Local pressure application of cannabinoid agonists increases spontaneous activity of rat substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons without affecting response to iontophoretically-applied GABA

Intrinsic and integrative properties of substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons

The GABA projection neurons of the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) are output neurons for the basal ganglia and thus critical for movement control. Their most striking neurophysiological feature is sustained, spontaneous high frequency spike firing. A fundamental question is: what are the key ion channels supporting the remarkable firing capability in these neurons? Recent studies indicate that these neurons express tonically active type 3 transient receptor potential (TRPC3) channels that conduct a Na-dependent inward current even at hyperpolarized membrane potentials. When the membrane potential reaches -60 mV, a voltage-gated persistent sodium current (I(NaP)) starts to activate, further depolarizing the membrane potential. At or slightly below -50 mV, the large transient voltage-activated sodium current (I(NaT)) starts to activate and eventually triggers the rapid rising phase of action potentials. SNr GABA neurons have a higher density of I(NaT), contributing to the faster rise and larger amplitude of action potentials, compared with the slow-spiking dopamine neurons. I(NaT) also recovers from inactivation more quickly in SNr GABA neurons than in nigral dopamine neurons. In SNr GABA neurons, the rising phase of the action potential triggers the activation of high-threshold, inactivation-resistant Kv3-like channels that can rapidly repolarize the membrane. These intrinsic ion channels provide SNr GABA neurons with the ability to fire spontaneous and sustained high frequency spikes. Additionally, robust GABA inputs from direct pathway medium spiny neurons in the striatum and GABA neurons in the globus pallidus may inhibit and silence SNr GABA neurons, whereas glutamate synaptic input from the subthalamic nucleus may induce burst firing in SNr GABA neurons. Thus, afferent GABA and glutamate synaptic inputs sculpt the tonic high frequency firing of SNr GABA neurons and the consequent inhibition of their targets into an integrated motor control signal that is further fine-tuned by neuromodulators including dopamine, serotonin, endocannabinoids, and H₂O₂.

Subcellular localization of type 1 cannabinoid receptors in the rat basal ganglia

Endocannabinoids, acting via type 1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1), are known to be involved in short-term synaptic plasticity via retrograde signaling. Strong depolarization of the postsynaptic neurons is followed by the endocannabinoid-mediated activation of presynaptic CB1 receptors, which suppresses GABA and/or glutamate release. This phenomenon is termed depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) or excitation (DSE), respectively. Although both phenomena have been reported to be present in the basal ganglia, the anatomical substrate for these actions has not been clearly identified. Here we investigate the high-resolution subcellular localization of CB1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens, striatum, globus pallidus and substantia nigra, as well as in the internal capsule, where the striato-nigral and pallido-nigral pathways are located. In all examined nuclei of the basal ganglia, we found that CB1 receptors were located on the membrane of axon terminals and preterminal axons. Electron microscopic examination revealed that the majority of these axon terminals were GABAergic, giving rise to mostly symmetrical synapses. Interestingly, preterminal axons showed far more intense staining for CB1, especially in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra, whereas their terminals were only faintly stained. Non-varicose, thin unmyelinated fibers in the internal capsule also showed strong CB1-labeling, and were embedded in bundles of myelinated CB1-negative axons. The majority of CB1 receptors labeled by immunogold particles were located in the axonal plasma membrane (92.3%), apparently capable of signaling cannabinoid actions. CB1 receptors in this location cannot directly modulate transmitter release, because the release sites are several hundred micrometers away. Interestingly, both the CB1 agonist, WIN55,212-2, as well as its antagonist, AM251, were able to block action potential generation, but via a CB1 independent mechanism, since the effects remained intact in CB1 knockout animals. Thus, our electrophysiological data suggest that these receptors are unable to influence action potential propagation, thus they may not be functional at these sites, but are likely being transported to the terminal fields. The present data are consistent with a role of endocannabinoids in the control of GABA, but not glutamate, release in the basal ganglia via presynaptic CB1 receptors, but also call the attention to possible non-CB1-mediated effects of widely used cannabinoid ligands on action potential generation.

Cannabinoid CB1 antagonists possess antiparkinsonian efficacy only in rats with very severe nigral lesion in experimental parkinsonism

We have observed that systemic administration of cannabinoid CB1 antagonists exerts antiparkinsonian effects in rats with very severe nigral lesion (>95% cell loss), but not in rats with less severe lesion (85-95% cell loss). Local injections into denervated striatum and corresponding globus pallidus reduced parkinsonian asymmetry. Infusions into lesioned substantia nigra enhanced motor asymmetries, but this effect was absent after very severe nigral lesion. At the striatal level, CB1 antagonists act enhancing dopamine D1 receptor function and reducing D2 receptor function. Striatal dopaminergic denervation did not affect cannabinoid CB1 receptor coupling to G proteins. These results suggest that (i) systemic administration of CB1 antagonists in rats with severe nigral degeneration is ineffective because striatopallidal-mediated motor effects are antagonized by nigra-mediated activity, and (ii) CB1 antagonists exert antiparkinsonian effects after very severe nigral degeneration because nigra-mediated inhibition disappears. CB1 receptor antagonists that lack psychoactive effects might be of therapeutic value in the control of very advanced stage of Parkinson's disease in humans.

