Two distinct modes of ATR activation orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1

Medicinal chemistry breakthroughs on ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK inhibitors as prospective cancer therapeutics

This review discusses the critical roles of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase (ATM), ATM and Rad3-related Kinase (ATR), and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) in the DNA damage response (DDR) and their implications in cancer. Emphasis is placed on the intricate interplay between these kinases, highlighting their collaborative and distinct roles in maintaining genomic integrity and promoting tumour development under dysregulated conditions. Furthermore, the review covers ongoing clinical trials, patent literature, and medicinal chemistry campaigns on ATM/ATR/DNA-PK inhibitors as antitumor agents. Notably, the medicinal chemistry campaigns employed robust drug design strategies and aimed at assembling new structural templates with amplified DDR kinase inhibitory ability, as well as outwitting the pharmacokinetic liabilities of the existing DDR kinase inhibitors. Given the success attained through such endeavours, the clinical pipeline of DNA repair kinase inhibitors is anticipated to be supplemented by a reasonable number of tractable entries (DDR kinase inhibitors) soon.

Dynamic R-loops at centromeres ensure chromosome alignment during oocyte meiotic divisions in mice

R-loops play various roles in many physiological processes, however, their role in meiotic division remains largely unknown. Here we show that R-loops and their regulator RNase H1 are present at centromeres during oocyte meiotic divisions. Proper centromeric R-loops are essential to ensure chromosome alignment in oocytes during metaphase I (MI). Remarkably, both Rnaseh1 knockout and overexpression in oocytes lead to severe spindle assembly defects and chromosome misalignment due to dysregulation of R-loops at centromeres. Furthermore, we find that replication protein A (RPA) is recruited to centromeric R-loops, facilitating the deposition of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase at centromeres by interacting with the ATR-interaction protein (ATRIP). The ATR kinase deposition triggers the activity of CHK1, stimulating the phosphorylation of Aurora B to finally promote proper spindle assembly and chromosome alignment at the equatorial plate. Most importantly, the application of ATR, CHK1, and Aurora B inhibitors could efficiently rescue the defects in spindle assembly and chromosome alignment due to RNase H1 deficiency in oocytes. Overall, our findings uncover a critical role of R-loops during mouse oocyte meiotic divisions, suggesting that dysregulation of R-loops may be associated with female infertility. Additionally, ATR, CHK1, and Aurora B inhibitors may potentially be used to treat some infertile patients.

ATM priming and end resection-coupled phosphorylation of MRE11 is important for fork protection and replication restart

The MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 (MRN) complex plays multiple roles in the maintenance of genome stability. MRN is associated with replication forks to preserve fork integrity and is also required for end resection at double-strand breaks (DSBs) to facilitate homologous recombination (HR). The critical need for proper control of the MRE11 nuclease activity is highlighted by the extensive nascent strand DNA degradation driven by MRE11 in BRCA-deficient cells, leading to genome instability and increased sensitivity to chemotherapeutics. In this study, we identified a tightly controlled mechanism, elicited by sequential phosphorylation of MRE11 by ATM and ATR to regulate MRE11 nuclease activities through its DNA binding. Specifically, at DSBs, MRE11 phosphorylation by ATM at the C-terminal S676/S678 primes it for subsequent phosphorylation by ATR, whose activation is triggered by end resection which requires the MRE11 nuclease activity. This ATR-mediated phosphorylation in turn induces MRE11 dissociation from DNA, providing a feedback mechanism to regulate the extent of end resection. At stalled replication forks, however, without ATM priming, MRN is stably associated with forks despite ATR activation. Furthermore, the ATR phosphorylation-defective MRE11 mutants are retained at single-ended DSBs formed by fork reversal upon replication stress, leading to extensive degradation of nascent DNA strands. Importantly, this end resection-coupled MRE11 phosphorylation elicits another critical layer of fork protection of nascent DNA in addition to BRCA2, ensuring proper end resection that is sufficient for replication restart at reversed forks while maintaining fork stability.

Mechanism of RPA phosphocode priming and tuning by Cdk1/Wee1 signaling circuit

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-strand DNA binding protein that is integral to DNA metabolism. Segregation of RPA functions in response to DNA damage is fine-tuned by hyperphosphorylation of the RPA32 subunit that is dependent on Cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk)-mediated priming phosphorylation at the Ser-23 and Ser-29 sites. However, the mechanism of priming-driven hyperphosphorylation of RPA remains unresolved. Furthermore, the modulation of cell cycle progression by the RPA-Cdk axis is not clearly understood. Here, we uncover that the RPA70 subunit is also phosphorylated by Cdk1 at Thr-191. This modification is crucial for the G2 to M phase transition. This function is enacted through reciprocal regulation of Cdk1 activity through a feedback circuit espoused by stabilization of Wee1 kinase. The Thr-191 phosphosite on RPA70 is also crucial for priming hyperphosphorylation of RPA32 in response to DNA damage. Structurally, phosphorylation by Cdk1 primes RPA by reconfiguring the domains to release the N-terminus of RPA32 and the two protein-interaction domains that markedly enhances the efficiency of multisite phosphorylation by other kinases. Our findings establish a unique phosphocode-dependent feedback mechanism between RPA and RPA-regulating kinases that is fine-tuned to enact bipartite functions in cell cycle progression and DNA damage response.

Non-homologous end joining shapes the genomic rearrangement landscape of chromothripsis from mitotic errors

Mitotic errors generate micronuclei entrapping mis-segregated chromosomes, which are susceptible to catastrophic fragmentation through chromothripsis. The reassembly of fragmented chromosomes by error-prone DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair generates diverse genomic rearrangements associated with human diseases. How specific repair pathways recognize and process these lesions remains poorly understood. Here we use CRISPR/Cas9 to systematically inactivate distinct DSB repair pathways and interrogate the rearrangement landscape of fragmented chromosomes. Deletion of canonical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) components substantially reduces complex rearrangements and shifts the rearrangement landscape toward simple alterations without the characteristic patterns of chromothripsis. Following reincorporation into the nucleus, fragmented chromosomes localize within sub-nuclear micronuclei bodies (MN bodies) and undergo ligation by NHEJ within a single cell cycle. In the absence of NHEJ, chromosome fragments are rarely engaged by alternative end-joining or recombination-based mechanisms, resulting in delayed repair kinetics, persistent 53BP1-labeled MN bodies, and cell cycle arrest. Thus, we provide evidence supporting NHEJ as the exclusive DSB repair pathway generating complex rearrangements from mitotic errors.

Resection of DNA double-strand breaks activates Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1- and Rad9-Hus1-Rad1-dependent mechanisms that redundantly promote ATR checkpoint activation and end processing in Xenopus egg extracts

Sensing and processing of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are vital to genome stability. DSBs are primarily detected by the ATM checkpoint pathway, where the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex serves as the DSB sensor. Subsequent DSB end resection activates the ATR checkpoint pathway, where replication protein A, MRN, and the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp serve as the DNA structure sensors. ATR activation depends also on Topbp1, which is loaded onto DNA through multiple mechanisms. While different DNA structures elicit specific ATR-activation subpathways, the regulation and mechanisms of the ATR-activation subpathways are not fully understood. Using DNA substrates that mimic extensively resected DSBs, we show here that MRN and 9-1-1 redundantly stimulate Dna2-dependent long-range end resection and ATR activation in Xenopus egg extracts. MRN serves as the loading platform for ATM, which, in turn, stimulates Dna2- and Topbp1-loading. Nevertheless, MRN promotes Dna2-mediated end processing largely independently of ATM. 9-1-1 is dispensable for bulk Dna2 loading, and Topbp1 loading is interdependent with 9-1-1. ATR facilitates Mre11 phosphorylation and ATM dissociation. These data uncover that long-range end resection activates two redundant pathways that facilitate ATR checkpoint signaling and DNA processing in a vertebrate system.

