Coronavirus Disease-2019 in the Immunocompromised Host

Discovery of a pan anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody with highly efficient infected cell killing capacity for novel immunotherapeutic approaches

Unlocking the potential of broadly reactive coronavirus monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives offers a transformative therapeutic avenue against severe COVID-19, especially crucial for safeguarding high-risk populations. Novel mAb-based immunotherapies may help address the reduced efficacy of current vaccines and neutralizing mAbs caused by the emergence of variants of concern (VOCs). Using phage display technology, we discovered a pan-SARS-CoV-2 mAb (C10) that targets a conserved region within the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the virus. Noteworthy, C10 demonstrates exceptional efficacy in recognizing all assessed VOCs, including recent Omicron variants. While C10 lacks direct neutralization capacity, it efficiently binds to infected lung epithelial cells and induces their lysis via natural killer (NK) cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Building upon this pan-SARS-CoV-2 mAb, we engineered C10-based, Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cells endowed with efficient killing capacity against SARS-CoV-2-infected lung epithelial cells. Notably, NK and CAR-T-cell mediated killing of lung infected cells effectively reduces viral titers. These findings highlight the potential of non-neutralizing mAbs in providing immune protection against emerging infectious diseases. Our work reveals a pan-SARS-CoV-2 mAb effective in targeting infected cells and demonstrates the proof-of-concept for the potential application of CAR-T cell therapy in combating SARS-CoV-2 infections. Furthermore, it holds promise for the development of innovative antibody-based and cell-based therapeutic strategies against severe COVID-19 by expanding the array of therapeutic options available for high-risk populations.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04093596.

Long-term prognosis following cytomegalovirus respiratory infection in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients: a retrospective single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) respiratory infection is associated with a high mortality rate. This observational cohort study investigated the long-term survival of patients after CMV respiratory infection and risk factors affecting their prognosis.

METHODS

Overall, 569 inpatients with CMV respiratory infection enrolled in this study. The prevalence of comorbidities, clinical characteristics, 30-d, 1-year, and 5-year mortality rates, and prognostic risk factors was analysed.

RESULTS

The 30-d, 1-year, and 5-year mortality rates of CMV respiratory infection were 21.6%, 51.4%, and 69.2%, respectively. Based on the different underlying diseases, the 1- and 5-year mortality rates were higher in patients with connective tissue diseases (61.7% vs. 79.4%), post-chemoradiotherapy (56.0% vs. 85.0%), interstitial pneumonia or long-term users of glucocorticoids (55.2% vs. 75.7%), and non-immunocompromised patients (53.8% vs. 68.3%). The 30-d mortality rate had the lowest in organ transplant recipients (6.8%), whereas the 5-year mortality rate was the lowest in patients with nephrotic syndrome (38.3%). Additionally, 76% of CMV infections, 85% of Pneumocystis pneumonia infections, and 70% of Aspergillus pneumonia infections occurred within the first 6 months of glucocorticoid or immunosuppressant use. The presence of interstitial pneumonia, respiratory failure, high Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 scores, and persistent lymphocytopenia were indicative of a poor 30-d prognosis, while post-organ transplantation was associated with a favourable prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate of CMV respiratory infection was found to be high, especially in patients with connective tissue diseases, cancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy, interstitial pneumonia, and non-immunocompromised patients. In patients on long-term immunosuppressants and corticosteroids, particularly within the first 6 months, vigilance needs to be exercised for CMV respiratory infection.

Impact of Immunosuppression on Immune Cell Dynamics in COVID-19: A Serial Comparison of Leukocyte Data in Healthy and Immunocompromised Patients Before and After Infection