Cannabinoid control of motor function at the basal ganglia

Classic and novel data strengthen the idea of a prominent role for the endocannabinoid signaling system in the control of movement. This finding is supported by three-fold evidence: (1) the abundance of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor subtype, but also of CB2 and vanilloid VR1 receptors, as well as of endocannabinoids in the basal ganglia and the cerebellum, the areas that control movement; (2) the demonstration of a powerful action, mostly of an inhibitory nature, of plant-derived, synthetic, and endogenous cannabinoids on motor activity, exerted by modulating the activity of various classic neurotransmitters; and (3) the occurrence of marked changes in endocannabinoid transmission in the basal ganglia of humans affected by several motor disorders, an event corroborated in animal models of these neurological diseases. This three-fold evidence has provided support to the idea that cannabinoid-based compounds, which act at key steps of the endocannabinoid transmission [receptors, transporter, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH)], might be of interest because of their potential ability to alleviate motor symptoms and/or provide neuroprotection in a variety of neurological pathologies directly affecting basal ganglia structures, such as Parkinson's disease and Huntington's chorea, or indirectly, such as multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. The present chapter will review the knowledge on this issue, trying to establish future lines for research into the therapeutic potential of the endocannabinoid system in motor disorders.

Inverse agonism and neutral antagonism at cannabinoid CB1 receptors

There are at least two types of cannabinoid receptor, CB1 and CB2, both G protein coupled. CB1 receptors are expressed predominantly at nerve terminals and mediate inhibition of transmitter release whereas CB2 receptors are found mainly on immune cells, one of their roles being to modulate cytokine release. Endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists also exist and these "endocannabinoids" together with their receptors constitute the "endocannabinoid system". These discoveries were followed by the development of a number of CB1- and CB2-selective antagonists that in some CB1 or CB2 receptor-containing systems also produce "inverse cannabimimetic effects", effects opposite in direction from those produced by cannabinoid receptor agonists. This review focuses on the CB1-selective antagonists, SR141716A, AM251, AM281 and LY320135, and discusses possible mechanisms by which these ligands produce their inverse effects: (1) competitive surmountable antagonism at CB1 receptors of endogenously released endocannabinoids, (2) inverse agonism resulting from negative, possibly allosteric, modulation of the constitutive activity of CB1 receptors in which CB1 receptors are shifted from a constitutively active "on" state to one or more constitutively inactive "off" states and (3) CB1 receptor-independent mechanisms, for example antagonism of endogenously released adenosine at A1 receptors. Recently developed neutral competitive CB1 receptor antagonists, which are expected to produce inverse effects through antagonism of endogenously released endocannabinoids but not by modulating CB1 receptor constitutive activity, are also discussed. So too are possible clinical consequences of the production of inverse cannabimimetic effects, there being convincing evidence that released endocannabinoids can have "autoprotective" roles.

Cannabinoid signaling in rat cerebellar granule cells: G-protein activation, inhibition of glutamate release and endogenous cannabinoids

Previous studies have indicated that cannabinoids inhibit presynaptic neurotransmitter release in brain through CB1 receptors. To examine this issue in a primary neuronal culture system, rat cerebellar granule cells (CGCs) were prepared. [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays in saponin-permeabilized CGCs showed that G-protein activation by the CB1 agonist, WIN55212-2, and adenosine A1 agonist, phenylisopropyladenosine, was maximal during the second week in culture. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding to a lesser degree than WIN55212-2, and the antagonists SR141716A and AM281 acted as inverse agonists in intact CGCs, but not in CGC membrane preparations. Ten micromolar WIN55212-2 and Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol decreased depolarization-evoked efflux of [3H]-D-aspartate from CGCs by 32% and 13%, respectively. SR141716A and AM281 increased [3H]-D-aspartate release by 28%. The fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and the anandamide uptake inhibitor AM404 inhibited transmitter release, implying that the antagonist effects were mediated by blockade of endocannabinoid activity. Levels of endocannabinoids (both anandamide and 2-arachidonyl glycerol [2-AG]) in extracts of the cells and cell incubation buffer were increased by PMSF pre-treatment. Depolarization with KCl significantly decreased the amount of anandamide and 2-AG in PMSF-treated CGCs. These results suggest that endogenous cannabinoids inhibit neurotransmitter release in CGCs, which may also release endocannabioids upon neural stimulation.

