Preoperative chemotherapy for lung cancer does not increase surgical morbidity

Postoperative hypoxaemic acute respiratory failure after neoadjuvant treatment for lung cancer: radiologic findings and risk factors

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the rate of hypoxaemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) on patients undergoing surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to describe clinical and radiological findings and to explore potential risk factors for this complication.

METHODS

Retrospective review of medical records of all patients who underwent surgery for NSCLC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy at a single centre between 2014 and 2021. Computed tomography scans of patients who developed hARF were reviewed by an experienced radiologist to provide a quantitative assessment of radiologic alterations.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 211 patients. Major morbidity was 13.3% (28/211) and hARF was the most common major complication (n = 11, 5.2%). Postoperative mortality was 1.9% (4/211) and occurred only in patients who experienced hARF. Most patients who experienced hARF underwent major procedures, including pneumonectomy (n = 3), lobectomy with chest wall resection (n = 3), bronchial or vascular reconstructions (n = 3) and extended or bilateral resections (n = 2). Analysis of computed tomography findings revealed that crazy paving and ground glass were the most common alterations and were more represented in the non-operated lung. Male gender, current smoking status, pathologic stage III-IV and operative time resulted significant risk factors for hARF at univariable analysis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

hARF is the main cause of major morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for NSCLC and occurs more frequently after complex and lengthier surgical procedures. Overall, our findings suggest that operative time may represent the most important risk factor for hARF.

Management of Complications After Lung Resection: Prolonged Air Leak and Bronchopleural Fistula

Prolonged air leak or alveolar-pleural fistula is common after lung resection and can usually be managed with continued pleural drainage until resolution. Further management options include blood patch administration, chemical pleurodesis, and 1-way endobronchial valve placement. Bronchopleural fistula is rare but is associated with high mortality, often caused by development of concomitant empyema. Bronchopleural fistula should be confirmed with bronchoscopy, which may allow bronchoscopic intervention; however, transthoracic stump revision or window thoracostomy may be required.

Agreement on Major Pathological Response in NSCLC Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

We have suggested that major pathologic response (MPR) could serve as a surrogate endpoint for survival and provide rapid means of comparing different neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Here, we confirm that MPR is predictive of long-term overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection, to assess agreement on MPR between 2 observers, and to determine the minimum number of slides needed to obtain an accurate determination of MPR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 151 patients with NSCLC who had been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by complete surgical resection from 2008 to 2012. Tissue specimens were retrospectively evaluated by 2 pathologists who had been blinded to patients' treatment and outcome. We assessed the relationships between MPR and OS, the levels of agreement between the pathologists, and determined the number of slides needed to obtain an accurate determination of MPR.

RESULTS

Our results reveal that MPR examined by either observer 1 (experienced) or by observer 2 (trained) was significantly predictive of long-term OS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MPR was associated with long-term OS in patients with NSCLC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 2.68; P = .01). The levels of agreement between 2 pathologists were high after direct in-person training by one pathologist or the other (R² = 0.994). Our data suggest that at least 3 slides should be read to accurately determine MPR.

CONCLUSIONS

MPR is significantly predictive of long-term OS in neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patients with NSCLC. MPR may serve as a surrogate endpoint for evaluating novel chemotherapies and immunotherapy response in biomarker-driven translational clinical trials.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for centrally-located lung tumors with 56 Gy in seven fractions: A retrospective study

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for centrally-located lung tumors remains a challenge because of the increased risk of treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and uncertainty around prescribing the optimal dose. The present study reported the results of central tumor SBRT with 56 Gy in 7 fractions (fr) at the University of Tokyo Hospital. A total of 35 cases that underwent SBRT with or without volumetric-modulated arc therapy consisting of 56 Gy/7 fr for central lung lesions between 2010 and 2016 at the University of Tokyo Hospital were reveiwed. A central lesion was defined as a tumor within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree (RTOG 0236 definition) or within 2 cm in all directions of any critical mediastinal structure. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and AEs were investigated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate LC and OS. AEs were scored per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Thirty-five patients with 36 central lung lesions were included. Fifteen lesions were primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 13 were recurrences of NSCLC, and 8 had oligo-recurrences from other primaries. Median tumor diameter was 29 mm. Eighteen patients had had prior surgery. At a median follow-up of 13.1 months for all patients and 18.3 months in surviving patients, 22 patients had died, ten due to primary disease (4 NSCLC), while three were treatment-related. The 1- and 2-year OS were 57.3 and 40.4%, respectively, and median OS was 15.7 months. Local recurrence occurred in only two lesions. 1- and 2-year LC rates were both 96%. Nine patients experienced grade ≥3 toxicity, representing 26% of the cohort. Two of these were grade 5, one pneumonitis and one hemoptysis. Considering the background of the subject, tumor control of our central SBRT is promising, especially in primary NSCLC. However, the safety of SBRT to central lung cancer remains controversial.