Background: The significance of cell population data (CPD) and leukocyte scattergrams in COVID-19 has not been fully established, partly due to the absence of serial leukocyte monitoring before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study first examined changes in these parameters in non-immunosuppressed subjects over the course of infection. Subsequently, these findings were compared with those observed in patients who were immunosuppressed to assess the impact of immunosuppression. Methods: In total, 48 patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. Complete blood count (CBC) results and CPD were assessed using a Sysmex XN-9000 hematological analyzer. Results: The control and IST groups had similar clinical characteristics regarding COVID-19 severity and baseline CBC and CPD. WBC and neutrophil counts showed no significant changes immediately post onset; however, they decreased in the control group and increased in the IST group. Platelet counts decreased transiently on days 3-5 in both groups. The control group's lymphocyte counts significantly dropped, but their lymphocyte-related CPD remained unchanged. The IST group experienced delayed lymphocyte recovery and showed reduced DNA/RNA content and cell size diversity. Scattergrams immediately after onset showed an increase in lymphocyte clusters, particularly juvenile lymphocytes, in the control group, while they decreased in the IST group. In the control group, mature neutrophils decreased while immature neutrophils increased. Conversely, the percentage of mature neutrophils increased in the IST group. Both groups showed minimal plasmacytoid lymphocyte clusters after onset. Conclusions: Immunosuppression impairs juvenile cell mobilization, which may increase susceptibility to viral impacts and potentially worsen prognosis by increasing the risk of infection.

Dysregulated Adaptive Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Immunocompromised Individuals

The SARS-CoV-2 virus poses a significant risk to immunocompromised patients, who display weakened immunity and reduced seroconversion following infection and vaccination. In this study, we recruited 19 hospitalized patients with immune disorders (ImCo) and 4 immunocompetent controls (ICC) with COVID-19. We evaluated their serological, humoral, and cellular immune responses at <30 days and >90 days post-symptom onset. ICC patients showed robust B and T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2, indicated by detectable antibody levels, memory antibody-secreting cells (mASCs) towards the spike protein and spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. ImCo patients showed impaired immune responses, with lower levels of B cell responses. Further subdivision of the ImCo patients demonstrates that solid organ transplant (SOT) patients generated B cell responses similar to ICC patients, whereas the other ImCo patients, including patients with hematological malignancies and anti-CD20 therapy, did not. Absolute T cell numbers and spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were low in the ImCo patients at <30 days but increased at later time points. Our findings suggest that even when B cell responses were reduced, patients could present a T cell response, suggesting a more successful line of passive immunization for immunocompromised individuals focusing on boosting T cell responses.

Clinical characteristics and COVID-19-related outcomes of immunocompromised patients receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis in Japan

OBJECTIVE

Tixagevimab/cilgavimab is a cocktail of two long-acting monoclonal antibodies approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (cause of coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) in immunocompromised (IC) or high-risk patients. We investigated the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of IC patients administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab for PrEP in real-world use in Japan.

METHODS

This observational study used anonymous secondary data from Real-World Data Co., Ltd. for IC patients aged ≥12 years administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab between September 2022 and September 2023. We analyzed the baseline characteristics and event-rates of COVID-19-related clinical outcomes within 6 months of administration.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed for 397 IC patients. About half (53.4 %) were male and the median age was 71.0 (interquartile range 61.0, 77.0) years. Malignancy (97.2 %), cardiovascular disease (71.3 %), and diabetes (66.5 %) were frequent comorbidities. Systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were prescribed to 87.4 % and 24.9 %, respectively. The two most common target clinical conditions were active therapy for hematologic malignancies (88.2 %) and treatment with B cell-depleting therapies (57.4 %). The event-rates per 100 person-months (95 % confidence interval; number) for medically attended COVID-19, COVID-19 hospitalization, in-hospital mortality due to COVID-19, and all-cause death were 4.14 (3.06-5.48; n = 49), 1.74 (1.09-2.64; n = 22), 0.07 (0.00-0.42; n = 1), and 0.60 (0.26-1.17; n = 8), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report using a multicenter database to describe the clinical characteristics and COVID-19-related outcomes of IC patients administered with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in real-world settings in Japan. This cohort of IC patients who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab included many elderly patients with comorbidities.

Vaccination After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: A Review of the Literature and Proposed Vaccination Protocol

