A secondary analysis of the Belimumab International Study in Lupus Nephritis trial examined effects of belimumab on kidney outcomes and preservation of kidney function in patients with lupus nephritis

2024 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Guideline for the Screening, Treatment, and Management of Lupus Nephritis

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to provide evidence-based and expert guidance for the screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis.

METHODS

The Core Team developed clinical questions for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis using the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were completed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and to formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus ≥70% on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation.

RESULTS

We present 28 graded recommendations (7 strong, 21 conditional) and 13 ungraded, consensus-based good practice statements for the screening and management of lupus nephritis. Our recommendations focus on the unifying principle that lupus nephritis therapy is continuous and ongoing, rather than consisting of discrete induction/initial and maintenance/subsequent therapies. Therapy should include pulse glucocorticoids followed by oral glucocorticoid taper and two additional immunosuppressive agents for 3-5 years for those achieving complete renal response.

CONCLUSION

This guideline provides direction for clinicians regarding screening and treatment decisions for management of lupus nephritis. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each individual patient.

Evolution and trajectory of B-cell targeted therapies in rheumatic diseases

Aberrant B-cell function, which could arise from various underlying causes, is central to the pathogenesis of diverse autoimmune rheumatic diseases. B cells remain the only cell type to be specifically therapeutically targeted through depletion and have the only therapy with a routinely available flow cytometric biomarker of treatment. Since first use and subsequent licensing for rheumatoid arthritis, rituximab has had a transformative impact on patients globally and across the rheumatic diseases. Further insights from B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) blockade with belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus have followed. Examination of B-cell depletion, clinical outcomes, and re-emergent disease after treatment have deepened our understanding of the identity, detailed phenotype, biology, and kinetics of the B-cell subsets that are central to disease. This Review reflects on 20 years of clinical and translational insights drawn from B-cell targeted therapies for adult autoimmune rheumatic diseases, and highlights how these therapies have informed an exciting new era of future therapeutic developments.

Therapeutic progress in the targeting of B cells in lupus nephritis: pathogenesis to clinical research

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common complication in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), where the key mechanism is the deposition of immune complexes in the kidneys, leading to renal damage. B lymphocytes play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis through several pathways. These include the production of autoantibodies, which contribute to the deposition of immune complexes in the kidneys, activation of the complement system, and promotion of local inflammatory responses. Additionally, B cells act as antigen-presenting cells, facilitating T cell activation, and secrete proinflammatory cytokines that further exacerbate inflammation. Moreover, an imbalance in B cell subpopulations can worsen autoimmune damage, highlighting the complex role of B cells in the progression of LN. Targeting B cells has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy, particularly for patients with relapsed or refractory LN. Recent advances in B cell-targeted therapies have shown significant clinical potential, offering new hope for better disease management. This review highlights the latest progress in B cell-targeted approaches for LN treatment and explores their potential to revolutionize care for this challenging condition.

[Lupus nephritis - does a lot help a lot?]

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent and often serious manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, which can lead to the need for renal replacement therapy. Its timely diagnosis and treatment is therefore of crucial importance. The use of targeted immunomodulating therapies and the consistent use of nephroprotective measures in the treatment of LN can now significantly improve the renal prognosis and reduce glucocorticoid-associated toxicity. Recent study data have shown that the combination of different immunomodulating therapies including calcineurin inhibitors or belimumab is superior to therapy with single agents in terms of clinically relevant renal endpoints. This multi-target therapy has now also been included in several recently updated international guidelines. In the future, CAR-T cell therapy could be a promising prospect for patients with refractory lupus nephritis.

2024 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Guideline for the Screening, Treatment, and Management of Lupus Nephritis

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to provide evidence-based and expert guidance for the screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis.

METHODS

The Core Team developed clinical questions for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis using the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were completed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and to formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus ≥70% on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation.

RESULTS

We present 28 graded recommendations (7 strong, 21 conditional) and 13 ungraded, consensus-based good practice statements for the screening and management of lupus nephritis. Our recommendations focus on the unifying principle that lupus nephritis therapy is continuous and ongoing, rather than consisting of discrete induction/initial and maintenance/subsequent therapies. Therapy should include pulse glucocorticoids followed by oral glucocorticoid taper and two additional immunosuppressive agents for 3-5 years for those achieving complete renal response.

CONCLUSION

This guideline provides direction for clinicians regarding screening and treatment decisions for management of lupus nephritis. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each individual patient.

Kidney transplantation in Lupus Nephritis: a comprehensive review of challenges and strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), significantly impacting patient outcomes. Despite advances in immunosuppressive therapies, many patients progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and kidney transplantation becomes essential for improving survival. However, the unique characteristics of autoimmune diseases make the timing of kidney transplantation and post-transplant management challenging. This review evaluates authoritative guidelines and recent studies to identify optimal timing for kidney transplantation and effective pre- and post-transplant management measures for patients with LN. RECENT FINDINGS: Advancements in immunosuppressive therapies, including calcineurin inhibitors, Voclosporin, and biologic agents such as belimumab, have significantly improved LN management. Emerging biomarkers, such as urinary MCP-1 and BAFF, offer promising tools for monitoring LN activity and predicting recurrence risk post-transplantation. Current guidelines emphasize the importance of achieving disease quiescence before transplantation, while new evidence supports the benefits of preemptive transplantation and personalized immunosuppressive regimens in improving patient and graft survival. This review highlights the latest evidence and strategies for optimizing kidney transplantation outcomes in LN patients, focusing on timing, immunosuppression, and disease monitoring.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: updated insights on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and therapeutics

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory illness with heterogeneous clinical manifestations covering multiple organs. Diversified types of medications have been shown effective for alleviating SLE syndromes, ranging from cytokines, antibodies, hormones, molecular inhibitors or antagonists, to cell transfusion. Drugs developed for treating other diseases may benefit SLE patients, and agents established as SLE therapeutics may be SLE-inductive. Complexities regarding SLE therapeutics render it essential and urgent to identify the mechanisms-of-action and pivotal signaling axis driving SLE pathogenesis, and to establish innovative SLE-targeting approaches with desirable therapeutic outcome and safety. After introducing the research history of SLE and its epidemiology, we categorized primary determinants driving SLE pathogenesis by their mechanisms; combed through current knowledge on SLE diagnosis and grouped them by disease onset, activity and comorbidity; introduced the genetic, epigenetic, hormonal and environmental factors predisposing SLE; and comprehensively categorized preventive strategies and available SLE therapeutics according to their functioning mechanisms. In summary, we proposed three mechanisms with determinant roles on SLE initiation and progression, i.e., attenuating the immune system, restoring the cytokine microenvironment homeostasis, and rescuing the impaired debris clearance machinery; and provided updated insights on current understandings of SLE regarding its pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and therapeutics, which may open an innovative avenue in the fields of SLE management.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Outcomes of Lupus Nephritis Patients With Thrombocytopenia: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to analyze and summarize the clinical characteristics and prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) patients with thrombocytopenia and to improve the cognition of the disease.

