Effect of pravastatin on metabolic parameters of apolipoprotein B in patients with mixed hyperlipoproteinemia

Control of very low-density lipoprotein secretion by N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor and miR-33

RATIONALE

Several reports suggest that antisense oligonucleotides against miR-33 might reduce cardiovascular risk in patients by accelerating the reverse cholesterol transport pathway. However, conflicting reports exist about the impact of anti-miR-33 therapy on the levels of very low-density lipoprotein-triglycerides (VLDL-TAG).

OBJECTIVE

We test the hypothesis that miR-33 controls hepatic VLDL-TAG secretion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using therapeutic silencing of miR-33 and adenoviral overexpression of miR-33, we show that miR-33 limits hepatic secretion of VLDL-TAG by targeting N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF), both in vivo and in primary hepatocytes. We identify conserved sequences in the 3'UTR of NSF as miR-33 responsive elements and show that Nsf is specifically recruited to the RNA-induced silencing complex following induction of miR-33. In pulse-chase experiments, either miR-33 overexpression or knock-down of Nsf lead to decreased secretion of apolipoproteins and TAG in primary hepatocytes, compared with control cells. Importantly, Nsf rescues miR-33-dependent reduced secretion. Finally, we show that overexpression of Nsf in vivo increases global hepatic secretion and raises plasma VLDL-TAG.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, our data reveal key roles for the miR-33-NSF axis during hepatic secretion and suggest that caution should be taken with anti-miR-33-based therapies because they might raise proatherogenic VLDL-TAG levels.

Ezetimibe and bile acid sequestrants: impact on lipoprotein metabolism and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several lines of evidence indicate that the enterocyte plays a pivotal role in cholesterol homeostasis. The development of the selective inhibitor of cholesterol absorption ezetimibe and bile acid sequestrants (BAS) interrupting the enterohepatic circulation of bile salts has expanded the options for preventing and treating cardiovascular disease. We discuss here a selection of recently published studies that evaluated the effects of ezetimibe and BAS on lipoprotein metabolism.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although significant progress has been made in recent years in elucidating the impacts of ezetimibe and BAS on lipoprotein metabolism, underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. Important new insights have been provided by using in-vivo kinetic studies of apolipoproteins labelled with a stable isotope. Other reports indicated that ezetimibe and BAS modulate the expression of several key genes involved in intestinal lipoprotein metabolism. Many of these effects have been related to the local effects of ezetimibe and BAS on intestinal cholesterol homeostasis.

SUMMARY

A substantial effort is being made by researchers to fully understand the mechanisms by which ezetimibe and BAS improve lipid profile. The efficacy of combination therapy of statins with ezetimibe or BAS for the prevention of cardiovascular disease remains to be confirmed in clinical endpoint studies.

Lifibrol as a model compound for a novel lipid-lowering mechanism of action

Lifibrol is a potent lipid-lowering drug with an unknown mechanism of action. We investigated its effects on lipoprotein and sterol metabolism in normocholesterolemic male participants. Seven participants were treated for 4 weeks with 600 mg/d lifibrol and 9 with 40 mg/d pravastatin in a double-blind randomized parallel-group trial. Kinetic studies were performed at baseline and under acute and chronic treatment. Turnover of apolipoprotein B-100 was investigated with endogenous stable-isotope labeling, and kinetic parameters were derived by multicompartmental modeling. Lathosterol and cholesterol metabolism were investigated using mass isotopomer distribution analysis (MIDA) after [1-(13)C]acetate labeling. Carbon metabolism was investigated by calculating the total isotope incorporation into newly formed sterols and measuring the disposal of acetate by (13)CO(2) breath analysis. Total- and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol decreased by 18% and 27% under lifibrol and by 17% and 28% under pravastatin, respectively, whereas very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol did not change. Very-low-density lipoprotein apoB fractional synthesis and production increased under lifibrol but remained unchanged under pravastatin. Low-density lipoprotein apoB fractional synthesis and production increased under pravastatin but remained unchanged under lifibrol. Mass isotopomer distribution analysis indicated that both drugs decrease endogenous sterol synthesis after acute administration, but pravastatin had more powerful effects. Carbon-13 appearance in breath was higher during pravastatin than during lifibrol treatment. Mass isotopomer distribution analysis and carbon metabolism analysis indicated compartmentalization at the site of sterol synthesis, thus suggesting differential effects of the 2 drugs. Although having comparable lipid-lowering properties, lifibrol seems to have a mechanism of action distinct from that of statins. Lifibrol could serve as a model compound for the development of new lipid-lowering agents.

