Stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of primary non-small cell lung cancer; systematic review and comparison with a surgical cohort

Deep match: A zero-shot framework for improved fiducial-free respiratory motion tracking

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Motion management is essential to reduce normal tissue exposure and maintain adequate tumor dose in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Lung SBRT using an articulated robotic arm allows dynamic tracking during radiation dose delivery. Two stereoscopic X-ray tracking modes are available - fiducial-based and fiducial-free tracking. Although X-ray detection of implanted fiducials is robust, the implantation procedure is invasive and inapplicable to some patients and tumor locations. Fiducial-free tracking relies on tumor contrast, which challenges the existing tracking algorithms for small (e.g., <15 mm) and/or tumors obscured by overlapping anatomies. To markedly improve the performance of fiducial-free tracking, we proposed a deep learning-based template matching algorithm - Deep Match.

METHOD

Deep Match consists of four self-definable stages - training-free feature extractor, similarity measurements for location proposal, local refinements, and uncertainty level prediction for constructing a more trustworthy and versatile pipeline. Deep Match was validated on a 10 (38 fractions; 2661 images) patient cohort whose lung tumor was trackable on one X-ray view, while the second view did not offer sufficient conspicuity for tumor tracking using existing methods. The patient cohort was stratified into subgroups based on tumor sizes (<10 mm, 10-15 mm, and >15 mm) and tumor locations (with/without thoracic anatomy overlapping).

RESULTS

On X-ray views that conventional methods failed to track the lung tumor, Deep Match achieved robust performance as evidenced by >80 % 3 mm-Hit (detection within 3 mm superior/inferior margin from ground truth) for 70 % of patients and <3 mm superior/inferior distance (SID) ∼1 mm standard deviation for all the patients.

CONCLUSION

Deep Match is a zero-shot learning network that explores the intrinsic neural network benefits without training on patient data. With Deep Match, fiducial-free tracking can be extended to more patients with small tumors and with tumors obscured by overlapping anatomy.

Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy based on hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) is the first-line recommended regimen for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is also regarded as an effective treatment for limited-stage (LS) SCLC, and the efficacy and safety of HART versus SBRT stay controversial.

METHODS

In this study, 188 LS-SCLC patients were retrospectively divided into two groups receiving chemotherapy combined with either HART or SBRT. In HART group, patients received 4500 cGy in 30 fractions, administered twice daily for 3 weeks. Whereas in the SBRT group, a total radiation dose of 4000-4500 cGy was delivered in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. Thirty-three pairs of patients were finally included for next analysis.

RESULTS

The estimated objective response rates were 63.6 % (21/33) and 78.8 % (26/33) in HART group and SBRT group, respectively (P = 0.269). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between HART and SBRT groups in overall survival (26 months vs. 29 months, P = 0.362) and progression free survival (11 months vs. 15 months, P = 0.223). As for the adverse events, toxicity of both groups is similar and slight that no grade 4 event was observed. Grade 3 pneumonitis cases were all occurred in the HART group (9.1%, 3/33, P = 0.238), and grade 3 esophagitis cases were all occurred in the SBRT group (6.1%, 2/33, P = 0.492).

CONCLUSION

Compared with HART, SBRT could be another effective treatment with satisfactory safety for the concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with LS-SCLC.

And Yet It Moves: Clinical Outcomes and Motion Management in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) of Centrally Located Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Shedding Light on the Internal Organ at Risk Volume (IRV) Concept

The internal organ at risk volume (IRV) concept might improve toxicity profiles in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied (1) clinical aspects in central vs. peripheral tumors, (2) the IRV concept in central tumors, (3) organ motion, and (4) associated normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). We analyzed patients who received SBRT for NSCLC (clinical aspects, n = 78; motion management, n = 35). We found lower biologically effective doses, larger planning target volume sizes, higher lung doses, and worse locoregional control for central vs. peripheral tumors. Organ motion was greater in males and tall patients (bronchial tree), whereas volume changes were lower in patients with a high body mass index (BMI) (esophagus). Applying the IRV concept (retrospectively, without new optimization), we found an absolute increase of >10% in NTCPs for the bronchial tree in three patients. This study emphasizes the need to optimize methods to balance dose escalation with toxicities in central tumors. There is evidence that organ motion/volume changes could be more pronounced in males and tall patients, and less pronounced in patients with higher BMI. Since recent studies have made efforts to further subclassify central tumors to refine treatment, the IRV concept should be considered for optimal risk assessment.

An optimal dose-fractionation for stereotactic body radiotherapy in peripherally, centrally and ultracentrally located early-stage non-small lung cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), is commonly used in inoperable patients with early-stage non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). This treatment has good outcomes and low toxicity in peripherally located tumors. However, in lesions which are located close to structures such as the bronchial tree or mediastinum the risk of severe toxicity increases. This review summarizes the evidence of dose-fractionation in SBRT of NSCLC patients in various locations.

Comparison of outcome after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of patients with metachronous lung versus primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Early-stage lung cancer, primarily treated with surgery, often occur in poor surgical candidates (impaired respiratory function, prior thoracic surgery, severe comorbidities). Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive alternative that provides comparable local control. This technique is particularly relevant for surgically resectable metachronous lung cancer, in patients unable to undergo surgery.. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients treated with SABR for stage I metachronous lung cancer (MLC) versus stage I primary lung cancer (PLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

137 patients treated with SABR for stage I non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed, of which 28 (20.4%) were MLC and 109 (79.6%) were PLC. Cohorts were evaluated for differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), metastasis-free survival, local control (LC), and toxicity.

RESULTS

After SABR, patients treated for MLC have comparable median age (76.6 vs 78.6, p = 0.2), 3-year LC (83.6% vs. 72.6%, p = 0.2), PFS (68.7% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.9), and OS (78.6% vs. 52.1%, p = 0.9) as PLC, along with similar rates of total (54.1% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.6) and grade 3 + toxicity (3.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.9). Previous treatment of MLC patients was either surgery (21/28, 75%) or SABR (7/28, 25%). The median follow-up was 53 months.

CONCLUSION

SABR is a safe and effective approach for localized metachronous lung cancer.

Local disease control after stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasms represent a diverse group of malignancies. Anatomic origin, histology and aggressiveness vary extensively, from low-grade tumours with an indolent prognosis to highly aggressive conditions with poor outcome. Surgery, with a curative intent, is the standard of treatment when possible. Other treatment regimens include local treatment, or systemic therapy. The role of radiotherapy in treating neuroendocrine neoplasms is not yet established, but studies indicate that a high rate of local control can be achieved by high-dose radiotherapy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is high dose of radiation delivered to a small volume. We aimed to investigate the one-year local control rate of SBRT in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms treated with SBRT between 2003 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics and SBRT-details were collected by review of patient records and the radiotherapy planning charts. All types except for small cell lung cancer and brain metastases were allowed. The prescribed dose was 45-67.8 Gy in three fractions. Progression, both within the target-site and in other sites, was determined based on existing imaging reports. One-year local control rate and systemic control rate was calculated. Descriptive analyses of local response duration, progression-free survival and overall survival were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included. The one-year local control rate was 94%. Four of the patients had local progression. All patients receiving SBRT towards their primary tumour (n = 11) had a bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasm, and a one-year local control rate of 100%. In patients treated at a metastatic target, 80% developed systemic progression but the local control remained high.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that SBRT may offer a feasible and effective treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms in selected cases. SBRT provides long-term local stability and may be useful in treating patients with localised disease not fit for surgery.

