Neural basis for improgan antinociception

Improgan, the prototype compound of a novel class of non-opioid analgesic drugs derived from histamine antagonists, attenuates thermal and mechanical nociception in rodents following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration. Improgan does not bind to known opioid, histamine or cannabinoid receptors, and its molecular target has not been identified. It is known however, that improgan acts directly in the periaqueductal gray and the rostral ventromedial medulla to produce its antinociceptive effects, and that inactivation of the rostral ventromedial medulla prevents the antinociceptive effect of improgan given i.c.v. Here we used in vivo single-cell recording in lightly anesthetized rats to show that improgan engages pain-modulating neurons in the medulla to produce antinociception. Following improgan administration, OFF-cells, which inhibit nociception, became continuously active and no longer paused during noxious stimulation. The increase in OFF-cell firing does not represent a non-specific neuroexcitant effect of this drug, since ON-cell discharge, associated with net nociceptive facilitation, was depressed. NEUTRAL-cell firing was unaffected by improgan. The net response of rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) neurons to improgan is thus comparable to that evoked by mu-opioids and cannabinoids, well known RVM-active analgesic drugs. This common basis for improgan, opioid, and cannabinoid antinociception in the RVM supports the idea that improgan functions as a specific analgesic agent.

Antinociceptive activity of furan-containing congeners of improgan and ranitidine

Furan-containing congeners of the histamine H(2) receptor antagonist ranitidine were synthesized and tested for improgan-like antinociceptive activity. The most potent ligand of the series, VUF5498, is the most potent improgan-like agent described to date (ED(50)=25 nmol, icv). This compound is approximately equal in potency with morphine. These non-imidazole, improgan-like pain relievers further define the structural requirements for analgesics of this class and are important tools for ongoing mechanism-based studies.

Absence of 5-HT3 and cholinergic mechanisms in improgan antinociception

Improgan, an analgesic derived from histamine antagonists, acts in the brain stem to activate descending non-opioid, pain-relieving circuits, but the mechanism of action of this drug remains elusive. Because improgan has a moderate affinity for 5-HT(3) receptors, and, since cholinergic and serotonergic drugs can modulate descending analgesic circuits, roles for 5-HT(3), nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in improgan antinociception were presently investigated in rats. Improgan (80 microg, icv) induced nearly maximal inhibition of hot plate and tail flick nociceptive responses, and these actions we unaffected by antagonists of muscarinic (atropine, 5.9 mg/kg, i.p.) and nicotinic (mecamylamine, 2 mg/kg, i.p.) receptors. Control experiments verified that these antagonist treatments were maximally effective against muscarinic and nicotinic antinociception in both tests. In addition, improgan antinociception was unaffected by icv pretreatment with a 5-HT(3) antagonist (ondansetron, 20 microg). When given alone, icv treatment with neither this antagonist nor a 5-HT(3) agonist (m-chlorophenylbiguanide, 1000 nmol, icv) modified thermal nociceptive latencies. These results show no role for supraspinal cholinergic and 5-HT(3) receptors in improgan antinociception. The findings help to narrow the search for the relevant mediators of the action of this novel analgesic agent.

Activation of brain stem nuclei by improgan, a non-opioid analgesic

Improgan is a compound developed from histamine antagonists which shows the pre-clinical profile of a highly effective, non-opioid analgesic when administered into the rodent CNS. Pharmacological studies suggest that improgan activates descending pain-relieving circuits, but the brain and spinal sites of action of this drug have not been previously studied. Presently, the effects of intracerebral and intrathecal microinjections of improgan were evaluated on thermal nociceptive responses in rats. Improgan produced large, dose- and time-related reductions in nociceptive responses following administration into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (PAG), the dorsal PAG, and the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). The drug had no measurable effects after injections into the caudate nucleus, basolateral amygdala, hippocampus, ventromedial hypothalamus, superior colliculi, ventrolateral medulla, or the spinal subarachnoid space. Inactivation of the RVM by muscimol microinjections completely attenuated antincociceptive responses produced by intraventricular improgan. These findings, taken with earlier results, show that, like opioids and cannabinoids, improgan acts in the PAG and RVM to activate descending analgesic systems. Unlike these other analgesics, improgan does not act in the spinal cord or in CNS areas outside of the brain stem.

