Sintilimab Plus Platinum and Gemcitabine as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Squamous NSCLC: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial (ORIENT-12)

Advances in platinum-based cancer therapy: overcoming platinum resistance through rational combinatorial strategies

Platinum-based cancer therapy remains a cornerstone of first-line treatment for several solid tumours such as ovarian, testicular, and non-small cell lung cancers, where it has received regulatory approval as both monotherapy and combination regimens. However, the inevitable emergence of resistance has necessitated extensive preclinical and clinical efforts to develop rational platinum-based combinations. The most appealing candidates for combination therapy are those that offer additive and/or synergistic effects without undesirable overlapping toxicities. Whilst early strategies focussed on co-administration with cytotoxic chemotherapies, recent advances have shifted towards combinations with targeted therapies and immunotherapies, offering improved efficacy and durability of response. In this review, we provide a comprehensive analysis of recent clinical trials evaluating platinum-based combination strategies (excluding radiotherapy) and give an overview of trial concepts that will lead to more refined therapies for cancer. We also highlight emerging dual-drug codelivery nanosystems, platinum-based antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and multi-targeted platinum compounds with promising preclinical and/or clinical evidence. Beyond traditional drug pairings, the improved design strategies of new platinum compounds such as their incorporation into ADCs offer enhanced targeting and reactivity. Whilst promising preclinical examples like trastuzumab-Pt(II) and cetuximab-C8Pt(IV) bring optimism to combinatorial approaches, significant challenges including stability and controlled payload release remain to be addressed before clinical translation. By integrating advances in molecular profiling and rational drug development, platinum-based therapies continue to evolve, offering renewed optimism for overcoming drug resistance and improving patient outcomes, although challenges such as biomarker identification, toxicity management, and treatment costs remain to be fully addressed.

Advances in molecular pathology and therapy of non-small cell lung cancer

Over the past two decades, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has witnessed encouraging advancements in basic and clinical research. However, substantial unmet needs remain for patients worldwide, as drug resistance persists as an inevitable reality. Meanwhile, the journey towards amplifying the breadth and depth of the therapeutic effect requires comprehending and integrating diverse and profound progress. In this review, therefore, we aim to comprehensively present such progress that spans the various aspects of molecular pathology, encompassing elucidations of metastatic mechanisms, identification of therapeutic targets, and dissection of spatial omics. Additionally, we also highlight the numerous small molecule and antibody drugs, encompassing their application alone or in combination, across later-line, frontline, neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. Then, we elaborate on drug resistance mechanisms, mainly involving targeted therapies and immunotherapies, revealed by our proposed theoretical models to clarify interactions between cancer cells and a variety of non-malignant cells, as well as almost all the biological regulatory pathways. Finally, we outline mechanistic perspectives to pursue innovative treatments of NSCLC, through leveraging artificial intelligence to incorporate the latest insights into the design of finely-tuned, biomarker-driven combination strategies. This review not only provides an overview of the various strategies of how to reshape available armamentarium, but also illustrates an example of clinical translation of how to develop novel targeted drugs, to revolutionize therapeutic landscape for NSCLC.

The efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The combination chemotherapy of alpha-PD-1/PD-L1 has become the standard treatment option for some cancer patients. However, studies have shown that not all patients benefit from improved survival rates, especially the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal cancer (GC/GEJC) remains highly controversial. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at comparing the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in GC/GEJC patients.

METHOD

By searching relevant databases, RCTs published up to November 2024 were collected, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall survival (OS) and PFS were calculated. Meanwhile, the odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated.

RESULT

A total of 6842 patients were included in seven trials. In the summary analysis of OS, compared with the chemotherapy group, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with the chemotherapy group showed significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.76-0.85; p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.71-0.81; p < 0.0001). Additionally, there were significant differences in the incidence of TRAEs (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.21-2.02; p = 0.0001) and grade 3-4 TRAEs (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.30-1.58; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

When compared to chemotherapy, the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy improves survival but with higher toxicity risks, requiring careful benefit-risk evaluation in clinical practice.

A comprehensive review on targeting diverse immune cells for anticancer therapy: Beyond immune checkpoint inhibitors

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, primary resistance and acquired resistance continue to limit their efficacy for many patients. To address resistance and enhance the anti-tumor activity within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), numerous therapeutic strategies targeting both innate and adaptive immune cells have emerged. These include combination therapies with ICIs, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T), chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-Ms) or chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cell (CAR-NK) therapy, colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitors, dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, cytokine therapies, and chemokine inhibition. These approaches underscore the significant potential of the TIME in cancer treatment. This article provides a comprehensive and up-to-date review of the mechanisms of action of various innate and adaptive immune cells within the TIME, as well as the therapeutic strategies targeting each immune cell type, aiming to deepen the understanding of their therapeutic potential.

Economic Evaluation of Penpulimab Plus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Combination Therapy as First-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in China

INTRODUCTION

Penpulimab is a PD-1 monoclonal antibody recommended for treating squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of penpulimab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin against paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC in China.

METHODS

A three-state partitioned survival model was constructed using the efficacy outcomes obtained by digitizing the AK105-302 trial and was extrapolated to the lifetime horizon. Data on direct medical costs and utilities was gathered from the literature and commercial databases from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), life years (LYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were performed to test the model robustness.

RESULTS

The incremental efficacy of penpulimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin was 0.821 QALYs and 1.176 LYs with an incremental cost of $20,335 compared with paclitaxel plus carboplatin combination therapy. The ICER was $24,778 per QALY, falling below the threshold of three times the per capita gross domestic product of China, a commonly applied benchmark. The results of the one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the ICER values were primarily influenced by the utility of progression-free state and cost of penpulimab. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that penpulimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin was cost-effective for 98.3% of the cases. Scenario analysis yielded results similar to those of the base-case analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that penpulimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin combination therapy is cost-effective for patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC in China.

Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of long-term responders for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has shown long-term benefits in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer patients. However, the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and selection of appropriate therapies for long-term responders (LTR) to first-line programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors remain undetermined.

METHODS

About 413 advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer patients were included from 1 June 2015 to 31 August 2021. It examined clinicopathologic data, overall survival distributions, and treatment strategies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 213 (51.6%) were LTRs. PD-L1 expression ≥50% was observed in 39.1% of LTR patients, higher than in non-LTR patients (21.7%). After propensity score matching, Cox univariable analysis revealed pathological type (hazard ratio [HR] 0.563; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.391-0.811; P = .002), bone metastasis (HR 1.820; 95% CI: 1.278-2.590; P = .001), and liver metastasis (HR 2.220; 95% CI: 1.291-3.817; P = .004) as significant predictors of LTR. The pathological type (HR 0.641; 95% CI: 0.441-0.932; P = .020), bone metastasis (HR 1.593; 95% CI: 1.106-2.293; P = .012), and liver metastasis (HR 1.820; 95% CI: 1.046-3.165; P = .034) were significant predictors of LTR in Cox multivariable analysis. Significant difference showed in overall survival (P < .0001) for Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy of lung squamous cell carcinoma in LTR group compared with Sintilimab-chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsquamous cell carcinoma, bone metastasis, and liver metastasis were significant predictors of LTR. LTR patients showed a higher proportion of PD-L1 expression. Compared to Sintilimab-chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy may be more promising for long-term survival of lung squamous cell carcinoma patients. Key messages What is already known on this topic - Immunotherapy (IO) has demonstrated long-term survival benefits in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and optimal treatment strategies for long-term responders (LTR) to first-line programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors remain unclear, necessitating further investigation. What this study adds - This study identifies nonsquamous cell carcinoma, absence of bone metastasis, and absence of liver metastasis as significant predictors of LTR in NSCLC patients. LTR patients exhibit a higher proportion of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression (≥50%). Additionally, Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy shows superior overall survival outcomes for LTR with lung squamous cell carcinoma compared to Sintilimab-chemotherapy. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy - These findings provide critical insights for patient stratification and therapy optimization in NSCLC. The identification of predictive factors and superior therapeutic combinations can guide clinical decision-making, personalized treatment strategies, and inform future research on IO in NSCLC.

Efficacy of immunotherapy remained in patients with recurrent/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after surgery with or without postoperative thoracic radiotherapy: a bi-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

Since mediastinal lymph node dissection and radiotherapy (RT) have potential unclear impacts on pulmonary lymphatic system, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in recurrent/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who previously received radical surgery with or without thoracic RT.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy (2000.1.1-2021.7.2) and received immunotherapy after progression were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy was mainly evaluated based on progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of the ICIs. Toxicity was defined as treatment discontinuation due to immune-related adverse effects (irAEs).

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were enrolled in the final cohort and 30 (31.6%) patients received thoracic RT before ICI treatment. ICIs were administered as a first-line systematic treatment in 52.6% of patients. The median follow-up time was 14.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.3-18.7 months). The median PFS was 12.3 months (95% CI 8.5-36.6 months). Six (6.3%) patients had treatment suspended due to irAEs. Patients who received RT had comparable median PFS with the non-RT group (17.0 months vs. 11.1 months, p = 0.16). Similar toxicity rates were observed. Similar mPFS were reported in the stage III subgroup (RT vs. non-RT, 8.10 vs. 8.45 months, p = 0.86) or the subgroup treated by ICIs as primary systematic therapy (RT vs. non-RT, 13.6 vs. 16.1 months, p = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs remained effective in recurrent/metastatic NSCLC patients with radical surgery and RT did not significantly compromise therapeutic effects.