METHODS

896 LN patients were enrolled in this study and their clinical and pathological data were collected and analyzed. The primary end point was mortality. The secondary end point was adverse renal outcomes, defined as doubling of the baseline serum creatinine or end-stage renal diseases. Cox regression model was used to analyze the risk factors of mortality or renal events in LN with and without thrombocytopenia.

RESULTS

Among 896 LN patients, 70 (7.8%) were diagnosed with thrombocytopenia. LN patients with thrombocytopenia had lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and higher systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLE-DAI), proportion of anemia, leukopenia, hypocomplementemia, and positive anti-cardiolipin antibodies, compared to those without thrombocytopenia. LN patients with thrombocytopenia had higher scores of activity index and more activity features (endocapillary hypercellularity, medullary loop necrosis) on kidney biopsy. There was no significant difference in patient survival and renal survival between LN patients with and without thrombocytopenia. Anemia was a risk factor for death in LN patients with thrombocytopenia and lower eGFR was a risk factor for adverse renal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

LN patients with thrombocytopenia showed higher disease activity, more anti-cardiolipin antibody positivity and a higher activity index in kidney biopsy, but the prognosis was similar compared with those without thrombocytopenia. Anemia was a risk factor for death in LN patients with thrombocytopenia.

Rough hypervolume-driven feature selection with groupwise intelligent sampling for detecting clinical characterization of lupus nephritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in SLE. Proliferative and pure membranous LN have different prognoses and may require different treatments. This study proposes a binary rough hypervolume-driven spherical evolution algorithm with groupwise intelligent sampling (bRGSE). The efficient dimensionality reduction capability of the bRGSE is verified across twelve datasets. These datasets are from the public datasets, with feature dimensions ranging from seven hundred to fifty thousand. The experimental results indicate that bRGSE performs better than seven high-performing alternatives. Then, the bRGSE was combined with adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) to form a new model (bRGSE_AdaBoost), which analyzed clinical records collected from 110 patients with LN. Experimental results show that the proposed bRGSE_AdaBoost can identify the most critical indicators, including urine latent blood, white blood cells, endogenous creatinine clearing rate, and age. These indicators may help differentiate between proliferative LN and membranous LN. The proposed bRGSE algorithm is an efficient dimensionality reduction method. The developed bRGSE_AdaBoost model, a computer-aided model, achieved an accuracy of 96.687 % and is expected to provide early warning for the treatment and diagnosis of LN.

Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis: a real-world retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the differences in efficacy and safety between lupus nephritis (LN) patients who received belimumab plus standard therapy and those who received only standard therapy in real world practice.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with LN at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from November 2012 to July 2023 were identified, and eligible cases were divided into two groups according to whether they received additional treatment with belimumab during the course of the disease.

RESULTS

A total of 1169 LN patients were identified from our follow-up database. In total, 112 patients receiving add-on treatment with belimumab (BLM group) and 112 control patients matched for relevant baseline characteristics were enrolled in this study. The median duration of treatment with belimumab was 13.82 [7.24, 20.29] months. Compared with the control group, the BLM group had more significant improvement in disease activity indicators such as serum albumin and complement levels, significantly lower B-cell count, immunoglobulin, and earlier first attainment of renal remission, but there was no significant improvement in renal function and kidney-related events or death during the 2-year follow-up period. In the BLM group, the treatment effect of belimumab was more prominent in patients with lower levels of proteinuria. The safety profile of belimumab treatment was favorable, with a lower incidence of respiratory tract infection in the BLM group than in the control group during the follow-up period (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study revealed that add-on treatment with belimumab provided better disease remission, and the therapeutic effect was more significant in patients with lower proteinuria levels. In addition, it had a favorable safety profile and reduced the risk of respiratory tract infection.

Advances in Targeted Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Current Treatments and Novel Approaches

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with diverse clinical manifestations that can lead to severe organ damage. The complex pathophysiology of SLE makes treatment selection difficult. This review examines the current evidence for biological therapies in SLE, including the anti-B cell activating factor antibody belimumab; the type I interferon receptor antagonist anifrolumab; the novel calcineurin inhibitor voclosporin; and rituximab, which targets CD20 on B cells. We also describe emerging therapies, including novel agents in development and CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, which has shown promise in early clinical experience. Recent advances in biomarker research, including interferon signatures and transcriptomic profiles, may facilitate patient stratification and treatment selection. This review offers insights into current and future treatment strategies for patients with SLE by analyzing clinical trial results and recent immunological findings.

New Treatment Regimens, New Drugs, and New Treatment Goals for Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis is one of the most severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus, affecting roughly 40% of all lupus patients. With the introduction of cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, outcomes have dramatically improved. However, 10% of patients still progress towards end-stage kidney disease, which carries an elevated mortality rate. In recent years, several novel agents have been approved for use or have shown preliminary evidence of efficacy in lupus nephritis. These agents include belimumab, voclosporin, and obinutuzumab, among others. Efficacy has also been demonstrated in recent trials combining older drugs. However, determining which patients would benefit the most from novel agents or combined drug regimens and whether these drugs might serve as an alternative to current remission-induction drug regimens rather than as add-on therapies remain unresolved issues. In this review, we will explore the current evidence regarding the efficacy of novel agents.

Belimumab versus telitacicept in sequential treatment after rituximab for refractory lupus nephritis: a real-world multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

Both belimumab and telitacicept are recognised blockers for B lymphocyte activation, both of which have been approved as add-on therapies for SLE in China. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) followed by belimumab or telitacicept in a real-world cohort.

METHODS

A total of 49 refractory lupus nephritis patients were enrolled from four independent centres, subsequently categorised into two treatment groups: belimumab group (n=35) and telitacicept group (n=14) based on their treatment following RTX. The outcomes of renal response rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

In this study cohort, 63.3% presented with anti-dsDNA antibody positivity and 79.6% exhibited hypocomplementemia, with a mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score of 13±6, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 76.2 (30.2, 113.7) mL/min and urinary protein creatinine ratio (uPCR) of 2.45 (0.77, 5.19) g/g. There was no significant differences between groups. After a follow-up duration of 26±12 months, renal objective remission rate was 80.0% (28 patients) in belimumab group and 85.7% (12 patients) in telitacicept group (difference, 5.7 percentage points, 95% CI, -25.8 to 26.8, p=1.000). Renal complete response was 54.3% (19 patients) in belimumab group and 78.6% (11 patients) in telitacicept group (difference, 24.3 percentage points, 95% CI, 9.7 to 47.8, p=0.194). The anti-dsDNA antibody, complement, eGFR, uPCR and SLEDAI-2K Score were improved in both groups with a significant reduction in prednisone dose. Major adverse effects included immunoglobulin deficiency, respiratory tract infection and urinary tract infection. No death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The sequential treatment of belimumab or telitacicept following RTX may represent a promising therapeutic approach in the management of refractory lupus nephritis. Further investigation is necessary to establish optimal protocols and long-term benefits.