Inhibition of improgan antinociception by the cannabinoid (CB)(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A): lack of obligatory role for endocannabinoids acting at CB(1) receptors

Improgan, a nonopioid antinociceptive agent, activates descending, pain-relieving mechanisms in the brain stem, but the receptor for this compound has not been identified. Because cannabinoids also activate nonopioid analgesia by a brain stem action, experiments were performed to assess the significance of cannabinoid mechanisms in improgan antinociception. The cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chloro phenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A) induced dose-dependent inhibition of improgan antinociception on the tail-flick test after i.c.v. administration in rats. The same treatments yielded comparable inhibition of cannabinoid [R-(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-mor pholinyl)methyl]pyrol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl)(1-naphthalenyl)methanone monomethanesulfonate, WIN 55,212-2] analgesia. Inhibition of improgan and WIN 55,212-2 antinociception by SR141716A was also observed in Swiss-Webster mice. Radioligand binding studies showed no appreciable affinity of improgan on rat brain, mouse brain, and human recombinant CB(1) receptors, ruling out a direct action at these sites. To test the hypothesis that CB(1) receptors indirectly participate in improgan signaling, the effects of improgan were assessed in mice with a null mutation of the CB(1) gene with and without SR141716A pretreatment. Surprisingly, improgan induced complete antinociception in both CB(1) (-/-) and wild-type control [CB(1) (+/+)] mice. Furthermore, SR141716A inhibited improgan antinociception in CB(1) (+/+) mice, but not in CB(1) (-/-) mice. Taken together, the results show that SR141716A reduces improgan antinociception, but neither cannabinoids nor CB(1) receptors seem to play an obligatory role in improgan signaling. Present and previous studies suggest that Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol may act at both CB(1) and other receptors to relieve pain, but no evidence was found indicating that improgan uses either of these mechanisms. SR141716A will facilitate the study of improgan-like analgesics.

A role for spinal, but not supraspinal, alpha(2) adrenergic receptors in the actions of improgan, a powerful, non-opioid analgesic

Improgan is a derivative of cimetidine that induces non-opioid antinociception after intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration, but the mechanism of action of this compound remains unknown. Since activation of either supraspinal or spinal alpha(2) adrenergic receptors can induce antinociception, and since improgan showed affinity for these receptors in vitro, the effects of the alpha(2) antagonist yohimbine on improgan antinociception were presently studied in rats on the hot plate and tail flick tests. Systemic yohimbine pretreatment (4 mg/kg, i.p.) completely blocked improgan antinociception (80 microg, i.c.v.), suggesting a mediator role for alpha(2) receptors. However, i.c.v. pretreatment with yohimbine (30 microg) had no effect on improgan antinociception. Since this treatment completely antagonized clonidine antinociception (40 microg, i.c.v.), supraspinal alpha(2) receptors seem to mediate the antinociceptive effects of clonidine, but not that produced by improgan. In contrast, intrathecal (i.t.) yohimbine pretreatment (30 microg) completely blocked the antinociception elicited by i.c.v. improgan and i.c.v. morphine. These results suggest that spinal (but not supraspinal) alpha(2) adrenergic receptors play a significant role in the pain-relieving actions of improgan. Furthermore, although improgan shows some affinity at alpha(2) receptors, this drug does not act directly at these receptors to induce antinociceptive responses. Like several other classes of analgesics, improgan-like drugs seem to activate non-opioid, descending pain-relieving circuits.