Background/Objectives: Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) induces profound immunosuppression, significantly increasing susceptibility to severe infections. This review examines vaccinations' necessity, timing, and efficacy post-HCT to reduce infection-related morbidity and mortality. It aims to provide a structured protocol aligned with international and national recommendations. Methods: A systematic review of current guidelines and studies was conducted to assess vaccination strategies in HCT recipients. The analysis included the timing of vaccine administration, factors influencing efficacy, and contraindications. Recommendations for pre- and post-transplant vaccination schedules were synthesised, specifically for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), immunosuppressive therapy, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Results: Vaccination is essential as specific immunity is often lost after HCT. Inactivated vaccines are recommended to commence three months post-transplant, including influenza, COVID-19, and pneumococcal vaccines. Live attenuated vaccines remain contraindicated for at least two years post-transplant and in patients with ongoing GVHD or immunosuppressive therapy. Factors such as GVHD and immunosuppressive treatments significantly impact vaccine timing and efficacy. The review also underscores the importance of pre-transplant vaccinations and ensuring that patients' close contacts are adequately immunised to reduce transmission risks. Conclusions: Implementing a structured vaccination protocol post-HCT is critical to improving patient outcomes. Timely and effective vaccination strategies can mitigate infection risks while addressing individual patient factors such as GVHD and immunosuppression. This review highlights the need for tailored vaccination approaches to optimize immune reconstitution in HCT recipients.

Exploring lymphocyte subsets in COVID-19 patients: insights from a tertiary academic medical center with a high proportion of patients on immunosuppression

Introduction

Severe COVID-19 is associated with reduced absolute lymphocyte counts, suggesting that lymphocyte subsets may serve as predictors of clinical outcomes in affected patients. Early identification of patients at risk for severe disease is crucial for optimizing care, accurately informing patients and their families, guiding therapeutic interventions, and improving patient flow in the ED. Given that immunosuppressive drugs significantly impact lymphocyte profiles, we aimed to determine the association between prior use of immunosuppressive drugs, lymphocyte subsets, and COVID-19 severity in our population with a high prevalence of immunosuppression.

Methods

In 2021, suspected COVID-19 patients were included in the ED. Lymphocyte subsets were determined in peripheral blood within 24 hours after presentation and comparative analyses was performed between SARS-CoV-2 negative and positive patients, mild versus severe disease and patients with and without prior immunosuppressive drug use. Mild cases were patients discharged home or admitted to a general ward, severe cases were patients with COVID-19-related mortality or necessitating ICU admission. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between lymphocyte subsets and COVID-19 severity, and between prior immunosuppressive drug use and COVID-19 severity.

Results

Twenty-five SARS-CoV-2 negative and 77 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were included, whereof 57 (74%) had mild and 20 (26%) severe COVID-19. No significant differences were observed in the absolute counts of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T-lymphocytes, B-lymphocytes, and NK-cells between SARS-CoV-2 negative and positive patients or between mild and severe cases. The 36 patients with prior use of immunosuppressive drugs had significantly lower CD4+ T-lymphocytes (p<0.01). Prior use of immunosuppressive drugs was not associated with COVID-19 severity (adjusted OR 1.074, 0.355-3.194).

Conclusion

Lymphocyte subsets were not significantly different between SARS-CoV-2 negative and positive patients and between mild versus severe cases. Neither lymphocyte subsets nor prior immunosuppressive drug use were associated with COVID-19 severity.

Clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron pneumonia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

Previous studies evaluating the differences in COVID-19 mortality rates between immunocompromised patients and other patient groups have shown conflicting findings. This research aimed to compare the mortality rates of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients during the Omicron-dominant period of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and to identify factors associated with prognosis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1085 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia to the China-Japan Friendship Hospital between December 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023. We assessed the prevalence of comorbidities, incidence of co-infections and nosocomial infections, and 30-day mortality.

Results

Among the 1085 patients, 254 were immunocompromised, and 831 were immunocompetent. Immunocompromised patients had higher rates of non-invasive ventilation use (30.3 % vs. 21.1 %), invasive ventilation (12.2 % vs. 5.3 %), and 30-day mortality (19.7 % vs. 13.7 %) compared to immunocompetent patients. However, overall mortality rates did not significantly differ based on immunocompromised status. Cox regression analysis identified that elevated troponin T (≥0.15 ng/mL), respiratory failure, high lactate dehydrogenase (≥272.5 U/L), elevated D-dimer (≥1.295 mg/L), increased C-reactive protein (≥90 mg/L), elevated interleukin-6 (>11.67 ng/L), high peripheral blood neutrophil count (>9.84 × 10⁹/L), and immunocompromised status were independent predictors of poor COVID-19 prognosis. In the immunocompetent group, current smoking and a history of interstitial lung disease were related to a worse prognosis.