Role of Consolidative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligoresistant/Oligoprogressive Pulmonary Parenchymal Metastases

Aim

To extend the survival of patients by providing local control of metastases in oligoresistance/oligoprogressive disease.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) applied to 30 lesions in the lungs of 19 patients who were considered inoperable by the tumor board upon the development of oligoresistance/oligoprogressive lung metastasis while undergoing chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2017. Each patient had one to five metastases in their lungs. The median SBRT biologic effective dose at α/β of 10 (BED₁₀) was 180.0 (IQR: 115.5–180.0) Gy.

Results

We obtained effective, low-toxicity results. The rates of local control were 89.4%, 84.2%, and 78.9% for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years, respectively. The median local control time was 4 (IQR: 3–6) months. The median overall survival (OS) was 36.3 (IQR: 29.7–42.9) months. The rates of OS for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years were 89.5%, 73.7%, and 61.4%, respectively. Despite the nonoccurrence of grade 4–5 toxicity in the lungs, six (31.6%) patients had grade 1–3 pulmonary pneumonia, one patient had a grade 4 skin ulceration, and two patients had increased chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the follow-up period.

Discussion

In patients with oligometastatic lung tumors, SBRT is very effective in terms of progression-free survival and OS.

UK 2022 Consensus on Normal Tissue Dose-Volume Constraints for Oligometastatic, Primary Lung and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the UK has expanded over the past decade, in part as the result of several UK clinical trials and a recent NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation programme. A UK SABR Consortium consensus for normal tissue constraints for SABR was published in 2017, based on the existing literature at the time. The published literature regarding SABR has increased in volume over the past 5 years and multiple UK centres are currently working to develop new SABR services. A review and update of the previous consensus is therefore appropriate and timely. It is hoped that this document will provide a useful resource to facilitate safe and consistent SABR practice.

Dosimetric impact of phase shifts on Radixact Synchrony tracking system with patient-specific breathing patterns

Purpose

The Synchrony tracking system of Radixact is capable of real‐time tumor tracking by building a correlation model between external light‐emitting diodes on the patient's chest and an internal marker. A phase shift between the chest wall and a lung tumor has been reported. Hence, this study focused on evaluating the accuracy of the tracking system, especially under a patient‐specific breathing pattern with respiratory phase shifts.

Methods

A phantom containing fiducial markers was placed on a moving platform. The intrinsic delivery accuracy was verified with a patient‐specific breathing pattern. Three patient‐specific breathing patterns were then implemented, for which phase shifts, φ, were introduced. Phase shifts with +0.3 s and +1 s were tested for dosimetric aspects, whereas ±0.3, ±0.6, and ±0.8 s shifts were used for tracking accuracy. The resultant dose distributions were analyzed by γ comparison. Dose profiles in the superior‐inferior and lateral directions were compared. Logfiles of the tracking information were extracted from the system and compared with the input breathing pattern. The root mean square (RMS) difference was used to quantify the consistency.

Results

When the φ value was as large as 1 s, a severe inconsistency was observed. The target was significantly underdosed, down to 89% of the originally planned dose. γ analysis revealed that the failed portion was concentrated in the target region. The RMS of the tracking difference was close to 1 mm when φ was ±0.3 s and approximately 4 mm when φ was ±0.8 s. Tracking errors increased with an increase in the degree of phase shifts.

Conclusion

Phase shifts between the patient chest wall and the internal target may hamper treatment delivery and jeopardize treatment using Synchrony Tracking. Hence, a larger planning target volume (PTV) may be necessary if a large phase shift is observed in a patient, especially when an external surrogate shows a lag in motion when compared with the tumor.

Single-fraction stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy for primary and metastasic lung tumor: A new paradigm?

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective technique comparable to surgery in terms of local control and efficacy in early stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pulmonary metastasis. Several fractionation schemes have proven to be safe and effective, including the single fraction (SF) scheme. SF is an option cost-effectiveness, more convenience and comfortable for the patient and flexible in terms of its management combined with systemic treatments. The outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has driven this not new but underutilized paradigm, recommending this option to minimize patients’ visits to hospital. SF SABR already has a long experience, strong evidence and sufficient maturity to reliably evaluate outcomes in peripheral primary NSCLC and there are promising outcomes in pulmonary metastases, making it a valid treatment option; although its use in central locations, synchronous and recurrencies tumors requires more prospective safety and efficacy studies. The SABR radiobiology study, together with the combination with systemic therapies, (targeted therapies and immunotherapy) is a direction of research in both advanced disease and early stages whose future includes SF.

CT Appearance Pattern After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Predicts Outcomes in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Backgrounds

Computed tomography (CT) appearance pattern after lung tumor stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) might predicts survival. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between CT appearance pattern after SBRT and outcomes in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Clinical data of inoperable patients with early-stage NSCLC undergoing SBRT were retrospectively analyzed from 2012 to 2015 at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. The relationship between CT appearance pattern after SBRT and patient’s survival was analyzed.

Results

The data from 173 patients with early-stage lung cancer treated with SBRT were analyzed. One month after SBRT, diffuse consolidation was seen in 17 patients, patchy consolidation in 28 patients, diffuse ground-glass opacity (GGO) in 10 patients, and patchy GGO in 22 patients. The survival time was significantly longer in the “no evidence of increased density” group compared with the “consolidation or GGO” group [2-year overall survival (OS) rate, 96.1% vs 89.3%; hazard ratio (HR), 0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16–0.85; P = 0.015]. A similar trend was found in the progression-free survival (PFS) analysis (2-year PFS rate, 91.3% vs 85.0%; HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13–0.95; P = 0.015) and distant metastasis free survival(DMFS) (2-year DMFS rate, 93.3% vs 87.1%; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20–0.86; P = 0.031). However, no significant difference was found in recurrence-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.212).

Conclusions

One month after SBRT, the radiological change “no evidence of increased density” was prevalent. The OS, PFS, and DMFS were significantly longer in the “no evidence of increased density” group compared with the “consolidation or GGO” group. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.

