Relevance of cutoff on a 4th generation ELISA performance in the false positive rate during HIV diagnostic in a low HIV prevalence setting

Analysis of Increased False-Positive ELISA Results for HIV in the Blood of Donors Infected with SARS-CoV-2

The study examined the effect of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus in the blood of donors after COVID-19 on objectivity of HIV detection in the blood samples with two ELISA variants employing reagents A or B in order to select reliable kits to minimize the false-positive HIV results. Retrospectively, the quality control data of two ELISA kits with reagents A or B developed to detect HIV were analyzed using the control sera together with the results of donor blood tested with both kits, which were collected in the periods from January to December 2022 (n = 55,528) and from January to March 2023 (n = 13,837). From the blood samples obtained in 2023, all the specimens with false-positive HIV results obtained with reagent A were selected (n = 126) together with randomly taken samples of this pool with negative HIV results (n = 345). All selected samples were tested for IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus, thereupon the correlation analysis was performed between the samples containing SARS-CoV-2 and those with HIV detected by ELISA reagent A. The data on reactivity of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 significantly correlated with the false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent A (r = 0.451, p < 0.01). In 2023, the share of false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent A was 0.91% (126/13,837), which was 6.06-fold greater than the corresponding value in 2022 (0.133% (74/55,528); χ2 = 230.38, p < 0.01). This data echoed the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic resulting in the appearance of antibodies against the virus in the donor blood. At the same time, the number of false-positive ELISA results for HIV obtained with reagent B in 2022 (0.014% (8/55,521)) and in 2023 (0.036% (5/13,837)) were essentially smaller than those obtained with reagent A, and the results obtained with the test kit B did not significantly differ from each other for both time periods. Thus, IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the blood of donors after COVID-19 can affect the results of HIV detection by some ELISA reagents and consequently elevate the number of false-positive analyses.

Optimizing HIV testing: Comparing diagnostic signatures and assay performance in ART-treated and general screening populations

INTRODUCTION

Accurate and early HIV detection is crucial for improving outcomes and controlling transmission. This study compares HIV marker patterns and evaluates detection assay performance in general screening and ART-treated populations to enhance diagnostic accuracy and public health.

METHODS

A total of 196 blood donor samples that were initially reactive in blood center screening were collected across 17 provinces in China, along with 126 ART samples from people living with HIV (PLWH). HIV RNA, Ag/Ab, and western blot were conducted in both groups. CD4 T cell counts were assessed in PLWH. The performance of two antigen detection kits (Wantai, Livzon) and eight Ag/Ab kits (Roche, Abbott, KHB, InTec, Wantai, Livzon, Murex, Bio-rad) were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the ART group, all samples were Ag/Ab positive, with 32.5 % (41/126) having undetectable viral loads; NAT-positive samples showed a higher rate of complete bands in western blot compared to NAT-negative group (42.5 % vs 15.4 %, P = 0.021), while p17, p39, and p31 bands were often absent. 90.8 % (178/196) of blood donors were NAT-positive and Ag/Ab-positive. 4.6 % (9/196) of blood donors were NAT-positive but Ag/Ab-negative, these samples were also tested as NAT-only reactive in screening at blood centers, often showing only a p24 band or negative result in WB, indicating early acute infection. 3.6 % (7/196) of blood donors were confirmed as NAT-negative but Ag/Ab-positive, hinting that a small group on ART might attempt to donate blood. HIV serological kits showed 100 % positivity in the ART group. Fourth-generation kits, particularly the Roche Ag/Ab kit, showed the highest sensitivity (95.2 %) for NAT-positive donors.

DISCUSSION

This study highlights critical differences in HIV detection between ART-treated individuals and general screening populations, emphasizing the need for tailored diagnostic strategies to ensure blood transfusion safety.

Evaluation of the MAGLUMI HIV Ab/Ag combi test for the detection of HIV infection

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection screening and diagnosis are critical to control the HIV epidemic. Testing for anti-HIV antibodies (Ab) and antigens (Ag) in blood samples is the first step to screen people who have been potentially exposed to the virus. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the MAGLUMI HIV Ab/Ag Combi for detection of HIV antibodies and antigens.

METHODS

We used residual samples to assess the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the MAGLUMI HIV Ab/Ag Combi retrospectively. All samples that met the test criteria were tested with the MAGLUMI HIV Ab/Ag Combi according to manufacturer's instruction. Results of the MAGLUMI HIV Ab/Ag Combi were compared with the Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo test.

RESULTS

The specificity of the MAGLUMI HIV Ab/Ag Combi was 99.85% in 5,057 unselected blood donors and 100.00% in 213 hospitalized patient samples, respectively. The sensitivity of the Test in 614 HIV-1 Ab, HIV-1 Ag or HIV-2 Ab positive samples was 100.00%. Seroconversion sensitivity from results of 30 panels was comparable between the MAGLUMI HIV Ab/Ag Combi and the Architect assay.

CONCLUSIONS

The reactivity of the MAGLUMI HIV Ab/Ag Combi test is comparable to the Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay.

Outcomes of discordant HIV screening test results at a southern academic medical center

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine outcomes of follow-up for persons with discordant fourth-generation HIV screening test results.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review.

METHODS

We analyzed the electronic health record at the Medical University of South Carolina for a 10-year period spanning 2012-2022 to identify instances of discordant HIV screening test results, wherein initial antigen/antibody screening was positive, but reflex confirmatory testing for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies was negative. We reviewed individual records to evaluate clinical follow-up and determine if the discordant test represented an acute HIV infection, a false-positive result, or was unresolved.

