A multicentric prospective study in usual care: D-dimer and cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation

D-dimer and fibrinogen indicate ischemic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the association of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and conventional markers of coagulation with ischemic and bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

In this prospective two-center observational cohort study, patients with AF and an indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) were enrolled after PCI. Blood was drawn on day 1-3 after PCI. Dilute Russell's viper venom time was used to determine lupus anticoagulant (LA) in OAC-free plasma. Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgG, IgM, and anti-β2-Glycoprotein 1 (aβ2GP1) IgG were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Fibrinogen (FIB), d-dimer, and prothrombin fragment 1 and 2 (PF 1 + 2) were measured in citrated plasma. The primary ischemic outcome was time to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) assessed at 6 months. Bleeding was defined according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

RESULTS

158 patients were enrolled between May 2020 and May 2021 on day 1-3 after PCI. The median age was 78 years (interquartile range [IQR] 72-82), 111 (70%) were male, and 39 (25%) presented with acute coronary syndrome. D-dimer was elevated in 74 (47%) patients, FIB was increased in 40 (25%) and PF1 + 2 in 68 (43%) patients. 32 (20%) patients had ≥ 1 antiphospholipid antibody elevated (aPL; LA: 19 [12%], aCL: 14 [9%], aβ2GP1: 2 [1%]). The presence of aPL was neither significantly associated with MACE (HR 1.46, 95% CI [0.39-5.49], p = 0.579), nor bleeding (HR 1.07 [0.30-3.84], p = 0.917). Elevated d-dimer was significantly associated with higher risk for MACE (HR 5.06 [1.09-23.41], p = 0.038) and major bleeding (HR 7.04 [1.58-31.47], p = 0.011). Elevated D-dimer increased the predictive capacity of HAS-BLED for major bleedings (HAS-BLED: AUC 0.71 [0.60-0.83] vs. HAS-BLED + d-dimer: AUC 0.79 [0.70-0.88]; p = 0.025). Increased levels of FIB were associated with higher risk for MACE (HR 3.65 [1.11-11.96], p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Biomarkers of coagulation might be suitable to assess ischemic and bleeding risk in patients with AF following PCI.

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and D-dimer combined with left atrial diameter to predict the risk of ischemic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to explore the potential role of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), d-dimer, and the echocardiographic parameter left atrial diameter (LAD) in identifying and predicting the occurrence of ischemic stroke (IS) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 445 patients with NVAF in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. They were divided into the NVAF (309 cases) and NVAF with stroke (136 cases) groups according to whether acute ischemic stroke (AIS) occurred at admission. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the odds ratio (OR) of NT-proBNP, d-dimer, and LAD for IS. The predictive value of NT-proBNP, d-dimer, and LAD in identifying the occurrence of IS in NVAF was determined by plotting the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

NT-proBNP, d-dimer, and LAD levels were significantly higher in the NVAF with stroke group than in the NVAF group (p < .05). NT-ProBNP, d-dimer, and LAD were independently associated with IS in NVAF patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.16; OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.37-2.55; OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.13-1.28, p < .01). The optimal cutoff points for NT-ProBNP, d-dimer, and LAD levels to distinguish the NVAF group from the NVAF with stroke group were 715.0 pg/ml, 0.515 ng/ml, and 38.5 mm, respectively, with the area under the curve (AUC) being [0.801 (95% CI: 0.76-0.84); 0.770 (95% CI: 0.72-0.85); 0.752 (95% CI: 0.71-0.80), p < .01]. The combined score of NT-proBNP, d-dimer, and LAD improved the predictive efficacy of the single index, with an AUC of 0.846 (95% CI: 0.81-0.88, p < .01), sensitivity of 77.2%, and specificity of 76.4%.

CONCLUSION

NT-proBNP, d-dimer, and the echocardiographic parameter LAD have outstanding value in predicting the risk of IS in patients with NVAF.

