Unravelling the unusual signalling properties of the GABA(B) receptor

Diversity of structure and function of GABAB receptors: a complexity of GABAB-mediated signaling

γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA_B) receptors are broadly expressed in the nervous system and play an important role in neuronal excitability. GABA_B receptors are G protein-coupled receptors that mediate slow and prolonged inhibitory action, via activation of Gαi/o-type proteins. GABA_B receptors mediate their inhibitory action through activating inwardly rectifying K⁺ channels, inactivating voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels, and inhibiting adenylate cyclase. Functional GABA_B receptors are obligate heterodimers formed by the co-assembly of R1 and R2 subunits. It is well established that GABA_B receptors interact not only with G proteins and effectors but also with various proteins. This review summarizes the structure, subunit isoforms, and function of GABA_B receptors, and discusses the complexity of GABA_B receptors, including how receptors are localized in specific subcellular compartments, the mechanism regulating cell surface expression and mobility of the receptors, and the diversity of receptor signaling through receptor crosstalk and interacting proteins.

Cross-talk and regulation between glutamate and GABAB receptors

Brain function depends on co-ordinated transmission of signals from both excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters acting upon target neurons. NMDA, AMPA and mGluR receptors are the major subclasses of glutamate receptors that are involved in excitatory transmission at synapses, mechanisms of activity dependent synaptic plasticity, brain development and many neurological diseases. In addition to canonical role of regulating presynaptic release and activating postsynaptic potassium channels, GABA_B receptors also regulate glutamate receptors. There is increasing evidence that metabotropic GABA_B receptors are now known to play an important role in modulating the excitability of circuits throughout the brain by directly influencing different types of postsynaptic glutamate receptors. Specifically, GABA_B receptors affect the expression, activity and signaling of glutamate receptors under physiological and pathological conditions. Conversely, NMDA receptor activity differentially regulates GABA_B receptor subunit expression, signaling and function. In this review I will describe how GABA_B receptor activity influence glutamate receptor function and vice versa. Such a modulation has widespread implications for the control of neurotransmission, calcium-dependent neuronal function, pain pathways and in various psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases.

GABAB receptor ligands for the treatment of alcohol use disorder: preclinical and clinical evidence

The present paper summarizes the preclinical and clinical studies conducted to define the "anti-alcohol" pharmacological profile of the prototypic GABAB receptor agonist, baclofen, and its therapeutic potential for treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). Numerous studies have reported baclofen-induced suppression of alcohol drinking (including relapse- and binge-like drinking) and alcohol reinforcing, motivational, stimulating, and rewarding properties in rodents and monkeys. The majority of clinical surveys conducted to date-including case reports, retrospective chart reviews, and randomized placebo-controlled studies-suggest the ability of baclofen to suppress alcohol consumption, craving for alcohol, and alcohol withdrawal symptomatology in alcohol-dependent patients. The recent identification of a positive allosteric modulatory binding site, together with the synthesis of in vivo effective ligands, represents a novel, and likely more favorable, option for pharmacological manipulations of the GABAB receptor. Accordingly, data collected to date suggest that positive allosteric modulators of the GABAB receptor reproduce several "anti-alcohol" effects of baclofen and display a higher therapeutic index (with larger separation-in terms of doses-between "anti-alcohol" effects and sedation).

Differential regulation of GABAB receptor trafficking by different modes of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor signaling

Inhibitory GABAB receptors (GABABRs) can down-regulate most excitatory synapses in the CNS by reducing postsynaptic excitability. Functional GABABRs are heterodimers of GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits and here we show that the trafficking and surface expression of GABABRs is differentially regulated by synaptic or pathophysiological activation of NMDA receptors (NMDARs). Activation of synaptic NMDARs using a chemLTP protocol increases GABABR recycling and surface expression. In contrast, excitotoxic global activation of synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDARs by bath application of NMDA causes the loss of surface GABABRs. Intriguingly, exposing neurons to extreme metabolic stress using oxygen/glucose deprivation (OGD) increases GABAB1 but decreases GABAB2 surface expression. The increase in surface GABAB1 involves enhanced recycling and is blocked by the NMDAR antagonist AP5. The decrease in surface GABAB2 is also blocked by AP5 and by inhibiting degradation pathways. These results indicate that NMDAR activity is critical in GABABR trafficking and function and that the individual subunits can be separately controlled to regulate neuronal responsiveness and survival.

