Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review

Expert consensus on the optimal management of BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in the Asia-Pacific region

The burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) is high in the Asia-Pacific region, and several countries in this region have among the highest and/or fastest growing rates of CRC in the world. A significant proportion of patients will present with or develop metastatic CRC (mCRC), and BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC represents a particularly aggressive phenotype that is less responsive to standard chemotherapies. In light of recent therapeutic advances, an Asia-Pacific expert consensus panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. The expert panel comprised nine medical oncologists from Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan (the authors), who met to review current literature and develop eight consensus statements that describe the optimal management of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC in the Asia-Pacific region. As agreed by the expert panel, the consensus statements recommend molecular testing at diagnosis to guide individualized treatment decisions, propose optimal treatment pathways according to microsatellite stability status, advocate for more frequent monitoring of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC, and discuss local treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease. Together, these expert consensus statements are intended to optimize treatment and improve outcomes for patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC in the Asia-Pacific region.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite advances in treatment, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a significant challenge due to its heterogeneity and resistance to therapy. Regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, can inhibit tumor progression through multiple mechanisms, thereby improving patient prognosis. It has emerged as a potential treatment option for mCRC patients who have progressed on standard therapies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Regorafenib in this patient population, synthesizing data from clinical trials to provide a comprehensive understanding of its role in mCRC treatment.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted via the PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and Embase databases from January 2012 to December 2024. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or clinical trials that reported outcomes of regorafenib treatment in mCRC patients, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). OS refers to the length of time from the start of treatment until the death of the patient from any cause, while mortality specifically denotes the number of deaths occurring within the study period. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a standardized form. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 statistical software.

RESULTS

A total of 5,082 articles were retrieved, and ultimately, 9 eligible studies involving a total of 2,823 patients were included. All 9 included studies reported OS and PFS. In these mCRC patients, the dose of regorafenib was usually 160 mg daily. The meta results indicated that the OS of patients in the regorafenib group was significantly different [MD = 1.33, 95% CI (0.33, 2.33), P = 0.009]. Eight studies reported the ORR of the disease [OR = 1.13, 95% CI (0.73, 1.76), P = 0.57]. Five studies reported the DCR, and the DCR of patients in the regorafenib group was significantly different from that of patients in the control group [OR = 3.45, 95% CI (2.04, 5.84), P < 0.00001]. The incidence of SAEs (> grade 3) was reported in all 9 included studies [OR = 2.48, 95% CI (1.29, 4.73), P = 0.006].

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review of prospective trials, regorafenib resulted in improved OS with manageable adverse effects for patients with advanced mCRC. Still, considering the safety, future research should focus on investigating the dose optimization of regorafenib, as well as predictive biomarkers for therapeutic efficacy.

Regorafenib enhances M1/M2 macrophage polarization by inhibiting the secretion of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

AIMS

Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of various metastatic/advanced cancers. Although clinical trials have reported the efficacy of regorafenib in multiple cancer types, its immunomodulatory activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear.

MAIN METHODS

This study investigated the effects of regorafenib on tumorigenesis by using two mouse models of HNSCC. The distribution of immune cells in tumor tissues was assessed through flow cytometry, RNA sequencing, and multiplex immunofluorescence staining.

KEY FINDINGS

Regorafenib exhibited significant antitumor activity in our HNSCC mouse models. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte isolation and RNA sequencing revealed that regorafenib can activate immune functions. Moreover, regorafenib-treated tumor-conditioned medium regulated macrophage proliferation ex vivo. Our data suggests that regorafenib modulates immune function by regulating both tumor and immune cells. Specifically, regorafenib induced the polarization of macrophages toward the proinflammatory M1 phenotype by suppressing the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), a macrophage regulator. In addition, regorafenib suppressed the secretion of PAI-1 from ex vivo human HNSCC organoids.

SIGNIFICANCE

Regorafenib enhances M1/M2 macrophage polarization and suppresses PAI-1 secretion from cancer cells, leading to a shift from M2 to M1 macrophages in the HNSCC tumor microenvironment.

Successful desensitization in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer presenting with regorafenib-mediated fix drug eruption

INTRODUCTION

Regorafenib is an oral protein kinase inhinitor approved fot the treatment of metastatic colorecral cancer. We present a first successful case of desensitization in regorafenib-related fix-drug eruption in the literature.

CASE REPORT

A 44-year-old female patient was diagnosed with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. The patient received regorafenib treatment for malignancy recurrence. The patient was admitted to adult allergy clinic with developing recurrent fix drug eruption in the second cycle, on the 10th day of regorafenib treatment. The patient was given the third cycle of regorafenib treatment with a 6-day desensitization protocol, the first day of which consisted of 6 steps and and the third cycle was successfully completed.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Regorafenib-mediated delayed hypersensitivity reactions occur less frequently and and regorafenib hypersensitivity reactions are difficult to manage and experience is limited. This is the first successful desensitization protocol developed by us for regorafenib-related fix drug eruption and more cases are needed to be reported to confirm the desensitization protocol.

DISCUSSION

There is only one successful regorafenib desensitization protocol for severe delayed hypersensivity reaction in the literature, but there is no protocol developed for mild type delayed hypersensivity reaction. The management of fix-drug eruption primarily involves discontinuation and avoidance of the offending drug but our patient had a mild delayed-type reaction and there was no alternative to regarofenib treatment. We developed the rapid 6-step desensitization protocol (Day 1). According to this protocol, the patient was able to continue regorafenib treatment successfully.

Third-line treatment and beyond in metastatic colorectal cancer: What do we have and what can we expect?

Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cancer worldwide and the second cause of cancer-related death. Treatment advances and precision oncological medicine for these tumours have been stalled in comparison to those for other common tumours such as lung and breast cancer. However, the recent publication of the SUNLIGHT trial results with the trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102)-bevacizumab combination and the irruption of new molecular targets with guided treatments have opened new possibilities in third-line metastatic colorectal cancer management. Anti-EGFR rechallenge, anti-HER2 targeted therapies or the promising results of Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC), are some of the available options that may modify what is presumably third-line colorectal treatment. Hereby, we present the evidence of the different treatment options in third-line colorectal cancer and beyond, as well as the possibilities of sequencing them.

Association of VEGFA and CCL4L2 polymorphisms with hand-foot skin reaction and survival of regorafenib in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment with regorafenib, which inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, frequently results in hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), requiring treatment discontinuation or dose reduction. In our prospective study of regorafenib on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, 17% of patients developed grade 3 HFSR. Herein, we retrospectively examined genetic polymorphisms associated with regorafenib-induced severe HFSR.

METHODS

To identify associated polymorphisms, exploratory whole-exome sequencing focusing on factors related to VEGF-mediated signaling pathways was first performed in seven patients each, with grade 3 HFSR and without HFSR. The identified HFSR-associated polymorphisms were analyzed in all the 40 patients.

RESULTS

The genotype frequency of rs3025009 G/A or A/A in the gene encoding VEGF-A (VEGFA) in patients with ≥ grade 2 HFSR was significantly higher than in other patients (P = 0.0257, Pc = 0.0771 [Bonferroni correction]). The frequency of C-C motif of chemokine ligand 4-like 2 (CCL4L2) rs3744596 A/T or T/T in patients with grade 3 HFSR was significantly lower than in others (P = 0.00894, Pc = 0.0268). The combination of the risk genotypes VEGFA rs3025009 G/A or A/A and CCL4L2 rs3744596 A/A was significantly associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 (P = 0.000614, Pc = 0.00246) and a longer median progression-free survival (P = 0.0234) than others.