Care of the Postoperative Pulmonary Resection Patient

Patients undergoing pulmonary resection all exhibit, to some degree, a level of pulmonary dysfunction. This is due to the physiologic stress of the procedure performed, the patient’s comorbidities, and preexisting cardiopulmonary reserve. Although prognostic factors for intensive care requirement exist, to date, there is no consensus for postoperative admission. Institutional practices vary across the country, with patients often admitted to intensive care for surveillance. Guidelines published from the American Thoracic Society in 1999 emphasize that admission to the ICU be reserved for those patients requiring care and monitoring for severe physiologic instability. Admissions following pulmonary resection are typically due to respiratory complications and are an independent predictor of mortality. The following chapter will review the indications for admission to the ICU and common issues encountered following pulmonary resection and conclude with a discussion of the management of patients undergoing pulmonary transplantation.

[Progress of Neoadjuvant Therapy Combined with Surgery in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

肺癌是世界范围内发病率和死亡率最高的恶性肿瘤。对于可手术切除的Ⅲa/N2期非小细胞肺癌患者，目前国内外指南均推荐采用手术联合化疗、放疗等多学科治疗模式。最新研究表明，与术后辅助治疗一样，新辅助治疗（化疗或放化疗）可显著改善可切除非小细胞肺癌患者的预后，且在治疗依从性及耐受性方面具有明显优势。非小细胞肺癌新辅助治疗的对象主要是局部进展期病变，特别是临床Ⅲa/N2期患者，基本治疗模式为术前2-4周期化疗，新辅助治疗后并不增加手术相关的死亡及并发症风险，但是在决定手术时机、入路及切除范围等方面仍面临着挑战。

SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC - What is too central?

Purpose

Current guidelines recommend stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically inoperable patients. There are excellent outcome and toxicity data for SBRT of peripheral lung tumors. However, the discussion on SBRT for centrally located tumors is controversial. This study evaluated current clinical practice regarding SBRT of centrally located lung tumors, to identify common fractionation schedules and commonly accepted contraindications for SBRT.

Methods

A questionnaire consisting of two parts was introduced at the annual meeting of the DEGRO working group on stereotactic radiotherapy, representing centers in Germany and Switzerland. The first part of the questionnaire covered general information about the centers, whereas the second part specifically addressed SBRT of centrally located lung tumors, using case examples of nine primary NSCLC patients. Reconstructions of a contrast enhanced CT, as well as PET-Imaging for each case were demonstrated to the participants.

Results

Twenty-six centers participated in the meeting. The majority was academic (73%), participated in interdisciplinary thoracic oncology tumorboards (88%) and offered SBRT for lung tumors (96%). Two centers questioned the indication of SBRT for central lung tumors because of lack of evidence. The majority of centers had experience in SBRT for central lung tumors (88%) and half of the centers reported more than ten cases treated during a median period of five years. Most fractionation schedules used PTV encompassing doses of 48–60 Gy in eight fractions with maximum doses of 125–150%.

A clear indication for SBRT treatment was seen by more than 85% of centers in three of the nine patients in whom tumors were small and not closer than 2 cm to the main bronchus. Prior pneumonectomy or immediate adjacency to hilar/mediastinal structures were not considered as contraindications for SBRT. In cases where the tumor exceeded 4 cm in diameter or was located closer than 4 cm to the carina 50–80% of centers saw an indication for SBRT. One case, with a 7 cm tumor reaching to the carina would have been treated with SBRT only by one center.

Conclusion

Within DEGRO working group on stereotactic radiotherapy, SBRT for small (<4 cm) early stage NSCLC is a common indication, if the minimal distance to the main bronchi is at least 2 cm. The controversy on the treatment of larger and more central tumors will hopefully be solved by ongoing prospective clinical trials.