Efficacy and safety of first-line sintilimab plus anlotinib versus chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with standard platinum-based chemotherapy was suboptimal, with safety concerns. Following encouraging results from a preliminary phase I study, this phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line sintilimab and anlotinib in metastatic NSCLC.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized controlled trial (NCT04124731), metastatic NSCLC without epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), or proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) mutations, and previous treatments for metastatic disease were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus anlotinib (12 mg D1-14 every 3 weeks) or a standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients in the chemotherapy group were permitted to switch to sintilimab after disease progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

From November 2019 to March 2023, 99 patients were randomized into the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (n = 49) and the chemotherapy group (n = 50). The ORR was significantly higher in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (44.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.7%-59.8%) compared to the chemotherapy group (18.0%; 95% CI = 8.6%-31.4%, P = 0.003). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also notably longer (median: 14.4 vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.23-0.67; P < 0.001). The 24-month overall survival rate was 58.4% (95% CI = 40.4%-72.6%) and 43.2% (95% CI = 26.0%-59.2%), respectively. The rate of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was lower in the sintilimab plus anlotinib group (28.0%) than in the chemotherapy group (49.0%), especially for the hematological toxicities.

CONCLUSION

First-line sintilimab plus anlotinib showed improved ORR and PFS, alongside a superior safety profile, compared to the standard platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC patients.

Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in real-world patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the predictors of immunotherapy efficacy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the real world and to analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of patients receiving immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Clinical pathological data from patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were collected. Survival analysis and differential efficacy comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of PFS and objective response rate (ORR) were performed by Cox proportional risk regression models and logistic regression models to explore influence factors associated with the prognosis of immunotherapy.

RESULTS

(1) Overall, the median PFS (median PFS, mPFS) for 237 patients was 11.3 months (range: 8.5-14.1), the ORR was 55.7 %. Univariate and multivariate analyses of PFS in the overall population found that age ≥65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) physical status (PS) score of 0-1, clinical stage III, absence of liver metastases, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥47.8 were independent predictors of longer PFS in immunotherapy-advanced NSCLC. Univariate and multifactorial logistic regression analysis of ORR in 237 patients suggested that ECOG PS score, number of ICI lines and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were independent influence factors of ORR. (2) In the "stage IV, first-line, ECOG PS 0-1" subgroup, 106（106/237）patients had an mPFS of 10.9 months (range: 9.6-12.2) and an ORR of 59.4 %. Univariate and multivariate analyses of PFS in subgroups found that liver metastases, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and PNI were independent influencers of PFS. A univariate analysis of ORR found that only High-PNI was associated with longer PFS. (3) Additional factors affecting the efficacy were explored. A subgroup analysis among 64 (64/237) patients with accessible programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels showed a trend towards a PFS benefit in patients with PD-L1 tumor cell proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50 % and TPS < 1 % compared to patients with PD-L1 TPS < 1 % (p=0.196); A subgroup analysis among 91 (91/237) patients with traceable genetic test results showed that patients with positive driver genes (KRAS/MET/RET/HER2/EGFR/ALK) had a shorter PFS than patients with negative driver genes (HR=1.712, 95 % CI: 0.994-2.947, p=0.048); Subgroup analyses of efficacy assessment showed significantly prolonged PFS in patients with an initial or best outcome assessment of complete response (CR) or partial remission (PR) compared with stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) (P < 0.001). (4) Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring pharmacological intervention or discontinuation were recorded. 61 (61/237) patients experienced irAEs during treatment. Grade 1∼2 adverse reactions occurred in 27.8 % of patients and grade ≥3 adverse reactions in 3.8 % of patients. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence (P=0.728) and severity (P=0.612) of adverse events between the ICIs.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the practical experience of ICIs in the treatment of NSCLC in China by analyzing the efficacy and safety of real-world advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs. The results were generally consistent with those of clinical trials, and the factors with the greatest impact on the efficacy of ICIs were ECOG PS, clinical stage, and PNI. Therefore, physicians can predict the future benefit of immunotherapy for NSCLC based on clinical prognostic indicators and make individualized treatment choices.

Ivonescimab versus pembrolizumab for PD-L1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (HARMONi-2): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study in China

BACKGROUND

Ivonescimab is a bispecific antibody against programmed cell death protein 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor, yielding promising clinical outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in early-phase studies. We compared the efficacy and safety of ivonescimab with pembrolizumab in patients with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

HARMONi-2 is a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial across 55 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had locally advanced or metastatic PD-L1-positive non-small cell lung cancer without sensitising epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocations and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 20 mg/kg ivonescimab or 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by histology, clinical stage, and PD-L1 expression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by a masked independent radiographic review committee per RECIST v1.1 in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05499390; recruitment is complete, with the trial ongoing and final analysis to be reported later.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 9, 2022, and Aug 26, 2023, 398 (45%) of 879 screened patients were randomly assigned to receive ivonescimab (n=198) or pembrolizumab (n=200). At the preplanned interim analysis, median PFS was significantly longer with ivonescimab than with pembrolizumab (11·1 vs 5·8 months; stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·51 [95% CI 0·38-0·69]; one-sided p<0·0001). The PFS benefit of ivonescimab over pembrolizumab was broadly consistent within prespecified subgroups, including patients with PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) 1-49% (HR 0·54 [95% CI 0·37-0·78]) and PD-L1 TPS of 50% of higher (HR 0·48 [0·29-0·79]). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 58 (29%) patients with ivonescimab and 31 (16%) patients with pembrolizumab. Immune-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 14 (7%) of 197 patients on ivonescimab and 16 (8%) of 199 patients on pembrolizumab. Ivonescimab demonstrated a manageable safety profile in patients with both squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups.

INTERPRETATION

Ivonescimab significantly improved PFS compared with pembrolizumab in previously untreated patients with advanced PD-L1 positive non-small cell lung cancer. Therefore, ivonescimab might represent another treatment option in the first-line setting for PD-L1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

FUNDING

Akeso Biopharma.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin as a first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China

OBJECTIVES

Penpulimab is a novel programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor that has been approved in China for use in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC). However, the cost-effectiveness of this treatment in China remains to be determined. In this study, we aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of penpulimab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin for metastatic sq-NSCLC.

DESIGN

Based on the AK105-302 trial (NCT03866993), a Markov model was created to evaluate the disease progression of metastatic sq-NSCLC patients over 10 years. The model included progression-free survival, progressive disease and death. The utility values were derived from published literature. Sensitivity studies were used to assess the robustness of the model outputs.

SETTING

The Chinese healthcare system perspective.

PARTICIPANTS

A hypothetical Chinese cohort of patients with locally advanced or metastatic sq-NSCLC.

INTERVENTIONS

Penpulimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the cost of penpulimab plus chemotherapy increased by US$3717.72, with an increase of 0.43 QALYs. The ICER was US$8625.78/QALY, which was well below the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$38 052/QALY. This demonstrated higher cost-effectiveness benefits, as confirmed by the sensitivity analysis results.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the Chinese health system, penpulimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin is cost-effective for metastatic sq-NSCLC patients and can be used as an economical and effective treatment option.

Severe thyroiditis induced by sintilimab monotherapy in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer: a case report and literature review

Thyroid dysfunction is a common immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. Nevertheless, the incidence of severe cases, defined as grade 3 or higher, remains rare. This report presents a detailed case study of severe thyroiditis in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who developed grade 3 thyroiditis following a single cycle of sintilimab monotherapy. The clinical presentation in this patient was remarkable for its early onset, occurring one week after the initiation of sintilimab therapy, and for its severe manifestations. During hospitalization, a prompt and accurate differential diagnosis was performed. Sintilimab treatment was discontinued, and the patient was promptly started on high-dose glucocorticoids, with a tapering schedule implemented as the condition improved or reached Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1 or lower. The patient subsequently developed overt hypothyroidism, necessitating the initiation of thyroxine replacement therapy. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive review of the mechanisms and risk factors associated with thyroid dysfunction immune-related adverse events (TD-irAEs). It is imperative for clinicians to meticulously monitor the clinical symptoms exhibited by patients. For those presenting with symptoms, prompt diagnosis and appropriate symptomatic management are essential. Additionally, regular thyroid function testing is recommended for high-risk patients, and we advocate for the assessment of baseline levels of thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb) and thyroglobulin antibodies (TGAb) prior to initiating ICI treatment.

Resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Unraveling causes, developing effective strategies, and exploring potential breakthroughs

Over the last two decades, advancements in deciphering the intricate interactions between oncology and immunity have fueled a meteoric rise in immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, typified by an explosive growth of immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, resistance to immunotherapy remains inevitable. Herein we unravel the labyrinthine mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy, characterized by their involvement of nearly all types of cells within the body, beyond the extrinsic cancer cells, and importantly, such cells are not only (inhibitory or excitatory, or both) signal recipients but also producers, acting in a context-dependent manner. At the molecular level, these mechanisms underlie genetic and epigenetic aberrations, which are regulated by or regulate various protein kinases, growth factors, and cytokines with inherently dynamic and spatially heterogeneous properties. Additionally, macroscopic factors such as nutrition, comorbidities, and the microbiome within and around organs or tumor cells are involved. Therefore, developing therapeutic strategies combined with distinct action informed by preclinical, clinical, and real-world evidence, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, oncolytic viruses, and cell-based therapies, may stand as a judicious reality, although the ideality is to overcome resistance point-by-point through a novel drug. Notably, we highlight a realignment of treatment aims, moving the primary focus from eliminating cancer cells -- such as through chemotherapy and radiotherapy -- to promoting immune modulation and underscore the value of regulating various components within the host macro- or micro-environment, as their effects, even if seemingly minimal, can cumulatively contribute to visible clinical benefit when applied in combination with ICIs. Lastly, this review also emphasizes the current hurdles scattered throughout preclinical and clinical studies, and explores evolving directions in the landscape of immunotherapy for NSCLC.