CONCLUSIONS

These VEGF-related polymorphisms were found to be associated with HFSR and the survival benefits of regorafenib treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE

UMIN000013939, registered on May 12, 2014, when 6 months after the approval by the Institutional Review Board of Showa University.

Potentials and future perspectives of multi-target drugs in cancer treatment: the next generation anti-cancer agents

Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide with more than an estimated 19.3 million new cases in 2020. The occurrence rises dramatically with age, and the overall risk accumulation is combined with the tendency for cellular repair mechanisms to be less effective in older individuals. Conventional cancer treatments, such as radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy, have been used for decades to combat cancer. However, the emergence of novel fields of cancer research has led to the exploration of innovative treatment approaches focused on immunotherapy, epigenetic therapy, targeted therapy, multi-omics, and also multi-target therapy. The hypothesis was based on that drugs designed to act against individual targets cannot usually battle multigenic diseases like cancer. Multi-target therapies, either in combination or sequential order, have been recommended to combat acquired and intrinsic resistance to anti-cancer treatments. Several studies focused on multi-targeting treatments due to their advantages include; overcoming clonal heterogeneity, lower risk of multi-drug resistance (MDR), decreased drug toxicity, and thereby lower side effects. In this study, we'll discuss about multi-target drugs, their benefits in improving cancer treatments, and recent advances in the field of multi-targeted drugs. Also, we will study the research that performed clinical trials using multi-target therapeutic agents for cancer treatment.

Inhibition of RhoGEF/RhoA alleviates regorafenib resistance and cancer stemness via Hippo signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are vulnerable to drug resistance. Although drug resistance has been taken much attention to HCC therapy, little is known of regorafenib and regorafenib resistance (RR). This study aimed to determine the drug resistance pattern and the role of RhoA in RR. Two regorafenib-resistant cell lines were constructed based on Huh7 and Hep3B cell lines. In vitro and in vivo assays were conducted to study RhoA expression, the activity of Hippo signaling pathway and cancer stem cell (CSC) traits. The data showed that RhoA was highly expressed, Hippo signaling was hypoactivated and CSC traits were more prominent in RR cells. Inhibiting RhoA could reverse RR, and the alliance of RhoA inhibition and regorafenib synergistically attenuated CSC phenotype. Furthermore, inhibiting LARG/RhoA increased Kibra/NF2 complex formation, prevented YAP from shuttling into the nucleus and repressed CD44 mRNA expression. Clinically, the high expression of RhoA correlated with poor prognosis. LARG, RhoA, YAP1 and CD44 show positive correlation with each other. Thus, inhibition of RhoGEF/RhoA has the potential to reverse RR and repress CSC phenotype in HCC.

A Phase II Exploratory Study to Identify Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Response to Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Failed First-Line Therapy

Single-agent regorafenib is approved in Canada for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who have failed previous lines of therapy. Identifying prognostic biomarkers is key to optimizing therapeutic strategies for these patients. In this clinical study (NCT01949194), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of single-agent regorafenib as a second-line therapy for mCRC patients who received it after failing first-line therapy with an oxaliplatin or irinotecan regimen with or without bevacizumab. Using various omics approaches, we also investigated putative biomarkers of response and resistance to regorafenib in metastatic lesions and blood samples in the same cohort. Overall, the safety profile of regorafenib seemed similar to the CORRECT trial, where regorafenib was administered as ≥ 2 lines of therapy. While the mutational landscape showed typical mutation rates for the top five driver genes (APC, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and TP53), KRAS mutations were enriched in intrinsically resistant lesions. Additional exploration of genomic-phenotype associations revealed several biomarker candidates linked to unfavorable prognoses in patients with mCRC using various approaches, including pathway analysis, cfDNA profiling, and copy number analysis. However, further research endeavors are necessary to validate the potential utility of these promising genes in understanding patients' responses to regorafenib treatment.

Regorafenib therapy as a third-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A single center long term experience

This study examined the effects of regorafenib (Reg) on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who underwent targeted treatment and chemotherapy. Reg was administered as a third-line treatment to 84 patients who had undergone 2 rounds of chemotherapy and targeted therapy and subsequently experienced progression. Treatment was initiated with a daily dose of 80 or 120 mg, based on the patient's ability to tolerate the medication, which was increased to 160 mg/day. The median PFS with Reg was 4 ± 0.2 months, while the median OS was 9 ± 1.2 months. When compared to patients who started Reg treatment at 80 mg, patients starting at 160 mg had longer median PFS and OS (PFS:6 ± 2.1 months vs 4 ± 0.2 months; P = .05; OS:13 ± 0.7 months vs 6 ± 1.3 months; P = .069). Patients with right-sided colon cancer who received Reg as third-line therapy had a significantly longer mPFS than those with left-sided colon cancer (8 months ± 4 vs 4 months ± 0.3, P = .039). Patients with KRAS mutations had a prolonged mPFS than those with panRAS-wild type (6 ± 1.6 months vs 4 ± 0.3 months, P = .06). The mPFS contribution in the BRAF mutant subgroup with poor prognosis is promising, as it is similar to that of patients without BRAF mutations (4 months ± 0.8 × 4 months ± 0.5, P = .74). The most common AEs reported were elevated liver enzyme levels and dermatological toxicities.

Associations of HLA-C*01:02 and HLA-B*46:01 with regorafenib-induced erythema multiforme in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Regorafenib improves the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, it is also characterized by detrimental dermal side effects that may require treatment cessation or modified dosing. In our previous prospective pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic studies, 17.5% (7/40) of the patients with mCRC had grade 3 erythema multiforme (EM) that caused treatment discontinuation. Haplotypes in genes encoding human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are associated with EM following the administration of drugs, such as allopurinol. This study examined the association between HLA haplotypes and regorafenib-induced EM. Regorafenib was administered orally at 160 mg/body once daily for weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle. To determine the HLA haplotypes, we used the WAKFlow HLA Typing Kit HLA-A, -B, or -C. The carrier frequency of HLA-C*01:02 in patients with EM (6/7) was higher than that in tolerant controls (8/33; odds ratio [OR] = 18.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.95-180, p = 0.00437). HLA-B*46:01 was also associated with EM (OR = 11.6, 95% CI = 1.47-92.1, p = 0.0299). These associations were no longer significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Therefore, regorafenib-induced EM in Japanese patients appears to be associated with specific HLA haplotypes but further validation is needed.

Refractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer with ERBB2/ERBB3 mutation may be preferred population for regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitor therapy: a real-world study

Background

Microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) has been referred to as the "cold tumor" because of almost no response to anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody. A recent REGONIVO trial showed that regorafenib plus nivolumab had an encouraging efficacy in MSS metastatic CRC (mCRC). However, only a small subset of patients may benefit from the combination therapy. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety data of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with regorafenib in refractory MSS mCRC and to discover biomarkers that can effectively stratify the beneficial patient population.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with MSS mCRC who received regorafenib combined with anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and status of gene mutation were reviewed and evaluated.

