The FSHD2 gene SMCHD1 is a modifier of disease severity in families affected by FSHD1

Deciphering Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy in the clinical trials era: where are we now?

Objectives

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a common genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness, especially in the face, shoulders, and upper limbs. Despite extensive research, the underlying pathogenesis and clinical variability remain incompletely understood. This review aims to summarize recent advances in FSHD research, focusing on genetic and epigenetic factors and the potential for precision medicine.

Methods

A comprehensive review of recent literature was conducted, examining molecular mechanisms such as mutations in the D4Z4 region, DUX4 expression, RNA interference (RNAi) and antisense oligonucleotides (AOs). Clinical variability was analyzed to assess different disease phenotypes. Clinical trials investigating potential treatments, especially those targeting DUX4, were also reviewed.

Results

FSHD shows significant clinical variability, with different progression rates across phenotypes. The 4qA allele is linked to more typical forms of the disease, but epigenetic factors, including DNA methylation and miRNA expression, also influence disease severity. Despite progress, the exact molecular mechanisms driving disease expression remain unclear. Clinical trials, such as Losmapimod, show promise in slowing muscle degeneration, though results remain inconsistent.

Conclusions

FSHD presents significant challenges for therapy development due to its genetic complexity and clinical variability. Ongoing research is needed to clarify pathogenesis and identify reliable biomarkers. Future therapeutic strategies should focus on precision medicine, integrating genetic, clinical, and imaging data to optimize patient stratification and treatment efficacy.

Modifiers and their impact on inherited retinal diseases: a review

BACKGROUND

The phenotypic variability of inherited conditions can be due to several factors including environmental, epigenetic, and genetic. One of those genetic factors is the presence of modifying loci which alter the phenotypic expression of a primary disease or phenotype-causing variant. Modifiers are known to affect penetrance, dominance, expressivity, and pleiotropy of disease.

METHODS

We review the literature to highlight the impact of modifiers on inherited retinal diseases.

RESULTS

Modifiers have been identified or associated with phenotypic variation in many inherited retinal diseases including retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease. Despite being notoriously difficult to identify, proposed candidate modifiers have been identified using multiple methods including GWAS, family and population studies, and variant calling methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, modifiers present themselves as an interesting target for further understanding of underlying disease pathways that could ultimately lead to therapeutic targets.

Optical genome mapping reveals maternal mosaicism in two Sibling cases of Early-Onset Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1

BACKGROUND

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by shortened D4Z4 repeat units in the subtelomeric region of 4q35, always on the 4qA haplotype, or due to variants in the SMCHD1 gene leading to hypomethylation of the D4Z4 macrosatellite DNA repeats.

METHODS

To explore the potential genetic basis for suspected FSHD presenting with early onset in two siblings without evident family history of the disorder, whole genome sequencing (WGS) and optical genome mapping (OGM) were conducted on the affected individuals and their parents.

RESULTS

The two siblings manifested severe and early-onset clinical features consistent with FSHD, initiating with facial muscle weakness that progressively spread downward since the age of four months. OGM disclosed a reduced number of D4Z4 repeat units within the subtelomeric region of 4q35 in both affected siblings. This finding was pivotal in establishing the diagnosis of FSHD1 in the two brothers. The analysis also revealed that their clinically asymptomatic mother harbored the pathogenic D4Z4 repeat configuration (4qA) at a 50% frequency, indicating her mosaic carrier status. Additionally, WGS and Sanger sequencing identified a paternal origin variant c.695_699del (p.Val232Glyfs*7) in the DNAJB6 gene in both siblings.

CONCLUSION

The application of advanced genomic methodologies has proven instrumental in unraveling the intricacies of genetic diseases that challenge traditional diagnostic paradigms. Specifically, this study highlights the effectiveness of OGM in diagnosing FSHD1 and confirming D4Z4 repeat reduction, particularly in cases involving parental mosaicism.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 combined with becker muscular dystrophy: a family case report

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) are distinct disorders caused by different genetic variations and exhibiting different inheritance patterns. The co-occurrence of both conditions within the same family is rare. In this case report, the proband was a 10 year-old boy who presented with eye and mouth orbicular muscles, shoulder and proximal upper and lower limbs weakness. Genetic testing showed that the number of D4Z4 repeat units in the sub-terminal region 4qA of chromosome 4q35 in the proband was only 4 (normal value ≥ 11) and, at the same time, a heterozygous deletion was found in exons 13-29 of DMD gene in the proband, thus the diagnosis was clinically and genetically compatible with both FSHD1 and BMD. Pedigree investigation revealed that his maternal grandmother, mother, aunt and cousin also had muscle weakness in the face, shoulders and limbs. Genetic testing confirmed that each of the four relatives had four D4Z4 repeats in the 4qA region, and all of them carried a heterozygous deletion in exons 13-29 of DMD. Based on the X-linked features of DMD/BMD, the maternal grandmother, mother, and aunt were diagnosed with FSHD1 combined with DMD deletion carriers, and the male cousin was diagnosed with FSHD1 combined with BMD. This study identifies a family with a co-occurrence of clinically overt FSHD1 and BMD, which has important reference value for the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary myopathies.

Double trouble: a comprehensive study into unrelated genetic comorbidities in adult patients with Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type I

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1) displays prominent intra- and interfamilial variability, which complicates the phenotype-genotype correlation. In this retrospective study, we investigated FSHD1 patients classified as category D according to the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form (CCEF), a category defined by FSHD patients showing uncommon clinical features, to identify genetic causes explaining these uncommon phenotypes. Demographics, clinical data and clinical scales of FSHD1 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into four CCEF categories, and comparisons between groups were performed. In category D, when uncommon features suggested the presence of an unrelated genetic disease, a more extensive collection of data was performed. 157 FSHD1 patients were included in the study (82 males, 75 females) with mean age of 52.1 ± 13.5 years at the time of the study. D4Z4 repeat sizes ranged between 2 and 10 RU. According to the CCEF, 114 patients were classified into category A, 8 into category B and C each, and 27 into category D. In category D, 9 patients presented uncommon features related to commonly acquired comorbidities, whereas in the remaining 18 patients, all but two with upper-sized FSHD1 D4Z4 repeats (7-10 RU), we suspected an unrelated genetic neurological disease based on clinical phenotype. In 14/18 patients, we identified FSHD-unrelated genetic causes, most often unrelated repeat expansion disorders. This emphasizes the need of careful clinical and genetic work-up to avoid confusion between FSHD-intrinsic clinical variability and clinical features unrelated to the disease.

SMCHD1 genetic variants in type 2 facioscapulohumeral dystrophy and challenges in predicting pathogenicity and disease penetrance

The molecular diagnosis of type 1 facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD1) relies on the detection of a shortened D4Z4 array at the 4q35 locus. Until recently, the diagnosis of FSHD2 relied solely on the absence of a shortened D4Z4 allele in clinically affected patients. It is now established that most FSHD2 cases carry a heterozygous variant in the SMCHD1 gene. A decrease in D4Z4 DNA methylation is observed in both FSHD1 and FSHD2 patients. To refine the molecular diagnosis of FSHD2, we performed a molecular diagnosis of SMCHD1 in 54 patients with a clinical diagnosis of FSHD. All patients carry a D4Z4 array of more than 10 D4Z4 units, or a cis-duplication of the locus. Forty-eight of them carry a variant in SMCHD1 and six other cases are hemizygous for the 18p32 locus encompassing SMCHD1. Genetic and epigenetic analyses were considered to assess the pathogenicity of new SMCHD1 variants and of variants previously classified as likely pathogenic. In comparison to the healthy population and FSHD1 patients, we defined a threshold of 40% of methylation at the D4Z4 DR1 site as associated with SMCHD1 variants or SMCHD1 hemizygosity. We also showed that the number of D4Z4 on the shortest 4q allele ranges from 11 up to 35 units in these same patients. Using variant interpretation and protein structure prediction tools, we also highlight the difficulty in interpreting the impact of pathogenic variants on SMCHD1 function. Our study further emphasizes the intriguing relationship between D4Z4 methylation, SMCHD1 variants with SMCHD1 protein structure-function in FSHD.