A novel CRT-IMRT-combined (Co-CRIM) planning technique for peripheral lung stereotactic body radiotherapy in pinnacle treatment planning system

Objectives

This study attempts to explore a novel peripheral lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning technique that can balance the pros and cons of three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (CRT) and intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) / volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Methods

Treatment plans were retrospectively designed based on CRT, IMRT, VMAT, and the proposed CRT‐IMRT‐combined (Co‐CRIM) techniques using Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) for 20 peripheral lung cancer patients. Co‐CRIM used an inverse optimization algorithm available in Pinnacle TPS. To develop a Co‐CRIM plan, the number of segments in each field was limited to one, the minimum segment area was set to the internal target volume (ITV), and the minimum monitor units (MU) of the segment was the quotient of fractional dose divided by twice the number of total fields. The performance of Co‐CRIM was then compared with other techniques.

Results

For conformity index (CI), Co‐CRIM performed comparably to IMRT/VMAT but better than CRT. For gradient index (GI), Co‐CRIM was similar to IMRT/VMAT or CRT. For heterogeneity index (HI), Co‐CRIM was comparable to IMRT/VMAT, higher than CRT. The dosimetric results of spinal cord and lung with Co‐CRIM were better than CRT, comparable to IMRT, but inferior to VMAT. The MU resulted from Co‐CRIM was lower than IMRT/VMAT but higher than CRT. For plan verification γ passing rate, Co‐CRIM was higher than IMRT/VMAT, comparable to CRT. For planning time, Co‐CRIM was shorter than CRT or VMAT but similar to IMRT.

Conclusions

The proposed Co‐CRIM technique on Pinnacle TPS is an effective planning technique for peripheral lung SBRT.

Comparison of modeling accuracy between Radixact®and CyberKnife®Synchrony®respiratory tracking system

Synchrony Respiratory Tracking system adapted from CyberKnife has been introduced in Radixact to compensate the tumor motion caused by respiration. This study aims to compare the modeling accuracy of the Synchrony system between Radixact and CyberKnife. Two Synchrony plans based on fiducial phantoms were created for CyberKnife and Radixact, respectively. Different respiratory motion traces were used to drive a motion platform to move along the superoinferior and left-right direction. The cycle time and the amplitude of target/surrogate motion of one selected motion trace were scaled to investigate the dependence of modeling accuracy on the motion characteristic. The predicted target position, the correlation error, potential difference (Radixact only) and standard error (CyberKnife only) were extracted from raw data or log files of the two systems. The modeling accuracy was evaluated by calculating the root-mean-square (RMS) error between the predicted target positions and the input motion trace. A threshold T95 within which 95% of the potential difference or the standard error lay was defined and evaluated. Except for the motion trace with a small amplitude and a good (linear) correlation between target and surrogate motion, Radixact showed smaller RMS errors than CyberKnife. The RMS error of both systems increased with the motion amplitude and showed a decreasing trend with the increasing cycle time. No correlation was found between the RMS error and the amplitude of surrogate motion. T95 could be a good estimator of modeling accuracy for CyberKnife rather than Radixact. The correlation error defined in Radixact were largely affected by the number of fiducial markers and the setup error. In general, the modeling accuracy of the Radixact Synchrony system is better than that of the CyberKnife Synchrony system under unfavorable conditions.

Developments in radiation techniques for thoracic malignancies

Radiation therapy is a cornerstone of modern lung cancer treatment alongside surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Advances in radiotherapy techniques have enhanced the accuracy of radiation delivery, which has contributed to the evolution of radiation therapy into a guideline-recommended treatment in both early-stage and locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Furthermore, although radiotherapy has long been used for palliation of disease in advanced lung cancer, it is increasingly having a role as a locally ablative treatment in patients with oligometastatic disease.This review provides an overview of recent developments in radiation techniques, particularly for non-radiation oncologists who are involved in the care of lung cancer patients. Technical advances are discussed, and findings of recent clinical trials are highlighted, all of which have led to a changing perception of the role of radiation therapy in multidisciplinary care.

Radiation dose and fraction in immunotherapy: one-size regimen does not fit all settings, so how does one choose?

Recent evidence indicates that ionizing radiation can enhance immune responses to tumors. Advances in radiation delivery techniques allow hypofractionated delivery of conformal radiotherapy. Hypofractionation or other modifications of standard fractionation may improve radiation’s ability to promote immune responses to tumors. Other novel delivery options may also affect immune responses, including T-cell activation and tumor-antigen presentation changes. However, there is limited understanding of the immunological impact of hypofractionated and unique multifractionated radiotherapy regimens, as these observations are relatively recent. Hence, these differences in radiotherapy fractionation result in distinct immune-modulatory effects. Radiation oncologists and immunologists convened a virtual consensus discussion to identify current deficiencies, challenges, pitfalls and critical gaps when combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy and making recommendations to the field and advise National Cancer Institute on new directions and initiatives that will help further development of these two fields.

This commentary aims to raise the awareness of this complexity so that the need to study radiation dose, fractionation, type and volume is understood and valued by the immuno-oncology research community. Divergence of approaches and findings between preclinical studies and clinical trials highlights the need for evaluating the design of future clinical studies with particular emphasis on radiation dose and fractionation, immune biomarkers and selecting appropriate end points for combination radiation/immune modulator trials, recognizing that direct effect on the tumor and potential abscopal effect may well be different. Similarly, preclinical studies should be designed as much as possible to model the intended clinical setting. This article describes a conceptual framework for testing different radiation therapy regimens as separate models of how radiation itself functions as an immunomodulatory ‘drug’ to provide alternatives to the widely adopted ‘one-size-fits-all’ strategy of frequently used 8 Gy×3 regimens immunomodulation.

Dose Prescription Methods in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Small Peripheral Lung Tumors: Approaches Based on the Gross Tumor Volume Are Superior to Prescribing a Dose That Covers 95% of the Planning Target Volume

Background and Purpose:

We aimed to validate the usefulness of prescriptions based on gross tumor volume for stereotactic body radiotherapy for small peripheral lung tumors.

Materials and Methods:

Radiotherapy treatment planning data of 50 patients with small peripheral lung tumors (adenocarcinoma: 24, squamous cell carcinoma: 10, other: 1, unknown: 15) receiving breath-hold computed tomography-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy at our institution during 2013–2016 were analyzed. For each case, 3 dose prescription methods were applied: one based on 95% (PTVD_95%) of the planning target volume, one based on 50% of the gross tumor volume (GTVD_50%), and one based on 98% (GTVD_98%) of the gross tumor volume. The maximum (GTVDmax), minimum (GTVDmin), and mean gross tumor volume dose (GTVDmean) and the dose covering 98% of the gross tumor volume were calculated to evaluate variations in the gross tumor volume dose.

Results:

Upon switching to GTVD_50%, the variations in GTVDmax and GTVDmean decreased significantly, compared with variations observed for PTVD_95% (p < 0.01), but the variation in GTVDmin increased significantly (p < 0.01). Upon switching to the GTVD_98%, the variation in GTVDmean decreased significantly compared with that observed for PTVD_95% (p < 0.01).