ATR signaling controls the bystander responses of human chondrosarcoma cells by promoting RAD51-dependent DNA repair

PURPOSE

Radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) frequently is seen as DNA damage in unirradiated bystander cells, but the repair processes initiated in response to that DNA damage are not well understood. RIBE-mediated formation of micronuclei (MN), a biomarker of persistent DNA damage, was previously observed in bystander normal fibroblast (AG01522) cells, but not in bystander human chondrosarcoma (HTB94) cells. The molecular mechanisms causing this disparity are not clear. Herein, we investigate the role of DNA repair in the bystander responses of the two cell lines.

METHODS

Cells were irradiated with X-rays and immediately co-cultured with un-irradiated cells using a trans-well insert system in which they share the same medium. The activation of DNA damage response (DDR) proteins was detected by immunofluorescence staining or Western blotting. MN formation was examined by the cytokinesis-block MN assay, which is a robust method to detect persistent DNA damage.

RESULTS

Immunofluorescent foci of γH2AX and 53BP1, biomarkers of DNA damage and repair, revealed a greater capacity for DNA repair in HTB94 cells than in AG01522 cells in both irradiated and bystander populations. Autophosphorylation of ATR at the threonine 1989 site was expressed at a greater level in HTB94 cells compared to AG01522 cells at the baseline and in response to hydroxyurea treatment or exposure to 1 Gy of X-rays. An inhibitor of ATR, but not of ATM, promoted MN formation in bystander HTB94 cells. In contrast, no effect of either inhibitor was observed in bystander AG01522 cells, indicating that ATR signaling might be a pivotal pathway to preventing the MN formation in bystander HTB94 cells. Supporting this idea, we found an ATR-dependent increase in the fractions of bystander HTB94 cells with pRPA2 S33 and RAD51 foci. A blocker of RAD51 facilitated MN formation in bystander HTB94 cells.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that HTB94 cells were likely more efficient in DNA repair than AG01522 cells, specifically via ATR signaling, which inhibited the bystander signal-induced MN formation. This study highlights the significance of DNA repair efficiency in bystander cell responses.

Role of RPA Phosphorylation in the ATR-Dependent G2 Cell Cycle Checkpoint

Cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks by initiating DSB repair and ensuring a cell cycle checkpoint. The primary responder to DSB repair is non-homologous end joining, which is an error-prone repair pathway. However, when DSBs are generated after DNA replication in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, a second DSB repair pathway, homologous recombination, can come into action. Both ATM and ATR are important for DSB-induced DSB repair and checkpoint responses. One method of ATM and ATR working together is through the DNA end resection of DSBs. As a readout and marker of DNA end resection, RPA is phosphorylated at Ser4/Ser8 of the N-terminus of RPA32 in response to DSBs. Here, the significance of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage, specifically in the S phase to G2 phase of the cell cycle, is examined. RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 phosphorylation in G2 synchronized cells is necessary for increases in TopBP1 and Rad9 accumulation on chromatin and full activation of the ATR-dependent G2 checkpoint. In addition, our data suggest that RPA Ser4/Ser8 phosphorylation modulates ATM-dependent KAP-1 phosphorylation and Rad51 chromatin loading in G2 cells. Through the phosphorylation of RPA Ser4/Ser8, ATM acts as a partner with ATR in the G2 phase checkpoint response, regulating key downstream events including Rad9, TopBP1 phosphorylation and KAP-1 phosphorylation/activation via the targeting of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8.

Identification of [1,2,4]Triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazine PARP1 inhibitors with overcome acquired resistance activities

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors can selectively kill homologous recombination (HR) deficient cancer cells and elicit anticancer effect through a mechanism of synthetic lethality. In this study, we designed, synthesized and pharmacologically evaluated a series of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazine derivatives as a class of potent PARP1 inhibitors. Among them, compounds 17m, 19a, 19c, 19e, 19i and 19k not only displayed more potent inhibitory activities (IC50s < 4.1 nM) than 9 and 1 against PARP1, but also exhibited nanomolar range of antiproliferative effects against MDA-MB-436 (BRCA1-/-, IC50s < 1.9 nM) and Capan-1 (BRCA2-/-, IC50s < 21.6 nM) cells. Notably, 19k significantly inhibited proliferation of resistant Capan-1 cells (IC50s < 0.3 nM). Collectively, the newly discovered PARP1 inhibitors act as a useful pharmacological tool for investigating the mechanism of acquired resistance to PARP1 inhibitors, and may also represent promising therapeutic agents for the treatment of HR deficient cancers with the potential to overcome the acquired resistance.

An ATR-PrimPol pathway confers tolerance to oncogenic KRAS-induced and heterochromatin-associated replication stress

Activation of the KRAS oncogene is a source of replication stress, but how this stress is generated and how it is tolerated by cancer cells remain poorly understood. Here we show that induction of KRASG12V expression in untransformed cells triggers H3K27me3 and HP1-associated chromatin compaction in an RNA transcription dependent manner, resulting in replication fork slowing and cell death. Furthermore, elevated ATR expression is necessary and sufficient for tolerance of KRASG12V-induced replication stress to expand replication stress-tolerant cells (RSTCs). PrimPol is phosphorylated at Ser255, a potential Chk1 substrate site, under KRASG12V-induced replication stress and promotes repriming to maintain fork progression and cell survival in an ATR/Chk1-dependent manner. However, ssDNA gaps are generated at heterochromatin by PrimPol-dependent repriming, leading to genomic instability. These results reveal a role of ATR-PrimPol in enabling precancerous cells to survive KRAS-induced replication stress and expand clonally with accumulation of genomic instability.

Maintaining Genome Integrity: Protein Kinases and Phosphatases Orchestrate the Balancing Act of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair in Cancer

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal DNA damages which lead to severe genome instability. Phosphorylation is one of the most important protein post-translation modifications involved in DSBs repair regulation. Kinases and phosphatases play coordinating roles in DSB repair by phosphorylating and dephosphorylating various proteins. Recent research has shed light on the importance of maintaining a balance between kinase and phosphatase activities in DSB repair. The interplay between kinases and phosphatases plays an important role in regulating DNA-repair processes, and alterations in their activity can lead to genomic instability and disease. Therefore, study on the function of kinases and phosphatases in DSBs repair is essential for understanding their roles in cancer development and therapeutics. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of kinases and phosphatases in DSBs repair regulation and highlight the advancements in the development of cancer therapies targeting kinases or phosphatases in DSBs repair pathways. In conclusion, understanding the balance of kinase and phosphatase activities in DSBs repair provides opportunities for the development of novel cancer therapeutics.