Neuronal protein trafficking: emerging consequences of endoplasmic reticulum dynamics

The highly polarized morphology and complex geometry of neurons is determined to a great extent by the structural and functional organization of the secretory pathway. It is intuitive to propose that the spatial arrangement of secretory organelles and their dynamic behavior impinge on protein trafficking and neuronal function, but these phenomena and their consequences are not well delineated. Here we analyze the architecture and motility of the archetypal endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and their relationship to the microtubule cytoskeleton and post-translational modifications of tubulin. We also review the dynamics of the ER in axons, dendrites and spines, and discuss the role of ER dynamics on protein mobility and trafficking in neurons.

Astrocytes as gatekeepers of GABAB receptor function

The long-lasting actions of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA result from the activation of metabotropic GABA(B) receptors. Enhanced GABA(B)-mediated IPSCs are critical for the generation of generalized thalamocortical seizures. Here, we demonstrate that GABA(B)-mediated IPSCs recorded in the thalamus are primarily defined by GABA diffusion and activation of distal extrasynaptic receptors potentially up to tens of micrometers from synapses. We also show that this diffusion is differentially regulated by two astrocytic GABA transporters, GAT1 and GAT3, which are localized near and far from synapses, respectively. A biologically constrained model of GABA diffusion and uptake shows how the two GATs differentially modulate amplitude and duration of GABA(B) IPSCs. Specifically, the perisynaptic expression of GAT1 enables it to regulate GABA levels near synapses and selectively modulate peak IPSC amplitude, which is primarily dependent on perisynaptic receptor occupancy. GAT3 expression, however, is broader and includes distal extrasynaptic regions. As such, GAT3 acts as a gatekeeper to prevent diffusion of GABA away from synapses toward extrasynaptic regions that contain a potentially enormous pool of GABA(B) receptors. Targeting this gatekeeper function may provide new pharmacotherapeutic opportunities to prevent the excessive GABA(B) receptor activation that appears necessary for thalamic seizure generation.

Prolonged activation of NMDA receptors promotes dephosphorylation and alters postendocytic sorting of GABAB receptors

Slow and persistent synaptic inhibition is mediated by metabotropic GABAB receptors (GABABRs). GABABRs are responsible for the modulation of neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals and for hyperpolarization at postsynaptic sites. Postsynaptic GABABRs are predominantly found on dendritic spines, adjacent to excitatory synapses, but the control of their plasma membrane availability is still controversial. Here, we explore the role of glutamate receptor activation in regulating the function and surface availability of GABABRs in central neurons. We demonstrate that prolonged activation of NMDA receptors (NMDA-Rs) leads to endocytosis, a diversion from a recycling route, and subsequent lysosomal degradation of GABABRs. These sorting events are paralleled by a reduction in GABABR-dependent activation of inwardly rectifying K+ channel currents. Postendocytic sorting is critically dependent on phosphorylation of serine 783 (S783) within the GABABR2 subunit, an established substrate of AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK). NMDA-R activation leads to a rapid increase in phosphorylation of S783, followed by a slower dephosphorylation, which results from the activity of AMPK and protein phosphatase 2A, respectively. Agonist activation of GABABRs counters the effects of NMDA. Thus, NMDA-R activation alters the phosphorylation state of S783 and acts as a molecular switch to decrease the abundance of GABABRs at the neuronal plasma membrane. Such a mechanism may be of significance during synaptic plasticity or pathological conditions, such as ischemia or epilepsy, which lead to prolonged activation of glutamate receptors.

Antibodies to the GABA(B) receptor in limbic encephalitis with seizures: case series and characterisation of the antigen

BACKGROUND

Some encephalitides or seizure disorders once thought idiopathic now seem to be immune mediated. We aimed to describe the clinical features of one such disorder and to identify the autoantigen involved.

METHODS

15 patients who were suspected to have paraneoplastic or immune-mediated limbic encephalitis were clinically assessed. Confocal microscopy, immunoprecipitation, and mass spectrometry were used to characterise the autoantigen. An assay of HEK293 cells transfected with rodent GABA(B1) or GABA(B2) receptor subunits was used as a serological test. 91 patients with encephalitis suspected to be paraneoplastic or immune mediated and 13 individuals with syndromes associated with antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 were used as controls.

FINDINGS

All patients presented with early or prominent seizures; other symptoms, MRI, and electroencephalography findings were consistent with predominant limbic dysfunction. All patients had antibodies (mainly IgG1) against a neuronal cell-surface antigen; in three patients antibodies were detected only in CSF. Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry showed that the antibodies recognise the B1 subunit of the GABA(B) receptor, an inhibitory receptor that has been associated with seizures and memory dysfunction when disrupted. Confocal microscopy showed colocalisation of the antibody with GABA(B) receptors. Seven of 15 patients had tumours, five of which were small-cell lung cancer, and seven patients had non-neuronal autoantibodies. Although nine of ten patients who received immunotherapy and cancer treatment (when a tumour was found) showed neurological improvement, none of the four patients who were not similarly treated improved (p=0.005). Low levels of GABA(B1) receptor antibodies were identified in two of 104 controls (p<0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

GABA(B) receptor autoimmune encephalitis is a potentially treatable disorder characterised by seizures and, in some patients, associated with small-cell lung cancer and with other autoantibodies.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health.

