1
|
Mertens LS, Bruins HM, Contieri R, Babjuk M, Rai BP, Puig AC, Escrig JLD, Gontero P, van der Heijden AG, Liedberg F, Martini A, Masson-Lecomte A, Meijer RP, Mostafid H, Neuzillet Y, Pradere B, Redlef J, van Rhijn BWG, Rouanne M, Rouprêt M, Sæbjørnsen S, Seisen T, Shariat SF, Soria F, Soukup V, Thalmann G, Xylinas E, Mariappan P, Alfred Witjes J. Consistencies in Follow-up After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Framework Based on Expert Practices Collaboratively Developed by the European Association of Urology Bladder Cancer Guideline Panels. Eur Urol Oncol 2025; 8:105-110. [PMID: 38906795 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE There is no standardized regimen for follow-up after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC). To address this gap, we conducted a multicenter study involving urologist members from the European Association of Urology (EAU) bladder cancer guideline panels. Our objective was to identify consistent post-RC follow-up strategies and develop a practice-based framework based on expert opinion. METHODS We surveyed 27 urologist members of the EAU guideline panels for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer using a pre-tested questionnaire with dichotomous responses. The survey inquired about follow-up strategies after RC and the use of risk-adapted strategies. Consistency was defined as >75% affirmative responses for follow-up practices commencing 3 mo after RC. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS We received responses from 96% of the panel members, who provided data from 21 European hospitals. Risk-adapted follow-up is used in 53% of hospitals, with uniform criteria for high-risk (at least ≥pT3 or pN+) and low-risk ([y]pT0/a/1N0) cases. In the absence of agreement for risk-based follow up, a non-risk-adapted framework for follow-up was developed. Higher conformity was observed within the initial 3 yr, followed by a decline in subsequent follow-up. Follow-up was most frequent during the first year, including patient assessments, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Computed tomography of the chest and abdomen/pelvis was the most common imaging modality, initially at least biannually, and then annually from years 2 to 5. There was a lack of consistency for continuing follow-up beyond 10 yr after RC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS This practice-based post-RC follow-up framework developed by EAU bladder cancer experts may serve as a valuable guide for urologists in the absence of prospective randomized studies. PATIENT SUMMARY We asked urologists from the EAU bladder cancer guideline panels about their patient follow-up after surgical removal of the bladder for bladder cancer. We found that although urologists have varying approaches, there are also common follow-up practices across the panel. We created a practical follow-up framework that could be useful for urologists in their day-to-day practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Harman Maxim Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Albert Carrión Puig
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienca, Torina School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Institute of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - John Redlef
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthieu Rouanne
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sæbjørn Sæbjørnsen
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienca, Torina School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - George Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van den Brink L, Reijerink MAA, Henderickx MMEL, Bex A, Jamaludin FS, Beerlage HP, van Delden OM, van Moorselaar RJA, Stoker J, Bipat S, Zondervan PJ. Is Frequent Imaging Necessary? Impact of Computed Tomography During Follow-up After Surgical Treatment for Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00276-1. [PMID: 39665918 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Revised: 10/25/2024] [Accepted: 11/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Current guidelines on radiological follow-up (FU) for patients after treatment for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not based on robust evidence. This review aims to evaluate whether the 2022 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines are noninferior, in terms of recurrence and (overall) survival, to a higher imaging frequency of computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen. METHODS A literature search of relevant search machines (PubMed/Medline and EMBASE) was performed up to May 29, 2024. Studies describing patients with nonmetastatic RCC who underwent curative treatment by means of partial or radical nephrectomy were included. Studies with a higher number of CT scans than recommended by the EAU were compared with those that followed guidelines by examining recurrences and survival data. Outcomes were classified into risk groups according to the 2022 EAU guidelines. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria. Sixteen (80%) studies employed a higher imaging frequency during FU compared with 2022 EAU guideline recommendations, two studies (10%) followed the guidelines, and two studies (10%) performed less imaging. Recurrences were rare in low-risk studies (0-7.6%) and varied among high-risk studies, ranging between 33% and 40% in randomized controlled trials and 11% and 28% in retrospective studies. A meta-analysis was not suited due to clinical diversity, and the risk of bias was high among cohort studies. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Most studies employ a higher imaging frequency during FU after treatment for nonmetastatic RCC than recommended by the 2022 EAU guidelines. Survival and recurrence rates suggest that more frequent imaging than recommended by the EAU may not be advantageous, although high-quality evidence is needed to further improve guidelines. PATIENT SUMMARY In this review, we assessed radiological follow-up schedules for patients after surgery for kidney cancer and compared these with the follow-up schedules recommended by the European Association of Urology guidelines. We found that most studies apply more frequent imaging during follow-up than recommended by guidelines, although survival and recurrence rates are similar among studies with different imaging frequencies. We conclude that more frequent imaging than recommended by guidelines may not be necessary and that prospective studies are needed to determine whether imaging can be reduced further during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luna van den Brink
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marlin A A Reijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Faridi S Jamaludin
- Medical Library AMC, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harrie P Beerlage
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jaap Stoker
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shandra Bipat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia J Zondervan
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lerner SP, Tangen C, Svatek RS, Daneshmand S, Pohar KS, Skinner E, Schuckman A, Sagalowsky AI, Smith ND, Kamat AM, Kassouf W, Plets M, Bangs R, Koppie TM, Alva A, La Rosa FG, Pal SK, Kibel AS, Canter DJ, Thompson IM. Standard or Extended Lymphadenectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. N Engl J Med 2024; 391:1206-1216. [PMID: 39589370 PMCID: PMC11599768 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2401497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether extended lymphadenectomy is associated with improved disease-free and overall survival, as compared with standard lymphadenectomy, among patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy is unclear. METHODS We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer of clinical stage T2 (confined to muscle) to T4a (invading adjacent organs) with two or fewer positive nodes (N0, N1, or N2) to undergo bilateral standard lymphadenectomy (dissection of lymph nodes on both sides of the pelvis) or extended lymphadenectomy involving removal of common iliac, presciatic, and presacral nodes. Randomization was performed during surgery and stratified according to the receipt and type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor stage (T2 vs. T3 or T4a), and a Zubrod's performance-status score (0 or 1 vs. 2; assessed on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater disability). The primary outcome was disease-free survival. Overall survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS Of 658 patients who were enrolled, 592 eligible patients were randomly assigned to undergo extended lymphadenectomy (292 patients) or standard lymphadenectomy (300). Surgery was performed by 36 surgeons at 27 sites in the United States and Canada. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had been received by 57% of the patients. At a median follow-up of 6.1 years, recurrence or death had occurred in 130 patients (45%) in the extended-lymphadenectomy group and in 127 (42%) in the standard-lymphadenectomy group, and the estimated 5-year disease-free survival was 56% and 60%, respectively (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 1.40; P = 0.45). Overall survival at 5 years was 59% in the extended-lymphadenectomy group and 63% in the standard-lymphadenectomy group (hazard ratio for death, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.45). Adverse events of grade 3 to 5 occurred in 157 patients (54%) in the extended-lymphadenectomy group and in 132 (44%) in the standard-lymphadenectomy group; death within 90 days after surgery occurred in 19 patients (7%) and 7 patients (2%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS As compared with standard lymphadenectomy, extended lymphadenectomy did not result in improved disease-free or overall survival among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and was associated with higher perioperative morbidity and mortality. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and the Canadian Cancer Society; SWOG S1011 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01224665.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Catherine Tangen
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Siamak Daneshmand
- University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, CA, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Anne Schuckman
- University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, CA, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Melissa Plets
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Rick Bangs
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network/SWOG Advocates, Pittsford, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel J. Canter
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA (former during conduct of trial)/Oschsner Medical Center, Jefferson, LA (current)
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Netsch C, Filmar S, Hook S, Rosenbaum C, Gross AJ, Becker B. [Follow-up after urinary diversion]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 63:1050-1059. [PMID: 39088083 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02401-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Radical cystectomy is currently the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Different parts of the small and large intestines can be utilized for continent and incontinent urinary diversion. The postoperative follow-up after urinary diversion should consider functional, metabolic and oncological aspects. The functional follow-up of (continent) urinary diversion includes stenosis, emptying disorders or incontinence. The oncological follow-up should focus on the detection of local, urethral and upper tract recurrences as well as distant metastases. As 90% of the tumor recurrences occur during the first 3 years, a close follow-up should be carried out during this period. Metabolic disturbances, such as vitamin B12 and bile acid deficits, acidosis and disorders of calcium metabolism can also occur during long-term follow-up. The metabolic follow-up should consider the metabolic consequences of the parts of the intestines utilized for the urinary diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Netsch
- Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| | - Simon Filmar
- Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Sophia Hook
- Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Clemens Rosenbaum
- Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Andreas J Gross
- Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Benedikt Becker
- Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Contieri R, Pichler R, del Giudice F, Marcq G, Gallioli A, Albisinni S, Soria F, d’Andrea D, Krajewski W, Carrion DM, Mari A, van Rhijn BWG, Moschini M, Pradere B, Mertens LS. Variation in Follow-Up after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer-An Inventory Roundtable and Literature Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2637. [PMID: 38731165 PMCID: PMC11084596 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Follow-up after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer can be divided into oncological and functional surveillance. It remains unclear how follow-up after RC should ideally be scheduled. The aim of this report was to gain insight into the organization of follow-up after RC in Europe, for which we conducted a roundtable inventory within the EAU Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Cancer working group. Methods: An inventory semi-structured survey was performed among urologists of the EAU Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Cancer working group to describe the organization of follow-up. The surveys were analyzed using a deductive approach. Similarities and differences in follow-up after RC for bladder cancer were described. Results: The survey included 11 urologists from six different European countries. An institutional follow-up scheme was used by six (55%); three (27%) used a national or international guideline, and two (18%) indicated that there was no defined follow-up scheme. Major divergent aspects included the time points of follow-up, the frequency, and the end of follow-up. Six centers (55%) adopted a risk-adapted follow-up approach tailored to (varying) patient and tumor characteristics. Laboratory tests and CT scans were used in all cases; however, the intensity and frequency varied. Functional follow-up overlapped with oncological follow-up in terms of frequency and duration. Patient-reported outcome measures were only used by two (18%) urologists. Conclusions: Substantial variability exists across European centers regarding the follow-up after RC for bladder cancer. This highlights the need for an international analysis focusing on its organization and content as well as on opportunities to improve patients' needs during follow-up after RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Contieri
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Francesco del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino School of Medicine, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - David d’Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Diego M. Carrion
- Department of Urology, Torrejon University Hospital, 28850 Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Mari
- Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Bas W. G. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, F-31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alfred Witjes J, Max Bruins H, Carrión A, Cathomas R, Compérat E, Efstathiou JA, Fietkau R, Gakis G, Lorch A, Martini A, Mertens LS, Meijer RP, Milowsky MI, Neuzillet Y, Panebianco V, Redlef J, Rink M, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, Sæbjørnsen S, Veskimäe E, van der Heijden AG. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2023 Guidelines. Eur Urol 2024; 85:17-31. [PMID: 37858453 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 212.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT We present an overview of the updated 2023 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (MMIBC). OBJECTIVE To provide practical evidence-based recommendations and consensus statements on the clinical management of MMIBC with a focus on diagnosis and treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of the MMIBC guidelines has been performed annually since 2017. Searches cover the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Libraries databases for yearly guideline updates. A level of evidence and strength of recommendation are assigned. The evidence cutoff date for the 2023 MIBC guidelines was May 4, 2022. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Patients should be counselled regarding risk factors for bladder cancer. Pathologists should describe tumour and lymph nodes in detail, including the presence of histological subtypes. The importance of the presence or absence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the prostatic urethra is emphasised. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the bladder is superior to computed tomography (CT) for disease staging, specifically in differentiating T1 from T2 disease, and may lead to a change in treatment approach in patients at high risk of an invasive tumour. Imaging of the upper urinary tract, lymph nodes, and distant metastasis is performed with CT or MRI; the additional value of flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT still needs to be determined. Frail and comorbid patients should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Postoperative histology remains the most important prognostic variable, while circulating tumour DNA appears to be an interesting predictive marker. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy remains cisplatin-based. In motivated and selected women and men, sexual organ-preserving cystectomy results in better functional outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes. Robotic and open cystectomy have comparable outcomes and should be combined with (extended) lymph node dissection. The diversion type is an individual choice after taking patient and tumour characteristics into account. Radical cystectomy remains a highly complex procedure with considerable morbidity and risk of mortality, although lower rates are observed for higher hospital volumes (>20 cases/yr). With proper patient selection, trimodal therapy (chemoradiation) has comparable outcomes to radical cystectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery improves disease-specific survival and overall survival (OS) in patients with high-risk disease who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment, and is strongly recommended. There is a weak recommendation for adjuvant nivolumab, as OS data are not yet available. Health-related quality of life should be assessed using validated questionnaires at baseline and after treatment. Surveillance is needed to monitor for recurrent cancer and functional outcomes. Recurrences detected on follow-up seem to have better prognosis than symptomatic recurrences. CONCLUSIONS This summary of the 2023 EAU guidelines provides updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of MMIBC for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY The European Association of Urology guidelines panel on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer has released an updated version of the guideline containing information on diagnosis and treatment of this disease. Recommendations are based on studies published up to May 4, 2022. Surgical removal of the bladder and bladder preservation are discussed, as well as updates on the use of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in localised and metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Carrión
- Department of Urology, Vall Hebron Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - John Redlef
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mathieu Rouanne
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sæbjørn Sæbjørnsen
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Press RH, Shelton JW, Zhang C, Dang Q, Tian S, Shu T, Seldon CS, Hasan S, Jani AB, Zhou J, McDonald MW. Bone Marrow Suppression during Postoperative Radiation for Bladder Cancer and Comparative Benefit of Proton Therapy—Phase 2 Trial Secondary Analysis. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:1-10. [PMID: 35127970 PMCID: PMC8768898 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-21-00003.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose For patients with high-risk bladder cancer (pT3+ or N+), local regional failure remains a challenge after chemotherapy and cystectomy. An ongoing prospective phase 2 trial (NCT01954173) is examining the role of postoperative photon radiation therapy for high-risk patients using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may be beneficial in this setting to reduce hematologic toxicity. We evaluated for dosimetric relationships with pelvic bone marrow (PBM) and changes in hematologic counts before and after pelvic radiation therapy and explored the potential of PBT treatment plans to achieve reductions in PBM dose. Materials and Methods All enrolled patients were retrospectively analyzed after pelvic radiation per protocol with 50.4 to 55.8 Gy in 28 to 31 fractions. Comparative PBT plans were generated using pencil-beam scanning and a 3-beam multifield optimization technique. Changes in hematologic nadirs were assessed using paired t test. Correlation of mean nadirs and relative PBM dose levels were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (CC). Results Eighteen patients with a median age of 70 were analyzed. Mean cell count values after radiation therapy decreased compared with preradiation therapy values for white blood cells (WBCs), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count (all P < .001), and platelets (P = .03). Increased mean PBM dose was associated with lower nadirs in WBC (Pearson CC −0.593, P = .02), ANC (Pearson CC −0.597, P = .02), and hemoglobin (Pearson CC −0.506, P = .046), whereas the PBM V30 to V40 correlated with lower WBC (Pearson CC −0.512 to −0.618, P < .05), and V20 to V30 correlated with lower ANC (Pearson CC −0.569 to −0.598, P < .04). Comparative proton therapy plans decreased the mean PBM dose from 26.5 Gy to 16.1 Gy (P < .001) and had significant reductions in the volume of PBM receiving doses from 5 to 40 Gy (P < .001). Conclusion Increased PBM mean dose and V20 to V40 were associated with lower hematologic nadirs. PBT plans reduced PBM dose and may be a valuable strategy to reduce the risk of hematologic toxicity in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph W. Shelton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Chao Zhang
- Biostatistics Core of Department Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Quang Dang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sibo Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Timothy Shu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Crystal S. Seldon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Ashesh B. Jani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mark W. McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Murthy V, Bakshi G, Manjali JJ, Prakash G, Pal M, Joshi A, Dholakia K, Bhattacharjee A, Talole S, Puppalwar A, Srinivasan S, Panigrahi G, Salunkhe R, Menon S, Noronha V, Prabhash K, Krishnatry R. Locoregional recurrence after cystectomy in muscle invasive bladder cancer: Implications for adjuvant radiotherapy. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:496.e9-496.e15. [PMID: 33573998 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report the patterns of locoregional recurrence (LRR) in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and propose a risk stratification to predict LRR for optimizing the indication for adjuvant radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included patients of urothelial MIBC who underwent radical cystectomy with standard perioperative chemotherapy between 2013 and 2019. Recurrences were classified into local and/or cystectomy bed, regional, systemic, or mixed. For risk stratification modelling, T stage (T2, T3, T4), N stage (N0, N1/2, N3) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI positive or negative) were given differential weightage for each patient. The cohort was divided into low risk (LR), intermediate risk (IR) and high risk (HR) groups based on the cumulative score. RESULTS Of the 317 patients screened, 188 were eligible for the study. Seventy patients (37.2%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) while 128 patients (68.1%) had T3/4 disease and 66 patients (35.1%) had N+ disease. Of the 55 patients (29%) who had a recurrence, 31 (16%) patients had a component of LRR (4% cystectomy bed, 11.5% regional 0.5% locoregional). The median time to LRR was 8.2 (IQR 3.3-18.8) months. The LR, IR and HR groups for LRR based on T, N and LVI had a cumulative incidence of 7.1%, 21.6%, and 35% LRR, respectively. The HR group was defined as T3, N3, LVI positive; T4 N1/2, LVI positive; and T4, N3, any LVI. The odds ratio for LRR was 3.37 (95% CI 1.16-9.73, P = 0.02) and 5.27 (95% CI 1.87-14.84, P = 0.002) for IR and HR respectively, with LR as reference. CONCLUSION LRR is a significant problem post radical cystectomy with a cumulative incidence of 35% in the HR group. The proposed risk stratification model in our study can guide in tailoring adjuvant radiotherapy in MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India.
