Abnormal high expression of B-cell activating factor belonging to the TNF superfamily (BAFF) associated with long-term outcome in kidney transplant recipients

Past and present discovery of the BAFF/APRIL system - A bibliometric study from 1999 to 2023

Cytokines from the Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) family are important regulators of both physiological and pathological processes. The discovery of novel TNF ligands and receptors, BAFF and APRIL, have opened up new possibilities for scientists to explore the effect of these cytokines on the human immune system. The role of BAFF/APRIL system in B lymphocytes is particularly important for survival and maintenance of homeostasis. Aberrant expression of the system is associated with various immunological disorders. Hence, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the past and present BAFF/APRIL system research development in a bibliometric perspective. To our best knowledge, this is the first ever bibliometric analysis conducted focusing on the BAFF/APRIL system. A total of 1055 relevant documents were retrieved from WoSCC. Microsoft Excel, VOSviewer, and Biblioshiny of R studio were bibliometric tools used to analyse the scientific literature. From 1999, the annual publications showed an upward trend, with Journal of Immunology being the most productive journal. USA leads the race for BAFF/APRIL system research developments. Pascal Schneider, a senior researcher affiliated with University of Lausanne, Switzerland was recognised as the most productive author and institution in the BAFF/APRIL system research field. The research focus transitioned from focusing on the role of the system in B cell biology, to immunological disorders and finally to development of BAFF/APRIL targeting drugs. Despite several studies elucidating briefly the pathway mechanism of BAFF/APRIL system in B-cell selection, substantial research on the mechanism of action in disease models and T cell activation and development of immunomodulating drugs from natural origins remains largely unexplored. Therefore, future research focusing on these areas are crucial for the deeper understanding of the system in disease manifestations and progression allowing a better treatment management for various immunological disorders.

Facile preparation of porphyrin-based porous organic polymers for specific enrichment and isolation of phosphopeptides and phosphorylated exosomes

Exosomes, which can be used to investigate various disease processes, are novel disease markers that have been extensively studied in recent years. In this work, zirconium-rich porphyrin-based porous organic polymers (Imi-Pops-Zr) were synthesized by a facile and low-cost strategy for specific enrichment and isolation of phosphorylated peptides and exosomes. The proposed material demonstrates a low detection limit (0.5 fmol), a high selectivity (bovine serum albumin (BSA): β-casein = 1000:1), and a loading capability of 100 mg/g for phosphopeptides. For complex practical samples, after enrichment with Imi-Pops-Zr, 4 characteristic phosphopeptides from human serum, 20 and 12 phosphopeptides from human saliva and defatted milk were detected, respectively. Besides, 74 phosphorylated peptides with 67 phosphorylation sites belonging to 61 phosphoproteins and 67 phosphorylated peptides with 63 phosphorylation sites belonging to 65 phosphoproteins were detected from the serum of normal controls and uremic patients, respectively. Biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions revealed that interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor, high density lipoprotein and proteases binding may be associated with uremia. Furthermore, Imi-Pops-Zr was successfully used to enrich and isolate exosomes from human serum. The experimental results show that Imi-Pops-Zr has promising application in the specific enrichment of phosphorylated peptides and exosomes in complex bio-samples.

Evaluating the Link between BAFF System Gene Expression and Acute Rejection Development in Kidney Transplantation

B-cell activating factor (BAFF) system signaling is critical for B-cell homeostasis, effector functions, and tolerance maintenance in transplants, but it has not been studied in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The aim was to analyze the changes in BAFF system expression in KTRs with/without acute rejection (AR/NAR). The BAFF system expression was analyzed by qPCR in 40 KTRs. A meta-analysis of BAFF system expression and histological renal damage was identified by the Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) and performed from the GEO database. Proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) expression increased at three- and six-months post-KT (p = 0.014 and p < 0.001). B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) expression increased at six-months post-KT (p = 0.038). BAFF expression remained stable in NAR-KTRs, but was increased in CADI concerning the No-CADI group at one year (p = 0.008). BCMA expression increased in the CADI group at one- (p = 0.001) and six-years post-KT (p = 0.024). At three months, the transmembrane activator and calcium modulator interactor (TACI) gene significantly elevated KTRs with DSAs (donor-specific antibody; p = 0.034). KTRs with DSAs significantly increase the B-cell activating factor receptor (R-BAFF; p = 0.021) and TACI (p = 0.018) between pre- and three-month post-KT. Changes in the expression of the BAFF system increase during post-KTR in the development of AR and chronic allograft damage, and could be an important pathological tool to detect and prevent kidney graft outcomes.