Significance of GABAergic systems in the action of improgan, a non-opioid analgesic

Improgan is the prototype drug from a new class of non-opioid analgesics chemically related to histamine and histamine antagonists, but the mechanism of action of these compounds has not been identified. Because several classes of analgesics act in the brain by reducing GABAergic inhibition of endogenous pain-relieving circuits, and because the activity of these substances is abolished by the GABA(A) agonist muscimol, the present study assessed the effects of muscimol on improgan antinociception in rats. Intracerebroventricular (icv) improgan (80 microg) and morphine (20 microg) both induced 80-100% of maximal analgesic responses on the tail flick test 10 to 30 min later. However, muscimol pretreatment (0.5 microg, icv) completely eliminated the antinociceptive activity of both compounds. Since improgan in vitro lacks activity at opioid and GABA(A) receptors, these findings: 1) confirm earlier literature showing that muscimol inhibits morphine analgesia, and 2) suggest that improgan activates a supraspinal, descending analgesic pathway, possibly via inhibition of GABAergic transmission. Since muscimol is the first compound discovered which inhibits improgan analgesia, muscimol will be a useful tool for the further characterization of this new class of pain-relieving substances.

Improgan, a cimetidine analog, induces morphine-like antinociception in opioid receptor-knockout mice

Improgan is an analog of the H(2) antagonist cimetidine that does not act on known histamine receptors, but induces highly effective analgesia in rodents following intracerebroventricular (icv) administration. Since the mechanism of action of this compound remains unknown, improgan analgesia was characterized presently with the tail immersion nociceptive test in mutant mice lacking either the mu (exon 1 of MOR-1), delta (exon 2 of DOR-1) or kappa (exon 3 of KOR-1) opioid receptor. Improgan (30 microg, icv) induced reversible, maximal analgesia in both sexes of all three genotypes (+/+, +/- and -/-) of MOR-1 mutant mice 10 and 20 min after administration, whereas morphine analgesia was reduced (+/-) or abolished (-/-) in these subjects. In DOR-1 mutant mice, improgan was equally effective in all three genotypes, despite the reduction (+/-) or complete loss (-/-) of delta opioid receptor (3H-[D-Pen(2), D-Pen(5)]enkephalin, DPDPE) binding. Similarly, improgan analgesia was equivalent in all three genotypes of KOR-1 mutant mice, whereas kappa-mediated analgesia (U50,488) and kappa opioid (3H-U69,593) binding were abolished in the homozygous (-/-) mice. These studies demonstrate that improgan analgesia does not require intact MOR-1, DOR-1, or KOR-1 genes, and support the hypothesis that improgan-like analgesics act in the CNS by non-opioid mechanisms.

A third life for burimamide. Discovery and characterization of a novel class of non-opioid analgesics derived from histamine antagonists

Burimamide, a histamine (HA) derivative with both H2- and H3-blocking properties, induces antinociception when injected into the rodent CNS. Several related compounds share this property, and structure-activity studies have shown that this new class of analgesics is distinct from known HA antagonists. The prototype, named improgan, shows a preclinical profile of a highly effective analgesic, with activity against thermal, mechanical and inflammatory nociception after doses that do not alter motor balance or locomotor activity. Improgen analgesia is not blocked by opioid antagonists and is observed in opioid receptor knock-out mice. Unlike morphine, improgan does not induce tolerance after daily dosing. Extensive in vitro pharmacology studies have excluded known histaminergic, opioid, serotonergic, GABAergic and adrenergic receptor mechanisms, as well as 50 other sites of action. The improgan-like analgesic activity of some HA congeners suggests an analgesic action on a novel HA receptor, but further studies are required to substantiate this. Studies in progress are characterizing the sites and mechanisms of action of improgan, and developing brain-penetrating derivatives that could be useful for clinical pain.

Increased histamine release and granulocytes within the thalamus of a rat model of Wernicke's encephalopathy

The current study examined the possible role of increased histamine release and granulocyte activity in the vascular changes that precede the onset of necrotic lesions with the thalamus of the pyrithiamine-induced thiamine deficiency (PTD) rat model of Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE). An increase in histamine release and the number of granulocytes was observed in lateral thalamus on day 9 and in medial thalamus on day 10 of PTD treatment, a duration of thiamine deficiency associated with perivascular edema in this brain region. Within the hippocampus, histamine release was significantly increased on day 9, declined to control levels on days 10-12, and was significantly elevated on days 12-14. No granulocytes were observed in hippocampus of either PTD or control rats. These observations suggest that the release of histamine from nerve terminals and histamine and other vasoactive substances from granulocytes may be responsible for thiamine deficiency-induced vascular breakdown and perivascular edema within thalamus.

