Cardiovascular Manifestations From Therapeutic Radiation: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement From the International Cardio-Oncology Society

Taiwan Consensus for the Management of Cardiovascular Risks and Complications in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among men globally, and it frequently coexists with cardiovascular disease (CVD). With increasing cancer survival rates and an aging population, the incidence of CVD among PC patients is also on the rise. The treatments for PC include androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, and docetaxel-based chemotherapy, and the cardiovascular complications include hypertension, metabolic syndrome, heart failure and arrhythmias. As it is important to provide personalized treatment planning and close monitoring, cardio-oncology collaboration plays a crucial role in optimizing treatment outcomes, emphasizing cardiovascular risk assessments and tailored treatment plans that balance cancer control and cardiovascular health. In this consensus statement, we review several important issues including the association between CVD and PC, screening for cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, timing and criteria for cardiology referral, cardiovascular risk assessments and management, and multidisciplinary collaboration and patient education. However, challenges remain in screening and preventive measures, and future research should focus on developing robust cardiovascular risk assessment tools, preventive measures, and interdisciplinary approaches to improve patient outcomes and reduce cardiovascular morbidity in patients being treated for PC.

Assessment and stratification of cardiovascular disease risk in people diagnosed with breast cancer: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, which often are associated with cardiotoxic breast cancer treatment or overlapping risk factors between the two diseases. Pre-treatment cardiovascular risk assessment can enable accurate risk stratification and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Several tools have been suggested, described or used in research to assess baseline (pre-treatment) risk to determine appropriate cardiovascular disease care before, during and after cancer treatment. This scoping review aims to identify and describe key features of baseline cardiovascular disease risk assessment tools for breast cancer patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched for articles published January 2013 - March 2024 to identify publications reporting cardiovascular disease risk assessment tools in breast cancer patients. Publications included research articles (observational and experimental studies) and position/policy, commentary and review papers. Eligibility was assessed and key data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Conflicts were discussed and resolved with the authorship team.

RESULTS

A total 144 articles were identified. Of these, 57 reported original data for the development, validation or recommendations of cardiovascular disease risk assessment tools and 87 reported the use of such tools. From these articles, 13 tools were identified that assessed the risk of cardiovascular disease broadly (n = 3) or death due to cardiovascular disease (n = 1) or specifically of cardiotoxicity or heart failure (n = 8) or venous thromboembolism (n = 1) in people diagnosed with breast cancer. Fourteen tools assessed cardiovascular disease risk in people diagnosed with mixed cancer types, including breast cancer. The planned development of four tools and/or surveillance pathways were described in protocol papers. Among all these tools identified (n = 31), seven tools (among these, four tools assessed people diagnosed with breast cancer only) went through external validation and performed poorly or moderately in stratifying cancer patients effectively into risk categories. Risk factors included in the assessment tools were age, breast cancer treatment type and pre-existing cardiovascular disease. While clinical guidelines and recommendations about baseline cardiovascular disease risk assessment were identified, these were either for cancer patients broadly or for cancer treatment types, and not specifically for people diagnosed with breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Several tools to assess baseline cardiovascular disease in people diagnosed with breast cancer were identified but only seven tools had gone through a validation process, and none were found to be very effective in differentiating people by baseline cardiovascular disease risk. Further work is needed to optimise the effectiveness of baseline cardiovascular disease risk assessments for breast cancer patients to enable appropriate stratification and monitoring of risk before, during and after treatment to improve cardiovascular health and outcomes.

Cardiac MRI-based Subclinical Cardiac Dysfunction during 2 Years after Breast Cancer Irradiation: The MEDIRAD EARLY-HEART Study

Purpose To evaluate the relationship between cardiac radiation doses and subclinical changes in cardiac function using cardiac MRI during 2 years of follow-up in patients with breast cancer treated with radiation therapy without chemotherapy after lumpectomy. Materials and Methods This prospective multicenter study (NCT03297346) enrolled female individuals with breast cancer treated with radiation therapy between December 2017 and September 2019. Participants underwent cardiac MRI at baseline, 6 months, and 24 months. Cardiac radiation doses were assessed for the whole heart (WH) and right and left ventricles (LV). A persistent decrease in LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) from baseline to the other two measurement points over the 2-year follow-up was considered an adverse subclinical change in cardiac function. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables and odds ratios for risk assessment. Results The study included 138 female participants (mean age, 58.4 years ± 8.0 [SD]). Mean WH and LV doses were 1.42 Gy (IQR, 1.03-2.01) and 1.46 Gy (IQR, 0.64-2.34). At the 2-year follow-up, all participants had reduced LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) (-4.0% ± 13.2; P < .001) and stroke volume (-3.4% ± 15.2; P < .001), preserved LV ejection fraction, and increased LV remodeling (LV mass/EDV ratio) (4.2% ± 18.1; P < .04) without associated symptoms. Twenty-three (16.6%) participants showed a persistent decrease in LV GLS and received higher mean WH and LV doses compared with participants without persistent decrease in LV GLS (WH: 2.09 Gy [IQR, 1.50-2.45] vs 1.36 Gy [IQR, 1.01-1.87], P < .001; LV: 2.40 Gy [IQR, 1.09-2.88] vs 1.34 Gy [IQR, 0.63-2.02], P = .002). The relative changes in LV EDV and LV mass/EDV were -12.7% ± 9.0 versus -2.2% ± 13.3 (P < .001) and 14.2% ± 15.5 versus 2.2% ± 18.1 (P = .002), respectively, in participants with and without a persistent decrease in LV GLS. A higher WH cardiac radiation dose was associated with a higher risk of a persistent decrease in LV GLS (odds ratio, 1.09 [95% CI: 1.02, 1.16]). Conclusion In participants with recent breast cancer radiation therapy, a modest but persistent reduction in LV GLS over a 2-year follow-up period was associated with the cardiac radiation dose. Keywords: Radiotherapy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cardiotoxicity, Strain Clinical trial registration no. NCT03297346 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.

Quantitative evaluation of radiation-induced heart disease in beagle dogs by speckle tracking echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to detect early changes in left ventricular systolic function in Beagle dogs after radiotherapy using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography and to explore its potential value in evaluating radiation-induced heart disease.

METHODS

Thirty-six Beagle dogs were randomized into a control group (n = 18) and an irradiation group (n = 18). The irradiation group received a single dose of 20 Gy to the left ventricular anterior wall, while controls underwent sham irradiation. Conventional echocardiography and 2D speckle tracking echocardiography were performed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure. Additionally, six dogs were randomly selected from each group and euthanized at 3-, 6-, and 12-month post-irradiation, and their hearts were collected for histopathological testing.

RESULTS

In the irradiation group, the global longitudinal strain of the left ventricle and regional strain in the irradiated area were significantly reduced versus baseline and controls by 3 months, with progressive decline at 6 and 12 months. Strain reduction correlated spatially with pathological injury. Conversely, there were no substantial differences in conventional echocardiographic parameters between the groups after 3 months. Conventional parameters (e.g., LVEF) showed differences only at later timepoints. Histopathology revealed progressive cardiomyocyte damage, fibrosis, and microvascular injury in irradiated regions, extending to the posterior wall by 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography-derived strain parameters spatially correlate with radiation-induced pathological changes and detect subtle systolic dysfunction prior to irreversible remodeling. Speckle tracking may localize regions of peak radiation dose delivery.

Mapping clinical and imaging factors that might predict cardiac events in breast cancer patients

Background

Breast cancer is the most common in women, with a 90% overall survival at 5 years. Cardiotoxicity is a side effect that can modify their morbidity and mortality. Its low prevalence and long latency period have challenged the establishment of a strategy for early detection and prevention.

Objectives

To investigate the association between coronary artery calcium (CAC) in planning computed tomography (CT) and cardiac events.