Dose and behavioral context dependent inhibition of movement and basal ganglia neural activity by ??9-tetrahydrocannabinol during spontaneous and treadmill locomotion tasks in rats

The effects of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinole (Delta-9-THC) on locomotor activities and related basal ganglia neural responses were investigated in rats. A multiple-channel, single unit recording method was used to record neuronal activity in the dorsal lateral striatum, the globus pallidus, the subthalamic nucleus, and the substantia nigra pars reticulata simultaneously during spontaneous movement and treadmill locomotion. Delta-9-THC treatment (0.05-2.0 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently decreased spontaneous motor activity and altered walking patterns in treadmill locomotion in that stance time was increased and step number was decreased. In parallel with the behavioral effects, Delta-9-THC treatment inhibited neural activity across all four basal ganglia areas recorded during both motor tests. Further, this inhibition of basal ganglia neural activity was behavioral context-dependent. Greater inhibition was found during resting than during walking periods in the treadmill locomotion test. Delta-9-THC treatment also changed firing patterns in the striatum and globus pallidus. More neurons in these regions discharged in an oscillatory pattern during treadmill walking with Delta-9-THC, and the oscillatory frequency was similar to that of the step cycle. Synchronized firing patterns were found in few basal ganglia neurons in the control condition (approximately 1%). Synchronized firing patterns increased during the treadmill resting phase after Delta-9-THC treatment, but still represented a very small proportion of the total neural population (1.9%). The drug treatment did not change neural responses to the tone cue proceeding treadmill locomotion. This study demonstrates dose-dependent inhibitory effects of cannabinoid injection on motor activity. This effect may be related to the behavioral context-dependent inhibition observed in the basal ganglia system where CB1 receptors are densely distributed.

Role of endogenous cannabinoids in synaptic signaling

Research of cannabinoid actions was boosted in the 1990s by remarkable discoveries including identification of endogenous compounds with cannabimimetic activity (endocannabinoids) and the cloning of their molecular targets, the CB1 and CB2 receptors. Although the existence of an endogenous cannabinoid signaling system has been established for a decade, its physiological roles have just begun to unfold. In addition, the behavioral effects of exogenous cannabinoids such as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the major active compound of hashish and marijuana, await explanation at the cellular and network levels. Recent physiological, pharmacological, and high-resolution anatomical studies provided evidence that the major physiological effect of cannabinoids is the regulation of neurotransmitter release via activation of presynaptic CB1 receptors located on distinct types of axon terminals throughout the brain. Subsequent discoveries shed light on the functional consequences of this localization by demonstrating the involvement of endocannabinoids in retrograde signaling at GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses. In this review, we aim to synthesize recent progress in our understanding of the physiological roles of endocannabinoids in the brain. First, the synthetic pathways of endocannabinoids are discussed, along with the putative mechanisms of their release, uptake, and degradation. The fine-grain anatomical distribution of the neuronal cannabinoid receptor CB1 is described in most brain areas, emphasizing its general presynaptic localization and role in controlling neurotransmitter release. Finally, the possible functions of endocannabinoids as retrograde synaptic signal molecules are discussed in relation to synaptic plasticity and network activity patterns.

Effects of CB1 cannabinoid receptor modulating compounds on the hyperkinesia induced by high-dose levodopa in the reserpine-treated rat model of Parkinson's disease

The present study was designed to determine the potential of CB1 cannabinoid receptor modulating compounds in the treatment of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa)-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. In the reserpine-treated rat model of parkinsonism, administration of a high dose of L-dopa (150 mg/kg) but not of Cl-APB (0.5 mg/kg) or quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg) produced a hyperkinetic state characterised by an increase in horizontal and vertical activity, which likely represent correlates of antiparkinsonian and dyskinetic activity, respectively. Injection of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716 (0.1-3 mg/kg) reduced the increase in vertical activity elicited by L-dopa without affecting the increase in horizontal activity. Injection of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (0.1-3 mg/kg) reduced the L-dopa-induced increase in vertical activity and, at the highest dose only (3 mg/kg), also reduced horizontal activity elicited by L-dopa. WIN55,212-2 (1 mg/kg) reduced motor activity induced by both the D1 receptor agonist Cl-APB (0.5 mg/kg) and the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg) in the reserpine-treated rat. SR141716 (1 mg/kg) had no effects on motor activity induced by Cl-APB (0.5 mg/kg) nor quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg) in the reserpine-treated rat. Injection of the inhibitor of endocannabinoid transport AM404 (0.1-1 mg/kg) did not affect the increase in horizontal or vertical activity elicited by L-dopa (150 mg/kg) in the reserpine-treated rat. The data suggest that both CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonists and agonists can modulate the behavioural effects of L-dopa and may be useful for the treatment of the dyskinesia associated with long-term L-dopa treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Stimulation of cannabinoid receptors reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the MPTP-lesioned nonhuman primate model of Parkinson's disease

Long-term treatment with levodopa in Parkinson's disease results in the development of motor fluctuations, including reduced duration of antiparkinsonian action and involuntary movements, i.e., levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Cannabinoid receptors are concentrated in the basal ganglia, and stimulation of cannabinoid receptors can increase gamma-aminobutyric acid transmission in the lateral segment of globus pallidus and reduce glutamate release in the striatum. We thus tested the hypothesis that the cannabinoid receptor agonist nabilone (0.01, 0.03, and 0.10 mg/kg) would alleviate levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine hydrochloride (MPTP) -lesioned marmoset model of Parkinson's disease. Coadministration of nabilone (0.1 mg/kg) with levodopa was associated with significantly less total dyskinesia (dyskinesia score, 12; range, 6-17; primate dyskinesia rating scale) than levodopa alone (22; range, 14-23; P < 0.05). This effect was more marked during the onset period (0-20 minutes post levodopa). There was no reduction in the antiparkinsonian action of levodopa. Furthermore, the intermediate dose of nabilone used (0.03 mg/kg) increased the duration of antiparkinsonian action of levodopa by 76%. Thus, cannabinoid receptor agonists may be useful in the treatment of motor complications in Parkinson's disease.

