Geriatric assessment with management in cancer care: Current evidence and potential mechanisms for future research

Geriatric assessment with management for older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy: a cluster-randomised controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Geriatric assessment and management (GAM) improve outcomes in older patients with cancer treated with surgery or chemotherapy. It is unclear whether GAM may provide better function and quality of life (QoL), or be cost-effective, in a radiotherapy (RT) setting.

METHODS

In this Norwegian cluster-randomised controlled pilot study, we assessed the impact of a GAM intervention involving specialist and primary health services. It was initiated in-hospital at the start of RT by assessing somatic and mental health, function, and social situation, followed by individually adapted management plans and systematic follow-up in the municipalities until 8 weeks after the end of RT, managed by municipal nurses as patients' care coordinators. Thirty-two municipal/city districts were 1:1 randomised to intervention or conventional care. Patients with cancer ≥ 65 years, referred for RT, were enrolled irrespective of cancer type, treatment intent, and frailty status, and followed the allocation of their residential district. The primary outcome was physical function measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes were overall quality of life (QoL), physical performance, use and costs of health services. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Study registration at ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03881137.

RESULTS

We included 178 patients, 89 in each group with comparable age (mean 74.1), sex (female 38.2%), and Edmonton Frail Scale scores (mean 3.4 [scale 0-17], scores 0-3 [fit] in 57%). More intervention patients received curative RT (76.4 vs 61.8%), had higher irradiation doses (mean 54.1 vs 45.5 Gy), and longer lasting RT (mean 4.4 vs 3.6 weeks). The primary outcome was completed by 91% (intervention) vs 88% (control) of patients. No significant differences between groups on predefined outcomes were observed. GAM costs represented 3% of health service costs for the intervention group during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this heterogeneous cohort of older patients receiving RT, the majority was fit. We found no impact of the intervention on patient-centred outcomes or the cost of health services. Targeting a more homogeneous group of only pre-frail and frail patients is strongly recommended in future studies needed to clarify the role and organisation of GAM in RT settings.

Geriatric Assessment in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of colorectal surgery among older adults is expected to rise due to the aging population. Geriatric conditions (e.g., frailty) are risk factors for poor surgical outcomes. The goal of this systematic review is to examine how current literature describes geriatric assessment interventions in colorectal surgery and associated outcomes.

METHODS

Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were completed. Review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews in health and social care. All cohort studies and randomized trials of adult colorectal surgery patients where geriatric assessment was performed were included. Geriatric assessment with/without management interventions were identified and described.

RESULTS

Seven-hundred ninety-three studies were identified. Duplicates (197) were removed. An additional 525 were excluded after title/abstract review. After full-text review, 20 studies met the criteria. Reference list review increased final total to 25 studies. All 25 studies were cohort studies. No randomized clinical trials were identified. Heterogeneous assessments were organized into geriatrics domains (mind, mobility, medications, matters most, and multi-complexity). Incomplete evaluations across geriatric domains were performed with few studies describing the use of assessments to impact management decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomized trials assessing the impact of geriatric assessment to tailor management strategies and improve outcomes in colorectal surgery. Few studies performed assessments to evaluate the geriatric domain matters most. These findings represent a gap in evidence for the efficacy of geriatric assessment and management strategies in colorectal surgical care.

Management of Older Adults With Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Geriatric Assessment

Older adults share a growing burden of cancer morbidity and mortality. This is present across the spectrum of oncologic diagnoses and is particularly true with colorectal cancer (CRC), where older adults continue to share the burden of diagnoses. However, optimal cancer treatment decision making in older adults remains a significant challenge, as the majority of previous clinical trials shaping the current treatment landscape have focused on younger patients, often with more robust performance status and fewer medical comorbid conditions. The heterogeneous aging process of older adults with CRC necessitates a personalized treatment approach, as approximately three-quarters of older adults with CRC also have a concominant geriatric syndrome and more than half of older adults with CRC are pre-frail or frail. Treatment decisions shoud be multifaceted, including consultation with the patient and their familes regarding their wishes, with consideration of the patient's quality of life, functional status, medical comorbid conditions, social support, and treatment toxicity risk. Geriatric assessment is a systematic and validated approach to assess an older adults's potential strengths and vulnerabilities, which can in turn be used to assist with comprehensive cancer care planning and support. In this review, we will summarize current treatment approaches for older adults with CRC, with a particular focus on the incorporation of the geriatric assessment.

Implementation of the Web-Enabled Cancer & Aging Resilience Evaluation (WeCARE) in an outpatient oncology setting

INTRODUCTION

Although geriatric assessments (GAs) are recommended for use in older adults with cancer, their integration into oncology practice remain suboptimal. Here, we report our experience integrating web-enabled GA (WeCARE) into oncology practice as an augmented delivery method and provider interface format to overcome implementation barriers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Older patients (≥60 years) with a gastro-intestinal (GI) malignancy presenting for an initial visit to medical oncology clinic at a single institution between December 7, 2021 and October 10, 2022 were contacted by staff two days in advance of their visits and sent a link to the WeCARE GA, rather than the paper version used previously. Results were directly embedded into the medical record. We describe our initial implementation outcomes and the results of a provider usability survey.

RESULTS

Of 266 eligible patients, 221 (83.1%) were successfully contacted by telephone and 200 (75.2%) completed the WeCARE prior to their appointment. More than one phone call was required to make contact for 35.7% of patients, with a mean duration of phone conversation of 2.8 min. Most patients preferred email delivery to text (63% vs 31%); 4.5% were unable to access surveys due to inadequate technology, and 25.7% brought up additional logistical concerns. Among GI oncology providers surveyed, all six found the WeCARE tool and dashboard acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. However, only a third of providers often or always used the dashboard to inform treatment decisions and guide interventions.

DISCUSSION

With nearly three-quarters of patients completing the WeCARE prior to their visits with minimal staff support and time required, this method of administration may be a viable format to overcome barriers to GA implementation. Additional work is needed to integrate the results meaningfully into clinical practice.

Nurse-led interventions among older adults affected by cancer: An integrative review

Objective

Aging can introduce significant changes in health, cognition, function, social status, and emotional status among older adults affected by cancer. Little is known about how existing nurse-led interventions address the needs of older adults. The objective was to identify existing nurse-led interventions among older adults to optimize recovery and survivorship needs.

Methods

A integrative systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines. Electronic databases (APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases) were searched using key search terms. Articles were assessed for inclusion according to a pre-determined eligibility criterion. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted. Findings were integrated into a narrative synthesis.

Results

Twenty-one studies were included, and a total of 4253 participants were represented. There were a range of study designs: quantitative (n ​= ​10), randomised controlled trials (n ​= ​6), mixed methods studies (n ​= ​3), qualitative (n ​= ​1), and a non-randomized controlled study (n ​= ​1). Most participants had prostate cancer, with some representation in colorectal, lung, head and neck, renal, esophageal, and mixed cancer patient populations.

Conclusions

This review shows a lack of evidence on the inclusion of geriatric assessments for older people with cancer within existing nurse-led interventions. Further research is needed to test nurse-led interventions with the inclusion of geriatric assessments and their contribution to the multidisciplinary team across the cancer care continuum for various cancer patient populations.

The Confusion Assessment Method Could Be More Accurate than the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale for Diagnosing Delirium in Older Cancer Patients: An Exploratory Study

BACKGROUND

Older people with cancer carry a high risk of delirium, an underdiagnosed syndrome due to its diagnostic complexity and often subtle presentation. Tools based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) are available to different health professionals. Our aim is to assess the prevalence of delirium in older people with cancer in an inpatient unit and the accuracy of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS).