Comprehensive mutational analysis of the checkpoint signaling function of Rpa1/Ssb1 in fission yeast

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric complex and the major single-strand DNA (ssDNA) binding protein in eukaryotes. It plays important roles in DNA replication, repair, recombination, telomere maintenance, and checkpoint signaling. Because RPA is essential for cell survival, understanding its checkpoint signaling function in cells has been challenging. Several RPA mutants have been reported previously in fission yeast. None of them, however, has a defined checkpoint defect. A separation-of-function mutant of RPA, if identified, would provide significant insights into the checkpoint initiation mechanisms. We have explored this possibility and carried out an extensive genetic screen for Rpa1/Ssb1, the large subunit of RPA in fission yeast, looking for mutants with defects in checkpoint signaling. This screen has identified twenty-five primary mutants that are sensitive to genotoxins. Among these mutants, two have been confirmed partially defective in checkpoint signaling primarily at the replication fork, not the DNA damage site. The remaining mutants are likely defective in other functions such as DNA repair or telomere maintenance. Our screened mutants, therefore, provide a valuable tool for future dissection of the multiple functions of RPA in fission yeast.

p130RB2 positively contributes to ATR activation in response to replication stress via the RPA32-ETAA1 axis

Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase is a crucial regulator of the cell cycle checkpoint and activated in response to DNA replication stress by two independent pathways via RPA32-ETAA1 and TopBP1. However, the precise activation mechanism of ATR by the RPA32-ETAA1 pathway remains unclear. Here, we show that p130RB2, a member of the retinoblastoma protein family, participates in the pathway under hydroxyurea-induced DNA replication stress. p130RB2 binds to ETAA1, but not TopBP1, and depletion of p130RB2 inhibits the RPA32-ETAA1 interaction under replication stress. Moreover, p130RB2 depletion reduces ATR activation accompanied by phosphorylation of its targets RPA32, Chk1, and ATR itself. It also causes improper re-progression of S phase with retaining single-stranded DNA after cancelation of the stress, which leads to an increase in the anaphase bridge phenotype and a decrease in cell survival. Importantly, restoration of p130RB2 rescued the disrupted phenotypes of p130RB2 knockdown cells. These results suggest positive involvement of p130RB2 in the RPA32-ETAA1-ATR axis and proper re-progression of the cell cycle to maintain genome integrity.

Emerging strategies for cancer therapy by ATR inhibitors

DNA replication stress (RS) causes genomic instability and vulnerability in cancer cells. To counteract RS, cells have evolved various mechanisms involving the ATR kinase signaling pathway, which regulates origin firing, cell cycle checkpoints, and fork stabilization to secure the fidelity of replication. However, ATR signaling also alleviates RS to support cell survival by driving RS tolerance, thereby contributing to therapeutic resistance. Cancer cells harboring genetic mutations and other changes that disrupt normal DNA replication increase the risk of DNA damage and the levels of RS, conferring addiction to ATR activity for sustainable replication and susceptibility to therapeutic approaches using ATR inhibitors (ATRis). Therefore, clinical trials are currently being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ATRis as monotherapies or in combination with other drugs and biomarkers. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the elucidation of the mechanisms by which ATR functions in the RS response and its therapeutic relevance when utilizing ATRis.

Comprehensive mutational analysis of the checkpoint signaling function of Rpa1/Ssb1 in fission yeast

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric complex and the major single-strand DNA (ssDNA) binding protein in eukaryotes. It plays important roles in DNA replication, repair, recombination, telomere maintenance, and checkpoint signaling. Because RPA is essential for cell survival, understanding its checkpoint signaling function in cells has been challenging. Several RPA mutants have been reported previously in fission yeast. None of them, however, has a defined checkpoint defect. A separation-of-function mutant of RPA, if identified, would provide significant insights into the checkpoint initiation mechanisms. We have explored this possibility and carried out an extensive genetic screening for Rpa1/Ssb1, the large subunit of RPA in fission yeast, looking for mutants with defects in checkpoint signaling. This screen has identified twenty-five primary mutants that are sensitive to genotoxins. Among these mutants, two have been confirmed partially defective in checkpoint signaling primarily at the replication fork, not the DNA damage site. The remaining mutants are likely defective in other functions such as DNA repair or telomere maintenance. Our screened mutants, therefore, provide a valuable tool for future dissection of the multiple functions of RPA in fission yeast.

AUTHOR SUMMARY

Originally discovered as a protein required for replication of simian virus SV40 DNA, replication protein A is now known to function in DNA replication, repair, recombination, telomere maintenance, and checkpoint signaling in all eukaryotes. The protein is a complex of three subunits and the two larger ones are essential for cell growth. This essential function however complicates the studies in living cells, and for this reason, its checkpoint function remains to be fully understood. We have carried out an genetic screening of the largest subunit of this protein in fission yeast, aiming to find a non-lethal mutant that lacks the checkpoint function. This extensive screen has uncovered two mutants with a partial defect in checkpoint signaling when DNA replication is arrested. Surprisingly, although the two mutants also have a defect in DNA repair, their checkpoint signaling remains largely functional in the presence of DNA damage. We have also uncovered twenty-three mutants with defects in DNA repair or telomere maintenance, but not checkpoint signaling. Therefore, the non-lethal mutants uncovered by this study provide a valuable tool for dissecting the multiple functions of this biologically important protein in fission yeast.

NBS1 binds directly to TOPBP1 via disparate interactions between the NBS1 BRCT1 domain and the TOPBP1 BRCT1 and BRCT2 domains

The TOPBP1 and NBS1 proteins are key components of DNA repair and DNA-based signaling systems. TOPBP1 is a multi-BRCT domain containing protein that plays important roles in checkpoint signaling, DNA replication, and DNA repair. Likewise, NBS1, which is a component of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex, functions in both checkpoint signaling and DNA repair. NBS1 also contains BRCT domains, and previous works have shown that TOPBP1 and NBS1 interact with one another. In this work we examine the interaction between TOPBP1 and NBS1 in detail. We report that NBS1 uses its BRCT1 domain to interact with TOPBP1's BRCT1 domain and, separately, with TOPBP1's BRCT2 domain. Thus, NBS1 can make two distinct contacts with TOPBP1. We report that recombinant TOPBP1 and NBS1 proteins bind one another in a purified system, showing that the interaction is direct and does not require post-translational modifications. Surprisingly, we also report that intact BRCT domains are not required for these interactions, as truncated versions of the domains are sufficient to confer binding. For TOPBP1, we find that small 24-29 amino acid sequences within BRCT1 or BRCT2 allow binding to NBS1, in a transferrable manner. These data expand our knowledge of how the crucial DNA damage response proteins TOPBP1 and NBS1 interact with one another and set the stage for functional analysis of the two disparate binding sites for NBS1 on TOPBP1.

SUMOylation of HNRNPA2B1 modulates RPA dynamics during unperturbed replication and genotoxic stress responses

Replication protein A (RPA) is a major regulator of eukaryotic DNA metabolism involved in multiple essential cellular processes. Maintaining appropriate RPA dynamics is crucial for cells to prevent RPA exhaustion, which can lead to replication fork breakage and replication catastrophe. However, how cells regulate RPA availability during unperturbed replication and in response to stress has not been well elucidated. Here, we show that HNRNPA2B1SUMO functions as an endogenous inhibitor of RPA during normal replication. HNRNPA2B1SUMO associates with RPA through recognizing the SUMO-interacting motif (SIM) of RPA to inhibit RPA accumulation at replication forks and impede local ATR activation. Declining HNRNPA2SUMO induced by DNA damage will release nuclear soluble RPA to localize to chromatin and enable ATR activation. Furthermore, we characterize that HNRNPA2B1 hinders homologous recombination (HR) repair via limiting RPA availability, thus conferring sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. These findings establish HNRNPA2B1 as a critical player in RPA-dependent surveillance networks.

