Immunohistochemistry for TFE3 lacks specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged neoplasms: a comparative, 2-laboratory study

SFPQ::TFE3-rearranged PEComa: Differences and analogies with renal cell carcinoma carrying the same translocation

Among perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas), some tumors have been found to carry rearrangements of the TFE3 gene. Such tumors can rarely occur in the kidney, closely resembling TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma. This study describes one additional case of TFE3-rearranged PEComa, two TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinomas, and a detailed literature review. All three tumors were composed of nested clear to eosinophilic cells with peculiar morphological findings in each case. By immunohistochemistry, PEComa expressed cathepsin K, HMB45, and CD68 (PG-M1), while labeling negative for PAX8, Melan-A, S100, smooth muscle actin, desmin, CD10, CD13, and keratins 7 and AE1/AE3. Conversely, both TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinomas were positive for PAX8, HMB45, and CD10, alongside staining negative for CD68 (PG-M1), Melan-A, CD13, and keratins. One of them expressed cathepsin K. TFE3 gene rearrangement was identified in all three cases by FISH, along with SFPQ::TFE3 fusion by molecular analysis. Our cases, combined with a comprehensive literature review, highlight several key differences and similarities: SFPQ::TFE3-rearranged PEComas lack the pseudorosettes frequently observed in SFPQ::TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma, although both may exhibit nested epithelioid morphology. Both tumor types can be positive for cathepsin K and melanogenesis markers and negative for smooth muscle markers. However, PAX8, keratins, and CD10 were expressed in TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma while CD68(PG-M1) was positive in PEComa. Notably, the SFPQ gene is the most common fusion partner in TFE3-rearranged PEComas, while it is the third most frequent one in TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, the exon breakpoints are analogous in both tumor types.

Evaluation of 3,606 renal cell tumors for TFE3 rearrangements and TFEB alterations via fluorescence in situ hybridization, next generation sequencing, and GPNMB immunohistochemistry

Molecularly defined renal cell carcinomas include TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) and TFEB-altered renal cell carcinoma (TFEB-RCC). There is significant morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap between these entities and common renal tumors, such that molecular testing is often required to make the diagnosis. Herein, we reviewed our reference laboratory experience pertaining to TFE3 and TFEB FISH testing, targeted next generation RNA sequencing (NGS), and GPNMB immunohistochemistry (IHC). Most FISH testing (2963/3543, 83.6%) was performed on renal tumors. TFE3 FISH showed rearrangements in 449 of 2467 specimens (18.2%), including 281 (of 1887, 14.9%) renal tumors. TFEB FISH identified an abnormality in 107 of 1076 (9.9%) renal tumors, including 52 (of 107, 48.6%) rearrangements, 41 (of 107, 38.3%) amplifications, or 14 (of 107, 13.1%) with both rearrangements and amplifications. More specifically, TFE3-rearranged, TFEB-rearranged, TFEB-amplified, and TFEB-rearranged/amplified renal tumors occurred in females in 54%, 69.6%, 39.1%, and 40% of cases, respectively. The pediatric and young adult population (aged ≤21) included 44 (of 121, 36.3%) TFE3-RCC and 9 (of 50, 18%) TFEB-RCC. TFE3-RCC fusion partners included RBM10, NONO, ASPSCR1, FUBP1, SFPQ, MAPK1IP1L, and PRCC. TFEB-rearranged RCC fusion partners SYNRG and BYSL were identified. Diffuse GPNMB expression was seen in 92% of TFE3-RCC (24/26; median H-score 275), 100% of TFEB-rearranged RCC (19/19; median H-score 300), and 100% of TFEB-amplified RCC (17/17; 240). Finally, our cohort included 5 eosinophilic TFEB-amplified RCCs with non-focal keratin 20 expression. This large series of TFE3-RCC and TFEB-RCC provides population data regarding these rare tumors and demonstrates the clinical value of targeted FISH strategies. Our results suggest that GPNMB IHC is an effective screen for TFE3-RCC and TFEB-RCC. Additionally, we report a RCC harboring a novel SYNRG::TFEB fusion.

Establishment of patient-derived 3D in vitro models of sarcomas: literature review and guidelines on behalf of the FORTRESS working group

Sarcomas are a large family of rare and heterogeneous mesenchymal tumors, which respond poorly to available systemic treatments. Translation of preclinical findings into clinical applications has been slow, limiting improvements in patients' outcomes and ultimately highlighting the need for a better understanding of sarcoma biology to develop more effective, subtype-specific therapies. To this end, reliable preclinical models are crucial, but the development of 3D in vitro sarcoma models has been lagging behind that of epithelial cancers. This is primarily due to the rarity and heterogeneity of sarcomas, and lack of widespread knowledge regarding the optimal growth conditions of these in vitro models. In this review, we provide an overview of currently available sarcoma tumoroid models, together with guidelines and suggestions for model development and characterization, on behalf of the FORTRESS (Forum For Translational Research in Sarcomas) international research working group on 3D sarcoma models.

TFE3-rearranged ossifying fibromyxoid tumors are uniquely negative for glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B: A study of 13 TFE3-rearranged mesenchymal tumors

OBJECTIVES

Glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB) is a transcriptional target of MiTF/TFE3. Prior studies have shown that immunohistochemistry for GPNMB is a sensitive screening tool for renal cell carcinomas with alterations of TSC1/TSC2/MTOR, TFE3, and TFEB genes, as well as alveolar soft part sarcomas (ASPS) and perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas). However, GPNMB expression has not been systematically evaluated in a diverse group of molecularly confirmed, TFE3-rearranged mesenchymal tumors.

METHODS

Our archive was interrogated for TFE3-rearranged non-renal neoplasms previously assessed with our RNA NGS panel. For each case, a whole-slide section was immunostained for GPNMB, and quantified using H-scores. The methylation profiles of the included tumor types were retrieved from our database.

RESULTS

Thirteen TFE3-rearranged tumors were identified, including 6 ossifying fibromyxoid tumors (OFMTs) (PHF1::TFE3), 3 PEComas/PEComa-like neoplasms (ASPSCR1::TFE3, DVL2::TFE3, and PRCC::TFE3, one case each), 2 YAP1::TFE3-rearranged hemangioendotheliomas, one ASPS (ASPSCR1::TFE3), and one unclassified CBX4::TFE3-rearranged sarcoma. Tumors harboring ASPSCR1, PRCC, YAP1, and DVL2 as the fusion partner had a mean H-score of 300, 300, 290 and 280, respectively. All 6 PHF1::TFE3-rearranged OFMTs and the CBX4::TFE3-rearranged sarcoma were GPNMB-negative, despite having similar TFE3 breakpoints to the positive cases (exon 6-7). PHF1::TFE3-rearranged OFMT showed relative hypermethylation of the GPNMB promoter locus cg02203656 compared to ASPS (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Although study of additional cases is necessary, these findings suggest that the downstream effects of TFE3-rearrangement are different in PHF1::TFE3-rearranged OFMTs, compared to other known TFE3-rearranged neoplasms. TFE3-rearranged OFMTs are epigenetically distinct, implying that the impact of TFE3-rearrangement may be lineage-dependent.