Role of New Potential Biomarkers in the Risk of Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation

Ischemic stroke risk in atrial fibrillation differs from patient to patient, depending on numerous variables. Many attempts have been made to translate this difference into simple numbers and to compare it to the hemorrhagic risk of anticoagulation. Different clinical scores have been studied to define a clear strategy. One score, the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, has been extensively and successfully applied worldwide. Nevertheless, it is not yet the “perfect instrument”. Many proposals have been made to integrate its clinical parameters with some biomarkers to improve its predictive power. This short review describes some of these biomarkers and their possible implications in potentiating the efficacy of clinical scores.

A Review of Biomarkers for Ischemic Stroke Evaluation in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and results in a significantly increased ischemic stroke (IS) risk. IS risk stratification tools are widely being applied to guide anticoagulation treatment decisions and duration in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF). The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is largely validated and currently recommended by renowned guidelines. However, this score is heavily dependent on age, sex, and comorbidities, and exhibits only moderate predictive power. Finding effective and validated clinical biomarkers to assist in personalized IS risk evaluation has become one of the promising directions in the prevention and treatment of NVAF. A number of studies in recent years have explored differentially expressed biomarkers in NVAF patients with and without IS, and the potential role of various biomarkers for prediction or early diagnosis of IS in patients with NVAF. In this review, we describe the clinical application and utility of AF characteristics, cardiac imaging and electrocardiogram markers, arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis-related markers, circulating biomarkers, and novel genetic markers in IS diagnosis and management of patients with NVAF. We conclude that at present, there is no consensus understanding of a desirable biomarker for IS risk stratification in NVAF, and enrolling these biomarkers into extant models also remains challenging. Further prospective cohorts and trials are needed to integrate various clinical risk factors and biomarkers to optimize IS prediction in patients with NVAF. However, we believe that the growing insight into molecular mechanisms and in-depth understanding of existing and emerging biomarkers may further improve the IS risk identification and guide anticoagulation therapy in patients with NVAF.

Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?

Stroke prevention with oral anticoagulants (OACs) is the cornerstone for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). It is crucial to assess the stroke and bleeding risks of individual AF patients to make appropriate decisions for OAC use and achieve optimal patient care. In this review, we provided an overview on the correct use of CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, and update important revisions about the definitions of some of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc components. Also, data about the biomarkers and potential roles of AF duration and left atrial functions in the prediction of stroke in AF were also discussed.

Most important international guidelines recommend the use of CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for stroke and bleeding risk assessments in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, respectively. The 2020 AF guidelines of European Society of Cardiology have revised the definition of “C: congestive heart failure (HF)” component, and now patients with either HF with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction should be assigned 1 point. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was also included. Besides, the revised “V: vascular diseases” component included both prior myocardial infarction and “angiographically significant coronary artery disease”. It is important to understand that the stroke and bleeding risks of AF patients were not static and should be re-assessed regularly. A high HAS-BLED score itself should not be the only reason to withhold or discontinue oral anticoagulants, but remind physicians for the corrections of modifiable bleeding risk factors and more regular follow up. In the future, the AF duration and left atrial function may play an important role for personalized evaluation of individual stroke risk while more studies are necessary.

Laboratory predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice that affects intracardiac hemodynamics and is accompanied by increased mortality due to the risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolism. In recent years, numerous studies, evaluating the use of biomarkers in AF patients, have been conducted to expand the possibility of stratification the complications risks.

