Continuous prazosin administration in cirrhotic patients: effects on portal hemodynamics and on liver and renal function

Effects of prazosin treatment on liver enzymes are moderated by alcohol withdrawal symptoms in individuals with alcohol use disorder

BACKGROUND

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with significant liver pathology marked by elevated liver enzymes. Prazosin, an alpha1-noradrenergic antagonist significantly improves alcohol drinking outcomes in individuals with alcohol withdrawal symptoms (AW), but effects on liver enzymes are unknown. We assessed the effects of prazosin treatment on the liver enzymes alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) in individuals with AUD.

METHODS

Participants (N=100) with AUD were enrolled in a 12-week randomized controlled trial and received either placebo or 16 mg/day of prazosin. Whole blood was drawn from 92 participants to measure liver enzyme levels every 4 weeks, and severity of AW was assessed weekly. Analysis predicting liver function outcomes used linear mixed effects models.

RESULTS

Controlling for alcohol consumption, a significant AW × treatment effect was seen for ALT (p < 0.05), AST (p < 0.05) and GGT (p < 0.01). Additionally, AST (b = 0.2, p < 0.01), ALT (b = 0.2, p < 0.05), and GGT (b = 0.3, p < 0.01) were elevated in individuals with higher AW in the placebo but not in the prazosin group (AST: p > 0.66; ALT: p > 0.65). Only in the prazosin group were lower GGT levels associated with higher withdrawal severity (b = -0.16, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an interaction of alcohol withdrawal symptoms and prazosin treatment on liver enzyme levels, which were not influenced by week in the trial or the amount of alcohol consumed. Together, these findings suggest that prazosin treatment reduces liver enzymes over the course of AUD treatment among individuals with significant AW, though replication to establish clinical utility is needed.

Close Relationship between Systemic Arterial and Portal Venous Pressure in an Animal Model with Healthy Liver

It is unclear to what extent systemic arterial blood pressure influences portal pressure. This relationship is clinically important as drugs, which are conventionally used for therapy of portal hypertension, may also influence systemic arterial blood pressure. This study investigated the potential correlation between mean arterial (MAP) and portal venous pressure (PVP) in rats with healthy livers. In a rat model with healthy livers, we investigated the effect of manipulation of MAP on PVP. Interventions consisted of 0.9% NaCl (group 1), 0.1 mg/kg body weight (bw) Sildenafil (low dose), an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-5 (group 2), and 1.0 mg/kg bw Sildenafil (high dose, group 3) in 600 µL saline injected intravenously. Norepinephrine was used to increase MAP in animals with circulatory failure while PVP was monitored. Injection of the fluids induced a transient drop in MAP and PVP, probably due to a reversible cardiac decompensation. The drop in MAP and drop in PVP are significantly correlated. The time lag between change in MAP and change in PVP by 24 s in all groups suggests a cause-and-effect relationship. Ten minutes after the injection of the fluid, cardiac function was normalized. Thereafter, MAP gradually decreased. In the NaCl group, PVP decreases by 0.485% for a 1% drop of MAP, by 0.550% in the low-dose sildenafil group, and by 0.651% in the high-dose sildenafil group (p < 0.05 for difference group two vs. group one, group three vs. group one, and group three vs. group two). These data suggest that Sildenafil has an inherent effect on portal pressure that exceeds the effect of MAP. Injection of norepinephrine led to a sudden increase in MAP followed by an increase in PVP after a time lag. These data show a close relationship between portal venous pressure and systemic arterial pressure in this animal model with healthy livers. A change in MAP is consequently followed by a change in PVP after a distinct time lag. This study, furthermore, suggests that Sildenafil influences portal pressure. Further studies should be performed in a model with cirrhotic livers, as these may be important in the evaluation of vasoactive drugs (e.g., PDE-5-inhibitors) for therapy of portal hypertension.

Adrenergic blocker terazosin potentially suppresses acetaminophen induced-acute liver injury in animal models via CYP2E1 gene

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is a global issue and acetaminophen (APAP) is considered as the main cause of this. Due to increasing incidents of DILI, current study attempted to investigate an alternative but better role of terazosin (alpha-adrenergic blocker) in APAP-induced acute liver injury in an animal model using New Zealand rabbits. APAP (1 g/kg of body weight) was given to New Zealand rabbits either with or without terazosin (0.5 mg/kg) and serum was collected after 4 h. Serum alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and ferritin level were determined to analyze the liver functioning of treated rabbits. Furthermore, total cholesterol (TC), total lipids (TL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglycerides (TG) levels were estimated to find any change in lipid profile of the treated animals. Moreover, the urea and creatinine levels assayed the actual renal functionality. To identify any modification in gene expression, qPCR of cytochrome P2E1 (CYP2E1) was performed. Terazosin in combination with APAP enhanced liver functioning by reducing the levels of liver injury markers viz. ALP and ALT, while lipid profile was also lowered by down regulation of TC, TL, LDL and TG with enhanced HDL levels. It caused significant down regulation of expression level of CYP2E1. It is concluded that terazosin has better effects induced on the recovery of normal liver functioning, by improving the liver profile, lipid profile and renal functioning both at tissue and molecular levels.

Test-Retest Reliability and Consistency of HVPG and Impact on Trial Design: A Study in 289 Patients from 20 Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Portal hypertension (PH) is a major driver for cirrhosis complications. Portal pressure is estimated in practice by the HVPG. The assessment of HVPG changes has been used for drug development in PH. This study aimed at quantifying the test-retest reliability and consistency of HVPG in the specific context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of PH in cirrhosis and its impact on power calculations for trial design.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We conducted a search of published RCTs in patients with cirrhosis reporting individual patient-level data of HVPG at baseline and after an intervention, which included a placebo or an untreated control arm. Baseline and follow-up HVPGs in the control groups were extracted after digitizing the plots. We assessed reliability and consistency and the potential impact of study characteristics. We retrieved a total of 289 before and after HVPG measurements in the placebo/untreated groups from 20 RCTs. The time span between the two HVPG measurements ranged between 20 minutes and 730 days. Pre-/post-HVPG variability was lower in studies including only compensated patients; therefore, modeled sample size calculations for trials in compensated cirrhosis were lower than for decompensated cirrhosis. A higher proportion of alcohol-associated cirrhosis and unicentric trials was associated with lower differences between baseline and follow-up measurements. The smallest detectable difference in an individual was 26% and 30% in compensated and decompensated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The test-retest reliability of HVPG is overall excellent. Within-individual variance was higher in studies including higher proportions of decompensated patients. These findings should be taken into account when performing power analysis for trials based on the effects on HVPG or when considering HVPG as a tool to guide therapy of PH.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for Liver Cirrhosis 2020

