Inhibition of morphine antinociception by centrally administered histamine H2 receptor antagonists

Activation of carbonic anhydrase isoforms involved in modulation of emotional memory and cognitive disorders with histamine agonists, antagonists and derivatives

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) activators were shown to be involved in memory enhancement and learning in animal models of cognition. Here we investigated the CA activating effects of a large series of histamine based compounds, including histamine receptors (H1R - H4R) agonists, antagonists and other derivatives of this autacoid. CA activators may be thus useful for improving cognition as well as in diverse therapeutic areas (phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalised anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorders), for which activation of this enzyme was recently shown to be involved.

Role of the thalamic submedius nucleus histamine H1 and H 2 and opioid receptors in modulation of formalin-induced orofacial pain in rats

Histamine and opioid systems are involved in supraspinal modulation of pain. In this study, we investigated the effects of separate and combined microinjections of agonists and antagonists of histamine H1 and H2 and opioid receptors into the thalamic submedius (Sm) nucleus on the formalin-induced orofacial pain. Two guide cannulas were implanted into the right and left sides of the Sm in ketamine- and xylazine-anesthetized rats. Orofacial formalin pain was induced by subcutaneous injection of a diluted formalin solution (50 μl, 1.5%) into the vibrissa pad. Face rubbing durations were recorded at 3-min blocks for 45 min. Formalin produced a biphasic pain response (first phase: 0-3 min and second phase: 15-33 min). Separate and combined microinjections of histamine H1 and H2 receptor agonists, 2-pyridylethylamine (2-PEA) and dimaprit, respectively, and opioid receptor agonist, morphine, attenuated the second phase of pain. The analgesic effects induced by 2-PEA, dimaprit, and morphine were blocked by prior microinjections of fexofenadine (a histamine H1 receptor antagonist), famotidine (a histamine H2 receptor antagonist), and naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist), respectively. Naloxone also prevented 2-PEA- and dimaprit-induced antinociception, and the analgesic effect induced by morphine was inhibited by fexofenadine and famotidine. These results showed the involvement of histamine H1 and H2 and opioid receptors in the Sm modulation of orofacial pain. Opioid receptor might be involved in analgesia induced by activation of histamine H1 and H2 receptors and vice versa.

Modification of formalin-induced nociception by different histamine receptor agonists and antagonists

The present study evaluated the effects of different histamine receptor agonists and antagonists on the nociceptive response in the mouse formalin test. Intracerebroventricular (20-40 microg/mouse i.c.v.) or subcutaneous (1-10 mg/kg s.c.) injection of HTMT (H(1) receptor agonist) elicited a dose-related hyperalgesia in the early and late phases. Conversely, intraperitoneal (20 and 30 mg/kg i.p.) injection of dexchlorpheniramine (H(1) receptor antagonist) was antinociceptive in both phases. At a dose ineffective per se, dexchlorpheniramine (10 mg/kg i.p.) antagonized the hyperalgesia induced by HTMT (40 mug/mouse i.c.v. or 10 mg/kg s.c.). Dimaprit (H(2) receptor agonist, 30 mg/kg i.p.) and ranitidine (H(2) receptor antagonist, 20 and 40 mg/kg i.p.) reduced the nociceptive responses in the early and late phases. No significant change in the antinociceptive activity was found following the combination of dimaprit (30 mg/kg i.p.) with ranitidine (10 mg/kg i.p.). The antinociceptive effect of dimaprit (30 mg/kg i.p.) was prevented by naloxone (5 mg/kg i.p.) in the early phase or by imetit (H(3) receptor agonist, 25 mg/kg i.p.) in both early and late phases. The histamine H(3) receptor agonist imetit was hyperalgesic following i.p. administration of 50 mg/kg. Imetit-induced hyperalgesia was completely prevented by treatment with a dose ineffective per se of thioperamide (H(3) receptor antagonist, 5 mg/kg i.p.). The results suggest that histamine H(1) and H(3) receptor activations increase sensitivity to nociceptive stimulus in the formalin test.