Functional modulation of GABAB receptors by protein kinases and receptor trafficking

GABA(B) receptors (GABA(B)R) are heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate slow and prolonged inhibitory signals in the central nervous system. The signaling of GPCRs is under stringent control and is subject to regulation by multiple posttranslational mechanisms. The beta-adrenergic receptor is a prototypic GPCR. Like most GPCRs, prolonged exposure of this receptor to agonist induces phosphorylation of multiple intracellular residues that is largely dependent upon the activity of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). Phosphorylation terminates receptor-effector coupling and promotes both interaction with beta-arrestins and removal from the plasma membrane via clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Emerging evidence for GABA(B)Rs suggests that these GPCRs do not conform to this mode of regulation. Studies using both native and recombinant receptor preparations have demonstrated that GABA(B)Rs do not undergo agonist-induced internalization and are not GRK substrates. Moreover, whilst GABA(B)Rs undergo clathrin-dependent constitutive endocytosis, it is generally accepted that their rates of internalization are not modified by prolonged agonist exposure. Biochemical studies have revealed that GABA(B)Rs are phosphorylated on multiple residues within the cytoplasmic domains of both the R1 and R2 subunits by cAMP-dependent protein kinase and 5'AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK). Here we discuss the role that this phosphorylation plays in determining GABA(B)R effector coupling and their trafficking within the endocytic pathway and go on to evaluate the significance of GABA(B)R phosphorylation in controlling neuronal excitability under normal and pathological conditions.

gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) induces GABA(B) receptor independent intracellular Ca2+ transients in astrocytes, but has no effect on GHB or GABA(B) receptors of medium spiny neurons in the nucleus accumbens

We report on cellular actions of the illicit recreational drug gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in the brain reward area nucleus accumbens. First, we compared the effects of GHB and the GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen. Neither of them affected the membrane currents of medium spiny neurons in rat nucleus accumbens slices. GABAergic and glutamatergic synaptic potentials of medium spiny neurons, however, were reduced by baclofen but not GHB. These results indicate the lack of GHB as well as postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors, and the presence of GHB insensitive presynaptic GABA(B) receptors in medium spiny neurons. In astrocytes GHB induced intracellular Ca(2+) transients, preserved in slices from GABA(B) receptor type 1 subunit knockout mice. The effects of tetrodotoxin, zero added Ca(2+) with/without intracellular Ca(2+) store depletor cyclopiazonic acid or vacuolar H-ATPase inhibitor bafilomycin A1 indicate that GHB-evoked Ca(2+) transients depend on external Ca(2+) and intracellular Ca(2+) stores, but not on vesicular transmitter release. GHB-induced astrocytic Ca(2+) transients were not affected by the GHB receptor-specific antagonist NCS-382, suggesting the presence of a novel NCS-382-insensitive target for GHB in astrocytes. The activation of astrocytes by GHB implies their involvement in physiological actions of GHB. Our findings disclose a novel profile of GHB action in the nucleus accumbens. Here, unlike in other brain areas, GHB does not act on GABA(B) receptors, but activates an NCS-382 insensitive GHB-specific target in a subpopulation of astrocytes. The lack of either post- or presynaptic effects on medium spiny neurons in the nucleus accumbens distinguishes GHB from many drugs and natural rewards with addictive properties and might explain why GHB has only a weak reinforcing capacity.

Dendritic assembly of heteromeric gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunits in hippocampal neurons

Understanding the mechanisms that control synaptic efficacy through the availability of neurotransmitter receptors depends on uncovering their specific intracellular trafficking routes. gamma-Aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptors (GABA(B)Rs) are obligatory heteromers present at dendritic excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic sites. It is unknown whether synthesis and assembly of GABA(B)Rs occur in the somatic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) followed by vesicular transport to dendrites or whether somatic synthesis is followed by independent transport of the subunits for assembly and ER export throughout the somatodendritic compartment. To discriminate between these possibilities we studied the association of GABA(B)R subunits in dendrites of hippocampal neurons combining live fluorescence microscopy, biochemistry, quantitative colocalization, and bimolecular fluorescent complementation. We demonstrate that GABA(B)R subunits are segregated and differentially mobile in dendritic intracellular compartments and that a high proportion of non-associated intracellular subunits exist in the brain. Assembled heteromers are preferentially located at the plasma membrane, but blockade of ER exit results in their intracellular accumulation in the cell body and dendrites. We propose that GABA(B)R subunits assemble in the ER and are exported from the ER throughout the neuron prior to insertion at the plasma membrane. Our results are consistent with a bulk flow of segregated subunits through the ER and rule out a post-Golgi vesicular transport of preassembled GABA(B)Rs.

