Crack-healing during two-stage crystallization of biomedical lithium (di)silicate glass-ceramics

Effect of staining techniques and repeated firing cycles on translucency, color and biaxial flexural strength of advanced lithium disilicate containing Virgilite crystals

BACKGROUND

The repeated firings can enhance shade matching, translucency, and strength; however, they may also lead to color shifts. Previous research suggests that multiple firings enhance these properties to a certain extent; however, the impact of staining techniques remains underexplored. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of staining techniques and multiple firings on the translucency, color and biaxial flexural strength of advanced lithium disilicate ALD containing Virgilite crystals.

METHODS

Sixty-three discs of ALD (CEREC Tessera®) were divided into 3 groups based on staining techniques (n = 21); group CO (glaze only), group SC (single-step characterization), and group DC (double-step characterization). The discs were then subjected to either 2, 4, or 6 firing cycles, resulting in 9 groups (n = 7): COII, COIV, COVI, SCII, SCVI, DCII, DCIV, and DCVI. Relative translucency parameter (RTP), color change (ΔE), and biaxial flexural strength were measured, then discs were analyzed using SEM. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA, Bonferroni correction, and Spearman's correlation (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Repeated firing and staining techniques significantly affected translucency, color change, and biaxial flexural strength (p < 0.001). Translucency increased with firings, highest in CO and lowest in DC. ΔE increased with firings, highest for DC and lowest in CO. The biaxial flexural strength of the CO group remained stable across firing cycles, with no significant changes. The SC group, initially the weakest, showed a significant increase, reaching its peak after six cycles. The DC group had high strength in the fourth cycle, with a significant difference observed between the second and fourth cycles. By the sixth cycle, all groups showed comparable strength with no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitation of this study, firing cycles and staining techniques impact the properties of ALD. More firing cycles enhance translucency but increase color change. Repeated firing, particularly with the double-step characterization technique, significantly improved biaxial flexural strength up to the fourth cycle, demonstrating its superior performance over the single-step characterization technique.

Reducing fractures in diamond-milled lithium metasilicate/disilicate glass-ceramics (LMGC/LDGC) by ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining

Digital CAD/CAM milling of aesthetic glass-ceramics in dental restorations induces extensive surface damage to the materials, jeopardising the quality of the restorations. This study aimed to reduce fractures in lithium metasilicate and disilicate glass-ceramics (LMGC and LDGC) induced by novel ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining for improved surface quality. Ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining of LMGC and LDGC was performed using a digital high-speed ultrasonic milling machine. Machining-induced surface fractures were quantitatively assessed in terms of 3D surface height, spatial, and hybrid parameters as a function of vibration amplitudes using a 3D white light profilometer. Damage morphologies were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Machining-induced surface fractures significantly depended on material microstructures, mechanical properties associated with brittleness and machinability indices, and ultrasonic machining vibration amplitudes. Higher brittleness indexed LMGC produced more surface damage than LDGC. Thus, LMGC surfaces had significantly higher 3D surface height, spatial, and hybrid parameters than LDGC, except texture aspect ratios. Brittle fracture dominated all material removal but ultrasonic machining at an optimized vibration amplitude of 3 μm promoted localized ductile deformation in LMGC and LDGC, and significantly improved the surface quality. Ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining at the optimized vibration amplitude enabled the surface quality improvement for both LMGC and LDGC. Further, one-step (direct) machining of LDGC can be approached for rapid high-quality ceramic restorations, replacing the two-step procedure for LMGC and saving the fabrication time.

Impact of repeated heat-pressing on the microstructure and flexural strength of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics

BACKGROUND

The leftover material from the heat-pressing of IPS e.max Press ceramic is often discarded, despite some laboratories exploring its potential for reuse. However, there is a lack of data on the performance of IPS e.max Press ceramic when combined with the button portions. This study investigated the impact of repeated heat-pressing on the crystal structure and flexural strength of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDGC).

METHODS

Specimens (N = 30, n = 10 per group) were categorized based on the number of heat-pressing cycles: G0 (control group, no heat-pressing), G1 (one cycle of heat-pressing), and G2 (two cycles of heat-pressing). The crystal structure of LDGC bars was characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Flexural strength was tested, and microstructures were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the ImageJ processing program. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple pairwise comparisons of means were performed with Tukey's post-hoc test.