RAD18 opposes transcription-associated genome instability through FANCD2 recruitment

DNA replication is a vulnerable time for genome stability maintenance. Intrinsic stressors, as well as oncogenic stress, can challenge replication by fostering conflicts with transcription and stabilizing DNA:RNA hybrids. RAD18 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for PCNA that is involved in coordinating DNA damage tolerance pathways to preserve genome stability during replication. In this study, we show that RAD18 deficient cells have higher levels of transcription-replication conflicts and accumulate DNA:RNA hybrids that induce DNA double strand breaks and replication stress. We find that these effects are driven in part by failure to recruit the Fanconi Anemia protein FANCD2 at difficult to replicate and R-loop prone genomic sites. FANCD2 activation caused by splicing inhibition or aphidicolin treatment is critically dependent on RAD18 activity. Thus, we highlight a RAD18-dependent pathway promoting FANCD2-mediated suppression of R-loops and transcription-replication conflicts.

MRN-dependent and independent pathways for recruitment of TOPBP1 to DNA double-strand breaks

Ataxia Telangiectasia mutated and RAD3-related (ATR) kinase is activated by DNA replication stress and also by various forms of DNA damage, including DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Recruitment to sites of damage is insufficient for ATR activation as one of two known ATR activators, either topoisomerase II-binding protein (TOPBP1) or Ewing’s tumor-associated antigen 1, must also be present for signaling to initiate. Here, we employ our recently established DSB-mediated ATR activation in Xenopus egg extract (DMAX) system to examine how TOPBP1 is recruited to DSBs, so that it may activate ATR. We report that TOPBP1 is only transiently present at DSBs, with a half-life of less than 10 minutes. We also examined the relationship between TOPBP1 and the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN), CtBP interacting protein (CtIP), and Ataxia Telangiectasia mutated (ATM) network of proteins. Loss of MRN prevents CtIP recruitment to DSBs, and partially inhibits TOPBP1 recruitment. Loss of CtIP has no impact on either MRN or TOPBP1 recruitment. Loss of ATM kinase activity prevents CtIP recruitment and enhances MRN and TOPBP1 recruitment. These findings demonstrate that there are MRN-dependent and independent pathways that recruit TOPBP1 to DSBs for ATR activation. Lastly, we find that both the 9-1-1 complex and MDC1 are dispensable for TOPBP1 recruitment to DSBs.

A field guide to the proteomics of post-translational modifications in DNA repair

All cells incur DNA damage from exogenous and endogenous sources and possess pathways to detect and repair DNA damage. Post-translational modifications (PTMs), in the past 20 years, have risen to ineluctable importance in the study of the regulation of DNA repair mechanisms. For example, DNA damage response kinases are critical in both the initial sensing of DNA damage as well as in orchestrating downstream activities of DNA repair factors. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics revolutionized the study of the role of PTMs in the DNA damage response and has canonized PTMs as central modulators of nearly all aspects of DNA damage signaling and repair. This review provides a biologist-friendly guide for the mass spectrometry analysis of PTMs in the context of DNA repair and DNA damage responses. We reflect on the current state of proteomics for exploring new mechanisms of PTM-based regulation and outline a roadmap for designing PTM mapping experiments that focus on the DNA repair and DNA damage responses.

Hallmarks of DNA replication stress

Faithful DNA replication is critical for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Although DNA replication machinery is highly accurate, the process of DNA replication is constantly challenged by DNA damage and other intrinsic and extrinsic stresses throughout the genome. A variety of cellular stresses interfering with DNA replication, which are collectively termed replication stress, pose a threat to genomic stability in both normal and cancer cells. To cope with replication stress and maintain genomic stability, cells have evolved a complex network of cellular responses to alleviate and tolerate replication problems. This review will focus on the major sources of replication stress, the impacts of replication stress in cells, and the assays to detect replication stress, offering an overview of the hallmarks of DNA replication stress.

Functional mapping of PHF6 complexes in chromatin remodeling, replication dynamics, and DNA repair

The Plant Homeodomain 6 gene (PHF6) encodes a nucleolar and chromatin-associated leukemia tumor suppressor with proposed roles in transcription regulation. However, specific molecular mechanisms controlled by PHF6 remain rudimentarily understood. Here we show that PHF6 engages multiple nucleosome remodeling protein complexes, including nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase, SWI/SNF and ISWI factors, the replication machinery and DNA repair proteins. Moreover, after DNA damage, PHF6 localizes to sites of DNA injury, and its loss impairs the resolution of DNA breaks, with consequent accumulation of single- and double-strand DNA lesions. Native chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analyses show that PHF6 specifically associates with difficult-to-replicate heterochromatin at satellite DNA regions enriched in histone H3 lysine 9 trimethyl marks, and single-molecule locus-specific analyses identify PHF6 as an important regulator of genomic stability at fragile sites. These results extend our understanding of the molecular mechanisms controlling hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis and leukemia transformation by placing PHF6 at the crossroads of chromatin remodeling, replicative fork dynamics, and DNA repair.

Mismatch repair proteins play a role in ATR activation upon temozolomide treatment in MGMT-methylated glioblastoma

The methylation status of the O⁶-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter has been widely accepted as a prognostic biomarker for treatment with the alkylator, temozolomide (TMZ). In the absence of promoter methylation, the MGMT enzyme removes O⁶-methylguanine (O⁶-meG) lesions. In the setting of MGMT-promoter methylation (MGMT-), the O⁶-meG lesion activates the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway which functions to remove the damage. Our group reported that loss of MGMT expression via MGMT promoter silencing modulates activation of ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3 related protein (ATR) in response to TMZ treatment, which is associated with synergistic tumor-cell killing. Whether or not MMR proteins are involved in ATR activation in MGMT-cells upon alkylation damage remains poorly understood. To investigate the function of MMR in ATR activation, we created isogenic cell lines with knockdowns of the individual human MMR proteins MutS homolog 2 (MSH2), MutS homolog 6 (MSH6), MutS homolog 3 (MSH3), MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), and PMS1 homolog 2 (PMS2). Here, we demonstrate that MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2, specifically, are involved in the activation of the ATR axis after TMZ exposure, whereas MSH3 is likely not. This study elucidates a potential mechanistic understanding of how the MMR system is involved in ATR activation by TMZ in glioblastoma cells, which is important for targeting MMR-mutated cancers.

Disrupting PHF8-TOPBP1 connection elicits a breast tumor-specific vulnerability to chemotherapeutics

The DNA damage response (DDR) pathway generally protects against genome instability, and defects in DDR have been exploited therapeutically in cancer treatment. We have reported that histone demethylase PHF8 demethylates TOPBP1 K118 mono-methylation (K118me1) to drive the activation of ATR kinase, one of the master regulators of replication stress. However, whether dysregulation of this physiological signalling is involved in tumorigenesis remains unknown. Here, we showed PHF8-promoted TOPBP1 demethylation is clinically associated with breast tumorigenesis and patient survival. Mammary gland tumors from Phf8 knockout mice grow slowly and exhibit higher level of K118me1, lower ATR activity, and increased chromosomal instability. Importantly, we found that disruption of PHF8-TOPBP1 axis suppresses breast tumorigenesis and creates a breast tumor-specific vulnerability to PARP inhibitor (PARPi) and platinum drug. CRISPR/Cas9 mutation modelling of the deleted or truncated mutation of PHF8 in clinical tumor samples demonstrated breast tumor cells expressing the mimetic variants are more vulnerable to PARPi. Together, our study supports the pursuit of PHF8-TOPBP1 signalling pathway as promising avenues for targeted therapies of PHF8-TOPBP1 proficient tumors, and provides proof-of-concept evidence for loss-of-function of PHF8 as a therapeutic indicator of PARPis.

