healthy volunteers ranking resulted in the best motion correction method of monomodal registration using nine motion states, while no motion correction was ranked last. Limits of agreement were (-0.18, 0.14), and (-0.25, 0.18) m/s for Best and Original, respectively. Using motion correction in patients resulted in a significant increase in SWS in the pancreas (Original: 1.39±0.10 and Best: 1.50±0.17 m/s). After motion correction PDAC had a mean SWS of 1.56±0.27 m/s (Original: 1.42±0.25 m/s). The fibrotic liver mean SWS was 2.07±0.20 m/s (Original: 2.12±0.18 m/s). Conclusions Motion correction in sagittal free-breathing abdominal MRE results in improved data quality, inversion precision, repeatability, and is feasible in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Sophie van Schelt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke Petronella Maria Wassenaar
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen Henk Runge
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jules Laurent Nelissen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Wilma Marlies van Laarhoven
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aart Johannes Nederveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Mathew Schrauben
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giacometti V, Grey AC, McCann AJ, Prise KM, Hounsell AR, McGarry CK, Turner PG, O’Sullivan JM. An objective measure of response on whole-body MRI in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy, external beam radiotherapy, and radium-223. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:794-802. [PMID: 38268482 PMCID: PMC11027342 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to generate an objective method to describe MRI data to assess response in the vertebrae of patients with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), treated with external beam radiation therapy and systemic therapy with Radium-223 and to correlate changes with clinical outcomes. METHODS Three sets of whole-body MRI (WBMRI) images were utilized from 25 patients from the neo-adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy pelvic Radiotherapy and RADium-223 (ADRRAD) clinical trial: MRI1 (up to 28 days before Radium-223), MRI2, and MRI3 (2 and 6 months post completion of Radium-223). Radiological response was assessed based on post baseline MRI images. Vertebrae were semi-automatically contoured in the sagittal T1-weighted (T1w) acquisitions, MRI intensity was measured, and spinal cord was used to normalize the measurements. The relationship between MRI intensity vs time to biochemical progression and radiology response was investigated. Survival curves were generated and splitting measures for survival and biochemical progression investigated. RESULTS Using a splitting measure of 1.8, MRI1 was found to be a reliable quantitative indicator correlating with overall survival (P = 0.023) and biochemical progression (P = 0.014). MRI (3-1) and MRI (3-2) were found to be significant indicators for patients characterized by progressive/non-progressive disease (P = 0.021, P = 0.004) and biochemical progression within/after 12 months (P = 0.007, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We have identified a potentially useful objective measure of response on WBMRI of vertebrae containing bone metastases in mHSPC which correlates with survival/progression (prognostic) and radiology response (predictive). ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Measurements of T1w WBMRI normalized intensity may allow identifying potentially useful response biomarkers correlating with survival, radiological response and biochemical progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Giacometti
- Advanced Radiotherapy Group, Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Belfast, BT97 1NN, United Kingdom
| | - Arthur C Grey
- Department of Imaging Services, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron J McCann
- Department of Radiological Imaging & Protection Service, Regional Medical Physics Service, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin M Prise
- Advanced Radiotherapy Group, Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Belfast, BT97 1NN, United Kingdom
| | - Alan R Hounsell
- Advanced Radiotherapy Group, Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Belfast, BT97 1NN, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
| | - Conor K McGarry
- Advanced Radiotherapy Group, Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Belfast, BT97 1NN, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
| | - Philip G Turner
- St Luke’s Cancer Centre, The Royal Hospital, Egerton Rd, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom
| | - Joe M O’Sullivan
- Advanced Radiotherapy Group, Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Belfast, BT97 1NN, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li Z, Wang X, Zhang H, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Zhuang Y, Yang Q, Gao E, Ren Y, Zhang Y, Cai S, Chen Z, Cai C, Dong Y, Bao J, Cheng J. Positive Progesterone Receptor Expression in Meningioma May Increase the Transverse Relaxation: First Prospective Clinical Trial Using Single-Shot Ultrafast T 2 Mapping. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:187-198. [PMID: 37316368 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES This project aims to investigate the diagnostic performance of multiple overlapping-echo detachment imaging (MOLED) technique-derived transverse relaxation time (T2) maps in predicting progesterone receptor (PR) and S100 expression in meningiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS 63 meningioma patients were enrolled from October 2021 to August 2022, who underwent a complete routine magnetic resonance imaging and T2 MOLED, which can characterize the whole brain transverse relaxation time within 32 seconds in a single scan. After the surgical resection of meningiomas, the expression levels of PR and S100 were determined by an experienced pathologist using immunohistochemistry techniques. Histogram analysis was performed in tumor parenchyma based on the parametric maps. Independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test were applied for the comparison of histogram parameters between different groups, with a significance level of P < .05. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with 95% confidence interval were conducted for the diagnostic efficiency evaluation. RESULTS PR-positive group had significantly elevated T2 histogram parameters (P = .001-.049) compared to the PR-negative group. The multivariate logistic regression model with T2 showed the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting PR expression (AUC=0.818). Additionally, the multivariate model also had the best diagnostic performance for predicting meningioma S100 expression (AUC=0.768). CONCLUSION The MOLED technique-derived T2 maps can distinguish PR and S100 status in meningiomas preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongye Li
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Hongyan Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China (H.Z.)
| | - Yijie Yang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Yuchuan Zhuang
- Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Y.Z.)
| | - Qinqin Yang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Eryuan Gao
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Yanan Ren
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Yong Zhang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Shuhui Cai
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Zhong Chen
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Congbo Cai
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China (Y.Y., Q.Y., S.C., Z.C., C.C.)
| | - Yanbo Dong
- Institute of Psychology, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, Saint Petersburg, Russia (Y.D.)
| | - Jianfeng Bao
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.)
| | - Jingliang Cheng
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe Dong Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China (Z.L., X.W., Y.Z., E.G., Y.R., Y.Z., J.B., J.C.).
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rahmani F, Brier MR, Gordon BA, McKay N, Flores S, Keefe S, Hornbeck R, Ances B, Joseph‐Mathurin N, Xiong C, Wang G, Raji CA, Libre‐Guerra JJ, Perrin RJ, McDade E, Daniels A, Karch C, Day GS, Brickman AM, Fulham M, Jack CR, la La Fougère C, Reischl G, Schofield PR, Oh H, Levin J, Vöglein J, Cash DM, Yakushev I, Ikeuchi T, Klunk WE, Morris JC, Bateman RJ, Benzinger TLS. T1 and FLAIR signal intensities are related to tau pathology in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease. Hum Brain Mapp 2023; 44:6375-6387. [PMID: 37867465 PMCID: PMC10681640 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Carriers of mutations responsible for dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease provide a unique opportunity to study potential imaging biomarkers. Biomarkers based on routinely acquired clinical MR images, could supplement the extant invasive or logistically challenging) biomarker studies. We used 1104 longitudinal MR, 324 amyloid beta, and 87 tau positron emission tomography imaging sessions from 525 participants enrolled in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Observational Study to extract novel imaging metrics representing the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of standardized image intensities of T1-weighted and Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR scans. There was an exponential decrease in FLAIR-μ in mutation carriers and an increase in FLAIR and T1 signal heterogeneity (T1-σ and FLAIR-σ) as participants approached the symptom onset in both supramarginal, the right postcentral and right superior temporal gyri as well as both caudate nuclei, putamina, thalami, and amygdalae. After controlling for the effect of regional atrophy, FLAIR-μ decreased and T1-σ and FLAIR-σ increased with increasing amyloid beta and tau deposition in numerous cortical regions. In symptomatic mutation carriers and independent of the effect of regional atrophy, tau pathology demonstrated a stronger relationship with image intensity metrics, compared with amyloid pathology. We propose novel MR imaging intensity-based metrics using standard clinical T1 and FLAIR images which strongly associates with the progression of pathology in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease. We suggest that tau pathology may be a key driver of the observed changes in this cohort of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Brian A. Gordon
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Nicole McKay
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Shaney Flores
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Sarah Keefe
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Russ Hornbeck
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Beau Ances
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | | | - Chengjie Xiong
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Guoqiao Wang
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Cyrus A. Raji
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | | | | | - Eric McDade
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Alisha Daniels
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Celeste Karch
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Gregory S. Day
- Mayo Clinic, Department of NeurologyJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Adam M. Brickman
- Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease & the Aging Brain, and Department of Neurology College of Physicians and SurgeonsColumbia UniversityNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | | | - Christian la La Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular ImagingUniversity Hospital TuebingenTübingenGermany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) TuebingenTübingenGermany
- Department of Preclinical Imaging and RadiopharmacyEberhard Karls University TübingenTübingenGermany
| | - Gerald Reischl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular ImagingUniversity Hospital TuebingenTübingenGermany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) TuebingenTübingenGermany
- Department of Preclinical Imaging and RadiopharmacyEberhard Karls University TübingenTübingenGermany
| | - Peter R. Schofield
- Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Hwamee Oh
- Brown UniversityProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of NeurologyLudwig‐Maximilians‐Universität MünchenMunichGermany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site MunichMunichGermany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)MunichGermany
| | - Jonathan Vöglein
- Department of NeurologyLudwig‐Maximilians‐Universität MünchenMunichGermany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site MunichMunichGermany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)MunichGermany
| | - David M. Cash
- UK Dementia Research Institute at University College LondonLondonUK
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyLondonUK
| | - Igor Yakushev
- Department of NeurologyLudwig‐Maximilians‐Universität MünchenMunichGermany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site MunichMunichGermany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)MunichGermany
| | | | | | - John C. Morris
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Venerito V, Del Vescovo S, Lopalco G, Proft F. Beyond the horizon: Innovations and future directions in axial-spondyloarthritis. Arch Rheumatol 2023; 38:491-511. [PMID: 38125058 PMCID: PMC10728740 DOI: 10.46497/archrheumatol.2023.10580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the spine and sacroiliac joints. This review discusses recent advances across multiple scientific fields that promise to transform axSpA management. Traditionally, axSpA was considered an immune-mediated disease driven by human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27), interleukin (IL)-23/IL-17 signaling, biomechanics, and dysbiosis. Diagnosis relies on clinical features, laboratory tests, and imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) nowadays. Management includes exercise, lifestyle changes, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and if this is not sufficient to achieve disease control also biological and targeted-synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Beyond long-recognized genetic risks like HLA-B27, high-throughput sequencing has revealed intricate gene-environment interactions influencing dysbiosis, immune dysfunction, and aberrant bone remodeling. Elucidating these mechanisms promises screening approaches to enable early intervention. Advanced imaging is revolutionizing the assessment of axSpA's hallmark: sacroiliac bone-marrow edema indicating inflammation. Novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques sensitively quantify disease activity, while machine learning automates complex analysis to improve diagnostic accuracy and monitoring. Hybrid imaging like synthetic MRI/computed tomography (CT) visualizes structural damage with new clarity. Meanwhile, microbiome analysis has uncovered gut ecosystem alterations that may initiate joint inflammation through HLA-B27 misfolding or immune subversion. Correcting dysbiosis represents an enticing treatment target. Moving forward, emerging techniques must augment patient care. Incorporating patient perspectives will be key to ensure innovations like genetics, microbiome, and imaging biomarkers translate into improved mobility, reduced pain, and increased quality of life. By integrating cutting-edge, multidisciplinary science with patients' lived experience, researchers can unlock the full potential of new technologies to deliver transformative outcomes. The future is bright for precision diagnosis, tightly controlled treatment, and even prevention of axSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Venerito
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Polyclinic Hospital, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Sergio Del Vescovo
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Polyclinic Hospital, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lopalco
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Polyclinic Hospital, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Fabian Proft
- Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology (including Nutrition Medicine), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Akin O, Lema-Dopico A, Paudyal R, Konar AS, Chenevert TL, Malyarenko D, Hadjiiski L, Al-Ahmadie H, Goh AC, Bochner B, Rosenberg J, Schwartz LH, Shukla-Dave A. Multiparametric MRI in Era of Artificial Intelligence for Bladder Cancer Therapies. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5468. [PMID: 38001728 PMCID: PMC10670574 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
