Disease Burden of Mild Asthma: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Real-World Survey

Uncovering the spectrum of healthcare resource utilization and costs across moderate to severe asthma: high-cost subgroups and impact of biologics

OBJECTIVES

The healthcare burden of moderate asthma is not as well studied as severe asthma. This study used 2019 US claims data to characterize patients in Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps 3 to 5 (moderate to severe) during the first 90 days of 2019.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization and costs were described for all patients and GINA groups. Patients in GINA 3 accounting for the top 10% and 20% of asthma-related total costs were also analyzed.

RESULTS

In the overall asthma population (N = 337 015), mean asthma-related healthcare cost per patient was $12 560; for GINA 3, 4 and 5, costs were $10 265, $12 923, and $22 601, respectively. For the GINA 3 top 10% and 20% cost subgroups, these expenditures were higher than for GINA 5 ($54 549 and $94 386, respectively), driven by outpatient and inpatient costs. The high-cost GINA 3 subgroups were older, more often female and had a higher comorbidity burden versus GINA 4 or 5. An exploratory analysis suggested that biologic initiation significantly increased costs in patients initially in GINA 3 (p < 0.0001), but significantly reduced costs in GINA 3 top 10% and 20% cost subgroups (both p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Results indicate patients receiving GINA 3 treatment can have a high disease burden and may benefit from treatment with a biologic.

Maternal Mental Health Spillovers From Child Illness and Disability: A Dynamic Panel Analysis

OBJECTIVES

There is growing recognition of the consequences of a person's health and illness experience for the health and wider welfare of those close to them. However, estimation of these health spillovers is challenging. This study adopts a longitudinal approach to examine maternal mental health spillovers associated with various forms of child illness and disability.

METHODS

Dynamic panel models are used in estimating maternal mental health spillovers related to 7 subcategories of chronic child illness and disability. In particular, we use longitudinal data from the Growing Up in Ireland study and a system generalized method of moments approach. We also consider heterogeneity in these spillovers by the severity of the child's illness/disability and by household deprivation.

RESULTS

We find that a child's experience of chronic nervous system conditions and chronic mental and behavioral disorders are associated with 10.8 and 5.1 percentage point increases in the probability of maternal depression, respectively. Similar associations were not observed for other health conditions. Spillover magnitude is also found to be strongly related to illness/disability severity. Finally, subsample analyses reveal a larger association between severe child illness and maternal depression among deprived households.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis, in observing health spillovers related to certain disease categories but not others, draws further attention to their context specificity. Our findings also further corroborate calls for inclusion of caregiver and family member outcomes in the economic evaluation of child health services and support consensus guidelines for collection of these outcomes alongside patient outcomes in clinical trials.

Best practice advice for asthma exacerbation prevention and management in primary care: an international expert consensus

Primary care clinicians play a key role in asthma and asthma exacerbation management worldwide because most patients with asthma are treated in primary care settings. The high burden of asthma exacerbations persists and important practice gaps remain, despite continual advances in asthma care. Lack of primary care-specific guidance, uncontrolled asthma, incomplete assessment of exacerbation and asthma control history, and reliance on systemic corticosteroids or short-acting beta2-agonist-only therapy are challenges clinicians face today with asthma care. Evidence supports the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) + fast-acting bronchodilator treatments when used as needed in response to symptoms to improve asthma control and reduce rates of exacerbations, and the symptoms that occur leading up to an asthma exacerbation provide a window of opportunity to intervene with ICS. Incorporating patient perspectives and preferences when designing asthma regimens will help patients be more engaged in their therapy and may contribute to improved adherence and outcomes. This expert consensus contains 10 Best Practice Advice Points from a panel of primary care clinicians and a patient representative, formed in collaboration with the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG), a clinically led charitable organization that works locally and globally in primary care to improve respiratory health. The panel met virtually and developed a series of best practice statements, which were drafted and subsequently voted on to obtain consensus. Primary care clinicians globally are encouraged to review and adapt these best practice advice points on preventing and managing asthma exacerbations to their local practice patterns to enhance asthma care within their practice.

Risk Factors for Acute Asthma Exacerbations in Adults With Mild Asthma

BACKGROUND

Although individuals with mild asthma account for 30% to 40% of acute asthma exacerbations (AAEs), relatively little attention has been paid to risk factors for AAEs in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with AAEs in patients with mild asthma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. We used administrative data from a large managed care organization to identify 199,010 adults aged 18 to 85 years who met study criteria for mild asthma between 2013 and 2018. An asthma-coded qualifying visit (index visit) was identified for each patient. We then used information at the index visit or from the year before the index visit to measure potential risk factors for AAEs in the subsequent year. An AAE was defined as either an asthma-coded hospitalization or emergency department visit, or an asthma-related systemic corticosteroid administration (intramuscular or intravenous) or oral corticosteroid dispensing. Poisson regression models with robust SEs were used to estimate the adjusted risk ratios for future AAEs.

RESULTS

In the study cohort, mean age was 44 years and 64% were female; 6.5% had AAEs within 1 year after the index visit. In multivariate models, age, sex, race, ethnicity, smoking status, body mass index, prior acute asthma care, and a variety of comorbidities and other clinical characteristics were significant predictors for future AAE risk.

CONCLUSION

Population-based disease management strategies for asthma should be expanded to include people with mild asthma in addition to those with moderate to severe disease.

Risk Factors Associated with Asthma Control and Quality of Life in Patients with Mild Asthma Without Preventer Treatment, a Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

To study risk factors for uncontrolled asthma and insufficient quality of life (QoL) in patients with mild asthma, ie those without preventer treatment.

Patients and Methods

Patients aged 18-75 years with a doctor's diagnosis of asthma randomly selected from primary and secondary care in Sweden. Mild asthma was defined as self-reported current asthma and no preventer treatment. Data were collected from self-completed questionnaires in 2012 and 2015. Well-controlled asthma was defined as Asthma Control Test (ACT) ≥20 points and no exacerbation and uncontrolled asthma as ACT<20 points and/or at least one exacerbation in the previous six months. QoL was measured by the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ), where a total mean score of ≥ 6 indicated sufficient and < 6 insufficient QoL. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using asthma control and Mini-AQLQ as dependent variables. Asthma control was dichotomized as controlled and uncontrolled asthma and the Mini-AQLQ as sufficient QoL (mean score ≥6) and insufficient QoL (mean score <6).

