Significance of lymph node metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing curative resection

Predictors for Long-Term Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Improved systemic therapy has made long term (≥ 5 years) overall survival (LTS) after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) increasingly common. However, a systematic review on predictors of LTS following resection of PDAC is lacking.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception until March 2023. Studies reporting actual survival data (based on follow-up and not survival analysis estimates) on factors associated with LTS were included. Meta-analyses were conducted by using a random effects model, and study quality was gauged by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies with 27,091 patients (LTS: 2,132, non-LTS: 24,959) who underwent surgical resection for PDAC were meta-analyzed. The median proportion of LTS patients was 18.32% (IQR 12.97-21.18%) based on 20 studies. Predictors for LTS included sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative levels of CA19-9, CEA, and albumin, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, tumor grade, AJCC stage, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, pathologic T-stage, nodal disease, metastatic disease, margin status, adjuvant therapy, vascular resection, operative time, operative blood loss, and perioperative blood transfusion. Most articles received a "good" NOS assessment, indicating an acceptable risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis pools all true follow up data in the literature to quantify associations between prognostic factors and LTS after resection of PDAC. While there appears to be evidence of a complex interplay between risk, tumor biology, patient characteristics, and management related factors, no single parameter can predict LTS after the resection of PDAC.

Para-aortic lymph node involvement should not be a contraindication to resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) are found in the aortocaval groove and they are staged as metastatic disease if involved by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The data in the literature is conflicting with some studies having associated PALN involvement with poor prognosis, while others not sharing the same results. PALN resection is not included in the standard lymphadenectomy during pancreatic resections as per the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery and there is no consensus on the management of these cases.

AIM

To investigate the prognostic significance of PALN metastases on the oncological outcomes after resection for PDAC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of data retrieved from a prospectively maintained database on consecutive patients undergoing pancreatectomies for PDAC where PALN was sampled between 2011 and 2020. Statistical comparison of the data between PALN+ and PALN- subgroups, survival analysis with the Kaplan-Meier method and risk analysis with univariable and multivariable time to event Cox regression analysis were performed, specifically assessing oncological outcomes such as median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

81 cases had PALN sampling and 17 (21%) were positive. Pathological N stage was significantly different between PALN+ and PALN- patients (P = 0.005), while no difference was observed in any of the other characteristics. Preoperative imaging diagnosed PALN positivity in one case. OS and DFS were comparable between PALN+ and PALN- patients with lymph node positive disease (OS: 13.2 mo vs 18.8 mo, P = 0.161; DFS: 13 mo vs 16.4 mo, P = 0.179). No difference in OS or DFS was identified between PALN positive and negative patients when they received chemotherapy either in the neoadjuvant or in the adjuvant setting (OS: 23.4 mo vs 20.6 mo, P = 0.192; DFS: 23.9 mo vs 20.5 mo, P = 0.718). On the contrary, when patients did not receive chemotherapy, PALN disease had substantially shorter OS (5.5 mo vs 14.2 mo; P = 0.015) and DFS (4.4 mo vs 9.8 mo; P < 0.001). PALN involvement was not identified as an independent predictor for OS after multivariable analysis, while it was for DFS doubling the risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

PALN involvement does not affect OS when patients complete the indicated treatment pathway for PDAC, surgery and chemotherapy, and should not be considered as a contraindication to resection.

Elderly Patients with Nondistant Metastatic Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma Cannot Benefit from More Radical Surgery

BACKGROUND

The incidence of pancreatic cancer continues to rise globally, with pancreatic head cancer accounting for nearly 60-70%. Pancreatic head cancer occurs mainly in people over the age of 60, and its morbidity and mortality increase with age. We investigated whether these elderly patients with nondistant metastases would benefit more from expanded pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) compared with standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (SPD).

METHODS

3317 elderly patients with pancreatic head cancer from the SEER database were included in the study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients were divided into a nonsurgical group and surgical group (including EPD and SPD). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were applied to identify the independent risk factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS). The survival differences between the nonsurgical group and surgical group were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) methods were applied to balance covariates and reduce the interference of confounding variables. The two groups of patients were matched in a 1 : 1 ratio, and the covariates between the two groups were compared to verify the matching validity. The survival difference in different groups was compared after the matching analysis.

RESULTS

3317 enrolled patients were divided into the surgical group (n = 984) and nonsurgical group (n = 2333). Before PSM, there were significant differences in overall survival (OS) and CSS between the nonsurgical group and surgical group (median OS: 8 months vs. 20 months, P < 0.001; median CSS: 8 months vs. 22 months, P < 0.001). The multivariate CSS Cox regression analysis demonstrated surgery is an independent risk factor. However, no significant differences were founded between the SPD and EPD groups (median OS: 20 months vs. 22 months, P=0.636; median CSS: 22 months vs. 22 months, P=0.270). After PSM, there were also no significant differences in OS and CSS between the SPD and EPD groups (median OS: 23 months vs. 18 months, P=0.415; median CSS: 26 months vs. 18 months, P=0.329).

CONCLUSION

This study uses PSM to evaluate the effects of EPD and SPD for elderly patients with nondistant metastatic pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. It found that surgery is an independent prognostic factor, but expanded surgery has no survival advantage for these patients, whereas SPD provides a better survival advantage than EPD. SPD is a reasonable treatment option for these patients.

Long-term outcomes following en bloc resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head with portomesenteric venous invasion

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to clarify the prognostic influence of venous resection of the portal vein (PV) or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) on long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the head with suspected vascular invasion.

METHODS

From May 1995 to December 2014, a total of 557 patients underwent surgery with curative intent for pancreatic cancer of the head.

RESULTS

Among 557 patients, 106 (19%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with PV-SMV resection and 89 (75.5%) of these patients were confirmed to have true pathological invasion. The 5-year overall survival rate in patients underwent PV-SMV resection was significantly lower compared with those who did not (18.7% versus 24.3%; p = 0.002). Patients with negative resection margins who underwent PV-SMV resection had a better prognosis than those with positive resection margins who did not undergo PV-SMV resection with positive resection margins (17% versus 6.3% in 5-year overall survival rate; p = 0.003). The overall morbidity rate was not significantly different between PV-SMV resection group and no PV-SMV resection group (p = 0.064). On multivariate analysis, margin status, advanced T stage (3 or 4), lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSION

PV-SMV resection was related to lower overall survival. However, on multivariate analysis, margin status was a more important prognostic factor than PV-SMV resection and true pathological invasion for survival. Therefore, en bloc PV-SMV resection should be performed when PV-SMV invasion is suspected to achieve R0 resection.