The aim of the review is to evaluate the possible isolated and combined predictive significance of NT-proBNP, troponin T (TnT) and D-dimer levels in the development and progression of AF and its thromboembolic complications according to published data. Determining the level of NT-proBNP can be used to diagnose cardioembolic stroke in latent forms of AF. Patients with a cardioembolic stroke have been shown to have higher BNP/NT-proBNP levels than patients with an atherothrombotic stroke and venous thromboembolism. Elevated TnT level is independently associated with AF detection as a cause of stroke. The assessment on the CHADS2 scale significantly correlates with the level of troponin I (TnI). However, it is equally important to take into account TnI level even with a low score of CHADS2. Patients with the level of TnI ≥ 0.040 pg/L are considered to be prescribed anticoagulants in the same way as the patients with high CHADS2 score. Similar results were obtained analyzing high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) data. The level of D-dimer 0.315 mg/L was determined to be the optimal limit level for predicting the adverse functional outcome of stroke owing to AF. Patients with a high level of D-dimer have shown a high risk of developing thromboembolic and cardiovascular complications despite their taking anticoagulant drugs. D-dimer levels positively correlate with the CHA2DS2 and CHA2DS2-VASC scales of stroke risk stratification. The analysis of the biomarkers combination has revealed the increase of hs-cTnT and BNP associated with stroke in AF patients (p<0.05). However, ABC scale, including hs-cTnT and NT- pro BNP, hasn't given more accurate result in stroke predicting than CHA2DS2-VASc scale. The integration of biomarkers in predicting the risk of AF occurrence, progression and appearance of thromboembolic complications is a promising direction. An isolated level of biomarkers (hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, D-dimer) and their combination with clinical risk factors can improve the quality of cardioembolic strokes prognosis.

Biomarkers for Predicting Left Atrial or Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Anticoagulated Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

PURPOSE

Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is often associated with thromboembolic complications, there is no definite biomarker for detecting the presence of thrombi in the left atrial (LA) or left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS

NVAF patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate LA/LAA thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) before AF ablation were included. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed to explore the independent risk factors of LA/LAA thrombus and indicate the best cutoff point.

RESULTS

Of the 260 consecutive subjects (mean age: 63.67 ± 9.39 years; 42% women), 45 (17.3%) patients were with LA/LAA thrombus, 131 (50.4%) were with SEC, and 84 (32.3%) were with neither thrombus nor SEC. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (OR, 2.179; 95% CI: 1.191-3.987; p=0.012) and red cell distribution width (RDW) (OR, 2.398; 95% CI: 1.075-5.349; p=0.033) were independently correlated with the presence of LA/LAA thrombus but not D-dimer (OR, 0.999; 95% CI: 0.998-1.000; p=0.210). When all patients were divided into four groups based on the combination between RDW (cutoff value: 12.95%) and NT-proBNP levels (cutoff value: 368.9 ng/L), the rate of LA/LAA thrombus was the highest in the high RDW and NT-proBNP group.

CONCLUSION

In anticoagulation patients with NVAF, elevated NT-proBNP and RDW are related to LA/LAA thrombus. Therefore, these might be considered as useful prognostic markers in the management and treatment of NVAF patients.

The emerging value of serum D-dimer measurement in the work-up and management of ischemic stroke

Background

Elevated D-dimer levels are a marker of both thrombin formation and fibrinolysis. Currently D-dimer measurement is routinely used for ruling out venous thromboembolism and diagnosis/monitoring of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Recent emerging data suggest that D-dimer may become an important biomarker in ischemic stroke as well as in cardiovascular diseases.

Aims

To outline the clinical utility of D-dimer in work-up and management of ischemic stroke.

Summary

D-dimer measurement is most useful in stroke with active cancer as it can confirm etiologic diagnosis, predict recurrent stroke risk, and aid treatment decision in cancer-associated stroke. In cryptogenic stroke, high D-dimer levels can also provide clues for the cause of stroke as occult cancer and undetected cardiac embolic source as occult atrial fibrillation and may be helpful in treatment decision making of secondary stroke prevention. Serial D-dimer measurements should be further studied to monitor antithrombotic therapy effectiveness in both cardiogenic and cryptogenic etiologies.

Conclusion

Accumulating data suggests the utility of D-dimer test in the management of ischemic stroke, although the evidence is still limited. Future studies would clarify the role of D-dimer measurement in ischemic stroke.