Results

Among 298 patients, 26% had uncontrolled asthma, 40% insufficient QoL and 20% both uncontrolled asthma and insufficient QoL. Age ≥60 years, obesity, daily smoking, rhinitis and inadequate knowledge of asthma self-management were independently associated with poor asthma control. Factors independently associated with insufficient QoL were age ≥60 years, overweight, obesity, rhinitis, sinusitis and inadequate knowledge of asthma self-management. Age ≥60 years, obesity, rhinitis and inadequate knowledge of asthma self-management were independently associated with both uncontrolled asthma and insufficient QoL.

Conclusion

Among asthma patients without preventer medication, 26% had uncontrolled asthma and 40% had insufficient asthma-related QoL. Older age, obesity, and rhinitis were risk factors for both poor asthma control and a reduced QoL, but having good knowledge of asthma self-management reduced this risk. Our findings suggest that this group of patients requires further attention and follow-up.

Mild asthma: Conundrums, complexities and the need to customize care

Mild and moderate asthma cover a wide range of asthma presentations, phenotypes and symptom burden, and account for the majority of people with asthma worldwide. Mild asthma has been difficult to define because of its heterogeneity and wide spectrum of impact and outcomes, including being associated with severe exacerbations. Assessment of mild-moderate asthma is best made by combining asthma symptom control and exacerbation risk as the principle means by which to determine treatment needs. Incontrovertible evidence and guidelines support treatment initiation with anti-inflammatory medication, completely avoiding reliever-only treatment of mild asthma. Shared decision making with patients and a treatable traits approach will ensure that a holistic approach is taken to maximize patient outcomes. Most importantly, mild asthma should be regarded as a reversible, potentially curable condition, remaining in long-term remission through minimizing triggers and optimizing care.

Maternal asthma in relation to infant size and body composition

Background

Asthma affects 10% of pregnancies and may influence offspring health, including infant size and body composition, through hypoxic and inflammatory pathways.

Objective

We sought to determine associations between maternal asthma and asthma phenotypes during pregnancy and infant size and body composition.

Methods

The B-WELL-Mom study (2015-19) is a prospective cohort of 418 pregnant persons with and without asthma recruited in the first trimester of pregnancy from 2 US obstetric clinics. Exposures were maternal self-reported active asthma (n = 311) or no asthma (n = 107), and asthma phenotypes were classified on the bases of atopy, onset, exercise induced, control, severity, symptomology, and exacerbations. Outcomes were infant weight, length, head circumference, and skinfold measurements at birth and postnatal follow-up, as well as fat and lean mass assessed by air displacement plethysmography at birth. Adjusted multivariable linear regression examined associations of maternal asthma and asthma phenotypes with infant outcomes.

Results

Offspring were born at a mean ± SD of 38 ± 2.3 weeks' gestation and were 18 ± 2.2 weeks of age at postnatal follow-up. Infants of participants with asthma had a mean ± SD fat mass of 11.0 ± 4.2%, birth weight of 3045.8 ± 604.3 g, and postnatal follow-up weight of 6696.4 ± 964.2 g, which were not different from infants of participants without asthma (respectively, β [95% confidence interval]: -0.1 [-1.4, 1.3], -26.7 [-156.9, 103.4], and 107.5 [-117.3, 332.3]). Few associations were observed between asthma or asthma phenotypes and infant size or body composition.

Conclusions

In a current obstetric cohort, maternal asthma during pregnancy was not associated with differential infant size or body composition.

Evaluating as-needed inhaled corticosteroid strategies in asthma: expanding the benefits to mild asthma

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to regular anti-inflammatory treatment is commonly low, and short-acting β2 agonist (SABA) overuse is common in patients with asthma, leading to an increased risk of asthma-related adverse events.

AREAS COVERED

Given the pivotal role of inflammation in asthma, multiple as-needed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapies have been developed, leading to a reduction in asthma exacerbations and improvement in symptom control. Currently, as-needed ICS/formoterol is one of the most commonly available formulations; however, other combinations such as ICS/SABA have been shown to be superior to as-needed SABA alone. Therefore, we performed a comprehensive review of the available scientific literature to enhance the advantages and disadvantages of each combination in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

The future direction we foresee in asthma management consists in abandoning as-needed short-acting bronchodilators in favor of as-needed ICS-containing therapies. Each patient is unique and differs from others; consequently, a single option will not fit everyone. Patients' and physicians' awareness of this perspective can be reached through the development of multiple therapeutic options suitable for each condition that can be found in 'real life'.

Mild asthma: Lessons learned and remaining questions

Patients living with mild disease represent the largest proportion of asthma patients. There are significant challenges in proposing a definition that would best describe these patients, while also accurately identifying at-risk individuals. Current literature suggests considerable inflammatory and clinical heterogeneity within this group. Research has shown that these patients are at risk of poor control, exacerbations, lung function decline, and death. Despite conflicting data on its prevalence, eosinophilic inflammation appears to be a predictor of poorer outcomes in mild asthma. There is an immediate need to better understand phenotypic clusters in mild asthma. It is also important to understand factors that influence disease progression and remission, as it is evident that both vary in mild asthma. Guided by robust literature that supports inhaled corticosteroid-based strategies over short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) reliant regimens, the management of these patients has evolved considerably. Unfortunately, SABA use remains high in clinical practice despite strong advocacy from the Global Initiative for Asthma. Future mild asthma research should explore the role of biomarkers, develop prediction tools based on composite risk scores, and explore targeted therapies at least for at-risk individuals.

