Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods

Disparities in Highly Effective Contraceptive Use Among U.S. Active Duty Service Women, Fiscal Years 2020-2023

Background: Despite universal coverage of all highly effective contraceptive (HEC) methods in the Military Health System (MHS), active duty service women (ADSW) have higher rates of unintended pregnancy and lower rates of HEC use than the general U.S. population. Between 2016 and 2019, racial minority and lower socioeconomic status (SES) ADSW demonstrated lower odds of HEC use. This study further investigated factors associated with HEC use among ADSW to assess their reproductive health needs. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using fiscal year 2020-2023 data from the MHS Data Repository for all ADSW aged 18-45 years. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and logistic regression models, adjusted and unadjusted, determining the odds of HEC use overall, by method, and by social characteristics, including race and military rank as a proxy for SES. Results: Of the 339,011 ADSW identified, 164,756 (48.6%) used at least one HEC method during the study period. Black (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.88-0.91) and Asian/Pacific Islander (OR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.78-0.82) ADSW demonstrated lower odds of overall HEC use than White ADSW. Junior Enlisted ADSW demonstrated lower odds of overall HEC use than nearly all other ranks. Conclusions: The proportion of ADSW using HEC methods has decreased since 2019, while HEC use in the general population has increased. Racial and socioeconomic disparities remain, highlighting the need for future research to investigate reasons for these disparities in order to design effective mitigation strategies to ensure access to contraceptive care for all ADSW.

Preferred use of contraceptive methods and reasons for non-use: a cross-sectional survey of a sample of Black, Indigenous, and people of color in the United States

Use of preferred contraceptive methods is a measure of reproductive autonomy, yet barriers persist across the United States in accessing preferred methods of contraception, with disparities in access among communities of color. Using data from a 2021-2022 cross-sectional survey of 727 people aged 13-50 and living in the United States who identified as Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander (29%); Black or African American (34%), Indigenous (13%), and Latina/Latinx (31%), we examined those who were not using their preferred contraceptive method(s), including the preferred method type and the reasons for not using this method(s). We ran an adjusted logistic regression to test the association between the quality of the last health care interaction related to contraception and the use of a non-preferred method. Thirty-seven percent of respondents preferred a contraceptive method they were not currently using. Among current contraceptive users, long-acting methods were preferred most often, while non-current contraceptive users desired long-acting and short-acting hormonal methods equally. Respondents most often cited concerns about side effects/health risks (65%) and financial/logistical reasons (42%) as the top reasons for not using their preferred method(s). Those who reported receiving higher quality care in a recent contraceptive visit were more likely to be using the method they wanted to be using. Use of a preferred contraceptive method may increase when receiving high-quality counselling and care. Strategies to improve access to preferred methods should address side effects and health concerns, as well as financial and logistical barriers among Black, Indigenous, and people of color.

What Happened in Delaware Following a Statewide Contraceptive Initiative?

Policy Points The 2015 to 2020 Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative followed other long-acting reversible contraception-focused contraceptive initiatives in Colorado and in St. Louis, Missouri. and preceded statewide contraceptive-access initiatives in South Carolina, Massachusetts, and North Carolina with additional initiatives planned. Our principle conclusion is that the DelCAN did not achieve its goal of reducing the fraction of births from unintended pregnancies. However, we find evidence of a substantial magnitude of decrease in unplanned pregnancies that can be attributed to the initiative, and that this decrease occurred entirely among Medicaid-covered women.

CONTEXT

The 2015 to 2020 Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative was motivated by Delaware's having among the highest rates of unintended pregnancies in the United States, of which were either wanted later or unwanted. The expectation of the DelCAN initiative was that by providing greater contraceptive access, especially to long-acting reversible contraception, Delaware's unintended-pregnancy rates could be substantially reduced. In this study, we assess the role of the DelCAN in explaining, for live births, changes in women's pregnancy intentions around the time of conception.

METHODS

We examine not only pregnancy intentions, but also the planned status of the pregnancies, including whether the woman was trying to get pregnant and whether she or her partner was using contraception when an unplanned pregnancy occurred. We use the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data with difference-in-difference estimators to compare Delaware with six states in 2007 to 2020 with respect to the planned status of pregnancies ending in births and with 14 states in 2012 to 2020 with respect to the intended status of pregnancies ending in births. Because several components of the DelCAN were designed to facilitate contraceptive access for low-income women, we conduct both an overall analysis and separate analyses for Medicaid-covered and non-Medicaid-covered women.

FINDINGS

The DelCAN was not associated with reductions in unintended pregnancies ending in births in Delaware relative to comparison states but was associated with an increase in pregnancies that were wanted sooner. DelCAN was also associated with an increase in planned pregnancies concentrated among Medicaid-insured women and produced through reductions in pregnancies occurring when not using contraception.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy intentions and pregnancy planning should be treated as distinct concepts in contraceptive-access program design and evaluation. Programs should attend to both pregnancies wanted later and pregnancies wanted sooner to address public health goals in concert with enhancing women's reproductive autonomy.

Did Universal Alcohol Screening and Brief Interventions Delivered in the Context of Reproductive Health Care Universally Reach Demographically Diverse Patients?

OBJECTIVE

To identify demographic disparities in rates of alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) aimed at reducing the risk of alcohol-exposed pregnancy (AEP).

DESIGN

Electronic health record data were analyzed to examine documented ASBI rates and contraceptive methods for patients who had wellness visits between June 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

This study included 15 health centers affiliated with Planned Parenthood of Southern New England (PPSNE) and 35 health centers affiliated with Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky (PPGNHAIK). Affiliates collaborated on a 4-year project implementing universal ASBI to reduce risky alcohol use and prevent AEPs.

PARTICIPANTS

Data included 29,659 patients assigned female at birth, ages 18 to 49 years, who completed a wellness visit at a participating health center.

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

Electronic health record data encompassed demographic characteristics, contraception method, patient-completed alcohol screening score, and clinician-documented brief interventions.

RESULTS

Although alcohol screening rates exceeded 85% of eligible visits, brief intervention completion rates for those at risk for AEP were low: 70.5% were missed at PPSNE and 78.2% were missed at PPGNHAIK. At PPSNE, Hispanic patients at risk for AEP were least likely to receive a brief intervention (75.9% missed) compared to Black (67.7%) or white (67.5%) patients (p < .001). At PPGNHAIK, Asian/Pacific Islander patients were most likely to miss receiving a brief intervention (92.2%) compared to Black (72.9%), race unknown (79.5%), white (77.9%), and multiracial/other (78.4%) patients (p < .003).

CONCLUSION

Universal ASBI is recommended to normalize asking about alcohol in reproductive health care, reduce subjectivity, and ensure that all patients benefit from alcohol education or intervention. Variation in screening rates and contraception type contribute to demographic differences in risk of AEP.

Barriers to Preferred Contraception Use in Mississippi

Introduction: Many Americans are not using the contraceptive method they prefer, but there has been limited study of how this may be related to health system barriers. We evaluated how such barriers to contraceptive care are related to unmet contraceptive preference in Mississippi and which contraceptive methods are preferred by those who report an unmet preference. Materials and Methods: Between September 2020 and February 2021, we used social media advertisements to recruit Mississippi residents 18-45 years of age, who were assigned female at birth, for an online survey. We asked respondents if they wanted to use a different contraceptive method or start using one, and if so, which method they preferred. We assessed barriers in the reproductive healthcare services environment (e.g., long wait for appointments, unaffordability or lack of insurance acceptance). We used multivariable-adjusted Poisson regression models to test the relationship between experiencing one or more barriers to reproductive healthcare and having an unmet contraceptive preference. Results: Among 462 eligible respondents, 37% had an unmet contraceptive preference. Most respondents (83%) reported one or more barriers to accessing office-based reproductive healthcare. Respondents who experienced a barrier had almost twice the prevalence of unmet preference as people who experienced no barrier (prevalence ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.86). Among respondents with unmet preference, short-acting hormonal, long-acting reversible, and permanent methods were most desired. Conclusion: We find that nearly two-fifths of reproductive-aged Mississippians with capacity for pregnancy are not using their preferred contraceptive method. Structural barriers to care are very common and are significantly associated with experiencing unmet contraceptive preference, undermining reproductive autonomy.

