1
|
Tobaruela-Resola AL, Riezu-Boj JI, Milagro FI, Mogna-Pelaez P, Herrero JI, Elorz M, Benito-Boillos A, Tur JA, Martínez JA, Abete I, Zulet MÁ. Circulating microRNA panels in subjects with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease after following a 2-year dietary intervention. J Endocrinol Invest 2025; 48:987-1003. [PMID: 39549213 PMCID: PMC11950055 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-024-02499-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 11/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) affects one-third of the global population. Despite its high prevalence, there is a lack of minimally non-invasive diagnostic methods to assess this condition. This study explores the potential of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as diagnostic biomarkers for MASLD after a 2-year nutritional intervention. METHODS Fifty-five subjects with steatosis (MASLD group) from the Fatty Liver in Obesity (FLiO) study (NCT03183193) were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 24 months. Participants were classified into two groups: those who still had steatosis after the intervention (unhealthy group) and those in whom steatosis had disappeared (healthy group). Hepatic status was evaluated through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography, elastography and serum transaminases. Circulating miRNA levels were measured by RT-PCR. RESULTS The dietary intervention was able to modulate the expression of circulating miRNAs after 6, 12, and 24 months. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the most effective panels for diagnosing whether MASLD has disappeared after the nutritional intervention included miR15b-3p, miR126-5p and BMI (AUC 0.68) at 6 months, miR29b-3p, miR122-5p, miR151a-3p and BMI (AUC 0.85) at 12 months and miR21-5p, miR151a-3p and BMI at 24 months (AUC 0.85). CONCLUSIONS Circulating miRNAs were useful in predicting MASLD in subjects with overweight or obesity after following a weight-loss oriented nutritional intervention. These findings highlight the potential role of miRNAs in diagnosing MASLD and underscore the importance of precision nutrition in managing and determining MASLD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration number: NCT03183193 (www. CLINICALTRIALS gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Luz Tobaruela-Resola
- Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, Centre for Nutrition Research, Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José Ignacio Riezu-Boj
- Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, Centre for Nutrition Research, Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fermín I Milagro
- Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, Centre for Nutrition Research, Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paola Mogna-Pelaez
- Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, Centre for Nutrition Research, Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José I Herrero
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre Network in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariana Elorz
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alberto Benito-Boillos
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Josep A Tur
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Research group on Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of Balearic Islands-IUNICS & IDISBA, 07122, Palma, Spain
| | - J Alfredo Martínez
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
- Precision Nutrition and Cardiovascular Health Program, IMDEA Food, CEI UAM + CSIC, 28049, Madrid, Spain
| | - Itziar Abete
- Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, Centre for Nutrition Research, Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Ángeles Zulet
- Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Physiology, Centre for Nutrition Research, Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gong P, Zhang J, Huang C, Lok UW, Tang S, Liu H, DeRuiter R, Peterson K, Knoll K, Robinson K, Watt K, Callstrom M, Chen S. Novel Quantitative Liver Steatosis Assessment Method With Ultrasound Harmonic Imaging. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2025; 44:77-85. [PMID: 39315751 PMCID: PMC11634646 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most prevalent liver disorder in Western countries, with approximately 20%-30% of the MASLD patients progressing to severe stages. There is an urgent need for noninvasive, cost-effective, widely accessible, and precise biomarkers to evaluate liver steatosis. This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of a novel reference frequency method-based ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) in both fundamental (RFM-ACE-FI) and harmonic (RFM-ACE-HI) imaging for detecting and grading liver steatosis. METHODS An Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study was carried out between December 2018 and October 2022. A total number of 130 subjects were enrolled in the study. The correlation between RFM-ACE-HI values and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), as well as between RFM-ACE-FI values and MRI-PDFF were calculated. The diagnostic performance of RFM-ACE-FI and RFM-ACE-HI was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, as compared to MRI-PDFF. The reproducibility of RFM-ACE-HI was assessed by interobserver agreement between two sonographers. RESULTS A strong correlation was observed between RFM-ACE-HI and MRI-PDFF, with R = 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.92; P < .001), while the correlation between RFM-ACE-FI and MRI-PDFF was R = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.50-0.76; P < .001). The area under the ROC (AUROC) curve for RFM-ACE-HI in staging liver steatosis grades of S ≥ 1 and S ≥ 2 was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99; P < .001) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00; P < .001), respectively, and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.85) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88) for RFM-ACE-FI, respectively. Great reproducibility was achieved for RFM-ACE-HI, with an interobserver agreement of R = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The novel RFM-ACE-HI method offered high liver steatosis diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility, which has important clinical implications for early disease intervention and treatment evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Gong
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jingke Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Chengwu Huang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - U-Wai Lok
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Shanshan Tang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
| | - Ryan DeRuiter
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Kendra Peterson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Kate Knoll
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Kymberly Watt
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Shigao Chen
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang W, Peng Y, Kang L. Advancements of non‐invasive imaging technologies for the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis: Present and future. VIEW 2024; 5. [DOI: 10.1002/viw.20240010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
Abstract
AbstractLiver fibrosis is a reparative response triggered by liver injury. Non‐invasive assessment and staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease are of paramount importance, as treatment strategies and prognoses depend significantly on the degree of fibrosis. Although liver fibrosis has traditionally been staged through invasive liver biopsy, this method is prone to sampling errors, particularly when biopsy sizes are inadequate. Consequently, there is an urgent clinical need for an alternative to biopsy, one that ensures precise, sensitive, and non‐invasive diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis. Non‐invasive imaging assessments have assumed a pivotal role in clinical practice, enjoying growing popularity and acceptance due to their potential for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring liver fibrosis. In this comprehensive review, we first delved into the current landscape of non‐invasive imaging technologies, assessing their accuracy and the transformative impact they have had on the diagnosis and management of liver fibrosis in both clinical practice and animal models. Additionally, we provided an in‐depth exploration of recent advancements in ultrasound imaging, computed tomography imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, radiomics, and artificial intelligence within the field of liver fibrosis research. We summarized the key concepts, advantages, limitations, and diagnostic performance of each technique. Finally, we discussed the challenges associated with clinical implementation and offer our perspective on advancing the field, hoping to provide alternative directions for the future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenpeng Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Peking University First Hospital Beijing China
| | - Yushuo Peng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Peking University First Hospital Beijing China
| | - Lei Kang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Peking University First Hospital Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Torgersen J, Skanderson M, Kidwai-Khan F, Carbonari DM, Tate JP, Park LS, Bhattacharya D, Lim JK, Taddei TH, Justice AC, Lo Re V. Identification of hepatic steatosis among persons with and without HIV using natural language processing. Hepatol Commun 2024; 8:e0468. [PMID: 38896066 PMCID: PMC11186806 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is a growing phenomenon, and our understanding of its determinants has been limited by our ability to identify it clinically. Natural language processing (NLP) can potentially identify hepatic steatosis systematically within large clinical repositories of imaging reports. We validated the performance of an NLP algorithm for the identification of SLD in clinical imaging reports and applied this tool to a large population of people with and without HIV. METHODS Patients were included in the analysis if they enrolled in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study between 2001 and 2017, had an imaging report inclusive of the liver, and had ≥2 years of observation before the imaging study. SLD was considered present when reports contained the terms "fatty," "steatosis," "steatotic," or "steatohepatitis." The performance of the SLD NLP algorithm was compared to a clinical review of 800 reports. We then applied the NLP algorithm to the first eligible imaging study and compared patient characteristics by SLD and HIV status. RESULTS NLP achieved 100% sensitivity and 88.5% positive predictive value for the identification of SLD. When applied to 26,706 eligible Veterans Aging Cohort Study patient imaging reports, SLD was identified in 72.2% and did not significantly differ by HIV status. SLD was associated with a higher prevalence of metabolic comorbidities, alcohol use disorder, and hepatitis B and C, but not HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS While limited to those undergoing radiologic study, the NLP algorithm accurately identified SLD in people with and without HIV and offers a valuable tool to evaluate the determinants and consequences of hepatic steatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie Torgersen
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Melissa Skanderson
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Farah Kidwai-Khan
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Dena M. Carbonari
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Janet P. Tate
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lesley S. Park
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Debika Bhattacharya
- Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joseph K. Lim
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Tamar H. Taddei
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Amy C. Justice
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Vincent Lo Re
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haddad GM, Gestic MA, Utrini MP, Chaim FDM, Chaim EA, Cazzo E. DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF THE NON-INVASIVE MARKERS NFLS, NI-NASH-DS, AND FIB-4 FOR ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE IN INDIVIDUALS WITH OBESITY: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2024; 61:e23050. [PMID: 38896571 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.24612023-050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-invasive markers have been developed to assess the presence and severity of liver abnormalities related to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). OBJECTIVE To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive NAFLD markers (NAFLD liver fat score [NLFS], non-invasive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis detection score [NI-NASH-DS] and fibrosis score based on four variables [FIB-4]) in individuals with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS A descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out enrolling 91 individuals who underwent bariatric surgery at a tertiary-level public university hospital. Non-invasive NAFLD markers were calculated using laboratory tests, clinical and anthropometric variables and diagnostic accuracy tests were calculated comparing them in relation to the gold-standard test for this analysis (histopathological evaluation). RESULTS A total of 85.7% of the participants were female and mean age was 39.1±9.8 years. The average body mass index was 38.4±3.6 kg/m2. At histopathological examination, 84 (92.3%) patients presented with steatosis, 82 (90.1%) with some type of fibrosis; 21 (23.1%) patients were diagnosed with NASH according to the NAFLD activity score criteria. The overall accuracy of NLFS score was 58.2% for general hepatic steatosis and 61.5% for moderate to severe steatosis. The overall accuracy of FIB-4 was 95.4% for advanced fibrosis. NI-NASH-DS had a 74.7% overall accuracy for NASH. CONCLUSION In a population of individuals with obesity, the FIB-4 score had high overall accuracy in assessing the presence of advanced liver fibrosis, whereas the NFLS and NI-NASH-DS had moderate accuracies for the assessment of steatosis and NASH, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Macedo Haddad
- Faculdade de Medicina da Pontíficia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Elinton Adami Chaim
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Departamento de Cirurgia, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Everton Cazzo
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Departamento de Cirurgia, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Freer CL, George ES, Tan SY, Abbott G, Scott D, Daly RM. Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Its Defining Components in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Varies According to the Method of Assessment and Adjustment: Findings from the UK Biobank. Calcif Tissue Int 2024; 114:592-602. [PMID: 38678512 PMCID: PMC11090922 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-024-01212-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Sarcopenia may increase non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) risk, but prevalence likely varies with different diagnostic criteria. This study examined the prevalence of sarcopenia and its defining components in adults with and without NAFLD and whether it varied by the method of muscle mass assessment [bioelectrical impedance (BIA) versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)] and adjustment (height2 versus BMI). Adults (n = 7266) in the UK Biobank study (45-79 years) with and without NAFLD diagnosed by MRI, were included. Sarcopenia was defined by the 2018 European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People definition, with low appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) assessed by BIA and DXA and adjusted for height2 or BMI. Overall, 21% of participants had NAFLD and the sex-specific prevalence of low muscle strength (3.6-7.2%) and sarcopenia (0.1-1.4%) did not differ by NAFLD status. However, NAFLD was associated with 74% (males) and 370% (females) higher prevalence of low ASM when adjusted for BMI but an 82% (males) to 89% (females) lower prevalence when adjusted for height2 (all P < 0.05). The prevalence of impaired physical function was 40% (males, P = 0.08) to 123% (females, P < 0.001) higher in NAFLD. In middle-aged and older adults, NAFLD was not associated with a higher prevalence of low muscle strength or sarcopenia but was associated with an increased risk of impaired physical function and low muscle mass when adjusted for BMI. These findings support the use of adiposity-based adjustments when assessing low muscle mass and the assessment of physical function in NAFLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine L Freer
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| | - Elena S George
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Sze-Yen Tan
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Gavin Abbott
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - David Scott
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Robin M Daly
