1
|
Lowry KP, Zuiderveld CC. Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:619-625. [PMID: 38777538 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer risk prediction models based on common clinical risk factors are used to identify women eligible for high-risk screening and prevention. Unfortunately, these models have only modest discriminatory accuracy with disparities in performance in underrepresented race and ethnicity groups. The field of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning are rapidly advancing the field of breast cancer risk prediction with the development of mammography-based AI breast cancer risk models. Early studies suggest mammography-based AI risk models may perform better than traditional risk factor-based models with more equitable performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn P Lowry
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ray KM. Interval Cancers in Understanding Screening Outcomes. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:559-569. [PMID: 38777533 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Interval breast cancers are not detected at routine screening and are diagnosed in the interval between screening examinations. A variety of factors contribute to interval cancers, including patient and tumor characteristics as well as the screening technique and frequency. The interval cancer rate is an important metric by which the effectiveness of screening may be assessed and may serve as a surrogate for mortality benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly M Ray
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Medical Center, 1825 4th Street, L3185, Box 4034, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sorin V, Bufman H, Bernstein-Molho R, Faermann R, Friedman E, Raskin D, Balint Lahat N, Sklair-Levy M. Breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 pathogenic sequence variant carriers during pregnancy and lactation. Clin Imaging 2024; 111:110189. [PMID: 38759599 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Women harboring germline BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic sequence variants (PSVs) are at an increased risk for breast cancer. There are no established guidelines for screening during pregnancy and lactation in BRCA carriers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of whole-breast ultrasound (US) screening in pregnant and lactating BRCA PSV carriers. METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of BRCA PSV carriers between 2014 and 2020, with follow-up until 2021. Associations between imaging intervals, number of examinations performed and pregnancy-associated breast cancers (PABCs) were examined. PABCs and cancers diagnosed at follow-up were evaluated and characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Overall 212 BRCA PSV carriers were included. Mean age was 33.6 years (SD 3.93, range 25-43 years). During 274 screening periods at pregnancy and lactation, eight (2.9 %) PABCs were diagnosed. An additional eight cancers were diagnosed at follow-up. Three out of eight (37.5 %) PABCs were diagnosed by US, whereas clinical breast examination (n = 3), mammography (n = 1) and MRI (n = 1) accounted for the other PACB diagnoses. One PABC was missed by US. The interval from negative imaging to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for PABCs compared with cancers diagnosed at follow-up (3.96 ± 2.14 vs. 11.2 ± 4.46 months, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION In conclusion, pregnant BRCA PSV carriers should not delay screening despite challenges like altered breast tissue and hesitancy towards mammography. If no alternatives exist, whole-breast ultrasound can be used. For lactating and postpartum women, a regular screening routine alternating between mammography and MRI is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Sorin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
| | - Hila Bufman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Rinat Bernstein-Molho
- The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel; Department of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Renata Faermann
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel; Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; The Meirav High Risk Clinic, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Daniel Raskin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Nora Balint Lahat
- The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel; Department of Pathology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Miri Sklair-Levy
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McDonald ES, Scheel JR, Lewin AA, Weinstein SP, Dodelzon K, Dogan BE, Fitzpatrick A, Kuzmiak CM, Newell MS, Paulis LV, Pilewskie M, Salkowski LR, Silva HC, Sharpe RE, Specht JM, Ulaner GA, Slanetz PJ. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:S168-S202. [PMID: 38823943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
As the proportion of women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer increases, the role of imaging for staging and surveillance purposes should be determined based on evidence-based guidelines. It is important to understand the indications for extent of disease evaluation and staging, as unnecessary imaging can delay care and even result in adverse outcomes. In asymptomatic patients that received treatment for curative intent, there is no role for imaging to screen for distant recurrence. Routine surveillance with an annual 2-D mammogram and/or tomosynthesis is recommended to detect an in-breast recurrence or a new primary breast cancer in women with a history of breast cancer, and MRI is increasingly used as an additional screening tool in this population, especially in women with dense breasts. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S McDonald
- Research Author, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John R Scheel
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| | - Alana A Lewin
- Panel Chair, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Susan P Weinstein
- Panel Vice Chair, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Basak E Dogan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amy Fitzpatrick
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Primary care physician
| | | | - Mary S Newell
- Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; RADS Committee
| | | | - Melissa Pilewskie
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Society of Surgical Oncology
| | - Lonie R Salkowski
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - H Colleen Silva
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; American College of Surgeons
| | | | - Jennifer M Specht
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; American Society of Clinical Oncology
| | - Gary A Ulaner
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, California; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Priscilla J Slanetz
- Specialty Chair, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma S, White C, Appavoo S, Yong-Hing CJ. Optimizing Patient-Centered Care in Breast Imaging: Strategies for Improving Patient Experience. Acad Radiol 2024:S1076-6332(24)00278-2. [PMID: 38760272 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sonali Sharma
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Cheryl White
- Community Access to Ventilation Information (CAVI), Toronto, Canada
| | - Shushiela Appavoo
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2A2.41 WMC 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Charlotte J Yong-Hing
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Diagnostic Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hamel C, Avard B, Flegg C, Freitas V, Hapgood C, Kulkarni S, Lenkov P, Seidler M. Canadian Association of Radiologists Breast Disease Imaging Referral Guideline. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024; 75:287-295. [PMID: 37724018 DOI: 10.1177/08465371231192391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Breast Disease Expert Panel consists of breast imaging radiologists, a high-risk breast clinician, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 20 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a systematic rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 30 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 69 recommendation statements across the 20 scenarios. This guideline presents the methods of development and the recommendations for referring asymptomatic individuals, symptomatic patients, and other scenarios requiring imaging of the breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candyce Hamel
- Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Barb Avard
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carolyn Flegg
- Irene and Les Dubé Breast Health Centre, Saskatoon City Hospital, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Pam Lenkov
- Women's College Hospital, Breast Clinic and Sunnybrook Hospital, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew Seidler
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Klassen CL, Viers LD, Ghosh K. Following the High-Risk Patient: Breast Cancer Risk-Based Screening. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3154-3159. [PMID: 38302622 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14957-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer occurring in women in the USA today, and accounts for more than 40,000 deaths annually (Giaquinto in CA Cancer J Clin 72: 524-541, 2022). While breast cancer survival has improved over the past decades, incidence has increased, and diagnoses are being made at younger ages. This emphasizes the importance of risk evaluation, accurate prediction, and effective mitigation and risk reduction strategies. Enhanced screening can help detect cancers at an earlier stage, thus improving morbidity and mortality. This review addresses the recognition of women at high-risk for BC and monitoring strategies for those at high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine L Klassen
- Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic- Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Lyndsay D Viers
- Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic- Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Karthik Ghosh
- Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic- Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pötsch N, Sodano C, Baltzer PAT. Performance of Diffusion-weighted Imaging-based Noncontrast MRI Protocols for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2024; 311:e232508. [PMID: 38771179 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is increasingly recognized as a powerful diagnostic tool and tested alternative to contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis that assesses the diagnostic performance of DWI-based noncontrast MRI protocols (ncDWI) for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search in PubMed for articles published from January 1985 to September 2023 was performed. Studies were excluded if they investigated malignant lesions or selected patients and/or lesions only, used DWI as an adjunct technique to CE MRI, or were technical studies. Statistical analysis included pooling of diagnostic accuracy and investigating between-study heterogeneity. Additional subgroup comparisons of ncDWI to CE MRI and standard mammography were performed. Results A total of 28 studies were included, with 4406 lesions (1676 malignant, 2730 benign) in 3787 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ncDWI were 86.5% (95% CI: 81.4, 90.4) and 83.5% (95% CI: 76.9, 88.6), and both measures presented with high between-study heterogeneity (I 2 = 81.6% and 91.6%, respectively; P < .001). CE MRI (18 studies) had higher sensitivity than ncDWI (95.1% [95% CI: 92.9, 96.7] vs 88.9% [95% CI: 82.4, 93.1], P = .004) at similar specificity (82.2% [95% CI: 75.0, 87.7] vs 82.0% [95% CI: 74.8, 87.5], P = .97). Compared with ncDWI, mammography (five studies) showed no evidence of a statistical difference for sensitivity (80.3% [95% CI: 56.3, 93.3] vs 56.7%; [95% CI: 41.9, 70.4], respectively; P = .09) or specificity (89.9% [95% CI: 85.5, 93.1] vs 90% [95% CI: 61.3, 98.1], respectively; P = .62), but ncDWI had a higher area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (0.93 [95% CI: 0.91, 0.95] vs 0.78 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.81], P < .001). Conclusion A direct comparison with CE MRI showed a modestly lower sensitivity at similar specificity for ncDWI, and higher diagnostic performance indexes for ncDWI than standard mammography. Heterogeneity was high, thus these results must be interpreted with caution. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kataoka and Iima in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Pötsch
- From the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna and General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudia Sodano
- From the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna and General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- From the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna and General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Singh A, Singh K, Sharma A, Sharma S, Batra K, Joshi K, Singh B, Kaur K, Chadha R, Bedi PMS. Mechanistic insight and structure activity relationship of isatin-based derivatives in development of anti-breast cancer agents. Mol Cell Biochem 2024; 479:1165-1198. [PMID: 37329491 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-023-04786-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is most common in women and most difficult to manage that causes highest mortality and morbidity among all diseases and posing significant threat to mankind as well as burden on healthcare system. In 2020, 2.3 million women were diagnosed with breast cancer and it was responsible for 685,000 deaths globally, suggesting the severity of this disease. Apart from that, relapsing of cases and resistance among available anticancer drugs along with associated side effects making the situation even worse. Therefore, it is a global emergency to develop potent and safer antibreast cancer agents. Isatin is most versatile and flying one nucleus which is an integral competent and various anticancer agent in clinical practice and widely used by various research groups around the globe for development of novel, potent, and safer antibreast cancer agents. This review will shed light on the structural insights and antiproliferative potential of various isatin-based derivatives developed for targeting breast cancer in last three decades that will help researchers in design and development of novel, potent, and safer isatin-based antibreast cancer agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atamjit Singh
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.
| | - Karanvir Singh
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India
| | - Aman Sharma
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India
| | - Sambhav Sharma
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India
| | - Kevin Batra
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India
| | - Kaustubh Joshi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India
| | - Brahmjeet Singh
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India
| | - Kirandeep Kaur
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India
| | - Renu Chadha
- University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India
| | - Preet Mohinder Singh Bedi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.