Computed tomography RECIST assessment of histopathologic response and prediction of survival in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

This study's objectives were to determine whether tumor response measured by computed tomography (CT) and evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) correlated with overall survival (OS) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection.

METHODS

We measured primary tumor size on CT before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 160 NSCLC patients who underwent surgical resection. The relationship between CT-measured response (RECIST) and histopathologic response (≤ 10% viable tumor) and OS were assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival, univariable, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant association between CT-measured response (RECIST) and OS (p = 0.03). However, histopathologic response was a stronger predictor of OS (p = 0.002), with a more pronounced separation of the survival curves when compared with CT-measured response. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, only pathologic stage and histopathologic response were significant predictors of OS. A 41% overall discordance rate was noted between CT RECIST response and histopathologic response. CT RECIST classified as nonresponders a subset of patients with histopathologic response (8 out of 30 points, 27%) who demonstrated prolonged survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

We were unable to show that CT RECIST is a reliable predictor of OS in patients with NSCLC undergoing surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The failure of CT RECIST to predict long-term outcome may be because of the inability of CT imaging to consistently identify patients with histopathologic response. CT RECIST may have only a limited role as an efficacy endpoint after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome after pulmonary resection

Postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a recognized complication of pulmonary resection. It is characterized by the acute onset of hypoxemia with radiographic infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema, without elevations in the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Many studies suggest that around 2-5 % of patients develop some degree of lung injury, and the mortality from ARDS following pulmonary resection remains high. ARDS following thoracotomy and lung resection has a miserable prognosis, with overall hospital mortality rates over 25 %. The present review evaluates the evidence available in the literature tracking perioperative mortality and morbidity as well as the pathogenesis and management of ARDS in patients undergoing pulmonary resection.

Respiratory failure following pulmonary resection

Improvements in the perioperative management of the patient undergoing pulmonary resections have reduced postoperative complication rates steadily in the last several decades. However, postresection respiratory failure, particularly lung injury with no discernible cause, remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Because the incidence of this entity is relatively low, the terminology, pathogenesis, and optimal management are poorly delineated in the literature. The purpose of this review is to describe the criteria used to define postresection lung injury, discuss the possible etiologic factors, and outline currently available treatment strategies.

Mortality related to neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or with concurrent radiation is often used for stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer but is often tried in patients with stage IIIB and at times in patients with stage I or II disease. Newer neoadjuvant regimens would need to be compared with currently used programs to see if they increased toxicity. For such a comparison, a baseline estimate is needed of the mortality of currently used regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this review, we searched PubMed and associated references, and data on mortality were identified in 34 publications.

RESULTS

The mortality of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiation has been estimated in 2015 patients was 0.7%, and the postsurgical mortality in 2195 patients was 4.3%.

CONCLUSION

These estimates might provide a benchmark for comparison for innovative trials.

Oxygen toxicity during one-lung ventilation: is it time to re-evaluate our practice?

Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of non-small cell lung cancer therapy, but an increasing number of patients receive preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy that may predispose these patients to unique organ toxicities. This chemotherapy, along with exposure to high oxygen concentrations, may combine to increase the risk of reactive oxygen species-mediated lung injury. Continued efforts are needed to improve overall outcome in these patients, including a reevaluation of our management of oxygen therapy.

Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer-Stage IIIA

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer represents a relatively heterogeneous group of patients with metastatic disease to the ipsilateral mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes and also includes T3N1 patients. Presentations of disease range from apparently resectable tumors with occult microscopic nodal metastases to unresectable, bulky multistation nodal disease. This review explores the published clinical trials to make treatment recommendations in this controversial subset of lung cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Systematic searches were made of MEDLINE, HealthStar, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2006, focusing primarily on randomized trials, with inclusion of selected metaanalyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

The evidence derived from the literature now appears to support routine adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of stage IIIA lung cancer encountered unexpectedly at surgery. However, using neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery for known stage IIIA lung cancer as a routine therapeutic option is not supported by current published randomized trials. Combination chemoradiotherapy, especially delivered concurrently, is still the preferred treatment for prospectively recognized stage IIIA lung cancer with all degrees of mediastinal lymph node involvement. Current and future trials may modify these recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodality therapy of some type appears to be preferable in all subsets of stage IIIA patients. However, because of the relative lack of consistent randomized trial data in this subset, the following evidence-based treatment guidelines lack compelling evidence in most scenarios.

