1
|
Fiorin A, López Pablo C, Lejeune M, Hamza Siraj A, Della Mea V. Enhancing AI Research for Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Datasets. JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE 2024:10.1007/s10278-024-01043-8. [PMID: 38806950 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01043-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
The field of immunology is fundamental to our understanding of the intricate dynamics of the tumor microenvironment. In particular, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) assessment emerges as essential aspect in breast cancer cases. To gain comprehensive insights, the quantification of TILs through computer-assisted pathology (CAP) tools has become a prominent approach, employing advanced artificial intelligence models based on deep learning techniques. The successful recognition of TILs requires the models to be trained, a process that demands access to annotated datasets. Unfortunately, this task is hampered not only by the scarcity of such datasets, but also by the time-consuming nature of the annotation phase required to create them. Our review endeavors to examine publicly accessible datasets pertaining to the TIL domain and thereby become a valuable resource for the TIL community. The overall aim of the present review is thus to make it easier to train and validate current and upcoming CAP tools for TIL assessment by inspecting and evaluating existing publicly available online datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Fiorin
- Oncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), C/Esplanetes no 14, 43500, Tortosa, Spain.
- Department of Pathology, Hospital de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta (HTVC), Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), C/Esplanetes no 14, 43500, Tortosa, Spain.
- Department of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain.
| | - Carlos López Pablo
- Oncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), C/Esplanetes no 14, 43500, Tortosa, Spain.
- Department of Pathology, Hospital de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta (HTVC), Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), C/Esplanetes no 14, 43500, Tortosa, Spain.
- Department of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain.
| | - Marylène Lejeune
- Oncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), C/Esplanetes no 14, 43500, Tortosa, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta (HTVC), Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), C/Esplanetes no 14, 43500, Tortosa, Spain
- Department of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain
| | - Ameer Hamza Siraj
- Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Della Mea
- Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Soliman A, Li Z, Parwani AV. Artificial intelligence's impact on breast cancer pathology: a literature review. Diagn Pathol 2024; 19:38. [PMID: 38388367 PMCID: PMC10882736 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-024-01453-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
This review discusses the profound impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and management within the field of pathology. It examines the various applications of AI across diverse aspects of BC pathology, highlighting key findings from multiple studies. Integrating AI into routine pathology practice stands to improve diagnostic accuracy, thereby contributing to reducing avoidable errors. Additionally, AI has excelled in identifying invasive breast tumors and lymph node metastasis through its capacity to process large whole-slide images adeptly. Adaptive sampling techniques and powerful convolutional neural networks mark these achievements. The evaluation of hormonal status, which is imperative for BC treatment choices, has also been enhanced by AI quantitative analysis, aiding interobserver concordance and reliability. Breast cancer grading and mitotic count evaluation also benefit from AI intervention. AI-based frameworks effectively classify breast carcinomas, even for moderately graded cases that traditional methods struggle with. Moreover, AI-assisted mitotic figures quantification surpasses manual counting in precision and sensitivity, fostering improved prognosis. The assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer using AI yields insights into patient survival prognosis. Furthermore, AI-powered predictions of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response demonstrate potential for streamlining treatment strategies. Addressing limitations, such as preanalytical variables, annotation demands, and differentiation challenges, is pivotal for realizing AI's full potential in BC pathology. Despite the existing hurdles, AI's multifaceted contributions to BC pathology hold great promise, providing enhanced accuracy, efficiency, and standardization. Continued research and innovation are crucial for overcoming obstacles and fully harnessing AI's transformative capabilities in breast cancer diagnosis and assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr Soliman
- Department of Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Zaibo Li
- Department of Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Anil V Parwani
- Department of Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wagner SJ, Matek C, Shetab Boushehri S, Boxberg M, Lamm L, Sadafi A, Winter DJE, Marr C, Peng T. Built to Last? Reproducibility and Reusability of Deep Learning Algorithms in Computational Pathology. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100350. [PMID: 37827448 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Recent progress in computational pathology has been driven by deep learning. While code and data availability are essential to reproduce findings from preceding publications, ensuring a deep learning model's reusability is more challenging. For that, the codebase should be well-documented and easy to integrate into existing workflows and models should be robust toward noise and generalizable toward data from different sources. Strikingly, only a few computational pathology algorithms have been reused by other researchers so far, let alone employed in a clinical setting. To assess the current state of reproducibility and reusability of computational pathology algorithms, we evaluated peer-reviewed articles available in PubMed, published between January 2019 and March 2021, in 5 use cases: stain normalization; tissue type segmentation; evaluation of cell-level features; genetic alteration prediction; and inference of grading, staging, and prognostic information. We compiled criteria for data and code availability and statistical result analysis and assessed them in 160 publications. We found that only one-quarter (41 of 160 publications) made code publicly available. Among these 41 studies, three-quarters (30 of 41) analyzed their results statistically, half of them (20 of 41) released their trained model weights, and approximately a third (16 of 41) used an independent cohort for evaluation. Our review is intended for both pathologists interested in deep learning and researchers applying algorithms to computational pathology challenges. We provide a detailed overview of publications with published code in the field, list reusable data handling tools, and provide criteria for reproducibility and reusability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia J Wagner
- Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Christian Matek
- Institute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sayedali Shetab Boushehri
- School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany; Institute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; Data & Analytics (D&A), Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Boxberg
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Pathology Munich-North, Munich, Germany
| | - Lorenz Lamm
- Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; Helmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Ario Sadafi
- School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany; Institute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Dominik J E Winter
- Institute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephan, Germany
| | - Carsten Marr
- Institute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Tingying Peng
- Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Corredor G, Bharadwaj S, Pathak T, Viswanathan VS, Toro P, Madabhushi A. A Review of AI-Based Radiomics and Computational Pathology Approaches in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Applications and Perspectives. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:800-812. [PMID: 37380569 PMCID: PMC10733554 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide. Approximately, 20% of all breast cancers are characterized as triple negative (TNBC). TNBC typically is associated with a poorer prognosis relative to other breast cancer subtypes. Due to its aggressiveness and lack of response to hormonal therapy, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy is the usual treatment; however, this treatment is not always effective, and an important percentage of patients develop recurrence. More recently, immunotherapy has started to be used on some populations with TNBC showing promising results. Unfortunately, immunotherapy is only applicable to a minority of patients and responses in metastatic TNBC have overall been modest in comparison to other cancer types. This situation evidences the need for developing effective biomarkers that help to stratify and personalize patient management. Thanks to recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), there has been an increasing interest in its use for medical applications aiming at supporting clinical decision making. Several works have used AI in combination with diagnostic medical imaging, more specifically radiology and digitized histopathological tissue samples, aiming to extract disease-specific information that is difficult to quantify by the human eye. These works have demonstrated that analysis of such images in the context of TNBC has great potential for (1) risk-stratifying patients to identify those patients who are more likely to experience disease recurrence or die from the disease and (2) predicting pathologic complete response. In this manuscript, we present an overview on AI and its integration with radiology and histopathological images for developing prognostic and predictive approaches for TNBC. We present state of the art approaches in the literature and discuss the opportunities and challenges with developing AI algorithms regarding further development and clinical deployment, including identifying those patients who may benefit from certain treatments (e.g., adjuvant chemotherapy) from those who may not and thereby should be directed toward other therapies, discovering potential differences between populations, and identifying disease subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Germán Corredor
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Satvika Bharadwaj
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
| | - Tilak Pathak
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
| | - Vidya Sankar Viswanathan
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Anant Madabhushi
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA; Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Uğurluoğlu C, Yormaz S. Clinicopathological and prognostic value of TIL and PD L1 in triple negative breast carcinomas. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 250:154828. [PMID: 37778126 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer, accounts for 15 % of all diagnosed breast cancers. This group, which has the worst clinical outcome, high recurrence rate and poor prognosis, does not benefit from specific treatment. Therefore, there is a need to develop more effective biomarker and therapeutic strategies especially for this group. A positive level of immunity has been found to be associated with patient survival in various organ cancers. More specifically, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have been documented to have strong prognostic value. The programmed cell death 1 (PD 1) protein on the surface of T lymphocytes is activated by the Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein on the cancer cell surface. PD- L1 is thought to form a pathway that results in suppression of antitumor responses when activated. Patients with breast cancer (BC) who underwent resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2010 and 2020 were included in this study. Of the 302 BCs examined, 21 constitute the group with TNBC. In our study, the mean age of the Triple positive breast cancer (TPBC) and TNBC groups was similar (55.67 ± 12.61 vs. 53.23 ± 8.21, p = 0.384). There was no significant correlation between TPBC and TNBC and tumor size, lymph node, histological grade, and PD-L1 positivity in the center of the tumor (all p-value >.05). It was observed that tumor stage was higher in patients with TNBC than in patients with TPBC (19 % vs. 1.1 %, p = .002). The Ki 67 proliferation index was found to be higher in patients with TNBC than in patients with TPBC (90.5 % vs. 41.8 %, p .001). Although not statistically significant, clinically, CD 3 and CD 8 immune scores with high tumor margin were higher in patients with TNBC than in patients with TPBC (90.4 % vs, 9.6 % and 85.7 % vs. 14.3 %, respectively). Positive expression of PD-L1 at the tumor margin was significantly higher in patients with TNBC than patients with TPBC (20.3 % vs, 52.4 %, p = .002). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the survival distribution of CD 3 and CD 8 immunoscore, tumor central and margin PD-L1 values were compared. Mean follow-up was 136.18 months (range, 1 - 144 months); and the 10-year Overall Survival (OS) estimate for the population was 90.9 % (95 % CI, 85.5 - 96.7). In this study, this difference was not statistically significant according to the log-rank test. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between CD 3, CD 8 T lymphocyte immune score and PD-L1 expression at the tumor center and margin in TNBC, the prognostic value and clinicopathological significance of this relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ceyhan Uğurluoğlu