- Drug and Pollution Testing Laboratory, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zafar N, Wolf AB, Kepniss JL, Teal AC, Brem RF. Effectiveness of Community Education for Breast Cancer Screening. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2024; 6:166-174. [PMID: 38412358 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Screening based on individual risk factors results in detection of earlier, more curable breast cancer. There is expectation that improved public education about the importance of personalized screening will result in earlier diagnoses and reduced breast cancer mortality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of community education on patient perceptions about risk-based screening. METHODS This study is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant and institutional review board exempt. A standardized curriculum was used by radiologists and experts to conduct nine 1-hour patient education sessions between October 2018 and January 2019 about breast cancer risk factors and screening options. Patient participants completed voluntary, anonymous pre-event and post event surveys to determine if the presented educational program led to attitude changes. Survey results were summarized using statistical analysis including mean, median, range, and percentage of participants responding and comparison of pre- and post event fear and anxiety. RESULTS Of 336 education session participants, 59.5% (200/336) completed the pre-event and 44.3% (149/336) completed the post event surveys, Respondents reported decreased anxiety and fear regarding breast cancer screening following educational sessions, with 36.1% (64/178) reporting anxiety pre-event compared to 23.3% (31/133) post event, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .96). Additionally, 64.7% (55/85) of participants stated they were more likely to schedule breast cancer screening based on individual risk factors, and 98.0% (145/148) of participants reported increased knowledge on post event surveys. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the importance and effectiveness of community-based educational programs in increasing knowledge of risk-based screening and potentially reducing anxiety related to screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Zafar
- Breast Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
- Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| | | | - Julia L Kepniss
- Brem Foundation to Defeat Breast Cancer, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Rachel F Brem
- Breast Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
- Brem Foundation to Defeat Breast Cancer, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abu Abeelh E, AbuAbeileh Z. Comparative Effectiveness of Mammography, Ultrasound, and MRI in the Detection of Breast Carcinoma in Dense Breast Tissue: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e59054. [PMID: 38800325 PMCID: PMC11128098 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to critically assess the effectiveness of mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast carcinoma within dense breast tissue. An exhaustive search of contemporary literature was undertaken, focusing on the diagnostic accuracy, false positive and negative rates, and clinical implications of the aforementioned imaging modalities. Each modality was assessed in isolation and side by side against the others to draw comparative inferences. While mammography remains a foundational imaging modality, its effectiveness waned within the context of dense breast tissue. Ultrasound demonstrated a strong differentiation prowess, especially among specific demographic cohorts. MRI, despite its exceptional precision and differentiation capabilities, exhibited a tendency for slightly elevated false positive rates. No single modality emerged as singularly superior for all cases. Instead, an integrated approach, combining the strengths of each modality based on individual patient profiles and clinical scenarios, is recommended. This tailored approach ensures optimized detection rates and minimizes diagnostic ambiguities, underscoring the significance of individualized patient care in the field of diagnostic radiology.
Collapse
|
12
|
Berg WA, Berg JM, Bandos AI, Vargo A, Chough DM, Lu AH, Ganott MA, Kelly AE, Nair BE, Hartman JY, Waheed U, Hakim CM, Harnist KS, Reginella RF, Shinde DD, Carlin BA, Cohen CS, Wallace LP, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML. Addition of Contrast-enhanced Mammography to Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Prospective TOCEM Trial Interim Analysis. Radiology 2024; 311:e231991. [PMID: 38687218 PMCID: PMC11070607 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Background Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is often inadequate for screening women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). The ongoing prospective Tomosynthesis or Contrast-Enhanced Mammography, or TOCEM, trial includes three annual screenings with both DBT and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Purpose To perform interim assessment of cancer yield, stage, and recall rate when CEM is added to DBT in women with PHBC. Materials and Methods From October 2019 to December 2022, two radiologists interpreted both examinations: Observer 1 reviewed DBT first and then CEM, and observer 2 reviewed CEM first and then DBT. Effects of adding CEM to DBT on incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR), cancer type and node status, recall rate, and other performance characteristics of the primary radiologist decisions were assessed. Results Among the participants (mean age at entry, 63.6 years ± 9.6 [SD]), 1273, 819, and 227 women with PHBC completed year 1, 2, and 3 screening, respectively. For observer 1, year 1 cancer yield was 20 of 1273 (15.7 per 1000 screenings) for DBT and 29 of 1273 (22.8 per 1000 screenings; ICDR, 7.1 per 1000 screenings [95% CI: 3.2, 13.4]) for DBT plus CEM (P < .001). Year 2 plus 3 cancer yield was four of 1046 (3.8 per 1000 screenings) for DBT and eight of 1046 (7.6 per 1000 screenings; ICDR, 3.8 per 1000 screenings [95% CI: 1.0, 7.6]) for DBT plus CEM (P = .001). Year 1 recall rate for observer 1 was 103 of 1273 (8.1%) for (incidence) DBT alone and 187 of 1273 (14.7%) for DBT plus CEM (difference = 84 of 1273, 6.6% [95% CI: 5.3, 8.1]; P < .001). Year 2 plus 3 recall rate was 40 of 1046 (3.8%) for DBT and 92 of 1046 (8.8%) for DBT plus CEM (difference = 52 of 1046, 5.0% [95% CI: 3.7, 6.3]; P < .001). In 18 breasts with cancer detected only at CEM after integration of both observers, 13 (72%) cancers were invasive (median tumor size, 0.6 cm) and eight of nine (88%) with staging were N0. Among 1883 screenings with adequate reference standard, there were three interval cancers (one at the scar, two in axillae). Conclusion CEM added to DBT increased early breast cancer detection each year in women with PHBC, with an accompanying approximately 5.0%-6.6% recall rate increase. Clinical trial registration no. NCT04085510 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendie A. Berg
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Jeremy M. Berg
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Andriy I. Bandos
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Adrienne Vargo
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Denise M. Chough
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Amy H. Lu
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Marie A. Ganott
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Amy E. Kelly
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Bronwyn E. Nair
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Jamie Y. Hartman
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | | | - Christiane M. Hakim
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Kimberly S. Harnist
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Ruthane F. Reginella
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Dilip D. Shinde
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Bea A. Carlin
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Cathy S. Cohen
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Luisa P. Wallace
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Jules H. Sumkin
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| | - Margarita L. Zuley
- From the Departments of Radiology (W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L.,
M.A.G., A.E.K., B.E.N., J.Y.H., U.W., C.M.H., K.S.H., R.F.R., D.D.S., B.A.C.,
C.S.C., L.P.W., J.H.S., M.L.Z.) and Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.),
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA
15213; Department of Radiology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa
(W.A.B., A.V., D.M.C., A.H.L., M.A.G., C.M.H., D.D.S., C.S.C., J.H.S., M.L.Z.);
and Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public
Health, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.I.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang Z, Ye S, Bernhardt SM, Nelson HD, Velie EM, Borges VF, Woodward ER, Evans DGR, Schedin PJ. Postpartum Breast Cancer and Survival in Women With Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e247421. [PMID: 38639936 PMCID: PMC11031688 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance In young-onset breast cancer (YOBC), a diagnosis within 5 to 10 years of childbirth is associated with increased mortality. Women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) are more likely to be diagnosed with BC at younger ages, but the impact of childbirth on mortality is unknown. Objective To determine whether time between most recent childbirth and BC diagnosis is associated with mortality among patients with YOBC and germline BRCA1/2 PVs. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study included women with germline BRCA1/2 PVs diagnosed with stage I to III BC at age 45 years or younger between 1950 and 2021 in the United Kingdom, who were followed up until November 2021. Data were analyzed from December 3, 2021, to November 29, 2023. Exposure Time between most recent childbirth and subsequent BC diagnosis, with recent childbirth defined as 0 to less than 10 years, further delineated to 0 to less than 5 years and 5 to less than 10 years. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, censored at 20 years after YOBC diagnosis. Mortality of nulliparous women was compared with the recent post partum groups and the 10 or more years post partum group. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were adjusted for age, tumor stage, and further stratified by tumor estrogen receptor (ER) and BRCA gene status. Results Among 903 women with BRCA PVs (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 34.7 [6.1] years; mean [SD] follow-up, 10.8 [9.8] years), 419 received a BC diagnosis 0 to less than 10 years after childbirth, including 228 women diagnosed less than 5 years after childbirth and 191 women diagnosed 5 to less than 10 years after childbirth. Increased all-cause mortality was observed in women diagnosed within 5 to less than 10 years post partum (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56 [95% CI, 1.05-2.30]) compared with nulliparous women and women diagnosed 10 or more years after childbirth, suggesting a transient duration of postpartum risk. Risk of mortality was greater for women with ER-positive BC in the less than 5 years post partum group (HR, 2.35 [95% CI, 1.02-5.42]) and ER-negative BC in the 5 to less than 10 years post partum group (HR, 3.12 [95% CI, 1.22-7.97]) compared with the nulliparous group. Delineated by BRCA1 or BRCA2, mortality in the 5 to less than 10 years post partum group was significantly increased, but only for BRCA1 carriers (HR, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.15-3.58]). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that YOBC with germline BRCA PVs was associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality if diagnosed within 10 years after last childbirth, with risk highest for ER-positive BC diagnosed less than 5 years post partum, and for ER-negative BC diagnosed 5 to less than 10 years post partum. BRCA1 carriers were at highest risk for poor prognosis when diagnosed at 5 to less than 10 years post partum. No such associations were observed for BRCA2 carriers. These results should inform genetic counseling, prevention, and treatment strategies for BRCA PV carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenzhen Zhang
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Shangyuan Ye
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Sarah M. Bernhardt
- Department of Cell, Developmental & Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Heidi D. Nelson
- Kaiser Permanente Bernard D. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
| | - Ellen M. Velie
- Zilber College of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Virginia F. Borges
- Young Women’s Breast Cancer Translational Program, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Emma R. Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution Infection and Genomic Science, St Mary’s Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Breast Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D. Gareth R. Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution Infection and Genomic Science, St Mary’s Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Breast Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Pepper J. Schedin