Ten tips in lupus nephritis management

Lupus nephritis is an important cause of severe glomerulonephritis, and a leading cause of kidney failure in young adults. While the disease can lead to rapid destruction of nephrons if untreated, there are effective therapies to reverse the severe acute kidney injury and prevent the lifetime risk of kidney failure. Early diagnosis and timely intervention are therefore of critical importance. Clinical management of lupus nephritis has improved considerably over the past two decades. The advent of mycophenolate as standard immunosuppressive therapy was a major paradigm shift that improved the safety and convenience of treatment and also patients' quality of life. Effective therapeutic options continue to increase, such as belimumab (a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B-cell activating factor, BAFF) and voclosporin (a calcineurin inhibitor) which have obtained regulatory approval in U.S.A. and Europe. There is also accumulating experience on tacrolimus, which has regulatory approval for lupus nephritis treatment in Japan and commonly used off-label in many countries. Ironically, the increasing therapeutic options have resulted in uncertainties in deciding which medication, and which treatment regimen, is best for a patient. In this context, one needs to take into consideration the distinct characteristics and the risk profile of each patient, and adopt a holistic and long-term perspective, so that treatment can be personalized to achieve favourable clinical outcomes.

Lupus Nephritis and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review

Prevention of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major objective in the management of patients with lupus nephritis (LN). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) of variable severity is common in these patients, but recent literature has mostly focused on novel immunosuppressive treatments for acute LN, while the data on CKD is relatively limited. This scoping review aims to summarise available data on the prevalence and risk factors for CKD in patients with LN. PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched on the 1st November 2024 for 'real world' SLE and LN cohorts with longitudinal follow-up which reported the outcome of CKD or CKD progression and its associated risk factors. Fifteen studies were included. The prevalence of CKD ranged from below 10% to almost 50% across diverse LN and SLE cohorts. Major risk factors for CKD or CKD progression included renal impairment at presentation, renal function at 1 year post-treatment, delayed diagnosis, established chronic pathological lesions on kidney biopsy, unsatisfactory treatment response, nephritic flares, hypertension, and persistent proteinuria during follow-up. Many of the identified risk factors are amenable to therapeutic intervention. CKD not only contributes to morbidity and mortality and inferior quality of life, but also influences the choice of therapy and optimal dosing of medications. Attention to immunomodulatory medications for disease control, and non-immune strategies for renoprotection and prevention of CKD complications, are both important in the management of patients with LN to reduce their life-time risk of ESKD.

Additional benefits of belimumab in chronic phase of systemic lupus erythematosus and efficacy of tacrolimus combination therapy

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a typical autoimmune disease; although severe disease and refractoriness to existing therapies are still experienced, the number of cases resistant to remission induction has decreased with the establishment of various therapies. However, improving long-term prognosis remains a challenge due to the unavoidable prolonged use of non-selective glucocorticoids. To investigate the additional effect of belimumab in the chronic phase, we included 28 of 46 patients with SLE who were initiated on belimumab between January 2018 and October 2022 for glucocorticoid reduction. The efficacy of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in combination with belimumab was also compared. In the stable chronic phase, the combination with belimumab improved the SLE Disease Activity Index and reduced glucocorticoid requirement. The tacrolimus with belimumab group was not significantly inferior to the mycophenolate mofetil with belimumab group and was effective in treatment and glucocorticoid sparing including cases at all phases of SLE. To improve the long-term prognosis of SLE, it is crucial to introduce highly selective biological agents and reduce glucocorticoids whenever possible. Belimumab is effective with or without hydroxychloroquine and Tac was effective as concomitant drugs.

Efficacy of initial combination with belimumab in newly diagnosed childhood-onset lupus nephritis: a single-centre historical control study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of initial treatment of newly diagnosed childhood-onset lupus nephritis (cLN) with combination of belimumab and either cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus or multitargeted therapy.

METHODS

A historical control study was conducted on children aged 5-17 years with newly diagnosed cLN. All patients recruited met the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics and/or 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE, and the 2003 International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society histopathological criteria for LN. The primary endpoint was primary efficacy renal response (PERR) at 12 months, and secondary endpoints included complete renal response (CRR), lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and remission (Definitions of Remission in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (DORIS)) at 12 months, changes of SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and dose of glucocorticoid (GC).

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were included with 38 patients in the belimumab group and 63 patients in the standard immunotherapy group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups at baseline. At 12 months, compared with the standard immunotherapy group, more patients in the belimumab group had a higher PERR (97.1% vs 80.0%, χ2=3.965, p=0.046), CRR (94.1% vs 76.6%, χ2=4.679, p=0.031), LLDAS (75.0% vs 18.6%, χ2=27.84, p<0.001) and DORIS (34.4% vs 11.9%, χ2=6.626, p=0.01). The belimumab group had faster and greater reductions in SLEDAI and dose of GC (p<0.05), with a significantly higher proportion of patients with dose of GC ≤7.5 mg/day (82.9% vs 30.4%, χ2=19.737, p<0.001). In the standard immunotherapy group, 4 patients (6.3%) experienced a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30% or more at 12 months, while no patients in the belimumab group experienced worsening of renal function. There were no serious adverse events reported in two groups, and there was no significant difference in the occurrence of infection between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study reported for the first time the effectiveness of combined belimumab therapy in a Chinese cohort of patients with cLN. The strategy of initial combination with belimumab helps achieve treatment targets earlier and faster GC tapering. And initial combination therapy in children with cLN with high disease activity may yield more significant benefits.

Efficacy and safety of biologics, multitarget therapy, and standard therapy for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of biologics, multitarget therapy, and standard therapy for the induction of lupus nephritis.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases (EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov) was conducted from inception to 30 August 2023. Our study included randomized controlled trials enrolling adult lupus nephritis patients treated with biologics or multitarget therapy, in comparison with standard therapy. The primary outcomes were the rates of complete renal remission (CRR) and serious adverse events (SAE). Stata 15.0 was used to conduct the network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials with a total of 1989 patients met the inclusion criteria. The network meta-analysis indicated that compared with standard therapy, multitarget therapy, obinutuzumab, belimumab, and voclosporin therapy demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving complete renal remission. Among these options, multitarget therapy had the greatest effect (OR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.81-4.26). Regarding safety, it was observed that there were no significant statistical differences among the various treatment options. Cluster analysis revealed that both obinutuzumab and belimumab exhibited good efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSIONS

belimumab and obinutuzumab stood out as promising treatments due to their good performance in terms of efficacy and safety. Multitarget therapy may be the most effective approach for treating lupus nephritis. However, since the study population consists exclusively of Asian patients, further research is needed to verify the efficacy of multitarget therapy in lupus nephritis patients of non-Asian descent.

Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS

INTRODUCTION

High-dose glucocorticoid (GC)-based dual immunosuppressive treatment regimens are still frequently used in active lupus nephritis (LN) despite their known association with dose-dependent toxicities and incomplete efficacy. We hypothesised that the addition of voclosporin to low-dose GCs and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would reduce exposure to the toxicities of high-dose GC-based dual immunosuppressive therapy regimens, resulting in an improved safety profile without compromising efficacy.

METHODS

Propensity score matching generated two groups of matched participants from the voclosporin arms (in combination with MMF (2 g/day) and low-dose GCs) of the Phase 2 AURA-LV and Phase 3 AURORA 1 studies and the MMF (3 g/day) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) arms (both in combination with high-dose GCs) of the Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS) induction study. Safety and efficacy outcomes were assessed over 6 months.

RESULTS

There were 179 matched participants identified between the AURA-LV/AURORA 1 studies and ALMS. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher in IVC- and MMF-treated participants of ALMS; more voclosporin-treated participants reported AEs by preferred term of glomerular filtration rate decreased, hypertension and anaemia. The incidence of serious AEs was similar across treatments. There were four (2.2%) deaths in IVC- and MMF-treated participants of ALMS compared with seven (3.9%) deaths in voclosporin-treated participants. Significantly more voclosporin-treated participants achieved a ≥25% reduction in urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) from baseline at 3 months and ≥50% reduction in UPCR from baseline at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the high-dose GC-based regimens used in ALMS, voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy resulted in fewer AEs overall and greater and earlier reductions in proteinuria over the first 6 months of treatment. These data reinforce the feasibility of using low doses of GCs and MMF to treat LN when combined with voclosporin as a third agent.

Do we really need cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis?

A 14-year-old patient presents with hematuria and proteinuria. Clinical evaluation reveals a positive anti-nuclear antibody titer, positive anti-double stranded DNA antibody and hypocomplementemia. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is diagnosed based on the 2019 EULAR/ACR (European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology) classification criteria (Aringer et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 71:1400-1412, 2019). A kidney biopsy is performed that confirms the presence of immune complex glomerulonephritis, ISN-RPS (International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society) class IV (Bajema et al. Kidney Int 93:789-796, 2018). According to the latest clinical practice guidelines (Rovin et al. Kidney Int 100:753-779, 2021; Fanouriakis et al. Ann Rheum Dis 83:15-29, 2023), there are alternatives to treating this patient with cyclophosphamide. But what if this patient also presented with oliguria and volume overload requiring intensive care and dialysis? What if this patient also presented with altered mental status and seizures, and was diagnosed with neuropsychiatric lupus? What if this patient was also diagnosed with a pulmonary hemorrhage and respiratory failure? The clinical practice guidelines do not address these scenarios that are not uncommon in patients with SLE. Moreover, in some countries worldwide, patients do not have the privilege of access to biologics or more expensive alternatives. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the contemporary options for initial treatment of nephritis in patients with SLE.

Targeting APRIL in the treatment of glomerular diseases

A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) is a key member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily of cytokines and plays a central role in B-cell survival, proliferation, and Ig class switching. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the role of APRIL and the related cytokine B-cell activating factor in several glomerular diseases, because of their importance in the above processes. The therapeutic inhibition of APRIL represents a potentially attractive immunomodulatory approach that may abrogate deleterious host immune responses in autoimmune diseases while leaving other important functions of humoral immunity intact, such as memory B-cell function and responses to vaccination, in contrast to B-cell-depleting strategies. In this review, we describe the physiological roles of APRIL in B-cell development and their relevance to glomerular diseases, and outline emerging clinical trial data studying APRIL inhibition, with a focus on IgA nephropathy where the clinical development of APRIL inhibitors is in its most advanced stage.

Management of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the new evidence (2018-2022) for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to inform the 2023 update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews were performed in the Medline and the Cochrane Library databases capturing publications from 1 January 2018 through 31 December 2022, according to the EULAR standardised operating procedures. The research questions focused on five different domains, namely the benefit/harm of SLE treatments, the benefits from the attainment of remission/low disease activity, the risk/benefit from treatment tapering/withdrawal, the management of SLE with antiphospholipid syndrome and the safety of immunisations against varicella zoster virus and SARS-CoV2 infection. A Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome framework was used to develop search strings for each research topic.

RESULTS

We identified 439 relevant articles, the majority being observational studies of low or moderate quality. High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) documented the efficacy of the type 1 interferon receptor inhibitor, anifrolumab, in non-renal SLE, and belimumab and voclosporin, a novel calcineurin inhibitor, in lupus nephritis (LN), when compared with standard of care. For the treatment of specific organ manifestations outside LN, a lack of high-quality data was documented. Multiple observational studies confirmed the beneficial effects of attaining clinical remission or low disease activity, reducing the risk for multiple adverse outcomes. Two randomised trials with some concerns regarding risk of bias found higher rates of relapse in patients who discontinued glucocorticoids (GC) or immunosuppressants in SLE and LN, respectively, yet observational cohort studies suggest that treatment withdrawal might be feasible in a subset of patients.

CONCLUSION

Anifrolumab and belimumab achieve better disease control than standard of care in extrarenal SLE, while combination therapies with belimumab and voclosporin attained higher response rates in high-quality RCTs in LN. Remission and low disease activity are associated with favourable long-term outcomes. In patients achieving these targets, GC and immunosuppressive therapy may gradually be tapered. Cite Now.

An Updated Comprehensive Review on Diseases Associated with Nephrotic Syndromes

There have been exciting advances in our knowledge of primary glomerular diseases and nephrotic syndromes in recent years. Beyond the histological pattern from renal biopsy, more precise phenotyping of the diseases and the use of modern nephrogenetics helps to improve treatment decisions and sometimes also avoid unnecessary exposure to potentially toxic immunosuppression. New biomarkers have led to easier and more accurate diagnoses and more targeted therapeutic decisions. The treatment landscape is becoming wider with a pipeline of promising new therapeutic agents with more sophisticated approaches. This review focuses on all aspects of entities that are associated with nephrotic syndromes with updated information on recent advances in each field. This includes podocytopathies (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal-change disease), membranous nephropathy, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, IgA nephropathy, fibrillary glomerulonephritis, amyloidosis, and monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance in the context of the nephrotic syndrome, but also renal involvement in systemic diseases, diabetic nephropathy, and drugs that are associated with nephrotic syndromes.

Immune-mediating and immunosuppressive pharmacotherapies for proliferative lupus nephritis

INTRODUCTION

Proliferative lupus nephritis is a common and severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus. Affected patients are at an increased risk of developing chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, and extra-renal comorbidities. In recent years, the prognosis for patients with proliferative lupus nephritis has improved thanks to advancements in management regimens. Despite these advances, lupus nephritis continues to present therapeutic complexities and unmet needs.