Conclusion:

Switching from prescriptions based on 95% of the planning target volume to those based on 98% of the gross tumor volume decreased variations among cases in the overall gross tumor volume dose. Overall, prescriptions based on 98% of the gross tumor volume appear to be more suitable than those based on 95% of the planning target volume in cases of small peripheral lung tumors treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

SABRTooth: a randomised controlled feasibility study of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with surgery in patients with peripheral stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer considered to be at higher risk of complications from surgical resection

OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a well-established treatment for medically inoperable peripheral stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous nonrandomised evidence supports SABR as an alternative to surgery, but high-quality randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence is lacking. The SABRTooth study aimed to establish whether a UK phase III RCT was feasible.

DESIGN AND METHODS

SABRTooth was a UK multicentre randomised controlled feasibility study targeting patients with peripheral stage I NSCLC considered to be at higher risk of surgical complications. 54 patients were planned to be randomised 1:1 to SABR or surgery. The primary outcome was monthly average recruitment rates.

RESULTS

Between July 2015 and January 2017, 318 patients were considered for the study and 205 (64.5%) were deemed ineligible. Out of 106 (33.3%) assessed as eligible, 24 (22.6%) patients were randomised to SABR (n=14) or surgery (n=10). A key theme for nonparticipation was treatment preference, with 43 (41%) preferring nonsurgical treatment and 19 (18%) preferring surgery. The average monthly recruitment rate was 1.7 patients against a target of three. 15 patients underwent their allocated treatment: SABR n=12, surgery n=3.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that a phase III RCT randomising higher risk patients between SABR and surgery is not feasible in the National Health Service. Patients have pre-existing treatment preferences, which was a barrier to recruitment. A significant proportion of patients randomised to the surgical group declined and chose SABR. SABR remains an alternative to surgery and novel study approaches are needed to define which patients benefit from a nonsurgical approach.

Adrenal oligometastasis cured with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as an effective, noninvasive alternative to surgery in patients with oligometastatic disease. Historically, select patients with adrenal oligometastases have been treated with adrenalectomies which can offer durable local control and reasonable survival rates. SABR is a promising noninvasive treatment alternative to surgery capable of delivering ablative doses of radiation to the tumor with the goal of achieving durable local control of adrenal metastases. We report on a case of a patient who underwent initial surgical resection for a locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma and subsequently developed an early, biopsy-proven, oligometastatic recurrence in the adrenal gland. He underwent chemotherapy and SABR using CyberKnife to the adrenal metastasis and is in remission 7 years after treatment with no late toxicity. Fractionated SABR is an attractive noninvasive alternative to surgery for adrenal metastases. This case demonstrates that select patients with adrenal oligometastases, can achieve long-term remission and even cure following SABR.

A physically meaningful relationship between R50% and PTV surface area in lung SBRT

Purpose

We propose a novel understanding of two characteristics of the planning target volume (PTV) that affect the intermediate‐dose spill in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as measured by R50%. This phantom model research investigates two characteristics of the PTV that have a marked effect on the value of R50%: the mean dose deposited within the PTV (D_av) and the surface area of the PTV (SA_PTV).

Methods

Using a phantom model provided by a CT of the IROC Thorax‐Lung Phantom® (IROC Houston QA Center, Houston, TX) and Eclipse® Treatment Planning System (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), we investigate the two characteristics for spherical and cylindrical PTVs. A total of 135 plans with tightly controlled PTV characteristics are employed. A lower bound for R50% (R50%min_∆r) is derived and clearly establishes a relationship between R50% and SA_PTV that has not been fully appreciated previously.

Results

The study of PTV D_av revealed a local minimum for R50% as a function of the PTV D_av at D_av ≈ 110% of Rx dose. As PTV D_av increases above this local minimum, R50% increases; while for PTV D_av less than this local minimum, the R50% value also increases. The study of PTV surface area (SA_PTV) demonstrated that as the SA_PTV increases, the R50% increases if the PTV volume stays the same. The SA_PTV result is predicted by the theoretical investigation that yields the R50% lower bound, R50%min_∆r.

Conclusions

This research has identified two characteristics of the PTV that have a marked influence on R50%: PTV D_av and SA_PTV. These characteristics have not been clearly articulated in the vast body of previous research in SBRT. These results could help explain plans that cannot meet the RTOG criteria for R50%. With further development, these concepts could be extended to provide additional guidance for creating acceptable SBRT plans.

Tumor volume reduction evaluated by cone beam computed tomography during stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Background

We hypothesized that significant tumor volume reduction (TVR) occurs over the course of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and that TVR correlates with clinical outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with SBRT for early stage NSCLC across two academic centers. For each patient, we contoured the tumor volume (TV) on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images obtained before each treatment fraction. We then calculated TVR based on the TV from the first and last days of treatment. We used log-rank tests to quantify differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence based on TVR.

Results

Data from 69 patients and a total of 73 treated tumors were analyzed. The median follow-up for survivors was 51.8 months (range, 6.9 to 80.0 months). The median TVR for the cohort was 10.1% (range, −5.7% to 43.5%). There was no significant difference in either OS (median 33.4 vs. 29.1 months, P=0.79) or PFS (median 26.3 vs. 12.3 months, P=0.43) for those with high TVRs (≥10.1%) vs. low TVRs (<10.1%), respectively. There was a trend toward superior 2-year PFS in the high TVR group (52.2% vs. 36.7%, P=0.062), but this effect diminished on longer follow-up (4-year PFS 31.9% vs. 26.7%, P=0.15). No associations were observed between TVR and local, regional or distant recurrence.

Conclusions

We were not able to demonstrate that TVR is a reliable predictive imaging marker for stage I/II NSCLC treated with SBRT. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to clarify a potential relationship between TVR and early outcomes.

Bronchoscopic treatments for early-stage peripheral lung cancer: Are we ready for prime time?

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and surgical lobectomy remains the preferred therapy for patients with early-stage NSCLC. Medical comorbidities and advanced age preclude resection in many patients and minimally invasive ablative therapies are needed for treatment. Stereotactic ablative radiation is established as an effective modality in this patient group, although may be contraindicated in some patients with prior radiation exposure, comorbidities or centrally positioned tumours. Percutaneous ablative methods are available, although are frequently associated with significant complications. Numerous endoscopic ablative techniques are under evaluation. With a more favourable safety profile and the ability to provide diagnosis and staging information potentially within a single procedure, there is a strong rationale for development of bronchoscopic ablative modalities. In the following article, the authors aim to explore the role bronchoscopic ablation may play in treatment of peripheral lung tumours, and to describe a pathway to establishing these modalities as part of routine care. The current status of several bronchoscopic ablative options is discussed in detail.

Impact of Health-Related Quality of Life and Prediagnosis Risk of Major Depressive Disorder on Treatment Choice for Stage I Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that prediagnosis depressive symptoms and patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) would be associated with treatment choice for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Using the SEER and Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS)-linked data set, we identified patients age 65 years and older with stage I NSCLC diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 who completed the HOS 24 or fewer months before diagnosis. HRQOL was measured by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 and the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey instruments. Major depressive disorder (MDD) risk was derived from responses to HOS questions that screen for depressive symptoms. Associations with treatment choice were assessed with multivariable multinomial logistic regression while controlling for prespecified patient characteristics.