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- Department of Cell, Developmental & Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hussain S, Ali M, Naseem U, Nezhadmoghadam F, Jatoi MA, Gulliver TA, Tamez-Peña JG. Breast cancer risk prediction using machine learning: a systematic review. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1343627. [PMID: 38571502 PMCID: PMC10987819 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1343627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related fatalities among women worldwide. Conventional screening and risk prediction models primarily rely on demographic and patient clinical history to devise policies and estimate likelihood. However, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in the development of personalized risk models. These models leverage individual patient information obtained from medical imaging and associated reports. In this systematic review, we thoroughly investigated the existing literature on the application of DL to digital mammography, radiomics, genomics, and clinical information for breast cancer risk assessment. We critically analyzed these studies and discussed their findings, highlighting the promising prospects of DL techniques for breast cancer risk prediction. Additionally, we explored ongoing research initiatives and potential future applications of AI-driven approaches to further improve breast cancer risk prediction, thereby facilitating more effective screening and personalized risk management strategies. Objective and methods This study presents a comprehensive overview of imaging and non-imaging features used in breast cancer risk prediction using traditional and AI models. The features reviewed in this study included imaging, radiomics, genomics, and clinical features. Furthermore, this survey systematically presented DL methods developed for breast cancer risk prediction, aiming to be useful for both beginners and advanced-level researchers. Results A total of 600 articles were identified, 20 of which met the set criteria and were selected. Parallel benchmarking of DL models, along with natural language processing (NLP) applied to imaging and non-imaging features, could allow clinicians and researchers to gain greater awareness as they consider the clinical deployment or development of new models. This review provides a comprehensive guide for understanding the current status of breast cancer risk assessment using AI. Conclusion This study offers investigators a different perspective on the use of AI for breast cancer risk prediction, incorporating numerous imaging and non-imaging features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadam Hussain
- School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Mansoor Ali
- School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Usman Naseem
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Munsif Ali Jatoi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Salim Habib University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - T. Aaron Gulliver
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Camps-Herrero J, Pijnappel R, Balleyguier C. MR-contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) for follow-up of breast cancer patients: a "pros and cons" debate. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10684-w. [PMID: 38488968 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10684-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC) are at an increased risk of either a local recurrence or a new primary breast cancer. Thus, surveillance is essential for the detection of recurrent disease at the earliest possible stage, allowing for prompt treatment, and potentially improving overall survival. Nowadays, mammography follow-up is the only surveillance imaging technique recommended by international guidelines. Nevertheless, sensitivity of mammography is lower after breast cancer treatment, particularly during the first 5 years, due to increased density or post-treatment changes. Contrast-enhanced breast imaging techniques, such as MRI or contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), are very sensitive to detect malignant enhancement, especially in dense breasts. This Special Report will provide arguments in favor of and against breast cancer follow-up with MRI or CEM, in a debate style between experts in Breast Imaging. Finally, the scientific points of pros and cons arguments will be summarized to help objectively decide the best follow-up strategy for women with a personal history of breast cancer. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A personalized approach to follow-up imaging after conservative breast cancer treatment could optimize patient outcomes, using mammography as a baseline for most patients, and MRI or CEM selectively in patients with higher risks for a recurrence. KEY POINTS: • Women with a personal history of breast cancer are at an increased risk of either a local recurrence or a new primary breast cancer. • Breast cancer survivors may benefit from additional imaging with MRI/CEM, in case of increased risk of a second breast cancer, with dense breasts or a cancer diagnosis before age 50 years. • As survival after local recurrence seems to depend on the initial stage at diagnosis, imaging should be more focused on detecting tumors in the earliest stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ruud Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Corinne Balleyguier
- Imaging Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
- BIOMAPS, UMR 1281, Université Paris-Saclay, 94800, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Iacob R, Iacob ER, Stoicescu ER, Ghenciu DM, Cocolea DM, Constantinescu A, Ghenciu LA, Manolescu DL. Evaluating the Role of Breast Ultrasound in Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:262. [PMID: 38534536 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11030262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer, affecting both genders, but mostly females, exhibits shifting demographic patterns, with an increasing incidence in younger age groups. Early identification through mammography, clinical examinations, and breast self-exams enhances treatment efficacy, but challenges persist in low- and medium-income countries due to limited imaging resources. This review assesses the feasibility of employing breast ultrasound as the primary breast cancer screening method, particularly in resource-constrained regions. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study examines 52 publications from the last five years. Breast ultrasound, distinct from mammography, offers advantages like radiation-free imaging, suitability for repeated screenings, and preference for younger populations. Real-time imaging and dense breast tissue evaluation enhance sensitivity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. However, limitations include reduced specificity, operator dependence, and challenges in detecting microcalcifications. Automatic breast ultrasound (ABUS) addresses some issues but faces constraints like potential inaccuracies and limited microcalcification detection. The analysis underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to breast cancer screening, emphasizing international collaboration and addressing limitations, especially in resource-constrained settings. Despite advancements, notably with ABUS, the primary goal is to contribute insights for optimizing breast cancer screening globally, improving outcomes, and mitigating the impact of this debilitating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana Iacob
- Department of Anatomy and Embriology, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Doctoral School, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Faculty of Mechanics, Field of Applied Engineering Sciences, Specialization Statistical Methods and Techniques in Health and Clinical Research, 'Politehnica' University Timișoara, Mihai Viteazul Boulevard No. 1, 300222 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Emil Radu Iacob
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Emil Robert Stoicescu
- Doctoral School, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Faculty of Mechanics, Field of Applied Engineering Sciences, Specialization Statistical Methods and Techniques in Health and Clinical Research, 'Politehnica' University Timișoara, Mihai Viteazul Boulevard No. 1, 300222 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Research Center for Pharmaco-Toxicological Evaluations, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Delius Mario Ghenciu
- Doctoral School, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Daiana Marina Cocolea
- Doctoral School, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Amalia Constantinescu
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Laura Andreea Ghenciu
- Discipline of Pathophysiology, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Diana Luminita Manolescu
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
- Center for Research and Innovation in Precision Medicine of Respiratory Diseases (CRIPMRD), 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pleasant V. Gynecologic Care of Black Breast Cancer Survivors. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2024; 16:84-97. [PMID: 38725438 PMCID: PMC11081127 DOI: 10.1007/s12609-024-00527-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Black patients suffer from breast cancer-related racial health disparities, which could have implications on their gynecologic care. This review explores considerations in the gynecologic care of Black breast cancer survivors. Recent Findings Black people have a higher risk of leiomyoma and endometrial cancer, which could confound bleeding patterns such as in the setting of tamoxifen use. As Black people are more likely to have early-onset breast cancer, this may have implications on long-term bone and heart health. Black patients may be more likely to have menopausal symptoms at baseline and as a result of breast cancer treatment. Furthermore, Black patients are less likely to utilize assisted reproductive technology and genetic testing services. Summary It is important for healthcare providers to be well-versed in the intersections of breast cancer and gynecologic care. Black breast cancer survivors may have unique considerations for which practitioners should be knowledgeable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Versha Pleasant
- University of Michigan Hospital, Mott Children & Women’s Hospital, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ameri MA, Shanbhag NM, Bin Sumaida A, Ansari J, Trad DA, Dawoud EA, Balaraj K. Oncotype DX in Breast Cancer Management: Insights and Outcomes From the United Arab Emirates. Cureus 2024; 16:e56535. [PMID: 38516286 PMCID: PMC10955450 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer remains the most significant cancer affecting women worldwide, with an increasing incidence, especially in developing regions. The introduction of genomic tests like Oncotype DX has revolutionized personalized treatment, allowing for more tailored approaches to therapy. This study focuses on the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, aiming to assess the predictive accuracy of the Oncotype DX test in categorizing patients based on recurrence risk. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 95 breast cancer patients diagnosed at Tawam Hospital between 2013 and 2017 who underwent Oncotype DX testing. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and Oncotype DX scores were collected. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the chi-square goodness of fit test assessing the model's adequacy. Results The cohort's age range was 27-71 years, with a mean age of 50, indicating a significant concentration of cases in the early post-menopausal period. The Oncotype DX analysis classified 55 patients (57.9%) as low risk, 29 (30.5%) as medium risk, and 11 (11.6%) as high risk of recurrence. The majority, 73 patients (76.8%), did not receive chemotherapy, highlighting the test's impact on treatment decisions. The survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in recurrence rates across the Oncotype DX risk categories (p = 0.268231). Conclusion The Oncotype DX test provides a valuable genomic approach to categorizing breast cancer patients by recurrence risk in the UAE. While the test influences treatment decisions, particularly the use of chemotherapy, this study did not find a significant correlation between Oncotype DX risk categories and actual recurrence events. These findings underscore the need for further research to optimize the use of genomic testing in the UAE's diverse patient population and enhance personalized treatment strategies in breast cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nandan M Shanbhag
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, ARE
- Oncology/Radiation Oncology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, ARE
- Oncology/Palliative Care, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, ARE
| | | | | | | | | | - Khalid Balaraj
- Oncology/Radiation Oncology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, ARE