METHODS

This exploratory, cross-sectional study included people aged 65 years or older with a diagnosis of cancer and admitted to the medical oncology unit from June 2021 to December 2022. The diagnostic accuracy of CAM and MDAS was analyzed against the gold standard medical diagnosis based on DSM-5 criteria by two medical oncologists. The cutoff point for the MDAS was determined using a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Among the 75 included patients (mean age 71.6 years, standard deviation 4.1; 52% males), the prevalence of delirium was 62.7%. The most prevalent types of cancer in patients with delirium were hematological and lung cancer. The scale with the highest diagnostic accuracy was the CAM, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86%, followed by the MDAS, with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 30%. The presence of cognitive impairment hindered the detection of delirium.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAM scale was more accurate than the MDAS pre-existing cognitive impairment in our sample. Further studies are needed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of delirium tools in older populations with cancer and in the presence of cognitive impairment.

Frailty and Cancer: Current Perspectives on Assessment and Monitoring

Frailty, an age-related condition of increased vulnerability to acute endogenous or exogenous stressors, is a key barrier to successful treatment of cancer in older people. In this group of patients, assessment of frailty is required before starting a new treatment. According to guidelines, the gold standard to assess frailty in older adults with cancer is geriatric screening followed by geriatric assessment (GA) across essential GA-domains (social status, physical function, nutrition, cognition, emotion, co-morbidity, polypharmacy). GA enables tailoring of both oncological therapy and non-oncological interventions to the patient's vulnerabilities. Large clinical trials recently have demonstrated that the feasibility and tolerability of systemic cancer treatment in older patients are significantly improved by such GA-guided management. Indications and optimal tools for frailty monitoring during the course of cancer treatment have not yet been defined in greater detail. New technologies such as wearable sensors or apps offer promising new opportunities to further develop frailty monitoring. This review describes the current standards and perspectives for the assessment and monitoring of frailty in elderly patients with cancer.

Chemobrain, Olfactory and Lifestyle Assessment in Onco-Geriatrics: Sex-Mediated Differences between Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy

A possible link between chemotherapy and cognitive impairment has been identified. In the literature, this condition is usually called chemobrain and can mostly affect some memory domain but can lead also to other cognitive impairments. Olfaction, which is known to be linked with cognitive domain and the nociception system, can also be affected by chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the main cognitive and olfactory abilities and the functional and nutritional state of a cohort of chemotherapy and immunotherapy onco-geriatric patients and control geriatrics subjects. Cognitive, olfactory, geriatric and nutritional assessments were performed through the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12, G8 test and a questionnaire on the adherence of the Mediterranean diet, respectively. Our findings show a gender effect on the MMSE. Overall results indicate more pronounced impairments both at the cognitive and frailty level regardless of the type of therapy. On the other hand, the Sniffin' Sticks performances highlight a significant decrease in olfactory perception ability of subjects following immunotherapy. Significant correlations between olfactory performance and MMSE and G8 scores were also found, as well as between MMSE and G8 measures.

Protocol paper: Multi-site, cluster-randomized clinical trial for optimizing functional outcomes of older cancer survivors after chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors over the age of 65 have unique needs due to the higher prevalence of functional and cognitive impairment, comorbidities, geriatric syndromes, and greater need for social support after chemotherapy. In this study, we will evaluate whether a Geriatric Evaluation and Management-Survivorship (GEMS) intervention improves functional outcomes important to older cancer survivors following chemotherapy.

METHODS

A cluster-randomized trial will be conducted in approximately 30 community oncology practices affiliated with the University of Rochester Cancer Center (URCC) National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Base. Participating sites will be randomized to the GEMS intervention, which includes Advanced Practice Practitioner (APP)-directed geriatric evaluation and management (GEM), and Survivorship Health Education (SHE) that is combined with Exercise for Cancer Patients (EXCAP©®), or usual care. Cancer survivors will be recruited from community oncology practices (of participating oncology physicians and APPs) after the enrolled clinicians have consented and completed a baseline survey. We will enroll 780 cancer survivors aged 65 years and older who have completed curative-intent chemotherapy for a solid tumor malignancy within four weeks of study enrollment. Cancer survivors will be asked to choose one caregiver to also participate for a total up to 780 caregivers. The primary aim is to compare the effectiveness of GEMS for improving patient-reported physical function at six months. The secondary aim is to compare effectiveness of GEMS for improving patient-reported cognitive function at six months. Tertiary aims include comparing the effectiveness of GEMS for improving: 1) Patient-reported physical function at twelve months; 2) objectively assessed physical function at six and twelve months; and 3) patient-reported cognitive function at twelve months and objectively assessed cognitive function at six and twelve months. Exploratory health care aims include: 1) Survivor satisfaction with care, 2) APP communication with primary care physicians (PCPs), 3) completion of referral appointments, and 4) hospitalizations at six and twelve months. Exploratory caregiver aims include: 1) Caregiver distress; 2) caregiver quality of life; 3) caregiver burden; and 4) satisfaction with patient care at six and twelve months.

DISCUSSION

If successful, GEMS would be an option for a standardized APP-led survivorship care intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT05006482, registered on August 9, 2021.

Safety of combining dabrafenib plus trametinib in elderly BRAF V600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma patients: real-world data analysis of Spanish patients (ELDERLYMEL)

Efficacy and safety of dabrafenib and trametinib in metastatic melanoma have been demonstrated in two-phase III and one-phase I/II clinical trials. However, patients at least 75 years old (y.o.) were largely underrepresented. Additionally, the safety profile of dabrafenib and trametinib based on age is unknown. ELDERLYMEL is a retrospective noninterventional multicenter study, describing the effectiveness and safety of at least 75 y.o. patients compared with less than 75 y.o. patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutated melanoma treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib or dabrafenib monotherapy. A total of 159 patients were included, 130 less than 75 y.o. and 29 at least 75 y.o. Clinical features were similar between the groups, except in the number of comorbidities, number of metastatic sites, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and BRAF V600-mutation type. Five patients per group received dabrafenib monotherapy. There were no differences in adverse events (AEs) rate or grade between the groups. However, AE profiles were different between the groups, being pyrexia infrequent in patients at least 75 y.o. (13.8% vs. 42.3%; P = 0.005). Dabrafenib and trametinib dose intensities were lower in at least 75 y.o. patients (P = 0.018 and P = 0.020), but there were no differences in effectiveness between the groups. Finally, in a multivariate analysis, sex (female) was the only variable independently associated with an increased risk of AE grade ≥3. Data from the ELDERLYMEL study demonstrate that dabrafenib plus trametinib is safe and effective in at least 75 y.o. patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutated melanoma without increasing toxicity. Additionally, we describe a different safety profile depending on age and sex.

Age-related health deficits and five-year mortality among older, long-term cancer survivors

INTRODUCTION

Geriatric assessment evaluates multiple domains of health that, together, are superior to using chronologic age for predicting outcomes, such as hospitalization and mortality among patients with cancer. Most studies have not included comparison groups of individuals without cancer and assessed domains around the time of initial cancer diagnosis. Further, the potential for brief, self-reported measures to capture deficits that similarly predict mortality has not been well examined. This study compared age-related health deficit prevalence between older, long-term cancer survivors and individuals without a cancer history, and estimated associations between deficits and mortality risk among survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analyses included participants in the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS)-II Nutrition Cohort who were cancer-free at enrollment in 1992/1993 and completed the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) global health questionnaire in 2011. Age-related deficits in five domains (comorbidities, functional status, mental health, malnutrition/weight loss, and social support) were self-reported. Cancer information was self-reported and confirmed via medical records or state cancer registries. Vital status through 2016 and cause of death was ascertained by linkage with the National Death Index.

RESULTS

Analyses included 9979 participants (median age = 80) diagnosed with invasive cancer 5-20 years prior to completing the 2011 survey and 63,578 participants without a cancer history (median age = 79). Overall deficits in the five domains were similar among long-term cancer survivors and controls. However, survivors of specific cancer types - non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), lung, and kidney cancer - were more likely to report deficits in mental health and functional status than the control group. Among all survivors, each domain was independently associated with all-cause mortality, particularly functional status (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-2.27) and mental health (HR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.65-2.04). Mortality risk increased with the number of deficits.