This review focuses on the principles, applications, and performance of mpMRI for bladder imaging. Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) derived from mpMRI are increasingly used in oncological applications, including tumor staging, prognosis, and assessment of treatment response. To standardize mpMRI acquisition and interpretation, an expert panel developed the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS). Many studies confirm the standardization and high degree of inter-reader agreement to discriminate muscle invasiveness in bladder cancer, supporting VI-RADS implementation in routine clinical practice. The standard MRI sequences for VI-RADS scoring are anatomical imaging, including T2w images, and physiological imaging with diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Physiological QIBs derived from analysis of DW- and DCE-MRI data and radiomic image features extracted from mpMRI images play an important role in bladder cancer. The current development of AI tools for analyzing mpMRI data and their potential impact on bladder imaging are surveyed. AI architectures are often implemented based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), focusing on narrow/specific tasks. The application of AI can substantially impact bladder imaging clinical workflows; for example, manual tumor segmentation, which demands high time commitment and has inter-reader variability, can be replaced by an autosegmentation tool. The use of mpMRI and AI is projected to drive the field toward the personalized management of bladder cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oguz Akin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alfonso Lema-Dopico
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | - Dariya Malyarenko
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Lubomir Hadjiiski
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alvin C. Goh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Bernard Bochner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jonathan Rosenberg
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Lawrence H. Schwartz
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
LoCastro E, Paudyal R, Konar AS, LaViolette PS, Akin O, Hatzoglou V, Goh AC, Bochner BH, Rosenberg J, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Schwartz LH, Shukla-Dave A. A Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Analysis Platform for Estimation of Robust Imaging Biomarkers in Clinical Oncology. Tomography 2023; 9:2052-2066. [PMID: 37987347 PMCID: PMC10661267 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9060161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a need to develop user-friendly imaging tools estimating robust quantitative biomarkers (QIBs) from multiparametric (mp)MRI for clinical applications in oncology. Quantitative metrics derived from (mp)MRI can monitor and predict early responses to treatment, often prior to anatomical changes. We have developed a vendor-agnostic, flexible, and user-friendly MATLAB-based toolkit, MRI-Quantitative Analysis and Multiparametric Evaluation Routines ("MRI-QAMPER", current release v3.0), for the estimation of quantitative metrics from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and multi-b value diffusion-weighted (DW) MR and MR relaxometry. MRI-QAMPER's functionality includes generating numerical parametric maps from these methods reflecting tumor permeability, cellularity, and tissue morphology. MRI-QAMPER routines were validated using digital reference objects (DROs) for DCE and DW MRI, serving as initial approval stages in the National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network (NCI/QIN) software benchmark. MRI-QAMPER has participated in DCE and DW MRI Collaborative Challenge Projects (CCPs), which are key technical stages in the NCI/QIN benchmark. In a DCE CCP, QAMPER presented the best repeatability coefficient (RC = 0.56) across test-retest brain metastasis data, out of ten participating DCE software packages. In a DW CCP, QAMPER ranked among the top five (out of fourteen) tools with the highest area under the curve (AUC) for prostate cancer detection. This platform can seamlessly process mpMRI data from brain, head and neck, thyroid, prostate, pancreas, and bladder cancer. MRI-QAMPER prospectively analyzes dose de-escalation trial data for oropharyngeal cancer, which has earned it advanced NCI/QIN approval for expanded usage and applications in wider clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve LoCastro
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Amaresha Shridhar Konar
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
| | - Peter S. LaViolette
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA;
| | - Oguz Akin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Vaios Hatzoglou
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Alvin C. Goh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Bernard H. Bochner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Jonathan Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Richard J. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.G.); (B.H.B.); (R.J.W.)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Lawrence H. Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (E.L.); (R.P.); (A.S.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (O.A.); (V.H.); (L.H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jun Y, Cho J, Wang X, Gee M, Grant PE, Bilgic B, Gagoski B. SSL-QALAS: Self-Supervised Learning for rapid multiparameter estimation in quantitative MRI using 3D-QALAS. Magn Reson Med 2023; 90:2019-2032. [PMID: 37415389 PMCID: PMC10527557 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and evaluate a method for rapid estimation of multiparametric T1 , T2 , proton density, and inversion efficiency maps from 3D-quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with T2 preparation pulse (3D-QALAS) measurements using self-supervised learning (SSL) without the need for an external dictionary. METHODS An SSL-based QALAS mapping method (SSL-QALAS) was developed for rapid and dictionary-free estimation of multiparametric maps from 3D-QALAS measurements. The accuracy of the reconstructed quantitative maps using dictionary matching and SSL-QALAS was evaluated by comparing the estimated T1 and T2 values with those obtained from the reference methods on an International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology phantom. The SSL-QALAS and the dictionary-matching methods were also compared in vivo, and generalizability was evaluated by comparing the scan-specific, pre-trained, and transfer learning models. RESULTS Phantom experiments showed that both the dictionary-matching and SSL-QALAS methods produced T1 and T2 estimates that had a strong linear agreement with the reference values in the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology phantom. Further, SSL-QALAS showed similar performance with dictionary matching in reconstructing the T1 , T2 , proton density, and inversion efficiency maps on in vivo data. Rapid reconstruction of multiparametric maps was enabled by inferring the data using a pre-trained SSL-QALAS model within 10 s. Fast scan-specific tuning was also demonstrated by fine-tuning the pre-trained model with the target subject's data within 15 min. CONCLUSION The proposed SSL-QALAS method enabled rapid reconstruction of multiparametric maps from 3D-QALAS measurements without an external dictionary or labeled ground-truth training data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohan Jun
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jaejin Cho
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Xiaoqing Wang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michael Gee
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - P. Ellen Grant
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Berkin Bilgic
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard/MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Borjan Gagoski
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging & Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Hooge M, Diekhoff T, Poddubnyy D. Magnetic resonance imaging in spondyloarthritis: Friend or Foe? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101874. [PMID: 37953121 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a valuable tool for early detection and of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). A standardized imaging acquisition protocol, aligned with the current state-of-the-art, is crucial to obtain MRI scans that meet the diagnostic quality requirements. It is important to note that certain lesions, particularly bone marrow edema (BME), can be induced by mechanical stress or be a manifestation of another non-inflammatory disorder and may mimic the characteristic findings of axSpA on MRI. Therefore, a thorough assessment of MRI lesions, considering their localization and presence of highly specific features such as erosions and backfill, becomes imperative. Additionally, the application of additional imaging modalities, when necessary, can contribute to the differentiation of axSpA from other conditions that may exhibit similar MRI findings. This review provides recommendations on how to perform MRI in daily clinical practice and how to interpret finding from the differential diagnostic point of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manouk de Hooge
- Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Torsten Diekhoff
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Denis Poddubnyy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology (including Nutrition Medicine), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jansen JFA, Paudyal R, Mazaheri Y, Shukla-Dave A. Editorial: Bridging quantitative imaging and artificial intelligence methods in preclinical and clinical oncology. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1272030. [PMID: 37727204 PMCID: PMC10505749 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1272030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jacobus FA. Jansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Yousef Mazaheri
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang Z, Li S, Wang W, Zhang Y, Wang K, Cheng J, Wen B. Synthetic MRI for the quantitative and morphologic assessment of head and neck tumors: a preliminary study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2023; 52:20230103. [PMID: 37427697 PMCID: PMC10461255 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20230103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of synthetic MRI for quantitative and morphologic assessment of head and neck tumors and compare the results with the conventional MRI approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 92 patients with different head and neck tumor histology who underwent conventional and synthetic MRI were retrospectively recruited. The quantitative T1, T2, proton density (PD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of 38 benign and 54 malignant tumors were measured and compared. Diagnostic efficacy for differentiating malignant and benign tumors was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and integrated discrimination index. The image quality of conventional and synthetic T1W/T2W images on a 5-level Likert scale was also compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS T1, T2 and ADC values of malignant head and neck tumors were smaller than those of benign tumors (all p < 0.05). T2 and ADC values showed better diagnostic efficacy than T1 for distinguishing malignant tumors from benign tumors (both p < 0.05). Adding the T2 value to ADC increased the area under the curve from 0.839 to 0.886, with an integrated discrimination index of 4.28% (p < 0.05). In terms of overall image quality, synthetic T2W images were comparable to conventional T2W images, while synthetic T1W images were inferior to conventional T1W images. CONCLUSIONS Synthetic MRI can facilitate the characterization of head and neck tumors by providing quantitative relaxation parameters and synthetic T2W images. T2 values added to ADC values may further improve the differentiation of tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zanxia Zhang
- Department of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shujian Li
- Department of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Weijian Wang
- Department of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yong Zhang
- Department of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Kaiyu Wang
- MR Research China, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
| | - Jingliang Cheng
- Department of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Baohong Wen
- Department of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vanherp L, Poelmans J, Govaerts K, Hillen A, Lagrou K, Vande Velde G, Himmelreich U. In vivo assessment of differences in fungal cell density in cerebral cryptococcomas of mice infected with Cryptococcus neoformans or Cryptococcus gattii. Microbes Infect 2023; 25:105127. [PMID: 36940783 DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2023.105127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023]
Abstract
In cerebral cryptococcomas caused by Cryptococcus neoformans or Cryptococcus gattii, the density of fungal cells within lesions can contribute to the overall brain fungal burden. In cultures, cell density is inversely related to the size of the cryptococcal capsule, a dynamic polysaccharide layer surrounding the cell. Methods to investigate cell density or related capsule size within fungal lesions of a living host are currently unavailable, precluding in vivo studies on longitudinal changes. Here, we assessed whether intravital microscopy and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging techniques (diffusion MRI and MR relaxometry) would enable non-invasive investigation of fungal cell density in cerebral cryptococcomas in mice. We compared lesions caused by type strains C. neoformans H99 and C. gattii R265 and evaluated potential relations between observed imaging properties, fungal cell density, total cell and capsule size. The observed inverse correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and cell density permitted longitudinal investigation of cell density changes. Using these imaging methods, we were able to study the multicellular organization and cell density within brain cryptococcomas in the intact host environment of living mice. Since the MRI techniques are also clinically available, the same approach could be used to assess fungal cell density in brain lesions of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Vanherp
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jennifer Poelmans
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristof Govaerts
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Amy Hillen
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katrien Lagrou
- Laboratory of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; National Reference Centre for Mycosis, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Greetje Vande Velde
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Uwe Himmelreich
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jordanova KV, Martin MN, Ogier SE, Poorman ME, Keenan KE. In vivo quantitative MRI: T 1 and T 2 measurements of the human brain at 0.064 T. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023:10.1007/s10334-023-01095-x. [PMID: 37208553 PMCID: PMC10386946 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01095-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To measure healthy brain [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] relaxation times at 0.064 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] relaxation times were measured in vivo for 10 healthy volunteers using a 0.064 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system and for 10 test samples on both the MRI and a separate 0.064 T nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) system. In vivo [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] values are reported for white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for automatic segmentation regions and manual regions of interest (ROIs). RESULTS [Formula: see text] sample measurements on the MRI system were within 10% of the NMR measurement for 9 samples, and one sample was within 11%. Eight [Formula: see text] sample MRI measurements were within 25% of the NMR measurement, and the two longest [Formula: see text] samples had more than 25% variation. Automatic segmentations generally resulted in larger [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] estimates than manual ROIs. DISCUSSION [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] times for brain tissue were measured at 0.064 T. Test samples demonstrated accuracy in WM and GM ranges of values but underestimated long [Formula: see text] in the CSF range. This work contributes to measuring quantitative MRI properties of the human body at a range of field strengths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalina V Jordanova
- Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, Boulder, CO, USA.