Results

Twenty-one patients received combination treatment. At a median treatment duration of 4 months, one patient achieved complete response, three patients achieved partial response, and two patients achieved stable disease as the best response. The ORR and DCR were 19% and 28.5% in the overall population, respectively. The median PFS was 4 months, and the median OS was 25 months. Only erbb2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2/erbb3 receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (ERBB2/ERBB3) mutation status was confirmed to be a potential predictive factor for effective treatment. In patients with ERBB2/ERBB3 mutation, ORR, DCR, and PFS exhibited significant improvements in comparison with that in wild-type patients. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in three patients (14.3%).

Conclusions

Regorafenib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor provides a feasible treatment regimen for refractory MSS mCRC with tolerated toxicity. Patients with ERBB2/ERBB3 mutation may be the preferred population for this combination regimen.

Risk of retinal vein occlusion in colorectal cancer patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factors - a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) treatment has been associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, the use of anti-VEGFs for patients with colorectal cancers (CRC) has raised concerns about the potential risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), an ocular disease caused by embolism or venous stasis. This study aims to evaluate the risk of RVO in patients with CRC treated with anti-VEGFs.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Database. The study cohort comprised patients newly diagnosed with CRC between 2011 and 2017, who received anti-VEGF treatment. For each patient in the study cohort, a control group comprising four patients newly diagnosed with CRC, but not receiving anti-VEGF treatment, was randomly selected. A washout period of 12 months was implemented to identify new cases. The index date was defined as the date of the first prescription of anti-VEGF drugs. The study outcome was the incidence of RVO, as identified by ICD-9-CM (362.35 and 362.36) or ICD-10-CM codes (H3481 and H3483). Patients were followed from their index date until the occurrence of RVO, death or the end of the study period. Covariates, including patients' age at index date, sex, calendar year of CRC diagnosis, stage of CRC and comorbidities related to RVO, were included. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with adjustments for all covariates to compare the risk of RVO between the anti-VEGF and control groups.

RESULTS

We recruited 6285 patients in the anti-VEGF group and 37,250 patients in the control group, with mean ages of 59.49 ± 12.11 and 63.88 ± 13.17 years, respectively. The incidence rates were 1.06 per 1000 person-years for the anti-VEGF group, and 0.63 per 1000 person-years for the controls. There was no statistically significant difference in RVO risk between the anti-VEGF and control groups (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 0.87-5.61).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated no association between use of anti-VEGF and occurrence of RVO among CRC patients, although the crude incidence rate of RVO was higher in patients receiving anti-VEGF, compared to control patients. Future study with larger sample size is required to confirm our findings.

Phase II dose titration study of regorafenib in progressive unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

Regorafenib has shown significant survival benefit as a salvage therapy for colorectal cancer; however, its starting dose has been controversial in recent studies. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study on the efficacy and safety of the dose reduction of regorafenib to 120 mg. Patients received 120 mg regorafenib once per day for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week off-treatment period. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR). Sixty patients were registered, and the DCR was 38.3% with a median progression-free survival of 2.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-3.7) and median overall survival of 10.0 months (95% CI 6.9-15.2). Common grade 3-4 adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension (20.0% each). The results of administration of 120 mg regorafenib as the starting dose are consistent with reports from prior phase III trials, which used starting doses of 160 mg. This lower initiating dose of regorafenib may be beneficial to certain patient populations. This clinical trial was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR number UMIN000018968, registration date: 10/09/2015).

Clinical activity of regorafenib in elderly patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiforme is one of the most frequent and aggressive primary tumors in the central nervous system, representing >60% of all brain tumors in adults. Despite treatment, prognosis remains poor with most if not all patients experiencing disease recurrence and a 2-year survival rate of 27%. At present, no confirmed standard treatment exists for recurrent glioblastoma. Regorafenib is one of the few options available, based on results from the REGOMA trial. In the present study, a real-life retrospective investigation on the role of regorafenib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (>60 years old) from two main Oncological Units in South Italy (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy and Ospedale Civile San Giovanni di Dio, Frattamaggiore, Naples, Italy), was performed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), whereas progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate and disease control were secondary endpoints. Survival was then analyzed according to age, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and methylated methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) status. A total of 56 patients met the eligibility criteria. The intention to treat population median PFS (mPFS) was 4.1 months and median OS (mOS) was 6.8 months. Age did not appear to have a significant influence on mPFS. mOS in MGMT-methylated patients was improved compared with that of the unmethylated group (7.7 months vs. 5.6 months). Both mOS and mPFS were longer in IDH-mutant patients. The present study was one of the first real life analyses of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma. The results were in line with the REGOMA trial. Age did not appear to be a prognostic factor, thus suggesting that treatment choice should not be different in elderly. MGMT methylation appeared to influence OS. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first report of regorafenib activity in older patients and, while the results were statistically significant, these should be confirmed in further studies.

A bioinformatics framework to identify the biomarkers and potential drugs for the treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC), a common malignant tumor, is one of the main causes of death in cancer patients in the world. Therefore, it is critical to understand the molecular mechanism of CRC and identify its diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. The purpose of this study is to reveal the genes involved in the development of CRC and to predict drug candidates that may help treat CRC through bioinformatics analyses. Two independent CRC gene expression datasets including The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and GSE104836 were used in this study. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed separately on the two datasets, and intersected for further analyses. 249 drug candidates for CRC were identified according to the intersected DEGs and the Crowd Extracted Expression of Differential Signatures (CREEDS) database. In addition, hub genes were analyzed using Cytoscape according to the DEGs, and survival analysis results showed that one of the hub genes, TIMP1 was related to the prognosis of CRC patients. Thus, we further focused on drugs that could reverse the expression level of TIMP1. Eight potential drugs with documentary evidence and two new drugs that could reverse the expression of TIMP1 were found among the 249 drugs. In conclusion, we successfully identified potential biomarkers for CRC and achieved drug repurposing using bioinformatics methods. Further exploration is needed to understand the molecular mechanisms of these identified genes and drugs/small molecules in the occurrence, development and treatment of CRC.

N6‑methyladenosine upregulates miR‑181d‑5p in exosomes derived from cancer‑associated fibroblasts to inhibit 5‑FU sensitivity by targeting NCALD in colorectal cancer

Resistance to 5‑Fluorouracil (5‑FU) is a frequent occurrence in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) from cancer‑associated fibroblasts (CAFs)‑secreted exosomes have been associated with 5‑FU sensitivity. The potential molecular mechanism of CAFs‑exosomal miRNAs in CRC remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the role of exosomal miRNAs in 5‑FU sensitivity in CRC. Exosomes derived from CAFs were extracted. Exosomal miR‑181d‑5p was identified as a miRNA associated with 5‑FU sensitivity. The putative function of exosomal miR‑181d‑5p was evaluated by ethynyl‑2‑deoxyuridine staining, flow cytometry, RNA immunoprecipitation, luciferase reporter assay, tumor xenograft formation, reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR and western blot analysis. Modification of miR‑181d‑5p by the RNA N6‑methyladenosine (m⁶A) methyltransferase like (METTL)3 was examined by m6A methylation analysis. The results indicated that m⁶A modification and METTL3 expression were upregulated in CRC patients. METTL3‑dependent m⁶A methylation promoted the miR‑181b‑5p process by DiGeorge Syndrome Critical Region 8 (DGCR8) in CAFs. CAFs‑derived exosomes inhibited 5‑FU sensitivity in CRC cells through the METTL3/miR‑181d‑5p axis. A mechanistic study revealed that miR‑181d‑5p directly targeted neurocalcin δ (NCALD) to inhibit the 5‑FU sensitivity of CRC cells. Patients with higher NCALD levels exhibited a higher survival rate. Taken together, METTL3‑dependent m⁶A methylation was upregulated in CRC to promote the processing of miR‑181d‑5p by DGCR8. This led to increased miR‑181d‑5p expression, which inhibited the 5‑FU sensitivity of CRC cells by targeting NCALD. The results of the present study provided novel insight into exosomal microRNAs in 5‑FU sensitivity in CRC cells. Furthermore, exosomal miR‑181d‑5p may represent a potential prognostic marker for CRC.