A tumor cornification and immune-infiltration-based scheme for anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy response in advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (combo) exhibits significantly prolonged survival for squamous cell lung cancer (LUSC). An exploration of predictive biomarkers is still needed.

METHODS

High-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of 349 LUSC samples from the randomized, multi-center, phase 3 trial ORIENT-12 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03629925) was conducted for biomarker discovery, followed by flow cytometry and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) in additional clinical cohorts, and in vitro experiments were performed for verification.

RESULTS

A high abundance of activated CD8+ T and CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells benefited patients' outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS]; overall survival [OS]) with combo treatment. Tumor cornification level remarkably affected the infiltration of the two crucial immune cells. Thus, a novel scheme of LUSC immune infiltration and cornification characterization-based classification (LICC) was established for combo efficacy prediction. Patients who received combo treatment achieved significant PFS improvements in LICC1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.75, p = 0.0029) and LICC2 (HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17-0.58, p = 0.0002) subtypes but not in the LICC3 subtype (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.60-1.23, p = 0.4053). Via single-cell RNA-seq analysis, the tumor cornification signal was mainly mapped to SPRR3+ tumor cells, whose relationships with activated CD8+ T or CD56bright NK cells were verified using flow cytometry and mIHC. Our data suggest that SPRR3+ tumor cells might evade immune surveillance via the CD24-SIGLEC10 (M2 macrophage) axis to maintain a suppressive tumor microenvironment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor cornification greatly impacts immune infiltration, and the LICC scheme may guide clinical medication of anti-PD-1+chemo treatment in patients with LUSC.

FUNDING

The study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghia Multidisplinary Cooperation Building Project for Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Disease, and Innovent Biologics, Inc.

Health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with sintilimab or placebo plus pemetrexed and platinum (ORIENT-11): A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 ORIENT-11 study, sintilimab plus pemetrexed-platinum provided statistically significant longer overall survival and progression-free survival versus placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) analysis findings in ORIENT-11.

METHODS

PROs were measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Questionnaire Core 30 items (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) questionnaire. PRO endpoints included evaluation of least square (LS) mean changes from baseline to week 12 (platinum-containing treatment) and week 21 (maintenance treatment), time to true deterioration (TTD), and overall improvement or stability rate for QLQ-C30 and LCSS scales. PRO scores in two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline to week 12, week 21, and other time points were assessed with mixed-effect model repeated measures analysis. TTD was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Cox proportional hazards model between groups.

RESULTS

252 (94.7 %) patients in the sintilimab-combination group and 123 (93.9 %) patients in the placebo-combination group had a baseline and at least one postbaseline PRO assessment. Change from baseline to week 12 or 21 favored the sintilimab-combination group on QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), most function and symptoms scales, and most LCSS scales. Notably, the QLQ-C30 pain score change gradually deteriorated in the placebo-combination group with increased treatment. At the same time, it improved in the sintilimab-combination group significantly from 6 weeks later, with the improvement sustained in subsequent courses of treatment. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy significantly delayed the TTD in most QLQ-C30 and LCSS scales compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, and the overall improvement or stability rates were higher in the former.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of sintilimab to chemotherapy maintained or improved health-related quality of life and symptoms compared with chemotherapy. Along with the previous efficacy and safety results, these data support the addition of sintilimab to standard chemotherapy as first-line therapy in locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03607539.

Impact of Prophylactic Use of PEG-rhG-CSF on First-Line Immunochemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Cohort Study

Introduction

This study aimed to assess the impact of prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF on first-line immunochemotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

Methods

A cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line immunochemotherapy at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University between January 2019 and July 2024 was selected for this study. Patients were divided into the following two groups: a treatment group that received prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF (≥1 cycle) 48 hours after immunochemotherapy and a control group that did not receive PEG-rhG-CSF. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate, and safety. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to reduce potential confounders.

Results

A total of 220 patients were enrolled, with 87 in the treatment group and 133 in the control group. Median PFS was 10.5 months in both the treatment and control groups (p = 0.86), and median OS was 33.9 months in the treatment group versus not reached in the control group (p = 0.71). The overall response rate was 64.4% in the treatment group and 58.6% in the control group (p = 0.40). After propensity score-matched analysis (each group included 78 patients), median PFS was 12.6 months in the treatment group versus 10.5 months in the control group (p = 0.99), and median OS remained 30.3 months in the treatment group versus not reached in the control group (p = 0.85). The treatment group had a reduced incidence of chemotherapy interruptions, any grade of leukopenia, any grade of neutropenia, and grades 3 to 5 neutropenia, without an increase in immune-related adverse events.

Conclusions

The prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing first-line immunochemotherapy did not compromise efficacy and safety. It reduced chemotherapy interruptions and neutropenia, without increasing immune-related adverse events, thus supporting safe and uninterrupted treatment.

Exploring miR-21 Knock-Out Using CRISPR/Cas as a Treatment for Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Its high incidence and poor prognosis demonstrate the need to investigate new therapies. The PI3K/AKT pathway is activated in carcinogenic processes such as invasion, proliferation, and drug resistance. MiR-21 is a microRNA overexpressed in numerous types of cancer and which activates PI3K/AKT pathway by down-regulating its main targets, PTEN and PDCD4. CRISPR is a revolutionary gene-editing technology that allows genes to be deleted. The aim of this study was to use CRISPR/Cas9 technology as an option to reduce carcinogenic and drug resistance processes by eliminating miR-21.

METHODS

CRISPR/Cas9 was used to knock out miR-21 (miR-21 KO) in A549 lung cancer cells and thus reverse the carcinogenic processes activated by miR-21 overexpression. Furthermore, the effect of miR-21 KO on drug resistance was studied, choosing the main chemotherapeutic agents used for the treatment of lung cancer: gemcitabine, carboplatin, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin.

RESULTS

miR-21 KO A549 cells exhibited a reduction in proliferation, migration, and colony formation compared to A549 cells. In contrast, the expression of PTEN and PDCD4 increased in miR-21 KO A549 cells. Furthermore, miR-21 KO A549 cells showed a decrease in the IC50 of the drugs used for the treatment of lung cancer: gemcitabine, carboplatin, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, miR-21 knock-out using CRISPR/Cas could be a promising strategy for the treatment of lung cancer.

Cost-effectiveness of the addition of sintilimab as a first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Chinese healthcare system perspective

BACKGROUND

The ORIENT-15 double-blind randomized controlled trial demonstrated that the addition of sintilimab to chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) resulted in better clinical outcomes. In this analysis, we sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC from a healthcare system perspective in China.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was constructed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing chemotherapy alone with sintilimab for locally advanced or metastatic OSCC patients. Clinical data were obtained from the ORIENT-15 trial and extrapolated to 10 years. Health state utilities and costs were sourced from the literature and from public healthcare institutions. The primary outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Two different sensitivity analyses, one-way and probabilistic, were performed to assess model uncertainty.

RESULTS

Sintilimab-based chemotherapy was more costly ($31699.21 vs. $20687.42) and more effective (0.74 vs. 0.53) than placebo-based chemotherapy, resulting in an ICER of $51908.19 /QALY, which is greater than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of China ($38223/QALY). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the PFS and cost of sintilimab were the major influencing factors affecting the results.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with locally advanced or metastatic OSCC, sintilimab chemotherapy could improve survival time and health benefits compared with traditional chemotherapy, but the present analysis suggests that sintilimab is not a cost-effective treatment option in China.

A network comparison on efficacy and safety profiling of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are novel immunotherapeutic agents that have been approved for first-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, which have completed phase 3 clinical trials, as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Materials and methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed to extract eligible literature up to October 2023. Findings included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted based on PD-L1 expression levels and histological type.

Results

We analyzed 29 studies including 18,885 patients. In analyses of all patients, penpulimab plus chemotherapy led the way for OS (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.40-0.75) and PFS (HR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.27-0.67). Regarding OS, for patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, 1%-49% and <1%, camrelizumab + chemotherapy (HR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.21-1.11), cemiplimab + chemotherapy (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.79) and nivolumab + ipilimumab (HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.81) were considered optimal treatments. Compared with chemotherapy, monotherapy with nivolumab, cemiplimab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab and durvalumab had lower odds of TRAE grade ≥3.

Conclusion

In all patients, penpulimab plus chemotherapy was the most effective therapy, but treatment preferences varied by PD-L1 expression, histology type and associated outcomes. Safety at the individual patient level must be a high priority in the decision-making process. Further validation is warranted.

Predicting therapeutic response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on an integration model in resectable stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Accurately predicting response during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer remains clinically challenging. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of blood-based tumor mutational burden (bTMB) and a deep learning (DL) model in predicting major pathologic response (MPR) and survival from a phase 2 trial.