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang M, Tang S, Li G, Huang Z, Mo S, Yang K, Chen J, Du B, Xu J, Ding Z, Dong F. Comparative study of ultrasound attenuation analysis and controlled attenuation parameter in the diagnosis and grading of liver steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:81. [PMID: 38395765 PMCID: PMC10885558 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03160-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the diagnostic performance of Ultrasound Attenuation Analysis (USAT) in the diagnosis and grading of hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) using Controlled Attenuation Parameters (CAP) as a reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS From February 13, 2023, to September 26, 2023, participants underwent CAP and USAT examinations on the same day. We used manufacturer-recommended CAP thresholds to categorize the stages of hepatic steatosis: stage 1 (mild) - 240 dB/m, stage 2 (moderate) - 265 dB/m, stage 3 (severe) - 295 dB/m. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were employed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of USAT and determine the thresholds for different levels of hepatic steatosis. RESULTS Using CAP as the reference, we observed that the average USAT value increased with the severity of hepatic steatosis, and the differences in USAT values among the different hepatic steatosis groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between USAT and CAP (r = 0.674, p < 0.0001). When using CAP as the reference, the optimal cut-off values for diagnosing and predicting different levels of hepatic steatosis with USAT were as follows: the cut-off value for excluding the presence of hepatic steatosis was 0.54 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.96); for mild hepatic steatosis, it was 0.59 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.86); for moderate hepatic steatosis, it was 0.73 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.81); and for severe hepatic steatosis, it was 0.87 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.87). CONCLUSION USAT exhibits strong diagnostic performance for hepatic steatosis and shows a high correlation with CAP values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengyun Wang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuzhen Tang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guoqiu Li
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhibin Huang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sijie Mo
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Keen Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China
| | - Baishan Du
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China
| | - Jinfeng Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
| | - Zhimin Ding
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
| | - Fajin Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Souza Echeverria L, Mounzer DLS, Gestic MA, Utrini MP, Chaim FDM, Callejas-Neto F, Chaim EA, Cazzo E. Fibrotic NASH in Individuals with Obesity: a Cross-sectional Analysis of the Prevalence of this Significant Milestone of Disease Progression and Accuracy of a Non-invasive Marker for its Screening. Obes Surg 2024; 34:389-395. [PMID: 38110785 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06998-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibrotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), i.e., the concomitant presence of active inflammation and fibrosis, represents a milestone in the natural history of NAFLD and a critical time point in its progression. The purpose of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the non-invasive Fibrotic NASH Index (FNI) in individuals with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study, enrolling individuals who underwent bariatric surgery with liver biopsy at a tertiary university hospital. FNI was calculated, and a cutoff value was determined. Its diagnostic accuracy was then calculated through comparison with the gold standard test for this analysis (histopathological examination). RESULTS Of 128 participants, 83.6% were female, and the average age was 39.8 ± 8.7 years. The mean BMI was 38.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2. NAFLD was histologically confirmed in 76.6%, of which 81.6% had NASH. Histologically confirmed fibrotic NASH was observed in 22.7% of the general study population, 29.6% of individuals with NAFLD, and 36.3% of those with NASH. The mean FNI was 0.18 ± 0.19. An optimal cutoff point of 0.21 was determined, with an overall accuracy of 90.1%, an 82.8% sensitivity, a 90.8% specificity, a 72.6% positive predictive value, and a 94.7% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS FNI provided adequate accuracy in detecting and ruling out fibrotic NASH. Considering the importance of fibrotic NASH within the natural history of NAFLD progression and the fact that this marker uses simple variables, it may be of great importance in high-risk populations, and its external validation and use should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Everton Cazzo
- Dept. of Surgery, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kizildag B, Baykara M, Yurttutan N, Vicdan H. Correlation between ultrasonography and MR proton density fat fraction techniques in evaluating the severity of liver steatosis. HEPATOLOGY FORUM 2024; 5:37-43. [PMID: 38283269 PMCID: PMC10809335 DOI: 10.14744/hf.2023.2023.0046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Background and Aim To investigate the relationship between ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) techniques, using the modified DIXON method, in determining the severity of liver steatosis. Materials and Methods This study included seventy consecutive patients who underwent upper abdominal MRI for various reasons between June 2016 and January 2017. Fatty liver staging was performed using US as indicated.The liver fat percentage was measured and staged according to PDFF values. Results In the study, of the 70 cases, 36 were male and 34 were female. On US, 18.5% of the cases had stage 0, 32.8% had stage 1, 42.8% had stage 2, and 5.7% had stage 3 liver steatosis. A significant correlation was found between ultrasonographic evaluation and PDFF in determining the percentage of liver fat (r=0.775, p<0.001). When comparing the percentages, MR-evaluated PDFF and ultrasonographic staging were most compatible at grade 3 and least compatible at grade 2. When the PDFF threshold value was set at 8.1%, the sensitivity of US in distinguishing between obvious and indistinct steatosis was 97.1%, and the specificity was 88.9%. Conclusion Ultrasound continues to be a useful tool for detecting fatty liver disease. However, magnetic resonance (MR) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) imaging is essential for accurately determining the severity and prevalence of steatosis. Our study revealed inconsistencies between US and MR PDFF in grading liver steatosis, showing higher agreement in severe cases and lower agreement in moderate cases. Therefore, we recommend classifying steatosis as either uncertain or apparent rather than using a grading system in US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betul Kizildag
- Department of Radiology, Sutcu Imam University School of Medicine, Kahramanmaras, Turkiye
| | - Murat Baykara
- Department of Radiology, Firat University School of Medicine, Elazig, Turkiye
| | - Nursel Yurttutan
- Department of Radiology, Sutcu Imam University School of Medicine, Kahramanmaras, Turkiye
| | - Halit Vicdan
- Department of Radiology, Sutcu Imam University School of Medicine, Kahramanmaras, Turkiye
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beiriger J, Chauhan K, Khan A, Shahzad T, Parra NS, Zhang P, Chen S, Nguyen A, Yan B, Bruckbauer J, Halegoua-DeMarzio D. Advancements in Understanding and Treating NAFLD: A Comprehensive Review of Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Emerging Therapies. LIVERS 2023; 3:637-656. [DOI: 10.3390/livers3040042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025] Open
Abstract
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current understanding of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its progression to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), focusing on key factors influencing its pathogenesis and emerging therapeutic strategies. This review highlights the growing prevalence of NAFLD and NASH, emphasizing their multifactorial nature. The manuscript identifies various contributors to NAFLD development, including genetic, dietary, and environmental factors, while examining the intricate interplay between these factors and their impact on hepatic lipid metabolism, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Genetic predisposition, dietary fat intake, and excessive fructose consumption are discussed as significant contributors to NAFLD progression. The article emphasizes the lack of a single therapeutic approach and underscores the need for combination strategies. Lifestyle interventions, particularly weight loss through diet and exercise, remain crucial, while pharmacological options like GLP-1 receptor agonists, obeticholic acid, lanifibranor, and resmetirom show promise but require further validation. Bariatric surgery and emerging endoscopic procedures offer potential in eligible patients. In sum, this article underscores the complexity of NAFLD and NASH, addresses key factors influencing pathogenesis, and discusses emerging therapies advocating for a multifaceted approach to this increasingly prevalent and clinically relevant condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Beiriger
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Kashyap Chauhan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Adnan Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Taha Shahzad
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Natalia Salinas Parra
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Peter Zhang
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Sarah Chen
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Anh Nguyen
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Brian Yan
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - John Bruckbauer
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Dina Halegoua-DeMarzio
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Memaj P, Ouzerara Z, Jornayvaz FR. Role of Oxidative Stress and Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Related Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11271. [PMID: 37511031 PMCID: PMC10379080 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become a widely studied subject due to its increasing prevalence and links to diseases such as type 2 diabetes and obesity. It has severe complications, including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and portal hypertension that can lead to liver transplantation in some cases. To better prevent and treat this pathology, it is important to understand its underlying physiology. Here, we identify two main factors that play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of NAFLD: oxidative stress and the key role of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1). We discuss the pathophysiology linking these factors to NAFLD pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Plator Memaj
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Therapeutic Patient Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Zayd Ouzerara
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Therapeutic Patient Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - François R Jornayvaz
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Therapeutic Patient Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Diabetes Center, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guglielmo FF, Barr RG, Yokoo T, Ferraioli G, Lee JT, Dillman JR, Horowitz JM, Jhaveri KS, Miller FH, Modi RY, Mojtahed A, Ohliger MA, Pirasteh A, Reeder SB, Shanbhogue K, Silva AC, Smith EN, Surabhi VR, Taouli B, Welle CL, Yeh BM, Venkatesh SK. Liver Fibrosis, Fat, and Iron Evaluation with MRI and Fibrosis and Fat Evaluation with US: A Practical Guide for Radiologists. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220181. [PMID: 37227944 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative imaging biomarkers of liver disease measured by using MRI and US are emerging as important clinical tools in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Because of their high accuracy and noninvasive nature, in many cases, these techniques have replaced liver biopsy for the diagnosis, quantitative staging, and treatment monitoring of patients with CLD. The most commonly evaluated imaging biomarkers are surrogates for liver fibrosis, fat, and iron. MR elastography is now routinely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and typically combined with MRI-based liver fat and iron quantification to exclude or grade hepatic steatosis and iron overload, respectively. US elastography is also widely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and has the advantage of lower equipment cost and greater availability compared with those of MRI. Emerging US fat quantification methods can be performed along with US elastography. The author group, consisting of members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Liver Fibrosis Disease-Focused Panel (DFP), the SAR Hepatic Iron Overload DFP, and the European Society of Radiology, review the basics of liver fibrosis, fat, and iron quantification with MRI and liver fibrosis and fat quantification with US. The authors cover technical requirements, typical case display, quality control and proper measurement technique and case interpretation guidelines, pitfalls, and confounding factors. The authors aim to provide a practical guide for radiologists interpreting these examinations. © RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Ronot in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavius F Guglielmo
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Richard G Barr
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Takeshi Yokoo
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Giovanna Ferraioli
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - James T Lee
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Jonathan R Dillman
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Jeanne M Horowitz
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Kartik S Jhaveri
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Frank H Miller
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Roshan Y Modi
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Amirkasra Mojtahed
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Michael A Ohliger
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Ali Pirasteh
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Scott B Reeder
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Krishna Shanbhogue
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Alvin C Silva
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Elainea N Smith
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Venkateswar R Surabhi
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Bachir Taouli
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Christopher L Welle
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Benjamin M Yeh
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| | - Sudhakar K Venkatesh
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (F.F.G.); Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio (R.G.B.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (G.F.); Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky (J.T.L.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (J.M.H., F.H.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (K.S.J.); Department of Radiology, ChristianaCare, Newark, Del (R.Y.M.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (M.A.O., B.M.Y.); Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics (A.P.) and Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (K.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (A.C.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (E.N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (V.R.S.); Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.L.W., S.K.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Asero C, Giandalia A, Cacciola I, Morace C, Lorello G, Caspanello AR, Alibrandi A, Squadrito G, Russo GT. High Prevalence of Severe Hepatic Fibrosis in Type 2 Diabetic Outpatients Screened for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. J Clin Med 2023; 12:2858. [PMID: 37109195 PMCID: PMC10146119 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a highly frequent condition in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the identification of subjects at higher risk of developing the more severe forms remains elusive in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and severity of liver fibrosis and its predictive factors in T2D outpatients without a known history of chronic liver disease by using recommended non-invasive methods. METHODS Consecutive T2D outpatients underwent a set of measurements of clinical and laboratory parameters, FIB-4 score (Fibrosis-4 index), and liver stiffness with controlled attenuation-parameter (CAP) performed by transient elastography (FibroScan) after excluding previous causes of liver disease. RESULTS Among the 205 T2D outpatients enrolled in the study (median age: 64 years, diabetes duration: 11 years, HbA1c: 7.4%, and BMI: 29.6 kg/m2), 54% had high ALT and/or AST levels, 15.6% had liver stiffness value > 10.1 kPa (severe fibrosis), 55.1% had CAP values > 290 dB/m (severe steatosis), and FIB-4 score was >2 in 11.2% of subjects (>2.67 in 15 subjects). Moreover, 49 (23.9%) T2D patients had clinically meaningful liver harm, with either a FIB-4 score > 2 and/or FibroScan > 10.1 kPa. At regression analysis, BMI, HbA1c, creatinine, and triglycerides values were independent predictors of liver fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS Liver fibrosis is a frequent finding in T2D outpatients without a known history of liver disease, especially in those with obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, worse glycemic control, and high creatinine levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clelia Asero
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.A.)