TFE3 -rearranged Head and Neck Neoplasms : Twenty-two Cases Spanning the Morphologic Continuum Between Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma and PEComa and Highlighting Genotypic Diversity

TFE3 rearrangements characterize histogenetically, topographically, and biologically diverse neoplasms. Besides being a universal defining feature in alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and clear cell stromal tumor of the lung, TFE3 fusions have been reported in subsets of renal cell carcinoma, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and ossifying fibromyxoid tumors. TFE3 -related neoplasms are rare in the head and neck and may pose diagnostic challenges. We herein describe 22 TFE3 fusion neoplasms affecting 11 males and 11 females aged 4 to 79 years (median, 25) and involving different head and neck sites: sinonasal cavities (n = 8), tongue (n = 4), oral cavity/oropharynx (n = 3), salivary glands (n = 2), orbit (n = 2), and soft tissue or unspecified sites (n = 3). Based on morphology and myomelanocytic immunophenotype, 10 tumors qualified as ASPS, 7 as PEComas (3 melanotic; all sinonasal), and 5 showed intermediate (indeterminate) histology overlapping with ASPS and PEComa. Immunohistochemistry for TFE3 was homogeneously strongly positive in all cases. Targeted RNA sequencing/FISH testing confirmed TFE3 fusions in 14 of 16 successfully tested cases (88%). ASPSCR1 was the most frequent fusion partner in ASPS (4 of 5 cases); one ASPS had a rare VCP::TFE3 fusion. The 6 successfully tested PEComas had known fusion partners as reported in renal cell carcinoma and PEComas ( NONO, PRCC, SFPQ , and PSPC1 ). The indeterminate tumors harbored ASPSCR1::TFE3 (n = 2) and U2AF2::TFE3 (n = 1) fusions, respectively. This large series devoted to TFE3-positive head and neck tumors illustrates the recently proposed morphologic overlap in the spectrum of TFE3 -associated mesenchymal neoplasms. While all PEComas were sinonasal, ASPS was never sinonasal and occurred in diverse head and neck sites with a predilection for the tongue. The indeterminate (PEComa-like) category is molecularly more akin to ASPS but shows different age, sex, and anatomic distribution compared with classic ASPS. We report VCP as a novel fusion partner in ASPS and PSPC1 as a novel TFE3 fusion partner in PEComa (detected in one PEComa). Future studies should shed light on the most appropriate terminological subtyping of these highly overlapping tumors.

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma with TFE3 rearrangement: a case report and literature review

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare low-grade malignant tumor of vascular origin. It may be confusing as its manifestations of multifocal lesions on imaging and epithelial histomorphology in pathology. EHE is easy to be mistaken for a metastatic tumor by radiologists and clinicians. Correct diagnosis and therapy are important owing to the variable clinical course and special treatment. EHEs harbor major CAMTA1 rearrangement and <5% TFE3 rearrangement. Meanwhile, EHE with TFE3 rearrangement has distinctive morphology features. Currently, there are only two cases of hepatic EHE with TFE3 rearrangement reported, we present another case here that occurred in a 34-year-old female. Both the clinician and radiologist provisionally considered it as a metastatic tumor. The tumor cells have mild atypia but infiltrative growth patterns like benign vascular tumors. Our case is unique mainly in that the absence of its characteristic well-defined vessels, and the presence of unreported morphology of intraluminal papillary proliferation of tombstone or hobnail endothelial cells. The final diagnosis of EHE with TFE3 rearrangement was made by combining morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular test results. The patient did not receive any treatment according to her condition and no change was detected in the mass's size and number on CT images during 3.5 years of follow-up.

Clear Cell Stromal Tumor of the Lung: Clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Characterization of Eight Cases

Clear cell stromal tumor is a recently described mesenchymal neoplasm of the lung, characterized by spindle cells with variably clear-to-pale eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent vascularity, as well as a recurrent YAP1::TFE3 gene fusion in most cases. Diagnosis can be challenging given its rarity and the lack of supportive immunohistochemical (IHC) markers aside from TFE3. To date, less than 20 cases have been reported, and data on clinical behavior are also limited. Although most appear to be benign, aggressive behavior has been reported rarely. In this study, we present the largest multiinstitutional series of clear cell stromal tumor to date, comprising a total of 8 cases and including 6 previously unpublished cases. We investigate its clinicopathologic and genomic features, while also assessing the diagnostic use of IHC for YAP1 C-terminus. Five patients were men and 3 were women. The median age was 59 years (range: 35-84 years). In all cases, a TFE3 rearrangement was demonstrated by either fluorescence in situ hybridization or DNA/RNA sequencing. In 7 tumors, the YAP1::TFE3 fusion was identified by sequencing. We demonstrate that the combination of YAP1 C-terminus loss and TFE3 overexpression using IHC reliably predicts an underlying YAP1::TFE3 fusion in these neoplasms and may be more sensitive than TFE3 fluorescence in situ hybridization. Although the median follow-up time for our study was short (18 months, available in 7 cases), all cases pursued a benign clinical course, with no recurrences or metastases. Our study provides further characterization of this novel entity, supporting its wider recognition.

TFE3-rearranged nonmelanotic renal PEComa: a case series expanding their phenotypic and fusion landscape

AIMS

A subset of exceptionally rare primary renal perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) that harbour Xp11.2 translocation have been reported, but no larger series devoted to this topic have been published.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of 10 renal PEComas, collected from our routine and consultation files. There were five female and five male patients aged 14-65 (median: 32 years). One patient had a history of childhood neuroblastoma, but no patients were known to have a tuberous sclerosis complex or other hereditary disorder. Complete surgical excision was the treatment for all patients. The available follow-up in five patients indicated a favourable outcome in 4/5 cases. Tumour size ranged from 2.8 to 15.2 cm (median, 5.2 cm). Immunohistochemistry revealed consistently strong TFE3 expression in all tumours, whereas PAX8 and keratin cocktails were uniformly negative. Other positive markers included HMB45 (7/9 tumours), CathepsinK (7/9 tumours), and CD117 (KIT) (3/5 tumours). TFE3 rearrangements were detected in 8/9 tumours (by targeted RNA sequencing in seven and by FISH in one). The identified fusion partners included SFPQ (n = 2) and one tumour each with ASPSCR1, ZC3H4, MED15, RBMX, and PRCC. One tumour that lacked TFE3 rearrangement by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed a large intrachromosomal deletion involving PKD1 and TSC2 by DNA-based NGS.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the morphologic and genetic diversity of TFE3-rearranged primary renal PEComas and underlines the value of surrogate TFE3 immunohistochemistry in identifying them. The lack of PAX8 and keratin expression represents the mainstay for distinguishing these tumours from MiTF-associated renal cell carcinomas. In addition, we report rare (ZC3H4, RBMX) and novel (MED15) TFE3 fusion partners in PEComa.

TFE3-Rearranged Tumors of the Kidney: An Emerging Conundrum

Background: Identical translocations involving the TFE3 gene and various partners have been found in both renal and soft tissue tumors, like alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPSCR1), ossifying fibromyxoid tumor (PHF1), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and the clear cell stromal tumor of the lung (YAP1). Methods: Herein, we review in detail the clinicopathologic and molecular data of TFE3-rearranged renal tumors and propose our perspective, which may shed light on this emerging conundrum. Results: Among the kidney tumors carrying TFE3 translocations, most are morphologically heterogeneous carcinomas labeling for the tubular marker PAX8. The others are mesenchymal neoplasms known as PEComas, characterized by epithelioid cells co-expressing smooth muscle actin, cathepsin-K, melanogenesis markers, and sometimes melanin pigment deposition. Over the past 30 years, numerous TFE3 fusion partners have been identified, with ASPL/ASPSCR1, PRCC, SFPQ/PSF, and NONO being the most frequent. Conclusions: It is not well understood why similar gene fusions can give rise to renal tumors with different morpho-immunophenotypes, which may contribute to the recent disagreement regarding their classification. However, as these two entities, respectively, epithelial and mesenchymal in nature, are widely recognized by the pathology community and their clinicopathologic features well established, we overall believe it is still better to retain the names TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma and TFE3-rearranged PEComa.