RESULTS

We analyzed 515 evaluable patients, of whom 140 (27%) met criteria for risk of MDD. On univariable analysis, a higher proportion of patients who received radiotherapy (RT) versus surgery were at risk for MDD (34% v 22%, respectively; P = .011). On multivariable analysis, higher PCS and MCS scores were associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving RT compared with surgery (adjusted odds ratio per 10-point PCS increase, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79; P < .001]; adjusted odds ratio per 10-point MCS increase, 0.61 [95% CI 0.46 to 0.80; P < .001]).

CONCLUSION

Among older patients with stage I NSCLC, there was a significant association between those who self-reported lower HRQOL and receipt of RT. There was also a nonsignificant association in MDD risk and increased likelihood of RT receipt. Additional studies are warranted to examine the impact of pretreatment HRQOL and MDD risk on clinical decision making.

Pulmonary function in stereotactic body radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy for primary and metastatic lung lesions

AIMS

This retrospective study reports outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as delivered by helical tomotherapy (HT) for lung lesions. It promotes a dose escalation program.

METHODS

Histological and/or radiological findings and/or case histories identified 41 primary and 15 metastatic lesions. Thirty patients received 40 Gy in 5 fractions (BED 72 Gy_10Gy) and 26 50 Gy in 5 fractions (BED 100Gy_10Gy). Primary end point was lung toxicity. Secondary end points were respiratory function, local control and local progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity developed in 18/56 patients and late toxicity in 8/54. Median FEV-1 variations versus baseline were - 0.5% (range - 16 to + 43%) at 6 months and - 4.00% (range - 42 to + 18%) at 24 months. Median DLCO variations versus baseline were - 1% (range - 38 to + 36%) at 6 months and - 12.2% (range - 48 to + 11%) at 24 months. At 6 months, a significant positive correlation emerged between FEV-1 change and KPS (p = 0.047). At 24 months, a significant negative correlation emerged between FEV-1 change and the ipsilateral lung V5 (p = 0.006). A low baseline DLCO correlated with more marked DLCO worsening at 6 months (p = 0.012). At 24 months, DLCO worsening correlated significantly with the median contralateral lung dose (p = 0.003). At the last checkup, 23 patients were in complete remission, 16 were in partial remission, 5 had stable disease, and 7 were in relapse. Median follow-up was 12 months (range 5-56).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with lung disease, SBRT, as delivered by HT, was well tolerated and provided good local control.

Correlation of normal lung density changes with dose after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation between normal lung CT density changes with dose accuracy and outcome after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients (with a total of 33 lesions) with non-small cell lung cancer were selected out of 270 patients treated with SBRT at a single institution between 2003 and 2009. Out of these 31 patients, 10 patients had developed radiation pneumonitis (RP). Dose distributions originally planned using a 1-D pencil beam-based dose algorithm were retrospectively recomputed using different algorithms. Prescription dose was 48 Gy in 4 fractions in most patients. Planning CT images were rigidly registered to follow-up CT datasets at 3-9 months after treatment. Corresponding dose distributions were mapped from planning to follow-up CT images. Hounsfield Unit (HU) changes in lung density in individual, 5 Gy, dose bins from 5 to 45 Gy were assessed in the peri-tumoral region. Correlations between HU changes in various normal lung regions, dose indices (V20, MLD, generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)), and RP grade were investigated.

RESULTS

Strong positive correlation was found between HU changes in the peri-tumoral region and RP grade (Spearman's r = 0.760; p < 0.001). Positive correlation was also observed between RP and HU changes in the region covered by V20 for all algorithms (Spearman's r ≥ 0.738; p < 0.001). Additionally, V20, MLD, and gEUD were significantly correlated with RP grade (p < 0.01). MLD in the peri-tumoral region computed with model-based algorithms was 5-7% lower than the PB-based methods.

CONCLUSION

Changes of lung density in the peri-tumoral lung and in the region covered by V20 were strongly associated with RP grade. Relative to model-based methods, PB algorithms over-estimated mean peri-tumoral dose and showed displacement of the high-dose region, which correlated with HU changes on follow-up CT scans.

Comparing local control and distant metastasis in NSCLC patients between CyberKnife and conventional SBRT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Previous literature suggests that the dose proximally outside the PTV could have an impact on the incidence of distant metastasis (DM) after SBRT in stage I NSCLC patients. We investigated this observation (along with local failure) in deliveries made by different treatment modalities: robotic mounted linac SBRT (CyberKnife) vs conventional SBRT (VMAT/CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 422 stage I NSCLC patients from 2 institutions who received SBRT: 217 treated conventionally and 205 with CyberKnife. The dose behavior outside the PTV of both sub-cohorts were compared by analyzing the mean dose in continuous shells extending 1, 2, 3, …, 100 mm from the PTV. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed between the two sub-cohorts with respect to DM-free survival and local progression-free survival. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was fitted to the combined cohort (n = 422) with respect to DM incidence and local failure.

RESULTS

The shell-averaged dose fall-off beyond the PTV was found to be significantly more modest in CyberKnife plans than in conventional SBRT plans. In a 30 mm shell around the PTV, the mean dose delivered with CyberKnife (38.1 Gy) is significantly larger than with VMAT/CRT (22.8 Gy, p<10^-8). For 95% of CyberKnife plans, this region receives a mean dose larger than the 21 Gy threshold dose discovered in our previous study. In contrast, this occurs for only 75% of VMAT/CRT plans. The DM-free survival of the entire CyberKnife cohort is superior to that of the 25% of VMAT/CRT patients receiving less than the threshold dose (VMAT/CRT_<21Gy), with a hazard ratio of 5.3 (95% CI: 3.0-9.3, p<10^-8). The 2 year DM-free survival rates were 87% (95% CI: 81%-91%) and 44% (95% CI: 28%-58%) for CyberKnife and the below-threshold dose conventional cohorts, respectively. A multivariable analysis of the combined cohort resulted in the confirmation that threshold dose was a significant predictor of DM(HR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.15-0.55, p<10^-3) when adjusted for other clinical factors. CyberKnife was also found to be superior to the entire VMAT/CRT with respect to local control (HR = 3.44, CI: 1.6-7.3). The 2-year local progression-free survival rates for the CyberKnife cohort and the VMAT/CRT cohort were 96% (95% CI: 92%-98%) and 88% (95% CI: 82%-92%) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In standard-of-care CyberKnife treatments, dose distributions that aid distant control are achieved 95% of the time. Although similar doses could be physically achieved by conventional SBRT, this is not always the case with current prescription practices, resulting in worse DM outcomes for 25% of conventional SBRT patients. Furthermore, CyberKnife was found to provide superior local control compared to VMAT/CRT.