Antinociceptive activity of derivatives of improgran and burimamide

Improgan, a compound related to H2 and H3 antagonists, induces antinociception in rodents after intraventricular administration. Characteristics of improgan and its congeners include: (a) morphine-like antinociception on thermal and mechanical tests in two species; (b) no impairment of motor coordination or locomotor activity; (c) evidence for a novel, nonopioid mechanism that is independent of known histamine receptors; (d) lack of tolerance with daily dosing; and (e) unique structure-activity relationships (SARs). Presently, the antinociceptive activity of several new derivatives of improgan was investigated in rats. Among compounds similar to burimamide, VUF4577 (possessing a two-carbon side chain) and VUF4582 (an N-phenyl derivative of VUF4577) induced complete, dose- and time-dependent antinociception on the hot-plate and tail-flick tests with no behavioral side effects. These compounds (with ED50 values of 71-117 nmol) were approximately twice as potent as burimamide itself (a four-carbon derivative). Two other derivatives in which the thiourea group (C=S, known to cause human toxicity) was replaced by either nitroethene (C=CH-NO2, VUF5405) or urea (C=O, VUF5407) also showed effective, potent antinociception on both assays. The latter compound is the most potent improgan-like drug discovered to date (ED50 = 71 nmol). Furthermore, positional isomers of antinociceptive compounds either lacked activity (VUF5394) or induced toxicity (VUF5393), revealing a high degree of pharmacological specificity. Although the mechanism of improgan antinociception remains unknown, the present results show promise for the further development of safe, effective, and potent pain-relieving compounds.

Antinociceptive activity of impentamine, a histamine congener, after CNS administration

The brain neuromodulator histamine induces antinociception when administered directly into the rodent CNS. However, several compounds derived from H2 and H3 antagonists also produce antinociception after central administration. Pharmacological studies have shown that a prototype of these agents, improgan, induces analgesia that is not mediated by actions on known histamine receptors. Presently, the antinociceptive properties of a compound that chemically resembles both improgan and histamine were investigated in rats. Intraventricular (i.v.t.) administration of impentamine (4-imidazolylpentylamine) induced reversible, near-maximal antinociception on the hot plate and tail flick tests (15 microg, 98 nmol). The dose-response function was extremely steep, however, since other doses showed either no effect or behavioral toxicity. On the tail flick test, impentamine antinociception was resistant to antagonism by blockers of H1, H2, or H3 receptors, similar to characteristics previously found for improgan. In contrast, histamine antinociception was highly attenuated by H1 and H2 antagonists. These findings suggest that: 1) the histamine congener impentamine may induce antinociception by a mechanism similar to that produced by improgan, and 2) additional histamine receptors may be discovered that are linked to pain-attenuating processes.

Absence of antinociceptive tolerance to improgan, a cimetidine analog, in rats

Improgan, an analog of the histamine receptor antagonist cimetidine, produces highly effective analgesia following intraventricular injection. The present study examined changes in the antinociceptive effects of improgan following once daily intraventricular injections. Improgan (100-150 microg) produced near maximal antinociception 10 and 30 min after daily administration on all 4 test days, whereas comparable morphine treatments (50 microg) induced considerable tolerance. Thus, improgan produced highly effective analgesia without the development of tolerance.