Hereditary Neuromuscular Disorders in Reproductive Medicine

Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) encompass a broad range of hereditary and acquired conditions that affect motor units, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and reproductive health. This narrative review aims to explore in detail the reproductive challenges associated with major hereditary NMDs, including Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), dystrophinopathies, Myotonic Dystrophy (DM), Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD), Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy (LGMD), and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Specifically, it discusses the stages of diagnosis and genetic testing, recurrence risk estimation, options for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and prenatal diagnosis (PND), the reciprocal influence between pregnancy and disease, potential obstetric complications, and risks to the newborn.

SMCHD1 activates the expression of genes required for the expansion of human myoblasts

SMCHD1 is an epigenetic regulatory protein known to modulate the targeted repression of large chromatin domains. Diminished SMCHD1 function in muscle fibers causes Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD2) through derepression of the D4Z4 chromatin domain, an event which permits the aberrant expression of the disease-causing gene DUX4. Given that SMCHD1 plays a broader role in establishing the cellular epigenome, we examined whether loss of SMCHD1 function might affect muscle homeostasis through additional mechanisms. Here we show that acute depletion of SMCHD1 results in a DUX4-independent defect in myoblast proliferation. Genomic and transcriptomic experiments determined that SMCHD1 associates with enhancers of genes controlling cell cycle to activate their expression. Amongst these cell cycle regulatory genes, we identified LAP2 as a key target of SMCHD1 required for the expansion of myoblasts, where the ectopic expression of LAP2 rescues the proliferation defect of SMCHD1-depleted cells. Thus, the epigenetic regulator SMCHD1 can play the role of a transcriptional co-activator for maintaining the expression of genes required for muscle progenitor expansion. This DUX4-independent role for SMCHD1 in myoblasts suggests that the pathology of FSHD2 may be a consequence of defective muscle regeneration in addition to the muscle wasting caused by spurious DUX4 expression.

The first genetically confirmed cohort of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy from Northern India

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is the third most common form of hereditary myopathy. Sixty per cent of the world's population lives in Asia, so a significant percentage of the world's FSHD participants is expected to live there. To date, most FSHD studies have involved individuals of European descent, yet small-scale studies of East-Asian populations suggest that the likelihood of developing FSHD may vary. Here, we present the first genetically confirmed FSHD cohort of Indian ancestry, which suggests a pathogenic FSHD1 allele size distribution intermediate between European and North-East Asian populations and more asymptomatic carriers of 4 unit and 5 unit FSHD1 alleles than observed in European populations. Our data provides important evidence of differences relevant to clinical diagnostics and underscores the need for global FSHD participation in research and trial-ready Indian FSHD cohorts.

Best practice guidelines on genetic diagnostics of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: Update of the 2012 guidelines

The gold standard for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) genetic diagnostic procedures was published in 2012. With the increasing complexity of the genetics of FSHD1 and 2, the increase of genetic testing centers, and the start of clinical trials for FSHD, it is crucial to provide an update on our knowledge of the genetic features of the FSHD loci and renew the international consensus on the molecular testing recommendations. To this end, members of the FSHD European Trial Network summarized the evidence presented during the 2022 ENMC meeting on Genetic diagnosis, clinical outcome measures, and biomarkers. The working group additionally invited genetic and clinical experts from the USA, India, Japan, Australia, South-Africa, and Brazil to provide a global perspective. Six virtual meetings were organized to reach consensus on the minimal requirements for genetic confirmation of FSHD1 and FSHD2. Here, we present the clinical and genetic features of FSHD, specific features of FSHD1 and FSHD2, pros and cons of established and new technologies (Southern blot in combination with either linear or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, molecular combing, optical genome mapping, FSHD2 methylation analysis and FSHD2 genotyping), the possibilities and challenges of prenatal testing, including pre-implantation genetic testing, and the minimal requirements and recommendations for genetic confirmation of FSHD1 and FSHD2. This consensus is expected to contribute to current clinical management and trial-readiness for FSHD.

DNMT3B splicing dysregulation mediated by SMCHD1 loss contributes to DUX4 overexpression and FSHD pathogenesis

Structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain-containing 1 (SMCHD1) is a noncanonical SMC protein and an epigenetic regulator. Mutations in SMCHD1 cause facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), by overexpressing DUX4 in muscle cells. Here, we demonstrate that SMCHD1 is a key regulator of alternative splicing in various cell types. We show how SMCHD1 loss causes splicing alterations of DNMT3B, which can lead to hypomethylation and DUX4 overexpression. Analyzing RNA sequencing data from muscle biopsies of patients with FSHD and Smchd1 knocked out cells, we found mis-splicing of hundreds of genes upon SMCHD1 loss. We conducted a high-throughput screen of splicing factors, revealing the involvement of the splicing factor RBM5 in the mis-splicing of DNMT3B. Subsequent RNA immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that SMCHD1 is required for RBM5 recruitment. Last, we show that mis-splicing of DNMT3B leads to hypomethylation of the D4Z4 region and to DUX4 overexpression. These results suggest that DNMT3B mis-splicing due to SMCHD1 loss plays a major role in FSHD pathogenesis.

Engineered FSHD mutations results in D4Z4 heterochromatin disruption and feedforward DUX4 network activation

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is linked to contraction of D4Z4 repeats on chromosome 4q with SMCHD1 mutations acting as a disease modifier. D4Z4 heterochromatin disruption and abnormal upregulation of the transcription factor DUX4, encoded in the D4Z4 repeat, are the hallmarks of FSHD. However, defining the precise effect of D4Z4 contraction has been difficult because D4Z4 repeats are primate-specific and DUX4 expression is very rare in highly heterogeneous patient myocytes. We generated isogenic mutant cell lines harboring D4Z4 and/or SMCHD1 mutations in a healthy human skeletal myoblast line. We found that the mutations affect D4Z4 heterochromatin differently, and that SMCHD1 mutation or disruption of DNA methylation stabilizes otherwise variegated DUX4 target activation in D4Z4 contraction mutant cells, demonstrating the critical role of modifiers. Our study revealed amplification of the DUX4 signal through downstream targets, H3.X/Y and LEUTX. Our results provide important insights into how rare DUX4 expression leads to FSHD pathogenesis.