DISCUSSION

These results suggest that, several years after treatment, NHL, lung, and kidney cancer survivors are still more likely to experience age-related deficits compared to other similarly-aged individuals. Furthermore, results show that shorter, self-reported physical and mental health assessments, such as the PROMIS® global health questions, are predictive of mortality among older, long-term cancer survivors and, therefore, may be useful in clinical and research settings.

Falls, walking or balance problems, and limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) among older endometrial cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Functional status deficits are important quality of life concerns for older cancer survivors. We examined the prevalence of falls, walking/balance problems, and limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) among older women with a history of endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Cancer registry records from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program linked with Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) data were used to identify endometrial cancer survivors aged ≥ 65 years who completed a survey ≥ 1 year after their cancer diagnosis (N = 3766), as well as an age- and race-matched group of women without a cancer history (N = 3766). We estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) to compare the prevalence of falls, walking or balance problems, and limitations in ADLs (bathing, dressing, eating, getting in/out of chairs, walking, using the toilet) between groups.

RESULTS

Difficulty with walking or balance was more common among survivors than the noncancer group (43% vs 36%; PR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.10-1.27). Fall prevalence was similar between groups (endometrial cancer: 25%; noncancer: 26%; PR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.89-1.08). Nearly half of endometrial cancer survivors (47%) reported at least one ADL limitation, with several activities (getting in/out of a chair, walking, bathing, using the toilet) more often limited among survivors than among women without cancer.

CONCLUSION

Functional impairments, especially problems with walking and/or balance, are common among older endometrial cancer survivors. Our results highlight the importance of addressing functional problems during the ongoing survivorship care of women with a history of endometrial cancer, with referral to rehabilitation or other relevant services when indicated.

The Evolution of Geriatric Oncology and Geriatric Assessment over the Past Decade

Cancer is predominantly a disease of aging, and older adults represent the majority of cancer diagnoses and deaths. Older adults with cancer differ significantly from younger patients, leading to important distinctions in cancer treatment planning and decision-making. As a consequence, the field of geriatric oncology has blossomed and evolved over recent decades, as the need to bring personalized cancer care to older adults has been increasingly recognized and a focus of study. The geriatric assessment (GA) has become the cornerstone of geriatric oncology research, and the past year has yielded promising results regarding the implementation of GA into routine cancer treatment decisions and outcomes for older adults. In this article, we provide an overview of the field of geriatric oncology and highlight recent breakthroughs with the use of GA in cancer care. Further work is needed to continue to provide personalized, evidence-based care for each older adult with cancer.

Evaluating the association of frailty with communication about aging-related concerns between older patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists

BACKGROUND

A geriatric assessment (GA) intervention improves communication about aging-related concerns, but its effect on communication in patients with various levels of frailty is unknown.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a nationwide trial of patients aged ≥70 years with incurable cancer and impairment on 1 or more GA domains (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02107443; principal investigator Supriya G. Mohile). Practice sites were randomized to either the GA-intervention or usual care. Frailty was assessed with a deficit accumulation index (range, 0-1), and patients were stratified as robust (0 to <0.2), prefrail (0.2 to <0.35), or frail (≥0.35). The clinic visit after the GA-intervention was audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded to evaluate the number and quality of conversations about aging-related concerns. Linear mixed models examined differences in the number and quality of conversations within and between arms. All P values were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 541) were classified as robust (27%), prefrail (42%), or frail (31%). In the usual care arm, frail patients (vs robust ones) engaged in more aging-related conversations (adjusted mean difference, 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-2.87), conversations of higher quality (difference, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.24-2.0), and more discussions about evidence-based recommendations (difference, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.04-1.38; all P values ≤ .01). Similarly, in the GA intervention arm, frail patients (vs robust ones) engaged in more aging-related conversations (difference, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.51-3.47), conversations of higher quality (difference, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.56-2.06), and more discussions about evidence-based recommendations (difference, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.32-1.42; all P values ≤ .01). Furthermore, the GA-intervention significantly improved the number and quality of conversations in all patients: robust, prefrail, and frail (all P values ≤ .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher degrees of frailty and those exposed to the GA-intervention had more and higher quality conversations about aging-related concerns with oncologists.

LAY SUMMARY

A geriatric assessment (GA) intervention improves communication about aging-related concerns, but its effect on communication in patients with various levels of frailty is unknown. This study conducted a secondary analysis of a nationwide trial of patients aged ≥70 years with incurable cancer and 1 or more GA domain impairments. Patients were stratified as robust, prefrail, or frail. The number and quality of conversations about aging-related concerns that occurred during the clinic visit after the GA-intervention were determined. Patients with higher degrees of frailty and those in the GA intervention arm had more and higher quality conversations about aging-related concerns with oncologists.

Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaires Among Older Adults with Advanced Cancer

CONTEXT

Systematic collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reduces symptom burden and improves quality of life. The ability of older adults to complete PROs, however, has not been thoroughly studied.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether older adults with advanced cancer received assistance completing PROs, the nature of the assistance, the factors associated with receiving assistance, and how the prevalence of assistance changed over time.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a multisite cluster randomized controlled study of geriatric assessment (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02107443). Adults ≥70 years with advanced cancer completed multiple PROs at 4 time points (enrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months). Factors associated with receipt of assistance were assessed with bivariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The study included 541 adults (range 70-96 years, 49% female, mixed incurable cancer diagnoses). Twenty-eight percent (153/541) received assistance completing PROs. Of these, 42% received assistance from caregivers, 37% from research staff, and 15% from both. Factors associated with receiving assistance included older age [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 3.71, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.03-13.38], lower education level (3.92, 2.11-7.29), impaired cognition (1.90, 1.23-2.93), impaired functional status (2.16, 1.33-3.52), and impaired hearing (1.38, 1.05-1.80). Eighty percent of individuals who received assistance were identified at study initiation. Receiving assistance decreased over time from 28% to 18%, partially due to drop-outs.

CONCLUSION

Over a quarter of older adults with advanced cancer in this study received assistance completing PROs. Completing PROs is a key aspect of many clinical programs and cancer trials; assistance in completing PROs should be offered and provided.

Immunotherapy in older patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common types of cancer globally and is currently the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Recently, immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been shown with encouraging anticancer activity and safety in clinical trials. To reverse the phenomenon of tumours evading immune response, ICIs can be used to stimulate the natural antitumour potential of cancer cells by blocking the relevant checkpoints to activate T cells. However, the components and functions of the immune system may undergo a series of changes with ageing, known as 'immunosenescence,' potentially affecting the antitumour effect and safety of immunotherapy. In the current phase III clinical trials of ICIs including nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, the proportion of patients with HCC older than 65 years in CheckMate 459, KEYNOTE-240 and IMbrave150 is 51%, 58% and 50%, respectively, which is less than 70%-73% of epidemiological investigation. Therefore, the elderly population recruited in clinical trials may not accurately represent the real-world elderly patients with HCC, which affects the extrapolation of the efficacy and safety profile obtained in clinical trials to the elderly population in the real world. This review provides the latest advances in ICIs immuno-treatment available for HCC and relevant information about their therapeutic effects and safety on elderly patients. We discuss the benefits of ICIs for older HCC patients, and relevant recommendations about conducting further clinical trials are proposed for more complete answers to this clinical issue.

Electronic FRAIL score as a predictor of treatment outcomes in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Frailty is a significant risk factor for poor outcomes among older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We present an automatically derived electronic frailty screening tool (FRAIL score) as a predictor of patient outcomes.

METHODS

Patients aged 70 or over who received R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy for DLBCL between 2010 and ` were retrospectively assessed for their FRAIL scores. Measured treatment outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-limiting toxicity from chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were analysed. When stratified by FRAIL score, the estimated 5-year PFS was 58%, 48% and, 0% for those with scores of 0-1, 2, and 3-5, respectively (p = 0.012). Similarly, the estimated 5-year OS for these respective groups was 60%, 60% and 0% (p = 0.010). Patients with a FRAIL score of 3-5 were also more likely than those with a score of 0-1 to need dose reduction or treatment delay due to toxicity (odds ratio [OR] 12.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.42-109.72) and less likely to complete the six planned cycles of treatment (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.77).