Malignant Perivascular epithelioid cell tumour of the uterus without TFE3 gene rearrangement: a case report

BACKGROUND

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) are soft tissue tumours. These neoplasms belong to the family of mesenchymal tumours, which include angiomyolipomas, clear-cell sugar tumours of the lung, and PEComas not otherwise specified (NOS). The probability of a perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa) occurring in the uterus is low, and the incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of such tumours are still unclear.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 51-year-old woman presented a 4-year history of natural menopause. An intrauterine mass was detected via ultrasound examination; the mass showed a tendency to increase but caused no symptoms. The levels of tumour markers were within the normal range. Pathological analysis of the curettage revealed perivascular epithelioid differentiation of the endometrial tumour. Consequently, a laparoscopic total hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy was performed. No distant metastasis was detected via whole-body positron emission computed tomography (PETCT) after the operation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed no TFE3 gene rearrangement. Next-generation sequencing of bone and soft tissue revealed negative TSC1/2 and TP53 expression. No recurrence or metastasis was observed during the 18-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

PEComa of the gynecologic tract is a rare and challenging entity. Diffuse HMB-45 expression, TSC alterations and TFE3 rearrangement are characteristic of uterine PEComas. Surgical resection is the first choice. Genetic testing is helpful for determining the nature of the mass and for choosing targeted therapy. Further research is needed to establish treatment protocols.

Renal epithelioid angiomyolipomas overexpress TFE3 and the TFE3-regulated gene TRIM63 in the absence of TFE3 rearrangement

Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a neoplasm within the perivascular epithelioid cell tumor family that occurs somewhat frequently in the kidney. Most are indolent and discovered incidentally, with rare tumors demonstrating malignant clinical behavior. A small subset of renal AMLs with epithelioid features are associated with aggressive behavior, and may demonstrate morphologic overlap with renal cell carcinomas (e.g., clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFE3-rearranged RCC). Prior studies of spindle cell and epithelioid AMLs have identified rare examples with underlying TFE3 gene fusions. TFE3 protein expression (demonstrated by immunohistochemistry) with no evidence of concurrent TFE3 rearrangements has been reported previously in 4/24 AMLs (17%) (Argani et al. Am J Surg Pathol 34:1395-1406, 2010). Currently, the relationship between TFE3 protein expression, TFE3 fusions, and expression of TFE3-mediated genes remains incompletely understood in renal epithelioid AMLs. We sought to explore these relationships using TFE3 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and TRIM63 RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) on epithelioid AMLs with moderate to strong TFE3 expression by immunohistochemistry. RNA sequencing (fusion panel) was performed on two cases with negative FISH results to assess for FISH-cryptic gene fusions. The series comprised five epithelioid AMLs from four patients (three women, one man) aged 13 to 76 years. All were considered positive for TFE3 by immunohistochemistry (2 + /3 + expression). TRIM63 ISH was performed on four specimens from three patients, yielding positive results in 3/3 tumors (100%) that were successfully analyzed. TFE3 break-apart FISH was performed on all samples, demonstrating a TFE3 rearrangement in only 1/4 tumors (25%). RNA sequencing demonstrated the absence of productive TFE3 gene fusions in three tumors with negative break-apart TFE3 FISH results. This study demonstrates that renal epithelioid AMLs overexpress TFE3 and TFE3-mediated genes (TRIM63) even in the absence of TFE3 rearrangements. This finding could be explained by functional upregulation of TFE3 secondary to activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). Expression of TFE3 and TRIM63 in this tumor type represents a potential pitfall, given the morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap between epithelioid AML and TFE3-altered renal cell carcinoma.

How Molecular Discoveries Have Changed Liver Tumor Pathology: A Brief Review

CONTEXT

Recent molecular discoveries have led to improved understanding of tumor biology and the development of new diagnostic assays.

OBJECTIVE

To review primarily 3 examples of liver tumors and to briefly illustrate how recent molecular discoveries have altered clinical liver pathology practice.

DATA SOURCES

First, we will discuss fibrolamellar carcinoma, which will be the main focus of discussion, as an example for new diagnostic tests that have been developed as a result of molecular discoveries. Additional information on the role of molecular diagnostics in hepatocellular adenoma and hepatocellular carcinoma will be provided. Second, we will use the example of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma as an example of how new diagnostic tools, based on molecular discoveries, may support improved prognostication. Finally, we will use the example of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as an example of a liver tumor where new molecular discoveries have identified tractable therapeutic targets and led to new effective therapies. This portion of the manuscript will also include a description of the anatomic and molecular differences between intrahepatic, hilar, and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Fueled by molecular discoveries, new and better diagnostic tests and therapeutic targets have improved clinical care in patients affected by liver tumors.

Vascular tumors of intermediate malignancy: An update

The term "hemangioendothelioma" is used for endothelial neoplasms of intermediate malignancy and describes a group of rare neoplasms having biologic behavior falling in between that of the benign hemangiomas and fully malignant angiosarcomas. The hemangioendotheliomas fall into several specific, clinicopathologically and genetically distinct entities, specifically epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma and retiform hemangioendothelioma (hobnailed hemangioendothelioma), pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma, composite hemangioendothelioma, and YAP1::TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma. The clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features, and the differential diagnosis of each of these rare entities are discussed in this review.

A nomogram based on TFE3 IHC results and clinical factors as a preliminary screening scheme for TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

TFE3 immunohistochemistry (TFE3-IHC) is controversial in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-rearranged RCC). This study is to investigate the accuracy and sensitivity of IHC and establish a predictive model to diagnose TFE3-rearranged RCC.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed by collecting IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results from 228 patients. IHC results were evaluated using three scoring systems. Scoring system 1 is graded based on nuclear staining intensity, scoring system 2 is graded based on the percentage of stained tumor cell nuclei, and scoring system 3 is graded based on both the nuclear staining intensity and the percentage. We collected patients' IHC results and clinical information. Important variables were screened based on univariate logistic regression analysis. Then, independent risk factors were established through multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram model was constructed. The model was validated in internal test set and external validation set. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were generated to assess discriminative ability of the model.

RESULTS

The accuracy of IHC based on three scoring systems were 0.829, 0.772, and 0.807, respectively. The model included four factors including age, gender, lymph node metastasis and IHC results. Area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.935 for the training set, 0.934 for the internal test set, 0.933 for all 228 patients, and 0.916 for the external validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

TFE3 IHC has high accuracy in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC. Clinical information such as age and lymph node metastasis are independent risk factors, which can be used as a supplement to the results of TFE3 IHC. This study confirms the value of IHC in the diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC. The accuracy of the diagnosis can be improved by incorporating IHC with other clinical risk factors.

Clinicopathologic Classification of Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients ≤40 Years Old From Peru

INTRODUCTION

There are scant data on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from relatively younger patients in South America using contemporary classification.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutively treated patients with RCC (≤40 years old) were assessed from the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases in Peru from 2008 to 2020 (34 males; 25 females), age range of 13 to 40 years.