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jing X, Dorrius MD, Zheng S, Wielema M, Oudkerk M, Sijens PE, van Ooijen PMA. Localization of contrast-enhanced breast lesions in ultrafast screening MRI using deep convolutional neural networks. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:2084-2092. [PMID: 37658141 PMCID: PMC10873226 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10184-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a deep learning-based method for contrast-enhanced breast lesion detection in ultrafast screening MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 837 breast MRI exams of 488 consecutive patients were included. Lesion's location was independently annotated in the maximum intensity projection (MIP) image of the last time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST) sequence for each individual breast, resulting in 265 lesions (190 benign, 75 malignant) in 163 breasts (133 women). YOLOv5 models were fine-tuned using training sets containing the same number of MIP images with and without lesions. A long short-term memory (LSTM) network was employed to help reduce false positive predictions. The integrated system was then evaluated on test sets containing enriched uninvolved breasts during cross-validation to mimic the performance in a screening scenario. RESULTS In five-fold cross-validation, the YOLOv5x model showed a sensitivity of 0.95, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99, with 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 false positive per breast, respectively. The LSTM network reduced 15.5% of the false positive prediction from the YOLO model, and the positive predictive value was increased from 0.22 to 0.25. CONCLUSIONS A fine-tuned YOLOv5x model can detect breast lesions on ultrafast MRI with high sensitivity in a screening population, and the output of the model could be further refined by an LSTM network to reduce the amount of false positive predictions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The proposed integrated system would make the ultrafast MRI screening process more effective by assisting radiologists in prioritizing suspicious examinations and supporting the diagnostic workup. KEY POINTS • Deep convolutional neural networks could be utilized to automatically pinpoint breast lesions in screening MRI with high sensitivity. • False positive predictions significantly increased when the detection models were tested on highly unbalanced test sets with more normal scans. • Dynamic enhancement patterns of breast lesions during contrast inflow learned by the long short-term memory networks helped to reduce false positive predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueping Jing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Data Science Center in Health (DASH), Machine Learning Lab, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Monique D Dorrius
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sunyi Zheng
- School of Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Biomedical Image Analysis Lab, Westlake University, No.18 Shilongshan, Road Cloud Town, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310024, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mirjam Wielema
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, and Institute of Diagnostic Accuracy, Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul E Sijens
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M A van Ooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Data Science Center in Health (DASH), Machine Learning Lab, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zaki-Metias KM, Wang H, Tawil TF, Miles EB, Deptula L, Agrawal P, Davis KM, Spalluto LB, Seely JM, Yong-Hing CJ. Breast Cancer Screening in the Intermediate-Risk Population: Falling Through the Cracks? Can Assoc Radiol J 2024:8465371241234544. [PMID: 38420877 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241234544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer screening guidelines vary for women at intermediate risk (15%-20% lifetime risk) for developing breast cancer across jurisdictions. Currently available risk assessment models have differing strengths and weaknesses, creating difficulty and ambiguity in selecting the most appropriate model to utilize. Clarifying which model to utilize in individual circumstances may help determine the best screening guidelines to use for each individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin M Zaki-Metias
- Department of Radiology, Trinity Health Oakland Hospital/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Pontiac, MI, USA
| | - Huijuan Wang
- Department of Radiology, Trinity Health Oakland Hospital/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Pontiac, MI, USA
| | - Tima F Tawil
- Department of Radiology, Trinity Health Oakland Hospital/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Pontiac, MI, USA
| | - Eda B Miles
- Department of Internal Medicine, Arnot Ogden Medical Center, Elmira, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Deptula
- Ross University School of Medicine, Bridgetown, Barbados
| | - Pooja Agrawal
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katie M Davis
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lucy B Spalluto
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Veterans Health Administration, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jean M Seely
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Charlotte J Yong-Hing
- Diagnostic Imaging, BC Cancer Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Austin JD, Jenkins SM, Suman VJ, Raygoza JP, Ridgeway JL, Norman A, Gonzalez C, Hernandez V, Ghosh K, Patel BK, Vachon CM. Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions Among Underserved, Hispanic Women: Implications for Risk-Based Approaches to Screening. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2024:10.1007/s40615-024-01949-7. [PMID: 38383839 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-01949-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding factors that shape breast cancer risk perceptions is essential for implementing risk-based approaches to breast cancer detection and prevention. This study aimed to assess multilevel factors, including prior screening behavior, shaping underserved, Hispanic women's perceived risk for breast cancer. METHODS Secondary analysis of survey data from Hispanic women (N = 1325, 92% Spanish speaking, 64% < 50) enrolled in a large randomized controlled trial. Analyses were performed in two cohorts to account for the role of age on screening guideline recommendations (< 50 and 50 +). For each cohort, we examined differences in three common measures of perceived risk of breast cancer (percent lifetime, ordinal lifetime, comparative) by participant factors with chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis tests, as appropriate. Multivariate analyses examined the association between mammography history with percent perceived lifetime risk (outcome > 10 vs ≤ 10%). RESULTS Overall, 75% reported a lifetime risk between 0 and 10%, 96% rated their ordinal risk as "not high," and 50% rated their comparative risk as "much lower." Women < 50 with a family history of breast cancer reported significantly higher levels of perceived risk across all three measures. Among women 50 + , those reporting lower levels of perceived risk were significantly more likely to be Spanish speaking. No significant association was observed between mammography history and percent lifetime risk of breast cancer. CONCLUSION Factors shaping breast cancer risk perceptions differ by age. Prior screening may play less of role in constructing risk perceptions. Research is needed to develop culturally and linguistically appropriate strategies to improve implementation of risk-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica D Austin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
| | - Sarah M Jenkins
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Vera J Suman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jhenitza P Raygoza
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Jennifer L Ridgeway
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Aaron Norman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Crystal Gonzalez
- Department of Integrated Nutrition Services and Collaborative Research, Mountain Park Health Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Valentina Hernandez
- Department of Integrated Nutrition Services and Collaborative Research, Mountain Park Health Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Karthik Ghosh
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bhavika K Patel
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Celine M Vachon
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang L. Mammography with deep learning for breast cancer detection. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1281922. [PMID: 38410114 PMCID: PMC10894909 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1281922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
X-ray mammography is currently considered the golden standard method for breast cancer screening, however, it has limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. With the rapid advancements in deep learning techniques, it is possible to customize mammography for each patient, providing more accurate information for risk assessment, prognosis, and treatment planning. This paper aims to study the recent achievements of deep learning-based mammography for breast cancer detection and classification. This review paper highlights the potential of deep learning-assisted X-ray mammography in improving the accuracy of breast cancer screening. While the potential benefits are clear, it is essential to address the challenges associated with implementing this technology in clinical settings. Future research should focus on refining deep learning algorithms, ensuring data privacy, improving model interpretability, and establishing generalizability to successfully integrate deep learning-assisted mammography into routine breast cancer screening programs. It is hoped that the research findings will assist investigators, engineers, and clinicians in developing more effective breast imaging tools that provide accurate diagnosis, sensitivity, and specificity for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lulu Wang
- Biomedical Device Innovation Center, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wilkerson AD, Gentle CK, Ortega C, Al-Hilli Z. Disparities in Breast Cancer Care-How Factors Related to Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Drive Inequity. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:462. [PMID: 38391837 PMCID: PMC10887556 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12040462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer survival has increased significantly over the last few decades due to more effective strategies for prevention and risk modification, advancements in imaging detection, screening, and multimodal treatment algorithms. However, many have observed disparities in benefits derived from such improvements across populations and demographic groups. This review summarizes published works that contextualize modern disparities in breast cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and presents potential strategies for reducing disparities. We conducted searches for studies that directly investigated and/or reported disparities in breast cancer prevention, detection, or treatment. Demographic factors, social determinants of health, and inequitable healthcare delivery may impede the ability of individuals and communities to employ risk-mitigating behaviors and prevention strategies. The disparate access to quality screening and timely diagnosis experienced by various groups poses significant hurdles to optimal care and survival. Finally, barriers to access and inequitable healthcare delivery patterns reinforce inequitable application of standards of care. Cumulatively, these disparities underlie notable differences in the incidence, severity, and survival of breast cancers. Efforts toward mitigation will require collaborative approaches and partnerships between communities, governments, and healthcare organizations, which must be considered equal stakeholders in the fight for equity in breast cancer care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avia D Wilkerson
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Corey K Gentle
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Camila Ortega
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Zahraa Al-Hilli
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Breast Center, Integrated Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Su YR, Sprague BL, Stout NK, Onega T, O’Meara ES, Henderson LM, Tosteson ANA, Wernli K, Miglioretti DL. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:249-257. [PMID: 37897090 PMCID: PMC10852604 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Examining screening outcomes by breast density for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with or without mammography could inform discussions about supplemental MRI in women with dense breasts. METHODS We evaluated 52 237 women aged 40-79 years who underwent 2611 screening MRIs alone and 6518 supplemental MRI plus mammography pairs propensity score-matched to 65 810 screening mammograms. Rates per 1000 examinations of interval, advanced, and screen-detected early stage invasive cancers and false-positive recall and biopsy recommendation were estimated by breast density (nondense = almost entirely fatty or scattered fibroglandular densities; dense = heterogeneously/extremely dense) adjusting for registry, examination year, age, race and ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, and prior breast biopsy. RESULTS Screen-detected early stage cancer rates were statistically higher for MRI plus mammography vs mammography for nondense (9.3 vs 2.9; difference = 6.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5 to 10.3) and dense (7.5 vs 3.5; difference = 4.0, 95% CI = 1.4 to 6.7) breasts and for MRI vs MRI plus mammography for dense breasts (19.2 vs 7.5; difference = 11.7, 95% CI = 4.6 to 18.8). Interval rates were not statistically different for MRI plus mammography vs mammography for nondense (0.8 vs 0.5; difference = 0.4, 95% CI = -0.8 to 1.6) or dense breasts (1.5 vs 1.4; difference = 0.0, 95% CI = -1.2 to 1.3), nor were advanced cancer rates. Interval rates were not statistically different for MRI vs MRI plus mammography for nondense (2.6 vs 0.8; difference = 1.8 (95% CI = -2.0 to 5.5) or dense breasts (0.6 vs 1.5; difference = -0.9, 95% CI = -2.5 to 0.7), nor were advanced cancer rates. False-positive recall and biopsy recommendation rates were statistically higher for MRI groups than mammography alone. CONCLUSION MRI screening with or without mammography increased rates of screen-detected early stage cancer and false-positives for women with dense breasts without a concomitant decrease in advanced or interval cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla Kerlikowske