METHODS

Blood samples were prospectively collected from 45 patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. An integrated model, combining the computed tomography-based DL score, bTMB, and clinical factors, was developed to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

RESULTS

At baseline, bTMB were detected in 77.8% (35 of 45) of patients. Baseline bTMB ≥11 mutations/megabase was associated with significantly greater MPR rates (77.8% vs 38.5%, P = .042), and longer disease-free survival (P = .043), but not overall survival (P = .131), compared with bTMB <11 mutations/megabase in 35 patients with bTMB available. The developed DL model achieved an area under the curve of 0.703 in all patients. Importantly, the predictive performance of the integrated model improved to an area under the curve of 0.820 when combining the DL score with bTMB and clinical factors. Baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status was not associated with pathologic response and survival. Compared with ctDNA residual, ctDNA clearance before surgery was associated with significantly greater MPR rates (88.2% vs 11.1%, P < .001) and improved disease-free survival (P = .010).

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated model shows promise as a predictor of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Serial ctDNA dynamics provide a reliable tool for monitoring tumor response.

Dual inhibition of LAG-3 and PD-1 with IBI110 and sintilimab in advanced solid tumors: the first-in-human phase Ia/Ib study

BACKGROUND

Co-inhibition of immune checkpoints lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) and PD-1 is believed to enhance cancer immunotherapy through synergistic effects. Herein, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of IBI110 (anti-LAG-3 antibody) with sintilimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

In this open-label phase I study, phase Ia dose escalation of IBI110 monotherapy and phase Ib combination dose escalation of IBI110 plus sintilimab were conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. Additionally, phase Ib combination dose expansion of IBI110 plus sintilimab and chemotherapy was conducted in previously untreated, advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) and HER-2 negative gastric cancer (GC). In phase Ia dose escalation, patients received IBI110 monotherapy at 0.01/0.1/0.3/1/3/10/20 mg/kg Q3W. In phase Ib dose escalation, patients received IBI110 at 0.3/0.7/1.5/3/5/8/10 mg/kg Q3W plus sintilimab 200 mg Q3W. In phase Ib combination dose expansion, patients received IBI110 at recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) plus sintilimab 200 mg Q3W and chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability and efficacy including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by RECIST v1.1 and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity.

RESULTS

In phase Ia dose escalation (n = 28), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 67.9% patients and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 21.4% patients. In phase Ib combination dose escalation (n = 45), TRAEs occurred in 75.6% patients and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 22.2% patients. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. The most common TRAE was anemia (17.9%, including 3.6% ≥ G3) in phase Ia dose escalation of IBI110 monotherapy (n = 28), aspartate aminotransferase increased (28.9%, all G1-G2) in phase Ib dose escalation of IBI110 plus sintilimab (n = 45), anemia (70.0%, all G1-G2) in phase Ib dose expansion in sqNSCLC (n = 20), and neutrophil count decreased (64.7%, including 17.6%≥ G3) in phase Ib dose expansion in GC (n = 17). The RP2D of IBI110 was determined at 200 mg (3 mg/kg) Q3W. ORR in phase Ia/Ib dose escalation was 3.6% with IBI110 monotherapy and 14% with IBI110 plus sintilimab. In phase Ib combination dose expansion of IBI110 plus sintilimab and chemotherapy, unconfirmed and confirmed ORR in sqNSCLC (n = 20) was 80.0% (95% CI, 56.3-94.3) and 75.0% (95% CI, 50.9-91.3), respectively and in GC (n = 17) was 88.2% (95% CI, 63.6-98.5) and 70.6% (95% CI, 44.0-89.7), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IBI110 monotherapy and in combination with sintilimab were well-tolerated in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Encouraging efficacy of IBI110 in combination with sintilimab and chemotherapies was observed in sqNSCLC and GC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04085185.

Machine learning identifies immune-based biomarkers that predict efficacy of anti-angiogenesis-based therapies in advanced lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The anti-angiogenic drugs showed remarkable efficacy in the treatment of lung cancer. Nonetheless, the potential roles of the intra-tumoral immune cell abundances and peripheral blood immunological features in prognosis prediction of patients with advanced lung cancer receiving anti-angiogenesis-based therapies remain unknown. In this study, we aimed to develop an immune-based model for early identification of patients with advanced lung cancer who would benefit from anti-angiogenesis-based therapies.

METHODS

We assembled the real-world cohort of 1058 stage III-IV lung cancer patients receiving the anti-angiogenesis-based therapies. We comprehensively evaluated the tumor immune microenvironment characterizations (CD4, CD8, CD68, FOXP3, and PD-L1) by multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF), as well as calculated the systemic inflammatory index by flow cytometry and medical record review. Based on the light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) algorithm, a machine-learning model with meaningful parameters was developed and validated in real-world populations.

RESULTS

In the first-line anti-angiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy cohort (n = 385), the intra-tumoral proportion of CD68 + Macrophages and several circulating inflammatory indexes were significantly related to drug response (p < 0.05). Further, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and myeloid to lymphoid ratio (M:L) were identified to construct the non-invasive prediction model with high predictive performance (AUC: 0.799 for treatment response and 0.7006-0.915 for progression-free survival (PFS)). Additionally, based on the unsupervised hierarchical clustering results, the circulating cluster 3 with the highest levels of NLR, MLR, SIRI, and M: L had the worst PFS with the first-line anti-angiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy compared to other circulating clusters (2.5 months, 95 % confidence interval 2.3-2.7 vs. 6.0-9.7 months, 95 % confidence interval 4.9-11.1, p < 0.01). The predictive power of the machine-learning model in PFS was also validated in the anti-angiogenic therapy plus immunotherapy cohort (n = 103), the anti-angiogenic monotherapy cohort (n = 284), and the second-line anti-angiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy cohort (n = 286).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating pre-treatment circulating inflammatory biomarkers could non-invasively and early forecast clinical outcomes for anti-angiogenic response in lung cancer. The immune-based prognostic model is a promising tool to reflect systemic inflammatory status and predict clinical prognosis for anti-angiogenic treatment in patients with stage III-IV lung cancer.

Toripalimab plus chemotherapy for first line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (CHOICE-01): final OS and biomarker exploration of a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial

A randomized double-blind phase 3 trial (CHOICE-01, NCT03856411) demonstrated that combining toripalimab with chemotherapy substantially improves progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without pretreatment. This study presents the prespecified final analysis of overall survival (OS) and biomarkers utilizing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and tissue-based sequencing. Additionally, the analysis revealed a higher median overall survival (OS, 23.8 months) in the toripalimab group than that in the control group (17.0 months). (HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.57-0.93, nominal P = 0.01). This survival benefit was particularly notable in the non-squamous subgroup. As the first phase 3 study to perform both baseline tissue whole-exome sequencing (WES) and peripheral blood ctDNA testing, we investigated efficacy predictive biomarkers based on both tissue and ctDNA, Genomic sequencing of ctDNA showed high concordance with tumor tissue independently confirmed that individuals exhibiting a high tumor mutational burden, as well as mutations in the FA-PI3K-Akt and IL-7 signaling pathways benefited more from the toripalimab treatment. Furthermore, a ctDNA response observed on cycle 3 day 1, was associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients treated with the combination therapy. In conclusion, Toripalimab plus chemotherapy yields significant improvements in OS as a first-line treatment. The study highlights the utility of ctDNA as a proxy for tumor tissue, providing novel prospects for predicting efficacy of immuno-chemotherapy through continuous ctDNA monitoring.

Role of the TME in immune checkpoint blockade resistance of non-small cell lung cancer

Primary and secondary resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) reduces its efficacy. The mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance are highly complex. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), these mechanisms are primarily associated with the loss of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, genetic mutations, circular RNA axis and transcription factor regulation, antigen presentation disorders, and dysregulation of signaling pathways. Additionally, alterations in the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a pivotal role in driving immunotherapy resistance. Primary resistance is mainly attributed to TME alterations, including mutations and co-mutations, modulation of T cell infiltration, enrichment of M2 tumor-associated macrophages (M2-TAMs) and mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and pulmonary fibrosis. Acquired resistance mainly stems from changes in cellular infiltration patterns leading to "cold" or "hot" tumors, altered interferon (IFN) signaling pathway expression, involvement of extracellular vesicles (EVs), and oxidative stress responses, as well as post-treatment gene mutations and circadian rhythm disruption (CRD). This review presents an overview of various mechanisms underlying resistance to ICB, elucidates the alterations in the TME during primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance, and discusses existing strategies for overcoming ICB resistance.

Pembrolizumab versus sintilimab in patients with advanced NSCLC: a retrospective multicenter study with propensity-score matching analysis

Background

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are commonly used worldwide for the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains unclear whether pembrolizumab and sintilimab, two of the most widely used PD-1 inhibitors in China, have significantly different effects on patients with NSCLC. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented using propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety profiles of pembrolizumab and sintilimab in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing comprehensive therapy.

Methods

A total of 225 patients who received comprehensive therapy including pembrolizumab (n = 127) or sintilimab (n = 98), from 1 January to 31 December 2020 and met the eligibility criteria were included. PSM analysis (1:1) was performed to balance potential baseline confounding factors. For both treatments, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to compare 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and rates of all adverse events (AEs).