The first edition of the clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis was published in 2010, and the second edition was published in 2015 by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE). The revised third edition was recently published in 2020. This version has become a joint guideline by the JSGE and the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH). In addition to the clinical questions (CQs), background questions (BQs) are new items for basic clinical knowledge, and future research questions (FRQs) are newly added clinically important items. Concerning the clinical treatment of liver cirrhosis, new findings have been reported over the past 5 years since the second edition. In this revision, we decided to match the international standards as much as possible by referring to the latest international guidelines. Newly developed agents for various complications have also made great progress. In comparison with the latest global guidelines, such as the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), we are introducing data based on the evidence for clinical practice in Japan. The flowchart for nutrition therapy was reviewed to be useful for daily medical care by referring to overseas guidelines. We also explain several clinically important items that have recently received focus and were not mentioned in the last editions. This digest version describes the issues related to the management of liver cirrhosis and several complications in clinical practice. The content begins with a diagnostic algorithm, the revised flowchart for nutritional therapy, and refracted ascites, which are of great importance to patients with cirrhosis. In addition to the updated antiviral therapy for hepatitis B and C liver cirrhosis, the latest treatments for non-viral cirrhosis, such as alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (ASH/NASH) and autoimmune-related cirrhosis, are also described. It also covers the latest evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of liver cirrhosis complications, namely gastrointestinal bleeding, ascites, hepatorenal syndrome and acute kidney injury, hepatic encephalopathy, portal thrombus, sarcopenia, muscle cramp, thrombocytopenia, pruritus, hepatopulmonary syndrome, portopulmonary hypertension, and vitamin D deficiency, including BQ, CQ and FRQ. Finally, this guideline covers prognosis prediction and liver transplantation, especially focusing on several new findings since the last version. Since this revision is a joint guideline by both societies, the same content is published simultaneously in the official English journal of JSGE and JSH.

Pathophysiology of decompensated cirrhosis: Portal hypertension, circulatory dysfunction, inflammation, metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction

Patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis have a dismal prognosis and frequently progress to acute-on-chronic liver failure, which is characterised by hepatic and extrahepatic organ failure(s). The pathomechanisms involved in decompensation and disease progression are still not well understood, and as specific disease-modifying treatments do not exist, research to identify novel therapeutic targets is of the utmost importance. This review amalgamates the latest knowledge on disease mechanisms that lead to tissue injury and extrahepatic organ failure - such as systemic inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress and metabolic changes - and marries these with the classical paradigms of acute decompensation to form a single paradigm. With this detailed breakdown of pathomechanisms, we identify areas for future research. Novel disease-modifying strategies that break the vicious cycle are urgently required to improve patient outcomes.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis 2020

The first edition of the clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis was published in 2010, and the second edition was published in 2015 by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE). The revised third edition was recently published in 2020. This version has become a joint guideline by the JSGE and the Japanese Society of Hepatology (JSH). In addition to the clinical questions (CQs), background questions (BQs) are new items for basic clinical knowledge, and future research questions (FRQs) are newly added clinically important items. Concerning the clinical treatment of liver cirrhosis, new findings have been reported over the past 5 years since the second edition. In this revision, we decided to match the international standards as much as possible by referring to the latest international guidelines. Newly developed agents for various complications have also made great progress. In comparison with the latest global guidelines, such as the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), we are introducing data based on the evidence for clinical practice in Japan. The flowchart for nutrition therapy was reviewed to be useful for daily medical care by referring to overseas guidelines. We also explain several clinically important items that have recently received focus and were not mentioned in the last editions. This digest version describes the issues related to the management of liver cirrhosis and several complications in clinical practice. The content begins with a diagnostic algorithm, the revised flowchart for nutritional therapy, and refracted ascites, which are of great importance to patients with cirrhosis. In addition to the updated antiviral therapy for hepatitis B and C liver cirrhosis, the latest treatments for non-viral cirrhosis, such as alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (ASH/NASH) and autoimmune-related cirrhosis, are also described. It also covers the latest evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of liver cirrhosis complications, namely gastrointestinal bleeding, ascites, hepatorenal syndrome and acute kidney injury, hepatic encephalopathy, portal thrombus, sarcopenia, muscle cramp, thrombocytopenia, pruritus, hepatopulmonary syndrome, portopulmonary hypertension, and vitamin D deficiency, including BQ, CQ and FRQ. Finally, this guideline covers prognosis prediction and liver transplantation, especially focusing on several new findings since the last version. Since this revision is a joint guideline by both societies, the same content is published simultaneously in the official English journal of JSGE and JSH.

Precision medicine in variceal bleeding: Are we there yet?

Variceal bleeding is one of the most feared complications of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis because of its deleterious impact on prognosis. Adequate management of patients at risk of developing variceal bleeding includes the prevention of the first episode of variceal bleeding and rebleeding, and is crucial in modifying prognosis. The presence of clinically significant portal hypertension is the main factor determining the risk of development of varices and other liver-related decompensations; therefore, it should be carefully screened for and monitored. Treating patients with clinically significant portal hypertension based on their individual risk of portal hypertension-related bleeding undoubtedly improves prognosis. The evaluation of liver haemodynamics and liver function can stratify patients according to their risk of bleeding and are no question useful tools to guide therapy in an individualised manner. That said, recent data support the idea that tailoring therapy to patient characteristics may effectively impact on prognosis and increase survival in all clinical scenarios. This review will focus on evaluating the available evidence supporting the use of individual risk characteristics for clinical decision-making and their impact on clinical outcome and survival. In primary prophylaxis, identification and treatment of patients with clinically significant portal hypertension improves decompensation-free survival. In the setting of acute variceal bleeding, the risk of failure and rebleeding can be easily predicted, allowing for early escalation of treatment (i.e. pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) which can improve survival in appropriate candidates. Stratifying the risk of recurrent variceal bleeding based on liver function and haemodynamic response to non-selective beta-blockers allows for tailored treatment, thereby increasing survival and avoiding adverse events.

Pharmacologic Management of Portal Hypertension

Terlipressin, somatostatin, or octreotide are recommended as pharmacologic treatment of acute variceal hemorrhage. Nonselective β-blockers decrease the risk of variceal hemorrhage and hepatic decompensation, particularly in those 30% to 40% of patients with good hemodynamic response. Carvedilol, statins, and anticoagulants are promising agents in the management of portal hypertension. Recent advances in the pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension have mainly focused on modifying an increased intrahepatic resistance through nitric oxide and/or modulation of vasoactive substances. Several novel pharmacologic agents for portal hypertension are being evaluated in humans.