D-Dimer to Predict the Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement During Oral Anticoagulation Therapy

Mechanical heart valve replacement (MHVR) entails lifetime oral anticoagulation to eliminate thrombosis. However, adverse events may still occur despite proper anticoagulation therapy. In this study, we investigated whether D-dimer can predict the clinical events in post-MHVR patients during oral anticoagulation therapy.This was a single-center, prospective study. In all, 772 patients who underwent MHVR in the Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital from January 2013 to May 2014 were screened. Patients were assigned to the abnormal D-dimer group and the normal D-dimer group according to the D-dimer levels measured 3 months after the beginning of the oral anticoagulation therapy regime. All patients were followed up for 24 months or until the observation of the endpoints, which included thrombotic events, bleeding events, and all-cause deaths.A total of 718 patients were included in the analysis: 91 had abnormal D-dimer levels, and 627 had normal D-dimer levels. In all, 53 events were observed during 24 months. Compared with the normal D-dimer group, patients with abnormal D-dimer levels had a higher incidence of thrombotic events (10 versus 14; hazard ratio (HR): 5.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.38-12.1; P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (8 versus 13; HR: 4.65; 95% CI: 1.93-11.2; P < 0.001), and a higher incidence of total events (16 versus 37; HR: 3.26; 95% CI: 1.81-5.86; P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in bleeding events (2 versus 21; HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.17-3.07; P = 0.66).D-dimer may be a useful marker to predict thrombotic events and all-cause deaths in post-MHVR patients during oral anticoagulation therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01996657).

D-Dimer Levels and Effect of Rivaroxaban on Those Levels and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (An ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46 Trial Substudy)

D-dimer has been used as both a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in the assessment of patients with venous thromboembolism, but its prognostic value in the setting of arterial acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and the ability of pharmacotherapy to reduce D-dimer in ACS is less well characterized. It was hypothesized that elevated baseline D-dimer would be associated with poor clinical outcomes in ACS, and that Factor Xa inhibition with Rivaroxaban would reduce D-dimer acutely and chronically. The ATLAS ACS TIMI-46 trial assessed the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban compared with placebo in ACS patients. A subset of subjects had a D-dimer measured at baseline (n = 1,834, 52.5%). A univariate and multivariable logistic regression assessed the relation between baseline D-dimer and a composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke through 6 months. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare change in D-dimer level between the treatment groups from baseline. Baseline D-dimer was associated with the composite efficacy outcome in a univariate logistic regression (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.29, p = 0.015) and a multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.28, p = 0.048). Rivaroxaban administration lowered D-dimer levels compared wth placebo after administration of the first dose of study drug (p = 0.026), at day 30 (p < 0.001) and day 180 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, elevated baseline D-dimer was associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome within 6 months of the ACS event and administration of the Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was associated with lower D-dimer levels compared with placebo after the first dose, at day 30 and day 180.

The association of high D-dimer level with high risk of ischemic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients: A retrospective study

This study aimed to explore the relationship of D-dimer level with the risk stratification of ischemic stroke, and determine whether high D-dimer levels could be used as a risk factor of ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).This single-center, retrospective study recruited NVAF patients who did not undergo anticoagulant therapy. These patients were divided into 2 groups: ischemic stroke group and no-stroke group. The medical records of each patient were reviewed, demographic and clinical analyses were performed, and the laboratory results were summarized.A total of 323 eligible in-patients with NVAF, who did not receive anticoagulant therapy, were recruited (206 male and 117 female patients, median age was 75.18 ± 10.46 years old). Among these patients, 78 patients suffered from acute ischemic stroke. D-dimer level increased with age, and was positively correlated with the risk stratification of stroke, CHADS2 score (rs = 0.441, P < .001), and CHA2DS2-VASC score (rs = 0.412, P < .001), even after adjustment for age and gender (rs = 0.422, P < .001). The difference in baseline D-dimer level between these 2 groups was not statistically significant (0.70 vs 0.66 mg/L, P = .330), but this significantly increased when patients suffered from stroke (1.34 vs 0.70 mg/L, P < .001). The D-dimer level after stroke (≥6 months) was also higher than the baseline (1.16 vs 0.68 mg/L, P = .514) in 6 months, and this level nearly returned to baseline level after one year (0.69 vs 0.68 mg/L, P = .158). However, logistic regression revealed that only the D-dimer level at stroke onset and OMI were independent risk factors for ischemic stroke (P < .001), while the increase from baseline D-dimer levels was not an independent risk factor (P = .125).D-dimer level is positively correlated with the risk stratification of ischemic stroke, but has no predictive value on the occurrence of ischemic stroke in patients with NVAF.