Preoperative defining system for pancreatic head cancer considering surgical resection

AIM

To provide appropriate treatment, it is crucial to share the clinical status of pancreas head cancer among multidisciplinary treatment members.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 113 patients who underwent surgery for pancreas head cancer from January 2008 to December 2012 was performed. We developed preoperative defining system of pancreatic head cancer by describing "resectability - tumor location - vascular relationship - adjacent organ involvement - preoperative CA19-9 (initial bilirubin level) - vascular anomaly". The oncologic correlations with this reporting system were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 113 patients, there were 75 patients (66.4%) with resectable, 34 patients (30.1%) with borderline resectable, and 4 patients (3.5%) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Mean disease-free survival was 24.8 mo (95%CI: 19.6-30.1) with a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 13.5%. Pretreatment tumor size ≥ 2.4 cm [Exp(B) = 3.608, 95%CI: 1.512-8.609, P = 0.044] and radiologic vascular invasion [Exp(B) = 5.553, 95%CI: 2.269-14.589, P = 0.002] were independent predictive factors for neoadjuvant treatment. Borderline resectability [Exp(B) = 0.222, P = 0.008], pancreatic head cancer involving the pancreatic neck [Exp(B) = 9.461, P = 0.001] and arterial invasion [Exp(B) = 6.208, P = 0.010], and adjusted CA19-9 ≥ 50 [Exp(B) = 1.972 P = 0.019] were identified as prognostic clinical factors to predict tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The suggested preoperative defining system can help with designing treatment plans and also predict oncologic outcomes.

Combined targeting of TGF-β, EGFR and HER2 suppresses lymphangiogenesis and metastasis in a pancreatic cancer model

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are aggressive with frequent lymphatic spread. By analysis of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we determined that ~35% of PDACs have a pro-angiogenic gene signature. We now show that the same PDACs exhibit increased expression of lymphangiogenic genes and lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) markers, and that LEC abundance in human PDACs correlates with endothelial cell microvessel density. Lymphangiogenic genes and LECs are also elevated in murine PDACs arising in the KRC (mutated Kras; deleted RB) and KIC (mutated Kras; deleted INK4a) genetic models. Moreover, pancreatic cancer cells (PCCs) derived from KRC tumors express and secrete high levels of lymphangiogenic factors, including the EGF receptor ligand, amphiregulin. Importantly, TGF-β1 increases lymphangiogenic genes and amphiregulin expression in KRC PCCs but not in murine PCCs that lack SMAD4, and combinatorial targeting of the TGF-β type I receptor (TβRI) with LY2157299 and EGFR/HER2 with lapatinib suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in a syngeneic orthotopic model, and attenuates tumor lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis while reducing lymphangiogenic genes and amphiregulin and enhancing apoptosis. Therefore, this combination could be beneficial in PDACs with lymphangiogenic or angiogenic gene signatures.

The lymphatic system and pancreatic cancer

This review summarizes current knowledge of the biology, pathology and clinical understanding of lymphatic invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer. We discuss the clinical and biological consequences of lymphatic invasion and metastasis, including paraneoplastic effects on immune responses and consider the possible benefit of therapies to treat tumors that are localized to lymphatics. A review of current techniques and methods to study interactions between tumors and lymphatics is presented.

Prognostic impact of a compartment-specific angiogenic marker profile in patients with pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer consists of a heterogenous bulk of tumor cells and stroma cells which contribute to tumor progression by releasing angiogenic factors. Those factors can be detected as circulating serum factors. We performed a compartment-specific analysis of tumor-derived and stroma-derived angiogenic factors to identify biomarkers and molecular targets for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Kryo-frozen tissue from primary ductal adenocarcinomas (n = 51) was laser-microdissected to isolate tumor and stroma tissue. Expression of 17 angiogenic factors (angiopoietin-2, follistatin, GCSF, HGF, interleukin-8, leptin, PDGF-BB, PECAM-1, VEGF, matrix metalloproteinase -1, -2, -3, -7, -9, -10, -12, and -13) was analyzed using a multiplex elisa assay for tissue-derived proteins and corresponding serum.

Our study reveals a compartment-specific expression profile for several angiogenic factors and matrix metalloproteinases. ROC analysis of corresponding serum samples reveals MMP-7 and MMP-12 as strong classifiers for the diagnosis of patients with pancreatic cancer vs. healthy control donors. High expression of tumor-derived PDGF-BB and MMP-1 correlates with prolonged survival in univariate and multivariate analysis. In conclusion, a distinct expression patterns for angiogenic cytokines and MMPs in pancreatic cancer and surrounding stroma may implicate them as novel targets for cancer treatment. Tumor-derived PDGF-BB and MMP-1 are significant and independent prognostic markers for poor survival.

Extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer is crucial

Lymph node metastasis is considered one of the most significant factors associated with postoperative prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. Some prospective studies found no significant differences in survival between patients who underwent pancreatic cancer surgery with extended lymphadenectomy and those who underwent surgery with standard lymphadenectomy. However, recent reports, such as those describing the significance of the metastatic to examined lymph node ratio, suggest the need for some degree of lymphadenectomy. This review describes the findings of published studies and discusses the usefulness of LN dissection in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Lymph node involvement beyond peripancreatic region in pancreatic head cancers: when results belie expectations

OBJECTIVES

Surgery remains the standard therapy for curative management of pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDA) involving the head of pancreas. This study aimed to report our experience in PDA about the prognostic value of lymph node (LN) invasion (N⁺) at the root of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and in N2 subgroup.

METHODS

From January 2005 to September 2009, 110 patients were included for pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy.

RESULTS

Etiologies were PDA (n = 87) or ampullary carcinomas (n = 23). Sixty-five percent of patients were N⁺, with N1/N2/N3 location, respectively, 63.6%, 9.1%, and 2.7%. Forty-four percent had a LN identified intraoperatively at the origin of the SMA, of whom only 12% were N⁺. In multivariate analysis (whole series), complication grade greater than II, location of positive LN (N1 to N3) and vascular resection were associated with a poorer survival. In the exocrine PDA subgroup, only location of positive LN and vascular resection were associated with a poorer survival. N⁺ SMA was not statistically correlated with survival, recurrence, or disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

N⁺ at the origin of the SMA was not a significant prognostic factor for PDA and should no longer be considered as a formal contraindication for curative surgery. Conversely, N2 invasion remains an unfavorable prognostic.