Pharmacologic prevention of variceal bleeding and rebleeding

BACKGROUND

Variceal bleeding is a major complication of portal hypertension, which is associated with significant mortality. Moreover, patients surviving a variceal bleeding episode have very high risk of rebleeding, which is associated with mortality as high as that of the first bleed. Because of this, prevention of bleeding from gastroesophageal varices has been one of the main therapeutic goals since the advent of the first effective therapies for portal hypertension.

AIM

This review deals with the present day state-of-the-art pharmacological prevention of variceal bleeding in primary and secondary prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Pharmacological therapy aims to decrease portal pressure (PP) by acting on the pathophysiological mechanisms of portal hypertension such as increased hepatic vascular tone and splanchnic vasodilatation. Propranolol and nadolol block the beta-1 in the heart and the peripheral beta-2 adrenergic receptors. Beta-1 blockade of cardiac receptors reduces heart rate and cardiac output and subsequently decreases flow into splanchnic circulation. Beta-2 blockade leads to unopposed alpha-1 adrenergic activity that causes splanchnic vasoconstriction and reduction of portal inflow. Both effects contribute to reduction in PP. Carvedilol is more powerful in reducing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than traditional nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) and achieves good hemodynamic response in nearly 75 % of cases. Simvastatin and atorvastatin improve endothelial dysfunction mainly by enhancing endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression and phosphorylation and NO production. In addition, statins deactivate hepatic stellate cells and ameliorate hepatic fibrogenesis. These effects cause a decrease in HVPG and improve liver microcirculation and hepatocyte perfusion in patients with cirrhosis. In addition, several promising drugs under development may change the management of portal hypertension in the coming years.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a background on the most important aspects of the treatment of portal hypertension in patients with compensated and decompensated liver cirrhosis. However, despite the great improvement in the prevention of variceal bleeding over the last years, further therapeutic options are needed.

Emerging therapies for portal hypertension in cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Counteracting splanchnic vasodilatation and increased portal-collateral blood flow has been the mainstay for the treatment of portal hypertension (PH) over the past three decades. However, there is still large room for improvement in the treatment of PH.

AREAS COVERED

The basic mechanism leading to portal hypertension is the increased hepatic vascular resistance to portal blood flow caused by liver structural abnormalities inherent to cirrhosis and increased hepatic vascular tone. Molecules modulating microvascular dysfunction which have undergone preclinical and clinical trials are summarized, potential drug development issues are addressed, and situations relevant to design of clinical trials are considered.

EXPERT OPINION

Experimental and clinical evidence indicates that molecules modulating liver microvascular dysfunction may allow for 30-40% reduction in portal pressure. Several agents could be utilized in the earlier stages of cirrhosis (antifibrotics, antiangiogenics, etiological therapies) may allow reduction of fibrosis and halt progression of PH. This 'nip at the bud' policy, by combining therapies with existing agents used in advanced phase of cirrhosis and novel agents which could be used in early phase of cirrhotic spectrum, which are likely to hit the market soon would be the future strategy for PH therapy.

[Aspects of pathogenetc pharmacotherapy for portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis]

The review of literature considers the principles of medical treatment for portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis, which are based on the current views of its development mechanisms. It describes both current pharmacotherapy methods for portal hypertension and drugs, the efficacy of which is being investigated.

Effect of adrenergic blockers, carvedilol, prazosin, metoprolol and combination of prazosin and metoprolol on paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in rabbits

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate hepatoprotective potential of carvedilol, prazosin, metoprolol and prazosin plus metoprolol in paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six male rabbits were divided into six groups, six in each, group 1 received distilled water, group 2 were treated with paracetamol (1 g/kg/day, orally), group 3, 4,5 and 6 were treated at a dose in (mg/kg/day) of the following: Carvedilol (10 mg), prazosin (0.5 mg), metoprolol (10 mg), and a combination of metoprolol (10 mg) and prazosin (0.5 mg) respectively 1 h before paracetamol treatment. All treatments were given for 9 days; animals were sacrificed at day 10. Liver function tests, malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) in serum and liver homogenates were estimated. Histopathological examinations of liver were performed.

RESULTS

Histopathological changes of hepatotoxicity were found in all paracetamol-treated rabbits. The histopathological findings of paracetamol toxicity disappeared in five rabbits on prazosin, very mild in one. In carvedilol group paracetamol toxicity completely disappeared in three, while mild in three rabbits. Paracetamol hepatotoxicity was not changed by metoprolol. In metoprolol plus prazosin treated rabbits, moderate histopathological changes were observed. Serum liver function tests and MDA in serum and in liver homogenate were elevated; GSH was depleted after paracetamol treatment and returned back to the control value on prior treatment with prazosin. MDA in serum and liver homogenate, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin were significantly decreased after carvedilol and prazosin plus metoprolol treatments.

CONCLUSION

Carvedilol and prazosin are hepatoprotective in paracetamol hepatotoxicity, combination of prazosin and metoprolol have moderate, and metoprolol has a little hepatoprotection.

Effects of Sapropterin on Portal and Systemic Hemodynamics in Patients With Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension: A Bicentric Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

OBJECTIVES

Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a cofactor of nitric oxide synthase, might have a role in the treatment of portal hypertension (PHT) as its administration improves endothelial nitric oxide generation and hepatic endothelial dysfunction, and reduces portal pressure in experimental models of cirrhosis. Sapropterin is an oral synthetic analogue of BH4 recently approved for the treatment of phenylketonuria. This study evaluated the safety and effects of sapropterin on hepatic and systemic hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis and PHT.

METHODS

Forty patients with cirrhosis and PHT (hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mm Hg) were randomly allocated to receive sapropterin (n=19) for 2 weeks (5 mg/kg/day increased to 10 at day 8) or placebo (n=21) in a double-blind multicenter clinical trial. Randomization was stratified according to concomitant treatment with β-adrenergic blockers. We studied at baseline and post-treatment splanchnic (HVPG and hepatic blood flow (HBF)) and systemic hemodynamics, endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress markers (von Willebrand factor and malondialdehyde), liver function tests, and safety variables.