Autosomal dominant in cis D4Z4 repeat array duplication alleles in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) has a unique genetic aetiology resulting in partial chromatin relaxation of the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat array on 4qter. This D4Z4 chromatin relaxation facilitates inappropriate expression of the transcription factor DUX4 in skeletal muscle. DUX4 is encoded by a retrogene that is embedded within the distal region of the D4Z4 repeat array. In the European population, the D4Z4 repeat array is usually organized in a single array that ranges between 8 and 100 units. D4Z4 chromatin relaxation and DUX4 derepression in FSHD is most often caused by repeat array contraction to 1-10 units (FSHD1) or by a digenic mechanism requiring pathogenic variants in a D4Z4 chromatin repressor like SMCHD1, combined with a repeat array between 8 and 20 units (FSHD2). With a prevalence of 1.5% in the European population, in cis duplications of the D4Z4 repeat array, where two adjacent D4Z4 arrays are interrupted by a spacer sequence, are relatively common but their relationship to FSHD is not well understood. In cis duplication alleles were shown to be pathogenic in FSHD2 patients; however, there is inconsistent evidence for the necessity of an SMCHD1 mutation for disease development. To explore the pathogenic nature of these alleles we compared in cis duplication alleles in FSHD patients with or without pathogenic SMCHD1 variant. For both groups we showed duplication-allele-specific DUX4 expression. We studied these alleles in detail using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis-based Southern blotting and molecular combing, emphasizing the challenges in the characterization of these rearrangements. Nanopore sequencing was instrumental to study the composition and methylation of the duplicated D4Z4 repeat arrays and to identify the breakpoints and the spacer sequence between the arrays. By comparing the composition of the D4Z4 repeat array of in cis duplication alleles in both groups, we found that specific combinations of proximal and distal repeat array sizes determine their pathogenicity. Supported by our algorithm to predict pathogenicity, diagnostic laboratories should now be furnished to accurately interpret these in cis D4Z4 repeat array duplications, alleles that can easily be missed in routine settings.

Epigenetic profiling of the D4Z4 locus: Optimization of the protocol for studying DNA methylation at single CpG site level

The alteration of epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, can contribute to the etiopathogenesis and progression of many diseases. Among them, facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is a muscular disorder characterized by the loss of repressive epigenetic features affecting the D4Z4 locus (4q35). As a consequence, these alterations are responsible for DNA hypomethylation and a transcriptional-active chromatin conformation change that, in turn, lead to the aberrant expression of DUX4 in muscle cells. In the present study, methylation levels of 29 CpG sites of the DR1 region (within each repeat unit of the D4Z4 macrosatellite) were assessed on 335 subjects by employing primers designed for enhancing the performance of the assay. First, the DR1 original primers were optimized by adding M13 oligonucleotide tails. Moreover, the DR1 reverse primer was replaced with a degenerate one. As a result, the protocol optimization allowed a better sequencing resolution and a more accurate evaluation of DR1 methylation levels. Moreover, the assessment of the repeatability of measurements proved the reliability and robustness of the assay. The optimized protocol emerges as an excellent method to detect methylation levels compatible with FSHD.

SMCHD1 has separable roles in chromatin architecture and gene silencing that could be targeted in disease

The interplay between 3D chromatin architecture and gene silencing is incompletely understood. Here, we report a novel point mutation in the non-canonical SMC protein SMCHD1 that enhances its silencing capacity at endogenous developmental targets. Moreover, it also results in enhanced silencing at the facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy associated macrosatellite-array, D4Z4, resulting in enhanced repression of DUX4 encoded by this repeat. Heightened SMCHD1 silencing perturbs developmental Hox gene activation, causing a homeotic transformation in mice. Paradoxically, the mutant SMCHD1 appears to enhance insulation against other epigenetic regulators, including PRC2 and CTCF, while depleting long range chromatin interactions akin to what is observed in the absence of SMCHD1. These data suggest that SMCHD1's role in long range chromatin interactions is not directly linked to gene silencing or insulating the chromatin, refining the model for how the different levels of SMCHD1-mediated chromatin regulation interact to bring about gene silencing in normal development and disease.

Influence of DUX4 Expression in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy and Possible Treatments

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) represents the third most common form of muscular dystrophy and is characterized by muscle weakness and atrophy. FSHD is caused by the altered expression of the transcription factor double homeobox 4 (DUX4), which is involved in several significantly altered pathways required for myogenesis and muscle regeneration. While DUX4 is normally silenced in the majority of somatic tissues in healthy individuals, its epigenetic de-repression has been linked to FSHD, resulting in DUX4 aberrant expression and cytotoxicity in skeletal muscle cells. Understanding how DUX4 is regulated and functions could provide useful information not only to further understand FSHD pathogenesis, but also to develop therapeutic approaches for this disorder. Therefore, this review discusses the role of DUX4 in FSHD by examining the possible molecular mechanisms underlying the disease as well as novel pharmacological strategies targeting DUX4 aberrant expression.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: the road to targeted therapies

Advances in the molecular understanding of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) have revealed that FSHD results from epigenetic de-repression of the DUX4 gene in skeletal muscle, which encodes a transcription factor that is active in early embryonic development but is normally silenced in almost all somatic tissues. These advances also led to the identification of targets for disease-altering therapies for FSHD, as well as an improved understanding of the molecular mechanism of the disease and factors that influence its progression. Together, these developments led the FSHD research community to shift its focus towards the development of disease-modifying treatments for FSHD. This Review presents advances in the molecular and clinical understanding of FSHD, discusses the potential targeted therapies that are currently being explored, some of which are already in clinical trials, and describes progress in the development of FSHD-specific outcome measures and assessment tools for use in future clinical trials.

D4Z4 Methylation Levels Combined with a Machine Learning Pipeline Highlight Single CpG Sites as Discriminating Biomarkers for FSHD Patients

The study describes a protocol for methylation analysis integrated with Machine Learning (ML) algorithms developed to classify Facio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy (FSHD) subjects. The DNA methylation levels of two D4Z4 regions (DR1 and DUX4-PAS) were assessed by an in-house protocol based on bisulfite sequencing and capillary electrophoresis, followed by statistical and ML analyses. The study involved two independent cohorts, namely a training group of 133 patients with clinical signs of FSHD and 150 healthy controls (CTRL) and a testing set of 27 FSHD patients and 25 CTRL. As expected, FSHD patients showed significantly reduced methylation levels compared to CTRL. We utilized single CpG sites to develop a ML pipeline able to discriminate FSHD subjects. The model identified four CpGs sites as the most relevant for the discrimination of FSHD subjects and showed high metrics values (accuracy: 0.94, sensitivity: 0.93, specificity: 0.96). Two additional models were developed to differentiate patients with lower D4Z4 size and patients who might carry pathogenic variants in FSHD genes, respectively. Overall, the present model enables an accurate classification of FSHD patients, providing additional evidence for DNA methylation as a powerful disease biomarker that could be employed for prioritizing subjects to be tested for FSHD.

Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the current knowledge on the clinical characteristics and disease mechanism of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), as well as advances in targeted therapy development.

RECENT FINDINGS

FSHD has a wide range of severity, yet a distinct phenotype characterized by weakness of the facial, shoulder, and upper arm muscles, followed by weakness of the trunk and leg muscles. It can be caused by two genetic mechanisms that share a common downstream pathway, namely, the epigenetic derepression and subsequent misexpression of the myotoxic DUX4 transcription factor. Treatment is currently supportive and outlined in evidence-based guidelines. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of FSHD are paving the way for targeted therapy development. Approaches for targeted therapies to reduce DUX4 expression that are currently being explored include small molecules, antisense oligonucleotides, vector-based RNA interference, and gene therapy. In anticipation of more clinical trials, "clinical trial preparedness," including the development of sensitive biomarkers and clinical outcome measures, are needed.

SUMMARY

The cornerstones of the diagnosis of FSHD are clinical observation and genetic testing. Management is currently supportive, but progress in the understanding of the disease mechanism has shifted the field of FSHD toward targeted therapy development.

