1
|
Sayed Ahmad AM, Raphael M, Han JF, Ahmed Y, Moustafa M, Solomon SK, Skiadopoulos A, Knikou M. Soleus H-reflex amplitude modulation during walking remains physiological during transspinal stimulation in humans. Exp Brain Res 2024; 242:1267-1276. [PMID: 38366214 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06779-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
The soleus H-reflex modulation pattern was investigated during stepping following transspinal stimulation over the thoracolumbar region at 15, 30, and 50 Hz with 10 kHz carry-over frequency above and below the paresthesia threshold. The soleus H-reflex was elicited by posterior tibial nerve stimulation with a single 1 ms pulse at an intensity that the M-wave amplitudes ranged from 0 to 15% of the maximal M-wave evoked 80 ms after the test stimulus, and the soleus H-reflex was half the size of the maximal H-reflex evoked on the ascending portion of the recruitment curve. During treadmill walking, the soleus H-reflex was elicited every 2 or 3 steps, and stimuli were randomly dispersed across the step cycle which was divided in 16 equal bins. For each subject and condition, the soleus M-wave and H-reflex were normalized to the maximal M-wave. The soleus background electromyographic (EMG) activity was estimated as the linear envelope for 50 ms duration starting at 100 ms before posterior tibial nerve stimulation for each bin. The gain was determined as the slope of the relationship between the soleus H-reflex and the soleus background EMG activity. The soleus H-reflex phase-dependent amplitude modulation remained unaltered during transspinal stimulation, regardless frequency, or intensity. Similarly, the H-reflex slope and intercept remained the same for all transspinal stimulation conditions tested. Locomotor EMG activity was increased in knee extensor muscles during transspinal stimulation at 30 and 50 Hz throughout the step cycle while no effects were observed in flexor muscles. These findings suggest that transspinal stimulation above and below the paresthesia threshold at 15, 30, and 50 Hz does not block or impair spinal integration of proprioceptive inputs and increases activity of thigh muscles that affect both hip and knee joint movement. Transspinal stimulation may serve as a neurorecovery strategy to augment standing or walking ability in upper motoneuron lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah M Sayed Ahmad
- Klab4Recovery Research Program, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Meghan Raphael
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Jessy Feng Han
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Yoseph Ahmed
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Mohamed Moustafa
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Shammah K Solomon
- Klab4Recovery Research Program, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Andreas Skiadopoulos
- Klab4Recovery Research Program, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Maria Knikou
- Klab4Recovery Research Program, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, USA.
- PhD Program in Biology and Collaborative Neuroscience Program, DPT Department, Graduate Center of The City University of New York and College of Staten Island, Staten Island, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mao Q, Zheng W, Shi M, Yang F. Scientometric Research and Critical Analysis of Gait and Balance in Older Adults. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:3199. [PMID: 38794055 PMCID: PMC11125350 DOI: 10.3390/s24103199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Gait and balance have emerged as a critical area of research in health technology. Gait and balance studies have been affected by the researchers' slow follow-up of research advances due to the absence of visual inspection of the study literature across decades. This study uses advanced search methods to analyse the literature on gait and balance in older adults from 1993 to 2022 in the Web of Science (WoS) database to gain a better understanding of the current status and trends in the field for the first time. The study analysed 4484 academic publications including journal articles and conference proceedings on gait and balance in older adults. Bibliometric analysis methods were applied to examine the publication year, number of publications, discipline distribution, journal distribution, research institutions, application fields, test methods, analysis theories, and influencing factors in the field of gait and balance. The results indicate that the publication of relevant research documents has been steadily increasing from 1993 to 2022. The United States (US) exhibits the highest number of publications with 1742 articles. The keyword "elderly person" exhibits a strong citation burst strength of 18.04, indicating a significant focus on research related to the health of older adults. With a burst factor of 20.46, Harvard University has made impressive strides in the subject. The University of Pittsburgh displayed high research skills in the area of gait and balance with a burst factor of 7.7 and a publication count of 103. The research on gait and balance mainly focuses on physical performance evaluation approaches, and the primary study methods include experimental investigations, computational modelling, and observational studies. The field of gait and balance research is increasingly intertwined with computer science and artificial intelligence (AI), paving the way for intelligent monitoring of gait and balance in the elderly. Moving forward, the future of gait and balance research is anticipated to highlight the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration, intelligence-driven approaches, and advanced visualization techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Mao
- School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Menghan Shi
- Lancaster Imagination Lab, Lancashire, Lancaster LA1 4YD, UK
| | - Fan Yang
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gradwell MA, Ozeri-Engelhard N, Eisdorfer JT, Laflamme OD, Gonzalez M, Upadhyay A, Medlock L, Shrier T, Patel KR, Aoki A, Gandhi M, Abbas-Zadeh G, Oputa O, Thackray JK, Ricci M, George A, Yusuf N, Keating J, Imtiaz Z, Alomary SA, Bohic M, Haas M, Hernandez Y, Prescott SA, Akay T, Abraira VE. Multimodal sensory control of motor performance by glycinergic interneurons of the mouse spinal cord deep dorsal horn. Neuron 2024; 112:1302-1327.e13. [PMID: 38452762 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Sensory feedback is integral for contextually appropriate motor output, yet the neural circuits responsible remain elusive. Here, we pinpoint the medial deep dorsal horn of the mouse spinal cord as a convergence point for proprioceptive and cutaneous input. Within this region, we identify a population of tonically active glycinergic inhibitory neurons expressing parvalbumin. Using anatomy and electrophysiology, we demonstrate that deep dorsal horn parvalbumin-expressing interneuron (dPV) activity is shaped by convergent proprioceptive, cutaneous, and descending input. Selectively targeting spinal dPVs, we reveal their widespread ipsilateral inhibition onto pre-motor and motor networks and demonstrate their role in gating sensory-evoked muscle activity using electromyography (EMG) recordings. dPV ablation altered limb kinematics and step-cycle timing during treadmill locomotion and reduced the transitions between sub-movements during spontaneous behavior. These findings reveal a circuit basis by which sensory convergence onto dorsal horn inhibitory neurons modulates motor output to facilitate smooth movement and context-appropriate transitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Gradwell
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Nofar Ozeri-Engelhard
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Neuroscience PhD program, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Jaclyn T Eisdorfer
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Olivier D Laflamme
- Dalhousie PhD program, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada; Department of Medical Neuroscience, Atlantic Mobility Action Project, Brain Repair Center, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Melissa Gonzalez
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Aman Upadhyay
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Neuroscience PhD program, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Laura Medlock
- Neurosciences & Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Shrier
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Komal R Patel
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Adin Aoki
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Melissa Gandhi
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Gloria Abbas-Zadeh
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Olisemaka Oputa
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Joshua K Thackray
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA; Tourette International Collaborative Genetics Study (TIC Genetics)
| | - Matthew Ricci
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Arlene George
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Nusrath Yusuf
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Neuroscience PhD program, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Jessica Keating
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Zarghona Imtiaz
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Simona A Alomary
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Manon Bohic
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Michael Haas
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Yurdiana Hernandez
- W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Steven A Prescott
- Neurosciences & Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Turgay Akay
- Department of Medical Neuroscience, Atlantic Mobility Action Project, Brain Repair Center, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Victoria E Abraira
- Cell Biology and Neuroscience Department, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; W.M. Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li E, Yan R, Qiao H, Sun J, Zou P, Chang J, Li S, Ma Q, Zhang R, Liao B. Combined transcriptomics and proteomics studies on the effect of electrical stimulation on spinal cord injury in rats. Heliyon 2024; 10:e23960. [PMID: 38226269 PMCID: PMC10788535 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Electrical stimulation (ES) of the spinal cord is a promising therapy for functional rehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the specific mechanism of action is poorly understood. We designed and applied an implanted ES device in the SCI area in rats and determined the effect of ES on the treatment of motor dysfunction after SCI using behavioral scores. Additionally, we examined the molecular characteristics of the samples using proteomic and transcriptomic sequencing. The differential molecules between groups were identified using statistical analyses. Molecular, network, and pathway-based analyses were used to identify group-specific biological features. ES (0.5 mA, 0.1 ms, 50 Hz) had a positive effect on motor dysfunction and neuronal regeneration in rats after SCI. Six samples (three independent replicates in each group) were used for transcriptome sequencing; we obtained 1026 differential genes, comprising 274 upregulated genes and 752 downregulated genes. A total of 10 samples were obtained: four samples in the ES group and six samples in the SCI group; for the proteome sequencing, 48 differential proteins were identified, including 45 up-regulated and three down-regulated proteins. Combined transcriptomic and proteomic studies have shown that the main enrichment pathway is the hedgehog signaling pathway. Western blot results showed that the expression levels of Sonic hedgehog (SHH) (P < 0.001), Smoothened (SMO) (P = 0.0338), and GLI-1 (P < 0.01) proteins in the ES treatment group were significantly higher than those in the SCI group. The immunofluorescence results showed significantly increased expression of SHH (P = 0.0181), SMO (P = 0.021), and GLI-1 (P = 0.0126) in the ES group compared with that in the SCI group. In conclusion, ES after SCI had a positive effect on motor dysfunction and anti-inflammatory effects in rats. Moreover, transcriptomic and proteomic sequencing also provided unique perspectives on the complex relationships between ES on SCI, where the SHH signaling pathway plays a critical role. Our study provides a significant theoretical foundation for the clinical implementation of ES therapy in patients with SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erliang Li
- Department of Joint Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Rongbao Yan
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Huanhuan Qiao
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jin Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Peng Zou
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jiaqi Chang
- School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, 37th Xueyuan Road, Beijing, China
| | - Shuang Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qiong Ma
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Bo Liao
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Capogrosso M, Balaguer JM, Prat-Ortega G, Verma N, Yadav P, Sorensen E, de Freitas R, Ensel S, Borda L, Donadio S, Liang L, Ho J, Damiani A, Grigsby E, Fields D, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Gerszten P, Weber D, Pirondini E. Supraspinal control of motoneurons after paralysis enabled by spinal cord stimulation. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-3650257. [PMID: 38260333 PMCID: PMC10802737 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3650257/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) restores motor control after spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke. This evidence led to the hypothesis that SCS facilitates residual supraspinal inputs to spinal motoneurons. Instead, here we show that SCS does not facilitate residual supraspinal inputs but directly triggers motoneurons action potentials. However, supraspinal inputs can shape SCS-mediated activity, mimicking volitional control of motoneuron firing. Specifically, by combining simulations, intraspinal electrophysiology in monkeys and single motor unit recordings in humans with motor paralysis, we found that residual supraspinal inputs transform subthreshold SCS-induced excitatory postsynaptic potentials into suprathreshold events. We then demonstrated that only a restricted set of stimulation parameters enables volitional control of motoneuron firing and that lesion severity further restricts the set of effective parameters. Our results explain the facilitation of voluntary motor control during SCS while predicting the limitations of this neurotechnology in cases of severe loss of supraspinal axons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josep-Maria Balaguer