B-cell activating factor BAFF as a novel alert marker for the immunological risk stratification after kidney transplantation

The B cell activating factor BAFF has gained importance in the context of kidney transplantation due to its role in B cell survival. Studies have shown that BAFF correlates with an increased incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and the development of donor-specific antibodies. In this study, we analyzed a defined cohort of kidney transplant recipients who were treated with standardized immunosuppressive regimens according to their immunological risk profile. The aim was to add BAFF as an awareness marker in the course after transplantation to consider patient’s individual immunological risk profile. Included patients were transplanted between 2016 and 2018. Baseline data, graft function, the occurrence of rejection episodes, signs of microvascular infiltration, and DSA kinetics were recorded over 3 years. BAFF levels were determined 14 d, 3 and 12 months post transplantation. Although no difference in graft function could be observed, medium-risk patients showed a clear dynamic in their BAFF levels with low levels shortly after transplantation and an increase in values of 123% over the course of 1 year. Patients with high BAFF values were more susceptible to rejection, especially antibody-mediated rejection and displayed intensified microvascular inflammation; the combination of high BAFF + DSA puts patients at risk. The changing BAFF kinetics of the medium risk group as well as the increased occurrence of rejections at high BAFF values enables BAFF to be seen as an awareness factor. To compensate the changing immunological risk, a switch from a weaker induction therapy to an intensified maintenance therapy is required.

Anti-BAFF Treatment Interferes With Humoral Responses in a Model of Renal Transplantation in Rats

BACKGROUND

B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) is associated with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and poorer outcomes after renal transplantation (RTx). We examined the effects of anti-BAFF treatment on B cells, expression of costimulatory molecules and cytokines, germinal centers (GCs), and DSA formation in an RTx model in rats.

METHODS

Anti-BAFF antibody was injected on days 3, 17, 31, and 45 after allogeneic RTx. Rats received reduced dose cyclosporine A for 28 or 56 days to allow chronic rejection and DSA formation. Leukocytes, B-cell subsets, and DSA were measured using flow cytometry; expression of cytokines and costimulatory molecules was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and GCs and T follicular helper were assessed using immunohistochemistry. Rejection was evaluated by a nephropathologist.

RESULTS

Anti-BAFF treatment reduced the frequency of B cells in allografts and spleen. Naive B cells were strongly reduced by anti-BAFF treatment in all compartments. Messenger RNA expression of interleukin-6 and the costimulatory molecules CD40 and inducible T cell costimulator ligand was significantly reduced in anti-BAFF-treated rats. GC area was smaller and plasmablasts/plasma cell numbers lower in anti-BAFF-treated rats, which was reflected by less DSA in certain IgG subclasses.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-BAFF treatment interferes with humoral responses at multiple levels in this model of allogeneic RTx.

High Pretransplant BAFF Levels and B-cell Subset Polarized towards a Memory Phenotype as Predictive Biomarkers for Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) is one of the leading causes of graft loss in kidney transplantation and B cells play an important role in the development of it. A B-cell activating factor (BAFF) is a cytokine involved in B cell ontogeny. Here, we analyzed whether B cell maturation and the effect of B cell soluble factors, such as BAFF could be involved in AbMR. Serum BAFF levels and B and T cell subpopulations were analyzed 109 kidney transplant patients before transplantation and at 6 and 12 months after kidney transplantation. Pretransplant serum BAFF levels as well as memory B cell subpopulations were significantly higher in those patients who suffered clinical AbMR during the first 12 months after kidney transplantation. Similar results were observed in the prospective analysis of patients with subclinical antibody-mediated rejection detected in the surveillance biopsy performed at 12 months after kidney transplantation. A multivariate analysis confirmed the independent role of BAFF in the development of AbMR, irrespective of other classical variables. Pretransplant serum BAFF levels could be an important non-invasive biomarker for the prediction of the development of AbMR and posttransplant increased serum BAFF levels contribute to AbMR.

The role of soluble B cell-activating factor in further stratifying the risk of antibody-mediated rejection post-renal transplant: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive value of serum soluble B cell-activating factor (sBAFF) for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which remains controversial.

METHODS

Systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and three Chinese databases. Studies of any relevant design were included. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019109198).