GABA-B(1) receptors are coupled to the ERK1/2 MAP kinase pathway in the absence of GABA-B(2) subunits

In the current model of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor function, there is a requirement for GABA-B(1/2) heterodimerisation for targetting to the cell surface. However, different lines of evidence suggest that the GABA-B(1) subunit can form a functional receptor in the absence of GABA-B(2). We observed coupling of endogenous GABA-B(1) receptors in the DI-TNC1 glial cell line to the ERK pathway in response to baclofen even though these cells do not express GABA-B(2). GABA-B(1A) receptors were also able to mediate a rapid, transient, and dose-dependent activation of the ERK1/2 MAP kinase pathway when transfected alone into HEK 293 cells. The response was abolished by G(i/o) and MEK inhibition, potentiated by inhibitors of phospholipase C and protein kinase C and did not involve PI-3-kinase activity. Finally, using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation, we show the existence of homodimeric GABA-B(1A) receptors in transfected HEK293 cells. Altogether, our observations show that GABA-B(1A) receptors are able to activate the ERK1/2 pathway despite the absence of surface targetting partner GABA-B(2) in both HEK 293 cells and the DI-TNC1 cell line.

Developmental profile and mechanisms of GABA-induced calcium signaling in hippocampal astrocytes

GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) is a transmitter with dual action. Whereas it excites neurons during the first week of postnatal development, it represents the major inhibitory transmitter in the mature brain. GABA also activates astrocytes by binding to ionotropic (GABA(A)) and metabotropic (GABA(B)) receptors. This results in glial calcium transients which can induce the release of gliotransmitters, rendering GABA an important mediator of neuron-glia interaction. Using whole-cell patch-clamp and ratiometric calcium imaging in hippocampal slices from rats at postnatal days 3-34, we have analyzed the developmental profile as well as the cellular mechanisms of calcium signals induced by GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor activation in astrocytes. We found that GABA-evoked glial calcium transients are mediated by both GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors. Throughout development, GABA(A)-receptor activation resulted in immediate calcium transients in the vast majority of astrocytes, most likely by influx of calcium through voltage-gated calcium channels. GABA(B) receptor activation, in contrast, resulted in delayed calcium transients, which were blocked following depletion of intracellular calcium stores and during persistent activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins. GABA(B) receptor-mediated calcium signals exhibited a clear developmental profile with less than 10% of astrocytes responding at P3 or P32-34, and about 60% of cells between P11 and P15. Our data thus indicate that GABA(B) receptor-mediated calcium transients are due to calcium release from intracellular stores following G-protein activation. Moreover, GABA(B) receptor-mediated calcium signaling in astrocytes preferentially occurs at a period during postnatal development when hippocampal networks are established.

Tracking cell surface GABAB receptors using an alpha-bungarotoxin tag

GABA(B) receptors mediate slow synaptic inhibition in the central nervous system and are important for synaptic plasticity as well as being implicated in disease. Located at pre- and postsynaptic sites, GABA(B) receptors will influence cell excitability, but their effectiveness in doing so will be dependent, in part, on their trafficking to, and stability on, the cell surface membrane. To examine the dynamic behavior of GABA(B) receptors in GIRK cells and neurons, we have devised a method that is based on tagging the receptor with the binding site components for the neurotoxin, alpha-bungarotoxin. By using the alpha-bungarotoxin binding site-tagged GABA(B) R1a subunit (R1a(BBS)), co-expressed with the R2 subunit, we can track receptor mobility using the small reporter, alpha-bungarotoxin-conjugated rhodamine. In this way, the rates of internalization and membrane insertion for these receptors could be measured with fixed and live cells. The results indicate that GABA(B) receptors rapidly turnover in the cell membrane, with the rate of internalization affected by the state of receptor activation. The bungarotoxin-based method of receptor-tagging seems ideally suited to follow the dynamic regulation of other G-protein-coupled receptors.