- Department of Patology, Faculty of Medical, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
| | - Serdar Yormaz
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medical, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thagaard J, Broeckx G, Page DB, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Kos Z, Gupta R, Khiroya R, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado‐Cabrero I, Amgad M, Azmoudeh‐Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Balslev E, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KRM, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Chardas A, Chon U Cheang M, Ciompi F, Cooper LAD, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dahl AB, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Doré Hansen J, Dudgeon SN, Ebstrup T, Elghazawy M, Fernandez‐Martín C, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez‐Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hauberg S, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EAM, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm A, Lang‐Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault‐Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto‐Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis‐Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Roslind A, Vincent‐Salomon A, Salto‐Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Scott E, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Fineberg S, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Zin RM, Adams S, Bartlett J, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Pitfalls in machine learning-based assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:498-513. [PMID: 37608772 PMCID: PMC10518802 DOI: 10.1002/path.6155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
The clinical significance of the tumor-immune interaction in breast cancer is now established, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have emerged as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with triple-negative (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2-negative) breast cancer and HER2-positive breast cancer. How computational assessments of TILs might complement manual TIL assessment in trial and daily practices is currently debated. Recent efforts to use machine learning (ML) to automatically evaluate TILs have shown promising results. We review state-of-the-art approaches and identify pitfalls and challenges of automated TIL evaluation by studying the root cause of ML discordances in comparison to manual TIL quantification. We categorize our findings into four main topics: (1) technical slide issues, (2) ML and image analysis aspects, (3) data challenges, and (4) validation issues. The main reason for discordant assessments is the inclusion of false-positive areas or cells identified by performance on certain tissue patterns or design choices in the computational implementation. To aid the adoption of ML for TIL assessment, we provide an in-depth discussion of ML and image analysis, including validation issues that need to be considered before reliable computational reporting of TILs can be incorporated into the trial and routine clinical management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
- Visiopharm A/SHørsholmDenmark
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of MedicineAntwerp UniversityAntwerpBelgium
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research InstituteProvidence Cancer InstitutePortlandORUSA
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineBC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Rajarsi Gupta
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular PathologyUniversity College Hospital LondonLondonUK
| | | | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co IncRahwayNJUSA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG)National Cancer Institute (NCI)Rockville, MDUSA
| | | | - Mohamed Amgad
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | | | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of MedicineEmory University Winship Cancer InstituteAtlantaGAUSA
| | | | - Eva Balslev
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
| | | | - Kim RM Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer CenterYale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Computer ScienceYale School of Engineering and Applied ScienceNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical SciencesMohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P)Ben‐GuerirMorocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology DepartmentHospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/InclivaValenciaSpain
| | - Alexandros Chardas
- Department of Pathobiology & Population SciencesThe Royal Veterinary CollegeLondonUK
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR‐CTSU, Division of Clinical StudiesThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of PathologyNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Lee AD Cooper
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and ImmunotherapyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering DepartmentEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Anders B Dahl
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | | | | | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and BioinformaticsYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | | | - Claudio Fernandez‐Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN‐techUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute – Precision Immunology InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational ImmunotherapyGerman Cancer Research CenterHeidelbergGermany
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochester, MNUSA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Søren Hauberg
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of PathologyMatsuyama Shimin HospitalMatsuyamaJapan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute (NKI)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas’ NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Emiel AM Janssen
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | | | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | | | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoChicagoILUSA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of HistopathologyAakash Healthcare Super Speciality HospitalNew DelhiIndia
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product DevelopmentF. Hoffmann‐La Roche AGBaselSwitzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical PathologySahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anne‐Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical PathologyZealand University HospitalRoskildeDenmark
- Department of Surgical PathologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Corinna Lang‐Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules BordetUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated DiagnosticsMassachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, PathologyGeorgia Institute of Technology and Emory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP FoundationPittsburghPAUSA
| | | | | | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research GroupUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic AtlasPuneIndia
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy FoundationNoidaIndia
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, InsermUniversity Paris‐Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled TeamVillejuifFrance
| | - Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, WAUSA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL and Cellular Pathology DepartmentUCLHLondonUK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of BiochemistryZiauddin UniversityKarachiPakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAll India Institute of Medical sciencesRaipurIndia
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Department of Clinical PathologyDrammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HFDrammenNorway
| | - Frederique Penault‐Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies ThéranostiquesClermont FerrandFrance
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure EngineeringUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics LaboratorySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary CollegeUniversity of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
- Department of OncologyLakeshore Animal Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE‐AI)University of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly
- Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer CenterYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of RosebankJohannesburgSouth Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jorge S Reis‐Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine OncologiqueGustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
| | - David Rimm
- Department of PathologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Anne Roslind
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Anne Vincent‐Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut CurieUniversity Paris‐Sciences et LettresParisFrance
| | - Manuel Salto‐Tellez
- Integrated Pathology UnitThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Precision Medicine CentreQueen's University BelfastBelfastUK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of PathologyAga Khan UniversityNairobiKenya
| | - Ely Scott
- Translational PathologyTranslational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers SquibbPrincetonNJUSA
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.‐C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM)HeidelbergGermany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”Cluj‐NapocaRomania
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical CenterBronxNYUSA
- Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNYUSA
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of PathologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
- Institute of Clinical MedicineAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of PathologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtThe Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology CenterBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of PathologyEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
- Department of PathologyUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiPR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | - Reena Md Zin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer CenterNYU Langone HealthNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of MedicineNYU Grossman School of MedicineManhattanNYUSA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and ResearchGerman Breast GroupNeu‐IsenburgGermany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für PathologiePhilipps‐Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Page DB, Broeckx G, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Gupta RR, Thagaard J, Khiroya R, Kos Z, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KR, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Cheang MCU, Ciompi F, Cooper LA, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Dudgeon SN, Elghazawy M, Ely S, Fernandez-Martín C, Fineberg S, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hardas A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EA, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm AV, Lang-Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault-Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto-Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis-Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Vincent-Salomon A, Salto-Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Adams S, Bartlett JMS, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Spatial analyses of immune cell infiltration in cancer: current methods and future directions: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:514-532. [PMID: 37608771 DOI: 10.1002/path.6165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Modern histologic imaging platforms coupled with machine learning methods have provided new opportunities to map the spatial distribution of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, there exists no standardized method for describing or analyzing spatial immune cell data, and most reported spatial analyses are rudimentary. In this review, we provide an overview of two approaches for reporting and analyzing spatial data (raster versus vector-based). We then provide a compendium of spatial immune cell metrics that have been reported in the literature, summarizing prognostic associations in the context of a variety of cancers. We conclude by discussing two well-described clinical biomarkers, the breast cancer stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes score and the colon cancer Immunoscore, and describe investigative opportunities to improve clinical utility of these spatial biomarkers. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rajarsi R Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Khalid Abduljabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sunil Badve
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Kim Rm Blenman
- Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Ben-Guerir, Morocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology Department, Hospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/Incliva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Ad Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Frederik Deman
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mahmoud Elghazawy
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Scott Ely
- Translational Pathology, Translational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claudio Fernandez-Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute - Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niels Halama
- Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Alexandros Hardas
- Pathobiology & Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Steven N Hart
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Department of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emiel Am Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Mohamed Kahila