The endogenous cannabinoid system and the basal ganglia. biochemical, pharmacological, and therapeutic aspects

New data strengthen the idea of a prominent role for endocannabinoids in the modulation of a wide variety of neurobiological functions. Among these, one of the most important is the control of movement. This finding is supported by 3 lines of evidence: (1) the demonstration of a powerful action, mostly inhibitory in nature, of synthetic and plant-derived cannabinoids and, more recently, of endocannabinoids on motor activity; (2) the presence of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor subtype and the recent description of endocannabinoids in the basal ganglia and the cerebellum, the areas that control movement; and (3) the fact that CB(1) receptor binding was altered in the basal ganglia of humans affected by several neurological diseases and also of rodents with experimentally induced motor disorders. Based on this evidence, it has been suggested that new synthetic compounds that act at key steps of endocannabinoid activity (i.e., more-stable analogs of endocannabinoids, inhibitors of endocannabinoid reuptake or metabolism, antagonists of CB(1) receptors) might be of interest for their potential use as therapeutic agents in a variety of pathologies affecting extrapyramidal structures, such as Parkinson's and Huntington's diseases. Currently, only a few data exist in the literature studying such relationships in humans, but an increasing number of journal articles are revealing the importance of this new neuromodulatory system and arguing in favour of the funding of more extensive research in this field. The present article will review the current knowledge of this neuromodulatory system, trying to establish the future lines for research on the therapeutic potential of the endocannabinoid system in motor disorders.

Desensitization of cannabinoid-mediated presynaptic inhibition of neurotransmission between rat hippocampal neurons in culture

Prolonged exposure to cannabinoids results in tolerance in vivo and desensitization of cannabinoid receptors in vitro. We show here that cannabinoid-induced presynaptic inhibition of glutamatergic neurotransmission desensitized after prolonged exposure to the cannabinoid receptor agonist (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo-[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-napthalenyl)methanone monomethanesulfonate (Win55,212-2). Synaptic activity between hippocampal neurons in culture was determined from network-driven increases in intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i) spikes) and excitatory postsynaptic currents. Win55,212-2-induced (100 nM) inhibition partially desensitized after 2 h and completely desensitized after 18- to 24-h exposure. The desensitization could be overcome by higher concentrations of agonist as indicated by a parallel rightward shift of the concentration response curve from an EC(50) of 2.7 +/- 0.3 nM to 320 +/- 147 nM for inhibition of [Ca(2+)](i) spiking and from 43 +/- 17 nM to 4505 +/- 403 nM for inhibition of synaptic currents, suggesting that this phenomenon may underlie tolerance. Presynaptic expression of dominant negative G-protein-coupled-receptor kinase (GRK2-Lys220Arg) or beta-arrestin (319-418) reduced the desensitization produced by 18- to 24-h pretreatment with 100 nM, Win55,212-2 suggesting that desensitization followed the prototypical pathway for G-protein-coupled receptors. Prolonged treatment with Win55,212-2 produced a modest increase in the EC(50) for adenosine inhibition of synaptic transmission and pretreatment with cyclopentyladenosine produced a slight increase in the EC(50) for Win55,212-2, suggesting a reciprocal ability to produce heterologous desensitization. The long-term changes in synaptic function that accompany chronic cannabinoid exposure will be an important factor in evaluating the therapeutic potential of these drugs and will provide insight into the role of the endocannabinoid system.

Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands

There are at least two types of cannabinoid receptors, CB(1) and CB(2), both coupled to G proteins. CB(1) receptors exist primarily on central and peripheral neurons, one of their functions being to modulate neurotransmitter release. CB(2) receptors are present mainly on immune cells. Their roles are proving more difficult to establish but seem to include the modulation of cytokine release. Endogenous agonists for cannabinoid receptors (endocannabinoids) have also been discovered, the most important being arachidonoyl ethanolamide (anandamide), 2-arachidonoyl glycerol and 2-arachidonyl glyceryl ether. Other endocannabinoids and cannabinoid receptor types may also exist. Although anandamide can act through CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, it is also a vanilloid receptor agonist and some of its metabolites may possess yet other important modes of action. The discovery of the system of cannabinoid receptors and endocannabinoids that constitutes the "endocannabinoid system" has prompted the development of CB(1)- and CB(2)-selective agonists and antagonists/inverse agonists. CB(1)/CB(2) agonists are already used clinically, as anti-emetics or to stimulate appetite. Potential therapeutic uses of cannabinoid receptor agonists include the management of multiple sclerosis/spinal cord injury, pain, inflammatory disorders, glaucoma, bronchial asthma, vasodilation that accompanies advanced cirrhosis, and cancer. Following their release onto cannabinoid receptors, endocannabinoids are removed from the extracellular space by membrane transport and then degraded by intracellular enzymic hydrolysis. Inhibitors of both these processes have been developed. Such inhibitors have therapeutic potential as animal data suggest that released endocannabinoids mediate reductions both in inflammatory pain and in the spasticity and tremor of multiple sclerosis. So too have CB(1) receptor antagonists, for example for the suppression of appetite and the management of cognitive dysfunction or schizophrenia.