Questionnaire survey on treatment planning techniques for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy in Japan

This study aimed to obtain details regarding treatment planning techniques for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) employed at each institution in Japan by using a questionnaire survey. An Internet questionnaire survey on SBRT procedures performed in 2016 was conducted by the QA/QC committee of the Japan Society of Medical Physics from April to June 2017. The questionnaire assessed two aspects: the environment for SBRT at each institution and the treatment planning techniques with and without respiratory motion management techniques (RMMT). Of the 309 evaluated responses, 218 institutions had performed SBRT. A total of 186 institutions performed SBRT without RMMT and 139 institutions performed SBRT with RMMT. When respiratory motion was ≥10 mm, 69 institutions applied RMMT. The leading RMMT were breath holding (77 institutions), respiratory gating (49 institutions) and real-time tumor tracking (11 institutions). The most frequently used irradiation technique was 3D conformal radiotherapy, which was used in 145 institutions without RMMT and 119 institutions with RMMT. Computed tomography (CT) images acquired under free breathing were mostly used for dose calculation for patients treated without RMMT. The usage ratio of IMRT/VMAT to SBRT is low in Japan, compared to elsewhere in the world (<20% vs ≥70%). Among the available dose calculation algorithms, superposition convolution was the most frequently used regardless of RMMT; however, 2% of institutions have not yet made heterogeneity corrections. In the prescription setting, about half of the institutions applied point prescriptions. The survey results revealed the most frequently used conditions, which may facilitate standardization of treatment techniques in lung SBRT.

Sublobar resection compared with stereotactic body radiation therapy and ablation for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A National Cancer Database study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the overall survival (OS) outcomes of sublobar resection (SLR) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or ablation for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage I (T1-T2aN0M0) NSCLC from 2004 to 2014 who were treated with SLR, SBRT, or ablation as the sole treatment were identified from the National Cancer Database. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated by log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score-matched analysis. Relative survival analyses compared with age- and sex-matched US population were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 53,973 patients were identified. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year relative survival rates were 96%, 90%, 84%, and 71% for SLR (n = 30,451); 93%, 78%, 65%, and 46% for SBRT (n = 22,134); and 90%, 73%, 58%, and 37% for ablation (n = 1388). Propensity score matching resulted in 9967 patients in the SBRT group versus 9967 in the SLR group and 1062 patients in the ablation group versus 1984 in the SLR group. After matching, both SBRT (hazard ratio, 1.559; 95% confidence interval, 1.497-1.623; P < .001) and ablation (hazard ratio, 1.906; 95% confidence interval, 1.730-2.101; P < .001) were associated with shorter OS when compared with SLR. These results persisted in patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results suggest SLR may be associated with longer OS in patients with early-stage NSCLC compared with SBRT or ablation. Future prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing these treatments are needed to confirm these results.

Post-treatment survival difference between lobectomy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer in England

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15%-20% of all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases present with stage I disease. Surgical resection traditionally offers the best chance of a cure but some patients will not have this treatment due to older age, comorbidities or personal choice. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become an established curative intent treatment option for patients who are not selected for or do not choose surgery. The aim of this study is to compare survival at 90 days, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years for patients who received either lobectomy or SABR.

METHODS

We used data from the 2015 National Lung Cancer Audit database and linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and the radiotherapy dataset to identify patients with NSCLC stage IA-IB and performance status (PS) 0-2 who underwent surgery or SABR treatment. We assessed the likelihood of death at 90 days, 6 months, 1 year and 2 year after diagnosis and procedure date to observe survival between two patient groups.

RESULTS

We identified 2373 patients in our cohort, 476 of whom had SABR. The median difference between date of diagnosis and date of treatment for surgery patients was 17 days while for SABR patients it was 73 days. Increasing age and worsening PS were associated with having SABR rather than surgery. Survival between the two treatment modalities was similar early on but by 1-year people who had surgery did better than those who had SABR (adjusted ORs 2.12, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.31). This difference persisted at 2 years and when the analysis was restricted to patients aged <80 years and with PS 0 or 1 and stage IA only.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that patients who have lobectomy have a better survival compared with SABR patients; however, we found considerable delays in patients receiving SABR which may contribute to poorer long-term outcomes with this treatment option. Reducing these delays should be a key focus in development and reorganisation of services.

Comparison of the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus surgical treatment for elderly (≥70) patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after propensity score matching

Background

The optimal treatment for elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains inconclusive. Previous studies have shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides encouraging local control though higher incidence of toxicity in elderly than younger populations. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of SBRT and surgical treatment in elderly patients with clinical stage I-II NSCLC.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 205 patients aged ≥70 years with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent SBRT or surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Hangzhou, China) from January 2012 to December 2017. A propensity score matching analysis was performed between the two groups. In addition, we compared outcomes and related toxicity in both study arms.

Results

Each group included 35 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 50.1 (0.8–74.4) months for surgery and 35.5 (11.5–71.4) months for SBRT. The rate of cancer-specific survival was similar between the two treatment arms (p = 0.958). In patients who underwent surgery, the corresponding 3- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85.3 and 81.7%, respectively. In those who received radiotherapy, these rates were 91.3 and 74.9%, respectively. Moreover, the 3- and 5-year locoregional control in patients who underwent surgery were 90.0 and 80.0%, respectively. In those who received radiotherapy, these rates were 91.1 and 84.1%, respectively. Notably, the observed differences in progression-free survival were not statistically significant (p = 0.934). In the surgery group, grade 1–2 complications were observed in eleven patients (31%). One patient died due to perioperative infection within 30 days following surgery. There was no grade 3–5 toxicity observed in the SBRT group.

Conclusions

The outcomes of surgery and SBRT in elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC were similar.

Long term results of single high dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the treatment of primary lung tumors

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a standard treatment for inoperable early-stage NSCLC, with local control rates comparable to surgical series. Promising results have been achieved utilizing a high single-dose schedule. The aim of our study was to evaluate long-term local control and toxicity in a series of patients treated with SBRT delivered in a single dose of 30 Gy. 44 patients affected by early stage NSCLC were treated with SBRT delivered in a single dose of 30 Gy. Survival and prognostic factors were retrospectively evaluated. Median follow-up was 34 months (range 3-81). Three- and 5-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) were 87.8% and 87.8% respectively (median 30 months; range 6-81 months), 3- and 5-year OS and CSS were 64.9% and 36.9%, 80.9% and 65.5%, respectively. Two (4.6%) cases of grade 3 pneumonitis occurred. At the univariate analysis lesion diameter ≤ 25 mm was predictive of better 5-year LPFS (95.8% versus 56.3%; p = 0.003) and 5-year PFS (69.8% versus 27.8%; p = 0.002). The results of our study indicated a high local control, survival and tolerability after a long-term follow-up with the use of SBRT 30 Gy single dose. Further prospective studies could better define the role of this regimen.