A Study of Zoledronic Acid as Neo-Adjuvant, Perioperative Therapy in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by abundant granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSC = CD45⁺/Lin^-/CD33⁺/CD11b⁺/CD15⁺), which infiltrate tumors and suppress anti-tumor immunity. We have previously demonstrated in a murine model of PDAC that zoledronic acid (ZA) depletes G-MDSC resulting in decreased tumor growth and improved survival. We report here the results of a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT00892242) using ZA as neo-adjuvant, perioperative therapy in patients with non-metastatic, resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Eligible PDAC patients received ZA (4mg) IV 2 weeks prior to surgery. Patients then received 2 additional doses of ZA 4 weeks apart. Blood and bone marrow were obtained from patients prior to treatment with ZA and 3 months after surgery for analysis of G-MDSC by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients received pre-operative ZA with at least 6 months of follow-up Only 15 PDAC patients had non-metastatic PDAC, which was amenable to resection. ZA was well tolerated, and all adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The most common adverse events were fatigue, abdominal pain/discomfort, anorexia, and arthralgia. Of resected PDAC patients treated with ZA, 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 85.7% and 33.3%, respectively, with a median OS of 18 months. This group had a 1- and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 26.9% and 8.9%, respectively, with a median PFS of 12 months. The prevalence of G-MDSC was unchanged in the blood and bone marrow of PDAC patients pre- and post-treatment with ZA.

CONCLUSION

ZA is safe and well tolerated as neo-adjuvant, peri-operative therapy in PDAC patients. In this small study, we did not observe a difference in OS or PFS compared to historical controls. Also, there was no difference in the prevalence of G-MDSC in the blood and bone marrow of PDAC patients pre- and post-treatment with ZA.

Prognostic significance of L-type amino-acid transporter 1 expression in surgically resected pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The expression of L-type amino-acid transporter 1 (LAT1) is tumour-specific and has been shown to have essential roles in cell growth and survival. However, little is known regarding the clinical significance of LAT1 expression in pancreatic cancer. This study was conducted to determine the prognostic significance of LAT1 expression.

METHODS

A total of 97 consecutive patients with surgically resected pathological stage I-IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. Tumour sections were stained by immunohistochemistry for LAT1, CD98, Ki-67 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and microvessel density was determined by CD34 and p53.

RESULTS

L-type amino-acid transporter 1 and CD98 were highly expressed in 52.6% (51/97) and 56.7% (55/97) of cases, respectively (P=0.568). The expression of LAT1 within pancreatic cancer cells was significantly associated with disease stage, tumour size, Ki-67, VEGF, CD34, p53 and CD98. L-type amino-acid transporter 1 expression was confirmed to be a significant prognostic factor for predicting poor outcome by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

L-type amino-acid transporter 1 expression is a promising pathological marker for the prediction of outcome in patients with pancreatic cancer.

HER3 overexpression as an independent indicator of poor prognosis for patients with curatively resected pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

The association between human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) overexpression and survival in patients with curatively resected pancreatic cancer was investigated.

METHODS

Tissue samples from 126 pancreatic cancers without hematogenous or peritoneal metastases recovered from macroscopically curative resection were fixed with formalin, embedded in paraffin and subjected to immunohistochemical staining. Semiquantitative scores of zero (no staining or staining in less than 10% of cancer cells), 1+, 2+, or 3+ were assigned to each sample based on the intensity of staining. Scores of 2+ or 3+ were defined as HER3-positive staining, i.e., HER3 overexpression.

RESULTS

HER3 overexpression was observed in 52 of the 126 tissue samples (41.3%). There were no associations between HER3 overexpression and clinicopathological factors, including tumor location, tumor size, tumor differentiation, T/N categories according to the International Union against Cancer, and serum carbohydrate antibody 19-9 level (CA19-9). Univariate analysis demonstrated the median survival time of patients with HER3 overexpression was 37.2 months, while that of patients with HER3-negative samples was 58.6 months (p = 0.008). HER3 overexpression, lymph node metastasis, and elevated serum CA19-9 level were independent predictors of poor prognosis based on multivariate survival analysis.

CONCLUSION

A new prognostic predictor, HER3 overexpression, was identified for resected pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic implications of lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas

OBJECTIVE

The current classification of pancreatic cancer is based only on anatomic location of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs). On the other hand, the number of metastatic LNs has been used in staging of colorectal, esophageal, and gastric cancers. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of the number or ratio of the metastatic LNs in pancreatic body and tail carcinoma.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with pancreatic body and tail adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatectomy were included. Location, number, ratio of metastatic LNs, and the survival of patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty patients with LN metastasis had poor prognosis (P = 0.007). The prognoses of patients with 5 or more metastatic LNs were poorer than those with less than 5 metastatic LNs (P = 0.046), and patients with a metastatic LN ratio of 0.2 or more had the worst prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that 5 or more metastatic LNs and metastatic LN ratio of 0.2 or more were independent prognostic factors for survival (P = 0.0015 and P = 0.014, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the number and the ratio of metastatic LNs can be used to predict poor patient survival and as a staging strategy.

Low expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) is a prognostic marker for poor survival in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) has been characterised as a cancer stem cell marker in different types of tumours. Additionally, it plays a pivotal role in gene regulation and endows tumour cells with augmented chemoresistance. Recently, ALDH1A1 has been described as a prognostic marker in a pancreatic cancer tissue microarray. The aim of this study was to reevaluate the expression of ALDH1A1 as a prognostic marker on whole-mount tissue sections.

METHODS

Real-time-quantitative-PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting were used to evaluate the expression profile of ALDH1A1 in seven pancreatic cancer cell lines and one non-malignant pancreatic cell line. Immunostaining against ALDH1A1 and Ki-67 was performed on paraffin-embedded samples from 97 patients with pancreatic cancer. The immunohistochemical results were correlated to histopathological and clinical data.

RESULTS

qRT-PCR and Western blotting revealed a different expression pattern of ALDH1A1 in different malignant and non-malignant pancreatic cell lines. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that ALDH1A1 was confined to the cellular cytoplasm and occurred in 72 cases (74%), whereas it was negative in 25 cases (26%). High expression of ALDH1A1 was significantly correlated to an increased proliferation rate (Spearman correlation, p = 0.01). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that decreased expression of ALDH1A1 is an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemical analysis on whole-mount tissue slides revealed that ALDH1A1 is more abundantly expressed in pancreatic cancer than initially reported by a tissue microarray analysis. Moreover, high expression of ALDH1A1 correlated significantly with the proliferation of tumour cells. Intriguingly, this study is the first which identifies low expression of ALDH1A1 as an independent adverse prognostic marker for overall survival in pancreatic cancer.

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a review of 285 published cases

BACKGROUND

Given the difficulty level of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD), limited data exist for a comparison to open pancreatoduodenectomies. As the technique becomes more diffuse, issues regarding the adequacy of oncologic margins and lymph node retrieval need to be addressed.