Conclusions

COVID-19 pneumonia due to the Omicron variant may lead to worse outcomes in immunocompromised patients. In immunocompetent patients, careful monitoring is essential for those with respiratory failure, smoking history, or interstitial lung disease to prevent adverse outcomes.

Molecular determinants of cross-species transmission in emerging viral infections

SUMMARYSeveral examples of high-impact cross-species transmission of newly emerging or re-emerging bat-borne viruses, such as Sudan virus, Nipah virus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, have occurred in the past decades. Recent advancements in next-generation sequencing have strengthened ongoing efforts to catalog the global virome, in particular from the multitude of different bat species. However, functional characterization of these novel viruses and virus sequences is typically limited with regard to assessment of their cross-species potential. Our understanding of the intricate interplay between virus and host underlying successful cross-species transmission has focused on the basic mechanisms of entry and replication, as well as the importance of host innate immune responses. In this review, we discuss the various roles of the respective molecular mechanisms underlying cross-species transmission using different recent bat-borne viruses as examples. To delineate the crucial cellular and molecular steps underlying cross-species transmission, we propose a framework of overall characterization to improve our capacity to characterize viruses as benign, of interest, or of concern.

A Brighton Collaboration standardized template with key considerations for a benefit-risk assessment for the Comirnaty COVID-19 mRNA vaccine

The Brighton Collaboration Benefit-Risk Assessment of VAccines by TechnolOgy (BRAVATO) Working Group evaluates the safety and other key features of new platform technology vaccines, including nucleic acid (RNA and DNA) vaccines. This manuscript uses the BRAVATO template to report the key considerations for a benefit-risk assessment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA-based vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®, or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) including the subsequent Original/Omicron BA.1, Original/Omicron BA.4-5 and Omicron XBB.1.5 variant-adapted vaccines developed by BioNTech and Pfizer to protect against COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Initial Emergency Use Authorizations or conditional Marketing Authorizations for the original BNT162b2 vaccine were granted based upon a favorable benefit-risk assessment taking into account clinical safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy data, which was subsequently reconfirmed for younger age groups, and by real world evidence data. In addition, the favorable benefit-risk assessment was maintained for the bivalent vaccines, developed against newly arising SARS-CoV-2 variants, with accumulating clinical trial data.

Immunological Enigma: A Case Report of COVID-19 Survival in a Patient With Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis C Virus, and Tuberculosis Co-infection

This case report aims to elucidate the unique clinical course of a 34-year-old male patient diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), chronic hepatitis C, and prior tuberculosis (TB) infections, who subsequently contracted COVID-19. Immunological assessments revealed profound immunosuppression, marked by decreased CD4+ T cells (0.037 x 10⁹/L), alongside mildly elevated IgG levels (16.701 g/L), reflecting both HIV-related immunodeficiency and non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Concurrently, the patient tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Imaging findings demonstrated overlapping characteristics of TB and COVID-19. Timely initiation of specific TB therapy, alongside supportive care and optimized antiretroviral and anti-TB regimens, was implemented. Despite the patient's immunocompromised state and complex medical history, he successfully recovered from COVID-19. Key factors contributing to survival included early TB diagnosis and treatment, comprehensive medical care, careful management of drug interactions, and a potentially effective individual immune response. Notably, no typical features of COVID-19 pneumonia were observed, suggesting that the dual infection may have influenced the clinical presentation. This case underscores the potential for positive outcomes in individuals with complex medical histories, including coexisting infections. Further research into the interplay of multiple infections in such patients is warranted to optimize clinical management strategies and enhance our understanding of COVID-19 within this distinctive population.

Stuck in pandemic uncertainty: a review of the persistent effects of COVID-19 infection in immune-deficient people

BACKGROUND

People who are immune-deficient/disordered (IDP) are underrepresented in COVID-19 studies. Specifically, there is limited research on post-SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes, including viral persistence and long-term sequelae in these populations.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to examine the published literature on the occurrence of persistent SARS-CoV-2 positivity, relapse, reinfections, variant coinfection, and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in IDP. Although the available literature largely centred on those with secondary immunodeficiencies, studies on people with inborn errors of immunity are also included.