| | - Ganesh Bakshi
- Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Jifmi Jose Manjali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Gagan Prakash
- Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahendra Pal
- Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Amit Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Kunal Dholakia
- Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Atanu Bhattacharjee
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Sanjay Talole
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Abhinav Puppalwar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Shashank Srinivasan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Gitanjali Panigrahi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India
| | - Rohan Salunkhe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Santosh Menon
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Vanita Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Rahul Krishnatry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMH/ACTREC), Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The clinical significance of ureteral and urethral recurrence in patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is scarce and heterogeneous. The aim of the current review is to summarize the recent literature on incidence, diagnosis and oncologic outcomes of ureteral and urethral recurrences after radical cystectomy. RECENT FINDINGS Frozen section analysis (FSA) of ureteral margin had a sensitivity and specificity of 69-77 and 83-96%, respectively. Considering the ureteral margin, the reported sensitivity and specificity were 33-93 and 99-100%, respectively. Transurethral biopsy of the prostatic urethra might help in counseling patients' treatment, although its accuracy and prognostic role is highly questionable. In patients treated with radical cystectomy, recurrence of the urethra or ureteral are rare, occurring approximately in 5% of patients. During the follow-up, urinary cytology and cross-sectional imaging improve the early detection of recurrence in asymptomatic patients, although the majority are diagnosed for symptomatic presentation. Their use should be tailored to the patient's risk of ureteral and/or urethral recurrence. Urethrectomy is indicated in case of singular urethral recurrence, whereas no clear data exists regarding the best management of ureteral recurrence, except surgical removal. SUMMARY Intraoperative FSA of ureters and urethra share good specificity but poor sensitivity. Recurrence at urethra and upper tract are rare and discordant data exists regarding survival outcomes. Oncologic surveillance after radical cystectomy with the aim to detect these recurrences should be tailored to the individualized patient's risk.
Collapse
|
10
|
Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, et alHorwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Vahr Lauridsen S, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Vives Rivera FA, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Witjes JA. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1697-1727. [PMID: 31740927 PMCID: PMC7360152 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz296] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - M Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - T M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - N James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - S Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - N Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, USA
| | - T Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - P C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - B H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - J L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - I Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - M Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - R Cathomas
- Department Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, HUEP, Paris; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - S Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - W DeBlok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J L Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - J J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, USA
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - V Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - J Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - V Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - S Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - P C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque, Canarias; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - A Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - V Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Y Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - R Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - H Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - A-C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C R Müller
- Cancer Treatment Centre, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - J R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - W J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - L Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - H Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - K Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - M Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - F Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - J E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - M Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris
| | - O Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - C Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - A Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
| | - B Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - H Van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - E Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - P Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J A Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Follow-up care of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is subdivided into oncological and functional surveillance. More than 80% of local relapses and distant metastases occur within the first 2 years. Recurrences in the remnant urothelium also occur several years after radical cystectomy. Urinary cytology and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and thorax including a urography phase are the standard diagnostics for tumor follow-up. There is no clear evidence for a survival benefit for the detection of asymptomatic vs. symptomatic recurrences. After partial cystectomy or trimodal treatment, there is no established follow-up schedule; however, the relatively high incidence of intravesical recurrences should be considered as there are curative treatment approaches including salvage cystectomy. Functional surveillance, which should be carried out lifelong, encompasses prevention and diagnostics of metabolic complications, urethral/ureteral strictures, problems with the urinary stoma, urinary incontinence, sexual dysfunction and urinary tract infections.
Collapse
|
12
|
Fischer‐Valuck BW, Michalski JM, Mitra N, Christodouleas JP, DeWees TA, Kim E, Smith ZL, Andriole GL, Arora V, Bullock A, Carmona R, Figenshau RS, Grubb RL, Guzzo TJ, Knoche EM, Malkowicz SB, Mamtani R, Pachynski RK, Roth BJ, Zaghloul MS, Gay HA, Baumann BC. Effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy after radical cystectomy for locally advanced bladder cancer. Cancer Med 2019; 8:3698-3709. [PMID: 31119885 PMCID: PMC6639450 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local-regional failure (LF) for locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) after radical cystectomy (RC) is common even with chemotherapy and is associated with high morbidity/mortality. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) can reduce LF and may enhance overall survival (OS) but has no defined role. We hypothesized that the addition of PORT would improve OS in LABC in a large nationwide oncology database. METHODS We identified ≥ pT3pN0-3M0 LABC patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed 2004-2014 who underwent RC ± PORT. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to identify predictors of OS. Propensity matching was performed to match RC patients who received PORT vs those who did not. RESULTS 15,124 RC patients were identified with 512 (3.3%) receiving PORT. Median OS was 20.0 months (95% CI, 18.2-21.8) for PORT vs 20.8 months (95% CI, 20.3-21.3) for no PORT (P = 0.178). In multivariable analysis, PORT was independently associated with improved OS: hazard ratio 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.97); P = 0.008. A one-to-three propensity match yielded 1,858 patients (24.9% receiving PORT and 75.1% without). In the propensity-matched cohort, median OS was 19.8 months (95% CI, 18.0-21.6) for PORT vs 16.9 months (95% CI, 15.6-18.1) for no PORT (P = 0.030). In the propensity-matched cohort of urothelial carcinoma patients (N = 1,460), PORT was associated with improved OS for pT4, pN+, and positive margins (P < 0.01 all). CONCLUSION In this observational cohort, PORT was associated with improved OS in LABC. While the data should be interpreted cautiously, these results lend support to the use of PORT in selected patients with LABC, regardless of histology. Prospective trials of PORT are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin W. Fischer‐Valuck
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
- Department of Radiation OncologyEmory University, Winship Cancer InstituteAtlantaGeorgia
| | - Jeff M. Michalski
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and InformaticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| | | | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Biomedical Statistics and InformaticsScottsdaleArizona
| | - Eric Kim
- Department of UrologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Zachary L. Smith
- Department of UrologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Gerald L. Andriole
- Department of UrologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Vivek Arora
- Department of Medical OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Arnold Bullock
- Department of UrologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Ruben Carmona
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| | | | - Robert L. Grubb
- Department of UrologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Thomas J. Guzzo
- Department of UrologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| | - Eric M. Knoche
- Department of Medical OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | | | - Ronac Mamtani
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| | - Russell K. Pachynski
- Department of Medical OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Bruce J. Roth
- Department of Medical OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | | | - Hiram A. Gay
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Brian C. Baumann
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zattoni F, Incerti E, Dal Moro F, Moschini M, Castellucci P, Panareo S, Picchio M, Fallanca F, Briganti A, Gallina A, Fanti S, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Rambaldi I, Lowe V, Karnes JR, Evangelista L. 18F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis-A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:700. [PMID: 31137599 PMCID: PMC6562413 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11050700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the ability of 18F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to predict survivorship of patients with bladder cancer (BC) and/or upper urinary tract carcinoma (UUTC). Materials: Data from patients who underwent FDG PET/CT for suspicion of recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively collected in a multicenter study. Disease management after the introduction of FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic algorithm was assessed in all patients. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were computed for survival assessment. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of recurrence and death, for BC, UUTC, and concomitant BC and UUTC. Results: Data from 286 patients were collected. Of these, 212 had a history of BC, 38 of UUTC and 36 of concomitant BC and UUTC. Patient management was changed in 114/286 (40%) UC patients with the inclusion of FDG PET/CT, particularly in those with BC, reaching 74% (n = 90/122). After a mean follow-up period of 21 months (Interquartile range: 4-28 mo.), 136 patients (47.4%) had recurrence/progression of disease. Moreover, 131 subjects (45.6%) died. At Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients with BC and positive PET/CT had a worse overall survival than those with a negative scan (log-rank < 0.001). Furthermore, a negative PET/CT scan was associated with a lower recurrence rate than a positive examination, independently from the primary tumor site. At multivariate analysis, in patients with BC and UUTC, a positive FDG PET/CT resulted an independent predictor of disease-free and overall survival (p < 0,01). Conclusions: FDG PET/CT has the potential to change patient management, particularly for patients with BC. Furthermore, it can be considered a valid survival prediction tool after primary treatment in patients with recurrent UC. However, a firm recommendation cannot be made yet. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Elena Incerti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Stefano Panareo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Diagnostic Imaging e Laboratory Medicine Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