Influence of simvastatin on apoB-100 secretion in non-obese subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia

Statins decrease apoB-100-containing lipoproteins by increasing their fractional catabolic rates through LDL receptor-mediated uptake. Their influence on hepatic secretion of these lipoproteins is controversial. The objective of the study was to examine the influence of simvastatin on the secretion of apoB-100-containing lipoproteins in fasting non-obese subjects. Turnover of apoB-100-containing lipoproteins was investigated using stable isotope-labeled tracers. Multicompartmental modeling was used to derive kinetic parameters. Eight male subjects (BMI 25 +/- 3 kg/m(2)) with mild hypercholesterolemia (LDL cholesterol 135 +/- 30 mg/dL) and normal triglycerides (111 +/- 44 mg/dL) were examined under no treatment (A), under chronic treatment with simvastatin 40 mg/day (B) and after an acute-on-chronic dosage of 80 mg simvastatin under chronic simvastatin treatment (C). Lipoprotein concentrations changed as expected under 40 mg/day simvastatin. Fractional catabolic rates increased in IDL and LDL but not in VLDL fractions versus control [VLDL +35% in B (n.s.) and +21% in C (n.s.); IDL +169% in B (P = 0.08) and +187% in C (P = 0.032); LDL +87% in B (P = 0.025) and +133% in C (P = 0.025)]. Chronic (B) and acute-on-chronic simvastatin treatment (C) did not affect lipoprotein production rates [VLDL -8 and -13%, IDL +47 and +38%, and LDL +19 and +30% in B and C, respectively (all comparisons n.s.)]. The data indicate that simvastatin does not influence the secretion of apoB-100-containing lipoproteins in non-obese subjects with near-normal LDL cholesterol concentrations.

Effects of ezetimibe and simvastatin on apolipoprotein B metabolism in males with mixed hyperlipidemia

Sixteen hyperlipidemic men were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study to evaluate the effect of ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 40 mg, coadministered and alone, on the in vivo kinetics of apolipoprotein (apo) B-48 and B-100 in humans. Subjects underwent a primed-constant infusion of a stable isotope in the fed state. The coadministration of simvastatin and ezetimibe significantly reduced plasma concentrations of cholesterol (-43.0%), LDL-C (-53.6%), and triglycerides (-44.0%). Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) apoB-48 pool size (PS) was significantly decreased (-48.9%) following combination therapy mainly through a significant reduction in TRL apoB-48 production rate (PR) (-38.0%). The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of VLDL and LDL apoB-100 were significantly increased with all treatment modalities compared with placebo, leading to a significant reduction in the PS of these fractions. We also observed a positive correlation between changes in TRL apoB-48 PS and changes in TRL apoB-48 PR (r = 0.85; P < 0.0001) with combination therapy. Our results indicate that treatment with simvastatin plus ezetimibe is effective in reducing plasma TRL apoB-48 levels and that this effect is most likely mediated by a reduction in the intestinal secretion of TRL apoB-48. Our study also indicated that the reduction in LDL-C concentration following combination therapy is mainly driven by an increase in FCR of apoB-100 containing lipoproteins.

Dose-dependent effect of rosuvastatin on apolipoprotein B-100 kinetics in the metabolic syndrome

In a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial of 5-week treatment period with placebo or rosuvastatin (10 or 40 mg/day) with 2-week placebo wash-outs between treatments, the dose-dependent effect of rosuvastatin on apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 kinetics in metabolic syndrome subjects were studied. Compared with placebo, there was a significant dose-dependent decrease with rosuvastatin in plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, apoB and apoC-III concentrations and in the apoB/apoA-I ratio, lathosterol:cholesterol ratio, HDL cholesterol concentration and campesterol:cholesterol ratio also increased significantly. Rosuvastatin significantly increased the fractional catabolic rates (FCR) of very-low density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) and LDL-apoB and decreased the corresponding pool sizes, with evidence of a dose-related effect. LDL apoB production rate (PR) fell significantly with rosuvastatin 40 mg/day with no change in VLDL and IDL-apoB PR. Changes in triglycerides were significantly correlated with changes in VLDL apoB FCR and apoC-III concentration, and changes in lathosterol:cholesterol ratio were correlated with changes in LDL apoB FCR, the associations being more significant with the higher dose of rosuvastatin. In the metabolic syndrome, rosuvastatin decreases the plasma concentration of apoB-containing lipoproteins by a dose-dependent mechanism that increases their rates of catabolism. Higher dose rosuvastatin may also decrease LDL apoB production. The findings provide a dose-related mechanism for the benefits of rosuvastatin on cardiovascular disease in the metabolic syndrome.