| | - Michele N Martin
- Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Stephen E Ogier
- Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, Boulder, CO, USA
- Department of Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | | | - Kathryn E Keenan
- Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, Boulder, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thorley N, Jones A, Ciurtin C, Castelino M, Bainbridge A, Abbasi M, Taylor S, Zhang H, Hall-Craggs MA, Bray TJP. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) in axial spondyloarthritis. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220675. [PMID: 36607267 PMCID: PMC10078871 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging, and particularly MRI, plays a crucial role in the assessment of inflammation in rheumatic disease, and forms a core component of the diagnostic pathway in axial spondyloarthritis. However, conventional imaging techniques are limited by image contrast being non-specific to inflammation and a reliance on subjective, qualitative reader interpretation. Quantitative MRI methods offer scope to address these limitations and improve our ability to accurately and precisely detect and characterise inflammation, potentially facilitating a more personalised approach to management. Here, we review quantitative MRI methods and emerging quantitative imaging biomarkers for imaging inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis. We discuss the potential benefits as well as the practical considerations that must be addressed in the movement toward clinical translation of quantitative imaging biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Thorley
- Imaging Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexis Jones
- Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Coziana Ciurtin
- Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Madhura Castelino
- Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Bainbridge
- Department of Medical Physics, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maaz Abbasi
- Imaging Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging (CMI), University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Computer Science and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Timothy J P Bray
- Centre for Medical Imaging (CMI), University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Malyarenko D, Amouzandeh G, Pickup S, Zhou R, Manning HC, Gammon ST, Shoghi KI, Quirk JD, Sriram R, Larson P, Lewis MT, Pautler RG, Kinahan PE, Muzi M, Chenevert TL. Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Repeatability and Reproducibility for Preclinical MRIs Using Standardized Procedures and a Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Phantom. Tomography 2023; 9:375-386. [PMID: 36828382 PMCID: PMC9964373 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9010030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Relevant to co-clinical trials, the goal of this work was to assess repeatability, reproducibility, and bias of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for preclinical MRIs using standardized procedures for comparison to performance of clinical MRIs. A temperature-controlled phantom provided an absolute reference standard to measure spatial uniformity of these performance metrics. Seven institutions participated in the study, wherein diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data were acquired over multiple days on 10 preclinical scanners, from 3 vendors, at 6 field strengths. Centralized versus site-based analysis was compared to illustrate incremental variance due to processing workflow. At magnet isocenter, short-term (intra-exam) and long-term (multiday) repeatability were excellent at within-system coefficient of variance, wCV [±CI] = 0.73% [0.54%, 1.12%] and 1.26% [0.94%, 1.89%], respectively. The cross-system reproducibility coefficient, RDC [±CI] = 0.188 [0.129, 0.343] µm2/ms, corresponded to 17% [12%, 31%] relative to the reference standard. Absolute bias at isocenter was low (within 4%) for 8 of 10 systems, whereas two high-bias (>10%) scanners were primary contributors to the relatively high RDC. Significant additional variance (>2%) due to site-specific analysis was observed for 2 of 10 systems. Base-level technical bias, repeatability, reproducibility, and spatial uniformity patterns were consistent with human MRIs (scaled for bore size). Well-calibrated preclinical MRI systems are capable of highly repeatable and reproducible ADC measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dariya Malyarenko
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Ghoncheh Amouzandeh
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Neuro42, Inc., San Francisco, CA 94105, USA
| | - Stephen Pickup
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rong Zhou
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Henry Charles Manning
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Seth T. Gammon
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kooresh I. Shoghi
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - James D. Quirk
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Renuka Sriram
- UCSF Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Peder Larson
- UCSF Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | | | | | - Paul E. Kinahan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Mark Muzi
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Borreguero J, Galve F, Algarín JM, Benlloch JM, Alonso J. Low field slice-selective ZTE imaging of ultra-short [Formula: see text] tissues based on spin-locking. Sci Rep 2023; 13:1662. [PMID: 36717649 PMCID: PMC9886919 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28640-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of hard biological tissues is very challenging due to small proton abundance and ultra-short [Formula: see text] decay times, especially at low magnetic fields, where sample magnetization is weak. While several pulse sequences, such as Ultra-short Echo Time (UTE), Zero Echo Time (ZTE) and SWeep Imaging with Fourier Transformation (SWIFT), have been developed to cope with ultra-short lived MR signals, only the latter two hold promise of imaging tissues with sub-millisecond [Formula: see text] times at low fields. All these sequences are intrinsically volumetric, thus 3D, because standard slice selection using a long soft radio-frequency pulse is incompatible with ultra-short lived signals. The exception is UTE, where double half pulses can perform slice selection, although at the cost of doubling the acquisition time. Here we demonstrate that spin-locking is a versatile and robust method for slice selection for ultra-short lived signals, and present three ways of combining this pulse sequence with ZTE imaging of the selected slice. With these tools, we demonstrate slice-selected 2D ex vivo imaging of the hardest tissues in the body at low field (260 mT) within clinically acceptable times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fernando Galve
- Institute for Molecular Imaging and Instrumentation, Spanish National Research Council, 46022 Valencia, Spain
- Institute for Molecular Imaging and Instrumentation, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - José M. Algarín
- Institute for Molecular Imaging and Instrumentation, Spanish National Research Council, 46022 Valencia, Spain
- Institute for Molecular Imaging and Instrumentation, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - José M. Benlloch
- Institute for Molecular Imaging and Instrumentation, Spanish National Research Council, 46022 Valencia, Spain
- Institute for Molecular Imaging and Instrumentation, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| | - Joseba Alonso
- Institute for Molecular Imaging and Instrumentation, Spanish National Research Council, 46022 Valencia, Spain
- Institute for Molecular Imaging and Instrumentation, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Goodburn RJ, Philippens MEP, Lefebvre TL, Khalifa A, Bruijnen T, Freedman JN, Waddington DEJ, Younus E, Aliotta E, Meliadò G, Stanescu T, Bano W, Fatemi‐Ardekani A, Wetscherek A, Oelfke U, van den Berg N, Mason RP, van Houdt PJ, Balter JM, Gurney‐Champion OJ. The future of MRI in radiation therapy: Challenges and opportunities for the MR community. Magn Reson Med 2022; 88:2592-2608. [PMID: 36128894 PMCID: PMC9529952 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a major component of cancer treatment pathways worldwide. The main aim of this treatment is to achieve tumor control through the delivery of ionizing radiation while preserving healthy tissues for minimal radiation toxicity. Because radiation therapy relies on accurate localization of the target and surrounding tissues, imaging plays a crucial role throughout the treatment chain. In the treatment planning phase, radiological images are essential for defining target volumes and organs-at-risk, as well as providing elemental composition (e.g., electron density) information for radiation dose calculations. At treatment, onboard imaging informs patient setup and could be used to guide radiation dose placement for sites affected by motion. Imaging is also an important tool for treatment response assessment and treatment plan adaptation. MRI, with its excellent soft tissue contrast and capacity to probe functional tissue properties, holds great untapped potential for transforming treatment paradigms in radiation therapy. The MR in Radiation Therapy ISMRM Study Group was established to provide a forum within the MR community to discuss the unmet needs and fuel opportunities for further advancement of MRI for radiation therapy applications. During the summer of 2021, the study group organized its first virtual workshop, attended by a diverse international group of clinicians, scientists, and clinical physicists, to explore our predictions for the future of MRI in radiation therapy for the next 25 years. This article reviews the main findings from the event and considers the opportunities and challenges of reaching our vision for the future in this expanding field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie J. Goodburn
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Thierry L. Lefebvre
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Aly Khalifa
- Department of Medical BiophysicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Tom Bruijnen
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
| | | | - David E. J. Waddington
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, ACRF Image X InstituteThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Eyesha Younus
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Eric Aliotta
- Department of Medical PhysicsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Gabriele Meliadò
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Fisica SanitariaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Teo Stanescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Wajiha Bano
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Ali Fatemi‐Ardekani
- Department of PhysicsJackson State University (JSU)JacksonMississippiUSA
- SpinTecxJacksonMississippiUSA
- Department of Radiation OncologyCommunity Health Systems (CHS) Cancer NetworkJacksonMississippiUSA
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Nico van den Berg
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
| | - Ralph P. Mason
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Petra J. van Houdt
- Department of Radiation OncologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - James M. Balter
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Oliver J. Gurney‐Champion
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
MRI data quality assessment for the RIN - Neuroimaging Network using the ACR phantoms. Phys Med 2022; 104:93-100. [PMID: 36379160 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Generating big-data is becoming imperative with the advent of machine learning. RIN-Neuroimaging Network addresses this need by developing harmonized protocols for multisite studies to identify quantitative MRI (qMRI) biomarkers for neurological diseases. In this context, image quality control (QC) is essential. Here, we present methods and results of how the RIN performs intra- and inter-site reproducibility of geometrical and image contrast parameters, demonstrating the relevance of such QC practice. METHODS American College of Radiology (ACR) large and small phantoms were selected. Eighteen sites were equipped with a 3T scanner that differed by vendor, hardware/software versions, and receiver coils. The standard ACR protocol was optimized (in-plane voxel, post-processing filters, receiver bandwidth) and repeated monthly. Uniformity, ghosting, geometric accuracy, ellipse's ratio, slice thickness, and high-contrast detectability tests were performed using an automatic QC script. RESULTS Measures were mostly within the ACR tolerance ranges for both T1- and T2-weighted acquisitions, for all scanners, regardless of vendor, coil, and signal transmission chain type. All measurements showed good reproducibility over time. Uniformity and slice thickness failed at some sites. Scanners that upgraded the signal transmission chain showed a decrease in geometric distortion along the slice encoding direction. Inter-vendor differences were observed in uniformity and geometric measurements along the slice encoding direction (i.e. ellipse's ratio). CONCLUSIONS Use of the ACR phantoms highlighted issues that triggered interventions to correct performance at some sites and to improve the longitudinal stability of the scanners. This is relevant for establishing precision levels for future multisite studies of qMRI biomarkers.