Effect of an Intensive Nurse Home Visiting Program on Postpartum Contraceptive Use and Birth Spacing: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of an intensive nurse home visiting program on postpartum contraceptive use and birth spacing among individuals with a first pregnancy who were eligible for Medicaid insurance in South Carolina.

METHODS

We conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP), an established intensive home visiting program that provides prenatal and postpartum home visits through 2 years after childbirth. The trial included patients who were eligible for Medicaid insurance with a first pregnancy at less than 28 weeks of gestation between April 1, 2016, and March 17, 2020, who were followed up through 2 years after childbirth. Participants were randomized 2:1 to NFP compared with standard of care treatment. The primary outcome was a birth interval of less than 21 months between the index pregnancy and a subsequent birth. The secondary outcomes were birth intervals of less than 15 and 24 months, receipt of a contraceptive implant or intrauterine device (IUD) immediately postpartum, any contraceptive use and receipt of a family planning visit (at both 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum), and IUD receipt at 1 year postpartum. We assessed outcomes using linked birth certificate records and Medicaid claims data.

RESULTS

A total of 4,932 trial participants (3,295 in the intervention group and 1,637 in the control group) were included in the study analysis. Within 21 months of the study index birth, 11.0% of individuals in the NFP group and 12.2% of the usual care group had a subsequent birth. The NFP did not have a statistically significant effect on birth intervals of less than 21 months (adjusted coefficient -1.1, 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.8). There were no statistically significant differences between the NFP and control groups for any of the study's eight secondary outcomes related to birth spacing and postpartum contraceptive use.

CONCLUSION

Home visits with a registered nurse did not affect postpartum contraceptive use or birth spacing.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03360539.

Addressing Teenage Pregnancy and Reproductive Health Among Latinx Adolescents and Young Adults

Despite a national decline in teenage pregnancy rates, Latinx and Black individuals continue to have higher teenage birth rates compared with White teens. In the United States, Latinx females (ages 15-19) are more than twice as likely to have a teenage birth compared with non-Latinx White teens. With an increasingly diverse nation, a shift toward culturally inclusive approaches to care is critical to achieving equitable patient outcomes. Improving access to preventive care, workforce diversity, and insurance coverage will lead to cost-savings and help restore trust in a system that has failed past generations. In this commentary, targeted recommendations tailored specifically toward Latinx women will be provided, including culturally competent birth control counseling and a focus on reproductive justice. Not speaking English, low socioeconomic status, acculturation, legal status, and being uninsured are all teenage pregnancy risk factors unique to Latinx women. Cultural preferences and attitudes toward contraception must also be considered. Further expansion of Medicaid insurance coverage is also necessary to increase reproductive access among vulnerable populations. A cultural humility framework to reproductive health counseling and services is recommended. Within this framework, family engagement is encouraged, and women are free from reproductive coercion; they have the freedom to access over-the-counter contraception and receive guidance and support from providers and community health workers who are cognizant of culture and heritage. An integrated community-based approach that is culturally sensitive and in tune with Latinx heterogenicity is necessary to lower teenage pregnancy rates and achieve reproductive justice.

A Scoping Review of Patient-Centered Perinatal Contraceptive Counseling

INTRODUCTION

Contraceptive counseling during the perinatal period is an important component of comprehensive perinatal care. We synthesized research about contraceptive counseling during the perinatal period, which has not previously been systematically compiled.

METHODS

We developed search criteria to identify articles listed in PubMed, Embase, and Popline databases published between 1992 and July 2022 that address patients' preferences for, and experiences of, perinatal contraceptive counseling, as well as health outcomes associated with this counseling. Search results were independently reviewed by multiple reviewers to assess relevance for the present review. Methods were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-four articles were included in the final full text review. Of the included articles, 10 included implementation and evaluation of a contraceptive counseling method or protocol, and 24 evaluated preferences for or experiences of existing contraceptive counseling in the perinatal period. Common themes included the acceptability of contraceptive counseling in the peripartum and postpartum periods, and a preference for contraceptive counseling at some point during the antenatal period and before the inpatient hospital experience, and direct provider-patient discussion instead of video or written material. Multiple studies suggest that timing, content, and modality should be individualized. In general, avoiding actual or perceived directiveness and providing multi-modal counseling that includes both written educational materials and patient-provider conversations was desired.

DISCUSSION

The perinatal period constitutes a critical opportunity to provide contraceptive counseling that can support pregnant and postpartum people's management of their reproductive futures. The reviewed studies highlight the importance of patient-centered approach to providing this care, including flexibility of timing, content, and modality to accommodate individual preferences.

Integrating Sexual and Reproductive Health Equity Into Public Health Goals and Metrics: Comparative Analysis of Healthy People 2030's Approach and a Person-Centered Approach to Contraceptive Access Using Population-Based Data

BACKGROUND

The Healthy People initiative is a national effort to lay out public health goals in the United States every decade. In its latest iteration, Healthy People 2030, key goals related to contraception focus on increasing the use of effective birth control (contraceptive methods classified as most or moderately effective for pregnancy prevention) among women at risk of unintended pregnancy. This narrow focus is misaligned with sexual and reproductive health equity, which recognizes that individuals' self-defined contraceptive needs are critical for monitoring contraceptive access and designing policy and programmatic strategies to increase access.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare 2 population-level metrics of contraceptive access: a conventional metric, use of contraceptive methods considered most or moderately effective for pregnancy prevention among those considered at risk of unintended pregnancy (approximating the Healthy People 2030 approach), and a person-centered metric, use of preferred contraceptive method among current and prospective contraceptive users.

METHODS

We used nationally representative data collected in 2022 to construct the 2 metrics of contraceptive access; the overall sample included individuals assigned female at birth not using female sterilization or otherwise infecund and who were not pregnant or trying to become pregnant (unweighted N=2760; population estimate: 43.9 million). We conducted a comparative analysis to examine the convergence and divergence of the metrics by examining whether individuals met the inclusion criteria for the denominators of both metrics, neither metric, only the conventional metric, or only the person-centered metric.

RESULTS

Comparing the 2 approaches to measuring contraceptive access, we found that 79% of respondents were either included in or excluded from both metrics (reflecting that the metrics converged when individuals were treated the same by both). The remaining 21% represented divergence in the metrics, with an estimated 5.7 million individuals who did not want to use contraception included only in the conventional metric denominator and an estimated 3.5 million individuals who were using or wanted to use contraception but had never had penile-vaginal sex included only in the person-centered metric denominator. Among those included only in the conventional metric, 100% were content nonusers-individuals who were not using contraception, nor did they want to. Among those included only in the person-centered metric, 68% were currently using contraception. Despite their current or desired contraceptive use, these individuals were excluded from the conventional metric because they had never had penile-vaginal sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis highlights that a frequently used metric of contraceptive access misses the needs of millions of people by simultaneously including content nonusers and excluding those who are using or want to use contraception who have never had sex. Documenting and quantifying the gap between current approaches to assessing contraceptive access and more person-centered ones helps clearly identify where programmatic and policy efforts should focus going forward.

Patient-Centered Care in Action: How Clinicians Respond to Patient Dissatisfaction with Contraceptive Side Effects

Patient-centered care is widely cited as a component of quality contraceptive health care, but its operationalization in clinical interaction is contested. This article examines patient-centered care as an interactional phenomenon using the case of patient dissatisfaction with side effects of hormonal contraceptive medications. Drawing on transcript data from 109 tape-recorded reproductive health visits, I find that provider responses to treatment dissatisfaction range from patient-centered to relatively authoritarian. Providers typically offer patient-centered responses that validate patient experiences and integrate them into contraceptive counseling and method selection. At the same time, explicit communication about patients' contraceptive priorities is rare. In its absence, providers use patient-centered communication to smooth the interactional path toward uptake of highly effective hormonal methods, mostly ignoring the possibility that some patients may prefer less effective methods. Patient-centered contraceptive care was circumscribed by the clinical goal of pregnancy prevention.