Results

PSM analysis resulted in 63 matched pairs of patients. After PSM, the median PFS was 8.68 months in the sintilimab group and 9.46 months in the pembrolizumab group. The 1-year PFS showed no significant difference between the pembrolizumab and sintilimab groups before and after PSM (P = 0.873 and P = 0.574, respectively). Moreover, within the matched cohort, the pembrolizumab group had an ORR of 30.2% and a DCR of 84.1%, whereas the sintilimab group exhibited an ORR of 41.3% and a DCR of 88.9%. There were no significant differences in the ORR and DCR between the two groups (P = 0.248 and P = 0.629, respectively). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs was significantly higher in the pembrolizumab group than that in the sintilimab group (42.9% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.043). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that the lines of treatment and regimens significantly influenced the PFS of patients (P <0.05).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the similar effectiveness of sintilimab and pembrolizumab in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC, with sintilimab potentially displaying a superior clinical safety profile.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.medicalresearch.org.cn/, identifier MR4423000113.

Clinical benefit of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment for patients over the age of 65 or 75 with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy (CT) is considered the standard of care in first line treatment of metastatic NSCLC. However, the clinical benefit of this combination in older patients is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of phase III randomized trials that compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus CT with CT alone in first line of treatment for older patients with advanced NSCLC. Subgroups of patients over 65 and over 75 were analyzed. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A fixedeffect model was used. We analyzed ten trials with an anti-PD-1 (camrelizumab, cemiplimab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, tislelizumab or toripalimab) and six trials with an anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab or sugemalimab), including 3666 patients over the age of 65 (41%) and 282 patients over the age of 75 (<10%). For patients over 65 years of age, anti-PD- 1/PD-L1 + CT was significantly associated (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) with prolonged OS (0.79 [0.72-0.86]; p < 0.00001) and P FS (0.63 [0.58-0.68]; p < 0.00001) compared to CT alone. Survival benefits occurred in both anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 trials. For patients over 75 years of age, OS benefit was not statistically significant (0.88 [0.67-1.16]; p = 0.37). For patients over the age of 65 with untreated NSCLC, the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination with CT, compared with CT alone, is associated with significantly improved OS and PFS. Due to the low number of patients, it is difficult to conclude for those over 75.

Case Report: Efficacy of anlotinib and sintilimab in treating lung adenocarcinoma with RET fusion and PD-L1 expression

We report a case of an advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient with brain metastasis, RET fusion, and high expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) at initial treatment. After receiving radiotherapy for the brain metastasis, the patient started with anlotinib and added immunotherapy with sintilimab. The patient had a good response to anlotinib and sintilimab treatment, tolerated the adverse reactions, and had a progression-free survival (PFS) of over 17 months. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical case report in the literature describing the benefit of anlotinib and sintilimab treatment for non-small cell lung cancer with RET fusion and high PD-L1 expression. This study explores the biomarker selection for targeted therapy and combined immunotherapy in NSCLC patients.

Sintilimab Combined with Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel-Based Chemotherapy in Severe Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous NSCLC Showed Good Efficacy and Safety: A Pilot Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

Squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (sqNSCLC) is associated with a poorer prognosis and limited treatment options. Sintilizumab combined with chemotherapy is used as first-line treatment for advanced sqNSCLC. However, the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for severe squamous NSCLC remain to be unknown in clinical studies.

Methods

Patients with confirmed unresectable stage III/IV sqNSCLC were retrospectively collected between July 1st, 2019, and December 31st. According to performance status (PS) scores, these patients received first-line sintilimab plus nab-PTX-based chemotherapy were divided into severe (PS=2) and non-severe groups (PS=0-1). The treatment regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles, or until unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess progression free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including the objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs) and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

Among 367 patients with unresectable stage III/IV sqNSCLC, 28 male patients, with a median age of 65.5 years, received first-line sintilimab plus nab-PTX-based chemotherapy. These patients were divided into a severe group (11 patients) and a non-severe group (17 patients). The severe group had a significantly higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared to the non-severe group (54.5% vs 11.8%, p = 0.03). The two groups had a similar median number of treatment cycles and safety profiles. Although the severe group showed higher ORR (63.6% vs 47.1%) and DCR (100% vs 76.5%) than the non-severe group, these differences were not statistically significant. Median PFS and Kaplan-Meier curves were also comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

Sintilimab combined with nab-PTX-based chemotherapy was effective and well tolerated in a small sample of severe lung squamous cell carcinoma population. This combination may offer a potential treatment option for these patients.

Clinical benefit evaluation of drug treatment regimens for advanced lung cancer:based on ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of novel targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for lung cancer (LC), the life expectancy of patients with LC has notably increased. In China, many drugs with the same mechanism of action have been approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) through phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, differences occur in these drugs' efficacy and adverse effects, all of which have been compared with standard treatments, and data from head-to-head studies are lacking.

METHODS

The key RCTs of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), ALK-TKIs, and ICIs approved by NMPA in advanced LC in China were searched and divided into five groups. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF v2) and European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) were used to evaluate the net health benefits (NHB) of RCTs, including efficacy, adverse reactions, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), etc. The consistency of the ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS was compared.

RESULTS

As of September 2024, 37 RCTs have been included in the ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS. NHB scores ranged from 12.30 to 93.25. Nineteen trials met the ASCO-VF "substantial benefit", and 28 trials achieved the ESMO-MCBS "substantial benefit". Except for icotinib, dacomitinib, and befotertinib, all EGFR-TKIs and ALK-TKIs met the threshold of two frameworks. In the ICI regimens, eight regimens met the threshold of " substantial benefit " as defined by the two frameworks and nine studies showed conflicting results. The correlation coefficient of the 37 pairs of scores in the advanced LC study was estimated to be 0.473(Spearman), and the consistency analysis showed fair agreement.(κ = 0.265, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS focus on clinical efficacy and consider the adverse effects of drugs and PROs. We look forward to head-to-head studies on the different treatment options and advocate refining the ESMO-MCBS.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to an increase in randomized controlled trials exploring various first-line combination treatment regimens. With the introduction of new PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, there are now more clinical options available. For the first time, the AK105 monoclonal antibody Penpulimab, developed in China, was included. The AK105-302 Phase III trial studied the efficacy and safety of Penpulimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC. To determine the optimal treatment options, we conducted an updated network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of these regimens.

METHODS

The system retrieves data from Chinese and English electronic databases, Clinical Trials, and the gov Clinical Trial Registration website up to September 6, 2023. The study indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination regimens, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), all-grade adverse events, and above-grade III adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) level, histological type, ECOG score, sex, and smoking history.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTS were included, with a total of ten thousand eight hundred patients. Penpulimab plus chemotherapy (Pen + CT) provided the best OS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81) for PD-L1 patients with non-selective advanced NSCLC. Except Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (Niv + Ipi), other PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapies significantly extended PFS compared with CT, and Nivolumab plus Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (Niv + Bev + CT) (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.74) provided the best PFS benefit and was comparable to Pen + CT (HR = 1.0) for PFS prolongation. For ORR, except Niv + Ipi, all the other regimens significantly improved ORR compared with CT. In terms of safety, except Tor + CT, the incidence of any-grade AEs or grade ≥ 3 adverse events may be higher than those of chemotherapy. The subgroup analysis revealed that for patients with PD-L1 levels below 1%, treatment with Tor + CT resulted in the best progression-free survival (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.86). For patients with PD-L1 levels of 1% or higher, Sintilimab plus chemotherapy (Sin + CT) (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-0.99) and Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (Cam + CT) (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.64) were associated with the best overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. For patients with SqNSCLC, combined immunotherapy may provide greater survival benefits. For patients with Non-sqNSCLC, Niv + Bev + CT and Tor + CT were associated with optimal PFS and OS, respectively. Cam + CT provided the best PFS in male patients with a history of smoking and an ECOG score of 0. In both female and non-smoking patient subgroups, Pem + CT was associated with the best PFS and OS benefits.

CONCLUSION

For patients with advanced non-selective PD-L1 NSCLC, two effective regimens are Pen + CT and Niv + Bev + CT, which rank first in OS and PFS among all patients. Cam + CT and Tor + CT have advantages for OS in patients with SqNSCLC and Non-sqNSCLC, respectively. Niv + Ipi + CT provided the best OS benefit for patients with an ECOG score of 0, while Pem + CT may be the most effective treatment for patients with an ECOG score of 1. Pem + CT has a better effect on female patients and non-smokers. Sin + CT was found to be the most effective treatment for male patients and the smoking subgroup, while Cam + CT was found to be the most effective for PFS. In addition, Tor + CT was associated with the best PFS for patients with negative PD-L1 expression. Pem + CT was found to significantly improve both PFS and OS compared to CT alone. For patients with positive PD-L1 expression, Sin + CT and Cam + CT were found to be optimal for OS and PFS, respectively. It is important to note that, with the exception of Tor + CT, the toxicity of the other combinations was higher than that of CT alone.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China: based on the ASTRUM-004 trial

OBJECTIVE

In the ASTRUM-004 trial, serplulimab plus chemotherapy demonstrated significantly improved survival and controllable safety. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of serplulimab plus chemotherapy in advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC), considering the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

METHODS

A decision tree and a Markov model were constructed to simulate the treatment. The interesting results included total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Scenario, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to examine model instability.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, serplulimab plus chemotherapy had an ICER of $55,539.46/QALY ($47,278.84/LY). The ICERs were estimated to be $58,706.03/QALY, $48,978.34/QALY and $59,709.54/QALY inpatients with programmed death-ligand 1 expression level of tumor proportion score (TPS) < 1%, 1% ≤ TPS < 50%, and TPS ≥ 50%. The cost-effective prices of serplulimab were $168.276/100 mg, $349.157/100 mg, and $530.039/100 mg at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $12,574.30/QALY, $25,148.60/QALY, and $37,722.90/QALY. Patient weight and price of serplulimab created the most significant impact. Presently, the probability of serplulimab plus chemotherapy being cost-effective was 14.15%.