Update on the Molecular Aspects and Methods Underlying the Complex Architecture of FSHD

Despite the knowledge of the main mechanisms involved in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), the high heterogeneity and variable penetrance of the disease complicate the diagnosis, characterization and genotype–phenotype correlation of patients and families, raising the need for further research and data. Thus, the present review provides an update of the main molecular aspects underlying the complex architecture of FSHD, including the genetic factors (related to D4Z4 repeated units and FSHD-associated genes), epigenetic elements (D4Z4 methylation status, non-coding RNAs and high-order chromatin interactions) and gene expression profiles (FSHD transcriptome signatures both at bulk tissue and single-cell level). In addition, the review will also describe the methods currently available for investigating the above-mentioned features and how the resulting data may be combined with artificial-intelligence-based pipelines, with the purpose of developing a multifunctional tool tailored to enhancing the knowledge of disease pathophysiology and progression and fostering the research for novel treatment strategies, as well as clinically useful biomarkers. In conclusion, the present review highlights how FSHD should be regarded as a disease characterized by a molecular spectrum of genetic and epigenetic factors, whose alteration plays a differential role in DUX4 repression and, subsequently, contributes to determining the FSHD phenotype.

Gene Editing to Tackle Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is a skeletal muscle disease caused by the aberrant expression of the DUX4 gene in the muscle tissue. To date, different therapeutic approaches have been proposed, targeting DUX4 at the DNA, RNA or protein levels. The recent development of the clustered regularly interspaced short-palindromic repeat (CRISPR) based technology opened new avenues of research, and FSHD is no exception. For the first time, a cure for genetic muscular diseases can be considered. Here, we describe CRISPR-based strategies that are currently being investigated for FSHD. The different approaches include the epigenome editing targeting the DUX4 gene and its promoter, gene editing targeting the polyadenylation of DUX4 using TALEN, CRISPR/cas9 or adenine base editing and the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing for SMCHD1. We also discuss challenges facing the development of these gene editing based therapeutics.

The evolution of DUX4 gene regulation and its implication for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

Double homeobox 4 (DUX4) is an early embryonic transcription factor whose expression in the skeletal muscle causes facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Despite decades of research, our knowledge of FSHD and DUX4 biology is incomplete, and the disease has currently no cures or targeted therapies. The unusual evolutionary origin of DUX4, its extensive epigenetic and post-transcriptional gene regulation, and various feedback regulatory loops that control its expression and function all contribute to the highly complex nature of FSHD pathogenesis. In this minireview, I synthesize the current state of knowledge in DUX4 and FSHD biology to highlight key areas where further research is needed to better understand DUX4 regulation. I also emphasize post-transcriptional regulation of and by DUX4 via changes in RNA and protein stability that might underlie key features of FSHD pathophysiology. Finally, I discuss the various feedback loops involved in DUX4 regulation and the context-specific consequences of its expression, which could be key to developing novel therapeutic approaches to combat FSHD.

Cross-sectional, Neuromuscular Phenotyping Study of Arhinia Patients With SMCHD1 Variants

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2 (FSHD2) and arhinia are two distinct disorders caused by pathogenic variants in the same gene, SMCHD1. The mechanism underlying this phenotypic divergence remains unclear. In this study, we characterize the neuromuscular phenotype of individuals with arhinia caused by SMCHD1 variants and analyze their complex genetic and epigenetic criteria to assess their risk for FSHD2.

METHODS

Eleven individuals with congenital nasal anomalies, including arhinia, nasal hypoplasia, or anosmia, underwent a neuromuscular exam, genetic testing, muscle ultrasound, and muscle MRI. Risk for FSHD2 was determined by combined genetic and epigenetic analysis of 4q35 haplotype, D4Z4 repeat length and methylation profile. We also compared expression levels of pathogenic DUX4 mRNA in primary myoblasts or dermal fibroblasts (upon myogenic differentiation or epigenetic transdifferentiation, respectively) in these individuals to those with confirmed FSHD2.

RESULTS

Among the eleven individuals with rare, pathogenic, heterozygous missense variants in exons 3-11 of SMCHD1, only a subset (n=3/11; 1 male, 2 females; age 25-51 years) met the strict genetic and epigenetic criteria for FSHD2 (D4Z4 repeat unit length <21 in cis with a 4qA haplotype, and D4Z4 methylation <30%). None of the 3 individuals had typical clinical manifestations or muscle imaging findings consistent with FSHD2. However, the arhinia patients meeting the permissive genetic and epigenetic criteria for FSHD2 displayed some DUX4 expression in dermal fibroblasts under the epigenetic de-repression by drug treatment and in the primary myoblasts undergoing myogenic differentiation.

DISCUSSION

In this cross-sectional study, we identified arhinia patients who meet the full genetic and epigenetic criteria for FSHD2 and display the molecular hallmark of FSHD, that is DUX4 de-repression and expression in vitro, but who do not manifest with the typical clinicopathologic phenotype of FSHD2. The distinct dichotomy between FSHD2 and arhinia phenotypes despite an otherwise poised DUX4 locus implies the presence of novel disease-modifying factors that seem to operate as a "switch", resulting in one phenotype and not the other. Identification and further understanding of these disease-modifying factors will likely provide valuable insight with therapeutic implications for both diseases.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy-Reproductive counseling, pregnancy, and delivery in a complex multigenetic disease

Reproductive counseling in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) can be challenging due to the complexity of its underlying genetic mechanisms and due to incomplete penetrance of the disease. Full understanding of the genetic causes and potential inheritance patterns of both distinct FSHD types is essential: FSHD1 is an autosomal dominantly inherited repeat disorder, whereas FSHD2 is a digenic disorder. This has become even more relevant now that prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis options are available for FSHD1. Pregnancy and delivery outcomes in FSHD are usually favorable, but clinicians should be aware of the risks. We aim to provide clinicians with case-based strategies for reproductive counseling in FSHD, as well as recommendations for pregnancy and delivery.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2: an update on the clinical, genetic, and molecular findings

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a common genetic disease of the skeletal muscle with a characteristic pattern of weakness. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2 (FSHD2) accounts for approximately 5% of all cases of FSHD and describes patients without a D4Z4 repeat contraction on chromosome 4. Phenotypically FSHD2 shows virtually no difference from FSHD1 and both forms of FSHD arise via a common downstream mechanism of epigenetic derepression of the transcription factor DUX4 in skeletal muscle cells. This results in expression of DUX4 and target genes leading to skeletal muscle toxicity. Over the past decade, major progress has been made in our understanding of the genetic and epigenetic architecture that underlies FSHD2 pathogenesis, as well as the clinical manifestations and disease progression. These include the finding that FSHD2 is a digenic disease and that mutations in the genes SMCHD1, DNMT3B, and more recently LRIF1, can cause FSHD2. FSHD2 is complex and it is important that clinicians keep abreast of recent developments; this review aims to serve as an update of the clinical, genetic, and molecular research into this condition.

Adenine base editing of the DUX4 polyadenylation signal for targeted genetic therapy in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by chromatin relaxation of the D4Z4 repeat resulting in misexpression of the D4Z4-encoded DUX4 gene in skeletal muscle. One of the key genetic requirements for the stable production of full-length DUX4 mRNA in skeletal muscle is a functional polyadenylation signal (ATTAAA) in exon three of DUX4 that is used in somatic cells. Base editors hold great promise to treat DNA lesions underlying genetic diseases through their ability to carry out specific and rapid nucleotide mutagenesis even in postmitotic cells such as skeletal muscle. In this study, we present a simple and straightforward strategy for mutagenesis of the somatic DUX4 polyadenylation signal by adenine base editing in immortalized myoblasts derived from independent FSHD-affected individuals. We show that mutating this critical cis-regulatory element results in downregulation of DUX4 mRNA and its direct transcriptional target genes. Our findings identify the somatic DUX4 polyadenylation signal as a therapeutic target and represent the first step toward clinical application of the CRISPR-Cas9 base editing platform for FSHD gene therapy.