Concise synthesis and biological activity evaluation of novel pyrazinyl–aryl urea derivatives against several cancer cell lines, which can especially induce T24 apoptotic and necroptotic cell death

Based on structural modification of regorafenib, 28 pyrazinyl–aryl urea derivatives were synthesized and the in vitro anti-cancer effects were evaluated. Compound 5-23 possessed the strongest inhibitory activity against bladder cancer T24 cell line.

Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib Monotherapy among Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Chinese Population: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Background

Present study was condeucted to investigate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a Chinese population and the prognostic implications of adverse reactions.

Methods

This retrospective study a total of 96 consecutive patients with mCRC who had failed standard chemotherapy regimens from June 2017 to December 2020. Patients received regorafenib at an initial dosage of 160 mg or 120 mg. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points objective response rate (ORR), disease-control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety, and associations between prognosis and adverse-reaction status.

Results

There were three patients with partial response, 49 with stable disease, and 44 with progressive disease. Consequently, the ORR and DCR of the 96 patients were 3.1% (95% CI 0.6%–8.9%) and 54.2% (95% CI 43.7–64.4%), respectively. Prognosis results showed that median PFS of the 96 patients was 2.5 (95% CI 1.98–3.02) months and median OS 9.8 (95% CI 7.02–12.59) months. Additionally, the most frequent adverse reactions during regorafenib treatment were hand–foot syndrome (HFS; 52.1%), hypertension (38.5%), and fatigue (33.3%). Interestingly, the relevance of prognosis to adverse-reaction status exhibited that median PFS of patients with HFS and patients without HFS was 3.3 months and 2.0 months, respectively (P=0.013). Similarly, median PFS of patients with hypertension and without hypertension was 3.6 months and 2.2 months, respectively (P=0.023).

Conclusion

Potential clinical benefit of regorafenib monotherapy was observed for patients with mCRC who had failed standard chemotherapy regimens. Hypertension and HFS induced by regorafenib therapy could be used as valuable biomarkers to predict the prognosis of regorafenib.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer: the French CORRELATE cohort

Aim: We report real-world evidence with regorafenib in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer from the French cohort of the international, prospective, observational CORRELATE study. Patients & methods: Patients receiving regorafenib according to French health authority approval were included. The primary end point was treatment-emergent adverse events. Overall survival and progression-free survival were secondary end points. Results: Two hundred and forty-two patients (61% male, median age: 66 years) were enrolled. The most common grade ≥3 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (10.3%), asthenia/fatigue (9.9/1.2%) and hypertension (6.2%). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 6.8 (95% CI: 6.3-7.6) and 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.6-3.0), respectively. Conclusion: The real-world safety and effectiveness data of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer in France align with findings from Phase III clinical trials and the global CORRELATE population.

Standard versus personalized schedule of regorafenib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective, multicenter, real-world study

Background

Despite its proven activity as third-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), regorafenib can present a poor tolerability profile which often leads to treatment modifications and transient or permanent discontinuation; thus, in clinical practice physicians usually adopt various dosing and interval schedules to counteract regorafenib-related adverse events and avoid treatment interruption. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of personalized schedules of regorafenib in patients with metastatic GIST, in comparison with the standard schedule (160 mg daily, 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off).

Patients and methods

Institutional registries across seven Italian reference centers were retrospectively reviewed and data of interest retrieved to identify patients with GIST who had received regorafenib from February 2013 to January 2021. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test to make comparisons.

Results

Of a total of 152 patients with GIST, 49 were treated with standard dose, while 103 received personalized schedules. At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.73-11.0 months] versus 9.7 months (95% CI 7.9-14.5 months) in the standard-dose and the personalized schedule groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.75; P = 0.00052]. Median overall survival was 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-21.8 months) versus 20.5 months (95% CI 15.0-25.4 months), respectively (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.22; P = 0.16).

Conclusions

Regorafenib-personalized schedules are commonly adopted in daily clinical practice of high-volume GIST expert centers and correlate with significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, regorafenib treatment optimization in patients with GIST may represent the best strategy to maximize long-term therapy.

•

Regorafenib-personalized schedules are commonly adopted in daily clinical practice.

•

Regorafenib-personalized schedules correlate with statistically significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes.

•

A prompt personalization of regorafenib could help clinicians avoid early treatment discontinuation due to adverse events.

•

A patient-tailored approach could be applied to other metastatic solid tumors treated with regorafenib.

Unravelling the tangled web of hypertension and cancer

Cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of mortality globally, being responsible for an estimated 17 million deaths every year. Cancer is the second leading cause of death on a global level with roughly 9 million deaths per year being attributed to neoplasms. The two share multiple common risk factors such as obesity, poor physical exercise, older age, smoking and there exists rare monogenic hypertension syndromes. Hypertension is the most important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and affects more than a billion people worldwide and may also be a risk factor for the development of certain types of cancer (e.g. renal cell carcinoma (RCC)). The interaction space of the two conditions becomes more complicated when the well-described hypertensive effect of certain antineoplastic drugs is considered along with the extensive amount of literature on the association of different classes of antihypertensive drugs with cancer risk/prevention. The cardiovascular risks associated with antineoplastic treatment calls for efficient management of relative adverse events and the development of practical strategies for efficient decision-making in the clinic. Pharmacogenetic interactions between cancer treatment and hypertension-related genes is not to be ruled out, but the evidence is not still ample to be incorporated in clinical practice. Precision Medicine has the potential to bridge the gap of knowledge regarding the full spectrum of interactions between cancer and hypertension (and cardiovascular disease) and provide novel solutions through the emerging field of cardio-oncology. In this review, we aimed to examine the bidirectional associations between cancer and hypertension including pharmacotherapy.