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bezard E, Bloch J, Courtine G. [A spinal neuroprosthesis against locomotor deficits in Parkinson's disease]. Med Sci (Paris) 2024; 40:104-106. [PMID: 38299913 DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2023185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Erwan Bezard
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Institut des maladies neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France - Motac Neuroscience, Floirac, France
| | - Jocelyne Bloch
- Institut NeuroX, Faculté des sciences de la vie, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Genève, Suisse - Département de neurosciences cliniques, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV), université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Suisse - NeuroRestore, Centre de neurothérapies interventionnelles Defitech, EPFL, CHUV, UNIL, Lausanne, Suisse - Département de neurochirurgie, CHUV, Lausanne, Suisse
| | - Grégoire Courtine
- Institut NeuroX, Faculté des sciences de la vie, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Genève, Suisse - Département de neurosciences cliniques, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV), université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Suisse - NeuroRestore, Centre de neurothérapies interventionnelles Defitech, EPFL, CHUV, UNIL, Lausanne, Suisse - Département de neurochirurgie, CHUV, Lausanne, Suisse
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Balaguer JM, Prat-Ortega G, Verma N, Yadav P, Sorensen E, de Freitas R, Ensel S, Borda L, Donadio S, Liang L, Ho J, Damiani A, Grigsby E, Fields DP, Gonzalez-Martinez JA, Gerszten PC, Fisher LE, Weber DJ, Pirondini E, Capogrosso M. SUPRASPINAL CONTROL OF MOTONEURONS AFTER PARALYSIS ENABLED BY SPINAL CORD STIMULATION. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.11.29.23298779. [PMID: 38076797 PMCID: PMC10705627 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.29.23298779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) restores motor control after spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke. This evidence led to the hypothesis that SCS facilitates residual supraspinal inputs to spinal motoneurons. Instead, here we show that SCS does not facilitate residual supraspinal inputs but directly triggers motoneurons action potentials. However, supraspinal inputs can shape SCS-mediated activity, mimicking volitional control of motoneuron firing. Specifically, by combining simulations, intraspinal electrophysiology in monkeys and single motor unit recordings in humans with motor paralysis, we found that residual supraspinal inputs transform subthreshold SCS-induced excitatory postsynaptic potentials into suprathreshold events. We then demonstrated that only a restricted set of stimulation parameters enables volitional control of motoneuron firing and that lesion severity further restricts the set of effective parameters. Our results explain the facilitation of voluntary motor control during SCS while predicting the limitations of this neurotechnology in cases of severe loss of supraspinal axons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep-Maria Balaguer
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Genis Prat-Ortega
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Nikhil Verma
- Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Prakarsh Yadav
- Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Erynn Sorensen
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Roberto de Freitas
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Scott Ensel
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Luigi Borda
- Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Serena Donadio
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Lucy Liang
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Jonathan Ho
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Arianna Damiani
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Erinn Grigsby
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Daryl P. Fields
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | | | - Peter C. Gerszten
- Dept. of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Lee E. Fisher
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Douglas J. Weber
- Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, US
- Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Elvira Pirondini
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| | - Marco Capogrosso
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
- Dept. of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, US
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guo XJ, Zhao Z, Chang JQ, He LW, Su WN, Feng T, Zhao C, Xu M, Rao JS. Epidural combined optical and electrical stimulation induces high-specificity activation of target muscles in spinal cord injured rats. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1282558. [PMID: 38027482 PMCID: PMC10667474 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1282558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has been shown to improve motor dysfunction after spinal cord injury (SCI) by activating residual locomotor neural networks. However, the stimulation current often spreads excessively, leading to activation of non-target muscles and reducing the accuracy of stimulation regulation. Objectives Near-infrared nerve stimulation (nINS) was combined with EES to explore its regulatory effect on lower limb muscle activity in spinal-cord-transected rats. Methods In this study, stimulation electrodes were implanted into the rats' L3-L6 spinal cord segment with T8 cord transected. Firstly, a series of EES parameters (0.2-0.6 mA and 20-60 Hz) were tested to determine those that specifically regulate the tibialis anterior (TA) and medial gastrocnemius (MG). Subsequently, to determine the effect of combined optical and electrical stimulation, near-infrared laser with a wavelength of 808 nm was used to irradiate the L3-L6 spinal cord segment while EES was performed. The amplitude of electromyography (EMG), the specific activation intensity of the target muscle, and the minimum stimulus current intensity to induce joint movement (motor threshold) under a series of optical stimulation parameters (power: 0.0-2.0 W; pulse width: 0-10 ms) were investigated and analyzed. Results EES stimulation with 40 Hz at the L3 and L6 spinal cord segments specifically activated TA and MG, respectively. High stimulation intensity (>2 × motor threshold) activated non-target muscles, while low stimulation frequency (<20 Hz) produced intermittent contraction. Compared to electrical stimulation alone (0.577 ± 0.081 mV), the combined stimulation strategy could induce stronger EMG amplitude of MG (1.426 ± 0.365 mV) after spinal cord injury (p < 0.01). The combined application of nINS effectively decreased the EES-induced motor threshold of MG (from 0.237 ± 0.001 mA to 0.166 ± 0.028 mA, p < 0.001). Additionally, the pulse width (PW) of nINS had a slight impact on the regulation of muscle activity. The EMG amplitude of MG only increased by ~70% (from 3.978 ± 0.240 mV to 6.753 ± 0.263 mV) when the PW increased by 10-fold (from 1 to 10 ms). Conclusion The study demonstrates the feasibility of epidural combined electrical and optical stimulation for highly specific regulation of muscle activity after SCI, and provides a new strategy for improving motor dysfunction caused by SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Jun Guo
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Neural Regeneration, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Ziyi Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jia-Qi Chang
- Smart Fluid Equipment and Manufacture Lab, School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang Univeristy, Beijing, China
| | - Le-Wei He
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Neural Regeneration, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Nan Su
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Neural Regeneration, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Ting Feng
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Neural Regeneration, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| | - Can Zhao
- Institute of Rehabilitation Engineering, China Rehabilitation Science Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Meng Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jia-Sheng Rao
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Neural Regeneration, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Milekovic T, Moraud EM, Macellari N, Moerman C, Raschellà F, Sun S, Perich MG, Varescon C, Demesmaeker R, Bruel A, Bole-Feysot LN, Schiavone G, Pirondini E, YunLong C, Hao L, Galvez A, Hernandez-Charpak SD, Dumont G, Ravier J, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Mignardot JB, Carparelli G, Harte C, Hankov N, Aureli V, Watrin A, Lambert H, Borton D, Laurens J, Vollenweider I, Borgognon S, Bourre F, Goillandeau M, Ko WKD, Petit L, Li Q, Buschman R, Buse N, Yaroshinsky M, Ledoux JB, Becce F, Jimenez MC, Bally JF, Denison T, Guehl D, Ijspeert A, Capogrosso M, Squair JW, Asboth L, Starr PA, Wang DD, Lacour SP, Micera S, Qin C, Bloch J, Bezard E, Courtine G. A spinal cord neuroprosthesis for locomotor deficits due to Parkinson's disease. Nat Med 2023; 29:2854-2865. [PMID: 37932548 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02584-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
People with late-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) often suffer from debilitating locomotor deficits that are resistant to currently available therapies. To alleviate these deficits, we developed a neuroprosthesis operating in closed loop that targets the dorsal root entry zones innervating lumbosacral segments to reproduce the natural spatiotemporal activation of the lumbosacral spinal cord during walking. We first developed this neuroprosthesis in a non-human primate model that replicates locomotor deficits due to PD. This neuroprosthesis not only alleviated locomotor deficits but also restored skilled walking in this model. We then implanted the neuroprosthesis in a 62-year-old male with a 30-year history of PD who presented with severe gait impairments and frequent falls that were medically refractory to currently available therapies. We found that the neuroprosthesis interacted synergistically with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and dopaminergic replacement therapies to alleviate asymmetry and promote longer steps, improve balance and reduce freezing of gait. This neuroprosthesis opens new perspectives to reduce the severity of locomotor deficits in people with PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomislav Milekovic
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Fundamental Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eduardo Martin Moraud
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolo Macellari
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Moerman
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Flavio Raschellà
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- NeuroX Institute, School of Bioengineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Shiqi Sun
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthew G Perich
- Department of Fundamental Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Camille Varescon
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Robin Demesmaeker
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alice Bruel
- Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Léa N Bole-Feysot
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Schiavone
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces (LSBI), NeuroX Institute, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Elvira Pirondini
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Cheng YunLong
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Li Hao
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Andrea Galvez
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sergio Daniel Hernandez-Charpak
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gregory Dumont
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jimmy Ravier
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Camille G Le Goff-Mignardot
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Baptiste Mignardot
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gaia Carparelli
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cathal Harte
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Hankov
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Viviana Aureli
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - David Borton
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- School of Engineering, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jean Laurens
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabelle Vollenweider
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Simon Borgognon
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bourre
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Michel Goillandeau
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Wai Kin D Ko
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Laurent Petit
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Qin Li
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China
| | | | | | - Maria Yaroshinsky
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jean-Baptiste Ledoux
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Becce
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Julien F Bally
- Department of Neurology, CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Dominique Guehl
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Auke Ijspeert
- Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marco Capogrosso
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jordan W Squair
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Leonie Asboth
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Doris D Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stéphanie P Lacour
- NeuroX Institute, School of Bioengineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces (LSBI), NeuroX Institute, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Silvestro Micera
- NeuroX Institute, School of Bioengineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chuan Qin
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jocelyne Bloch
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Erwan Bezard
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK.
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China.
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France.