RESULTS

We identified 199 testing instances with discordant results. Most discordant results ( n  = 115) were subsequently determined to reflect a false-positive test, while 56 were unresolved without documented follow-up testing. Twenty-eight cases of acute HIV infection were identified of which 26 were linked to care within a month of initial testing. Two acute HIV cases were not identified in real time leading to delay in diagnosis and care. Testing done in the context of infectious symptoms and testing performed in the emergency department were associated with increased odds of a discordant test ultimately reflecting acute HIV infection.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate the importance of appropriate and timely follow-up for discordant HIV screening test results.

False-Reactive Fourth-Generation Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing in Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The fourth-generation (4th-gen) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1/2 antibody/antigen (Ab/Ag) combination immunoassay currently used for HIV screening offers greater sensitivity than previous assays, but false-reactive results occur in up to 20% of patients. Large-scale observations in cancer patients are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of cancer patients seen at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (March 2016-January 2023) who had reactive 4th-gen ARCHITECT HIV-1/2 Ab/Ag combination immunoassay results. We analyzed characteristics of patients with true-reactive and false-reactive results, defined based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 43 637 patients underwent 4th-gen HIV screening, and 293 had reactive 4th-gen HIV test results. Twenty-one patients were excluded because they did not have cancer. Among the remaining 272 patients, 78 (29%) had false-reactive results. None of these patients experienced delays in their cancer treatment, but 26% experienced mental distress. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 5 predictors of having false-reactive results: age >60 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.983; P < .0001), female sex (aOR, 6.060; P < .0001), race/ethnicity (Black: aOR, 0.274; Hispanic: aOR, 0.236; P = .002), syphilis coinfection (aOR, 0.046; P = .038), and plant alkaloids therapy (aOR, 2.870; P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

False-reactive 4th-gen HIV test results occur in almost one-third of cancer patients. Physicians should be aware of the high rates of false-reactive HIV screening results in this patient population. These findings may have implications for counseling regarding testing, especially among those at low risk for HIV infection.

False-positive HIV screening tests during the COVID-19 pandemic, a passing trend?

False-positive fourth-generation HIV screening tests are rare and are usually associated with various infections and autoimmune diseases. SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination were recently linked with false-positive HIV screening test results. However, little is known about false-positives in people who performed HIV screening tests after outbreaks of different SARS-CoV-2 strains and vaccination campaigns. Here, we examined the false-positive rates in samples collected by the Israeli AIDS Task Force in 2018--2022, with respect to such factors.

Evaluation of a two-test strategy for HIV screening in a low-prevalence setting and the indications for optimizing clinical management

Objectives

To evaluate a two-test strategy for HIV screening in the low-prevalence population and to assess the feasibility of utilizing the optimal signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) threshold on the chemiluminescence immunoassay(CMIA) and an additional rapid test on the gold immune-chromatography assay (GICA) for screening positive patients and optimization of clinical management.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of samples analyzed by the fourth-generation Architect HIV Ag/Ab combo assay (CMIA) in a large medical center between June 2017 and August 2020. Reactive samples underwent a second screening test using the rapid test GICA, followed by Western blot (WB) as the confirmatory test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal S/CO. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value based on our population. The performance of the single-test strategy (CMIA) was compared with that of the two-test strategy (CMIA and GICA). Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors of clinical characteristics leading to false positive results.

Results

A total of 220558 samples were screened by CMIA, and 429 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, CMIA produced 199 false-positive results with a median S/CO of 1.93(IQR1.45-3.68) and 230 positive results with a median S/CO of 455.1 (IQR169.3-709.7). The optimal S/CO of the single-test strategy was 8.82, which achieved a sensitivity of 100% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.9%. The two-test strategy (CMIA and GICA) provided a sensitivity of 100% and a PPV of 98.7%, which best correlated with the confirmatory test WB. The combination of S/CO 8.82 on the CMIA assay and additional test results of GICA can be defined as four types used to interpret HIV serostatus. The false positive rate (FPR) was high in the female, the age≤18 group, the pre-operative patients, and the patients from the clinical departments of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Oncology, etc.

Conclusions

The false positive rate is high in the low-prevalence setting by using CMIA. The two-test strategy (CMIA and GICA) is recommended for HIV screening in hospitals. Hopefully, the clinicians will be able to interpret HIV serostatus and facilitate clinical decision-making while waiting for the confirmatory results.

Comparative evaluation of four commercial analyzers for the serological screening of hepatitis A, B, C and HIV

BACKGROUND

Independent evaluations that deploy clinical patient samples are important in assessing the performance of commercial tests used for serological screening of viral hepatitis and HIV in clinical laboratories.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the analytical performance of Abbott Architect i2000SR, Abbott Alinity i, DiaSorin Liaison XL, and Siemens Atellica for the following analytes: anti-HAV IgG/anti-HAV total, anti-HAV IgM, HBsAg, anti-HBc IgM, Anti-HBc, HBeAg, anti-HBe, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, and HIV Ag/Ab. In addition, anti-HBc IgM, HBeAg, and anti-HBe were evaluated for Abbott Architect, Abbott Alinity and DiaSorin Liaison.

STUDY DESIGN

Pseudonymized clinical serum specimens (N = 98-200 for each analyte) were selected for the analysis according to their reactivity on the Abbott Architect. The results were compared against Abbott Architect and against consensus.