CONCLUSION

Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, serplulimab plus chemotherapy might not be cost-effective in the first-line treatment for advanced sqNSCLC.

Clinical Management in NSCLC Patients With EGFR Mutation After Osimertinib Progression With Unknown Resistance Mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is approved as a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation by FDA. However, the mechanisms of resistance for nearly half of patients after osimertinib progression are still unknown, and the optimal therapies for these patients are still controversial. In this retrospective study, we compared efficacy and safety between immunotherapy + chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and osimertinib + bevacizumab in NSCLC patients after osimertinib progression with unknown resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients with unknown resistance mechanisms after osimertinib progression were retrospectively reviewed and divided into immunotherapy + chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and osimertinib + bevacizumab treatment groups according to the treatment they received after osimertinib progression. Clinicopathological features, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients were enrolled in this study, 22 in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group, 72 in the chemotherapy group, and 27 in the osimertinib + bevacizumab group. The ORR was much higher in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group compared with chemotherapy or osimertinib + bevacizumab group (55.56% vs. 14.81% vs. 0% in patients after progression on 1st line osimertinib treatment; 30.77% vs. 6.67% vs. 13.33% in patients after progression on 2nd/3rd line osimertinib treatment). Median PFS was also significantly longer in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group compared with other groups (8.2 months vs. 4.0 months vs. 6.0 months in all patients, p = 0.0066). The median OS did not reach remarkable difference among groups, although osimertinib + bevacizumab group had a numerically longer median OS (37.0 months vs. 37.0 months vs. 47.6 months in all patients, p = 0.6357). Compared with immunotherapy + chemotherapy and chemotherapy, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of osimertinib + bevacizumab were milder, especially in AEs related to gastrointestinal and bone marrow suppression.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides clinical evidence that NSCLC patients after osimertinib progression with unknown resistance mechanisms may benefit from immunotherapy + chemotherapy, with higher ORR and longer PFS compared with osimertinib + bevacizumab or chemotherapy groups. Osimertinib + bevacizumab treatment was also an optional option for patients because OS was numerically longer and safer in this group.

Efficacy and safety of personalized optimal PD-(L)1 combinations in advanced NSCLC: a network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)-directed immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas the optimal therapeutic combinations remain uncertain.

METHODS

Our study encompassed phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved anti-PD-(L)1-based therapies for stage-IV NSCLC. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and incidences of adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted by treatment lines, PD-L1 expression levels, histological types, and metastatic sites.

RESULTS

Our analysis incorporated 38 publications, covering 14 therapeutic combinations and involving 18 048 participants. PD-(L)1+chemotherapy (CT), PD-(L)1+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) +CT, and PD-(L)1+ T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain were notably effective in prolonging OS. Overall, PD-(L)1+CT and PD-(L)1+CT+ vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were significantly beneficial for PFS and ORR. As for the subsequent-line treatments, incorporating radiotherapy can enhance PFS and ORR (ranked fourth among enrolled treatments). For patients with PD-L1 <1%, PD-(L)1+CT+VEGF and PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT were favorable approaches. Conversely, in patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, PD-(L)1+CT represented an effective treatment. Patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma or liver metastases might benefit from the addition of VEGF. In cases of squamous cell carcinoma or brain metastases, the combination of PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT yielded superior benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the enhanced efficacy of combination immunotherapies over monotherapy. It highlights the necessity for personalized treatment, considering individual factors. These insights are vital for clinical decision making in the management of advanced NSCLC.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in China

Background

The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has recommended sintilimab plus chemotherapy (SINT + Chemo) as a standard first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), based on the proven effectiveness and safety in the ORINT-16 trail. Its cost-effectiveness, however, remains to be evaluated.

Methods

We established a partitioned survival approach (PartSA) model with a 10-year time horizon to determine whether SINT + Chemo (vs. chemotherapy) was more cost-effective as a first-line treatment for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC. Survival data was generated from the ORIENT-16 trail. Cost calculation was limited to direct medical costs. Database of Hunan Public Resources Trading Service Platform was used as the source for obtaining drug prices. Other cost and utility values were gathered from established literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the primary output. Additionally, we conducted sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and scenario analysis.

Results

In the base-case analysis, group SINT + Chemo showed an increase in utility value by 0.32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an extra cost of $7988.43, resulting in an ICER of $25239.29/QALY, below the Chinese cost-effective willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38223.34. Upon further subgroup analysis according to patients' programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), the ICERs were $26341.01/QALY for patients highly expressing PD-L1 (CPS ≥5) and $17658.26/QALY for patients lowly expressing PD-L1 (CPS <5). Based on the sensitivity analysis, we found the PFS utility was the parameter that had the most significant impact on the model's outcomes. Moreover, in scenario analysis, the results remained consistent despite variations in the model's time frame.

Conclusion

In China, SINT + Chemo is a more cost-effective option (vs. chemotherapy) as a first-line therapy for unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression levels.

Sintilimab in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: The multicenter SWORD phase 2 trial

This single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial (NCT04106180) investigated the triple combination of sintilimab (anti-PD1 antibody), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With a median follow-up of 32.1 months, 18 (36.7%, 90% CI 25.3%-49.5%) of the 49 evaluable patients had an objective response, meeting the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included out-of-field (abscopal) response rate (ASR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The ASR was 30.6% (95% CI 18.3%-45.4%). The median PFS and OS were 5.9 (95% CI 2.5-9.3) and 18.4 (95% CI 9.7-27.1) months, respectively. Any grade and grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 44 (86.3%) and 6 (11.8%) patients, without grade 4-5 TRAEs. Moreover, in pre-specified biomarker analyses, SBRT-induced increase of follicular helper T cells (Tfh) in unirradiated tumor lesions and patient's blood, as well as of circulating IL-21 levels, was found associated with improved prognosis. Taken together, the triple combination therapy was well tolerated with promising efficacy and Tfh may play a critical role in SBRT-triggered anti-tumor immunity in metastatic NSCLC.

Genomic correlates of the response to first-line PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade plus chemotherapy has become the new first-line standard of care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet not all NSCLC patients benefit from this regimen. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in untreated advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

We integrated clinical, genomic, and survival data from 287 patients with untreated advanced NSCLC who were enrolled in one of five registered phase 3 trials and received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. We randomly assigned these patients into a discovery cohort (n = 125), a validation cohort (n = 82), and a control cohort (n = 80). The candidate genes that could predict the response to PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy were identified using data from the discovery cohort and their predictive values were then evaluated in the three cohorts. Immune deconvolution was conducted using transcriptome data of 1014 NSCLC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset.

RESULTS

A genomic variation signature, in which one or more of the 15 candidate genes were altered, was correlated with significantly inferior response rates and survival outcomes in patients treated with first-line PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in both discovery and validation cohorts. Its predictive value held in multivariate analyses when adjusted for baseline parameters, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level, and tumor mutation burden. Moreover, applying both the 15-gene panel and PD-L1 expression level produced better performance than either alone in predicting benefit from this treatment combination. Immune landscape analyses revealed that tumors with one or more variation in the 15-gene panel were associated with few immune infiltrates, indicating an immune-desert tumor microenvironment.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that a 15-gene panel can serve as a negative prediction biomarker for first-line PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of older people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is a cancer of the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 71. More than one-third of people diagnosed with lung cancer are over 75 years old. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are special antibodies that target a pathway in the immune system called the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) pathway. These antibodies help the immune system fight cancer cells by blocking signals that cancer cells use to avoid being attacked by the immune system. ICIs have changed the treatment of people with lung cancer. In particular, for people with previously-untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), current first-line treatment now comprises ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy, rather than platinum-based chemotherapy alone, regardless of their PD-L1 expression status. However, as people age, their immune system changes, becoming less effective in its T cell responses. This raises questions about how well ICIs work in older adults.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) in treatment-naïve adults aged 65 years and older with advanced NSCLC.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Lung Cancer Group Trial Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other trial registers, and the websites of drug regulators. The latest search date was 23 August 2023. We also checked references and searched abstracts from the meetings of seven cancer organisations from 2019 to August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the efficacy and safety of adding ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone for people 65 years and older who had not previously been treated. All data emanated from international multicentre studies involving adults with histologically-confirmed advanced NSCLC who had not received any previous systemic anticancer therapy for their advanced disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were overall survival and treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). Our secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, objective response rate, time to response, duration of response, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 primary studies, with a total of 4276 participants, in the review synthesis. We identified nine ongoing studies, and listed one study as 'awaiting classification'. Twelve of the 17 studies included people older than 75 years, accounting for 9% to 13% of their participants. We rated some studies as having 'some concerns' for risk of bias arising from the randomisation process, deviations from the intended interventions, or measurement of the outcome. The overall GRADE rating for the certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to low because of the risk of bias, imprecision, or inconsistency. People aged 65 years and older The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably increased overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.88; 8 studies, 2093 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only one study reported data for treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events may not differ between the two treatment groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.09, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.32; 1 study, 127 participants; low-certainty evidence). The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improves progression-free survival (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.68; 7 studies, 1885 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). People aged 65 to 75 years, inclusive The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improved overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87; 6 studies, 1406 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only one study reported data for treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events probably increased in people treated with ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to those treated with platinum-based chemotherapy alone (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.13; 1 study, 97 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improved progression-free survival (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.73; 8 studies, 1466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). People aged 75 years and older There may be no difference in overall survival in people treated with ICIs combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16; 4 studies, 297 participants; low-certainty evidence). No data on treatment-related adverse events were available in this age group. The effect of combination ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy on progression-free survival is uncertain (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.36; 3 studies, 226 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only three studies assessed the objective response rate. For time to response, duration of response, and health-related quality of life, we do not have any evidence yet.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone, adding ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably leads to higher overall survival and progression-free survival, without an increase in treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher), in people 65 years and older with advanced NSCLC. These data are based on results from studies dominated by participants between 65 and 75 years old. However, the analysis also suggests that the improvements reported in overall survival and progression-free survival may not be seen in people older than 75 years.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of recombinant human endostatin plus PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for EGFR/ALK-negative, advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) plus programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on patients with EGFR/ALK-negative, advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients received Rh-endostatin plus PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy every three weeks for 4 to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. As of data cutoff (December 13, 2022), the median follow-up of 21.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8.3-44.4 months). The median PFS and OS was 22.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.6-27.4) and 31.0 months (95% CI: 23.4-not evaluable [NE]), respectively. The ORR was 72.06% (95% CI: 59.85-82.27%), and DCR was 95.59% (95% CI: 87.64-99.08%). Patients with stage IIIB/IIIC NSCLC had significantly longer median PFS (23.4 vs. 13.2 months), longer median OS (not reached vs. 18.0 months), and higher ORR (89.2% vs. 51.6%) than those with stage IV NSCLC (all p ≤ 0.001). The ORR was higher in patients with high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%) than in those with low PD-L1 expression or positive PD-L1 expression (75% vs. 50%, p = 0.025). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 16 (23.53%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Rh-endostatin combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment yielded favorable effectiveness with a manageable profile in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, representing a promising treatment modality.