- Medicine and Hepatology Unit, University Hospital of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Annalisa Giandalia
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.A.)
- Internal Medicine and Diabetology Unit, University Hospital of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Irene Cacciola
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.A.)
- Medicine and Hepatology Unit, University Hospital of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Carmela Morace
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.A.)
| | - Giuseppe Lorello
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.A.)
| | - Amalia Rita Caspanello
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.A.)
- Medicine and Hepatology Unit, University Hospital of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Angela Alibrandi
- Unit of Statistical and Mathematical Sciences, Department of Economics, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Giovanni Squadrito
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.A.)
- Internal Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppina T. Russo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.A.)
- Internal Medicine and Diabetology Unit, University Hospital of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Delfino JG, Pennello GA, Barnhart HX, Buckler AJ, Wang X, Huang EP, Raunig DL, Guimaraes AR, Hall TJ, deSouza NM, Obuchowski N. Multiparametric Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for Phenotype Classification: A Framework for Development and Validation. Acad Radiol 2023; 30:183-195. [PMID: 36202670 PMCID: PMC9825632 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
This manuscript is the third in a five-part series related to statistical assessment methodology for technical performance of multi-parametric quantitative imaging biomarkers (mp-QIBs). We outline approaches and statistical methodologies for developing and evaluating a phenotype classification model from a set of multiparametric QIBs. We then describe validation studies of the classifier for precision, diagnostic accuracy, and interchangeability with a comparator classifier. We follow with an end-to-end real-world example of development and validation of a classifier for atherosclerotic plaque phenotypes. We consider diagnostic accuracy and interchangeability to be clinically meaningful claims for a phenotype classification model informed by mp-QIB inputs, aiming to provide tools to demonstrate agreement between imaging-derived characteristics and clinically established phenotypes. Understanding that we are working in an evolving field, we close our manuscript with an acknowledgement of existing challenges and a discussion of where additional work is needed. In particular, we discuss the challenges involved with technical performance and analytical validation of mp-QIBs. We intend for this manuscript to further advance the robust and promising science of multiparametric biomarker development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana G Delfino
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
| | - Gene A Pennello
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Huiman X Barnhart
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Xiaofeng Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Erich P Huang
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis - National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Dave L Raunig
- Data Science Institute, Statistical and Quantitative Sciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Lexington, MA
| | - Alexander R Guimaraes
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR
| | - Timothy J Hall
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Nandita M deSouza
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, the Insitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology (ESR), Vienna, Austria
| | - Nancy Obuchowski
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Neck Circumference for NAFLD Assessment during a 2-Year Nutritional Intervention: The FLiO Study. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14235160. [PMID: 36501189 PMCID: PMC9740086 DOI: 10.3390/nu14235160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Neck circumference (NC) and its relationship to height (NHtR) and weight (NWtR) appear to be good candidates for the non-invasive management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study aimed to evaluate the ability of routine variables to assess and manage NAFLD in 98 obese subjects with NAFLD included in a 2-year nutritional intervention program. Different measurements were performed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. The nutritional intervention significantly improved the anthropometric, metabolic and imaging variables. NC was significantly associated with the steatosis degree at baseline (r = 0.29), 6 m (r = 0.22), 12 m (r = 0.25), and 24 m (r = 0.39) (all p < 0.05). NC was also significantly associated with visceral adipose tissue at all the study time-points (basal r = 0.78; 6 m r = 0.65; 12 m r = 0.71; 24 m r = 0.77; all p < 0.05). NC and neck ratios combined with ALT levels and HOMA-IR showed a good prediction ability for hepatic fat content and hepatic steatosis (at all time-points) in a ROC analysis. The model improved when weight loss was included in the panel (NC-ROC: 0.982 for steatosis degree). NC and ratios combined with ALT and HOMA-IR showed a good prediction ability for hepatic fat during the intervention. Thus, their application in clinical practice could improve the prevention and management of NAFLD.
Collapse
|
16
|
Billmann F, El Shishtawi S, Bruckner T, ElSheikh M, Müller-Stich BP, Billeter A. Combined non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes in severely obese patients-medium term effects of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass on disease markers. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2022; 11:795-807. [PMID: 36523925 PMCID: PMC9745618 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
Background We aimed to evaluate the medium-term efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on remission of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods We identified severely obese patients [body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2] with NAFLD (as defined by the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery Study) and T2DM (as defined by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Endocrinology) who underwent SG or RYGB in a single university surgical centre. The cohorts were match-paired and data were analysed after at least 3 years of follow up. The key outcomes measured were: (I) the improvement of liver function tests and NAFLD markers; (II) glycemic control and insulin resistance. Results Ninety-six patients were investigated; 44 (45.8%) were women. The mean pre-operative BMI was 45.2 kg/m2 in the SG and 42.0 kg/m2 in the RYGB group. SG and RYGB both significantly reduced serum liver enzyme concentrations. NAFLD markers resolved 2 years after SG in all patients. In contrast, only 78% and 80% of patients achieved remission of NAFLD 2 and 3 years after RYBG respectively. Both procedures resulted in comparable rates of remission of T2DM. Conclusions Bariatric surgery with SG may be preferable to RYGB for obese patients with NAFLD and T2DM based on the rates of remission of markers of these co-morbidities. However, our results need to be confirmed in prospective trials. Understanding the metabolic effects of specific bariatric surgical procedures may facilitate the development of a personalised approach to weight-loss surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franck Billmann
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Tom Bruckner
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Informatik, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mostafa ElSheikh
- Department of General Surgery, El-Gharbia Govenorate, Tanta, El gash St. Medical Campus, The Faculty of Medicine, Tanta, Egypt
| | | | - Adrian Billeter
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gong P, Huang C, Lok UW, Tang S, Ling W, Zhou C, Yang L, Watt KD, Callstrom M, Chen S. Improved Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation with Non-uniform Structure Detection and Removal. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2022; 48:2292-2301. [PMID: 36031504 PMCID: PMC9529831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Accurate detection of liver steatosis is important for liver disease management. Ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) has great potential in quantifying liver fat content. The ACE methods commonly assume uniform tissue characteristics. However, in vivo tissues typically contain non-uniform structures, which may bias the attenuation estimation and lead to large standard deviations. Here we propose a series of non-uniform structure detection and removal (NSDR) methods to reduce the impact from non-uniform structures during ACE analysis. The effectiveness of NSDR was validated through phantom and in vivo studies. In a pilot clinical study, ACE with NSDR provided more robust in vivo performance as compared with ACE without NSDR, indicating its potential for in vivo applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Gong
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Chengwu Huang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - U-Wai Lok
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shanshan Tang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Wenwu Ling
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chenyun Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lulu Yang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Kymberly D Watt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Shigao Chen
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cao D, Li M, Liu Y, Jin H, Yang D, Xu H, Lv H, Liu JI, Zhang P, Zhang Z, Yang Z. Comparison of reader agreement, correlation with liver biopsy, and time-burden sampling strategies for liver proton density fat fraction measured using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with obesity: a secondary cross-sectional study. BMC Med Imaging 2022; 22:92. [PMID: 35581577 PMCID: PMC9112589 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00821-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based proton density fat fraction (PDFF) has become popular for quantifying liver fat content. However, the variability of the region-of-interest (ROI) sampling strategy may result in a lack of standardisation of this technology. In an effort to establish an accurate and effective PDFF measurement scheme, this study assessed the pathological correlation, the reader agreement, and time-burden of different sampling strategies with variable ROI size, location, and number. Methods Six-echo spoiled gradient-recalled-echo magnitude-based fat quantification was performed for 50 patients with obesity, using a 3.0-T MRI scanner. Two readers used different ROI sampling strategies to measure liver PDFF, three times. Intra-reader and inter-reader agreement was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients and Bland‒Altman analysis. Pearson correlations were used to assess the correlation between PDFFs and liver biopsy. Time-burden was recorded. Results For pathological correlations, the correlations for the strategy of using three large ROIs in Couinaud segment 3 (S3 3L-ROI) were significantly greater than those for all sampling strategies at the whole-liver level (P < 0.05). For inter-reader agreement, the sampling strategies at the segmental level for S3 3L-ROI and using three large ROIs in Couinaud segment 6 (S6 3L-ROI) and the sampling strategies at the whole-liver level for three small ROIs per Couinaud segment (27S-ROI), one large ROI per Couinaud segment (9L-ROI), and three large ROIs per Couinaud segment (27S-ROI) had limits of agreement (LOA) < 1.5%. For intra-reader agreement, the sampling strategies at the whole-liver level for 27S-ROI, 9L-ROI, and 27L-ROI had both intraclass coefficients > 0.995 and LOAs < 1.5%. The change in the time-burden was the largest (100.80 s) when 9L-ROI was changed to 27L-ROI. Conclusions For hepatic PDFF measurement without liver puncture biopsy as the gold standard, and for general hepatic PDFF assessment, 9L-ROI sampling strategy at the whole-liver level should be used preferentially. For hepatic PDFF with liver puncture biopsy as the gold standard, 3L-ROI sampling strategy at the puncture site segment is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Cao
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Mengyi Li
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - He Jin
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Dawei Yang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Hui Xu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Han Lv
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - JIa Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
| | - Zhenghan Yang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lok UW, Gong P, Huang C, Tang S, Zhou C, Yang L, Watt KD, Callstrom M, Trzasko JD, Chen S. Reverberation clutter signal suppression in ultrasound attenuation estimation using wavelet-based robust principal component analysis. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35358950 PMCID: PMC9297384 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac62fd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. Ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) has diagnostic potential for clinical applications such as quantifying fat content in the liver. Previously, we have proposed a system-independent ACE technique based on spectral normalization of different frequencies, called the reference frequency method (RFM). This technique does not require a well-calibrated reference phantom for normalization. However, this method may be vulnerable to severe reverberation clutter introduced by the body wall. The clutter superimposed on liver echoes may bias the estimation. Approach. We proposed to use robust principal component analysis, combined with wavelet-based sparsity promotion, to suppress the severe reverberation clutters. The capability to mitigate the reverberation clutters was validated through phantom and in vivo studies. Main Results. In the phantom studies with added reverberation clutters, higher normalized cross-correlation and smaller mean absolute errors were attained as compared to RFM results without the proposed method, demonstrating the capability to reconstruct tissue signals from reverberations. In a pilot patient study, the correlation between ACE and proton density fat fraction (PDFF), a measurement of liver fat by MRI as a reference standard, was investigated. The proposed method showed an improvement of the correlation (coefficient of determination, R = 0.82) as compared with the counterpart without the proposed method (R = 0.69). Significance: The proposed method showed the feasibility of suppressing the reverberation clutters, providing an important basis for the development of a robust ACE with large reverberation clutters.