AREAS COVERED

Research was conducted across major databases to identify the most relevant articles pertaining to immune-mediating and immunosuppressive therapies in lupus nephritis.

EXPERT OPINION

The prognosis for patients with proliferative lupus nephritis remains severe. Some drugs used in this disease may be unable to control activity, and most of them have a low therapeutic index and may cause severe and life-threatening side effects. Nonetheless, better management of traditional drugs and the introduction of novel therapies have improved renal prognosis and reduced local and systemic adverse events in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.

Efficacy and safety of telitacicept in patients with lupus nephritis

Although telitacicept is a promising drug for treating systemic lupus erythematosus, there are limited studies on its efficacy and safety in patients with lupus nephritis in China. This lack of research data restricts its potential for broader application and acceptance on a global scale. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of telitacicept in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) in China. Using a self-controlled before-after comparison method, patients with LN were recruited at Lishui Central Hospital between February 2022 and April 2023, who received telitacicept weekly as part of the standard treatment. Data on the systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), glucocorticoid dosing and the quantity of immunosuppressive medicines prescribed was collected. Additionally, serum complements, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), urinary protein levels, immunoglobulin concentrations, serum creatinine levels, plasma albumin concentrations, platelet counts and renal function parameters were documented throughout the study. A total of 13 patients were enrolled in the trial, comprising 11 women and two men. Following 12-48 weeks of treatment with telitacicept (80 or 160 mg per week), 84.6% (n=11) of all patients experienced symptom relief and their SLEDAI-2K score was reduced by more than four points. By the observation endpoint, the median glucocorticoid dosage of the 13 patients was decreased from 15 to 2.5 mg/d, and six patients discontinued their glucocorticoids. Furthermore, 46.1% of patients (n=6) reduced their dose and number of immunosuppressive medicines, while 15.4% (n=2) stopped their immunosuppressive medicines. Minimal changes were observed in serum creatinine, platelet count, C3 levels and C4 levels among patients. Immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgA and IgM) remained stable or showed an upward trend. Plasma albumin levels remained within the normal range in three patients and increased in ten patients. It increased to the normal range in three of these ten patients. At the endpoint, ESR levels decreased in all patients. Additionally, three patients displayed varying degrees of renal function improvement, and their estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/l.73 m2) increased from 127.8 to 134.2, 95.1 to 123.1 and 61.5 to 67.3, respectively. Urinary protein levels decreased in all patients. It decreased >0.5 g/l in seven patients and reached the normal levels in three patients. The adverse events of telitacicept were manageable. Among the patients infected with COVID-19, three patients had fever, 10 patients remained asymptomatic and none of them exhibited severe respiratory syndromes. In this study, telitacicept effectively stabilized LN activity and alleviated the clinical symptoms of most patients. Furthermore, it reduced the dose of glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive medicines. Therefore, telitacicept may be a promising treatment option for individuals with lupus nephritis.

Serum IFN-γ Predicts the Therapeutic Effect of Belimumab in Refractory Lupus Nephritis Patients

Objective

To evaluate belimumabf's efficacy in refractory lupus nephritis (LN) patients and identify predictive serum biomarkers for treatment response.

Methods

In this single-arm retrospective study, we assessed clinical responses in LN patients at baseline and six months after initiating belimumab. Serum cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ) were quantified using multiplex magnetic bead flow immunoassay before and after treatment.

Results

Fourteen patients with various subtypes of refractory LN participated in the study: seven with class III and V LN, three with type V alone, two with class III, and two with class IV+V and V LN. Post six months of belimumab therapy, all participants exhibited a reduction in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2K scores from their respective baseline values. Notably, most patients showed a decrease in the dosage of prednisone, levels of 24-hour urinary protein, immunoglobulins, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody IgM, along with serum levels of IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ. Meanwhile, levels of C3, C4, IL-2, and TNF-α were observed to increase. Of the participants, nine (64.29%) achieved a complete renal response, one (7.14%) showed a partial response, and four (28.57%) exhibited no response. Significantly, higher baseline serum IFN-γ levels were found in patients who did not achieve complete renal response (CR) compared to those who did (p = 0.009). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that baseline IFN-γ levels had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.96 (0.70-1.00), with a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 1.00 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Belimumab shows potential efficacy in treating refractory LN. Baseline serum IFN-γ levels may predict response to belimumab therapy, potentially enabling more targeted treatment approaches for this challenging condition.

Evidence based treatment for lupus nephritis: present perspectives and challenges

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease known for its high heterogeneity among individuals, which affects various organs including the kidneys. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent and life-threatening manifestation of the disease, with up to 50% of patients developing kidney involvement. Classification of renal involvement in lupus is based on specific histopathological findings, guiding therapeutical decisions. Immunosuppressive therapy, particularly glucocorticoids combined with cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil, has been the mainstay of treatment for many years, while rates of complete remission have not changed dramatically. Despite advancements in therapy, in an important proportion of patients LN leads to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Emerging therapies including belimumab, voclosporin, and obinutuzumab offer promising results in improving renal outcomes, especially in refractory or relapsing disease. Maintenance therapy is crucial to prevent disease flares and preserve renal function. Supportive measures including lifestyle modifications and non-immunosuppressive pharmacological interventions are nowadays also essential in managing LN. This review emphasizes recent advances of therapy and challenges regarding treatment optimization with strategies to improve long-term outcomes.

[Treatment of lupus nephritis]

Lupus nephritis remains the most frequent severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus, leading to chronic renal impairment in 20 to 25% of cases. Current treatment is based on the combined use of immunosuppressive treatment and targeted biotherapies to optimize the chances of promptly obtaining and maintaining a complete renal response over the long term. The author discusses these recent advances.

Tailoring the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases by a better stratification and characterization of the clinical patient heterogeneity. Findings from a systematic literature review and experts' consensus

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases are different pathologic conditions associated with a deregulated immune response, codified along a spectrum of disorders, with autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases as two-end phenotypes of this continuum. Despite pathogenic differences, inflammatory rheumatic diseases are commonly managed with a limited number of immunosuppressive drugs, sometimes with partial evidence or transferring physicians' knowledge in different patients. In addition, several randomized clinical trials, enrolling these patients, did not meet the primary pre-established outcomes and these findings could be linked to the underlying molecular diversities along the spectrum of inflammatory rheumatic disorders. In fact, the resulting patient heterogeneity may be driven by differences in underlying molecular pathology also resulting in variable responses to immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, the identification of different clinical subsets may possibly overcome the major obstacles that limit the development more effective therapeutic strategies for these patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This clinical heterogeneity could require a diverse therapeutic management to improve patient outcomes and increase the frequency of clinical remission. Therefore, the importance of better patient stratification and characterization is increasingly pointed out according to the precision medicine principles, also suggesting a new approach for disease treatment. In fact, based on a better proposed patient profiling, clinicians could more appropriately balance the therapeutic management. On these bases, we synthetized and discussed the available literature about the patient profiling in regard to therapy in the context of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, mainly focusing on randomized clinical trials. We provided an overview of the importance of a better stratification and characterization of the clinical heterogeneity of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases identifying this point as crucial in improving the management of these patients.