Enhanced antinociceptive effects of morphine in histamine H2 receptor gene knockout mice

We have previously shown that antinociceptive effects of morphine are enhanced in histamine H1 receptor gene knockout mice. In the present study, involvement of supraspinal histamine H2 receptor in antinociception by morphine was examined using histamine H2 receptor gene knockout (H2KO) mice and histamine H2 receptor antagonists. Antinociception was evaluated by assays for thermal (hot-plate, tail-flick and paw-withdrawal tests), mechanical (tail-pressure test) and chemical (formalin and capsaicin tests) stimuli. Thresholds for pain perception in H2KO mice were higher than wild-type mice. Antinociceptive effects of intracerebroventricularly administered morphine were enhanced in the H2KO mice compared to wild-type mice. Intracerebroventricular co-administration of morphine and cimetidine produced significant antinociceptive effects in the wild-type mice when compared to morphine or cimetidine alone. Furthermore, zolantidine, a selective and hydrophobic H2 receptor antagonist, enhanced the effects of morphine in all nociceptive assays examined. These results suggest that histamine exerts inhibitory effects on morphine-induced antinociception through H2 receptors at the supraspinal level. Our present and previous studies suggest that H1 and H2 receptors cooperatively function to modulate pain perception in the central nervous system.

Enhanced antinociception by intracerebroventricularly administered orexin A in histamine H1 or H2 receptor gene knockout mice

Orexins are neuropeptides that are mostly expressed in the posterior and lateral hypothalamus, and related to the central control of appetite, arousal, and antinociception. Orexin neurons projected to the tuberomammillary nucleus and orexins may release histamine from the histamine neurons in this nucleus. Histamine is known to cause hypernociception. The roles of histamine H1 and H2 receptors in the orexin A-induced antinociception, however, have not been clarified yet. Here we studied the effects of histamine H1 and H2 receptors on orexin A-produced antinociception using histamine receptor knockout mice in four assays of nociception; the hot-plate, the tail-flick, the tail-pressure and the capsaicin tests. Furthermore we studied effects of histamine H1 and H2 receptor antagonists on orexin A-produced antinociception in C57BL/6 mice. The antinociceptive effects of i.c.v. orexin A were greater in histamine H1 receptor or H2 receptor knockout mice than in the wild-type mice in all four assays of pain. Furthermore, treatment of C57BL/6 mice with a combination of i.c.v. orexin A and d-chlorpheniramine (a histamine H1 receptor antagonist) or cimetidine (a histamine H2 receptor antagonist) showed a greater antinociception than i.c.v. orexin A alone in all four assays. These findings suggest the possibility that orexin A may activate H1 and H2 receptors in the supraspinal levels through the release of histamine from neurons, which might attenuate the antinociceptive effects of orexin A. Thus, the blocking of the histamine H1 or H2 receptor may produce antinociception and enhance the orexin A-induced antinociception.

Involvement of histaminergic system in the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine

The interactions between morphine and the histaminergic system are not yet fully clarified. More especially, the involvement of the histaminergic system in the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine has not been determined. Therefore, the effects of histamine-related compounds on the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine were examined in rats. Combination tests using histamine-related compounds with morphine were initiated in rats trained to discriminate between 3.0 mg/kg morphine and saline. Zolantidine (central histamine H2-receptor antagonist), but not pyrilamine (central histamine H1-receptor antagonist) or ranitidine (peripheral histamine H2-receptor antagonist), significantly attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. The histamine precursor L-histidine significantly potentiated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine are, at least in part, mediated through the central activation of histamine H2-receptors in rats.

Antinociceptive effects of galanin in the rat tuberomammillary nucleus and the plasticity of galanin receptor 1 during hyperalgesia

Although the tuberomammillary nucleus (TM) is well defined in terms of anatomy and neurochemistry, little is known about its function in nociceptive modulation. There was an abundance of galanin-immunoreactive fibers in the TM, and galanin has been implicated in pain processing. The present study assessed the role of galanin in the modulation of nociception in the TM of rats. Intra-TM injection of galanin dose-dependently increased the hindpaw withdrawal latency of rats to a noxious thermal stimulus, indicating an antinociceptive role of galanin in the TM. The antinociceptive effect of galanin was blocked by a subsequent intra-TM injection of galantide, a putative galanin receptor antagonist, suggesting that the antinociceptive effect of galanin is mediated by galanin receptors. Moreover, there was abundant galanin receptor 1 (GalR1) in the TM, and the number of GalR1-positive neurons in the ipsilateral TM increased significantly after unilateral loose ligation of the sciatic nerve compared with the contralateral TM or the TM of intact rats. However, the number of GalR1-positive neurons was not significantly altered by carrageenan-induced inflammation, in either the ipsilateral or the contralateral TM. The results suggest that galanin and GalR1 in the TM may play important roles in pain regulation.