SOURCES

PubMed was searched using medical subject headings terms to identify relevant articles from the last 4 years. Articles on primary and secondary immunodeficiencies were chosen, and a special emphasis was placed on including articles that studied people with inborn errors of immunity. The absence of extensive cohort studies including these individuals has limited most articles in this review to case reports, whereas the articles focusing on secondary immunodeficiencies include larger cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. Articles focusing solely on HIV/AIDS were excluded.

CONTENT

Scientific literature suggests that IDP of any age are more likely to experience persistent SARS-CoV-2 infections. Although adult IDP exhibits a higher rate of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, milder COVID-19 infections in children may reduce their risk of experiencing post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Reinfections and coinfections may occur at a slightly higher rate in IDP than in the general population.

IMPLICATIONS

Although IDP experience increased viral persistence and inter-host evolution, it is unlikely that enough evidence can be generated at the population-level to support or refute the hypothesis that infections in IDP are significantly more likely to result in variants of concern than infections in the general population. Additional research on the relationship between viral persistence and the rate of long-term sequelae in IDP could inform the understanding of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in IDP and the general population.

A 67-Year-Old Man with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) on Maintenance Therapy with Ibrutinib with Persistent SARS-CoV-2 Infection Unresponsive to Antiviral Treatments

BACKGROUND SARS-CoV-2 infection can persist in immunocompromised patients with hematological malignancies, despite antiviral treatment. This report is of a 67-year-old man with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, and thrombocytopenia on maintenance therapy with ibrutinib, with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection unresponsive to antiviral treatment, including remdesivir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid), and tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld). CASE REPORT The patient was admitted to our hospital 3 times. During his first hospitalization, he was treated with 5-day course of remdesivir and intravenous steroids; however, antigen and molecular nasopharyngeal swabs were persistently positive, and he was discharged home. Due to respiratory worsening, he was rehospitalized, and despite being treated initially with tixagevimab/cilgavimab, and subsequently with a remdesivir course of 5 days, SARS-CoV-2 tests remained persistently positive. During his third hospital stay, our patient was subjected to combined therapy with remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for 5 days, obtaining a significant reduction of viral load at both antigen and molecular testing. As an ultimate attempt to achieve a negative status before discharge, a 10-day course of combined remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was administered, with a temporary reduction of viral load, followed by a sudden increase immediately after the discontinuation of Paxlovid. Due to worsening hematological disease and bacterial over-infections, the patient gradually worsened until death. CONCLUSIONS This is an emblematic case of correlation between persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection and immunosuppression status in hematological hosts. In these patients, the viral load remains high, favoring the evolution of the virus, and the immunodeficiency makes it difficult to identify the appropriate therapeutic approach.

Rituximab-to-vaccine interval on SARS-CoV-2 immunogenicity in children: The potential role of prior natural infection

BACKGROUND

Treatment with anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab) is used in both adults and children to treat various autoimmune and oncological diseases. Rituximab depletes B CD20+ cells and, thereby, antibody response to vaccines. This study aimed to examine the antibody response to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines in children aged 5-18 years undergoing rituximab treatment compared to healthy matched children.

METHODS

Between 31 January and 18 July 2022, we conducted a prospective observational study at the Geneva University Hospitals, enrolling children aged 5-18 years under rituximab treatment who had received two mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. Controls were healthy volunteers with no significant medical conditions. Exclusion criteria included a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Blood samples were collected at day 60 (±30) and day 270 (±90) after the second vaccination.

RESULTS

The rituximab-treated group exhibited significantly lower levels of antibodies specific to the anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein than healthy controls at 60 (±30) days after the second vaccine dose (geometric mean concentration: 868.3 IU/mL in patients and 11,393 IU/mL in controls; p = .008). However, patients with a rituximab-to-vaccine interval shorter than 6 months and with evidence of a past infection (based on positive anti-N antibody levels) had a high level of anti-RBD antibodies.

CONCLUSION

A past infection with SARS-CoV-2 may induce anti-RBD-specific memory B cells that can be re-activated by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, even after rituximab-induced B-cell depletion. This suggests that it is possible to vaccinate earlier than 6 months after rituximab to develop a good antibody response, especially in the case of past SARS-CoV-2 infection.

B-cell-depleted patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection: combination therapy or monotherapy? A real-world experience

Objectives

The aim of the study was to describe a cohort of B-cell-depleted immunocompromised (IC) patients with prolonged or relapsing COVID-19 treated with monotherapy or combination therapy.