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Durga Kharidehal
- Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, India
| | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Aakash Healthcare Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product Development, F.Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Surgical Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinna Lang-Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Douglas K Marks
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genome Atlas, Pune, India
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of Biochemistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, INSERM U1240, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Lakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, University Paris-Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Integrated Pathology Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Precision Medicine Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.-C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Pathology, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology & University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and Research, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee M. Recent Advancements in Deep Learning Using Whole Slide Imaging for Cancer Prognosis. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:897. [PMID: 37627783 PMCID: PMC10451210 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10080897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
This review furnishes an exhaustive analysis of the latest advancements in deep learning techniques applied to whole slide images (WSIs) in the context of cancer prognosis, focusing specifically on publications from 2019 through 2023. The swiftly maturing field of deep learning, in combination with the burgeoning availability of WSIs, manifests significant potential in revolutionizing the predictive modeling of cancer prognosis. In light of the swift evolution and profound complexity of the field, it is essential to systematically review contemporary methodologies and critically appraise their ramifications. This review elucidates the prevailing landscape of this intersection, cataloging major developments, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses, and providing discerning insights into prospective directions. In this paper, a comprehensive overview of the field aims to be presented, which can serve as a critical resource for researchers and clinicians, ultimately enhancing the quality of cancer care outcomes. This review's findings accentuate the need for ongoing scrutiny of recent studies in this rapidly progressing field to discern patterns, understand breakthroughs, and navigate future research trajectories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minhyeok Lee
- School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guo J, Hu J, Zheng Y, Zhao S, Ma J. Artificial intelligence: opportunities and challenges in the clinical applications of triple-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:2141-2149. [PMID: 36871044 PMCID: PMC10241896 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02215-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of all invasive breast cancer subtypes. Owing to its clinical characteristics, such as the lack of effective therapeutic targets, high invasiveness, and high recurrence rate, TNBC is difficult to treat and has a poor prognosis. Currently, with the accumulation of large amounts of medical data and the development of computing technology, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning, has been applied to various aspects of TNBC research, including early screening, diagnosis, identification of molecular subtypes, personalised treatment, and prediction of prognosis and treatment response. In this review, we discussed the general principles of artificial intelligence, summarised its main applications in the diagnosis and treatment of TNBC, and provided new ideas and theoretical basis for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiamin Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, P. R. China
| | - Junjie Hu
- Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, P. R. China
| | - Yichen Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, P. R. China
| | - Shuang Zhao
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, P. R. China.
| | - Ji Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Verdicchio M, Brancato V, Cavaliere C, Isgrò F, Salvatore M, Aiello M. A pathomic approach for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes classification on breast cancer digital pathology images. Heliyon 2023; 9:e14371. [PMID: 36950640 PMCID: PMC10025040 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives The detection of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) could aid in the development of objective measures of the infiltration grade and can support decision-making in breast cancer (BC). However, manual quantification of TILs in BC histopathological whole slide images (WSI) is currently based on a visual assessment, thus resulting not standardized, not reproducible, and time-consuming for pathologists. In this work, a novel pathomic approach, aimed to apply high-throughput image feature extraction techniques to analyze the microscopic patterns in WSI, is proposed. In fact, pathomic features provide additional information concerning the underlying biological processes compared to the WSI visual interpretation, thus providing more easily interpretable and explainable results than the most frequently investigated Deep Learning based methods in the literature. Methods A dataset containing 1037 regions of interest with tissue compartments and TILs annotated on 195 TNBC and HER2+ BC hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained WSI was used. After segmenting nuclei within tumor-associated stroma using a watershed-based approach, 71 pathomic features were extracted from each nucleus and reduced using a Spearman's correlation filter followed by a nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The relevant features were used to classify each candidate nucleus as either TILs or non-TILs using 5 multivariable machine learning classification models trained using 5-fold cross-validation (1) without resampling, (2) with the synthetic minority over-sampling technique and (3) with downsampling. The prediction performance of the models was assessed using ROC curves. Results 21 features were selected, with most of them related to the well-known TILs properties of having regular shape, clearer margins, high peak intensity, more homogeneous enhancement and different textural pattern than other cells. The best performance was obtained by Random-Forest with ROC AUC of 0.86, regardless of resampling technique. Conclusions The presented approach holds promise for the classification of TILs in BC H&E-stained WSI and could provide support to pathologists for a reliable, rapid and interpretable clinical assessment of TILs in BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Valentina Brancato
- IRCCS SYNLAB SDN, Via E. Gianturco 113, Naples, 80143, Italy
- Corresponding author.