Pathomechanisms and biomarkers in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: roles of DUX4 and PAX7

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is characterised by progressive skeletal muscle weakness and wasting. FSHD is linked to epigenetic derepression of the subtelomeric D4Z4 macrosatellite at chromosome 4q35. Epigenetic derepression permits the distal-most D4Z4 unit to transcribe DUX4, with transcripts stabilised by splicing to a poly(A) signal on permissive 4qA haplotypes. The pioneer transcription factor DUX4 activates target genes that are proposed to drive FSHD pathology. While this toxic gain-of-function model is a satisfying "bottom-up" genotype-to-phenotype link, DUX4 is rarely detectable in muscle and DUX4 target gene expression is inconsistent in patients. A reliable biomarker for FSHD is suppression of a target gene score of PAX7, a master regulator of myogenesis. However, it is unclear how this "top-down" finding links to genomic changes that characterise FSHD and to DUX4. Here, we explore the roles and interactions of DUX4 and PAX7 in FSHD pathology and how the relationship between these two transcription factors deepens understanding via the immune system and muscle regeneration. Considering how FSHD pathomechanisms are represented by "DUX4opathy" models has implications for developing therapies and current clinical trials.

Relating SMCHD1 structure to its function in epigenetic silencing

The structural maintenance of chromosomes hinge domain containing protein 1 (SMCHD1) is a large multidomain protein involved in epigenetic gene silencing. Variations in the SMCHD1 gene are associated with two debilitating human disorders, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) and Bosma arhinia microphthalmia syndrome (BAMS). Failure of SMCHD1 to silence the D4Z4 macro-repeat array causes FSHD, yet the consequences on gene silencing of SMCHD1 variations associated with BAMS are currently unknown. Despite the interest due to these roles, our understanding of the SMCHD1 protein is in its infancy. Most knowledge of SMCHD1 function is based on its similarity to the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins, such as cohesin and condensin. SMC proteins and SMCHD1 share similar domain organisation and affect chromatin conformation. However, there are important differences between the domain architectures of SMC proteins and SMCHD1, which distinguish SMCHD1 as a non-canonical member of the family. In the last year, the crystal structures of the two key domains crucial to SMCHD1 function, the ATPase and hinge domains, have emerged. These structures reveal new insights into how SMCHD1 may bind and regulate chromatin structure, and address how amino acid variations in SMCHD1 may contribute to BAMS and FSHD. Here, we contrast SMCHD1 with canonical SMC proteins, and relate the ATPase and hinge domain structures to their roles in SMCHD1-mediated epigenetic silencing and disease.

Control of DUX4 Expression in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy and Cancer

DUX4, a gene encoding a transcription factor involved in early embryogenesis, is located within the D4Z4 subtelomeric repeat on chromosome 4q35. In most healthy somatic tissues, DUX4 is heavily repressed by multiple genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, and its aberrant expression is linked to facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) where it has been extensively studied. Recently, DUX4 expression has been implicated in oncogenesis, although this is much less explored. In this review, we discuss multiple levels of control of DUX4 expression, including enhancer-promoter interactions, DNA methylation, histone modifications, noncoding RNAs, and telomere positioning effect. We also connect disparate data on intrachromosomal contacts involving DUX4 and emphasize the feedback loops in DUX4 regulation. Finally, we bridge data on DUX4 in FSHD and cancer and discuss prospective approaches for future FSHD therapies and the potential outcomes of DUX4 inhibition in cancer.

Genetic Approaches for the Treatment of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by progressive, asymmetric muscle weakness at the face, shoulders, and upper limbs, which spreads to the lower body with age. It is the third most common inherited muscular disorder worldwide. Around 20% of patients are wheelchair-bound, and some present with extramuscular manifestations. FSHD is caused by aberrant expression of the double homeobox protein 4 (DUX4) gene in muscle. DUX4 codes for a transcription factor which, in skeletal muscle, dysregulates numerous signaling activities that culminate in cytotoxicity. Potential treatments for FSHD therefore aim to reduce the expression of DUX4 or the activity of its toxic protein product. In this article, we review how genetic approaches such as those based on oligonucleotide and genome editing technologies have been developed to achieve these goals. We also outline the challenges these therapies are facing on the road to translation, and discuss possible solutions and future directions.

Relationship of DUX4 and target gene expression in FSHD myocytes

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is associated with the upregulation of the DUX4 transcription factor and its target genes. However, low-frequency DUX4 upregulation in patient myocytes is difficult to detect and examining the relationship and dynamics of DUX4 and target gene expression has been challenging. Using RNAScope in situ hybridization with highly specific probes, we detect the endogenous DUX4 and target gene transcripts in situ in patient skeletal myotubes during 13-day differentiation in vitro. We found that the endogenous DUX4 transcripts primarily localize as foci in one or two nuclei as compared with the accumulation of the recombinant DUX4 transcripts in the cytoplasm. We also found the continuous increase of DUX4 and target gene-positive myotubes after Day 3, arguing against its expected immediate cytotoxicity. Interestingly, DUX4 and target gene expression become discordant later in differentiation with the increase of DUX4-positive/target gene-negative as well as DUX4-negative/target gene-positive myotubes. Depletion of DUX4-activated transcription factors, DUXA and LEUTX, specifically repressed a DUX4-target gene, KDM4E, later in differentiation, suggesting that after the initial activation by DUX4, target genes themselves contribute to the maintenance of downstream gene expression. Together, the study provides important new insights into the dynamics of the DUX4 transcriptional network in FSHD patient myocytes.

Two Cases of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy 2 in Korea

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant muscular disorder characterized by weakness of facial, shoulder, abdominal, hip girdle, humeral, and anterior distal leg muscles, with descending progression from the face to the legs in an asymmetric pattern. In about 5% of patients with FSHD, no D4Z4 repeat contraction on chromosome 4q35 is observed; this disease entity is called FSHD2. FSHD2 is characterized by DNA hypomethylation on the 4q-subtelomeric macrosatellite repeat array D4Z4. In Korea, there have been no previous reports of FSHD2. We report the first two cases of FSHD2 in Korea, carrying c.3801delG and c.1580C>T mutations in the SMCHD1 gene, respectively. For rapid and accurate diagnosis of FSHD2, genetic analysis of the D4Z4 haplotype and methylation with next-generation sequencing are required.

CLIA Laboratory Testing for Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy: A Retrospective Analysis

Objective

To summarize facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) diagnostic testing results from the University of Iowa Molecular Pathology Laboratory.

Methods

All FSHD tests performed in the diagnostic laboratory from January 2015 to July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Testing was by restriction enzyme digestion and Southern blot analysis with sequencing of SMCHD1, if indicated. Cases were classified as FSHD1 (4q35 EcoRI size ≤40 kb; 1–10 D4Z4 repeats), FSHD2 (permissive 4q35A allele, D4Z4 hypomethylation, and pathogenic SMCHD1 variant), or non-FSHD1,2. We also noted cases with borderline EcoRI fragment size (41–43 kb; 11 D4Z4 repeats), cases that meet criteria for both FSHD1 and FSHD2, somatic mosaicism, and cases with hybrid alleles that add complexity to test interpretation.

Results

Of the 1,594 patients with FSHD tests included in the analysis, 703 (44.1%) were diagnosed with FSHD. Among these positive tests, 664 (94.5%) met criteria for FSHD1 and 39 (5.5%) met criteria for FSHD2. Of all 1,594 cases, 20 (1.3%) had a 4q35 allele of borderline size, 23 (1.5%) were somatic mosaics, and 328 (20.9%) had undergone translocation events. Considering only cases with at least 1 4q35A allele, D4Z4 repeat number differed significantly among groups: FSHD1 cases median 6.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 4–7) repeats, FSHD2 cases 15.0 (IQR 12–22) repeats, and non-FSHD1,2 cases 28.0 (IQR 19–40) repeats.