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Weiwei Zhu
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yu-Ru Su
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian L Sprague
- Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Natasha K Stout
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tracy Onega
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ellen S O’Meara
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Louise M Henderson
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Dartmouth Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Karen Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Diana L Miglioretti
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Youn I, Biswas D, Hippe DS, Winter AM, Kazerouni AS, Javid SH, Lee JM, Rahbar H, Partridge SC. Diagnostic Performance of Point-of-Care Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measures to Reduce Biopsy in Breast Lesions at MRI: Clinical Validation. Radiology 2024; 310:e232313. [PMID: 38349238 PMCID: PMC10902596 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Background The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Group multicenter A6702 trial identified an optimal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cutoff to potentially reduce biopsies by 21% without affecting sensitivity. Whether this performance can be achieved in clinical settings has not yet been established. Purpose To validate the performance of point-of-care ADC measurements with the A6702 trial ADC cutoff for reducing unnecessary biopsies in lesions detected at breast MRI. Materials and Methods Consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from May 2015 to January 2019 at a single medical center and showing biopsy-confirmed Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 lesions, without ipsilateral cancer, were identified. Point-of-care lesion ADC measurements collected at clinical interpretation were retrospectively evaluated. MRI examinations included axial T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences. Sensitivity and biopsy reduction rates were calculated by applying the A6702 optimal (ADC, 1.53 × 10-3 mm2/sec) and alternate conservative (1.68 × 10-3 mm2/sec) cutoffs. Lesion pathologic outcomes were the reference standard. To assess reproducibility, one radiologist repeated ADC measurements, and agreement was summarized using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results A total of 240 lesions in 201 women (mean age, 49 years ± 13 [SD]) with pathologic outcomes (63 malignant and 177 benign) were included. Applying the optimal ADC cutoff produced an overall biopsy reduction rate of 15.8% (38 of 240 lesions [95% CI: 11.2, 20.9]), with a sensitivity of 92.1% (58 of 63 lesions [95% CI: 82.4, 97.4]; sensitivity was 97.2% [35 of 36 lesions] [95% CI: 82.7, 99.6] for invasive cancers). Results were similar for screening versus diagnostic examinations (P = .92 and .40, respectively). Sensitivity was higher for masses than for nonmass enhancements (NMEs) (100% vs 85.3%; P = .009). Applying the conservative ADC cutoff achieved a sensitivity of 95.2% (60 of 63 lesions [95% CI: 86.7, 99.0]), with a biopsy reduction rate of 10.4% (25 of 240 lesions [95% CI: 6.7, 14.5]). Repeated single-reader measurements showed good agreement with clinical ADCs (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.72 [95% CI: 0.58, 0.81]). Conclusion This study validated the clinical use of ADC cutoffs to reduce MRI-prompted biopsies by up to 16%, with a suggested tradeoff of lowered sensitivity for in situ and microinvasive disease manifesting as NME. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02022579 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Honda and Iima in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Debosmita Biswas
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Daniel S. Hippe
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Andrea M. Winter
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Anum S. Kazerouni
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Sara H. Javid
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Janie M. Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Habib Rahbar
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Savannah C. Partridge
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Udayakumar D, Madhuranthakam AJ, Doğan BE. Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging for Breast Cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2024; 32:135-150. [PMID: 38007276 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, carrying a significant socioeconomic burden. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with 4 major subtypes identified. Each subtype has unique prognostic factors, risks, treatment responses, and survival rates. Advances in targeted therapies have considerably improved the 5-year survival rates for primary breast cancer patients largely due to widespread screening programs that enable early detection and timely treatment. Imaging techniques are indispensable in diagnosing and managing breast cancer. While mammography is the primary screening tool, MRI plays a significant role when mammography results are inconclusive or in patients with dense breast tissue. MRI has become standard in breast cancer imaging, providing detailed anatomic and functional data, including tumor perfusion and cellularity. A key characteristic of breast tumors is angiogenesis, a biological process that promotes tumor development and growth. Increased angiogenesis in tumors generally indicates poor prognosis and increased risk of metastasis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI measures tumor perfusion and serves as an in vivo metric for angiogenesis. DCE-MRI has become the cornerstone of breast MRI, boasting a high negative-predictive value of 89% to 99%, although its specificity can vary. This review presents a thorough overview of magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging in breast cancer, focusing on the role of DCE-MRI in clinical applications and exploring emerging MR perfusion imaging techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durga Udayakumar
- Department of Radiology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| | - Ananth J Madhuranthakam
- Department of Radiology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Başak E Doğan
- Department of Radiology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Alhassan B, Rjeily MB, Villareal-Corpuz V, Prakash I, Basik M, Boileau JF, Martel K, Pollak M, Foulkes WD, Wong SM. Awareness and Candidacy for Endocrine Prevention and Risk Reducing Mastectomy in Unaffected High-Risk Women Referred for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:981-987. [PMID: 37973648 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14566-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary prevention of breast cancer in women at elevated risk includes several strategies such as endocrine prevention and risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). The objective of this study was to evaluate awareness of different preventive strategies across high-risk subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women referred for high risk evaluation between 2020 and 2023 completed an initial risk-assessment questionnaire that included questions around perceived lifetime risk and consideration of preventive strategies. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-squared tests were used to compare differences across different high-risk subgroups. RESULTS 482 women with a median age of 43 years (20-79 years) met inclusion criteria; 183 (38.0%) germline pathogenic variant carriers (GPV), 90 (18.7%) with high-risk lesions (HRL) on breast biopsy, and 209 (43.4%) with strong family history (FH) without a known genetic predisposition. Most high-risk women reported that they had considered increased screening and surveillance (83.7%) and lifestyle strategies (80.6%), while fewer patients had considered RRM (39.8%) and endocrine prevention (27.0%). Prior to initial consultation, RRM was more commonly considered in GPV carriers (59.4%) relative to those with HRL (33.3%) or strong FH (26.3%, p < 0.001). Based on current guidelines, 206 (43%) patients were deemed eligible for endocrine prevention, including 80.5% with HRL and 39.0% with strong FH. Prior consideration of endocrine prevention was highest in patients with HRL and significantly lower in those with strong FH (47.2% HRL versus 31.1% GPV versus 18.7% FH, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Endocrine prevention is the least considered preventive option for high-risk women, despite eligibility in a significant proportion of those presenting with HRL or strong FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basmah Alhassan
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Marianne Bou Rjeily
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Victor Villareal-Corpuz
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ipshita Prakash
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Karyne Martel
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Michael Pollak
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada.
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rahman WT, Gerard S, Grundlehner P, Oudsema R, McLaughlin C, Noroozian M, Neal CH, Helvie M. Outcomes of High-Risk Breast MRI Screening in Women Without Prior History of Breast Cancer: Effectiveness Data from a Tertiary Care Center. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2024; 6:53-63. [PMID: 38142230 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic performance outcomes of a breast MRI screening program in high-risk women without prior history of breast cancer. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 1 405 consecutive screening breast MRI examinations in 681 asymptomatic women with high risk of breast cancer without prior history of breast cancer from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false-negative rate [FNR], cancer detection rate [CDR]) and characteristics of cancers were determined based on histopathology or 12-month follow-up. MRI examinations performed, BI-RADS assessments, pathology outcomes, and CDRs were analyzed overall and by age decade. Results in incidence screening round (MRI in last 18 months) and nonincidence round were compared. RESULTS Breast MRI achieved CDR 20/1000, sensitivity 93.3% (28/30), and specificity 83.4% (1 147/1375). Twenty-eight (28/1 405, CDR 20/1000) screen-detected cancers were identified: 18 (64.3%, 18/28) invasive and 10 (35.7%, 10/28) ductal carcinoma in situ. Overall, 92.9% (26/28) of all cancers were stage 0 or 1 and 89.3% (25/28) were node negative. All 14 incidence screening round malignancies were stage 0 or 1 with N0 disease. Median size for invasive carcinoma was 8.0 mm and for ductal carcinoma in situ was 9.0 mm. There were two false-negative exams for an FNR 0.1% (2/1 405). CONCLUSION High-risk screening breast MRI was effective at detecting early breast cancer and associated with favorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Tania Rahman
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Paul Grundlehner
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rebecca Oudsema
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Carol McLaughlin
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mitra Noroozian
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Diagnostic Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Colleen H Neal
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark Helvie
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Greenwood HI, Dodelzon K. Screening in Women With BRCA Mutations Revisited. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2024; 6:4-13. [PMID: 38166173 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/04/2024]
Abstract
Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations are at high risk for the development of breast cancer. This article reviews the current evidence for breast cancer screening of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic gene mutations if they have not undergone prophylactic mastectomy. It will review the current evidence-based imaging recommendations for different modalities and ages of screening initiation in screening this patient population at high risk. Special considerations in transgender BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather I Greenwood
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katerina Dodelzon