Novel qualitative structure-activity relationships for the antinociceptive actions of H2 antagonists, H3 antagonists and derivatives

Recent studies have shown that cimetidine, burimamide and improgan (also known as SKF92374, a cimetidine congener lacking H2 antagonist activity) induce antinociception after intracerebroventricular administration in rodents. Because these substances closely resemble the structure of histamine (a known mediator of some endogenous analgesic responses), yet no role for known histamine receptors has been found in the analgesic actions of these agents, the structure-activity relationships for the antinociceptive effects of 21 compounds chemically related to H2 and H3 antagonists were investigated in this study. Antinociceptive activity was assessed on the hot-plate and tail-flick tests after intracerebroventricular administration in rats. Eleven compounds induced time-dependent (10-min peak) and dose-dependent antinociceptive activity with no observable behavioral impairment. ED50 values, estimated by nonlinear regression, were highly correlated across nociceptive assays (r2 = 0.98, n = 11). Antinociceptive potencies varied more than 6-fold (80-464 nmol), but were not correlated with activity on H1, H2 or H3 receptors. Although highly potent H3 antagonists such as thioperamide lacked antinociceptive activity, homologs of burimamide and thioperamide containing N-aromatic substituents retained H3 antagonist activity and also showed potent, effective analgesia. A literature review of the pharmacology of these agents did not find a basis for their antinociceptive effects. Taken with previous findings, the present results suggest: 1) these compounds act on the brain to activate powerful analgesic responses that are independent of known histamine receptors, 2) the structure-activity profile of these agents is novel and 3) brain-penetrating derivatives of these compounds could be clinically useful analgesics.

Effects of naltrexone and histamine antagonists on the antinociceptive activity of the cimetidine analog SKF92374 in rats

A recent study showed that SKF92374, a structural analog of the histamine H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine, induces antinociception after intraventricular (i.v.t.) administration in the rat. SKF92374 lacked significant activity on H1 or H2 receptors, but had weak activity on H3 receptors. To test the hypothesis that SKF92374-induced antinociception is mediated by an action on H3 receptors, the effects of the H3 agonist R-alpha-methylhistamine (RAMH) and the H3 antagonist thioperamide (both by i.v.t. administration) were investigated on SKF92374 antinociception. SKF92374-induced antinociception was slightly enhanced by thioperamide (30 microg), but unaffected by a range of doses of RAMH (up to 2 microg). Furthermore, SKF92374-induced antinociception was not reduced by large doses of systemically-administered antagonists of H1 (pyrilamine), H2 (zolantidine), H3 (GT-2016), or opioid (naltrexone) receptors. These findings show that the novel compound SKF92374 induces antinociception by a non-opioid mechanism that does not utilize brain H1, H2 or H3 receptors.

Modulation of morphine-induced antinociception by ibogaine and noribogaine

The potential modulation of morphine antinociception by the putative anti-addictive agent ibogaine and its active metabolite (noribogaine) was investigated in rats with the radiant heat tail-flick test. Ibogaine pretreatment (40 mg/kg, i.p., 19 h) significantly decreased morphine (4 mg/kg, s.c.) antinociception, with no effects in the absence of morphine. However, co-administration of ibogaine (1-40 mg/kg, i.p.) and morphine (4 mg/kg, s.c.) exhibited a dose-dependent enhancement of morphine antinociception. Co-administration of noribogaine (40 mg/kg, i.p.) and morphine also resulted in an increase in morphine antinociception, while noribogaine pretreatment (19 h) had no effect on morphine antinociception. The results show that ibogaine acutely potentiates morphine antinociception and that noribogaine could be the active metabolite responsible for this effect. However, the inhibitory effects of a 19 h ibogaine pretreatment, which resemble ibogaine-induced inhibition of morphine's stimulant properties, cannot be accounted for by noribogaine.

Characterization of the antinociceptive properties of cimetidine and a structural analog