Effects of different doses of atorvastatin on human apolipoprotein B-100, B-48, and A-I metabolism

Nine hypercholesterolemic and hypertriglyceridemic subjects were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study to test the effect of atorvastatin 20 mg/day and 80 mg/day on the kinetics of apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) in triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), and LDL, of apoB-48 in TRL, and of apoA-I in HDL. Compared with placebo, atorvastatin 20 mg/day was associated with significant reductions in TRL, IDL, and LDL apoB-100 pool size as a result of significant increases in fractional catabolic rate (FCR) without changes in production rate (PR). Compared with the 20 mg/day dose, atorvastatin 80 mg/day caused a further significant reduction in the LDL apoB-100 pool size as a result of a further increase in FCR. ApoB-48 pool size was reduced significantly by both atorvastatin doses, and this reduction was associated with nonsignificant increases in FCR. The lathosterol-campesterol ratio was decreased by atorvastatin treatment, and changes in this ratio were inversely correlated with changes in TRL apoB-100 and apoB-48 PR. No significant effect on apoA-I kinetics was observed at either dose of atorvastatin. Our data indicate that atorvastatin reduces apoB-100- and apoB-48-containing lipoproteins by increasing their catabolism and has a dose-dependent effect on LDL apoB-100 kinetics. Atorvastatin-mediated changes in cholesterol homeostasis may contribute to apoB PR regulation.

Thematic review series: patient-oriented research. What we have learned about VLDL and LDL metabolism from human kinetics studies

Lipoprotein metabolism is the result of a complex network of many individual components. Abnormal lipoprotein concentrations can result from changes in the production, conversion, or catabolism of lipoprotein particles. Studies in hypolipoproteinemia and hyperlipoproteinemia have elucidated the processes that control VLDL secretion as well as VLDL and LDL catabolism. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding apolipoprotein B (apoB) metabolism, focusing on selected clinically relevant conditions. In hypobetalipoproteinemia attributable to truncations in apoB, the rate of secretion is closely linked to the length of apoB. On the other hand, in patients with the metabolic syndrome, it appears that substrate, in the form of free fatty acids, coupled to the state of insulin resistance can induce hypersecretion of VLDL-apoB. Studies in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, familial defective apoB, and mutant forms of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 show that mutations in the LDL receptor, the ligand for the receptor, or an intracellular chaperone for the receptor are the most important determinants in regulating LDL catabolism. This review also demonstrates the variance of results within similar, or even the same, phenotypic conditions. This underscores the sensitivity of metabolic studies to methodological aspects and thus the importance of the inclusion of adequate controls in studies.

REVIEW: Efficacy and mechanisms of action of statins in the treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia

CONTEXT

The Adult Treatment Panel III recommends 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or statins, as first-line lipid-altering therapy for all adult patients with diabetes mellitus. This is based on the well-characterized efficacy and safety profiles of this class of agents as well as several clinical trials demonstrating that statin treatment reduces the risk of cardiovascular events.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This review provides an overview of the effectiveness and mechanisms of action of statins in patients with diabetes mellitus using small efficacy trials and large clinical outcomes trials as well as studies of the effects of statins on apolipoprotein B (apoB) metabolism.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The major findings presented are a review of mechanistic studies of selected subjects with diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia and a compilation of results from large-scale clinical trials of patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Statins are highly efficacious as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering agents and have more modest effects on very low-density lipoprotein triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The effects of statins on plasma lipids and lipoproteins result from their ability to both increase the efficiency with which very low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein are cleared from the circulation and reduce the production of apoB-containing lipoproteins by the liver. Additional investigations are needed to clarify the mechanisms by which statins reduce apoB secretion from the liver.

Treatment with high-dose simvastatin reduces secretion of apolipoprotein B-lipoproteins in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are effective lipid-altering drugs for the treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design trial to determine the effects of simvastatin, 80 mg/day, on plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels and on the metabolism of apolipoprotein B (apoB) in VLDL, intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), and LDL and of triglycerides (TGs) in VLDL. Simvastatin therapy decreased TG, cholesterol, and apoB significantly in VLDL, IDL, and LDL. These effects were associated with reduced production of LDL-apoB, mainly as a result of reduced secretion of apoB-lipoproteins directly into the LDL density range. Statin therapy also reduced hepatic production of VLDL-TG. There were no effects of simvastatin on the fractional catabolic rates of VLDL-apoB or -TG or LDL-apoB. The basis for decreased VLDL-TG secretion during simvastatin treatment is not clear, but recent studies suggest that statins may activate peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha). Activation of PPARalpha could lead to increased hepatic oxidation of fatty acids and less synthesis of TG for VLDL assembly.