D-dimer and factor VIIa in atrial fibrillation – prognostic values for cardiovascular events and effects of anticoagulation therapy

Coagulation markers may improve monitoring the risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) during anticoagulant treatment. We examined baseline levels of D-dimer and their association with stroke, cardiovascular death and major bleeding in 6,202 AF patients randomised to dabigatran or warfarin in the RE-LY trial. The effects of treatment on serial levels of D-dimer and coagulation factor (F) VIIa in 2,567 patients were also analysed. Baseline D-dimer levels were related to the rate of stroke/systemic embolism (SEE) with 0.64 % in the lowest quartile (Q1, as reference) (D-dimer < 298 μg/l), 1.38 % Q2 (D-dimer 298–473 μg/l), 1.71 % Q3 (D-dimer 474–822 μg/l) and 2.00 % in Q4 (D-dimer > 822 μg/l) (p=0.0007). Similar associations were shown for cardiovascular death and major bleeding. Addition of baseline D-dimer to established clinical risk factors improved prediction of stroke/SEE, cardiovascular death and major bleeding (C-index increased from 0.66 to 0.68, 0.71 to 0.73 and 0.66 to 0.67, respectively). Dabigatran provided a greater reduction of D-dimer levels than warfarin regardless of baseline anticoagulant treatment. Ontreatment levels of FVIIa were markedly reduced by warfarin (median 12.1–13.8 mU/ml) but significantly higher with dabigatran (median 39.4–49.0 mU/ml) at all-time points. Dabigatran is associated with greater reduction in D-dimer without the pronounced reduction of FVIIa seen with warfarin. These different effects on the coagulation system might explain the better efficacy and less intracranial bleeding observed with dabigatran compared with warfarin.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00262600 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

D-dimer to guide the intensity of anticoagulation in Chinese patients after mechanical heart valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial

Essentials Low anticoagulation intensity reduces bleeding but increases thrombosis during warfarin therapy. Elevated D-dimer level is associated with increased thrombosis events. D-dimer can be used to find potential thrombosis in those receiving low intensity therapy. D-dimer-guided therapy may be the optimal strategy for those with mechanical heart valve replacement.

SUMMARY

Background Controversies remain regarding the optimal anticoagulation intensity for Chinese patients after mechanical heart valve replacement despite guidelines having recommended a standard anticoagulation intensity. Objectives To investigate whether D-dimer could be used to determine the optimal anticoagulation intensity in Chinese patients after mechanical heart valve replacement. Patients/Methods This was a prospective, randomized controlled clinical study. A total of 748 patients following mechanical heart valve replacement in Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital were randomized to three groups at a ratio of 1 : 1 : 1. Patients in two control groups received warfarin therapy based on constant standard intensity (international normalized ratio [INR], 2.5-3.5; n = 250) and low intensity (INR, 1.8-2.6; n = 248), respectively. In the experimental group (n = 250), warfarin therapy was initiated at low intensity, then those with elevated D-dimer levels were adjusted to standard intensity. All patients were followed-up for 24 months until the occurrence of endpoints, including bleeding events, thrombotic events and all-cause mortality. Results A total of 718 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-three events occurred during follow-up. There was less hemorrhage (3/240 vs. 16/241; hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.45) and all-cause mortality (4/240 vs. 12/241; HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.87) observed in the D-dimer-guided group than in the standard-intensity group. A lower incidence of thrombotic events was also observed in the D-dimer-guided group when compared with the low-intensity group (5/240 vs. 14/237; HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.85). Overall, the total events were less in the D-dimer-guided group (9/240) when compared with the other two control groups (24/241, 20/237; HR, 0.37, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.19-0.72, 0.21-0.90 Conclusions The D-dimer-guided adjustment of anticoagulation intensity could reduce adverse events in Chinese patients after mechanical heart valve replacement.