RESULTS

Most common presenting symptoms were flank pain (n = 40), hematuria (n = 19), and weight loss (n = 12). Associated conditions included 4 patients with proven or presumed tuberous sclerosis and 1 patient with von Hippel Lindau syndrome, all with clear cell RCC. Tumor histopathology was clear cell RCC in 32 of 59 (54%), chromophobe RCC in 6 of 59 (10%), and 5 of 59 (8%) each of papillary RCC and MiT family translocation-associated RCC. Four of 59 (7%) were FH-deficient RCC and 2 of 59 (3%) remained unclassified. The remaining tumors were isolated examples of clear cell papillary renal cell tumor, eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC (ESC RCC), RCC with fibromyomatous stroma, sarcomatoid RCC, and sarcomatoid clear cell RCC. Of the 4 FH-deficient RCCs, none had the classic morphology. The 5 MiT family translocation RCCs had variable morphology. There were 41 tumors without recurrence or metastases, 3 tumors with local recurrence only, 8 tumors with metastases only, and 7 tumors with both local recurrence and metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates the importance of special studies in accurately classifying RCC in younger individuals. The distribution of RCC subtypes in younger individuals is similar between 2 representative large institutions of the United States and Peru.

Alveolar soft part sarcoma: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 26 cases emphasizing risk factors and prognosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features and prognostic indicators of alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS).

METHODS

The characteristics of 26 ASPS patients diagnosed at our hospital between January 2011 and January 2019 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The data for 12 male and 14 female patients, with a median age of 27.5 years, were assessed. The clinical symptoms mainly included painless enlarged masses in deep soft tissues. ASPS had a characteristic pathological morphology. Twenty-four patients were positive for TFE3, and TFE3 gene rearrangement was detected in 12 patients. Among the 26 patients who completed follow-up, 14 had metastasis, 1 had local recurrence, and 7 died. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that prognosis was significantly correlated with sex, tumour size and metastasis (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that sex and metastasis were independent prognostic risk factors for patients with ASPS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ASPS is a rare soft tissue sarcoma of unknown origin that occurs in young people, has a slow but metastatic course, and is associated with a poor 5-year survival rate among patients with metastasis. ASPS has character TFE3 protein and gene expression, and the diagnosis is relatively specific. The diagnosis requires comprehensive analysis of clinical history, histological morphology, and immunohistochemistry.

Mesenchymal tumours of the pleura: review and update

Primary mesenchymal tumours of the pleura are uncommon and can be diagnostically challenging due to their overlapping histopathologic and immunophenotypic features. Herein we discuss selected mesenchymal tumours of the pleura, including solitary fibrous tumour, calcifying fibrous tumour, desmoid fibromatosis, synovial sarcoma, schwannoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and desmoplastic small round cell tumour. We review their clinicopathologic characteristics, along with an update on the relevant immunohistochemical and molecular features.

Multicystic Clear Cell Renal Tumors With Low-grade Nuclear Features: Time to Include TFE3 Translocation-associated Carcinomas

TFE3 -rearranged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a distinct, uncommon entity with more than 20 different fusion partners identified; however, histomorphology may be suggestive of specific fusion partners in select TFE3 -rearranged RCCs. For example, most MED15 :: TFE3 fusion associated RCCs exhibit multilocular cystic morphology, mimicking multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential. Here we present a case of MED15 :: TFE3 RCC in an older adult and review the literature with an emphasis on practical diagnostic approaches for predominantly cystic, low-grade, clear cell renal tumors.

A Matched Molecular and Clinical Analysis of the Epithelioid Haemangioendothelioma Cohort in the Stafford Fox Rare Cancer Program and Contextual Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare malignant vascular tumour with a prevalence of 1 per 1,000,000. It is typically molecularly characterised by a WWTR1::CAMTA1 gene fusion in approximately 90% of cases, or a YAP1::TFE3 gene fusion in approximately 10% of cases. EHE cases are typically refractory to therapies, and no anticancer agents are reimbursed for EHE in Australia.

METHODS

We report a cohort of nine EHE cases with comprehensive histologic and molecular profiling from the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Stafford Fox Rare Cancer Program (WEHI-SFRCP) collated via nation-wide referral to the Australian Rare Cancer (ARC) Portal. The diagnoses of EHE were confirmed by histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) examination. Molecular profiling was performed using the TruSight Oncology 500 assay, the TruSight RNA fusion panel, whole genome sequencing (WGS), or whole exome sequencing (WES).

RESULTS

Molecular analysis of RNA, DNA or both was possible in seven of nine cases. The WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion was identified in five cases. The YAP1::TFE3 fusion was identified in one case, demonstrating unique morphology compared to cases with the more common WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion. All tumours expressed typical endothelial markers CD31, ERG, and CD34 and were negative for pan-cytokeratin. Cases with a WWTR1::CAMTA1 fusion displayed high expression of CAMTA1 and the single case with a YAP1::TFE3 fusion displayed high expression of TFE3. Survival was highly variable and unrelated to molecular profile.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort of EHE cases provides molecular and histopathological characterisation and matching clinical information that emphasises the molecular patterns and variable clinical outcomes and adds to our knowledge of this ultra-rare cancer. Such information from multiple studies will advance our understanding, potentially improving treatment options.

Primary Intracranial Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma: A Report of 3 Cases

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) commonly involves extremities and head and neck regions. Primary intracranial ASPS is rare. We report a series of 3 primary intracranial ASPS. These were not suspected clinically and histopathology with immunohistochemistry proved to be diagnostic in all 3 tumors.

Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas

Histological identification of dispersed glioma cells in small biopsies can be challenging, especially in tumours lacking the IDH1 R132H mutation or alterations in TP53. We postulated that immunohistochemical detection of proteins expressed preferentially in gliomas (EGFR, MEOX2, CD34) or during embryonal development (SOX11, INSM1) can be used to distinguish reactive gliosis from glioma. Tissue microarrays of 46 reactive glioses, 81 glioblastomas, 34 IDH1-mutant diffuse gliomas, and 23 gliomas of other types were analysed. Glial neoplasms were significantly more often (p < 0.001, χ2) positive for EGFR (34.1% vs. 0%), MEOX2 (49.3% vs. 2.3%), SOX11 (70.5% vs. 20.4%), and INSM1 (65.4% vs. 2.3%). In 94.3% (66/70) of the glioblastomas, the expression of at least two markers was observed, while no reactive gliosis showed coexpression of any of the proteins. Compared to IDH1-mutant tumours, glioblastomas showed significantly higher expression of EGFR, MEOX2, and CD34 and significantly lower positivity for SOX11. Non-diffuse gliomas were only rarely positive for any of the five markers tested. Our results indicate that immunohistochemical detection of EGFR, MEOX2, SOX11, and INSM1 can be useful for detection of glioblastoma cells in limited histological samples, especially when used in combination.