| | - Maria Picchio
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| | - Federico Fallanca
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Department of Urology, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Department of Urology, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Ilaria Rambaldi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Diagnostic Imaging e Laboratory Medicine Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
| | - Val Lowe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | | | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Follow-Up of Bladder Cancer. Urol Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42623-5_31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
15
|
Zuiverloon TCM, van Kessel KEM, Bivalacqua TJ, Boormans JL, Ecke TH, Grivas PD, Kiltie AE, Liedberg F, Necchi A, van Rhijn BW, Roghmann F, Sanchez-Carbayo M, Schmitz-Dräger BJ, Wezel F, Kamat AM. Recommendations for follow-up of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: A consensus by the international bladder cancer network. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:423-431. [PMID: 29496372 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Revised: 01/04/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Several guidelines exist that address treatment of patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, most only briefly mention follow-up strategies for patients and hence the treating physician is often left to infer on what the preferred follow-up schema would be for an individual patient. Herein, we aim to synthesize recommendations for follow-up of patients with MIBC for easy reference. METHODS A multidisciplinary MIBC expert panel from the International Bladder Cancer Network was assembled to critically assess currently available major guidelines on surveillance of MIBC patients. Recommendations for follow-up were extracted and critically evaluated. Important considerations for guideline assessment included both aspects of oncological and functional follow-up-frequency of visits, the use of different imaging modalities, the role of cytology and molecular markers, and the duration of follow-up. OUTCOME An International Bladder Cancer Network expert consensus recommendation was constructed for the follow-up of patients with MIBC based on the currently available evidence-based data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahlita C M Zuiverloon
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - Kim E M van Kessel
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Petros D Grivas
- Department of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Anne E Kiltie
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Bas W van Rhijn
- Division of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marta Sanchez-Carbayo
- Lucio Lascaray Research Center, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen and Urologie24, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Felix Wezel
- Department of Urology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sargos P, Baumann BC, Eapen L, Christodouleas J, Bahl A, Murthy V, Efstathiou J, Fonteyne V, Ballas L, Zaghloul M, Roubaud G, Orré M, Larré S. Risk factors for loco-regional recurrence after radical cystectomy of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic-review and framework for adjuvant radiotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 70:88-97. [PMID: 30125800 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy (RC) associated with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the most common local therapy in the management of non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Loco-regional recurrence (LRR), however, remains a common and important therapeutic challenge associated with poor oncologic outcomes. We aimed to systematically review evidence regarding factors associated with LRR and to propose a framework for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in patients with MIBC. METHODS We performed this systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the PubMed database for articles related to MIBC and associated treatments, published between January 1980 and June 2015. Articles identified by searching references from candidate articles were also included. We retrieved 1383 publications from PubMed and 34 from other sources. After an initial screening, a review of titles and abstracts, and a final comprehensive full text analysis of papers assessed for eligibility, a final consensus on 32 studies was obtained. RESULTS LRR is associated with specific patient-, tumor-, center- or treatment-related variables. LRR varies widely, occurring in as many as 43% of the cases and is strongly related to survival outcomes. While perioperative treatment does not impact on LRR, pathological factors such as pT, pN, positive margins status, extent of PLND, number of lymph nodes removed and/or invaded are correlated with LRR. Patients with pT3-T4a and/or positive lymph-nodes and/or limited pelvic lymph-node dissection and/or positive surgical margins have been distributed in LRR risk groups with accuracy. CONCLUSIONS LRR patterns are well-known and for selected patients, adjuvant treatments could target this event. Intrinsic tumor subtype may guide future criteria to define a personalized treatment strategy. Prospective trials evaluating safety and efficacy of adjuvant RT are ongoing in several countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, F-33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France.
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Washington, MO 63110, United States
| | - Libni Eapen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ottawa Hospital, K1H 8L6 Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - John Christodouleas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 19104-6021 Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Amhit Bahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol BS2 8HW, United Kingdom
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India
| | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Leslie Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States
| | - Mohamed Zaghloul
- Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, F-33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France
| | - Mathieu Orré
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, F-33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France
| | - Stéphane Larré
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, F-51092 Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
11 - Follow-Up. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 104:S41-S43. [PMID: 29893174 DOI: 10.1177/0300891618766116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
18
|
Lewis GD, Haque W, Verma V, Butler EB, Teh BS. The Role of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2018; 4:205-213. [PMID: 29732391 PMCID: PMC5929306 DOI: 10.3233/blc-180163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background: The standard of care for locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy. However, the role of adjuvant therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer is unclear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for patients with LABC, and to determine which risk factors best predict for patients who may best benefit from adjuvant RT. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried (2004– 2013) for patients with newly-diagnosed pT3-4N0-3M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: RT or observation. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving adjuvant RT, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. Results: Altogether, 1,646 patients met inclusion criteria; 59 (3.6%) patients received adjuvant RT, while 1,587 (96.4%) were observed. Patients treated with adjuvant RT were more likely to be female, have positive surgical margins, and receive treatment at a non-academic facility. There was no difference in median overall survival (OS) between patients treated with RT when compared to patients observed (17.7 months vs. 23.5 months; p = 0.085). However, an improvement in median OS with the use of adjuvant RT was observed among patients with positive surgical margins (20.3 months vs. 13.1 months; p = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, advancing age, pT4 stage, positive N stage, positive margins, and lower socioeconomic status were associated with worse OS. Conclusions: In the largest study to date evaluating efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer, use of RT was not associated with OS in all patients, while RT was associated with improvemed OS among patients with positive surgical margins. Prospective studies are recommended to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary D Lewis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - E Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Locke JA, Hamidizadeh R, Kassouf W, Rendon RA, Bell D, Izawa J, Chin J, Kapoor A, Shayegen B, Lattouf JB, Saad F, Lacombe L, Fradet Y, Fairey AS, Jacobson NE, Drachenberg DE, Cagiannos I, So AI, Black PC. Surveillance guidelines based on recurrence patterns for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Can Urol Assoc J 2018; 12:243-251. [PMID: 29688881 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for 5% of all urothelial tumours. Due to its rarity, evidence regarding postoperative surveillance is lacking. The objective of this study was to develop a post-radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) surveillance protocol based on recurrence patterns in a large, multi-institutional cohort of patients. METHODS Retrospective clinical and pathological data were collected from 1029 patients undergoing RNU over a 15-year period (1994-2009) at 10 Canadian academic institutions. A multivariable model was used to identify prognostic clinicopathological factors, which were then used to define risk categories. Risk-based surveillance guidelines were proposed based on actual recurrence patterns. RESULTS Overall, 555 (49.9%) patients developed recurrence, including 289 (25.9%) in the urothelium and 266 (23.9%) with loco-regional and distant recurrences. Based on multivariable analysis, three risk groups were identified: 1) low-risk patients with pTa-T1, pN0 disease, and no adverse histological features (high tumour grade, lymphovascular invasion [LVI], tumour multifocality); 2) intermediate-risk patients with pTa-T1, pN0 disease with one or more of the adverse histological features; and 3) high-risk patients with a ≥pT2 tumour and/or nodal involvement. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were free of urothelial recurrence at three years in 72%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, and free of regional/distant recurrence in 93%, 87%, and 62%, respectively. The risks of loco-regional and distant recurrences (p<0.0001) and time to death (p<0.0001) were significantly different between the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS Based on recurrence patterns in a large, multicentre patient cohort, we have proposed an evidence-based, risk-adapted post-RNU surveillance protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - David Bell
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Joseph Chin
- University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Fred Saad
- University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alan I So