Evaluating Pregnancy Rates in Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Family Planning: Simulated Comparison of Correct Use to Avoid, Method-Related, and Total Pregnancy Rates

Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs), also known as natural family planning (NFP), enable couples to identify the days of the menstrual cycle when intercourse may result in pregnancy ("fertile days"), and to avoid intercourse on fertile days if they wish to avoid pregnancy. Thus, these methods are fully dependent on user behavior for effectiveness to avoid pregnancy. For couples and clinicians considering the use of an FABM, one important metric to consider is the highest expected effectiveness (lowest possible pregnancy rate) during the correct use of the method to avoid pregnancy. To assess this, most studies of FABMs have reported a method-related pregnancy rate (a cumulative proportion), which is calculated based on all cycles (or months) in the study. In contrast, the correct use to avoid pregnancy rate (also a cumulative proportion) has the denominator of cycles with the correct use of the FABM to avoid pregnancy. The relationship between these measures has not been evaluated quantitatively. We conducted a series of simulations demonstrating that the method-related pregnancy rate is artificially decreased in direct proportion to the proportion of cycles with intermediate use (any use other than correct use to avoid or targeted use to conceive), which also increases the total pregnancy rate. Thus, as the total pregnancy rate rises (related to intermediate use), the method-related pregnancy rate falls artificially while the correct use pregnancy rate remains constant. For practical application, we propose the core elements needed to assess correct use cycles in FABM studies.

Summary

Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs) can be used by couples to avoid pregnancy, by avoiding intercourse on fertile days. Users want to know what the highest effectiveness (lowest pregnancy rate) would be if they use an FABM correctly and consistently to avoid pregnancy. In this simulation study, we compare two different measures: (1) the method-related pregnancy rate; and (2) the correct use pregnancy rate. We show that the method-related pregnancy rate is biased too low if some users in the study are not using the method consistently to avoid pregnancy, while the correct use pregnancy rate obtains an accurate estimate.

Short Summary

In FABM studies, the method-related pregnancy rate is biased too low, but the correct use pregnancy rate is unbiased.

Multilevel Barriers to Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Uptake: A Narrative Review

Unintended pregnancies, which occur in almost half (45%) of all pregnancies in the United States, are associated with adverse health and social outcomes for the infant and the mother. The risk of unintended pregnancies is significantly reduced when women use long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), namely intrauterine devices and implants. Although LARCs are highly acceptable to women at risk of unintended pregnancies, barriers to accessing LARCs hinder its uptake. These barriers are greater among racial and socioeconomic lines and persist within and across the intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, and policy levels. A synthesis of these barriers is unavailable in the current literature but would be beneficial to health care providers of reproductive-aged women, clinical managers, and policymakers seeking to provide equitable reproductive health care services. The aim of this narrative review was to aggregate these complex and overlapping barriers into a concise document that examines: (a) patient, provider, clinic, and policy factors associated with LARC access among populations at risk of unintended pregnancy and (b) the clinical implications of mitigating these barriers to provide equitable reproductive health care services. This review outlines numerous barriers to LARC uptake across multiple levels and demonstrates that LARC uptake is possible when the woman is informed of her contraceptive choices and when financial and clinical barriers are minimized. Equitable reproductive health care services entail unbiased counseling, a full range of contraceptive options, and patient autonomy in contraceptive choice.

Claims for Contraceptive Services and Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing Among Insured Adolescent and Young Adult Females in the United States

Objective: To examine claims for reversible prescription contraceptives and chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among commercially and Medicaid-insured adolescent and young adult (AYA) females in the United States. Methods: Using IBM MarketScan Research Databases, we identified sexually active, nonpregnant AYA (15- to 24-year-old) females enrolled in 2018. We examined claims for reversible prescription contraceptives and chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, using drug names and diagnosis/procedure codes, by age-group in commercially and Medicaid-insured separately and by race/ethnicity in Medicaid-insured. Results: Among 15- to 19-year-old and 20- to 24-year-old females, 67.2% and 67.9% of commercially insured and 57.3% and 54.0% of Medicaid-insured, respectively, had claims for reversible prescription contraceptives in 2018. Across insurance types among both age-groups, the most common claim for contraceptives was prescription for combined oral contraceptives. Among Medicaid-insured 15- to 19-year-olds, claims for contraceptives ranged from 42.6% for Hispanic females to 63.4% for non-Hispanic White females; among Medicaid-insured 20- to 24-year-olds, claims ranged from 50.4% for non-Hispanic Black females to 57.0% for non-Hispanic White females. Approximately half of the commercially and Medicaid-insured females had claims for chlamydia and gonorrhea testing. Non-Hispanic Black females had the highest percentages of claims for chlamydia testing (56.3% among 15- to 19-year-olds and 61.1% among 20- to 24-year-olds) and gonorrhea testing (61.6% among 15- to 19-year-olds and 64.9% among 20- to 24-year-olds). Conclusion: Approximately, two-thirds of commercially insured and more than half of Medicaid-insured, sexually active, nonpregnant AYA females had claims for reversible prescription contraceptives. Race/ethnicity data were available for Medicaid-insured females, and there were differences in claims for contraceptives and chlamydia and gonorrhea testing by race/ethnicity. Half of the AYA females had claims for chlamydia and gonorrhea testing suggesting missed opportunities.

"I probably have access, but I can't afford it": expanding definitions of affordability in access to contraceptive services among people with low income in Georgia, USA

BACKGROUND

Disparities in rates of contraceptive use are frequently attributed to unequal access to and affordability of care. There is a need to better understand whether common definitions of affordability that solely relate to cost or to insurance status capture the reality of individuals' lived experiences. We sought to better understand how individuals with low incomes and the capacity for pregnancy conceptualized one domain of contraceptive access-affordability --in terms of health system and individual access and how both shaped contraceptive care-seeking in the US South.

METHOD

Between January 2019 to February 2020, we conducted twenty-five life-history interviews with low-income individuals who may become pregnant living in suburban counties in Georgia, USA. Interviews covered the ways individual and health system access factors influenced care-seeking for family planning over the life course. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach to identify experiences associated with individual and health system access.

RESULTS

Affordability was identified as a major determinant of access, one tied to unique combinations of individual factors (e.g., financial status) and health system characteristics (e.g., cost of methods) that fluctuated over time. Navigating the process to attain affordable care was unpredictable and had important implications for care-seeking. A "poor fit" between individual and health system factors could lead to inequities in access and gaps in, or non-use of contraception. Participants also reported high levels of shame and stigma associated with being uninsured or on publicly funded insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Affordability is one domain of contraceptive access that is shaped by the interplay between individual factors and health system characteristics as well as by larger structural factors such as health and economic policies that influence both. Assessments of the affordability of contraceptive care must account for the dynamic interplay among multilevel influences. Despite the expansion of contraceptive coverage through the Affordable Care Act, low-income individuals still struggle with affordability and disparities persist.

Unfulfilled and method-specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin

OBJECTIVE

To identify characteristics associated with unfulfilled contraceptive preferences, document reasons for these unfulfilled preferences, and examine how these unfulfilled preferences vary across specific method users.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

We draw on secondary baseline data from 4660 reproductive-aged contraceptive users in the Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin Surveys of Women (SoWs), state-representative surveys fielded between October 2018 and August 2020 across the four states.

STUDY DESIGN

This is an observational cross-sectional study, which examined associations between individuals' reproductive health-related experiences and contraceptive preferences, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Our primary outcome of interest is having an unfulfilled contraceptive preference, and a key independent variable is experience of high-quality contraceptive care. We also examine specific contraceptive method preferences according to current method used, as well as reasons for not using a preferred method.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Survey respondents who indicated use of any contraceptive method within the last 3 months prior to the survey were eligible for inclusion in this analysis.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Overall, 23% reported preferring to use a method other than their current method, ranging from 17% in Iowa to 26% in New Jersey. Young age (18-24), using methods not requiring provider involvement, and not receiving quality contraceptive care were key attributes associated with unfulfilled contraceptive preferences. Those using emergency contraception and fertility awareness-based methods had some of the highest levels of unfulfilled contraceptive preferences, while pills, condoms, partner vasectomy, and IUDs were identified as the most preferred methods. Reasons for not using preferred contraceptive methods fell largely into one of two buckets: system-level or interpersonal/individual reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight that avenues for decreasing the gap between contraceptive methods used and those preferred to be used may lie with healthcare providers and funding streams that support the delivery of contraceptive care.