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kočo L, Balkenende L, Appelman L, Moman MR, Sponsel A, Schimanski M, Prokop M, Mann RM. Optimized, Person-Centered Workflow Design for a High-Throughput Breast MRI Screening Facility-A Simulation Study. Invest Radiol 2024:00004424-990000000-00188. [PMID: 38193779 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This project aims to model an optimal scanning environment for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening based on real-life data to identify to what extent the logistics of breast MRI can be optimized. MATERIALS AND METHODS A novel concept for a breast MRI screening facility was developed considering layout of the building, workflow steps, used resources, and MRI protocols. The envisioned screening facility is person centered and aims for an efficient workflow-oriented design. Real-life data, collected from existing breast MRI screening workflows, during 62 scans in 3 different hospitals, were imported into a 3D simulation software for designing and testing new concepts. The model provided several realistic, virtual, logistical pathways for MRI screening and their outcome measures: throughput, waiting times, and other relevant variables. RESULTS The total average appointment time in the baseline scenario was 25:54 minutes, with 19:06 minutes of MRI room occupation. Simulated improvements consisted of optimizing processes and resources, facility layout, and scanning protocol. In the simulation, time spent in the MRI room was reduced by introducing an optimized facility layout, dockable tables, and adoption of an abbreviated MRI scanning protocol. The total average appointment time was reduced to 19:36 minutes, and in this scenario, the MRI room was occupied for 06:21 minutes. In the most promising scenario, screening of about 68 people per day (10 hours) on a single MRI scanner could be feasible, compared with 36 people per day in the baseline scenario. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that by optimizing workflow MRI for breast screening total appointment duration and MRI occupation can be reduced. A throughput of up to 6 people per hour may be achieved, compared with 3 people per hour in the current setup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lejla Kočo
- From the Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (L.K., L.A., M.P., R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Antoni van Leeuwenhoek), Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.B., R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Alexander Monro Hospital, Bilthoven, the Netherlands (L.A., M.R.M.); and Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany (A.S., M.S.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kinkar KK, Fields BKK, Yamashita MW, Varghese BA. Empowering breast cancer diagnosis and radiology practice: advances in artificial intelligence for contrast-enhanced mammography. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2024; 3:1326831. [PMID: 38249158 PMCID: PMC10796447 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1326831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in breast imaging span a wide range of tasks including decision support, risk assessment, patient management, quality assessment, treatment response assessment and image enhancement. However, their integration into the clinical workflow has been slow due to the lack of a consensus on data quality, benchmarked robust implementation, and consensus-based guidelines to ensure standardization and generalization. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has improved sensitivity and specificity compared to current standards of breast cancer diagnostic imaging i.e., mammography (MG) and/or conventional ultrasound (US), with comparable accuracy to MRI (current diagnostic imaging benchmark), but at a much lower cost and higher throughput. This makes CEM an excellent tool for widespread breast lesion characterization for all women, including underserved and minority women. Underlining the critical need for early detection and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer, this review examines the limitations of conventional approaches and reveals how AI can help overcome them. The Methodical approaches, such as image processing, feature extraction, quantitative analysis, lesion classification, lesion segmentation, integration with clinical data, early detection, and screening support have been carefully analysed in recent studies addressing breast cancer detection and diagnosis. Recent guidelines described by Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) to establish a robust framework for rigorous evaluation and surveying has inspired the current review criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ketki K. Kinkar
- Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Brandon K. K. Fields
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Mary W. Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Bino A. Varghese
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ghuman N, Ambinder EB, Oluyemi ET, Sutton E, Myers KS. Clinical and Imaging Features of MRI Screen-Detected Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:45-52. [PMID: 37821332 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supplemental screening with breast MRI is recommended annually for patients who have greater than 20% lifetime risk for breast cancer. While there is robust data regarding features of mammographic screen-detected breast cancers, there is limited data regarding MRI-screen-detected cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Screening breast MRIs performed between August 1, 2016 and July 30, 2022 identified 50 screen-detected breast cancers in 47 patients. Clinical and imaging features of all eligible cancers were recorded. RESULTS During the study period, 50 MRI-screen detected cancers were identified in 47 patients. The majority of MRI-screen detected cancers (32/50, 64%) were invasive. Pathology revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 36% (18/50), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in 52% (26/50), invasive lobular carcinoma in 10% (5/50), and angiosarcoma in 2% (1/50). The majority of patients (43/47, 91%) were stage 0 or 1 at diagnosis and there were no breast cancer-related deaths during the follow-up periods. Cancers presented as masses in 50% (25/50), nonmass enhancement in 48% (25/50), and a focus in 2% (1/50). DCIS was more likely to present as nonmass enhancement (94.4%, 17/18), whereas invasive cancers were more likely to present as masses (75%, 24/32) (P < .001). All cancers that were stage 2 at diagnosis were detected either on a baseline exam or more than 4 years since the prior MRI exam. CONCLUSION MRI screen-detected breast cancers were most often invasive cancers. Cancers detected by MRI screening had an excellent prognosis in our study population. Invasive cancers most commonly presented as a mass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Ghuman
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Emily B Ambinder
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Eniola T Oluyemi
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Kelly S Myers
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ahmed Shaker Hegian Z, Moh'd Abu Tahoun L, Ramli RM, Noor Azman NZ. The relationship between mean glandular dose and compressed breast thickness specified for Jordan. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2023; 200:25-31. [PMID: 37738470 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
The mean glandular dose (MGD) is a measurement used in mammography to assess the amount of radiation absorbed. By considering specific exposure radiation dose criteria, MGD ensures minimal radiation while maintaining image quality for detecting abnormalities. The relationship between MGD and compressed breast thickness (CBT) is commonly utilized in mammographic dose surveys. This study aims to estimate the MGD-CBT relationship based on patient age in Jordan through retrospective analysis. The analysis involved 3465 screening mammography images of women aged 40-80, divided into three age groups: 40-49, 50-64 and 65-80 years. Each group had a specific CBT range (16.5-156 mm). The results indicate that MGD ranges from 1.6 to 1.7 mGy across all three age groups, independent of CBT. Thus, a significant and positive correlation exists between MGD and CBT in all age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeinab Ahmed Shaker Hegian
- School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800 Minden, Malaysia
- Breast Imaging Unit, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), 11831 Amman, Jordan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tollens F, Baltzer PA, Froelich MF, Kaiser CG. Economic evaluation of breast MRI in screening - a systematic review and basic approach to cost-effectiveness analyses. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1292268. [PMID: 38130995 PMCID: PMC10733447 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1292268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Economic evaluations have become an accepted methodology for decision makers to allocate resources in healthcare systems. Particularly in screening, where short-term costs are associated with long-term benefits, and adverse effects of screening intermingle, cost-effectiveness analyses provide a means to estimate the economic value of screening. Purpose To introduce the methodology of economic evaluations and to review the existing evidence on cost-effectiveness of MR-based breast cancer screening. Materials and methods The various concepts and techniques of economic evaluations critical to the interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses are briefly introduced. In a systematic review of the literature, economic evaluations from the years 2000-2022 are reviewed. Results Despite a considerable heterogeneity in the reported input variables, outcome categories and methodological approaches, cost-effectiveness analyses report favorably on the economic value of breast MRI screening for different risk groups, including both short- and long-term costs and outcomes. Conclusion Economic evaluations indicate a strongly favorable economic value of breast MRI screening for women at high risk and for women with dense breast tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Tollens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Pascal A.T. Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias F. Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Clemens G. Kaiser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Grimm LJ. Beyond the AJR: Patient Knowledge About the Risk of Dense Breasts Is Lacking. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221:850. [PMID: 37132551 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lars J Grimm
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Liyanage UA, Sirisena ND, Deshapriya PC, Dissanayake VHW. Breast cancer surveillance in BRCA positive Sri Lankan women: health equity for a high-risk group at a limited resource setting. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:636. [PMID: 38017478 PMCID: PMC10685476 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02797-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants account for 90% of hereditary breast malignancies, incurring a lifetime breast cancer risk of 85% and 40-45% respectively, in affected individuals. Well-resourced health care settings offer genetic counselling and genetic screening for susceptible individuals, followed by intense breast cancer surveillance programmes for those identified at high risk of breast cancer. Such high standards of care are not available in countries with limited resources. This study assessed breast cancer surveillance behaviors among a cohort of BRCA positive Sri Lankan women. METHODS A retrospective case review of all patients diagnosed with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes from 2015 to 2022 at the Human Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo was carried out followed by telephone interviews of the respondents. Patients who were not contactable, deceased, undergone bilateral mastectomy and males were excluded from the interview component of the study. Standard descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data using SPSS statistics version 25. RESULTS Only 25 patients were diagnosed during the study period:14/25 women responded (6/25 deceased, 3/25 non-contactable; 2/25 excluded). 71.4% (10/14) had performed breast self-examination during the preceding month; 35.7% (5/14) had a clinical breast examination (CBE), and 50% (7/14) had undergone a screening/diagnostic mammogram during the last one year. 28.5% (4/14) had undergone both mammography and CBE; 21.45% (3/14) mammogram only, 7.1% (1/14) had CBE only. 42.8%(6/14) had not undergone any surveillance(mammography, CBE or MRI). None had dual screening with mammogram and MRI. 85.71% (12/14) women expressed willingness to participate in a regular screening programme if made available. CONCLUSION Fifty percent of BRCA1/2 positive women in our study had not undergone annual imaging-based surveillance by mammography or MRI, and none had undergone annual dual screening with mammography and MRI, indicating inadequate breast cancer surveillance in this high-risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udari Apsara Liyanage
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
| | - Nirmala Dushyanthi Sirisena
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Alnahdi AS, Idrees M. Nonlinear dynamics of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer integrating experimental data: A novel spatial modeling approach. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING : MBE 2023; 20:21163-21185. [PMID: 38124592 DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2023936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Oncology research has focused extensively on estrogen hormones and their function in breast cancer proliferation. Mathematical modeling is essential for the analysis and simulation of breast cancers. This research presents a novel approach to examine the therapeutic and inhibitory effects of hormone and estrogen therapies on the onset of breast cancer. Our proposed mathematical model comprises a nonlinear coupled system of partial differential equations, capturing intricate interactions among estrogen, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, dormant cancer cells, and active cancer cells. The model's parameters are meticulously estimated through experimental studies, and we conduct a comprehensive global sensitivity analysis to assess the uncertainty of these parameter values. Remarkably, our findings underscore the pivotal role of hormone therapy in curtailing breast tumor growth by blocking estrogen's influence on cancer cells. Beyond this crucial insight, our proposed model offers an integrated framework to delve into the complexity of tumor progression and immune response under hormone therapy. We employ diverse experimental datasets encompassing gene expression profiles, spatial tumor morphology, and cellular interactions. Integrating multidimensional experimental data with mathematical models enhances our understanding of breast cancer dynamics and paves the way for personalized treatment strategies. Our study advances our comprehension of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and exemplifies a transformative approach that merges experimental data with cutting-edge mathematical modeling. This framework promises to illuminate the complexities of cancer progression and therapy, with broad implications for oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abeer S Alnahdi