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zaghloul MS, Christodouleas JP, Smith A, Abdallah A, William H, Khaled HM, Hwang WT, Baumann BC. Adjuvant Sandwich Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy vs Adjuvant Chemotherapy Alone for Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial. JAMA Surg 2018; 153:e174591. [PMID: 29188298 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Importance Locoregional failure for patients with locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) after radical cystectomy (RC) is common even with chemotherapy and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) can decrease locoregional failure but has not been studied in the chemotherapy era. Objective To investigate if adjuvant sequential RT plus chemotherapy can improve locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) compared with adjuvant chemotherapy alone. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized phase 3 trial was opened to compare adjuvant RT vs sequential chemotherapy plus RT after RC for LABC, but a third arm was added later as a randomized phase 2 trial to compare chemotherapy plus RT vs adjuvant chemotherapy alone, an emerging standard. The intent-to-treat phase 2 trial reported herein enrolled patients from December 2002 to July 2008. Data were analyzed from August 3, 2015, to January 6, 2016. Routine follow-up and surveillance pelvic computed tomographic (CT) scans every 6 months during the first 2 years were performed. The setting was an academic center. Patients with bladder cancer 70 years or younger having 1 or more risk factors (≥pT3b, grade 3, or positive nodes) with negative margins after radical cystectomy plus pelvic lymph node dissection were eligible. Patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, no evidence of distant metastases on CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis or on chest imaging, and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function. Ninety-one percent (109 of 120) had ≥ pT3 disease. Interventions Chemotherapy plus RT included 2 cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 intravenously on day 2) before and after RT to 4500 cGy in 150 cGy twice-daily fractions over 3 weeks using 3-dimensional conformal techniques. Chemotherapy alone included 4 cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin. Main Outcome and Measure Locoregional recurrence-free survival. Results The chemotherapy plus RT arm accrued 75 patients, and the chemotherapy-alone arm accrued 45 patients, with a weighted randomization to speed accrual. Fifty-three percent (64 of 120) had urothelial carcinoma, and 46.7% (56 of 120) had squamous cell carcinoma or other. The arms were balanced except for age (median, 52 vs 55 years; P = .04) and tumor size (mean, 4.9 vs 5.8 cm; P < .01), both favoring chemotherapy plus RT. Two-year outcomes and overall adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for chemotherapy plus RT vs chemotherapy alone were 96% vs 69% (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.39; P < .01) for LRFS, 68% vs 56% (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.27-1.06; P = .07) for disease-free survival, and 71% vs 60% (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.33-1.11; P = .11) for overall survival (OS). Five patients (7%) had RT-associated late grade 3 gastrointestinal tract adverse effects in the chemotherapy plus RT arm. Conclusions and Relevance Adjuvant chemotherapy plus RT was reasonably well tolerated and was associated with significant improvements in LRFS and marginal improvements in disease-free survival vs chemotherapy alone in LABC. The addition of adjuvant RT should be considered for LABC. This regimen warrants further study in phase 3 trials. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01734798.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S Zaghloul
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.,Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - John P Christodouleas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Andrew Smith
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ahmed Abdallah
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hany William
- Department of Oncology, Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Wei-Ting Hwang
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bock H, Madersbacher S. Follow-Up of Bladder Cancer. Urol Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42603-7_31-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
22
|
Ha YS, Kim TH. The Surveillance for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC). Bladder Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809939-1.00030-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
23
|
Nakagawa T, Taguchi S, Kanatani A, Kawai T, Ikeda M, Urakami S, Matsumoto A, Komemushi Y, Miyakawa J, Yamada D, Suzuki M, Enomoto Y, Nishimatsu H, Kondo Y, Nagase Y, Hirano Y, Okaneya T, Tanaka Y, Miyazaki H, Fujimura T, Fukuhara H, Kume H, Igawa Y, Homma Y. Oncologic Outcome of Metastasectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma: Who Is the Best Candidate? Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:2794-2800. [PMID: 28687875 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5970-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of metastatic lesions (metastasectomy) is performed for highly selected patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). This study aimed to identify the clinicopathologic factors associated with oncologic outcome for patients who underwent metastasectomy for mUC. METHODS This analysis included 37 UC patients who underwent metastasectomy with curative intent at nine Japanese hospitals. The primary end point was cancer-specific survival. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test and the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model addressed the relationship between clinical characteristics and survival. RESULTS Metastasectomy was performed for pulmonary (n = 23), nodal (n = 7), and other (n = 7) metastases. The median survival time was 35.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 15.5, not reached) from the detection of metastasis and 34.3 months (IQR 13.1, not reached) from metastasectomy. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate after detection of metastasis was 39.7%. In the multivariate analysis, the time from primary surgery to detection of metastasis (time-to-recurrence [TTR]) of 15 months or longer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23; p = 0.0063), no symptoms of recurrence (HR 0.23; p = 0.0126), and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels lower than than 0.5 mg/dl (HR 0.24; p = 0.0052) were significantly associated with better survival. CONCLUSIONS Long-term survival could be achieved for some patients with mUC who underwent metastasectomy. Lung and lymph nodes were predominant sites for metastasectomy. Symptoms, TTR, and CRP value were identified as associated with survival and should be taken into account when metastasectomy is considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tohru Nakagawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Satoru Taguchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kanatani
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaomi Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Akihiko Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Daisuke Yamada
- Department of Urology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yutaka Enomoto
- Department of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yasushi Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nagase
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Hirano
- Department of Urology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yoshinori Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyo Miyazaki
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Fujimura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fukuhara
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Igawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukio Homma
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sargos P, Larré S, Chapet O, Latorzeff I, Fléchon A, Roubaud G, Orré M, Belhomme S, Richaud P. [Adjuvant radiotherapy for bladder cancer in patients with risk of locoregional recurrence: Who, what and how?]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:67-72. [PMID: 28187997 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.08.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Radical cystectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection remains the standard of care for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Locoregional control is a key factor in the outcome of patients since it is related to overall survival, metastasis-free survival and specific survival. Locoregional recurrence rate is directly correlated to pathological results and the quality of lymphadenectomy. In addition, while pre- or postoperative chemotherapy improved overall survival, it showed no impact on locoregional recurrence-free survival. Several recent publications have led to the development of a nomogram that predicts the risk of locoregional recurrence, in order to identify patients for which adjuvant radiotherapy could be beneficial. International cooperative groups have then come together to provide the rational for adjuvant radiotherapy, reinforced by recent technical developments limiting toxicity, and to develop prospective studies to reduce the risk of relapse. The aim of this critical literature review is to provide an overview of the elements in favor of adjuvant radiation for patients treated for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sargos
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France.
| | - S Larré
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, 45, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51100 Reims, France
| | - O Chapet
- Département de radiothérapie, CHU Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - I Latorzeff
- Département de radiothérapie, groupe Oncorad Garonne, clinique Pasteur, bâtiment Atrium, 1, rue de la Petite-Vitesse, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - A Fléchon
- Département d'oncologie médicale, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, promenade Léa-et-Napoléon-Bullukian, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - G Roubaud
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - M Orré
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - S Belhomme
- Département de physique médicale, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - P Richaud
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Baumann BC, Sargos P, Eapen LJ, Efstathiou JA, Choudhury A, Bahl A, Murthy V, Ballas LK, Fonteyne V, Richaud PM, Zaghloul MS, Christodouleas JP. The Rationale for Post-Operative Radiation in Localized Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2017; 3:19-30. [PMID: 28149931 PMCID: PMC5271478 DOI: 10.3233/blc-160081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Local-regional recurrence for patients with ≥pT3 disease after radical cystectomy is a significant problem. Chemotherapy has not been shown to reduce the risk of local-regional recurrences in randomized prospective trials, and salvage therapies for local-regional failure are rarely successful. There is promising evidence, particularly from a recent Egyptian NCI trial, that radiation therapy plus chemotherapy can significantly reduce local recurrences compared to chemotherapy alone, and that this improvement in local-regional control may translate to meaningful improvements in disease-free and overall survival with acceptable toxicity. In light of the high rates of local failure following cystectomy for locally advanced disease and the progress that has been made in identifying patients at high risk of failure and the patterns of failure in the pelvis, the NCCN guidelines were revised in 2016 to include post-operative radiotherapy as an option to consider for patients with ≥pT3 disease. Despite advances in our understanding of the problem of local-regional failure after cystectomy and the potential role of adjuvant radiotherapy, the question of whether adjuvant radiotherapy should have a defined role for patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma has not yet been determined. The results of the NRG, European, Indian, and Egyptian trials on adjuvant radiotherapy are eagerly awaited. While none of these trials on their own may provide definitive conclusions, their aggregate outcomes will help clarify whether this treatment should have a role in the management of patients with locally advanced bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C Baumann
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Amit Bahl
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust , Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Mohamed S Zaghloul
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhou L, Chang Y, Xu L, Hoang STN, Liu Z, Fu Q, Lin Z, Xu J. Prognostic value of vascular mimicry in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder after radical cystectomy. Oncotarget 2016; 7:76214-76223. [PMID: 27776348 PMCID: PMC5342808 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Vascular mimicry (VM) refers to the plasticity of aggressive cancer cells forming de novo vascular networks, which promoted tumor metastasis. The aim of this study was evaluate the impact of VM on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Records from 202 patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for UCB at Zhongshan Hospital between 2002 and 2014 were reviewed. The presence of VM was identified by CD31-PAS double staining. Positive VM staining occurred in 19.3% (39 of 202) UCB cases, and it was associated with increased risks of recurrence (Log-Rank p<0.001). VM was identified as an independent prognostic factor (p=0.002). In the cohort with MIBC, patients with VM negative got CSS benefit from the use of ACT (p = 0.048). As for lung metastasis, the combination of VM and TNM stage (AUC 0.792) showed a better prognostic value than TNM stage alone (AUC 0.748, p = 0.008) or VM alone (AUC 0.714, p = 0.023). Vascular mimicry could be a potential prognosticator for recurrence-free survival in patients with UCB after RC. Vascular mimicry seems to predict risk of developing lung metastases after RC. The presence of VM identified a subgroup of patients with MIBC who appeared to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhou
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Chang
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Le Xu
- Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Fu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zongming Lin
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiejie Xu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Westerman ME, Parker WP, Viers BR, Rivera ME, Karnes RJ, Frank I, Tarrell R, Thapa P, Thompson RH, Tollefson MK, Boorjian SA. Malignant ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture following radical cystectomy with urinary diversion: Patterns, risk factors, and outcomes. Urol Oncol 2016; 34:485.e1-485.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2015] [Revised: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
28
|
Sargos P, Baumann BC, Eapen LJ, Bahl A, Murthy V, Roubaud G, Orré M, Efstathiou JA, Shariat S, Larré S, Richaud P, Christodouleas JP. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer: time to reconsider? Transl Androl Urol 2016; 5:702-710. [PMID: 27785427 PMCID: PMC5071208 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2016.08.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical cystectomy with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection, associated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, remains the standard of care for advanced, non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Loco-regional control is a key factor in the outcome of patients since it is related to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cause-specific survival. The risk of loco-regional recurrence (LRR) is correlated to pathological factors as well as the extent of the lymphadenectomy. In addition, neither pre- nor post-operative chemotherapy have shown a clear impact on LRR-free survival. Several recent publications have led to the development of a nomogram predicting the risk of LRR, in order to identify patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Given the high risk of LRR for selected patients and improvements in radiation techniques that can reduce toxicity, there is a growing interest in adjuvant radiotherapy; international cooperative groups have come together to provide the rationale in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinical trials in order to reduce the risk of pelvic relapse are opened based on this optimizing patient selection. The aim of this critical literature review is to provide an overview of the rationale supporting the studies of adjuvant radiation for patients with pathologic high-risk MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Libni J Eapen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit Bahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mathieu Orré
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephane Larré
- Department of Urology, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Pierre Richaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - John P Christodouleas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Alimi Q, Verhoest G, Kammerer-Jacquet SF, Mathieu R, Rioux-Leclercq N, Manunta A, Laguerre B, Guille F, Bensalah K, Peyronnet B. Role of routine computed tomography scan in the oncological follow up of patients treated by radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Int J Urol 2016; 23:840-846. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.13164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Quentin Alimi
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Rennes; Rennes France
| | - Grégory Verhoest
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Rennes; Rennes France
| | | | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Rennes; Rennes France
| | | | - Andréa Manunta
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Rennes; Rennes France
| | | | - François Guille
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Rennes; Rennes France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Rennes; Rennes France
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Rennes; Rennes France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Alanee S, Ganai S, Gupta P, Holland B, Dynda D, Slaton J. Disparities in long-term radiographic follow-up after cystectomy for bladder cancer: Analysis of the SEER-Medicare database. Urol Ann 2016; 8:178-83. [PMID: 27141188 PMCID: PMC4839235 DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.164852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: It is uncertain whether there are disparities related to receiving long-term radiographic follow-up after cystectomy performed for bladder cancer, and whether intensive follow-up influences survival. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 2080 patients treated with cystectomy between 1992 and 2004 isolated from the SEER-Medicare database. The number of abdominal computerized tomography scans performed in patients surviving 2 years after surgery was used as an indicator of long-term radiographic follow-up to exclude patients with early failures. Results: Patients were mainly males (83.18%), had a mean age at diagnosis of 73.4 ± 6.6 (standard deviation) years, and mean survival of 4.6 ± 3.2 years. Multivariate analysis showed age >70 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.796, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.651–0.974), African American race (OR: 0.180, 95% CI: 0.081–0.279), and Charlson comorbidity score >2 (OR: 0.694, 95% CI: 0.505–0.954) to be associated with lower odds of long-term radiographic follow-up. Higher disease stage (Stage T4N1) (OR: 1.873, 95% CI: 1.491–2.353), higher quartile for education (OR: 5.203, 95% CI: 1.072–9.350) and higher quartile for income (OR: 6.940, 95% CI: 1.444–12.436) were associated with increased odds of long-term radiographic follow-up. Interestingly, more follow-up with imaging after cystectomy did not improve cancer-specific or overall survival in these patients. Conclusion: There are significant age, race, and socioeconomic disparities in long-term radiographic follow-up after radical cystectomy. However, more radiographic follow-up may not be associated with better survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaheen Alanee
- Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Sabha Ganai
- Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Priyanka Gupta
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bradley Holland
- Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Danuta Dynda
- Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Joel Slaton
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma, School of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Oncologic surveillance in bladder cancer following radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2016; 34:236.e13-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2015] [Revised: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
32
|
Complications of Radical Cystectomy and Orthotopic Reconstruction. Adv Urol 2015; 2015:323157. [PMID: 26697063 PMCID: PMC4677163 DOI: 10.1155/2015/323157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2015] [Revised: 10/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical cystectomy and orthotopic reconstruction significant morbidity and mortality despite advances in minimal invasive and robotic technology. In this review, we will discuss early and late complications, as well as describe efforts to minimize morbidity and mortality, with a focus on ileal orthotopic bladder substitute (OBS). We summarise efforts to minimize morbidity and mortality including enhanced recovery as well as early and late complications seen after radical cystectomy and OBS. Centralisation of complex cancer services in the UK has led to a fall in mortality and high volume institutions have a significantly lower rate of 30-day mortality compared to low volume institutions. Enhanced recovery pathways have resulted in shorter length of hospital stay and potentially a reduction in morbidity. Early complications of radical cystectomy occur as a direct result of the surgery itself while late complications, which can occur even after 10 years after surgery, are due to urinary diversion. OBS represents the ideal urinary diversion for patients without contraindications. However, all patients with OBS should have regular long term follow-up for oncological surveillance and to identify complications should they arise.
Collapse
|
33
|
Reply to Farshad Pourmalek, Hamidreza Abdi, and Peter C. Black's Letter to the Editor re: Daniel P. Nguyen, Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh, Xian Wu, et al. Recurrence Patterns After Open and Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2015;68:399-405. Eur Urol 2015; 69:e36. [PMID: 26187784 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
34
|
Vemana G, Vetter J, Chen L, Sandhu G, Strope SA. Sources of variation in follow-up expenditure after radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2015; 33:267.e31-7. [PMID: 25907624 PMCID: PMC4472448 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2014] [Revised: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/07/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up care after radical cystectomy is poorly defined, with extensive variation in practice patterns. We sought to determine sources of these variations in care as well as examine the economic effect of standardization of care to guideline-recommended care. METHODS Using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 1992 to 2007, we determined follow-up care expenditures (time and geography standardized) for 24 months after surgery. Accounted expenditures included office visits, imaging studies, urine tests, and blood work. A multilevel model was implemented to determine the effect of region, surgeon, and patient factors on care delivery. We then compared the actual expenditures on care in the Medicare system (interquartile range) with the expenditures if patients received care recommended by current clinical guidelines. RESULTS Expenditures over 24 months of follow-up were calculated per month and per patient. The mean and median total expenditures per patient were $1108 and $805 respectively (minimum $0, maximum $9,805; 25th-75th percentile $344-$1503). Variations in expenditures were most explained at the patient level. After accounting for surgeon and patient levels, we found no regional-level variations in care. Adherence to guidelines would lead to an increase in expenditures by 0.80 to 10.6 times the expenditures exist in current practice. CONCLUSION Although some regional-level and surgeon-level variations in care were found, the most variation in expenditure on follow-up care was at the patient level, largely based on node positivity, chemotherapy status, and final cancer stage. Standardization of care to current established guidelines would create higher expenditures on follow-up care than current practice patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goutham Vemana
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Joel Vetter
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ling Chen
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Gurdarshan Sandhu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Seth A Strope
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abdallah A, Abdel-Hakiem M, El-Feel A. Laparo-endoscopic single-site radical cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion: Technique, feasibility, and the 3-year follow-up. Arab J Urol 2015; 12:229-33. [PMID: 26019955 PMCID: PMC4435925 DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Revised: 04/24/2014] [Accepted: 05/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility, operative morbidity and oncological outcome of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ten patients with clinical stage T1-T2 bladder cancer underwent a LESS radical cystectomy. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 64.8 (8.6) years and their mean body mass index was 25.9 (2.7) kg/m(2). The procedure was done via a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port using a rigid 5-mm 30° long-shaft laparoscope in addition to the two working instruments. A 7-cm Pfannenstiel incision was made to remove the specimens and to allow the creation of an ileal neobladder with hand assistance. RESULTS In eight patients the LESS radical cystectomy was completed as scheduled, with the other two requiring a conversion, one to an open procedure due to locally advanced disease, and the other to conventional laparoscopy due to gas leakage. The mean (SD) operative duration was 236 (49) min, with a mean estimated blood loss of 575 (113) mL, and a mean hospital stay of 5.5 (0.7) days. No postoperative analgesic medications were prescribed and patients returned to normal activity after a mean (SD) of 17.6 (2.6) days. The pathological examination showed negative surgical margins for the bladder specimens, with a mean (SD) of 14 (1.9) lymph nodes retrieved. Seven patients were cancer-free within a mean (SD, range) follow-up of 37 (6, 29-44) months. CONCLUSIONS LESS radical cystectomy is technically feasible, with a favourable course and convalescence, and it has an acceptable oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ahmed El-Feel