Methods

Retrospective cohort of 873 breast cancer patients (460 right-side; 413 left-side) treated with radiotherapy (2013-2022). We extract the Hounsfield Unit to quantify the CAC degree from the heart structure in the planning CT. We used IBM-SPSS software (V 29.0 Armonk, NY) for the statistical analysis.

Results

After a median follow-up of 4.52 years (range: 2.42-6.22 years), the cardiac events incidence was 1.95% vs 5.1% in right and left breast cancer, respectively. The mean heart dose was higher in cases with cardiac events (6.74Gy vs 2.28Gy; p<0.01). CAC score>0 was detected in 32.76% of planning CT and was more frequent in the elderly and those with cardiovascular risk factors (p<0.01). Patients with cardiac events presented a CAC score>0 in 41.4% of cases. However, the overall survival in these patients did not differ from those without CAC (p=0.58).

Conclusions

Patients with cardiovascular risk factors and a mean cardiac dose greater than 5 Gy are at increased risk of cardiotoxicity and should be referred for Cardio-Oncology evaluation. The application of the CAC score in CT planning could be a valuable screening test that requires further study.

Imaging of the Acute and Chronic Cardiovascular Complications of Radiation Therapy

Chest radiotherapy (XRT) plays a crucial role in the treatment of a multitude of cancers including breast, lung, esophageal, and lymphoma. Although XRT enhances cancer survival rates, it may also expose healthy bystander tissues to radiation, potentially leading to severe complications. Initially considered relatively resistant to radiation damage, the heart has been shown over the past 4 decades to be susceptible to radiation-induced cardiovascular toxicity and despite advances in XRT which can minimize radiation exposure to heart tissue, no cardiac radiation dose is entirely safe. The clinical spectrum of radiation-induced cardiovascular toxicity is broad, encompassing coronary artery disease, myocardial dysfunction, valvular abnormalities, and pericardial disorders. Radiation-induced cardiovascular toxicity may manifest acutely or many years after XRT, with each condition more likely to present at certain time points post-XRT. Cardiac imaging is a crucial tool in both the screening and diagnosis of radiation-induced cardiovascular toxicity with an understanding of its pathophysiology, incidence, and progression required to implement a comprehensive, multimodality imaging approach to detect and manage these complications effectively.

Reduction of subclinical acute cardiac injury through DIBH radiotherapy: a single-institution real-world clinical cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer is associated with additional cardiac risks. Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) has emerged as the primary cardiac sparing technique, demonstrating significant reduction in mean heart dose (MHD) and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) dose. However, the issue of whether dosimetric advantages can be effectively translated into clinically measurable benefits for patients remains to be further elucidated. The study aims to investigate whether DIBH, in contrast to free breathing (FB), could yield a clinical cardiac advantage, beyond dosimetry benefits, for patients with early left breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery combined with whole breast radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study involved 78 patients with early-stage left breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy between 2021 and 2022 after breast-conserving surgery. 46 patients were treated with DIBH technique and 32 were treated with FB. Patients with previous cardiac disease were excluded. We performed myocardial enzymes, electrocardiogram (EKG), and echocardiograms (ECHO) in all patients within 2 weeks before, during, and 6 months after radiotherapy. EKG and ECHO follow-up extended to 24 months. The results of the two groups were compared using nonparametric tests and chi-square tests, and P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Subclinical acute cardiac injury was characterized by the emergence of elevated myocardial enzymes beyond normal levels and/or EKG alterations in ST-T or T-wave patterns and/or abnormalities detected in ECHO within a 6-month period following radiotherapy.

RESULT

The average age was 52.3 years for FB and 44.9 years for DIBH. There were no significant differences in staging, molecular subtype, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy history. The proportion of subclinical acute cardiac injury was lower with DIBH compared to FB (DIBH = 31/46 and FB = 28/32, p = 0.042). The most sensitive subclinical acute cardiac injury events were detected by myocardial enzymes, with cardiac troponin I (cTnI, p = 0.034) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, p = 0.023) appearing significantly lower in the DIBH patients during radiotherapy. The difference of cTnI between 2 groups at 6 months after radiotherapy became non-significant. Creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) was higher in DIBH comparedwith FB only 6 months after radiotherapy (p = 0.006). The differences in EKG and ECHO were not significant between the two groups within 6 months after radiotherapy. Notably, the DIBH group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of abnormal EKG at 12-24 months compared to the 3-6 months (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of DIBH has been demonstrated to reduce the proportion of patients experiencing subclinical acute cardiac injury, with a higher proportion of patients returning to normalcy after one year. This finding suggests the potential reversibility of radiation-induced cardiac injury. The monitoring of these early cardiac biomarker changes to identify high-risk patients, followed by the implementation of early interventions, may contribute to a reduction in the incidence of long-term cardiac complications. Future research could integrate cardiac biomarkers, EKG, as well as traditional dosimetric parameters and baseline cardiac risk factors, to construct a more precise, individualized cardiac risk prediction model, thereby better assessing the long-term cardiac risks in patients.

Mixed valvular heart disease: diagnosis and management

Mixed valvular diseases (MVDs) are common but have received little attention in the literature, especially regarding the mitral valve (MV) and the right-sided cardiac valves. Whereas echocardiography plays a pivotal diagnostic role, the diagnosis is made difficult due to haemodynamic interactions that may invalidate common indices of severity used in isolated stenosis or regurgitation. The diagnostic strategy should aim at initially separately assessing stenosis and regurgitation, taking into account the diagnostic pitfalls, with complementary use of multimodality imaging in cases of persisting diagnostic uncertainties. Unlike aortic stenosis, the calcium score cannot be used as a surrogate for haemodynamic severity of mixed MV disease. Severe stenosis and/or severe regurgitation are indicative of severe MVD, and management should follow recommendations on the predominant lesion. However, some patients with the combination of moderate stenosis and moderate regurgitation have a poor prognosis when left untreated. Concordant data suggest that, in patients with mixed aortic or MV disease, transvalvular velocities and pressure gradients are more powerful prognostic indicators than valve area or the severity of regurgitation. It is essential to consider the global repercussions that indicate poor outcomes in patients with MVD. However, whereas symptoms and/or ventricular dysfunction are considered as clear indication for intervention, imaging cut-offs have not been validated for balanced moderate regurgitation and stenosis. Although emerging evidence tends to support earlier management, further prospective studies are required, and pending the results of these studies, asymptomatic patients with MVD should be closely monitored.

Prevention of cancer-therapy related cardiac dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Introduction of modern cancer therapies has led to increased survival of affected patients. With this advantage, the incidence of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) has increased and reasonable prevention strategies become necessary. This review outlines the major approaches to limit development and progression of CTRCD.

RECENT FINDINGS

A broad range of cancer therapies can provoke CTRCD ranging from mild asymptomatic forms to severe heart failure. Profound cardiological assessment of cardiovascular comorbidities before initiation of cancer therapy allows identification of cancer patients at higher risk developing CTRCD which may also require closer surveillance. Cardioprotective adjustment of cancer therapy and initiation of cardioprotective medication and lifestyle optimization prior to anti-cancer treatment additionally limit the risk of CTRCD. During therapy, regular examination of cancer patients using high-sensitive cardiological diagnostic tools as three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography and global longitudinal strain (GLS) enables early detection of mild forms of CTRCD. This allows appropriate adjustment of cancer therapy and initiation of CTRCD treatment to prevent further progression to severe forms. Cardiological risk stratification before treatment initiation, cardioprotective interventions before and during cancer therapy, along with regular monitoring of treated cancer patients, can help prevent the development of CTRCD. This maintains the antitumor effects of cancer therapy while limiting cardiotoxic side effects resulting in improved quality of life and mortality of affected cancer patients.