METHODS

All published cases of MIPD were examined. Variables analyzed included conversion rates, operating room time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, follow-up, complications, mortality, lymph node retrieval, and margins.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles describing outcomes after MIPD were found, and a total of 285 cases were described. Main malignancy treated was pancreatic adenocarcinoma, accounting for 32% of all cases. Eighty-seven percent were performed totally laparoscopically, and 13% were performed with a hand-assisted approach to facilitate the reconstruction step of the procedure. The rate of conversion to an open procedure was 9%. Estimated blood loss had a weighted average (WA) of 189 mL. Average length of stay had a WA of 12 days, and average follow-up had a WA of 14 months. The overall complication rate was 48%, and the overall mortality rate was 2%. Average lymph nodes retrieved ranged from 7 to 36 nodes, with a WA of 15 nodes, and positive margins of resection were reported to be positive in 0.4% of patients with malignant disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This review found similar outcomes with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality rates compared to open pancreatoduodenectomies. The oncologic goals of pancreatic resection may be able to be achieved by MIPD, but longer follow-up and larger series are still needed.

The role of "fatty pancreas" and of BMI in the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic fistula (PF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still a serious complication. We hypothesized that the amount of fatty tissue in the pancreatic parenchyma could be associated with the occurrence of PF after PD with pancreatogastrostomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2006, 111 consecutive patients underwent PD with pancreatogastrostomy. The microscopic amount of fatty tissue in the pancreas was evaluated.

RESULTS

The morbidity and mortality rates were 35.1% and 1.8%, respectively. PF occurred in 10.8% (n = 12). PF was of grade A in nine, grade B in two, and grade C in one patient. Univariate analysis showed that a body mass index (BMI) > 25 (P = 0.035), a soft pancreatic parenchyma (P = <0.003), a pancreatic duct size <3 mm (P = 0.015), and a fatty infiltration of the pancreas of more than 10% (P = 0.0003) were associated with the occurrence of PF. The advanced age (P = 0.049) and the BMI (P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with the presence of >10% of pancreatic fat.

CONCLUSIONS

A pancreatic fatty infiltration of the pancreas over 10% constitutes a risk factor for PF after PD. Age and BMI are useful preoperative predictors of the percentage of pancreatic fat.

Increased expression of ALCAM/CD166 in pancreatic cancer is an independent prognostic marker for poor survival and early tumour relapse

Background:

ALCAM (activated leucocyte cell adhesion molecule, synonym CD166) is a cell adhesion molecule, which belongs to the Ig superfamily. Disruption of the ALCAM-mediated adhesiveness by proteolytic sheddases such as ADAM17 has been suggested to have a relevant impact on tumour invasion. Although the expression of ALCAM is a valuable prognostic and predictive marker in several types of epithelial tumours, its role as a prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer has not yet been reported.

Methods:

In this study, paraffin-embedded samples of 97 patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing potentially curative resection were immunostained against ALCAM, ADAM17 and CK19. Expression of ALCAM and ADAM17 was semiquantitatively evaluated and correlated to clinical and histopathological parameters.

Results:

We could show that in normal pancreatic tissue, ALCAM is predominantly expressed at the cellular membrane, whereas in pancreatic tumour cells, it is mainly localised in the cytoplasm. In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses show that increased expression of ALCAM is an adverse prognostic factor for recurrence-free and overall survival. Overexpression of ADAM17 in pancreatic cancer, however, failed to be a significant prognostic marker and was not coexpressed with ALCAM.

Conclusions:

Our findings support the hypothesis that the disruption of ALCAM-mediated adhesiveness is a relevant step in pancreatic cancer progression. Moreover, ALCAM overexpression is a relevant independent prognostic marker for poor survival and early tumour relapse in pancreatic cancer.

Current state of adjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic carcinoma cannot generally be cured by surgery alone. This review summarizes the development of adjuvant therapy over the past two decades. Four randomized controlled trials compare long-term survival of different treatments. The small GITSG-study supports combined chemoradiation, but the EORTC-study found no significant effect. A Norwegian study of adjuvant chemotherapy found an increased median survival, but no effect beyond two years. The large ESPAC-1 study shows a benefit for 5-FU based chemotherapy, while chemoradiation had a negative effect. Thus, evidence favours adjuvant therapy, but 5-FU may not be the ultimate drug. Support for gemcitabine is given by preliminary data from a German randomized trial, and further American and European studies are upcoming. However, postoperative therapy is problematic, as 20-30% of resected patients never undergo treatment because of slow recovery or other reasons. Preoperative therapy has some theoretical advantages, and moreover, patients with rapidly progressive disease may be spared surgery. Randomized controlled trials are lacking, but published results compare well with postoperative, adjuvant therapy. The value of locally targeted therapy is difficult to assess. Reasonable results have been obtained with regional chemotherapy, whereas intraoperative radiotherapy does not seem to increase survival despite reducing reducing local recurrences.

Low-level expression of Smad7 correlates with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Whether Smad7 acts as a tumor proliferation promoting factor or as a metastatic suppressor in human pancreatic cancer remains unclear. This study aims to determine the prognostic value of Smad7 in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Surgical specimens obtained from 71 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were immunohistochemically assessed for Smad7, Ki-67, MMP2, CD34, and Smad4 expression. The relationship between Smad7 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-one of 71 specimens (71.8%) were Smad7 positive and 20 specimens were Smad7 negative. Negative expression of Smad7 correlated with lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis after surgery, and a poor survival rate (P = 0.0004, 0.0044, and 0.0003, respectively). We also found an inverse correlation between the expression of Smad7 and MMP2 (P = 0.0189). Multivariate analysis revealed that Smad7 expression was an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) 0.3902; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1839-0.8277; P = 0.0142]. Furthermore, in both Smad4-negative and Smad4-positive groups, survival of patients with Smad7-positive tumors was significantly better than those with Smad7-negative tumors (both P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that low-level expression of Smad7 in pancreatic cancer is significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, high MMP2 expression, and poor prognosis.

Nodal microinvolvement in patients with carcinoma of the papilla of vater receiving no adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To assess the prognostic significance of nodal microinvolvement in patients with carcinoma of the papilla of Vater.

METHODS

From 1993 to 2003 at the University Clinic Hamburg, 777 patients were operated upon pancreatic and periampullary carcinomas. The vast majority of patients were operated upon pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 566, 73%), followed by carcinomas of the papilla of Vater (n = 112, 14%), pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (n = 39, 5%), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (n = 33, 4%), and distal bile duct carcinomas (n = 27, 3%). Fresh-frozen tissue sections from 169 lymph nodes (LNs) classified as tumor free by routine histopathology from 57 patients with R0 resected carcinoma of the papilla of Vater who had been spared from adjuvant chemotherapy were immunohistochemically (IHC) examined, using a sensitive IHC assay with the anti-epithelial monoclonal antibody Ber-EP4 for tumor cell detection. With regard to histopathology, 39 (63%) of the patients were staged as pT1/pT2, 21 (37%) as pT3/pT4, 30 (53%) as pN0, while 38 (67%) as G1/G2.