Pathologic response after modern radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pathologic complete response (pCR) following radiotherapy treatment has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor for long-term survival, progression-free survival and locoregional control. PCR is considered a surrogate to therapeutic efficacy, years before survival data are available, and therefore can be used to guide treatment plans and additional therapeutic interventions post-surgical resection. Given the extensive fibrotic changes induced by radiotherapy in the lung, radiological assessment of response can potentially misrepresent pathologic response. The optimal timing for assessment of pathologic response after conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) remains poorly understood. In this review, we summarize recent literature on pathologic response after radiotherapy for early stage and locally advanced NSCLC, we discuss current controversies around radiobiological considerations, and we present upcoming trials that will provide insight into current knowledge gaps.

[Stereotactic radiotherapy of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. State of the art in 2019 and recommendations: Stereotaxy as an alternative to surgery?]

Stereotactic radiotherapy (or Stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]) is a technique currently well established in the therapeutic arsenal for the management of bronchial cancers. It represents the standard treatment for inoperable patients or who refuses surgery. It is well tolerated, especially in elderly and frail patients, and the current issue is to define its indications in operated patients, based on retrospective and randomized trials comparing stereotactic radiotherapy and surgery, with results equivalents. This work analyzes in detail the different aspects of pulmonary stereotactic radiotherapy and suggests arguments that help in the therapeutic choice between surgery and stereotaxic irradiation. In all cases, the therapeutic decision must be discussed in a multidisciplinary consultation meeting, while informing the patient of the possible therapeutic options.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the gold standard therapy for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may provide as an alternative for patients who are medically inoperable or refuse surgical resection. The optimal treatment (SBRT or surgery) for patients with early-stage NSCLC is not clear.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Study heterogeneity and publication bias were estimated.

RESULTS

Fourteen cohort studies involving 1438 participants (719 who received SBRT and 719 who received surgery) were included in the meta-analysis. The main bias sources between the two groups, such as age, gender, tumor diameter, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and Charlson comorbidity index were matched. The surgery was associated with a better overall survival (OS) and long-term distant control (DC) for early-stage NSCLC. The pooled OR and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1-y, 3-y, 5-y OS, and 5-y DC were 1.56 (1.12-2.15), 1.86 (1.50-2.31), 2.43 (1.80-3.28), and 2.74 (1.12-6.67), respectively. No difference was found between the treatments in the 1-y and 3-y disease-free survival; 1-y, 3-y and 5-y locoregional control; or 1-y and 3-y DC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results found a superior OS and long-term DC for early-stage NSCLC after surgery compared with SBRT after propensity score matching.

Multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging technique for treating oligometastases, but limited data is available on what plan quality is achievable for a range of modalities and clinical sites.

METHODS

SBRT plans for lung, spine, bone, adrenal, liver and node sites from 17 participating centers were reviewed. Centers used various delivery techniques including static and rotational intensity-modulation and multiple non-coplanar beams. Plans were split into lung and other body sites and evaluated with different plan quality metrics, including two which are independent of target coverage; "prescription dose spillage" (PDS) and "modified gradient index" (MGI). These were compared to constraints from the ROSEL and RTOG 0813 clinical trials.

RESULTS

Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was compromised (PTV V100% < 90%) in 29% of patient plans in order to meet organ-at-risk (OAR) tolerances, supporting the use of plan quality metrics which are independent of target coverage. Both lung (n = 48) and other body (n = 99) site PDS values agreed well with ROSEL constraints on dose spillage, but RTOG 0813 values were too high to detect sub-optimal plans. MGI values for lung plans were mis-matched to both sets of previous constraints, with ROSEL values too high and RTOG 0813 values too low. MGI values were lower for other body plans as expected, though this was only statistically significant for PTV volumes <20 cm3.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated guidance for lung and other body site SBRT plan quality using the PDS and MGI metrics is presented.

Calculating the individualized fraction regime in stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer based on uncomplicated tumor control probability function

BACKGROUND

To calculate the individualized fraction regime (IFR) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using the uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP, P⁺) function.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with peripheral lung cancer or lung metastases who had undergone SBRT were analyzed. Treatment planning was performed using the dose regime of 48 Gy in 4 fractions. Dose volume histogram (DVH) data for the gross tumor volume (GTV), lung, chest wall (CW) and rib were exported and the dose bin was multiplied by a certain percentage of the dose in that bin which ranged from 1 to 200% in steps of 1%. For each dose fraction, P⁺ values were calculated by considering the tumor control probability (TCP), radiation-induced pneumonitis (RIP), chest wall pain (CWP) and radiation-induced rib fracture (RIRF). UTCP values as a function of physical dose were plotted and the maximum P⁺ values corresponded to the optimal therapeutic gain. The IFR in 3 fractions was also calculated with the same method by converting the dose using the linear quadratic (LQ) model.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients attained an IFR using the introduced methods. All the patients achieved a TCP value higher than 92.0%. The IFR ranged from 3 × 10.8 Gy to 3 × 12.5 Gy for 3 fraction regimes and from 4 × 9.2 Gy to 4 × 10.7 Gy for 4 fraction regimes. Four patients with typical tumor characteristics demonstrated that the IFR was patient-specific and could maximize the therapeutic gain. Patients with a large tumor had a lower TCP and UTCP and a smaller fractional dose than patients with a small tumor. Patients with a tumor adjacent to the organ at risk (OAR) or at a high risk of RIP had a lower UTCP and a smaller fractional dose compared with patients with a tumor located distant from the OAR.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method is capable of predicting the IFR for NSCLC patients undergoing SBRT. Further validation in clinical samples is required.

Choice of immobilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy in lung tumor patient by BMI

BACKGROUND

An accurate, reproducible, and comfortable immobilization device is essential for stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with lung cancer. This study compared thermoplastic masks (TMP) and vacuum cushion (VCS) system to assess the differences in interfraction and intrafraction setup accuracy and the impact of body mass index (BMI) with respect to the immobilization choice.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with lung SBRT between 2012 and 2015 at the Zhejiang cancer hospital. The treatment setup accuracy was analyzed in 121 patients. A total of 687 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans before treatment and 126 scans after treatment were recorded to determine the uncertainties, and plan target volume margins. Data were further stratified and analyzed by immobilization methods and patients' BMI. The t-test (Welch) was used to assess the differences between the two immobilization systems when stratified by the patients' BMI.

RESULTS

For patients with BMI ≥ 24, the mean displacements for the TMP and VCS systems were 1.4 ± 1.2 vs. 2.4 ± 2.0 mm at medial-lateral (ML) direction (p < 0.001); 2.0 ± 1.9 vs. 2.0 ± 1.9 mm at cranial-caudal (CC) direction (p = 0.917); and 2.4 ± 1.4 vs. 2.6 ± 2.1 mm at anterior-posterior (AP) direction, (p = 0.546). The rate of acceptable errors increased dramatically when immobilized by TMP. In the case of patients with BMI < 24, the mean displacements for the TMP and VCS systems were 1.8 ± 1.4 vs. 2.1 ± 1.8 mm at ML direction (p = 0.098); 2.9 ± 2.3 vs. 2.2 ± 2.2 mm at CC direction (p = 0.001); and 1.8 ± 1.8 vs. 2.3 ± 2.0 mm at CC direction, (p = 0.006). The proportion of acceptable errors increased after immobilization by VCS. No difference was detected in the intrafraction setup error by different immobilization methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The immobilization choice of SBRT for lung tumors depends on the BMI of the patients. For patients with BMI ≥ 24, TMP offers a better reproducibility with significantly less interfractional setup displacement than VCS, resulting in fewer CBCT scans. However, VCS may be preferred over TMP for the patients with BMI < 24. Therefore, an optimal immobilization system needs to be considered in different BMI groups for lung SBRT.