Conclusion

FSHD1 accounts for 94.5% of genetically confirmed cases of FSHD. The data show a continuum of D4Z4 repeat numbers with FSHD1 samples having the fewest, FSHD2 an intermediate number, and non-FSHD1,2 the most.

Dnmt3b regulates DUX4 expression in a tissue-dependent manner in transgenic D4Z4 mice

BACKGROUND

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a skeletal muscle disorder that is caused by derepression of the transcription factor DUX4 in skeletal muscle cells. Apart from SMCHD1, DNMT3B was recently identified as a disease gene and disease modifier in FSHD. However, the exact role of DNMT3B at the D4Z4 repeat array remains unknown.

METHODS

To determine the role of Dnmt3b on DUX4 repression, hemizygous mice with a FSHD-sized D4Z4 repeat array (D4Z4-2.5 mice) were cross-bred with mice carrying an in-frame exon skipping mutation in Dnmt3b (Dnmt3bMommeD14 mice). Additionally, siRNA knockdowns of Dnmt3b were performed in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) derived from the D4Z4-2.5 mouse model.

RESULTS

In mESCs derived from D4Z4-2.5 mice, Dnmt3b was enriched at the D4Z4 repeat array and DUX4 transcript levels were upregulated after a knockdown of Dnmt3b. In D4Z4-2.5/Dnmt3bMommeD14 mice, Dnmt3b protein levels were reduced; however, DUX4 RNA levels in skeletal muscles were not enhanced and no pathology was observed. Interestingly, D4Z4-2.5/Dnmt3bMommeD14 mice showed a loss of DNA methylation at the D4Z4 repeat array and significantly higher DUX4 transcript levels in secondary lymphoid organs. As these lymphoid organs seem to be more sensitive to epigenetic modifiers of the D4Z4 repeat array, different immune cell populations were quantified in the spleen and inguinal lymph nodes of D4Z4-2.5 mice crossed with Dnmt3bMommeD14 mice or Smchd1MommeD1 mice. Only in D4Z4-2.5/Smchd1MommeD1 mice the immune cell populations were disturbed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrates that loss of Dnmt3b results in derepression of DUX4 in lymphoid tissues and mESCs but not in myogenic cells of D4Z4-2.5/Dnmt3bMommeD14 mice. In addition, the Smchd1MommeD1 variant seems to have a more potent role in DUX4 derepression. Our studies suggest that the immune system is particularly but differentially sensitive to D4Z4 chromatin modifiers which may provide a molecular basis for the yet underexplored immune involvement in FSHD.

Skeletal muscle regeneration in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy is correlated with pathological severity

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal-dominant myopathy characterized by slowly progressive skeletal muscle weakness and wasting. While a regenerative response is often provoked in many muscular dystrophies, little is known about whether a regenerative response is regularly elicited in FSHD muscle, prompting this study. For comparison, we also examined the similarly slowly progressing myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2). To first investigate regeneration at the transcriptomic level, we used the 200 human gene Hallmark Myogenesis list. This myogenesis biomarker was elevated in FSHD and control healthy myotubes compared to their myoblast counterparts, so is higher in myogenic differentiation. The myogenesis biomarker was also elevated in muscle biopsies from most independent FSHD, DM2 or Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) studies compared to control biopsies, and on meta-analysis for each condition. In addition, the myogenesis biomarker was a robust binary discriminator of FSHD, DM2 and DMD from controls. We also analysed muscle regeneration at the protein level by immunolabelling muscle biopsies for developmental myosin heavy chain. Such immunolabelling revealed one or more regenerating myofibres in 76% of FSHD muscle biopsies from quadriceps and 91% from tibialis anterior. The mean proportion of regenerating myofibres per quadriceps biopsy was 0.48%, significantly less than 1.72% in the tibialis anterior. All DM2 muscle biopsies contained regenerating myofibres, with a mean of 1.24% per biopsy. Muscle regeneration in FSHD was correlated with the pathological hallmarks of fibre size variation, central nucleation, fibrosis and necrosis/regeneration/inflammation. In summary, the regenerative response in FSHD muscle biopsies correlates with the severity of pathology.

Prader-Willi syndrome: reflections on seminal studies and future therapies

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is caused by the loss of function of the paternally inherited 15q11-q13 locus. This region is governed by genomic imprinting, a phenomenon in which genes are expressed exclusively from one parental allele. The genomic imprinting of the 15q11-q13 locus is established in the germline and is largely controlled by a bipartite imprinting centre. One part, termed the Prader-Willi syndrome imprinting center (PWS-IC), comprises a CpG island that is unmethylated on the paternal allele and methylated on the maternal allele. The second part, termed the Angelman syndrome imprinting centre, is required to silence the PWS_IC in the maternal germline. The loss of the paternal contribution of the imprinted 15q11-q13 locus most frequently occurs owing to a large deletion of the entire imprinted region but can also occur through maternal uniparental disomy or an imprinting defect. While PWS is considered a contiguous gene syndrome based on large-deletion and uniparental disomy patients, the lack of expression of only non-coding RNA transcripts from the SNURF-SNRPN/SNHG14 may be the primary cause of PWS. Patients with small atypical deletions of the paternal SNORD116 cluster alone appear to have most of the PWS related clinical phenotypes. The loss of the maternal contribution of the 15q11-q13 locus causes a separate and distinct condition called Angelman syndrome. Importantly, while much has been learned about the regulation and expression of genes and transcripts deriving from the 15q11-q13 locus, there remains much to be learned about how these genes and transcripts contribute at the molecular level to the clinical traits and developmental aspects of PWS that have been observed.

DUX4 Expression in FSHD Muscles: Focus on Its mRNA Regulation

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is the most frequent muscular disease in adults. FSHD is characterized by a weakness and atrophy of a specific set of muscles located in the face, the shoulder, and the upper arms. FSHD patients may present different genetic defects, but they all present epigenetic alterations of the D4Z4 array located on the subtelomeric part of chromosome 4, leading to chromatin relaxation and, ultimately, to the aberrant expression of one gene called DUX4. Once expressed, DUX4 triggers a cascade of deleterious events, eventually leading to muscle dysfunction and cell death. Here, we review studies on DUX4 expression in skeletal muscle to determine the genetic/epigenetic factors and regulatory proteins governing DUX4 expression, with particular attention to the different transcripts and their very low expression in muscle.

Deep phenotyping of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2 by magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim was to define the radiological picture of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 2 (FSHD2) in comparison with FSHD1 and to explore correlations between imaging and clinical/molecular data.

METHODS

Upper girdle and/or lower limb muscle magnetic resonance imaging scans of 34 molecularly confirmed FSHD2 patients from nine European neuromuscular centres were analysed. T1-weighted and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences were used to evaluate the global pattern and to assess the extent of fatty replacement and muscle oedema.

RESULTS

The most frequently affected muscles were obliquus and transversus abdominis, semimembranosus, soleus and gluteus minimus in the lower limbs; trapezius, serratus anterior, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major in the upper girdle. Iliopsoas, popliteus, obturator internus and tibialis posterior in the lower limbs and subscapularis, spinati, sternocleidomastoid and levator scapulae in the upper girdle were the most spared. Asymmetry and STIR hyperintensities were consistent features. The pattern of muscle involvement was similar to that of FSHD1, and the combined involvement of trapezius, abdominal and hamstring muscles, together with complete sparing of iliopsoas and subscapularis, was detected in 91% of patients. Peculiar differences were identified in a rostro-caudal gradient, a predominant involvement of lower limb muscles compared to the upper girdle, and in the higher percentage of STIR hyperintensities in FSHD2.