Collapse
|
20
|
Angelidi AM, Papadaki A, Nolen-Doerr E, Boutari C, Mantzoros CS. The effect of dietary patterns on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease diagnosed by biopsy or magnetic resonance in adults: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Metabolism 2022; 129:155136. [PMID: 35032545 DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Adhering to specific dietary patterns might hold promise as a lifestyle modification treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effect of dietary patterns on changes in hepatic fat content, liver enzymes and metabolic syndrome components. We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science for randomised controlled trials published in English until April 2020, comparing a specific dietary pattern with no treatment, usual care, or a different diet in adults with NAFLD. Studies were included if NAFLD had been diagnosed using biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging, or proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Data from three trials in adults with NAFLD but without diabetes (n = 128; mean age 49.9 ± 5.0 years, range 42-55 years) were included in the qualitative synthesis; across them, risk of bias was considered low, unclear and high for 33%, 38% and 29% of domains, respectively. There was moderate evidence that a low-carbohydrate, compared to a low-calorie diet (-27%, P = 0.008, one study, n = 18) and the Mediterranean, compared to a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet (-4.4%, P = 0.030, one study, n = 12) result in greater reductions in hepatic fat content, but no such evidence was found for the Fatty Liver in Obesity dietary pattern (based on the principles of the Mediterranean diet), compared to the American Heart Association diet (-0.6%, P = 0.706, one study, n = 98). No between-group differences were reported for other outcomes across studies. A post hoc analysis, including two eligible studies assessing the effect of the Mediterranean, compared to a low-fat diet, irrespective of baseline presence of diabetes, showed strong evidence that the Mediterranean diet reduces hepatic fat content (-4.1%, 95% CI = -5.8 to -2.3, P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and triglyceride concentrations (-16.9 mg/dL, 95% CI = -26.3 to -7.7, P < 0.001; I2 = 0%). Well-designed, adequately powered and rigorous randomised controlled trials are needed to provide robust evidence on the effect of these dietary patterns, but also other whole dietary approaches, on NAFLD progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki M Angelidi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Endocrinology, Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Angeliki Papadaki
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Eric Nolen-Doerr
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chrysoula Boutari
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christos S Mantzoros
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Endocrinology, Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Akter S. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Steatohepatitis: Risk Factors and Pathophysiology. Middle East J Dig Dis 2022; 14:167-181. [PMID: 36619154 PMCID: PMC9489315 DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2022.270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its progressive subtype non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are the most prevalent liver diseases, often leading to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This review aims to describe the present knowledge of the risk factors responsible for the development of NAFLD and NASH. I performed a literature review identifying studies focusing on the complex pathogenic pathway and risk factors of NAFLD and steatohepatitis. The relationship between NAFLD and metabolic syndrome is well established and widely recognized. Obesity, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and insulin resistance are the most common risk factors associated with NAFLD. Among the components of metabolic syndrome, current evidence strongly suggests obesity and type 2 diabetes as risk factors of NASH and HCC. However, other elements, namely gender divergences, ethnicity, genetic factors, participation of innate immune system, oxidative stress, apoptotic pathways, and adipocytokines, take a leading role in the onset and promotion of NAFLD. Pathophysiological mechanisms that are responsible for NAFLD development and subsequent progression to NASH are insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, oxidative stress, hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, cytokine/adipokine signaling pathways, and genetic and environmental factors. Major pathophysiological findings of NAFLD are dysfunction of adipose tissue through the enhanced flow of free fatty acids (FFAs) and release of adipokines, and altered gut microbiome that generate proinflammatory signals and cause NASH progression. Understanding the pathophysiology and risk factors of NAFLD and NASH; this review could provide insight into the development of therapeutic strategies and useful diagnostic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharmin Akter
- Department of Physiology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh,Corresponding Author: Sharmin Akter, PhD Department of Physiology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh Tel: +0088-091-67401-6 (ext. 6320) Fax: + 880 91 61510
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Betanzos‐Robledo L, Téllez‐Rojo MM, Lamadrid‐Figueroa H, Roldan‐Valadez E, Peterson KE, Jansen EC, Basu N, Cantoral A. Differential fat accumulation in early adulthood according to adolescent-BMI and heavy metal exposure. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev 2022; 2022:37-51. [PMID: 35583253 PMCID: PMC9790480 DOI: 10.1002/cad.20463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Heavy metals such as Lead (Pb) and Mercury (Hg) can affect adipose tissue mass and function. Considering the high prevalence of exposure to heavy metals and obesity in Mexico, we aim to examine if exposure to Pb and Hg in adolescence can modify how fat is accumulated in early adulthood. METHODS This study included 100 participants from the ELEMENT cohort in Mexico. Adolescent Pb and Hg blood levels were determined at 14-16 years. Age- and sex-specific adolescent BMI Z-scores were calculated. At early adulthood (21-22 years), fat accumulation measurements were performed (abdominal, subcutaneous, visceral, hepatic, and pancreatic fat). Linear regression models with an interaction between adolescent BMI Z-score and Pb or Hg levels were run for each adulthood fat accumulation outcome with normal BMI as reference. RESULTS In adolescents with obesity compared to normal BMI, as Pb exposure increased, subcutaneous (p-interaction = 0.088) and visceral (p-interaction < 0.0001) fat accumulation increases. Meanwhile, Hg was associated with subcutaneous (p-interaction = 0.027) and abdominal (p-interaction = 0.022) fat deposition among adolescents with obesity. CONCLUSIONS Heavy metal exposure in adolescence may alter how fat is accumulated in later periods of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Betanzos‐Robledo
- CONACYTNational Institute of Public HealthCenter for Nutrition and Health ResearchCuernavacaMexico
| | - Martha M. Téllez‐Rojo
- CONACYTNational Institute of Public HealthCenter for Nutrition and Health ResearchCuernavacaMexico
| | - Hector Lamadrid‐Figueroa
- Department of Perinatal HealthReproductive Health DirectorateNational Institute of Public HealthCenter for Population Health ResearchCuernavacaMéxico
| | - Ernesto Roldan‐Valadez
- Directorate of Clinical ResearchHospital General de Mexico “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”Mexico CityMexico
- Department of RadiologyI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)MoscowRussia
| | - Karen E. Peterson
- Department of Nutritional SciencesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Erica C. Jansen
- Department of Nutritional SciencesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Nil Basu
- Department of Natural Resource SciencesMcGill UniversityMontrealQuebecCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Martinou E, Pericleous M, Stefanova I, Kaur V, Angelidi AM. Diagnostic Modalities of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: From Biochemical Biomarkers to Multi-Omics Non-Invasive Approaches. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:407. [PMID: 35204498 PMCID: PMC8871470 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide, and its prevalence is increasing globally. NAFLD is a multifaceted disorder, and its spectrum includes steatosis to steatohepatitis, which may evolve to advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. In addition, the presence of NAFLD is independently associated with a higher cardiometabolic risk and increased mortality rates. Considering that the vast majority of individuals with NAFLD are mainly asymptomatic, early diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and accurate staging of fibrosis risk is crucial for better stratification, monitoring and targeted management of patients at risk. To date, liver biopsy remains the gold standard procedure for the diagnosis of NASH and staging of NAFLD. However, due to its invasive nature, research on non-invasive tests is rapidly increasing with significant advances having been achieved during the last decades in the diagnostic field. New promising non-invasive biomarkers and techniques have been developed, evaluated and assessed, including biochemical markers, imaging modalities and the most recent multi-omics approaches. Our article provides a comprehensive review of the currently available and emerging non-invasive diagnostic tools used in assessing NAFLD, also highlighting the importance of accurate and validated diagnostic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eirini Martinou
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK;
| | - Marinos Pericleous
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK;
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Irena Stefanova
- Department of General Surgery, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley GU16 7UJ, UK;
| | - Vasha Kaur
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, St George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK;
| | - Angeliki M. Angelidi
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Memaj P, Jornayvaz FR. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 1 diabetes: Prevalence and pathophysiology. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1031633. [PMID: 36531463 PMCID: PMC9752856 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1031633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most frequent chronic liver disease in the general population with a global prevalence of 25%. It is often associated with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, as insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia are known to be favoring factors. Recent studies have described growing incidence of NAFLD in type 1 diabetes (T1D) as well. Although increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome in these patients seems to explain part of this increase in NAFLD, other underlying mechanisms may participate in the emergence of NAFLD. Notably, some genetic factors are more associated with fatty liver disease, but their prevalence in T1D has not been evaluated. Moreover, oxidative stress, poor glucose control and long-lasting hyperglycemia, as well as exogenous insulin administration play an important role in intrahepatic fat homeostasis. The main differential diagnosis of NAFLD in T1D is glycogenic hepatopathy, which needs to be considered mostly in T1D patients with poor glycemic control. This article aims to review the prevalence and pathophysiology of NAFLD in T1D and open perspectives for clinicians taking care of T1D patients with potential hepatopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Plator Memaj
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Therapeutic Patient Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - François R. Jornayvaz
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Therapeutic Patient Education, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Diabetes Center, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: François R. Jornayvaz,
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bencikova D, Han F, Kannengieser S, Raudner M, Poetter-Lang S, Bastati N, Reiter G, Ambros R, Ba-Ssalamah A, Trattnig S, Krššák M. Evaluation of a single-breath-hold radial turbo-spin-echo sequence for T2 mapping of the liver at 3T. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:3388-3397. [PMID: 34940906 PMCID: PMC9038820 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08439-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES T2 mapping of the liver is a potential diagnostic tool, but conventional techniques are difficult to perform in clinical practice due to long scan time. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a prototype radial turbo-spin-echo (rTSE) sequence, optimized for multi-slice T2 mapping in the abdomen during one breath-hold at 3 T. METHODS A multi-sample (fat: 0-35%) agarose phantom doped with MnCl2 and 80 subjects (73 patients undergoing abdomen MR examination and 7 healthy volunteers) were investigated. A radial turbo-spin-echo (rTSE) sequence with and without fat suppression, a Cartesian turbo-spin-echo (Cart-TSE) sequence, and a single-voxel multi-echo STEAM spectroscopy (HISTO) were performed in phantom, and fat-suppressed rTSE and HISTO sequences were performed in in vivo measurements. Two approaches were used to sample T2 values: manually selected circular ROIs and whole liver analysis with Gaussian mixture models (GMM). RESULTS The rTSE-T2s values exhibited a strong correlation with Cart-TSE-T2s (R2 = 0.988) and with HISTO-T2s of water (R2 = 0.972) in phantom with an offset between rTSE and Cart-TSE maps (mean difference = 3.17 ± 1.18 ms). The application of fat suppression decreased T2 values, and the effect was directly proportional to the amount of fat. Measurements in patients yielded a linear relationship between rTSE- and HISTO-T2s (R2 = 0.546 and R2 = 0.580 for ROI and GMM, respectively). CONCLUSION The fat-suppressed rTSE sequence allows for fast and accurate determination of T2 values of the liver, and appears to be suitable for further large cohort studies. KEY POINTS •Radial turbo-spin-echo T2 mapping performs comparably to Cartesian TSE-T2 mapping, but an offset in values is observed in phantom measurements. •Fat-suppressed radial turbo-spin-echo T2 mapping is consistent with T2 of water as assessed by MRS in phantom measurements. •Fat-suppressed radial turbo-spin-echo sequence allows fast T2 mapping of the liver in a single breath-hold and is correlated with MRS-based T2 of water.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Bencikova