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France.
| | - G Courtine
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Punjani N, Deska-Gauthier D, Hachem LD, Abramian M, Fehlings MG. Neuroplasticity and regeneration after spinal cord injury. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2023; 15:100235. [PMID: 37416090 PMCID: PMC10320621 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition with significant personal, societal, and economic burden. The highest proportion of traumatic injuries occur at the cervical level, which results in severe sensorimotor and autonomic deficits. Following the initial physical damage associated with traumatic injuries, secondary pro-inflammatory, excitotoxic, and ischemic cascades are initiated further contributing to neuronal and glial cell death. Additionally, emerging evidence has begun to reveal that spinal interneurons undergo subtype specific neuroplastic circuit rearrangements in the weeks to months following SCI, contributing to or hindering functional recovery. The current therapeutic guidelines and standards of care for SCI patients include early surgery, hemodynamic regulation, and rehabilitation. Additionally, preclinical work and ongoing clinical trials have begun exploring neuroregenerative strategies utilizing endogenous neural stem/progenitor cells, stem cell transplantation, combinatorial approaches, and direct cell reprogramming. This review will focus on emerging cellular and noncellular regenerative therapies with an overview of the current available strategies, the role of interneurons in plasticity, and the exciting research avenues enhancing tissue repair following SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nayaab Punjani
- Division of Genetics and Development, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dylan Deska-Gauthier
- Division of Genetics and Development, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laureen D. Hachem
- Division of Genetics and Development, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Madlene Abramian
- Division of Genetics and Development, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Division of Genetics and Development, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mundra A, Varma Kalidindi K, Chhabra HS, Manghwani J. Spinal cord stimulation for spinal cord injury - Where do we stand? A narrative review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2023; 43:102210. [PMID: 37663171 PMCID: PMC10470322 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Recovery of function following a complete spinal cord injury (SCI) or an incomplete SCI where recovery has plateaued still eludes us despite extensive research. Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was initially used for managing neuropathic pain. It has subsequently demonstrated improvement in motor function in otherwise non-recovering chronic spinal cord injury in animal and human trials. The mechanisms of how it is precisely effective in doing so will need further research, which would help refine the technology for broader application. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS) is also emerging as a modality to improve the functional outcome in SCI individuals, especially when coupled with appropriate rehabilitation. Apart from motor recovery, ESCS and TSCS have also shown improvement in autonomic, metabolic, genitourinary, and pulmonary function. Since the literature on this is still in its infancy, with no large-scale randomised trials and different studies using different protocols in a wide range of patients, a review of the present literature is imperative to better understand the latest developments in this field. This article examines the existing literature on the use of SCS for SCI individuals with the purpose of enabling functional recovery. It also examines the voids in the present research, thus providing future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuj Mundra
- Department of Spine and Rehabilitation, Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute, New Delhi, 110063, India
| | | | - Harvinder Singh Chhabra
- Department of Spine and Rehabilitation, Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute, New Delhi, 110063, India
| | - Jitesh Manghwani
- Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110070, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liang L, Damiani A, Del Brocco M, Rogers ER, Jantz MK, Fisher LE, Gaunt RA, Capogrosso M, Lempka SF, Pirondini E. A systematic review of computational models for the design of spinal cord stimulation therapies: from neural circuits to patient-specific simulations. J Physiol 2023; 601:3103-3121. [PMID: 36409303 PMCID: PMC10259770 DOI: 10.1113/jp282884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Seventy years ago, Hodgkin and Huxley published the first mathematical model to describe action potential generation, laying the foundation for modern computational neuroscience. Since then, the field has evolved enormously, with studies spanning from basic neuroscience to clinical applications for neuromodulation. Computer models of neuromodulation have evolved in complexity and personalization, advancing clinical practice and novel neurostimulation therapies, such as spinal cord stimulation. Spinal cord stimulation is a therapy widely used to treat chronic pain, with rapidly expanding indications, such as restoring motor function. In general, simulations contributed dramatically to improve lead designs, stimulation configurations, waveform parameters and programming procedures and provided insight into potential mechanisms of action of electrical stimulation. Although the implementation of neural models are relentlessly increasing in number and complexity, it is reasonable to ask whether this observed increase in complexity is necessary for improved accuracy and, ultimately, for clinical efficacy. With this aim, we performed a systematic literature review and a qualitative meta-synthesis of the evolution of computational models, with a focus on complexity, personalization and the use of medical imaging to capture realistic anatomy. Our review showed that increased model complexity and personalization improved both mechanistic and translational studies. More specifically, the use of medical imaging enabled the development of patient-specific models that can help to transform clinical practice in spinal cord stimulation. Finally, we combined our results to provide clear guidelines for standardization and expansion of computational models for spinal cord stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Liang
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Arianna Damiani
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matteo Del Brocco
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Evan R Rogers
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Maria K Jantz
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lee E Fisher
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Gaunt
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marco Capogrosso
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elvira Pirondini
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fietkiewicz C, McDougal RA, Corrales Marco D, Chiel HJ, Thomas PJ. Tutorial: using NEURON for neuromechanical simulations. Front Comput Neurosci 2023; 17:1143323. [PMID: 37583894 PMCID: PMC10424731 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1143323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The dynamical properties of the brain and the dynamics of the body strongly influence one another. Their interaction generates complex adaptive behavior. While a wide variety of simulation tools exist for neural dynamics or biomechanics separately, there are few options for integrated brain-body modeling. Here, we provide a tutorial to demonstrate how the widely-used NEURON simulation platform can support integrated neuromechanical modeling. As a first step toward incorporating biomechanics into a NEURON simulation, we provide a framework for integrating inputs from a "periphery" and outputs to that periphery. In other words, "body" dynamics are driven in part by "brain" variables, such as voltages or firing rates, and "brain" dynamics are influenced by "body" variables through sensory feedback. To couple the "brain" and "body" components, we use NEURON's pointer construct to share information between "brain" and "body" modules. This approach allows separate specification of brain and body dynamics and code reuse. Though simple in concept, the use of pointers can be challenging due to a complicated syntax and several different programming options. In this paper, we present five different computational models, with increasing levels of complexity, to demonstrate the concepts of code modularity using pointers and the integration of neural and biomechanical modeling within NEURON. The models include: (1) a neuromuscular model of calcium dynamics and muscle force, (2) a neuromechanical, closed-loop model of a half-center oscillator coupled to a rudimentary motor system, (3) a closed-loop model of neural control for respiration, (4) a pedagogical model of a non-smooth "brain/body" system, and (5) a closed-loop model of feeding behavior in the sea hare Aplysia californica that incorporates biologically-motivated non-smooth dynamics. This tutorial illustrates how NEURON can be integrated with a broad range of neuromechanical models. Code available at https://github.com/fietkiewicz/PointerBuilder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Fietkiewicz
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY, United States
| | - Robert A. McDougal
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
- Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- Section for Biomedical Informatics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - David Corrales Marco
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY, United States
| | - Hillel J. Chiel
- Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Peter J. Thomas
- Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Cognitive Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Electrical, Control, and Systems Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Data and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lorach H, Galvez A, Spagnolo V, Martel F, Karakas S, Intering N, Vat M, Faivre O, Harte C, Komi S, Ravier J, Collin T, Coquoz L, Sakr I, Baaklini E, Hernandez-Charpak SD, Dumont G, Buschman R, Buse N, Denison T, van Nes I, Asboth L, Watrin A, Struber L, Sauter-Starace F, Langar L, Auboiroux V, Carda S, Chabardes S, Aksenova T, Demesmaeker R, Charvet G, Bloch J, Courtine G. Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain-spine interface. Nature 2023:10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5. [PMID: 37225984 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
A spinal cord injury interrupts the communication between the brain and the region of the spinal cord that produces walking, leading to paralysis1,2. Here, we restored this communication with a digital bridge between the brain and spinal cord that enabled an individual with chronic tetraplegia to stand and walk naturally in community settings. This brain-spine interface (BSI) consists of fully implanted recording and stimulation systems that establish a direct link between cortical signals3 and the analogue modulation of epidural electrical stimulation targeting the spinal cord regions involved in the production of walking4-6. A highly reliable BSI is calibrated within a few minutes. This reliability has remained stable over one year, including during independent use at home. The participant reports that the BSI enables natural control over the movements of his legs to stand, walk, climb stairs and even traverse complex terrains. Moreover, neurorehabilitation supported by the BSI improved neurological recovery. The participant regained the ability to walk with crutches overground even when the BSI was switched off. This digital bridge establishes a framework to restore natural control of movement after paralysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henri Lorach
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Galvez
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Valeria Spagnolo
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Felix Martel
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, Clinatec, Grenoble, France
| | - Serpil Karakas
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, Clinatec, Grenoble, France
| | - Nadine Intering
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Molywan Vat
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Faivre
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, Clinatec, Grenoble, France
| | - Cathal Harte
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Salif Komi
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jimmy Ravier
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thibault Collin
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laure Coquoz
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Icare Sakr
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Edeny Baaklini
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sergio Daniel Hernandez-Charpak
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gregory Dumont
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Tim Denison
- Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ilse van Nes
- Department of Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie Asboth
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Lucas Struber
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, Clinatec, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Lilia Langar
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinatec, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Stefano Carda
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Chabardes
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, Clinatec, Grenoble, France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinatec, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Robin Demesmaeker
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Jocelyne Bloch
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Grégoire Courtine
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Haggie L, Schmid L, Röhrle O, Besier T, McMorland A, Saini H. Linking cortex and contraction-Integrating models along the corticomuscular pathway. Front Physiol 2023; 14:1095260. [PMID: 37234419 PMCID: PMC10206006 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1095260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Computational models of the neuromusculoskeletal system provide a deterministic approach to investigate input-output relationships in the human motor system. Neuromusculoskeletal models are typically used to estimate muscle activations and forces that are consistent with observed motion under healthy and pathological conditions. However, many movement pathologies originate in the brain, including stroke, cerebral palsy, and Parkinson's disease, while most neuromusculoskeletal models deal exclusively with the peripheral nervous system and do not incorporate models of the motor cortex, cerebellum, or spinal cord. An integrated understanding of motor control is necessary to reveal underlying neural-input and motor-output relationships. To facilitate the development of integrated corticomuscular motor pathway models, we provide an overview of the neuromusculoskeletal modelling landscape with a focus on integrating computational models of the motor cortex, spinal cord circuitry, α-motoneurons and skeletal muscle in regard to their role in generating voluntary muscle contraction. Further, we highlight the challenges and opportunities associated with an integrated corticomuscular pathway model, such as challenges in defining neuron connectivities, modelling standardisation, and opportunities in applying models to study emergent behaviour. Integrated corticomuscular pathway models have applications in brain-machine-interaction, education, and our understanding of neurological disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lysea Haggie
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Laura Schmid
- Institute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Oliver Röhrle
- Institute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
- Stuttgart Center for Simulation Sciences (SC SimTech), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Thor Besier
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Angus McMorland
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Harnoor Saini
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Azzarito M, Emmenegger T, Ziegler G, Huber E, Grabher P, Callaghan MF, Thompson A, Friston K, Weiskopf N, Killeen T, Freund P. Coherent, time-shifted patterns of microstructural plasticity during motor-skill learning. Neuroimage 2023; 274:120128. [PMID: 37116765 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Motor skill learning relies on neural plasticity in the motor and limbic systems. However, the spatial and temporal characteristics of these changes-and their microstructural underpinnings-remain unclear. Eighteen healthy males received 1 hour of training in a computer-based motion game, 4 times a week, for 4 consecutive weeks, while 14 untrained participants underwent scanning only. Performance improvements were observed in all trained participants. Serial myelin- and iron-sensitive multiparametric mapping at 3T during this period of intensive motor skill acquisition revealed temporally and spatially distributed, performance-related microstructural changes in the grey and white matter across a corticospinal-cerebellar-hippocampal circuit. Analysis of the trajectory of these transient changes suggested time-shifted cascades of plasticity from the dominant sensorimotor system to the contralateral hippocampus. In the cranial corticospinal tracts, changes in myelin-sensitive metrics during training in the posterior limb of the internal capsule were of greater magnitude in those who trained their upper limbs vs. lower limb trainees. Motor skill learning is associated with waves of grey and white matter plasticity, across a broad sensorimotor network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Azzarito
- Spinal Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tim Emmenegger
- Spinal Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gabriel Ziegler
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Eveline Huber
- Spinal Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Grabher
- Spinal Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martina F Callaghan
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alan Thompson
- Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karl Friston
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nikolaus Weiskopf
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tim Killeen
- Spinal Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Freund
- Spinal Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bandres MF, Gomes JL, McPherson JG. Motor-targeted spinal stimulation promotes concurrent rebalancing of pathologic nociceptive transmission in chronic spinal cord injury. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.04.12.536477. [PMID: 37090665 PMCID: PMC10120632 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.12.536477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Electrical stimulation of spinal networks below a spinal cord injury (SCI) is a promising approach to restore functions compromised by inadequate excitatory neural drive. The most translationally successful examples are paradigms intended to increase neural transmission in weakened yet spared motor pathways and spinal motor networks rendered dormant after being severed from their inputs by lesion. Less well understood is whether spinal stimulation is also capable of reducing neural transmission in pathways made pathologically overactive by SCI. Debilitating spasms, spasticity, and neuropathic pain are all common manifestations of hyperexcitable spinal responses to sensory feedback. But whereas spasms and spasticity can often be managed pharmacologically, SCI-related neuropathic pain is notoriously medically refractory. Interestingly, however, spinal stimulation is a clinically available option for ameliorating neuropathic pain arising from etiologies other than SCI, and it has traditionally been assumed to modulate sensorimotor networks overlapping with those engaged by spinal stimulation for motor rehabilitation. Thus, we reasoned that spinal stimulation intended to increase transmission in motor pathways may simultaneously reduce transmission in spinal pain pathways. Using a well-validated pre-clinical model of SCI that results in severe bilateral motor impairments and SCI-related neuropathic pain, we show that the responsiveness of neurons integral to the development and persistence of the neuropathic pain state can be enduringly reduced by motor-targeted spinal stimulation while preserving spinal responses to non-pain-related sensory feedback. These results suggest that spinal stimulation paradigms could be intentionally designed to afford multi-modal therapeutic benefits, directly addressing the diverse, intersectional rehabilitation goals of people living with SCI.