Early cardio-oncology intervention in thoracic radiotherapy: prospective single-arm pilot study

BACKGROUND

While there is increasing recognition of the morbidity of cardiovascular disease in cancer survivors, including accelerated atherosclerosis following thoracic radiotherapy, patients are frequently under-optimized for cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

In this prospective single-arm cohort pilot study, patients were treated with high-dose thoracic radiotherapy and had early consultation with cardio-oncology. Twenty patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint was adherence to cardio-oncology consultation. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular medication intervention rate and patient-reported intervention perspectives. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, a major cardiovascular risk marker enriched in patients with cancer and induced by radiation exposure, was measured as an exploratory endpoint.

RESULTS

The cohort median age is 71 years. Most patients are female (13/20), have primary lung or esophageal carcinoma (16/20), and 7/20 have pre-existing cardiovascular disease. We show that cardio-oncology consultation adherence is high (19/20) and results in cardiovascular medication optimization changes in most patients (12/19), most commonly to initiate or intensify statin therapy (8/12). 8/12 patients with a primary cardiologist prior to enrollment have medication changes recommended. Most (12/17) participants are glad to learn about their heart health during cancer treatment. Clonal hematopoiesis is detectable prior to treatment in 8/20 patients and three develop new variants after treatment (1/3 de novo).

CONCLUSIONS

We observe that early cardio-oncology consultation is feasible, leads to cardiovascular medication optimization in the majority (>60%) of participants, most commonly to initiate or intensify statin therapy. New clonal hematopoiesis variants are detectable early after radiotherapy and the impact on post-treatment cardiovascular risk is worthy of further study.

Cardio-Oncology and Heart Failure: a Scientific Statement From the Heart Failure Society of America

Heart failure and cancer remain 2 of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, and the 2 disease entities are linked in a complex manner. Patients with cancer are at increased risk of cardiovascular complications related to the cancer therapies. The presence of cardiomyopathy or heart failure in a patient with new cancer diagnosis portends a high risk for adverse oncology and cardiovascular outcomes. With the rapid growth of cancer therapies, many of which interfere with cardiovascular homeostasis, heart failure practitioners need to be familiar with prevention, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management strategies in cardio-oncology. This Heart Failure Society of America statement addresses the complexities of heart failure care among patients with active cancer diagnoses and cancer survivors. Risk stratification, monitoring and management of cardiotoxicity are presented across stages A through D heart failure, with focused discussion on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and special populations, such as survivors of childhood and young-adulthood cancers. We provide an overview of the shared risk factors between cancer and heart failure, highlighting heart failure as a form of cardiotoxicity associated with many different cancer therapeutics. Finally, we discuss disparities in the care of patients with cancer and cardiac disease and present a framework for a multidisciplinary-team approach and critical collaboration among heart failure, oncology, palliative care, pharmacy, and nursing teams in the management of these complex patients.

Cardiac Complications of Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy is a critical component in managing many malignancies by improving local control and survival. The benefits of radiation may come at the expense of unintended radiation injury to the surrounding normal tissues, with the heart being one of the most affected organs in thoracic radiation treatments. As cancer survivors live longer, radiation-induced cardiotoxicity (RICT) is now increasingly recognized. In this review, we highlight the spectrum and pathophysiology of RICT. We summarize contemporary recommendations for risk stratification, screening, prevention, and management of RICT. We briefly highlight novel applications for radiation to treat some cardiac conditions such as resistant arrhythmias.

Aiming for patient safety indicators in radiation oncology - Results from a systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study

BACKGROUND

Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) allow the evaluation of safety levels in healthcare settings. Despite their use in various medical fields, a specific and comprehensive PSI catalogue for radiation oncology (RO) is lacking. The Patient Safety in German Radiation Oncology (PaSaGeRO) study aims for the development of a specific PSI catalogue in radiation oncology.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study is to identify, formulate, and categorize PSIs specific to RO to bridge existing gaps in comprehensive patient safety evaluation.

METHODS

An electronic search in PubMed included studies from 1989 onwards, in English or German, focusing on safety and quality indicators in RO, patient safety measures, or risk analyses. Exclusions were non-transferable, country-specific measures, techniques exclusive to specific departments, and legally mandated procedures. Additional sources were identified through reference tracking and professional society websites. Two experts independently extracted PSIs from the included references.

RESULTS

Out of 157 included publications and nine secondary sources, we identified and formulated 145 PSIs. These were categorized into patient-specific processes (82, 56%), quality and risk management (42, 28%), human resources (15, 10%), and institutional culture (13, 9%).

CONCLUSION

The hereby developed PSIs provides a base for professionals to systematically evaluate and improve safety practices, addressing previously unmet needs in this field. By offering clear guidance on safety assessment, the catalogue has the potential to drive significant improvements in patient care and safety outcomes in RO. Funded by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00034690).

Cardiovascular Health in Breast Cancer: Survivorship Care

Improved screening and treatment have increased breast cancer survival rates, with over 7.8 million women surviving 5 years post-diagnosis globally. However, survivors face heightened cardiovascular morbidity and mortality due to cancer treatment and patient related risk factors. Cardio-oncology has emerged as a discipline to manage cardiovascular health in patients throughout and following cancer treatment. This review focuses on strategies to optimize cardiovascular health in breast cancer survivors, aligning with ASCO's survivorship principles. Key strategies include risk stratification, primary prevention, lifestyle interventions, pharmacologic management, appropriate cardiovascular monitoring, and tailored exercise programs. Effective cardio-oncology care hinges on collaboration between specialists and patients, underscoring the significance of shared-care models and telemedicine options in survivorship management.

Radiotherapy toxicities: mechanisms, management, and future directions

For over a century, radiotherapy has revolutionised cancer treatment. Technological advancements aim to deliver high doses to tumours with increased precision while minimising off-target effects to organs at risk. Despite advancements such as image-guided, high-precision radiotherapy delivery, long-term toxic effects on healthy tissues remain a great clinical challenge. In this Review, we summarise common mechanisms driving acute and long-term side-effects and discuss monitoring strategies for radiotherapy survivors. We explore ways to mitigate toxic effects through novel technologies and proper patient selection and counselling. Additionally, we address policies and management strategies to minimise the severity and impact of toxicity during and after treatment. Finally, we examine the potential advantages of emerging technologies and innovative approaches to improve conformity, accuracy, and minimise off-target effects.

Cardiovascular diseases in patients with cancer: A comprehensive review of epidemiological trends, cardiac complications, and prognostic implications

ABSTRACT

This article provides an overview of the current evidence on the epidemiology, overlapping risk factors, and pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with cancer. It explores the cardiotoxic effects of anticancer therapy and their impact on prognosis. Although cancer survival rates have improved over the last two decades, the risk of CVD has risen over time in patients with cancer. CVD and cancer share similar risk factors and a common pathophysiology involving inflammation. Many chemotherapeutic agents used to treat cancer are associated with cardiovascular complications (such as heart failure, myocardial infarction, and thrombosis). Current evidence indicates a significant burden of CVD in patients with cancer, particularly in the first year following cancer diagnosis, with elevated risk persisting beyond this period. This short- and long-term risk of CVD may vary depending on the cancer type and treatment regimen. Early identification of potential cardiovascular risk in patients with cancer, can lead to more favorable clinical and survival outcomes. Given the acute and long-term consequences, patients with cancer require increased cardiovascular care and lifestyle optimization. This article offers valuable insights into the cardiovascular burden and needs of patients with cancer. It is intended for a general medical research readership interested in the intersection of cardiology and oncology.

Considerations in screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in irradiated head and neck cancer survivors

Carpenter et al. add to the body of evidence demonstrating that irradiated head and neck cancer survivors are at high risk for carotid artery stenosis. In this editorial, the concept of screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in this subpopulation is explored.