RESULTS

HVPG was not modified by either sapropterin (16.0±4.4 vs. 15.8±4.7 mm Hg) or placebo (16.0±4.6 vs. 15.5±4.9 mm Hg). HBF, systemic hemodynamics, endothelial dysfunction markers, and liver function tests remained unchanged. Sapropterin was well tolerated (no patient required dose adjustment or withdrawal), and adverse events were mild and similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Sapropterin, an oral synthetic analogue of BH4, at the used dose did not reduce portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis. Sapropterin was safe and no serious adverse effects or deleterious systemic hemodynamic effects were observed.

Contemporary concepts of the medical therapy of portal hypertension under liver cirrhosis

Severe complications of liver cirrhosis are mostly related to portal hypertension. At the base of the pathogenesis of portal hypertension is the increase in hepatic vascular resistance to portal blood flow with subsequent development of hyperdynamic circulation, which, despite of the formation of collateral circulation, promotes progression of portal hypertension. An important role in its pathogenesis is played by the rearrangement of vascular bed and angiogenesis. As a result, strategic directions of the therapy of portal hypertension under liver cirrhosis include selectively decreasing hepatic vascular resistance with preserving or increasing portal blood flow, and correcting hyperdynamic circulation and pathological angiogenesis, while striving to reduce the hepatic venous pressure gradient to less than 12 mmHg or 20% of the baseline. Over the last years, substantial progress in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of hemodynamic disorders under liver cirrhosis has resulted in the development of new drugs for their correction. Although the majority of them have so far been investigated only in animal experiments, as well as at the molecular and cellular level, it might be expected that the introduction of the new methods in clinical practice will increase the efficacy of the conservative approach to the prophylaxis and treatment of portal hypertension complications. The purpose of the review is to describe the known methods of portal hypertension pharmacotherapy and discuss the drugs that may affect the basic pathogenetic mechanisms of its development.

Systemic inflammation is associated with increased intrahepatic resistance and mortality in alcohol-related acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is characterized by acute deterioration of cirrhosis, systemic inflammation and multi-organ failure. Inflammation is also key to the pathobiology of portal hypertension. This study aims to define the relationship between systemic and hepatic haemodynamics in patients with ACLF.

METHODS

Sixty patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were prospectively enrolled - stable cirrhosis (SC, n = 27), acute decompensation without ACLF (AD, n = 14) and ACLF (n = 19) - and managed with standard therapy. Systemic and hepatic haemodynamic studies were performed, and patients were followed up for 3 months. Plasma norepinephrine, cytokine profile, nitrate/nitrite and malondialdehyde levels were measured.

RESULTS

Three-month mortality was as follows: SC - none; AD - 14%; ACLF - 47.2% (P < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure was lowest in the ACLF group (P < 0.001). ACLF patients had significantly higher hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG), while the hepatic blood flow was markedly reduced with an increase in intrahepatic resistance, which predicted mortality (AUROC: 0.87, P < 0.0001). In ACLF, the severity of intrahepatic resistance correlated with markers of inflammatory response, norepinephrine levels, creatinine levels and severity of encephalopathy. Modelling data showed that the high norepinephrine levels in ACLF may contribute to the right shift of the HVPG-hepatic blood flow relationship and its levels correlated with inflammatory markers and mortality (AUROC: 0.90; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The disturbances in systemic and hepatic haemodynamics in alcohol-related ACLF are associated with dysregulated inflammation, multi-organ failure and marked activation of the sympathetic nervous system. These abnormalities predict high mortality rates in alcohol-related ACLF patients.

Pharmacologic management of portal hypertension

Progress in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension has disclosed new targets for therapy, resulting in a larger spectrum of drugs with a potential role for clinical practice. This review focuses on pharmacologic treatments already available for reducing portal pressure and summarizes drugs currently under investigation in this field.

Medical management of ascites

INTRODUCTION

Ascites is a common complication of advanced cirrhosis that has a significant negative impact on survival. This review updates the reader on the medical management of ascites.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores the pathophysiology of ascites formation in cirrhosis; the current mainstays of medical management (treating the underlying cause of cirrhosis, avoiding nephrotoxic agents, sodium restriction, and combination diuretic therapy); potential novel agents, such as vasoconstrictors and vaptans; and albumin infusions. The literature research covers all aspects of medical management of ascites from the English literature, concentrating on publications from the past 10 years. It provides a thorough understanding of how the correction of pathophysiology of ascites formation helps to improve ascites; knowledge on the monitoring of patients with cirrhosis and ascites receiving medical management, and on prophylaxis against potentially life-threatening complication such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; and potential new treatments for ascites.

EXPERT OPINION

Management of patients with cirrhosis and ascites requires careful attention to fluid and electrolyte balance and avoidance of complications. Recognition of refractory ascites allows for the use of second-line treatments. All patients with cirrhosis and ascites should be considered for liver transplantation.

Clinical pharmacology of portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is an increase in pressure in the portal vein and its tributaries. It is defined as a portal pressure gradient (the difference in pressure between the portal vein and the hepatic veins) greater than 5 mm Hg. Although this gradient defines portal hypertension, a gradient of 10 mm Hg or greater defines clinically significant portal hypertension, because this pressure gradient predicts the development of varices, decompensation of cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The most direct consequence of portal hypertension is the development of gastroesophageal varices that may rupture and lead to the development of variceal hemorrhage. This article reviews the pathophysiologic bases of the different pharmacologic treatments for portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis and places them in the context of the natural history of varices and variceal hemorrhage.

NCX-1000, a nitric oxide-releasing derivative of UDCA, does not decrease portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis: results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-escalating study

OBJECTIVES

NCX-1000 (2(acetyloxy) benzoic acid-3(nitrooxymethyl)phenyl ester) is an nitric oxide (NO)-releasing derivative of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), which showed selective vasodilatory effect on intrahepatic circulation in animal models of cirrhosis. This study was aimed at testing the efficacy and tolerability of this compound in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

METHODS

This was a single-center, phase-2a, randomized (4:1), double-blind, parallel-group, dose-escalating study. Patients received progressive oral doses of NCX-1000 or placebo up to 2 g t.i.d. or maximum tolerated doses for 16 days. Efficacy on fasting and postprandial hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) at baseline and after treatment was assessed. Hepatic blood flow (HBF) and arterial blood pressure were also measured.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (nine NCX-1000 and two placebo) were enrolled and completed the trial. After NCX-1000 treatment, HVPG did not change (16.7+/-3.8 vs. 17.1+/-3.8 mm Hg; P=0.596), and HBF decreased significantly (904+/-310 vs. 1,129+/-506 ml/min; P=0.043). The postprandial increase in portal pressure and HBF was not modified by NCX-1000. There was no significant effect on diastolic blood pressure, but systolic blood pressure was reduced by the treatment in a dose-dependent manner (121+/-11 mm Hg after NCX-1000 vs. 136+/-7 mm Hg at baseline; P=0.003). Seven non-serious adverse events were experienced by four patients (one on placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, NCX-1000 administration was safe, but it was not able to reduce portal pressure. A significant reduction of systolic blood pressure and HBF was observed in the treatment arm, suggesting that the drug had systemic effects and lacked selective release of NO at the intrahepatic circulation.