Collapse
|
22
|
Huang C, Qian Y, Yu SCH, Hou J, Jiang B, Chan Q, Wong VWS, Chu WCW, Chen W. Uncertainty-aware self-supervised neural network for liver T1ρmapping with relaxation constraint. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 36317270 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9e3e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective.T1ρmapping is a promising quantitative MRI technique for the non-invasive assessment of tissue properties. Learning-based approaches can mapT1ρfrom a reduced number ofT1ρweighted images but requires significant amounts of high-quality training data. Moreover, existing methods do not provide the confidence level of theT1ρestimation. We aim to develop a learning-based liverT1ρmapping approach that can mapT1ρwith a reduced number of images and provide uncertainty estimation.Approach. We proposed a self-supervised neural network that learns aT1ρmapping using the relaxation constraint in the learning process. Epistemic uncertainty and aleatoric uncertainty are modelled for theT1ρquantification network to provide a Bayesian confidence estimation of theT1ρmapping. The uncertainty estimation can also regularize the model to prevent it from learning imperfect data. Main results. We conducted experiments onT1ρdata collected from 52 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The results showed that when only collecting twoT1ρ-weighted images, our method outperformed the existing methods forT1ρquantification of the liver. Our uncertainty estimation can further regularize the model to improve the performance of the model and it is consistent with the confidence level of liverT1ρvalues.Significance. Our method demonstrates the potential for accelerating theT1ρmapping of the liver by using a reduced number of images. It simultaneously provides uncertainty ofT1ρquantification which is desirable in clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoxing Huang
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.,CUHK Lab of AI in Radiology (CLAIR), Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Yurui Qian
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Simon Chun-Ho Yu
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.,CUHK Lab of AI in Radiology (CLAIR), Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Hou
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Baiyan Jiang
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.,Illuminatio Medical Technology Limited, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Queenie Chan
- Philips Healthcare, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Vincent Wai-Sun Wong
- Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.,CUHK Lab of AI in Radiology (CLAIR), Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Weitian Chen
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.,CUHK Lab of AI in Radiology (CLAIR), Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Quantitative Relaxometry Metrics for Brain Metastases Compared to Normal Tissues: A Pilot MR Fingerprinting Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225606. [PMID: 36428699 PMCID: PMC9688653 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the present pilot study was to estimate T1 and T2 metric values derived simultaneously from a new, rapid Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) technique, as well as to assess their ability to characterize-brain metastases (BM) and normal-appearing brain tissues. Fourteen patients with BM underwent MRI, including prototype MRF, on a 3T scanner. In total, 108 measurements were analyzed: 42 from solid parts of BM's (21 each on T1 and T2 maps) and 66 from normal-appearing brain tissue (11 ROIs each on T1 and T2 maps for gray matter [GM], white matter [WM], and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). The BM's mean T1 and T2 values differed significantly from normal-appearing WM (p < 0.05). The mean T1 values from normal-appearing GM, WM, and CSF regions were 1205 ms, 840 ms, and 4233 ms, respectively. The mean T2 values were 108 ms, 78 ms, and 442 ms, respectively. The mean T1 and T2 values for untreated BM (n = 4) were 2035 ms and 168 ms, respectively. For treated BM (n = 17) the T1 and T2 values were 2163 ms and 141 ms, respectively. MRF technique appears to be a promising and rapid quantitative method for the characterization of free water content and tumor morphology in BMs.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hubbard Cristinacce PL, Keaveney S, Aboagye EO, Hall MG, Little RA, O'Connor JPB, Parker GJM, Waterton JC, Winfield JM, Jauregui-Osoro M. Clinical translation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers - An overview and gap analysis of current practice. Phys Med 2022; 101:165-182. [PMID: 36055125 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This overview of the current landscape of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers (qMR IBs) aims to support the standardisation of academic IBs to assist their translation to clinical practice. METHODS We used three complementary approaches to investigate qMR IB use and quality management practices within the UK: 1) a literature search of qMR and quality management terms during 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; 2) a database search for clinical research studies using qMR IBs during 2016-2020; and 3) a survey to ascertain the current availability and quality management practices for clinical MRI scanners and associated equipment at research institutions across the UK. RESULTS The analysis showed increased use of all qMR methods between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020 and diffusion-tensor MRI and volumetry to be popular methods. However, the "translation ratio" of journal articles to clinical research studies was higher for qMR methods that have evidence of clinical translation via a commercial route, such as fat fraction and T2 mapping. The number of journal articles citing quality management terms doubled between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; although, its proportion relative to all journal articles only increased by 3.0%. The survey suggested that quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) of data acquisition procedures are under-reported in the literature and that QA/QC of acquired data/data analysis are under-developed and lack consistency between institutions. CONCLUSIONS We summarise current attempts to standardise and translate qMR IBs, and conclude by outlining the ideal quality management practices and providing a gap analysis between current practice and a metrological standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sam Keaveney
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Eric O Aboagye
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Division of Cancer, Imperial College London, W12 0NN London, UK
| | - Matt G Hall
- National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, UK
| | - Ross A Little
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - James P B O'Connor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Geoff J M Parker
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6LJ, UK; Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester M15 6SZ, UK
| | - John C Waterton
- Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester M15 6SZ, UK; Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Jessica M Winfield
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Maite Jauregui-Osoro
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Division of Cancer, Imperial College London, W12 0NN London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Meloche R, Vučković I, Mishra PK, Macura S. Transverse relaxation in fixed tissue: Influence of temperature and resolution on image contrast in magnetic resonance microscopy. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 35:e4747. [PMID: 35467776 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
To describe transverse relaxation of water in fixed tissue, we propose a model of transverse relaxation accelerated by diffusion and exchange (TRADE) that assumes exchange between free (visible) and bound (invisible) water, which relax by the dipole-dipole interaction, chemical exchange, and translation in the field gradient. Depending on the prevailing mechanism, transverse relaxation time (T2 ) of water in fixed tissue could increase (when dipole-dipole interaction prevails) or decrease with temperature (when diffusion in the field gradient prevails). Chemical exchange can make T2 even temperature independent. Also, variation of resolution from 100 to 15 μm/pxl (or less) affects effective transverse relaxation. T2 steadily decreases with increased resolution ( T 2 ∝ ∆ x 2 , ∆ x is the read direction resolution). TRADE can describe all of these observations (semi)quantitatively. The model has been experimentally verified on water phantoms and on formalin-fixed zebrafish, mouse brain, and rabbit larynx tissues. TRADE could help predict optimal scanning parameters for high-resolution MRM from much faster measurements at lower resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Meloche
- Metabolomics Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ivan Vučković
- Metabolomics Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Slobodan Macura
- Metabolomics Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Salluzzi M, McCreary CR, Gobbi DG, Lauzon ML, Frayne R. Short-term repeatability and long-term reproducibility of quantitative MR imaging biomarkers in a single centre longitudinal study. Neuroimage 2022; 260:119488. [PMID: 35878725 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) can be defined as objective measures that are sensitive and specific to changes in tissue physiology. Provided the acquired QIBs are not affected by scanner changes, they could play an important role in disease diagnosis, prognosis, management, and treatment monitoring. The precision of selected QIBs was assessed from data collected on a 3-T scanner in four healthy participants over a 5-year period. Inevitable scanner changes and acquisition protocol revisions occurred during this time. Standard and custom processing pipelines were used to calculate regional brain volume, cortical thickness, T2, T2*, quantitative susceptibility, cerebral blood flow, axial, radial and mean diffusivity, peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy from the acquired images. Coefficient of variation (CoV) and intra-class correlation (ICC) indices were determined in the short-term (i.e., repeatable over three acquisitions within 4 weeks) and in the long-term (i.e., reproducible over four acquisition sessions in 5 years). Precision indices varied based on acquisition technique, processing pipeline, and anatomical region. Good repeatability (average CoV=2.40% and ICC=0.78) and reproducibility (average CoV=8.86 % and ICC=0.72) were found over all QIBs. The best performance indices were obtained for diffusion derived biomarkers (CoV∼0.96% and ICCs=0.87); conversely, the poorest indices were found for the cerebral blood flow biomarker (CoV>10% and ICC<0.5). These results demonstrate that changes in protocol, along with hardware and software upgrades, did not affect the estimates of the selected biomarkers and their precision. Further characterization of the QIB is necessary to understand meaningful changes in the biomarkers in longitudinal studies of normal brain aging and translation to clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Salluzzi
- Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Calgary Image Processing and Analysis Centre (CIPAC), Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Cheryl R McCreary
- Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - David G Gobbi
- Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Calgary Image Processing and Analysis Centre (CIPAC), Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Michel Louis Lauzon
- Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Richard Frayne
- Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Calgary Image Processing and Analysis Centre (CIPAC), Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Peng Q, Wu C, Kim J, Li X. Efficient phase-cycling strategy for high-resolution 3D gradient-echo quantitative parameter mapping. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 35:e4700. [PMID: 35068007 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Magnetization-prepared (MP) gradient-echo (GRE) sequences suffer from signal contaminations from T1 recovery during the readout train, which can be eliminated by paired RF phase cycling (PC) at the cost of doubling the scan time. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel unpaired PC strategy to eliminate the time penalty for high-resolution quantitative parameter mapping in 3D MP-GRE sequences. Based on the observation that the contaminating T1 recovery signal along the GRE readout train is independent of magnetization preparation, its impact can be eliminated using a novel curve-fitting approach with complex-valued data without needing paired PC acquisitions. Four new unpaired PC schemes were compared with two traditional paired PC schemes in both phantom and in vivo human knee studies at 3 T using a MP angle-modulated partitioned k-space spoiled gradient-echo snapshots (MAPSS) T1ρ mapping sequence. In the phantom study, all methods resulted in consistent T1ρ measurements (∆T1ρ < 0.5%) at the center slice when B0 /B1 values were uniform. Results were not consistent when off-center slices with nonideal B0 /B1 were included. Two unpaired PC schemes had comparable or significantly improved quantitative accuracy and scan-rescan reproducibility compared with the paired PC schemes. There was no significant T1ρ quantitative variability increase or spatial fidelity loss using the new unpaired PC schemes. Unpaired PC schemes also had different T1ρ spectral responses at different B0 frequency offsets, which can potentially be exploited to reduce sensitivity to B0 field inhomogeneities. The human knee study results were consistent with the phantom study findings. In conclusion, an unpaired PC strategy potentially allows more accurate quantitative parameter mapping with halved scan time compared with the paired PC approach to eliminate signal contaminations from T1 recovery. It therefore offers additional flexibility in SNR optimization, spatial resolution improvement, and choice of imaging sampling points to obtain more accurate quantitative parameter mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Peng
- GRUSS Magnetic Resonance Research Center (MRRC), Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Can Wu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeehun Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Xiaojuan Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bnaiahu N, Omer N, Wilczynski E, Levy S, Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Ben-Eliezer N. Correcting for imaging gradients-related bias of T 2 relaxation times at high-resolution MRI. Magn Reson Med 2022; 88:1806-1817. [PMID: 35666831 PMCID: PMC9544944 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose High‐resolution animal imaging is an integral part of preclinical drug development and the investigation of diseases' pathophysiology. Quantitative mapping of T2 relaxation times (qT2) is a valuable tool for both preclinical and research applications, providing high sensitivity to subtle tissue pathologies. High‐resolution T2 mapping, however, suffers from severe underestimation of T2 values due to molecular diffusion. This affects both single‐echo and multi‐echo spin echo (SSE and MESE), on top of the well‐known contamination of MESE signals by stimulated echoes, and especially on high‐field and preclinical scanners in which high imaging gradients are used in comparison to clinical scanners. Methods Diffusion bias due to imaging gradients was analyzed by quantifying the effective b‐value for each coherence pathway in SSE and MESE protocols, and incorporating this information in a joint T2‐diffusion reconstruction algorithm. Validation was done on phantoms and in vivo mouse brain using a 9.4T and a 7T MRI scanner. Results Underestimation of T2 values due to strong imaging gradients can reach up to 70%, depending on scan parameters and on the sample's diffusion coefficient. The algorithm presented here produced T2 values that agreed with reference spectroscopic measurements, were reproducible across scan settings, and reduced the average bias of T2 values from −33.5 ± 20.5% to −0.1 ± 3.6%. Conclusions A new joint T2‐diffusion reconstruction algorithm is able to negate imaging gradient–related underestimation of T2 values, leading to reliable mapping of T2 values at high resolutions. Click here for author‐reader discussions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Bnaiahu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Noam Omer
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ella Wilczynski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shir Levy
- School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Noam Ben-Eliezer