How We Monitor Cardiac Health in Breast Cancer Survivors

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Cardiovascular Considerations After Cancer Therapy: Gaps in Evidence and JACC: CardioOncology Expert Panel Recommendations

Cancer survivors, particularly those treated with anthracyclines and chest radiation, face an elevated risk of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. These complications affect not only physical health, but also life expectancy. Risk factors for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity include age at which cancer treatment was received, the use of (potentially) cardiotoxic cancer therapies, and the presence of concomitant cardiovascular risk factors. Current guidelines provide recommendations for cardiovascular surveillance after cancer therapy, including type and frequency. All cancer survivors are advised to undergo annual clinical screenings and optimization of cardiovascular risk factors. Those at higher risk should undergo additional cardiovascular testing. This document aims to summarize the available evidence, present practical recommendations, and outline existent gaps in the current literature regarding cardiovascular care after cancer therapies.

Changes in Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Cancer Survivors: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Background

Cancer survivors face an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease, with physical inactivity after cancer treatment potentially worsening this risk.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between physical activity before and after a cancer diagnosis and the risk for heart disease.

Methods

A nationwide cohort of 269,943 cancer survivors (mean age 56.3, 45.7% men) was evaluated for physical activity adherence 2 years before and after diagnosis. The primary outcomes were the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and atrial fibrillation. Subdistribution HRs (sHRs) and 95% CIs were calculated using Gray's method, accounting for death as a competing risk.

Results

Over a follow-up period of 1,111,329.28 person-years, compared with those who remained inactive, persistent physical activity was associated with a 20% reduction in MI risk (sHR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.70-0.91) and a 16% reduction risk in HF risk (sHR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.78-0.90). Initiating physical activity after a cancer diagnosis was linked to an 11% lower risk for MI (sHR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.99) and a 13% lower risk for HF (sHR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.93). Being active only before diagnosis was associated with a 20% lower risk for MI (sHR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.91) and a 6% lower risk for HF (sHR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88-1.00). No association was observed between physical activity and atrial fibrillation risk. Associations varied by primary cancer site.

Conclusions

These findings underscore the importance of maintaining physical activity for cardiovascular health in cancer survivors and suggest that physical activity before a diagnosis may offer enduring protection against ischemic heart disease and cardiac dysfunction.

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria on Cardiac Toxicity Prevention and Management After Thoracic Radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The multidisciplinary American Radium Society Thoracic Committee was assigned to create appropriate use criteria on cardiac toxicity prevention and management for patients undergoing radiotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic review of the current literature was conducted. Case variants of patients with thoracic malignancies undergoing radiation were created based on presence or absence of cardiovascular risk factors and treatment-related risks assessed by dose exposure to the heart and cardiac substructures. Modified Delphi methodology was used to evaluate the variants and procedures, with less than or equal to three rating points from median defining agreement/consensus.

RESULTS

A total of six variants were evaluated. The panel felt that patients with cardiac comorbidities at high risk for radiation-related cardiac toxicity should undergo a prescreening cardiac-focused history and physical (H&P) examination, electrocardiogram, cardiac imaging including an echocardiogram, and referral to a cardiologist/cardio-oncologist. Recommendations for those without cardiac comorbidities at low risk for cardiac toxicity were to undergo a baseline H&P examination only. Conversely, those without cardiac comorbidities but at high risk for radiation-related cardiac toxicity were recommended to undergo a prescreening electrocardiogram, in addition to a H&P examination. For patients with cardiac comorbidities at low risk for cardiac toxicity, the panel felt that prescreening and postscreening tests may be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

The American Radium Society Thoracic appropriate use criteria panel has developed multidisciplinary consensus guidelines for cardiac toxicity prevention, surveillance, and management after thoracic radiotherapy based on cardiac comorbidities at presentation and risk of radiation-related cardiac toxicity.

Patients with metastatic cancer have worse short-term coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes: A population-based study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Metastasis is a hallmark for cancer progression. While patients with metastatic cancer (MC) have higher risk profiles, outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in these patients have not been established, likely due to their smaller representation in the CABG patient population. This study aimed to examine the short-term outcomes of patients with MC who underwent CABG.

METHODS

Patients who underwent CABG were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, concomitant procedures, and non-metastatic malignancies. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to address differences in demographics, socioeconomic status, primary payer status, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and transfer/admission status between MC and non-MCC patients. In-hospital post-CABG outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 379 (0.23 %) patients with MC who underwent CABG. All MC patients were matched to 1161 out of 164,351 non-MC patients who underwent CABG during the same period. Patients with MC had higher risks of mortality (4.76 % vs 2.58 %, p = 0.04), pacemaker implantation (2.91 % vs 1.12 %, p = 0.03), venous thromboembolism (1.85 % vs 0.43 %, p = 0.01), and hemorrhage/hematoma (61.11 % vs 55.04 %, p = 0.04). In addition, MC patients had a longer time from admission to operation (3.35 ± 4.19 vs 2.82 ± 3.54 days, p = 0.03) and longer hospital length of stay (11.86 ± 8.17 vs 10.65 ± 8.08 days, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with MC had higher short-term mortality and morbidities after CABG. These findings can help provide insights for clinicians in the management of patients with concurrent coronary artery disease and MC, particularly in terms of preoperative risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

Radiation Oncology Opinions and Practice on Cardiotoxicity in Lung Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study by the International Cardio-oncology Society

AIMS

Symptomatic radiation cardiotoxicity affects up to 30% patients with lung cancer and several heart substructure doses are associated with reduced overall survival. A greater focus on minimising cardiotoxicity is now possible due to advancements in radiotherapy technology and the new discipline of cardio-oncology, but uptake of emerging data has not been ascertained. A global cross-sectional analysis of Radiation Oncologists who treat lung cancer was therefore conducted by the International Cardio-Oncology Society in order to establish the impact of recently published literature and guidelines on practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A bespoke questionnaire was designed following an extensive review of the literature and from recurring relevant themes presented at Radiation Oncology and Cardio-Oncology research meetings. Six question domains were retained following consensus discussions among the investigators, comprising 55 multiple choice stems: guidelines, cardiovascular assessment, cardiology investigations, radiotherapy planning strategies, primary prevention prescribing and local cardio-oncology service access. An invitation was sent to all Radiation Oncologists registered with ICOS and to Radiation Oncology colleagues of the investigators.

RESULTS

In total 118 participants were recruited and 92% were consultant physicians. The ICOS 2021 expert consensus statement was rated as the most useful position paper, followed by the joint ESC-ESTRO 2022 guideline. The majority (80%) of participants indicated that a detailed cardiovascular history was advisable. Although 69% of respondents deemed the availability of cardiac substructure auto-segmentation to be very/quite important, it was implemented by only a few, with the most common being the left anterior descending coronary artery V15. A distinct cardio-oncology service was available to 39% participants, while the remainder utilised general cardiology services.

CONCLUSION

The uptake of recent guidelines on cardiovascular optimisation is good, but access to cardiology investigations and consultations, and auto-segmentation, represent barriers to modifying radiotherapy practices in lung cancer to reduce the risk of radiation cardiotoxicity.

Cardio-oncology and radiation oncology: How collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists can be realised in radiation oncology

Increased survivorship, improvements in cancer treatments, and the potential for cardiac side effects from cancer treatments have resulted in increased collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists and the development of cardio-oncology clinics. This collaboration is important given its role in ensuring greater patient satisfaction, aiding teams of clinicians in making complex treatment decision, and ensuring cardiac complications are diagnosed at an early stage. The particularities of implementing this collaboration in the field of radiation oncology and how this setting is different from other areas of cardio-oncology have not been well detailed in the literature. This paper will discuss what is currently understood about the need for and role of cardio-oncology and what a cardio-oncology services involves, with a particular emphasis on patient and clinician needs in the field of radiation oncology. The literature and recent guidelines do advocate for a detailed baseline assessment of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, especially patients with treatment or patient risk factors that increase their risk of cancer-therapy related cardiotoxicity. Advancements in cardiac imaging techniques will be discussed as these may help to diagnose cardiac side effects of certain cancer treatments, including radiotherapy, at an early stage. A multi-disciplinary and collaborative approach is well received by patients and such an approach, guided by the aim of maintaining a patient's cancer treatment wherever possible, should be the cornerstone of cardio-oncology clinics regardless of the patient's treatment regime.