Effects of atorvastatin versus fenofibrate on apoB-100 and apoA-I kinetics in mixed hyperlipidemia

Kinetics of apo B and apo AI were assessed in 8 patients with mixed hyperlipidemia at baseline and after 8 weeks of atorvastatin 80 mg q.d. and micronised fenofibrate 200 mg q.d. in a cross-over study. Both increased hepatic production and decreased catabolism of VLDL accounted for elevated cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations at baseline. Atorvastatin significantly decreased triglyceride, total, VLDL and LDL cholesterol and apo B concentrations (-65%, -36%, -57%, -40% and -33%, respectively, P<0.05). Kinetic analysis revealed that atorvastatin stimulated the catabolism of apo B containing lipoproteins, enhanced the delipidation of VLDL1 and decreased VLDL1 production. Fenofibrate lowered triglycerides and VLDL cholesterol (-57% and -64%, respectively, P<0.05) due to enhanced delipidation of VLDL1 and VLDL2 and increased VLDL1 catabolism. Changes of HDL particle composition accounted for the increase of HDL cholesterol during atorvastatin and fenofibrate (18% and 23%, P<0.01). Only fenofibrate increased apo AI concentrations through enhanced apo AI synthesis (45%, P<0.05). We conclude that atorvastatin exerts additional beneficial effects on the metabolism of apo B containing lipoproteins unrelated to an increase in LDL receptor activity. Fenofibrate but not atorvastatin increases apo AI production and plasma turnover.

Influence of atorvastatin and simvastatin on apolipoprotein B metabolism in moderate combined hyperlipidemic subjects with low VLDL and LDL fractional clearance rates

Subjects with moderate combined hyperlipidemia (n=11) were assessed in an investigation of the effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin (both 40 mg per day) on apolipoprotein B (apoB) metabolism. The objective of the study was to examine the mechanism by which statins lower plasma triglyceride levels. Patients were studied on three occasions, in the basal state, after 8 weeks on atorvastatin or simvastatin and then again on the alternate treatment. Atorvastatin produced significantly greater reductions than simvastatin in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (49.7 vs. 44.1% decrease on simvastatin) and plasma triglyceride (46.4 vs. 39.4% decrease on simvastatin). ApoB metabolism was followed using a tracer of deuterated leucine. Both drugs stimulated direct catabolism of large very low density lipoprotein (VLDL(1)) apoB (4.52+/-3.06 pools per day on atorvastatin; 5.48+/-4.76 pools per day on simvastatin versus 2.26+/-1.65 pools per day at baseline (both P<0.05)) and this was the basis of the 50% reduction in plasma VLDL(1) concentration; apoB production in this fraction was not significantly altered. On atorvastatin and simvastatin the fractional transfer rates (FTR) of VLDL(1) to VLDL(2) and of VLDL(2) to intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) were increased significantly, in the latter instance nearly twofold. IDL apoB direct catabolism rose from 0.54+/-0.30 pools per day at baseline to 1.17+/-0.87 pools per day on atorvastatin and to 0.95+/-0.43 pools per day on simvastatin (both P<0.05). Similarly the fractional transfer rate for IDL to LDL conversion was enhanced 58-84% by statin treatment (P<0.01) LDL apoB fractional catabolic rate (FCR) which was low at baseline in these subjects (0.22+/-0.04 pools per day) increased to 0.44+/-0.11 pools per day on atorvastatin and 0.38+/-0.11 pools per day on simvastatin (both P<0.01). ApoB-containing lipoproteins were more triglyceride-rich and contained less free cholesterol and cholesteryl ester on statin therapy. Further, patients on both treatments showed marked decreases in all LDL subfractions. In particular the concentration of small dense LDL (LDL-III) fell 64% on atorvastatin and 45% on simvastatin. We conclude that in patients with moderate combined hyperlipidemia who initially have a low FCR for VLDL and LDL apoB, the principal action of atorvastatin and simvastatin is to stimulate receptor-mediated catabolism across the spectrum of apoB-containing lipoproteins. This leads to a substantial, and approximately equivalent, percentage reduction in plasma triglyceride and LDL cholesterol.