Over-prescription of short-acting β2-agonists is associated with poor asthma outcomes: results from the Latin American cohort of the SABINA III study

OBJECTIVE

Short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) over-reliance is associated with poor asthma outcomes. As part of the SABA Use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study, we assessed SABA prescriptions and clinical outcomes in patients from six Latin American countries.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, data on disease characteristics/asthma treatments were collected using electronic case report forms. Patients (aged ≥12 years) were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (guided by the 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma) and practice type (primary/specialist care). Multivariable regression models analyzed the associations between SABA prescriptions and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Data from 1096 patients (mean age, 52.0 years) were analyzed. Most patients were female (70%), had moderate-to-severe asthma (79.4%), and were treated by specialists (87.6%). Asthma was partly controlled/uncontrolled in 61.5% of patients; 47.4% experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation in the previous 12 months. Overall, 39.8% of patients were prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters in the preceding 12 months (considered over-prescription). SABA canisters were purchased over the counter (OTC) by 17.2% of patients, of whom 38.8% purchased ≥3 canisters in the 12 months prior. Of patients who purchased SABA OTC, 73.5% were prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters. Higher SABA prescriptions (vs. 1 - 2 canisters) were associated with an increased incidence rate of severe exacerbations (ranging from 1.31 to 3.08) and lower odds ratios of having at least partly controlled asthma (ranging from 0.63 to 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

SABA over-prescription was common in Latin America, highlighting the need for urgent collaboration between healthcare providers and policymakers to align clinical practices with the latest evidence-based recommendations to address this public health concern.

Consensus on mild asthma management: results of a modified Delphi study

OBJECTIVE

In order to understand the role of regular controller inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus as-needed ICS-formoterol in managing mild asthma, we performed a modified Delphi procedure.

METHODS

Opinions from 16 respiratory experts to three surveys and during a virtual scientific workshop helped to develop final consensus statements (pre-defined as 70% agreement).

RESULTS

Thirteen participants completed all rounds (response rate 81%). At the end of the procedure, there was final consensus on: regular daily ICS being the recommended treatment approach in mild persistent asthma, with better symptom control and robust long-term clinical data compared with as-needed ICS-formoterol (85%); to avoid noncompliance, frequently seen in mild asthma patients, regular ICS dosing should be accompanied by ongoing education on treatment adherence (100%); treatment aims should be targeting asthma control (92%) and reduction of exacerbation risk (85%). No consensus was reached on whether GINA or national guidelines most influence prescribing decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to encourage patients to be adherent and to target both asthma control and exacerbation risk reduction. There is robust clinical evidence to support proactive regular dosing with ICS controller therapy plus as-needed short-acting beta-agonists for the management of patients with mild asthma.

ABBREVIATIONS.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2022.2034850 .

Over-prescription of short-acting β2-agonists is associated with poor asthma outcomes: results from the African cohort of the SABINA III study

BACKGROUND

The extent of short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) overuse in Africa remains poorly documented. As part of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study, we assessed SABA prescriptions/clinical outcomes in 3 African countries.

METHODS

Data on disease characteristics/asthma treatments were collected from patients (≥12 years) using electronic case report forms. Patients were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (guided by the 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma) and practice type (primary/specialist care). Multivariable regression models analyzed associations between SABA prescriptions and outcomes.

RESULTS

Data from 1778 patients (mean age, 43.7 years) were analyzed. Most patients were female (62.4%) and had moderate-to-severe asthma (63.3%), with 57.1 and 42.9% of patients treated in specialist and primary care, respectively. Asthma was partly controlled/uncontrolled in 66.2% of patients, with 57.9% experiencing ≥1 severe exacerbation in the previous 12 months. Overall, 46.5% of patients were prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters in the preceding 12 months (over-prescription); 26.2% were prescribed ≥10 canisters. SABAs were purchased over-the-counter by 32.6% of patients, of whom 79.3% had received SABA prescriptions; 71.9% and 40.1% for ≥3 and ≥10 canisters, respectively. Higher SABA prescriptions (vs. 1-2 canisters) were associated with increased incidence rate of severe exacerbations and lower odds of having at least partly controlled asthma (except 3-5 canisters).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this African cohort of the SABINA III study indicate that SABA over-prescription and SABA over-the-counter purchase are common and associated with poor asthma-related outcomes. This highlights the need for healthcare providers/policymakers to align clinical practices with the latest treatment recommendations.

Expert Opinion on Practice Patterns in Mild Asthma After the GINA 2019 Updates: A Major Shift in Treatment Paradigms from a Long-Standing SABA-Only Approach to a Risk Reduction-Based Strategy with the Use of Symptom-Driven (As-Needed) Low-Dose ICS/LABA

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This expert opinion, prepared by a panel of chest disease specialists, aims to review the current knowledge on practice patterns in real-life management of mild asthma and to address the relevant updates in asthma treatment by The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) to guide clinicians for the best clinical practice in applying these new treatment paradigms.

RECENT FINDINGS

On the basis of the emerging body of evidence suggesting the non-safety of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA)-only therapy and comparable efficacy of the as-needed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-formoterol combinations with maintenance ICS regimens, GINA recently released their updated Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention Guide (2019). The new GINA 2019 recommendations no longer support the SABA-only therapy in mild asthma but instead includes new off-label recommendations such as symptom-driven (as-needed) low-dose ICS-formoterol and "low dose ICS taken whenever SABA is taken." The GINA 2019 asthma treatment recommendations include a major shift from long-standing approach of clinical practice regarding the use of symptom-driven SABA treatment alone in the management of mild asthma. This expert opinion supports the transition from a long-standing SABA-only approach to a risk reduction-based strategy, with the use of symptom-driven (as-needed) low-dose ICS/LABA in mild asthma patients, particularly in those with poor adherence to controller medications. The thoughtful and comprehensive approach of clinicians to these strategies is important, given that the exact far-reaching impact of this major change in management of mild asthma in the real-world settings will only be clarified over time.

Short-acting β2-agonist prescription patterns for asthma management in the SABINA III primary care cohort

Short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) prescriptions and associated outcomes were assessed in 1440 patients with asthma from the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study treated in primary care. Data on asthma medications were collected, and multivariable regression models analysed the association of SABA prescriptions with clinical outcomes. Patients (mean age, 47.9 years) were mostly female (68.6%); 58.3% had uncontrolled/partly controlled asthma and 38.8% experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation (reported in 39% of patients with mild asthma). Overall, 44.9% of patients were prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters (over-prescription) and 21.5% purchased SABA over-the-counter. Higher SABA prescriptions (vs 1−2 canisters) were associated with significantly decreased odds of having at least partly controlled asthma (6–9 and 10–12 canisters) and an increased incidence rate of severe exacerbations (10–12 and ≥13 canisters). Findings revealed a high disease burden, even in patients with ‘mild’ asthma, emphasising the need for local primary care guidelines based on international recommendations.