RESULTS

Nine observational studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 1302 cases (median NOS quality score = 8, range 6-8). The incidence of ABMR was significantly higher in the high sBAFF group than in the low sBAFF level group (Risk ratio [RR] 2.04 [95% CI 1.52-2.74], I² = 26%, P < 0.01, N = 1014). The subgroup analysis showed that regardless of pre-transplant donor-specific antibody (DSA) status, the high sBAFF level group still had a significantly higher incidence of ABMR. sBAFF was not associated with the risk of TCMR. The sBAFF level was significantly higher in the anti-HLA-antibody (+) group than in anti-HLA-antibody (-) patients before or after kidney transplantation (Standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.43 [0.29-0.56], P < 0.01, I² = 34%, N = 1001).

CONCLUSION

sBAFF is a promising biomarker to further stratify the risk of ABMR post-renal transplant.

B-Cell Activating Factor Predicts Acute Rejection Risk in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A 6-Month Follow-Up Study

B cell activating factor (BAFF) belonging to TNF family is a cytokine that enhances B-cell proliferation and differentiation. Recently, It has been suggested that BAFF might be a potential therapeutic target for treating autoimmune disease. However, the relationship between BAFF and allograft rejection is controversial, and the clinical significance of BAFF in predicting allograft rejection need to be further explored. We conducted 6-month follow-up study to confirm the hypothesis that BAFF might be a risk factor for predicting acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. At the end of the study, a total of 155 kidney transplant recipients were recruited from October 2015 to October 2017, and classified into acute rejection group (n = 34) and stable renal function group (n = 121) according to their clinical course. We demonstrate that the serum BAFF levels when acute rejection occurred was significantly higher than that in the stable renal function group (2426.19 ± 892.19 vs. 988.17 ± 485.63 pg/mL, P < 0.05). BAFF expression was significantly enhanced in the membrane and cytoplasm of renal tubule epithelial cells in the transplant kidney tissue with acute rejection, and a positive correlation between BAFF and C4d expression was also observed (r = 0.880, P = 0.001). ROC analyses highlight the superiority of serum BAFF level before transplant over those on other post-transplant days in prediction of acute rejection episodes. The sensitivity, specificity and AUC (area under curve) were 83.3, 89.5, and 0.886%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that recipients with higher pretransplant BAFF levels had higher acute rejection incidence (P = 0.003). In conclusion, we have identified that BAFF levels are associated with the acute rejection and could be a promising biomarker to predict kidney transplant rejection risks.

B-cell activating factor, a predictor of antibody mediated rejection in kidney transplantation recipients

AIM

Donor-specific antibody (DSA) is a widely-used biomarker for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) but correctly indicates only 30-40% of patients with ABMR. Additional biomarkers of ABMR in kidney transplant recipients are needed.

METHODS

All 68 kidney transplanted-recipients enrolled in this study were negative for graft rejection as determined by surveillance-biopsy ELISA at day 7 post-transplantation. Allograft biopsy was then performed at 6 months post-transplantation for subclinical-ABMR detection. Recipients were stratified by pre-transplant DSA and BAFF at day 7 into four groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 13.2% of the recipients demonstrated subclinical-ABMR at 6 months, without patient with clinical ABMR presentations. Overall mean BAFF at day 7 was 393 pg/mL (95% CI = 316-471 pg/mL). The optimal cut-off value for low vs. high BAFF level was 573 pg/mL, with sensitivity and specificity at 77.8% and 88.1%, respectively. Fifty percent of recipients with high BAFF at day 7 (14 patients) and only 3.7% of patients with low BAFF demonstrated ABMR (P < 0.05). Indeed, ABMR was more common in patients high BAFF level (hazard ratio = 7.30; 95% CI = 3.77-14.15). The prevalence of ABMR among negative pre-transplant DSA/low BAFF, positive DSA/low BAFF, negative DSA/high BAFF, and positive DSA/ high BAFF recipients were 4.4, 0, 37.5 and 66.7%, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant ABMR can be predicted by perioperative serum BAFF level. Together with DSA testing, BAFF provides additional predictive value for ABMR.

B Cell Activating Factor, Renal Allograft Antibody-Mediated Rejection, and Long-Term Outcome

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of renal allograft lacks typical phenotypes and clinical manifestations, always resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment. It has been considered to be an elemental factor influencing the improvement of the long-term outcome of renal allograft. The B cell activating factor (BAFF) signal plays a fundamental function in the process of antibody-mediated immune response. Data from recipients and the nonhuman primate ABMR model suggest that the BAFF signal participates in the ABMR of renal allograft, while there are objections. The challenges in the diagnosis of ABMR, different study population, and details of research may explain the discrepancy. Large quantities of dynamic, credible data of BAFF ligands and their association with renal allograft pathological characteristics would constitute a direct proof of the role of BAFF in the progression of renal allograft ABMR.