CONCLUSION

The FRAIL score is independently predictive of OS, PFS, and treatment-related toxicity in older patients with DLBCL receiving R-CHOP chemotherapy. Once implemented, it provides a quick and accessible method to stratify disease and treatment-related risk among these patients.

Geriatric assessment with management for older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy. Protocol of a Norwegian cluster-randomised controlled pilot study

About 50% of patients with cancer are expected to need radiotherapy (RT), and the majority of these are older. To improve outcomes for older patients with cancer, geriatric assessment (GA) with management (GAM) is highly recommended. Evidence for its benefits is still scarce, in particular for patients receiving RT. We report the protocol of a cluster-randomised pilot study designed to test the effect, feasibility and health economic impact of a GAM intervention for patients ≥65 years, referred for palliative or curative RT. The randomising units are municipalities and city districts. The intervention is municipality-based and carried out in collaboration between hospital and municipal health services from the start of RT to eight weeks after the end of RT. Its main constituents are an initial GA followed by measures adapted to individual patients' impairments and needs, systematic symptom assessments and regular follow-up by municipal cancer nurses, appointed to coordinate the patient's care. Follow-up includes at least one weekly phone call, and a house call four weeks after the end of RT. All patients receive an individually adapted physical exercise program and nutritional counselling. Detailed guidelines for management of patients' impairments are provided. Patients allocated to the intervention group will be compared to controls receiving standard care. The primary outcome is physical function assessed by the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30. Secondary outcomes are global quality of life, objectively tested physical performance and use of health care services. Economic evaluation will be based on a comparison of costs and effects (measured by the main outcome measures). Feasibility will be assessed with mixed methodology, based on log notes and questionnaires filled in by the municipal nurses and interviews with patients and nurses. The study is carried out at two Norwegian RT centres. It was opened in May 2019. Follow-up will proceed until June 2022. Statistical analyses will start by the end of 2021. We expect the trial to provide important new knowledge about the effect, feasibility and costs of a GAM intervention for older patients receiving RT. Trial registration: ClinTrials.gov, ID NCT03881137, initial release 13th of March 2019.

Association of frailty with 90-day postoperative mortality & geriatric comanagement among older adults with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Geriatric medical comanagement of older surgical patients with cancer is associated with lower 90-day postoperative mortality. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that this association varies on the basis of the degree of a patient's frailty.

METHODS

Frailty was assessed using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index. Our hypothesis was evaluated using two approaches, both adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, preoperative albumin, operating room duration, and estimated blood loss. A logistic regression was performed with 90-day mortality as the outcome and geriatric comanagement, continuous Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index, and an interaction term between these two variables as the primary predictors. We then categorized frailty into four levels and, within each level, performed logistic regression with geriatric comanagement as the primary predictor and 90-day mortality as the outcome. Finally, we extracted the effect size and used a meta-analytic approach to test for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 1687 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent elective cancer surgery with a length of stay of ≥1 day, 931 (55%) received comanagement; 31 patients (3.3%) who received comanagement died within 90 days, compared with 72 (9.5%) who did not. Ninety-day mortality was not statistically significantly different by degree of frailty in either analysis (interaction P = 0.4; test of heterogeneity P = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

Geriatric comanagement is valuable for all older surgical patients, not just the frail, and should be provided to as large a portion of the older surgical population as possible. Further research should examine predictors of response to geriatric comanagement.

The Relationship Between Frailty and Emotional Health in Older Patients with Advanced Cancer

BACKGROUND

Aging-related deficits that eventually manifest as frailty may be associated with poor emotional health in older patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to examine the relationship between frailty and emotional health in this population.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of baseline data from a nationwide cluster randomized trial. Patients were aged ≥70 years with incurable stage III/IV solid tumors or lymphomas, had ≥1 geriatric assessment (GA) domain impairment, and had completed the Geriatric Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Distress Thermometer. Frailty was assessed using a Deficit Accumulation Index (DAI; range 0-1) based on GA, which did not include emotional health variables (depression and anxiety), and participants were stratified into robust, prefrail, and frail categories. Multivariate logistic regression models examined the association of frailty with emotional health outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.

RESULTS

Five hundred forty-one patients were included (mean age: 77 years; 70-96). DAI ranged from 0.04 to 0.94; 27% of patients were classified as robust, 42% prefrail, and 31% frail. Compared with robust patients, frail patients had an increased risk of screening positive for depression (aOR = 12.8; 95% CI = 6.1-27.0), anxiety (aOR = 6.6; 95% CI = 2.2-19.7), and emotional distress (aOR = 4.62; 95% CI = 2.9-8.3). Prefrail compared with robust patients also had an increased risk of screening positive for depression (aOR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.0-4.8) and distress (aOR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.0-2.8).

CONCLUSION

In older patients with advanced cancer, frailty is associated with poorer emotional health, which indicates a need for an integrated care approach to treating these patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A relationship exists between frailty and poor emotional health in older adults with advanced cancer. Identifying areas of frailty can prompt screening for emotional health and guide delivery of appropriate interventions. Alternatively, attention to emotional health may also improve frailty.

Prevalence of and factors associated with treatment modification at first cycle in older adults with advanced cancer receiving palliative treatment

INTRODUCTION

Treatment toxicities are common in older adults with cancer and consequently, treatment modifications are sometimes considered. We evaluated the prevalence and factors associated with treatment modifications at the first cycle in older patients receiving palliative systemic treatment.

METHODS

Patients (n = 369) from the GAP 70+ Trial (NCT02054741; PI: Mohile) usual care arm were included. Enrolled patients were aged 70+ with advanced cancer and ≥ 1 Geriatric Assessment (GA) domain impairment. Treatment modification was defined as any change from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines or published clinical trials. Baseline variables included: 1) sociodemographic factors; 2) clinical variables; 3) GA domains; and 4) physician beliefs about life expectancy. Bivariate analyses and multivariable cluster-weighted generalized estimating equation model were conducted to assess the association of baseline variables with cycle 1 treatment modifications.

RESULTS

Mean age was 77.2 years (range: 70-94); 62% had lung or gastrointestinal cancers, and 35% had treatment modifications at cycle 1. Increasing age by one year (odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.2), receipt of ≥second line of chemotherapy (OR 1.8, CI 1.1-3.0), functional impairment (OR 1.6, CI 1.1-2.3) and income ≤$50,000 (OR 1.7, CI 1.1-2.4) were independently associated with a higher likelihood of cycle 1 treatment modification.

CONCLUSION

Treatment modifications occurred in 35% of older adults with advanced cancer at cycle 1. Increasing age, receipt of ≥second line of chemotherapy, functional impairment, and lower income were independently associated with treatment modifications. These findings emphasize the need for evidence-based regimens in older adults with cancer and GA impairments.

Patient-Reported Cognitive and Functional Impairments Among Older Canadians With Cancer: a Population-Based Study

CONTEXT

Cancer is estimated to affect one out of two Canadians throughout their lifetime and to be the cause of death of one out of four Canadians. Although it can affect virtually patients of any age, it disproportionately affects older adults.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the present study is to assess the prevalence of self-reported cognitive and functional impairments among older adults with cancer vs. older adults without cancer; and to evaluate the factors associated with self-reported cognitive impairment among older adults with cancer.