Clinical outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with uncommon driver gene alterations

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon driver alterations in genes such as ERBB2, BRAF, RET, and MET. This study retrospectively assessed ICI-combination therapy outcomes in this molecular subset of NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC confirmed with driver alterations in genes including ERBB2, BRAF, RET or MET, and received ICI combined with chemotherapy (ICI + chemo) and/or targeted therapy (ICI + chemo/TT) as first-line (1L) or second- or third-line (≥ 2L) treatment at Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and May 2024.

RESULTS

Of the 181 patients included in the study, 131 patients received 1L-ICI + chemo (ERBB2, n = 64; BRAF, n = 34; RET, n = 23; and MET, n = 10), and 50 patients received ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT (ERBB2, n = 16; BRAF, n = 7; RET, n = 14; MET, n = 13). The full cohort had an overall response rate (ORR) of 45.9% and disease control rate of 84.0%. Among patients who received 1L-ICI + chemo, ORR ranged between 51.6% and 60.0%, with the median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) of 8.2 and 21.0 months for those with ERBB2-altered tumors, 10.0 and 15.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 12.1 months and OS not reached for RET-altered tumors, and 6.2 and 28.0 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively. Additionally, ORR ranged between 14.3% and 30.8% for ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT; mPFS and mOS were 5.4 and 16.2 months for patients with ERBB2-altered tumors, 2.7 and 5.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 6.2 and 14.3 months for RET-altered tumors, and 5.7 and 11.5 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ICI-based combination therapies, regardless of treatment line, were effective in treating patients with advanced NSCLC harboring driver alterations in ERBB2, BRAF, RET, or MET. This suggests their potential as alternative treatment options in this patient population.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of camrelizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin versus sintilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC in Chinese mainland

Objective

Both camrelizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (CTC) and sintilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin (SGP) have been approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China (NMPA) for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC. However, the comparison of the two treatments as first-line treatments in efficacy or pharmacoeconomics has barely been studied. To deeply understand the costs and outcomes of the two treatments, this work directly compared the cost-effectiveness for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC in the Chinese mainland.

Methods

A network meta-analysis was first performed based on the three clinical trials, namely, CameL-Sq, ORIENT-12, and C-TONG1002, to compare the clinical benefits of the two treatments. The Weibull approximation was applied to further calculate the life expectancy of the two treatments. The partitioned survival model (PSM) was next established, and one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed to evaluate the stability of the underlying parameter values and assumptions within the model.

Results

CTC treatment gained 0.68 QALYs and cost $14,764. SGP treatment gained 0.54 QALYs and cost $14,584. The CTC arm gained 0.14 additional QALYs and cost $179 more than the SGP arm, and the ICERs was $1,269/QALY, which was lower than one-fold GDP per capita in the Chinese mainland ($12,734 GDP per capita in 2022). In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, when the WTP ranged from $12,734-38,202 (1-3 folds, 2022 GDP per capita in China), the CTC group had higher probabilities than the SGP group for being cost effective, which ranged from 85.65% to 88.38%.

Conclusion

From the perspective of the payers, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy was cost-effective compared with sintilimab plus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of local advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC in the Chinese mainland.

Differences in the risk of immune-related pneumonitis between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors: a meta-analysis according to the new mirror-principle and PRISMA guidelines

PURPOSE

To compare the risk of immune-associated pneumonitis between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, the meta-analysis was designed.

METHOD

The difference in risk of immune-associated pneumonitis between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors was assessed by two different meta-analysis methods, the Mirror-pairing and the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of eighty-eight reports were used for meta-analysis, while thirty-two studies were used for the Mirror-pairing. Both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (used alone or combined with chemotherapy) increased the risk of developing immune-related pneumonitis (P < 0.00001; P < 0.00001). Based on indirect analyses results (subgroup analyses), the risk of PD-L1-induced pneumonitis was weaker than that of PD-1 inhibitors when the control group was chemotherapy (OR = 3.33 vs. 5.43) or placebo (OR = 2.53 vs. 3.19), while no obvious significant differences were found (P = 0.17; P = 0.53). For the Mirror-pairing-based meta-analysis, the risk of PD-1-induced pneumonitis was significantly higher than that of PD-L1 inhibitors (OR = 1.46, 95%CI [1.08, 1.98], I2 = 0%, Z = 2.47 (P = 0.01)). However, this difference was not significant, when they were combined with chemotherapy (OR = 1.05, 95%CI [0.68, 1.60], I2 = 38%, Z = 0.21 (P = 0.84)).

CONCLUSION

Both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors increased the risk of immune-related pneumonitis, while the risk of PD-1-induced pneumonitis was significantly higher than that of PD-L1 inhibitors.

A real-world analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A single-center experience

Background

We aimed to assess the value of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered under the situation of controlled or progressed disease during ICI therapy in advanced or recurrent NSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively collected patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received SBRT concurrently with ICI in our institution between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, including those for whom SBRT was delivered initially or to the residual tumors during the first- or later-line ICI treatment (Group 1), and those for whom SBRT was given to the progressed tumors irrespective of first- or later-line ICI treatment (Group 2).

Results

A total of 144 patients were included. With median follow-up duration of 25.6 (range: 3.6 to 56.2) months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.7 (95 % CI: 10.4 to 17.1) months and median overall survival (OS) was 52.8 [95 % CI: 30.6 to not available (NA)] months. In Group 1 (n = 78), median PFS was 17.9 (95 % CI: 14.5 to 29.8) months while median OS was not reached and 5-year OS rate was 61.2 %. In Group 2 (n = 66), median PFS was 8.0 (95 % CI: 6.0 to 13.1) months and median OS was 30.6 (95 % CI: 21.5 to NA) months.

Conclusions

SBRT combined with ICI demonstrated favorable survival for advanced or recurrent NSCLC, delivered in a controlled-disease situation as well as to progressed diseases with salvage-intent. Future prospective studies are warranted to investigate the optimal SBRT dose regimen and appropriate combination strategy to synergize ICI.

Impact of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors on survival in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death, and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the predominant subtype. Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are widely used to treat stage IV NSCLC. This study systematically reviewed the literature to clarify the impact of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment on the survival of patients with stage III NSCLC.

Methods

Randomized phase III clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors administered to patients with stage III NSCLC that were written in English and published between November 2012 and November 2022 were eligible for review. The sources of information were the MEDLINE database (last consulted on December 26, 2022), ScienceDirect website (last consulted on December 26, 2022), and CENTRAL register (last consulted on December 27, 2022). The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS). Risk of bias assessments were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0. The findings have been assessed for certainty according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines.

Results

Fourteen eligible studies and 2788 participants were included in the review. The key characteristics used to group the participants were disease histology, percentage of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells, and timeline of therapy. OS and PFS were improved (risk ratio [RR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96 and RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.70-0.86, respectively) based on the use of PD-L1 inhibitors after chemoradiation and OS was improved using first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-squamous NSCLC (RR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.17-0.95), with the GRADE results indicating moderate quality of evidence.

Conclusion

This review highlights the OS and PFS benefits of PD-L1 inhibitors in stage III NSCLC when used after chemoradiation and OS benefits of first-line PD-1 inhibitors added to chemotherapy in non-squamous stage III disease.