Renal allograft rejection, lymphocyte infiltration, and de novo donor-specific antibodies in a novel model of non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy

Background

Non-adherence has been associated with reduced graft survival. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunological mechanisms underlying chronic renal allograft rejection using a model of non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. We used a MHC (major histocompatibility complex) -mismatched rat model of renal transplantation (Brown Norway to Lewis), in which rats received daily oral cyclosporine A. In analogy to non-adherence to therapy, one group received cyclosporine A on alternating days only. Rejection was histologically graded according to the Banff classification. We quantified fibrosis by trichrome staining and intra-graft infiltration of T cells, B cells, and monocytes/macrophages by immunohistochemistry. The distribution of B lymphocytes was assessed using immunofluorescence microscopy. Intra-graft chemokine, chemokine receptor, BAFF (B cell activating factor belonging to the TNF family), and immunoglobulin G transcription levels were analysed by RT-PCR. Finally, we evaluated donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity using flow cytometry.

Results

After 28 days, cellular rejection occurred during non-adherence in 5/6 animals, mixed with humoral rejection in 3/6 animals. After non-adherence, the number of T lymphocytes were elevated compared to daily immunosuppression. Monocyte numbers declined over time. Accordingly, lymphocyte chemokine transcription was significantly increased in the graft, as was the transcription of BAFF, BAFF receptor, and Immunoglobulin G. Donor specific antibodies were elevated in non-adherence, but did not induce complement-dependent cytotoxicity.

Conclusion

Cellular and humoral rejection, lymphocyte infiltration, and de novo DSA are induced in this model of non-adherence.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/s12865-017-0236-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

B-cell activating factor BAFF reflects patients' immunological risk profile after kidney transplantation

The B-cell activating factor BAFF plays an important role in the development and maturation of B-lymphocytes, which can contribute to the generation of donor-specific antibodies and thus may influence graft function and graft survival. Inconsistent data on the role of BAFF levels after renal transplantation for the formation of donor-specific antibodies and the contribution for allograft rejection exist. The aim of the current study was to determine to what extent the degree of pre-immunization is reflected by each patient's BAFF levels before transplantation and in the follow-up. Furthermore, the impact of BAFF on allograft rejection frequency as well as severity and resulting allograft function over time was analyzed. Additionally, the impact of viral infections on BAFF levels after transplantation - as a potential confounder - was examined. For this purpose, a group of pre-sensitized patients (PRA>0%, (52±24% on average), n=40) was compared with non-sensitized patients (PRA=0%, n=62) and in a subsequent analysis stratification in accordance to the detected BAFF level was performed. Pre-sensitized patients had significantly higher BAFF levels before transplantation and suffered significantly more often from early steroid-resistant, mainly antibody-mediated rejections. A result which was confirmed also in highly sensitized patients with PRA levels >50%. Additionally, in the follow-up patients with either rising BAFF levels over time or BAFF levels above the median also had significantly more often antibody mediated rejections. Additionally, patients with BAFF levels above detected median even displayed impaired creatinine values as well as an induced eGFR slope up to month 48 after transplantation. The occurrence of viral infections (CMV, BKV) was only an additional influencing factor in the absence of concomitant allograft rejections. Therefore, the B-cell proliferation factor BAFF appears not only to reflect the immunological risk profile of patients in the context of kidney transplantation, it may possibly be further developed as a predictor of patients with an increased risk profile for subsequent allograft rejection and impaired allograft function.

B-Cell-Activating Factor Levels Are Associated With Antibody-Mediated Histological Damage in Kidney Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Along with death engraftment, in recent years, antibody-mediated damage has been identified as the leading cause of loss of kidney transplants. Despite the recognition of the role of the B-lymphocyte subpopulation in the development of both tolerance and rejection, little is known about the trigger mechanisms and effectors of this humoral response.

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the relationship between B lymphocyte subpopulations and levels of B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) with the histological findings in biopsies of renal transplantation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We selected 35 patients whose kidney transplant biopsy was performed between January and November 2015. The biopsy specimens were classified according to Banff criteria. At the moment of the biopsy BAFF levels and B-lymphocyte subpopulations in blood were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and using flow cytometry, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean BAFF levels were 493 ± 245 pg/mL. The median performance of biopsy post-transplantation was 12.9 (11.7-23.9) months. BAFF levels correlated with pretransplantation antibodies (r = 0.523; P = .002) but not with kidney function. In biopsies performed more than 1 year after transplantation BAFF levels correlated with the severity of chronic glomerular (cg) involvement (r = 0.625; P = .003). Histological variables related to antibody-mediated injury selected by principal component analysis (glomerulitis, peritubular capillary, and chronic glomerulopathy) related to BAFF levels (B factor, 116; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12-220; P = .029). Biopsy specimens with transplant glomerulopathy (TG) showed lower levels of circulating naive CD19 + subpopulation, IgD+, and CD27- (32.7 ± 28.1 vs 87.9 ± 79.1; P = .017) compared with biopsy specimens without TG.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated levels of BAFF are associated with increased presence and severity of TG and a set of variables related to antibody-mediated histological damage. TG is associated with changes in circulating B-lymphocyte subpopulations that could contribute to its pathogenesis.