RESULTS

A generally high agreement was observed between the tests. Abbott Alinity had the lowest anti-HAV IgG/total specificity (75.9% against Abbott Architect and 83.0% against consensus). The comparatively low sensitivity of Siemens Atellica (78.2%), Abbott Alinity (87.5%) and DiaSorin Liaison (89.3%) for anti-HAV IgM against Abbott Architect may reflect a higher false-positive rate of Abbott Architect. Particular variation was observed in the sensitivity values of anti-HBc, HBsAg and HIV Ag/Ab between the test methods. DiaSorin Liaison anti-HBs gave consistently higher values as compared to the other tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The serodiagnostic methods for HIV and viral hepatitis of Abbott Architect, Abbott Alinity, DiaSorin Liaison, and Siemens Atellica performed well in comparison with each other. The observed differences between the tests will provide useful information for clinical laboratories in planning their workflows for screening and confirmation.

Clinical Application Evaluation of Elecsys® HIV Duo Assay in Southwest China

Background

HIV/AIDS continues to be a serious health concern of morbidity and mortality globally, and novel HIV testing is still an important component of diagnosing HIV earlier and reducing the spread of HIV. The Elecsys^® HIV Duo assay is a 4th generation assay that can detect both HIV-1 p24 antigen (Ag) and HIV-1/2 antibody (Ab) in parallel and show the subresults for the Ab and Ab units.

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical performance of the Elecsys^® HIV Duo assay on the new cobas E 801 analyzer using a large number of clinical samples from a population in southwest China.

Methods

We collected testing results and information from all patients in a large general hospital. All eligible clinical specimens were first analyzed using the Elecsys^® HIV Duo assay. The test results are given either as reactive or nonreactive as well as in the form of a cutoff index (COI). All initially reactive specimens were retested in duplicate with a 3rd-generation kit. Supplementary tests were divided into Ab confirmation tests and HIV-1 nucleic acid tests. GraphPad Prism and Python were used for plotting, and SPSS 21.0 software was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 186391 specimens were received, and 436 patients were confirmed to be positive for HIV. Among the 86 cases with contact history available, there were more males than females, and heterosexual transmission was the most common route of HIV infection. The Elecsys^® HIV Duo assay displayed 99.94%, 99.93% and 99.98% specificity for inpatient, outpatient and physical examination patients, respectively. The median COI ratios of the false-positive group were significantly lower than those of the true-positive group.

Conclusions

The Elecsys^® HIV Duo test (Cobase801 analyzer) differentiates the detection of HIV-1 p24 Ag and HIV-1/2 Ab with high specificity and facilitates the diagnosis of patients with early HIV infection. Therefore, the Elecsys^®HIV Duo test is used for differentiation of antigen and antibody reactivity, making it suitable for routine clinical diagnosis.

Development of a Bead-Based Multiplex Assay for Use in Multianalyte Screening and Surveillance of HIV, Viral Hepatitis, Syphilis, and Herpes

Diagnostic assays that can simultaneously determine the presence of infection with multiple pathogens are key for diagnosis and surveillance. Current multiplex diagnostic assays are complex and often have limited availability. We developed a simple, multianalyte, pathogen detection assay for screening and serosurveillance using the Luminex Magpix platform that is high throughput and can be helpful in monitoring multiple diseases. The Luminex bead-based 10-plex immunoassay for the detection of HIV-1, HIV-2, Treponema pallidum, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), and HSV-2 infections was accomplished by coupling beads with specific antigens to detect IgG antibodies in plasma or serum samples. Each coupled antigen was systematically optimized, and the performance was evaluated using a panel of well-characterized specimens (n = 417) that contained antibodies to HIV-1, HIV-2, T. pallidum, HBV, HCV, HSV-1, and HSV-2. The multiplex assay had a sensitivity of 92.2% (95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval [CI], 90.2 to 94.0%) and a specificity of 98.1% (95% CI, 97.6 to 98.7%). The sensitivities and specificities for disease-specific biomarker detection ranged from 68.7 to 100% and 95.6 to 100%, respectively. The results showed that the 10-plex immunoassay had an overall agreement of 96.7% (95% CI, 96.7 to 97.3%) with reference tests and a corresponding kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.93). Kappa values for the individual pathogens ranged from 0.69 to 1.00. The assay is robust and allows the simultaneous detection of antibodies to multiple antigens using a small sample volume in a high-throughput format. This assay has the potential to simplify disease surveillance by providing an alternative to expensive and highly specialized individual tests.

Clinical Utility of the Signal-to-Cutoff Ratio of Reactive HIV Antigen/Antibody Screening Tests in Guiding Emergency Physician Management

BACKGROUND

The signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratio of the HIV antigen/antibody test may help immediately to differentiate true-positive results from false-positive results, which may be particularly useful in time-sensitive circumstances, such as when providing emergency department (ED) care.

SETTING

Seven US EDs with HIV screening programs using HIV antigen/antibody assays.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study of existing data correlated S/CO ratios with confirmed HIV status. Test characteristics at predetermined S/CO ratios and the S/CO ratio with the best performance by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 1035 patients with a reactive HIV antigen/antibody test, 232 (22.4%) were confirmed HIV-negative and 803 (77.6%) were confirmed HIV-positive. Of the 803 patients, 713 (88.8%) experienced chronic infections and 90 (11.2%) experienced acute infections. S/CO ratios were greater for HIV-positive (median 539.2) than for HIV-negative patients (median 1.93) (P < 0.001) and lower for acute infection (median 22.8) than for chronic infection (median 605.7) (P < 0.001). All patients with an S/CO ratio < 1.58 (n = 93) were HIV-negative (NPV 100%), and nearly all with an S/CO ≥ 20.7 (n = 760) (optimal level by ROC analysis) were HIV-positive (PPV 98.6%). Of patients with S/CO values between 1.58 and 20.7 (n = 182), 29.7% were HIV-positive.