Examining the impact of Medicaid payments for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception on the mental health of low-income mothers

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of Medicaid immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (IPP LARC) reforms on self-reported mental health among low-income mothers aged 18-44 years.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

We used national secondary data on self-reported mental health status in the past 30 days from the core component (2014-2019) of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

STUDY DESIGN

We estimated linear probability models for reporting any days of not good mental health in the past 30 days. We adjusted for individual-level factors, state-level factors, and state and year fixed effects. Our primary independent variable was an indicator for IPP LARC payment reform. We examined the effect of the Medicaid payment reforms on self-reported mental health status in the past 30 days using difference-in-differences and event-study designs.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Not applicable.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

State adoption of Medicaid IPP LARC reforms was associated with significant reductions (between 5.7% and 11.5%) in the predicted probability of reporting any days of not good mental health among low-income mothers. Treatment effects appeared to be driven by respondents reporting two or more children (less than 18 years of age) in the household (ATT = -0.028, p = 0.04). Results are robust to a series of sensitivity tests and alternative estimation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that contemporary efforts to improve access to contraceptive methods may have important benefits beyond reproductive autonomy. These findings have implications for policymakers as the landscape related to family planning services continues to shift.

Neighborhood-level racialized socioeconomic deprivation and contraceptive use in the United States, 2011-2019

INTRODUCTION

The social and structural environments where people live are understudied in contraceptive research. We assessed if neighborhood measures of racialized socioeconomic deprivation are associated with contraceptive use in the United States.

METHODS

We used restricted geographic data from four waves of the National Survey of Family Growth (2011-2019) limited to non-pregnant women ages 15-44 who had sex in the last 12 months. We characterized respondent neighborhoods (census tracts) with the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), a measure of spatial social polarization, into areas of concentrated privilege (predominantly white residents living on high incomes) and deprivation (predominantly people of color living on low incomes). We used multivariable binary and multinomial logistic regression with year fixed effects to estimate adjusted associations between ICE tertile and contraceptive use and method type. We also assessed for an interactive effect of ICE and health insurance type.

RESULTS

Of the 14,396 respondents, 88.4% in neighborhoods of concentrated deprivation used any contraception, compared to 92.7% in the most privileged neighborhoods. In adjusted models, the predicted probability of using any contraception in neighborhoods of concentrated deprivation was 2.8 percentage points lower than in neighborhoods of concentrated privilege, 5.0 percentage points higher for barrier/coital dependent methods, and 4.3 percentage points lower for short-acting methods. Those with Medicaid were less likely to use any contraception than those with private insurance irrespective of neighborhood classification.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the salience of structural factors for contraceptive use and the need for continued examination of structural oppressions to inform health policy.

Assessing the Contraceptive Attitudes of US-Born and Foreign-Born Black Women Living in the USA: a Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Racially and ethnically marginalized US women experience unintended pregnancy at twice the rate of White women. Understanding contraceptive attitudes can help identify women at increased risk of contraceptive non-use and unintended pregnancy. We assessed the contraceptive attitudes of US-born and foreign-born Black women and examined differences by nativity.

METHODS

We used an electronic survey, implemented by Lucid LLC, a consumer research firm, to collect cross-sectional data from 657 reproductive-aged women. Analysis was limited to 414 Black women aged 18-44 years. The exposure variable was nativity (US-born or foreign-born), and the outcome variable was cumulative score on the 32-item Contraceptive Attitude Scale (CAS). Analysis included multivariable linear regression, adjusted for confounders. We also estimated separate models, stratified by nativity to identify predictors of contraceptive attitude among US-born Black women and foreign-born Black women, respectively.

RESULTS

Three in four participants were US-born (76.6%). The average cumulative CAS score was 118.4 ±20.4 out of 160 indicating favorable contraceptive attitudes. In pooled analysis, foreign-born Black women had significantly lower contraceptive attitude scores compared to US-born women (adjusted regression coefficient (β)= -6.48, p=0.036). In nativity-stratified analysis, income, education, and perceived control over pregnancy timing were significant predictors of contraceptive attitudes for both US-born and foreign-born women. Other significant predictors of contraceptive attitude among US-born women were older maternal age, multi-parity, and perceived pregnancy risk; whereas, for foreign-born women, other significant predictors included marital status (married/cohabiting), language spoken predominantly at home (French), and perceived ability to have a baby and still achieve life goals (agree, neither agree nor disagree).

CONCLUSION

In addressing the contraceptive needs of Black women, it is important to recognize the differences in attitudes towards contraception by nativity and provide culturally sensitive information and education.

Provision of DMPA-SC for self-administration in different practice settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from providers across the United States

OBJECTIVES

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate-subcutaneous (DMPA-SC) can be prescribed through telemedicine and self-administered, but data about availability, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, are limited. This study assessed changes in the availability of DMPA-SC for self-administration during the pandemic.

STUDY DESIGN

This study used survey data from a convenience sample of US providers engaged in contraceptive care and participating in a Continuing Medical Education-accredited contraceptive training (April 2020-April 2022; n = 849). Providers were recruited from across 503 clinics, including primary care and family planning clinics, public health departments, college and school-based health centers, independent abortion care clinics, and outpatient clinics in hospital settings. Measures included the availability of DMPA-SC for self-administration before and during the pandemic and the use of telemedicine. We used Poisson regression models and cluster-robust errors by clinic, adjusting for region, time of survey, and clinic size, to assess clinic availability of DMPA-SC for self-administration by practice setting.

RESULTS

Compared to the prepandemic period (4%), the availability of DMPA-SC for self-administration increased significantly during the pandemic (14%) (adjusted prevalence ratios [aPR] 3.43, 95% CI [2.43-4.85]). During the pandemic, independent abortion clinics were more likely to offer DMPA-SC for self-administration compared to primary care clinics (aPR 2.44, 95% CI [1.10-5.41]). Clinics receiving Title X funds were also more likely to provide DMPA-SC for self-administration during the pandemic compared to other clinics (aPR 2.32, 95% CI [1.57-3.43]), and more likely to offer DMPA-SC for self-administration through telemedicine (aPR 2.35, 95% CI [1.52-3.63]). Compared to the early pandemic period (April-September 2022), telemedicine access to DMPA-SC for self-administration was highest during the later pandemic time period (October 2021-April 2022) (aPR 2.10, 95% CI [1.06-4.17]).

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of DMPA-SC for self-administration significantly increased during the pandemic with differences by practice setting and Title X funding. However, overall method availability remains persistently low.

IMPLICATIONS

Despite increased availability of DMPA-SC for self-administration among US contraceptive providers during the COVID-19 pandemic, there remains a need to train providers, educate patients, and remove barriers to ensure broader availability of this method across different practice settings.

Effects of Georgia's Medicaid Family Planning Waiver on Pregnancy Characteristics and Birth Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Medicaid family planning waivers can increase access to health care services and have been associated with lower rates of unintended pregnancy, which is associated with a higher risk of negative birth outcomes such as preterm birth and low birthweight. The objective of this study was to test the effect of Georgia's Medicaid family planning waiver, Planning for Healthy Babies (P4HB), on pregnancy characteristics and birth outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey data in pre- (2008-2009) and two post-periods (2012-2013; 2017-2019). We identified those likely eligible for P4HB in Georgia (n = 1,967) and 10 comparison states (n = 13,449) and tested for effects using state and year fixed effects difference-in-differences modeling.

RESULTS

P4HB was associated with a 13.3 percentage-point (pp) decrease in unintended pregnancy in the immediate post-period (p < .01) and an 11.4 pp decrease in the later post-period (p < .05). For the immediate post-period, P4HB was also associated with a 29.2 pp increase in the probability of prepregnancy contraception (p < .001) and a 1.1 pp decrease in the probability of a very low birthweight (VLBW) birth (p < .01). The reduction in VLBW birth was significant for non-Hispanic Black mothers (-3.9 pp; p < .05) but not for mothers of other races/ethnicities.

DISCUSSION

Medicaid family planning waivers are an important structural policy intervention that can improve reproductive health care, particularly in states without Medicaid expansion. These waivers may also help address long-standing racial/ethnic disparities in access to reproductive health care and, potentially, adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. However, the initial increase in pregnancies among people using contraception indicates that care must be taken to ensure that recipients have access to effective methods of contraception and receive counseling on effective use in order to avoid unintended consequences as more individuals try to prevent a pregnancy.