Impact of Induction Treatment on Postoperative Complications in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

A main drawback of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is that it may increase operative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of chemotherapy on these complications.

METHODS

Patient data were collected from the Epithor database. From June 2002 to June 2004, 3888 successive observations of surgery for lung cancer have been reported from 51 thoracic surgery departments throughout France. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperative clinical characteristics of patients with significant postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of 3888 patients, 555 (14.3%) received induction chemotherapy. The groups were similar with respect to sex and the number of comorbidities. The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.01%. The multivariate analysis allows us to identify age (older than 65 years), sex (male), preoperative clinical score (moderate and severe), surgical procedure (right pneumonectomy and bilobectomy) as significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. No statistical difference was observed according to the delivery or preoperative chemotherapy. In total, 1219 patients (31.4%) had at least one postoperative complication. Using a multivariate analysis, we observed a significant correlation between morbidity and age (older than 65 years), sex (male), presence of comorbidities (two or more), clinical score (moderate), and type of operation (bilobectomy). Preoperative administration of chemotherapy did not significantly influenced postoperative morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemotherapy is not associated with an increase in either the mortality rate or major surgical complications. Future randomized trials are warranted to confirm the survival benefit of this strategy.

Surgery: therapeutic indications

Although never proven to be superior in a large, prospective randomized trial, surgical resection remains the treatment of choice for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB and resectable IIIA surgical treatment offers the best long-term prognosis when a complete resection can be performed. Standard operations include lobectomy, bilobectomy and pneumonectomy. Whenever possible, lobectomy is the procedure of choice. Lesser resections like segmentectomy or wedge excision are rarely indicated in primary NSCLC. Specific lung parenchyma saving operations include tracheo- and bronchoplastic procedures which are indicated in selected cases of centrally located NSCLC. Extended resections include removal of lung together with another organ or structure as thoracic wall, pericardium, diaphragm or superior sulcus. En bloc excision of the involved structure is advised. Accurate peroperative evaluation will determine the extent of resection and if possible, a pneumonectomy should be avoided because of its high mortality and morbidity rate. Surgical resection after induction therapy for early stage or locally advanced NSCLC is feasible, but is often more complex and carries a higher risk, especially when a right pneumonectomy has to be performed after induction chemoradiotherapy.

Role of preoperative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

The efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy for improving postoperative survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis of the published phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to quantitatively evaluate the survival benefit of preoperative chemotherapy. After searching the MEDLINE database from 1980 to 2005, five studies were selected for the present meta-analysis. DerSimonian-Laird random effects analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy at the time points of 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. A total of 564 patients in stages IB-IIIA served as the data sources. Preoperative chemotherapy was assigned to a total of 281 patients, while surgery alone was assigned to 283 patients. The combined HRs at 1, 3, and 5 years after resection were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.93), and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.70-1.04), respectively, for preoperative chemotherapy compared to surgery alone. The combined survival differences at 1 and 3 years time point were significant, while the difference at 5 years after resection was not significant. When only the 122 stage IIIA patients were analyzed, none of the HR at any time point was significant. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggests that the benefit of preoperative chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC is unclear, especially for stage IIIA patients.

[Postoperative risk after induction treatment on surgery in non-small cell lung cancer]

Induction treatments in non-small cell lung cancer are usually discussed. Long-term survival after surgery and resecability are enhanced in locally advanced cancers. Morbidity and mortality observed after surgery limit the use of these treatments, despite they depend on many other factors: comorbidities in patient, smoking status, cancer staging, and type of surgery. Right pneumectomy enhances this risk more than left pneumectomy or other limited resections allowed by neoadjuvant treatments, especially in case of downstaging.

Thoracoscopic lobectomy: a safe and effective strategy for patients receiving induction therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic lobectomy is an accepted oncologic approach for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent lobectomy after induction therapy to determine the feasibility of thoracoscopic lobectomy compared with conventional thoracotomy lobectomy.