RESULTS

Of the 169 "tumor-free" LNs, 91 LNs (53.8%) contained Ber-EP4-positive tumor cells. These 91 LNs were from 40 (70%) patients. The mean overall survival in patients without nodal microinvolvement of 35.8 months (median-not yet reached) was significantly longer than that in patients with nodal microinvolvement (mean 16.6; median 13; p = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for overall survival revealed that grading was the most significant independent prognostic factor (p = 0.001), followed by nodal microinvolvement (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of occult tumor cell dissemination in LNs of patients with histologically proven carcinoma of the papilla of Vater supports the need for further tumor staging through immunohistochemistry.

The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

The role of lymph node (LN) dissection for pancreatic cancer remains uncertain, and guidelines for a minimum LN number have not been established. We hypothesized that LN number in node-negative (N0) pancreatic cancer influences survival.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients undergoing resection for N0 pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1988 and 2003. Lymph node number was categorized as 1-10, 11-20, and >20.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 1915 patients, the median LN number was 7 (range 1-57); 1365 (71%) patients had <11 LN. Survival was significantly better in the 11 to 20 compared with the 1-10 group (median, 20 vs 15 months, respectively, P < 0.0001); no difference was observed between the 11-20 and >20 groups (median, 20 vs 23 months, respectively, P = 0.14). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the prognostic significance of LN number for determining overall survival (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-0.99; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic cancer lymphadenectomy with examination of >10 LN is associated with improved survival in N0 disease and should be considered a benchmark for adequacy of surgery and/or pathology. Currently, only a minority of patients are assessed by this measure. The variation in LN number may be indicative of diverse surgical technique and/or pathologic analysis and warrants further investigation.

Chemokine receptor CCR7 expression correlates with lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer

AIMS

The clinical significance of chemokine receptor CCR7 expression in pancreatic ductal cancer was investigated.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining of 89 pancreatic cancers treated macroscopically with curative resection without hematogenous metastases or peritoneal dissemination were analyzed in association with clinicopathological data.

RESULTS

The positivity of CCR7 in pancreatic cancer was 32.6% (29/89). A significant correlation was detected between CCR7-positive expression and lymph node metastasis. Patients with CCR7-positive tumors had significantly shorter survival times than those with CCR7-negative tumors (median, 12.8 vs. 21.9 months, respectively; p = 0.0039). CCR7 expression was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 1.949; p = 0.0364) by multivariate survival analysis; however, it was not an indicator for any particular site of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The survival impact of CCR7 expression on resectable pancreatic cancer may be associated with lymphatic spread. The results from the present study should foster further investigation of treatments using an inhibitor for the CCR7 protein to improve the survival of pancreatic cancer.

Improved survival with adjuvant external-beam radiation therapy in lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer: a United States population-based assessment

BACKGROUND

Although chemoradiation often is administered as an adjuvant to pancreatic cancer surgery, recent reports have disputed the benefit of radiation therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with locally confined, lymph node-negative (N0) pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was used to identify patients who had undergone cancer-directed surgery for N0 pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1988 and 2003. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to compare overall survival between patients who did and did not receive adjuvant external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of EBRT when additional clinicopathologic factors were assessed. The analysis also examined the potential treatment selection bias of patients with survival <3 months.

RESULTS

A cohort of 1930 surgical patients with N0 disease was identified. The median survival was 17 months. Irradiated patients had significantly better survival compared with nonirradiated patients (20 months vs 15 months, respectively; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant EBRT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.63-0.82; P < .001), age, grade, tumor classification, and tumor location were independent predictors of survival. When patients with survival <3 months were excluded from the analysis, no difference in survival between the EBRT group and the nonradiation group was noted on univariate comparison (P value not significant). However, on multivariate analysis, EBRT remained an independent predictor of improved overall survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00; P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant EBRT was associated with improved survival in patients with operable, N0 pancreatic cancer. Its use should be considered in patients who have early-stage N0 disease.

Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Pancreaticoduodenectomy remains the most formidable operative procedure for the surgical treatment of gastrointestinal malignancy. Improved outcomes after the Whipple procedure have been attributed to better preoperative patient selection, advances in three-dimensional radiographic imaging, and regionalization of referrals to high-volume, tertiary care centers. Despite these advances, morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy are not insignificant and the overall prognosis following resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains poor. Improvements in endoscopic decompression of malignant biliary obstruction have decreased the need for palliative bypass operations and have focused current surgical issues on ways to improve clinical outcomes following potentially curative resections. Controversies such as whether or not to perform extended lymph node dissections, and standard versus pylorus-preserving resections have been addressed by randomized, prospective clinical trials. Major venous resections secondary to local tumor extension are now performed without an increase in morbidity or mortality and with survival rates comparable to standard resections. This has led to even more aggressive resections following neoadjuvant therapy for lesions previously considered unresectable and now perhaps better categorized as borderline resectable. The impact of surgical specialization and regionalization of referrals to tertiary care centers is evident in markedly improved perioperative mortality rates. This article will attempt to describe current guidelines for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma

Surgical resection provides the only chance for long-term survival for patients diagnosed with pancreatic and other associated periampullary adenocarcinomas. In the past, it had been suggested that the performance of an extended lymphadenectomy in association with a pancreaticoduodenal resection might have improved long-term survival for some patients. In response, six prospective trials have been performed and reported addressing this issue. These studies, including a large randomized trial of 280 patients from Johns Hopkins University, indicate that there is no demonstrable survival benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for periampullary cancer.

Tumour characteristics predictive of survival following resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas

AIMS

We have maintained a highly conservative policy in selecting patients with carcinoma of the head of pancreas for resection. This has been based on tumour size, evidence of lymph node involvement or local invasion outside of the gland at laparotomy, laparoscopy or CT imaging. This study investigated our survival rates following pancreatic resection and examined clinicopathological predictors of survival.

METHODS

Sixty-two consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resections for malignancy were identified from 1999 onwards. Thirty-three underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and were included in our analysis, the remainder included resections for ampullary adenocarcinoma (n=20) or other malignancies (n=9). Patient, tumour and operative characteristics were analysed to assess predictors of survival following resection (Kaplan-Meier survival curves).

RESULTS

Median survival following resection for ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 54 months (ampullary adenocarcinomas achieved a median survival of 62 months) and thirty-day mortality was 2.7% (n=1). Survival was not associated with any demographic or intraoperative factors, such as blood loss, operative duration or anaesthetic technique. Survival curves were significantly worse when perineural or vascular invasion was evident histologically (p=0.023 and 0.0023 respectively). Patients with positive lymph nodes had a significantly shorter survival (p=0.0030) especially when lymph node status was expressed as a percentage of total lymph node yield. If more than 20% of retrieved lymph nodes were positive for tumour, this was a clear predictor of survival (p<0.0001). A positive resection margin was also associated with shortened survival (p=0.0291).