Determinants of unmet need for family planning: Evidence from the 2018 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey

Unmet need for family planning is a valuable concept to indicate the discrepancy between women's fertility preferences and contraceptive use. Unmet need may lead to unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions. These may result in health deterioration and reduced employment opportunities for women. The 2018 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey report indicated that the estimated unmet need for family planning doubled from 2013 to 2018, returning to the high levels of the late 1990s. Considering this unfavourable change, this study aims to investigate the determinants of unmet need for family planning among married women of reproductive age in Turkey by using the 2018 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey data. Logit model estimations revealed that women who were at older ages, more educated, wealthier, and had more than one child were less likely to have unmet need for family planning. Employment statuses of women and their spouses and place of residence were significantly associated with unmet need. Results emphasised that training and counselling to enhance the use of family planning methods should effectively target young, less educated, and poor women.

Respondent Demographics and Contraceptive Use Patterns in the United States: A National Survey of Family Growth Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Contraception is an important tool for helping to prevent both unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Medical costs related to STIs are high and impose a large burden on both patients and the healthcare system. In addition, unintended pregnancies account for a large portion of pregnancies in the United States (US) and are associated with adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. Both STIs and unintended pregnancies are continuous public health concerns, and this study aims to identify patterns in contraceptive method use in relation to specific social determinants of health.

METHODS

Utilizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth report on current contraceptive status, we isolated data from 3,572 respondents who reported using one of the following contraceptive methods: oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), male condoms, partner's vasectomy, female sterilization, withdrawal, medroxyprogesterone acetate injections (Depo-Provera), hormonal implant, or an intrauterine device (IUD). We analyzed these contraceptive methods among age, race, education, marital status, and insurance status. Data were analyzed in RStudio 2022.02.0 (RStudio Team, RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA) through a test of equal proportions for a significance of P < 0.05. A concurrent Yates' continuity correction was performed in order to limit erroneous significant findings based on small sample sizes where applicable. The study conception and data analysis were performed independently with oversight from our preceptor at HCA Florida Brandon Hospital, Brandon, Florida.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences for all our selected methods of contraception across different age groups. There were statistically significant differences for OCPs, male condoms, partner's vasectomy, female sterilization, Depo-Provera, hormonal implant, and IUD across different race groups and different insurance statuses. There were statistically significant differences for OCPs, male condoms, partner's vasectomy, female sterilization, withdrawal, hormonal implant, and IUD across different education levels and different marital statuses.

CONCLUSION

This analysis highlights gaps that are present in female reproductive autonomy through the statistical differences in contraceptive methods across various demographics and warrants continued focus on the role that social determinants of health play in the prevention of unintended pregnancies and STIs. In order to promote fairness and equality in healthcare, it is essential to increase education on these topics both within and beyond medical settings. This effort aims to provide patients with equitable access to healthcare and attempt to address health disparities that are prevalent in multiple different sectors.

Data Equity for Asian American and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander People in Reproductive Health Research

Though racial and ethnic disparities in sexual and reproductive health outcomes are receiving greater interest and research funding, the experiences of Asian American and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (NHPI) people are often combined with those of other racial and ethnic minority groups or excluded from data collection altogether. Such treatment is often rationalized because Asian American and NHPI groups comprise a smaller demographic proportion than other racial or ethnic groups, and the model minority stereotype assumes that these groups have minimal sexual and reproductive health needs. However, Asian American and NHPI people represent the fastest-growing racial-ethnic groups in the United States, and they face disparities in sexual and reproductive health access, quality of care, and outcomes compared with those of other races and ethnicities. Disaggregating further by ethnicity, people from certain Asian American and NHPI subgroups face disproportionately poor reproductive health outcomes that suggest the need for culturally targeted exploration of the unique drivers of these inequities. This commentary highlights the evidence for sexual and reproductive health disparities both in and between Asian American and NHPI groups. We also examine the failures of national data sets and clinical studies to recruit Asian American and NHPI people in proportion to their share of the U.S. population or to consider how the cultural and experiential diversity of Asian American and NHPI people influence sexual and reproductive health. Lastly, we provide recommendations for the equitable inclusion of Asian American and NHPI people to promote and systematize the study and reporting of sexual and reproductive health behaviors and outcomes in these culturally, religiously, and historically diverse groups.

Development of a clinical questionnaire to support contraception decisions in an adolescent reproductive health clinic in Colorado

CONTEXT

Adolescents need support to make informed decisions about contraception. Few clinical questionnaires exist to help adolescents and their healthcare providers align contraception decisions with patient needs and preferences.

METHODS

Our mixed-methods study involved a convenience sample of English-speaking, female patients aged 13-19 seeking contraception services at an adolescent reproductive health clinic in Colorado, USA. Qualitative interviews informed development of clinical questionnaire items. The questionnaire elicited demographic characteristics, pregnancy and contraception use history, preferred contraception attributes, peer and family involvement, healthcare information and support needs, motivations for contraceptive use, and barriers to contraceptive services. We identified key decision-making factors and reduced the number of questionnaire items through principal components analysis. Using multivariable analyses, we examined the correlation between questionnaire responses and current contraceptive method.

RESULTS

Twenty individuals participated in interviews and 373 individuals completed the preliminary questionnaire with 63 candidate items. We identified five contraceptive decision-making factors: side-effect avoidance (eight items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.84), preferred method attributes (six items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.67), parental involvement (three items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.67), life goals prior to parenting (four items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and access to a contraceptive provider (two items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and nine stand-alone items. In multivariable analyses, we found that questionnaire responses for decision-making factors varied among participants using different contraceptive methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple priorities may influence adolescent contraceptive decisions. This clinical questionnaire can elicit these priorities before or during a healthcare encounter. Future studies should assess generalizability of the questionnaire and examine impact on method choice, continuation, satisfaction, and reproductive health outcomes.

Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage

BACKGROUND

Young people's ability to use their preferred contraceptive method is an indicator of reproductive autonomy and healthcare access. State policies can hinder or facilitate access to a preferred contraceptive method.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared use of preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California, states with contrasting health policy contexts that impact health insurance coverage and access to subsidized family planning services.

METHODS

We used baseline survey data from an ongoing cluster randomized controlled trial of sexually active students, assigned female at birth, ages 18-25, at 29 community colleges in Texas and California (N = 1,974). We described contraceptive preferences and use, as well as reasons for nonuse of a preferred method. We conducted multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression analyses for clustered data, and then calculated the predicted probability of using a preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California by insurance status.

RESULTS

More Texas participants were uninsured than Californians (30% vs. 8%, p<0.001). Thirty-six percent of Texas participants were using their preferred contraceptive method compared to 51% of Californians. After multivariable adjustments, Texas participants had lower odds of using their preferred method (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.48-0.81) compared to those in California. Texas participants in all insurance categories had a lower predicted probability of preferred method use compared to California participants. In Texas, we found a 12.1 percentage-point difference in the predicted probability of preferred method use between the uninsured (27.5%) and insured (39.6%) (p<0.001). Texans reported financial barriers to using their preferred method more often than Californians (36.7% vs. 19.2%, p<0.001) as did the uninsured compared to the insured (50.9% vs. 18.7%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

These findings present new evidence that state of residence plays an important role in young people's ability to realize their contraceptive preference. Young people in Texas, with lower insurance coverage and more limited access to safety net programs for contraceptive care than in California, have lower use of preferred contraception. It has become urgent in states with abortion bans to support young people's access to their preferred methods.

Women's preferences for a new contraceptive under development: an exploratory study

Objective

Currently available contraceptive methods do not meet the needs of all users. We sought to explore preferences of potential end-users regarding an on-demand, non-hormonal female contraceptive currently under development, using a web-based survey.

Study design

We recruited respondents for an exploratory survey via web link on Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Individuals were eligible if they were 18-44 years of age, identified as cis-gender female, were English-speaking, not pregnant, and had used barrier contraception previously. Respondents provided demographic characteristics and a basic reproductive history. We then provided a brief description of the potential contraceptive. Respondents were asked about their interest in the proposed contraceptive and preferences for method attributes.

Results

A total of 500 respondents completed the survey. Three-quarters of respondents were <35 years of age and 48.2% were currently using a barrier contraceptive method. Three-fourths of respondents (73.8%) expressed interest in using the contraceptive under development. The majority wanted the method to be small (≤2 inches), rod-shaped, and low cost (<$5 per use). More than half (59.4%) said it was important to be able to use the method without partners' knowledge. The most reported potential concerns were vaginal irritation (51.6%) and lack of effectiveness (46.4%). Sixty percent of respondents were confident they could use the method correctly.