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gouel P, Hapdey S, Dumouchel A, Gardin I, Torfeh E, Hinault P, Vera P, Thureau S, Gensanne D. Synthetic MRI for Radiotherapy Planning for Brain and Prostate Cancers: Phantom Validation and Patient Evaluation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:841761. [PMID: 35515105 PMCID: PMC9065558 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.841761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of T1 and T2 mappings derived from a multispectral pulse sequence (magnetic resonance image compilation, MAGiC®) on 1.5-T MRI and with conventional sequences [gradient echo with variable flip angle (GRE-VFA) and multi-echo spin echo (ME-SE)] compared to the reference values for the purpose of radiotherapy treatment planning. Methods The accuracy of T1 and T2 measurements was evaluated with 2 coils [head and neck unit (HNU) and BODY coils] on phantoms using descriptive statistics and Bland–Altman analysis. The reproducibility and repeatability of T1 and T2 measurements were performed on 15 sessions with the HNU coil. The T1 and T2 synthetic sequences obtained by both methods were evaluated according to quality assurance (QA) requirements for radiotherapy. T1 and T2in vivo measurements of the brain or prostate tissues of two groups of five subjects were also compared. Results The phantom results showed good agreement (mean bias, 8.4%) between the two measurement methods for T1 values between 490 and 2,385 ms and T2 values between 25 and 400 ms. MAGiC® gave discordant results for T1 values below 220 ms (bias with the reference values, from 38% to 1,620%). T2 measurements were accurately estimated below 400 ms (mean bias, 8.5%) by both methods. The QA assessments are in agreement with the recommendations of imaging for contouring purposes for radiotherapy planning. On patient data of the brain and prostate, the measurements of T1 and T2 by the two quantitative MRI (qMRI) methods were comparable (max difference, <7%). Conclusion This study shows that the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the multispectral pulse sequence (MAGiC®) were compatible with its use for radiotherapy treatment planning in a range of values corresponding to soft tissues. Even validated for brain imaging, MAGiC® could potentially be used for prostate qMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierrick Gouel
- Quantification en Imagerie Fonctionnelle-Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes Equipe d'accueil 4108 (QuantIF-LITIS EA4108), University of Rouen, Rouen, France.,Imaging Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Sebastien Hapdey
- Quantification en Imagerie Fonctionnelle-Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes Equipe d'accueil 4108 (QuantIF-LITIS EA4108), University of Rouen, Rouen, France.,Imaging Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Arthur Dumouchel
- Imaging Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Isabelle Gardin
- Quantification en Imagerie Fonctionnelle-Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes Equipe d'accueil 4108 (QuantIF-LITIS EA4108), University of Rouen, Rouen, France.,Imaging Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France.,Radiotherapy Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Eva Torfeh
- Radiotherapy Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Pauline Hinault
- Quantification en Imagerie Fonctionnelle-Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes Equipe d'accueil 4108 (QuantIF-LITIS EA4108), University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Pierre Vera
- Quantification en Imagerie Fonctionnelle-Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes Equipe d'accueil 4108 (QuantIF-LITIS EA4108), University of Rouen, Rouen, France.,Imaging Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Sebastien Thureau
- Quantification en Imagerie Fonctionnelle-Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes Equipe d'accueil 4108 (QuantIF-LITIS EA4108), University of Rouen, Rouen, France.,Imaging Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France.,Radiotherapy Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - David Gensanne
- Quantification en Imagerie Fonctionnelle-Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes Equipe d'accueil 4108 (QuantIF-LITIS EA4108), University of Rouen, Rouen, France.,Imaging Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France.,Radiotherapy Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Deeba F, Hu R, Lessoway V, Terry J, Pugash D, Mayer C, Hutcheon J, Salcudean S, Rohling R. Project SWAVE 2.0: An overview of the study design for multimodal placental image acquisition and alignment. MethodsX 2022; 9:101738. [PMID: 35677846 PMCID: PMC9168134 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Development of non-invasive and in utero placenta imaging techniques can potentially identify biomarkers of placental health. Correlative imaging using multiple multiscale modalities is particularly important to advance the understanding of placenta structure, function and their relationship. The objective of the project SWAVE 2.0 was to understand human placental structure and function and thereby identify quantifiable measures of placental health using a multimodal correlative approach. In this paper, we present a multimodal image acquisition protocol designed to acquire and align data from ex vivo placenta specimens derived from both healthy and complicated pregnancies. Qualitative and quantitative validation of the alignment method were performed. The qualitative analysis showed good correlation between findings in the MRI, ultrasound and histopathology images. The proposed protocol would enable future studies on comprehensive analysis of placental anatomy, function and their relationship. ● An overview of a novel multimodal placental image acquisition protocol is presented. ● A co-registration method using surface markers and external fiducials is described. ● A preliminary correlative imaging analysis for a placenta specimen is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Deeba
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Corresponding author.
| | - Ricky Hu
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Jefferson Terry
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Ultrasound, BC Women’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Denise Pugash
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Chantal Mayer
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jennifer Hutcheon
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Septimiu Salcudean
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Robert Rohling
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nigri A, Ferraro S, Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott CAM, Tosetti M, Redolfi A, Forloni G, D'Angelo E, Aquino D, Biagi L, Bosco P, Carne I, De Francesco S, Demichelis G, Gianeri R, Lagana MM, Micotti E, Napolitano A, Palesi F, Pirastru A, Savini G, Alberici E, Amato C, Arrigoni F, Baglio F, Bozzali M, Castellano A, Cavaliere C, Contarino VE, Ferrazzi G, Gaudino S, Marino S, Manzo V, Pavone L, Politi LS, Roccatagliata L, Rognone E, Rossi A, Tonon C, Lodi R, Tagliavini F, Bruzzone MG. Quantitative MRI Harmonization to Maximize Clinical Impact: The RIN-Neuroimaging Network. Front Neurol 2022; 13:855125. [PMID: 35493836 PMCID: PMC9047871 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.855125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroimaging studies often lack reproducibility, one of the cardinal features of the scientific method. Multisite collaboration initiatives increase sample size and limit methodological flexibility, therefore providing the foundation for increased statistical power and generalizable results. However, multisite collaborative initiatives are inherently limited by hardware, software, and pulse and sequence design heterogeneities of both clinical and preclinical MRI scanners and the lack of benchmark for acquisition protocols, data analysis, and data sharing. We present the overarching vision that yielded to the constitution of RIN-Neuroimaging Network, a national consortium dedicated to identifying disease and subject-specific in-vivo neuroimaging biomarkers of diverse neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. This ambitious goal needs efforts toward increasing the diagnostic and prognostic power of advanced MRI data. To this aim, 23 Italian Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care (IRCCS), with technological and clinical specialization in the neurological and neuroimaging field, have gathered together. Each IRCCS is equipped with high- or ultra-high field MRI scanners (i.e., ≥3T) for clinical or preclinical research or has established expertise in MRI data analysis and infrastructure. The actions of this Network were defined across several work packages (WP). A clinical work package (WP1) defined the guidelines for a minimum standard clinical qualitative MRI assessment for the main neurological diseases. Two neuroimaging technical work packages (WP2 and WP3, for clinical and preclinical scanners) established Standard Operative Procedures for quality controls on phantoms as well as advanced harmonized quantitative MRI protocols for studying the brain of healthy human participants and wild type mice. Under FAIR principles, a web-based e-infrastructure to store and share data across sites was also implemented (WP4). Finally, the RIN translated all these efforts into a large-scale multimodal data collection in patients and animal models with dementia (i.e., case study). The RIN-Neuroimaging Network can maximize the impact of public investments in research and clinical practice acquiring data across institutes and pathologies with high-quality and highly-consistent acquisition protocols, optimizing the analysis pipeline and data sharing procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Nigri
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Ferraro
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
- MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- NMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michela Tosetti
- Medical Physics and MR Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Redolfi
- Laboratory of Neuroinformatics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Forloni
- Medical Physics and MR Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy
| | - Egidio D'Angelo
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Domenico Aquino
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Biagi
- Medical Physics and MR Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paolo Bosco
- Medical Physics and MR Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy
| | - Irene Carne
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia De Francesco
- Laboratory of Neuroinformatics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Greta Demichelis
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben Gianeri
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Edoardo Micotti
- Laboratory of Biology of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Napolitano
- Medical Physics, IRCCS Istituto Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy
| | - Fulvia Palesi
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Savini
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Alberici
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carmelo Amato
- Unit of Neuroradiology, Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Troina, Italy
| | - Filippo Arrigoni
- Neuroimaging Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
| | | | - Marco Bozzali
- Neuroimaging Laboratory, Santa Lucia Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Valeria Elisa Contarino
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Simona Gaudino
- Istituto di Radiologia, UOC Radiologia e Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Marino
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, Messina, Italy
| | - Vittorio Manzo
- Department of Radiology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Letterio S. Politi
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Roccatagliata
- Neuroradiologia IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute Università di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Rognone
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Rossi
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute Università di Genova, Genoa, Italy
- UO Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Caterina Tonon
- Functional and Molecular Neuroimaging Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Raffaele Lodi
- Functional and Molecular Neuroimaging Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Tagliavini
- Scientific Direction, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Bruzzone
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Carr ME, Keenan KE, Rai R, Boss MA, Metcalfe P, Walker A, Holloway L. Conformance of a 3T Radiotherapy MRI Scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile. Med Phys 2022; 49:4508-4517. [PMID: 35365884 PMCID: PMC9543906 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the technical performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on a dedicated 3T radiotherapy scanner, using a standardized phantom and sequences. Investigations into factors that could impact the technical performance of ADC in the clinic were also completed, including changing the slice‐encoded imaging direction and the reference sample ADC value. Methods ADC acquisitions were performed monthly on an isotropic diffusion phantom over 1 year. Measurements of ADC %bias, coefficients of variation for short‐/long‐term repeatability and precision (CVST/CVLT and CVP), and b‐value dependency (Depb) were calculated. The measurements were then assessed according to the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Profile specifications. Results The average of all measurements over the year was within Profile recommended ranges. This included when testing was performed in different imaging directions, and on samples that had different ADC reference values (0.4–1.1 μm2/ms). Results in the axial plane for the central water vial included a bias of +0.05%, CVST /CVLT/CVP = 0.1%/ 0.9%/0.4% and Depb = 0.4%. Conclusions The technical performance of ADC on a radiotherapy dedicated MRI scanner over the course of 12 months was considered conformant to the QIBA Profile. Quantifying these metrics and factors that may affect the performance is essential in progressing the use of ADC clinically: ensuring that the observed change of ADC in a tissue is due to a physiological response and not measurement variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeline E Carr
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathryn E Keenan
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, United States
| | - Robba Rai
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Michael A Boss
- American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Peter Metcalfe
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Amy Walker
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Keenan KE, Delfino JG, Jordanova KV, Poorman ME, Chirra P, Chaudhari AS, Baessler B, Winfield J, Viswanath SE, deSouza NM. Challenges in ensuring the generalizability of image quantitation methods for MRI. Med Phys 2022; 49:2820-2835. [PMID: 34455593 PMCID: PMC8882689 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Image quantitation methods including quantitative MRI, multiparametric MRI, and radiomics offer great promise for clinical use. However, many of these methods have limited clinical adoption, in part due to issues of generalizability, that is, the ability to translate methods and models across institutions. Researchers can assess generalizability through measurement of repeatability and reproducibility, thus quantifying different aspects of measurement variance. In this article, we review the challenges to ensuring repeatability and reproducibility of image quantitation methods as well as present strategies to minimize their variance to enable wider clinical implementation. We present possible solutions for achieving clinically acceptable performance of image quantitation methods and briefly discuss the impact of minimizing variance and achieving generalizability towards clinical implementation and adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn E. Keenan
- Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
| | - Jana G. Delfino
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, 10993 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - Kalina V. Jordanova
- Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
| | - Megan E. Poorman
- Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
| | - Prathyush Chirra
- Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Akshay S. Chaudhari
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Bettina Baessler
- University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jessica Winfield
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Satish E. Viswanath
- Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Nandita M. deSouza
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
So S, Park HW, Kim B, Fritz FJ, Poser BA, Roebroeck A, Bilgic B. BUDA-MESMERISE: Rapid acquisition and unsupervised parameter estimation for T 1 , T 2 , M 0 , B 0 , and B 1 maps. Magn Reson Med 2022; 88:292-308. [PMID: 35344611 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rapid acquisition scheme and parameter estimation method are proposed to acquire distortion-free spin- and stimulated-echo signals and combine the signals with a physics-driven unsupervised network to estimate T1 , T2 , and proton density (M0 ) parameter maps, along with B0 and B1 information from the acquired signals. THEORY AND METHODS An imaging sequence with three 90° RF pulses is utilized to acquire spin- and stimulated-echo signals. We utilize blip-up/-down acquisition to eliminate geometric distortion incurred by the effects of B0 inhomogeneity on rapid EPI acquisitions. For multislice imaging, echo-shifting is applied to utilize dead time between the second and third RF pulses to encode information from additional slice positions. To estimate parameter maps from the spin- and stimulated-echo signals with high fidelity, 2 estimation methods, analytic fitting and a novel unsupervised deep neural network method, are developed. RESULTS The proposed acquisition provided distortion-free T1 , T2 , relative proton density (M0), B0 , and B1 maps with high fidelity both in phantom and in vivo brain experiments. From the rapidly acquired spin- and stimulated-echo signals, analytic fitting and the network-based method were able to estimate T1 , T2 , M0 , B0 , and B1 maps with high accuracy. Network estimates demonstrated noise robustness owing to the fact that the convolutional layers take information into account from spatially adjacent voxels. CONCLUSION The proposed acquisition/reconstruction technique enabled whole-brain acquisition of coregistered, distortion-free, T1 , T2 , M0 , B0 , and B1 maps at 1 × 1 × 5 mm3 resolution in 50 s. The proposed unsupervised neural network provided noise-robust parameter estimates from this rapid acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seohee So