RESULTS

G2 exhibited significantly lower flexural strength and crystallinity, as well as larger crystal size, compared to G1 and G0 (p < 0.05). Flexural strength values decreased significantly with an increased number of heat-pressing cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanical properties of LDGC significantly degraded after repeated heat pressing. Therefore, it is not clinically advisable to repeatedly press the lithium disilicate ingot together with the leftover material.

Effect of "fast"-crystallization and simultaneous glazing on physicochemical properties of lithium-disilicate CAD/CAM ceramic

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the impact of a "fast" crystallization and simultaneous-glazing on the physicochemical properties of lithium-disilicate CAD/CAM-ceramic.

METHODS

Lithium-disilicate bars and crowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent) were divided into four groups (n = 30): WG/F (WG=with glaze/F=fast crystallization), NG/F (NG=no glaze), WG/C (C=conventional crystallization), and NG/C. A liquid/powder glaze system was used (IPS Ivocolor®, Ivoclar-Vivadent). Specimens were crystallized (Programat P310, Ivoclar-Vivadent) using the P161 program for C (approx. 20-25 min), and P165 for F (approx. 14-16 min). Bars (n = 30) underwent three-point bending tests (flexural strength-FS in MPa and modulus of elasticity-E in GPa) using a universal testing machine. Crowns were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after selective etching, and to Raman, FTIR-ATR, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectroscopies to assess chemical composition.

RESULTS

For FS, both factors/interaction were statistically significant. C (427.48±42.41 MPa) showed significantly higher values than F (409.82±38.82 MPa). WG (398.32±29.80 MPa) exhibited significantly lower FS than NG (438.21±41.77 MPa). For E data, both factors/interaction were significant. NG (90.28±14.71 GPa) displayed higher E than WG (83.07±5.69 GPa), while C (90.08±12.98 GPa) exhibited higher E than F (83.46±9.40 GPa). NG/C showed the best results for both variables. F groups showed (SEM) porous surfaces and crack-like marks on crystals. FTIR, Raman and XRD spectra confirmed the typical composition of a lithium-disilicate glass ceramic, and some attenuated signals and structural variations (XRD) in WG.

CONCLUSIONS

"Fast" crystallization and simultaneous-glazing produced weaker/less-rigid structures with irregular crystals and glassy phases. Simultaneous glazing may have hindered proper thermal distribution during crystallization.

SIGNIFICANCE

"Fast" crystallization and simultaneous glazing with non-recommended systems, can adversely affect the final properties of lithium disilicate restorations.

Glass science behind lithium silicate glass-ceramics

OBJECTIVES

Lithium silicate-based glass ceramics have evolved as a paramount restorative material in restorative and prosthetic dentistry, exhibiting outstanding esthetic and mechanical performance. Along with subtractive machining techniques, this material class has conquered the market and satisfied the patients' needs for a long-lasting, excellent, and metal-free alternative for single tooth replacements and even smaller bridgework. Despite the popularity, not much is known about the material chemistry, microstructure and terminal behaviour.

METHODS

This article combines a set of own experimental data with extensive review of data from literature and other resources. Starting at manufacturer claims on unique selling propositions, properties, and microstructural features, the aim is to validate those claims, based on glass science. Deep knowledge is mandatory for understanding the microstructure evolution during the glass ceramic process.

RESULTS

Fundamental glass characteristics have been addressed, leading to formation of time-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams, which are the basis for kinetic description of the glass ceramic process. Nucleation and crystallization kinetics are outlined in this contribution as well as analytical methods to describe the crystalline fraction and composition qualitatively and quantitatively. In relation to microstructure, the mechanical performance of lithium silicate-based glass ceramics has been investigated with focus on fracture strength versus fracture toughness as relevant clinical predictors.

CONCLUSION

Fracture toughness has been found to be a stronger link to initially outlined manufacturer claims, and to more precisely match ISO recommendations for clinical indications.

Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM endocrowns made from different materials in maxillary premolar interproximal defects

OBJECTIVES

This in vitro study aims to compare the fracture resistance of three CAD/CAM materials used in endocrown restoration of interproximal defects in maxillary premolars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

45 maxillary premolars extracted as part of orthodontic treatment were included. Following standardized root canal treatment, all teeth were prepared into Mesial-Occlusal (MO) cavity types. The samples were then randomly divided into three groups: LD [repaired with lithium disilicate glass ceramics (IPS e.max CAD)], VE [treated with polymer-infiltrated ceramics (Vita Enamic)], and LU [repaired with resin-based nanoceramics (Lava Ultimate)]. Axial static loading was applied using a universal testing machine at 1 mm/min until fracture, and fracture resistance and failure modes were recorded.

RESULTS

Regarding Fracture Resistance Values (FRVs), the LD group exhibited significantly higher values than the other two groups, VE (P = 0.028) and LU (P = 0.005), which showed no significant difference (P = 0.778). On the other hand, regarding failure modes, the LD group had a higher prevalence of irreparable fractures compared to the other two groups, VE (P < 0.001) and LU (P < 0.001), which showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Although lithium disilicate glass ceramics exhibited higher FRVs, they had a lower repair probability. In contrast, polymer-infiltrated ceramics and resin-based nanoceramics contributed to tooth structure preservation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

For maxillary premolars with interproximal defects following root canal treatment, resin ceramic composites are recommended for restoration to enhance abutment teeth protection.

Influence of the Crystallization Firing Process on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Silicate-based Glass-ceramic Inlays Fabricated With a CAD/CAM Chairside System

OBJECTIVE

Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems are widely used in dental treatment. Clinicians can use chairside CAD/CAM technology, which has the advantage of being able to fabricate inlays on the same day. We aimed to evaluate the effects of crystallization firing processes, fabrication methods (one-step and two-step), and materials on marginal and internal adaptations of silicate-based glass-ceramic all-ceramic inlays fabricated with CAD/CAM chairside systems.

METHODS

Ten artificial mandibular left first molars were prepared with standardized ceramic class II mesialocclusal (MO) inlay cavities. Optical impressions were obtained using CEREC Omnicam Ban. IPS e-max CAD (IE), (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Initial LiSi Block (LS) (Hongo, Bunkyoku, Tokyo, Japan), VITA Suprinity (SP), (Vita Zahnfabrick, Bad Säckingen, Germany), and Celtra Duo (CD) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (n=10) were milled using CEREC MC XL (Bensheim, Germany). IE and SP were crystallization-fired using CEREC Speed Fire. The silicone replica technique was used for the measurement of internal (axial and pulpal walls) and marginal (cervical and occlusal edge) adaptations. The adaptations were measured using a thin layer of light-body polyvinyl siloxane impression material placed between the master tooth inlay preparation and restoration. Marginal and internal adaptations of IE, LS, SP, and CD were measured using a stereomicroscope (500×). For IE and SP, marginal and internal adaptations were measured before and after the crystallization firing process. Data analyses were conducted using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey test. For IE and SP, marginal and internal adaptations before and after the crystallization firing process were analyzed using the t-test. The significance level was set at α=0.05.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences in occlusal and cervical edge marginal adaptations among the material groups (p<0.001). The Tukey HSD test revealed a significant difference in marginal occlusal and cervical edge adaptations between LS and CD groups and IE and SP groups (p≤0.05). For IE and SP inlays, the t-test revealed a significant difference between occlusal and cervical edge adaptations before the crystallization firing process and those after the crystallization firing process, with the latter group showing a more significant discrepancy in adaptation than the former group (p≤0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fabrication methods (one- and two-step) affected the marginal adaptation compatibility but not internal compatibility of MO inlays. The crystallization firing process affected the marginal adaptation of inlays using lithium silicate or lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. However, adaptation to the cavity was considered clinically acceptable for all materials.

Does glaze firing affect the strength of advanced lithium disilicate after simulated defects?

OBJECTIVE

To study the influence of glazing on strength repair of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics after defect incorporation in different production processing phases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bar-shaped specimens (1 × 1 × 12 mm, n = 280; 20/group) made from different lithium disilicate ceramics (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar, "LD" or advanced lithium disilicate CEREC Tessera, Dentsply Sirona, "ALD") were exposed to 7 different protocols: crystallized without (c) and with glaze layer (cg), with a defect incorporated before crystallization without (ic) and with glaze layer (icg), with a defect after crystallization without (ci) or with glaze layer (cig), and defect incorporated after the glaze layer (cgi). The flexural strength was determined using the three-point bending test. Analysis of indented areas and fractured specimens was performed by scanning electron microscopy. Flexural strength data were evaluated by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey tests (α = 5%).