Discussion

Available contraceptive methods lack attributes preferred by some users. Development of new contraceptives frequently does not involve end-user input early in the development process. Individuals in this sample displayed interest in the proposed contraceptive and expressed preferences that can inform the further development of this method.

Reasons for Having Unprotected Sex Among Adolescents and Young Adults Accessing Reproductive Health Services

INTRODUCTION

Although research suggests that young people are more likely to have unprotected sex than adults, their reasons for doing so are not well-understood. Among a sample of young people accessing no-cost contraceptive services, we explored their reported reasons for having unprotected sex and their willingness to have unprotected sex in the future.

METHODS

We recruited sexually active assigned female at birth youth at 10 family planning clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area (n = 212). Participants completed a self-administered survey reporting their reasons for having unprotected sex and willingness to do so in the future. We used bivariate analyses to assess associations between reasons for unprotected sex and age group (adolescents ages 14-19 vs. young adults ages 20-25) and willingness to have unprotected sex in the future.

RESULTS

Most young people (69%) had recently engaged in unprotected sex and 41% were willing to in the future. The most common reported reasons for having unprotected sex included not planning to have sex, a preference for unprotected sex, and difficulty using contraception. Worrying about contraceptive side effects and a preference for unprotected sex were significantly associated with a willingness to have unprotected sex in the future (p < .01). Age group was not associated with most reasons for having unprotected sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Person-centered care should give attention to the range of reasons that may influence young people's sexual and contraceptive decision-making.

Reproductive Autonomy in Appalachia: An Investigation into Perceived Contraceptive Pressure

The reproductive autonomy of persons who can give birth can be impeded through forms of interpersonal violence and coercion. Moreover, macro-level factors (e.g., poverty, discrimination, community violence, legislative policies) may impede the reproductive autonomy of entire communities. This study investigates a form of violence we term perceived contraceptive pressure in Appalachia, an understudied region of the Eastern U.S., regarding reproductive health and decision-making. Through targeted Meta advertising, participants (N = 632) residing in Appalachian zip codes completed an online survey on reproductive health. The focus of this study was to investigate the prevalence of perceived contraceptive pressure, who was at increased risk of experiencing pressure, and the source(s) of perceived pressure. Binomial regressions were conducted on three different dependent variables: perceived pressure to be sterilized, perceived pressure to use birth control, and perceived pressure not to use birth control. Approximately half of all respondents (49.5%) reported experiencing at least one type of pressure targeting contraceptive decision-making. The most prevalent source of perceived pressure to use birth control was from the healthcare provider (67.4%), and the most prevalent source of perceived pressure not to use birth control was the respondent's partner (51.1%). Recommendations for providers serving clients in the Appalachian region include pursuing education regarding contraceptive pressure at the individual level and macro-level. In addition, Appalachian residents may benefit from educational programming on reproductive autonomy, healthy relationships, and how to navigate pressure in relationships.

Contraceptive Implant-Associated Bleeding in Adolescent/Young Adult Clinical Practice: Associated Factors, Management, and Rates of Discontinuation

PURPOSE

To identify factors associated with bothersome implant-associated uterine bleeding, and to evaluate the impact of bleeding management on implant discontinuation.

METHODS

We analyzed a quality improvement database of implant insertions (n = 825) at three adolescent/young adult programs and described individuals with and without reported bothersome bleeding. We utilized logistic regression to assess for factors associated with bleeding.

RESULTS

Implant recipient mean age was 18.9 ± 2.6 years, and 27% reported having subsequent bothersome uterine bleeding. Recipients had increased odds of reporting such bleeding if they had previously irregular menses (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.68 irregular and infrequent, OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.07-1.86 irregular and frequent) or sought the implant for menstrual management purposes exclusively (OR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.42-1.96) or in combination with contraceptive need (OR 1.65; 95%: CI 1.57-1.72). Prior use of the progestin injection or implant was associated with lower odds of subsequent bleeding report (OR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.54-0.73; OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.39-0.75, respectively). Medication management of bleeding was associated with the likelihood of implant discontinuation at 1 year compared to those with untreated bleeding (hazard ratio 1.98 times, 95% CI: 1.39-2.81). The implant was continued for 3 years in over 50% of recipients with ever-managed bothersome bleeding.

DISCUSSION

Individuals with historically irregular menses and those seeking the implant for menstrual management more often reported bothersome bleeding. Treating such bleeding with medication was associated with higher 1-year discontinuation rates, although many continued implant use for 3 years. Such findings may influence implant preinsertion counseling and/or postinsertion bleeding management.

Meeting Preferences for Specific Contraceptive Methods: An Overdue Indicator

Fertility surveys have rarely asked people who are using contraception about the contraceptive method they would like to be using, implicitly assuming that those who are contracepting are using the method they want. In this commentary, we review evidence from a small but growing body of work that oftentimes indicates this assumption is untrue. Discordant contraceptive preferences and use are relatively common, and unsatisfied preferences are associated with higher rates of method discontinuation and subsequent pregnancy. We argue that there is opportunity to center autonomy and illuminate the need for and quality of services by building on this research and investing in the development of survey items that assess which method people would like to use, as well as their reasons for nonpreferred use. The widespread adoption of questions regarding method preferences could bring indicators of reproductive health services into closer alignment with the needs of the people they serve.

Developmental pathways from child maltreatment to adolescent pregnancy: A multiple mediational model

Adolescent pregnancy (AP) is a significant public health issue. Child maltreatment (CM) represents an established risk factor, yet little is known about the explanatory mechanisms linking the phenomena. Informed by developmental theory, this study prospectively tested seven multi-level, indirect pathways that could plausibly explain the relationship between CM and AP: (1) substance use (polysubstance use and frequency); (2) sexual risk behavior; (3) depressive symptoms; (4) posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms; (5) cognitive dysregulation; (6) pregnancy desire and difficulty expectancies; and (7) age at menarche. Data came from a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of 469 ethnically diverse, nulliparous adolescent females, designed to examine the impact of substantiated CM on reproductive outcomes such as pregnancy and childbirth (265 maltreated and 204 demographically matched comparison adolescents). A multiple-mediator structural equation model was conducted to simultaneously test multiple indirect effects while accounting for confounding variables. Maltreatment had an indirect effect on pregnancy via substance use and higher pregnancy desire/lower perceived difficulty. Findings represent a step towards elucidating pathways linking CM with AP. Recommendations are offered to prevent pregnancy by addressing the pregnancy-specific mechanisms that are part of the maltreatment sequelae.

Non-barrier contraceptive use patterns among Latina adolescents attending California reproductive health centers: A longitudinal study

OBJECTIVES

To describe use of non-barrier contraceptives over a 9-month period, consistency in method use, and identify factors associated with method nonuse, switching, and consistency among Latina adolescents attending California sexual and reproductive health (SRH) centers.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cohort study using data self-reported at baseline, and 3- and 9-months post-baseline. The analysis included 1162 sexually active adolescents aged 18 to 19 who self-identified as female and Latina, indicated that they were not currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant, and who attended California SRH centers between June 2016 and June 2020. We used binomial generalized multivariable linear models with a log link to assess the likelihood of nonbarrier method consistency, switching, and non-use.

RESULTS

At baseline, 453 of 1162 (39%) of respondents were using short-acting methods (pill, patch, ring, or injection), 113 of 1162 (9.7%) were using long-acting methods (implants or intrauterine devices [IUDs]), and 596 of 1162 (51.3%) reported using neither short- nor long-acting methods. Over a 9-month period, 22/33 (66.7%) of those using IUDs consistently used the method, which was a statistically greater frequency of consistency than individuals who selected other nonbarrier methods (270/530 [50.9%], aRR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.77). Implant users had rates of method consistency similar to users of other nonbarrier methods (aRR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.38). Factors independently associated with method consistency included being older, having never been pregnant, having greater perceived risk of pregnancy, and greater contraceptive knowledge.

CONCLUSION

Sexually active Latina adolescents attending California SRH centers who were not trying to become pregnant maintained consistent contraceptive use more frequently when using an IUD. Using a patient-centered approach, contraceptive counseling for Latina adolescents can describe the combined efficacy and contraceptive stability offered by IUDs should patients desire it.