The carbon footprint of respiratory treatments in Europe and Canada: An observational study from the CARBON programme

Climate change represents a global challenge and nations are increasingly looking to decarbonise their economies by developing roadmaps for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in accordance with international treaties, such as the Paris Agreement [1]. As the healthcare sector remains a key contributor to GHG emissions [2], an examination of the global carbon footprint of its operations and treatment pathways is essential to identify targets for decarbonisation.

Relievers account for the majority of inhaler use and associated GHG emissions. Implementing treatment guidelines can reduce the unmet need in respiratory care by improving disease control and reducing reliever overuse and the overall carbon footprint.https://bit.ly/3zh3c2B

Disease Control, Not Severity, Drives Job Absenteeism in Young Adults with Asthma - A Nationwide Cohort Study

Introduction

The impact of asthma and disease control on job absenteeism in young adults is sparsely investigated and conflicting evidence exist. Based on a nationwide cohort, the present study aims to describe the overall job absenteeism across asthma severities and describe the possible influence of asthma control.

Methods

REASSESS is a nationwide cohort of Danish asthma patients aged 18–45 using controller medication between 2014 and 2018, followed retrospectively for up to 15 years using national databases. Impact of asthma was investigated using negative binomial regression adjusted for age, sex, Charlson score and level of education and presented as adjusted incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

A total of 60,534 patients with asthma (median age 33 (25, 39), 55% female, 19% uncontrolled disease and 5.7% possible severe asthma) were followed for 12.7 (6.5–14.8) years. The prevalence of any absenteeism was more common in both mild-to-moderate and possible severe asthma compared to the background population (67%, 80% and 62%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Compared to the background population, mild-to-moderate and possible severe asthma were more likely to have temporary sick leave (1.37 (1.33–1.42); 1.78 (1.62–1.96)), unemployment (1.11 (1.07–1.14); 1.26 (1.15–1.38)) and obtain disability benefits (1.67 (1.66–1.67); 2.64 (2.63–2.65)). Uncontrolled asthma had increased temporary sick leave (1.42 (1.34–1.50)), unemployment (1.40 (1.32–1.48)) and disability (1.26 (1.26–1.27)) when compared to controlled disease. Significant increases in absenteeism could be measured already at ≥100 annual doses of rescue medication (1.09 (1.04–0.1.14)), patients’ first moderate or severe exacerbation (1.31 (1.15–1.49) and 1.31 (1.24–1.39), respectively). Further increases in absenteeism were observed with increasing rescue medication use and severe exacerbations.

Conclusion

Across severities, job absenteeism is increased among patients with asthma compared to the background population. Increases in absenteeism was seen already at ≥100 annual doses of rescue medication, representing a substantial, and probably preventable, reduction in productivity among young adults.

Over-prescription of short-acting β2-agonists for asthma in South Africa: Results from the SABINA III study

Background

Asthma medication prescription trends, including those of short-acting β₂ -agonists (SABAs), are not well documented for South Africa (SA).

Objectives

To describe demographics, disease characteristics and asthma prescription patterns in the SA cohort of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study.

Methods

An observational, cross-sectional study conducted at 12 sites across SA. Patients with asthma (aged ≥12 years) were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity, guided by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2017 recommendations, and practice type (primary/ specialist care). Data were collected using electronic case report forms.

Results

Overall, 501 patients were analysed - mean (standard deviation) age, 48.4 (16.6) years; 68.3% female - of whom 70.6% and 29.4% were enrolled by primary care physicians and specialists, respectively. Most patients were classified with moderate-to-severe asthma (55.7%; GINA treatment steps 3 - 5), were overweight or obese (70.7%) and reported full healthcare reimbursement (55.5%). Asthma was partly controlled/uncontrolled in 60.3% of patients, with 46.1% experiencing ≥1 severe exacerbations in the 12 months before the study visit. Overall, 74.9% of patients were prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters in the previous 12 months (over-prescription); 56.5% were prescribed ≥10 SABA canisters. Additionally, 27.1% of patients reported purchasing SABA over-the-counter (OTC); among patients with both SABA purchase and prescriptions, 75.4% and 51.5% already received prescriptions for ≥3 and ≥10 SABA canisters, respectively, in the preceding 12 months.

Conclusion

SABA over-prescription and OTC purchase were common in SA, demonstrating an urgent need to align clinical practices with the latest evidence-based recommendations and regulate SABA OTC purchase to improve asthma outcomes.

Study synopsis

What the study adds. This study provides valuable insights into asthma medication prescription patterns, particularly SABAs, across SA. Collection of this real-world data in patients treated in primary and specialty care demonstrates that SABA over-prescription and SABA OTC purchase are common, even in patients with mild asthma. These findings will enable clinicians and policymakers to make targeted changes to optimise asthma outcomes across the country Implications of the findings. SABA over-prescription represents a major public health concern in SA. Healthcare providers and policymakers will need to work together to promote educational initiatives aimed at patients, pharmacists and physicians, align clinical practices with the latest evidence-based recommendations, improve access to affordable medications and regulate SABA purchase without prescription.

Depression, suicidal motivation and suicidal ideation among individuals with asthma: a cross-sectional study

Background

Asthma is a chronic disease associated with risk of depression and suicidal events. The present study estimated the frequency of depression, suicidal motivation (SM) and suicidal ideation (SI) and identified clinical and psychosocial factors associated with these outcomes among individuals with asthma.

Methods

Cross-sectional study of a non-probabilistic sample of 1,358 adults with asthma and controls without asthma. Asthma severity and asthma control were assessed by a physician according to WHO (2009) and GINA (2012) criteria. Depression, SM and SI were screened by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Psychosocial factors were evaluated by a Community Violence Questionnaire, a Social Support Scale, a Stress Perceived Scale and a Resilience Scale. Chi-Square Test, and logistic regression models were performed to evaluate association between variables and outcomes.

