Home-Based Treatment with Immunoglobulins: an Evaluation from the Perspective of Patients and Healthcare Professionals

Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Serum IgG Trough Levels of Hyaluronidase-Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 10% in US Pediatric Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and serum IgG trough levels of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10% in US pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs).

METHODS

This phase 3, open-label, prospective study (NCT03277313) was conducted at 17 US centers. Eligible patients aged 2 to < 16 years had PIDDs and had received immunoglobulin G (IgG) at a consistent dose for ≥ 3 months before screening. Participants received fSCIG 10% via dose ramp-up for up to 6 weeks (Epoch 1), then every 3-4 weeks for ≤ 3 years (Epoch 2). The primary endpoint was the rate of acute serious bacterial infections (ASBIs).

RESULTS

Data were provided by 44 participants for Epoch 1 (mean ± SD age: 9.0 ± 3.6 years) and 43 (97.7%) for Epoch 2; 34 (77.3%) completed the study. Two ASBIs (both bacterial pneumonia) were reported in one participant with specific antibody deficiency. The mean rate of ASBIs was 0.04 events/participant-year (99% upper confidence interval limit: 0.20), significantly lower than the regulatory-defined threshold of 1.0 (p < 0.001). The mean rate of all infections was 3.12 events/participant-year. Stable mean serum IgG trough levels were maintained during Epoch 2 (10.4, 9.2, and 9.2 g/L at Months 0, 6, and 12, respectively). Most related treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. No participant developed anti-recombinant human hyaluronidase neutralizing antibodies; 1/44 participants (2.3%) developed binding antibodies.

CONCLUSION

fSCIG 10% effectively prevented ASBIs in pediatric patients with PIDDs, with a favorable safety profile consistent with previous clinical studies.

Patient Preferences for Faster Home-Based Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Infusion Therapy and the Effect on Adverse Events

Patients have expressed a preference for home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusion therapy, often citing the time savings from not having to commute, as well as the flexible scheduling that home-based treatment provides. In this review of evidence, the opportunity to decrease time spent during infusions is explored, as well as the contrast between subcutaneous and intravenous infusion therapy. How decisions are made is also explored. Stakeholders include patients, their caregivers, and medical professionals supervising their care. Costs associated with various treatment options have been explored in the literature, in some depth. One element of cost that is often omitted, however, is the cost of time to patients and caregivers. A conclusion that there is a substantial opportunity to save patient and caregiver time is warranted. There is an opportunity to improve infusion protocols using existing devices. Evidence suggests that the mean savings per infusion is 38.94 minutes with optimized infusion protocols, saving more than one and one-half days of waking hours over the course of a year. More research in this domain is warranted.

Safety and Tolerability of Home Infusions in Down Syndrome Regression Disorder

PURPOSE

Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD) is a rare neuropsychiatric condition affecting otherwise healthy individuals with Down syndrome. Multiple studies on DSRD have revealed that immunotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is both safe and effective, although site of infusion has never been studied. This study sought to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IVIg in individuals with DSRD receiving home-based infusions.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective chart review evaluating infusion reactions was performed for individuals meeting criteria for DSRD and having received IVIg infusions between 2019 and 2024. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated for severity and need for alterations in infusion plan. A cohort of individuals receiving home-based infusions was compared with a cohort of individuals receiving infusions at an academic medical center.

FINDINGS

A total of 315 individuals (162 institutional infusions [51%] and 153 home infusions [49%]) met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistical differences between the demographic and clinical features of the cohorts. Individuals receiving home infusions had the same rate of AE during an infusion (P = 0.14), although they did have a lower number of total AEs (P < 0.001). Individuals receiving home infusions experienced a lower number of behavioral issues with infusions (P = 0.03) and had significantly lower discontinuations of infusions secondary to behavioral issues (P = 0.04).

IMPLICATIONS

Rates of AEs and serious AEs in those with DSRD were the same regardless of site of infusion. These data should be considered in policy regarding the appropriateness of home-based infusions as a safe alternative, when suitable for patients and caregivers, for individuals with DSRD.

Drug delivery improvements to enable a flexible care setting for monoclonal antibody medications in oncology - Analogue-based decision framework

INTRODUCTION

The substantial acceleration in healthcare spending together with the expenditures to manage the COVID19 pandemic demand drug delivery solutions that enable a flexible care setting for high-dose monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in oncology.