IMPLICATIONS

This study addressees gaps in knowledge about U.S. Latina adolescents' contraceptive use patterns. We demonstrate that IUD users, and not implant users, appear more likely to consistently use their method than those using non-LARC methods. Patient-centered contraceptive counseling for Latina adolescents can describe the greater contraceptive stability that IUDs may offer.

Catholic sole community hospitals are associated with decreased receipt of postpartum permanent contraception among Medicaid recipients

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association of Catholic hospitals with receipt of postpartum tubal ligation and long acting, reversible contraception among Medicaid recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of live births from January 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016 to female Medicaid beneficiaries in the United States between ages 21 and 44. Our main exposure was the presence of a Catholic-affiliated sole community hospital, and our primary outcome was highly effective postpartum contraception. We examined rates of postpartum permanent contraception, along with the use of a long acting, reversible form of contraception (LARC) at 3 and 60 days are postpartum. We compared counties that had only a Catholic-affiliated hospital with counties with only a non-Catholic hospital.

RESULTS

Our study population included 14,545 postpartum Medicaid beneficiaries. Study participants came from 88 counties across 10 United States states. Only 7.7% of women in counties with Catholic sole community hospitals received permanent contraception by 3 days postpartum, compared to 11.3% in counties with non-Catholic sole community hospitals (RD: -3.92%; 95% CI: -6.01%, -1.83%). This difference was not mitigated by receipt of outpatient procedures or long-acting, reversible contraception. Importantly, women residing in counties with Catholic sole community hospitals were much less likely to return postpartum for an outpatient visit between 8 and 60 days postpartum than women in counties with non-Catholic sole community hospitals (35.4% vs 45.4%, RD: -9.29%; 95% CI: -16.71%, -1.86%).

CONCLUSIONS

In counties where the only hospital was Catholic, Medicaid recipients giving birth were significantly less likely to receive permanent contraception and to return for postpartum care.

IMPLICATIONS

Catholic hospitals are increasing in the United States, which may restrict access to postpartum contraception, particularly in rural areas. We found that Medicaid recipients giving birth at a Catholic sole community hospital were less likely to receive permanent contraception and to return for care.

What a (Young) Woman Wants: Concurrent Effects of Desire to Avoid Pregnancy and Desire for Sex on Sexual Intercourse and Contraceptive Use

Of all pregnancies among young women in the United States, more than 60% are undesired, yet explanations for this phenomenon remain elusive. While research has investigated how pregnancy desires and intentions shape pregnancy-related behavior, only recently have scholars noted that desire for sex influences these same behaviors. Many young women simultaneously experience strong desires for sex alongside a strong desire to avoid pregnancy, but few studies have considered the extent to which young women adapt their reproductive behaviors in response to these potentially competing desires. Using novel weekly panel data, this analysis assesses how desires for sex may moderate the effect of the desire to avoid pregnancy on a young woman's sexual behavior and contraceptive use. Findings suggest that when a woman strongly wants to avoid pregnancy, she is less likely to have sex and more likely to use hormonal or coital contraceptives. As her desire for sex increases, however, she is instead more likely to have sex and use hormonal contraceptives. If she does not use hormonal methods, she is less likely to use coital contraceptives when she has intercourse. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing the desire for sex as a behavioral modifier for avoiding undesired pregnancy in the transition to adulthood.

Long-acting reversible contraception: Targeting those judged to be unfit for parenthood in the United States and the United Kingdom

There is a long history of regarding marginalised groups as unfit to parent and of eugenic policies targeting those with 'undesirable' bodily conditions or behaviours. This is part of a broader pattern of stratified reproduction - structural conditions that enable or discourage certain groups from reproducing - that often brings about and exacerbates injustices. This paper critically assesses the US and UK social and medical literature on applying pressure to marginalised groups, or those who have behaved 'irresponsibly', to use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Targeting young people for LARC fails to recognise that social inequality is the context for teenage pregnancy, not the result of it. Provider pressure on women of colour to use LARC is linked to institutional racism, whilst policy for those with physical and intellectual disabilities is shaped by disability discrimination. Other groups to be targeted include so-called 'welfare mothers', substance users, those who have had children put into care and offenders. Particularly controversial are cases in which LARC has been ordered by courts. LARC policy incorporating these kind of discriminatory practices needs to stop; future policy should focus on person-centred care that bolsters reproductive justice.

Effects of a Novel Erectogenic Condom on Men and Women's Sexual Pleasure: Randomized Controlled Trial

We tested whether CSD500 (Futura Medical; Guildford, UK), a novel condom containing erectogenic gel designed to increase penile firmness, penile size, and erection duration, results in greater sexual pleasure. In 2017-2020, we randomized heterosexual couples in Thanh Hoa, Vietnam to use CSD500 (N = 248) or standard condoms (N = 252) and followed them up for six months. Women completed the Quality of Sexual Experience (QSE) scale; men completed the QSE, Sexual Experience Questionnaire (SEX-Q), and 11 condom acceptability items. Female participants' mean age was 32.1 years (SD = 0.24; range 21-46). QSE scores were higher among women (B, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.21) and men (B, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08-0.35) in the CSD500 relative to the control arm. SEX-Q scores were higher among men in the CSD500 compared to the control arm (B, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.53-4.91). Higher proportions of men in the CSD500 relative to the control arm reported the condom felt "natural" during sex (68.6% vs. 32.3%; p < .01) and that sex with the condom felt "a lot better" than condomless sex (15.5% vs. 5.3%; p < .01). Compared with standard condoms, CSD500 use was associated with higher reports of sexual pleasure and condom acceptability.

Fulfillment of Desired Postpartum Permanent Contraception: a Health Disparities Issue

Women of color experience marked disparities in fulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception. While many attribute the disparity to the required Medicaid sterilization consent form and 30-day waiting period established in response to forced and coerced sterilizations, the policy does not entirely explain the disparity; racial and ethnic disparities persist even within strata of insurance type. We therefore propose framing postpartum permanent contraception as a health disparities issue that requires multi-level interventions to address. Based on the literature, we identify discrete levels of barriers to postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment at the patient, physician, hospital, and policy levels that interact and compound within and between individual levels, affecting each individual patient differently. At the patient level, sociodemographic characteristics such as age, race and ethnicity, and parity impact desire for and fulfillment of permanent contraception. At the physician level, implicit bias and paternalistic counseling contribute to barriers in permanent contraception fulfillment. At the hospital level, Medicaid reimbursement, operating room availability, and religious affiliation influence fulfillment of permanent contraception. Lastly, at the policy level, the Medicaid consent form and waiting period pose a known barrier to fulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception. Unpacking each of these discrete barriers and untangling their collective impact is necessary to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in permanent contraception fulfillment.

The Effect of an Entertainment-Education Intervention on Reproductive Health of Young Women of Color

While teen pregnancy rates in the United States have been declining for decades, they remain the highest of all western countries. Within the U.S., Black and Latina teens experience disproportionate rates of unplanned pregnancy. Plan A is an entertainment-education video intervention that was developed to help address these disparities, in part by emphasizing the ability of young cisgender women to control when they become pregnant by using an effective contraception method. The intervention was developed in close collaboration with the target audience (Black and Latina women aged 18-19) to ensure that it was relevant, engaging, and motivational. We conducted an online study to: (a) investigate the effects of Plan A on attitudes toward the contraception methods covered in the video; (b) whether these effects varied by race/ethnicity or age, and; (c) if identification with characters in the video mediated these effects. The study used a posttest-only design where participants were randomly assigned to watch Plan A or to a neutral control condition. The sample included Black, Latina, and non-Latina White women aged 16 to 19 (N= 242), with younger and White women included for comparison purposes. Results indicated that exposure to Plan A significantly improved attitudes toward long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) among all age groups and among young Black and Latina women, but not White women. These findings may be explained by participant's identification with the Black and Latina lead characters - both of whom model positive reproductive health behaviors.

The Ethics of Access: Reframing the Need for Abortion Care as a Health Disparity

The majority of U.S. abortion patients are poor women, and Black and Hispanic women. Therefore, this article encourages bioethicists and equity advocates to consider whether the need for abortion care should be considered a health disparity, and if yes, whether framing it this way would increase the ability of poor women and women of color to get the medical care they need. In order to engage with these critical questions, bioethicists must avoid abortion exceptionalism and respect patients as moral agents. Centering the conscience of pregnant people shifts our analysis away from the ethics of the act of abortion, and toward the ethics of access to abortion care. Because the Supreme Court is on the brink of shifting the question of abortion's legality to state legislatures, this is the moment for all bioethicists to clarify and strengthen their thinking, writing, and teaching in abortion ethics.