Hypocholesterolemic effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors in the guinea pig: atorvastatin versus simvastatin

Male Hartley guinea pigs were fed a hypercholesterolemic diet rich in lauric and myristic acids with 0, 10, or 20 mg/kg of simvastatin or atorvastatin for 21 days. Atorvastatin and simvastatin resulted in a lowering of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in a dose-dependent manner by an average of 48 and 61% with 10 and 20 mg/kg, respectively. Both statins were equally effective in lowering plasma LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (apo-B) levels. Atorvastatin and simvastatin treatments yielded LDL particles that differed in composition from the control. Due to the relevance of LDL oxidation and cholesteryl ester transfer in plasma to the progression of atherosclerosis, these parameters were analyzed after statin treatment. Atorvastatin and simvastatin treatment decreased the susceptibility of LDL particles to oxidation by 95% as determined by the formation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. An 80% decrease in the transfer of cholesteryl ester between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and the apo-B-containing lipoproteins was observed after simvastatin and atorvastatin treatment. In addition, statin effects on plasma LDL transport were studied. Simvastatin- and atorvastatin-treated guinea pigs exhibited 125 and 175% faster LDL fractional catabolic rates, respectively, compared with control animals. No change in LDL apo-B flux was induced by either treatment; however, LDL apo-B pool size was reduced after statin treatment. Hepatic microsomal free cholesterol was lower in the atorvastatin and simvastatin groups. However, only atorvastatin treatment resulted in an 80% decrease of acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase activity (P < 0.001). In summary, atorvastatin and simvastatin had similar LDL cholesterol lowering properties, but these drugs modified LDL transport and hepatic cholesterol metabolism differently.

Metabolic modes of action of the statins in the hyperlipoproteinemias

Conflicting results have been published during the past few years regarding the physiologic modes of action of the hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, generally referred to as statins, using standard doses. Three mechanisms have been described: increased LDL catabolic rate, increased removal of LDL precursors resulting in decreased LDL production and decreased VLDL production. The physiologic effects of statins seem to depend on the underlying pathology of the disorders under therapy. More recent data using either the more potent atorvastatin or larger doses of previously available statins (e.g. simvastatin 80-160 mg/day), suggest that both the potency of the statins and the underlying pathopHysiology are important in determining the predominant physiologic responses of patients. To understand physiologic responses more completely, drug-dose-physiologic response curves of apo B kinetics in various groups of patients are needed. Simultaneous studies of apo B, triglycerides and cholesterol metabolism are also needed and are currently feasible.

Role of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ("statins") in familial combined hyperlipidemia

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) is a heterogeneous genetic disorder characterized by multiple lipoprotein phenotypes. The genetic defect is unknown, although linkage to the region of the apolipoprotein (apo) A-I-apoC-III-apo A-IV gene cluster on chromosome 11 has been suggested. The metabolic abnormality in many affected individuals is overproduction of apoB-containing lipoproteins causing elevated levels of plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, or both. Low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and an abundance of dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles are other features contributing to the high association of this disorder with premature coronary artery disease. Many affected individuals need drug therapy to lower their lipid levels. The hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or "statins," offer a potent therapeutic option in patients with FCHL. These drugs significantly decrease levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apoB, although their effects on HDL cholesterol and triglycerides are limited. The mechanisms by which statins exert their beneficial effects in patients with FCHL remain controversial. We studied 7 patients with FCHL and 5 genetically uncharacterized patients with mixed lipemia during treatment with pravastatin 20 mg/day. Metabolic parameters of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-apoB and LDL-apoB were studied using endogenous labeling with stable isotopes. In all patients pravastatin caused an increase in fractional catabolic rates of LDL-apoB without a significant effect on the production rates of apoB-containing lipoproteins. We cannot exclude the possibility that higher doses of statins may decrease VLDL and LDL production.