The effect and mechanism of action of capsaicin on gastric acid output

BACKGROUND

Capsaicin has beneficial pharmacological properties, such as the ability to improve appetite and digestion. However, capsaicin has been reported to suppress gastric acid output, but to increase secretion; no consensus as to its effects on gastric acid output has been reached, and the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated.

METHODS

Rat gastric lumen was perfused with capsaicin. Basal acid output and gastric acid secretion stimulated by vagal nerve activation and bethanecol, a muscarinic receptor agonist, were measured. After intravenous infusion of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), the measurements were repeated. The secretion of gastrin, somatostatin, and histamine was measured in isolated vascularly perfused rat stomach after vagal nerve and bethanecol stimulation, and under the influence of capsaicin.

RESULTS

Capsaicin administration had no effect on basal gastric acid output, but inhibited acid secretion resulting from vagal stimulation. Capsaicin had no effect on acid secretion resulting from stimulation with bethanecol. Administration of high-dose CGRP inhibited basal acid output and gastric acid secretion from both vagal nerve and bethanecol stimulation. Low-dose CGRP inhibited gastric acid secretion because of vagal stimulation, but had no effect on basal secretion or acid secretion following stimulation with bethanecol. Capsaicin administration inhibited the stimulated gastrin and histamine secretion and reversed the suppression of somatostatin secretion mediated by vagal stimulation. However, capsaicin had no effect on stimulated gastrin secretion, suppression of somatostatin secretion, or stimulated histamine secretion because of bethanecol.

CONCLUSIONS

Capsaicin inhibited gastric acid output, and the mechanism underlying this effect appears to involve vagal nerve inactivation.

Pathophysiologic basis for the medical management of portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertension is a potentially life-threatening complication of cirrhosis, resulting from increased intrahepatic resistance and portal inflow.

OBJECTIVE

Given the complex nature of this disorder, a more complete understanding of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension is necessary to develop new therapies that target specific pathways that regulate portal pressure.

METHODS

This review is based on a literature search of published articles and abstracts on the pathophysiology of portal hypertension, its complications and its treatment.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

A number of therapies have been developed or are under investigation for the treatment of portal hypertension and its complications. These agents may reduce mortality and improve quality of life for patients with advanced liver disease.

Review: Vasoconstrictors for the treatment of portal hypertension

Vasoconstrictors have long been used in an attempt to mitigate the effects of portal hypertension. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of portal hypertension and the use of vasoconstrictors in the management of its sequlae, including variceal hemorrhage, hepatorenal syndrome, and paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction. Experimental and clinical evidence for the use of vasoconstrictors is considered, and several exciting recent developments are reviewed.

Clinical trial: a randomized controlled study on prevention of variceal rebleeding comparing nadolol + ligation vs. hepatic venous pressure gradient-guided pharmacological therapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) monitoring of therapy to prevent variceal rebleeding provides strong prognostic information. Treatment of nonresponders to beta-blockers +/- nitrates has not been clarified.

AIM

To assess the value of HVPG-guided therapy using nadolol + prazosin in nonresponders to nadolol + isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN) compared with a control group treated with nadolol + ligation.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding were randomized to HVPG-guided therapy (n = 30) or nadolol + ligation (n = 29). A Baseline haemodynamic study was performed and repeated within 1 month. In the guided-therapy group, nonresponders to nadolol + ISMN received nadolol and carefully titrated prazosin and had a third haemodynamic study.

RESULTS

Nadolol + prazosin decreased HVPG in nonresponders to nadolol + ISMN (P < 0.001). Finally, 74% of patients were responders in the guided-therapy group vs. 32% in the nadolol + ligation group (P < 0.01). The probability of rebleeding was lower in responders than in nonresponders in the guided therapy group (P < 0.01), but not in the nadolol + ligation group (P = 0.41). In all, 57% of nonresponders rebled in the guided-therapy group and 20% in the nadolol + ligation group (P = 0.05). The incidence of complications was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated to prevent variceal rebleeding, the association of nadolol and prazosin effectively rescued nonresponders to nadolol and ISMN, improving the haemodynamic response observed in controls receiving nadolol and endoscopic variceal ligation. Our results also suggest that ligation may rescue nonresponders.

The effect of 1 month of therapy with midodrine, octreotide-LAR and albumin in refractory ascites: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of refractory ascites (RA) is linked to splanchnic vasodilation. We hypothesized that a combination of midodrine, octreotide long-acting release (LAR) and albumin would result in increased natriuresis, better control of ascites and an improvement in renal function in patients with RA+/-Type 2 hepatorenal syndrome.

METHODS

A prospective pilot study in patients with RA as defined by the International Ascites Club. Consecutive patients received an intramuscular injection of octreotide-LAR, 50 g of albumin three times per week and midodrine titrated to increase the systolic blood pressure for 1 month.

RESULTS

Ten patients with RA were enrolled and eight with complete data to 1 month post-treatment were included in the analysis. There was no change in renal function but there was a trend towards a reduction in the volume of ascites removed by paracentesis (P=0.08) and a significant reduction in the plasma renin (P=0.01) and aldosterone concentrations (P=0.01). Interestingly, there was a transient worsening in the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (P=0.01). The deterioration in MELD was completely reversible after discontinuation of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study of prolonged midodrine, octreotide and albumin therapy in RA. We observed a significant reduction in the plasma renin and aldosterone concentrations and a trend towards a reduction in the volume of ascites removed by paracentesis without an effect on renal function. The beneficial effects are at the expense of a reversible deterioration in the MELD score. Large controlled trials are needed before this therapy can be routinely recommended.

Portal hypertension and variceal hemorrhage

Portal hypertension, a major hallmark of cirrhosis, is defined as a portal pressure gradient exceeding 5 mm Hg. In portal hypertension, porto-systemic collaterals decompress the portal circulation and give rise to varices. Successful management of portal hypertension and its complications requires knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology, the pertinent anatomy, and the natural history of the collateral circulation, particularly the gastroesophageal varices.