Involvement of H2-receptors in the mechanism of analgesic action of Tyr-MIF-1

The antinociceptive effects of H2-agents cimetidine (CIM) and dimaprit (DMP) as well as their effects on the Tyr-MIF-1-evoked analgesia have been studied after intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration in rats. In the paw-pressure (PP) test Tyr-MIF-1 (1 mg/kg), CIM (50 and 100mg/kg) and DMP (5 and 10mg/kg) induced analgesia. Injected before DMP, naloxone (NAL) and CIM diminished or completely prevented the pain-relieving effect of H2-agonist DMP. The antinociceptive effect of Tyr-MIF-1 has been potentiated by DMP dose-dependently. CIM (50mg/kg) decreased the antinociceptive action of the combination Tyr-MIF-1 + DMP, while CIM (100mg/kg) expressed a weaker inhibitory effect on it. The data obtained clearly show that H2-receptor activation is involved in the mechanism of the Tyr-MIF-1 antinociceptive action.

Enhanced antinociception by intrathecally-administered morphine in histamine H1 receptor gene knockout mice

We previously reported that histamine H(1) receptor gene knockout mice (H1KO) showed lower spontaneous nociceptive threshold to pain stimuli when compared to wild-type mice. The objective of the present study was to examine the antinociceptive effect of intrathecally-administered morphine in H1KO mice. The antinociceptive effects of morphine were examined using assays for thermal (tail-flick, hot-plate, paw-withdrawal), mechanical (tail-pressure) and chemical nociception (formalin and capsaicin tests) using H1KO and wild-type mice. In these nociceptive assays, intrathecally-administered morphine produced significant antinociceptive effects in wild-type mice. The antinociceptive effect produced by intrathecally administered morphine was enhanced in the knockout mice. We also examined the effect of an histamine H(1) receptor antagonist, an active (d-) isomer of chlorpheniramine, on morphine-induced antinociception in ICR mice. The intrathecal co-administration of d-chlorpheniramine enhanced the effect of morphine in all nociceptive assays examined. The pharmacological experiments using d-chlorpheniramine further substantiate the evidence for the histamine H(1) receptor-mediated suppression of morphine-induced antinociception. These results suggest that existing H(1) receptors play an inhibitory role in morphine-induced antinociception at the spinal cord level.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

The physiology of brain histamine

Histamine-releasing neurons are located exclusively in the TM of the hypothalamus, from where they project to practically all brain regions, with ventral areas (hypothalamus, basal forebrain, amygdala) receiving a particularly strong innervation. The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of TM neurons (slow spontaneous firing, broad action potentials, deep after hyperpolarisations, etc.) are extremely similar to other aminergic neurons. Their firing rate varies across the sleep-wake cycle, being highest during waking and lowest during rapid-eye movement sleep. In contrast to other aminergic neurons somatodendritic autoreceptors (H3) do not activate an inwardly rectifying potassium channel but instead control firing by inhibiting voltage-dependent calcium channels. Histamine release is enhanced under extreme conditions such as dehydration or hypoglycemia or by a variety of stressors. Histamine activates four types of receptors. H1 receptors are mainly postsynaptically located and are coupled positively to phospholipase C. High densities are found especially in the hypothalamus and other limbic regions. Activation of these receptors causes large depolarisations via blockade of a leak potassium conductance, activation of a non-specific cation channel or activation of a sodium-calcium exchanger. H2 receptors are also mainly postsynaptically located and are coupled positively to adenylyl cyclase. High densities are found in hippocampus, amygdala and basal ganglia. Activation of these receptors also leads to mainly excitatory effects through blockade of calcium-dependent potassium channels and modulation of the hyperpolarisation-activated cation channel. H3 receptors are exclusively presynaptically located and are negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase. High densities are found in the basal ganglia. These receptors mediated presynaptic inhibition of histamine release and the release of other neurotransmitters, most likely via inhibition of presynaptic calcium channels. Finally, histamine modulates the glutamate NMDA receptor via an action at the polyamine binding site. The central histamine system is involved in many central nervous system functions: arousal; anxiety; activation of the sympathetic nervous system; the stress-related release of hormones from the pituitary and of central aminergic neurotransmitters; antinociception; water retention and suppression of eating. A role for the neuronal histamine system as a danger response system is proposed.