Molecular Targeted Agent and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Co-Loaded Thermosensitive Hydrogel for Synergistic Therapy of Rectal Cancer

Molecular targeted therapy has been proved effective in treatment of rectal cancer. Up-regulated expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) was observed after the management of molecular targeted therapy, which made the therapeutic effect discounted. Tumors with higher PD-L1 expression were more sensitive and responsive to treatment of PD-L1 inhibitor. Therefore, the combination of molecular targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade makes sense. In this study, the copolymers of poly (ethylene glycol)-block-poly (L-leucine) (PEG-PLLeu) were synthesized as a thermosensitive hydrogel composite for consecutive release of regorafenib (REG) and BMS202. The mechanical properties of PEG-PLLeu were investigated, confirming that PEG-PLLeu (5 wt.%) was suitable for in situ injection as drug-delivery composite at low temperature and stable after sol-gel transition at body temperature. Importantly, the double drug loaded hydrogel showed superior antitumour activity over single drugs in an orthotopic rectal cancer model (CT26-Luc). Further analysis of the tumor tissues suggested that REG upregulated the expression of PD-L1 in tumor tissues. In addition, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of CT26-Luc tumor was distinctly relieved under the effect of BMS202, as characterized by increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells in tumors and enhanced secretion of antitumour cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α). Moreover, the drug-loaded composite showed no obvious toxicity in histological analysis. Taken together, the administration of REG and BMS202 in the PEG-PLLeu composite could induce a synergistic effect in in situ treatment of rectal cancer without obvious toxicity, and thus represented a potential strategy for enhanced in situ therapeutic modality.

Harnessing affinity-based protein profiling to reveal a novel target of nintedanib

Nintedanib (BIBF1120), a triple angiokinase inhibitor, was first approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) therapy and is also efficacious for lung carcinoma, and interstitial lung diseases, far beyond its inhibition of VEGFR/PDGFR/FGFR. We identified tripeptidyl-peptidase 1 (TPP1) as one of the direct targets of nintedanib employing the affinity-based protein profiling (AfBPP) technique. This may be a new mechanism for nintedanib's role different from tyrosine kinase inhibition.

Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Metatinib Tromethamine Tablet in Patients with Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors: A Phase I Clinical Trial

LESSONS LEARNED

MET overexpression is uncommon, and positive MET immunohistochemistry (1+/2+) was an independent positive prognostic factor for response rate and progression-free survival. Whether MET overexpression can be considered a potential predictive biomarker and be used as an inclusion criterion is worth investigating in a future study.

BACKGROUND

Metatinib tromethamine tablet (metatinib) is a small molecule receptor kinase inhibitor targeting both c-MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. This phase I trial aimed to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of metatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Eligible patients received a single dose of metatinib in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with dose levels of 25-800 mg/day, after a single dose on day 1, then 2 days off, and then a multidose schedule of once-daily doses for 25 consecutive days (days 4-28). Primary endpoints were MTD and safety; secondary and exploratory endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and biomarkers.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (including nine patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]) received at least one dose of study drug (one patient quit the study without continuous multiple-dose administration after receiving a single dose of metatinib). Hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, and liver dysfunction were the DLTs, and 200 mg/day was the MTD. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were skin toxicity (50%), diarrhea (33.3%), and liver dysfunction (27.8%). Three patients (only one of six in the 200 mg/day cohort; the other two in the 300 mg/day cohort) experienced severe TRAEs: one patient with severe liver dysfunction and two patients with severe liver dysfunction and skin toxicity, respectively. Pharmacokinetics assessment indicated that metatinib was rapidly absorbed and metabolized to the formation of reactive metabolite, SCR-1510, after single-dose administration. The mean time taken to achieve maximum concentration and terminal elimination half-life of SCR-1510 was approximately 2.0-3.0 hours and ranged from 8 to 14 hours. Two patients had partial responses. The objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 11.1% and 61.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.75 months.

CONCLUSION

Metatinib administration of 200 mg/day was well tolerated, safe, and effective. The MTD was 200 mg/day, which should be recommended in further investigations.

Bioinformatic analysis reveals an exosomal miRNA-mRNA network in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Exosomes play important roles in angiogenesis, drug resistance, and metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC), but the underlying mechanism has seldom been reported. Herein, our study aimed to reveal an exosomal miRNA-mRNA network involved in CRC by performing bioinformatical analysis.

METHODS

The mRNA and miRNA data of colon adenocarcinoma and rectal adenocarcinoma were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, and exosomal miRNAs data were downloaded from the GEO dataset GSE39833. The differential expression analysis was performed using "limma" and "edgeR". Target mRNAs of miRNAs were predicted using FunRich 3.1.3, miRNAtap and multiMiR. The candidate mRNAs and exosomal miRNAs were obtained by intersecting two groups of differentially expressed miRNAs and intersection of the differential expressed mRNAs and the target mRNAs, respectively. Key mRNAs and exosomal miRNAs were identified by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis, and used to construct the exosomal miRNA-mRNA network. The network verified was by receiver operating characteristic curve, GEPIA and LinkedOmics. Functional enrichment analysis was also performed for studied miRNAs and mRNAs.

RESULTS

A total of 6568 differentially expressed mRNAs and 531 differentially expressed miRNAs from TCGA data, and 166 differentially expressed exosomal miRNAs in GSE39833 dataset were identified. Next, 16 key mRNAs and five key exosomal miRNAs were identified from the 5284 candidate mRNAs and 61 candidate exosomal miRNAs, respectively. The exosomal miRNA-mRNA network with high connectivity contained 13 hub mRNAs (CBFB, CDH3, ETV4, FOXQ1, FUT1, GCNT2, GRIN2D, KIAA1549, KRT80, LZTS1, SLC39A10, SPTBN2, and ZSWIM4) and five hub exosomal miRNAs (hsa-miR-126, hsa-miR-139, hsa-miR-141, hsa-miR-29c, and hsa-miR-423). The functional annotation revealed that these hub mRNAs were mainly involved in the regulation of B cell receptor signaling pathway and glycosphingolipid biosynthesis related pathways. All hub mRNAs and hub exosomal miRNAs exhibited high diagnosis value for CRC. Furthermore, the association of the hub mRNAs with overall survival, stages, and MSI phenotype of CRC revealed their important roles in CRC progression.

CONCLUSION

This study constructed an exosomal miRNA-mRNA network which may play crucial roles in the carcinogenesis and progression of CRC, thus providing potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CRC.

Effective management of advanced colon cancer genotyping microsatellite stable/microsatellite instable-low with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene mutation using nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with regorafenib and irinotecan: A case report

Microsatellite stable /microsatellite instable-low is the most common colorectal cancer genotype, counting for approximately 85% of common colorectal cancer patients. Treatment of advanced microsatellite stable/microsatellite instable-low colorectal cancer is difficult and successful pharmacological treatment options are currently lacking. Here, we report a case of a 37-year-old man with advanced colorectal cancer genotyping microsatellite stable/microsatellite instable-low with a Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (G12V) mutation. Following palliative surgery, the patient did not response to the common recommended chemotherapy FOLFIRI regimen and other chemotherapy options. Finally, the patient was successfully treated using a unique combinational immunotherapy, using nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with regorafenib and irinotecan. Significant improvement in the Karnofsky Performance Status scores, liver function and well-being, reduction in serum tumor biomarkers, and reduction in the size of multiple liver metastatic tumors was evident. This report provides a rare case in which a unique and effective combinational immunotherapy for refractory advanced colon cancer patients is discussed. It encourages further research into combined immunotherapy for immuno-insensitive colon cancer patients.

The inhibition of colorectal cancer growth by the natural product macrocarpal I

BACKGROUND

Presently, few small molecule compounds are used as targeted therapy drugs in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). It is important to identify new small molecule compounds, which can be used in the treatment of CRC.