CONCLUSION

Despite the advances made in the management of pancreatic cancer, tumour biology still dictates long-term survival. A highly selective surgical approach to the management of these patients results in good long-term survival.

Impact of Lymph Node Micrometastasis in Patients with Pancreatic Head Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of nodal micrometastasis in patients who underwent a curative operation for pancreatic cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Fifty-eight patients underwent a macroscopically curative resection with extended lymph node dissection for pancreatic cancer. The total number of resected lymph nodes was 1,058, and 944 histologically negative lymph nodes were subjected to immunohistochemical staining to detect occult micrometastases.

RESULTS

Nodal micrometastases were detected immunohistochemically in 147 out of 944 resected histologically negative lymph nodes (15.6%). Forty-four of all 58 patients (75.9%) and 13 of the 23 histologically node-negative patients (56.5%) had nodal micrometastases. Nodal micrometastases existed in the N1 lymph node area most frequently, followed by the N2 and N3 lymph node areas. The distribution was similar to that of histologically metastatic lymph nodes. Ten out of 16 patients (62.5%) with histological N1, and 5 out of 16 patients (31.3%) with histological N2 had nodal micrometastases beyond the histological lymph node status. Three and 5-year survival rates of pN0 patients without lymph node nodal micrometastases were both 60.0%, while those with nodal micrometastases were 19.2% and 0%, respectively. There was statistically significant difference between the both groups (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Nodal micrometastasis in pancreatic cancer existed in wider and more distant areas than histological lymph node status, and it was an unfavorable predictive factor, even in N0 patients.

Oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery

Despite the development of more sophisticated diagnostic techniques, pancreatic carcinoma has not yet been detected in the early stage. Surgical resection provides the only chance for cure or long-term survival. The resection rate has increased due to recent advances in surgical techniques and the application of extensive surgery. However, the postoperative prognosis has been poor due to commonly occurring liver metastasis, local recurrence and peritoneal dissemination. Recent molecular-biological studies have clarified occult metastasis, micrometastasis and systemic disease in pancreatic cancer. Several oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery are discussed in the present review.

Curative resection for left-sided pancreatic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Surgical technique in pancreatic cancer has seen significant developments, but much of the knowledge refers to pancreatic head carcinoma. Reports on the management of tumours of the body and tail have been less frequent. Current knowledge teaches that adenocarcinomas of the body and tail of the pancreas have a worse prognosis. The aim of this study is to report the short- and long-term outcome in 20 patients with left-sided pancreatic malignancy, where 'resection for cure' was done.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of demographic data, symptomatology, diagnostic methods, operative management, pathology report, postoperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications were seen in 40% of patients. One patient died on day 5 from sepsis with multiple organ failure. Other complications were intra-abdominal bleeding, bleeding from the gastroentero-anastomosis, postoperative jaundice, pleural exudate, wound dehiscence and intra-abdominal abscess. The patients with ductal adenocarcinoma had a median survival of 14 months and a 5-year survival of 17%. The median survival for the whole group of patients was 17 months and the 5-year survival was 23%. One patient with malignant insulinoma and two patients with adenocarcinoma had a survival exceeding 5 years (98, 174 and 183 months, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Selected patients with left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma may be operated on with results similar to pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) for cancer of the pancreatic head regarding postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as long-term survival. Thus, although left-sided pancreatic cancer generally appears at a more advanced stage, it seems true that treatment results are similar if radical excision can be achieved.

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine for stage IV pancreatic cancer: a preliminary report of initial experience

BACKGROUND

The effects of gemcitabine on postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated in patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer. The results were compared with those of our historical control patients treated with surgery alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer who had pancreatic resection with curative intent during the 5 years up to February 2003 were enrolled in this study. Nine cases received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with biweekly administration of 1,000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine, while the remaining 10 cases underwent surgery without any adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The chemotherapy was well tolerated with only mild symptomatic and hematologic toxicities. The disease-specific cumulative survival rates of the chemotherapy and surgery-alone groups were 86 and 70% at 1 year, and 50 and 12% at 2 years, with a median survival of 20 and 14 months, respectively (p = 0.0255). The disease-free interval was improved, and the occurrence of hepatic metastasis was reduced in the chemotherapy group compared with the surgery-alone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy utilizing gemcitabine was feasible with acceptable adverse effects, and showed some survival benefit in stage IV pancreatic cancer patients. Further investigation into gemcitabine-based combination therapies is warranted.

The Prognostic Effect of Clinical Staging in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The importance of pancreatic cancer staging is uncertain. The aim of this report was to evaluate the accuracy of combined standard imaging techniques in predicting the pathologic stage and to evaluate the prognostic effect of clinical staging to identify patient groups in which laparoscopy and laparotomy could be beneficial.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients were included in this analysis. The techniques used for clinical staging were endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, abdominal computed tomographic scan, and ultrasonography. All patients underwent both clinical and surgical/pathologic staging. A comparison was performed between presurgical stage and surgical/pathologic stage. The prognostic effect of different factors on survival was evaluated with both univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox) analysis.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity for vascular involvement were 73.9% and 96.3%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for nodal involvement were 63.6% and 95.4%, respectively. A total of 33.3% of patients showed a higher than expected pathologic stage, and 3.7% showed a lower than expected pathologic stage, by comparing clinical and pathologic evaluation. A highly significant correlation was observed between clinical T stage (P = .0067) and tumor diameter (P = .0037) and patient survival. Maximal prognostic differentiation was observed by dividing patients into two groups based on imaging results: group A (favorable prognosis) and group B (unfavorable prognosis). The median survival was 25.1 and 8.0 months for group A and B, respectively. Five-year survival was 20.1% and 0%, respectively (multivariate analysis: P = .0007).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated standard imaging studies achieved reasonable diagnostic accuracy in our analysis. A single classification based on clinical stage and tumor diameter evaluated by imaging predicts prognosis in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of metastatic disease in lymph nodes 8a and 16b1 (as defined by the Japanese Pancreas Society) on survival in patients with periampullary malignancy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing resection for primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or intrapancreatic bile duct adenocarcinoma were identified from a prospective database (September 1997-May 2003).