- Department of Urology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yuh B, Chan K, Lau C, Wilson T. Variable recurrence patterns after cystectomy in bladder cancer: can the robot be blamed? Eur Urol 2015; 68:406-7. [PMID: 25900783 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 04/03/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bertram Yuh
- Division of Urologic Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| | - Kevin Chan
- Division of Urologic Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Clayton Lau
- Division of Urologic Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Wilson
- Division of Urologic Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nguyen DP, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wu X, O'Malley P, Inoyatov IM, Ayangbesan A, Faltas BM, Christos PJ, Scherr DS. Recurrence patterns after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2015; 68:399-405. [PMID: 25709026 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2014] [Accepted: 02/06/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns remain whether robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compromises survival because of inadequate oncologic resection or alteration of recurrence patterns. OBJECTIVE To describe recurrence patterns following open radical cystectomy (ORC) and RARC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review of 383 consecutive patients who underwent ORC (n=120) or RARC (n=263) at an academic institution from July 2001 to February 2014. INTERVENTION ORC and RARC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Recurrence-free survival estimates were illustrated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Recurrence patterns (local vs distant and anatomic locations) within 2 yr of surgery were tabulated. Cox regression models were built to evaluate the effect of surgical technique on the risk of recurrence. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median follow-up time for patients without recurrence was 30 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 5-72) for ORC and 23 mo (IQR 9-48) for RARC (p=0.6). Within 2 yr of surgery, there was no large difference in the number of local recurrences between ORC and RARC patients (15/65 [23%] vs 24/136 [18%]), and the distribution of local recurrences was similar between the two groups. Similarly, the number of distant recurrences did not differ between the groups (26/73 [36%] vs 43/147 [29%]). However, there were distinct patterns of distant recurrence. Extrapelvic lymph node locations were more frequent for RARC than ORC (10/43 [23%] vs 4/26 [15%]). Furthermore, peritoneal carcinomatosis was found in 9/43 (21%) RARC patients compared to 2/26 (8%) ORC patients. In multivariable analyses, RARC was not a predictor of recurrence. Limitations of the study include selection bias and a limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS Within limitations, we found that RARC is not an independent predictor of recurrence after surgery. Interestingly, extrapelvic lymph node locations and peritoneal carcinomatosis were more frequent in RARC than in ORC patients. Further validation is warranted to better understand the oncologic implications of RARC. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, the locations of bladder cancer recurrences following conventional and robotic techniques for removal of the bladder are described. Although the numbers are small, the results show that the distribution of distant recurrences differs between the two techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Nguyen
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
| | | | - Xian Wu
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Padraic O'Malley
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Igor M Inoyatov
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Abimbola Ayangbesan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bishoy M Faltas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul J Christos
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Douglas S Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Novotny V, Froehner M, May M, Protzel C, Hergenröther K, Rink M, Chun FK, Fisch M, Roghmann F, Palisaar RJ, Noldus J, Gierth M, Fritsche HM, Burger M, Sikic D, Keck B, Wullich B, Nuhn P, Buchner A, Stief CG, Vallo S, Bartsch G, Haferkamp A, Bastian PJ, Hakenberg OW, Propping S, Aziz A. Risk stratification for locoregional recurrence after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. World J Urol 2015; 33:1753-61. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1502-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Accepted: 01/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
39
|
Baumann BC, Noa K, Wileyto EP, Bekelman JE, Deville C, Vapiwala N, Kirk M, Both S, Dolney D, Kassaee A, Christodouleas JP. Adjuvant radiation therapy for bladder cancer: A dosimetric comparison of techniques. Med Dosim 2015; 40:372-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2014] [Revised: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
40
|
Strope SA. Comparative effectiveness research in urologic cancers. Cancer Treat Res 2015; 164:221-35. [PMID: 25677026 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12553-4_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Controversies abound in urologic cancers. While some work in comparative effectiveness research has been performed, most controversies remain unresolved. In this chapter, we examine the three most common urologic malignancies: Prostate cancer, kidney cancer, and bladder cancer. We will review progress made in comparative effectiveness research for each cancer and outline important topics where future research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth A Strope
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Koie T, Ohyama C, Yamamoto H, Imai A, Hatakeyama S, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Yoneyama T, Tobisawa Y. Differences in the recurrence pattern after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to surgery alone in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Med Oncol 2014; 32:421. [PMID: 25471790 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0421-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Accepted: 11/27/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
In patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) confers a survival benefit compared to radical cystectomy (RC) alone. Recurrence is observed in many cases and is the most common cause of death in MIBC patients. However, the rate and pattern of recurrence after NAC in MIBC patients remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 348 consecutive patients who underwent RC and bilateral pelvic node dissection between May 1994 and July 2012. Our study focused on patients with MIBC who had histologically confirmed stage T2-T4a urothelial carcinoma of the bladder without lymph node or distant metastasis. Accordingly, 265 patients were included in this analysis, of whom 130 received NAC and 135 underwent RC alone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for potential selection biases associated with treatment type. Recurrence was defined as local recurrence and distant metastasis, according to site. Propensity score matching analysis identified 130 matched pairs from the two groups. For the neoadjuvant gemcitabine and carboplatin (GCarbo) and RC alone groups, the 5-year overall survival rates were 89.2 and 51.4 %, respectively (P < 0.0001), and the recurrence-free survival rates were 85.4 and 57.0 %, respectively (P < 0.0001). However, the total number of local recurrences was markedly lower in the neoadjuvant GCarbo group than in the RC alone group. Neoadjuvant GCarbo was associated with improved oncological outcomes and a different recurrence pattern in MIBC patients compared to RC alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, 5 Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bayoumi Y, Heikal T, Darweish H. Survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy in stage III and IV bladder cancer: results of 170 patients. Cancer Manag Res 2014; 6:459-65. [PMID: 25506244 PMCID: PMC4259260 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s69055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancers. However, the locoregional recurrence rate is still significantly higher for locally advanced cases post-RC. The underuse of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in such cases after RC is related mainly to a lack of proven survival benefit. Here we are reporting our long-term Egyptian experience with bladder cancer patients treated with up-front RC with or without conformal PORT. Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 170 locally advanced bladder cancer (T3–T4, N0/N1, M0) patients who had RC performed with or without PORT at Damietta Cancer Institute during the period of 1998–2006. The treatment outcomes and toxicity profile of PORT were evaluated and compared with those of a non-PORT group of patients. Results: Ninety-two patients received PORT; 78 did not. At median follow-up of 47 months (range, 17–77 months), 33% locoregional recurrences were seen in the PORT group versus 55% in the non-PORT group (P<0.001). The overall distant metastasis rate in the whole group was 39%, with no difference between the two groups. The 5-year disease-free survival for the whole group of patients was 53%±11%, which was significantly affected by additional PORT, and 65%±13% compared with 40%±9% for the non-PORT group (P=0.04). The pathological subtypes did not affect 5-year disease-free survival significantly (P=0.9). The 5-year overall survival was 44%±10%. Using multivariate analysis, PORT, stage, and extravesical extension (positive surgical margins) were found to be important prognostic factors for locoregional control. Stage and lymph node status were important prognosticators for distant metastasis control. Conclusion: PORT was found to be a safe and effective tool in decreasing local recurrence rates and improving disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser Bayoumi
- Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Tarek Heikal
- Medical Oncology, Damietta Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health, Damietta, Egypt
| | - Hossam Darweish
- Medical Oncology, Damietta Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health, Damietta, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hrbáček J, Macek P, Ali-El-Dein B, Thalmann GN, Stenzl A, Babjuk M, Shaaban AA, Gakis G. Treatment and Outcomes of Urethral Recurrence of Urinary Bladder Cancer in Women after Radical Cystectomy and Orthotopic Neobladder: A Series of 12 Cases. Urol Int 2014; 94:45-9. [DOI: 10.1159/000363112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2013] [Accepted: 04/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence, treatment, and outcome of urethral recurrence (UR) after radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer with orthotopic neobladder in women have rarely been addressed in the literature. Patients and Methods: A total of 12 patients (median age at recurrence: 60 years) who experienced UR after RC with an orthotopic neobladder were selected for this study from a cohort of 456 women from participating institutions. The primary clinical and pathological characteristics at RC, including the manifestation of the UR and its treatment and outcome, were reviewed. Results: The primary bladder tumors in the 12 patients were urothelial carcinoma in 8 patients, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in 1 patient each, and mixed histology in 2 patients. Three patients (25%) had lymph node-positive disease at RC. The median time from RC to the detection of UR was 8 months (range 4-55). Eight recurrences manifested with clinical symptoms and 4 were detected during follow-up or during a diagnostic work-up for clinical symptoms caused by distant metastases. Treatment modalities were surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and bacillus Calmette-Guérin urethral instillations. Nine patients died of cancer. The median survival after the diagnosis of UR was 6 months. Conclusions: UR after RC with an orthotopic neobladder in females is rare. Solitary, noninvasive recurrences have a favorable prognosis when detected early. Invasive recurrences are often associated with local and distant metastases and have a poor prognosis.