METHODS

Canadian Community Health Survey data sets (2007-2016) were accessed, and participants 65 years wand older who answered the question Do you have cancer? and who have complete information about participant-reported cognitive function (assessed through health utilities index) were included. Differences in participant-reported functional status (including cognition, vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, and emotion) between older adults with or without cancer were evaluated through Chi-squared testing. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess factors associated with participant-reported cognitive impairment among older adults with cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 73,110 participants 65 years and older were included: 4342 participants with an active cancer diagnosis and 68,768 participants without an active cancer diagnosis (at the time of survey completion). Participants with cancer were more likely to report impairment in cognition (participants with cancer who can remember and think: 62.3%, whereas participants without cancer who can remember and think: 67.3%; P < 0.001), hearing (participants with cancer who can hear well: 82.2%, whereas participants without cancer who can hear well: 86.7%; P < 0.001), and mobility (participants with cancer who can walk without difficulty: 77.3%, whereas participants without cancer who can walk without difficulty: 84%; P < 0.001). The following factors were associated with participant-reported cognitive impairment among older adults with cancer: older age (odds ratio [OR] for age 65-69 years vs. age 80 years and older: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.35-0.84), lower income (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.14-3.92), poor self-perceived health (OR for excellent vs. poor health: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17-0.81), poor self-perceived mental health (OR for excellent vs. poor health: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.02-0.28), and illicit drug use (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.31-3.18).

CONCLUSION

Older adults with an active cancer diagnosis are more likely to report impaired cognitive and functional status compared with older adults without an active cancer diagnosis. More efforts are needed to ensure the integration of validated geriatric assessment tools (incorporating patient-reported elements) in the care of older adults with cancer.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older adults with cancer: Recommendations by the Italian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SIGG)

INTRODUCTION

Optimizing the approach to older adults with cancer is now a priority given the increasing frequency of new cancer diagnoses that are made in the older population. The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) represents the gold-standard for (1) defining prognosis and ability to withstand cancer treatments, (2) exploring the multiple aspects that define the complexity of frail older persons, and (3) designing person-tailored interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this document, based on a comprehensive revision of the literature, the Italian Society for Geriatrics and Gerontology proposes a CGA model (ONCOGER CGA) to be adopted by oncology centers for their routine approach to older patients with cancer.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A widespread use of this standardized CGA format will facilitate comparisons across institutions, promote studies based on a multidimensional patient assessment, and foster the inclusion of geriatric endpoints in oncological clinical trials. Furthermore, we predict that the use of a standardized CGA approach will increase the integration of geriatricians into oncology care teams with the final result of improving therapeutic choices and clinical outcomes.

Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions

Cancer is a disease of aging and, as the world's population ages, the number of older persons with cancer is increasing and will make up a growing share of the oncology population in virtually every country. Despite this, older patients remain vastly underrepresented in research that sets the standards for cancer treatments. Consequently, most of what we know about cancer therapeutics is based on clinical trials conducted in younger, healthier patients, and effective strategies to improve clinical trial participation of older adults with cancer remain sparse. For this systematic review, the authors evaluated published studies regarding barriers to participation and interventions to improve participation of older adults in cancer trials. The quality of the available evidence was low and, despite a literature describing multifaceted barriers, only one intervention study aimed to increase enrollment of older adults in trials. The findings starkly amplify the paucity of evidence-based, effective strategies to improve participation of this underrepresented population in cancer trials. Within these limitations, the authors provide their opinion on how the current cancer research infrastructure must be modified to accommodate the needs of older patients. Several underused solutions are offered to expand clinical trials to include older adults with cancer. However, as currently constructed, these recommendations alone will not solve the evidence gap in geriatric oncology, and efforts are needed to meet older and frail adults where they are by expanding clinical trials designed specifically for this population and leveraging real-world data.

Developing an electronic geriatric assessment to improve care of older adults with cancer receiving radiotherapy

Older adults make up a substantial proportion of patients diagnosed with cancer. Gaps in evidence of care for older adults with cancer leads to treatment heterogeneity and poor outcomes. Medical and Surgical Oncology clinics throughout the world are increasingly using Geriatric Assessment (GA) based approaches to treatment that are beginning to improve care through treatment decision-making communication, health-related quality of life outcomes, and reducing chemotherapy toxicities. Yet, GA based approaches are not often used in radiation oncology clinics. This manuscript aims to describe the ongoing development of an electronic patient-reported GA with real-time data interpretation and recommendation delivery to help increase the use of a personalized GA based approach to the care of older adults within radiation oncology clinics. Future studies demonstrating the utility and benefit of GA based approaches to help older adults undergoing radiotherapy for their cancers are still sorely needed.

Electronic FRAIL score may predict treatment outcomes in older adults with myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Frailty is a known risk factor for older patients with myeloma. Here we present realworld data using a computer-generated frailty assessment score (FRAIL score), based on 5 clinically derived parameters, in predicting patient outcomes.

METHODS

Older patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who received frontline treatment with cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone had their FRAIL score retrospectively assessed. Treatment outcomes were assessed using standard IMWG criteria, and event free survival and overall survival determined.

RESULTS

155 patients were analysed. Compared to those who were assessed as non-frail (FRAIL score 0-1) likely-frail patients (score ≥ 2) were less likely to complete the full course of treatment (24.3% vs 53.4%, p = 0.002), and more likely to terminate treatment due to toxicities (35.1% vs 22.0%, p = 0.109), as well as having a greater number of patients stop treatment early for reasons other than toxicity or progression (27.0% vs 10.2%, p = 0.010). After a median follow up of 42.5 months, likely-frail patients were found to have a trend for shorter event-free survival (median EFS, 8.7 vs 17.9 months, p = 0.064) and statistically inferior overall survival (median OS, 30.2 vs 49.8 months, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, stage, and Charlson comorbidity index, FRAIL score was prognostic for OS (HR = 3.47, 95% CI 1.88-6.4), but not EFS (HR = 1.28, 95%CI 0.79-2.06).

CONCLUSION

The FRAIL score is independently predictive of overall survival in older patients with myeloma receiving bortezomib-based induction chemotherapy and can help identify those patients more likely to experience treatment toxicity.

Capacity to Provide Geriatric Specialty Care for Older Adults in Community Oncology Practices

BACKGROUND

American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend that patients ≥65 years of age starting chemotherapy undergo a geriatric assessment (GA) to inform and guide management; however, little is known about resources available in community oncology practices to implement these guidelines and to facilitate geriatric oncology research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oncology practices within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) were electronically surveyed in 2017 regarding the availability of specialty providers, supportive services, and practice characteristics, as part of a larger survey of cancer care delivery research capacity.

RESULTS

Of the 943 NCORP practices, 504 (54%) responded to the survey, representing 210 practice groups. The median new cancer cases per year ≥65 years of age was 457 (interquartile range 227-939). Of respondents, only 2.0% of practices had a fellowship-trained geriatric oncologist on staff. Geriatricians were available for consultation or comanagement at 37% of sites, and of those, only 13% had availability within the oncology clinic (5% of overall). Practice size of ≥1,000 new adult cancer cases (ages ≥18) per year was associated with higher odds (1.81, confidence interval 1.02-3.23) of geriatrician availability. Other multidisciplinary care professionals that could support GA were variably available onsite: social worker (84%), nurse navigator (81%), pharmacist (77%), dietician (71%), rehabilitative medicine (57%), psychologist (42%), and psychiatrist (37%).

CONCLUSION

Only a third of community oncology practices have access to a geriatrician within their group and only 5% of community sites have access within the oncology clinic. Use of primarily self-administered GA tools that direct referrals to available services may be an effective implementation strategy for guideline-based care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Only a minority of community oncology practices in the U.S. have access to geriatric specialty care. Developing models of care that use patient-reported measures and/or other geriatric screening tools to assess and guide interventions in older adults, rather than geriatric consultations, are likely the most practical methods to improve the care of this vulnerable population.

Early stage breast cancer treatment and outcome of older patients treated in an oncogeriatric care and a standard care setting: an international comparison

Introduction

Since older patients with breast cancer are underrepresented in clinical trials, an oncogeriatric approach is advocated to guide treatment decisions. However, the effect on outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare treatments and outcomes between patients treated in an oncogeriatric and a standard care setting.

Methods

Patients aged ≥ 70 years with early stage breast cancer were included. The oncogeriatric cohort comprised unselected patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center, and the standard cohort patients from a Dutch population-based cohort. Cox models were used to characterize the influence of care setting on recurrence risk and overall mortality.