Opposite modulation of histaminergic neurons by nociceptin and morphine

We have studied the effects of nociceptin/orphanin FQ on the histaminergic neurons in the tuberomammillary (TM) nucleus and compared them with the actions of opioid agonists. Intracellular recordings of the membrane potential were made with sharp electrodes from superfused rat hypothalamic slices. Nociceptin strongly inhibited the firing of the TM neurons. In the concentration range 10-300 nM, nociceptin hyperpolarized the neurons in a dose-dependent and reversible manner. Insensitivity to tetrodotoxin indicated a postsynaptic effect which was associated with decreased input resistance. Voltage-current plots suggested the involvement of a potassium conductance which was highly sensitive to Ba(2+) and decreased by Cs(+), in keeping with the activation of an inwardly rectifying potassium channel. Morphine (20-100 microM) depolarized the TM neurons and increased their firing, and this effect was blocked by tetrodotoxin. Dynorphin A(1-13) at 100-300 nM did not affect the TM neurons. Nociceptin and morphine modulate the activity of the TM neurons, and most likely histamine release, in opposite ways. Histamine has an antinociceptive effect in the brain and may be involved in opioid-induced analgesia. Nociceptin might therefore influence pain transmission by inhibiting opioid-induced histamine release from the TM nucleus and also modulate other physiological mechanisms which have been ascribed to the histaminergic system.

A third life for burimamide. Discovery and characterization of a novel class of non-opioid analgesics derived from histamine antagonists

Burimamide, a histamine (HA) derivative with both H2- and H3-blocking properties, induces antinociception when injected into the rodent CNS. Several related compounds share this property, and structure-activity studies have shown that this new class of analgesics is distinct from known HA antagonists. The prototype, named improgan, shows a preclinical profile of a highly effective analgesic, with activity against thermal, mechanical and inflammatory nociception after doses that do not alter motor balance or locomotor activity. Improgen analgesia is not blocked by opioid antagonists and is observed in opioid receptor knock-out mice. Unlike morphine, improgan does not induce tolerance after daily dosing. Extensive in vitro pharmacology studies have excluded known histaminergic, opioid, serotonergic, GABAergic and adrenergic receptor mechanisms, as well as 50 other sites of action. The improgan-like analgesic activity of some HA congeners suggests an analgesic action on a novel HA receptor, but further studies are required to substantiate this. Studies in progress are characterizing the sites and mechanisms of action of improgan, and developing brain-penetrating derivatives that could be useful for clinical pain.

Effects of naltrexone and histamine antagonists on the antinociceptive activity of the cimetidine analog SKF92374 in rats

A recent study showed that SKF92374, a structural analog of the histamine H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine, induces antinociception after intraventricular (i.v.t.) administration in the rat. SKF92374 lacked significant activity on H1 or H2 receptors, but had weak activity on H3 receptors. To test the hypothesis that SKF92374-induced antinociception is mediated by an action on H3 receptors, the effects of the H3 agonist R-alpha-methylhistamine (RAMH) and the H3 antagonist thioperamide (both by i.v.t. administration) were investigated on SKF92374 antinociception. SKF92374-induced antinociception was slightly enhanced by thioperamide (30 microg), but unaffected by a range of doses of RAMH (up to 2 microg). Furthermore, SKF92374-induced antinociception was not reduced by large doses of systemically-administered antagonists of H1 (pyrilamine), H2 (zolantidine), H3 (GT-2016), or opioid (naltrexone) receptors. These findings show that the novel compound SKF92374 induces antinociception by a non-opioid mechanism that does not utilize brain H1, H2 or H3 receptors.

Effects of intrathecally injected histamine receptor antagonists on the antinociception induced by morphine, beta-endorphin, and U50, 488H administered intrathecally in the mouse

The present study was designed to investigate the modulatory effects of blockade of spinal histamine receptors on antinociception induced by spinally administered morphine, beta-endorphin and U50, 488H. The effects of intrathecal (i.t.) injections with cyproheptadine (a histamine-1 (H1) receptor antagonist), ranitidine (an H2 receptor antagonist), or thioperamide (an H3 receptor antagonist) injected i.t., on the antinociception induced by morphine, beta-endorphin or trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) cyclohexyl] benzeocetamide (U50, 488H) injected intrathecally (i.t.) were studied. The antinociception was assayed using the tail-flick test. The i.t. injection of cyproheptadine (20 micrograms), ranitidine (20 micrograms), or thioperamide (20 micrograms) alone did not produce any antinociceptive effect. i.t. pretreatment with cyproheptadine attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.t. administered morphine or beta-endorphin, but not U50, 488H. In addition, i.t. pretreatment with ranitidine attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.t. administered morphine, beta-endorphin, or U50, 488H. Furthermore, the i.t. pretreatment with thioperamide attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by beta-endorphin or U50, 488H, but not morphine, administered i.t. Our results indicate that spinal H1 receptors may be involved in the production of antinociception induced by spinally applied morphine or beta-endorphin- but not U50, 488H. Spinal H2 receptors appear to be involved in spinally administered morphine-, beta-endorphin- and U50, 488H-induced antinociception. Supraspinal histamine H3 receptors may be involved in the production of antinociception induced by supraspinally applied beta-endorphin or U50, 488H, but not morphine.