- School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Wook Park
- School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Byungjai Kim
- School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Francisco J Fritz
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt A Poser
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alard Roebroeck
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Berkin Bilgic
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
van der Hoogt KJJ, Schipper RJ, Winter-Warnars GA, Ter Beek LC, Loo CE, Mann RM, Beets-Tan RGH. Factors affecting the value of diffusion-weighted imaging for identifying breast cancer patients with pathological complete response on neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:187. [PMID: 34921645 PMCID: PMC8684570 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01123-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This review aims to identify factors causing heterogeneity in breast DWI-MRI and their impact on its value for identifying breast cancer patients with pathological complete response (pCR) on neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). A search was performed on PubMed until April 2020 for studies analyzing DWI for identifying breast cancer patients with pCR on NST. Technical and clinical study aspects were extracted and assessed for variability. Twenty studies representing 1455 patients/lesions were included. The studies differed with respect to study population, treatment type, DWI acquisition technique, post-processing (e.g., mono-exponential/intravoxel incoherent motion/stretched exponential modeling), and timing of follow-up studies. For the acquisition and generation of ADC-maps, various b-value combinations were used. Approaches for drawing regions of interest on longitudinal MRIs were highly variable. Biological variability due to various molecular subtypes was usually not taken into account. Moreover, definitions of pCR varied. The individual areas under the curve for the studies range from 0.50 to 0.92. However, overlapping ranges of mean/median ADC-values at pre- and/or during and/or post-NST were found for the pCR and non-pCR groups between studies. The technical, clinical, and epidemiological heterogeneity may be causal for the observed variability in the ability of DWI to predict pCR accurately. This makes implementation of DWI for pCR prediction and evaluation based on one absolute ADC threshold for all breast cancer types undesirable. Multidisciplinary consensus and appropriate clinical study design, taking biological and therapeutic variation into account, is required for obtaining standardized, reliable, and reproducible DWI measurements for pCR/non-pCR identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay J J van der Hoogt
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert J Schipper
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gonneke A Winter-Warnars
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon C Ter Beek
- Department of Medical Physics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Unit South, Institute of Regional Health Research, Vejle University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Spindler M, Thiel CM. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for segmentation and white matter extraction of the hypothalamus. J Neurosci Res 2021; 100:564-577. [PMID: 34850453 DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Since the hypothalamus is involved in many neuroendocrine, metabolic, and affective disorders, detailed hypothalamic imaging has become of major interest to better characterize disease-induced tissue damages and abnormalities. Still, image contrast of conventional anatomical magnetic resonance imaging lacks morphological detail, thus complicating complete and precise segmentation of the hypothalamus. The hypothalamus' position lateral to the third ventricle and close proximity to white matter tracts including the optic tract, fornix, and mammillothalamic tract display one of the remaining shortcomings of hypothalamic segmentation, as reliable exclusion of white matter is not yet possible. Recent studies found that quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI), a method to create maps of different standardized tissue contents, improved segmentation of cortical and subcortical brain regions. So far, this has not been tested for the hypothalamus. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the usability of qMRI and diffusion MRI for the purpose of detailed and reproducible manual segmentation of the hypothalamus and data-driven white matter extraction and compared our results to recent state-of-the-art segmentations. Our results show that qMRI presents good contrast for delineation of the hypothalamus and white matter, and that the properties of these images differ between subunits, such that they can be used to reliably exclude white matter from hypothalamic tissue. We propose that qMRI poses a useful addition to detailed hypothalamic segmentation and volumetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Spindler
- Biological Psychology, Department of Psychology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christiane M Thiel
- Biological Psychology, Department of Psychology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.,Research Centre Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Weingärtner S, Desmond KL, Obuchowski NA, Baessler B, Zhang Y, Biondetti E, Ma D, Golay X, Boss MA, Gunter JL, Keenan KE, Hernando D. Development, validation, qualification, and dissemination of quantitative MR methods: Overview and recommendations by the ISMRM quantitative MR study group. Magn Reson Med 2021; 87:1184-1206. [PMID: 34825741 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
On behalf of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) Quantitative MR Study Group, this article provides an overview of considerations for the development, validation, qualification, and dissemination of quantitative MR (qMR) methods. This process is framed in terms of two central technical performance properties, i.e., bias and precision. Although qMR is confounded by undesired effects, methods with low bias and high precision can be iteratively developed and validated. For illustration, two distinct qMR methods are discussed throughout the manuscript: quantification of liver proton-density fat fraction, and cardiac T1 . These examples demonstrate the expansion of qMR methods from research centers toward widespread clinical dissemination. The overall goal of this article is to provide trainees, researchers, and clinicians with essential guidelines for the development and validation of qMR methods, as well as an understanding of necessary steps and potential pitfalls for the dissemination of quantitative MR in research and in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Weingärtner
- Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Kimberly L Desmond
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy A Obuchowski
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Bettina Baessler
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Yuxin Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Emma Biondetti
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, D'Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Dan Ma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Xavier Golay
- Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, University College London, United Kingdom.,Gold Standard Phantoms Limited, Rochester, United Kingdom
| | - Michael A Boss
- Center for Research and Innovation, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Kathryn E Keenan
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Diego Hernando
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kaandorp MPT, Barbieri S, Klaassen R, van Laarhoven HWM, Crezee H, While PT, Nederveen AJ, Gurney‐Champion OJ. Improved unsupervised physics-informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients. Magn Reson Med 2021; 86:2250-2265. [PMID: 34105184 PMCID: PMC8362093 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Earlier work showed that IVIM-NETorig , an unsupervised physics-informed deep neural network, was faster and more accurate than other state-of-the-art intravoxel-incoherent motion (IVIM) fitting approaches to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). This study presents a substantially improved version, IVIM-NEToptim , and characterizes its superior performance in pancreatic cancer patients. METHOD In simulations (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] = 20), the accuracy, independence, and consistency of IVIM-NET were evaluated for combinations of hyperparameters (fit S0, constraints, network architecture, number of hidden layers, dropout, batch normalization, learning rate), by calculating the normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE), Spearman's ρ, and the coefficient of variation (CVNET ), respectively. The best performing network, IVIM-NEToptim was compared to least squares (LS) and a Bayesian approach at different SNRs. IVIM-NEToptim 's performance was evaluated in an independent dataset of 23 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Fourteen of the patients received no treatment between two repeated scan sessions and nine received chemoradiotherapy between the repeated sessions. Intersession within-subject standard deviations (wSD) and treatment-induced changes were assessed. RESULTS In simulations (SNR = 20), IVIM-NEToptim outperformed IVIM-NETorig in accuracy (NRMSE(D) = 0.177 vs 0.196; NMRSE(f) = 0.220 vs 0.267; NMRSE(D*) = 0.386 vs 0.393), independence (ρ(D*, f) = 0.22 vs 0.74), and consistency (CVNET (D) = 0.013 vs 0.104; CVNET (f) = 0.020 vs 0.054; CVNET (D*) = 0.036 vs 0.110). IVIM-NEToptim showed superior performance to the LS and Bayesian approaches at SNRs < 50. In vivo, IVIM-NEToptim showed significantly less noisy parameter maps with lower wSD for D and f than the alternatives. In the treated cohort, IVIM-NEToptim detected the most individual patients with significant parameter changes compared to day-to-day variations. CONCLUSION IVIM-NEToptim is recommended for accurate, informative, and consistent IVIM fitting to DWI data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misha P. T. Kaandorp
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSt. Olav’s University HospitalTrondheimNorway
- Department of Circulation and Medical ImagingNTNU – Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| | | | - Remy Klaassen
- Department of Medical OncologyCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical OncologyCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Hans Crezee
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Peter T. While
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSt. Olav’s University HospitalTrondheimNorway
- Department of Circulation and Medical ImagingNTNU – Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| | - Aart J. Nederveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Oliver J. Gurney‐Champion
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Carr ME, Keenan KE, Rai R, Metcalfe P, Walker A, Holloway L. Determining the longitudinal accuracy and reproducibility of T 1 and T 2 in a 3T MRI scanner. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:143-150. [PMID: 34562341 PMCID: PMC8598150 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine baseline accuracy and reproducibility of T1 and T2 relaxation times over 12 months on a dedicated radiotherapy MRI scanner. Methods An International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology (ISMRM/NIST) System Phantom was scanned monthly on a 3T MRI scanner for 1 year. T1 was measured using inversion recovery (T1‐IR) and variable flip angle (T1‐VFA) sequences and T2 was measured using a multi‐echo spin echo (T2‐SE) sequence. For each vial in the phantom, accuracy errors (%bias) were determined by the relative differences in measured T1 and T2 times compared to reference values. Reproducibility was measured by the coefficient of variation (CV) of T1 and T2 measurements across monthly scans. Accuracy and reproducibility were mainly assessed on vials with relaxation times expected to be in physiological ranges at 3T. Results A strong linear correlation between measured and reference relaxation times was found for all sequences tested (R2 > 0.997). Baseline bias (and CV[%]) for T1‐IR, T1‐VFA and T2‐SE sequences were +2.0% (2.1), +6.5% (4.2), and +8.5% (1.9), respectively. Conclusions The accuracy and reproducibility of T1 and T2 on the scanner were considered sufficient for the sequences tested. No longitudinal trends of variation were deduced, suggesting less frequent measurements are required following the establishment of baselines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeline E Carr
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathryn E Keenan
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Robba Rai
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Peter Metcalfe
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Amy Walker
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hernando D, Zhang Y, Pirasteh A. Quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. Med Phys 2021; 49:2774-2793. [PMID: 34554579 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffusion MRI has enormous potential and utility in the evaluation of various abdominal and pelvic disease processes including cancer and noncancer imaging of the liver, prostate, and other organs. Quantitative diffusion MRI is based on acquisitions with multiple diffusion encodings followed by quantitative mapping of diffusion parameters that are sensitive to tissue microstructure. Compared to qualitative diffusion-weighted MRI, quantitative diffusion MRI can improve standardization of tissue characterization as needed for disease detection, staging, and treatment monitoring. However, similar to many other quantitative MRI methods, diffusion MRI faces multiple challenges including acquisition artifacts, signal modeling limitations, and biological variability. In abdominal and pelvic diffusion MRI, technical acquisition challenges include physiologic motion (respiratory, peristaltic, and pulsatile), image distortions, and low signal-to-noise ratio. If unaddressed, these challenges lead to poor technical performance (bias and precision) and clinical outcomes of quantitative diffusion MRI. Emerging and novel technical developments seek to address these challenges and may enable reliable quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. Through systematic validation in phantoms, volunteers, and patients, including multicenter studies to assess reproducibility, these emerging techniques may finally demonstrate the potential of quantitative diffusion MRI for abdominal and pelvic imaging applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Hernando
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Yuxin Zhang
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ali Pirasteh
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Houdt PJ, Saeed H, Thorwarth D, Fuller CD, Hall WA, McDonald BA, Shukla-Dave A, Kooreman ES, Philippens MEP, van Lier ALHMW, Keesman R, Mahmood F, Coolens C, Stanescu T, Wang J, Tyagi N, Wetscherek A, van der Heide UA. Integration of quantitative imaging biomarkers in clinical trials for MR-guided radiotherapy: Conceptual guidance for multicentre studies from the MR-Linac Consortium Imaging Biomarker Working Group. Eur J Cancer 2021; 153:64-71. [PMID: 34144436 PMCID: PMC8340311 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) derived from MRI techniques have the potential to be used for the personalised treatment of cancer patients. However, large-scale data are missing to validate their added value in clinical practice. Integrated MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) systems, such as hybrid MRI-linear accelerators, have the unique advantage that MR images can be acquired during every treatment session. This means that high-frequency imaging of QIBs becomes feasible with reduced patient burden, logistical challenges, and costs compared to extra scan sessions. A wealth of valuable data will be collected before and during treatment, creating new opportunities to advance QIB research at large. The aim of this paper is to present a roadmap towards the clinical use of QIBs on MRIgRT systems. The most important need is to gather and understand how the QIBs collected during MRIgRT correlate with clinical outcomes. As the integrated MRI scanner differs from traditional MRI scanners, technical validation is an important aspect of this roadmap. We propose to integrate technical validation with clinical trials by the addition of a quality assurance procedure at the start of a trial, the acquisition of in vivo test-retest data to assess the repeatability, as well as a comparison between QIBs from MRIgRT systems and diagnostic MRI systems to assess the reproducibility. These data can be collected with limited extra time for the patient. With integration of technical validation in clinical trials, the results of these trials derived on MRIgRT systems will also be applicable for measurements on other MRI systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 102, Amsterdam, 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| | - Hina Saeed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Av, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Av, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - Brigid A McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Ernst S Kooreman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 102, Amsterdam, 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| | - Marielle E P Philippens
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Astrid L H M W van Lier
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, Nijmegen, 6525GA, the Netherlands.