RESULTS

Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant influence of ceramic (p < 0.001; F = 55.45), protocol (p < 0.001; F = 56.94), and the interaction protocol*ceramic (p < 0.001; F = 13.86). Regardless of ceramics, defect incorporation as final step resulted in the worst strength, while defects introduced before crystallization did not reduce strength. Glaze firing after defect incorporation led to strength repair for ALD, whereas such an effect was not evident for LD.

CONCLUSIONS

The advanced lithium disilicate must receive a glaze layer to achieve its highest strength. Defects incorporated in the pre-crystallized stage can be healed during crystallization. Defects should not be incorporated after glazing.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinical adjustments should be performed on pre-crystallized or crystalized restorations that receive a glazer layer afterwards.

Surface fractures in pre-crystallized and crystallized zirconia-containing lithium silicate glass-ceramics generated in ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining

Machining-induced surface fractures in ceramic restorations is a long-standing problem in dentistry, affecting the restorations' functionality and reliability. This study approached a novel ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining technique to zirconia-containing lithium silicate glass-ceramics (ZLS) and characterized its induced surface fracture topographies and morphologies to understand the microstructure-property-processing relations. The materials were processed using a digitally controlled ultrasonic milling machine at a harmonic vibration frequency with different amplitudes. Machining-induced surface fracture topographies were measured with a 3D white light optical profilometer using the arithmetic mean, peak and valley, and maximum heights, as well as the kurtosis and skewness height distributions, and the texture aspect ratios. Fracture morphologies were analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The surface fracture topographies were significantly dependent on the material microstructure, the mechanical properties, and the ultrasonic machining vibration amplitudes. Larger scale fractures with higher arithmetic mean, peak and valley heights, and kurtosis and skewness height distributions were induced in higher brittleness indexed pre-crystallized ZLS than lower indexed crystallized ZLS by conventional machining. Conchoidal fractures occurred in pre-crystallized ZLS while microcracks were found in crystallized state although brittle fractures mixed with localized ductile flow deformations dominated all machined ZLS surfaces. Ultrasonic machining at an ideal vibration amplitude resulted in more ductile removal, reducing fractured-induced peaks and valleys for both materials than conventional processing. This research demonstrates the microstructure-property-processing interdependence for ZLS materials and the novel machining technique to be superior to current processing, reducing fractures in the materials and potentially advancing dental CAD/CAM techniques.

Biaxial flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of a resin ceramic material after thermal-cycling

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of 3 different resin-ceramic materials with a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate material after thermal-cycling.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four different computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing restorative materials (Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate, Crystal Ultra, and Vita Suprinity) were tested. A total of 40 Ø12×1.2-mm disks were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n = 10). Their flexural strength was evaluated after 5000 thermal-cycles with a 4-point biaxial flexure test using a universal testing machine. The Weibull modulus and probability of failure were also determined from the biaxial flexural strength data. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and the Tukey pairwise comparison test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found among the materials in terms of biaxial flexural strength (p < 0.05). Vita Suprinity had the highest mean ±standard deviation flexural strength (289.1 ± 15.1 MPa), and Vita Enamic had the lowest (100.0 ± 3.2 MPa). The highest Weibull modulus was calculated for Crystal Ultra, followed by Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate, and Vita Suprinity.

CONCLUSION

Vita Suprinity had the highest flexural strength when compared with the other materials tested. Crystal Ultra had the highest flexural strength among the resin-ceramic materials. The highest Weibull modulus was calculated for Crystal Ultra and the lowest for Vita Suprinity.

Edge chipping damage in lithium silicate glass-ceramics induced by conventional and ultrasonic vibration-assisted diamond machining

OBJECTIVES

Diamond machining of lithium silicate glass-ceramics (LS) induces extensive edge chipping damage, detrimentally affecting LS restoration functionality and long-term performance. This study approached novel ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining of pre-crystallized and crystallized LS materials to investigate induced edge chipping damage in comparison with conventional machining.