Effect of minute amounts of [D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly(ol)5]enkephalin injected into the tuberomammillary nucleus of rats on histamine release from the cerebral cortex

[D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly(ol)5]enkephalin (DAGO) (10 ng/0.5 microliters saline solution) injected into the tuberomammillary nucleus (TM) of rats in minute amounts decreased the amount of histamine released to approximately 50% of the basal value on measurements taken 20-40 min after administration. This effect of DAGO was inhibited by the simultaneous microinjection of naloxone (320 ng). These results may be explained in two ways. The first is that the stimulation of mu-receptors results in the inhibition of histaminergic cell bodies. The second is that the somatodendritic release of histamine was increased by the stimulation of mu-receptors and as a result of increased histamine concentration in TM, many histaminergic neurons may be inhibited through the stimulation of H3-receptors. Further studies are necessary regarding the influence of mu-agonists on various cellular sites of histaminergic neurons.

Importance of histamine H2 receptors in restraint-morphine interactions

The effects of the brain-penetrating H2 antagonist zolantidine (ZOL, 3 mg/kg, s.c.) were studied on morphine (MOR, 4 mg/kg, s.c.) antinociception (tail flick test) in the presence and absence of previous restraint stress. Animals were handled for 3 days (to reduce handling stress), restrained for 1 hr or handled on day 4, and tested 24 hrs later. As found previously, restraint enhanced the intensity and duration of MOR antinociception. ZOL potentiated MOR antinociception in handled, non-restrained animals, but inhibited MOR action in restrained animals. In contrast, ZOL had no effects on nociceptive responses in either handled or stressed subjects in the absence of MOR. The data suggest that, in the absence of restraint, brain HA acts at the H2 receptor to inhibit MOR antinociception. In contrast, when an animal has been previously restrained, HA enhances MOR antinociception. Thus, brain HA appears to mediate the restraint-induced potentiation of MOR antinociception. Taken with previous results, the present findings suggest that in the presence of MOR, brain HA can provide bidirectional modulation of nociception. The direction of the modulation seems to depend upon the stress experience of the animal.

Effects of a histamine H2 receptor agonist and antagonist on restraint-induced antinociception in female mice

Restraint for 1 h induced significant antinociceptive activity, as assessed by the hot plate test, in female mice. The antinociceptive activity was significant throughout the 1 h period of observation starting immediately after restraint. Prior administration of the histamine H2 receptor agonist dimaprit (1.5-6.0 mg/kg s.c.) 15 min before restraint further enhanced the restraint-induced antinociceptive activity. Furthermore, the induction of antinociceptive activity by restraint was antagonised by prior administration of histamine H2 receptor antagonists, cimetidine (2.5-10.0 mg/kg s.c.) or zolantidine (2.5-10.0 mg/kg s.c.). However, when these drugs were administered immediately after restraint for 1 h, the antinociceptive activity observed was similar to those restrained animals receiving saline injection. The histamine receptor agonist and antagonists, at the doses used in the present study, did not affect the response of unrestrained animals to the hot plate test. These results demonstrate that the effect of a histamine H2 receptor agonist and antagonists on restraint-induced antinociception is dependent upon their time of administration and may act by altering the intensity of stress, thus affecting the antinociceptive activity induced.

Histamine-induced modulation of nociceptive responses

Because previous studies suggest an antinociceptive role for the neuromodulator histamine (HA) in the periaqueductal grey or the nearby dorsal raphe (PAG/DR), a detailed pharmacological investigation of the effects of intracerebral HA on the hot-plate nociceptive test was performed in rats. Intracerebral microinjections of HA (1 microgram) into the PAG/DR or into the median raphe evoked a mild, reversible antinociceptive response; injections into lateral or dorsal midbrain evoked either a delayed response or no response, respectively. In the PAG/DR, the HA dose-response curve had an inverted U-shape, showing that HA can induce both antinociceptive (0.3-3 micrograms) and pro-nociceptive (10-30 micrograms) responses. Larger doses of HA (e.g., 100 micrograms) produced irreversible and highly variable antinociceptive responses that were accompanied by behavioral and histopathological changes; such effects, indicative of toxicity, were not observed after 0.3 microgram of HA, the peak antinociceptive dose. HA (0.3 microgram) antinociception was completely inhibited by intracerebral co-administration of the opiate antagonist naloxone (1 ng), the H1-receptor antagonist temelastine (20 pg), and the H2-receptor antagonist tiotidine (1 ng); none of these drugs altered nociceptive scores in the absence of HA. These results show that: (1) HA, a neurotransmitter in the PAG, can evoke antinociception in the absence of other behavioral or toxic effects; and (2) HA antinociception depends on the activation of both opiate and HA receptors in the PAG/DR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The differential effects of histamine receptor antagonists on morphine- and U-50,488H-induced antinociception in the mouse