Collapse
|
18
|
Powell MP, Verma N, Sorensen E, Carranza E, Boos A, Fields DP, Roy S, Ensel S, Barra B, Balzer J, Goldsmith J, Friedlander RM, Wittenberg GF, Fisher LE, Krakauer JW, Gerszten PC, Pirondini E, Weber DJ, Capogrosso M. Epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord for post-stroke upper-limb paresis. Nat Med 2023; 29:689-699. [PMID: 36807682 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02202-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Cerebral strokes can disrupt descending commands from motor cortical areas to the spinal cord, which can result in permanent motor deficits of the arm and hand. However, below the lesion, the spinal circuits that control movement remain intact and could be targeted by neurotechnologies to restore movement. Here we report results from two participants in a first-in-human study using electrical stimulation of cervical spinal circuits to facilitate arm and hand motor control in chronic post-stroke hemiparesis ( NCT04512690 ). Participants were implanted for 29 d with two linear leads in the dorsolateral epidural space targeting spinal roots C3 to T1 to increase excitation of arm and hand motoneurons. We found that continuous stimulation through selected contacts improved strength (for example, grip force +40% SCS01; +108% SCS02), kinematics (for example, +30% to +40% speed) and functional movements, thereby enabling participants to perform movements that they could not perform without spinal cord stimulation. Both participants retained some of these improvements even without stimulation and no serious adverse events were reported. While we cannot conclusively evaluate safety and efficacy from two participants, our data provide promising, albeit preliminary, evidence that spinal cord stimulation could be an assistive as well as a restorative approach for upper-limb recovery after stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc P Powell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nikhil Verma
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- NeuroMechatronics Lab, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Erynn Sorensen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Erick Carranza
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amy Boos
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daryl P Fields
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Souvik Roy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Scott Ensel
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Beatrice Barra
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Balzer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeff Goldsmith
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert M Friedlander
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - George F Wittenberg
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Veterans Affairs HS, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lee E Fisher
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John W Krakauer
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA
| | - Peter C Gerszten
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Elvira Pirondini
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Douglas J Weber
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- NeuroMechatronics Lab, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- The Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marco Capogrosso
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Aureli V, Vat M, Hankov N, Théaudin M, Ravier J, Becce F, Demesmaeker R, Asboth L, Courtine G, Bloch J. Targeted dorsal root entry zone stimulation alleviates pain due to meralgia paresthetica. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 36541540 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aca5f7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Meralgia paresthetica (MP) is a mononeuropathy of the exclusively sensory lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) that is difficult to treat with conservative treatments. Afferents from the LFCN enter the spinal cord through the dorsal root entry zones (DREZs) innervating L2 and L3 spinal segments. We previously showed that epidural electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can be configured to steer electrical currents laterally in order to target afferents within individual DREZs. Therefore, we hypothesized that this neuromodulation strategy is suitable to target the L2 and L3 DREZs that convey afferents from the painful territory, and thus alleviates MP related pain.Approach.A patient in her mid-30s presented with a four year history of dysesthesia and burning pain in the anterolateral aspect of the left thigh due to MP that was refractory to medical treatments. We combined neuroimaging and intraoperative neuromonitoring to guide the surgical placement of a paddle lead over the left DREZs innervating L2 and L3 spinal segments.Main results.Optimized electrode configurations targeting the left L2 and L3 DREZs mediated immediate and sustained alleviation of pain. The patient ceased all other medical management, reported improved quality of life, and resumed recreational physical activities.Significance.We introduced a new treatment option to alleviate pain due to MP, and demonstrated how neuromodulation strategies targeting specific DREZs is effective to reduce pain confined to specific regions of the body while avoiding disconfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Aureli
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Molywan Vat
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Hankov
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Marie Théaudin
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jimmy Ravier
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Becce
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Robin Demesmaeker
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Leonie Asboth
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Grégoire Courtine
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Jocelyne Bloch
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.,NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneve, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Skiadopoulos A, Pulverenti TS, Knikou M. Physiological effects of cathodal electrode configuration for transspinal stimulation in humans. J Neurophysiol 2022; 128:1663-1682. [PMID: 36416443 PMCID: PMC9762966 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00342.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Transspinal stimulation modulates neuronal excitability and promotes recovery in upper motoneuron lesions. The recruitment input-output curves of transspinal evoked potentials (TEPs) recorded from knee and ankle muscles, and their susceptibility to spinal inhibition, were recorded when the position, size, and number of the cathode electrode were arranged in four settings or protocols (Ps). The four Ps were the following: 1) one rectangular electrode placed at midline (KNIKOU-LAB4Recovery or K-LAB4Recovery; P-KLAB), 2) one square electrode placed at midline (P-2), 3) two square electrodes 1 cm apart placed at midline (P-3), and 4) one square electrode placed on each paravertebral side (P-4). P-KLAB and P-3 required less current to reach TEP threshold or maximal amplitudes. A rightward shift in TEP recruitment curves was evident for P-4, whereas the slope was increased for P-2 and P-4 compared with P-KLAB and P-3. TEP depression upon single and paired transspinal stimuli was pronounced in ankle TEPs but was less prominent in knee TEPs. TEP depression induced by single transspinal stimuli at 1.0 Hz was similar for most TEPs across protocols, but TEP depression induced by paired transspinal stimuli was different between protocols and was replaced by facilitation at 100-ms interstimulus interval for P-4. Our results suggest that P-KLAB and P-3 are preferred based on excitability threshold of motoneurons. P-KLAB produced more TEP depression, thereby maximizing the engagement of spinal neuronal pathways. We recommend P-KLAB to study neurophysiological mechanisms underlying transspinal stimulation or when used as a neuromodulation method for recovery in neurological disorders.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transspinal stimulation with a rectangular cathode electrode (P-KLAB) requires less current to produce transspinal evoked potentials and maximizes spinal inhibition. We recommend P-KLAB for neurophysiological studies or when used as a neuromodulation method to enhance motor output and normalize muscle tone in neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Skiadopoulos
- Klab4Recovery Research Program, The City University of New York, New York, New York
| | - Timothy S Pulverenti
- Klab4Recovery Research Program, The City University of New York, New York, New York
| | - Maria Knikou
- Klab4Recovery Research Program, The City University of New York, New York, New York
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, Staten Island, New York
- PhD Program in Biology and Collaborative Neuroscience Program, Graduate Center of The City University of New York and College of Staten Island, Staten Island, New York
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Anderson MA, Squair JW, Gautier M, Hutson TH, Kathe C, Barraud Q, Bloch J, Courtine G. Natural and targeted circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Nat Neurosci 2022; 25:1584-1596. [PMID: 36396975 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01196-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
A spinal cord injury disrupts communication between the brain and the circuits in the spinal cord that regulate neurological functions. The consequences are permanent paralysis, loss of sensation and debilitating dysautonomia. However, the majority of circuits located above and below the injury remain anatomically intact, and these circuits can reorganize naturally to improve function. In addition, various neuromodulation therapies have tapped into these processes to further augment recovery. Emerging research is illuminating the requirements to reconstitute damaged circuits. Here, we summarize these natural and targeted reorganizations of circuits after a spinal cord injury. We also advocate for new concepts of reorganizing circuits informed by multi-omic single-cell atlases of recovery from injury. These atlases will uncover the molecular logic that governs the selection of 'recovery-organizing' neuronal subpopulations, and are poised to herald a new era in spinal cord medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Anderson
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jordan W Squair
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthieu Gautier
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas H Hutson
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Kathe
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Quentin Barraud
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jocelyne Bloch
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Grégoire Courtine
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. .,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland. .,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jantz MK, Gopinath C, Kumar R, Chin C, Wong L, Ogren JI, Fisher LE, McLaughlin BL, Gaunt RA. High-density spinal cord stimulation selectively activates lower urinary tract nerves. J Neural Eng 2022; 19:066014. [PMID: 36343359 PMCID: PMC9855651 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aca0c2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a potential intervention to improve limb and autonomic functions, with lumbar stimulation improving locomotion and thoracic stimulation regulating blood pressure. Here, we asked whether sacral SCS could be used to target the lower urinary tract (LUT) and used a high-density epidural electrode array to test whether individual electrodes could selectively recruit LUT nerves.Approach. We placed a high-density epidural SCS array on the dorsal surface of the sacral spinal cord and cauda equina of anesthetized cats and recorded the stimulation-evoked activity from nerve cuffs on the pelvic, pudendal and sciatic nerves.Main results. Here we show that sacral SCS evokes responses in nerves innervating the bladder and urethra and that these nerves can be activated selectively. Sacral SCS always recruited the pelvic and pudendal nerves and selectively recruited both of these nerves in all but one animal. Individual branches of the pudendal nerve were always recruited as well. Electrodes that selectively recruited specific peripheral nerves were spatially clustered on the arrays, suggesting anatomically organized sensory pathways.Significance.This selective recruitment demonstrates a mechanism to directly modulate bladder and urethral function through known reflex pathways, which could be used to restore bladder and urethral function after injury or disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria K Jantz
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Chaitanya Gopinath
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Ritesh Kumar
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Celine Chin
- Micro-Leads Inc., Somerville, MA, United States of America
| | - Liane Wong
- Micro-Leads Inc., Somerville, MA, United States of America
| | - John I Ogren
- Micro-Leads Inc., Somerville, MA, United States of America
| | - Lee E Fisher
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | | | - Robert A Gaunt
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bandres MF, Gomes JL, McPherson JG. Spinal stimulation for motor rehabilitation immediately modulates nociceptive transmission. J Neural Eng 2022; 19:10.1088/1741-2552/ac9a00. [PMID: 36228593 PMCID: PMC9797038 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac9a00] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in debilitating movement impairments and neuropathic pain. Electrical stimulation of spinal neurons holds considerable promise both for enhancing neural transmission in weakened motor pathways and for reducing neural transmission in overactive nociceptive pathways. However, spinal stimulation paradigms currently under development for individuals living with SCI continue overwhelmingly to be developed in the context of motor rehabilitation alone. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that motor-targeted spinal stimulation simultaneously modulates spinal nociceptive transmission.Approach. We characterized the neuromodulatory actions of motor-targeted intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) on the firing dynamics of large populations of discrete nociceptive specific and wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons. Neurons were accessed via dense microelectrode arrays implantedin vivointo lumbar enlargement of rats. Nociceptive and non-nociceptive cutaneous transmission was induced before, during, and after ISMS by mechanically probing the L5 dermatome.Main results. Our primary findings are that (a) sub-motor threshold ISMS delivered to spinal motor pools immediately modulates concurrent nociceptive transmission; (b) the magnitude of anti-nociceptive effects increases with longer durations of ISMS, including robust carryover effects; (c) the majority of all identified nociceptive-specific and WDR neurons exhibit firing rate reductions after only 10 min of ISMS; and (d) ISMS does not increase spinal responsiveness to non-nociceptive cutaneous transmission. These results lead to the conclusion that ISMS parameterized to enhance motor output results in an overall net decrease n spinal nociceptive transmission.Significance. These results suggest that ISMS may hold translational potential for neuropathic pain-related applications and that it may be uniquely suited to delivering multi-modal therapeutic benefits for individuals living with SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria F. Bandres
- Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Jefferson L. Gomes
- Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| | - Jacob G. McPherson
- Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
- Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
- Program in Neuroscience; Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering; Washington University in St. Louis
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Eisdorfer JT, Sobotka-Briner H, Schramfield S, Moukarzel G, Chen J, Campion TJ, Smit R, Rauscher BC, Lemay MA, Smith GM, Spence AJ. Chemogenetic modulation of sensory afferents induces locomotor changes and plasticity after spinal cord injury. Front Mol Neurosci 2022; 15:872634. [PMID: 36090254 PMCID: PMC9461563 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.872634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuromodulatory therapies for spinal cord injury (SCI) such as electrical epidural stimulation (EES) are increasingly effective at improving patient outcomes. These improvements are thought to be due, at least in part, to plasticity in neuronal circuits. Precisely which circuits are influenced and which afferent classes are most effective in stimulating change remain important open questions. Genetic tools, such as Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs), support targeted and reversible neuromodulation as well as histological characterization of manipulated neurons. We therefore transduced and activated lumbar large diameter peripheral afferents with excitatory (hM3Dq) DREADDs, in a manner analogous to EES, in a rat hemisection model, to begin to trace plasticity and observe concomitant locomotor changes. Chronic DREADDs activation, coupled with thrice weekly treadmill training, was observed to increase afferent fluorescent labeling within motor pools and Clarke's column when compared to control animals. This plasticity may underlie kinematic differences that we observed across stages of recovery, including an increased and less variable hindquarters height in DREADDs animals, shorter step durations, a more flexed ankle joint early in recovery, a less variable ankle joint angle in swing phase, but a more variable hip joint angle. Withdrawal of DREADDs agonist, clozapine-N-oxide (CNO) left these kinematic differences largely unaffected; suggesting that DREADDs activation is not necessary for them later in recovery. However, we observed an intermittent “buckling” phenomenon in DREADDs animals without CNO activation, that did not occur with CNO re-administration. Future studies could use more refined genetic targeted of specific afferent classes, and utilize muscle recordings to find where afferent modulation is most influential in altering motor output.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn T. Eisdorfer
- Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States
| | - Hannah Sobotka-Briner
- Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Susan Schramfield
- Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - George Moukarzel
- Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Neuroscience, Shriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Thomas J. Campion
- Department of Neuroscience, Shriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Rupert Smit
- Department of Neuroscience, Shriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Bradley C. Rauscher
- Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Michel A. Lemay
- Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - George M. Smith
- Department of Neuroscience, Shriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Andrew J. Spence
- Department of Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: Andrew J. Spence
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pirondini E, Carranza E, Balaguer JM, Sorensen E, Weber DJ, Krakauer JW, Capogrosso M. Poststroke arm and hand paresis: should we target the cervical spinal cord? Trends Neurosci 2022; 45:568-578. [PMID: 35659414 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Despite advances in understanding of corticospinal motor control and stroke pathophysiology, current rehabilitation therapies for poststroke upper limb paresis have limited efficacy at the level of impairment. To address this problem, we make the conceptual case for a new treatment approach. We first summarize current understanding of motor control deficits in the arm and hand after stroke and their shared physiological mechanisms with spinal cord injury (SCI). We then review studies of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for recovery of locomotion after SCI, which provide convincing evidence for enhancement of residual corticospinal function. By extrapolation, we argue for using cervical SCS to restore upper limb motor control after stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvira Pirondini
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Erick Carranza
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Josep-Maria Balaguer
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Erynn Sorensen
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Douglas J Weber
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John W Krakauer
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, CA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Marco Capogrosso
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mansour NM, Peña Pino I, Freeman D, Carrabre K, Venkatesh S, Darrow D, Samadani U, Parr AM. Advances in Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation to Restore Function after Spinal Cord Injury: History and Systematic Review. J Neurotrauma 2022; 39:1015-1029. [PMID: 35403432 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS) has been recently recognized as a potential therapy for chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). eSCS has been shown to uncover residual pathways within the damaged spinal cord. The purpose of this review is to summarize the key findings to date regarding the use of eSCS in SCI. Searches were carried out using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science database and reference lists of the included articles. A combination of medical subject heading terms and keywords was used to find studies investigating the use of eSCS in SCI patients to facilitate volitional movement and to restore autonomic function. The risk of bias was assessed using Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool for nonrandomized studies. We were able to include 40 articles that met our eligibility criteria. The studies included a total of 184 patient experiences with incomplete or complete SCI. The majority of the studies used the Medtronic 16 paddle lead. Around half of the studies reported lead placement between T11- L1. We included studies that assessed motor (n = 28), autonomic (n = 13), and other outcomes (n = 10). The majority of the studies reported improvement in outcomes assessed. The wide range of included outcomes demonstrates the effectiveness of eSCS in treating a diverse SCI population. However, the current studies cannot definitively conclude which patients benefit the most from this intervention. Further study in this area is needed to allow improvement of the eSCS technology and allow it to be more widely available for chronic SCI patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine M Mansour
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Isabela Peña Pino
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - David Freeman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kailey Carrabre
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shivani Venkatesh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - David Darrow
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Uzma Samadani
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Neurosurgery, VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ann M Parr
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Samejima S, Henderson R, Pradarelli J, Mondello SE, Moritz CT. Activity-dependent plasticity and spinal cord stimulation for motor recovery following spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2022; 357:114178. [PMID: 35878817 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Spinal cord injuries lead to permanent physical impairment despite most often being anatomically incomplete disruptions of the spinal cord. Remaining connections between the brain and spinal cord create the potential for inducing neural plasticity to improve sensorimotor function, even many years after injury. This narrative review provides an overview of the current evidence for spontaneous motor recovery, activity-dependent plasticity, and interventions for restoring motor control to residual brain and spinal cord networks via spinal cord stimulation. In addition to open-loop spinal cord stimulation to promote long-term neuroplasticity, we also review a more targeted approach: closed-loop stimulation. Lastly, we review mechanisms of spinal cord neuromodulation to promote sensorimotor recovery, with the goal of advancing the field of rehabilitation for physical impairments following spinal cord injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soshi Samejima
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Richard Henderson
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jared Pradarelli
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah E Mondello
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Chet T Moritz
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lee H, Graham RD, Melikyan D, Smith B, Mirzakhalili E, Lempka SF, Duan B. Molecular Determinants of Mechanical Itch Sensitization in Chronic Itch. Front Mol Neurosci 2022; 15:937890. [PMID: 35782385 PMCID: PMC9244800 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.937890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic itch is associated with sensitization of the somatosensory nervous system. Recent studies have identified the neural circuits transmitting acute itch; however, the mechanisms by which itch transforms into a pathological state remain largely unknown. We have previously shown that Aβ low-threshold mechanoreceptors, together with spinal urocortin 3-positive (Ucn3+) excitatory interneurons and neuropeptide Y-positive (NPY+) inhibitory interneurons, form a microcircuit that transmits and gates acute mechanical itch. Here, using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, we observed increased excitability in spinal Ucn3+ neurons under chronic itch conditions. In contrast to Ucn3+ neurons, the excitability of spinal NPY+ neurons was largely reduced under chronic itch conditions. To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying sensitization of this microcircuit, we examined the mRNA expression levels of voltage-gated ion channels in recorded spinal Ucn3+ and NPY+ neurons by single-cell quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). We found that the expression levels of Nav1.6 and Cav2.3 channels were increased in spinal Ucn3+ neurons in chronic itch mice, while the expression level of SK3 channels was decreased. By contrast, the expression levels of Nav1.6 and BK channels were decreased in spinal NPY+ neurons in chronic itch mice. To determine the contribution of different ion channels in chronic itch sensitization, we then used a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to parameterize a large number of biophysically distinct multicompartment models of Ucn3+ and NPY+ neurons. These models included explicit representations of the ion channels that we found to be up- or down-regulated under chronic itch conditions. Our models demonstrated that changes in Nav1.6 conductance are predominantly responsible for the changes in excitability of both Ucn3+ and NPY+ neurons during chronic itch pathogenesis. Furthermore, when simulating microcircuits of our Ucn3+ and NPY+ models, we found that reduced Nav1.6 conductance in NPY+ models played a major role in opening the itch gate under chronic itch conditions. However, changing SK, BK, or R-type calcium channel conductance had negligible effects on the sensitization of this circuit. Therefore, our results suggest that Nav1.6 channels may play an essential role in mechanical itch sensitization. The findings presented here may open a new avenue for developing pharmaceutical strategies to treat chronic itch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hankyu Lee
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Robert D. Graham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Diana Melikyan
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Brennan Smith
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Ehsan Mirzakhalili
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Scott F. Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Bo Duan
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shneider M, Pekker M. Theoretical model of external spinal cord stimulation. Phys Biol 2022; 19. [PMID: 35671753 DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/ac768e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, a simple theoretical model of the excitation of action potentials of multiple motor pools by stimulating current pulses over the lumbosacral regions of the spinal cord is presented. The present model is consistent with known experimental data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhail Shneider
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-5263, USA, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544, UNITED STATES
| | - Mikhail Pekker
- Retired, 310 Elm Road,, Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kapardi M, Pithapuram MV, Rangayyan YM, Iyengar RS, Singh AK, Sripada S, Raghavan M. In-silico neuro musculoskeletal model reproduces the movement types obtained by spinal micro stimulation. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 220:106804. [PMID: 35436659 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Virtual patients and physiologies allow experimentation, design, and early-stage clinical trials in-silico. Virtual patient technology for human movement systems that encompasses musculoskeleton and its neural control are few and far in between. Our major goal is to create a neuro- musculoskeletal upper limb in-silico model, which is modular in architecture and generates movement as an emergent phenomenon out of a multiscale co-simulation of spinal cord neural control and musculoskeletal dynamics. METHODS The model is developed on the NEUROiD movement simulation platform that enables a co-simulation of popular neural simulator NEURON and the musculoskeletal simulator OpenSim. We further characterized and demonstrated the use of this model in generating a range of commonly observed upper limb movements by means of a spatio-temporal stimulation pattern delivered to the cervical spinal cord. RESULTS We were able to characterize the model based on proprioception (Ia, Ib and II fibers), afferent conduction delay and inital postures of the musculoskeletal system. A smooth movement was achieved in all the considered experiments. The generated movements in all degrees of freedom were reproduced in accordance with the previous experimental studies. CONCLUSION In this work, design and development of the upper limb model was described in a modular fashion, while reusing existing models and modules. We believe this work enables a first and small step towards an in-silico paradigms for understanding upper limb movement, disease pathology, medication, and rehabilitation.