Exploration of clinicopathological features of rearranged renal cell carcinoma and TFE3, TFEB, and ALK staining performance in renal entities

Rearranged renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are rare types of kidney cancer. The clinicopathological features of rearranged RCC require further validation. The pathological diagnosis usually depends on immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. This study aimed to explore the expression features of anti-TFE3, TFEB, and ALK in different renal entities. In addition, we collected thirty-six TFE3-rearranged RCC, two TFEB-altered RCC, and one ALK-rearranged RCC to explore their clinicopathological features. We observed that TFE3 can sometimes be weakly expressed in non-TFE3-rearranged RCC. TFE3-rearranged RCC usually exhibited strong TFE3 expression. However, clear cell RCC and FH-deficient RCC also displayed strong TFE3 expression. TFEB also can be weakly expressed in clear cell RCC. However, ALK IHC showed a relatively high specificity and was negative for all non-ALK-rearranged RCC. The ALK-rearranged RCC was analyzed using next generation sequencing to explore gene alterations, and we identified a novel gene partner, SLIT1. ALK-rearranged RCC appears to have eosinophilic cytoplasm. Tumor cells with clear cytoplasm may exclude this diagnosis. Psammomatous bodies (22/38) and pattern multiplicity (35/38) were observed in more than half of the patients. In conclusion, weak TFE3 expression did not indicate TFE3 rearrangement. Strong TFE3 expression had a higher value for indicating TFE3-rearranged RCC, although other entities can also exhibit a strong pattern. Young age combined with morphological features (psammomatous calcification and pattern multiplicity) may indicate the diagnosis of rearranged RCC.

Primary Alveolar Soft-Part Sarcoma of the Lung: A Case Report

Alveolar soft-part sarcoma is a rare type of soft tissue malignant tumor. Although the tumor can occur in many parts of the body, primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the lung is extremely rare. According to previous literature, only 3 cases of primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the lung were reported, and no comprehensive analysis was conducted on these cases. Here, we describe another case of alveolar soft-part sarcoma in the lung, where the negative results of immunohistochemical staining cause extreme difficulty in distinguishing this lesion from other tumors. A 30-year-old Chinese male presented with chest pain and dyspnea. Computed tomography revealed a pulmonary mass, and biopsy results showed vacuolar tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. A number of immunohistochemical markers were negative, but the tumor cells were positive for TFE3 and ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion gene. No other tumor masses were found in the patient after whole-body scanning. The final diagnosis was primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma of the lung. Pathologists should consider the possibility of alveolar soft-part sarcoma in lung tumors with typical "organ like" or "acinar like" cell nests, where the tumor cells are large, vacuolated, and the nucleolus is obvious. After excluding metastasis from other sites, TFE3 immunohistochemical staining and ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion gene detection are recommended for the diagnosis of primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma.

Application of TFE3 Immunophenotypic and TFE3 mRNA Expressions in Diagnosis and Prognostication of Adrenal Cortical Neoplasms and Distinction From Kidney Tumors

We explored the application of TFE3 immunostaining and TFE3 mRNA expression in the differential diagnosis and prognostication of adrenal cortical tumors and distinction of the latter from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) which show significant morphologic overlap. TFE3 immunostaining was performed on a large cohort of samples including 40 adrenal cortex tissues, 95 adrenocortical adenoma (ACA), 11 adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), 53 ccRCC, and 18 pheochromocytomas. TFE3 was compared with other immunomarkers melan-A, inhibin-α, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CAIX and CD10. One hundred percent normal adrenal cortices and 94% ACA were strongly and diffusely stained for TFE3 while no ACC showed diffuse staining. TFE3 is thus useful in distinguishing ACA from ACC. TFE3 is also useful in separating ACC from ccRCC as 64% ACC showed partial, while only 7% of ccRCC showed partial TFE3 staining. Only 1 pheochromocytoma showed focal weak TFE3 staining. Results also demonstrated superiority of TFE3 over other commonly used immunomarkers. TFE3 gene rearrangement testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization showed no rearrangement in 6 TFE3 positive adrenal tumors. TFE3 mRNA were analyzed by the Cancer Genome Atlas database and we found TFE3 mRNA expression correlated with overall patient survival in ACC. Our study showed usefulness of TFE3 in distinguishing ACA from ACC, and ACC from ccRCC. TFE3 is superior over other commonly used immunomarkers for adrenal tumors. In addition, decreased TFE3 immunoexpression and TFE3 mRNA expression may carry poor prognostic implication in adrenal tumors.

How New Developments Impact Diagnosis in Existing Renal Neoplasms

In recent years, several emerging diagnostic entities have been described in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, our understanding of well-known and established entities has also grown. Clear cell papillary RCC is now relabeled as a tumor rather than carcinoma in view of its nonaggressive behavior. Renal tumors with a predominantly infiltrative pattern are very important for recognition, as most of these have aggressive behavior, including fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC, SMARCB1-deficient medullary carcinoma, collecting duct carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and metastases from other cancers.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of TFE3-positive renal cell carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to investigate the expression profile of TFE3 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the clinicopathological features as well as prognosis of TFE3-positive RCC.

Methods

Tissue sections from 796 patients with RCC were collected for immunohistochemical staining of TFE3. Molecular TFE3 rearrangement tests were also carried out on the TFE3-positive RCCs using fluorescence in situ hybridization and RNA-sequencing assays. Both clinicopathological features and follow-up information were collected for further analysis.

Results

The present study showed that 91 patients with RCC (91/796, 11.4%) were TFE3 positive expression but only 31 (31/91, 34.1%) of the patients were diagnosed with Xp11.2 translocation RCC. Further, it was found that the patients with TFE3-positive RCCs were more likely to develop lymph node and distant metastasis at diagnosis as well as presented a significantly higher WHO/ISUP nuclear grade and AJCC stage as compared with patients with TFE3-negative RCCs (p<0.01). Results of univariate and multivariate analyses showed that TFE3 positive expression was an independent prognostic factor associated with poor progression-free survival. Further, the findings of survival analysis showed that patients with positive TFE3 expression showed a shorter progression-free survival as compared with the patients with negative expression of TFE3 (p<0.001). In addition, results of the survival analysis found that there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the Xp11.2 translocation RCC and TFE3-positive non-Xp11.2 translocation RCC groups (p=0.9607).

Conclusion

This study found that nuclear TFE3 expression is not specific to the Xp11.2 translocation RCC. Moreover, the positive TFE3 expression is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with RCC irrespective of the presence of TFE3 translocation.

TFE3 Rearrangement and Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma

TFE3 rearranged Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not very common, and demonstrates unique heterogenous morphological features overlapping other recognized entities and distinct immunoprofile. It can be seen in any age group, therefore practicing pathologists should be aware of the distinctive clinical settings and histologic findings associated with these tumors and subsequently employ an adequate panel of ancillary studies in order to confirm the diagnosis. Recognizing these entities remains crucial for future clinical trials and development of novel therapies.

A Case of TFE3-positive Non-neoplastic Pseudodecidualized Endometrium Presenting as a Cervical Mass

Transcription factor E3 (TFE3) represents a useful target for immunohistochemistry assays in routine surgical pathology practice. This protein has shown nuclear expression in a variety of normal tissues; however, this expression is usually at very low levels, while strong nuclear immunoreactivity of TFE3 has been seen almost exclusively in tumors. We present the case of a 30-year-old female on oral contraceptive pill (drospirenone/ethinylestradiol) and with complaints of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. She was found to have a cervical mass on pelvic ultrasound, and the biopsy showed fragments of benign squamous epithelium and polypoid endometrial tissue with stromal pseudodecidualization and abundant mixed inflammation. The pseudodecidualized stromal component showed moderate to strong nuclear staining in ~85% of stromal cells for TFE3. We discuss the intracellular role of TFE3 during inflammatory states and hypothesize that TFE3 expression can be associated with ongoing inflammation. Our case shed light upon the possibility that non-neoplastic environments with an inflammatory background could lead to increased nuclear expression of TFE3. Pathologists should be aware of the possibility of strong nuclear expression of TFE3 in non-neoplastic endometrium to avoid potential misdiagnosis.