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad Idrees
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mao X, He W, Eriksson M, Lindström LS, Holowko N, Bajalica-Lagercrantz S, Hammarström M, Grassmann F, Humphreys K, Easton D, Hall P, Czene K. Prediction of breast cancer risk for sisters of women attending screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1310-1317. [PMID: 37243694 PMCID: PMC10637039 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk assessment is important for breast cancer prevention and early detection. We aimed to examine whether common risk factors, mammographic features, and breast cancer risk prediction scores of a woman were associated with breast cancer risk for her sisters. METHODS We included 53 051 women from the Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) study. Established risk factors were derived using self-reported questionnaires, mammograms, and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping. Using the Swedish Multi-Generation Register, we identified 32 198 sisters of the KARMA women (including 5352 KARMA participants and 26 846 nonparticipants). Cox models were used to estimate the hazard ratios of breast cancer for both women and their sisters, respectively. RESULTS A higher breast cancer polygenic risk score, a history of benign breast disease, and higher breast density in women were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer for both women and their sisters. No statistically significant association was observed between breast microcalcifications and masses in women and breast cancer risk for their sisters. Furthermore, higher breast cancer risk scores in women were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer for their sisters. Specifically, the hazard ratios for breast cancer per 1 standard deviation increase in age-adjusted KARMA, Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA), and Tyrer-Cuzick risk scores were 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07 to 1.27), 1.23 (95% CI = 1.12 to 1.35), and 1.21 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.32), respectively. CONCLUSION A woman's breast cancer risk factors are associated with her sister's breast cancer risk. However, the clinical utility of these findings requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinhe Mao
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wei He
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Chronic Disease Research Institute, The Children’s Hospital, and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linda S Lindström
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Hereditary Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Natalie Holowko
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medicine Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Svetlana Bajalica-Lagercrantz
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Hereditary Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mattias Hammarström
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Felix Grassmann
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Institute for Clinical Research and Systems Medicine, Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Douglas Easton
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Webster JL, Goldstein ND, Rowland JP, Tuite CM, Siegel SD. A catchment and location-allocation analysis of mammography access in Delaware, US: implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:137. [PMID: 37941020 PMCID: PMC10631173 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01738-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a 40% reduction in breast cancer mortality over the last 30 years, not all groups have benefited equally from these gains. A consistent link between later stage of diagnosis and disparities in breast cancer mortality has been observed by race, socioeconomic status, and rurality. Therefore, ensuring equitable geographic access to screening mammography represents an important priority for reducing breast cancer disparities. Access to breast cancer screening was evaluated in Delaware, a state that experiences an elevated burden from breast cancer but is otherwise representative of the US in terms of race and urban-rural characteristics. We first conducted a catchment analysis of mammography facilities. Finding evidence of disparities by race and rurality, we next conducted a location-allocation analysis to identify candidate locations for the establishment of new mammography facilities to optimize equitable access. METHODS A catchment analysis using the ArcGIS Pro Service Area analytic tool characterized the geographic distribution of mammography sites and Breast Imaging Centers of Excellence (BICOEs). Poisson regression analyses identified census tract-level correlates of access. Next, the ArcGIS Pro Location-Allocation analytic tool identified candidate locations for the placement of additional mammography sites in Delaware according to several sets of breast cancer screening guidelines. RESULTS The catchment analysis showed that for each standard deviation increase in the number of Black women in a census tract, there were 68% (95% CI 38-85%) fewer mammography units and 89% (95% CI 60-98%) fewer BICOEs. The more rural counties in the state accounted for 41% of the population but only 22% of the BICOEs. The results of the location-allocation analysis depended on which set of screening guidelines were adopted, which included increasing mammography sites in communities with a greater proportion of younger Black women and in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study illustrate how catchment and location-allocation analytic tools can be leveraged to guide the equitable selection of new mammography facility locations as part of a larger strategy to close breast cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Webster
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Neal D Goldstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer P Rowland
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Section, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Catherine M Tuite
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Section, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Scott D Siegel
- Cawley Center for Translational Cancer Research, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, 4701 Ogletown-Stanton Road, Newark, DE, 19713, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Omoleye OJ, Woodard AE, Howard FM, Zhao F, Yoshimatsu TF, Zheng Y, Pearson AT, Levental M, Aribisala BS, Kulkarni K, Karczmar GS, Olopade OI, Abe H, Huo D. External Evaluation of a Mammography-based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Breast Cancer in an Ethnically Diverse Population. Radiol Artif Intell 2023; 5:e220299. [PMID: 38074785 PMCID: PMC10698602 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.220299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To externally evaluate a mammography-based deep learning (DL) model (Mirai) in a high-risk racially diverse population and compare its performance with other mammographic measures. Materials and Methods A total of 6435 screening mammograms in 2096 female patients (median age, 56.4 years ± 11.2 [SD]) enrolled in a hospital-based case-control study from 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Pathologically confirmed breast cancer was the primary outcome. Mirai scores were the primary predictors. Breast density and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment categories were comparative predictors. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and concordance index analyses. Results Mirai achieved 1- and 5-year AUCs of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.74) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.67), respectively. One-year AUCs for nondense versus dense breasts were 0.72 versus 0.58 (P = .10). There was no evidence of a difference in near-term discrimination performance between BI-RADS and Mirai (1-year AUC, 0.73 vs 0.68; P = .34). For longer-term prediction (2-5 years), Mirai outperformed BI-RADS assessment (5-year AUC, 0.63 vs 0.54; P < .001). Using only images of the unaffected breast reduced the discriminatory performance of the DL model (P < .001 at all time points), suggesting that its predictions are likely dependent on the detection of ipsilateral premalignant patterns. Conclusion A mammography DL model showed good performance in a high-risk external dataset enriched for African American patients, benign breast disease, and BRCA mutation carriers, and study findings suggest that the model performance is likely driven by the detection of precancerous changes.Keywords: Breast, Cancer, Computer Applications, Convolutional Neural Network, Deep Learning Algorithms, Informatics, Epidemiology, Machine Learning, Mammography, Oncology, Radiomics Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023See also commentary by Kontos and Kalpathy-Cramer in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olasubomi J. Omoleye
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Anna E. Woodard
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Frederick M. Howard
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Fangyuan Zhao
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Toshio F. Yoshimatsu
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Yonglan Zheng
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Alexander T. Pearson
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Maksim Levental
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Benjamin S. Aribisala
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Kirti Kulkarni
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Gregory S. Karczmar
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | - Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
- From the Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health,
Department of Medicine (O.J.O., A.E.W., T.F.Y., Y.Z., B.S.A., O.I.O.), Data
Science Institute (A.E.W.), Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of
Medicine (F.M.H., A.T.P.), Department of Public Health Sciences (F.Z., D.H.),
Department of Computer Science (M.L.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.,
G.S.K., H.A.), The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2000, Chicago,
IL 60637; Department of Computer Science, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria
(B.S.A.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Conley CC, Rodriguez JD, McIntyre M, Brownstein NC, Niell BL, O'Neill SC, Vadaparampil ST. Self-reported barriers to screening breast MRI among women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 202:345-355. [PMID: 37640965 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07085-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Annual screening breast MRI is recommended for women at high (≥ 20% lifetime) breast cancer risk, but is underutilized. Guided by the Health Services Utilization Model (HSUM), we assessed factors associated with screening breast MRI among high-risk women. METHODS From August 2020-January 2021, we recruited an online convenience sample of high-risk women ages 25-85 (N = 232). High-risk was defined as: pathogenic genetic mutation in self or first-degree relative; history of lobular carcinoma in situ; history of thoracic radiation; or estimated lifetime risk ≥ 20%. Participants self-reported predisposing factors (breast cancer knowledge, health locus of control), enabling factors (health insurance type, social support), need factors (perceived risk, screening-supportive social norms, provider recommendation), and prior receipt of screening breast MRI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with backward selection identified HSUM factors associated with receipt of screening breast MRI. RESULTS About half (51%) of participants had received a provider recommendation for screening breast MRI; only 32% had ever received a breast MRI. Breast cancer knowledge (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.04-1.27) and screening-supportive social norms (OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.64-2.97) were positively related to breast MRI receipt. No other HSUM variables were associated with breast MRI receipt (all p's > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS High-risk women reported low uptake of screening breast MRI, indicating a gap in guideline-concordant care. Breast cancer knowledge and screening-supportive social norms are two key areas to target in future interventions. Data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic and generalizability of results is unclear. Future studies with larger, more heterogeneous samples are needed to replicate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C Conley
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2115 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 300, 20007, Washington, DC, USA.