Acute variceal bleeding: pharmacological treatment and primary/secondary prophylaxis

Variceal bleeding is one of the most severe complications of portal hypertension related to liver cirrhosis. Primary prophylaxis is considered mandatory in patients with cirrhosis and high-risk oesophageal varices, and once varices have bled, every effort should be made to arrest the haemorrhage and prevent further bleeding episodes. In acute variceal bleeding, vasoactive drugs that lower portal pressure should be started even before endoscopy, and should be maintained for up to 5 days. The choice of vasoactive drug should be made according to local resources. Terlipressin, somatostatin and octreotide can be used; vasopressin plus transdermal nitroglycerin may be used if no other drug is available. In variceal bleeding, antibiotic therapy is also mandatory. In primary and secondary prophylaxis, beta-blockers are the mainstay of therapy. In secondary prophylaxis (but not in primary prophylaxis) these drugs can be combined with organic nitrates.

alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists prevent paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in mice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Paracetamol, a major cause of acute liver failure (ALF) represents a significant clinical problem. Adrenoceptor stimulation or antagonism can modulate chemical-induced hepatotoxicity. We investigated the role of endogenous catecholamines and alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in the development of paracetamol- induced hepatotoxicity.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Paracetamol (3.5 mmol kg(-1)) was administered to male CD-1 mice, with and without alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists (prazosin, doxazosin, terazosin and tamsulosin; 35.7 micromol kg(-1)). Serum transaminases and hepatic glutathione (GSH) levels were assessed as markers of hepatic damage. Paracetamol bioactivation was assessed by covalent binding, hepatic and urinary conjugate formation and uridine glucuronosyltransferase activity. Plasma catecholamines levels and hepatic congestion were also analysed.

KEY RESULTS

Plasma catecholamine levels were significantly elevated 5 h post paracetamol administration. Prazosin prevented hepatotoxicity when administered 1 h before a toxic paracetamol insult and importantly, when administered up to 1 h post paracetamol injection. Prazosin had no effect on paracetamol-induced depletion of hepatic GSH, paracetamol bioactivation or paracetamol-induced transcription of defence genes. Paracetamol toxicity is associated with marked accumulation of erythrocytes within hepatic sinusoids and prazosin completely prevented this accumulation.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Paracetamol-induced hepatocellular damage is associated with increased circulating catecholamines. alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists conferred complete protection from paracetamol -induced hepatotoxicity. Protection was associated with absence of hepatic erythrocyte accumulation. Increased catecholamine levels may contribute to the pathophysiology of paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity by compromising hepatic perfusion. Protection against paracetamol toxicity by alpha(1) antagonists in mice has implications for therapeutic management of patients presenting with paracetamol overdose and ALF.

Effects of a 7-day treatment with midodrine in non-azotemic cirrhotic patients with and without ascites

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Splanchnic arterial vasodilatation has been causally related with hyperdynamic circulation and impaired natriuresis in advanced cirrhosis and has also been suggested to be responsible for the subtle sodium retention in pre-ascitic cirrhosis. This study evaluated the effects of a 7-day treatment with the alpha1-adrenergic agonist midodrine in non-azotemic cirrhotic patients with and without ascites.

METHODS

Thirty-nine cirrhotic patients were studied at baseline and 7 days after administration of oral midodrine 10mg, t.i.d. (11 without and 12 with ascites) or placebo (8 without and 8 with ascites).

RESULTS

A significant increase in urine sodium excretion was noted after midodrine administration in patients without and with ascites, in line with significant increases in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance, and significant decreases in cardiac output and heart rate. Significant increases in glomerular filtration rate, filtration fraction, and urine volume and significant decreases in plasma renin activity and aldosterone were observed in patients with ascites. Placebo had no effect in any study group.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of midodrine for 7 days improves systemic haemodynamics and sodium excretion in non-azotemic cirrhotic patients without or with ascites. In patients with ascites, but not in those without ascites, these effects are associated with a suppression of the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, suggesting that the increase in natriuresis is related to the improvement in the effective arterial blood volume.

Effect of carvedilol on portal hypertension depends on the degree of endothelial activation and inflammatory changes

OBJECTIVE

Bleeding from esophageal varices is a major complication of liver cirrhosis. Non-selective beta-blockers exert an influence on the functional part of portal hypertension, thereby reducing the risk of bleeding. Direct measurement of this functional part is not possible; nevertheless, pro-inflammatory markers as well as parameters of endothelial dysfunction might serve as surrogate markers. The aim of study was to assess the correlation between the therapeutic efficacy of carvedilol and markers of endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension were given carvedilol, 25 mg q.i.d. for 30 days. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and biochemical determinations were performed prior to and after the treatment. Eight healthy individuals served as controls for comparison of biochemical markers.

RESULTS

In the whole group of cirrhotic patients, HVPG decreased from 17.7+/-3.8 to 14.9+/-4.8 mmHg (p<0.001). Complete response was seen in 15 patients (42%). Baseline serum levels of E-selectin were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (119.8+/-70.6 versus 52.6+/-25.7 ng/ml; p=0.023) and in controls (28.8+/-22.2 ng/ml; p=0.004). Furthermore, baseline TNF-alpha levels were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (22.8+/-15.7 versus 7+/-8.9; p=0.047) and in controls (5.5+/-5.9 pg/ml; p=0.005). Serum levels of ICAM-1 showed the same trend (4360+/-2870 versus 2861+/-1577 versus 651+/-196 ng/ml), although differences did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Markers of systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction seem to predict the hypotensive effect of carvedilol on portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis and may be useful in the assessment of the efficacy of the therapy.

Norepinephrine induces calcium spikes and proinflammatory actions in human hepatic stellate cells

Catecholamines participate in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension and liver fibrosis through alpha1-adrenoceptors. However, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Here, we investigated the effects of norepinephrine (NE) on human hepatic stellate cells (HSC), which exert vasoactive, inflammatory, and fibrogenic actions in the injured liver. Adrenoceptor expression was assessed in human HSC by RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. Intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) was studied in fura-2-loaded cells. Cell contraction was studied by assessing wrinkle formation and myosin light chain II (MLC II) phosphorylation. Cell proliferation and collagen-alpha1(I) expression were assessed by [3H]thymidine incorporation and quantitative PCR, respectively. NF-kappaB activation was assessed by luciferase reporter gene and p65 nuclear translocation. Chemokine secretion was assessed by ELISA. Normal human livers expressed alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors, which were markedly upregulated in livers with advanced fibrosis. Activated human HSC expressed alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors. NE induced multiple rapid [Ca2+]i oscillations (Ca2+ spikes). Prazosin (alpha1-blocker) completely prevented NE-induced Ca2+ spikes, whereas propranolol (nonspecific beta-blocker) partially attenuated this effect. NE caused phosphorylation of MLC II and cell contraction. In contrast, NE did not affect cell proliferation or collagen-alpha1(I) expression. Importantly, NE stimulated the secretion of inflammatory chemokines (RANTES and interleukin-8) in a dose-dependent manner. Prazosin blocked NE-induced chemokine secretion. NE stimulated NF-kappaB activation. BAY 11-7082, a specific NF-kappaB inhibitor, blocked NE-induced chemokine secretion. We conclude that NE stimulates NF-kappaB and induces cell contraction and proinflammatory effects in human HSC. Catecholamines may participate in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension and liver fibrosis by targeting HSC.