CONCLUSIONS

The S/CO ratio may be used in real time to classify most ED patients as almost certain to be either HIV-positive or HIV-negative long before nucleic acid confirmatory testing is available. When combined with clinical judgment, this could guide preliminary result disclosure and management.

An Analysis of Predictive Sample-to-Cutoff Index for HIV Infection Confirmation Using Elecsys® HIV Combi PT Assay

BACKGROUND

Early and rapid diagnosis is crucial in HIV preventing and treatment. However, the false-positive rate (FPR) by 4-th generation detection assays was high in low-HIV-prevalence regions.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the relation between sample-to-cutoff index (COI) and HIV confirmatory results, and to explore a new COI threshold in our own laboratory to predict HIV infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed primarily reactive results by Elecsys® HIV combi PT assays and their confirmatory results by western blot (WB) at Nanjing Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The mean COI values of true positive (TP), false positive (FP), and indeterminate groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimal COI value for predicting HIV infection.

RESULTS

Totally 150,980 HIV serological results were reviewed, and 305 (0.2%) were primarily reactive. There are 82 (26.89%) true positives, 210 (71.92%) false positives, and 11 indeterminate samples confirmed by WB tests, and another 2 patients rejected WB tests. Mean COI values of TP (643.5) were greatly higher than that of FP (3.174) (P < 0.0001), but there is no significant difference between FP and indeterminate groups. Combining the requirement of HIV diagnosis and ROC analysis, 9.87 was established as the optimal threshold to predict the infection, with 100% sensitivity and 99.99% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

By adjusting the COI threshold, the FP samples can be reduced and the efficiency of screening assays can be increased, which can save much additional reagent and staff costs and much time for delivery of HIV test results.

Performance evaluation and optimized reporting workflow for HIV diagnostic screening and confirmatory tests in a low prevalence setting

BACKGROUND

Our institution utilizes an antigen/antibody screening test followed by a confirmatory antibody assay for preliminary positive results. Given the low prevalence for HIV infections in our institution's county, we suspect that a substantial portion of the reactive screens are false positives.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to characterize the false positivity rate of the HIV screening test performed at Stanford Health Care. In parallel, we modified our reporting workflow to release both the screening and confirmatory results simultaneously to mitigate the stress of a presumptive positive test.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed 45,296 eligible HIV screen specimens that underwent the Abbott ARCHITECT™ 4th generation HIV antigen/antibody combination assay between August 5, 2016 and March 16, 2021. Final sample signal/cutoff (S/CO) ratios ≥ 1 were deemed positive, which triggers a reflex order for the confirmatory Bio-Rad Geenius™ HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay. Additional chart review was performed for positive screen cases with negative or indeterminate confirmatory results.

RESULTS

Our institution demonstrated a 0.28% (128/45,296) positive screen rate, with 12.5% (16/128) of these samples confirmed as false positives based on a negative HIV-1 RNA test. Median S/CO ratios of true positive screens were significantly higher than those with negative or indeterminate confirmatory tests (602.27vs 2.98; p = 0.0000323). We implemented a new synchronized reporting system for positive screens, which co-releases screen and confirmatory reports without compromise in the overall turnaround time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates a relatively high percentage of false positive screens. Subsequently, by providing a more complete picture up front, our new reporting pipeline may reduce anxiety of a stand-alone positive screen and optimize downstream clinical decision-making.

Retrospective Study of the Seroprevalence of HIV, HCV, and HBV in Blood Donors at a Blood Bank of Western Mexico

Obtaining blood which is safe for transfusions is one of the principal challenges in the health systems of developing countries. Supply of contaminated blood increases morbidity, mortality, and the costs of patient care. In Mexico, serological screening is mandatory, but only a few of the main blood banks routinely perform a nucleic acid test (NAT). Data from 80,391 blood donations processed between August 2018 and December 2019 at the Central Blood Bank of the Western National Medical Center of the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) were analyzed. All donors were screened for serological markers and NAT was performed. Reactive donors were followed-up to confirm their results. The number of reactive donors and seroprevalence rates for HIV, HCV, and HBV were 152 (18.91/10,000), 385 (47.89/10,000), and 181 (22.51/10,000), respectively; however, these rates decreased when NAT-confirmed reactive results were considered. Male donors were found to have a higher seroprevalence than females, and younger donors higher than older donors. The present study shows that HIV, HCV, and HBV seroprevalence in blood donors in Western Mexico is low. We propose that Mexico should establish future strategies, including pathogen reduction technologies (PRTs), in order to improve blood safety and reduce transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs).

Missed Opportunity Encounters for Early Diagnosis of HIV Infection in Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of HIV infection improves patient outcomes and reduces transmission. Adolescents make up one-fifth of new HIV diagnoses in the United States. We sought to quantify the number of missed opportunity encounters (MOEs) before HIV diagnosis for adolescents at a pediatric hospital (PediHosp) and a proximate adult hospital which employs universal HIV screening in its emergency department (ED) (CountyHosp).