METHODS

The vibration-assisted diamond machining was conducted using a five-axis ultrasonic high-speed grinding/machining machine at different vibration amplitudes while conventional machining was performed using the same machine without vibration assistance. LS microstructural characterization and phase development were performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques. Machining-induced edge chipping depths, areas and morphology were also characterized using the SEM and Java-based imaging software.

RESULTS

All machining-induced edge chipping damages resulted from brittle fractures. The damage scales, however, depended on the material microstructures; mechanical properties associated with the fracture toughness, critical strain energy release rates, brittleness indices, and machinability indices; and ultrasonic vibration amplitudes. Pre-crystallized LS with more glass matrix and lithium metasilicate crystals yielded respective 1.8 and 1.6 times greater damage depths and specific damage areas than crystallized LS with less glass matrix and tri-crystal phases in conventional machining. Ultrasonic machining at optimized amplitudes diminished such damages by over 50 % in pre-crystallized LS and up to 13 % in crystallized LS.

SIGNIFICANCE

This research highlights that ultrasonic vibration assistance at optimized conditions may advance current dental CAD/CAM machining techniques by significant suppression of edge chipping damage in pre-crystallized LS.

Polishing the bonding surface, before or after crystallization, does not alter the fatigue behavior of bonded CAD-CAM lithium disilicate

The aim of this study was to assess if the finishing/polishing of the bonding surface of lithium disilicate ceramic, prior to or after crystallization, would affect the fatigue behavior of a bonded restorations. For this, lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) discs (n = 15) were milled and randomly divided into 3 groups: CAD-CAM group which remained untouched; PRE group which received a finishing/polishing protocol (OptraFine system) prior to its crystallization; and POST group, which received the treatment after its crystallization. After surface treatments, ceramic and glass-fiber reinforced epoxy resin discs were paired and bonded using a resin cement (Multilink N). A cyclical fatigue test was conducted (frequency 20 Hz, initial load 200 N for 5000 cycles, step-size of 100 N for 10,000 cycles/step) until failure occurrence. Surface roughness and topography were analyzed. An initial descriptive analysis of surface roughness, FFL and CFF was performed to obtain the mean, standard deviation and confidence interval values (SPSS v. 21, SPSS Inc.) for statistical analysis. Roughness data was using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05), while the fatigue data was submitted to survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier test (α = 0.05) and Weibull modulus (Weibull++, Reliasoft). Neither the finishing/polishing procedure of the bonding surface, nor the moment (prior to or after crystallization), affected the fatigue behavior of bonded milled lithium disilicate. There were also no differences for mechanical reliability among conditions. Despite this, finishing/polishing reduced surface roughness and led to smoother topography. Finishing/polishing the bonding surface of milled lithium disilicate, before or after crystallization, does not alter the fatigue behavior of the bonded restorative set, although there is some influence on roughness and topography.

Grasping the Lithium hype: Insights into modern dental Lithium Silicate glass-ceramics

OBJECTIVES

Lithium-based glass-ceramics are currently dominating the landscape of dental restorative ceramic materials, with new products taking the market by storm in the last years. Though, the difference among all these new and old products is not readily accessible for the practitioner, who faces the dilemma of reaching a blind choice or trusting manufacturers' marketing brochures. To add confusion, new compositions tend to wear material terminologies inherited from vanguard dental lithium disilicates, disregarding accuracy. Here we aim to characterize such materials for their microstructure, crystalline fraction, glass chemistry and mechanical properties.

METHODS

Eleven commercial dental lithium-based glass ceramics were evaluated: IPS e.max® CAD, IPS e.max® Press, Celtra® Duo, Suprinity® PC, Initial™ LiSi Press, Initial™ LiSi Block, Amber® Mill, Amber® Press, N!CE®, Obsidian® and CEREC Tessera™. The chemical composition of their base glasses was measured by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) and Inductive Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES), as well as the composition of their residual glass by subtracting the oxides bound in the crystallized fraction, characterized by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Rietveld refinement, and quantified accurately using the G-factor method (QXRD). The crystallization behavior is revealed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves. Elastic constants are provided from Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS) and the fracture toughness measured by the Ball-on-Three-Balls method (B3B- K Ic). The microstructure is revealed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM).