Systemic treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer after failure of previous immune checkpoint inhibitors: a bayesian network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought survival benefits to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), disease progression still occurs, and there is no consensus on the treatment options for these patients. We designed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate systemic treatment options for NSCLC after failure of ICIs.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched, then literature screening was followed by NMA. We included all Phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) used hazard ratio (HR) for evaluation. Objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) used odds ratio (OR) and relative risk (RR) effect sizes, respectively. R software was applied to compare the Bayesian NMA results.

RESULTS

We finally included 6 studies. 1322 patients received ICI plus Chemotherapy (ICI + Chemo), ICI plus Anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibody (ICI + Antiangio-Ab), ICI plus Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ICI + TKI), Tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus Chemotherapy (TKI + Chemo), Standard of Care (SOC), Chemotherapy (Chemo). TKI + Chemo is associated with longer PFS, higher ORR (surface under cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 99.7%, 88.2%), ICI + TKI achieved the longest OS (SUCRA, 82.7%). ICI + Antiangio-Ab was granted the highest safety rating for adverse events (AEs) of any grade, AEs greater than or equal to grade 3 and AEs of any grade leading to discontinuation of treatment (SUCRA, 95%, 82%, 93%).

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLC after failure of ICIs, TKI + Chemo was associated with longer PFS and higher ORR, while ICI + TKI was associated with the longest OS. In terms of safety, ICI + Antiangio-Ab was the highest.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic Without Oncogenic Alterations

This overview provides a thorough review of current treatment approaches for first-line management of nononcogenic addicted non-small cell lung cancer. We also address pertinent clinical decision-making queries encountered in everyday practice, such as the optimal treatment strategy for PD-L1-high patients, predictive factors for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) both in terms of patient and cancer characteristics, the potential benefits of dual checkpoint blockade, and the unresolved issue of safe discontinuation strategies for long-term responders. Around one in five patients falls into this latter category while the majority develop either primary or acquired resistance to ICI-based first-line therapy, necessitating effective subsequent lines of treatment. Docetaxel, with or without combination of antiangiogenic agents, serves as the backbone of treatment, although evidence in the post-ICI setting is limited. Given that an inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME) is crucial for ICI responses, targeting the TME in cases of acquired resistance alongside continued ICI administration appears rational, although clinical trials so far have failed to confirm this hypothesis. Antibody-drug conjugates have emerged as a promising treatment modality, offering the potential for reduced toxicity and improved efficacy by targeting specific cancer antigens. Moreover, several chemotherapy-free approaches are currently under investigation for treatment-naïve patients, including alternative ICI and drugs targeting epitopes on both cancer and immune cells.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Antibodies Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for NSCLC in the People's Republic of China: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The available approved anticancer drugs for Chinese patients are relatively limited because of China's low participation rate in international clinical trials. Therefore, a focus on approved anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) drugs in China is needed. This study aims to assess the heterogeneity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies manufactured in China (domestic PD-1/PD-L1) and overseas (imported PD-1/PD-L1) when combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of NSCLC.

Methods

A systematic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library of publications up to July 13, 2023. Meta-analysis was applied to compare the efficacy and safety profile between anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo) and chemotherapy alone using STATA software. Pooled hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival, odds ratios for objective response rate, and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events with 95% confidence intervals were calculated in the domestic group and imported group by a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity between the two estimates was assessed.

Results

There were 14 eligible clinical studies with a total of 3951 patients involved in this analysis, including eight studies of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo and six studies of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo. The study revealed that there was no significant difference between domestic and imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo in overall survival (p = 0.80), progression-free survival (p = 0.53), and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events (p = 0.10). Nevertheless, the objective response rate of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo was significantly higher than that of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Domestic anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy were found to have comparable efficacy and safety to those combined with imported anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies based on current evidence.

Modulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition by gemcitabine: Targeting ionizing radiation-induced cellular senescence in lung cancer cell

Ionizing radiation, a standard therapeutic approach for lung cancer, often leads to cellular senescence and the induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), posing significant challenges in treatment efficacy and cancer progression. Overcoming these obstacles is crucial for enhancing therapeutic outcomes in lung cancer management. This study investigates the effects of ionizing radiation and gemcitabine on lung cancer cells, with a focus on induced senescence, EMT, and apoptosis. Human-derived A549, PC-9, and mouse-derived Lewis lung carcinoma cells exposed to 10 Gy X-ray irradiation exhibited senescence, as indicated by morphological changes, β-galactosidase staining, and cell cycle arrest through the p53-p21 pathway. Ionizing radiation also promoted EMT via TGFβ/SMAD signaling, evidenced by increased TGFβ1 levels, altered EMT marker expressions, and enhanced cell migration. Gemcitabine, a first-line lung cancer treatment, was shown to enhance apoptosis in senescent cells caused by radiation. It inhibited cell proliferation, induced mitochondrial damage, and triggered caspase-mediated apoptosis, thus mitigating EMT in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo studies using a lung cancer mouse model revealed that gemcitabine, combined with radiation, significantly reduced tumor volume and weight, extended survival, and suppressed malignancy indices in irradiated tumors. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that gemcitabine enhances the therapeutic efficacy against radiation-resistant lung cancer cells, both by inducing apoptosis in senescent cells and inhibiting EMT, offering potential improvements in lung cancer treatment strategies.

A real-world analysis of second-line treatment option, gemcitabine plus anlotinib and anti-PD1, in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

In the second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (APC), there is only one approved regimen based on the phase III NAPOLI-1 trial. However, for patients progressing after Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine (Nab-P/Gem) or Nab-P combinations, second-line treatment were very limited.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center analysis of patients. Our aim was to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of a novel regimen, gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1, in APC patients and to compare it with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFIRINOX) in the second-line setting who have failed on the first-line Nab-P combinations.

RESULTS

In total, twenty-three patients received Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 in the second-line, 28 patients were treated with FOLFORINOX. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or progression free survival (PFS) for either of the two sequences (p > 0.05). Patients who received Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 had a median PFS of 4.0 months (95% CI: 1.1-6.9) versus 3.5 months (95% CI 1.8-5.2) in FOLFORINOX group (p = 0.953). The median OS of Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 was 9.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-13.7) and 8.0 months (95% CI: 5.5-10.5) in FOLFORINOX group (p = 0.373). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred for 13% of patients with Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 and 40% for FOLFORINOX.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirms the effectiveness of Gemcitabine plus Anlotinib and anti-PD1 as a well-tolerated regimen in the second-line treatment of APC and extends available data on its use as a second-line treatment option when compared with FOLFIRINOX.

Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced driver-gene negative non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of different combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We obtained relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to May 31, 2023. The analysis of clinical prognostic factors was performed using R 4.2.3 and STATA 15.0. The main outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-5 severity (Grade ≥3 TRAE).

Results

A total of 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted between 2012 and 2023, involving 7792 patients. These trials evaluated 11 different treatment methods. The results of these trials showed that in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), the combination of tislelizumab with chemotherapy and the combination of camrelizumab with chemotherapy were particularly effective. Moreover, when compared with other combination therapies, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy showed superiority in terms of disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR). Subgroup analyses further demonstrated that the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS in patients without liver metastasis and in those with brain metastasis. Additionally, carboplatin-based combination therapy was found to confer favorable survival benefits in terms of PFS, while cisplatin-based combination therapy showed the most favorable outcomes in terms of OS. The results of subgroup analyses for overall survival (OS) showed that the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy yielded positive outcomes in specific subgroups. These subgroups were characterized by PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of 50 % or higher, usage of anti-PD-1 medications, age below 65, male gender, smoking history, and non-squamous cell carcinoma histology. Superior effectiveness was demonstrated only in extending the progression-free survival (PFS) of female patients and patients with squamous carcinoma. Meanwhile, other patient cohorts did not show the same level of improvement.

Conclusions

Tislelizumab, camrelizumab or pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy may be the optimal first-line treatment strategies for NSCLC.

Development of pharmacological immunoregulatory anti-cancer therapeutics: current mechanistic studies and clinical opportunities

Immunotherapy represented by anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors has revolutionized cancer treatment, but challenges related to resistance and toxicity still remain. Due to the advancement of immuno-oncology, an increasing number of novel immunoregulatory targets and mechanisms are being revealed, with relevant therapies promising to improve clinical immunotherapy in the foreseeable future. Therefore, comprehending the larger picture is important. In this review, we analyze and summarize the current landscape of preclinical and translational mechanistic research, drug development, and clinical trials that brought about next-generation pharmacological immunoregulatory anti-cancer agents and drug candidates beyond classical immune checkpoint inhibitors. Along with further clarification of cancer immunobiology and advances in antibody engineering, agents targeting additional inhibitory immune checkpoints, including LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT, CD47, and B7 family members are becoming an important part of cancer immunotherapy research and discovery, as are structurally and functionally optimized novel anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents and agonists of co-stimulatory molecules of T cells. Exemplified by bispecific T cell engagers, newly emerging bi-specific and multi-specific antibodies targeting immunoregulatory molecules can provide considerable clinical benefits. Next-generation agents also include immune epigenetic drugs and cytokine-based therapeutics. Cell therapies, cancer vaccines, and oncolytic viruses are not covered in this review. This comprehensive review might aid in further development and the fastest possible clinical adoption of effective immuno-oncology modalities for the benefit of patients.