CONCLUSION

This multicentre study defines the pattern of muscle involvement in FSHD2, providing useful information for diagnostics and clinical trial design. Both similarities and differences between FSHD1 and FSHD2 were detected, which is also relevant to better understand the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the FSHD-related disease spectrum.

Crystal structure of the hinge domain of Smchd1 reveals its dimerization mode and nucleic acid-binding residues

Structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1 (SMCHD1) is an epigenetic regulator in which polymorphisms cause the human developmental disorder, Bosma arhinia micropthalmia syndrome, and the degenerative disease, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. SMCHD1 is considered a noncanonical SMC family member because its hinge domain is C-terminal, because it homodimerizes rather than heterodimerizes, and because SMCHD1 contains a GHKL-type, rather than an ABC-type ATPase domain at its N terminus. The hinge domain has been previously implicated in chromatin association; however, the underlying mechanism involved and the basis for SMCHD1 homodimerization are unclear. Here, we used x-ray crystallography to solve the three-dimensional structure of the Smchd1 hinge domain. Together with structure-guided mutagenesis, we defined structural features of the hinge domain that participated in homodimerization and nucleic acid binding, and we identified a functional hotspot required for chromatin localization in cells. This structure provides a template for interpreting the mechanism by which patient polymorphisms within the SMCHD1 hinge domain could compromise function and lead to facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

Consequences of epigenetic derepression in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), a common hereditary myopathy, is caused either by the contraction of the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat at the distal end of chromosome 4q to a size of 1 to 10 repeat units (FSHD1) or by mutations in D4Z4 chromatin modifiers such as Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes Hinge Domain Containing 1 (FSHD2). These two genotypes share a phenotype characterized by progressive and often asymmetric muscle weakening and atrophy, and common epigenetic alterations of the D4Z4 repeat. All together, these epigenetic changes converge the two genetic forms into one disease and explain the derepression of the DUX4 gene, which is otherwise kept epigenetically silent in skeletal muscle. DUX4 is consistently transcriptionally upregulated in FSHD1 and FSHD2 skeletal muscle cells where it is believed to exercise a toxic effect. Here we provide a review of the recent literature describing the progress in understanding the complex genetic and epigenetic architecture of FSHD, with a focus on one of the consequences that these epigenetic changes inflict, the DUX4-induced immune deregulation cascade. Moreover, we review the latest therapeutic strategies, with particular attention to the potential of epigenetic correction of the FSHD locus.

Single-nucleus RNA-seq identifies divergent populations of FSHD2 myotube nuclei

FSHD is characterized by the misexpression of DUX4 in skeletal muscle. Although DUX4 upregulation is thought to be the pathogenic cause of FSHD, DUX4 is lowly expressed in patient samples, and analysis of the consequences of DUX4 expression has largely relied on artificial overexpression. To better understand the native expression profile of DUX4 and its targets, we performed bulk RNA-seq on a 6-day differentiation time-course in primary FSHD2 patient myoblasts. We identify a set of 54 genes upregulated in FSHD2 cells, termed FSHD-induced genes. Using single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq on myoblasts and differentiated myotubes, respectively, we captured, for the first time, DUX4 expressed at the single-nucleus level in a native state. We identified two populations of FSHD myotube nuclei based on low or high enrichment of DUX4 and FSHD-induced genes ("FSHD-Lo" and "FSHD Hi", respectively). FSHD-Hi myotube nuclei coexpress multiple DUX4 target genes including DUXA, LEUTX and ZSCAN4, and also upregulate cell cycle-related genes with significant enrichment of E2F target genes and p53 signaling activation. We found more FSHD-Hi nuclei than DUX4-positive nuclei, and confirmed with in situ RNA/protein detection that DUX4 transcribed in only one or two nuclei is sufficient for DUX4 protein to activate target genes across multiple nuclei within the same myotube. DUXA (the DUX4 paralog) is more widely expressed than DUX4, and depletion of DUXA suppressed the expression of LEUTX and ZSCAN4 in late, but not early, differentiation. The results suggest that the DUXA can take over the role of DUX4 to maintain target gene expression. These results provide a possible explanation as to why it is easier to detect DUX4 target genes than DUX4 itself in patient cells and raise the possibility of a self-sustaining network of gene dysregulation triggered by the limited DUX4 expression.

Phenotypic Variability Among Patients With D4Z4 Reduced Allele Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

IMPORTANCE

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is considered an autosomal dominant disorder, associated with the deletion of tandemly arrayed D4Z4 repetitive elements. The extensive use of molecular analysis of the D4Z4 locus for FSHD diagnosis has revealed wide clinical variability, suggesting that subgroups of patients exist among carriers of the D4Z4 reduced allele (DRA).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical expression of FSHD in the genetic subgroup of carriers of a DRA with 7 to 8 repeat units (RUs).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter cross-sectional study included 422 carriers of DRA with 7 to 8 RUs (187 unrelated probands and 235 relatives) from a consecutive sample of 280 probands and 306 relatives from the Italian National Registry for FSHD collected between 2008 and 2016. Participants were evaluated by the Italian Clinical Network for FSHD, and all clinical and molecular data were collected in the Italian National Registry for FSHD database. Data analysis was conducted from January 2017 to June 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The phenotypic classification of probands and relatives was obtained by applying the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form which classifies patients in the 4 following categories: (1) participants presenting facial and scapular girdle muscle weakness typical of FSHD (category A, subcategories A1-A3), (2) participants with muscle weakness limited to scapular girdle or facial muscles (category B, subcategories B1 and B2), (3) asymptomatic or healthy participants (category C, subcategories C1 and C2), and (4) participants with myopathic phenotypes presenting clinical features not consistent with FSHD canonical phenotype (category D, subcategories D1 and D2).

RESULTS

A total of 187 probands (mean [SD] age at last neurological examination, 53.5 [15.2] years; 103 [55.1%] men) and 235 relatives (mean [SD] age at last neurologic examination, 45.1 [17.0] years; 104 [44.7%] men) with a DRA with 7 to 8 RUs and a molecular diagnosis of FSHD were evaluated. Of 187 probands, 99 (52.9%; 95% CI, 45.7%-60.1%) displayed the classic FSHD phenotype, whereas 86 (47.1%; 95% CI, 39.8%-54.3%) presented incomplete or atypical phenotypes. Of 235 carrier relatives from 106 unrelated families, 124 (52.8%; 95% CI, 46.4%-59.7%) had no motor impairment, whereas a small number (38 [16.2%; 95% CI, 9.8%-23.1%]) displayed the classic FSHD phenotype, and 73 (31.0%; 95% CI, 24.7%-38.0%) presented with incomplete or atypical phenotypes. In 37 of 106 families (34.9%; 95% CI, 25.9%-44.8%), the proband was the only participant presenting with a myopathic phenotype, while only 20 families (18.9%; 95% CI, 11.9%-27.6%) had a member with autosomal dominant FSHD.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found large phenotypic variability associated with individuals carrying a DRA with 7 to 8 RUs, in contrast to the indication that a positive molecular test is the only determining aspect for FSHD diagnosis. These findings suggest that carriers of a DRA with 7 to 8 RUs constitute a genetic subgroup different from classic FSHD. Based on these results, it is recommended that clinicians use the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form for clinical classification and, whenever possible, study the extended family to provide the most adequate clinical management and genetic counseling.