GABA(B) receptors in neuroendocrine regulation

Gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), in addition to being a metabolic intermediate and the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the synaptic cleft, is postulated as a neurohormone, a paracrine signaling molecule, and a trophic factor. It acts through pre- and post-synaptic receptors, named GABA(A) and GABA(C) (ionotropic receptors) and GABA(B) (metabotropic receptor). Here we reviewed the participation of GABA(B) receptors in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, using physiological, biochemical, and pharmacological approaches in rats, as well as in GABA(B1) knock-out mice, that lack functional GABA(B) receptors. Our general conclusion indicates that GABA(B )receptors participate in the regulation of pituitary hormone secretion acting both in the central nervous system and directly on the gland. PRL and gonadotropin axes are affected by GABA(B) receptor activation, as demonstrated in the rat and also in the GABA(B1) knock-out mouse. In addition, hypothalamic and pituitary GABA(B) receptor expression is modulated by steroid hormones. GABA participation in the brain control of pituitary secretion through GABA(B) receptors depends on physiological conditions, being age and sex critical factors.These results indicate that patients receiving GABA(B) agonists/antagonists should be monitored for possible endocrine side effects.

The availability of surface GABA B receptors is independent of gamma-aminobutyric acid but controlled by glutamate in central neurons

The efficacy of synaptic transmission depends on the availability of ionotropic and metabotropic neurotransmitter receptors at the plasma membrane, but the contribution of the endocytic and recycling pathways in the regulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptors remains controversial. To understand the mechanisms that regulate the abundance of GABA(B) receptors, we have studied their turnover combining surface biotin labeling and a microscopic immunoendocytosis assay in hippocampal and cortical neurons. We report that internalization of GABA(B) receptors is agonist-independent. We also demonstrate that receptors endocytose in the cell body and dendrites but not in axons. Additionally, we show that GABA(B) receptors endocytose as heterodimers via clathrin- and dynamin-1-dependent mechanisms and that they recycle to the plasma membrane after endocytosis. More importantly, we show that glutamate decreases the levels of cell surface receptors in a manner dependent on an intact proteasome pathway. These observations indicate that glutamate and not GABA controls the abundance of surface GABA(B) receptors in central neurons, consistent with their enrichment at glutamatergic synapses.

Marlin-1 is expressed in testis and associates to the cytoskeleton and GABAB receptors

Marlin-1 is a GABA(B) receptor and Jak tyrosine kinase-binding protein that also associates with RNA and microtubules. In humans and rodents, expression of Marlin-1 is predominantly restricted to the brain, but expression in lymphoid cells has also been reported. Here, we have studied the distribution of Marlin-1 in testis and spermatozoa. Our results indicate that Marlin-1 is highly expressed in testis. The protein is abundant in spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatozoa, and Sertoli cells. We also have studied the subcellular distribution in spermatozoa. Marlin-1 is present in the tail and to a lesser degree in the head of the sperm cell. Finally, we have explored two protein interactions. Our findings demonstrate that Marlin-1 associates with a microtubule fraction and with GABA(B) receptors in testis suggesting that the set of protein interactions of Marlin-1 are conserved in different tissues.

Functioning of the dimeric GABA(B) receptor extracellular domain revealed by glycan wedge scanning

The G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activated by the neurotransmitter GABA is made up of two subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). GABA(B1) binds agonists, whereas GABA(B2) is required for trafficking GABA(B1) to the cell surface, increasing agonist affinity to GABA(B1), and activating associated G proteins. These subunits each comprise two domains, a Venus flytrap domain (VFT) and a heptahelical transmembrane domain (7TM). How agonist binding to the GABA(B1) VFT leads to GABA(B2) 7TM activation remains unknown. Here, we used a glycan wedge scanning approach to investigate how the GABA(B) VFT dimer controls receptor activity. We first identified the dimerization interface using a bioinformatics approach and then showed that introducing an N-glycan at this interface prevents the association of the two subunits and abolishes all activities of GABA(B2), including agonist activation of the G protein. We also identified a second region in the VFT where insertion of an N-glycan does not prevent dimerization, but blocks agonist activation of the receptor. These data provide new insight into the function of this prototypical GPCR and demonstrate that a change in the dimerization interface is required for receptor activation.

Presynaptic metabotropic glutamate and GABAB receptors

Glutamate and GABA, the two most abundant neurotransmitters in the mammalian central nervous system, can act on metabotropic receptors that are structurally quite dissimilar from those targeted by most other neurotransmitters/modulators. Accordingly, metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and GABA(B) receptors (GABA(B)Rs) are classified as members of family 3 (or family C) of G protein-coupled receptors. On the other hand, mGluRs and GABA(B)Rs exhibit pronounced and partly unresolved differences between each other. The most intriguing difference is that mGluRs exist as multiple pharmacologically as well as structurally distinct subtypes, whereas, in the case of GABA(B)Rs, molecular biologists have so far identified only one structurally distinct heterodimeric complex whose few variants seem unable to explain the pharmacological heterogeneity of GABA(B)Rs observed in many functional studies. Both mGluRs and GABA(B)Rs can be localized on axon terminals of different neuronal systems as presynaptic autoreceptors and heteroreceptors modulating the exocytosis of various transmitters.