Results

Among all participants, 222 (16.30%) had depression, 331 (24.40%) SM and 73 (5.40%) SI. There were 138 (12.10%) individuals with mild depression and SM, and 14 (1.20%) with mild depression and SI. After adjustment, severe asthma (SA) increased the chance of depression by 53.00% whereas mild to moderate asthma (MMA) increased by eleven-fold the likelihood of SI. Perception of low social support increased the chance of depression (OR 3.59; 95% CI, 2.44-5.28) and low resilience by (OR 2.96; 95% CI, 2.00-4.38); distress increased the odds of SM by 37.00%, and low affective support perception raised the likelihood of SI by (OR 6.82; 95% CI, 1.94-2.90).

Conclusions

Asthma, whether mild to moderate or severe, increased the chance of depression and SI. It is noteworthy that individuals with mild depression and MMA are at greater risk for SM and SI. Among the psychosocial variables, perception of low social support and low resilience were the variables associated with depression; distress impacted on SM, and the perception of low affective support raised the chance of SI.

Revisiting Mild Asthma: Current Knowledge and Future Needs

Asthma is a common chronic airways disease with significant impact on patients, caregivers, and the health-care system. Although most research and novel interventions mainly have focused on patients with uncontrolled severe asthma, most patients with asthma have mild disease. Epidemiologic studies suggest that many patients with mild asthma report frequent exacerbations of the disease and uncontrolled symptoms. However, despite its impact, mild asthma does not have either a uniformly agreed on definition for or a consensus on its clinical and pathophysiologic progression. More recently, the approach to treatment of patients with mild asthma has undergone significant changes primarily based on emerging evidence that airway inflammation in this population is important. This led to clinical research studies that explored the efficacy of as-needed inhaled corticosteroids along with the rescue medications that traditionally have been the mainstay of treatment. Despite some advancement in the field in recent years, many controversies and unmet needs remain. In this review, we examine the current understanding of the pathophysiologic features and management of mild asthma. In addition, we outline unmet needs for future research. We conclude that mild asthma contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality of asthma and should be the focus of future research.

Impact of asthma severity as risk factor to future exacerbations in patients admitted for asthma exacerbation

Background

To investigate the impact of disease severity on exacerbation patterns and identify its potential as a risk factor for future exacerbations in patients admitted for asthma exacerbations.

Methods

We analyzed frequency and time to next exacerbation over a period of three years in 532 patients admitted for exacerbation. Disease severity was selected as a potential risk factor for the events. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to identify the probability of future exacerbations. A Cox-proportional hazards model was used to assess independent relative risks.

Results

Out of 532 patients analyzed, the frequency of exacerbations rose as the severity of the asthma increased. The exacerbation rates in the following year were 1.66 per person for patients with mild asthma and 3.98 for patients with severe asthma. The median time to the next exacerbation in patients with mild asthma was 61.4 weeks (95% CI, 40.1-82.6) compared to 15.0 weeks (95% CI, 11.3-18.6) in patients with severe asthma (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that asthma severity (severe vs mild asthma, HR=1.42, 95% CI, 1.07-1.89), a history of 1-2 exacerbations (HR=1.95, 95% CI, 1.45-2.63) or > 2 exacerbations (HR=2.32, 95% CI, 1.56-3.44) in the previous 12 months, and a high number of comorbidities (≥5 vs none, HR=2.5, 95% CI, 1.41-4.45) were independent predictors of the probability of future exacerbations.

Conclusion

Asthma severity is a strong independent risk factor for future exacerbations, and exacerbation rates also become more frequent as the severity of the asthma increases. These findings help in better understanding of the natural course of exacerbations across the spectrum of asthma disease severity.

Disease control in patients with asthma and respiratory symptoms (wheezing, cough) during sleep

INTRODUCTION

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)-defined criteria for asthma control include questions about daytime symptoms, limitation of activity, nocturnal symptoms, need for reliever treatment and patients' satisfaction. Patients with nocturnal symptoms like wheezing and cough often suffer from lower sleep quality and impaired daytime performance. The lack of an appropriate method for standardized and objective monitoring of respiratory symptoms leads to difficulties in asthma management. The aim of this study is to present a new method for automated wheeze and cough detection during sleep and to assess the actual level of asthma control by the Asthma Control Test (ACT).

METHODS

Respiratory symptoms like wheezing and cough were recorded with the LEOSound-Monitor for one night in 55 asthmatic patients in their individual domestic setting. Patients were asked to assess their level of asthma subjectively with the ACT. The study consisted of 37 women and 18 men, with a mean age of 41 years, and a mean BMI of 27 kg/m2. Most of the patients had been taking an ICS/LABA combination and would resort to a SABA as their rescue medication.

RESULTS

60% of the participants were classed as having controlled, and 40% were classed as having partially- or uncontrolled asthma. During sleep wheezing was found in 8 of the 55 asthma patients (14.5%) and coughing was found in 30 patients (54.5%). The median ACT score in wheezing-patients was 14, while in non-wheezing patients it was 21. Uncontrolled asthma was found in 6 of the 8 wheezing-patients. Coughing versus non-coughing patients did not show a significant difference in the ACT-score (20, 22 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Wheezing is a sign of uncontrolled asthma. The ACT-score in wheezing patients is worse compared to patients without wheezing. LEOSound proofed to be a useful tool in providing an objective evaluation of respiratory symptoms, like coughing and wheezing. In clinical practice, this may allow an improvement in asthma therapy.

Burden and socioeconomics of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and food allergy

INTRODUCTION

Asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy affect approximately 20% of the global population. Few studies describe the burden of the totality of these diseases and only a handful studies provide a comprehensive overview of the socioeconomic impact of these diseases.