METHODS

An observational study at 2 academic tertiary care hospitals in the United States that included all adolescents 13-20 years old with a new diagnosis of behaviorally-acquired HIV infection from 2006 to 2017. MOE were defined as any encounter at PediHosp or CountyHosp after the latter of the individual's 13th birthday or the date 3 months after the individual's most recent negative HIV screen, and before the encounter of HIV diagnosis. Comparisons were made by site of diagnosis and location of MOE.

RESULTS

Two-hundred five subjects met inclusion criteria: 68% male, 76% Black and 81% men who have sex with men. There were 264 MOE, the proportion of adolescent ED encounters that were MOE at the PediHosp ED was 8.3 MOE per 10,000 encounters and the proportion at the CountyHosp ED was 1.2 (relative risk = 6.7; 95% CI: 4.1-11.0; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MOE for HIV diagnosis in adolescents occur frequently and are greater in number at a PediHosp as compared with a similar adult setting with universal screening. Universal HIV screening protocols at PediHosp may identify HIV-positive adolescents earlier.

HIV false positive screening serology due to sample contamination reduced by a dedicated sample and platform in a high prevalence environment

Automated testing of HIV serology on clinical chemistry analysers has become common. High sample throughput, high HIV prevalence and instrument design could all contribute to sample cross-contamination by microscopic droplet carry-over from seropositive samples to seronegative samples resulting in false positive low-reactive results. Following installation of an automated shared platform at our public health laboratory, we noted an increase in low reactive and false positive results. Subsequently, we investigated HIV serology screening test results for a period of 21 months. Of 485 initially low positive or equivocal samples 411 (85%) tested negative when retested using an independently collected sample. As creatinine is commonly requested with HIV screening, we used it as a proxy for concomitant clinical chemistry testing, indicating that a sample had likely been tested on a shared high-throughput instrument. The contamination risk was stratified between samples passing the clinical chemistry module first versus samples bypassing it. The odds ratio for a false positive HIV serology result was 4.1 (95% CI: 1.69-9.97) when creatinine level was determined first, versus not, on the same sample, suggesting contamination on the chemistry analyser. We subsequently issued a notice to obtain dedicated samples for HIV serology and added a suffix to the specimen identifier which restricted testing to a dedicated instrument. Low positive and false positive rates were determined before and after these interventions. Based on measured rates in low positive samples we estimate that before the intervention, of 44 117 HIV screening serology samples, 753 (1.71%) were false positive, declining to 48 of 7 072 samples (0.68%) post-intervention (p<0.01). Our findings showed that automated high throughput shared diagnostic platforms are at risk of generating false-positive HIV test results, due to sample contamination and that measures are required to address this. Restricting HIV serology samples to a dedicated platform resolved this problem.

High level of HIV false positives using EIA-based algorithm in survey: Importance of confirmatory testing

The Mozambique Indicators of Immunization, Malaria and HIV/AIDS (IMASIDA) survey was conducted in 2015 and used a two Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) (Vironostika HIV-1/2 and Murex HIV-1/2) based algorithm to determine the HIV status of the consented participants. The Mozambique Ministry of Health, with support from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US CDC), added Bio-Rad Geenius™ HIV-1/2 Supplemental Assay to the IMASIDA HIV testing algorithm to confirm all specimens that were found to be reactive on one or both EIAs. In total 11690 specimens were collected to estimate the proportion of HIV positive samples. Results indicate that the proportion of HIV positive samples based on the concordant positive results of two EIA assays was 21.5% (2518/11690). The addition of the Geenius assay to the IMASIDA HIV testing algorithm demonstrated that 792 (31.5%) of 2518 specimens were false-positive and reduced the proportion of HIV positive samples to 14.7% (1722/11690), demonstrating the importance of including a highly specific HIV test to confirm HIV diagnosis. HIV surveys exclusively based on EIA testing algorithm may result in misleading high prevalence results. Our results demonstrate that more specific confirmatory testing should be added to the EIA-based algorithms to ensure accurate HIV diagnosis and correct HIV prevalence estimate in cross-sectional surveys.

The evaluation of low cut-off index values of Elecsys® HIV combi PT assay in predicting false-positive results

Objective

To analyze the results of different cut‐off index (COI) values of Elecsys^® HIV combi PT assay and to assess the role of COI in reducing the frequency of false‐positive results.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of samples analyzed by Elecsys^® HIV combi PT assay, a 4th‐generation ECLIA, between 2016 and 2017. A total amount of 379 122 samples were collected for HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) screening.

Results

A total of 379 122 samples were analyzed. 2528 (0.67%) were positive by Elecsys^® HIV combi PT. Of these, 468 were false‐positive results, and most of them (94.87%) were in samples with 1 < COI < 15. The false‐positive rate was 0.12%. Patients with false‐positive samples were more distributed in elder (P < .001) and female (P < .001) than true‐positive specimens. The median COI in true‐positive specimens was (385.20), which is significantly higher than false‐positive specimens (2.08). The consistency between Elecsys^® HIV combi PT assay and 3rd‐generation and positive predictive value (PPV) increased with higher COI values. Cancer, infection, and neurological diseases were considered the potential confounding factors of HIV false‐positive results (19.44%, 11.11%, and 6.62%, respectively).

Conclusion

Samples with low COI values, especially those contain confounding factors, need to be further scrutinized to determine whether the confounding factors may cause false‐positive problem. In addition, the hypothesis that low COI values may predict false‐positive results is valid.