Surface-based deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer: final results from the SAVE-HEART study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) plays an essential role in the management of early breast cancer (BC), but can lead to cardiovascular and lung toxicities. RT in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) often allows better protection of organs at risk. This prospective study compares surface-guided DIBH with free breathing (FB) in patients with left-sided BC, by evaluating individual cardiovascular risks and treatment plan dosimetry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study enrolled 585 patients from October 2016 to January 2021 with left-sided invasive breast carcinoma with indicated adjuvant RT of the breast/thoracic wall with or without regional lymph nodes. The ability to hold breath for 20 s was a prerequisite. The treatments were either hypofractionated (HF; 40.05 Gy/15Fx) or normofractionated (NF; 50.00 Gy/25Fx). DIBH was applied using the automatically triggered surface guidance system Catalyst with audio-video feedback. Computed tomography and surface data were acquired during both DIBH and FB. The primary endpoint of the study was the comparative evaluation of heart dose reduction using DIBH.

RESULTS

Plan dosimetry was significantly improved by DIBH. The mean and maximum doses to the heart and the left coronary artery were significantly reduced by 36%-42% in HF and NF plans (P < 0.001), while the mean ipsilateral lung dose was reduced by 12%-14% (P < 0.001). Furthermore, DIBH resulted in a 5% reduction in the cumulative 10-year cardiovascular disease risk (10-year cardiovascular disease risk) compared with FB (3.59% to 3.41%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study showing better sparing for cardiac and ipsilateral lung doses with surface-guided DIBH compared with FB in patients with left-sided BC.

Breast cancer and cardiovascular health

Modern cancer therapies greatly improve clinical outcomes for both early and advanced breast cancer patients. However, these advances have raised concerns about potential short- and long-term toxicities, including cardiovascular toxicities. Therefore, understanding the common risk factors and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular toxicity is essential to ensure best breast cancer outcomes. While cardio-oncology has emerged as a sub-speciality to address these challenges, it is essential that all cardiologists recognize and understand the cardiovascular consequences of cancer therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential adverse cardiovascular effects associated with modern breast cancer therapies. A preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic workflow to minimize the impact of cardiovascular toxicity on patient outcomes is presented. Key aspects of this workflow include regular monitoring of cardiovascular function, early detection and management of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicities, and optimization of cardiovascular risk factor control. By highlighting the gaps in knowledge in some areas, this review aims to emphasize the critical role of cardio-oncology research in ensuring the holistic well-being of patients with breast cancer.

Cardiovascular mortality among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a population-based study

We aim to investigate cardiovascular mortality risk among diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients and explore cardiovascular mortality trends in the past decades in United States. We extracted data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for adult patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 1975 and 2019. Standardized mortality ratio, joinpoint regression analysis, and competing risk model were analyzed. Overall, 49,918 patients were enrolled, of whom 4167 (8.3%) cardiovascular deaths were observed, which was 1.22 times the number expected (95%CI, 1.19-1.26). During 1985-2019, the incidence-based cardiovascular mortality rate increased by 0.98% per year (95%CI, 0.58-1.39%), with statistically significant increases in age groups younger than 75 years. The cumulative mortality from cardiovascular disease increased by age but never exceeded that from DLBCL. Older age, male sex, earlier year of diagnosis, lower tumor stage at diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery were all poor prognostic factors for cardiovascular mortality.

Novel risk score for predicting acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after chest radiotherapy in patients with breast or lung cancer

AIMS

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral component of cancer therapy but associated with adverse events. Our goal was to establish risk prediction models for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after chest RT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective study of lung/breast cancer patients who had chest RT with planning CT at Mayo Clinic between 01/2010 and 01/2014. Predictive models were developed based on weighted independent predictors using a derivation (406 lung and 711 breast cancer) and validation cohort (179 lung and 234 breast cancer). Patient characteristics, pre-RT CT for coronary artery calcification (CAC), and post-RT MACCE data were reviewed. Post-RT MACCE occurred in 6.1 and 5.6% in the derivation and validation cohort over a mean follow-up of 42 ± 13 months. Post-therapy model (C2AD2) included CAC (two points), MACCE history (two points), age ≥74 (three points), DM (two points), and mean heart radiation dose ≥ 850 mGy (two points), and pre-therapy model (C2AD) included post-therapy model parameters minus mean heart radiation dose. Both models stratified patients into three risk groups: low (0-2), intermediate (3-5), and high (≥6). Post-RT MACCE across these groups were 2.7, 8.9, and 19.8% in the derivation, and 3.9, 6.6, and 16.4% in the validation cohort for post-therapy model (C2AD2) and 2.8, 9.2, and 20.4% in the derivation and 3.7, 9.2, and 13.2% in the validation cohort for pre-therapy model. Both models showed statistically significant graded survival outcome.

CONCLUSION

Post-therapy (C2AD2) and pre-therapy (C2AD) models are simple, easy to use and effective tools to stratify breast and lung cancer patients undergoing chest radiation for post-RT MACCE.

Cardiovascular toxicity in antitumor therapy: biological and therapeutic insights

The evolution of antitumor therapies has significantly improved cancer prognosis but has concurrently resulted in cardiovascular toxicities. Understanding the biological mechanisms behind these toxicities is crucial for effective management. Immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicities are primarily mediated by immune cells and secreted cytokines. Chemotherapy may cause cardiovascular damage through autophagy disruption and mitochondrial dysfunction. Targeted therapies can induce toxicity through endothelin-1 (ET-1) production and cardiac signaling disruption. Radiotherapy may lead to cardiomyopathy and myocardial fibrosis by affecting endothelial cells, triggering inflammatory responses and accelerating atherosclerosis. This review provides insights into these mechanisms and strategies, aiming to enhance the clinical prevention and treatment of cardiovascular toxicities.

How to utilize current guidelines to manage patients with cancer at high risk for heart failure

Heart failure (HF) in patients with cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The success of cancer therapy has resulted in an exponential rise in the population of cancer survivors, however cardiovascular disease (CVD) is now a major life limiting condition more than 5 years after cancer diagnosis [Sturgeon, Deng, Bluethmann, et al 40(48):3889-3897, 2019]. Prevention and early detection of CVD, including cardiomyopathy (CM) and HF is of paramount importance. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published guidelines on Cardio-Oncology (CO) [Lyon, López-Fernández, Couch, et al 43(41):4229-4361, 2022] detailing cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification, prevention, monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment throughout the course and following completion of cancer therapy. Here we utilize a case to summarize aspects of the ESC guideline relevant to HF clinicians, with a focus on risk stratification, early detection, prevention of CM and HF, and the role for guideline directed medical therapy in patients with cancer.

Radiation-associated cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer: current insights from a cardio-oncologist

Radiation-associated cardiovascular disease (RACD), a complex disease characterized with pericarditis, myocardial damage, valvular heart diseases, heart failure, vasculopathy and ischemic heart disease, has a generally poor prognosis. While RACD may be acute, it often manifests in the late years or even decades following radiation exposure to the chest. With an increasing number of cancer survivors, RACD is likely to become an important issue in cardio-oncology. This review discusses pre-radiation therapy (RT) preparation, peri-RT patient management and long follow-up planning post-RT from a cardiology perspective. Additionally, a novel technique of stereotactic radiotherapy, which has been applied for the treatment of intractable cardiac arrhythmias, is presented. Appropriate patient examination and management during and after RT are essential to support patients undergoing cancer treatment to improve long life expectancy. A multidisciplinary team is needed to determine how to manage patients who receive RT to reduce RACD, to detect early phases of RACD and to provide the best treatment for RACD. Recent studies increasingly report advances in diagnosis using new equipment that has the potential to detect early phases of RACD, along with growing evidence for the optimal treatment for RACD. This review provides an overview of recent studies and guidelines to report on the latest findings, and to identify unresolved issues surrounding RACD that require validation in future studies.

Retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation for ventricular tachycardia in a patient with inaccessible substrate due to previous surgery

INTRODUCTION

Catheter-based radiofrequency (RF) ablation is generally regarded as the standard approach for patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy and may be considered as a first-line approach when there is a preference to avoid these agents. Patients with a history of cardiac surgery may have VT substrate inaccessible to catheter ablation due to intervening prosthetic materials or scar.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This article describes a 55-year-old patient with a history of surgically repaired subvalvular aortic stenosis and subsequent valve-sparing root replacement who presented with sustained VT. After RF ablation failed due to VT substrate "guarded" by graft material, retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation (RCVEA) was employed to successfully treat the clinical VT.

CONCLUSION

RCVEA ablation can be useful for treating VT when conventional ablation is limited by inaccessible substrate due to prior cardiac surgery.

Risk, prevention, screening and management of carotid artery stenosis in head & neck cancer patients-An evidence based review

Our review aims to clarify the incidence of carotid artery stenosis, risks of development, screening, management, and primary prevention strategies documented in the literature after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. The high prevalence of carotid stenosis after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers has made surveillance and risk stratification critical. In addition to general cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, risk factors for carotid artery stenosis after head and neck radiation included total plaque score, radiotherapy use and dosage, length of time after radiotherapy, and age greater than 50. Cancer subtype, namely nasopharyngeal cancer, may be correlated with increased risk as well, though contrasting results have been found. Interestingly, however, no significant relationship has been found between radiotherapy dose and stroke risk. Surgical management of post-radiation carotid stenosis is similar to that of stenosis unrelated to radiation, with carotid endarterectomy considered to be the gold standard treatment and carotid artery stenting being an acceptable, less-invasive alternative. Medical management of these patients has not been well-studied, but antiplatelet therapy, statins, and blood pressure control may be beneficial. The mainstay of screening for radiation-induced stenosis has been Doppler ultrasound, with measurement of changes in the intima-media thickness being a primary marker of disease development. A literature review was carried out using the MeSH terms "Carotid Artery Stenosis," "Head and Neck Neoplasms," and "Radiotherapy."

Comparison of Diagnostic Parameters of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients with and without Cancer: A Multifactorial Analysis

BACKGROUND

The simultaneous occurrence of cancer and acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) presents a complex clinical challenge. This study clarifies variances in diagnostic parameters among ACS patients with and without concurrent cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 320 individuals diagnosed with ACS, stratified equally into two cohorts-one with cancer and the other cancer-free. We evaluated risk factors, symptom profiles, coronary angiography results, echocardiographic evaluations, and laboratory diagnostics. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the chi-square test.

RESULTS

Cancer patients were older (mean age 71.03 vs. 65.13 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (33.1% vs. 15.0%, p < 0.001) but a lower prevalence of hyperlipidemia (59.7% vs. 82.5%, p < 0.001). Chest pain was less frequent in cancer patients (72.5% vs. 90%, p < 0.001), while hypotension was more common (41.9% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.022). NSTEMI was more common in cancer patients (41.9% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.048), while STEMI was less common (20.6% vs. 45.3%, p < 0.001). RCA and LAD involvement were less frequent in cancer patients (RCA: 18.1% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.018; LAD: 18.8% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates differences in the clinical presentation of ACS between patients with and without cancer. Cancer patients were less likely to present with chest pain and more likely to experience hypotension. Additionally, they had a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease and they were less likely to have hyperlipidemia. These findings highlight the need for a careful approach to diagnosing ACS in oncology patients, considering their distinct symptomatology.

Cardiac Substructure Radiation Dose and Associations With Tachyarrhythmia and Bradyarrhythmia After Lung Cancer Radiotherapy

Background

Arrhythmias are common following radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to analyze the association of distinct arrhythmia classes with cardiac substructure radiotherapy dose.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 748 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy. Cardiac substructure dose parameters were calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses for predictors of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3 atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter, non-AF and non-atrial flutter supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT), bradyarrhythmia, and ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) or asystole were calculated. Fine-Gray regression models were performed (with noncardiac death as a competing risk).

Results

Of 748 patients, 128 (17.1%) experienced at least 1 grade ≥3 arrhythmia, with a median time to first arrhythmia of 2.0 years (Q1-Q3: 0.9-4.2 years). The 2-year cumulative incidences of each arrhythmia group were 8.0% for AF, 2.7% for atrial flutter, 1.8% for other SVT, 1.4% for bradyarrhythmia, and 1.1% for VT or asystole. Adjusting for baseline cardiovascular risk, pulmonary vein (PV) volume receiving 5 Gy was associated with AF (subdistribution HR [sHR]: 1.04/mL; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08; P = 0.016), left circumflex coronary artery volume receiving 35 Gy with atrial flutter (sHR: 1.10/mL; 95% CI: 1.01-1.19; P = 0.028), PV volume receiving 55 Gy with SVT (sHR: 1.03 per 1%; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05; P < 0.001), right coronary artery volume receiving 25 Gy with bradyarrhythmia (sHR: 1.14/mL; 95% CI: 1.00-1.30; P = 0.042), and left main coronary artery volume receiving 5 Gy with VT or asystole (sHR: 2.45/mL; 95% CI: 1.21-4.97; P = 0.013).

Conclusions

This study revealed pathophysiologically distinct arrhythmia classes associated with radiotherapy dose to discrete cardiac substructures, including PV dose with AF and SVT, left circumflex coronary artery dose with atrial flutter, right coronary artery dose with bradyarrhythmia, and left main coronary artery dose with VT or asystole, guiding potential risk mitigation approaches.

Carotid Artery Stenosis and Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy: A Critical Review

The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature on carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and ischemic stroke (IS) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiation therapy (RT) to guide assessment, screening, and management strategies. Patients treated with RT for HNC are at an elevated risk of developing CAS, with published meta-analyses demonstrating that CAS >50% occurs in approximately 25% of patients. Previous research suggests a 10-year cumulative incidence of stroke between 5.7% and 12.5%. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction tools such as Qstroke, QRISK-2, and Framingham risk score perform poorly for predicting IS for patients with HNC who received RT. Duplex ultrasound is the most common imaging modality to assess CAS, but controversy remains as to the utility of screening asymptomatic individuals. Only 3 of the 5 major HNC survivorship guidelines acknowledge RT as a risk factor for CAS or IS, while only 1 makes a specific recommendation on screening for CAS (American Head and Neck Society). Within the general population, only 1 CVD guideline discusses RT as a risk factor for CAS (Society for Vascular Surgery). Clinicians involved in the care of patients with HNC treated with RT should be aware of the increased risk of CAS and IS and the challenges in risk prediction. Although there is a lack of evidence to make firm recommendations, HNC survivorship recommendations should ensure HNC survivors and primary care providers are informed of these risks and the importance of assessment and management of CVD risk factors. Future studies are required to refine risk prediction models in patients with HNC and to determine those most likely to benefit from targeted screening and initiation of early preventative strategies.

Intercellular pathways of cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity and their therapeutic implications: the paradigm of radiotherapy

Advances in cancer therapeutics have improved patient survival rates. However, cancer survivors may suffer from adverse events either at the time of therapy or later in life. Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) represent a clinically important, but mechanistically understudied complication, which interfere with the continuation of best-possible care, induce life-threatening risks, and/or lead to long-term morbidity. These concerns are exacerbated by the fact that targeted therapies and immunotherapies are frequently combined with radiotherapy, which induces durable inflammatory and immunogenic responses, thereby providing a fertile ground for the development of CVDs. Stressed and dying irradiated cells produce 'danger' signals including, but not limited to, major histocompatibility complexes, cell-adhesion molecules, proinflammatory cytokines, and damage-associated molecular patterns. These factors activate intercellular signaling pathways which have potentially detrimental effects on the heart tissue homeostasis. Herein, we present the clinical crosstalk between cancer and heart diseases, describe how it is potentiated by cancer therapies, and highlight the multifactorial nature of the underlying mechanisms. We particularly focus on radiotherapy, as a case known to often induce cardiovascular complications even decades after treatment. We provide evidence that the secretome of irradiated tumors entails factors that exert systemic, remote effects on the cardiac tissue, potentially predisposing it to CVDs. We suggest how diverse disciplines can utilize pertinent state-of-the-art methods in feasible experimental workflows, to shed light on the molecular mechanisms of radiotherapy-related cardiotoxicity at the organismal level and untangle the desirable immunogenic properties of cancer therapies from their detrimental effects on heart tissue. Results of such highly collaborative efforts hold promise to be translated to next-generation regimens that maximize tumor control, minimize cardiovascular complications, and support quality of life in cancer survivors.