Soluble BAFF Cytokine Levels and Antibody-Mediated Rejection of the Kidney Allograft

The B-cell activating factor (BAFF) cytokine has important functions for the survival and maturation of B lymphocytes, which implies that this cytokine might play a role in the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after kidney transplantation. In our study, we compared the concentrations of the soluble BAFF cytokine in kidney graft recipients with AMR and patients without rejection with the goal of testing the hypothesis whether BAFF level measurement might be useful as a diagnostic marker of AMR. The study included a cohort of 19 high-risk patients with diagnosed AMR and 17 control patients free of rejection. BAFF was measured in all patients before transplantation, during the rejection episodes, and three months after transplantation in patients free of rejection using the Luminex technique. Before transplantation, the serum concentrations of BAFF in patients with AMR and kidney recipients without rejection did not significantly differ. After transplantation, however, BAFF levels were significantly lower in patients with AMR and also in patients with concurrent humoral and cellular rejection compared with patients without rejection (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). No correlation was found between BAFF and the production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) before and after transplantation. Patients experiencing AMR and simultaneous cellular and AMR had significantly lower concentrations of BAFF in comparison with patients free of rejection.

Clinical Significance of Pre- and Post-Transplant BAFF Levels in Kidney Transplant Recipients

It is well known that pre-transplant B cell activating factor (BAFF) levels are associated with the development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies and antibody mediated rejection post-transplant. However, the clinical significance of BAFF values at allograft rejection has not been determined. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of pre-transplant BAFF level as well as post-transplant BAFF levels measured when indication biopsy was done. We checked for anti-HLA antibodies in 115 kidney transplant recipients who required allograft biopsy due to an increase in serum creatinine. With the same serum specimen, we measured BAFF levels, and in 78 of these patients, pre-transplant BAFF and anti-HLA antibody levels were detected as well. Patients in each group were divided into tertiles according to BAFF levels. We investigated the relationship between BAFF levels and the occurrence of anti-HLA antibodies. Pre-transplant BAFF levels showed significant association with pre-transplant sensitization, and also with early rejection (Tertile 3, 26.9% vs. Tertile 1, 11.5%; P<0.05). Post-transplant BAFF levels showed significant association with pre-transplant sensitization, but did not show association with anti-HLA antibodies and positive donor-specific antibodies at the time of biopsy. We did not find any association between post-transplant BAFF levels and allograft biopsy results, Banff scores and microvascular inflammation scores. In conclusion, pre-transplant BAFF levels are associated with pre-transplant sensitization and are useful in predicting allograft rejection. But post-transplant BAFF levels measured at the time of indication biopsy are not associated with the appearance of de novo HLA-DSA, allograft rejection, biopsy findings and other allograft outcomes.

High B-cell activating factor is not associated with worse 3-year graft outcome in blood group-incompatible kidney transplantation with rituximab induction

B cells and their regulation by B-cell activating factor BAFF are of growing interest in kidney transplantation (KTx). There is evidence that high serum (s) BAFF leads to increased allosensitization and impaired long-term graft function. We prospectively investigated sBAFF, peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), and donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in patients after ABOi with B-cell depleting rituximab induction treatment and compared them to a group of blood group-compatible (ABOc) living donor kidney recipients. Twelve patients after ABOi and 18 after ABOc were included. After rituximab treatment prior to ABOi, B cells remained significantly lower 1 year after KTx (1.2% (0.0-17.8) compared to ABOc of 8.6% (2.8-35.0), p = 0.0004, and also BAFF-R expression was significantly lower in ABOi (p < 0.006). sBAFF remained elevated 1 year post-Tx compared to ABOc (3615 ± 1800 vs. 1394 ± 493 pg/mL, p < 0.004). Kidney function was not significantly different between both groups after 1, 2, and 3 years. The use of rituximab in ABOi together with maintenance immunosuppression leads to significant elevation of sBAFF and lowering of B-cell numbers for more than 1 year, and this does not correlate with worse 3-year graft outcome.

Kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept exhibit increased naïve and transitional B cells

Phase III clinical studies have shown that kidney transplant (KT) recipients treated with the costimulation blocker belatacept exhibited a better renal allograft function and lower donor-specific anti-HLA immunization when compared to recipients treated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). We analyzed B cell phenotype in KT recipients treated with belatacept and stable renal function (N = 13). Results were compared to those observed in stable patients treated with CNI (N = 12), or with chronic antibody-mediated rejection (N = 5). Both transcriptional profile and phenotypic characterization of peripheral B cells were performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry, respectively. In belatacept group, the frequency and absolute number of transitional B cells as defined by both phenotypes: CD19(+) CD24(hi) CD38(hi) and CD19(+) IgD(hi) CD38(hi) CD27(-) , as well as naïve B cells were significantly higher compared with CNI group. B cell activating factor (BAFF) and BAFF receptor mRNA levels were significantly lower in belatacept group than in CNI group. These results show for the first time that belatacept influences B cell compartment by favoring the occurrence of transitional B cells with potential regulatory properties, as described in operational tolerant patients. This role may explain the lower alloimmunization rate observed in belatacept-treated patients.

Biologic agents in islet transplantation

Islet transplantation is today an accepted modality for treating selected patients with frequent hypoglycemic events or severe glycemic lability. Despite tremendous progress in islet isolation, culture, and preservation, clinical use is still restricted to a limited subset, and lifelong immunosuppression is required. Issues surrounding limited islet revascularization and immune destruction remain. One of the major challenges is to prevent alloreactivity and recurrence of autoimmunity against β-cells. These two hurdles can be effectively reduced by immunosuppressive therapy combining induction and maintenance treatments. The introduction of highly potent and selective biologic agents has significantly reduced the frequency of acute rejection and has prolonged graft survival, while minimizing the complications of this therapeutic scheme. This review will address the most important biological agents used in islet transplantation. We provide a historical perspective of their introduction into clinical practice and their role in current clinical protocols, aiming at improved engraftment efficiency, increased long-term survival, and better overall results of clinical islet transplantation.

Elevated pretransplantation soluble BAFF is associated with an increased risk of acute antibody-mediated rejection

BACKGROUND

B cells play an important role in renal allograft pathology, particularly in acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). B-cell activating factor belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF; also known as BLyS) is a cytokine that enhances B-cell survival and proliferation.

METHODS

We analyzed serum BAFF levels in 32 patients undergoing antibody-incompatible (Ai) renal transplantation and 319 antibody-compatible transplant recipients and sought to determine whether there was a correlation with acute rejection and with transplant function and survival.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that, in patients undergoing Ai transplantation, elevated serum BAFF levels at baseline (before both antibody removal/desensitization and transplantation) are associated with an increased risk of subsequent AMR. In antibody-compatible transplant recipients at lower risk of AMR, no statistically significant association was observed between pretransplantation serum BAFF and AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

These data raise the possibility that, in high immunologic risk patients undergoing Ai transplantation, the presence of elevated pretransplantation serum BAFF might identify those at increased risk of AMR. BAFF neutralization may be an interesting therapeutic strategy to explore in these patients, particularly because such agents are available and have already been used in the treatment of autoimmunity.

B-cell regulation and its application to transplantation

There has been increasing interest in the role played by B cells and their associated antibody in the immune response to an allograft, driven by the need to undertake antibody-incompatible transplantation and evidence suggesting that B cells play a role in acute T-cell-mediated rejection and in acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. This review focuses on the molecular events, both activating and inhibitory, which control B-cell activation, and considers how this information might inform therapeutic strategies. Potential targets include the BAFF (B-cell-activating factor belonging to the tumour necrosis factor family) and CD40-CD40L pathways and inhibitory molecules, such as CD22 and FcγRIIB. B cells can also play an immunomodulatory role via interleukin (IL)10 production and may contribute to transplant tolerance. The expansion of allograft-specific IL10-producing B cells may be an additional therapeutic goal. Thus, the treatment paradigm required in transplantation has shifted from that of simple B-cell depletion, to that of a more subtle, differential manipulation of different B-cell subsets.

The BAFF/APRIL system: emerging functions beyond B cell biology and autoimmunity

The BAFF system plays a key role in the development of autoimmunity, especially in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This often leads to the assumption that BAFF is mostly a B cell factor with a specific role in autoimmunity. Focus on BAFF and autoimmunity, driven by pharmaceutical successes with the recent approval of a novel targeted therapy Belimumab, has relegated other potential roles of BAFF to the background. Far from being SLE-specific, the BAFF system has a much broader relevance in infection, cancer and allergy. In this review, we provide the latest views on additional roles of the BAFF system in health and diseases, as well as an update on BAFF and autoimmunity, with particular focus on current clinical trials.