The antinociceptive and pharmacological properties of the H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine and a novel cimetidine analog, SKF92374, were characterized. On both the hot-plate and tail-flick nociceptive tests, cimetidine and SKF92374 induced complete, dose-related analgesic responses when injected into the lateral ventricle of rats. SKF92374 showed strong similarities to cimetidine in analgesic efficacy, slope of dose-response curves and chemical structure, suggesting that these compounds share a common analgesic mechanism. In contrast, histamine induced submaximal antinociceptive effects, and the H3 antagonist thioperamide, a known HA-releasing drug, had little or no analgesic effects. Compared with cimetidine, SKF92374 showed very weak activity (400-fold lower affinity) on H2 receptors in vitro (isolated guinea pig atrium) and in vivo (rat gastric secretion). In addition, SKF92374 (100 microM) had neither agonist nor antagonist action on guinea pig ileum H1 receptors. SKF92374 was also a weak competitive antagonist of N alpha-methylhistamine-induced inhibition of electrically induced contractions of the guinea pig ileum (Kd = 5.2 microM), an H3 receptor-mediated response. Autoradiographic binding assays in guinea pig brain confirmed a weak antagonism of H3 receptors by SKF92374. The compound (up to 10 microM) also had no effect on unpurified rat brain histamine N-methyltransferase activity. These results support the hypothesis that cimetidine induces analgesia by a novel brain mechanism unrelated to H1, H2 or H3 receptors.

Pharmacological characterization of GT-2016, a non-thiourea-containing histamine H3 receptor antagonist: in vitro and in vivo studies

GT-2016, a non-thiourea-containing imidazole, has been developed as a histamine H3 antagonist. In vitro and in vivo studies in rats were conducted to characterize receptor selectivity and autoreceptor functionality for GT-2016. GT-2016 demonstrated high affinity (43.8 +/- 3.0 nM) and selectivity for the histamine H3 receptor in vitro. In vivo, GT-2016 (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg i.p. and p.o.) was shown to cross the blood-brain barrier and dose-dependently bind to cortical histamine H3 receptors. GT-2016 induced dose-dependent increases in histamine turnover at concentrations that exhibited significant histamine H3 receptor occupancy. Also, in vivo microdialysis experiments were conducted in awake, freely moving rats treated with GT-2016. GT-2016 (10 and 30 mg/kg i.p.) increased histamine release by approximately 75% above baseline within 1 hr, and elevated histamine release was observed for up to 2.5 hr after the higher dose. In contrast, GT-2016 was devoid of activity on histamine methyltransferase in vitro at concentrations up to 3 microM. Taken together, the results show that GT-2016 crosses the blood-brain barrier, binds to H3 receptors and increases the release of histamine in the cerebral cortex, consistent with blockade of presynaptic H3 autoreceptors. In summary, these findings allowed us to identify and characterize the in vitro and in vivo biochemical properties of a novel H3 receptor antagonist, GT-2016.

Importance of histamine H2 receptors in restraint-morphine interactions

The effects of the brain-penetrating H2 antagonist zolantidine (ZOL, 3 mg/kg, s.c.) were studied on morphine (MOR, 4 mg/kg, s.c.) antinociception (tail flick test) in the presence and absence of previous restraint stress. Animals were handled for 3 days (to reduce handling stress), restrained for 1 hr or handled on day 4, and tested 24 hrs later. As found previously, restraint enhanced the intensity and duration of MOR antinociception. ZOL potentiated MOR antinociception in handled, non-restrained animals, but inhibited MOR action in restrained animals. In contrast, ZOL had no effects on nociceptive responses in either handled or stressed subjects in the absence of MOR. The data suggest that, in the absence of restraint, brain HA acts at the H2 receptor to inhibit MOR antinociception. In contrast, when an animal has been previously restrained, HA enhances MOR antinociception. Thus, brain HA appears to mediate the restraint-induced potentiation of MOR antinociception. Taken with previous results, the present findings suggest that in the presence of MOR, brain HA can provide bidirectional modulation of nociception. The direction of the modulation seems to depend upon the stress experience of the animal.