Chameleon TFE3-translocation RCC and How Gene Partners Can Change Morphology: Accurate Diagnosis Using Contemporary Modalities

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) with TFE3 gene rearrangements has been born as a distinct entity 20 years ago. These relatively rare tumors were notable among other RCC subtypes because of their disproportionally high incidence among children and young adults. Initial reports were focused on describing unifying morphologic criteria and typical clinical presentation. Follow-up studies of ancillary immunohistochemical and hybridization techniques provided additional diagnostic tools allowing recognition of tRCC tumors in practice. However, a growing body of literature also expanded the clinicomorphologic spectrum of tRCCs, to include a significant morphologic overlap with other RCC variants thus blurring the diagnostic clarity of this entity. More recent molecular studies utilizing next-generation sequencing technology accelerated recognition of numerous novel gene partners fusing at different breakpoints with the TFE3 gene. Accumulating data indicates that morphologic and clinical heterogeneity of tRCC could be explained by fusion subtypes, and knowledge of TFE3 partnering genes may be important in predicting tumor behavior. Herein we provided a comprehensive analysis of ∼400 tRCC cases with known TFE3 fusion partners, estimated their relative incidence and summarized clinicomorphologic features associated with most common fusion subtypes. Our data was based on an extensive literature review and had a special focus on comparing immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridization and contemporary molecular studies for the accurate diagnosis of tRCC.

GPNMB expression identifies TSC1 /2/ mTOR ‐associated and MiT family translocation‐driven renal neoplasms

GPNMB (glycoprotein nonmetastatic B) and other TFE3/TFEB transcriptional targets have been proposed as markers for microphthalmia (MiT) translocation renal cell carcinomas (tRCCs). We recently demonstrated that constitutive mTORC1 activation via TSC1/2 loss leads to increased activity of TFE3/TFEB, suggesting that the pathogenesis and molecular markers for tRCCs and TSC1/2‐associated tumors may be overlapping. We examined GPNMB expression in human kidney and angiomyolipoma (AML) cell lines with TSC2 and/or TFE3/TFEB loss produced using CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing as well as in a mouse model of Tsc2 inactivation‐driven renal tumorigenesis. Using an automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay for GPNMB, digital image analysis was employed to quantitatively score expression in clear cell RCC (ccRCC, n = 87), papillary RCC (papRCC, n = 53), chromophobe RCC (chRCC, n = 34), oncocytoma (n = 4), TFE3‐ or TFEB‐driven tRCC (n = 56), eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC (ESC, n = 6), eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT, n = 4), and low‐grade oncocytic tumor (LOT, n = 3), as well as AML (n = 29) and perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas, n = 8). In cell lines, GPNMB was upregulated following TSC2 loss in a MiT/TFE‐ and mTORC1‐dependent fashion. Renal tumors in Tsc2^+/− A/J mice showed upregulation of GPNMB compared with normal kidney. Mean GPNMB expression was significantly higher in tRCC than in ccRCC (p < 0.0001), papRCC (p < 0.0001), and chRCC (p < 0.0001). GPNMB expression in TSC1/2/MTOR alteration‐associated renal tumors (including ESC, LOT, AML, and PEComa) was comparable to that in tRCC. The immunophenotype of tRCC and TSC1/2/MTOR alteration‐associated renal tumors is highly overlapping, likely due to the increased activity of TFE3/TFEB in both, revealing an important caveat regarding the use of TFE3/TFEB‐transcriptional targets as diagnostic markers. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma: a multi-institutional clinicopathologic study of 24 genetically-confirmed cases

YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma is an extremely rare malignant vascular tumor. We present the largest multi-institutional clinicopathologic study of YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma to date. The 24 cases of YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma showed a female predominance (17 female, 7 male) across a wide age range (20-78 years old, median 44). Tumors were most commonly located in soft tissue (50%), followed by bone (29%), lung (13%), and liver (8%), ranging from 3 to 115 mm in size (median 40 mm). About two-thirds presented with multifocal disease, including 7 cases with distant organ metastasis. Histopathologically, we describe three dominant architectural patterns: solid sheets of coalescing nests, pseudoalveolar and (pseudo)vasoformative pattern, and discohesive strands and clusters of cells set in a myxoid to myxohyaline stroma. These patterns were present in variable proportions across different tumors and often coexisted within the same tumor. The dominant cytomorphology (88%) was large epithelioid cells with abundant, glassy eosinophilic to vacuolated cytoplasm, prominent nucleoli and well-demarcated cell borders. Multinucleated or binucleated cells, prominent admixed erythrocytic and lymphocytic infiltrates, and intratumoral fat were frequently present. Immunohistochemically, ERG, CD31, and TFE3 were consistently expressed, while expression of CD34 (83%) and cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (20%) was variable. CAMTA1 was negative in all but one case. All cases were confirmed by molecular testing to harbor YAP1-TFE3 gene fusions: majority with YAP1 exon 1 fused to TFE3 exon 4 (88%), or less commonly, TFE3 exon 6 (12%). Most patients (88%) were treated with primary surgical resection. Over a follow-up period of 4-360 months (median 36 months) in 17 cases, 35% of patients remained alive without disease, and 47% survived many years with stable, albeit multifocal and/or metastatic disease. Five-year progression-free survival probability was 88%. We propose categorizing YAP1-TFE3-fused hemangioendothelioma as a distinct disease entity given its unique clinical and histopathologic characteristics in comparison to conventional epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of renal epithelial neoplasms

Despite the increasing number of newly identified renal neoplasms, the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can usually be reached with careful histologic examination and a limited immunohistochemical (IHC) panel. Clear cell, papillary, chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma account for more than 90% of renal neoplasia in adults, and sophisticated ancillary tools are usually unnecessary. Renal tumors with entity-defining genetic alterations may ultimately require molecular confirmation via cytogenetics or sequencing technologies, such as RCC with TFE3, TFEB, or ALK gene rearrangements, or TFEB amplified RCC. In fumarate hydratase-deficient and succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC, highly specific IHC markers can strongly suggest the diagnosis. In the metastatic setting, PAX8 and carbonic anhydrase 9 are among the most helpful markers for confirming RCC and clear cell type, respectively; however, caution should be exercised in the absence of a current or historical renal mass. In diagnostically challenging cases, such as renal eosinophilic tumors with low-grade nuclear features, or infiltrative high-grade tumors, careful examination coupled with a judicious panel of IHC markers usually resolves the diagnosis. This review offers concise algorithms for diagnosis of kidney neoplasia with the latest recognized, provisional, and emerging entities to daily pathology practice.