Understanding contraceptive failure: an analysis of qualitative narratives

Most American women wanting to avoid pregnancy use contraception, yet contraceptive failures are common. Guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM), we conducted a secondary qualitative analysis of interviews with women who described experiencing a contraceptive failure (n=69) to examine why and how this outcome occurs. We found three primary drivers of contraceptive failures (health literacy and beliefs, partners and relationships, and structural barriers), and we identified pathways through which these drivers led to contraceptive failures that resulted in pregnancy. These findings have implications for how individuals can be better supported to select their preferred contraception during clinical contraceptive discussions.

Differentials in Contraceptive Use Among Selected Minority Ethnic Groups in Nigeria

Ethnicity is one of the critical factors that shape contraceptive use in Nigeria. While there are growing disparities in contraceptive uptake among women of reproductive age in the three major ethnic groups (Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba), not much is known about differentials in contraceptive use among the minority ethnic groups. This study examined differentials in contraceptive use among a sample of 1,072 respondents comprising the Ebira (352), Igala (358) and Okun (361) ethnic groups in Nigeria. Questionnaire was administered to respondents proportionately in the selected minority ethnic groups with six key informant interviews and 12 focus group discussions to generate quantitative and qualitative data among ever-married women. Quantitative data were analyzed at bivariable and multivariable levels. The qualitative data were content-analyzed. Differentials in contraception are shaped by ethnic affiliations and socio-demographic characteristics of couples. The use of modern contraceptives was low among the Ebira (25.7%) and Igala (24.1%) ethnic groups, but high among Okun (67%) women of reproductive age. The odd of using a modern contraceptive is significantly higher among the Okun women (UOR = 5.618, 95% CI 4.068–7.759) than the Ebira and Igala. There is no significant difference between the Ebira and Igala minority ethnic groups on modern contraceptive use. Ethnicity as a factor is not a stand-alone predictor of the use of modern contraception among the study groups, other socio-economic variables such as residence, religion, income and marital status were significant predictors of modern contraceptive use among minority ethnic groups. We suggest introducing reproductive health intervention programmes targeted at sensitizing the minority ethnic groups on effective modern contraceptive use while addressing their specific modern contraceptive need in Nigeria.

Black Women's Lived Experiences of Abortion

In this study, we aim to understand abortion in the context of structural racism and reproductive injustice. We designed this study using Reproductive Justice and Public Health Critical Race Praxis frameworks. We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with self-identified Black women over the age of 18 who have had an abortion. The primary identified theme is that "choice" around abortion is a privilege that is not always available to Black women. Participants discussed domains of experience around abortion. The domains were (1) community experience and intergenerational wisdom, (2) personal experience and beliefs, (3) the process of accessing abortion, and (4) reflecting on abortion experience and recovery. Understanding the ways in which reproductive injustices and structural racism constrict choices is critical to providing abortion care. Abortion care should seek to honor the experiences of Black women, trust in the expertise that Black women have in our own bodies, and work to provide Reproductive-Justice-informed care.

Contraceptive Use Among Women in the United States Aged 18-44 Years with Selected Medical Contraindications to Estrogen

Objective: Medical contraindications to estrogen limit women's contraceptive options. This study assessed the association between selected medical contraindications to estrogen on contraceptive use and examined whether contraindications serve as a barrier to the prevention of unintended pregnancy. Materials and Methods: We analyzed women aged 18-44 at risk of unintended pregnancy participating in the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Survey questions queried women regarding contraceptive use and contraindications to estrogen use. We assessed the most recently used contraceptive method and compared the odds of women using each category of contraception (no methods, less effective methods, pill/patch/ring, injection, intrauterine device, implant, permanent contraception) between those with and without potential contraindications to estrogen using multinomial logistic regression models. Results: This study included 32,098 women, of whom 16% had one or more potential contraindications to estrogen. There were significant differences in contraceptive choice by potential contraindication status (p < 0.01). Fifteen percent of women with potential contraindications reported using estrogen-containing methods (pill, patch, or ring) compared with 20% of women with no potential contraindication. Women with potential contraindications to estrogen more frequently used permanent contraception (odds ratio [OR] vs. pill/patch/ring: 1.48 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.88) or no contraceptive method (OR vs. pill/patch/ring: 1.37 95% CI: 1.07-1.75) after adjustment for race, age, marital status, and income. Conclusions: Potential medical contraindications to estrogen are associated with permanent contraception and the use of no contraception. These results portray a complicated relationship but could suggest a lack of access to other contraceptive options.

The Examination of Young Mexican American Women’s Contraceptive Use

The purpose of this paper is to review all literature on young Mexican American women’s contraceptive use practices in the U.S. to provide an overall picture of the largest Hispanic subgroup. We also discuss how sex education is important to contraceptive use and how parent-child sex communication takes place among young women of this specific population.

Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Objective

To assess the effects of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of different types of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions and were published as original papers in scientific journals. The literature search was performed in June 2021 in PubMed, Central Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Google Scholar; without restrictions in language or publication date. Two independent authors identified studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Whenever possible, meta-analyses were performed. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354).

Results

Eleven RCTs were eligible for inclusion (published from 2004 to 2017), from which nine compared enhanced versus standard counseling. Pooled estimates showed that, compared to standard counseling, enhanced counseling was associated with a higher incidence of effective contraceptive use (>3 months) (relative risk [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.16), although no significant difference was found in the incidence of long-acting reversible contraceptive use (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.68–2.29), contraceptive uptake (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98–1.15), and obstetric event occurrence (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.57–1.47). Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. In addition, two studies compared contraceptive counseling provided by physicians versus that provided by non-physicians, which did not show significant differences.

Conclusions

Enhanced contraceptive counseling may favor effective contraceptive use but may not affect the rate of obstetric event occurrence. Also, the studies did not find a difference in the effects of counseling interventions given by different providers. Since evidence certainty was very low, future well-designed RCTs are needed to make informed decisions.

Registration

The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354).

Doctor Knows Best? Provider Bias in the Context of Contraceptive Counseling in the United States

OBJECTIVES

The study examined how clinicians described their patients in relation to their practices of contraceptive counseling.

STUDY DESIGN

This qualitative study involved individual interviews with 15 clinicians working in obstetrics and gynecology in South Carolina about their approaches to contraceptive counseling. We analyzed the data using a combination of deductive and inductive approaches.

RESULTS

Clinicians attributed challenges of working with diverse patient populations to patients' race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and age. Clinicians often interpreted patient concerns about or refusal to use effective contraceptive methods as a problem with patients themselves. When clinicians described patients in disparaging ways, they often focused on adolescent patients.

CONCLUSION

Bias informed by structural inequalities and power relations influences how clinicians perceive their patients and approach counseling them about contraception. Such practices may limit patients' informed decision-making and autonomy when making decisions about initiating or continuing contraceptive use.

The limitations of patient-centered care: The case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal

Patient-centered care (PCC) is frequently recommended to improve healthcare outcomes in the United States. Despite its purported benefits, little research explores how and to what extent providers implement this model in their care. We examine such processes through the case of contraception, specifically, "early" removals of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). In-depth interviews with 51 healthcare providers reveal that while providers describe embracing patient-centeredness when considering patients' early LARC removal requests, their implementation ironically sidelines patient preferences and needs. Rather than be responsive to patients' requests, all providers in the study resist early LARC removal by: withholding information about self-removal of intrauterine devices (IUDs); negotiating with patients to keep their device longer; setting subjective timelines to prolong LARC use; and/or engaging in delay tactics to wear down patients' resolve for removal. Furthermore, beyond simply resisting LARC removal requests using these strategies, providers purposively employ tenets of PCC to sway patients away from removal. In other words, providers utilize PCC as a means to undermine it. Understanding how providers implement patient-centered care reveals the challenges to doing so, even in cases like early LARC removal where providers indicate patient-centeredness is a priority. It also elucidates the need for enhanced training, specificity, and institutionalization around patient-centered models of care; informs interventions that promote LARC use among patients; as well as offers opportunities for improving patient-provider exchanges generally.