| | - Carlo Cavaliere
- IRCCS SYNLAB SDN, Via E. Gianturco 113, Naples, 80143, Italy
| | - Francesco Isgrò
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples Federico II, Claudio 21, Naples, 80125, Italy
| | - Marco Salvatore
- IRCCS SYNLAB SDN, Via E. Gianturco 113, Naples, 80143, Italy
| | - Marco Aiello
- IRCCS SYNLAB SDN, Via E. Gianturco 113, Naples, 80143, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chan RC, To CKC, Cheng KCT, Yoshikazu T, Yan LLA, Tse GM. Artificial intelligence in breast cancer histopathology. Histopathology 2023; 82:198-210. [PMID: 36482271 DOI: 10.1111/his.14820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This is a review on the use of artificial intelligence for digital breast pathology. A systematic search on PubMed was conducted, identifying 17,324 research papers related to breast cancer pathology. Following a semimanual screening, 664 papers were retrieved and pursued. The papers are grouped into six major tasks performed by pathologists-namely, molecular and hormonal analysis, grading, mitotic figure counting, ki-67 indexing, tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte assessment, and lymph node metastases identification. Under each task, open-source datasets for research to build artificial intelligence (AI) tools are also listed. Many AI tools showed promise and demonstrated feasibility in the automation of routine pathology investigations. We expect continued growth of AI in this field as new algorithms mature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Ck Chan
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Chun Kit Curtis To
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ka Chuen Tom Cheng
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Tada Yoshikazu
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Lai Ling Amy Yan
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Gary M Tse
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:6154-6166. [PMID: 36135052 PMCID: PMC9498194 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29090483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and other clinicopathological features in HER2+ MBC patients who received first-line anti-HER2 therapy. A total of 129 patients were assigned to NLR-low and NLR-high groups based on a cutoff value of 3.0 at baseline. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and gene mutations in circulating tumor DNA were analyzed by flow cytometry and Next-generation sequencing, respectively. Survival was evaluated by the Kaplan−Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Of the 129 patients, 77 and 52 were assigned to the NLR-low (≤3) and NLR-high (>3) groups, respectively. Compared with NLR-high patients, the NLR-low patients had significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) (11.7 vs. 7.7 months) (p = 0.001, HR = 2.703 95% CI 1.543−4.736 and overall survival (OS) (37.4 vs. 28.7 months) (p = 0.044, HR = 2.254 95% CI 1.024−4.924). Furthermore, this association was independent of metastatic sites or estrogen receptor status. Peripheral blood CD3+ (p = 0.034) and CD4+ (p = 0.010) T cell numbers were significantly higher in the NLR-low group than the NLR-high group. The mutational profile of MBC was generally similar between the two groups. Baseline NLR was a prognostic factor of PFS and OS for patients with HER2+ MBC in the first-line setting. These results may facilitate the selection of patients who will benefit most from anti-HER2 treatment.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sandarenu P, Millar EKA, Song Y, Browne L, Beretov J, Lynch J, Graham PH, Jonnagaddala J, Hawkins N, Huang J, Meijering E. Survival prediction in triple negative breast cancer using multiple instance learning of histopathological images. Sci Rep 2022; 12:14527. [PMID: 36008541 PMCID: PMC9411153 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18647-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Computational pathology is a rapidly expanding area for research due to the current global transformation of histopathology through the adoption of digital workflows. Survival prediction of breast cancer patients is an important task that currently depends on histopathology assessment of cancer morphological features, immunohistochemical biomarker expression and patient clinical findings. To facilitate the manual process of survival risk prediction, we developed a computational pathology framework for survival prediction using digitally scanned haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue microarray images of clinically aggressive triple negative breast cancer. Our results show that the model can produce an average concordance index of 0.616. Our model predictions are analysed for independent prognostic significance in univariate analysis (hazard ratio = 3.12, 95% confidence interval [1.69,5.75], p < 0.005) and multivariate analysis using clinicopathological data (hazard ratio = 2.68, 95% confidence interval [1.44,4.99], p < 0.005). Through qualitative analysis of heatmaps generated from our model, an expert pathologist is able to associate tissue features highlighted in the attention heatmaps of high-risk predictions with morphological features associated with more aggressive behaviour such as low levels of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, stroma rich tissues and high-grade invasive carcinoma, providing explainability of our method for triple negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piumi Sandarenu
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Ewan K A Millar
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, NSW Health Pathology, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.,St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sydney Western University, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia.,University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Yang Song