RESULTS

Thirteen of 54 and ten of 44 evaluable patients had metastatic involvement of lymph nodes 8a and 16b1 respectively. Metastatic involvement of lymph node 8a was associated with a significantly shorter median survival (197 versus 470 days; P = 0.003) but metastatic involvement of lymph node 16b1 did not affect survival (457 versus 503 days; P = 0.185). Multivariate analysis showed lymph node 8a status to be the strongest predictor of outcome (P = 0.006). Median survival of those with metastatic lymph node 8a was not significantly different from that of 81 patients with overt metastatic periampullary cancer at the time of diagnosis (98 days; P = 0.072)

CONCLUSION

Lymph node 8a was an independent prognostic factor in patients with periampullary malignancy, but lymph node 16b1 was not. Survival in those with metastatic lymph node 8a was not significantly different from that in patients with metastatic disease at presentation. Preoperative determination of lymph node 8a status may have important implications in selecting patients for treatment.

The role of extended resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is there good evidence-based justification?

Thus far, there are no studies concerning the radicality of pancreaticoduodenectomy which, in well-performed, randomized-controlled trials employing high standards of evidence-based medicine, show a benefit over extended lymphadenectomy. The results of the only two prospective randomized studies are not comparable and both are underpowered (level of evidence Ib). Therefore, it is still unclear whether extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma improves outcome. Only one study suggests a positive tendency toward increased survival rates in node-positive patients. Extended approaches including additional venous resection can be performed without a rise in the morbidity and mortality rates of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. In the future appropriately powered randomized trials of standard vs. extended resections may show the benefit of extended surgical resections. In addition, well powered trials of postoperative adjuvant therapies or preoperative neoadjuvant strategies together with surgical resections may identify more effective combinations showing a survival benefit in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer

Background

Pancreatic cancer carries a dismal prognosis but there has been a vast increase in evidence on its management in the past decade.

Methods

An electronic and manual search was performed for articles on the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer published in the past 10 years.

Results

Six major areas of advancement were identified. Groups at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer, notably those with chronic pancreatitis and hereditary pancreatitis, have been defined, raising the need for secondary screening. Methods of staging pancreatic cancer for resection have greatly improved but accuracy is still only 85–90 per cent. Pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy without extended lymphadenectomy is the simplest procedure; it does not compromise long-term survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves long-term survival. Patients who are free from major co-morbidity have better palliation by surgery (with a double bypass) than by endoscopy. High-volume centres improve the results of surgery for all outcome measures including long-term survival.

Conclusion

The surgical management of pancreatic cancer has undergone a significant change in the past decade. It has moved away from no active treatment. The standard of care can now be defined as potentially curative resection in a specialist centre followed by adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.

Identification and staging of pancreatic tumours using computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Pancreatic malignancy can be staged by a number of different investigations, either alone or in combination. The purpose of the present study was to compare the use of endoscopic ultrasound, CT and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRI for the staging of pancreatic malignancy, particularly with respect to determining resectability prior to surgery. Twenty-seven patients referred for the investigation of a suspected pancreatic malignancy were entered into the trial. All patients had contrast-enhanced CT, gadolinium and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRI, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Images were assessed for nodal staging, tumour staging and resectability for each investigation, and the results compared with findings at surgery. The results for the accuracy of MRI, CT and EUS, in detecting T4 disease versus T3 or lower was 78, 79 and 68%, respectively; nodal involvement was 56, 63 and 69%, respectively; and overall resectability (including the T stage, presence of involved nodes and metastases) was 83, 76 and 63%, respectively. There was no significant difference demonstrated between the three tests. The present study suggests that for patients referred for investigation and staging of pancreatic malignancy, EUS and MRI scanning convey little advantage over contrast-enhanced CT. Furthermore, although mangafodipir trisodium improved the conspicuity of pancreatic tumours, it has little influence on T staging.

Main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: clinical predictors of malignancy and long-term survival following resection

OBJECTIVE

To describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of a large cohort of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas affecting the main pancreatic duct.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

IPMNs are being diagnosed with increasing frequency. Preoperative determination of malignancy remains problematic, and reported results of long-term survival following resection are conflicting.

METHODS

The combined databases from the Massachusetts General Hospital and the Pancreatic Unit of the University of Verona were analyzed. To avoid confusing overlap with mucinous cystic neoplasms, only patients with tumors of the main pancreatic duct (with or without side branch involvement) were included. A total of 140 tumors consecutively resected between 1990 and 2002 were classified as either benign (adenoma and borderline tumors) or malignant (carcinoma in situ or invasive cancer) to compare their characteristics and survival.

RESULTS

Men and women were equally affected (mean age 65 years). Seven patients (12%) had adenomas, 40 (28%) borderline tumors, 25 (18%) carcinoma in situ, and 58 (42%) invasive carcinoma. The median age of patients with benign IPMN was 6.4 years younger than those with malignant tumors (P = 0.04). The principal symptoms were abdominal pain (65%), weight loss (44%), acute pancreatitis (23%), jaundice (17%), and onset or worsening of diabetes (12%); 27% of patients were asymptomatic. Jaundice and diabetes were significantly associated with malignant tumors. Five- and 10-year cancer-specific survival for patients with noninvasive tumors was 100%, and comparable survival of the 58 patients with invasive carcinoma was 60% and 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer is found in 60% of patients with main-duct IPMNs. Patients with malignant tumors are 6 years older than their benign counterparts and have a higher likelihood of presenting with jaundice or new onset diabetes. No patients with benign tumors or carcinoma in situ died of their disease following resection, and those with invasive cancer had a markedly better survival (60% at 5 years) than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. These findings support both the concept of progression of benign IPMNs to invasive cancer and an aggressive policy of resection at diagnosis.

Long-term survival after radical resection of advanced pancreatic cancer: a case report with special reference to CD8+ T-cell infiltration

A 65-yr-old man who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer is alive 8 yr after surgery. Originally, computed tomography (CT) revealed an 8-cm tumor in the pancreatic head. The tumor had infiltrated the portal vein, but grew expansively, so there was neither biliary obstruction nor jaundice. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the portal vein was performed for pancreatic cancer. Many tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were seen within cancer cell nests on routine histopathology. We performed immunostaining for CD8, and found that a large number of the lymphocytes were CD8+ T cells. The patient's prognosis was considered poor because the tumor was large and had infiltrated the portal vein. We suspect that long-term survival may be related to the response of CD8+ T cells to the cancer.

Survival benefits of portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer is controversial.

METHODS

Eighty-one consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological findings and relationship between portal vein resection and survival were investigated.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with pancreatic cancer underwent pancreatic resection with portal vein resection. Histological examination revealed that 17 patients had definite invasion to the portal vein (group 1) and 16 patients had no invasion (group 2). Forty-eight patients with pancreatic cancer underwent pancreatic resection without portal vein resection (group 3). There were no significant differences in survival rates (P = 0.437) between patients with portal vein resection and patients without portal vein resection. However, patients in group 1 had a significantly (P = 0.021) worse prognosis as compared with those in group 2. Despite aggressive surgical resection, the surgical margin was positive in 35% of patients in group 1 as compared with 13% of patients in group 2 and 21% of patients in group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer had a prognosis similar to patients without portal vein resection. Negative microscopic invasion to the portal vein was significantly associated with improved survival.