Risks of requiring a dedicated molecular specimen for HIV diagnosis and a potential strategy for mitigation

Background

HIV screening (i.e. antigen/antibody) tests are followed by a supplemental (i.e. antibody-only) if the screen is positive. Discrepant results can result from two scenarios: a false-positive screening test or acute HIV infection. These scenarios can be distinguished by a molecular HIV test, but due to contamination concerns, our laboratory recently implemented a policy requiring a second specimen dedicated for molecular HIV testing. Our objective was to (1) characterize the effect of this policy on the time-to-diagnosis for patients with discrepant screening and supplemental test results, and (2) explore “strength of positivity” as an interim predictor of screening test accuracy while awaiting confirmatory test results.

Methods

Data from our laboratory information system, electronic health record, and instrument logs were used to collate data for all HIV testing performed at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (BJH) between January 1, 2014 and October 18, 2017.

Results

Requiring a dedicated specimen for molecular testing significantly increased the time-to-diagnosis for patients with discrepant screening and supplemental HIV tests (p = 0.0084). This policy also contributed to loss-to-followup, with 0/35 discrepant cases lost-to-followup prior to policy implementation compared to 2/10 after implementation. However, by optimizing the signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratio of the screening test, we were able to more accurately distinguish false-positives from acute-HIV prior to molecular testing (sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 89%).

Conclusions

We propose utilizing quantitative fourth-generation assay results (S/CO) ratios as a predictor of infection true positivity in situations where the screening assay is reactive but the supplemental test is negative and confirmatory molecular results are not immediately available.

Decreased Seroreactivity in Individuals Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy during Acute HIV Infection

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) during acute HIV infection (AHI) interrupts viral dynamics and may delay the emergence of serological markers targeted by current HIV screening and confirmatory assays, thus creating challenges for correctly classifying HIV infection status. The performance of three HIV antigen/antibody combination (HIV Ag/Ab Combo) assays (the Bio-Rad GS, Abbott Architect, and Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 assays) was evaluated with samples collected from RV254/South East Asia Research Collaboration in HIV 010 (RV254/SEARCH010) study (Bangkok, Thailand) participants at weeks 12 and 24 following the initiation of ART at Fiebig stage I (FI) (n = 23), FII (n = 39), or FIII/IV (n = 22). Supplemental, confirmatory testing was performed by the Geenius HIV 1/2 and HIV-1 Western blot assays (Bio-Rad). Samples from 30 untreated, HIV-1-infected individuals demonstrated robust HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay reactivity with well-developed HIV-1 Western blotting profiles by 24 weeks after infection. In contrast, 52.2% of samples from individuals initiating ART at FI, 7.7% of samples from individuals initiating ART at FII, and 4.5% of samples from individuals initiating ART at FIII/IV were nonreactive by the HIV Ag/Ab Combo assays, with 36.4 to 39.1% of samples having low signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) results by the Architect and BioPlex assays (S/CO < 10). Seroreversion from a reactive to a nonreactive status was observed in 10 individuals initiating ART at FII and 3 individuals initiating ART at FIII/IV. The Geenius and HIV-1 Western blot assay results were negative or indeterminate for 73.9% and 69.6% of individuals, respectively, treated at FI; 50.0% and 26.3% of individuals, respectively, treated at FII; and 54.5% and 40.9% of individuals, respectively, treated at FIII/IV. Virologic suppression of HIV-1 by ART during AHI impedes seroconversion to biomarkers of infection, limiting the utility of HIV Ag/Ab Combo and supplemental, confirmatory assays for infection status determination.

Sample-to-cutoff ratios using Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo: The influence with the results of supplemental tests and optimal cutoff value to predict HIV infection

BACKGROUND

The Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo has excellent performance for HIV screening; however, the false-positive rate (FPR) was high in low HIV prevalence setting.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of sample-to-cutoff (s/co) ratios by Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo with the results of confirmatory test and explore the potential utility of s/co to predict HIV infection.

METHODS

A retrospective review on Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo reactive results was performed at a teaching hospital in Xi'an. The s/co values in different groups, that is, true positives (TP) and false positives (FP), different Western blotting (WB) bands among WB-positive cases, were compared. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff value for predicting HIV infection.

RESULTS

During the study period, 219 out of 84 702 patients were reactive by ARCHITECT with a 0.0992% of HIV prevalence and a 56.25% of FPR. The mean s/co ratios in TP were significantly higher than that in FP (458.15 vs 3.11, P < 0.0001). Among the WB-positive cases, the s/co ratios increased significantly with the increase in the number of bands, P = 0.0065. The optimal cutoff (24.44) by ROC analysis can provide the highest sum of sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) with no FP results.

CONCLUSIONS

For Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo, the FPR is reduced when s/co ratios increase, and the s/co ≥24.44 may be reliable to predict HIV infection.

BioRad BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay: Incidence of false positivity in a low-prevalence population and its effects on the current HIV testing algorithm

BACKGROUND

The BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay, unlike other HIV 1/2 antigen/antibody immunoassays, is capable of differentiating positive HIV-1 antibodies (Groups M and O) from HIV-2 antibodies and/or HIV-1 p24 antigen in a single test.

OBJECTIVE

The Alaska State Virology Laboratory (ASVL) adopted the BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay early 2017 and can report on its performance in terms of false positivity in a low-prevalence population and its effects on the current HIV testing algorithm recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

STUDY DESIGN

Specimens received between March 2017 and August 2018 were screened using the BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay. Specimens screening positive for HIV antibodies or antigen were further confirmed using the Geenius™ HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay and/or HIV RNA testing.