Results

Overall, 268 patients were included in the oncogeriatric and 1932 patients in the standard cohort. Patients in the oncogeriatric cohort were slightly younger, had more comorbidity, and received more adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Oncogeriatric care was associated with a lower risk of recurrence, which remained significant after adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–0.99]. Oncogeriatric care was also associated with a lower overall mortality, which also remained significant after adjustment for patient and tumour characteristics (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.87).

Conclusions

Patients treated in the oncogeriatric care setting had a lower risk of recurrence, which may be explained by more systemic treatment. Overall mortality was also lower, but other explanations besides care setting could not be ruled out as the cohorts had different patient profiles. Future studies need to clarify the impact of an oncogeriatric approach on outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05860-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impairment and Longitudinal Recovery of Older Adults Treated with Radical Cystectomy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer includes radical cystectomy, a major surgery that can be associated with significant toxicity. Limited data exist related to changes in patient global health status and recovery following radical cystectomy. We used geriatric assessment to longitudinally compare health related impairments in older and younger patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who undergo radical cystectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Older and younger patients (70 or older and younger than 70 years) with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy at an academic institution were enrolled between 2012 and 2019. Patients completed the geriatric assessment before radical cystectomy, and 1, 3 and 12 months after radical cystectomy. For each geriatric assessment measure the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare score distribution between age groups at each time point. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare distributions between time points within each age group.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients (42 younger and 38 older) were enrolled. Before radical cystectomy 78% of patients were impaired on at least 1 geriatric assessment measure. Both age groups had worsening physical function and nutrition at 1 month after radical cystectomy, with older patients having a greater decline in function than younger patients. Both groups recovered to baseline at 3 months after radical cystectomy and maintained this status at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of impairments were found across age groups in the short term after radical cystectomy, followed by recovery to baseline.

Pilot prospective study of Frailty and Functionality in routine clinical assessment in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

A Frailty and Functionality evaluation for alloHCT was implemented using existing resources. We describe the implementation of this evaluation across all ages and at first consultation, and correlate results with posttransplant outcomes in 168 patients. The evaluation consists of: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), grip strength (GS), timed up and go test (TUGT), self-rated health question (SRH), Single question of Falls, albumin and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) levels. Median time to perform the evaluation was 5-6 min. Median age was 58 years (range: 19-77) and median follow-up was 5.3 months. TUGT > 10 s (HR 2.92; p = 0.003), raised CRP (HR 4.40; p < 0.001), and hypoalbuminemia (HR 2.10; p = 0.043) were significant risk factors for worse overal survival (OS). CFS ≥ 3 (HR 3.11; p = 0.009), TUGT > 10 s (HR 3.47; p = 0.003), GS (HR 2.56; p = 0.029), SRH (<excellent) (HR 3.8 × 10⁶; p < 0.001), elevated CRP (HR 11.8; p < 0.001), and hypoalbuminemia (HR 4.6; p < 0.001), were significant predictors for worse non relapse mortality (NRM). On multivariable analysis, TUGT > 10 s and raised CRP were significant predictors for worse OS and NRM. SRH (<excellent) was a significant predictor for higher NRM. Frailty and Functionality can be assessed in routine clinical practice in alloHCT and may be predictive of short-term outcomes.

Lessons Learned from Arti-Collaborating to Improve Care: the Past, Present, and Future of the Cancer and Aging Research Group

Dr Arti Hurria, who died tragically in November 2018, was a driving force in the growing field of geriatric oncology. She led the field through her commitment to her goals, collaboration with her colleagues, and the creation of the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG). As two of her closest colleagues, we are carrying her work forward with our colleagues through an infrastructure grant we led with Arti from the National Institute on Aging (R21/33; CARinG). This grant will provide a national structure for continuing to build the field through research, mentorship, and dissemination. We miss our friend dearly but are committed to carrying her legacy forward through CARG. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:879-883, 2019.

Managing older patients with cancer

With the growing population of adults over age 70 years, clinicians must know how to care appropriately for the increasing number of older patients with cancer. Although older adults have higher rates of surgical complications and chemotherapy-related toxicity, they should not be excluded from treatment opportunities based on age alone. Rather, patients should be assessed for fitness, or functional age, for a more accurate estimation of how they will tolerate treatment. This article discusses considerations clinicians should take into account when developing effective treatment plans that do not compromise quality of life for older patients with cancer.

Use of an Abbreviated Geriatric Screening Tool in the Assessment of Older Cancer Patients' Functional Status, Dependency, and Comorbidities: Cross-Sectional Audit and Observations From a Regional Cancer Center in Australia

BACKGROUND

Malignancies are the leading cause of disease burden in Australia, comprising 19% of total diseases. Approximately 1 in 4 men and 1 in 6 women die from malignancies by 85 years of age, with patients aged 65 years and older contributing to 58% of diagnoses and 76% of cancer mortality. In the context of malignancy-related disease and age-related degeneration, there is a need for comprehensive assessment of older patients to plan for appropriate management and predict prognosis. The utility of available comprehensive geriatric assessment tools has been limited in routine practice because of their time-consuming nature, despite their informing clearer understanding of patients' functional status, better clinical decision making, prevention of unpredictable admissions and emergency department overload, and support services planning. Though there are several promising tools available, there is a lack of literature on tools that can comprehensively assess functional status in an expedited fashion.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to document functional status and comorbidities among a geriatric oncology patient cohort attending a regionally located, dedicated cancer care facility, using the completed Adelaide tool assessments. This study documents cohort characteristics, including sociodemographics, malignancy type, and comorbidities. Secondarily, we observed the utility of an abridged functional assessment in the multidisciplinary team (MDT) management of older cancer patients.

METHODS

The study comprised a facility-based cross-sectional audit of results obtained from a screening tool administered to patients aged 65 years and older and attending an outpatient medical oncology clinic for management of cancer from late 2015 to 2017. Data relating to five domains were collected, including instrumental activities of daily living, activities of daily living, performance status, unintended weight loss, and exhaustion. Sociodemographic and disease-related factors were summarized as frequencies with percentages or mean with SD. Distribution of functional status based on sociodemographic characteristics, living status, disease-related factors, and comorbidities was analyzed using a chi-square test. Cumulative dependencies in the five domains were identified, and patients were classified as fit, vulnerable, or frail. Supplementary review of presentation notes for cases discussed at MDT meetings was undertaken to identify discrepancies.

RESULTS

A majority of the study population showed poor functional status, with 88.7% (243/274) categorized as vulnerable and 8.4% (23/274) as frail. Exhaustion and unintended weight loss were identified as the most common contributors to dependency. Polypharmacy was strongly associated with decreased functional status.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of this study are congruent with the existence of dependency in various domains, and with similar research in geriatric oncology. The Adelaide tool provided a useful basis for MDT discussion and management, where cases were referred to the MDT. We recommend further examination of the tool's utility and impact in clinical decision making, and the distribution of dependencies in a rural cohort compared with metropolitan patients.

Cognitive function prior to systemic therapy and subsequent well-being in older breast cancer survivors: Longitudinal findings from the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationships between self-reported and objectively measured cognitive function prior to systemic therapy and subsequent well-being outcomes over 24 months in older breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Data were from 397 women aged 60 to 98 diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer in the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study recruited from 2010-2016. Cognitive function was measured at baseline (following surgery, prior to systemic therapy) using neuropsychological assessments of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE), learning and memory (LM), and the self-reported FACT-Cog scale. Well-being was measured using the FACT-G functional, physical, social, and emotional well-being domain scales at baseline and 12 and 24 months later, scaled from 0 (low) to 100 (high). Linear mixed-effects models assessed the relationships between each of baseline APE, LM, and FACT-Cog quartiles with well-being scores over 24 months, adjusted for confounding variables.