AREAS COVERED

For this narrative review, we searched Pubmed using selected keywords and inspected relevant references using a snowballing process. We provide an overview of the socioeconomic burden of allergic diseases (in particular, asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy). The focus of this review is on their epidemiology (incidence, prevalence), burden (disability-adjusted life years, quality of life), and direct and indirect costs (absenteeism and presenteeism). We have put special emphasis on differences between countries.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Both the prevalence and the burden of allergic diseases are considerable with prevalence varying between 1% and 20%. We identified a plethora of studies on asthma, but studies were generally difficult to compare due to the heterogeneity in measures used. There were only few studies on the burden of food allergy; therefore, more studies on this allergy are required. For future studies, we recommend standardizing epidemiologic, socioeconomic impact, and quality of life measures of allergic diseases.

The burden of exacerbations in mild asthma: a systematic review

Background

Although most patients with asthma have mild disease, data on how mild asthma is defined, and how frequently exacerbations occur in this patient population are scarce, so we aimed to redress this.

Methods

We searched Medline and Medline In-Process (PubMed), and Embase in OVID for English-language publications containing “mild asthma” plus at least one relevant therapy and outcome/keyword, limited to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published between January 1990 and February 2019. Publications were filtered to ensure appropriate data extraction. The main outcomes were the definitions of mild asthma and exacerbations, baseline exacerbation rates and exacerbation data for placebo recipients in prospective studies. Meta-analysis of exacerbation rates was planned.

Findings

Of 4064 articles identified, 64 were included in our review (49 743 subjects); 54 RCTs and 10 observational/other studies. Six main types of definitions of mild asthma were identified. While care was taken to ensure inclusion only of patients with mild asthma, marked heterogeneity was revealed in the definitions of mild asthma and hence the study populations. Reporting of exacerbations also varied widely between studies, precluding meta-analysis. Between 0–22% of patients were hospitalised for asthma or had a severe exacerbation in the previous year, according to baseline data from prospective studies. In RCTs, severe exacerbation rates in placebo recipients taking only short-acting β₂-agonist therapy ranged from 0.20–2.88 per year.

Conclusions

These data provide new evidence of the burden of exacerbations in mild asthma and highlight the need for standardised definitions of mild asthma and of exacerbations to progress further research.

This comprehensive literature review highlights the risk of exacerbations for patients with mild asthmahttps://bit.ly/3cauSb3

Quality of Life Determinants in Children and Adolescents with Mild to Moderate Asthma in Tunisia

Chronic childhood asthma is a leading cause of poor quality of life. Factors associated with this major asthma outcome were controversial. The aim of this study is to assess the quality of life of children and adolescents with mild to moderate asthma and to determine the factors associated with quality of life impairment in this population. This was a descriptive study carried out in the pediatric outpatient clinic of a University Hospital in the center of Tunisia over a period of 3 months (April-June 2018). Participants were children with mild to moderate asthma aged 7 to 17 years. The Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire was used to assess quality of life. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of asthma-related quality of life. A total of 90 children participated in the study. Almost 68% of children were aged 7 to 11, and nearly 32% were adolescents. The mean of PAQLQ total score was 4.7 ± 1.2. The final logistic regression model demonstrated that asthma symptoms control had the greatest impact on quality of life, followed by acute health care use in the past 12 months (p = .007; p = .01, respectively). The child gender and the parent's quality of life were also associated with the child's quality of life (p = .02; p = .008, respectively). This study revealed that children and adolescents with mild to moderate asthma had a moderate quality of life score. Asthma symptoms control, acute health care use, gender, and parent's quality of life determined the quality of life of children with asthma. Family-based asthma training programs that target family functioning and asthma outcomes are required.

Factors Associated with Acute Health Care Use in Children and Adolescents with Asthma

Asthma is a leading cause of acute health care use (AHCU) as defined by hospitalization and emergency department visits (ED). Little was known about factors associated with asthma-related AHCU. This study aimed to identify factors determining AHCU in children and adolescents with asthma. A descriptive study was conducted among children with mild to severe asthma referred to the pediatric outpatient clinic of "Farhat Hached" University Hospital of Sousse (Tunisia) over a period of three months (April-June 2018). We collected data regarding clinical information, the number of hospitalizations and ED visits related to asthma in the past 12 months, asthma management behaviors, and quality of life of children. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using SPSS (20.0). A total of 90 children have participated in the study. The percentage of children aged 7 to 11 years was higher than the percentage of adolescents aged 12 to 17 years (67.8%; 32.2%, respectively). The final logistic regression model demonstrated that asthma severity and inhaler technique increased the odds of AHCU (OR a = 4.6; 95% CI: 1.1-18.1; p = .03, OR a = 2.9; 95% CI: 1.1-7.8; p = .02, respectively). Also, increased quality of life score reduced the odds of AHCU (OR a = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4-0.9; p = .01). These results suggest that the organization of programs targeting the management of these factors can reduce the workload on hospital services and emergencies.

The Global Initiative for Asthma 2019 recommendation for mild asthma - A critique

Recognising that mild asthmatics are at risk of exacerbations and mortality, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) issued an updated strategy in 2019. This was premised on two studies culminating in their recommendation that mild asthma should be treated by using a combination of a rapid and long-acting beta 2 agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) administered as required. Their rationale is, however, debatable, as the studies actually showed that regular daily ICS administration was more effective for a number of asthma control endpoints. A patient-driven treatment strategy is also questionable, as there are a number of concerns about behaviour of patients suffering from asthma and perception of airway narrowing that should trigger medication intake but in fact does not do so. These deficiencies also influence a similar maintenance and reliever treatment (MART) approach that would be suboptimal. Intermittent ICS regimens are also inferior when compared to regular treatment. Not all asthmatics respond to the same dose of ICS. The best way to manage asthma is by adopting a step-up ICS approach, to encompass varying disease severity, with a long-acting beta agonist taken on a daily basis, ideally in a single combination inhaler.