Influence of beta-2 adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism on the hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis

The beta-2-adrenergic receptor (beta(2-)-AR) has several single-nucleotide polymorphisms. These influence the functional response to adrenergic stimulation; genotypes homozygous for Gly16-Glu27 or Gly16-Gln27 alleles (Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes) are associated with enhanced response, whereas genotypes homozygous for Arg16-Gln27 alleles (Arg16-Gln27) show a decreased response. We hypothesized that gene polymorphisms at the beta2-AR may influence the hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis. The beta2-AR gene polymorphisms were determined by direct sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products in 48 patients with cirrhosis. All patients also had hepatic and systemic hemodynamic studies before and after propranolol administration. Prevalence of Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes was 29.1%, Arg16-Gln27 haplotype was 16.7%, and 54.2% were compound heterozygotes. Patients with cirrhosis with Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes had a greater decrease in heart rate, cardiac index, and hepatic blood flow after propranolol administration than those with Arg16-Gln27 haplotype. However, the HVPG response to propranolol was similar in both groups, whereas estimated hepatic sinusoidal resistance increased significantly in Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes but not in Arg16-Gln27 (+27.1 +/- 17.8% vs -17.9 +/- 13.9%, P = .042), suggesting that unopposed vasoconstrictive activity at the intrahepatic circulation hinders the fall in HVPG despite enhanced hemodynamic response to propranolol in Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes. In conclusion, beta2-AR gene polymorphisms influence the response to beta-blockade. However, HVPG reduction cannot be predicted from polymorphism analysis. Patients with the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes may benefit from the association of hepatic vasodilators to propranolol therapy.

Portal hypertension: from pathophysiology to clinical practice

Portal hypertension (PHT) is responsible for the more severe and often lethal complications of cirrhosis such as bleeding oesophageal varices, ascites, renal dysfunction and hepatic encephalopathy. Because of the combined impact of these complications, PHT remains the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Over the years, it has become clear that a decrease in portal pressure is not only protective against the risk of variceal (re)bleeding but is also associated with a lower long-term risk of developing complications and an improved long-term survival. A milestone in therapy was the introduction of non-selective beta-blockers for the prevention of bleeding and rebleeding of gastro-esophageal varices. However, in practice, less than half the patients under beta-blockade are protected from these risks, supporting the overall demand for innovation and expansion of our therapeutic armamentarium. Recent advances in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of cirrhotic PHT have directed future therapy towards the increased intrahepatic vascular resistance, which, in part, is determined by an increased hepatic vascular tone. This increased vasculogenic component provides the rationale for the potential use of therapies aimed at increasing intrahepatic vasorelaxing capacity via gene therapy, liver-selective nitric oxide donors and statines on the one hand, and at antagonizing excessive intrahepatic vasoconstrictor force through the use of endothelin antagonists, angiotensin blockers, alpha(1) adrenergic antagonists or combined alpha(1)- and non-selective beta-blockers or somatostatin analogues on the other. The focus of this review is to give an update on the pathophysiology of PHT in order to elucidate these potential novel strategies subsequently.

The management of portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is an almost unavoidable complication of cirrhosis, and it is responsible for the more lethal complications of this syndrome. Appearance of these complications represents the major cause of death and liver transplantation in patients who have cirrhosis. This article highlights treatment modalities in use for managing portal hypertension and those that may be available in the future.

Effects of sympathetic nerves and angiotensin II on renal sodium and water handling in rats with common bile duct ligature

We tested the hypothesis that angiotensin II is likely to be mandatory for the neurogenic sodium and volume retention in cirrhotic rats with common bile duct ligature (BDL) following an acute volume load. To assess the neural control of volume homeostasis, 21 days after common BDL rats underwent volume expansion (0.9% NaCL; 10% body wt over 30 min) to decrease renal sympathetic nerve activity. Untreated animals, rats with renal denervation or pretreated with a nonhypotensive dose of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist were studied. The renal renin-angiotensin system was assessed by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. Rats with BDL excreted only 71 ± 4% of the administered volume load. In cirrhotic rats pretreated with an angiotensin II AT1inhibitor or after renal denervation, these values ranged significantly higher from 98 to 103% ( P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Renal sympathetic nerve activity decreases by volume expansion were impaired in BDL rats ( P < 0.05) but unaffected by angiotensin II receptor inhibition. In kidneys of BDL animals, renin mRNA was increased, and immunohistochemistry revealed increased staining for peritubular angiotensin II. Renal denervation in BDL animals reduced renin expression within 5 days to control levels. In conclusion, the impaired excretion of an acute volume load in rats with liver cirrhosis is due to effects of an increased renal sympathetic nerve activity that are likely to be dependent on intrarenal angiotensin II and renin. We speculate that similar changes may contribute to long-term volume retention in liver cirrhosis.

Increased hepatic resistance: a new target in the pharmacologic therapy of portal hypertension

Increased resistance to portal blood flow is the primary factor in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension, and is mainly determined by the morphologic changes occurring in chronic liver diseases. This is aggravated by an increased hepatic vascular tone, which results from an insufficient hepatic bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) and an increased production of circulating and local vasoconstrictors (angiotensin, endothelin, cysteinyl-leukotrienes, and thromboxane, among others). This dynamic and reversible component provides the rationale for the use of therapies aimed at decreasing portal pressure by reducing the vascular tone. Among them, systemic and liver-selective NO donors, statins, and gene therapy with adenovirus encoding NO synthases have been used to increase NO availability with promising results. Other attempts have been the blockade of the effect of vasoconstrictors, using anti alpha-adrenergic agents and renin-angiotensin system blockers. Some of these pharmacologic approaches have already been incorporated into clinical practice while others are still under investigation.