Recurrent YAP1-TFE3 Gene Fusions in Clear Cell Stromal Tumor of the Lung

Clear cell (hemangioblastoma-like) stromal tumor of the lung (CCST-L) is a recently described distinctive rare pulmonary neoplasm of unknown histogenesis and molecular pathogenesis. Only 7 cases have been reported in 2 recent studies, although additional cases might have been reported under the heading of extraneural pulmonary hemangioblastoma. We herein describe 4 CCST-L cases, 3 of them harboring a YAP1-TFE3 fusion. The fusion-positive tumors occurred in 3 women, aged 29, 56, and 69 years. All presented with solitary lung nodules measuring 2.3 to 9.5 cm. Histologically, all tumors showed similar features being composed of relatively uniform medium-sized epithelioid to ovoid cells with clear cytoplasm and small round monomorphic nuclei. Scattered larger cells with enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei and marked pleomorphism were noted in 2 cases. The tumors were associated with a hypervascularized stroma with variable but essentially subtle resemblance to capillary hemangioblastoma and perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa). Immunohistochemistry was negative for all lineage-specific markers. Targeted RNA sequencing showed a YAP1-TFE3 fusion in 3 of 4 cases. All 3 tumors showed homogeneous nuclear TFE3 immunoreactivity. Two patients were disease free at 36 and 12 months. The third patient had biopsy-proven synchronous renal and hepatic metastases, but extended follow-up is not available (recent case). The fourth case lacking the fusion affected a 66-year-old woman and showed subtle histologic differences from the fusion-positive cases, but had comparable TFE3 immunoreactivity. CCST-L represents a distinctive entity unrelated to hemangioblastoma and likely driven by recurrent YAP1-TFE3 fusions in most cases. The relationship of our cases to the recently reported "hemangioblastoma-like" CCST-L remains to be determined. Analysis of larger series is paramount to delineate the morphologic spectrum and biological behavior of this poorly characterized entity.

Immunohistochemical expression of PAX8, PAX2, and cytokeratin in melanomas

BACKGROUND

Deviations from the classic melanocytic immunophenotype in melanoma can present a diagnostic challenge. PAX8 and PAX2 are common markers for renal or Müllerian differentiation. While most PAX8+ or PAX2+ carcinomas are seldom confused with melanoma, some cases may show a more ambiguous immunophenotype, especially when MiTF family altered renal cell carcinoma (MiTF-RCC) is in the differential diagnosis. Neither PAX8 nor PAX2 expression has been reported in melanoma to date. We aimed to better characterize PAX8, PAX2, and cytokeratin immunoreactivity in a large series of melanomas.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays consisting of 263 melanomas were immunostained for PAX8, PAX2, and cytokeratin and graded by an h-score.

RESULTS

PAX8 expression was seen in 7.9% of melanomas and was significantly associated with spindle cytomorphology. PAX2 was positive in one (0.4%) melanoma. Cytokeratin positivity was seen in three (1.2%) cases and was associated with metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

PAX8 is expressed in a subset of melanomas and may be strong/extensive. As PAX8 positivity does not exclude a diagnosis of melanoma, it should be used in conjunction with other immunohistochemical markers, such as cytokeratin and PAX2, when melanoma, MiTF-RCC, and other PAX8+ tumors are in the differential diagnosis.

Gene fusions in vascular tumors and their underlying molecular mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

The group of vascular tumors contains many different entities, and is considered difficult by pathologists, as they often have overlapping histological characteristics. Chromosomal translocations have been identified in ~20% of mesenchymal tumors and are considered the drivers of tumor formation. Many translocations have been discovered over the past decade through next-generation sequencing. This technological advancement has also revealed several recurrent gene fusions in vascular tumors.

AREAS COVERED

This review will discuss the various vascular tumors for which recurrent gene fusions have been identified. The gene fusions and the presumed molecular mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis are shown, and potential implications for targeted therapies discussed. The identification of these gene fusions in vascular tumors has improved diagnostic accuracy, especially since several of these fusions can be easily detected using surrogate immunohistochemical markers.

EXPERT OPINION

The identification of gene fusions in a subset of vascular tumors over the past decade has improved diagnostic accuracy, and has provided the pathologists with novel diagnostic tools to accurately diagnose these often difficult tumors. Moreover, the increased understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms can guide the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.

Kidney cancer: from genes to therapy

Renal cell carcinoma incidence is rising worldwide with increasing subtype stratification by the World Health Organization. Each subtype has unique genetic alterations, cell biology changes and clinical findings. Such genetic alterations offer the potential for individualized therapeutic approaches that are rapidly progressing. This review highlights the most common subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, including both hereditary and sporadic forms, with a focus on genetic changes, clinical findings and ongoing clinical trials.

Contemporary Characterization and Recategorization of Adult Unclassified Renal Cell Carcinoma

Our recent study of early-onset unclassified eosinophilic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) demonstrated that two third of cases could be reclassified by performing a limited number of immunohistochemistry stains. Following the same approach, we aimed to investigate what proportion of adult unclassified RCC could be reclassified. We identified 79 cases. The mean age at presentation was 58 years (range, 29 to 84 y). Tumors were grouped based on their predominant morphologic features as oncocytic (n=23); papillary (n=22); clear cell (n=22); mucinous tubular and spindle cell (MTSC; n=5); rhabdoid (n=4); or lacking a dominant pattern (n=3). By reviewing the morphologic features and performing ancillary studies, we were able to reclassify 10 cases (13%). Four cases were positive for CK20 and showed morphologic features consistent with eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC. Four cases were reclassified as MTSC based on VSTM2A expression by RNA in situ hybridization. One case was negative for SDHB and reclassified as succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC. None of the cases showed loss of expression of fumarate hydratase. One case was diffusely positive for CK7 and negative for CD117 and reclassified as a low-grade oncocytic tumor. Four cases were positive for both cathepsin-K and TFE3 by immunohistochemistry, although fluorescence in situ hybridization failed to identify rearrangement in either TFE3 or TFEB genes. Of the tumors that remained unclassified, those with oncocytic features were less likely to be a high grade (odds ratio [OR]=0.22, P=0.013) or advanced stage (OR=0.19, P=0.039) and were more common in women (OR=3.4, P=0.05) compared with those without oncocytic features. Tumors with rhabdoid morphology were associated with advanced stage (relative risk=3.6, P=0.009), while tumors with clear cell or papillary features had a wide range of grades and stages at presentation. In summary, the most frequent reclassified entity is eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC. Investigation of expression of succinate dehydrogenase or fumarate hydratase in individuals older than 35 years with unclassifiable tumors is low yield in the absence of specific morphologic features. A subset of MTSC without well-developed morphologic features can be reclassified by using RNA-ISH for VSTM2A. Recognition of more-recently described RCC subtypes allows for their distinction from the unclassified subtype and improves the prognostic information provided.

Hibernoma-like Changes and TFE3 Expression in Mesothelioma Mimicking TFE3-Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Diagnostic Pitfall

The long delay between asbestos exposure and the development of mesothelioma will likely result in an increased incidence of mesothelioma in our industrialized societies. Radiation therapy is another factor known to induce these tumors. We describe a rare case of foamy looking mesothelioma in a 63-year-old patient with a long oncology history of a supposed peritoneal carcinomatosis. The pathologist was faced with a diagnostic pitfall as this peritoneal clear cell tumor expressed transcription factor binding to immunoglobulin heavy constant mu enhancer 3 (TFE3) at the nuclear level. Fortunately, the pathologist performed an extensive panel of immunomarkers, leading to a final diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma. Thus, we describe the first case of mesothelioma expressing TFE3. Note that there was no rearrangement of TFE3 in fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Diagnostic approach in TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional international survey