RESULTS

At baseline, older survivors in the lowest APE, LM, and FACT-Cog score quartiles experienced poorer global well-being than those in the highest quartiles. At 24 months, older survivors tended to improve in well-being, and there were no differences according to baseline APE or LM scores. At 24 months, mean global well-being was 80.3 (95% CI: 76.2-84.3) among those in the lowest vs 86.6 (95% CI: 83.1-90.1) in the highest FACT-cog quartile, a clinically meaningful difference of 6.3 points (95% CI: 1.5-11.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older breast cancer survivors, self-reported, but not objective cognitive impairments, were associated with lower global well-being over the first 2 years of survivorship.

[Multiple myeloma in old people : Practical skills for geriatricians and general practitioners]

Multiple myeloma is an age-associated disease. In aged and multimorbid patients the diagnosis could be delayed due to the diversity of symptoms of this disease. Key diagnostic steps are the detection of an M protein as a surrogate of clonal plasma cell proliferation and evaluation of the CRAB criteria (hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, bone lesions). The individual prognosis and vulnerability to treatment complications can be assessed by use of validated scores. Following the introduction of many new drugs, vulnerable aged patients with multiple myeloma can also be very effectively treated with modern (partially chemotherapy-free) combination treatment and additional supportive care. Successful management of aged and multimorbid patients with multiple myeloma is not the sole task of the treating hemato-oncologist but also mostly requires the inclusion of general practitioners and geriatricians.

[Cross-speciality geriatrics: A health-care challenge for the 21st century]

Increasing numbers of older persons are being treated by specialties other than Geriatric Medicine. Specialists turn to Geriatric Teams when they need to accurately stratify their patients' risk and prognosis, predict the potential impact of their, often, invasive interventions, optimise their clinical status, and contribute to discharge planning. Oncology and Haematology, Cardiology, General Surgery, and other surgical departments are examples where such collaborative working is already established, to a varying extent. The use of the term "Cross-speciality Geriatrics" is suggested when geriatric care is provided in clinical areas traditionally outside the reach of Geriatric Teams. The core principles of Geriatric Medicine (comprehensive geriatric assessment, patient-centred multidisciplinary targeted interventions, and input at point-of-care) are adapted to the specifics of each specialty and applied to frail older patients in order to deliver a holistic assessment/treatment, better patient/carer experience, and improved clinical outcomes. Using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment methodology and Frailty scoring in such patients provides invaluable prognostic information, helps in decision making, and enables personalised treatment strategies. There is evidence that such an approach improves the efficiency of health care systems and patient outcomes. This article includes a review of these concepts, describes existing models of care, presents the most commonly used clinical tools, and offers examples of excellence in this new era of geriatric care. In an ever ageing population it is likely that teams will be asked to provide Cross-specialty Geriatrics across different Health Care systems. The fundamentals for its implementation are in place, but further evidence is required to guide future development and consolidation, making it one of the most important challenges for Geriatrics in the coming years.

Cancer and older adult patient care

Cancer occurs most frequently in patients aged 65 and older. With the increasing age of the world's population, there will be a significant increase in cancer diagnoses in older adults. Aging imposes a wide variety of physiological responses, comorbidities, and ailments, but older patients are less represented in clinical studies. Specific needs of older patients with cancer often go under-recognized and consequently unmet. In this review, common diagnoses that can affect the outcomes of this population, including frailty, malnutrition, and delirium, are discussed. Areas that need further research to improve the care of geriatric cancer patients, particularly in the hospital settings, are also identified.

Communication With Older Patients With Cancer Using Geriatric Assessment: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial From the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program

Importance

Older patients with cancer and their caregivers worry about the effects of cancer treatment on aging-related domains (eg, function and cognition). Quality conversations with oncologists about aging-related concerns could improve patient-centered outcomes. A geriatric assessment (GA) can capture evidence-based aging-related conditions associated with poor clinical outcomes (eg, toxic effects) for older patients with cancer.

Objective

To determine whether providing a GA summary and GA-guided recommendations to oncologists can improve communication about aging-related concerns.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cluster-randomized clinical trial enrolled 541 participants from 31 community oncology practices within the University of Rochester National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program from October 29, 2014, to April 28, 2017. Patients were aged 70 years or older with an advanced solid malignant tumor or lymphoma who had at least 1 impaired GA domain; patients chose 1 caregiver to participate. The primary outcome was assessed on an intent-to-treat basis.

Interventions

Oncology practices were randomized to receive either a tailored GA summary with recommendations for each enrolled patient (intervention) or alerts only for patients meeting criteria for depression or cognitive impairment (usual care).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The predetermined primary outcome was patient satisfaction with communication about aging-related concerns (modified Health Care Climate Questionnaire [score range, 0-28; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction]), measured after the first oncology visit after the GA. Secondary outcomes included the number of aging-related concerns discussed during the visit (from content analysis of audiorecordings), quality of life (measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale for patients and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey for caregivers), and caregiver satisfaction with communication about aging-related patient concerns.

Results

A total of 541 eligible patients (264 women, 276 men, and 1 patient did not provide data; mean [SD] age, 76.6 [5.2] years) and 414 caregivers (310 women, 101 men, and 3 caregivers did not provide data; mean age, 66.5 [12.5] years) were enrolled. Patients in the intervention group were more satisfied after the visit with communication about aging-related concerns (difference in mean score, 1.09 points; 95% CI, 0.05-2.13 points; P = .04); satisfaction with communication about aging-related concerns remained higher in the intervention group over 6 months (difference in mean score, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.04-2.16; P = .04). There were more aging-related conversations in the intervention group's visits (difference, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.22-4.95; P < .001). Caregivers in the intervention group were more satisfied with communication after the visit (difference, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.12-1.98; P = .03). Quality of life outcomes did not differ between groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Including GA in oncology clinical visits for older adults with advanced cancer improves patient-centered and caregiver-centered communication about aging-related concerns.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02107443.

Adherence to geriatric assessment-based recommendations in older patients with cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study in Belgium

Background

In the general older population, geriatric assessment (GA)-guided treatment plans can improve overall survival, quality of life and functional status (FS). In GA-related research in geriatric oncology, studies mainly focused on geriatric screening and GA but not on geriatric recommendations, interventions and follow-up. The aim of this study was to investigate the adherence to geriatric recommendations and subsequent actions undertaken in older patients with cancer.

Patient and methods

A prospective Belgian multicenter (N = 22) cohort study included patients ≥70 years with a malignant tumor upon oncologic treatment decision. Patients with an abnormal result on the geriatric screening (G8 ≤14/17) underwent GA. Geriatric recommendations were formulated based on GA results. At follow-up the adherence to geriatric recommendations was documented including a description of actions undertaken.

Results

From November 2012 till February 2015, G8 screening was carried out in 8451 patients, of which 5838 patients had an abnormal result. Geriatric recommendations data were available for 5631 patients. Geriatric recommendations were made for 4459 patients. Geriatric interventions data were available for 4167 patients. A total of 12 384 geriatric recommendations were made. At least one different geriatric recommendation was implemented in 2874 patients. A dietician, social worker and geriatrician intervened most frequently for problems detected on the nutritional, social and functional domain. A total of 7569 actions were undertaken for a total of 5725 geriatric interventions, most frequently nutritional support and supplements, extended home care and psychological support.

Conclusions

This large-scale Belgian study focuses on the adherence to geriatric recommendations and subsequent actions undertaken and contributes to the optimal management of older patients with cancer. We identified the domains for which geriatric recommendations are most frequently made and adhered to, and which referrals to other health care workers and facilities are frequently applied in the multidisciplinary approach of older patients with cancer.

Engaging older patients with cancer and their caregivers as partners in cancer research

Active patient partner engagement with SCOREboard – a diverse group of older patients with cancer, caregivers of older patients with cancer, survivors, and patient advocates – to conduct the largest randomized geriatric assessment clinical trial to date, has been shown to be feasible and resulted in tangible and invaluable benefits for both the research team and patient partners alike. Actively engaging patient partners should be an essential component in the development, conduct, and completion of all clinical research.