BAFF and BAFF-R levels are associated with risk of long-term kidney graft dysfunction and development of donor-specific antibodies

There are lines of evidence that B cells may play a role in transplantation. B cell activating factor, BAFF, is a homotrimer that has been shown to play a role in B cell survival, maturation and activation. To date, little is known of the role of BAFF and its receptors in transplantation. We analyzed the level of BAFF mRNA and its soluble protein, as well as transcripts coding for its receptors, BAFF-R, TACI and BCMA, in the blood of 143 patients with stable kidney transplant function 5 years or more posttransplantation. Three endpoints were analyzed: the time to renal dysfunction, the time to appearance of anti-HLA antibodies and the time to development of donor-specific antibodies. We established threshold values for BAFF and BAFF-R and showed that (1) stable patients with high BAFF-R levels had a higher risk of developing graft dysfunction, (2) patients with lower levels of BAFF transcripts or a higher level of soluble BAFF had a significantly higher risk of developing donor-specific antibodies. These data suggest that BAFF constitutes a risk factor for renal graft dysfunction and development of donor-specific antibodies. They also suggest that agents targeting BAFF-R interactions may offer new therapeutic opportunities in transplantation.

Elevated serum levels of B-cell activating factor in pediatric renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

B-cells are increasingly recognized as important players in alloimmunity. B cell-activating factor (BAFF) and its receptor BAFF-R are essential for B-cell differentiation and survival. Data on BAFF levels in pediatric renal transplant (RT) patients are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

It is known from adult data that elevated BAFF levels correlate with an unfavorable outcome in bone marrow and kidney recipients. To analyze this hypothesis in pediatric renal transplant patients we performed a cross-sectional analysis of serum BAFF levels, lymphocyte surface BAFF-R expression, and clinical variables in a cohort of 43 pediatric renal transplant patients.

METHODS

We studied serum BAFF, CD19+ B-, and FoxP3+ regulatory T-cells (Tregs) and BAFF-R expression in 43 children 2.9 (0.1-12.4) years after RT on maintenance immunosuppression. Twenty-two healthy children and 19 children with chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD5) served as controls.

RESULTS

BAFF levels were significantly higher in RT patients than in healthy children (1,435±574 vs 894±189 pg/mL; p<0.0001) whereas numbers of B-cells and Tregs were significantly lower. BAFF-R expression on B-cells was decreased after RT (531±334 vs 707±257 MFI; p<0.005), BAFF inversely correlated with BAFF-R (r=-0.5022, p<0.006), but not with B-cell count. BAFF was elevated in CKD5 patients (1,276±294 pg/mL). In RT patients BAFF was significantly higher in those with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m(2) (1,553±447 vs 1,234±323 pg/mL; p=0.02). BAFF levels and BAFF-R expression did not correlate with HLA antibody status, time after transplantation, age or gender of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Serum BAFF concentrations were significantly elevated in pediatric RT patients. They correlated with decreased BAFF-R expression on CD19+ B-cells and impaired allograft function. Our findings of a dysregulated BAFF/BAFF-R axis may be of clinical relevance after renal transplantation and therefore underline the importance of further research into BAFF-dependent mechanisms.

Tolerogenic therapies in transplantation

Since the concept of immunologic tolerance was discovered in the 1940s, the pursuit of tolerance induction in human transplantation has led to a rapid development of pharmacologic and biologic agents. Short-term graft survival remains an all-time high, but successful withdrawal of immunosuppression to achieve operational tolerance rarely occurs outside of liver transplantation. Collaborative efforts through the NIH sponsored Immune Tolerance Network and the European Commission sponsored Reprogramming the Immune System for Establishment of Tolerance consortia have afforded researchers opportunity to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tolerogenic strategies, investigate mechanisms of tolerance, and identify molecular and genetic markers that distinguish the tolerance phenotype. In this article, we review traditional and novel approaches to inducing tolerance for organ transplantation, with an emphasis on their translation into clinical trials.

Biologics in organ transplantation

The last two decades have witnessed a pandemic in antibody development, with over 600 entering clinical studies and a total of 28 approved by the FDA and European Union. The incorporation of biologics in transplantation has made a significant impact on allograft survival. Herein, we review the armamentarium of clinical and preclinical biologics used for organ transplantation--with the exception of belatacept--from depleting and IL-2R targeting induction agents to costimulation blockade, B-cell therapeutics, BAFF and complement inhibition, anti-adhesion, and anti-cytokine approaches. While individual agents may be insufficient for tolerance induction, they provide possibilities for reduction of steroid or calcineurin inhibitor use, alternatives to rejection episodes refractory to conventional therapies, and specialized immunosuppression for highly sensitized patients.