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, Odense C, 5000, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 19.3, Odense C, 5000, Denmark.
| | - Catherine Coolens
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5M 1G7, Canada.
| | - Teodor Stanescu
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5M 1G7, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada.
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Neelam Tyagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 102, Amsterdam, 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Radunsky D, Stern N, Nassar J, Tsarfaty G, Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Ben-Eliezer N. Quantitative platform for accurate and reproducible assessment of transverse (T 2 ) relaxation time. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2021; 34:e4537. [PMID: 33993573 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
MRI's transverse relaxation time (T2 ) is sensitive to tissues' composition and pathological state. While variations in T2 values can be used as clinical biomarkers, it is challenging to quantify this parameter in vivo due to the complexity of the MRI signal model, differences in protocol implementations, and hardware imperfections. Herein, we provide a detailed analysis of the echo modulation curve (EMC) platform, offering accurate and reproducible mapping of T2 values, from 2D multi-slice multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) protocols. Computer simulations of the full Bloch equations are used to generate an advanced signal model, which accounts for stimulated echoes and transmit field (B1+ ) inhomogeneities. In addition to quantifying T2 values, the EMC platform also provides proton density (PD) maps, and fat-water fraction maps. The algorithm's accuracy, reproducibility, and insensitivity to T1 values are validated on a phantom constructed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and on in vivo human brains. EMC-derived T2 maps show excellent agreement with ground truth values for both in vitro and in vivo models. Quantitative values are accurate and stable across scan settings and for the physiological range of T2 values, while showing robustness to main field (B0 ) inhomogeneities, to variations in T1 relaxation time, and to magnetization transfer. Extension of the algorithm to two-component fitting yields accurate fat and water T2 maps along with their relative fractions, similar to a reference three-point Dixon technique. Overall, the EMC platform allows to generate accurate and stable T2 maps, with a full brain coverage using a standard MESE protocol and at feasible scan times. The utility of EMC-based T2 maps was demonstrated on several clinical applications, showing robustness to variations in other magnetic properties. The algorithm is available online as a full stand-alone package, including an intuitive graphical user interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dvir Radunsky
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Neta Stern
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Jannette Nassar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Galia Tsarfaty
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | - Noam Ben-Eliezer
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Israel
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Israel
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Khajehim M, Christen T, Tam F, Graham SJ. Streamlined magnetic resonance fingerprinting: Fast whole-brain coverage with deep-learning based parameter estimation. Neuroimage 2021; 238:118237. [PMID: 34091035 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a quantitative MRI (qMRI) framework that provides simultaneous estimates of multiple relaxation parameters as well as metrics of field inhomogeneity in a single acquisition. However, current challenges exist in the forms of (1) scan time; (2) need for custom image reconstruction; (3) large dictionary sizes; (4) long dictionary-matching time. This study aims to introduce a novel streamlined magnetic-resonance fingerprinting (sMRF) framework based on a single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence to simultaneously estimate tissue T1, T2, and T2* with integrated B1+ correction. Encouraged by recent work on EPI-based MRF, we developed a method that combines spin-echo EPI with gradient-echo EPI to achieve T2 in addition to T1 and T2* quantification. To this design, we add simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) acceleration to enable full-brain coverage in a few minutes. Moreover, in the parameter-estimation step, we use deep learning to train a deep neural network (DNN) to accelerate the estimation process by orders of magnitude. Notably, due to the high image quality of the EPI scans, the training process can rely simply on Bloch-simulated data. The DNN also removes the need for storing large dictionaries. Phantom scans along with in-vivo multi-slice scans from seven healthy volunteers were acquired with resolutions of 1.1×1.1×3 mm3 and 1.7×1.7×3 mm3, and the results were validated against ground truth measurements. Excellent correspondence was found between our T1, T2, and T2* estimates and results obtained from standard approaches. In the phantom scan, a strong linear relationship (R = 1-1.04, R2>0.96) was found for all parameter estimates, with a particularly high agreement for T2 estimation (R2>0.99). Similar findings are reported for the in-vivo human data for all of our parameter estimates. Incorporation of DNN results in a reduction of parameter estimation time on the order of 1000 x and a reduction in storage requirements on the order of 2500 x while achieving highly similar results as conventional dictionary matching (%differences of 7.4 ± 0.4%, 3.6 ± 0.3% and 6.0 ± 0.4% error in T1, T2, and T2* estimation). Thus, sMRF has the potential to be the method of choice for future MRF studies by providing ease of implementation, fast whole-brain coverage, and ultra-fast T1/T2/T2* estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Khajehim
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 101 College St Suite 15-701, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada.
| | - Thomas Christen
- Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, Inserm, Grenoble, France
| | - Fred Tam
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Simon J Graham
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 101 College St Suite 15-701, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada; Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sakaie K, Fedler JK, Yankey JW, Nakamura K, Debbins J, Lowe MJ, Raska P, Fox RJ. Influence of equipment changes on MRI measures of brain atrophy and brain microstructure in a placebo-controlled trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2021; 7:20552173211010843. [PMID: 34046185 PMCID: PMC8138298 DOI: 10.1177/20552173211010843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hardware changes can be an unavoidable confound in imaging trials. Understanding the impact of such changes may play an important role in the analysis of imaging data. Objective To characterize the effect of equipment changes in a longitudinal, multi-site multiple sclerosis trial. Methods Using data from a clinical trial in progressive multiple sclerosis, we explored how major changes in imaging hardware affected data. We analyzed the extent to which these changes affected imaging biomarkers and the estimated treatment effects by including such changes as a time-dependent covariate. Results Significant differences whole brain atrophy (brain parenchymal fraction, BPF) and microstructure (transverse diffusivity, TD) between scans with and without changes were found and depended on the type of hardware change. A switch from GE HDxt to Siemens Skyra led to significant shifts in BPF (p < 0.04) and TD (p < 0.0001). However, we could not detect the influence of hardware changes on overall trial outcomes- differences between placebo and treatment arms in change over time of BPF and TD (p > 0.5). Conclusions The results suggest that differences among hardware types should be considered when planning and analyzing brain atrophy and diffusivity in a longitudinal clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Sakaie
- Imaging Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Janel K Fedler
- Data Coordinating Center, NeuroNEXT, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jon W Yankey
- Data Coordinating Center, NeuroNEXT, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kunio Nakamura
- Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Josef Debbins
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Mark J Lowe
- Imaging Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Paola Raska
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert J Fox
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Huang SS, Boyacioglu R, Bolding R, MacAskill C, Chen Y, Griswold MA. Free-Breathing Abdominal Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Using a Pilot Tone Navigator. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54:1138-1151. [PMID: 33949741 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantitative T1 and T2 mapping in the abdomen provides valuable information in tissue characterization but is technically challenging due to respiratory motions. The proposed technique integrates magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) and pilot tone (PT) navigator with retrospective gating to provide simultaneous quantification of multiple tissue properties in a single acquisition without breath-holding or patient set-up. PURPOSE To develop a free-breathing abdominal MRF technique for quantitative mapping in the abdomen. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION Twelve healthy volunteers. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE A 3 T, two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) spiral MRF sequence with fast imaging with steady-state free precession (FISP) readout. ASSESSMENT The PT navigator was compared to standard respiratory belt performance. The T1 and T2 values acquired using 2D and 3D MRF with and without PT were obtained in a phantom and compared to reference values. Digital phantom simulation was performed to evaluate PT MRF reconstruction with varying breathing patterns. In the in vivo studies, T1 and T2 values derived from PT 2D MRF were compared to 2D breath-hold MRF. T1 and T2 values derived from PT 3D MRF were compared to published values. STATISTICAL TESTS Principal component analysis (PCA), linear regression, relative error, Pearson correlation, paired Student's t-test, Bland-Altman Analysis. RESULTS The phantom study showed PT MRF T1 values had a mean difference of 0.2% ± 0.1%, and T2 values had a mean difference of 0.1% ± 0.4% when compared to no-PT MRF values. The digital phantom experiment suggested the T1 and T2 maps at both end-exhalation and end-inhalation states resemble the corresponding ground-truth maps. DATA CONCLUSION The phantom study showed good agreement between MRF T1 and T2 values and with reference values. In vivo studies demonstrated that 2D and 3D quantitative imaging in the abdomen could be achieved with integration of PT navigation with MRF reconstruction using retrospective gating of respiratory motion. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry S Huang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rasim Boyacioglu
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Reid Bolding
- Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christina MacAskill
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mark A Griswold