METHODS

In this study, we selected four protein molecules as drug targets: PRL-3 (Phosphatase of regenerating liver 3), CLIC4 (Chloride intracellular channel 4), THBS2 (Thrombospondin 2), and BGN (Biglycan). These protein molecules were associated with the growth and metastasis of CRC cells. Small molecular compounds were screened on the basis of their target structures. Thus, five small molecule compounds were screened from each target structure, and three small molecule compounds (macrocarpal I, sildenafil, and neoandrographolide) were found to bind with two drug targets at the same time. Further experiments revealed that the inhibition rate of macrocarpal I was the highest in CRC cells. Therefore, we determined the effects of macrocarpal I on proliferation, apoptosis, cytoskeleton of CRC cells, and subcutaneous tumorigenesis in nude mice. Furthermore, RNA-seq analysis was performed to determine the molecular mechanism through which macrocarpal I inhibited the progression of CRC.

RESULTS

We found that macrocarpal I could effectively inhibit proliferation, colony formation of CRC cells, and subcutaneous tumorigenesis in nude mice. Moreover, it also destroyed the cytoskeleton of CRC cells and promoted apoptosis. The effects on kinase activity, cytoskeleton, and DNA repair is the mechanism of macrocarpal I to inhibiting CRC growth.

CONCLUSION

Macrocarpal I is a small molecule compound that can effectively inhibit the progression of CRC. Thus, macrocarpal I is a therapeutic compound that shows promising results in the treatment of advanced CRC.

Regorafenib, an investigational agent for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Cholangiocarcinoma is a prevalent gastrointestinal cancer with a high mortality rate. A limited number of cholangiocarcinoma patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease but unfortunately, most patients present with an advanced-stage disease which is not amenable to curative surgical resection.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss regorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, which has been investigated as a therapeutic agent in advanced stage biliary tract cancer patients in phase II trials. We examined the efficacy and toxicity of this agent and its potential in this patient population in the future. We also provide further insights on novel approaches to optimize the efficacy of regorafenib in cholangiocarcinoma patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent phase II trials of single-agent regorafenib in advanced stage biliary tumors revealed a modest activity in non enriched patient population and is currently part of the national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) guidelines (Level 2B) in the refractory setting. However, more opportunities for this agent exist in combination approaches with other therapeutics such as immune checkpoint inhibitors. It is also important to recognize that the paradigm has significantly shifted for targeted therapy to more specific and more potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting specific actionable genes.

FOXM1/DVL2/Snail axis drives metastasis and chemoresistance of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer worldwide. Metastasis and chemoresistance are regarded as the two leading causes of treatment failure and high mortality in CRC. Forkhead Box M1 (FOXM1) has been involved in malignant behaviors of cancer. However, the role and mechanism of FOXM1 in simultaneously regulating metastasis and chemoresistance of CRC remain poorly understood. Here, we found that FOXM1 was overexpressed in oxaliplatin- and vincristine-resistant CRC cells (HCT-8/L-OHP and HCT-8/VCR) with enhanced metastatic potential, compared with HCT-8 cells. FOXM1 overexpression increased migration, invasion and drug-resistance to oxaliplatin and vincristine in HCT-8 cells, while FOXM1 knockdown using shFOXM1 impaired metastasis and drug-resistance in HCT-8/L-OHP and HCT-8/VCR cells. Moreover, FOXM1 up-regulated Snail to trigger epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like molecular changes and multidrug-resistance protein P-gp expression, while silencing Snail inhibited FOXM1-induced metastasis and drug-resistance. We further identified that disheveled-2 (DVL2) was crucial for FOXM1-induced Snail expression, metastasis and chemoresistance. Furthermore, FOXM1 bound to DVL2, and enhanced nuclear translocation of DVL2 and DVL2-mediated transcriptional activity of Wnt/β-catenin known to induce Snail expression. In conclusion, FOXM1/DVL2/Snail axis triggered aggressiveness of CRC. Blocking FOXM1/DVL2/Snail pathway simultaneously inhibited metastasis and chemoresistance in CRC cells, providing a new strategy for successful CRC treatment.

Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment

Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY 73-4506; Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) is a novel oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of several protein kinases. However, few guidelines exist for novel biomarkers to select patients who will likely benefit from regorafenib treatment. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with regorafenib were evaluated in this study. Tumor tissues of these patients were subjected to next-generation sequencing-based cancer panel tests. The relationship between molecular profiling and efficacy of regorafenib was analyzed. Among the 76 mCRC patients, the median age was 58 years (range 22–79 years), and 73.7% received regorafenib as a third-line therapy. The primary tumor locations were the right side (n = 15, 19.8%) and the left side (n = 61, 80.2%). Most patients (97.4%) had received prior anti-angiogenetic agents, and a prior anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agent had been administered to 32.9%. Of these 76 patients, 65 were evaluated to determine the efficacy of treatment. We observed zero complete responses, seven confirmed partial responses (PR 9.2%), 26 stable disease states (34.2%), and 32 disease progressions (42.1%). The overall confirmed response rate and the disease control rate were 9.2% and 43.4%, respectively. Genomic analysis revealed that APC mutations were significant in patients who demonstrated a tumor response to regorafenib (p < 0.05). Interestingly, FGFR1 amplification was detected in only three of 76 patients (3.9%), and these three patients achieved a PR to regorafenib. The median progression-free survival time was 2.8 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.6–4.0). Patients with BRAF mutation and/or SMAD4 mutation had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) than those without such a mutation. On pathway analysis, Tumor Growth Factor (TGF)-beta pathways were significantly associated with worse PFS. We found that efficacy of regorafenib might be correlated with specific genetic aberrations, such as APC mutation and FGFR1 amplification. In addition, SMAD4 mutation and TGF-beta pathway were associated with worse PFS after regorafenib. We found that efficacy of regorafenib might be correlated with specific genetic aberrations, such as APC mutation and FGFR1 amplification. In addition, SMAD4 mutation and the TGF-beta pathway were associated with worse PFS after regorafenib.

Practical considerations in the use of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer

Over the past 20 years, management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably, leading to increased overall survival and more patients eligible for third- or later-line therapy. Currently, two oral therapies are recommended in the third-line treatment of mCRC, regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil. Selecting the most appropriate treatment in the third-line setting poses different challenges compared with treatment selection at earlier stages. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand and differentiate between available treatment options and to communicate the benefits and challenges of these to patients. In this narrative review, practical information on regorafenib is provided to aid physicians in their decision-making and patient communications in daily practice. We discuss the importance of appropriate patient selection and adverse events management through close patient monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure patients stay on treatment for longer and receive as much benefit as possible. We also highlight key physician-patient communication points to facilitate shared decision-making.

Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Combination with Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Although various therapies are available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is lack of head-to-head evidence. Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of chemotherapy in combination with different biological agents including regorafenib in second-line therapy in patients with mCRC. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of regorafenib in combination with chemotherapy compared to other biological agents with chemotherapy combinations.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab, regorafenib, panitumumab, cetuximab, ramucirumab, conatumumab, ganitumab, and aflibercept in combination with chemotherapy against chemotherapy alone as second-line setting from inception to 7 February 2019 in patients with mCRC. The survival outcomes were analyzed by the frequentist statistical approach (R software, netmeta package) while the level of individual treatment arms was assessed using the Bayesian method (R software, gemtc package).