METHODS

The outcomes of 97 consecutive patients with NSCLC who received induction therapy followed by lobectomy from 1996 to 2005 were reviewed. Outcome variables analyzed included complete resection, chest tube duration, length of hospitalization, 30-day mortality, hemorrhage, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and other major complications. The Student t test and chi2 or RxC contingency tables were used to compare continuous and categoric variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Lobectomy was performed by thoracotomy in 85 patients and thoracoscopically in 12 patients (1 conversion), with complete resection in all patients. All patients received induction chemotherapy, and 74 (76%) received induction radiotherapy as well: 66 of 85 (78%) in the thoracotomy group and 8 of 12 (67%) in the thoracoscopy group. The overall median survival was 2.3 years, with no difference between the groups. Patients undergoing a thoracoscopic lobectomy had a shorter median hospital stay (3.5 vs 5 days, p = 0.0024) and chest tube duration (2 vs 4 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality, hemorrhage, pneumonia, or respiratory failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a feasible approach for selected patients undergoing resection after induction therapy, and is associated with shorter hospital stay and chest tube duration. Long-term follow-up of survival will determine the role of thoracoscopic lobectomy in the management of patients after induction therapy.

Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Chemotherapy Before Lung Resection: A Case-Matched Analysis of Early Outcome

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present study was to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin was associated with an increased incidence of morbidity and mortality after major lung resection for lung cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed 570 patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for nonsmall-cell lung cancer at our institution from January 2000 through June 2005. Of these, 70 patients underwent three cycles of gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy before operation for locally advanced disease. Propensity scores were constructed to match those patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and lung resection with those undergoing surgery alone. The propensity score analysis yielded two groups of 70 well-matched pairs that were compared in terms of baseline characteristics and early outcome (morbidity, mortality, length of postoperative stay, intensive care unit admission).

RESULTS

The two case-matched groups had similar morbidity (p = 0.8), mortality (p = 0.4), perioperative blood transfusions (p = 0.8) and intensive care unit admission rates (p = 0.8). Likewise, the length of postoperative stay did not differ between the groups (p = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabin-cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be safe before major lung resection. This finding warrants its use for efficacy studies of locally advanced and even early-stage lung cancer.

Postoperative Pneumonia after Major Lung Resection

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a life-threatening complication of lung resection. The incidence, causative bacteria, predisposing factors, and outcome are poorly understood.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

A prospective study of all patients undergoing major lung resections for noninfectious disease was performed over a 6-mo period. Culture of intraoperative bronchial aspirates was systematically performed. All patients with suspicion of pneumonia underwent bronchoscopic sampling and culture before antibiotherapy.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-eight patients were included in the study. Bronchial colonization was identified in 31 of 136 patients (22.8%) on analysis of intraoperative samples. The incidence of POP was 25% (42 of 168). Microbiologically documented and nondocumented pneumonias were recorded in 24 and 18 cases, respectively. Haemophilus species, Streptococcus species, and, to a much lesser extent, Pseudomonas and Serratia species were the most frequently identified pathogens. Among colonized and noncolonized patients, POP occurred in 15 of 31 and 20 of 105 cases, respectively (p = 0.0010; relative risk, 2.54). Death occurred in 8 of 42 patients who developed POP and in 3 of 126 of patients who did not (p = 0.0012). Patients with POP required noninvasive ventilation or reintubation more frequently than patients who did not develop POP (p < 0.0000001 and p = 0.00075, respectively). POP was associated with longer intensive care unit and hospital stay (p < 0.0000001 and p = 0.0000005, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, extent of resection, presence of intraoperative bronchial colonization, and male sex were independent risk factors for POP.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumonia acquired in-hospital represents a relatively frequent complication of lung resections, associated with an important percentage of postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Cost-effectiveness of routine mediastinoscopy in computed tomography– and positron emission tomography–screened patients with stage I lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Accurate preoperative staging is essential for the optimal management of patients with lung cancer. An important goal of preoperative staging is to identify mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography may identify mediastinal lymph node metastasis with sufficient sensitivity to allow omission of mediastinoscopy. This study utilizes our experience with patients with clinical stage I lung cancer to perform a decision analysis addressing whether mediastinoscopy should be performed in clinical stage I lung cancer patients staged by computed tomography and positron emission tomography.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our thoracic surgery database for cases between May 1999 and May 2004. Patients deemed clinical stage I by computed tomography and positron emission tomography were chosen for further study. Individual computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and operative and pathology reports were reviewed. The postresection pathologic staging and long-term survival were recorded. A decision model was created using TreeAgePro software and our observed data for the prevalence of mediastinal lymph node metastases and for the rate of benign nodules. Data reported in the literature were also utilized to complete the decision analysis model. A sensitivity analysis of key variables was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients with clinical stage I lung tumors were identified. One hundred seventy-eight patients (72%) underwent mediastinoscopy before resection, and 5/178 (3%) showed N2 disease. An additional 9 patients were found to have N2 metastasis in the final resected specimen, resulting in a total of 14/248 patients (5.6%) with occult mediastinal lymph node metastases. Benign nodules were found in 19/248 (8%) of patients. Decision analysis determined that mediastinoscopy added 0.008 years of life expectancy at a cost of 250,989 dollars per life-year gained. The outcome was sensitive to the prevalence of N2 disease in the population and the benefit of induction versus adjuvant therapy for N2 lung cancer. If the prevalence of N2 disease exceeds 10%, the sensitivity analysis predicts that mediastinoscopy would lengthen life at a cost of less than 100,000 dollars per life-year gained.