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Shridhar Konar A, Qian E, Geethanath S, Buonincontri G, Obuchowski NA, Fung M, Gomez P, Schulte R, Cencini M, Tosetti M, Schwartz LH, Shukla-Dave A. Quantitative imaging metrics derived from magnetic resonance fingerprinting using ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom: An international multicenter repeatability and reproducibility study. Med Phys 2021; 48:2438-2447. [PMID: 33690905 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the bias and inherent reliability of the quantitative (T1 and T2 ) imaging metrics generated from the magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) technique using the ISMRM/NIST system phantom in an international multicenter setting. METHOD ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom provides standard reference T1 and T2 relaxation values (vendor-provided) for each of the 14 vials in T1 and T2 arrays. MRF-SSFP scans repeated over 30 days on GE 1.5 and 3.0 T scanners at three collaborative centers. MRF estimated T1, and T2 values averaged over 30 days were compared with the phantom vendor-provided and spin-echo (SE) based convention gold standard (GS) method. Repeatability and reproducibility were characterized by the within-case coefficient of variation (wCV) of the MRF data acquired over 30 days, along with the biases. RESULT For the wide ranges of MRF estimated T1 values, vials #1-8 (T1 relaxation time between 2033 and 184 ms) exhibited a wCV less than 3% and 4%, respectively, on 3.0 and 1.5 T scanners. T2 values in vials #1-8 (T2 relaxation, 1044-45 ms) have shown wCV to be <7% on both 3.0 and 1.5 T scanners. A stronger linear correlation overall for T1 (R2 = 0.9960 and 0.9963 at center-1 and center-2 on 3.0 T scanner, and R2 = 0.9951 and 0.9988 at center-1 and center-3 on 1.5 T scanner) compared to T2 (R2 = 0.9971 and 0.9972 at center-1 and center-2 on 3.0 T scanner, and R2 = 0.9815 and 0.9754 at center-1 and center-3 on 1.5 T scanner). Bland-Altman (BA) analysis showed MRF based T1 and T2 values were within the limit of agreement (LOA) except for one data point. The mean difference or bias and 95% lower bound (LB) and upper bound (UB) LOA are reported in the format; mean bias: 95% LB LOA: 95% UB LOA. The biases for T1 values were 21.34: -50.00: 92.69, 21.32: -47.29: 89.94 ms, and for T2 values were -19.88: -42.37: 2.61, -19.06: -43.58: 5.45 ms on 3.0 T scanner at center-1 and center-2, respectively. Similarly, on 1.5 T scanner biases for T1 values were 26.54: -53.41: 106.50, 9.997: -51.94: 71.94 ms, and for T2 values were -23.84: -135.40: 87.76, -37.30: 134.30: 59.73 ms at center-1 and center-3, respectively. Additionally, the correlation between the SE based GS and MRF estimated T1 and T2 values (R2 = 0.9969 and 0.9977) showed a similar trend as we observed between vendor-provided and MRF estimated T1 and T2 values (R2 = 0.9963 and 0.9972). In addition to correlation, BA analysis showed that all the vials are within the LOA between the GS and vendor-provided for the T1 values and except one vial for T2 . All the vials are within the LOA between GS and MRF except one vial in T1 and T2 array. The wCV for reproducibility was <3% for both T1 and T2 values in vials #1-8, for all the 14 vials, wCV calculated for reproducibility was <4% for T1 values and <5% for T2 . CONCLUSION This study shows that MRF is highly repeatable (wCV <4% for T1 and <7% for T2 ) and reproducible (wCV < 3% for both T1 and T2 ) in certain vials (vials #1-8).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaresha Shridhar Konar
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Enlin Qian
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Sairam Geethanath
- Columbia Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Guido Buonincontri
- Imago7 Foundation and IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, PI, 56128, Italy
| | - Nancy A Obuchowski
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | | | - Pedro Gomez
- Munich School of Bioengineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, BY, 85748, Germany
| | | | - Matteo Cencini
- Imago7 Foundation and IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, PI, 56128, Italy
| | - Michela Tosetti
- Imago7 Foundation and IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Pisa, PI, 56128, Italy
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Serkova NJ, Glunde K, Haney CR, Farhoud M, De Lille A, Redente EF, Simberg D, Westerly DC, Griffin L, Mason RP. Preclinical Applications of Multi-Platform Imaging in Animal Models of Cancer. Cancer Res 2021; 81:1189-1200. [PMID: 33262127 PMCID: PMC8026542 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-0373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In animal models of cancer, oncologic imaging has evolved from a simple assessment of tumor location and size to sophisticated multimodality exploration of molecular, physiologic, genetic, immunologic, and biochemical events at microscopic to macroscopic levels, performed noninvasively and sometimes in real time. Here, we briefly review animal imaging technology and molecular imaging probes together with selected applications from recent literature. Fast and sensitive optical imaging is primarily used to track luciferase-expressing tumor cells, image molecular targets with fluorescence probes, and to report on metabolic and physiologic phenotypes using smart switchable luminescent probes. MicroPET/single-photon emission CT have proven to be two of the most translational modalities for molecular and metabolic imaging of cancers: immuno-PET is a promising and rapidly evolving area of imaging research. Sophisticated MRI techniques provide high-resolution images of small metastases, tumor inflammation, perfusion, oxygenation, and acidity. Disseminated tumors to the bone and lung are easily detected by microCT, while ultrasound provides real-time visualization of tumor vasculature and perfusion. Recently available photoacoustic imaging provides real-time evaluation of vascular patency, oxygenation, and nanoparticle distributions. New hybrid instruments, such as PET-MRI, promise more convenient combination of the capabilities of each modality, enabling enhanced research efficacy and throughput.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie J Serkova
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
- Animal Imaging Shared Resource, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kristine Glunde
- Division of Cancer Imaging Research, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, and the Sydney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Chad R Haney
- Center for Advanced Molecular Imaging, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | | | | | | | - Dmitri Simberg
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David C Westerly
- Animal Imaging Shared Resource, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Lynn Griffin
- Department of Radiology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Ralph P Mason
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jun Y, Shin H, Eo T, Kim T, Hwang D. Deep model-based magnetic resonance parameter mapping network (DOPAMINE) for fast T1 mapping using variable flip angle method. Med Image Anal 2021; 70:102017. [PMID: 33721693 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Quantitative tissue characteristics, which provide valuable diagnostic information, can be represented by magnetic resonance (MR) parameter maps using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); however, a long scan time is necessary to acquire them, which prevents the application of quantitative MR parameter mapping to real clinical protocols. For fast MR parameter mapping, we propose a deep model-based MR parameter mapping network called DOPAMINE that combines a deep learning network with a model-based method to reconstruct MR parameter maps from undersampled multi-channel k-space data. DOPAMINE consists of two networks: 1) an MR parameter mapping network that uses a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) that estimates initial parameter maps from undersampled k-space data (CNN-based mapping), and 2) a reconstruction network that removes aliasing artifacts in the parameter maps with a deep CNN (CNN-based reconstruction) and an interleaved data consistency layer by an embedded MR model-based optimization procedure. We demonstrated the performance of DOPAMINE in brain T1 map reconstruction with a variable flip angle (VFA) model. To evaluate the performance of DOPAMINE, we compared it with conventional parallel imaging, low-rank based reconstruction, model-based reconstruction, and state-of-the-art deep-learning-based mapping methods for three different reduction factors (R = 3, 5, and 7) and two different sampling patterns (1D Cartesian and 2D Poisson-disk). Quantitative metrics indicated that DOPAMINE outperformed other methods in reconstructing T1 maps for all sampling patterns and reduction factors. DOPAMINE exhibited quantitatively and qualitatively superior performance to that of conventional methods in reconstructing MR parameter maps from undersampled multi-channel k-space data. The proposed method can thus reduce the scan time of quantitative MR parameter mapping that uses a VFA model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohan Jun
- School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyungseob Shin
- School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Taejoon Eo
- School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Taeseong Kim
- School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Dosik Hwang
- School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
van Houdt PJ, Yang Y, van der Heide UA. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Biological Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 10:615643. [PMID: 33585242 PMCID: PMC7878523 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.615643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI-guided radiotherapy systems have the potential to bring two important concepts in modern radiotherapy together: adaptive radiotherapy and biological targeting. Based on frequent anatomical and functional imaging, monitoring the changes that occur in volume, shape as well as biological characteristics, a treatment plan can be updated regularly to accommodate the observed treatment response. For this purpose, quantitative imaging biomarkers need to be identified that show changes early during treatment and predict treatment outcome. This review provides an overview of the current evidence on quantitative MRI measurements during radiotherapy and their potential as an imaging biomarker on MRI-guided radiotherapy systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hu HH, Yokoo T, Bashir MR, Sirlin CB, Hernando D, Malyarenko D, Chenevert TL, Smith MA, Serai SD, Middleton MS, Henderson WC, Hamilton G, Shaffer J, Shu Y, Tkach JA, Trout AT, Obuchowski N, Brittain JH, Jackson EF, Reeder SB. Linearity and Bias of Proton Density Fat Fraction as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker: A Multicenter, Multiplatform, Multivendor Phantom Study. Radiology 2021; 298:640-651. [PMID: 33464181 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimated by using chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI is an accepted imaging biomarker of hepatic steatosis. This work aims to promote standardized use of CSE MRI to estimate PDFF. Purpose To assess the accuracy of CSE MRI methods for estimating PDFF by determining the linearity and range of bias observed in a phantom. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, a commercial phantom with 12 vials of known PDFF values were shipped across nine U.S. centers. The phantom underwent 160 independent MRI examinations on 27 1.5-T and 3.0-T systems from three vendors. Two three-dimensional CSE MRI protocols with minimal T1 bias were included: vendor and standardized. Each vendor's confounder-corrected complex or hybrid magnitude-complex based reconstruction algorithm was used to generate PDFF maps in both protocols. The Siemens reconstruction required a configuration change to correct for water-fat swaps in the phantom. The MRI PDFF values were compared with the known PDFF values by using linear regression with mixed-effects modeling. The 95% CIs were calculated for the regression slope (ie, proportional bias) and intercept (ie, constant bias) and compared with the null hypothesis (slope = 1, intercept = 0). Results Pooled regression slope for estimated PDFF values versus phantom-derived reference PDFF values was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.98) in the biologically relevant 0%-47.5% PDFF range. The corresponding pooled intercept was -0.27% (95% CI: -0.50%, -0.05%). Across vendors, slope ranges were 0.86-1.02 (vendor protocols) and 0.97-1.0 (standardized protocol) at 1.5 T and 0.91-1.01 (vendor protocols) and 0.87-1.01 (standardized protocol) at 3.0 T. The intercept ranges (absolute PDFF percentage) were -0.65% to 0.18% (vendor protocols) and -0.69% to -0.17% (standardized protocol) at 1.5 T and -0.48% to 0.10% (vendor protocols) and -0.78% to -0.21% (standardized protocol) at 3.0 T. Conclusion Proton density fat fraction estimation derived from three-dimensional chemical shift-encoded MRI in a commercial phantom was accurate across vendors, imaging centers, and field strengths, with use of the vendors' product acquisition and reconstruction software. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Dyke in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houchun H Hu
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Takeshi Yokoo
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Diego Hernando
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Dariya Malyarenko
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Thomas L Chenevert
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Mark A Smith
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Suraj D Serai
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Michael S Middleton
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Walter C Henderson
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Gavin Hamilton
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Jean Shaffer
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Yunhong Shu
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Jean A Tkach
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Andrew T Trout
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Nancy Obuchowski
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Jean H Brittain
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Edward F Jackson
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Scott B Reeder
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | -
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| |
Collapse
|