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Christian Doppler Laboratory for Clinical Molecular Imaging, MOLIMA, MUW, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fei Han
- Siemens Medical Solutions, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Marcus Raudner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sarah Poetter-Lang
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nina Bastati
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gert Reiter
- Research and Development, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics GmbH, Graz, Austria
| | - Raphael Ambros
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Siegfried Trattnig
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Christian Doppler Laboratory for Clinical Molecular Imaging, MOLIMA, MUW, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Clinical Molecular MRI in the Musculoskeletal System, Karl Landsteiner Society, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Krššák
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Clinical Molecular Imaging, MOLIMA, MUW, Vienna, Austria. .,Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Martí-Aguado D, Jiménez-Pastor A, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Rodríguez-Ortega A, Alfaro-Cervello C, Mestre-Alagarda C, Bauza M, Gallén-Peris A, Valero-Pérez E, Ballester MP, Gimeno-Torres M, Pérez-Girbés A, Benlloch S, Pérez-Rojas J, Puglia V, Ferrández A, Aguilera V, Escudero-García D, Serra MA, Martí-Bonmatí L. Automated Whole-Liver MRI Segmentation to Assess Steatosis and Iron Quantification in Chronic Liver Disease. Radiology 2021; 302:345-354. [PMID: 34783592 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021211027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Standardized manual region of interest (ROI) sampling strategies for hepatic MRI steatosis and iron quantification are time consuming, with variable results. Purpose To evaluate the performance of automatic MRI whole-liver segmentation (WLS) for proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and iron estimation (transverse relaxometry [R2*]) versus manual ROI, with liver biopsy as the reference standard. Materials and Methods This prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study recruited participants with chronic liver disease who underwent liver biopsy and chemical shift-encoded 3.0-T MRI between January 2017 and January 2021. Biopsy evaluation included histologic grading and digital pathology. MRI liver sampling strategies included manual ROI (two observers) and automatic whole-liver (deep learning algorithm) segmentation for PDFF- and R2*-derived measurements. Agreements between segmentation methods were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and biases were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the correlation between measurements and digital pathology. Results A total of 165 participants were included (mean age ± standard deviation, 55 years ± 12; 96 women; 101 of 165 participants [61%] with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease). Agreements between mean measurements were excellent, with ICCs of 0.98 for both PDFF and R2*. The median bias was 0.5% (interquartile range, -0.4% to 1.2%) for PDFF and 2.7 sec-1 (interquartile range, 0.2-5.3 sec-1) for R2* (P < .001 for both). Margins of error were lower for WLS than ROI-derived parameters (-0.03% for PDFF and -0.3 sec-1 for R2*). ROI and WLS showed similar performance for steatosis (ROI AUC, 0.96; WLS AUC, 0.97; P = .53) and iron overload (ROI AUC, 0.85; WLS AUC, 0.83; P = .09). Correlations with digital pathology were high (P < .001) between the fat ratio and PDFF (ROI r = 0.89; WLS r = 0.90) and moderate (P < .001) between the iron ratio and R2* (ROI r = 0.65; WLS r = 0.64). Conclusion Proton density fat fraction and transverse relaxometry measurements derived from MRI automatic whole-liver segmentation (WLS) were accurate for steatosis and iron grading in chronic liver disease and correlated with digital pathology. Automated WLS estimations were higher, with a lower margin of error than manual region of interest estimations. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Moura Cunha and Fowler in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Martí-Aguado
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Ana Jiménez-Pastor
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Ángel Alberich-Bayarri
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Alejandro Rodríguez-Ortega
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Clara Alfaro-Cervello
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Claudia Mestre-Alagarda
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Mónica Bauza
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Ana Gallén-Peris
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Elena Valero-Pérez
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - María Pilar Ballester
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Marta Gimeno-Torres
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Alexandre Pérez-Girbés
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Salvador Benlloch
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Judith Pérez-Rojas
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Víctor Puglia
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Antonio Ferrández
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Victoria Aguilera
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Desamparados Escudero-García
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Miguel A Serra
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Luis Martí-Bonmatí
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee MS, Lee JS, Kim BS, Kim DR, Kang KS. Quantitative Analysis of Pancreatic Fat in Children with Obesity Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 2021; 24:555-563. [PMID: 34796100 PMCID: PMC8593362 DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2021.24.6.555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the pancreatic fat fraction (PFF) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children with and without obesity and to correlate PFF with body mass index (BMI) z-score, hepatic fat fraction (HFF), and ultrasonography-derived pancreato-perihepatic fat index (PPHFI). METHODS This prospective study included 45 children with obesity and 19 without obesity (control group). PFF and HFF were quantitatively assessed using the abdominal multi-echo Dixon method for MRI. The PPHFI was assessed using transabdominal ultrasonography. Anthropometric, MRI, and ultrasonographic characteristics were compared between the two groups. Correlations between PFF, HFF, PPHFI, and BMI z-scores in each group were also analyzed. RESULTS The PFF, HFF, PPHFI, and BMI z-score were higher in the group with obesity than in the control group (PFF: 6.65±3.42 vs. 1.78±0.55, HFF: 19.5±13.0 vs. 2.31±1, PPHFI: 3.65 ±1.63 vs. 0.94±0.31, BMI z-score: 2.27±0.56 vs. 0.42±0.54, p<0.01, respectively). PFF was correlated with BMI z-scores, PPHFI, and HFF in the obesity group, and multivariate analysis showed that PFF was strongly correlated with BMI z-score and PPHFI (p<0.05). The BMI z-score was strongly correlated with PFF in the control group (p<0.01). CONCLUSION These results suggest that MRI-derived PFF measures are associated with childhood obesity. PFF and PPHFI were also highly correlated in the obesity group. Therefore, PFF may be an objective index of pancreatic fat content and has the potential for clinical utility as a non-invasive biomarker for the assessment of childhood obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu Sook Lee
- Department of Radiology, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jeong Sub Lee
- Department of Radiology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
| | - Bong Soo Kim
- Department of Radiology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
| | - Doo Ri Kim
- Department of Radiology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
| | - Ki Soo Kang
- Department of Pediatrics, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gong P, Song P, Huang C, Lok UW, Tang S, Zhou C, Yang L, Watt K, Callstrom M, Chen S. Noise Suppression for Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation Based on Spectrum Normalization. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS, FERROELECTRICS, AND FREQUENCY CONTROL 2021; 68:2667-2674. [PMID: 33877970 PMCID: PMC8344359 DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2021.3074293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) has great diagnostic potential for fatty liver detection and assessment. In a previous study, we proposed a reference phantom-free ACE method, called reference frequency method (RFM), which does not require a calibrated phantom for normalization. The power of each frequency component can be normalized by the power of an adjacent frequency component in the spectrum to cancel system-dependent effects such as focusing and time gain compensation (TGC). RFM demonstrated accurate ACE in both phantom and in in-vivo liver studies. However, our study also showed that the robustness and penetration of RFM were affected by noise in the ACE signals. Here we propose a noise suppression (NS) and a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) quality control method to reduce the influence of noise on ACE-RFM performance. The proposed methods were tested in harmonic ACE because harmonic imaging is a more frequently used mode than fundamental imaging for abdominal applications. After applying the NS and SNR control methods, the noise-induced bias for attenuation estimation in harmonic ACE was effectively reduced, leading to significantly improved effective penetration depth. The proposed methods directly measure the noise spectrum of the ultrasound system, which can also be adapted to other spectrum-based ACE methods, such as the reference phantom method and the spectra shift method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Gong
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Pengfei Song
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
| | - Chengwu Huang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - U-Wai Lok
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shanshan Tang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Chenyun Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lulu Yang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Kymberly Watt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew Callstrom
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shigao Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Association of hepatic steatosis derived from ultrasound and quantitative MRI with prediabetes in the general population. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13276. [PMID: 34168217 PMCID: PMC8225774 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92681-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of our study was to investigate the association of hepatic steatosis derived from quantitative ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with prediabetes in a large population-based study conducted in Northeast Germany. Hepatic steatosis was assessed through transabdominal ultrasound and quantitative MRI. For analysis we included 1622 subjects with MRI who participated in an oral glucose tolerance test and reported no known type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We classified participants as proposed by the American Diabetes Association: isolated impaired fasting glucose (i-IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (i-IGT), combined IFG and IGT (IFG + IGT), and undiagnosed T2DM. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex body mass index and alcohol consumption. We observed positive associations of hepatic steatosis with glycated hemoglobin, fasting glucose and insulin, 2-h glucose and insulin, as well as homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index. Similarly, individuals having hepatic steatosis as defined by MRI had a higher relative risk ratio (RR) to be in the prediabetes groups i-IFG (RR = 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2; 2.2), i-IGT (RR = 3.3, 95% CI 2.0; 5.6) and IFG + IGT (RR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.6; 3.9) or to have undiagnosed T2DM (RR = 4.8, 95% CI 2.6; 9.0). All associations were attenuated when defining hepatic steatosis by ultrasound. Hepatic steatosis is associated with prediabetes and undiagnosed T2DM in the general population. Quantitative liver MRI revealed stronger associations with prediabetes and undiagnosed T2DM compared to ultrasound, which indicates the higher sensitivity and specificity of MRI to determine hepatic steatosis.