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhang Q, Cheng Y, Zhou M, Dai Y. Locomotor Pattern and Force Generation Modulated by Ionic Channels: A Computational Study of Spinal Networks Underlying Locomotion. Front Comput Neurosci 2022; 16:809599. [PMID: 35493855 PMCID: PMC9050146 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2022.809599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Locomotion is a fundamental movement in vertebrates produced by spinal networks known as central pattern generators (CPG). During fictive locomotion cat lumbar motoneurons (MNs) exhibit changes in membrane properties, including hyperpolarization of voltage threshold, reduction of afterhyperpolarization and input resistance, and amplification of nonlinear membrane properties. Both modeling and electrophysiological studies suggest that these changes can be produced by upregulating voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC), persistent sodium (NaP), or L-type calcium channel (LTCC) or downregulating delayed-rectifier potassium (K(DR)) or calcium-dependent potassium channel (KCa) in spinal MNs. Further studies implicate that these channel modulations increase motor output and facilitate MN recruitment. However, it remains unknown how the channel modulation of CPG networks or MN pools affects the rhythmic generation of locomotion and force production of skeletal muscle during locomotion. In order to investigate this issue, we built a two-level CPG model composed of excitatory interneuron pools (Exc-INs), coupled reciprocally with inhibitory interneuron pools (Inh-INs), and projected to the flexor-extensor MN pools innervating skeletal muscles. Each pool consisted of 100 neurons with membrane properties based on cat spinal neurons. VGSC, K(DR), NaP, KCa, LTCC, and H-current channels were included in the model. Simulation results showed that (1) upregulating VGSC, NaP, or LTCC or downregulating KCa in MNs increased discharge rate and recruitment of MNs, thus facilitating locomotor pattern formation, increased amplitude of electroneurogram (ENG) bursting, and enhanced force generation of skeletal muscles. (2) The same channel modulation in Exc-INs increased the firing frequency of the Exc-INs, facilitated rhythmic generation, and increased flexor-extensor durations of step cycles. (3) Contrarily, downregulation of NaP or LTCC in MNs or Exc-INs or both CPG (Exc-INs and Inh-INs) and MNs disrupted locomotor pattern and reduced or even blocked the ENG bursting of MNs and force generation of skeletal muscles. (4) Pharmacological experiments showed that bath application of 25 μM nimodipine or 2 μM riluzole completely blocked fictive locomotion in isolated rat spinal cord, consistent with simulation results. We concluded that upregulation of VGSC, NaP, or LTCC or downregulation of KCa facilitated rhythmic generation and force production during walking, with NaP and LTCC playing an essential role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Zhang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, School of Communication and Electronic Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Cheng
- School of Physical Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
| | - Mei Zhou
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, School of Communication and Electronic Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yue Dai
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, School of Communication and Electronic Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Adolescent Health Assessment and Exercise Intervention of Ministry of Education, School of Physical Education and Health Care, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Yue Dai,
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pasquini M, James ND, Dewany I, Coen FV, Cho N, Lai S, Anil S, Carpaneto J, Barraud Q, Lacour SP, Micera S, Courtine G. Preclinical upper limb neurorobotic platform to assess, rehabilitate, and develop therapies. Sci Robot 2022; 7:eabk2378. [PMID: 35353601 DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.abk2378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Numerous neurorehabilitative, neuroprosthetic, and repair interventions aim to address the consequences of upper limb impairments after neurological disorders. Although these therapies target widely different mechanisms, they share the common need for a preclinical platform that supports the development, assessment, and understanding of the therapy. Here, we introduce a neurorobotic platform for rats that meets these requirements. A four-degree-of-freedom end effector is interfaced with the rat's wrist, enabling unassisted to fully assisted execution of natural reaching and retrieval movements covering the entire body workspace. Multimodal recording capabilities permit precise quantification of upper limb movement recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI), which allowed us to uncover adaptations in corticospinal tract neuron dynamics underlying this recovery. Personalized movement assistance supported early neurorehabilitation that improved recovery after SCI. Last, the platform provided a well-controlled and practical environment to develop an implantable spinal cord neuroprosthesis that improved upper limb function after SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pasquini
- Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'anna, Pisa, Italy.,Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicholas D James
- Center for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (.NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Inssia Dewany
- Center for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (.NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Florent-Valéry Coen
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Neuroprosthetic Technology, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Institute of Electrical and MicroEngineering and Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Newton Cho
- Center for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (.NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Lai
- Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Selin Anil
- Center for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (.NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jacopo Carpaneto
- Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Quentin Barraud
- Center for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (.NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stéphanie P Lacour
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Neuroprosthetic Technology, Center for Neuroprosthetics, Institute of Electrical and MicroEngineering and Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Silvestro Micera
- Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'anna, Pisa, Italy.,Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Grégoire Courtine
- Center for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (.NeuroRestore), EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pithapuram MV, Raghavan M. Automatic rule-based generation of spinal cord connectome model for a neuro-musculoskeletal limb in-silico. IOP SCINOTES 2022. [DOI: 10.1088/2633-1357/ac585e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Studying spinal interactions with muscles has been of great importance for over a century. However, with surging spinal-related movement pathologies, the need for computational models to study spinal pathways is increasing. Although spinal cord connectome models have been developed, anatomically relevant spinal neuromotor models are rare. However, building and maintaining such models is time consuming. In this study, the concept of the rule-based generation of a spinal connectome was introduced and lumbosacral connectome generation was demonstrated as an example. Furthermore, the rule-based autogenerated connectome models were synchronized with lower-limb musculoskeletal models to create an in-silico test bed. Using this setup, the role of the autogenic Ia-excitatory pathway in controlling the ankle angle was tested.
Collapse
|
34
|
Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis. Nat Med 2022; 28:260-271. [PMID: 35132264 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01663-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) targeting the dorsal roots of lumbosacral segments restores walking in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, EES is delivered with multielectrode paddle leads that were originally designed to target the dorsal column of the spinal cord. Here, we hypothesized that an arrangement of electrodes targeting the ensemble of dorsal roots involved in leg and trunk movements would result in superior efficacy, restoring more diverse motor activities after the most severe SCI. To test this hypothesis, we established a computational framework that informed the optimal arrangement of electrodes on a new paddle lead and guided its neurosurgical positioning. We also developed software supporting the rapid configuration of activity-specific stimulation programs that reproduced the natural activation of motor neurons underlying each activity. We tested these neurotechnologies in three individuals with complete sensorimotor paralysis as part of an ongoing clinical trial ( www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02936453). Within a single day, activity-specific stimulation programs enabled these three individuals to stand, walk, cycle, swim and control trunk movements. Neurorehabilitation mediated sufficient improvement to restore these activities in community settings, opening a realistic path to support everyday mobility with EES in people with SCI.