Methods

This is a multicenter observational retrospective study conducted on IC patients consecutively hospitalized with a prolonged or relapsing SARS-CoV-2 infection from November 2020 to January 2023. IC COVID-19 subjects were stratified according to the monotherapy or combination anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapy received.

Results

Eighty-eight patients were enrolled, 19 under monotherapy and 69 under combination therapy. The study population had a history of immunosuppression (median of 2 B-cells/mm3, IQR 1-24 cells), and residual hypogammaglobulinemia was observed in 55 patients. A reduced length of hospitalization and time to negative SARS-CoV-2 molecular nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) in the combination versus monotherapy group was observed. In the univariable and multivariable analyses, the percentage change in the rate of days to NPS negativity showed a significant reduction in patients receiving combination therapy compared to those receiving monotherapy.

Conclusion

In IC persistent COVID-19 patients, it is essential to explore new therapeutic strategies such as combination multi-target therapy (antiviral or double antiviral plus antibody-based therapies) to avoid persistent viral shedding and/or severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Clinical features and 28-day mortality predictors of vaccinated patients admitted to a COVID-19 ICU hub in Italy

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 vaccination has been proved to be effective in preventing hospitalization and illness progression, even though data on mortality of vaccinated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are conflicting. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of vaccinated patients admitted to ICU according to their immunization cycle and to outline the risk factors for 28-day mortality. This observational study included adult patients admitted to ICU for acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to SARS-CoV-2 and who had received at least one dose of vaccine.

RESULTS

Fully vaccination was defined as a complete primary cycle from < 120 days or a booster dose from > 14 days. All the other patients were named partially vaccinated. One-hundred sixty patients (91 fully and 69 partially vaccinated) resulted eligible, showing a 28-day mortality rate of 51.9%. Compared to partially vaccinated, fully vaccinated were younger (69 [60-77.5] vs. 74 [66-79] years, p 0.029), more frequently immunocompromised (39.56% vs. 14.39%, p 0.003), and affected by at least one comorbidity (90.11% vs 78.26%, p 0.045), mainly chronic kidney disease (CKD) (36.26% vs 20.29%, p 0.035). At multivariable analysis, independent predictors of 28-day mortality were as follows: older age [OR 1.05 (CI 95% 1.01-1.08), p 0.005], history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [OR 3.05 (CI 95% 1.28-7.30), p 0.012], immunosuppression [OR 3.70 (CI 95% 1.63-8.40), p 0.002], and admission respiratory and hemodynamic status [PaO2/FiO2 and septic shock: OR 0.99 (CI 95% 0.98-0.99), p 0.009 and 2.74 (CI 95% 1.16-6.48), p 0.022, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a full vaccination cycle, severe COVID-19 may occur in patients with relevant comorbidities, especially immunosuppression and CKD. Regardless the immunization status, predisposing conditions (i.e., older age, COPD, and immunosuppression) and a severe clinical presentation were predictors of 28-day mortality.

Real-World Experience of the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy with Remdesivir and Monoclonal Antibodies versus Remdesivir Alone for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 and Immunosuppression: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in Aichi, Japan

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic continues to threaten global public health. Remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies have shown promise for COVID-19 treatment of patients who are immunocompromised, including those with cancer, transplant recipients, and those with autoimmune disorder. However, the effectiveness and safety of this combination therapy for patients who are immunosuppressed remain unclear. We compared the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and remdesivir monotherapy for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who were immunosuppressed. Eighty-six patients treated in July 2021-March 2023 were analyzed. The combination therapy group (CTG) showed a statistically significant reduction in viral load compared with the monotherapy group (MTG) (p < 0.01). Patients in the CTG also experienced earlier resolution of fever than those in the MTG (p = 0.02), although this difference was not significant in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.21). Additionally, the CTG had significantly higher discharge rates on days 7, 14, and 28 than the MTG (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p = 0.04, respectively). No serious adverse events were observed with combination therapy. These findings suggest that combination therapy may improve the clinical outcomes of immunosuppressed COVID-19 patients by reducing the viral load and hastening recovery. Further studies are required to fully understand the benefits of this combination therapy for immunocompromised COVID-19 patients.