Nucleases and Co-Factors in DNA Replication Stress Responses

DNA replication stress is a constant threat that cells must manage to proliferate and maintain genome integrity. DNA replication stress responses, a subset of the broader DNA damage response (DDR), operate when the DNA replication machinery (replisome) is blocked or replication forks collapse during S phase. There are many sources of replication stress, such as DNA lesions caused by endogenous and exogenous agents including commonly used cancer therapeutics, and difficult-to-replicate DNA sequences comprising fragile sites, G-quadraplex DNA, hairpins at trinucleotide repeats, and telomeres. Replication stress is also a consequence of conflicts between opposing transcription and replication, and oncogenic stress which dysregulates replication origin firing and fork progression. Cells initially respond to replication stress by protecting blocked replisomes, but if the offending problem (e.g., DNA damage) is not bypassed or resolved in a timely manner, forks may be cleaved by nucleases, inducing a DNA double-strand break (DSB) and providing a means to accurately restart stalled forks via homologous recombination. However, DSBs pose their own risks to genome stability if left unrepaired or misrepaired. Here we focus on replication stress response systems, comprising DDR signaling, fork protection, and fork processing by nucleases that promote fork repair and restart. Replication stress nucleases include MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase, CtIP, MRE11, EXO1, DNA2-BLM, SLX1-SLX4, XPF-ERCC1-SLX4, Artemis, XPG, and FEN1. Replication stress factors are important in cancer etiology as suppressors of genome instability associated with oncogenic mutations, and as potential cancer therapy targets to enhance the efficacy of chemo- and radiotherapeutics.

LAP2α preserves genome integrity through assisting RPA deposition on damaged chromatin

BACKGROUND

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) coated with replication protein A (RPA) acts as a key platform for the recruitment and exchange of genome maintenance factors in DNA damage response. Yet, how the formation of the ssDNA-RPA intermediate is regulated remains elusive.

RESULTS

Here, we report that the lamin-associated protein LAP2α is physically associated with RPA, and LAP2α preferentially facilitates RPA deposition on damaged chromatin via physical contacts between LAP2α and RPA1. Importantly, LAP2α-promoted RPA binding to ssDNA plays a critical role in protection of replication forks, activation of ATR, and repair of damaged DNA. We further demonstrate that the preference of LAP2α-promoted RPA loading on damaged chromatin depends on poly ADP-ribose polymerase PARP1, but not poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides mechanistic insight into RPA deposition in response to DNA damage and reveals a genome protection role of LAP2α.

An Eye in the Replication Stress Response: Lessons From Tissue-Specific Studies in vivo

Several inherited human syndromes that severely affect organogenesis and other developmental processes are caused by mutations in replication stress response (RSR) genes. Although the molecular machinery of RSR is conserved, disease-causing mutations in RSR-genes may have distinct tissue-specific outcomes, indicating that progenitor cells may differ in their responses to RSR inactivation. Therefore, understanding how different cell types respond to replication stress is crucial to uncover the mechanisms of RSR-related human syndromes. Here, we review the ocular manifestations in RSR-related human syndromes and summarize recent findings investigating the mechanisms of RSR during eye development in vivo. We highlight a remarkable heterogeneity of progenitor cells responses to RSR inactivation and discuss its implications for RSR-related human syndromes.

MicroRNAs and the DNA damage response: How is cell fate determined?

It is becoming clear that the DNA damage response orchestrates an appropriate response to a given level of DNA damage, whether that is cell cycle arrest and repair, senescence or apoptosis. It is plausible that the alternative regulation of the DNA damage response (DDR) plays a role in deciding cell fate following damage. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are associated with the transcriptional regulation of many cellular processes. They have diverse functions, affecting, presumably, all aspects of cell biology. Many have been shown to be DNA damage inducible and it is conceivable that miRNA species play a role in deciding cell fate following DNA damage by regulating the expression and activation of key DDR proteins. From a clinical perspective, miRNAs are attractive targets to improve cancer patient outcomes to DNA-damaging chemotherapy. However, cancer tissue is known to be, or to become, well adapted to DNA damage as a means of inducing chemoresistance. This frequently results from an altered DDR, possibly owing to miRNA dysregulation. Though many studies provide an overview of miRNAs that are dysregulated within cancerous tissues, a tangible, functional association is often lacking. While miRNAs are well-documented in 'ectopic biology', the physiological significance of endogenous miRNAs in the context of the DDR requires clarification. This review discusses miRNAs of biological relevance and their role in DNA damage response by potentially 'fine-tuning' the DDR towards a particular cell fate in response to DNA damage. MiRNAs are thus potential therapeutic targets/strategies to limit chemoresistance, or improve chemotherapeutic efficacy.

The Safe Path at the Fork: Ensuring Replication-Associated DNA Double-Strand Breaks are Repaired by Homologous Recombination

Cells must replicate and segregate their DNA to daughter cells accurately to maintain genome stability and prevent cancer. DNA replication is usually fast and accurate, with intrinsic (proofreading) and extrinsic (mismatch repair) error-correction systems. However, replication forks slow or stop when they encounter DNA lesions, natural pause sites, and difficult-to-replicate sequences, or when cells are treated with DNA polymerase inhibitors or hydroxyurea, which depletes nucleotide pools. These challenges are termed replication stress, to which cells respond by activating DNA damage response signaling pathways that delay cell cycle progression, stimulate repair and replication fork restart, or induce apoptosis. Stressed forks are managed by rescue from adjacent forks, repriming, translesion synthesis, template switching, and fork reversal which produces a single-ended double-strand break (seDSB). Stressed forks also collapse to seDSBs when they encounter single-strand nicks or are cleaved by structure-specific nucleases. Reversed and cleaved forks can be restarted by homologous recombination (HR), but seDSBs pose risks of mis-rejoining by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) to other DSBs, causing genome rearrangements. HR requires resection of broken ends to create 3' single-stranded DNA for RAD51 recombinase loading, and resected ends are refractory to repair by NHEJ. This Mini Review highlights mechanisms that help maintain genome stability by promoting resection of seDSBs and accurate fork restart by HR.

Valproic Acid Regulates HR and Cell Cycle Through MUS81-pRPA2 Pathway in Response to Hydroxyurea

Breast cancer is the primary problem threatening women’s health. The combined application of valproic acid (VPA) and hydroxyurea (HU) has a synergistic effect on killing breast cancer cells, but the molecular mechanism remains elusive. Replication protein A2 phosphorylation (pRPA2), is essential for homologous recombination (HR) repair and cell cycle. Here we showed that in response to HU, the VPA significantly decreased the tumor cells survival, and promoted S-phase slippage, which was associated with the decrease of pCHK1 and WEE1/pCDK1-mediated checkpoint kinases phosphorylation pathway and inhibited pRPA2/Rad51-mediated HR repair pathway; the mutation of pRPA2 significantly diminished the above effect, indicating that VPA-caused HU sensitization was pRPA2 dependent. It was further found that VPA and HU combination treatment also resulted in the decrease of endonuclease MUS81. After MUS81 elimination, not only the level of pRPA2 was abolished in response to HU treatment, but also VPA-caused HU sensitization was significantly down-regulated through pRPA2-mediated checkpoint kinases phosphorylation and HR repair pathways. In addition, the VPA altered the tumor microenvironment and reduced tumor burden by recruiting macrophages to tumor sites; the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with high pRPA2 expression had significantly worse survival. Overall, our findings demonstrated that VPA influences HR repair and cell cycle through down-regulating MUS81-pRPA2 pathway in response to HU treatment.