CONCLUSION

Patients with clinical stage I lung cancer staged by computed tomography and positron emission tomography benefit little from mediastinoscopy. The survival advantage it confers is very small and is dependent on the prevalence of N2 metastasis and the unproven superiority of induction therapy over adjuvant therapy.

Preoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy and surgery for stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

This is to examine whether aggressive multimodality therapy improves the treatment outcomes in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fifty-three consecutive NSCLC patients with N2 disease, confirmed by mediastinoscopic biopsy, received preoperative thoracic radiation therapy (45 Gy/5 weeks) concurrent with two cycles of oral etoposide and intravenous cisplatin and surgery. Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT, 18 Gy/2 weeks) was optionally recommended for those with the risk factors of loco-regional recurrence based on the surgical and pathological findings. Surgical resection was performed in 38 patients (71.7%), and down-staging was achieved in 19 patients (50%). The median survival period was 27 months in 38 patients who underwent resection, and the rates at 3-yr of overall survival, loco-regional control, distant metastasis-free survival, and disease-free survival were 44.3%, 87.9%, 32.9%, and 29.3%. Significantly favorable factor regarding overall survival was achieving p0/I stage by the multivariate analysis. PORT was successful in reducing locoregional recurrences in patients with the risk factors. Current preoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy and surgery by the authors resulted in comparable survival with other reports, however, further refinement of multimodality approach may be warranted for more effective reduction of distant metastasis.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of therapy for early-stage disease and offers the best chance for cure. Local and distant failure rates, however, remain unacceptably high with surgery alone. Radiation and systemic chemotherapy have been used to reduce recurrences in early-stage disease. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies both offer sound theoretical benefit, but evidence supporting this has been lacking. The publication of a meta-analysis in 1995 triggered a reevaluation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Four randomized trials reported in the last 2 years support the use of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

This article reviews the history of clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves 5-year survival rates by approximately 5%-15% compared with surgery alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care treatment for patients with completely resected stage I, II, and IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer.

Risk Stratification for Lung Cancer Surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Current surgical strategies for lung cancer are directed toward the following two distinct targets: the increased prevalence of early-stage lung cancer; and locally advanced lung cancer treated with induction therapy (IT). To establish the risk stratification for operative morbidity from this viewpoint, we evaluated the impact of IT and/or an extended surgical procedure on operative results.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

A 674-bed teaching hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The morbidity and mortality of 758 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed. There were 666 patients who underwent surgery alone (S group; 560 standard lobectomies and 106 extended resections) and 92 patients who received IT (IT group; 35 standard lobectomies and 57 extended resections). Comparisons between the groups were performed using unpaired t tests or chi(2) tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors for operative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

IT and extended surgery were strong independent factors for predicting postoperative morbidity (p < 0.0001). Significant differences were observed for pathologic stage (p < 0.0001), preoperative hemoglobin and Dlco levels (p < 0.001), the ratio of extended resection (p < 0.0001), and operation time and intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.001) between the S and IT groups. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 16.8% and 0.9%, respectively, in the S group, and 55.4% and 5.4%, respectively, in the IT group (p < 0.01). The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 63.2% and 7.0%, respectively, for extended resection after IT, and 12.8% and 0.3%, respectively, for those who underwent a standard resection without IT.

CONCLUSIONS

The morbidity and mortality of lung resection are both significantly increased after IT, and the patients with the greatest risk are those who have undergone IT and extended resection. The impact of IT on risk stratification should be emphasized in perioperative care.

Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome after pulmonary resection

The occurrence of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after thoracic surgery are perplexing and persistent problems. Variously described as postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, and postlung resection pulmonary edema, ALI and ARDS may be considered a single entity, with ALI being the less severe form of ARDS. It is characterized by the acute onset of hypoxemia with radiographic infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema, without elevations in the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Although this syndrome does not occur frequently and is usually without identifiable cause, the mortality is high. However, the phenomenon has not been rigorously studied owing to the low incidence, with primarily retrospective case series reported. Thus, the nomenclature, risks, and pathogenesis are not well defined. Interest in this syndrome has recently been renewed as the rate of other perioperative complications has declined. ALI/ARDS is reviewed with a focus on potential etiologies and the spectrum of available interventions.

Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Perspectives in Combined-Modality Therapy

The most effective treatment for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains complete surgical resection, providing the disease is medically operable and adequately staged. The effectiveness of surgical resection, however, is limited by high rates of distant recurrence caused by the presence of metastatic disease that is not apparent at the time of surgery. Thus, induction, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, as well as a combination of both, have been studied for their ability to reduce local and distant recurrence rates and to improve survival. Adjuvant chest radiation therapy following resection decreases local relapse rates but also decreases overall patient survival, with an increase in the hazard ratio of death. A previous metaanalysis of cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy showed a 13% reduction in the hazard ratio of death and a 5% improvement in 5-year survival, but the differences in the small sample failed to reach statistical significance. Newer 2-drug combinations were shown to reduce the hazard ratio of death by 14%, with a 4.3% improvement in 5-year survival in the largest trial recently reported. These newer 2-drug combinations also have the benefits of reduced toxicity and improved delivery. Induction chemotherapy offers several potential advantages compared with adjuvant chemotherapy, such as improved delivery, early control of micrometastatic disease, and reduction of the primary tumor size prior to surgery, thus allowing for more conservative and possibly complete resection of the tumor. A number of clinical trials have shown that induction chemotherapy is safe and feasible, with no significant increase in surgical complications, and results in favorable survival rates in patients with resectable NSCLC. A number of phase III randomized trials are currently under way to confirm the benefits of induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC and to compare induction chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery versus surgery alone. In addition, biologically targeted agents are currently under study for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Results of clinical trials of multimodality therapy for resectable nonsmall-cell lung cancer

More than 50% of patients presenting with so-called early stage or surgical disease nonsmall-cell lung cancer will die of their cancer despite resection. Over the years, postoperative efforts to improve the survival of these patients have been disappointing. There is presently a lot of enthusiasm surrounding the strategy of preoperative or induction chemotherapy in the treatment of such patients. Worldwide, at least 4 large-scale ongoing cooperative group trials are evaluating this question at the present time. Only by completing these trials in a timely manner will we know if induction chemotherapy should become the standard of care for all patients with surgical disease nonsmall-cell lung cancer.

Induction chemotherapy followed by radical local therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Many patients who receive a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have locally advanced disease at initial presentation. Historically, these patients were treated with primary thoracic radiation therapy and had poor long-term survival rates, secondary to both progression of local disease and development of distant metastases. With the goal of improving clinical outcomes, multiple concepts of combined-modality therapy for locally advanced NSCLC have been investigated. The rationale for using chemotherapy in the induction regimen is to eliminate subclinical metastatic disease while improving local control. The optimal treatment of locally advanced NSCLC continues to evolve, but combined-modality therapy has led to improved survival rates compared to treatment with radiation alone and has become the new standard of care. This report reviews the major trials that have investigated various combinations of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.

Carboplatin and paclitaxol (Taxol) as an induction regimen for patients with biopsy-proven stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer. an EORTC phase II study (EORTC 08958)