Managing elderly with colorectal cancer

The aging population is an increasing healthcare concern in developing countries. In Singapore, 25% of the local population are expected to be older than 65 years old by 2030. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked third most diagnosed cancers worldwide with up to 1.8 million new cases diagnosed in 2018. 60% of newly diagnosed CRC are among patients who are 70 years or older and hence majority of these patients will invariably face challenges with frailty and multiple comorbidities that require appropriate assessment and stratification. The standard of care in patients with stage I or II CRC is surgery with curative intent. For patients with stage III CRC, upfront surgical resection of tumor along with adjuvant chemotherapy is the internationally recommended treatment approach. As for those patients with metastatic disease, they are usually managed within a multidisciplinary team and considered for surgical resection if deemed feasible. Elderly patients are mostly burdened with frailty, functional dependency and existing co-morbidities, all of which are predictors of early postoperative mortality and morbidity in patients with CRC. This article thus aims to review existing evidence to discuss the intricate decision-making process for the surgical management of elderly patient with CRC.

Community Oncologists' Decision-Making for Treatment of Older Patients With Cancer

Background: This study's objectives were to describe community oncologists' beliefs about and confidence with geriatric care and to determine whether geriatric-relevant information influences cancer treatment decisions. Methods: Community oncologists were recruited to participate in 2 multisite geriatric oncology trials. Participants shared their beliefs about and confidence in caring for older adults. They were also asked to make a first-line chemotherapy recommendation (combination vs single-agent vs no chemotherapy) for a hypothetical vignette of an older patient with advanced pancreatic cancer. Each oncologist received one randomly chosen vignette that varied on 3 variables: age (72/84 years), impaired function (yes/no), and cognitive impairment (yes/no). Other patient characteristics were held constant. Logistic regression models were used to identify associations between oncologist/vignette-patient characteristics and treatment decisions. Results: Oncologist response rate was 61% (n=305/498). Most oncologists agreed that "the care of older adults with cancer needs to be improved" (89%) and that "geriatrics training is essential" (72%). However, <25% were "very confident" in recognizing dementia or conducting a fall risk or functional assessment, and only 23% reported using the geriatric assessment in clinic. Each randomly varied patient characteristic was independently associated with the decision to treat: younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.01; 95% CI, 2.73-9.20), normal cognition (aOR, 5.42; 95% CI, 3.01-9.76), and being functionally intact (aOR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.12-7.00). Accounting for all vignettes across all scenarios, 161 oncologists (52%) said they would offer chemotherapy. All variables were independently associated with prescribing single-agent over combination chemotherapy (older age: aOR, 3.22; 95% CI 1.43-7.25, impaired cognition: aOR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.36-7.20, impaired function: aOR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.12-5.72). Oncologists' characteristics were not associated with decisions about providing chemotherapy. Conclusion: Geriatric-relevant information, when available, strongly influences community oncologists' treatment decisions.

Arti Hurria and the progress in integrating the geriatric assessment into oncology: Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology review paper

Until recently, the progress in the diagnosis and management of cancer has not been matched by similar progress in the assessment of the increasing numbers of older and more complex patients with cancer. Dr. Arti Hurria identified this gap at the outset of her career, which she dedicated toward studying the geriatric assessment (GA) as an improvement over traditional methods used in oncology to assess vulnerability in older patients with cancer. This review documents the progress of the GA and its integration into oncology. First, we detail the GA's origins in the field of geriatrics. Next, we chronicle the early rise of geriatric oncology, highlighting the calls of early thought-leaders to meet the demands of the rapidly aging cancer population. We describe Dr. Hurria's early efforts toward meeting these calls though the implementation of the GA in oncology research. We then summarize some of the seminal studies constituting the evidence base supporting GA's implementation. Finally, we lay out the evolution of cancer-focused guidelines recommending the GA, concluding with future needs to advance the next steps toward more widespread implementation in routine cancer care. Throughout, we describe Dr. Hurria's vision and its execution in driving progress of the GA in oncology, from her fellowship training to her co-authored guidelines recommending GA for all older adults with cancer-published in the year of her untimely death.

Utility of a chemotherapy toxicity prediction tool for older patients in a community setting

Background

Expert groups have recommended incorporation of a geriatric assessment into clinical practice for older patients starting oncologic therapy. However, that practice is not standard primarily because of resource limitations. In the present study, we evaluated the effect on treatment decisions by oncologists in the community oncology setting of a brief geriatric assessment tool that estimates risk of toxicity.

Methods

This prospective longitudinal study in 5 community oncology practices in British Columbia involved patients 70 years of age and older starting a new cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen. Clinical personnel completed a brief validated geriatric assessment tool-the Cancer and Aging Research Group chemotherapy toxicity tool (carg-tt)-that estimates the risk of grade 3 or greater toxicity in older patients. Physicians were asked if the carg-tt changed their treatment plan or prompted extra supports. Patients were followed to assess the incidence of toxicity during treatment.

Results

The study enrolled 199 patients between July 2016 and February 2018. Mean age was 77 years. Treatment was palliative in 61.4% of the group. Compared with physician judgment, the carg-tt predicted higher rates of toxicity. In 5 patients, treatment was changed based on the carg-tt. In 38.5% of the patients, data from the tool prompted extra supports. Within the first 3 cycles of treatment, 21.3% of patients had experienced grade 3 or greater toxicity.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that use of a brief geriatric assessment tool is possible in a broad community oncology practice. The tool modified the oncologist's supportive care plan for a significant number of older patients undertaking cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Neurocognitive evaluation in older adult patients affected by glioma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) has an increasing incidence and dismal prognosis in older adults. This study evaluated neurocognitive status of an older adult population with GBM and its correlation with clinical and demographical variables.

METHODS

Each patient underwent an extended neuropsychological evaluation by means of a battery of standardized tests describing eight cognitive domains: global function; verbal learning; short- and long-term memory (LTM); executive functions (EFs); abstract reasoning (AR); attention; and visuo-constructional abilities (CA).

RESULTS

We assessed 79 patients with GBM (median age: 74 years). Out of this initial sample, a subgroup of seventeen patients with six-month median time underwent a follow-up test session. 46 out of the 79 patients (58.2%) presented multi-domain cognitive impairment, 24 patients (30.3%) showed single-domain cognitive impairment and only seven (9%) showed no cognitive impairment. Kaplan Meier estimator showed that patients with AR deficit had a poorer prognosis in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival (p < .001). At the multivariate analysis AR (deficit vs non; hazard ratio (HR) = 5.07, 95%; confidence interval (CI): 1.91-13.46; p < .001) was correlated with disease progression and overall survival, AR (deficit vs non; HR = 7.24, 95% CI: 2.58-20.32; p < .001). Eight out of seventeen patients who underwent follow-up test session showed cognitive improvement, five resulted in further deterioration, and four patients remained stable. LTM, EF, and CA were the most affected functions at follow-up, while verbal learning was the most improved one in patients with cognitive improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive functioning evaluation should be included among the standard clinical endpoints in the treatment of older adult neuro-oncology patients.

Understanding and improving multidisciplinary team working in geriatric medicine

Geriatric medicine is a speciality that has historically relied on team working to best serve patients. The nature of frailty in older people means that people present with numerous comorbidities, which in turn require a team-based approach to be managed, including allied health professionals, social work and nursing alongside medicine. The 'engine room' of the speciality has thus for many years been the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting-something other specialities have discovered only recently. Yet, rather paradoxically, the speciality has been slow compared to others (e.g. trauma, surgery, cancer) to reflect more formally on how team working can be enhanced, trained and supported in geriatric teams. This paper is a reflective review, grounded on our respective expertise in geriatric medicine and improvement science, on practice and its changing patterns within geriatric medicine, and the role of MDTs within it (Part 1). It offers a perspective from behavioural safety science, which has been studying team-working in healthcare for the last 20 years (Part 2) and concludes with practical suggestions, based on evidence, on how to integrate evidence and best practice into modern geriatric medicine-to address current and future challenges (Part 3).