Collapse
|
30
|
Yilmaz Y, Yilmaz N, Ates F, Karakaya F, Gokcan H, Kaya E, Adali G, Caliskan Kartal A, Sen I, Ahishali E, Ozenirler S, Koruk M, Uygun A, Idilman R, Turkish Association for the Study of the Liver (TASL), Fatty Liver Diseases Special Interest Groups. The prevalence of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease in the Turkish population: A multicenter study. HEPATOLOGY FORUM 2021; 2:37-42. [PMID: 35783905 PMCID: PMC9138918 DOI: 10.14744/hf.2021.2020.0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aim The objective of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in patients with dyspepsia. Materials and Methods A total of 909 consecutive patients who presented with dyspepsia at 8 tertiary care centers in Turkey between March 2019 and December 2019 were included. Results The median age was 47 years. Among them, 30.3% of the patients were obese, 18.8% had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), 35.1% had metabolic syndrome, 84.8% had dyslipidemia, and 23.9% had hypertension. The prevalence of MAFLD was 45.5%. Among the patients with MAFLD, the prevalence of obesity, T2DM, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, and hypertension was 43.3%, 24.9%, 52.5%, 92.3%, and 31.9%, respectively. MAFLD was significantly associated with all of the metabolic comorbidities (p<0.001). The median Fibrosis-4 Index score of the MAFLD patients was 0.88 (range: 0.1-9.5). Of note, 53 patients with hepatic steatosis did not meet the MAFLD criteria. Conclusion The results of the present study indicated that there was a significantly high prevalence of MAFLD observed in daily clinical practice in Turkey. Early diagnosis and prevention efforts should be implemented to reduce disease progression, and a region-based strategy is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuf Yilmaz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nimet Yilmaz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, SANKO University School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Fehmi Ates
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Fatih Karakaya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Health Sciences University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hale Gokcan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Eda Kaya
- Department of Internal Medicine, Helios Hospital Schleswig, Academical Educational Hospital of Luebeck and Kiel Universities, Schleswig, Germany
| | - Gupse Adali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Aysun Caliskan Kartal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ilker Sen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Health Sciences University Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emel Ahishali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Seren Ozenirler
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Koruk
- Deparment of Gastroenterology, Medical Park Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Uygun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Health Sciences University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ramazan Idilman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Turkish Association for the Study of the Liver (TASL)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, SANKO University School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Health Sciences University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Helios Hospital Schleswig, Academical Educational Hospital of Luebeck and Kiel Universities, Schleswig, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Health Sciences University Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Deparment of Gastroenterology, Medical Park Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Fatty Liver Diseases Special Interest Groups
- Department of Gastroenterology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, SANKO University School of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Health Sciences University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Helios Hospital Schleswig, Academical Educational Hospital of Luebeck and Kiel Universities, Schleswig, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Health Sciences University Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Deparment of Gastroenterology, Medical Park Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Betanzos-Robledo L, Cantoral A, Peterson KE, Hu H, Hernández-Ávila M, Perng W, Jansen E, Ettinger AS, Mercado-García A, Solano-González M, Sánchez B, Téllez-Rojo MM. Association between cumulative childhood blood lead exposure and hepatic steatosis in young Mexican adults. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2021; 196:110980. [PMID: 33691159 PMCID: PMC8119339 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to environmental toxicants may play a role in the pathogenesis of Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Cumulative exposure to lead (Pb) has chronic and permanent effects on liver function. Pediatric populations are vulnerable to the toxic effects of Pb, even at low exposure levels. The purpose of the study was to estimate the association between cumulative Pb exposure during childhood and hepatic steatosis biomarkers in young Mexican adults. METHODS A subsample of 93 participants from the ELEMENT cohort were included in this study. Childhood blood samples were collected annually from ages 1-4 years and were used to calculate the Cumulative Childhood Blood Lead Levels (CCBLL). Hepatic steatosis during adulthood was defined as an excessive accumulation of hepatic triglycerides (>5%) determined using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Liver enzymes were also measured at this time, and elevated liver enzyme levels were defined as ALT (≥30 IU/L), AST (≥30 IU/L), and GGT (≥40 IU/L). Adjusted linear regression models were fit to examine the association between CCBLL (quartiles) and the hepatic steatosis in young adulthood. RESULTS In adulthood, the mean age was 21.4 years, 55% were male. The overall prevalence of hepatic steatosis by MRI was 19%. Elevate levels of the enzymes ALT, AST, and GGT were present in 25%, 15%, and 17% of the sample, respectively. We found a positive association between the highest quartile of CCBLL with the steatosis biomarkers of hepatic triglycerides (Q4 vs. Q1: β = 6.07, 95% CI: 1.91-10.21), elevated ALT (Q4 vs. Q1: β = 14.5, 95% CI: 1.39-27.61) and elevated AST (Q4 vs. Q1: β = 7.23, 95% CI: 0.64-13.82). No significant associations were found with GGT. CONCLUSIONS Chronic Pb exposure during early childhood is associated with a higher levels of hepatic steatosis biomarkers and hepatocellular injury in young adulthood. More actions should be taken to eliminate sources of Pb during the first years of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Betanzos-Robledo
- National Council of Science and Technology, National Institute of Public Health, Mexico City, MX, Mexico
| | - Alejandra Cantoral
- Department of Health, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, MX, Mexico.
| | - Karen E Peterson
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Howard Hu
- Department of Preventive Medicine Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, USA
| | | | - Wei Perng
- Department of Epidemiology, Lifecourse Epidemiology of Adiposity and Diabetes (LEAD) Center, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Erica Jansen
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Adriana Mercado-García
- National Council of Science and Technology, National Institute of Public Health, Mexico City, MX, Mexico
| | - Maritsa Solano-González
- National Council of Science and Technology, National Institute of Public Health, Mexico City, MX, Mexico
| | - Brisa Sánchez
- Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, USA
| | - Martha M Téllez-Rojo
- National Council of Science and Technology, National Institute of Public Health, Mexico City, MX, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jimenez-Pastor A, Alberich-Bayarri A, Lopez-Gonzalez R, Marti-Aguado D, França M, Bachmann RSM, Mazzucco J, Marti-Bonmati L. Precise whole liver automatic segmentation and quantification of PDFF and R2* on MR images. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:7876-7887. [PMID: 33768292 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07838-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To automate the segmentation of whole liver parenchyma on multi-echo chemical shift encoded (MECSE) MR examinations using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to seamlessly quantify precise organ-related imaging biomarkers such as the fat fraction and iron load. METHODS A retrospective multicenter collection of 183 MECSE liver MR examinations was conducted. An encoder-decoder CNN was trained (107 studies) following a 5-fold cross-validation strategy to improve the model performance and ensure lack of overfitting. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* were quantified on both manual and CNN segmentation masks. Different metrics were used to evaluate the CNN performance over both unseen internal (46 studies) and external (29 studies) validation datasets to analyze reproducibility. RESULTS The internal test showed excellent results for the automatic segmentation with a dice coefficient (DC) of 0.93 ± 0.03 and high correlation between the quantification done with the predicted mask and the manual segmentation (rPDFF = 1 and rR2* = 1; p values < 0.001). The external validation was also excellent with a different vendor but the same magnetic field strength, proving the generalization of the model to other manufacturers with DC of 0.94 ± 0.02. Results were lower for the 1.5-T MR same vendor scanner with DC of 0.87 ± 0.06. Both external validations showed high correlation in the quantification (rPDFF = 1 and rR2* = 1; p values < 0.001). In both internal and external validation datasets, the relative error for the PDFF and R2* quantification was below 4% and 1% respectively. CONCLUSION Liver parenchyma can be accurately segmented with CNN in a vendor-neutral virtual approach, allowing to obtain reproducible automatic whole organ virtual biopsies. KEY POINTS • Whole liver parenchyma can be automatically segmented using convolutional neural networks. • Deep learning allows the creation of automatic pipelines for the precise quantification of liver-related imaging biomarkers such as PDFF and R2*. • MR "virtual biopsy" can become a fast and automatic procedure for the assessment of chronic diffuse liver diseases in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Jimenez-Pastor
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office J, 46021, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Angel Alberich-Bayarri
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office J, 46021, Valencia, Spain
| | - Rafael Lopez-Gonzalez
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office J, 46021, Valencia, Spain
| | - David Marti-Aguado
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Manuela França
- Radiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP), Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Luis Marti-Bonmati
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI) at La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain.,Radiology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Virarkar M, Szklaruk J, Jensen CT, Taggart MW, Bhosale P. What's New in Hepatic Steatosis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2021; 42:405-415. [PMID: 34130852 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hepatic steatosis can lead to liver cancer, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension. There are two main types, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease. The detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis with lifestyle changes can slow the evolution from NAFLD to steatohepatitis. Currently, the gold standard for the quantification of fat in the liver is biopsy, has some limitations. Hepatic steatosis is frequently detected during cross sectional imaging. Ultrasound (US), Computed Tomography (CT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provide noninvasive assessment of liver parenchyma and can detect fat infiltration in the liver. However, the non-invasive quantification of hepatic steatosis by imaging has been challenging. Recent MRI techniques show great promise in the detection and quantification of liver fat. The aim of this article is to review the utilization of non-invasive imaging modalities for the detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis, to evaluate their advantages and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayur Virarkar
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Janio Szklaruk
- Department of Abdominal Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Corey T Jensen
- Department of Abdominal Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Melissa W Taggart
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Abdominal Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Quantification of Hepatic Fat Fraction in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Comparison of Multimaterial Decomposition Algorithm and Fat (Water)-Based Material Decomposition Algorithm Using Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2021; 45:12-17. [PMID: 33186174 PMCID: PMC7834908 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
METHODS Hepatic fat fractions were quantified by noncontrast (HFFnon-CE) and contrast-enhanced single-source dual-energy computed tomography in arterial phase (HFFAP), portal venous phase (HFFPVP) and equilibrium phase (HFFEP) using MMD in 19 nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients. The fat concentration was measured on fat (water)-based images. As the standard of reference, magnetic resonance iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation-iron quantification images were reconstructed to obtain HFF (HFFIDEAL-IQ). RESULTS There was a strong correlation between HFFnon-CE, HFFAP, HFFPVP, HFFEP, fat concentration and HFFIDEAL-IQ (r = 0.943, 0.923, 0.942, 0.952, and 0.726) with HFFs having better correlation with HFFIDEAL-IQ. Hepatic fat fractions did not significantly differ across scanning phases. The HFFs of 3-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography had a good consistency with HFFnon-CE. CONCLUSIONS Hepatic fat fraction using MMD has excellent correlation with that of magnetic resonance imaging, is independent of the computed tomography scanning phases, and may be used as a routine technique for quantitative assessment of HFF.