Internal Mammary Node Irradiation Debate: Case Closed? Not Yet, and Maybe Never

The IMN debate is still open and may never be closed for reasons outlined in this Comments and Controversies piece.

Prevalence of concomitant aortic disease and lung cancer: an exploratory study

Background

Lung cancer and aortic disease share multiple risk factors. The co-presence of both diseases defines a peculiar type of patient who needs a specific protocol of treatment and follow-up. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of aortic disease in a population of patients with a diagnosis of primary lung cancer.

Methods

A retrospective, single center analysis of all patients admitted to the Thoracic Surgery Unit from January 2015 to January 2021. Demographic and baseline characteristics were retrieved from hospital electronic charts. All patients were screened for aortic disease, reviewing thoraco-abdominal Computed Tomography with contrast medium administration performed for oncological reasons. A cancer-free control group was obtained for comparison. Multilinear regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for the presence of aortic disease.

Results

A total of 264 patients were preliminarily identified. After reviewing for exclusion criteria, a total of 148 patients were included in the analysis. Most of the patients were male (62.2%) with a mean age of 71±8.7 years. Cardiovascular risk factors were extensively prevalent in the population study. The incidence of aortic pathologies in the group of patients suffering from primary lung cancer was 27% (40 patients). The majority presented thoracic aortic aneurysms (11.5%). Comparison between the lung cancer group and the control group highlighted a substantial difference in terms of aortic disease prevalence (27% vs. 2.9%; P<0.0001). The regression analysis revealed that coronary artery disease [odds ratio (OR) 4.6988, P=0.001], peripheral artery disease (OR 7.7093, P=0.002), hypertension (OR 4.0152, P=0.03) and history of previous non-aortic vascular surgery procedures (OR 6.4509, P=0.003) were risk factors for aortic disease in patients with primary lung cancer.

Conclusions

Patients with lung cancer have a high prevalence of aortic disease, defining a peculiar subset of patients who deserve a specific protocol of treatment and follow-up. Further studies are needed to define a dedicated standardized multidisciplinary approach.

Neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Radiotherapy is one of the mainstay treatment modalities for the management of non-metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC). Notable improvements in treatment outcomes have been observed in the recent decades. Modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and charged particle therapy, have significantly improved tumor target conformity and enabled better preservation of normal structures. However, because of the intricate anatomy of the head and neck region, multiple critical neurological structures such as the brain, brainstem, spinal cord, cranial nerves, nerve plexuses, autonomic pathways, brain vasculature, and neurosensory organs, are variably irradiated during treatment, particularly when tumor targets are in close proximity. Consequently, a diverse spectrum of late neurological sequelae may manifest in HNC survivors. These neurological complications commonly result in irreversible symptoms, impair patients' quality of life, and contribute to a substantial proportion of non-cancer deaths. Although the relationship between radiation dose and toxicity has not been fully elucidated for all complications, appropriate application of dosimetric constraints during radiotherapy planning may reduce their incidence. Vigilant surveillance during the course of survivorship also enables early detection and intervention. This article endeavors to provide a comprehensive review of the various neurological complications of modern radiotherapy for HNC, summarize the current incidence data, discuss methods to minimize their risks during radiotherapy planning, and highlight potential strategies for managing these debilitating toxicities.

Integrating Cardio-Oncology Across the Research Pipeline, Policy, and Practice in Australia-An Australian Cardiovascular Alliance Perspective

Over 18 million people worldwide were diagnosed with cancer in 2020, including over 150,000 people in Australia. Although improved early detection and treatment have increased the survival rates, cardiotoxic treatment and inadequate management of cardiovascular risk factors have resulted in cardiovascular disease (CVD) being one of the leading causes of non-cancer-related death and disability among cancer survivors. International guidelines outline the standards of care for CVD risk surveillance and management. However, Australian cardio-oncology policies and clinical guidelines are limited. There is increasing growth of cardio-oncology research in Australia and support from leading Australian professional bodies and advocacy and research networks, including the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, the National Heart Foundation of Australia, and the Australian Cardiovascular Alliance (ACvA). Thus, opportunities to drive multidisciplinary cardio-oncology initiatives are growing, including grant funding, position statements, and novel research to inform new policies. The ACvA has a unique flagship structure that spans the translational research pipeline from drug discovery to implementation science. This article aims to highlight how multidisciplinary cardio-oncology innovations could intersect with the seven ACvA flagships, and to showcase Australian achievements in cardio-oncology thus far. We summarise eight key priority areas for future cardio-oncology research that emerged. These strategies will strengthen cardio-oncology research and care in Australia, and drive new guidelines, policies, and government initiatives to ensure equity in health outcomes for all cardio-oncology patients.

Cardiac structure, function, and coronary anatomy 10 years after isolated contemporary adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with low cardiovascular baseline risk

AIMS

The effects of isolated contemporary low-dose breast cancer (BC) radiotherapy (RT) on the heart remain poorly understood. This study aims to assess the long-term impacts of BC-RT on cardiac structure and function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-six women (62 ± 7 years) without history of prior heart disease, who had undergone RT for either first left (n = 36) or right (n = 40) BC, without additional medical oncology therapy apart from hormonal treatment 11 ± 1 years earlier, underwent transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), NT-proBNP, and a 6-min walk test (6MWT). They were compared with 54 age-matched healthy female controls. By CTCA, 68% of BC patients exhibited no or very mild coronary disease, while only 11% had moderate stenosis (50-69%) and 3% had significant stenosis (>70%). Despite slightly reduced regional echocardiographic midventricular strains, BC patients exhibited similar global left and right ventricular volumes, ejection fractions, and global strains by echocardiography and CMR as controls. Mitral E/e' ratios were slightly higher, and mitral deceleration times were slightly lower, but NT-proBNP was similar to controls. Also, 6MWT was normal. None had late gadolinium enhancement, and extracellular volume fraction was similar in BC (28 ± 3 vs. 29 ± 3, P = 0.15) and controls. No differences were observed relative to dose or side of RT.

CONCLUSION

Aside from minor alterations of regional strains and diastolic parameters, women who received isolated RT for BC had low prevalence of coronary disease, normal global systolic function, NT-proBNP, and exercise capacity and showed no structural changes by CMR, refuting significant long-term cardiotoxicity in such low-risk patients.

Early Impairment of Paracrine and Phenotypic Features in Resident Cardiac Mesenchymal Stromal Cells after Thoracic Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy-induced cardiac toxicity and consequent diseases still represent potential severe late complications for many cancer survivors who undergo therapeutic thoracic irradiation. We aimed to assess the phenotypic and paracrine features of resident cardiac mesenchymal stromal cells (CMSCs) at early follow-up after the end of thoracic irradiation of the heart as an early sign and/or mechanism of cardiac toxicity anticipating late organ dysfunction. Resident CMSCs were isolated from a rat model of fractionated thoracic irradiation with accurate and clinically relevant heart dosimetry that developed delayed dose-dependent cardiac dysfunction after 1 year. Cells were isolated 6 and 12 weeks after the end of radiotherapy and fully characterized at the transcriptional, paracrine, and functional levels. CMSCs displayed several altered features in a dose- and time-dependent trend, with the most impaired characteristics observed in those exposed in situ to the highest radiation dose with time. In particular, altered features included impaired cell migration and 3D growth and a and significant association of transcriptomic data with GO terms related to altered cytokine and growth factor signaling. Indeed, the altered paracrine profile of CMSCs derived from the group at the highest dose at the 12-week follow-up gave significantly reduced angiogenic support to endothelial cells and polarized macrophages toward a pro-inflammatory profile. Data collected in a clinically relevant rat model of heart irradiation simulating thoracic radiotherapy suggest that early paracrine and transcriptional alterations of the cardiac stroma may represent a dose- and time-dependent biological substrate for the delayed cardiac dysfunction phenotype observed in vivo.