The role of B cells in solid organ transplantation

The role of antibodies in chronic injury to organ transplants has been suggested for many years, but recently emphasized by new data. We have observed that when immunosuppressive potency decreases either by intentional weaning of maintenance agents or due to homeostatic repopulation after immune cell depletion, the threshold of B cell activation may be lowered. In human transplant recipients the result may be donor-specific antibody, C4d+ injury, and chronic rejection. This scenario has precise parallels in a rhesus monkey renal allograft model in which T cells are depleted with CD3 immunotoxin, or in a CD52-T cell transgenic mouse model using alemtuzumab to deplete T cells. Such animal models may be useful for the testing of therapeutic strategies to prevent DSA. We agree with others who suggest that weaning of immunosuppression may place transplant recipients at risk of chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and that strategies to prevent this scenario are needed if we are to improve long-term graft and patient outcomes in transplantation. We believe that animal models will play a crucial role in defining the pathophysiology of antibody-mediated rejection and in developing effective therapies to prevent graft injury. Two such animal models are described herein.

Monitoring tolerance and rejection in organ transplant recipients

To avoid toxic side effects caused by permanent immunosuppressive treatment, research in transplantation focuses on new treatment strategies inducing tolerance or allowing drug weaning. Implementing drug minimization into clinical routine can be only safely achieved when guided by biomarkers reflecting the individual immune reactivity. We review recently described biomarkers and assays allowing identification of patients suitable for drug weaning or at risk of rejection. However, the majority of described biomarkers and assays have not been validated in prospective clinical trials. Thus, collaborative efforts are needed to design and perform prospective multicenter trials to validate the identified biomarkers across different laboratories.

B-lymphocyte homeostasis and BLyS-directed immunotherapy in transplantation

Current strategies for immunotherapy after transplantation are primarily T-lymphocyte directed and effectively abrogate acute rejection. However, the reality of chronic allograft rejection attests to the fact that transplantation tolerance remains an elusive goal. Donor-specific antibodies are considered the primary cause of chronic rejection. When naive, alloreactive B-cells encounter alloantigen and are activated, a resilient "sensitized" state, characterized by the presence of high-affinity antibody, is established. Here, we will delineate findings that support transient B-lymphocyte depletion therapy at the time of transplantation to preempt sensitization by eliminating alloreactive specificities from the recipient B-cell pool (ie, "repertoire remodeling"). Recent advances in our understanding of B-lymphocyte homeostasis provide novel targets for immunomodulation in transplantation. Specifically, the tumor necrosis factor-related cytokine BLyS is the dominant survival factor for "tolerance-susceptible" transitional and "preimmune" mature follicular B-cells. The transitional phenotype is the intermediate through which all newly formed B-cells pass before maturing into the follicular subset, which is responsible for mounting an alloantigen-specific antibody response. Systemic BLyS levels dictate the stringency of negative selection during peripheral B-cell repertoire development. Thus, targeting BLyS will likely provide an opportunity for repertoire-directed therapy to eliminate alloreactive B-cell specificities in transplant recipients, a requirement for the achievement of humoral tolerance and prevention of chronic rejection. In this review, the fundamentals of preimmune B-cell selection, homeostasis, and activation will be described. Furthermore, new and current B-lymphocyte-directed therapy for antibody-mediated rejection and the highly sensitized state will be discussed. Overall, our objective is to propose a rational approach for induction of humoral transplantation tolerance by remodeling the primary B-cell repertoire of the allograft recipient.

B-cell tolerance in transplantation: is repertoire remodeling the answer?

T lymphocytes are the primary targets of immunotherapy in clinical transplantation; however, B lymphocytes and their secreted alloantibodies are also highly detrimental to the allograft. Therefore, the achievement of sustained organ transplant survival will likely require the induction of B-lymphocyte tolerance. During development, acquisition of B-cell tolerance to self-antigens relies on clonal deletion in the early stages of B-cell compartment ontogeny. We contend that this mechanism should be recapitulated in the setting of alloantigens and organ transplantation to eliminate the alloreactive B-cell subset from the recipient. Clinically feasible targets of B-cell-directed immunotherapy, such as CD20 and B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), should drive upcoming clinical trials aimed at remodeling the recipient B-cell repertoire.