TRIAL REGISTRY

NCT01996657; ClinicalTrials.gov.

Monoclonal antibodies with equal specificity to D-dimer and high-molecular-weight fibrin degradation products

Fibrin degradation results in the formation of fibrin degradation products (FDPs) of different molecular weights, which include D-dimer. Commercial D-dimer assays recognize multiple forms of FDP with different specificity. As a result, the absence of an international D-dimer standard and the marked discrepancy in the D-dimer values in the same samples measured by assays from different manufacturers have become the primary problems that clinicians face in the D-dimer determination. We consider that an assay with equal specificity to all FDP forms regardless of their molecular weights could help to solve these problems. We aimed to produce mAbs that could equally recognize high-molecular-weight FDP (HMW FDP) and D-dimer. mAbs against D-dimer were produced. The HMW FDP/D-dimer ratios in plasma samples were analyzed following protein separation by gel filtration using the developed fluoroimmunoassay. A sandwich immunoassay with equal specificity to HMW FDP and D-dimer was developed and applied to determine HMW FDP/D-dimer ratios in patients with different diseases. Although the HMW FDP levels prevailed in thrombotic patients, the FDP and D-dimer levels were comparable in septic patients. Meanwhile, the D-dimer levels often exceeded the HMW FDP levels in patients who had undergone surgery. The 'D-dimer' levels that were detected by different assays also varied greatly depending on the assay specificities to FDP and D-dimer. Our findings show that the introduction of assays with equal specificities to FDP and D-dimer in clinical practice is a possible way of standardizing D-dimer measurements.

Plasma d-Dimer as a Useful Marker Predicts Severity of Atherosclerotic Lesion and Short-Term Outcome in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Increased d-dimer is indicative of a hypercoagulable state and found to be associated with acute coronary syndromes. The present study aimed to evaluate whether plasma d-dimer levels could predict subsequent major clinical events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). First, 2209 angiographic-proven patients with CAD were consecutively enrolled. Then, all patients were subjected to follow up for an average of 18 months (ranged from 14 to 1037 days). The relationships of the plasma d-dimer with the severity of CAD and future clinical outcomes were evaluated. We found that plasma d-dimer was higher in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) than that in patients with nonprior MI (P = .006). Multivariate linear regression analysis suggested that the plasma d-dimer was linked to the severity of CAD assessed by Gensini score (β = 0.052, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-6.84, P = .005) even after adjusting for confounding factors. During the follow-up, 42 patients underwent prespecified outcomes. After adjustment for multiple variables in the Cox regression model, the d-dimer levels remained to be a potential predictor of total outcome (hazard ratio = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.09-1.37, P = .001). Therefore, plasma d-dimer levels appeared to be a useful predictor for the severity of CAD and the subsequent major clinical events.

Inflammation and hemostasis in atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease: The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest atrial fibrillation (AF) is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD).

AIMS

To determine if alterations in hemostasis or inflammation explain the association between AF and CHD.

METHODS

C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, factor VIII, and fibrinogen were measured in incident CHD cases (n = 647) and a stratified cohort random sample (CRS, n = 1104) between 2003 and 2007 from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Using a case-cohort approach, Cox models examined whether inflammation or hemostasis biomarkers explained the association between AF and CHD.

RESULTS

In participants free of CHD at baseline, 12.2% of CHD cases and 7.1% of the CRS had AF. Over a median follow-up of 4.4 years, all biomarkers were associated with an increased risk of CHD in those with and those without AF after adjusting for CHD risk factors. The association of D-dimer with CHD was greater in those with AF (HR 2.52, 95% CI = 1.49, 4.26) than those without AF (HR 1.34, 95% CI = 1.12, 1.61) (p-interaction = 0.02). Similar interactions were not observed for the other biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that alterations in D-dimer, a marker of hemostasis, explain the association between AF and CHD. Potentially, D-dimer is a useful biomarker to assess CHD risk in persons with AF.