Therapeutic strategies based on non-ionizing radiation to prevent venous neointimal hyperplasia: the relevance for stenosed arteriovenous fistula, and the role of vascular compliance

We have reviewed the development and current status of therapies based on exposure to non-ionizing radiation (with a photon energy less than 10 eV) aimed at suppressing the venous neointimal hyperplasia, and consequentially at avoiding stenosis in arteriovenous grafts. Due to the drawbacks associated with the medical use of ionizing radiation, prominently the radiation-induced cardiovascular disease, the availability of procedures using non-ionizing radiation is becoming a noteworthy objective for the current research. Further, the focus of the review was the use of such procedures for improving the vascular access function and assuring the clinical success of arteriovenous fistulae in hemodialysis patients. Following a brief discussion of the physical principles underlying radiotherapy, the current methods based on non-ionizing radiation, either in use or under development, were described in detail. There are currently five such techniques, including photodynamic therapy (PDT), far-infrared therapy, photochemical tissue passivation (PTP), Alucent vascular scaffolding, and adventitial photocrosslinking. The last three are contingent on the mechanical stiffening achievable by the exogenous photochemical crosslinking of tissular collagen, a process that leads to the decrease of venous compliance. As there are conflicting opinions on the role of compliance mismatch between arterial and venous conduits in a graft, this aspect was also considered in our review.

Radiation injury and gut microbiota-based treatment

The exposure to either medical sources or accidental radiation can cause varying degrees of radiation injury (RI). RI is a common disease involving multiple human body parts and organs, yet effective treatments are currently limited. Accumulating evidence suggests gut microbiota are closely associated with the development and prevention of various RI. This article summarizes 10 common types of RI and their possible mechanisms. It also highlights the changes and potential microbiota-based treatments for RI, including probiotics, metabolites, and microbiota transplantation. Additionally, a 5P-Framework is proposed to provide a comprehensive strategy for managing RI.

A multimodality assessment of the protective capacity of statin therapy in a mouse model of radiation cardiotoxicity

PURPOSE

Despite technological advances in radiotherapy (RT), cardiotoxicity remains a common complication in patients with lung, oesophageal and breast cancers. Statin therapy has been shown to have pleiotropic properties beyond its lipid-lowering effects. Previous murine models have shown statin therapy can reduce short-term functional effects of whole-heart irradiation. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of atorvastatin in protecting against the late effects of radiation exposure on systolic function, cardiac conduction, and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) following a clinically relevant partial-heart radiation exposure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female, 12-week old, C57BL/6j mice received an image-guided 16 Gy X-ray field to the base of the heart using a small animal radiotherapy research platform (SARRP), with or without atorvastatin from 1 week prior to irradiation until the end of the experiment. The animals were followed for 50 weeks with longitudinal transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and electrocardiography (ECG) every 10 weeks, and plasma ANP every 20 weeks.

RESULTS

At 30-50 weeks, mild left ventricular systolic function impairment observed in the RT control group was less apparent in animals receiving atorvastatin. ECG analysis demonstrated prolongation of components of cardiac conduction related to the heart base at 10 and 30 weeks in the RT control group but not in animals treated with atorvastatin. In contrast to systolic function, conduction disturbances resolved at later time-points with radiation alone. ANP reductions were lower in irradiated animals receiving atorvastatin at 30 and 50 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Atorvastatin prevents left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and the perturbation of cardiac conduction following partial heart irradiation. If confirmed in clinical studies, these data would support the use of statin therapy for cardioprotection during thoracic radiotherapy.

Relation between Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Cardiovascular Events in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Thoracic radiotherapy is one of the corner stones of HL treatment, but it is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. As HL is often diagnosed at a young age, long-term follow-up including screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) is recommended.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the presence of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in relation to cardiovascular events in HL patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy compared to a non-cancer control group.

METHODS

Consecutive HL patients who underwent evaluation for asymptomatic CAD with coronary computed tomography angiography > 10 years after thoracic irradiation were included. The study population consisted of 97 HL patients matched to 97 non-cancer patients on gender, age, cardiovascular risk factors, and statin use.

RESULTS

Mean age during CT scan in the HL population was 45.5 ± 9.9 and in the non-cancer population 45.5 ± 10.3 years. CACS was elevated (defined as >0) in 49 (50.5%) HL patients and 30 (30.9%) control patients. HL survivors had an odds ratio of 2.28 [95% CI: 1.22-4.28] for having a CACS > 0 compared to the matched population (p = 0.006). Prevalence of CACS > 90th percentile differed significantly: 17.1% in HL survivors vs. 4.6% in the matched population (p = 0.009). Non-obstructive coronary artery stenosis was more prevalent in the HL population than in the control population (45.7% vs. 28.4%, respectively, p = 0.01). During follow-up of 8.5 [5.3; 9.9] years, nine HL patients experienced an event including two patients with a CACS of zero. No events occurred in the control population.

CONCLUSION

In a matched study population, HL survivors have a higher prevalence of a CACS > 0 and an increased risk of cardiovascular events after thoracic irradiation compared to a matched non-cancer control group.

Surgical Approaches for Pericardial Diseases: What Is New?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss the evolving techniques and approaches for pericardiectomy, with a focus on the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and the extent of radical pericardial resection. The review aims to highlight the benefits and considerations associated with these modifications in radical pericardiectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of CPB during pericardiectomy does not increase procedural risk or negatively impact survival. In fact, it has been shown to contribute to a more radical resection and improve postoperative outcomes, which is associated with less recurrence and better survival. The review emphasizes the importance of radical pericardiectomy and the use of CPB in achieving successful outcomes. Radical resection of the pericardium, facilitated by CPB, helps minimize the risk of recurrent constrictions and the need for reinterventions. The findings highlight the correlation between postoperative outcomes and survival, further supporting the use of CPB.

Risk profiles and incidence of cardiovascular events across different cancer types

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors are at increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease, although additional data are needed to better understand the incidence of CV events across different malignancies. This study sought to characterize the incidence of major adverse CV events [myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina (MACE), or heart failure (HF)] across multiple cancer types after cancer diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were identified from a USA-based administrative claims database who had index cancer diagnoses of breast, lung, prostate, melanoma, myeloma, kidney, colorectal, leukemia, or lymphoma between 2011 and 2019, with continuous enrollment for ≥12 months before diagnosis. Baseline CV risk factors and incidence rates of CV events post-index were identified for each cancer. Multivariable Cox hazards models assessed the cumulative incidence of MACE, accounting for baseline risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 839 934 patients across nine cancer types, CV risk factors were prevalent. The cumulative incidence of MACE was highest in lung cancer and myeloma, and lowest in breast cancer, prostate cancer, and melanoma. MACE cumulative incidence for lung cancer was 26% by 4 years (2.7-fold higher relative to breast cancer). The incidence of stroke was especially pronounced in lung cancer, while HF was highest in myeloma and lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

CV events were especially increased following certain cancer diagnoses, even after accounting for baseline risk factors. Understanding the variable patient characteristics and associated CV events across different cancers can help target appropriate CV risk factor modification and develop strategies to minimize adverse CV events and improve patient outcomes.