Loss of ATRX confers DNA repair defects and PARP inhibitor sensitivity

Alpha Thalassemia/Mental Retardation Syndrome X-Linked (ATRX) is mutated frequently in gliomas and represents a potential target for cancer therapies. ATRX is known to function as a histone chaperone that helps incorporate histone variant, H3.3, into the genome. Studies have implicated ATRX in key DNA damage response (DDR) pathways but a distinct role in DNA repair has yet to be fully elucidated. To further investigate the function of ATRX in the DDR, we created isogenic wild-type (WT) and ATRX knockout (KO) model cell lines using CRISPR-based gene targeting. These studies revealed that loss of ATRX confers sensitivity to poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, which was linked to an increase in replication stress, as detected by increased activation of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) signaling axis. ATRX mutations frequently co-occur with mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 and -2 (IDH1/2), and the latter mutations also induce HR defects and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. We found that the magnitude of PARP inhibitor sensitivity was equal in the context of each mutation alone, although no further sensitization was observed in combination, suggesting an epistatic interaction. Finally, we observed enhanced synergistic tumor cell killing in ATRX KO cells with ATR and PARP inhibition, which is commonly seen in HR-defective cells. Taken together, these data reveal that ATRX may be used as a molecular marker for DDR defects and PARP inhibitor sensitivity, independent of IDH1/2 mutations. These data highlight the important role of common glioma-associated mutations in the regulation of DDR, and novel avenues for molecularly guided therapeutic intervention.

Impact of the interplay between stemness features, p53 and pol iota on replication pathway choices

Using human embryonic, adult and cancer stem cells/stem cell-like cells (SCs), we demonstrate that DNA replication speed differs in SCs and their differentiated counterparts. While SCs decelerate DNA replication, differentiated cells synthesize DNA faster and accumulate DNA damage. Notably, both replication phenotypes depend on p53 and polymerase iota (POLι). By exploring protein interactions and newly synthesized DNA, we show that SCs promote complex formation of p53 and POLι at replication sites. Intriguingly, in SCs the translocase ZRANB3 is recruited to POLι and required for slow-down of DNA replication. The known role of ZRANB3 in fork reversal suggests that the p53–POLι complex mediates slow but safe bypass of replication barriers in SCs. In differentiated cells, POLι localizes more transiently to sites of DNA synthesis and no longer interacts with p53 facilitating fast POLι-dependent DNA replication. In this alternative scenario, POLι associates with the p53 target p21, which antagonizes PCNA poly-ubiquitination and, thereby potentially disfavors the recruitment of translocases. Altogether, we provide evidence for diametrically opposed DNA replication phenotypes in SCs and their differentiated counterparts putting DNA replication-based strategies in the spotlight for the creation of therapeutic opportunities targeting SCs.

PHF8-promoted TOPBP1 demethylation drives ATR activation and preserves genome stability

The checkpoint kinase ATR [ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) and rad3-related] is a master regulator of DNA damage response. Yet, how ATR activity is regulated remains to be investigated. We report here that histone demethylase PHF8 (plant homeodomain finger protein 8) plays a key role in ATR activation and replication stress response. Mechanistically, PHF8 interacts with and demethylates TOPBP1 (DNA topoisomerase 2-binding protein 1), an essential allosteric activator of ATR, under unperturbed conditions, but replication stress results in PHF8 phosphorylation and dissociation from TOPBP1. Consequently, hypomethylated TOPBP1 facilitates RAD9 (RADiation sensitive 9) binding and chromatin loading of the TOPBP1-RAD9 complex to fully activate ATR and thus safeguard the genome and protect cells against replication stress. Our study uncovers a demethylation and phosphorylation code that controls the assembly of TOPBP1-scaffolded protein complex, and provides molecular insight into non-histone methylation switch in ATR activation.

Therapeutic targeting of ATR yields durable regressions in small cell lung cancers with high replication stress

Small cell neuroendocrine cancers (SCNCs) are recalcitrant cancers arising from diverse primary sites that lack effective treatments. Using chemical genetic screens, we identified inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia and rad3 related (ATR), the primary activator of the replication stress response, and topoisomerase I (TOP1), nuclear enzyme that suppresses genomic instability, as synergistically cytotoxic in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In a proof-of-concept study, we combined M6620 (berzosertib), first-in-class ATR inhibitor, and TOP1 inhibitor topotecan in patients with relapsed SCNCs. Objective response rate among patients with SCLC was 36% (9/25), achieving the primary efficacy endpoint. Durable tumor regressions were observed in patients with platinum-resistant SCNCs, typically fatal within weeks of recurrence. SCNCs with high neuroendocrine differentiation, characterized by enhanced replication stress, were more likely to respond. These findings highlight replication stress as a potentially transformative vulnerability of SCNCs, paving the way for rational patient selection in these cancers, now treated as a single disease.

Inhibition of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase impairs DNA damage tolerance and repair in glioma cells

Expression of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) is a determinant of malignancy in gliomas through kynurenine (KYN) signaling. We report that inhibition of TDO activity attenuated recovery from replication stress and increased the genotoxic effects of bis-chloroethylnitrosourea (BCNU). Activation of the Chk1 arm of the replication stress response (RSR) was reduced when TDO activity was blocked prior to BCNU treatment, whereas phosphorylation of serine 33 (pS33) on replication protein A (RPA) was enhanced—indicative of increased fork collapse. Analysis of quantitative proteomic results revealed that TDO inhibition reduced nuclear 53BP1 and sirtuin levels. We confirmed that cells lacking TDO activity exhibited elevated gamma-H2AX signal and defective recruitment of 53BP1 to chromatin following BCNU treatment, which corresponded with delayed repair of DNA breaks. Addition of exogenous KYN increased the rate of break repair. TDO inhibition diminished SIRT7 deacetylase recruitment to chromatin, which increased histone H3K18 acetylation—a key mark involved in preventing 53BP1 recruitment to sites of DNA damage. TDO inhibition also sensitized cells to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced damage, but this effect did not involve altered 53BP1 recruitment. These experiments support a model where TDO-mediated KYN signaling helps fuel a robust response to replication stress and DNA damage.

Critical role of SMG7 in activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis in response to genotoxic stress

CHK1 is a crucial DNA damage checkpoint kinase and its activation, which requires ATR and RAD17, leads to inhibition of DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Recently, we reported that SMG7 stabilizes and activates p53 to induce G1 arrest upon DNA damage; here we show that SMG7 plays a critical role in the activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis. Following genotoxic stress, SMG7-null cells exhibit deficient ATR signaling, indicated by the attenuated phosphorylation of CHK1 and RPA32, and importantly, unhindered DNA replication and fork progression. Through its 14-3-3 domain, SMG7 interacts directly with the Ser635-phosphorylated RAD17 and promotes chromatin retention of the 9-1-1 complex by the RAD17-RFC, an essential step to CHK1 activation. Furthermore, through maintenance of CHK1 activity, SMG7 controls G2-M transition and facilitates orderly cell cycle progression during recovery from replication stress. Taken together, our data reveals SMG7 as an indispensable signaling component in the ATR-CHK1 pathway during genotoxic stress response.