Advances in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment With Monoclonal Antibodies: A Mini-Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects multiple organs and systems. It is characterized by the production of abnormal antibodies that attack healthy cells and tissues. The disease presents a wide range of symptoms and severity, from mild to severe. Diagnosis can be complex, but the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) help to facilitate it. Incidence and prevalence vary considerably worldwide, mainly affecting adult women between the third and fourth decades of life, although it can also occur in childhood. The prognosis of SLE has improved over time, but there is still a risk of irreversible organ damage. Treatment is individualized for each patient and is based on immunosuppression and the use of corticosteroids. Biological therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, have emerged as a more specific alternative. Methotrexate, antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and monoclonal antibodies are some of the medications used to treat SLE. New therapeutic strategies are currently being developed, such as targeted therapies, immunomodulators, and biological agents. Treatment adherence, monitoring, and regular follow-up are important aspects of SLE management. This article aims to describe the characteristics of the new monoclonal antibody therapies that exist for the management of SLE.

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.

RESULTS

All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.

CONCLUSION

This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

Fibroblast: A Novel Target for Autoimmune and Inflammatory Skin Diseases Therapeutics

Fibroblasts are crucial components of the skin structure. They were traditionally believed to maintain the skin's structure by producing extracellular matrix and other elements. Recent research illuminated that fibroblasts can respond to external stimuli and exhibit diverse functions, such as the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors, adipogenesis, and antigen presentation, exhibiting remarkable heterogeneity and plasticity. This revelation positions fibroblasts as active contributors to the pathogenesis of skin diseases, challenging the traditional perspective that views fibroblasts solely as structural entities. Based on their diverse functions, fibroblasts can be categorized into six subtypes: pro-inflammatory fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, adipogenic fibroblasts, angiogenic fibroblasts, mesenchymal fibroblasts, and antigen-presenting fibroblasts. Cytokines, metabolism, and epigenetics regulate functional abnormalities in fibroblasts. The dynamic changes fibroblasts exhibit in different diseases and disease states warrant a comprehensive discussion. We focus on dermal fibroblasts' aberrant manifestations and pivotal roles in inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases, including psoriasis, vitiligo, lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, and atopic dermatitis, and propose targeting aberrantly activated fibroblasts as a potential therapeutic strategy for inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases.

New and emerging therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis treatment is still based on non-specific immune suppression despite the first biological therapy for the disease having been approved more than a decade ago. Intense basic and translational research has uncovered a multitude of pathways that are actively being evaluated as treatment targets in SLE and lupus nephritis, with two new medications receiving FDA approval in the last 3 years. Herein we provide an overview of targeted therapies for SLE including medications targeting the B lymphocyte compartment, intracellular signaling, co-stimulation, and finally the interferons and other cytokines.

Longitudinal modeling of efficacy response in patients with lupus nephritis receiving belimumab

Belimumab was approved for active lupus nephritis (LN) in adults in the European Union and patients ≥ 5 years of age in the USA based on a Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 104-week study. The study evaluated the efficacy of belimumab plus background standard therapy in adults with active LN using an intravenous (IV) dose of 10 mg/kg. A longitudinal analysis of Primary Efficacy Renal Response (PERR) and Complete Renal Response (CRR) was performed to assess whether patients with high proteinuria at the start of belimumab treatment would benefit from a higher dose. Responder probability was modeled as a logistic regression with probability a function of time and treatment (belimumab or placebo). Dropout risk at each visit was incorporated into a joint model of efficacy response; only efficacy data prior to dropout events (belimumab discontinuation, treatment failure, or withdrawal) were included. Average belimumab concentration over the first 4 and 12 weeks and baseline proteinuria were considered as continuous covariates. In general, renal response (PERR and CRR) over time was higher in patients receiving belimumab than in those receiving placebo. Baseline proteinuria was considered the most relevant predictor of renal response, with reduced efficacy in patients with increased proteinuria for both belimumab or placebo treatment. For belimumab-treated patients, belimumab exposure was not found to be an important predictor of renal response. In conclusion, the 10 mg/kg IV dose was considered appropriate in all patients and there was no evidence to suggest a higher response would be achieved by increasing the dose.

Combination of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-dsDNA serotype is predictive of belimumab renal response in patients with lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness of belimumab on active lupus nephritis (LN) and explore the predictors, including serological biomarkers, of renal response to belimumab in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This multicentre, real-world observational study enrolled patients with active LN receiving intravenous belimumab as an add-on therapy with 24-hour urine protein≥1 g and estimated glomerular filtration rate≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline. Complete renal response (CRR), partial renal response (PRR), no renal response (NRR) and primary efficacy renal response (PERR) were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for NRR to belimumab at 6 months.

RESULTS

Among the 122 patients enrolled, the proportions of patients achieving CRR, PRR, NRR and PERR were 35.9%, 17.1%, 47.0% and 44.4% at 6 months (n=117) and 55.6%, 19.4%, 26.4% and 58.3% at 12 months (n=72), respectively. Proteinuria, daily prednisone dosage and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 scores significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months (p<0.0001). NRR at 6 months (NRR6) was the strongest negative predictor of CRR at 12 months. Baseline anti-dsDNA positivity inversely predicted NRR6 (OR=0.32,95% CI=0.10 to 0.98, p=0.049), while anti-SSA/Ro60 positively predicted NRR6 (OR=3.16, 95% CI=1.14 to 8.74, p=0.027). The combination of anti-SSA/Ro60 and anti-dsDNA serotype quantitatively predicted belimumab renal response.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of belimumab was reproducible in Chinese patients with active LN. The simple yet interesting serotype predictive model needs further validation and its possible underlying mechanistic relevance deserves further exploration.

New guidelines and therapeutic updates for the management of lupus nephritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be a devastating condition, striking young patients often in their prime reproductive years. Lupus nephritis is a common and serious complication occurring in roughly 50% of SLE cases, indicating a high likelihood of disease progression, morbidity, and mortality. As the early trials of steroid therapy, and later cyclophosphamide (CYC), therapeutic changes had been stagnant. Then came the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the 2000s. After the Aspreva Lupus Management Study, there had been a dearth of trials showing positive therapy results. Since 2020, new studies have emerged for lupus nephritis involving the use of anti-BLYS agents, novel calcineurin inhibitors, CD20 blockade, and antiinterferon agents. Nephrology and rheumatology society guidelines in the United States and across the world are still catching up.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although therapeutic guidelines are being developed, updates that have come through have focused on improved diagnostic and monitoring guidelines. One theme is the recommendation of increasingly tight proteinuria control and firmer guidelines for the rapid induction of remission. The reality of multitarget therapy and the expectation of rapid induction for a more complete remission are being widely recognized.