RESULTS

The base glasses showed a wide range of SiO₂ /Li₂O ratios, from 1.5 to 3.0, with the degree of depolymerization dropping from ½ to 2/3 of the initial connectivity. Materials contained Li₂SiO₃+Li₃PO₄, Li₂SiO₃+Li₃PO₄+Li₂Si₂O₅, Li₂Si₂O₅+Li₃PO₄+ Cristobalite and/or Quartz and Li₂Si₂O₅+Li₃ PO₄+LiAlSi₂O₆, in crystallinity degrees from 45 to 80 vol%. Crystalline phases could be traced to their crystallization peaks on the DSC curves. Pressable materials and IPS e.max® CAD were the only material showing micrometric phases, with N!CE® and Initial™ LiSi Block showing solely nanometric crystals, with the rest presenting a mixture of submicrometric and nanometric particles. Fracture toughness from 1.45 to 2.30 MPa√m were measured, with the linear correlation to crystalline fraction breaking down for submicrometric and nanometric crystal phases.

SIGNIFICANCE

Dental lithium-based silicate glass-ceramics cannot be all put in the same bag, as differences exist in chemical composition, microstructure, crystallinity and mechanical properties. Pressable materials still perform better mechanically than CAM/CAM blocks, which loose resistance to fracture when crystal phases enter the submicrometric and nanometric range.

Toughening by revitrification of Li2SiO3 crystals in Obsidian® dental glass-ceramic

As a predominantly lithium-metasilicate-containing glass-ceramic, Obsidian® (Glidewell Laboratories, USA) has a peculiar composition and microstructure among other dental lithium silicates, warranting an evaluation of the crystallization process to establish relationships between microstructural evolution and mechanical properties. Blocks of the pre-crystallized material were processed into slices measuring 12 × 12 × 1.5 mm³ and subjected to the mandatory crystallization firing by interruption the heating ramp at temperatures between 700 °C and 820 °C (dwell time between 0 min and 10 min). The crystallization peaks of the base and the pre-crystallized glass were obtained by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The coefficient of thermal expansion and the glass transition temperature were derived from differential thermal analysis (DTA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed to quantify and characterize the crystal phase fraction, whose microstructural changes were visualised using FE-SEM. The ball-on-three-balls surface crack in flexure method was used to track the evolution of fracture toughness. The microstructural evolution during crystallization firing was characterized by two regimes of growth: (i) the progressive revitrification (dissolution) of the 5 μm-sized Li₂SiO₃ polycrystals manifested at the boundaries of nanometric single coherent scattering domains (CSDs); (ii) the non-isothermal period is marked by an Ostwald ripening process characterized by the growth of the single crystalline structures into 0.5 μm polycrystals. The decrease in the crystal fraction of Li₂SiO₃ crystals from 41 vol.% to 37 vol.% is accompanied by the formation of a small amount of Li₃PO₄ (6 vol.%), maintaining the total crystal phase fraction mostly constant. The K_Ic accompanied the reverse trend of crystallinity, departing from 1.63 ± 0.02 MPa√m at the pre-crystallized stage to 1.84 ± 0.06 MPa√m after 10 min at 820 °C in a linear trend. Toughening appeared counter-intuitive in view of the decreasing crystal fraction and size, to rather relate to the relaxation of the residual stresses in the interstitial glass due to the spheroidization of the initially anisotropic, elongated Li₂SiO₃ crystals into round, nearly equiaxed particles, as let suggest from the disappearance of the extensive microcracking.

Inner marginal strength of CAD/CAM materials is not affected by machining protocol

Purpose

Here we aimed to compare two machining strategies regarding the marginal strength of CAD/CAM materials using a hoop-strength test in model sphero-cylindrical dental crowns, coupled with finite element analysis.

Materials and Methods

Five CAD/CAM materials indicated for single posterior crowns were selected, including a lithium disilicate (IPS e.max^® CAD), a lithium (di)silicate (Suprinity^® PC), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic scaffold (Enamic^®), and two indirect resin composites (Grandio^® Blocs and Lava™ Ultimate). A sphero-cylindrical model crown was built on CAD Software onto a geometrical abutment and machined using a Cerec MC XL system according to the two available protocols: rough-fast and fine-slow. Specimens were fractured using a novel hoop-strength test and analyzed using the finite element method to obtain the inner marginal strength. Data were evaluated using Weibull statistics.