Phosphoproteomics reveals a distinctive Mec1/ATR signaling response upon DNA end hyper-resection

The Mec1/ATR kinase is crucial for genome maintenance in response to a range of genotoxic insults, but it remains unclear how it promotes context-dependent signaling and DNA repair. Using phosphoproteomic analyses, we uncovered a distinctive Mec1/ATR signaling response triggered by extensive nucleolytic processing (resection) of DNA ends. Budding yeast cells lacking Rad9, a checkpoint adaptor and an inhibitor of resection, exhibit a selective increase in Mec1-dependent phosphorylation of proteins associated with single-strand DNA (ssDNA) transactions, including the ssDNA-binding protein Rfa2, the translocase/ubiquitin ligase Uls1, and the Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 (STR) complex that regulates homologous recombination (HR). Extensive Mec1-dependent phosphorylation of the STR complex, mostly on the Sgs1 helicase subunit, promotes an interaction between STR and the DNA repair scaffolding protein Dpb11. Fusion of Sgs1 to phosphopeptide-binding domains of Dpb11 strongly impairs HR-mediated repair, supporting a model whereby Mec1 signaling regulates STR upon hyper-resection to influence recombination outcomes. Overall, the identification of a distinct Mec1 signaling response triggered by hyper-resection highlights the multi-faceted action of this kinase in the coordination of checkpoint signaling and HR-mediated DNA repair.

Combined inhibition of Aurora-A and ATR kinase results in regression of MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma

Amplification of MYCN is the driving oncogene in a subset of high-risk neuroblastoma. The MYCN protein and the Aurora-A kinase form a complex during S phase that stabilizes MYCN. Here we show that MYCN activates Aurora-A on chromatin, which phosphorylates histone H3 at serine 10 in S phase, promotes the deposition of histone H3.3 and suppresses R-loop formation. Inhibition of Aurora-A induces transcription-replication conflicts and activates the Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) kinase, which limits double-strand break accumulation upon Aurora-A inhibition. Combined inhibition of Aurora-A and ATR induces rampant tumor-specific apoptosis and tumor regression in mouse models of neuroblastoma, leading to permanent eradication in a subset of mice. The therapeutic efficacy is due to both tumor cell-intrinsic and immune cell-mediated mechanisms. We propose that targeting the ability of Aurora-A to resolve transcription-replication conflicts is an effective therapy for MYCN-driven neuroblastoma (141 words).

IQGAP3 interacts with Rad17 to recruit the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex and contributes to radioresistance in lung cancer

IQ motif containing GTPase-activating protein 3 (IQGAP3) has been implicated in diverse cellular processes, including neuronal morphogenesis, cell proliferation and motility, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. However, its role in cancer radioresistance is completely unknown. Here, we report that IQGAP3 is overproduced in lung cancer patients and correlates with poor clinical outcomes. Functionally, we demonstrate that depletion of IQGAP3 impairs oncogenesis and overcomes radioresistance in lung cancer in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, we uncover that IQGAP3 interacts with Rad17 and controls its expression to activate the ATM/Chk2 and ATR/Chk1 signaling pathways by recruiting the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex in response to DNA damage. Moreover, Rad17 is identified as the major downstream effector that mediates the functions of IQGAP3 in lung cancer. Clinically, IQGAP3 overexpression positively correlates with Rad17 upregulation in human lung cancer tissues. Collectively, these data support key role for IQGAP3 in promoting lung cancer radioresistance by interacting with Rad17 and suggest that targeting IQGAP3 may be an attractive strategy for lung cancer radiotherapy.

NBS1 interacts with Notch signaling in neuronal homeostasis

NBS1 is a critical component of the MRN (MRE11/RAD50/NBS1) complex, which regulates ATM- and ATR-mediated DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. Mutations in NBS1 cause the human genomic instability syndrome Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (NBS), of which neuronal deficits, including microcephaly and intellectual disability, are classical hallmarks. Given its function in the DDR to ensure proper proliferation and prevent death of replicating cells, NBS1 is essential for life. Here we show that, unexpectedly, Nbs1 deletion is dispensable for postmitotic neurons, but compromises their arborization and migration due to dysregulated Notch signaling. We find that Nbs1 interacts with NICD-RBPJ, the effector of Notch signaling, and inhibits Notch activity. Genetic ablation or pharmaceutical inhibition of Notch signaling rescues the maturation and migration defects of Nbs1-deficient neurons in vitro and in vivo. Upregulation of Notch by Nbs1 deletion is independent of the key DDR downstream effector p53 and inactivation of each MRN component produces a different pattern of Notch activity and distinct neuronal defects. These data indicate that neuronal defects and aberrant Notch activity in Nbs1-deficient cells are unlikely to be a direct consequence of loss of MRN-mediated DDR function. This study discloses a novel function of NBS1 in crosstalk with the Notch pathway in neuron development.

Dynamic elements of replication protein A at the crossroads of DNA replication, recombination, and repair

The heterotrimeric eukaryotic Replication protein A (RPA) is a master regulator of numerous DNA metabolic processes. For a long time, it has been viewed as an inert protector of ssDNA and a platform for assembly of various genome maintenance and signaling machines. Later, the modular organization of the RPA DNA binding domains suggested a possibility for dynamic interaction with ssDNA. This modular organization has inspired several models for the RPA-ssDNA interaction that aimed to explain how RPA, the high-affinity ssDNA binding protein, is replaced by the downstream players in DNA replication, recombination, and repair that bind ssDNA with much lower affinity. Recent studies, and in particular single-molecule observations of RPA-ssDNA interactions, led to the development of a new model for the ssDNA handoff from RPA to a specific downstream factor where not only stability and structural rearrangements but also RPA conformational dynamics guide the ssDNA handoff. Here we will review the current knowledge of the RPA structure, its dynamic interaction with ssDNA, and how RPA conformational dynamics may be influenced by posttranslational modification and proteins that interact with RPA, as well as how RPA dynamics may be harnessed in cellular decision making.

Replication protein A: a multifunctional protein with roles in DNA replication, repair and beyond

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) forms continuously during DNA replication and is an important intermediate during recombination-mediated repair of damaged DNA. Replication protein A (RPA) is the major eukaryotic ssDNA-binding protein. As such, RPA protects the transiently formed ssDNA from nucleolytic degradation and serves as a physical platform for the recruitment of DNA damage response factors. Prominent and well-studied RPA-interacting partners are the tumor suppressor protein p53, the RAD51 recombinase and the ATR-interacting proteins ATRIP and ETAA1. RPA interactions are also documented with the helicases BLM, WRN and SMARCAL1/HARP, as well as the nucleotide excision repair proteins XPA, XPG and XPF–ERCC1. Besides its well-studied roles in DNA replication (restart) and repair, accumulating evidence shows that RPA is engaged in DNA activities in a broader biological context, including nucleosome assembly on nascent chromatin, regulation of gene expression, telomere maintenance and numerous other aspects of nucleic acid metabolism. In addition, novel RPA inhibitors show promising effects in cancer treatment, as single agents or in combination with chemotherapeutics. Since the biochemical properties of RPA and its roles in DNA repair have been extensively reviewed, here we focus on recent discoveries describing several non-canonical functions.

SMARCA4 deficiency-associated heterochromatin induces intrinsic DNA replication stress and susceptibility to ATR inhibition in lung adenocarcinoma

The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex regulates transcription through the control of chromatin structure and is increasingly thought to play an important role in human cancer. Lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) patients frequently harbor mutations in SMARCA4, a core component of this multisubunit complex. Most of these mutations are loss-of-function mutations, which disrupt critical functions in the regulation of chromatin architecture and can cause DNA replication stress. This study reports that LADC cells deficient in SMARCA4 showed increased DNA replication stress and greater sensitivity to the ATR inhibitor (ATRi) in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, loss of SMARCA4 increased heterochromatin formation, resulting in stalled forks, a typical DNA replication stress. In the absence of SMARCA4, severe ATRi-induced single-stranded DNA, which caused replication catastrophe, was generated on nascent DNA near the reversed forks around heterochromatin in an Mre11-dependent manner. Thus, loss of SMARCA4 confers susceptibility to ATRi, both by increasing heterochromatin-associated replication stress and by allowing Mre11 to destabilize reversed forks. These two mechanisms synergistically increase susceptibility of SMARCA4-deficient LADC cells to ATRi. These results provide a preclinical basis for assessing SMARCA4 defects as a biomarker of ATRi efficacy.