AREAS COVERED

This expert opinion introduces an analogue-based framework applied to guide decision-making for associated product improvements for mAb medications that are either already authorized or in late-stage clinical development. The four pillars of this framework comprise (1) the drug delivery profile of current and emerging treatments in the market, (2) the needs and preferences of people treated with mAbs, (3) existing healthcare infrastructures, and (4) country-dependent reimbursement and procurement models. The following product optimization examples for mAb-based treatments are evaluated based on original research and review articles in the field: subcutaneous formulations, an established drug delivery modality to reduce parenteral dosing complexity, fixed-dose combinations, an emerging concept to complement combination therapy, and (connected) on-body delivery systems, an identified future opportunity to support dosing outside of a controlled healthcare institutional environment.

EXPERT OPINION

Leveraging existing synergies and learnings from other disease areas is a measure to reduce associated development and commercialization costs and thus to provide sustainable product offerings already at the initial launch of a medication.

British Society for Immunology and United Kingdom Primary Immunodeficiency Network (UKPIN) consensus guideline for the management of immunoglobulin replacement therapy

Currently, there is no guideline to support the use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) in primary and secondary immunodeficiency disorders in UK. The UK Primary Immunodeficiency Network (UK-PIN) and the British Society of Immunology (BSI) joined forces to address this need. Given the paucity of evidence, a modified Delphi approach was used covering statements for the initiation, monitoring, discontinuation of IgRT as well as home therapy programme. A group of six consultant immunologists and three nurse specialists created the statements, reviewed responses and feedback and agreed on final recommendations. This guideline includes 22 statements for initiation, 22 statements for monitoring, 11 statement for home therapy, and 19 statements for discontinuation of IgRT. Further areas of research are proposed to improve future delivery of care.

Willingness and concerns of transfusion-dependent hematological patients toward the option of home transfusion therapy

BACKGROUND

One of the main obstacles of providing home-based palliative care to transfusion-dependent hematology patients is the lack of home transfusions services. While healthcare professionals are concerned with safety and cost of home transfusions, the attitude of the patients toward home transfusions are mostly unknown.

AIM

To obtain quantitative data regarding the willingness and concerns of transfusion-dependent patients with hematological diseases toward the option of home transfusions.

DESIGN

A cross sectional survey including a self-administered questionnaire in one of the three main spoken languages in Israel was administered to patients in 17 hospital hematology outpatient clinics between May 2019 and March 2020.

RESULTS

About 52% of 385 patients that participated in the survey preferred home transfusions to hospital transfusions. Gender, age, education, or type of disease were not associated with preference for home transfusions, nor were hospital location or its size. The likelihood to prefer home transfusions was significantly higher among the Hebrew-speakers and those who had not experienced adverse effects previously. The most significant factor associated with preference of home transfusions was a perceived negative effect of hospital-based transfusion on quality of life. The main reason to reject home transfusions was fear of possible adverse effects and concerns over losing contact with the medical staff at the treating hospital.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that a significant portion of transfusion-dependent patients in Israel view home transfusions as a preferred treatment option and that its successful implementation requires maintaining ongoing contact with the treating hospital.

Efficacy of immunoglobulin replacement therapy and azithromycin in severe asthma with antibody deficiency

BACKGROUND

Although antibody deficiency (AD) is a well-known cause of recurrent respiratory infections, there are few data on its impact in adults with asthma. The objective of the present study was to assess outcomes in adults with severe asthma and AD after treatment with either azithromycin or subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIg).

METHODS

We performed a 5-year, prospective, observational, two-centre study of adults with severe asthma and AD in France. Bronchiectasis was ruled out by high-resolution computed tomography. Patients were treated for one year with either azithromycin (250 mg every other day) or SCIg (0.4-0.6 g/kg/months, weekly). All patients were evaluated for exacerbations, asthma control and lung function at baseline and then one year after treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with severe asthma were included in the study: 14 had been treated with azithromycin and 25 had been treated with SCIg. Before the initiation of treatment for AD, all patients had an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) score > 1.5 (mean ± SD: 2.71 ± 0.53) despite treatment at GINA step 4 or 5, and had a high exacerbation rate requiring oral corticosteroids and/or rescue antibiotics (∼7.2 ± 2.1/patient/year). One year after treatment initiation, we observed a significantly higher FEV1 (mean: 0.18 ± 0.22 L) and ACQ-7 score (1.26 ± 0.68), and a significantly lower exacerbation rate (1.63 ± 1.24/patient/year).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of AD dramatically improved asthma outcomes - suggesting that adults with severe asthma and recurrent respiratory infections should be screened and (if appropriate) treated for AD.