Modulation of morphine antinociception by the brain-penetrating H2 antagonist zolantidine: detailed characterization in five nociceptive test systems

Because histamine (HA) in the CNS may be a mediator of antinociception, a detailed investigation of the effects of the brain-penetrating H2 antagonist zolantidine (ZOL) was performed on five nociceptive tests in the presence and absence of morphine (MOR) in rats. ZOL inhibited MOR antinociception on the tail flick test, although a diurnal difference (inhibition in the dark cycle >> light cycle) was found. Similar results were found with the hot plate test, although details of the test procedure were significant. In contrast, ZOL induced opposing effects on MOR antinociception on two nonthermal tests (jump test and tail pinch test); ZOL alone induced moderate antinociception on the former test and mild antinociception on the latter test. Thus, ZOL exerts differential effects on baseline nociception and on MOR antinociception that vary depending on the nociceptive test employed, the light-dark cycle of the subjects, and the degree of stress associated with the nociceptive testing. These complex effects reveal the heterogeneous nature of opiate-induced modulation of nociception, and show that ZOL is a powerful tool for studying the relationships between opiates, HA, and nociceptive mechanisms.

Prolonged antinociception following carbon dioxide anesthesia in the laboratory rat

In the laboratory rat, inhalation (30 s) of high (> 70%) CO2 concentrations resulted in short-term (1-3 min) anesthesia, followed by a prolonged (up to 60 min) mild antinociception. Exposure to 100% CO2 resulted in significant thermal (hot-plate, 52 degrees, and tail-flick) and mechanical (tail-pinch, 886 g force) antinociception. Control animals, placed in the same chamber filled with air, showed no such effects. Rats exposed to 70% CO2 exhibited effects on the hot plate comparable to those seen after inhalation of 100% CO2, indicating that the response is not due to CO2-induced hypoxia. Additionally, recovery from halothane-induced anesthesia of comparable duration did not result in antinociception, confirming that anesthesia alone is not sufficient to produce the effect. Pretreatment with the opiate antagonist naltrexone (0.1-10 mg/kg i.p.) did not diminish the CO2-induced antinociception, suggesting that endogenous opioids are not obligatory in the mechanism of this response. Furthermore, hypophysectomy abolished hot-plate antinociception in animals exposed to 100% CO2 while sham-treated controls exhibited a pattern of hot-plate responses similar to that reported above. Taken together, these findings show that: (1) recovery from CO2-induced anesthesia results in a prolonged mild antinociception, detectable with thermal and mechanical nociceptive tests; and (2) this response may represent a novel from of environmentally induced antinociception, mediated by a non-opiate hormonal substance.

alpha-Fluoromethylhistidine-induced inhibition of brain histidine decarboxylase. Implications for the CO2-trapping enzymatic method

The actions of S-alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (FMH), an irreversible inhibitor of the histamine biosynthetic enzyme histidine decarboxylase (HD), were studied on rat brain HD, as measured by a recently developed CO2-trapping enzymatic method. As expected, FMH induced a virtually complete inhibition of HD in the hypothalamus both in vivo and in vitro. In the frontal cortex, however, maximal doses of FMH did not maximally inhibit HD, suggesting the existence of an FMH-resistant form of HD. Careful studies of the conditions under which the assays were performed (homogenate dilution, preincubation times, incubation times, temperatures), as well as experiments with inhibitors of other decarboxylases, were unable to provide an explanation for this. When comparable studies of the effects of FMH in these brain regions were performed by alternative methods for measuring HD activity, no evidence for the existence of an FMH-resistant form of HD could be found. Thus, even though the CO2-trapping method appears to be accurate for measuring HD activity in rat hypothalamic homogenates, the present results show that this method may not be specific when studying brain regions other than the hypothalamus.

Modulation of morphine antinociception by antagonism of H2 receptors in the periaqueductal gray