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Lois Browne
- Cancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
| | - Julia Beretov
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, NSW Health Pathology, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.,St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Cancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
| | - Jodi Lynch
- St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Cancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
| | - Peter H Graham
- St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Cancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
| | | | - Nicholas Hawkins
- School of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Junzhou Huang
- University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
| | - Erik Meijering
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Homeyer A, Geißler C, Schwen LO, Zakrzewski F, Evans T, Strohmenger K, Westphal M, Bülow RD, Kargl M, Karjauv A, Munné-Bertran I, Retzlaff CO, Romero-López A, Sołtysiński T, Plass M, Carvalho R, Steinbach P, Lan YC, Bouteldja N, Haber D, Rojas-Carulla M, Vafaei Sadr A, Kraft M, Krüger D, Fick R, Lang T, Boor P, Müller H, Hufnagl P, Zerbe N. Recommendations on compiling test datasets for evaluating artificial intelligence solutions in pathology. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:1759-1769. [PMID: 36088478 PMCID: PMC9708586 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01147-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis. Prior to routine use, it is important to evaluate their predictive performance and obtain regulatory approval. This assessment requires appropriate test datasets. However, compiling such datasets is challenging and specific recommendations are missing. A committee of various stakeholders, including commercial AI developers, pathologists, and researchers, discussed key aspects and conducted extensive literature reviews on test datasets in pathology. Here, we summarize the results and derive general recommendations on compiling test datasets. We address several questions: Which and how many images are needed? How to deal with low-prevalence subsets? How can potential bias be detected? How should datasets be reported? What are the regulatory requirements in different countries? The recommendations are intended to help AI developers demonstrate the utility of their products and to help pathologists and regulatory agencies verify reported performance measures. Further research is needed to formulate criteria for sufficiently representative test datasets so that AI solutions can operate with less user intervention and better support diagnostic workflows in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Homeyer
- Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Max-von-Laue-Straße 2, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Christian Geißler
- grid.6734.60000 0001 2292 8254Technische Universität Berlin, DAI-Labor, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587 Berlin, Germany
| | - Lars Ole Schwen
- grid.428590.20000 0004 0496 8246Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Max-von-Laue-Straße 2, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | - Falk Zakrzewski
- grid.412282.f0000 0001 1091 2917Institute of Pathology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital Dresden (UKD), TU Dresden (TUD), Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Theodore Evans
- grid.6734.60000 0001 2292 8254Technische Universität Berlin, DAI-Labor, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587 Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Strohmenger
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Westphal
- grid.428590.20000 0004 0496 8246Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Max-von-Laue-Straße 2, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | - Roman David Bülow
- grid.412301.50000 0000 8653 1507Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Michaela Kargl
- grid.11598.340000 0000 8988 2476Medical University of Graz, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Aray Karjauv
- grid.6734.60000 0001 2292 8254Technische Universität Berlin, DAI-Labor, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587 Berlin, Germany
| | - Isidre Munné-Bertran
- MoticEurope, S.L.U., C. Les Corts, 12 Poligono Industrial, 08349 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carl Orge Retzlaff
- grid.6734.60000 0001 2292 8254Technische Universität Berlin, DAI-Labor, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587 Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Markus Plass
- grid.11598.340000 0000 8988 2476Medical University of Graz, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Rita Carvalho
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Steinbach
- grid.40602.300000 0001 2158 0612Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Yu-Chia Lan
- grid.412301.50000 0000 8653 1507Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Nassim Bouteldja
- grid.412301.50000 0000 8653 1507Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - David Haber
- Lakera AI AG, Zelgstrasse 7, 8003 Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Alireza Vafaei Sadr
- grid.412301.50000 0000 8653 1507Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Krüger
- grid.474385.90000 0004 4676 7928Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH, Johann-Krane-Weg 39, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Rutger Fick
- Tribun Health, 2 Rue du Capitaine Scott, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Tobias Lang
- Mindpeak GmbH, Zirkusweg 2, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Boor
- grid.412301.50000 0000 8653 1507Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Heimo Müller
- grid.11598.340000 0000 8988 2476Medical University of Graz, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Hufnagl