CT and pathologic assessment of prospective nodal staging in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to compare the assessment of peripancreatic lymph nodes using CT with the gold standard of detailed histopathologic assessment of resected specimens in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with presumed pancreatic carcinoma were prospectively studied with dual-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT, and images were interpreted in consensus by three radiologists. Complete surgical resection was performed in 28 patients. A detailed nodal classification system was used for radiologic, surgical, and pathologic staging in the nine patients whose final diagnosis at histology was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Forty lymph nodes were prospectively identified on CT in these nine patients. Two of 23 nodes (9%) measuring less than 5 mm in the short-axis diameter were malignant, four of 11 nodes (36%) measuring 5-10 mm were malignant, and one of six nodes (17%) larger than 10 mm was malignant. Using a short-axis diameter of greater than 10 mm as the criterion for nodal involvement, we found a sensitivity of 14% (1/7) and a specificity of 85% (28/33), with a positive predictive value of 17% (1/6), a negative predictive value of 82% (28/34), and an overall accuracy of 73% (29/40). Ovoid nodal shape, clustering of nodes, and the absence of a fatty hilum were not useful predictors of malignancy on CT.

CONCLUSION

In resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, CT is not accurate overall for the prediction of nodal involvement. In a patient with presumed pancreatic carcinoma that is considered to be resectable, the depiction on CT of peripancreatic nodes should not prevent attempted curative resection.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in a prospective, randomized single-institution trial, the end points of operative morbidity, operative mortality, and survival in patients undergoing standard versus radical (extended) pancreaticoduodenectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Numerous retrospective reports and a few prospective randomized trials have suggested that the performance of an extended lymphadenectomy in association with a pancreaticoduodenal resection may improve survival for patients with pancreatic and other periampullary adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Between April 1996 and June 2001, 299 patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospective, randomized single-institution trial. After intraoperative verification (by frozen section) of margin-negative resected periampullary adenocarcinoma, patients were randomized to either a standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (removing only the peripancreatic lymph nodes en bloc with the specimen) or a radical (extended) pancreaticoduodenectomy (standard resection plus distal gastrectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy). All pathology specimens were reviewed, fully categorized, and staged. The postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 299 patients randomized, 5 (1.7%) were subsequently excluded because their final pathology failed to reveal periampullary adenocarcinoma, leaving 294 patients for analysis (146 standard vs. 148 radical). The two groups were statistically similar with regard to age (median 67 years) and gender (54% male). All the patients in the radical group underwent distal gastric resection, while 86% of the patients in the standard group underwent pylorus preservation ( <.0001). The mean operative time in the radical group was 6.4 hours, compared to 5.9 hours in the standard group ( =.002). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements (median zero units), location of primary tumor (57% pancreatic, 22% ampullary, 17% distal bile duct, 3% duodenal), mean tumor size (2.6 cm), positive lymph node status (74%), or positive margin status on final permanent section (10%). The mean total number of lymph nodes resected was significantly higher in the radical group. Of the 148 patients in the radical group, only 15% (n = 22) had metastatic adenocarcinoma in the resected retroperitoneal lymph nodes, and none had retroperitoneal nodes as the only site of lymph node involvement. One patient in the radical group with negative pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen lymph nodes had a micrometastasis to one perigastric lymph node. There were six perioperative deaths (4%) in the standard group versus three perioperative deaths (2%) in the radical group ( = NS). The overall complication rates were 29% for the standard group versus 43% for the radical group ( =.01), with patients in the radical group having significantly higher rates of early delayed gastric emptying and pancreatic fistula and a significantly longer mean postoperative stay. With a mean patient follow-up of 24 months, there were no significant differences in 1-, 3-, or 5-year and median survival when comparing the standard and radical groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical (extended) pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed with similar mortality but some increased morbidity compared to standard pancreaticoduodenectomy. The data to date fail to indicate that a survival benefit is derived from the addition of a distal gastrectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy to a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in a prospective, randomized single-institution trial, the end points of operative morbidity, operative mortality, and survival in patients undergoing standard versus radical (extended) pancreaticoduodenectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Numerous retrospective reports and a few prospective randomized trials have suggested that the performance of an extended lymphadenectomy in association with a pancreaticoduodenal resection may improve survival for patients with pancreatic and other periampullary adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Between April 1996 and June 2001, 299 patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospective, randomized single-institution trial. After intraoperative verification (by frozen section) of margin-negative resected periampullary adenocarcinoma, patients were randomized to either a standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (removing only the peripancreatic lymph nodes en bloc with the specimen) or a radical (extended) pancreaticoduodenectomy (standard resection plus distal gastrectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy). All pathology specimens were reviewed, fully categorized, and staged. The postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 299 patients randomized, 5 (1.7%) were subsequently excluded because their final pathology failed to reveal periampullary adenocarcinoma, leaving 294 patients for analysis (146 standard vs. 148 radical). The two groups were statistically similar with regard to age (median 67 years) and gender (54% male). All the patients in the radical group underwent distal gastric resection, while 86% of the patients in the standard group underwent pylorus preservation ( <.0001). The mean operative time in the radical group was 6.4 hours, compared to 5.9 hours in the standard group ( =.002). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements (median zero units), location of primary tumor (57% pancreatic, 22% ampullary, 17% distal bile duct, 3% duodenal), mean tumor size (2.6 cm), positive lymph node status (74%), or positive margin status on final permanent section (10%). The mean total number of lymph nodes resected was significantly higher in the radical group. Of the 148 patients in the radical group, only 15% (n = 22) had metastatic adenocarcinoma in the resected retroperitoneal lymph nodes, and none had retroperitoneal nodes as the only site of lymph node involvement. One patient in the radical group with negative pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen lymph nodes had a micrometastasis to one perigastric lymph node. There were six perioperative deaths (4%) in the standard group versus three perioperative deaths (2%) in the radical group ( = NS). The overall complication rates were 29% for the standard group versus 43% for the radical group ( =.01), with patients in the radical group having significantly higher rates of early delayed gastric emptying and pancreatic fistula and a significantly longer mean postoperative stay. With a mean patient follow-up of 24 months, there were no significant differences in 1-, 3-, or 5-year and median survival when comparing the standard and radical groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical (extended) pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed with similar mortality but some increased morbidity compared to standard pancreaticoduodenectomy. The data to date fail to indicate that a survival benefit is derived from the addition of a distal gastrectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy to a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.