Collapse
|
35
|
Rejc E, Angeli CA, Ichiyama RM. Editorial: Advances in Spinal Cord Epidural Stimulation for Motor and Autonomic Functions Recovery After Severe Spinal Cord Injury. Front Syst Neurosci 2022; 15:820913. [PMID: 35069134 PMCID: PMC8770738 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.820913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Rejc
- Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
- *Correspondence: Enrico Rejc
| | - Claudia A. Angeli
- Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
- Frazier Rehabilitation Institute, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, KY, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Ronaldo M. Ichiyama
- Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
When animals walk overground, mechanical stimuli activate various receptors located in muscles, joints, and skin. Afferents from these mechanoreceptors project to neuronal networks controlling locomotion in the spinal cord and brain. The dynamic interactions between the control systems at different levels of the neuraxis ensure that locomotion adjusts to its environment and meets task demands. In this article, we describe and discuss the essential contribution of somatosensory feedback to locomotion. We start with a discussion of how biomechanical properties of the body affect somatosensory feedback. We follow with the different types of mechanoreceptors and somatosensory afferents and their activity during locomotion. We then describe central projections to locomotor networks and the modulation of somatosensory feedback during locomotion and its mechanisms. We then discuss experimental approaches and animal models used to investigate the control of locomotion by somatosensory feedback before providing an overview of the different functional roles of somatosensory feedback for locomotion. Lastly, we briefly describe the role of somatosensory feedback in the recovery of locomotion after neurological injury. We highlight the fact that somatosensory feedback is an essential component of a highly integrated system for locomotor control. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 11:1-71, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alain Frigon
- Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Turgay Akay
- Department of Medical Neuroscience, Atlantic Mobility Action Project, Brain Repair Center, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Boris I Prilutsky
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tinkhauser G, Moraud EM. Controlling Clinical States Governed by Different Temporal Dynamics With Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation: A Principled Framework. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:734186. [PMID: 34858126 PMCID: PMC8632004 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.734186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Closed-loop strategies for deep brain stimulation (DBS) are paving the way for improving the efficacy of existing neuromodulation therapies across neurological disorders. Unlike continuous DBS, closed-loop DBS approaches (cl-DBS) optimize the delivery of stimulation in the temporal domain. However, clinical and neurophysiological manifestations exhibit highly diverse temporal properties and evolve over multiple time-constants. Moreover, throughout the day, patients are engaged in different activities such as walking, talking, or sleeping that may require specific therapeutic adjustments. This broad range of temporal properties, along with inter-dependencies affecting parallel manifestations, need to be integrated in the development of therapies to achieve a sustained, optimized control of multiple symptoms over time. This requires an extended view on future cl-DBS design. Here we propose a conceptual framework to guide the development of multi-objective therapies embedding parallel control loops. Its modular organization allows to optimize the personalization of cl-DBS therapies to heterogeneous patient profiles. We provide an overview of clinical states and symptoms, as well as putative electrophysiological biomarkers that may be integrated within this structure. This integrative framework may guide future developments and become an integral part of next-generation precision medicine instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eduardo Martin Moraud
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (.NeuroRestore), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Alashram AR, Padua E, Raju M, Romagnoli C, Annino G. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation effects on spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med 2021:1-8. [PMID: 34855565 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.2000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Spasticity is one of the most prevalent impairments following spinal cord injury (SCI). It can lead to a decrease in the patient's functional level. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has demonstrated motor function improvements following SCI. No systematic reviews were published examining the influences of tSCS on spasticity post-SCI. OBJECTIVES This review aimed to investigate the effects of tSCS on spasticity in patients with SCI. METHODS PubMed, SCOPUS, PEDro, CINAHL, MEDLINE, REHABDATA, AMED, and Web of Science databases were searched until June 2021. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. RESULTS Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies were pilot studies, and one was a case series. The scores on the PEDro scale ranged from two to four, with a median score of four. The results showed heterogenous evidence for the effects of tSCS on spasticity reduction post-SCI. CONCLUSIONS TSCS appears safe and well-tolerated intervention in patients with SCI. The evidence for the effectiveness of tSCS on spasticity in chronic SCI patients is limited. Further randomized controlled studies are strongly needed to study the effects of tSCS on patients with SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elvira Padua
- Department of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of Life, San Raffaele Roma Open University, Rome, Italy
| | - Manikandan Raju
- Clinical/Experimental Neuroscience and Psychology, Department of Neuroscience Umane, University of Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristian Romagnoli
- PhD School in Science and Culture of Well-being and Lifestyle, Alma Mater University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Annino
- Department of Medicine Systems, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hachmann JT, Yousak A, Wallner JJ, Gad PN, Edgerton VR, Gorgey AS. Epidural spinal cord stimulation as an intervention for motor recovery after motor complete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 2021; 126:1843-1859. [PMID: 34669485 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00020.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) commonly results in permanent loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic function. Recent clinical studies have shown that epidural spinal cord stimulation may provide a beneficial adjunct for restoring lower extremity and other neurological functions. Herein, we review the recent clinical advances of lumbosacral epidural stimulation for restoration of sensorimotor function in individuals with motor complete SCI and we discuss the putative neural pathways involved in this promising neurorehabilitative approach. We focus on three main sections: review recent clinical results for locomotor restoration in complete SCI; discuss the contemporary understanding of electrical neuromodulation and signal transduction pathways involved in spinal locomotor networks; and review current challenges of motor system modulation and future directions toward integrative neurorestoration. The current understanding is that initial depolarization occurs at the level of large diameter dorsal root proprioceptive afferents that when integrated with interneuronal and latent residual supraspinal translesional connections can recruit locomotor centers and augment downstream motor units. Spinal epidural stimulation can initiate excitability changes in spinal networks and supraspinal networks. Different stimulation parameters can facilitate standing or stepping, and it may also have potential for augmenting myriad other sensorimotor and autonomic functions. More comprehensive investigation of the mechanisms that mediate the transformation of dysfunctional spinal networks to higher functional states with a greater focus on integrated systems-based control system may reveal the key mechanisms underlying neurological augmentation and motor restoration after severe paralysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan T Hachmann
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Andrew Yousak
- Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Josephine J Wallner
- Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Parag N Gad
- Department of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - V Reggie Edgerton
- Department of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
- Fundación Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ashraf S Gorgey
- Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC, Richmond, Virginia
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhou K, Wei W, Liu Y. Restoring Sensorimotor Function Through Neuromodulation After Spinal Cord Injury: Progress and Remaining Challenges. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:749465. [PMID: 34720867 PMCID: PMC8551759 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.749465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major disability that results in motor and sensory impairment and extensive complications for the affected individuals which not only affect the quality of life of the patients but also result in a heavy burden for their families and the health care system. Although there are few clinically effective treatments for SCI, research over the past few decades has resulted in several novel treatment strategies which are related to neuromodulation. Neuromodulation-the use of neuromodulators, electrical stimulation or optogenetics to modulate neuronal activity-can substantially promote the recovery of sensorimotor function after SCI. Recent studies have shown that neuromodulation, in combination with other technologies, can allow paralyzed patients to carry out intentional, controlled movement, and promote sensory recovery. Although such treatments hold promise for completely overcoming SCI, the mechanisms by which neuromodulation has this effect have been difficult to determine. Here we review recent progress relative to electrical neuromodulation and optogenetics neuromodulation. We also examine potential mechanisms by which these methods may restore sensorimotor function. We then highlight the strengths of these approaches and remaining challenges with respect to its application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Zhang
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases and Institute of Neuroscience, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yaping Liu
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases and Institute of Neuroscience, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Kai Zhou
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases and Institute of Neuroscience, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases and Institute of Neuroscience, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yaobo Liu
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Diseases and Institute of Neuroscience, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cho Y, Park S, Lee J, Yu KJ. Emerging Materials and Technologies with Applications in Flexible Neural Implants: A Comprehensive Review of Current Issues with Neural Devices. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2021; 33:e2005786. [PMID: 34050691 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202005786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Neuroscience is an essential field of investigation that reveals the identity of human beings, with a comprehensive understanding of advanced mental activities, through the study of neurobiological structures and functions. Fully understanding the neurotransmission system that allows for connectivity among neuronal circuits has paved the way for the development of treatments for neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and depression. The field of flexible implants has attracted increasing interest mainly to overcome the mechanical mismatch between rigid electrode materials and soft neural tissues, enabling precise measurements of neural signals from conformal contact. Here, the current issues of flexible neural implants (chronic device failure, non-bioresorbable electronics, low-density electrode arrays, among others are summarized) by presenting material candidates and designs to address each challenge. Furthermore, the latest investigations associated with the aforementioned issues are also introduced, including suggestions for ideal neural implants. In terms of the future direction of these advances, designing flexible devices would provide new opportunities for the study of brain-machine interfaces or brain-computer interfaces as part of locomotion through brain signals, and for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Younguk Cho
- School of Electrical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Sanghoon Park
- School of Electrical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Juyoung Lee
- School of Electrical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Ki Jun Yu
- School of Electrical Engineering, YU-KIST Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Audet J, Lecomte CG. Epidural electrical stimulation to facilitate locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 2021; 126:1751-1755. [PMID: 34705588 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00261.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Tonic or phasic electrical epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral region of the spinal cord facilitates locomotion and standing in a variety of preclinical models with severe spinal cord injury. However, the mechanisms of epidural electrical stimulation that facilitate sensorimotor functions remain largely unknown. This review aims to address how epidural electrical stimulation interacts with spinal sensorimotor circuits and discusses the limitations that currently restrict the clinical implementation of this promising therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannie Audet
- Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Charly G Lecomte
- Department of Pharmacology-Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Seáñez I, Capogrosso M. Motor improvements enabled by spinal cord stimulation combined with physical training after spinal cord injury: review of experimental evidence in animals and humans. Bioelectron Med 2021; 7:16. [PMID: 34706778 PMCID: PMC8555080 DOI: 10.1186/s42234-021-00077-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Electrical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been gaining momentum as a potential therapy for motor paralysis in consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI). Specifically, recent studies combining SCS with activity-based training have reported unprecedented improvements in motor function in people with chronic SCI that persist even without stimulation. In this work, we first provide an overview of the critical scientific advancements that have led to the current uses of SCS in neurorehabilitation: e.g. the understanding that SCS activates dormant spinal circuits below the lesion by recruiting large-to-medium diameter sensory afferents within the posterior roots. We discuss how this led to the standardization of implant position which resulted in consistent observations by independent clinical studies that SCS in combination with physical training promotes improvements in motor performance and neurorecovery. While all reported participants were able to move previously paralyzed limbs from day 1, recovery of more complex motor functions was gradual, and the timeframe for first observations was proportional to the task complexity. Interestingly, individuals with SCI classified as AIS B and C regained motor function in paralyzed joints even without stimulation, but not individuals with motor and sensory complete SCI (AIS A). Experiments in animal models of SCI investigating the potential mechanisms underpinning this neurorecovery suggest a synaptic reorganization of cortico-reticulo-spinal circuits that correlate with improvements in voluntary motor control. Future experiments in humans and animal models of paralysis will be critical to understand the potential and limits for functional improvements in people with different types, levels, timeframes, and severities of SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismael Seáñez
- Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA. .,Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
| | - Marco Capogrosso
- Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Shinozaki M, Nagoshi N, Nakamura M, Okano H. Mechanisms of Stem Cell Therapy in Spinal Cord Injuries. Cells 2021; 10:cells10102676. [PMID: 34685655 PMCID: PMC8534136 DOI: 10.3390/cells10102676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Every year, 0.93 million people worldwide suffer from spinal cord injury (SCI) with irretrievable sequelae. Rehabilitation, currently the only available treatment, does not restore damaged tissues; therefore, the functional recovery of patients remains limited. The pathophysiology of spinal cord injuries is heterogeneous, implying that potential therapeutic targets differ depending on the time of injury onset, the degree of injury, or the spinal level of injury. In recent years, despite a significant number of clinical trials based on various types of stem cells, these aspects of injury have not been effectively considered, resulting in difficult outcomes of trials. In a specialty such as cancerology, precision medicine based on a patient’s characteristics has brought indisputable therapeutic advances. The objective of the present review is to promote the development of precision medicine in the field of SCI. Here, we first describe the multifaceted pathophysiology of SCI, with the temporal changes after injury, the characteristics of the chronic phase, and the subtypes of complete injury. We then detail the appropriate targets and related mechanisms of the different types of stem cell therapy for each pathological condition. Finally, we highlight the great potential of stem cell therapy in cervical SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munehisa Shinozaki
- Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan;
| | - Narihito Nagoshi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; (N.N.); (M.N.)
| | - Masaya Nakamura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; (N.N.); (M.N.)
| | - Hideyuki Okano
- Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hu D, Wang S, Li B, Liu H, He J. Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Changes in Encoding and Decoding of Bipedal Walking by Motor Cortical Ensembles. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11091193. [PMID: 34573213 PMCID: PMC8469283 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11091193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that motor recovery following spinal cord injury (SCI) is task-specific. However, most consequential conclusions about locomotor functional recovery from SCI have been derived from quadrupedal locomotion paradigms. In this study, two monkeys were trained to perform a bipedal walking task, mimicking human walking, before and after T8 spinal cord hemisection. Importantly, there is no pharmacological therapy with nerve growth factor for monkeys after SCI; thus, in this study, the changes that occurred in the brain were spontaneous. The impairment of locomotion on the ipsilateral side was more severe than that on the contralateral side. We used information theory to analyze single-cell activity from the left primary motor cortex (M1), and results show that neuronal populations in the unilateral primary motor cortex gradually conveyed more information about the bilateral hindlimb muscle activities during the training of bipedal walking after SCI. We further demonstrated that, after SCI, progressively expanded information from the neuronal population reconstructed more accurate control of muscle activity. These results suggest that, after SCI, the unilateral primary motor cortex could gradually regain control of bilateral coordination and motor recovery and in turn enhance the performance of brain–machine interfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dingyin Hu
- School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (B.L.); (H.L.); (J.H.)