The global initiative for asthma guidelines (2019): change in the recommendation for the management of mild asthma based on the SYGMA-2 trial - A critical appraisal

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recently released their updated Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention Guide (2019). The pocket guide for practicing clinicians states that "the 2019 GINA strategy report represents the most important change in asthma management in 30 years." An important recommendation is the change in treatment strategy for the management of mild asthma where the guideline recommends that" all adults and adolescents with asthma should receive either symptom driven (in mild asthma) or daily low dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) containing controller treatment to reduce the risk of serious exacerbations." Our study critically appraises the SYGMA-2 trial, a key trial that largely formed the basis of this recommendation and discusses the potential consequences of using only long-acting beta-2-agonist + ICS as needed as against regular, daily low-dose ICS with as-needed short-acting beta-2-agonist. Our critique covers airway inflammation, disease heterogeneity, understanding the noninferiority margin and its consequences, the Hawthorne effect, and conflict of interest. It is our view that statement of this magnitude will have far-reaching implications for clinical practice which will be in the interests of some patients but also against the interests of others.

Analysis of the Mechanism of Zhichuanling Oral Liquid in Treating Bronchial Asthma Based on Network Pharmacology

Zhichuanling oral liquid (ZOL) as a preparation of traditional Chinese medicine is widely used for the treatment of asthma in China; therefore, it is necessary to systematically clarify bioactive chemical ingredients and the mechanism of action of ZOL. Information on ZOL ingredients and asthma-related targets was collected, and we used the latest systematic pharmacological methods to construct protein-protein interaction network and compound-target network and then visualized them. Finally, GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was conducted through the clusterProfiler package in the R software. The results showed that 58 bioactive ingredients and 42 potential targets of ZOL related to asthma were identified, following six important components and nine hub genes screened. Further cluster and enrichment analysis suggested that NF-κB signaling pathway, PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, IL-17 signaling pathway, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, and TNF signaling pathway might be core pathways of ZOL for asthma. Our work successfully predicted the active ingredients and potential targets of ZOL and provided the explanation for the mechanism of action of ZOL for asthma through the systematic analysis, which suggested that ZOL played a major role in many ways including reducing airway inflammation and inhibiting airway remodeling and mucus secretion. Moreover, ZOL combined with glucocorticoids may have some effects on severe asthma.

Asthma impacts on workplace productivity in employed patients who are symptomatic despite background therapy: a multinational survey

Background: Asthma affects millions of people worldwide, with many patients experiencing symptoms that affect their daily lives despite receiving long-term controller medication.

Purpose: Work is a large part of most people’s lives, hence this study investigated the impact of uncontrolled asthma on work productivity in adults receiving asthma maintenance therapy.

Patients and methods: An online survey was completed by employed adults in Brazil, Canada, Germany, Japan, Spain and the UK. Participants were confirmed as symptomatic using questions from the Royal College of Physicians’ 3 Questions for Asthma tool. The survey contained the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment – Specific Health Problem questionnaire and an open-ended question on the effect of asthma at work.

Results: Of the 2,055 patients on long-term maintenance therapy screened, 1,598 were symptomatic and completed the survey. The average percentage of work hours missed in a single week due to asthma symptoms was 9.3%, ranging from 3.5% (UK) to 17.4% (Brazil). Nearly three-quarters of patients reported an impact on their productivity at work caused by asthma. Overall work productivity loss (both time off and productivity whilst at work) due to asthma was 36%, ranging from 21% (UK) to 59% (Brazil). When asked how asthma made participants feel at work, many respondents highlighted how their respiratory symptoms affect them. Tiredness, weakness and mental strain were also identified as particular challenges, with respondents describing concerns about the perception of colleagues and feelings of inferiority.

Conclusions: This study emphasizes the extent to which work time is adversely affected by asthma in patients despite the use of long-term maintenance medication, and provides unique personal insights. Strategies to improve patients’ lives may include asthma education, optimizing asthma management plans and running workplace well-being programs. Clinicians, employers and occupational health teams should be more aware of the impact of asthma symptoms on employees, and work together to help overcome these challenges.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoaEgER_CSE

A review of the burden and management of mild asthma in adults - Implications for clinical practice

Mild asthma is present in 50-75% of patients with asthma and is defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma as asthma that can be well controlled with low-intensity treatments (Steps 1 and 2). Despite this definition, 'mild' asthma is often not well controlled in reality, and can have a significant impact on an individual's symptom burden and quality of life. We performed a PubMed literature search to investigate the burden of 'mild' asthma in the lives of patients, including future risk and asthma control, and the current management strategies. While clinical guidelines recommend long-term, daily, low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for 'mild' asthma, published data suggest that ICS are often under-prescribed or used intermittently as symptoms arise. Furthermore, patients and physicians tend to overestimate disease control, impacting the accuracy of diagnosing 'mild asthma' and subsequent management. This disconnect may be amplified by miscommunication between patients and physicians, limited objective assessment of control, and differences in guidelines. As with moderate and severe asthma, current evidence supports early initiation of regular ICS in 'mild' asthma to address the underlying inflammation, achieve symptom control and reduce risk of exacerbations. Adherence to ICS treatment is key and can be improved by educating both patients and healthcare professionals. The results of this literature search challenge the term 'mild' asthma and suggest strategies to improve the proactive management of the disease to enable patients to live symptom-free.

Nationwide use of theophylline among adults-A 20-year Danish drug utilisation study

BACKGROUND

Theophylline, a dimethylxanthine, has been used the last 100 years to treat airway disease. Although it is one of the most widely prescribed medicines to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) throughout the years, the utilisation patterns are not well-described.

METHODS

Using the Danish Register of Medicinal Products Statistics, we identified adults above 18 years redeeming one or more prescriptions of theophylline between 1997 up to 2017, with a 2-year run-in period from 1995 to 1997. Using descriptive statistics, we reported the development in prevalence, incidence, and a measure of treatment duration (proportion of patients covered).

RESULTS

In total, 55,636 individuals redeemed 1,066,475 prescriptions of theophylline, 30,619 women (55%) and 25,017 men (45%). The prevalence decreased from 401 per 100,000 individuals in 1997 to 26 per 100,000 individuals in 2016. The incidence rate decreased throughout the entire study period (105 per 100,000 person-years in 1997 to 5 per 100,000 person-years in 2016). In total, 52% were still current users three months after theophylline initiation, 33%, 27%, and 23% were current users after 6 months, one year, and two years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although newer and more efficient medicines to treat asthma and COPD has been developed, theophylline is still prescribed and used in 2016, but the incidence and prevalence have decreased markedly since 1997.