| | | | - McKenzie McIntyre
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Naomi C Brownstein
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Bethany L Niell
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gao Y, Bahl M. Management of screening-detected lobular neoplasia in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: A preliminary study. Clin Imaging 2023; 103:109979. [PMID: 37673705 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.109979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to determine upgrade rates of lobular neoplasia detected by screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and to determine imaging and clinicopathological features that may influence risk of upgrade. METHODS Medical records were reviewed of consecutive women who presented with screening DBT-detected atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and/or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2020. Included patients underwent needle biopsy and had surgery or at least two-year imaging follow-up. Imaging and clinicopathological features were compared between upgraded and nonupgraded cases of lobular neoplasia using the Pearson's chi-squared test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS During the study period, 107 women (mean age 55 years, range 40-88 years) with 110 cases of ALH and/or LCIS underwent surgery (80.9%, n = 89) or at least two-year imaging follow-up (19.1%, n = 21). The overall upgrade rate to cancer was 5.5% (6/110), and the upgrade rate to invasive cancer was 3.6% (4/110). The upgrade rate of ALH to cancer was 4.1% (3/74), whereas the upgrade rate of LCIS to cancer was 9.4% (3/32) (p = .28). The upgrade rate of cases presenting as calcifications was 4.2% (3/71), whereas the upgrade rates of cases presenting as noncalcified findings was 7.7% (3/39) (p = .44). CONCLUSIONS The upgrade rate of screening DBT-detected lobular neoplasia is less than 6%. Surveillance rather than surgery can be considered for lobular neoplasia, particularly in patients with ALH and in those with screening-detected calcifications leading to the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukun Gao
- Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street (WAC 240), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Manisha Bahl
- Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street (WAC 240), Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Qu FL, Wu SY, Li JJ, Shao ZM. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery: insights into biology and treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 202:215-220. [PMID: 37528263 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07071-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite modern surgical and irradiation techniques, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) accounts for 5-15% of all cancer recurrence in women treated with breast conservative treatment. Historically, this event has been treated definitively with salvage mastectomy and completion axillary clearance. However, many local recurrences are small and without nodal involvement at presentation. Thus, there has been an interest in performing a surgical de-escalation procedure in the breast and the axilla. The current guidelines do not provide detailed descriptions and treatment suggestions for these selected patients, resulting in inconsistent treatment strategies. Moreover, the methods to define true recurrence (TR) and new primary tumor (NP) for IBTR remain controversial. Most developed classification methods mainly rely on clinical and pathological criteria, limiting the accuracy of the discerption and causing misclassification. In this editorial, we will discuss the current trends in surgical de-escalation for patients with IBTR. Moreover, we will focus on recent IBTR innovations, highlighting molecular-integrated classification and multimodal staging methods for clinical practice and postoperative surveillance strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei-Lin Qu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong-An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Song-Yang Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong-An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jun-Jie Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong-An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhi-Ming Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dong-An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Eskreis-Winkler S, Sung JS, Dixon L, Monga N, Jindal R, Simmons A, Thakur S, Sevilimedu V, Sutton E, Comstock C, Feigin K, Pinker K. High-Temporal/High-Spatial Resolution Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Diagnostic Accuracy Compared With Standard Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With High Background Parenchymal Enhancement. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4747-4755. [PMID: 37561962 PMCID: PMC10602549 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostic performance using a standard high-spatial resolution protocol versus a simultaneous high-temporal/high-spatial resolution (HTHS) protocol in women with high levels of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of contrast-enhanced breast MRIs performed at our institution before and after the introduction of the HTHS protocol. We compared diagnostic performance of the HTHS and standard protocol by comparing cancer detection rate (CDR) and positive predictive value of biopsy (PPV3) among women with high BPE (ie, marked or moderate). RESULTS Among women with high BPE, the HTHS protocol demonstrated increased CDR (23.6 per 1,000 patients v 7.9 per 1,000 patients; P = 0. 013) and increased PPV3 (16.0% v 6.3%; P = .021) compared with the standard protocol. This corresponded to a 9.8% (95% CI, 1.29 to 18.3) decrease in the proportion of unnecessary biopsies among high-BPE patients and an additional cancer yield of 15.7 per 1,000 patients (95% CI, 1.3 to 18.3). CONCLUSION Among women with high BPE, HTHS MRI improved diagnostic performance, leading to an additional cancer yield of 15.7 cancers per 1,000 women and concomitantly decreasing unnecessary biopsies by 9.8%. A multisite prospective trial is warranted to confirm these findings and to pave the way for more widespread clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janice S. Sung
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Linden Dixon
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Natasha Monga
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ragni Jindal
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Sunitha Thakur
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth Sutton
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Kimberly Feigin
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Katouli FS, Bayani L, Azizinik F, Fathi S, Seifollahi A, Bozorgabadi FZ. Spectrum of ultrasound findings in patients with history of breast conservative treatment. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND : JCU 2023; 51:1381-1389. [PMID: 37526634 DOI: 10.1002/jcu.23524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Breast conservative treatment (BCT) is currently accepted as the standard treatment option for breast cancer. Targeted ultrasound helps detect recurrent lesions, postoperative changes, and scarring tissue. In this pictorial essay, we review the ultrasound features of benign (seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, traumatic neuroma, fibrosis/scarring) and malignant (recurrence, new primary cancer) causes of palpable lumps after BCT and provide images from our patients to illustrate some typical findings of common pathologies. Ultrasound, especially as an adjunct to mammography, can make a specific diagnosis in most cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Shakki Katouli
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiology, Arash Women Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Leila Bayani
- Department of Radiology, Arash Women Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Azizinik
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiology, Amiralam and Yas Hospitals, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Somayeh Fathi
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiology, Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Akram Seifollahi
- Pathology Department, Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Zare Bozorgabadi
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Romero KN, Ouellette T, Patel R, Patel T. The Use of MRI to Detect Malignancy in a Patient Presenting With Unilateral Bloody Nipple Discharge. Cureus 2023; 15:e47986. [PMID: 38034172 PMCID: PMC10686522 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Nipple discharge presents as either physiological, which is green, white, or yellow, or is considered pathological, which is typically unilateral, spontaneous, and bloody. Bloody nipple discharge (BND) can be due to underlying malignancy or premalignant lesions. Mammogram (MMG), ultrasound (US), MRI, and ductography are all used to evaluate BND, but different modalities offer greater value in the diagnostic process. Here, we present a case that demonstrates the ability of MRI to detect abnormalities not seen on MMG and US in the setting of BND due to underlying malignancy. The use of MRI earlier in the diagnostic process allows for the use of breast-conserving measures and decreases the possibility of metastasis. This would result in less of a need for more aggressive treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn N Romero
- Internal Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| | - Taylor Ouellette
- General Surgery, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| | - Radhika Patel
- Internal Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Huppe AI, Inciardi MF, Aripoli AM, Peterson JK, Smith CB, Winblad OD. Pearls and Pitfalls of Interpretation of Automated Breast US. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230023. [PMID: 37792592 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Dense breast tissue is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and reduces the sensitivity of mammography. Patients with dense breast tissue are more likely to present with interval cancers and higher-stage disease. Successful breast cancer screening outcomes rely on detection of early-stage breast cancers; therefore, several supplemental screening modalities have been developed to improve cancer detection in dense breast tissue. US is the most widely used supplemental screening modality worldwide and has been proven to demonstrate additional mammographically occult cancers that are predominantly invasive and node negative. According to the American College of Radiology, intermediate-risk women with dense breast tissue may benefit from adjunctive screening US due to the limitations of mammography. Several studies have demonstrated handheld US (HHUS) and automated breast US (AUS) to be comparable in the screening setting. The advantages of AUS over HHUS include lack of operator dependence and a formal training requirement, image reproducibility, and ability for temporal comparison. However, AUS exhibits unique features that can result in high false-positive rates and long interpretation times for new users. Familiarity with the common appearance of benign mammographic findings and artifacts, technical challenges, and unique AUS features is essential for fast, efficient, and accurate interpretation. The goals of this article are to (a) examine the role of AUS as a supplemental screening modality and (b) review the pearls and pitfalls of AUS interpretation. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley I Huppe
- From the Department of Radiology, The University of Kansas Health System, 4000 Cambridge St, Kansas City, KS 66160
| | - Marc F Inciardi
- From the Department of Radiology, The University of Kansas Health System, 4000 Cambridge St, Kansas City, KS 66160
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sarkis-Tannous D, Sukol RB, Sullivan E. Toward more personalized breast cancer risk assessment: The polygenic risk score. JAAPA 2023; 36:37-40. [PMID: 37751256 DOI: 10.1097/01.jaa.0000977692.63075.f3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Healthcare providers often are uncertain about how best to assess and manage breast cancer risk. Women at average risk wonder when to start mammography and how often to go. Women at increased risk might inquire about genetic testing, MRI screening, and preventive measures. Patients who carry gene mutations face higher stakes and more complex risk management choices, but only some are aware of their status. This article helps clinicians stratify breast cancer risk and discusses a newer genomic test, the polygenic risk score, that may enable more personalized risk management and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daad Sarkis-Tannous
- At the time this article was written, Daad Sarkis-Tannous, Roxanne B. Sukol, and Erika Sullivan were medical breast specialists at the Cleveland (Ohio) Clinic. Dr. Sukol is now retired. The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Knerr S, Guo B, Wernli KJ, Mittendorf KF, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Jarvik GP, Kauffman TL, Keast E, Liles EG, Lynch FL, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Veenstra DL, Zepp JM, Wilfond BS, Devine B, Goddard KAB. Longitudinal adherence to breast cancer surveillance following cancer genetic testing in an integrated health care system. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 201:461-470. [PMID: 37470892 PMCID: PMC10503958 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07007-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Screening with mammography and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important risk management strategy for individuals with inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in genes associated with increased breast cancer risk. We describe longitudinal screening adherence in individuals who underwent cancer genetic testing as part of usual care in a vertically integrated health system. METHODS We determined the proportion time covered (PTC) by annual mammography and breast MRI for individuals with PVs in TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, NF1, CHEK2, and ATM. We determined time covered by biennial mammography beginning at age 50 years for individuals who received negative results, uncertain results, or with PVs in genes without specific breast cancer screening recommendations. RESULTS One hundred and forty individuals had PVs in TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, NF1, CHEK2, or ATM. Among these individuals, average PTC was 48% (range 0-99%) for annual screening mammography and 34% (range 0-100%) for annual breast MRI. Average PTC was highest for individuals with PVs in CHEK2 (N = 14) and lowest for individuals with PVs in TP53 (N = 3). Average PTC for biennial mammography (N = 1,027) was 49% (0-100%). CONCLUSION Longitudinal screening adherence in individuals with PVs in breast cancer associated genes, as measured by the proportion of time covered, is low; adherence to annual breast MRI falls below that of annual mammography. Additional research should examine screening behavior in individuals with PVs in breast cancer associated genes with a goal of developing interventions to improve adherence to recommended risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Knerr
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Boya Guo
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karen J Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Erin Keast
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Frances L Lynch
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | - David L Veenstra
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Beth Devine
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gegios AR, Peterson MS, Fowler AM. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: Recent Advances in Imaging and Current Limitations. PET Clin 2023; 18:459-471. [PMID: 37296043 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer detection has a significant impact on population health. Although there are many breast imaging modalities, mammography is the predominant tool for breast cancer screening. The introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis to mammography has contributed to increased cancer detection rates and decreased recall rates. In average-risk women, starting annual screening mammography at age 40 years has demonstrated the highest mortality reduction. In intermediate- and high-risk women as well as in those with dense breasts, additional modalities, including MRI, ultrasound, and molecular breast imaging, can also be considered for adjunct screening to improve the detection of mammographically occult malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison R Gegios
- Section of Breast Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA
| | - Molly S Peterson
- Section of Breast Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA
| | - Amy M Fowler
- Section of Breast Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|