LC8/DYNLL1 is a 53BP1 effector and regulates checkpoint activation

The tumor suppressor protein 53BP1 plays key roles in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by serving as a master scaffold at the damaged chromatin. Current evidence indicates that 53BP1 assembles a cohort of DNA damage response (DDR) factors to distinctly execute its repertoire of DSB responses, including checkpoint activation and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair. Here, we have uncovered LC8 (a.k.a. DYNLL1) as an important 53BP1 effector. We found that LC8 accumulates at laser-induced DNA damage tracks in a 53BP1-dependent manner and requires the canonical H2AX-MDC1-RNF8-RNF168 signal transduction cascade. Accordingly, genetic inactivation of LC8 or its interaction with 53BP1 resulted in checkpoint defects. Importantly, loss of LC8 alleviated the hypersensitivity of BRCA1-depleted cells to ionizing radiation and PARP inhibition, highlighting the 53BP1-LC8 module in counteracting BRCA1-dependent functions in the DDR. Together, these data establish LC8 as an important mediator of a subset of 53BP1-dependent DSB responses.

The noncoding function of NELFA mRNA promotes the development of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating the Rad17-RFC2-5 complex

Recently, RNAs interacting with proteins have been implicated in playing an important role in the occurrence and progression of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this study, we found that NELFA mRNA interacts with Rad17 through a novel noncoding mode in the nucleus and that the aberrant expression of USF2 contributed to the upregulation of Rad17 and NELFA. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that the deletion of NELFA mRNA significantly decreased ESCC proliferation and colony formation in vitro. Moreover, NELFA mRNA knockdown inhibited DNA damage repair and promoted apoptosis. Mechanistic studies indicated that NELFA mRNA regulated the interaction between Rad17 and RFC2‐5, which had a major impact on the phosphorylation of CHK1, CHK2 and BRCA1. NELFA mRNA expression was consistently elevated in ESCC patients and closely related to decreased overall survival. Taken together, our results confirmed the critical role of the noncoding function of NELFA mRNA in ESCC tumorigenesis and indicated that NELFA mRNA can be regarded as a therapeutic target and an independent prognostic indicator in ESCC patients.

Hypoosmotic stress induces R loop formation in nucleoli and ATR/ATM-dependent silencing of nucleolar transcription

The contribution of nucleoli to the cellular stress response has been discussed for over a decade. Stress-induced inhibition of RNA polymerase I-dependent transcription is hypothesized as a possible effector program in such a response. In this study, we report a new mechanism by which ribosomal DNA transcription can be inhibited in response to cellular stress. Specifically, we demonstrate that mild hypoosmotic stress induces stabilization of R loops in ribosomal genes and thus provokes the nucleoli-specific DNA damage response, which is governed by the ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase. Activation of ATR in nucleoli strongly depends on Treacle, which is needed for efficient recruitment/retention of TopBP1 in nucleoli. Subsequent ATR-mediated activation of ATM results in repression of nucleolar transcription.

HERC2 regulates RPA2 by mediating ATR-induced Ser33 phosphorylation and ubiquitin-dependent degradation

Replication protein A (RPA) binds to and stabilizes single-stranded DNA and is essential for the genome stability. We reported that an E3 ubiquitin ligase, HERC2, suppresses G-quadruplex (G4) DNA by regulating RPA-helicase complexes. However, the precise mechanism of HERC2 on RPA is as yet largely unknown. Here, we show essential roles for HERC2 on RPA2 status: induction of phosphorylation and degradation of the modified form. HERC2 interacted with RPA through the C-terminal HECT domain. Ubiquitination of RPA2 was inhibited by HERC2 depletion and rescued by reintroduction of the C-terminal fragment of HERC2. ATR-mediated phosphorylation of RPA2 at Ser33 induced by low-level replication stress was inhibited by depletion of HERC2. Contrary, cells lacking HERC2 catalytic residues constitutively expressed an increased level of Ser33-phosphorylated RPA2. HERC2-mediated ubiquitination of RPA2 was abolished by an ATR inhibitor, supporting a hypothesis that the ubiquitinated RPA2 is a phosphorylated subset. Functionally, HERC2 E3 activity has an epistatic relationship with RPA in the suppression of G4 when judged with siRNA knockdown experiments. Together, these results suggest that HERC2 fine-tunes ATR-phosphorylated RPA2 levels through induction and degradation, a mechanism that could be critical for the suppression of secondary DNA structures during cell proliferation.

Regulation of ATR activity via the RNA polymerase II associated factors CDC73 and PNUTS-PP1

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase is a key factor activated by DNA damage and replication stress. An alternative pathway for ATR activation has been proposed to occur via stalled RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). However, how RNAPII might signal to activate ATR remains unknown. Here, we show that ATR signaling is increased after depletion of the RNAPII phosphatase PNUTS-PP1, which dephosphorylates RNAPII in its carboxy-terminal domain (CTD). High ATR signaling was observed in the absence and presence of ionizing radiation, replication stress and even in G1, but did not correlate with DNA damage or RPA chromatin loading. R-loops were enhanced, but overexpression of EGFP-RNaseH1 only slightly reduced ATR signaling after PNUTS depletion. However, CDC73, which interacted with RNAPII in a phospho-CTD dependent manner, was required for the high ATR signaling, R-loop formation and for activation of the endogenous G2 checkpoint after depletion of PNUTS. In addition, ATR, RNAPII and CDC73 co-immunoprecipitated. Our results suggest a novel pathway involving RNAPII, CDC73 and PNUTS-PP1 in ATR signaling and give new insight into the diverse functions of ATR.

DNA Replication Checkpoint: New ATR Activator Identified

The ATR kinase is a master regulator of replication stress responses. Four new studies show that the protein ETAA1 is an important activator of ATR in human cells, providing insights into how the ATR pathway reacts to replication stress.

Nucleolar protein nucleolin functions in replication stress-induced DNA damage responses

The nucleolus contains multiple copies of ribosomal (r)DNA, which indicate sites of frequent replication stress and suggest the existence of a mechanism to prevent replication stress-related rDNA instability and the possibility that such a mechanism contributes to the whole genomic stability against replication stress. We have previously reported that nucleolin, a major nucleolar protein, is involved in ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage responses (DDRs) such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent cell cycle checkpoints and homologous recombination (HR) repair. Here, we investigated the role of nucleolin in DDR due to replication stress. The results indicate that following replication stress, nucleolin interacted with the histone γH2AX, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and replication protein A (RPA)32, suggesting that it may be recruited to DNA damage sites on the replication fork. Furthermore, the knockdown of nucleolin by siRNA reduced the activation of ATM and RAD3-related (ATR) kinase and the formation of RAD51 and RPA32 foci after replication stress due to UV or camptothecin exposure, whereas nucleolin overexpression augmented ATR-dependent phosphorylation and RAD51 and RPA accumulation on chromatin. Moreover, these overexpressing cells seemed to increase repair activity and resistance to replication stress. Our results indicate that nucleolin plays an important role in replication stress-induced DDRs such as ATR activation and HR repair. Given that nucleolin overexpression is often observed in many types of cancer cells, our findings suggest that nucleolin is involved in the regulation of resistance to replication stress that may otherwise lead to tumorigenesis and it could be a possible target for chemotherapy and radiotherapy.