Lovastatin decreases de novo cholesterol synthesis and LDL Apo B-100 production rates in combined-hyperlipidemic males

The effect of lovastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity, on the kinetics of de novo cholesterol synthesis and apolipoprotein (apo) B in very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was investigated in five male patients with combined hyperlipidemia. Subjects were counseled to follow a Step 2 diet and were treated with lovastatin and placebo in randomly assigned order for 6-week periods. At the end of each experimental period, subjects were given deuterium oxide orally and de novo cholesterol synthesis was assessed from deuterium incorporation into cholesterol and expressed as fractional synthesis rate (C-FSR) and production rate (C-PR). Simultaneously, the kinetics of VLDL, IDL, and LDL apo B-100 were studied in the fed state using a primed-constant infusion of deuterated leucine to measure fractional catabolic rates (FCR) and production rates (PR). Drug treatment resulted in significant decreases in total cholesterol (-29%), VLDL cholesterol (-40%), LDL cholesterol (-27%), and apo B (-16%) levels and increases in HDL cholesterol (+13%) and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I (+11%) levels. Associated with these plasma lipoprotein responses was a significant reduction in both de novo C-FSR (-40%; P = .04) and C-PR (-42%; P = .03). Treatment with lovastain in these patients had no significant effect on the FCR of apoB-100 in VLDL, IDL, or LDL, but resulted in a significant decrease in the PR of apoB-100 in IDL and LDL. Comparing the kinetic data of these patients with those of 10 normolipidemic control subjects indicates that lovastatin treatment normalized apoB-100 IDL and LDL PR. The results of these studies suggest that the declines in plasma lipid levels observed after treatment of combined hyperlipidemic patients with lovastatin are attributable to reductions in the C-FSR and C-PR of de novo cholesterol synthesis and the PR of apoB-100 containing lipoproteins. The decline in de novo cholesterol synthesis, rather than an increase in direct uptake of VLDL and IDL, may have contributed to the decline in the PR observed.

A familial combined hyperlipidemic kindred with impaired apolipoprotein B catabolism. Kinetics of apolipoprotein B during placebo and pravastatin therapy

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by multiple lipoprotein phenotypes, a high risk for coronary heart disease, and predominance among the LDL fraction of smaller and denser particles. We report on an FCHL kindred (the M-kindred) in which decreased VLDL- and LDL-apoB elimination rates rather than enhanced production rates were the main kinetic abnormalities. Lipoprotein levels and metabolic parameters of all apoB-containing lipoproteins (including light and dense LDLs) were determined during placebo and pravastatin treatment periods. ApoB metabolism was studied by endogenous labeling with stable isotopes and a multicompartmental model. Five members of the M-kindred participated. The study was doubly blinded, randomized, and placebo controlled. Treatment periods of 6 weeks were separated by 2-week washout periods. All subjects had high apoB levels, 2 had a mixed lipemia, 1 had hypercholesterolemia, and 2 had hypertriglyceridemia. Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia, hypercholesterolemia, and defective apoB-100 were excluded by genetic, testing. Kinetic parameters were remarkably similar in the five study subjects during the placebo period, despite their diverse plasma lipid profiles. Compared with nine normolipidemic control subjects, low VLDL-apoB fractional catabolic rates (FCRs) (3.6 +/- .1 versus 9.3 +/- 2.9 pools per day) and low LDL-apoB FCRs (0.19 +/- 0.05 versus 0.41 +/- 0.13 pool per day) were observed in every case. The majority of the LDL particles were identified in the denser fraction (d = 1.036 to 1.063 g/mL). A clear precursor-product relationship was observed from VLDL to IDL to light LDL to dense LDL, ie, there was no "metabolic channeling." Light LDL had significantly higher FCR than dense LDL (0.82 +/- 0.21 versus 0.22 +/- 0.08 pool per day). VLDL-apoB production rates were normal (19.7 +/- 6.0 versus 21.6 +/- 6.1 mg/kg per day for control subjects). In contrast, in two subjects drawn from two other FCHL kindreds (the C- and K-kindreds), VLDL-apoB production rates were increased (35.6 and 32.1 mg/kg per day, respectively). In these two, more "typical" FCHL subjects, FCRs of LDL-apoB were near normal (0.351 and 0.311 pool per day, respectively). Pravastatin (20 mg/d) resulted in significantly lower plasma cholesterol (265 +/- 30 to 218 +/- 16 mg/dL, P < .01), LDL cholesterol (186 +/- 31 to 145 +/- 15 mg/dL, P < .03), and apoB levels (168 +/- 14 to 125 +/- 16 mg/dL, P < .01) in the five FCHL subjects of the M-kindred. No changes were observed in plasma HDL cholesterol, apoA-I, or lipoprotein(a). Pravastatin significantly increased the LDL-apoB FCR (from 0.19 +/- 0.05 to 0.34 +/- 0.04 pool per day). The FCRs of both LDL subclasses increased with treatment. No pravastatin-induced changes were seen in apoB production rates.