Results

Machining strategy did not affect the marginal strength of any restorative material tested here. Ceramic materials showed a higher density of chippings in the outer margin, but this did not reduce inner marginal strength. IPS e.max^® CAD showed the statistically highest marginal strength, and Enamic^® and Lava™ Ultimate were the lowest. Grandio^® Blocs showed higher performance than Suprinity^® PC.

Conclusions

The rough-fast machining strategy available in Cerec MC XL does not degrade the marginal strength of the evaluated CAD/CAD materials when compared to its fine-fast machining strategy. Depending on the material, resin composites have the potential to perform better than some glass-ceramic materials.

Resistance to Fracture of Lithium Disilicate Feldspathic Restorations Manufactured Using a CAD/CAM System and Crystallized with Different Thermal Units and Programs

The aim of this study was to determine the resistance to fracture of feldspathic restorations with lithium disilicate and crystallized with different ovens and programs. Methods: Sixty monolithic restorations (LD) (EMAX CAD™ LT, Ivoclar-Vivadent™) were designed with the same parameters and milled with a CAD/CAM system (CEREC SW 5.1, CEREC MCXL, Dentsply-Sirona™, Bensheim). Each restoration was randomly assigned by randomization software (RANDNUM) to one of the three groups: (a) (NF) Oven P310 (Ivoclar, Vivadent) normal crystallization program, (b) (FF) Ivoclar P310 oven (Ivoclar-Vivadent™) rapid crystallization program, or (c) (SF) SpeedFire oven (Dentsply-Sirona™). Results: There were statistically significant differences between the groups (ANOVA, p < 0.05). The NF and FF groups showed the highest values of resistance to fracture, with statistically significant differences with the SF group. Conclusions: Using a furnace from the same dental company with predetermined programs from the material manufacturer, as well as using a predetermined program for rapid crystallization, has no effect on fracture resistance, and would save clinical time when performing ceramic restorations with lithium disilicate, while keeping their mechanical properties.

Selected Spectroscopic Techniques for Surface Analysis of Dental Materials: A Narrative Review

The presented work focuses on the application of spectroscopic methods, such as Infrared Spectroscopy (IR), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Raman spectroscopy, Ultraviolet and Visible Spectroscopy (UV-Vis), X-ray spectroscopy, and Mass Spectrometry (MS), which are widely employed in the investigation of the surface properties of dental materials. Examples of the research of materials used as tooth fillings, surface preparation in dental prosthetics, cavity preparation methods and fractographic studies of dental implants are also presented. The cited studies show that the above techniques can be valuable tools as they are expanding the research capabilities of materials used in dentistry.

Effects of multiple firing processes on the mechanical properties of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics produced by two different production techniques

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Repeated firings cause materials to be exposed to additional heat treatments. The effect of these additional heat treatments on the mechanical properties of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics is not fully known.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of repeated firing on the mechanical properties of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics produced by 2 different techniques, press and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty rectangular (25×4×2 mm) lithium disilicate glass-ceramic specimens were used in this study, 40 produced by heat pressing and 40 by milling, and divided into 4 groups (n=10) with a different number of veneer porcelain firings (1 to 4). After firing, the Vickers hardness, flexural strength (3-point bend test), and fracture toughness were determined, and the specimens were analyzed with an environmental scanning electron micrograph. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α=.05).

RESULTS

The repeat firing processes did not affect the flexural strength of the specimens in either group (P>.05), while the surface hardness and fracture toughness were significantly changed (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the number of firings adversely affected the mechanical properties of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics.

Effect of neutralization and hydrofluoric acid precipitate remotion on the compressive strength of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns

BACKGROUND

The cleaning protocol for the ceramic surface after acid etching resulted in a decrease in bond strength and flexural strength of a glass ceramic. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different ceramic surface treatments after hydrofluoric acid etching (HF) on the compressive strength of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns.