Marlin-1 and conventional kinesin link GABAB receptors to the cytoskeleton and regulate receptor transport

The cytoskeleton and cytoskeletal motors play a fundamental role in neurotransmitter receptor trafficking, but proteins that link GABA(B) receptors (GABA(B)Rs) to the cytoskeleton have not been described. We recently identified Marlin-1, a protein that interacts with GABA(B)R1. Here, we explore the association of GABA(B)Rs and Marlin-1 to the cytoskeleton using a combination of biochemistry, microscopy and live cell imaging. Our results indicate that Marlin-1 is associated to microtubules and the molecular motor kinesin-I. We demonstrate that a fraction of Marlin-1 is mobile in dendrites of cultured hippocampal neurons and that mobility is microtubule-dependent. We also show that GABA(B)Rs interact robustly with kinesin-I and that intracellular membranes containing GABA(B)Rs are sensitive to treatments that disrupt a protein complex containing Marlin-1, kinesin-I and tubulin. Finally, we report that a kinesin-I mutant severely impairs receptor transport. We conclude that Marlin-1 and kinesin-1 link GABA(B)Rs to the tubulin cytoskeleton in neurons.

Dominant role of GABAB2 and Gbetagamma for GABAB receptor-mediated-ERK1/2/CREB pathway in cerebellar neurons

gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptor is an allosteric complex made of two subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). GABA(B2) plays a major role in the coupling to G protein whereas GABA(B1) binds GABA. It has been shown that GABA(B) receptor activates ERK(1/2) in neurons of the central nervous system, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this event are poorly characterized. Here, we demonstrate that activation of GABA(B) receptor by either GABA or the selective agonist baclofen induces ERK(1/2) phosphorylation in cultured cerebellar granule neurons. We also show that CGP7930, a positive allosteric regulator specific of GABA(B2), alone can induce the phosphorylation of ERK(1/2). PTX, a G(i/o) inhibitor, abolishes both baclofen and CGP7930-mediated-ERK(1/2) phosphorylation. Moreover, both baclofen and CGP7930 induce ERK-dependent CREB phosphorylation. Furthermore, by using LY294002, a PI-3 kinase inhibitor, and a C-term of GRK-2 that has been reported to sequester Gbetagamma subunits, we demonstrate the role of Gbetagamma in GABA(B) receptor-mediated-ERK(1/2) phosphorylation. In conclusion, the activation of GABA(B) receptor leads to ERK(1/2) phosphorylation via the coupling of GABA(B2) to G(i/o) and by releasing Gbetagamma subunits which in turn induce the activation of CREB. These findings suggest a role of GABA(B) receptor in long-term change in the central nervous system.

Phospho-dependent functional modulation of GABA(B) receptors by the metabolic sensor AMP-dependent protein kinase

GABA(B) receptors are heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptors composed of R1 and R2 subunits that mediate slow synaptic inhibition in the brain by activating inwardly rectifying K(+) channels (GIRKs) and inhibiting Ca(2+) channels. We demonstrate here that GABA(B) receptors are intimately associated with 5'AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK acts as a metabolic sensor that is potently activated by increases in 5'AMP concentration that are caused by enhanced metabolic activity, anoxia, or ischemia. AMPK binds the R1 subunit and directly phosphorylates S783 in the R2 subunit to enhance GABA(B) receptor activation of GIRKs. Phosphorylation of S783 is evident in many brain regions, and is increased dramatically after ischemic injury. Finally, we also reveal that S783 plays a critical role in enhancing neuronal survival after ischemia. Together our results provide evidence of a neuroprotective mechanism, which, under conditions of metabolic stress or after ischemia, increases GABA(B) receptor function to reduce excitotoxicity and thereby promotes neuronal survival.