Endocannabinoids and basal ganglia functionality

In recent years, our knowledge on the cannabinoid pharmacology has shown a significant rise in terms of both quantity (more compounds and more targets) and quality (more selective compounds). This allows to consider cannabinoids and related compounds as a promising new line of research for therapeutic treatment of a variety of conditions, such as brain injury, chronic pain, glaucoma, asthma, cancer and AIDS-associated effects and other pathologies. Motor disorders are another promising field for the therapeutic application of cannabinoid-related compounds, since the control of movement is one of the more relevant physiological roles of the endocannabinoid transmission in the brain. There are two pathologies, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's chorea, which are particularly interesting from a clinical point of view due to the direct relationship of endocannabinoids and their receptors with neurons that degenerate in those disorders. However, other neurological pathologies, such as Alzheimer's disease or multiple sclerosis, which are not motor disorders in origin, but present a strong alteration in the control of movement, have also been a subject of interesting research for a cannabinoid therapy. This review will summarize our current knowledge on the role of these endogenous substances in the control of movement and, in particular, on the possible therapeutic usefulness of these compounds in the treatment of motor pathologies.

Role of the endogenous cannabinoid system as a modulator of dopamine transmission: implications for Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia

The endogenous cannabinoid system is a new signaling system composed by the central (CB1) and the peripheral (CB2) receptors, and several lipid transmitters including anandamide and 2-arachidonylglycerol. This system is the target of natural cannabinoids, the psychoactive constituents of Cannabis sativa preparations (marijuana, hashish). Acute and chronic cannabis exposure has been associated with subjective feelings of pleasure and relaxation, but also to the onset of psychiatric syndromes, a decrease of the efficacy of neuroleptics and alterations in the extrapyramidal system regulation of motor activity. These actions point to a tight association of the cannabinoid system with the brain dopaminergic circuits involved in addiction, the clinical manifestation of positive symptoms of schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease. The present work discusses anatomical, biochemical and pharmacological evidences supporting a role for the endogenous cannabinoid system in the modulation of dopaminergic transmission. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are present in dopamine projecting brain areas. In primates and certain rat strains it is also located in dopamine cells of the A8, A9 and A10 mesencephalic cell groups, as well as in hypothalamic dopaminergic neurons controlling prolactin secretion. CB1 receptors co-localize with dopamine D1/D2 receptors in dopamine projecting fields. Manipulation of dopaminergic transmission is able to alter the synthesis and release of anandamide as well as the expression of CB1 receptors. Additionally, CB1 receptors can switch its transduction mechanism to oppose to the ongoing dopamine signaling. Acute blockade of CB1 receptor potentiates the facilitatory role of dopamine D2 receptor agonists on movement. CB1 stimulation results in sensitization to the motor effects of indirect dopaminergic agonists. The dynamics of these changes indicate that the cannabinoid system is an activity-dependent modulator of dopaminergic transmission, an hypothesis relevant for the design of new therapeutic strategies for dopamine-related diseases such as the psychosis and Parkinson's disease.

Effects of the cannabinoid ligand SR 141716A alone or in combination with delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol or scopolamine on learning in squirrel monkeys

To investigate the effects of the cannabinoids on learning and on scopolamine-induced disruptions in learning, delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC), SR 141716A (an antagonist at CB1 receptors) and scopolamine were administered to squirrel monkeys responding in a repeated-acquisition task. In this task, monkeys acquired a different three-response sequence each session and responding was maintained by food presentation under a second-order fixed-ratio 5 schedule. When either delta9-THC (0.1-0.56 mg/kg, i.m.) or SR 141716A (1-10 mg/kg, i.m.) was administered alone, 60 and 75 min before the session, respectively, both cannabinoid ligands dose-dependently decreased the overall rate of responding and increased the overall percentage of errors. However, at a dose that had little or no effect alone (i.e. 1 mg/kg), SR 141716A antagonized the disruptive effects of delta9-THC (0.18-1.8 mg/kg) on acquisition, shifting the dose-effect curves for rate of responding and percentage of errors at least 1/2 log unit to the right. Finally, when either delta9-THC (0.001-1 mg/kg) or SR 141716A (0.32-10 mg/kg) was administered with scopolamine (0.01 or 0.032 mg/kg, 15 min before the session), greater rate-decreasing and error-increasing effects were obtained than with scopolamine alone. These results suggest that while low doses of SR 141716A can antagonize the effects of delta9-THC in squirrel monkeys, high doses can also disrupt acquisition when administered alone and potentiate the disruptive effects of scopolamine on acquisition.