Collapse
|
35
|
Tanpowpong N, Panichyawat S. Comparison of sonographic hepatorenal ratio and the degree of hepatic steatosis in magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction. J Ultrason 2020; 20:e169-e175. [PMID: 33365152 PMCID: PMC7705486 DOI: 10.15557/jou.2020.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Conventional ultrasonography can provide only semi-quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis. The aim of this study was to assess sonographic hepatorenal ratio to quantify the severity of fatty liver. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 179 patients with various liver diseases who underwent abdominal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography on the same day. The hepatorenal ratio was calculated by the ratio between the mean echo intensity in regions of interests of the liver and regions of interests of the right renal cortex. Magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction was used as standard reference for steatosis grading. The effect of fibrosis measured by magnetic resonance elastography on the degree of correlation was also assessed. Results: The hepatorenal ratio was highly correlated with magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (Spearman’s coefficient = 0.83) (p <0.001). High correlation of hepatorenal ratio with magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction was observed in patients with less than stage 2 fibrosis (p <0.001), whereas moderate correlation of hepatorenal ratio with magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction was found in patients with ≥ stage 2 fibrosis or higher (p <0.001). The hepatorenal ratio cutoff point for prediction of grade 1 hepatic steatosis was 1.18 with sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 80.0%. The hepatorenal ratio cutoff point for prediction of grade 2 and grade 3 hepatic steatosis was 1.55 and 1.60, respectively, with sensitivity greater than 90% and specificity greater than 80%. Conclusions: The hepatorenal ratio could become an effective quantitative tool for hepatic steatosis alternative to magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction. Application should be careful in the group of patients with stage 2 liver fibrosis or higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natthaporn Tanpowpong
- Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sineenart Panichyawat
- Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Martí-Aguado D, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Martín-Rodríguez JL, França M, García-Castro F, González-Cantero J, González-Cantero Á, Martí-Bonmatí L. Differences in multi-echo chemical shift encoded MRI proton density fat fraction estimation based on multifrequency fat peaks selection in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Clin Radiol 2020; 75:880.e5-880.e12. [PMID: 32888653 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM To compare the performance of multi-echo chemical-shift-encoded (MECSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimation, considering three different fat frequency peak combinations, for the quantification of steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study was a prospective cross-sectional research of 121 patients with metabolic syndrome and evidence of hepatic steatosis on ultrasound, who underwent a 3 T MRI examination. All patients were studied with a multifrequency MECSE sequence. The PDFF was calculated using six peaks (MECSEp123456), three peaks (MECSEp456), and a single peak (MECSEp5) model. The two simpler fat peak models were compared to the six peaks model, which was considered the reference standard. Linearity was evaluated using linear regression while agreement was described using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS The mean age was 47 (±9) years and BMI was 29.9 (±2.9) kg/m2. Steatosis distribution was 15%/31%/54% (S1/S2/S3, respectively). Compared to MECSEp123456, both models provided linear PDFF measurements (R2= 0.99 and 0.97, MECSEp456 and MECSEp5 respectively). Regression slope (0.92; p<0.001) and mean Bland-Altman bias (-1.5%; 95% limits of agreement: -3.19%, 0.22%) indicated minimal underestimation by using PDFF-MECSEp456. Nonetheless, mean differences in PDFF estimations varied from -1.5% (MECSEp456,p=0.006) to -2.2% (MECSEp5,p<0.001) when compared to full six fat frequencies model. CONCLUSION Although simpler spectral fat MECSE analysis shows a linear relationship with the standard six peaks model, their variation in estimated PDFF values introduces a low but clinically significant bias in fat quantification and steatosis grading in NAFLD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Martí-Aguado
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Rio Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2(30)), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Á Alberich-Bayarri
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2(30)), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain; QUIBIM SL, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - M França
- Imaging Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - F García-Castro
- QUIBIM SL, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Á González-Cantero
- Department of Dermatology, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - L Martí-Bonmatí
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2(30)), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain; Medical Imaging Department, La Fe Polytechnics and University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gong P, Zhou C, Song P, Huang C, Lok UW, Tang S, Watt K, Callstrom M, Chen S. Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation in Harmonic Imaging for Robust Fatty Liver Detection. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2020; 46:3080-3087. [PMID: 32773254 PMCID: PMC7534411 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Accurate detection of liver steatosis is important for liver disease management. Ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) has great potential in quantifying liver fat content. The commonly used ACE methods (e.g., spectral shift methods, reference phantom methods) assume linear tissue response to ultrasound and were developed in fundamental imaging. However, fundamental imaging may be vulnerable to reverberation clutters introduced by the body wall. The clutters superimposed on liver echoes may bias the attenuation estimation. Here we propose a new ACE technique, the reference frequency method (RFM), in harmonic imaging to mitigate the reverberation bias. The accuracy of harmonic RFM was validated through a phantom study. In a pilot patient study, harmonic RFM performed more robustly in vivo compared with fundamental RFM, illustrating the potential of ACE in harmonic imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Gong
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Chenyun Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Pengfei Song
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - Chengwu Huang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - U-Wai Lok
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shanshan Tang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kymberly Watt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Shigao Chen
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cantoral A, Montoya A, Luna-Villa L, Roldán-Valadez EA, Hernández-Ávila M, Kershenobich D, Perng W, Peterson KE, Hu H, Rivera JA, Téllez-Rojo MM. Overweight and obesity status from the prenatal period to adolescence and its association with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in young adults: cohort study. BJOG 2020; 127:1200-1209. [PMID: 32145139 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the associations of maternal and child overweight status across multiple time-points with liver fat content in the offspring during young adulthood. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING ELEMENT Cohort in Mexico City. POPULATION Pregnant women with singleton births (n = 97). METHODS We quantified hepatic triglyceride content (liver fat content) by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) and conventional T2-weighted MRIs (3T scanner) in 97 young adults from the ELEMENT birth cohort in Mexico City. Historical records of the cohort were used as a source of pregnancy, and childhood and adolescence anthropometric information, overweight and obesity (OWOB) were defined. Adjusted structural equation models were run to identify the association between OWOB in different life stages with liver fat content (log-transformed) in young adulthood. MAIN OUTCOME Maternal OWOB at the time of delivery was directly and indirectly associated with the liver fat content in the offspring at young adulthood. RESULTS Seventeen percent of the participants were classified as having NAFLD. We found a strong association of OWOB between all periods assessed. Maternal OWOB at time of delivery (β = 1.97, 95% CI 1.28-3.05), and OWOB status in the offspring at young adulthood (β = 3.17, 95% CI 2.10-4.77) were directly associated with the liver fat content in the offspring. Also, maternal OWOB was indirectly associated with liver fat content through offspring OWOB status. CONCLUSION We found that maternal OWOB status is related to fatty liver content in the offspring as young adults, even after taking into account OWOB status and lifestyle factors in the offspring. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT There was an association between pre-pregnancy overweight and the development of NAFLD in adult offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Cantoral
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - A Montoya
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - L Luna-Villa
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - E A Roldán-Valadez
- Hospital General de México 'Dr. Eduardo Liceaga', Mexico City, Mexico
- Department of Radiology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | | | - D Kershenobich
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición 'Salvador Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico
| | - W Perng
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - K E Peterson
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - H Hu
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - J A Rivera
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
There are >1.5 billion people with chronic liver disease worldwide, causing liver diseases to be a significant global health issue. Diffuse parenchymal liver diseases, including hepatic steatosis, fibrosis, metabolic diseases, and hepatitis cause chronic liver injury and may progress to fibrosis and eventually hepatocellular carcinoma. As early diagnosis and treatment of these diseases impact the progression and outcome, the need for assessment of the liver parenchyma has increased. While the current gold standard for evaluation of the hepatic parenchymal tissue, biopsy has disadvantages and limitations. Consequently, noninvasive methods have been developed based on serum biomarkers and imaging techniques. Conventional imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging provide noninvasive options for assessment of liver tissue. However, several recent advances in liver imaging techniques have been introduced. This review article focuses on the current status of imaging methods for diffuse parenchymal liver diseases assessment including their diagnostic accuracy, advantages and disadvantages, and comparison between different techniques.
Collapse
|
40
|
Aljenedil S, Alothman L, Bélanger AM, Brown L, Lahijanian Z, Bergeron J, Couture P, Baass A, Ruel I, Brisson D, Khoury E, Gaudet D, Genest J. Lomitapide for treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: The Québec experience. Atherosclerosis 2020; 310:54-63. [PMID: 32906018 DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an orphan disease, most often caused by bi-allelic mutations of the LDLR gene. Patients with HoFH have elevated LDL-C levels >13 mmol/L, tendinous xanthomata and severe, premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Untreated, most HoFH patients die of ASCVD in youth. New therapeutic modalities include lomitapide, an inhibitor of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein that lowers hepatic LDL-C production. We have recently identified 79 Canadian patients with HoFH. Here, we describe our experience with lomitapide in the province of Quebec, a geographic area known to have a high prevalence of HoFH. METHODS This is a retrospective case series of 12 HoFH patients followed at three lipidology centers in the province of Quebec. RESULTS Mean age of the patients was 44 ± 18 years; age at time of HoFH diagnosis ranged from 2 to 59 years. All patients were on a statin and ezetimibe 10 mg/day and five patients were treated with LDL apheresis. Treatment with lomitapide reduced LDL-C levels by 38% (intention-to-treat). Intolerable gastrointestinal side effects were observed in 3/12 patients and were the main reason for treatment discontinuation. Three patients tolerated lomitapide at doses ranging between 5 and 30 mg/day without major side effects. Downwards drug titration was necessary in the 6 remaining patients because of gastrointestinal side effects (n = 5) and elevated liver enzymes (n = 1), and 2 of them finally discontinued treatment. CONCLUSIONS Lomitapide may be used to further decrease LDL-C in HoFH patients; gastrointestinal side effects and hepatic toxicity may limit adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumayah Aljenedil
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Latifah Alothman
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alexandre M Bélanger
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Leslie Brown
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zubin Lahijanian
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean Bergeron
- Endocrinology and Nephrology Unit, CHU de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Patrick Couture
- Endocrinology and Nephrology Unit, CHU de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Alexis Baass
- Division of Experimental Medicine and Medical Biochemistry, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Québec, Canada; Nutrition, Metabolism, and Atherosclerosis Clinic, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Ruel
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Diane Brisson
- Lipidology Unit, Community Genomic Medicine Center, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, ECOGENE-21 Clinical and Translational Research Center, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada
| | - Etienne Khoury
- Lipidology Unit, Community Genomic Medicine Center, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, ECOGENE-21 Clinical and Translational Research Center, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada
| | - Daniel Gaudet
- Lipidology Unit, Community Genomic Medicine Center, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, ECOGENE-21 Clinical and Translational Research Center, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada
| | - Jacques Genest
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ozturk A, Mohammadi R, Pierce TT, Kamarthi S, Dhyani M, Grajo JR, Corey KE, Chung RT, Bhan AK, Chhatwal J, Samir AE. Diagnostic Accuracy of Shear Wave Elastography as a Non-invasive Biomarker of High-Risk Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis in Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2020; 46:972-980. [PMID: 32005510 PMCID: PMC7034057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) for differentiating high-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (hrNASH) from non-alcoholic fatty liver and low-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease scheduled for liver biopsy underwent pre-biopsy SWE. Ten SWE measurements were obtained. Biopsy samples were reviewed using the NASH Clinical Research Network Scoring System and patients with hrNASH were identified. Receiver operating characteristic curves for SWE-based hrNASH diagnosis were charted. One hundred sixteen adult patients underwent liver biopsy at our institution for the evaluation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SWE for hrNASH diagnosis was 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.84, p < 0.001). The Youden index-based optimal stiffness cutoff value for hrNASH diagnosis was calculated as 8.4 kPa (1.67 m/s), with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 66%. SWE may be useful for the detection of NASH patients at risk of long-term liver-specific morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arinc Ozturk
- Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ramin Mohammadi
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theodore T Pierce
- Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sagar Kamarthi
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Manish Dhyani
- Department of Radiology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Joseph R Grajo
- Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kathleen E Corey
- Liver Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Raymond T Chung
- Liver Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Atul K Bhan
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jagpreet Chhatwal
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anthony E Samir
- Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lv Y, Zhang HJ. Effect of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease on the Risk of Synchronous Liver Metastasis: Analysis of 451 Consecutive Patients of Newly Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:251. [PMID: 32181157 PMCID: PMC7059642 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) on the risk of synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (synCRLM). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 451 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) from January 2014 to January 2019. According to the presence of NAFLD, the CRC patients were divided into two groups, NAFLD group (60 cases) and the control group (391 cases). The clinicopathological features and the prevalence of synCRLM between the two groups were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of synCRLM. Different non-invasive liver fibrosis scoring models were used to evaluate the effect of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis stage in NAFLD on the prevalence of synCRLM. Results: The prevalence of synCRLM was significantly higher in patients with NAFLD than that in patients without NAFLD (18.33 vs. 7.42%; χ2 = 7.669, P = 0.006). A logistic regression analysis indicated that NAFLD, CEA, CA19-9, and lymph node status were risk factors for synCRLM, and NAFLD showed the highest hazard ratio (3.930 [95% confidence interval: 1.616 ~ 9.560]). In NAFLD patients, both fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) were significantly lower in those with synCRLM compared to those without synCRLM [FIB-4: 1.246 (0.833 ~ 1.276) vs. 1.436 (1.016 ~ 2.699), Z = −2.130, P = 0.033; NFS: −1.282 (−2.407 ~ −0.262) vs. −0.255 (−1.582 ~ 0.755), Z = −2.302, P = 0.021; Mann-Whitney test]. Conclusion: NAFLD may be associated with increased liver metastasis, and for NAFLD-related advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis may be associated with reduced synchronous liver metastasis in CRC patients. However, the correlation between simple steatosis and steatohepatitis remains to be further determined. Certain factors such as NAFLD, lymph node metastasis, elevated levels of preoperative CEA and CA19-9 are suggesting a high risk of synCRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Lv
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hai-Jun Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sherif FM, Elmogy SA, EL-wahab RMA, Wahab MA. Utility of magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction technique in quantification of liver fat in living donors for liver transplantation. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-019-0061-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Hepatic steatosis in living donors for liver transplantation causes morbidity of both donor and recipient. This study aims at evaluating magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction technique (MR PDFF) in quantitative evaluation of living donor’s hepatic steatosis compared to histopathology.