GABA(B) receptors: structure and function

In the basal ganglia the effects of gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) are mediated by both ionotropic (GABA(A)) and metabotropic (GABA(B)) receptors. Although the existence and widespread distribution in the CNS of the GABA(B) receptor had been established in the 1980s the field of GABA(B) research was revolutionized with the discovery that two related G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) needed to dimerize to form the functional GABA(B) receptor at the cell surface. This finding lead to a number of studies of oligomerization in GPCRs and detailed pharmacological studies of the cloned receptors and their splice variants. Particular interest has focused on the proteins interacting with the receptor which may be important in mediating the longer term signalling effects of the receptor and modifying its cellular localization or physiology. The cloning of the GABA(B) receptors also lead to the identification of the first compounds interacting in an allosteric fashion with the receptor some of which may have therapeutic value. Most recently "knockouts" of both the GABA(B) subunits have been produced where in general as expected there is a loss of the majority of the inhibitory effects of the GABA(B) receptor.

The 7 TM G-protein-coupled receptor target family

Chemical biology approaches have a long history in the exploration of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, which represents the largest and most important group of targets for therapeutics. The analysis of the human genome revealed a significant number of new members with unknown physiological function which are today the focus of many reverse pharmacology drug-discovery programs. As the seven hydrophobic transmembrane segments are a defining common structural feature of these receptors, and as signaling through heterotrimeric G proteins is not demonstrated in all cases, these proteins are also referred to as seven transmembrane (7 TM) or serpentine receptors. This review summarizes important historic milestones of GPCR research, from the beginning, when pharmacology was mainly descriptive, to the age of modern molecular biology, with the cloning of the first receptor and now the availability of the entire human GPCR repertoire at the sequence and protein level. It shows how GPCR-directed drug discovery was initially based on the careful testing of a few specifically made chemical compounds and is today pursued with modern drug-discovery approaches, including combinatorial library design, structural biology, molecular informatics, and advanced screening technologies for the identification of new compounds that activate or inhibit GPCRs specifically. Such compounds, in conjunction with other new technologies, allow us to study the role of receptors in physiology and medicine, and will hopefully result in novel therapies. We also outline how basic research on the signaling and regulatory mechanisms of GPCRs is advancing, leading to the discovery of new GPCR-interacting proteins and thus opening new perspectives for drug development. Practical examples from GPCR expression studies, HTS (high-throughput screening), and the design of monoamine-related GPCR-focused combinatorial libraries illustrate ongoing GPCR chemical biology research. Finally, we outline future progress that may relate today's discoveries to the development of new medicines.

GABA(B2) receptor subunit mRNA decreases in the thalamus of monoarthritic animals

Many studies have implicated GABA(B) receptors in pain transmission mechanisms, especially in the spinal cord. In the thalamus, mRNA expression of the GABA(B(1b)) isoform was shown to be regulated in relay nuclei in response to chronic noxious input arising from experimental monoarthritis. GABA(B(1a)) and GABA(B2) mRNA expression was here determined by in situ hybridisation in the brain of control, 2, 4, 7 and 14 days monoarthritic rats, to evaluate whether this expression was regulated by chronic noxious input in thalamic nuclei. mRNA labelling was analysed quantitatively in the ventrobasal complex, posterior, central medial/central lateral and reticular thalamic nuclei; the thalamic visual relay and dentate gyrus were examined for control. No mRNA expression was detected for GABA(B(1a)) in control and monoarthritic animals. Similarly, GABA(B2) mRNA was not found in the reticular nucleus. However, GABA(B2) mRNA expression was observed in the ventrobasal complex, posterior and central medial/central lateral nuclei of control animals. A significant decrease of 42% at 2 days and 27% at 4 days of monoarthritis was observed in the ventrobasal complex contralaterally, when compared with controls, returning to basal levels at 7 days of monoarthritis. In the ipsilateral posterior nucleus, there was a significant decrease of 38% at 2 days of monoarthritis. No significant changes were observed in central medial/central lateral nuclei. The data suggest that GABA(B2) mRNA expression in the ventrobasal complex and posterior nucleus is regulated by noxious input and that GABA(B) receptors might play a role in the plasticity of these relay nuclei during chronic inflammatory pain.

GABAB receptor isoforms caught in action at the scene

The metabotropic GABAB receptors mediate slow synaptic inhibition and consist of heterodimers of GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits. The only known molecular diversity of the GABAB receptors arises from the two GABAB1 isoforms, but its functional significance has been unclear. Two studies in this issue of Neuron now demonstrate that GABAB1a and GABAB1b show strategically distinct subcellular localization and physiological action.