SUMMARY

The need for more complete and more rapid induction and control of lupus nephritis is undisputed according to the evidence and guidelines, and the medications to achieve this are growing at a rate not seen over the prior two decades. What remains is a stepwise approach to recognize how to best optimize therapy. Based on available evidence, an algorithm for induction and maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis used by the University of California Irvine Lupus Nephritis clinic, is recommended.

Emerging biologic therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The approval of belimumab and anifrolumab has expanded the scope of treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. However, many patients remain refractory to currently available therapies and suffer from drug toxicities. This review will discuss approved and target-specific therapeutics in development that bring hope for better SLE treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the last review on this subject in the journal, the FDA has approved anifrolumab and belimumab for SLE and lupus nephritis (LN), respectively. A fully humanized anti-CD20, obinutuzumab, met the primary end point in a phase II trial in LN. A Tyk2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, and an antibody targeting plasmacytoid dendritic cells, litifilimab, met the primary end point in phase II trials in SLE and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). Ustekinumab and baricitinib met the primary end point in phase II but not in phase III trials.

SUMMARY

While many drug candidates which met the end points in phase II trials have failed phase III trials, the number of target-specific therapies for SLE has continued to expand.

A Comprehensive and Practical Approach to the Management of Lupus Nephritis in the Current Era

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with SLE. It is estimated that up to 60% of individuals with SLE will develop LN, which can manifest at any stage of a patient's life; however, it commonly emerges early in the course of SLE and tends to exhibit a more aggressive phenotype in men compared to women. Black and Hispanic patients are more likely to progress to kidney failure than white patients. LN is characterized by kidney inflammation and chronic parenchymal damage, leading to impaired kidney function and potential progression to kidney failure. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of LN, highlighting the importance of early recognition and treatment of LN to prevent progressive, irreversible kidney damage and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, the article discusses current and emerging therapies for LN, including traditional immunosuppressive agents, biological agents, and novel therapies targeting specific pathways involved in LN pathogenesis, to provide a practical guide for clinicians in properly diagnosing LN and determining a patient-centered treatment plan.

Improving Kidney Disease Care: One Giant Leap for Nephrology

Nephrology is an ever-evolving field of medicine. The importance of such a discipline is related to the high clinical impact of kidney disease. In fact, abnormalities of kidney function and/or structure are common in the general population, reaching an overall prevalence of about 10%. More importantly, the onset of kidney damage is related to a strikingly high risk of cardiovascular events, mortality, and progression to kidney failure which, in turn, compromises quality and duration of life. Attempts to comprehend the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms involved in kidney disease occurrence have prompted the development and implementation of novel drugs in clinical practice with the aim of treating the 'specific cause' of kidney disease (including chronic kidney disease, glomerular disease, and genetic kidney disorders) and the main immunological complications following kidney transplantation. Herein, we provide an overview of the principal emerging drug classes with proved efficacy in the context of the aforementioned clinical conditions. This can represent a simplified guide for clinical nephrologists to remind them of the vast and heterogeneous armamentarium of drugs that should be used in the present and the future to improve the management of patients suffering from kidney disease.

Efficacy of Voclosporin in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis with High Levels of Proteinuria

BACKGROUND

In a phase 3 study of adults with active lupus nephritis, addition of voclosporin to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and low-dose glucocorticoids led to significant improvements in the proportion of participants achieving complete and partial renal response as well as sustained reduction in proteinuria. This analysis examined the efficacy and safety of voclosporin in a subgroup of the phase 3 study with proliferative lupus nephritis and high levels of proteinuria.

METHODS

Participants were randomized to oral voclosporin (23.7 mg twice daily) or placebo for 12 months; all participants received MMF and low-dose glucocorticoids. This analysis includes participants with class III or IV (±class V) lupus nephritis and baseline urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR) ≥3 g/g. Efficacy end points included complete renal response (UPCR ≤0.5 g/g with stable eGFR, low-dose glucocorticoids, and no rescue medication), partial renal response (≥50% reduction from baseline UPCR), and UPCR over time. Safety outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 148 participants were in the voclosporin ( n =76) and control ( n =72) arms. At 12 months, 34% and 11% of participants in the voclosporin and control arms, respectively, achieved a complete renal response (odds ratio, 4.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78 to >9.99; P = 0.001). A partial renal response was achieved by 65% of the voclosporin arm and 51% of the control arm at 12 months (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.8 to 3.20; P = 0.18). More voclosporin- than control-treated participants achieved UPCR ≤0.5 g/g (51% versus 26%), and voclosporin-treated participants met this end point significantly earlier (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.19 to 3.60; P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the arms; mean eGFR values remained stable and within normal range in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of voclosporin to MMF and low-dose glucocorticoids resulted in a significantly higher proportion of participants with proliferative lupus nephritis achieving complete and partial renal responses as well as earlier reductions in proteinuria, with no evidence of worsening kidney function.

Kidney Outcomes and Preservation of Kidney Function With Obinutuzumab in Patients With Lupus Nephritis: A Post Hoc Analysis of the NOBILITY Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether adding obinutuzumab to standard-of-care lupus nephritis (LN) therapy could improve the likelihood of long-term preservation of kidney function and do so with less glucocorticoids.

METHODS

Post hoc analyses of the phase II NOBILITY trial were performed. Time to unfavorable kidney outcome (a composite of treatment failure, doubling of serum creatinine, or death), LN flare, first 30% and 40% declines in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline, and chronic eGFR slope during the trial were compared between patients with active LN who were randomized to take obinutuzumab (n = 63) or placebo (n = 62) in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids. The number of patients who achieved complete renal response (CRR) on 7.5 mg or less per day of prednisone was also determined.

RESULTS

Obinutuzumab reduced the risk of developing the composite kidney outcome by 60%, LN flare by 57%, and first eGFR decline of 30% or 40% by 80% and 91%, respectively. Patients receiving obinutuzumab had a significantly slower decline in eGFR than patients receiving placebo, with an annualized eGFR slope advantage of 4.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 /year (95% confidence interval 0.14-8.08). Overall, 38% of patients receiving obinutuzumab compared with 16% of patients receiving placebo achieved CRR at week 76 while receiving 7.5 mg or less per day of prednisone (P < 0.01); at week 104, the difference did not achieve significance (38% vs 22%; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Post hoc analyses of NOBILITY demonstrated that compared with standard-of-care therapy, obinutuzumab treatment resulted in superior preservation of kidney function and prevention of LN flares. More patients achieved CRR at week 76 with less glucocorticoid use in the obinutuzumab group.