Results
The examined potential living liver donors’ liver biopsies revealed hepatic steatosis < 5% (grade 0) in 40 donors and 5–10% (grade 1) in 7 donors. MR PDFF technique with IDEAL sequence showed excellent results for prediction and quantitative evaluation of liver fat with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.7%, 97.5%, and 95.7%, respectively, compared to histopathology (95% confidence interval 0.98–1.01). There was an excellent inter-reader agreement between both readers in estimation of MR liver fat fraction (r = 0.969 at 95% confidence interval 0.946–0.983).
Conclusion
Noninvasive hepatic MR PDFF technique with IDEAL sequence is a precise reliable technique for pre-operative quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis in potential living liver donors.
Collapse
|
44
|
Baldwin D, Chennakesavalu M, Gangemi A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass against laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for amelioration of NAFLD using four criteria. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15:2123-2130. [PMID: 31711944 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.09.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) prevalence is rising worldwide, as a direct consequence of the obesity epidemic. Bariatric surgery provides proven NAFLD amelioration, although questions remain regarding whether Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is more effective. To answer this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis exclusively comparing RYGB and LSG for amelioration of NAFLD using 4 separate criteria: alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, NAFLD activity score, and NAFLD fibrosis score. Our search included 1290 initial studies, which were narrowed to 20 final studies in the meta-analysis. Overall, both RYGB and LSG significantly improved alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, NAFLD activity score, and NAFLD fibrosis score postoperatively. Direct comparisons of RYGB to LSG in any of the 4 criteria failed to demonstrate superiority. Our findings corroborate the current literature showing that bariatric surgery significantly improves biochemical and histologic parameters in patients with NAFLD. The novel individual comparisons of 4 criteria failed to show superiority between RYGB and LSG in ameliorating NAFLD. Despite several limitations, our study can assist clinicians by supporting the notion that RYGB and LSG may be equally efficacious in ameliorating NAFLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin Baldwin
- Department of Surgery, Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mohansrinivas Chennakesavalu
- Department of Surgery, Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Antonio Gangemi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kim TH, Kim JE, Ryu JH, Jeong CW. Development of liver surface nodularity quantification program and its clinical application in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep 2019; 9:9994. [PMID: 31292497 PMCID: PMC6620281 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46442-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The liver morphological changes in relation to fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have not yet been clearly understood. This study was to develop a liver surface nodularity (LSN) quantification program and to compare the fibrosis grades in simple steatosis (SS) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Thirty subjects (7 normal controls [NC], 12 SS and 11 NASH) were studied. LSN quantification procedure was bias correction, boundary detection, segmentation and LSN measurement. LSN scores among three groups and fibrosis grades compared using Kruskal–Wallis H test. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Mean LSN scores were NC 1.30 ± 0.09, SS 1.54 ± 0.21 and NASH 1.59 ± 0.23 (p = 0.008). Mean LSN scores according to fibrosis grade (F) were F0 1.30 ± 0.09, F1 1.45 ± 0.17 and F2&F3 1.67 ± 0.20 (p = 0.001). The mean LSN score in F2&F3 is significantly higher than that in F1 (p = 0.019). The AUROC curve to distinguish F1 and F2&F3 was 0.788 (95% CI 0.595–0.981, p = 0.019) at a cut-off LSN score greater than 1.48, and its diagnostic accuracy had 0.833 sensitivity and 0.727 specificity. This study developed LSN program and its clinical application demonstrated that the quantitative LSN scores can help to differentially diagnose fibrosis stage in NAFLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae-Hoon Kim
- Medical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Eon Kim
- Medical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Hyun Ryu
- Medical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Won Jeong
- Medical Convergence Research Center, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
A gathering storm: HIV infection and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in low and middle-income countries. AIDS 2019; 33:1105-1115. [PMID: 31045941 DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000002161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
: Despite the decreasing total incidence of liver-related deaths, liver disease remains one of the major non-AIDS causes of morbidity and mortality amongst people living with HIV, and a significant proportion of liver disease in these individuals can be attributed to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD in HIV infection is a growing problem in view of increasing life expectancy associated with the use of effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), wider uptake of ART and increasing rates of obesity in many Asian as well as western countries. The problem may be more pronounced in developing countries where there are limited resources available for mass screening and diagnosis of NAFLD. There is a small but growing body of literature examining NAFLD in the setting of HIV, with data from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) particularly lacking. Here, we review the cohort data on NAFLD in HIV, and discuss the risk factors, pathogenesis of hepatic steatosis, NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), diagnostic approaches and therapeutic options available for NAFLD in the setting of HIV, and the specific challenges of NAFLD in HIV for LMICs.
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh
- From the Department of Radiology (B.A.V.) and School of Medicine (J.A.C.L.), Johns Hopkins University, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Joao A. C. Lima
- From the Department of Radiology (B.A.V.) and School of Medicine (J.A.C.L.), Johns Hopkins University, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gong P, Song P, Huang C, Trzasko J, Chen S. System-Independent Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimation Using Spectra Normalization. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS, FERROELECTRICS, AND FREQUENCY CONTROL 2019; 66:867-875. [PMID: 30843826 PMCID: PMC6508689 DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2019.2903010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) has diagnostic potential for clinical applications such as differentiating tumors and quantifying fat content in the liver. The two commonly used ACE methods in the ultrasound array imaging system are the spectral shift method and the reference-phantom-based methods. The spectra shift method estimates the central frequency downshift along depth, whereas the reference-phantom-based methods use a well-calibrated phantom to cancel system dependent effects in attenuation estimation. In this study, we propose a novel system-independent ACE technique based on spectra normalization of different frequencies. This technique does not require a reference phantom for normalization. The power of each frequency component is normalized by the power of an adjacent frequency component in the spectrum to cancel system-dependent effects, such as focusing and time gain compensation (TGC). This method is referred to as the reference frequency method (RFM), and its performance has been evaluated in phantoms and in vivo liver studies. The RFM technique can be applied to various transducer geometries (e.g., linear or curved arrays) with different beam patterns (e.g., focused or unfocused).
Collapse
|
49
|
Torgersen J, So-Armah K, Freiberg MS, Goetz MB, Budoff MJ, Lim JK, Taddei T, Butt AA, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Justice AC, Kostman JR, Lo Re V. Comparison of the prevalence, severity, and risk factors for hepatic steatosis in HIV-infected and uninfected people. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19:52. [PMID: 30987601 PMCID: PMC6466708 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-0969-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic steatosis is prevalent in Western countries, but few studies have evaluated whether the frequency and severity of steatosis are greater in the setting of HIV infection. We compared the prevalence and severity of hepatic steatosis between HIV-infected (HIV+) and uninfected persons and identified factors associated with greater steatosis severity within both groups. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study among participants without cardiovascular disease who participated in a substudy of the Veterans Aging Cohort Study. Hepatic steatosis was defined by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) liver-to-spleen (L/S) attenuation ratio < 1.0. Multivariable linear regression was used to: 1) evaluate the association between HIV infection and severity of hepatic steatosis, as measured by absolute liver attenuation, and 2) identify factors associated with greater severity of steatosis, by HIV status. RESULTS Among 268 participants (median age, 55 years; 99% male; 79% black; 23% obese; 64% HIV+ [91% on antiretroviral therapy]), the overall prevalence of steatosis was 7.8% and was similar between HIV+ and uninfected individuals (13 [7.6%] versus 8 [8.2%], respectively; p = 0.85). Participants with HIV, the majority of whom received antiretroviral therapy, had a higher mean absolute liver attenuation (mean difference, 5.68 Hounsfield units; p < 0.001), correlating with lesser hepatic steatosis severity, compared to uninfected participants. After adjusting for covariates, only advanced hepatic fibrosis was associated with greater severity of steatosis in HIV+ persons (p = 0.03) and uninfected individuals (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this sample of participants without cardiovascular disease, the prevalence of hepatic steatosis by noncontrast abdominal CT was not different by HIV status. Increasing severity of steatosis was independently associated with advanced hepatic fibrosis in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie Torgersen
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3910 Powelton Ave 4nd Floor, Ste. 411F, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Kaku So-Armah
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Matthew S. Freiberg
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Matthew B. Goetz
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Matthew J. Budoff
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Joseph K. Lim
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Tamar Taddei
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA, and VA Connecticut Healthcare, West Haven, CT USA
| | - Adeel A. Butt
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Ar-Rayyan, Qatar
| | | | - Amy C. Justice
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA, and VA Connecticut Healthcare, West Haven, CT USA
| | - Jay R. Kostman
- John Bell Health Center, Philadelphia FIGHT, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Vincent Lo Re
- Department of Medicine and Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wang K, Mamidipalli A, Retson T, Bahrami N, Hasenstab K, Blansit K, Bass E, Delgado T, Cunha G, Middleton MS, Loomba R, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Sirlin CB, Hsiao A. Automated CT and MRI Liver Segmentation and Biometry Using a Generalized Convolutional Neural Network. Radiol Artif Intell 2019; 1. [PMID: 32582883 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2019180022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess feasibility of training a convolutional neural network (CNN) to automate liver segmentation across different imaging modalities and techniques used in clinical practice and apply this to enable automation of liver biometry. Methods We trained a 2D U-Net CNN for liver segmentation in two stages using 330 abdominal MRI and CT exams acquired at our institution. First, we trained the neural network with non-contrast multi-echo spoiled-gradient-echo (SGPR)images with 300 MRI exams to provide multiple signal-weightings. Then, we used transfer learning to generalize the CNN with additional images from 30 contrast-enhanced MRI and CT exams.We assessed the performance of the CNN using a distinct multi-institutional data set curated from multiple sources (n = 498 subjects). Segmentation accuracy was evaluated by computing Dice scores. Utilizing these segmentations, we computed liver volume from CT and T1-weighted (T1w) MRI exams, and estimated hepatic proton- density-fat-fraction (PDFF) from multi-echo T2*w MRI exams. We compared quantitative volumetry and PDFF estimates between automated and manual segmentation using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman statistics. Results Dice scores were 0.94 ± 0.06 for CT (n = 230), 0.95 ± 0.03 (n = 100) for T1w MR, and 0.92 ± 0.05 for T2*w MR (n = 169). Liver volume measured by manual and automated segmentation agreed closely for CT (95% limit-of-agreement (LoA) = [-298 mL, 180 mL]) and T1w MR (LoA = [-358 mL, 180 mL]). Hepatic PDFF measured by the two segmentations also agreed closely (LoA = [-0.62%, 0.80%]). Conclusions Utilizing a transfer-learning strategy, we have demonstrated the feasibility of a CNN to be generalized to perform liver segmentations across different imaging techniques and modalities. With further refinement and validation, CNNs may have broad applicability for multimodal liver volumetry and hepatic tissue characterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang Wang
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytic Laboratory (AiDA lab), Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092.,Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Adrija Mamidipalli
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Tara Retson
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytic Laboratory (AiDA lab), Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092.,Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Naeim Bahrami
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytic Laboratory (AiDA lab), Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Kyle Hasenstab
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Kevin Blansit
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytic Laboratory (AiDA lab), Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Emily Bass
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Timoteo Delgado
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Guilherme Cunha
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Michael S Middleton
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Rohit Loomba
- Department of Hepatology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92029
| | | | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | - Albert Hsiao
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytic Laboratory (AiDA lab), Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA 92092
| | | |
Collapse
|