Type 1 FSHD with 6-10 Repeated Units: Factors Underlying Severity in Index Cases and Disease Penetrance in Their Relatives Attention

Molecular defects in type 1 facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) are caused by a heterozygous contraction of the D4Z4 repeat array from 1 to 10 repeat units (RUs) on 4q35. This study compared (1) the phenotype and severity of FSHD1 between patients carrying 6-8 vs. 9-10 RUs, (2) the amount of methylation in different D4Z4 regions between patients with FSHD1 with different clinical severity scores (CSS). This cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted to measure functional scales and for genetic analysis. Patients were classified into two categories according to RUs: Group 1, 6-8; Group 2, 9-10. Methylation analysis was performed in 27 patients. A total of 99 carriers of a contracted D4Z4 array were examined. No significant correlations between RUs and CSS (r = 0.04, p = 0.73) and any of the clinical outcome scales were observed between the two groups. Hypomethylation was significantly more pronounced in patients with high CSS (>3.5) than those with low CSS (<1.5) (in DR1 and 5P), indicating that the extent of hypomethylation might modulate disease severity. In Group 1, the disease severity is not strongly correlated with the allele size and is mostly correlated with the methylation of D4Z4 regions.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 1 patients participating in the UK FSHD registry can be subdivided into 4 patterns of self-reported symptoms

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant incurable skeletal muscle disease. FSHD1 constitutes 95% of cases and is linked to truncation of the D4Z4 macrosatellite at 4q35. In most cases the condition initially presents with facial and proximal weakness of the upper limbs, but over the course of the disease involves lower limb and truncal muscles. Weakness is progressive and frequently asymmetric, which is a hallmark of the disease. Here we performed an analysis of 643 FSHD1 patients in the UK FSHD patient registry, investigating factors affecting rate of onset of 5 major FSHD symptoms: facial, periscapular, foot dorsiflexor, hip girdle weakness, and hearing loss. We found shorter D4Z4 repeat length associated with accelerated onset of each symptom. Furthermore, paternal inheritance of the pathogenic allele was associated with accelerated onset of foot dorsiflexor weakness, while pregnancy and carrying multiple children to term was associated with slower onset of all muscle symptoms. Lastly, we performed clustering analysis on age of onset of the 4 muscle symptoms across 222 patients. We identified 4 clinical presentations of FSHD1. A classical presentation (74%) and 3 facial sparing phenotypes: a mild presentation (5%) with later facial and periscapular involvement, an early shoulder presentation (10%) with accelerated periscapular weakness and an early foot presentation (9%) with accelerated foot dorsiflexor weakness. The mild presentation was associated with longer D4Z4 repeat lengths, while the early foot presentation had a female bias. We note, however that symptom progression differs significantly in these 4 clinical presentations independently of D4Z4 repeat length and gender, motivating investigation of further modifiers of FSHD1 severity.

The effects of the DNA Demethylating reagent, 5-azacytidine on SMCHD1 genomic localization

Background

DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that mainly repress expression of genes essential during embryogenesis and development. There are key ATPase-dependent enzymes that read or write DNA methylation to remodel chromatin and regulate gene expression. Structural maintenance of chromosome hinge domain containing 1 (SMCHD1) is an architectural protein that regulates expression of numerous genes, some of which are imprinted, that are sensitive to DNA methylation. In addition, SMCHD1 germline mutations lead to developmental diseases; facioscapulohumoral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), bosma arhinia and micropthalmia (BAMS). Current evidence suggests that SMCHD1 functions through maintenance or de novo DNA methylation required for chromatin compaction. However, it is unclear if DNA methylation is also essential for genomic recruitment of SMCHD1 and its role as an architectural protein. We previously isolated SMCHD1 using a methylated DNA region from mouse pituitary growth hormone (Gh1) promoter, suggesting that methylation is required for SMCHD1 DNA binding. The goal of this study was to further understand DNA methylation directed role of SMCHD1 in regulating gene expression. Therefore, we profiled SMCHD1 genome wide occupancy in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells and evaluated if DNA methylation is required for SMCHD1 genomic binding by treating cells with the DNA demethylating reagent, 5-azacytidine (5-azaC).

Results

Our data suggest that the majority of SMCHD1 binding occurs in intron and intergenic regions. Gene ontology analysis of genes associated with SMCHD1 genomic occupancy that is sensitive to 5-azaC treatment suggests SMCHD1 involvement in central nervous system development. The potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member1 (KCNQ1) gene that associates with central nervous system is a known SMCHD1 target. We showed SMCHD1 binding to an intronic region of KCNQ1 that is lost following 5-azaC treatment suggesting DNA methylation facilitated binding of SMCHD1. Indeed, deletion of SMCHD1 by CRISPR- Cas9 increases KCNQ1 gene expression confirming its role in regulating KCNQ1 gene expression.

Conclusion

These findings provide novel insights on DNA methylation directed function of SMCHD1 in regulating expression of genes associated with central nervous system development that impact future drug development strategies.

Intronic SMCHD1 variants in FSHD: testing the potential for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing

BACKGROUND

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is associated with partial chromatin relaxation of the DUX4 retrogene containing D4Z4 macrosatellite repeats on chromosome 4, and transcriptional de-repression of DUX4 in skeletal muscle. The common form of FSHD, FSHD1, is caused by a D4Z4 repeat array contraction. The less common form, FSHD2, is generally caused by heterozygous variants in SMCHD1.

METHODS

We employed whole exome sequencing combined with Sanger sequencing to screen uncharacterised FSHD2 patients for extra-exonic SMCHD1 mutations. We also used CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to repair a pathogenic intronic SMCHD1 variant from patient myoblasts.

RESULTS

We identified intronic SMCHD1 variants in two FSHD families. In the first family, an intronic variant resulted in partial intron retention and inclusion of the distal 14 nucleotides of intron 13 into the transcript. In the second family, a deep intronic variant in intron 34 resulted in exonisation of 53 nucleotides of intron 34. In both families, the aberrant transcripts are predicted to be non-functional. Deleting the pseudo-exon by CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing in primary and immortalised myoblasts from the index case of the second family restored wild-type SMCHD1 expression to a level that resulted in efficient suppression of DUX4.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimated intronic mutation frequency of almost 2% in FSHD2, as exemplified by the two novel intronic SMCHD1 variants identified here, emphasises the importance of screening for intronic variants in SMCHD1. Furthermore, the efficient suppression of DUX4 after restoring SMCHD1 levels by genome editing of the mutant allele provides further guidance for therapeutic strategies.

Role of the Chromosome Architectural Factor SMCHD1 in X-Chromosome Inactivation, Gene Regulation, and Disease in Humans

Structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain-containing 1 (SMCHD1) is an architectural factor critical for X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) and the repression of select autosomal gene clusters. In mice, homozygous nonsense mutations in Smchd1 cause female-specific embryonic lethality due to an XCI defect. However, although human mutations in SMCHD1 are associated with congenital arhinia and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2 (FSHD2), the diseases do not show a sex-specific bias, despite the essential nature of XCI in humans. To investigate whether there is a dosage imbalance for the sex chromosomes, we here analyze transcriptomic data from arhinia and FSHD2 patient blood and muscle cells. We find that X-linked dosage compensation is maintained in these patients. In mice, SMCHD1 controls not only protocadherin (Pcdh) gene clusters, but also Hox genes critical for craniofacial development. Ablating Smchd1 results in aberrant expression of these genes, coinciding with altered chromatin states and three-dimensional (3D) topological organization. In a subset of FSHD2 and arhinia patients, we also found dysregulation of clustered PCDH, but not HOX genes. Overall, our study demonstrates preservation of XCI in arhinia and FSHD2, and implicates SMCHD1 in the regulation of the 3D organization of select autosomal gene clusters.