[Main determinants of liver microcirculation during systemic inflammation]

More than 50% of all patients on intensive care units acquire a systemic inflammation such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis. The development of hepatic microcirculatory failure with consecutive organ damage might occur during the course of the systemic inflammation. The liver microcirculation is regulated by a complex network of cellular components and specific mediators. The perfusion in liver sinusoids is regulated by the tonus of the contractile Ito cells. Nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO) influence each other and cause the Ito cells to dilate while endothelin results in a contraction of the Ito cells. On-going studies are investigating the role of angiotensin II, catecholamines and prostaglandins for the regulation of the hepatic microcirculatory system during systemic inflammation. Some investigations aim to determine the impact of sedatives and analgesics on the hepatic microcirculation in sepsis and SIRS. Therefore, a decisive recommendation about the choice and dosage of sedatives and analgesics for these patients is not possible. Nevertheless, ketamine, midazolam and fentanyl with their potential anti-inflammatory properties seem to be suitable for patients with systemic inflammation.

Role of adrenoceptor-linked signaling pathways in the regulation of CYP1A1 gene expression

Alpha2-adrenoceptor agents as well as stress affect the activity of several hepatic monoxygenases including those related to CYP1A enzymes. This study was therefore designed to assess the role of central and/or peripheral catecholamines and, in particular, of adrenoceptors in the regulation of B(alpha)P-induced cytochrome CYP1A1 expression. In order to discriminate the role of central from that of peripheral catecholamines in the regulation of CYP1A1 induction, the effect of central and peripheral catecholamine depletion using reserpine versus only peripheral catecholamine depletion using guanethidine was assessed. By using selected agonists and antagonists, the role of alpha and beta-adrenoceptors in the regulation of CYP1A1 induction was evaluated. The results showed that the central catecholaminergic system has a negative regulatory effect on 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD) inducibility by benzo(alpha)pyrene (B(alpha)P), and that this may be mediated via alpha1-, alpha2- and beta-adrenoceptors. Specifically, stimulation of alpha2-adrenoceptors with dexmedetomidine and blockade of alpha1- or beta-adrenoceptors with prazosin or propranolol respectively, resulted in a further increase of EROD inducibility. Adrenoceptors were found to be involved in the regulation of the CYP1A1 gene at mRNA level. Both, reduced noradrenaline release in central nervous system induced with dexmedetomidine and central catecholamine depletion, as well as blockade of central alpha1-adrenoceptors induced with prazosin, all were associated with up-regulation of CYP1A1 expression. In contrast, stimulation of central beta-adrenoceptors with isoprenaline resulted in a down-regulation of CYP1A1 expression. Our observations indicate that drugs, which stimulate or block adrenoceptors and catecholamine release may lead to complications in drug therapy and modulate the toxicity or carcinogenicity of drugs that are substrates for the CYP1A1.

Variceal bleeding: pharmacological therapy

The complications of portal hypertension are totally prevented if hepatic venous pressure gradient is decreased below 12 mm Hg. Besides, if this target is not achieved, a 20% decrease in portal pressure from baseline levels offers an almost total protection from variceal bleeding. This sets the rationale for drug therapy to reduce portal pressure in portal hypertension. Pharmacological therapy to decrease portal pressure includes vasoconstrictors to decrease portal blood inflow, vasodilators to decrease hepatic resistance, and combination therapy. Oral agents, such as beta-adrenergic blockers and organic nitrates, are used for long-term prevention of variceal bleeding, while parenteral agents, such as somatostatin (and analogues) and terlipressin, are used for the treatment of acute variceal bleeding.

The role of vasoactive drugs in the treatment of oesophageal varices

Oesophageal varices are among the most important clinical consequences of portal hypertension. Recent progress in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension has led to the concept that it results from the increase of sinusoidal resistance and the increase in portal blood inflow consequent to splanchnic vasodilatation. Vasoactive drugs have therefore been evaluated, aiming to restore the imbalance between the increased intrahepatic and the decreased splanchnic vascular resistance. A large number of randomised, controlled trials have shown that vasoactive drugs in single or combination therapy, significantly reduce the risk of the first bleeding and rebleeding from oesophageal varices. Vasoactive drugs are also effective and safe in controlling acute variceal bleeding. Because of their high clinical efficacy, safety, ease of use and low cost, vasoactive drugs should be considered the first choice treatment for oesophageal varices.

Stress-mediated modulation of B(α)P-induced hepatic CYP1A1: role of catecholamines

The present study investigated the involvement of catecholamines in stress-mediated alterations in CYP1A1 induction by benzo(alpha)pyrene (B(alpha)P) in Wistar rats. This was achieved by measuring EROD activity and CYP1A1 mRNA levels in liver tissue from rats exposed to restraint stress and B(alpha)P coupled with pharmacological modulation of peripheral and central catecholamine levels and different adrenoceptors. In a state of reserpine-induced central and peripheral catecholamine depletion, stress strongly suppressed EROD induction. Peripheral catecholamines do not appear to play a critical role in the stress-mediated modulation of EROD inducibility by B(alpha)P. Stress did not alter EROD inducibility by B(alpha)P when peripheral catecholamines were either depleted by guanethidine or supplemented by peripheral adrenaline administration. On the other hand, central noradrenergic systems appear to have a role in the stress-mediated changes in B(alpha)P-induced EROD activity and Cyp1A1 gene expression. Stimulation or blockade of noradrenaline release with atipamezole and dexmedetomidine, respectively, significantly modified the up-regulating effect of stress. Alpha1 adrenoceptors also appear to participate in the effect of stress on EROD inducibility. Alpha1-blockade with prazosin potentiated the up-regulating effect of stress, possibly preventing the down-regulating effect of noradrenaline. Beta adrenoceptors also seem to be involved directly or indirectly in the stress-mediated modulation of Cyp1A1, as propranolol (beta-antagonist) blocked the down-regulating effect of stress on B(alpha)P-induced Cyp1A1 gene expression. Plasma corticosterone alterations after stress were not related to alterations in the B(alpha)P-induced EROD activity and Cyp1A1 gene expression. In conclusion, stress appears to interfere in the regulation of B(alpha)P-induced hepatic CYP1A1 in an unpredictable manner and via signalling pathways not always directly related to catecholamines. In particular, whenever drug treatment disrupts noradrenergic neurotransmission, other stress-stimulated factors appear to modify the induction of CYP1A1. In summary, regulation of induction of hepatic CYP1A1 during stress appears to involve various components of the stress system, including central and peripheral catecholamines, which interact in a complex manner, yet to be elucidated.