The aim of this study was to document the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel (Taxol)/carboplatin when used as induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prior to definitive local treatment within a large, ongoing comparative study (EORTC 08941). 52 eligible, consenting, chemotherapy-naïve patients with NSCLC, median age of 60 years, stage IIIA N2 disease and the ability to tolerate a pneumonectomy received paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion followed by carboplatin at an area under the concentration curve (AUC) of 6 every 3 weeks for three courses. Most patients received three courses. No grade 3/4 anaemia or thrombocytopenia was documented. Over all of the cycles, 6% (3 patients) experienced grade 3 leucopenia while 63% (32/51 patients) experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia. There was 1 patient (2%) with febrile neutropenia, no early or toxic deaths and no hypersensitivity reactions. Severe non-haematological toxicity was uncommon, with the exception of grade 3 alopecia in 39%, lethargy in 8% and myalgia in 6%. Of the eligible patients (n=52), there was one complete response (CR) and 32 partial responses (PR), resulting in a response rate of 64% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 49%-76%). Of the 15 eligible patients randomised to surgery after induction chemotherapy, 3 patients did not receive surgery and 2 patients (n=12) had no tumour in the mediastinal nodes (17%). Resections were considered complete in 2 of the 12. Median survival for all eligible patients (n=52) was 20.5 months (95% CI 16.1-31.2), with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 68.5% (95% CI 55.2-81.7). In patients with N2 stage IIIA NSCLC, paclitaxel/carboplatin is an active and very well-tolerated induction regimen.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current status and future prospects

Of the patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 60% present with localised or locally advanced disease. Although they may be considered potentially curable, the vast majority will die, usually from systemic disease. So far, adjuvant (postoperative) therapy has failed to demonstrate benefit. In contrast, chemotherapy has demonstrated clear advantages when administered prior to, or concurrently with radiotherapy in Stage III disease or prior to surgery in Stage III disease. Chemotherapy administered prior to surgery, termed neoadjuvant therapy, in Stage I and II disease has been demonstrated to be feasible. Several trials employing currently available agents have yielded promising results. Whether these regimens will result in an unequivocal benefit is the subject of several ongoing studies in the US and Europe. Current research is focusing on the role of newer drugs including novel antitubulin agents, growth factor receptor antagonists, eicosanoid modulators and various other agents.

Mediastinal lymph node clearance after docetaxel-cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy is prognostic of survival in patients with stage IIIA pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II trial

PURPOSE

A multicenter, phase II trial investigated the efficacy and toxicity of neoadjuvant docetaxel-cisplatin in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and examined prognostic factors for patients not benefiting from surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety patients with previously untreated, potentially operable stage IIIA (mediastinoscopically pN2) NSCLC received three cycles of docetaxel 85 mg/m2 day 1 plus cisplatin 40 mg/m2 days 1 and 2, with subsequent surgical resection.

RESULTS

Administered dose-intensities were docetaxel 85 mg/m2/3 weeks (range, 53 to 96) and cisplatin 95 mg/m2/3 weeks (range, 0 to 104). The 265 cycles were well tolerated, and the overall response rate was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55% to 75%). Seventy-five patients underwent tumor resection with positive resection margin and involvement of the uppermost mediastinal lymph node in 16% and 35% of patients, respectively (perioperative mortality, 3%; morbidity, 17%). Pathologic complete response occurred in 19% of patients with tumor resection. In patients with tumor resection, downstaging to N0-1 at surgery was prognostic and significantly prolonged event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS; P =.0001). At median follow-up of 32 months, the median EFS and OS were 14.8 months (range, 2.4 to 53.4) and 33 months (range, 2.4 to 53.4), respectively. Local relapse occurred in 27% of patients with tumor resection, with distant metastases in 37%. Multivariate analyses identified mediastinal clearance (hazard ratio, 0.22; P =.0003) and complete resection (hazard ratio, 0.26; P =.0006) as strongly prognostic for increased survival.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant docetaxel-cisplatin is effective and tolerable in stage IIIA pN2 NSCLC. Resection is recommended only for patients with mediastinal downstaging after chemotherapy.

Treatment of stage II non-small cell lung cancer

Based on clinical assessment alone, patients with stage II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprise only 5% of all patients with NSCLC. In addition, patients with stage II NSCLC represent a heterogeneous group, since stage II consists of patients with T1-2N1 or T3N0 tumors. By definition, patients with tumor invading the chest wall apex, mediastinum, diaphragm, or even the mainstem bronchus may all have T3 tumors. The extent of the data available regarding treatment of each of these different groups is therefore limited. The quality of the data is limited as well, because information often comes from small series of patients. Studies of adjuvant therapy after complete resection of stage II NSCLC are an important exception to this generalization, since data from large, randomized studies of adjuvant radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of the two are available for analysis. Superior sulcus tumors are discussed elsewhere in these guidelines.