Different mechanisms for dopaminergic excitation induced by opiates and cannabinoids in the rat midbrain

1. The mechanism underlying morphine and cannabinoid-induced excitation of meso-accumbens and nigro-striatal dopaminergic neurons was investigated by extracellular single unit recording techniques coupled with antidromic activation from the nucleus accumbens and striatum respectively, in unanesthetized rats. 2. The intravenous administration of cumulative doses (1-4 mg/kg) of morphine, dose-dependently increased the firing rate of dopaminergic neurons projecting to the nucleus accumbens and neostriatum, while the same doses inhibited the activity of pars reticulata neurons of the substantia nigra. Both effects were antagonized by naloxone (0.1 mg/kg i.v.) but not by the selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A (1 mg/kg i.v.). 3. The intravenous administration of cumulative doses (0.125-0.5 mg/kg) of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) also increased the firing rate of meso-accumbens and nigro-striatal dopaminergic neurons; this effect was antagonized by SR 141716A (1 mg/kg i.v.), but not by naloxone. 4. Furthermore, nor delta9-THC up to a dose of 1 mg/kg, maximally effective in stimulating dopamine neurons, neither SR 141716A (1 mg/kg i.v.) at a dose able to reverse the stimulatory effect of delta9, THC on dopamine cells, did alter the activity of SNr neurons. 5. The results indicate that morphine and delta9-THC activate dopaminergic neurons through distinct receptor-mediated mechanisms; morphine may act by removing the inhibitory input from substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons (an effect mediated by mu-opioid receptors). Alternatively, the delta9-THC-induced excitation of dopaminergic neurons seems to be mediated by CB1 cannabinoid receptors, while neither mu-opioid receptors nor substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons are involved.

The functional neuroanatomy of brain cannabinoid receptors

The effects of the primary psychoactive constituent of marijuana, delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, are mediated by cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2. The CB1 receptors display a unique central nervous system (CNS) distribution and are present in mammalian brain at higher levels than most other known G-protein-coupled receptors. The highest levels occur in several areas involved in motor control and hippocampus. Cannabinoid effects on CNS activities, including movement, memory, nociception, endocrine regulation, thermoregulation, sensory perception, cognitive functions, and mood, correlate with the regional distribution of cannabinoid receptors and their activation of specific G-protein-mediated signal transduction systems in various brain regions.

Brain cannabinoid systems as targets for the therapy of neurological disorders

Unprecedented developments in cannabinoid research within the past decade include discovery of a brain (CB1) and peripheral (CB2) receptor; endogenous ligands, anandamide, and 2-arachidonylglycerol; cannabinoid drug-induced partial and inverse agonism at CB1 receptors, antagonism of NMDA receptors and glutamate, and antioxidant activity; and preferential CB1 receptor localization in areas subserving spasticity, pain, abnormal involuntary movements, seizures, and amnesia. These endogenous structures and chemicals and mechanisms are potentially new pathophysiologic substrates, and targets for novel cannabinoid treatments, of several neurological disorders.

Role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in the regulation of motor activity

One of the prominent pharmacological features of drugs acting at the brain cannabinoid receptor (CB1) is the induction of alterations in motor behavior. Catalepsy, immobility, ataxia, or the impairment of complex behavioral acts are observed after acute administration of either natural and synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists or the endogenous CB1 ligand anandamide. The dense presence of CB1 receptors in the cerebellum and in the basal ganglia, especially at the outflow nuclei (substantia nigra and the internal segment of the globus pallidus), supports the existence of an endogenous cannabinoid system regulating motor activity. In the basal ganglia, the functionality of the anandamide-CB1 system is poorly understood. Dual effects are often observed after the administration of CB1 ligands in animal models of pharmacological manipulation of basal ganglia transmitter systems, indicating that the activity of the anandamide-CB1 system depends on the ongoing activation of the different elements of the basal ganglia. This finding is in agreement with the proposed activity-dependent release of anandamide from a plasmalemma precursor. Additionally, a potential state-dependent bidirectional coupling of the CB1 receptor to the adenylate cyclase transduction system has also been described. From this perspective, the endogenous cannabinoid system can be proposed as a local regulator of neurotransmission processes within the basal ganglia. This system may serve as a counterregulatory homeostatic mechanism preserving the functional role of basal ganglia circuits in coding the serial order of events that constitute movement.

SR 141716A acts as an inverse agonist to increase neuronal voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents by reversal of tonic CB1 cannabinoid receptor activity

The CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716A abolished the inhibition of Ca2+ currents by the agonist WIN 55,212-2. However, SR 141716A alone increased Ca2+ currents, with an EC50 of 32 nM, in neurons that had been microinjected with CB1 cRNA. For an antagonist to elicit an effect, some receptors must be tonically active. Evidence for tonically active CB1 receptors was seen as enhanced tonic inhibition of Ca2+ currents. Preincubation with anandamide failed to enhance the effect of SR 141716A, indicating that anandamide did not cause receptor activity. Under Ca2+-free conditions designed to block the Ca2+-dependent formation of anandamide and sn-2-arachidonylglycerol, SR 141716A again increased the Ca2+ current. The Ca2+ current was tonically inhibited in neurons expressing the mutant K192A receptor, which has no affinity for anandamide, demonstrating that this receptor is also tonically active. SR 141716A had no effect on the Ca2+ current in these neurons, but SR 141716A could still antagonize the effect of WIN 55, 212-2. Thus, the K192 site is critical for the inverse agonist activity of SR 141716A. SR 141716A appeared to become a neutral antagonist at the K192A mutant receptor. Native cannabinoid receptors were studied in male rat major pelvic ganglion neurons, where it was found that WIN 55,212-2 inhibited and SR 141716A increased Ca2+ currents. Taken together, our results demonstrate that a population of native and cloned CB1 cannabinoid receptors can exist in a tonically active state that can be reversed by SR 141716A, which acts as an inverse agonist.

Role of cannabinoid receptors in memory storage

Studies have shown that delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the principal psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, produces memory deficits similar to those produced by neurochemical lesions of the hippocampus. Such lesions impair performance in short-term spatial memory tasks learned prior to the lesion. Animals trained in the behavioral task following the lesion can still perform the task, but learn a different behavioral strategy. Cannabinoid agonists impair behavioral performance in a delay-dependent manner similar to that produced by lesions, but also shift the behavioral response strategy. A possible role for cannabinoid receptors and endogenous cannabinoids may thus be to regulate the storage (i.e., encoding) of information, as well as the means by which that information is retrieved.

Cannabinoid transmission and reward-related events

The reward/reinforcement circuitry of the mammalian brain consists of synaptically interconnected neurons associated with the medial forebrain bundle, linking the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, and ventral pallidum. Electrical stimulation of this circuit supports intense self-stimulation in animals and, in humans, produces intense pleasure or euphoria. This circuit is strongly implicated in the neural substrates of drug addiction and in such addiction-related phenomena as withdrawal dysphoria and craving. This circuit is also implicated in the pleasures produced by natural rewards (e.g., food, sex). Cannabinoids are euphorigenic in humans and have addictive liability in vulnerable persons, but were long considered "anomalous" drugs of abuse, lacking pharmacological interaction with these brain reward substrates. It is now clear, however, that cannabinoids activate these brain substrates and influence reward-related behaviors. From these actions, presumably, derive both the abuse potential of cannabinoids and the possible clinical efficacy in dysphoric states.

Local effects of cannabinoids on spontaneous activity and evoked inhibition in the globus pallidus

The globus pallidus has been identified as a site of action for the motor effects of cannabinoids. A previous report from this laboratory demonstrated that systemic administration of the potent and selective cannabinoid receptor agonist (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl) methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl] (1-napthalenyl) methanone (WIN 55,212-2) inhibits rat pallidal neurons and reverses the inhibition of pallidal activity produced by electrical stimulation of the striatum. The current study used in vivo single unit electrophysiology/micropressure ejection to investigate whether the effects of cannabinoids on spontaneous activity and evoked inhibition in the globus pallidus are locally mediated. Micropressure ejection of either WIN 55,212-2 or CP 55,940 into the globus pallidus inhibited spontaneous activity in the globus pallidus. Local administration of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist, N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazo le-carboxamide (SR141716A), did not produce an effect on its own but blocked the effect of WIN 55,212-2 on spontaneous activity of pallidal neurons. The decrease in pallidal activity produced by WIN 55,212-2 was not blocked by coadministration of bicuculline, suggesting this effect is independent of GABA(A) receptors. Micropressure ejection of cannabinoids into the globus pallidus did not reverse the inhibitory effect of striatal stimulation in the globus pallidus. Taken together, these findings suggest that pallidal cannabinoid receptors mediate an inhibition of spontaneous activity in the globus pallidus.

Inhibition of GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents by cannabinoids in rat corpus striatum

Electrophysiological consequences of activation of cannabinoid receptors have been mostly investigated on neuronal cell lines and on cells transfected with cannabinoid receptors. The aim of the present experiments was to study cannabinoid effects on identified neurons in situ. Electrically-evoked postsynaptic currents and voltage-dependent calcium currents were investigated in the principal neurons of the corpus striatum, the medium spiny neurons, with the patch-clamp method for brain slices. These neurons were chosen because they produce messenger RNA for cannabinoid receptors and because the density of cannabinoid binding sites in the striatum is high. Activation of muscarinic receptors by carbachol (10(-5) M) reduced inhibitory postsynaptic current amplitude by 67%. The synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4- benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphtalenyl)methanone (WIN55212-2; 10(-8) to 10(-5) M) dose-dependently reduced striatal inhibitory postsynaptic currents; the maximum effect, inhibition by 52%, was observed at 10(-6) M. Another cannabinoid agonist, (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydr oxypropyl)cyclohexanol (CP55940; 10(-6) M), also reduced inhibitory postsynaptic currents, by 50%. The CB1 cannnabinoid receptor antagonist N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)4-methyl-3-pyra zolecarboxamide (SR141716A; 10(-6) M) had no effect when given alone but abolished the effect of WIN55212-2 (10(-6) M). WIN55212-2 (10(-6) M) did not change the current evoked by the GABA(A)-receptor agonist muscimol (10(-6) M). Activation of muscarinic receptors by carbachol (10(-5) M) inhibited voltage-dependent calcium currents by 21%, but the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 (10(-6) M) was without effect. The results show that activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors reduces GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents in medium spiny neurons of the corpus striatum: the likely mechanism is presynaptic inhibition of GABA release from terminals of recurrent axons of the medium spiny neurons themselves.