Local failure after stereotactic body radiation therapy or wedge resection for colorectal pulmonary metastases

OBJECTIVE

Several options are available for the local treatment of colorectal pulmonary metastases; however, the efficacy of each treatment has not been well characterized. We compared the risk of local recurrence after wedge resection or stereotactic body radiation therapy for pulmonary metastases of colorectal origin.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of patients treated for pulmonary colorectal metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy or wedge resection from 2006 to 2016 at a single institution. Local recurrence was defined as an enlarging nodule either adjacent to the staple line or within the radiation field on computed tomography. Matching weights using the propensity score with death as a competing event was used to estimate the risk of local recurrence for each metastatic nodule.

RESULTS

A total of 381 patients underwent 762 wedge resections and 64 courses of stereotactic body radiation therapy for definitive treatment of 826 pulmonary nodules. The risk of local recurrence was increased with stereotactic body radiation therapy (hazard ratio, 3.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-7.04; P = .002) and larger tumor size (hazard ratio, 1.38 per additional centimeter; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.87; P = .042). After reweighting with matching weights, the marginal 2-year risk of local recurrence for each nodule was 14.1% (95% confidence interval, 9.8-18.5) after wedge resection and 29.4% (95% confidence interval, 13.8-45.0) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary colorectal metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy have a higher risk of local recurrence than those treated with wedge resection. Stereotactic body radiation therapy should be reserved for patients with comorbidities precluding surgical resection.

Performance evaluation of the CyberKnife system in real-time target tracking during beam delivery using a moving phantom coupled with two-dimensional detector array

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the tracking error of the Synchrony Respiratory Tracking system by conducting beam-by-beam analyses to determine the variation in the tracking beams measured during target motion. A moving phantom of in-house design coupled with a two-dimensional (2D) detector array was used to simulate respiratory motion in the superoinferior (SI) and anteroposterior (AP) direction. A styrofoam block with four implanted fiducial markers was placed on top of the detector to enable the fiducial-based respiratory tracking. Measurements were performed with the phantom under either stationary mode or sinusoidal motion of 6-s cycle and 15/20-mm amplitude at SI and AP direction. The measurement data were saved as movie files that were used to calculate the center shift of the beam with 100-ms sampling time. The tracking accuracy of the system was defined as the targeting error, which could be tracked with probability of > 95% (Ep95). The mean ± standard deviation of Ep95 was 0.28 ± 0.08 mm under stationary condition; 0.66 ± 0.23 mm (range: 0.28-1.22 mm) under sinusoidal respiratory motion. The maximum drift of the beam center for all beam paths was 2.7 mm. The tracking accuracy of CyberKnife Synchrony system was successfully evaluated using a moving phantom and 2D detector array; the maximum tracking error was < 1.5 mm for sinusoidal motion of amplitude ≤ 20 mm.

Comparison of Three Radiobiological Models in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective: The applicability of the linear quadratic (LQ) model to local control (LC) modeling after hypofractionated radiotherapy to treat lung cancer is highly debated. To date, the differences in predicted outcomes between the LQ model and other radiobiological models, which are characterized by additional dose modification beyond a certain transitional dose (d_T), have not been well established. This study aims to compare the outcomes predicted by the LQ model with those predicted by two other radiobiological models in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Computer tomography (CT) simulation data sets for 20 patients diagnosed with stage Ⅰ primary NSCLC were included in this study. Three radiobiological models, including the LQ, the universal survival curve (USC) and the modified linear quadratic and linear (mLQL) model were employed to predict the tumor control probability (TCP) data. First, the d_T values for the USC and mLQL models were determined. Then, the biologically effective dose (BED) and the predicted TCP values from the LQ model were compared with those calculated from the USC and mLQL models. Results: The d_T values from the USC model were 29.6 Gy, 33.8 Gy and 44.5 Gy, whereas the values were 90.2 Gy, 84.0 Gy and 57.3 Gy for the mLQL model for 1-year, 2-year and 3-year TCP prediction. The remarkable higher d_T values obtained from the mLQL model revealed the same dose-response relationship as the LQ model in the low- and high-dose ranges. We also found that TCP prediction from the LQ and USC models differed by less than 3%, although the BED values for the two models were significantly different. Conclusion: Radiobiological analysis reveals small differences between the models and suggested that the LQ model is applicable for modeling LC using SBRT to treat lung cancer, even when an extremely high fractional dose is used.

Developments in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique of accurately delivering high doses of radiotherapy to small volume targets in a single or small number of sessions. The high biological effective dose of this treatment is reflected in the high rates of local control achieved across multiple tumour sites. Toxicity of the treatment can be significant and ongoing prospective trials will help define the utility of this treatment as an alternative to surgery in treating primary tumours and oligometastatic disease. Longer follow-up and survival data from prospective trials will be essential in determining the value of this resource-intensive treatment. The opportunity to combine this treatment with systemic therapies and its potential synergy with immunotherapy opens up interesting avenues for research in the future.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Multiple Primary Lung Cancers

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple primary lung cancers increasingly receive multiple courses of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of such treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed a prospective lung SBRT database of patients treated for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer between June 2004 and December 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 374 patients received a single course of SBRT, 14 received synchronous SBRT, 48 received metachronous SBRT alone, and 108 received surgery and metachronous SBRT. Median follow-up was 37.0 months for survivors. Patients who received a single course had a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 54.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.8-59.3), 3-year freedom from progression (FFP) of 67.3% (95% CI, 60.9-72.9), and grade 3 or higher toxicity of 3.5%. Compared to single-course patients, patients receiving metachronous SBRT alone and patients receiving surgery and metachronous SBRT had improved OS (79.7% [95% CI, 64.4-88.9%], P < .0001 and 95.4% [95% CI, 89.2-98.0%], P < .0001, respectively) and FFP (85.8% [95% CI, 70.7-93.5], P = .03 and 95.4% [95% CI, 89.2-98.0%], P < .0001, respectively). Patients receiving synchronous SBRT had similar OS (46.4% [95% CI, 19.3-69.9%], P = .75) and similar FFP (57.5% [95% CI, 25.3-80.0%], P = .17) as single-course patients. There were no significant differences in rates of grade 3 or higher toxicity or of grade 1 or higher toxicity between single-course patients and the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received either synchronous or metachronous SBRT had no significant detriment in OS or toxicity compared to single-course patients. This supports the use of SBRT in patients with multiple primary lung cancers.