RESULTS

Of the 12,338 sera screened by the BioPlex assay for HIV, 35 specimens were positive. Only 22 of the specimens were confirmed by supplemental testing and were considered to be truly positive (PPV, 62.9%). RNA was not detected in these cases suggesting initial false positivity on the BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay. True positive results had index values (IDX) of >180 whereas false positive IDX's were between 1 and 4, with the exception of one specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that specimens demonstrating positivity with low IDX values <4 on the BioPlex® HIV Ag-Ab assay proceed directly to RNA testing, essentially bypassing supplemental antibody confirmation tests, to reduce turnaround time and cost of HIV confirmation.

HIV infection in Xi'an, China: epidemic characterization, risk factors to false positives and potential utility of the sample-to-cutoff index to identify true positives using Architect HIV Ag/Ab combo

Background

In China, although tremendous efforts has been made, the HIV/AIDS is still not controlled.

Objectives

The study was carried out to determine the epidemic of HIV infection in Xi'an, analyse false positives (FP) risk factors and potential utility of sample-to-cutoff index to identify true positives using Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo.

Methods

A retrospective review for HIV screening by Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo was performed in a teaching hospital in Xi'an between 2015 and 2016. The prevalence of HIV, positive predictive value (PPV) at different cut-off indexices (COI) were calculated. The epidemic of infections and risk factors for FP results were investigated.

Results

In the study, the HIV prevalence and FP rate of Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo were 0.076 and 46.08%, respectively. The Han Chinese, males and people aged < 40 years accounted for the majority of infections (98.29, 76.07 and 73.5%, respectively). 85.47% of the infections were transmitted through sexual contact (35.04% of male homosexual and 50.43% of heterosexual). COI at 1-10, 10-30 and ≥ 30, the PPVs were 0, 50 and 100%, respectively. The independent risk factors for FP, i.e., pregnancy and malignancy had a statistically significant association with FP (p < 0.05), and age had a very strong statistically significant association with FP (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In Xi'an, sexual contact was the most important transmission mode for HIV, and the infections were predominantly identified in Han Chinese, males, young and middle-aged people. For Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo, it can achieve 100% of PPV with COI ≥30, and the age was strongly statistically associated with FP.

Evaluation of the virtues and pitfalls in an HIV screening algorithm based on two fourth generation assays - A step towards an improved national algorithm

BACKGROUND

Fourth-generation immunoassays used for HIV screening, simultaneously detect anti-HIV antibodies and HIV-1 P24 antigen, but are prone to false-positive results. Usually, they are followed by highly specific third-generation assay, able to differentiate between HIV-1/2 infections. In Israel, screening algorithm is based on consecutive testing by two fourth-generation assays and confirmation by a third-generation test.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of this algorithm.

STUDY DESIGN

Architect HIV1/2 Combo (Combo) reactive results were tested by Vidas HIV Duo Ultra (VD). Confirmation was by INNO-LIA HIV 1/2 or Geenius assays. Five-year results were retrospectively analyzed. HIV true positives (TPs), acute infected (AI), false-positives (FPs) and HIV negatives, were as defined by the algorithm.

RESULTS

501,338 individuals were screened, of which 956 were TPs, 64 AI and 30 F Ps. Specificity was almost 100% and positive predictive value 97%. VD was negative in 94% of confirmed Combo false-reactive individuals. The Combo results in the first tested sample differed substantially between TPs, AI and FPs, enabling the determination of a cutoff value that distinguished 94% of TPs and AI from FPs.

CONCLUSIONS

An algorithm is suggested that will use a single sample collection. HIV negative diagnosis will be based on Combo unreactive or Combo reactive/VD negative results. HIV positive diagnosis will be based on Combo reactive/ VD positive results, given a Combo value above a designated cutoff. Below this cutoff samples will be tested by a molecular assay. Since HIV-2 rarely occurs in Israel, the use of a third-generation confirmation assay should be discussed.

HIV serology signal-to-cutoff ratio as a rapid method to predict confirmation of HIV infection

Early and rapid detection of patients with HIV is a key to preventing further transmission. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratio from initial screening fourth-generation HIV serology to predict subsequent confirmation of HIV. Patients with a first-time positive HIV serology (S/CO ratio ≥ 1) from 2012 to 2016 were included. Ratios were compared to the results of confirmatory testing. Predictive probabilities (PPs) of a positive confirmatory result were calculated based on a logistic regression model. A total of 45,138 HIV serology tests were performed; 250 patients met inclusion criteria, comprising 84 (34%) HIV negative patients, 136 (54%) chronic infections, and 30 (12%) acute infections. The PP of a confirmed positive result increased with higher S/CO ratios, with a PP of 100% for a S/CO of 55 (95% CI 95-100). This study enables a more informed discussion of the probability of HIV infection, based on HIV serology S/CO thresholds, prior to a confirmatory result.

Evaluation of the Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo Assay in a low-prevalence setting: The role of samples with a low S/CO ratio

BACKGROUND

The Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo Assay, a fourth-generation ELISA, has proven to be highly reliable for the diagnosis of HIV infection. However, its high sensitivity may lead to false-positive results.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Architect in a low-prevalence population and to assess the role of the sample-to-cutoff ratio (S/CO) in reducing the frequency of false-positive results.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study of samples analyzed by Architect between January 2015 and June 2017. Positive samples were confirmed by immunoblot (RIBA) or nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Different S/CO thresholds (1, 2.5, 10, 25, and 100) were analyzed to determine sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values (NPV, PPV). ROC analysis was used to determine the optimal S/CO.