RESULTS

We identified 12 articles involving eight RCTs studies analyzing 6805 patients. The studies compared bevacizumab (3), regorafenib (1), panitumumab (2), cetuximab (3), ramucirumab (1), conatumumab (1), ganitumab (1), and aflibercept (1) against chemotherapy alone as comparator. The progression-free survival (PFS) revealed that regorafenib performed better than aflibercept (HR 0.9631, 95% CI 0.6785-1.367), ganitumab (HR 0.7228, 95% CI 0.3985-1.3109), panitumumab (HR 0.9653, 95% CI 0.6781-1.3742), and ramucirumab (HR 0.9206, 95% CI 0.6504-1.303). Regorafenib performed better than bevacizumab (OR 0.797, 95% CI 0.328-1.88) in terms of tumor response. Safety analysis showed that regorafenib performed better in reducing grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AE) than cetuximab and conatumumab, neutropenia than conatumumab, and fatigue than cetuximab.

CONCLUSIONS

Regorafenib combined with chemotherapy might be a potential alternative to conventional therapeutic options in second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and could be considered as the best option for treating patients with KRAS and BRAF mutated mCRC. However future RCTs are needed to confirm these results.

Higher Systemic Exposure to Unbound Active Metabolites of Regorafenib Is Associated With Short Progression-Free Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Regorafenib treatment improves survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but it is also characterized by detrimental side effects that may require modified dosing or interval schedules. Regorafenib is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 in the liver to its active metabolites, M-2 and M-5. We examined area under the unbound plasma concentration-time curve (AUCu) to these compounds to establish pharmacokinetic bases for individualized dosing strategies. The plasma protein binding of M-2 and M-5 was approximately 10-fold lower than that of regorafenib, whereas AUCu values for active metabolites on both days 1 and 15 were significantly higher than that of regorafenib. Patients with higher AUCu values of M-2 or M-5 on day 1 showed significantly shorter progression-free survival than others, likely due, at least in part, to treatment discontinuation as a result of adverse events, especially occurred during first cycle.

Dose reduction and discontinuation of standard-dose regorafenib associated with adverse drug events in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Regorafenib (REG) is an oral multikinase inhibitor used in colorectal cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumour and hepatocellular carcinoma. Several adverse events (AEs) are commonly reported during REG administration, and strategies for managing AEs in everyday clinical practice include supportive care, dose modifications and, when necessary, treatment withdrawal. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the schedule treatment modifications of REG associated with AEs across randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs).

Methods

Eligible studies included RCTs assessing standard dose REG versus placebo. Outcomes of interest included: AE-related permanent discontinuation, dose interruptions and dose reductions.

Results

We retrieved all the relevant RCTs through PubMed/Med, Cochrane library and EMBASE: 7 eligible studies involving a total of 2099 patients (Regorafenib: 1362; placebo: 737) were included in our analysis. The use of REG was associated with higher incidence and risk of all outcomes of interest when compared with placebo. The incidences of permanent discontinuation, dose interruptions and dose reductions in patients receiving REG were 9.7%, 57.2% and 47%, respectively, versus 3.3%, 16.7% and 7.7% of placebo group; compared with placebo, the summary relative risks (RRs) of permanent discontinuation, dose interruptions and dose reductions in REG arm were 2.80 (95% CI 1.85-4.22), 3.21 (95% CI 2.59-3.99) and 6.02 (95% CI 3.28-11.03), respectively.

Conclusions

Treatment with REG at the standard dose of 160 mg is associated with a significant increase in AE-related permanent discontinuation, dose interruptions and dose reductions. Prompt identification and management of AEs seem mandatory to obtain maximal benefit from REG treatment. In the current landscape, dose personalization of REG may have the potential to improve quality of life, minimize treatment discontinuation and maximize patient outcomes.

Comparing Late-line Treatment Sequence of Regorafenib and Reduced-intensity FOLFOXIRI for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Both regorafenib and reduced-intensity FOLFOXIRI (riFOLFOXIRI) prolong survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the sequence in which they should be administrated first in late-line treatment for refractory mCRC remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study that reviewed data from patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, with mCRC refractory to fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, cetuximab (wild-type RAS), and bevacizumab. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a regorafenib-first group and a riFOLFOXIRI-first group. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze survival, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 136 and 55 patients followed a regorafenib-first or riFOLFOXIRI-first treatment strategy, respectively. At baseline, patient characteristics were similar between the groups, except for younger age in the riFOLFOXIRI-first group. The regorafenib-first group had better overall survival (13.8 vs. 10.7 mo, P=0.038), whereas patients in the riFOLFOXIRI-first group had a better partial response rate (P=0.005) but a higher rate of discontinuation due to adverse effects (P=0.004) and cross-over to regorafenib (P<0.001). Thus, no significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (regorafenib-first strategy: 3.17 mo; riFOLFOXIRI-first strategy: 4.97 mo; P=0.624). Regorafenib-first strategy, sex, and pathology were identified as independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis indicated that younger age, better performance status, stage IV disease, and mutant RAS gene favored the regorafenib-first strategy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with regorafenib-first followed by riFOLFOXIRI resulted in better overall survival when given as late-line treatment for patients with refractory mCRC.

Targeting HER2 with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan: A Dose-Expansion, Phase I Study in Multiple Advanced Solid Tumors

HER2-targeted therapies are approved only for HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. We assessed the safety/tolerability and activity of the novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in 60 patients with pretreated, HER2-expressing (IHC ≥ 1+), non-breast/non-gastric or HER2-mutant solid tumors from a phase I trial (NCT02564900). Most common (>50%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were nausea, decreased appetite, and vomiting. Two drug-related TEAEs were associated with fatal outcomes. The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 28.3% (17/60). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8-11.1] months. In HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ORR was 72.7% (8/11), and median PFS was 11.3 (95% CI, 8.1-14.3) months. Confirmed responses were observed in six tumor types, including HER2-expressing NSCLC, colorectal cancer, salivary gland cancer, biliary tract cancer, endometrial cancer, and HER2-mutant NSCLC and breast cancer. Results suggest T-DXd holds promise for HER2-expressing/mutant solid tumors. SIGNIFICANCE: T-DXd demonstrated promising activity in a heterogeneous patient population with heavily pretreated HER2-expressing or HER2-mutant solid tumors, especially HER2-mutant NSCLC. The safety profile was generally acceptable. Interstitial lung disease can be severe and requires prompt monitoring and intervention. Further research of T-DXd is warranted to address these unmet medical needs.See related commentary by Rolfo and Russo, p. 643.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 627.

Supportive roles of brain macrophages in CNS metastases and assessment of new approaches targeting their functions

Metastases to the central nervous system (CNS) occur frequently in adults and their frequency increases with the prolonged survival of cancer patients. Patients with CNS metastases have short survival, and modern therapeutics, while effective for extra-cranial cancers, do not reduce metastatic burden. Tumor cells attract and reprogram stromal cells, including tumor-associated macrophages that support cancer growth by promoting tissue remodeling, invasion, immunosuppression and metastasis. Specific roles of brain resident and infiltrating macrophages in creating a pre-metastatic niche for CNS invading cancer cells are less known. There are populations of CNS resident innate immune cells such as: parenchymal microglia and non-parenchymal, CNS border-associated macrophages that colonize CNS in early development and sustain its homeostasis. In this study we summarize available data on potential roles of different brain macrophages in most common brain metastases. We hypothesize that metastatic cancer cells exploit CNS macrophages and their cytoprotective mechanisms to create a pre-metastatic niche and facilitate metastatic growth. We assess current pharmacological strategies to manipulate functions of brain macrophages and hypothesize on their potential use in a therapy of CNS metastases. We conclude that the current data strongly support a notion that microglia, as well as non-parenchymal macrophages and peripheral infiltrating macrophages, are involved in multiple stages of CNS metastases. Understanding their contribution will lead to development of new therapeutic strategies.