To determine the brain site of action of the H2 receptor antagonist tiotidine as an inhibitor of systemic morphine (MOR) antinociception, the effects of intracerebral microinjections of this drug were studied on this response in rats. As assessed on the hot plate test, microinjections of tiotidine (1 ng in 0.5 microliter) into the ventral lateral periaqueductal gray at the level of the dorsal raphe (PAG/DR) attenuated MOR-induced antinociceptive responses 10-15 min later, but potentiated these responses when tested 20-30 min after its administration. This treatment had neither effect in the absence of MOR. In contrast, intracerebral tiotidine had no effects on tail flick responses in the presence or absence of MOR. Intracerebral tiotidine reduced by about 50% the antinociception induced by systemic MOR (5.6 and 10 mg/kg), resulting in a parallel, rightward shift in the MOR dose-response curve. When testing occurred with a fixed dose of MOR at a fixed time interval, tiotidine dose-response curves were U-shaped, an effect postulated to result from the separate inhibitory and stimulatory mechanisms found at different times. Intracerebral mapping studies showed that the attenuation of MOR antinociception by tiotidine given into the PAG/DR was not reproduced by tiotidine injections into adjacent rostral, caudal, dorsal or ventral areas. Taken with previous studies showing that: (1) both MOR and histamine (HA) induce antinociception when given into the PAG/DR, and (2) systemic MOR releases HA in the PAG, the present results strongly suggest that systemic MOR attenuates supraspinally organized responses to phasic, thermal nociceptive stimuli by mechanisms that include PAG HA release and subsequent activation of PAG H2 receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inhibition of morphine antinociception by centrally administered histamine H2 receptor antagonists

The actions of zolantidine dimaleate and five other histamine H2 receptor antagonists, given into the lateral ventricle of rats, were assessed on nociceptive responses in the presence and absence of systemically administered morphine. On the tail flick response, zolantidine induced a time- and dose-dependent inhibition of morphine antinociception, with no effect on responses in the absence of morphine. Zolantidine and another H2 receptor antagonist, tiotidine, also inhibited morphine responses in the hot plate test. Four other H2 receptor antagonists of varying structure, brain-penetrating ability, and H2 potency also induced dose-related inhibition of morphine tail flick responses. Over three orders of magnitude, the potency of these compounds as inhibitors of morphine antinociception was highly correlated with H2 receptor antagonist potency (r = 0.98, P less than 0.005, n = 5). Taken with previous studies showing the selectivity of these compounds for histamine H2 receptors, and the antinociceptive properties of histamine, these results strongly suggest a role for brain histamine H2 receptors in the expression of morphine antinociception.

Zolantidine-induced attenuation of morphine antinociception in rhesus monkeys

The effect of zolantidine dimaleate (ZOL), the first brain-penetrating histamine H2 receptor antagonist, was determined on morphine (MOR) antinociception (ANC) in rhesus monkeys. ZOL (0.75 mg/kg, s.c., given every 30 min), completely attenuated the ANC resulting from the lowest dose of MOR tested (1.0 mg/kg), with no effect on the responses to higher doses (3-10 mg/kg). ZOL had no effect on baseline nociceptive responses in the absence of MOR. Taken with previous studies on the pharmacological specificity of ZOL, the ANC properties of histamine, and more extensive studies in rodents, the present results suggest that opiates like MOR relieve pain in primates by mechanisms that include activation of brain H2 receptors.

Differential effects of morphine on histamine metabolism in brain and spinal cord of mice

The effects of morphine on the levels of histamine (HA), its metabolite tele-methylhistamine (t-MH) and on t-MH synthesis rates (thought to be indicative of neuronal HA release) were investigated in brain regions and spinal cords of DBA/2J (DBA) and C57/BL6 (C57) mice, two strains known to differ in their sensitivity to morphine. In DBA (a strain highly sensitive to morphine antinociception), morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) had no effect on brain regional t-MH or HA levels, but produced a generalized inhibition of regional t-MH synthesis rates ranging from 11 to 53%. The monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor pargyline (used to estimate t-MH synthesis rates) had no effect on HA or t-MH levels in the DBA or C57 spinal cord, indicating the absence of detectable spinal HA turnover. Morphine (10 mg/kg) had no effect on DBA or C57 spinal cord HA or t-MH levels, but significantly increased t-MH synthesis in the DBA but not in the C57 spinal cord. These results suggest that in DBA mice, antinociceptive doses of morphine inhibit HA release in brain, and promote the release of HA from spinal cord. Neither effect was found in C57 mice, which are resistant to morphine antinociception. The relevance of these actions to previous studies showing the blockade of opiate antinociception by H2 antagonists remains to be established.