[Measurement of d-dimers in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. First prospective Tunisian study]

Atrial fibrillation can expose to thrombo-embolic complications. Many biomarkers have been tested to refine the stratification of thrombo-embolic risk. The study aim was to assess the interest of the d-dimer testing in this pathology. We conducted a prospective observational study including 50 cases and 19 controls, enrolled at the cardiology department of the Mongi Slim Hospital, from July to November 2012. The d-dimer assay was performed on mini-VIDAS(®) and analyzed according to clinical, echocardiographic and biological data. The mean age of patients was 61.8±10.6years. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.58±1.31. The average of D-dimer levels was 590±506ng/ml in patients and 225.26±112.95ng/ml in controls (P=0.02). No significant difference has been found between the d-dimer level and age, sex, type and etiology of atrial fibrillation, the CHA2DS2-VASc score, the left atrial surface. Among patients on acenocoumarol, d-dimer levels was significantly higher in patients with an INR<2 compared to those with an INR≥2 (P=0.004). We identified a positive d-dimer threshold (300ng/ml) in patients distinguishing them significantly with controls (P<0.001). In conclusion, the measurement of d-dimers could help clinicians to identify patients with atrial fibrillation having an increased coagulability and, therefore, an increased thrombo-embolic risk. It could be complementary to the determination of INR in monitoring anticoagulation therapy: d-dimers level refines the thrombo-embolic risk and INR measurement assesses the level of anticoagulation and the bleeding risk.

Hypercoagulability, D-dimer and atrial fibrillation: an overview of biological and clinical evidence

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common among the severe cardiac arrhythmias and carries a significant risk of mortality and morbidity in the general population. The most important complication is represented by development of one or more thrombi in the left atrium of the dyskinetic heart, and their successive cerebral and peripheral embolization. The pathophysiological basis of the thromboembolic complications in AF entails the presence of a hypercoagulable state, which is mirrored by increased concentrations of a variety of prothrombotic markers. D-dimer is universally considered the gold standard among the various biomarkers that reflect activation of coagulation, fibrinolysis, or both, and several studies have assessed its diagnostic and prognostic role in AF. With a few exceptions and despite a broad heterogeneity in the study designs, published data seem to demonstrate that D-dimer values may be associated with the presence of atrial thrombosis, may be predictive of primary adverse outcomes and death, may be correlated with cerebral infarction volume, and may also be a useful parameter for assessing the degree of hypercoagulability of AF patients after cardioversion. If larger prospective studies confirm these findings, D-dimer assessment may hence become an integral part of the clinical decision-making in patients with AF.

D-dimer level predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with infective endocarditis: a prospective single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Increased circulating D-dimer levels have been correlated with adverse outcomes in various clinical conditions. To our knowledge, the association of on-admission D-dimer and in-hospital mortality in infective endocarditis (IE) has not been investigated. We hypothesized that increased on-admission D-dimer levels would correlate with adverse outcomes when prospectively studied in patients with IE.

METHODS

In this prospective study, a total of 157 consecutive patients with the definite IE diagnosis met the inclusion criteria and underwent testing for on-admission D-dimer and CRP assays. The outcome measure was in-hospital death from any cause.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality occurred in 40 (26%) patients. Increased levels of plasma D-dimer (5.1 ± 1.7 vs 1.9 ± 0.8, p<0.001), CRP [45(13-98) vs 12(5-28), p<0.001] were found in dead patients compared with those survived. In addition to S. aureus infection, increased leukocyte count, end-stage renal disease, LVEF<50%, vegetation size of >10mm, perivalvular abscess, on-admission D-dimer (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.24-1.40; p<0.001) and CRP (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.09-1.36; p=0.001) levels were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer ≥ 4.2mg/L in predicting in-hospital death in IE were 86% and 85%, respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of CRP levels ≥ 13.6 mg/L were 72% and 69%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that on-admission D-dimer level may be a simple, available and valuable biomarker that allows us to identify high-risk IE patients for in-hospital mortality. D-dimer ≥ 4.2mg/L, CRP ≥ 13.6 mg/L were independently associated with IE related in-hospital death.