RESULTS

A total of 69,471 samples were analyzed. 709 (1.02%) were positive by Architect. Of these, 63 (8.89%) were false-positive results. Most of them (93.65%) were in samples with S/CO < 100. However, most confirmations by NAATs (12 out of 19 cases) were also recorded for these samples. The optimal S/CO was 2.5, which provided the highest area under the ROC curve (0.9998) and no false-negative results. With this S/CO, sensitivity and specificity were 100.0%, and PPV and NPV were 95.8% and 100.0%, respectively. In addition, the frequency of false-positive results decreased significantly to 4.15%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Architect generates a relatively high number of false-positive results, raising the S/CO limit too much to increase specificity can lead to false-negative results, especially in newly infected individuals.

Diagnosis of HIV-1 infection: Performance of Xpert Qual and Geenius supplemental assays in fourth generation ELISA-reactive samples

BACKGROUND

Architect (AR) and Vidas (VD) fourth generation HIV screening immunoassays, which identify early stages of HIV infections, could have false positive results especially at low signal/cutoff (S/C) AR values. Geenius HIV1/2 (GS) is a specific confirmation line immunoassay that is not highly sensitive to early HIV infections. An HIV-1 RNA assay may better detect such infections.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate all AR-VD reactive samples with GS results, and to assess Xpert Qual HIV-1 RNA assay (XQ) as an alternative to GS, in the first low S/C AR-VD-reactive samples from a tested individual.

STUDY DESIGN

First AR-VD-reactive-GS-tested results from all individuals with resolved HIV status, collected between March 2015 and March 2017 (n = 749), were retrospectively assessed. Samples with AR-VD-reactive-GS-discordant results and those with low S/C AR-VD-reactive results, were tested by XQ. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of GS and XQ sensitivity/specificity was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 94.1% (705/749) of AR-VD-reactive results were true HIV-1 positive. All samples with <3 S/C AR values were false positive. XQ resolved all first samples with AR-VD-reactive-GS-discordant results. The diagnostic accuracy of XQ in low (≤33 S/C) AR-VD-reactive samples was better than that of GS (97.6%, 81/83 versus 73.5%, 61/83, p < 0.01). ROC analysis for low S/C AR samples was optimal for pooled XQ and GS results.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating XQ in the current screening algorithm for the first AR-VD-reactive-GS-discordant samples may significantly reduce overall turn-around time of HIV-1 diagnosis.

HIV misdiagnosis: A root cause analysis leading to improvements in HIV diagnosis and patient care

BACKGROUND

Standard diagnostic testing for HIV infection has traditionally relied on a high sensitivity HIV antibody screening test using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) followed by a high specificity antibody confirmatory test such as a Western Blot. Recently several of the screening assays have been enhanced with an ability to identify p24 antigen thereby narrowing the diagnostic window.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the implications of enhanced HIV screening methods that may be leading to HIV misdiagnoses.

STUDY DESIGN

A patient deemed to be an HIV infected 'elite controller' was found to be misdiagnosed when undergoing detailed investigations prior to initiating antiretroviral therapy. A root cause analysis was performed to identify the causative factors of this misdiagnosis. A retrospective review of all "elite controllers" in Alberta, Canada revealed challenges of current HIV testing algorithms.

RESULTS

Technical and human factors were identified as being causative in this HIV misdiagnosis including (i) high rates of false reactive results on the Abbott ARCHITECT HIV-1&2 COMBO EIA, (ii) human error in reading the initial Western blot, (iii) HIV algorithmic directives in which confirmatory (Western blot) testing was not performed on a repeatedly reactive screen test. The outcome of this analysis identified opportunities for improvement, including implementation of a newly approved (automated) confirmatory assay and improved communication between the clinician and laboratory.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV testing remains problematic despite significant advances in HIV test performance and algorithm development, presenting new and unexpected issues. Ensuring a high-quality management system including implementation of the latest HIV technologies and algorithms along with human resources and policies are required to minimize the impact of false positive diagnoses, especially in the era of universal screening and 'test and treat' recommendations.

Specificity of two HIV screening tests detecting simultaneously HIV-1 p24 antigen and antibodies to HIV-1 and -2

This study aimed at assessing the specificity of the Elecsys^® HIV combi PT in comparison to the ARCHITECT^® HIV Ag/Ab Combo. With both of these assays, 3997 unselected sera from patients of a tertiary health care centre in Basel, Switzerland, were screened for HIV. Reactive sera were reanalysed on the VIDAS^® HIV Duo Ultra to identify false-reactive specimens prior to confirmation by quantitative PCR and line immunoassay. The Elecsys^® compared to the ARCHITECT^® shows a similar specificity (99.7% versus 99.8%) but a slightly lower positive predictive value (71.8% versus 80%). Samples tested with a cut-off index (COI) between 0.91 and 4.85 (cut-off <0.9) with the Elecsys^® and with a signal to cut-off index (S/CO) between 1.09 and 12.49 (cut-off <1.0) with the ARCHITECT^® were false-reactive. There was no false-reactive result with the VIDAS^®. Of the false-reactive samples, 66.7% could be related to patient-specific underlying conditions. The HIV two-tiered diagnostic algorithm proposed in this work improved the positive predictive values of the Elecsys^® or ARCHITECT^® to 100% when the results of the VIDAS^® were included. Values just above the cut-off are highly suspicious to be false-reactive and high COI or S/CO ratios are associated with true positivity.