Functional pharmacology in human brain

Most neurological and psychiatric disorders involve selective or preferential impairments of neurotransmitter systems. Therefore, studies of functional transmitter pathophysiology in human brain are of unique importance in view of the development of effective, mechanism-based, therapeutic modalities. It is well known that central nervous system functional proteins, including receptors, transporters, ion channels, and enzymes, can exhibit high heterogeneity in terms of structure, function, and pharmacological profile. If the existence of types and subtypes of functional proteins amplifies the possibility of developing selective drugs, such heterogeneity certainly increases the likelihood of interspecies differences. It is therefore essential, before choosing animal models to be used in preclinical pharmacology experimentation, to establish whether functionally corresponding proteins in men and animals also display identical pharmacological profiles. Because of evidence that scaffolding proteins, trafficking between plasma membrane and intracellular pools, phosphorylation and allosteric modulators can affect the function of receptors and transporters, experiments with human clones expressed in host cells where the environment of native receptors is rarely reproduced should be interpreted with caution. Thus, the use of neurosurgically removed fresh human brain tissue samples in which receptors, transporters, ion channels, and enzymes essentially retain their natural environment represents a unique experimental approach to enlarge our understanding of human brain processes and to help in the choice of appropriate animal models. Using this experimental approach, many human brain functional proteins, in particular transmitter receptors, have been characterized in terms of localization, function, and pharmacological properties.

Drosophila GABA(B) receptors are involved in behavioral effects of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB)

Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) can be synthesized in the brain but is also a known drug of abuse. Although putative GHB receptors have been cloned, it has been proposed that, similar to the behavior-impairing effects of ethanol, the in vivo effects of pharmacological GHB may involve metabotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) GABA(B) receptors. We developed a fruitfly (Drosophila melanogater) model to investigate the role of these receptors in the behavioral effects of exogenous GHB. Injecting GHB into male flies produced a dose-dependent motor impairment (measured with a computer-assisted automated system), which was greater in ethanol-sensitive cheapdate mutants than in wild-type flies. These effects of pharmacological concentrations of GHB require the presence and activation of GABA(B) receptors. The evidence for this was obtained by pharmacological antagonism of GABA(B) receptors with CGP54626 and by RNA interference (RNAi)-induced knockdown of the GABA(B(1)) receptor subtype. Both procedures inhibited the behavioral effects of GHB. GHB pretreatment diminished the behavioral response to subsequent GHB injections; i.e., it triggered GHB tolerance, but did not produce ethanol tolerance. On the other hand, ethanol pretreatment produced both ethanol and GHB tolerance. It appears that in spite of many similarities between ethanol and GHB, the primary sites of their action may differ and that recently cloned putative GHB receptors may participate in actions of GHB that are not mediated by GABA(B) receptors. These receptors do not have a Drosophila orthologue. Whether Drosophila express a different GHB receptor should be explored.

Subtype-selective Interaction with the Transcription Factor CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein (C/EBP) Homologous Protein (CHOP) Regulates Cell Surface Expression of GABAB Receptors

The metabotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid, type B (GABA(B)) receptors mediate the slow component of GABAergic transmission in the brain. Functional GABA(B) receptors are heterodimers of the two subunits GABA(B1) and GABA(B2), of which GABA(B1) exists in two main isoforms, GABA(B1a) and GABA(B1b). The significance of the structural heterogeneity of GABA(B) receptors, the mechanism leading to their differential targeting in neurons as well as the regulation of cell surface numbers of GABA(B) receptors, is poorly understood. To gain insights into these processes, we searched for proteins interacting with the C-terminal domain of GABA(B2). Here, we showed that the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) homologous protein (CHOP) directly interacts with GABA(B) receptors in a subtype-selective manner to regulate cell surface expression of GABA(B1a)/GABA(B2) receptors upon co-expression in HEK 293 cells. The interaction of CHOP with GABA(B1a)/GABA(B2) receptors resulted in their intracellular accumulation and in a reduced number of cell surface receptors. This regulation required the interaction of CHOP via two distinct domains with the heterodimeric receptor; its C-terminal leucine zipper associates with the leucine zipper present in the C-terminal domain of GABA(B2), and its N-terminal domain associates with an as yet unidentified site on GABA(B1a). In conclusion, the data indicated a subtype-selective regulation of cell surface receptors by interaction with the transcription factor CHOP.

Role of arginine in immunonutrition

Arginine plays an important role in many physiologic and biologic processes beyond its role as a protein-incorporated amino acid. Dietary supplementation of arginine can enhance wound healing, regulate endocrine activity and potentiate immune activity. Under normal unstressed conditions the arginine requirement of adult humans is fulfilled by endogenous sources, however this is compromised during times of stress, especially in critical illness. These finding have led to use of arginine supplementation as part of an immune-enhancing dietary regimen to help combat the immune suppression seen in such patients. Though the results from studies examining the use of this type of immunonutrition in critically ill patients are far from definitive, they are promising that this mode of therapy may be of some advantage. A better understanding of the in vivo biology of arginine and its metabolism is necessary to truly define a benefit from arginine supplementation.