Stroke Risk Predictor Scoring Systems in Atrial Fibrillation

An effective risk stratification which could help us identify high-risk patients who should take oral anticoagulants (OACs) is the key step for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). Several scoring systems were available to estimate the risk of stroke in AF, including CHADS₂, CHA₂DS₂-VASc, R₂CHADS₂ and ATRIA scores, which were constituted of different clinical risk factors. Recently, several new OACs (NOACs) were demonstrated to be at least as effective as warfarin in stroke prevention and were much safer regarding the risk of intra-cranial hemorrhage. In the era of NOACs, the roles of scoring schemes have shifted to identify patients with a truly low-risk of thromboembolic events, in whom OACs were not recommended. The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is powerful in selecting "truly low-risk" patients who do not require anticoagulation. Whether the new-emerging scoring systems, R₂CHADS₂ and ATRIA scores, could further improve the stroke prediction in AF deserves a further study. ("SPAF", the same as the initials of a series of studies about aspirin, warfarin and stroke prevention in AF, was used as the abbreviation for "stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation" in this review article.).

Plasma D-dimer predicts short-term poor outcome after acute ischemic stroke

Objective

Haemostatic biomarkers associated with poor outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The objective of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of plasma D-dimer (D-D) on functional outcome at 90-day follow-up from stroke onset.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study in the emergency department and enrolled 220 patients with AIS. Plasma D-D concentrations, determined by a particle-enhanced, immunoturbidimetric assay, were measured. Each patient’s medical record was reviewed, and demographic, clinical, laboratory and neuroimaging information was abstracted.

Results

There was a positive correlation between levels of D-D and the NIHSS (r = 0.361, p<0.001), and the infarct volume (r = 0.449, p<0.001). In the 69 patients with an unfavorable functional outcome, D-D levels were higher compared with those in patients with a favorable outcome [3.24(IQR, 2.18–4.60)mg/L vs 0.88(IQR, 0.35–1.77) mg/L; p<0.001]. After adjusting for all other significant outcome predictors, D-D level remained an independent predictor for unfavorable functional outcome and mortality with an odds ratio of 2.18 (95% CI, 1.55–2.83), 3.22 (95% CI, 2.05–6.43); respectively.

Conclusions

D-D levels are a useful tool to predict outcome and mortality 90-day after acute ischemic stroke and have a potential to assist clinicians.

Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation - Long-term Follow-up of Cardiovascular Events

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was around 1.5 per 1000 person-years in Taiwan. Systemic thromboembolism is the most severe complication of AF. Risk stratification and adequate thromboembolism prophylaxis is the cornerstone of treatment in AF patients. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is powerful in selecting "truly low-risk" patients who are not necessary to receive anticoagulation therapies. It is also useful in predicting thromboembolic events and mortality for patients undergoing AF ablation. Recently, more and more biomarkers and imaging parameters were reported to be associated with adverse events in AF patients. How could these biomarkers and imaging tools change the current strategy of stroke prevention in AF deserves further investigations.

Risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation: Biomarkers and other future perspectives

Risk stratification of atrial fibrillation (AF) and adequate thromboembolism prophylaxis is the cornerstone of treatment in patients with AF. Current risk stratification schemes such as the CHADS(2) and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores are based on clinical risk factors and suboptimally weight the risk/benefit of anticoagulation. Recently, the potential of biomarkers (troponin and NT-proBNP) in the RE-LY biomarker sub-analysis has been demonstrated. Echocardiography is also being evaluated as a possible approach to improve risk score performance. The authors present an overview on AF risk stratification and discuss future potential developments that may be introduced into our current risk stratification schemes.