Adherence to COPD treatment in Turkey and Saudi Arabia: results of the ADCARE study

Background

COPD affects millions of people worldwide. Poor treatment adherence contributes to increased symptom severity, morbidity and mortality. This study was designed to investigate adherence to COPD treatment in Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

Methods

An observational, cross-sectional study in adult COPD patients in Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Through physician-led interviews, data were collected on sociodemographics and disease history, including the impact of COPD on health status using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT); quality of life, using the EuroQol Five-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D); and anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Treatment adherence was measured using the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis examined the predictors of non-adherence and the impact of adherence on symptom severity.

Results

Four hundred and five COPD patients participated: 199 in Turkey and 206 in Saudi Arabia. Overall, 49.2% reported low adherence (MMAS-8 <6). Of those, 74.7% reported high disease impact (CAT >15) compared to 58.4% reporting medium/high adherence (p=0.0008). Patients with low adherence reported a lower mean 3-level EQ-5D utility value (0.54±0.35) compared to those with medium/high adherence (0.64±0.30; p<0.0001). Depression with HADS score 8–10 or >10 was associated with lower adherence (OR 2.50 [95% CI: 1.43–4.39] and 2.43 [95% CI: 1.39–4.25], respectively; p=0.0008). Being a high school/college graduate was associated with better adherence compared with no high school (OR 0.57 [95% CI: 0.33–0.98] and 0.38 [95% CI: 0.15–1.00], respectively; p=0.0310). After adjusting for age, gender, and country, a significant association between treatment adherence (MMAS-8 score ≥6) and lower disease impact (CAT ≤15) was observed (OR 0.56 [95% CI: 0.33–0.95]; p=0.0314).

Conclusion

Adherence to COPD treatment is poor in Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Non-adherence to treatment is associated with higher disease impact and reduced quality of life. Depression, age, and level of education were independent determinants of adherence.

Tiotropium added to low- to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus low- to medium-dose ICS alone for adults with mild to moderate uncontrolled persistent asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety profile of tiotropium when added to low- to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimen versus low- to medium-dose ICS alone for adults with mild to moderate uncontrolled persistent asthma.

DATA SOURCES

The online databases Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant data published up to November 14, 2017; we also conducted a supplementary search using clinicaltrials.gov.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Only randomized control trials were included in this review.

RESULTS

Four studies met our inclusion criteria for this review. In our review, two crossover studies were rated as "high risk" in the domain of "other bias" because a washout was not performed between each intervention. Lung function was significantly improved in the patient group receiving low- to medium-dose ICS with tiotropium. Results were consistent between each of three subgroups (tiotropium dry powder inhaler 18 μg or Respimat Soft Mist inhaler 5 µg, Respimat Soft Mist inhaler 2.5 μg, and Respimat Soft Mist inhaler 1.25 μg). Although no significant difference in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score was found between the two treatment groups, substantial heterogeneity was observed. The incidence of serious adverse events between the two treatment groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Tiotropium as a once daily add-on to low- to medium-dose ICS may be efficacious and well-tolerated treatment in adults with moderate uncontrolled asthma. However, as only a few studies were identified, more studies of better design and long-term trial duration are required in the future.

Corticosteroid plus β2-agonist in a single inhaler as reliever therapy in intermittent and mild asthma: a proof-of-concept systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend a single inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) regimen for moderate to severe asthma. However, evidence for the inhaled corticosteroid plus fast-onset-acting β₂-agonist (ICS/FABA) as reliever therapy in management of intermittent and mild asthma patients is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically explore efficacy and safety of the proof-of-concept of the ICS plus FABA regimen in a single inhaler as reliever therapy across children and adults with intermittent and mild persistent asthma.

METHODS

We searched online bibliographic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the as-needed use of ICS/FABA as monotherapy in intermittent or mild asthma patients. The primary outcomes were exacerbations and the hazard ratio (HR) of the time to first exacerbation.

RESULTS

Six RCTs (n = 1300) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the as-needed FABA regimen, the as-needed use of ICS/FABA as monotherapy statistically reduced exacerbations (RR = 0.56, P = 0.001). Compared with regular ICS regimen, the as-needed ICS/FABA therapy had slightly higher risk of exacerbations (RR = 1.39, P = 0.011). The HR for time to first exacerbations in the ICS/FABA regimen was significant lower when compared with FABA regimen (HR = 0.52, P = 0.002) but had no difference when compared with ICS regimen (HR = 1.30, P = 0.286). The corticosteroid exposure in the daily ICS regimen was 2- to 5-fold compared with as-needed use of ICS/FABA regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows that the ICS/FABA as a symptom-driven therapy may be a promising alternative regimen for the patients with intermittent or mild asthma, but it needs further real-world RCTs to confirm these findings.

Disease burden of mild asthma in China

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The impact, treatment patterns and control of mild asthma are poorly understood for Chinese patients. This study describes the characteristics, therapeutic interventions and burden of mild asthma on patients residing in major cities of China.

METHODS

The Respiratory Disease Specific Program 2015, a cross-sectional survey, was conducted with Chinese physicians and their patients. The survey assessed clinical characteristics, asthma symptoms, exacerbations, rescue inhaler usage, treatment adherence, asthma control, work and activity impairments and healthcare utilization for patients prescribed Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Step 1 or 2 treatment defined mild asthma.

RESULTS

From a total sample of 988 patients, 229 patients met the criteria for mild asthma, with 25.3% classified as Step 1 and 74.7% as Step 2. Overall, 12.6% of patients were considered of high adherence to prescribed treatment. Physicians reported that 75% of patients overall were well controlled, although well-controlled asthma as defined by GINA was achieved in only 14.2% of patients. 26.5% of patients indicated daily use of as-needed rescue medication in the last 4 weeks. 17.8% of patients experienced ≥1 exacerbations in the last 12 months and impaired work productivity was 27.2% overall.

CONCLUSION

Less than 15% of patients were well controlled according to GINA criteria despite physicians reporting the majority of patients were well controlled. Over one-fourth of patients relied on daily rescue inhaler medication, while exacerbation frequency and work and activity impairment were higher than might reasonably be expected in a mild asthmatic population.