Belimumab and antimalarials combined against renal flares in patients treated for extra-renal systemic lupus erythematosus: results from 4 phase III clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of antimalarial agents (AMA) and different doses and pharmaceutical forms of belimumab on preventing renal flares in patients with SLE treated for extra-renal disease.

METHODS

We pooled data from the BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-SC and BLISS-Northeast Asia trials of belimumab (n = 3225), that included patients with active SLE yet no severe ongoing nephritis. Participants were allocated to receive intravenous belimumab 1 mg/kg, intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg, subcutaneous belimumab 200 mg, or placebo in addition to standard therapy. We estimated hazards of renal flare development throughout the study follow-up (52-76 weeks) using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 192 patients developed a renal flare after a median of 197 days. Compared with placebo, the risk of renal flares was lower among patients receiving intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.92; P = 0.018) and intravenous belimumab 1 mg/kg (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.79; P = 0.007), while no significant association was found for subcutaneous belimumab 200 mg. AMA use yielded a lower hazard of renal flares (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.78; P < 0.001). The protection conferred was enhanced when belimumab and AMA were co-administered; the lowest flare rate was observed for the combination intravenous belimumab 1 mg/kg and AMA (18.5 cases per 1000 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS

The protection conferred from belimumab against renal flare development in patients treated for extra-renal SLE appears enhanced when belimumab was administered along with AMA. The prominent effect of low-dose belimumab warrants investigation of the efficacy of intermediate belimumab doses.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFICATION

BLISS-52: NCT00424476; BLISS-76: NCT00410384; BLISS-SC: NCT01484496; BLISS-NEA: NCT01345253.

Targeted therapies for lupus nephritis: Current perspectives and future directions

ABSTRACT

Lupus nephritis (LN), a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, poses a substantial risk of progression to end-stage renal disease, with increased mortality. Conventional therapy for LN relies on broad-spectrum immunosuppressants such as glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil, and calcineurin inhibitors. Although therapeutic regimens have evolved over the years, they have inherent limitations, including non-specific targeting, substantial adverse effects, high relapse rates, and prolonged maintenance and remission courses. These drawbacks underscore the need for targeted therapeutic strategies for LN. Recent advancements in our understanding of LN pathogenesis have led to the identification of novel therapeutic targets and the emergence of biological agents and small-molecule inhibitors with improved specificity and reduced toxicity. This review provides an overview of the current evidence on targeted therapies for LN, elucidates the biological mechanisms of responses and failure, highlights the challenges ahead, and outlines strategies for subsequent clinical trials and integrated immunomodulatory approaches.

EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on emerging new evidence.

METHODS

An international Task Force formed the questions for the systematic literature reviews (January 2018-December 2022), followed by formulation and finalisation of the statements after a series of meetings. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned, and participants finally provided their level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The Task Force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 13 recommendations, concerning the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), glucocorticoids (GC), immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC)), calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, voclosporin) and biologics (belimumab, anifrolumab, rituximab). Advice is also provided on treatment strategies and targets of therapy, assessment of response, combination and sequential therapies, and tapering of therapy. HCQ is recommended for all patients with lupus at a target dose 5 mg/kg real body weight/day, considering the individual's risk for flares and retinal toxicity. GC are used as 'bridging therapy' during periods of disease activity; for maintenance treatment, they should be minimised to equal or less than 5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Prompt initiation of ISDs (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) and/or biological agents (anifrolumab, belimumab) should be considered to control the disease and facilitate GC tapering/discontinuation. CYC and rituximab should be considered in organ-threatening and refractory disease, respectively. For active lupus nephritis, GC, mycophenolate or low-dose intravenous CYC are recommended as anchor drugs, and add-on therapy with belimumab or CNIs (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric and haematological disease, SLE-associated antiphospholipid syndrome, kidney protection, as well as preventative measures for infections, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

The updated recommendations provide consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence and expert opinion.

Executive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Lupus Nephritis

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases was published in 2021. Since then, the pace of drug development for glomerular diseases has accelerated, due in large part to rapidly accumulating insights into disease pathogenesis from genetic and molecular studies of afflicted patients. To keep the Glomerular Diseases Guideline as current as possible, KDIGO made a commitment to the nephrology community to provide periodic updates, based on new developments for each disease. After the 2021 guideline was published, two novel drugs received regulatory approval for the management of lupus nephritis, leading to the first KDIGO guideline update. Herein, an executive summary of the most important guideline changes from the Lupus Nephritis chapter is provided as a quick reference.

B cell-intrinsic Myd88 regulates disease progression in murine lupus

Nucleic acid-specific Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been implicated in promoting disease pathogenesis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Whether such TLRs mediate disease onset, progression, or both remains undefined; yet the answer to this question has important therapeutic implications. MyD88 is an essential adaptor that acts downstream of IL-1 family receptors and most TLRs. Both global and B cell-specific Myd88 deficiency ameliorated disease in lupus-prone mice when constitutively deleted. To address whether Myd88 was needed to sustain ongoing disease, we induced B cell-specific deletion of Myd88 after disease onset in MRL.Faslpr mice using an inducible Cre recombinase. B cell-specific deletion of Myd88 starting after disease onset resulted in ameliorated glomerulonephritis and interstitial inflammation. Additionally, treated mice had reduced autoantibody formation and an altered B cell compartment with reduced ABC and plasmablast numbers. These experiments demonstrate the role of MyD88 in B cells to sustain disease in murine lupus. Therefore, targeting MyD88 or its upstream activators may be a viable therapeutic option in SLE.

Management of systemic lupus erythematosus: A new scenario

The introduction of targeted biological agents in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has created a momentum for improving overall disease management and patients' prognosis. To achieve this, a comprehensive strategy is required spanning the entire patient journey from diagnosis to prevention and management of late complications and comorbidities. In this review, we focus on four aspects that are closely linked to SLE prognosis, namely early disease recognition and treatment initiation, reduction of the cumulative glucocorticoid exposure, attainment of well-defined targets of remission and low disease activity, prevention of flares and, kidney-protective strategies with non-immune-directed agents. We review the recent literature related to these topics in conjunction with the existing treatment recommendations, highlighting areas of uncertainty and providing guidance towards facilitating the care of SLE patients.

Kidney involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: From the patient assessment to a tailored treatment

In the last few years, several studies have provided new evidence for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis. Evidence showing dissociation between clinical and histological findings has prompted reevaluation of the role of the kidney biopsy as a tool for diagnosis and follow-up. In therapeutics, four immunosuppressive schemes now have supporting evidence for use as initial therapy. Current challenges include individualized selection of the best immunosuppressive regimen, an unmet need for non-invasive biomarkers of disease activity to inform treatment responses and guide subsequent therapy, holistic patient management in this complex, multisystem disease, and ultimately the development of more targeted therapies directed at specific effector pathways driving glomerular inflammation and damage in order to improve treatment response. In this communication, we review the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to lupus nephritis, as well as evaluation of response to therapy and disease control.