Transcription factor E3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) has heterogenous morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features.131 pathologists with genitourinary expertise were invited in an online survey containing 23 questions assessing their experience on TFE3-RCC diagnostic work-up.Fifty (38%) participants completed the survey. 46 of 50 participants reported multiple patterns, most commonly papillary pattern (almost always 9/46, 19.5%; frequently 29/46, 63%). Large epithelioid cells with abundant cytoplasm were the most encountered cytologic feature, with either clear (almost always 10/50, 20%; frequently 34/50, 68%) or eosinophilic (almost always 4/49, 8%; frequently 28/49, 57%) cytology. Strong (3+) or diffuse (>75% of tumour cells) nuclear TFE3 IHC expression was considered diagnostic by 13/46 (28%) and 12/47 (26%) participants, respectively. Main TFE3 IHC issues were the low specificity (16/42, 38%), unreliable staining performance (15/42, 36%) and background staining (12/42, 29%). Most preferred IHC assays other than TFE3, cathepsin K and pancytokeratin were melan A (44/50, 88%), HMB45 (43/50, 86%), carbonic anhydrase IX (41/50, 82%) and CK7 (32/50, 64%). Cut-off for positive TFE3 fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) was preferably 10% (9/50, 18%), although significant variation in cut-off values was present. 23/48 (48%) participants required TFE3 FISH testing to confirm TFE3-RCC regardless of the histomorphologic and IHC assessment. 28/50 (56%) participants would request additional molecular studies other than FISH assay in selected cases, whereas 3/50 participants use additional molecular cases in all cases when TFE3-RCC is in the differential.Optimal diagnostic approach on TFE3-RCC is impacted by IHC and/or FISH assay preferences as well as their conflicting interpretation methods.

Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Characteristics of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Confirmed TFE3-Gene Fusion Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single Institutional Cohort

TFE3-fusion associated renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) accounts for up to 5% adults and 40% of childhood RCC. Their comprehensive immunohistochemical (IHC) profile in correlation to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing and their role in the diagnostic approach are not well documented because of lacking published data. FISH confirmed TFE3-RCC between years 2010 and 2020 were identified from institutional electronic database and retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-five TFE3-RCC were identified. Seventy-six of 85 (89.4%) TFE3-RCC cases had positive TFE3 expression, with diffuse and strong/moderate TFE3 expression in 45 (54.2%). Three (3.5%) TFE3-RCC had negative TFE3 expression whereas 6 (7%) cases had equivocal TFE3 expression. On the other hand, positive TFE3-IHC expression was observed in 17/29 (58.6%) TFE3-FISH negative RCC cases, although only 8 (27.5%) had diffuse and moderate/strong TFE3 expression. Diffuse and strong TFE3-IHC expression was statistically significant in predicting TFE3-FISH positivity (P<0.0001) regardless of morphologic features. After univariate and multivariate analyses, TFE3-IHC was the only parameter with significant predictive value for detecting positive TFE3-FISH (P<0.0001). On univariate analysis, sex, classic morphology, age, negative AE1/AE3 or cytokeratin 7 were not predictive of TFE3-FISH positivity. Diffuse and strong nuclear TFE3-IHC expression is significantly associated with TFE3-FISH positivity and can be used as a surrogate marker to confirm translocation associated cases. TFE3-rearranged RCCs show variable histomorphologic features and TFE3-FISH should be performed in cases presenting at a younger age or, regardless of the age, tumors with unusual morphology. Despite previous reports, negative pancytokeratin and positive cathepsin K expression may not be reliable markers for TFE3-RCC.

Pediatric Renal Tumors: Updates in the Molecular Era

Molecular characterization has led to advances in the understanding of pediatric renal tumors, including the association of pediatric cystic nephromas with DICER1 tumor syndrome, the metanephric family of tumors with somatic BRAF mutations, the characterization of ETV6-NTRK3-negative congenital mesoblastic nephromas, the expanded spectrum of gene fusions in translocation renal cell carcinoma, the relationship of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney with other BCOR-altered tumors, and the pathways affected by SMARCB1 alterations in rhabdoid tumors of the kidney. These advances have implications for diagnosis, classification, and treatment of pediatric renal tumors.

Lingual alveolar soft part sarcoma with absent TFE3 rearrangement

Background

Lingual ASPS is extremely rare and aggressive tumor. rearrangement is typically detected in ASPS patients using FISH analysis.

Aim

To present the clinical, histopathological, and radiological features of lingual Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma.

Method

A 30‐year‐old male presented with a painless, slowly growing mass of the tongue. Initial impression was of benign vascular lesion. Later, the patient became symptomatic as the mass progressed in size, which necessitated further investigations.

Result

A lip‐split, mandibulotomy was performed for the excision of the tumor and revealed an alveolar soft part sarcoma with PAS‐positive, diastase resistant intracytoplasmic granules. However, molecular analysis using FISH was negative for TFE3 rearrangement. Patient underwent partial glossectomy with postoperative radiotherapy.

Conclusion

Clinical and pathological correlation of ASPS is very useful to reach a proper diagnosis.

Ocular PEComas are frequently melanotic and TFE3-translocated: report of two cases including the first description of PRCC-TFE3 fusion in PEComa

Ocular perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is exceedingly rare. We reported two examples involving the choroid and subconjunctival tissue, respectively, in patients aged 17 and 20 years. Both tumors comprised packets and sheets of large polygonal cells with moderately pleomorphic nuclei and prominent nucleoli, traversed by delicate fibrovascular septa. Melanin pigmentation was present in one case. The tumors showed HMB45 and TFE3 immunoreactivity. TFE3 gene translocation was confirmed by FISH break-apart probes. RNA seq revealed PRCC-TFE3 and NONO-TFE3 fusions, with the former representing the first description of PRCC-TFE3 in PEComa. Critical reappraisal of the reported cases showed that ocular PEComa frequently affected young patents with melanin pigmentation, frequent TFE3 protein expression, and/or TFE3 gene translocation. No recurrence or metastasis was reported after complete excision despite the presence of cytologic atypia.

Computational analysis of pathological images enables a better diagnosis of TFE3 Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

TFE3 Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) generally progresses more aggressively compared with other RCC subtypes, but it is challenging to diagnose TFE3-RCC by traditional visual inspection of pathological images. In this study, we collect hematoxylin and eosin- stained histopathology whole-slide images of 74 TFE3-RCC cases (the largest cohort to date) and 74 clear cell RCC cases (ccRCC, the most common RCC subtype) with matched gender and tumor grade. An automatic computational pipeline is implemented to extract image features. Comparative study identifies 52 image features with significant differences between TFE3-RCC and ccRCC. Machine learning models are built to distinguish TFE3-RCC from ccRCC. Tests of the classification models on an external validation set reveal high accuracy with areas under ROC curve ranging from 0.842 to 0.894. Our results suggest that automatically derived image features can capture subtle morphological differences between TFE3-RCC and ccRCC and contribute to a potential guideline for TFE3-RCC diagnosis.

Translocation renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive form of renal cancer that is often misdiagnosed to other subtypes. Here the authors demonstrated that by using machine learning and H&E stained whole-slide images, an accurate diagnose of this particular type of renal cancer can be achieved.

Update on selected advances in the immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis of soft tissue tumors

Although traditional morphological evaluation remains the cornerstone for the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, ancillary diagnostic modalities such as immunohistochemistry and molecular genetic analysis are of ever-increasing importance in this field. New insights into the molecular pathogenesis of soft tissue tumors, often obtained from high-throughput sequencing technologies, has enabled significant progress in the characterization and biologic stratification of mesenchymal neoplasms, expanding the spectrum of immunohistochemical tests (often aimed towards recently discovered genetic events) and molecular genetic assays (most often fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction). This review discusses selected novel molecular and immunohistochemical assays with diagnostic applicability in mesenchymal neoplasms, with emphasis on diagnosis, refinement of tumor classification, and treatment stratification.