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing 100081, China;
- Correspondence:
| | - Shirong Wang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing 100081, China;
| | - Bo Li
- School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (B.L.); (H.L.); (J.H.)
| | - Honghao Liu
- School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (B.L.); (H.L.); (J.H.)
| | - Jiping He
- School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (B.L.); (H.L.); (J.H.)
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing 100081, China;
- Center for Neural Interface Design, School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 86287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ibáñez J, Angeli CA, Harkema SJ, Farina D, Rejc E. Recruitment order of motor neurons promoted by epidural stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2021; 131:1100-1110. [PMID: 34382840 PMCID: PMC8461808 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00293.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) combined with activity-based training can promote motor function recovery in individuals with motor complete spinal cord injury (SCI). The characteristics of motor neuron recruitment, which influence different aspects of motor control, are still unknown when motor function is promoted by scES. Here, we enrolled five individuals with chronic motor complete SCI implanted with a scES unit to study the recruitment order of motor neurons during standing enabled by scES. We recorded high-density electromyography (HD-EMG) signals on the vastus lateralis muscle, and inferred the order of recruitment of motor neurons from the relation between amplitude and conduction velocity of the scES-evoked EMG responses along the muscle fibers. Conduction velocity of scES-evoked responses was modulated over time, while stimulation parameters and standing condition remained constant, with average values ranging between 3.0±0.1 and 4.4±0.3 m/s. We found that the human spinal circuitry receiving epidural stimulation can promote both orderly (according to motor neuron size) and inverse trends of motor neuron recruitment, and that the engagement of spinal networks promoting rhythmic activity may favor orderly recruitment trends. Conversely, the different recruitment trends did not appear to be related with time since injury or scES implant, nor to the ability to achieve independent knees extension, nor to the conduction velocity values. The proposed approach can be implemented to investigate the effects of stimulation parameters and training-induced neural plasticity on the characteristics of motor neuron recruitment order, contributing to improve mechanistic understanding and effectiveness of epidural stimulation-promoted motor recovery after SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Ibáñez
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Clinical and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Claudia A Angeli
- Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.,Frazier Rehabilitation Institute, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
| | - Susan J Harkema
- Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.,Frazier Rehabilitation Institute, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
| | - Dario Farina
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Enrico Rejc
- Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Neckel ND, Dai H, Hanckel J, Lee Y, Albanese C, Rodriguez O. Skilled reach training enhances robotic gait training to restore overground locomotion following spinal cord injury in rats. Behav Brain Res 2021; 414:113490. [PMID: 34358574 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Rehabilitative training has been shown to improve motor function following spinal cord injury (SCI). Unfortunately, these gains are primarily task specific; where reach training only improves reaching, step training only improves stepping and stand training only improves standing. More troublesome is the tendency that the improvement in a trained task often comes at the expense of an untrained task. However, the task specificity of training does not preclude the benefits of combined rehabilitative training. Here we show that robot assisted gait training alone can partially reduce the deficits in unassisted overground locomotion following a C4/5 overhemisection injury in rats. When robot-assisted gait training is done in conjunction with skilled forelimb training, we observe a much greater level of recovery of unassisted overground locomotion. In order to provide reach training that would not interfere with our robotic gait training schedule, we prompted rats to increase the use of their forelimbs by replacing the standard overhead feeder with a custom made, deep welled hopper that dispensed nutritionally equivalent small milled pellets. We speculate that the increase in recovery from combined training is due to a more robust interneuronal relay network around the injury site. in vivo manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord indicated that there was no increase in the cellular activity, however ex vivo diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) suggested an increase in collateralization around the injury site in rats that received both reach training and robot assisted gait training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan D Neckel
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, United States; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University, United States.
| | - Haining Dai
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, United States
| | - John Hanckel
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, United States
| | - Yichien Lee
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, United States; Center for Translational Imaging, Georgetown University, United States
| | - Christopher Albanese
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, United States; Center for Translational Imaging, Georgetown University, United States
| | - Olga Rodriguez
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, United States; Center for Translational Imaging, Georgetown University, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hogan MK, Barber SM, Rao Z, Kondiles BR, Huang M, Steele WJ, Yu C, Horner PJ. A wireless spinal stimulation system for ventral activation of the rat cervical spinal cord. Sci Rep 2021; 11:14900. [PMID: 34290260 PMCID: PMC8295294 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94047-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord is gaining traction as a therapy following spinal cord injury; however, it is difficult to target the cervical motor region in a rodent using a non-penetrating stimulus compared with direct placement of intraspinal wire electrodes. Penetrating wire electrodes have been explored in rodent and pig models and, while they have proven beneficial in the injured spinal cord, the negative aspects of spinal parenchymal penetration (e.g., gliosis, neural tissue damage, and obdurate inflammation) are of concern when considering therapeutic potential. We therefore designed a novel approach for epidural stimulation of the rat spinal cord using a wireless stimulation system and ventral electrode array. Our approach allowed for preservation of mobility following surgery and was suitable for long term stimulation strategies in awake, freely functioning animals. Further, electrophysiology mapping of the ventral spinal cord revealed the ventral approach was suitable to target muscle groups of the rat forelimb and, at a single electrode lead position, different stimulation protocols could be applied to achieve unique activation patterns of the muscles of the forelimb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K Hogan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, USA.
| | - Sean M Barber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, USA
| | | | - Bethany R Kondiles
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, USA.,International Collaboration on Repair Discovories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Meng Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, USA
| | - William J Steele
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, USA
| | | | - Philip J Horner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sharma P, Shah PK. In vivo electrophysiological mechanisms underlying cervical epidural stimulation in adult rats. J Physiol 2021; 599:3121-3150. [PMID: 33894695 DOI: 10.1113/jp281146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
KEY POINTS To electrophysiologically determine the predominant neural structures activated with cervical epidural stimulation (ES), well-established electrophysiological protocols (single-pulse, paired-pulse and multiple frequency stimulation) were delivered at rest, during motor activity and under anaesthesia in adult rats. Cervical ES resulted in spinal evoked motor responses with three different waveforms - early response (ER), middle response (MR) and late response (LR). ERs remained unmodulated by repeated stimulation protocols. In contrast, MRs and LRs were modulated by repeated stimulation protocols and volitional motor activity. ERs are consequential to the direct activation of motor efferents; MRs are secondary to type-I sensory afferent activation and LRs result from the engagement of wider spinal interneuronal circuitry with potential influence from supraspinal pathways. Evidence from this work is fundamental in enhancing our understanding of cervical ES, and critical in refining the design of neuromodulation-based rehabilitative strategies and in the construction of neuroprosthetics. ABSTRACT Epidural stimulation (ES) of the lumbar spinal cord has demonstrated significant improvements in various physiological functions after a traumatic spinal cord injury in humans. Electrophysiological evidence from rodent, human and computational studies collectively suggest that the functional recovery following lumbar ES is mediated via direct activation of sensory afferent fibres. However, the mechanisms underlying cervical ES have not been comprehensively studied, which greatly limits our understanding of its effectiveness in restoring upper limb function. In this work, we determined the predominant neural structures that are activated with cervical ES using in vivo cervical spinal evoked motor responses (SEMRs). Standard electrophysiological protocols (single-pulse, paired-pulse and multiple frequency stimulation) were implemented in 11 awake and anaesthetized rats in four experimental stages. Three distinct types of cervical SEMRs were identified based on latency of their appearance: early response (ER), middle response (MR) and late response (LR). ERs remained unmodulated by repeated stimulation protocols. MRs and LRs were modulated by repeated stimulation protocols and volitional motor activity. Except for LRs being completely abolished under urethane, ketamine or urethane anaesthesia did not affect the appearance of cervical SEMRs. Our data, backed by literature, suggest that ERs are secondary to the direct activation of motor efferents, MRs are elicited by activation of type-I sensory afferents and LRs result from the engagement of interneuronal circuitry with potential influence from supraspinal pathways. The gathered information paves the way to designing motor rehabilitation strategies that can utilize cervical ES to recover upper limb function following neurological deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawan Sharma
- Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Technology and Management, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11727, USA
| | - Prithvi K Shah
- Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Technology and Management, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11727, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chen Q, Zhao Z, Yin G, Yang C, Wang D, Feng Z, Ta N. Identification and analysis of spinal cord injury subtypes using weighted gene co-expression network analysis. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:466. [PMID: 33850863 PMCID: PMC8039699 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Spinal cord injury (SCI) has an immediate and devastating impact on the control over various movements and sensations. However, no effective therapies for SCI currently exist. Methods To identify and analyze SCI subtypes, we obtained the expression profile data of the 1,057 genes (889 intersection genes) in GSE45550 using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and 14 co-expression gene modules were identified. Next, we filtered out the network degree top 10 (degree >80) genes, considered the final key SCI genes. A multifactor regulatory network (105 interaction pairs), consisting of messenger RNAs (mRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and transcription factors (TFs) was constructed. This network was involved in the co-expression of key genes. We selected the top 10 regulatory factors (degree >4) as core regulators in the multifactor regulatory network. Results The results of functional enrichment analysis of the target gene expressing the core regulatory factor [1,059] showed that these target genes were enriched in pathways for human cytomegalovirus infection, chronic myeloid leukemia, and pancreatic cancer. Further, we used the key genes in the co-expression network to categorize the SCI samples in GSE45550. The expression levels of the top 6 genes (CCNB2, CCNB1, CKS2, COL5A1, KIF20A, and RACGAP1) may act as potential marker genes for different SCI subtypes. On the basis of these different subtypes, 8 SCI core gene CDK1-associated drugs were also found to provide potential therapeutic options for SCI. Conclusions These results may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ziru Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Guoyong Yin
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Chuanjun Yang
- Department of Orthopedics, Anting Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Danfeng Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Anting Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi Feng
- Department of Orthopedics, Anting Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Na Ta
- Department of Nursing Management, Anting Hospital, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|