Synthesis and in vitro anticancer activity of certain novel 1-(2-methyl-6-arylpyridin-3-yl)-3-phenylureas as apoptosis-inducing agents

In connection with our research program on the development of novel anticancer candidates, herein we report the design and synthesis of novel series of 1-(2-methyl-6-arylpyridin-3-yl)-3-phenylureas 5a-l. The target pyridins were evaluated for their in vitro anticancer activity against two cancer cell lines: non-small cell lung cancer A549 cell line and colon cancer HCT-116 cell line. Compound 5l emerged as the most active congener towards both A549 and HCT-116 cell lines with IC50 values equal to 3.22 ± 0.2 and 2.71 ± 0.16 µM, respectively, which are comparable to those of Doxorubicin; 2.93 ± 0.28 and 3.10 ± 0.22, respectively. Furthermore, compound 5l stood out as the most potent pyridine derivative (mean % GI = 40), at US-NCI Developmental Therapeutic Program anticancer assay, with broad-spectrum antitumor activity against the most tested cancer cell lines from all subpanels. Compound 5l was able to provoke apoptosis in HCT-116 cells as evidenced by the decreased expression of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein, and the enhanced expression of the pro-apoptotic proteins levels; Bax, cytochrome C, p53, caspase-3 and caspase-9. Moreover, 5l disrupted the HCT-116 cell cycle via alteration of the Sub-G1 phase and arresting the G2-M stage. Also, 5l showed a significant increase in the percent of annexinV-FITC positive apoptotic cells from 1.99 to 15.76%.

Anti-tumoral activity of single and combined regorafenib treatments in preclinical models of liver and gastrointestinal cancers

Regorafenib is a sorafenib-derived chemotherapy drug belonging to the multikinase inhibitor family. This agent effectively targets a wide range of tyrosine kinases involved in cancer biology, such as those implicated in oncogenesis, angiogenesis, and tumor microenvironment control. The beneficial effects of regorafenib in clinical trials of patients who suffer from advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colorectal cancer (CRC) or gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) refractory to standard treatments led to regorafenib monotherapy approval as a second-line treatment for advanced HCC and as a third-line treatment for advanced CRC and GISTs. Multiple in vitro and in vivo studies have been performed over the last decade to reveal the molecular mechanisms of the favorable actions exerted by regorafenib in patients. Given the hypothetical loss of sensitivity to regorafenib in tumor cells, preclinical research is also searching for novel therapeutic approaches consisting of co-administration of this drug plus other agents as a strategy to improve regorafenib effectiveness. This review summarizes the anti-tumor effects of regorafenib in single or combined treatment in preclinical models of HCC, CRC and GISTs and discusses both the global and molecular effects that account for its anti-cancer properties in the clinical setting.

The cancer drug regorafenib exhibits a broad range of anti-tumor activities that could be enhanced by combination with other treatments. A team led by José L. Mauriz from the University of León, Spain, review the ways in which regorafenib, blocking several enzymes involved in cancer biology, has been shown to shrink tumors in different models of liver, colon and gastrointestinal cancer. Its mechanisms of action include blockade of new blood vessel formation, induction of cell death and modulation of the immune microenvironment. Research studies show that co-administration of regorafenib with other drugs directed at various molecular targets or immune pathways produces synergistic effects against cancer cells. The preclinical data highlights the potential of combination drug regimens to improve outcomes among patients eligible for regorafenib treatment.

Antiangiogenic Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal carcinoma is the third most common cancer worldwide. Approximately 20% of patients with colorectal cancer will have metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis, and approximately 30% to 50% of patients with primary colon cancer will relapse and die of metastatic cancer. The 5-year survival rate of metastatic colorectal cancer remains disappointing at approximately 10%.Angiogenesis plays a significant role in tumor growth and metastasis in colorectal carcinoma. There are currently 4 US Food and Drug Administration-approved antiangiogenic agents for metastatic colorectal cancer. Bevacizumab is the only antiangiogenic agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Other antiangiogenic agents include ramucirumab, ziv-aflibercept, and regorafenib. We review the data supporting the use of antiangiogenics in this disease.

A personalized platform identifies trametinib plus zoledronate for a patient with KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer remains a leading source of cancer mortality worldwide. Initial response is often followed by emergent resistance that is poorly responsive to targeted therapies, reflecting currently undruggable cancer drivers such as KRAS and overall genomic complexity. Here, we report a novel approach to developing a personalized therapy for a patient with treatment-resistant metastatic KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer. An extensive genomic analysis of the tumor's genomic landscape identified nine key drivers. A transgenic model that altered orthologs of these nine genes in the Drosophila hindgut was developed; a robotics-based screen using this platform identified trametinib plus zoledronate as a candidate treatment combination. Treating the patient led to a significant response: Target and nontarget lesions displayed a strong partial response and remained stable for 11 months. By addressing a disease's genomic complexity, this personalized approach may provide an alternative treatment option for recalcitrant disease such as KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer.

Neratinib augments the lethality of [regorafenib + sildenafil]

Regorafenib is approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. In the trial NCT02466802, we have discovered that regorafenib can be safely combined with the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor sildenafil in advanced solid tumor patients. The present studies determined whether the approved ERBB1/2/4 and RAS downregulating drug neratinib, could enhance the lethality of [regorafenib + sildenafil]. Neratinib enhanced [regorafenib + sildenafil] lethality in a greater than additive fashion in colon cancer cells. The drug combination reduced the expression of mutant K-RAS and of multiple histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins that required autophagosome formation. It caused green fluorescent protein or red fluorescent protein-tagged forms of K-RAS V12 to localize into large intracellular vesicles. Compared with [regorafenib + sildenafil], the three-drug combination caused greater and more prolonged activation of the ATM-AMPK-ULK-1 pathway and caused a greater suppression and prolonged inactivation of mammalian target of rapamycin, AKT, and p70 S6K. Approximately 70% of enhanced lethality caused by neratinib required ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)-AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) signaling whereas knockdown of Beclin1, ATG5, FADD, and CD95 completely prevented the elevated killing effect. Exposure of cells to [regorafenib + sildenafil] reduced the expression of the checkpoint immunotherapy biomarkers programmed death-ligand 1, ornithine decarboxylase, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 and increased the expression of major histocompatibility complex A (MHCA), which also required autophagosome formation. Knockdown of specific HDAC proteins recapitulated the effects observed using chemical agents. In vivo, using mouse cancer models, neratinib significantly enhanced the antitumor efficacy of [regorafenib + sildenafil]. Our data support performing a new three drug Phase I trial combining regorafenib, sildenafil, and neratinib.