Occlusion of the presynaptic action of cannabinoids in rat substantia nigra pars reticulata by cadmium

Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNR) neurones in rat midbrain slices to characterise the presynaptic action of cannabinoids on GABA neurotransmission and to study the involvement of calcium channels. The cannabinoid agonist WIN55212-2 at 10 microM reduced the amplitudes of GABA(A) receptor mediated spontaneous postsynaptic currents (IPSCs). This effect was fully reversed by the selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A (20 microM). WIN55212-2 also caused a reduction in the evoked IPSC amplitude, which was associated with a significant increase in the paired pulse ratio over a 50 ms interval. In addition, the reduction in spontaneous IPSC amplitude by WIN55212-2 could be largely occluded by the presence of extracellular Cd2+ (200 microM). These observations suggest that cannabinoids exert a presynaptic inhibition on GABAergic transmission to SNR neurones via CB1 receptor, an action which involves inhibition of Cd2+-sensitive presynaptic Ca2+ channels.

Presynaptic inhibition of GABAergic inputs to rat substantia nigra pars reticulata neurones by a cannabinoid agonist

Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNR) neurones in rat midbrain slices to investigate the electrophysiological effects of cannabinoids. The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55212-2 (10 microM) significantly reduced intranigrally evoked and spontaneous inhibitory post-synaptic currents (IPSCs) which were mediated by GABA(A) receptors. The postsynaptic current induced by bath application of GABA was not affected by the presence of WIN 55212-2. The actions of WIN 55212-2 were not mimicked by the inactive enantiomer WIN 55212-3. WIN 55212-2 also hyperpolarized the membrane of SNR neurones in a tetrodotoxin/0-Ca2+-insensitive manner. These data suggest that cannabinoids modulate the activity of SNR neurones by presynaptic inhibition of GABA inputs. They may also exert a direct post-synaptic inhibition on these neurones.

Inhibition by cannabinoid receptor agonists of acetylcholine release from the guinea-pig myenteric plexus

1. The dose-related inhibition of the twitch responses of the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation of the guinea-pig small intestine by cannabinoid (CB) agonists, (+)-WIN 55212 and CP 55940 during stimulation at 0.1 Hz with supramaximal voltage was confirmed. These agonists inhibited acetylcholine (ACh) release in the presence of physostigmine (7.7 microM) thus indicating a prejunctional site of action. 2. Inhibition of twitch responses and ACh release by CB agonists was reversed by the CB1-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist, SR141716A. Dose-response curves to (+)-WIN 55212 and CP 55940 were shifted to the right, with no reduction of maximal response, by pretreatment with SR141716A (31.6-1000 nM), but not its vehicle, Tween 80 (1 microM). However, at very high concentrations (25-400 microM), Tween 80 itself caused a dose-related inhibition of the twitch response which was significantly reduced in the presence of SR141716A (1 microM). The opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (1 microM) had no significant effect on the inhibition by CP 55940 of the twitch response. 3. (+)-WIN 55212, CP 55940 and Tween 80 (50 microM) had no effect on responses to exogenous ACh, confirming that their actions were prejunctional. SR141716A (1 microM) did not increase the sensitivity of the longitudinal muscle to either ACh or histamine, but inhibited the responses to high doses of ACh. 4. The (-)-enantiomer of WIN 55212, was approximately 300 times less active than the (+) enantiomer in inhibiting the twitch response, had no CB1 antagonist activity against the active isomer and did not inhibit the release of ACh in the presence of physostigmine. 5. The dissociation constant (KD) values for SR 141716A against the inhibitory effect of (+)-WIN 55212 and CP 55940 on the twitch response were 12.07 nM (95% confidence intervals 8.55 and 20.83) and 6.44 nM (95% confidence intervals 4.70 and 10.24), respectively. In experiments in which the release of ACh was inhibited by (+)-WIN 55212, the KD values were 9.21 nM and 10.53 nM at SR141716A concentrations of 31.6 nM and 100 nM, respectively. The KD values for the antagonism by naloxone of the inhibition of the twitch responses and the inhibition of ACh release by normorphine in this preparation were found to be 2.38 +/- 0.69 nM and 2.00 +/- 0.9 nM, respectively. 6. During maximal inhibition of ACh release by (+)-WIN 55212, the addition of normorphine (400 nM) caused a further significant decrease in ACh output. 7. SR141716A alone produced a significant increase in ACh release in both the absence and presence of exogenous cannabinoid drugs, hence we conclude that it has a presynaptic site of action. We also conclude that SR141716A acts either by antagonizing the effect of an endogenous CB1 receptor agonist or by having an inverse agonist effect at these receptors.