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Norman Zerbe
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Finkelman BS, Meindl A, LaBoy C, Griffin B, Narayan S, Brancamp R, Siziopikou KP, Pincus JL, Blanco LZ. Correlation of manual semi-quantitative and automated quantitative Ki-67 proliferative index with OncotypeDXTM recurrence score in invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Dis 2021; 41:55-65. [PMID: 34397396 DOI: 10.3233/bd-201011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is a widely used cancer proliferation assay; however, its limitations could be improved with automated scoring. The OncotypeDXTM Recurrence Score (ORS), which primarily evaluates cancer proliferation genes, is a prognostic indicator for breast cancer chemotherapy response; however, it is more expensive and slower than Ki-67. OBJECTIVE To compare manual Ki-67 (mKi-67) with automated Ki-67 (aKi-67) algorithm results based on manually selected Ki-67 "hot spots" in breast cancer, and correlate both with ORS. METHODS 105 invasive breast carcinoma cases from 100 patients at our institution (2011-2013) with available ORS were evaluated. Concordance was assessed via Cohen's Kappa (κ). RESULTS 57/105 cases showed agreement between mKi-67 and aKi-67 (κ 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.45), with 41 cases overestimated by aKi-67. Concordance was higher when estimated on the same image (κ 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.69). Concordance between mKi-67 score and ORS was fair (κ 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.42), and concordance between aKi-67 and ORS was poor (κ 0.10, 95% CI -0.03-0.23). CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the limits of Ki-67 algorithms that use manual "hot spot" selection. Due to suboptimal concordance, Ki-67 is likely most useful as a complement to, rather than a surrogate for ORS, regardless of scoring method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian S Finkelman
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Amanda Meindl
- Department of Pathology, Great Lakes Pathologists, West Allis, WI, USA
| | - Carissa LaBoy
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brannan Griffin
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Suguna Narayan
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ryan Brancamp
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jennifer L Pincus
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Luis Z Blanco
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thagaard J, Stovgaard ES, Vognsen LG, Hauberg S, Dahl A, Ebstrup T, Doré J, Vincentz RE, Jepsen RK, Roslind A, Kümler I, Nielsen D, Balslev E. Automated Quantification of sTIL Density with H&E-Based Digital Image Analysis Has Prognostic Potential in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3050. [PMID: 34207414 PMCID: PMC8235502 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13123050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and difficult-to-treat cancer type that represents approximately 15% of all breast cancers. Recently, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) resurfaced as a strong prognostic biomarker for overall survival (OS) for TNBC patients. Manual assessment has innate limitations that hinder clinical adoption, and the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group (TIL-WG) has therefore envisioned that computational assessment of sTIL could overcome these limitations and recommended that any algorithm should follow the manual guidelines where appropriate. However, no existing studies capture all the concepts of the guideline or have shown the same prognostic evidence as manual assessment. In this study, we present a fully automated digital image analysis pipeline and demonstrate that our hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-based pipeline can provide a quantitative and interpretable score that correlates with the manual pathologist-derived sTIL status, and importantly, can stratify a retrospective cohort into two significant distinct prognostic groups. We found our score to be prognostic for OS (HR: 0.81 CI: 0.72-0.92 p = 0.001) independent of age, tumor size, nodal status, and tumor type in statistical modeling. While prior studies have followed fragments of the TIL-WG guideline, our approach is the first to follow all complex aspects, where appropriate, supporting the TIL-WG vision of computational assessment of sTIL in the future clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe Thagaard
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; (L.G.V.); (S.H.); (A.D.)
- Visiopharm A/S, 2970 Hørsholm, Denmark; (T.E.); (J.D.)
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (E.S.S.); (R.E.V.); (R.K.J.); (A.R.); (E.B.)
| | - Line Grove Vognsen
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; (L.G.V.); (S.H.); (A.D.)
- Visiopharm A/S, 2970 Hørsholm, Denmark; (T.E.); (J.D.)
| | - Søren Hauberg
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; (L.G.V.); (S.H.); (A.D.)
| | - Anders Dahl
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; (L.G.V.); (S.H.); (A.D.)
| | | | - Johan Doré
- Visiopharm A/S, 2970 Hørsholm, Denmark; (T.E.); (J.D.)
| | - Rikke Egede Vincentz
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (E.S.S.); (R.E.V.); (R.K.J.); (A.R.); (E.B.)
| | - Rikke Karlin Jepsen
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (E.S.S.); (R.E.V.); (R.K.J.); (A.R.); (E.B.)
| | - Anne Roslind
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (E.S.S.); (R.E.V.); (R.K.J.); (A.R.); (E.B.)
| | - Iben Kümler
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (I.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Dorte Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (I.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Eva Balslev
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (E.S.S.); (R.E.V.); (R.K.J.); (A.R.); (E.B.)
| |
Collapse
|