The effects of thioperamide, an H3 antagonist, and histamine H1 and H2 antagonists (s.c.) on morphine (s.c. or i.c.v.)- and U-50,488H (i.c.v.)-induced antinociception in male ddY mice were examined using the hot-plate (55 degrees C) test. Thioperamide significantly inhibited morphine-induced antinociception, but not U-50,488H-induced antinociception. The suppressive effect of thioperamide on morphine-induced antinociception was reversed by the H1 antagonist pyrilamine, but not by the H2 antagonist zolantidine. On the other hand, pyrilamine significantly potentiated the antinociception induced by morphine, but not that induced by U-50,488H. Zolantidine significantly inhibited morphine-induced antinociception in a dose-dependent manner, but not U-50,488H-induced antinociception. Both astemizole, an H1 antagonist, and ranitidine, an H2 antagonist, which are known to barely cross the blood brain barrier, did not affect morphine-induced antinociception. These results suggest that morphine-induced antinociception may be potentiated by activation of H2 receptors and suppressed by activation of H1 receptors in the brain. Furthermore, neuronal histamine release induced by thioperamide may suppress morphine-induced antinociception through H1 receptors.

Modulation of morphine antinociception by antagonism of H2 receptors in the periaqueductal gray

To determine the brain site of action of the H2 receptor antagonist tiotidine as an inhibitor of systemic morphine (MOR) antinociception, the effects of intracerebral microinjections of this drug were studied on this response in rats. As assessed on the hot plate test, microinjections of tiotidine (1 ng in 0.5 microliter) into the ventral lateral periaqueductal gray at the level of the dorsal raphe (PAG/DR) attenuated MOR-induced antinociceptive responses 10-15 min later, but potentiated these responses when tested 20-30 min after its administration. This treatment had neither effect in the absence of MOR. In contrast, intracerebral tiotidine had no effects on tail flick responses in the presence or absence of MOR. Intracerebral tiotidine reduced by about 50% the antinociception induced by systemic MOR (5.6 and 10 mg/kg), resulting in a parallel, rightward shift in the MOR dose-response curve. When testing occurred with a fixed dose of MOR at a fixed time interval, tiotidine dose-response curves were U-shaped, an effect postulated to result from the separate inhibitory and stimulatory mechanisms found at different times. Intracerebral mapping studies showed that the attenuation of MOR antinociception by tiotidine given into the PAG/DR was not reproduced by tiotidine injections into adjacent rostral, caudal, dorsal or ventral areas. Taken with previous studies showing that: (1) both MOR and histamine (HA) induce antinociception when given into the PAG/DR, and (2) systemic MOR releases HA in the PAG, the present results strongly suggest that systemic MOR attenuates supraspinally organized responses to phasic, thermal nociceptive stimuli by mechanisms that include PAG HA release and subsequent activation of PAG H2 receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Morphine-induced increases of extracellular histamine levels in the periaqueductal grey in vivo: a microdialysis study

The effect of morphine on extracellular histamine levels in two regions of the rat midbrain was studied in vivo by microdialysis. Morphine (5.6 and 12.8 mg/kg, s.c.) significantly and dose-dependently increased extracellular histamine levels in the periaqueductal grey, while no significant effect was observed in the reticular formation. In addition, no significant effect of sequential saline injections was observed on extracellular histamine levels in the periaqueductal grey. Since morphine has no effect on histamine catabolism, these results suggest that morphine increases histamine release in the rat PAG, a site where morphine and histamine are known to have analgesic action. Taken with earlier studies showing the ability of H2 antagonists to block morphine analgesia, these results support the hypothesis that histamine and H2 receptors are important in mediating morphine analgesia in the rat periaqueductal grey. The cellular origin of the extracellular histamine, and the mechanism of this morphine effect remain to be determined.