Collapse
|
44
|
Ku JH, Kim M, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH. Risk prediction models of locoregional failure after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma: external validation in a cohort of korean patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 89:1032-1037. [PMID: 25035206 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2014] [Revised: 04/20/2014] [Accepted: 04/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the predictive accuracy and general applicability of the locoregional failure model in a different cohort of patients treated with radical cystectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 398 patients were included in the analysis. Death and isolated distant metastasis were considered competing events, and patients without any events were censored at the time of last follow-up. The model included the 3 variables pT classification, the number of lymph nodes identified, and margin status, as follows: low risk (≤pT2), intermediate risk (≥pT3 with ≥10 nodes removed and negative margins), and high risk (≥pT3 with <10 nodes removed or positive margins). RESULTS The bootstrap-corrected concordance index of the model 5 years after radical cystectomy was 66.2%. When the risk stratification was applied to the validation cohort, the 5-year locoregional failure estimates were 8.3%, 21.2%, and 46.3% for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. The risk of locoregional failure differed significantly between the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups (subhazard ratio [SHR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-5.11; P<.001) and between the low-risk and high-risk groups (SHR, 4.28; 95% CI, 2.17-8.45; P<.001). Although decision curves were appropriately affected by the incidence of the competing risk, decisions about the value of the models are not likely to be affected because the model remains of value over a wide range of threshold probabilities. CONCLUSIONS The model is not completely accurate, but it demonstrates a modest level of discrimination, adequate calibration, and meaningful net benefit gain for prediction of locoregional failure after radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myong Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Fattahi Masoum SH, Feizzdeh Kerigh B, Goreifi A. Pulmonary and chest wall metastasectomy in urogenital tumors: a single center experience and review of literature. Nephrourol Mon 2014; 6:e17258. [PMID: 25032142 PMCID: PMC4090669 DOI: 10.5812/numonthly.17258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2014] [Accepted: 03/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary metastases are often found in advanced malignancies. Urogenital malignancies originating from kidney, prostate, testes, and bladder all metastasize preferentially to the lungs. OBJECTIVES This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the results of pulmonary and chest wall metastasectomy in patients with primary urogenital Tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS The patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy in Ghaem Hospital from 1996 to 2011 were examined. Thirteen out of 79 patients referred for pulmonary metastasectomy to a single thoracic surgeon had metastases from urogenital tumors; two cases with metastasis from urogenital tumors were inoperable. We reviewed their demographic data and also clinicopathological features. Disease free interval (DFI) was defined as the time between the first curative surgery and the appearance of the signs and symptoms of pulmonary metastasis. RESULTS Among 11 patients who underwent surgery consisted of eight males and three females. Their metastasis originated from testis tumors (n = 5), renal cell carcinoma (RCC; n = 4), bladder tumor (n = 1), and prostate cancer (n = 1). Their mean age was 41.27 years (range, 21-67). The mean age of the patients with RCC and testis tumor at the time of diagnosing metastasis was 54 and 24.8 years, respectively. There were two other patients (a 62-year-old female and a 54-year-old male) with pleural effusion due to metastatic RCC whose tumor was inoperable because of their poor general condition and hence, were referred for chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Pulmonary metastasectomy is feasible in selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyd Hossein Fattahi Masoum
- Transplant Research Center, Imam Reza Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
| | - Behzad Feizzdeh Kerigh
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Kidney Transplantation Complications Research Center, Ghaem Medical Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
- Corresponding author: Behzad Feizzdeh Kerigh, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Kidney Transplantation Complications Research Center, Ghaem Medical Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran. Tel: +98-5118012857, Fax: +98-5118417404, E-mail:
| | - Alireza Goreifi
- Department of Urology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Transurethral bladder tumor resection can cause seeding of cancer cells into the bloodstream. J Urol 2014; 193:53-7. [PMID: 24996129 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transurethral bladder tumor resection is the initial diagnostic procedure for bladder cancer. Hypothetically tumor resection could induce seeding of cancer cells into the circulation and subsequent metastatic disease. In this study we ascertain whether transurethral bladder tumor resection induces measurable seeding of cancer cells into the vascular system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients newly diagnosed with suspected invasive bladder cancer and planned for transurethral resection of bladder tumor in 2012 to 2013 were enrolled in the study. Before transurethral bladder tumor resection a vascular surgeon placed a venous catheter in the inferior vena cava via the femoral vein. Blood samples were drawn before and during the resection from the inferior vena cava and a peripheral vein, and analyzed for circulating cancer cells using the CellSearch® system. The number of circulating tumor cells identified was compared in preoperative and intraoperative blood samples. RESULTS The circulating tumor cell data on 16 eligible patients were analyzed. In 6 of 7 positive inferior vena cava samples (86%) the number of circulating tumor cells was increased intraoperatively (28 vs 9, 28 vs 0, 28 vs 5, 3 vs 0, 4 vs 0, 1 vs 0), and results were similar, although less conclusive, for the corresponding peripheral vein samples. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms that tumor cells can be released into the circulation during transurethral bladder tumor resection. It is currently unknown whether this will increase the risk of metastatic disease.
Collapse
|
47
|
Kim HS, Kim M, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH. Multifactorial, site-specific recurrence models after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma: external validation in a cohort of Korean patients. PLoS One 2014; 9:e100491. [PMID: 24937260 PMCID: PMC4061079 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2014] [Accepted: 05/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of site-specific recurrence models after radical cystectomy in the Korean population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a review of an electronic medical record of 572 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Primary end point was the site-specific recurrence after radical cystectomy. RESULTS The median follow-up in the validation cohort was 42.3 months (interquartile range: 23.0-89.3 months). During the follow-up period, there were 165 patients (28.8%), 85 (14.9%), 31 (5.4%), and 78 (13.6%) who recurred in abdomen/pelvis, thoracic region, upper urinary tract, and bone, respectively. The c-indices of abdomen/pelvis, thoracic region, upper urinary tract, and bone models 3 years after radical cystectomy were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.73), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.75), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.52-0.69), and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.71), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that models discriminated well and log-rank test were all highly significant (all p<0.001), except upper urinary tract model (p = 0.366). Decision curve analysis revealed that the use of prediction models for abdomen/pelvis, thoracic region, and bone recurrence was associated with net benefit gains relative to the treat-all strategy, but not the model for upper urinary tract recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Abdomen/pelvis, thoracic region, and bone models demonstrate moderate discrimination, adequate calibration, and meaningful net benefit gains, whereas upper urinary tract model does not seem applicable to patients from Asia because it has suboptimal accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myong Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tang K, Li H, Xia D, Hu Z, Zhuang Q, Liu J, Xu H, Ye Z. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. PLoS One 2014; 9:e95667. [PMID: 24835573 PMCID: PMC4023936 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2013] [Accepted: 03/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective More recently laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has increasingly been an attractive alternative to open radical cystectomy (ORC) and many centers have reported their early experiences in the treatment of bladder cancer. Evaluate the safety and efficacy of LRC compared with ORC in the treatment of bladder cancer. Methods A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to Mar 1, 2013. Outcomes of interest assessing the two techniques included demographic and clinical baseline characteristics, perioperative, pathologic and oncological variables, and post-op neobladder function and complications. Results Sixteen eligible trials evaluating LRC vs ORC were identified including seven prospective and nine retrospective studies. Although LRC was associated with longer operative time (p<0.001), patients might benefit from significantly fewer overall complications (p<0.001), less blood loss (p<0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (p<0.001), less need of blood transfusion (p<0.001), less narcotic analgesic requirement (p<0.001), shorter time to ambulation (p = 0.03), shorter time to regular diet (p<0.001), fewer positive surgical margins (p = 0.006), fewer positive lymph node (p = 0.05), lower distant metastasis rate (p = 0.05) and fewer death (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in other demographic parameters except for a lower ASA score (p = 0.01) in LRC while post-op neobladder function were similar between the two groups. Conclusions Our data suggest that LRC appears to be a safe, feasible and minimally invasive alternative to ORC with reliable perioperative safety, pathologic & oncologic efficacy, comparable post-op neobladder function and fewer complications. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample prospective, multi-centric, long-term follow-up studies and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Tang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ding Xia
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiquan Hu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qianyuan Zhuang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hua Xu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Late Recurrence after Radical Cystectomy: Patterns, Risk Factors and Outcomes. J Urol 2014; 191:1256-61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
50
|
Zaghloul MS, Gouda I. Schistosomiasis and bladder cancer: similarities and differences from urothelial cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 12:753-63. [DOI: 10.1586/era.12.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|