METHODS

Forty (40) human third molars received conventional full coverage preparation. After performing digital impressions of teeth preparations, ceramic blocks were machined using a CAD/CAM system in order to obtain the crowns. The crowns were distributed in 4 groups as ceramic surface treatment (N.=10): (HF) - 4.9% HF for 20s + air-water spray for 30s; (HFN) - HF + neutralizing agent for 5 min (N); (HFU) - HF + ultrasonic bath for 5 min (U); e (HFNU) - HF + N + U. SEM and EDS analysis was performed in each group in order to characterize the ceramic surface and to verify the chemical element distribution after HF cleaning protocols. A silane layer was applied (for 60s), and crowns were then cemented with dual resin cement. A compressive load was applied on the middle of the occlusal crown surface with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05).

RESULTS

Fluoride ions were found in samples of all postetching cleaning protocols. The mean value (Kgf) was: HF =169.92±21.37; HFN =187.34±34.79; HFU =166.63±40.22 and HFNU=175.26±40.22. The ceramic surface treatment after HF etching did not significantly influence (P>0.05) the compressive strength of the tested ceramic crowns.

CONCLUSIONS

Surface treatments with neutralizing agent associated with the ultrasonic bath as the pre-cementation protocol was the most efficient protocol in eliminating the precipitate deposited on the porosities created by acid etching.

Machinability: Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic

Diamond grinding used in dental adjustment of high-strength zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic (ZLS) and lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) is challenging in restorative dentistry. This study aimed to compare the machinability of ZLS and LDGC in diamond grinding in terms of machining forces and energy, debris, surface and edge chipping damage. Grinding experiments in simulation of dental adjustment were conducted using a computer-assisted high-speed dental handpiece and coarse diamond burs. A piezoelectric force dynamometer and a high-speed data acquisition system were used for on-processing monitoring for assessment of grinding forces and energy. Grinding debris and grinding-induced surface and edge chipping damage were examined using scanning electron microscopy. The results show that grinding of ZLS required higher tangential and normal forces and energy than LDGC (p < 0.05). ZLS was ranked the most difficult to machine among dental glass ceramics based on a machinability index associated with the material mechanical properties. The higher machinability indices of ZLS and LDGC pose a challenge for clinicians to conduct high-efficient material removal for dental adjustment and repair. Both ZLS and LDGC debris were micro fractured particles but the former were smaller than the latter due to the finer microstructure of ZLS. Ground ZLS surfaces contained more irregular microchipping and microfracture in comparison with LDGC surfaces with intergranular fracture or grain dislodgement. Grinding-induced edge chipping damage remained a serious issue for both ZLS and LDGC, which depths ranged approximately 20-100 μm and significantly increased with the material removal rate (p < 0.01). As the zirconia-reinforcement in ZLS only slightly reduced edge chipping damage (p > 0.05), continued efforts are required to explore new reinforcement technologies for optimized LDGC.

Effect of sintering parameters on phase evolution and strength of dental lithium silicate glass-ceramics

OBJECTIVE

With the establishment of CAD/CAM technology, competing lithium silicate based formulations have been introduced for clinical use, but little is known about their phase composition. Here we investigate a commercially available SiO₂-Al₂O₃-K₂O-Li₂O-P₂O₅-ZrO₂ system to evaluate the crystal phase evolution during the second heat treatment by changing the main crystallization parameters.

METHODS

With a focus on the final stage of crystallization, we characterized the dimensional changes in the crystallographic structure of the residual Li₂SiO₃ and the lithium orthophosphate (Li₃PO₄) phases with variations in crystallization parameters, i.e. time, temperature and cooling rate over the range of the glass transition temperature T_g. The phase fractions (crystalline and glass) and the sizes of coherent scattering domains (CSDs) were resolved by means of quantitative X-Ray Diffraction using Rietveld refinement combined with an external standard method (G-factor). Biaxial flexure testing was conducted to evaluate the influence of crystallization parameters on the characteristic strength and natural defect distribution.

RESULTS

An increase in crystallization temperature from 840 to 880°C resulted in a significant reduction of the Li₂Si₂O₅ content, which indicated a reversion of the Li₂SiO₃ to Li₂Si₂O₅ phase transformation. Reduction to 800°C had no significant effect. Furthermore, the CSD sizes of Li₂SiO₃ and Li₃PO₄ continuously increased with increasing temperature, which was accompanied by an increase in strength parameters. Reducing the cooling rate over the range of T_g resulted in an increased strength at low failure probabilities.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings help to establish recommendations for adjustment of the crystallization protocol, which has potential to increase the clinical reliability of the material investigated.