Fos expression in the sleep-active cell group of the ventrolateral preoptic area in the diurnal murid rodent, Arvicanthis niloticus

Diurnal predators in dim light: the ability of mantids to prey for supper

Many insects rely heavily on visual cues in foraging and other life activities. Mantids are insect predators that usually ambush prey. The sophisticated visual system of mantids allows them to spot, track, and strike at prey with high accuracy. Mantids are categorized as diurnal animals in most cases, while our field observations suggested that they were active in foraging both day and night. Therefore, we hypothesize that predation in dim light is possible for mantids, while mantids are unable to capture prey in complete darkness. In this study, we experimentally examined whether different light conditions could affect the predation success and efficiency of mantid nymphs and adults, Hierodula chinensis Werner (Mantodea: Mantidae), through behavioral observations. Individual mantids were placed in individual chambers in complete darkness, simulated moonlight (0.1 lux), or simulated dusk (50 lux) conditions and were allowed to forage for prey items for 10 min. Our observations showed no evidence that H. chinensis could capture any prey in complete deprivation of light. The proportion of nymphs with successful predation in simulated moonlight was 50% higher than that in complete darkness and 45.83% lower than that in simulated dusk. The proportion of adults with successful predation in simulated moonlight was 42.11% higher than that in complete darkness and 57.89% lower than that in simulated dusk. Overall, the results provide new insights into the behavioral ecology of diurnal predators at night, with potential association with moonlight, starlight, and light pollution.

Sex hormone dose escalation for treating abnormal sleep in ovariectomized rats: in vitro GABA synthesis in sleep-related brain areas

No data in the literature have evaluated sex hormone dose escalation for treating abnormal sleep of ovariectomized rats-nor studies on the role of sex hormones in GABA synthesis of rats' sleep-related areas. The main aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of estradiol (ET), progesterone (PT), and the mixture of both (EPT) to restore normal sleep in a model of menopause in rats. The second purpose was to describe the in vitro activity of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) in sleep-related brain areas in the presence or absence of sex hormones. A weekly dose-escalation design of ET, PT, or EPT was implemented in ovariectomized rats (six per group). Dose escalation continued until the dose at which 100% of the rats exhibited a state of "complete somnolence." Doses that were not toxic or did not show side effects were considered. For in vitro experiments, sleep-related brain areas were separated and incubated with radiolabeled glutamate. Estradiol (17β-E2), progesterone (P), and pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) were added to this assay, and GAD activity was determined. Under the same conditions, a second test was carried out, but the P antagonist RU486 was added to assess the role of P in GAD activity. Ovariectomy increased periodic awakenings compared to those determined for the SHAM group. The EPT for ovariectomized rats was very effective by the fifth week in decreasing arousal and achieving a similar sleep behavior to the SHAM-control group. Rats tolerated the ET, PT, and EPT well to the maximum planned dose (0.66 mg/kg and 4.4 mg/kg, respectively). No lethal events occurred; the MTD was reached. The in vitro studies indicated that the presence of 17β-E2 plus P in the assay triggered the activity of isotype 65 GAD in all the studied brain areas. RU486 in the incubation medium blocked such activity; however, the action of isotype 67 GAD was not blocked by RU486. A dose-escalation model was determined; the MTD coincided with the maximum dose of ET and PT used. However, the EPT combination restored normal sleep in the menopause model compared to the SHAMs without toxic effects. The in vitro model demonstrated that 17β-E2 plus P presence in the assay increased the activity of GAD65 in the studied brain tissues.

An overview of the orexinergic system in different animal species

Orexin (hypocretin), is a neuropeptide produced by a subset of neurons in the lateral hypothalamus. From the lateral hypothalamus, the orexin-containing neurons project their fibres extensively to other brain structures, and the spinal cord constituting the central orexinergic system. Generally, the term ''orexinergic system'' usually refers to the orexin peptides and their receptors, as well as to the orexin neurons and their projections to different parts of the central nervous system. The extensive networks of orexin axonal fibres and their terminals allow these neuropeptidergic neurons to exert great influence on their target regions. The hypothalamic neurons containing the orexin neuropeptides have been implicated in diverse functions, especially related to the control of a variety of homeostatic functions including feeding behaviour, arousal, wakefulness stability and energy expenditure. The broad range of functions regulated by the orexinergic system has led to its description as ''physiological integrator''. In the last two decades, the orexinergic system has been a topic of great interest to the scientific community with many reports in the public domain. From the documentations, variations exist in the neuroanatomical profile of the orexinergic neuron soma, fibres and their receptors from animal to animal. Hence, this review highlights the distinct variabilities in the morphophysiological aspects of the orexinergic system in the vertebrate animals, mammals and non-mammals, its presence in other brain-related structures, including its involvement in ageing and neurodegenerative diseases. The presence of the neuropeptide in the cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral tissues, as well as its alteration in different animal models and conditions are also reviewed.

Circadian and photic modulation of daily rhythms in diurnal mammals

The temporal niche that an animal occupies includes a coordinated suite of behavioral and physiological processes that set diurnal and nocturnal animals apart. The daily rhythms of the two chronotypes are regulated by both the circadian system and direct responses to light, a process called masking. Here we review the literature on circadian regulations and masking responses in diurnal mammals, focusing on our work using the diurnal Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus) and comparing our findings with those derived from other diurnal and nocturnal models. There are certainly similarities between the circadian systems of diurnal and nocturnal mammals, especially in the phase and functioning of the principal circadian oscillator within the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). However, the downstream pathways, direct or indirect from the SCN, lead to drastic differences in the phase of extra-SCN oscillators, with most showing a complete reversal from the phase seen in nocturnal species. This reversal, however, is not universal and in some cases the phases of extra-SCN oscillators are only a few hours apart between diurnal and nocturnal species. The behavioral masking responses in general are opposite between diurnal and nocturnal species, and are matched by differential responses to light and dark in several retinorecipient sites in their brain. The available anatomical and functional data suggest that diurnal brains are not simply a phase-reversed version of nocturnal ones, and work with diurnal models contribute significantly to a better understanding of the circadian and photic modulation of daily rhythms in our own diurnal species.

Diurnal rodents as pertinent animal models of human retinal physiology and pathology

This presentation will survey the retinal architecture, advantages, and limitations of several lesser-known rodent species that provide a useful diurnal complement to rats and mice. These diurnal rodents also possess unusually cone-rich photoreceptor mosaics that facilitate the study of cone cells and pathways. Species to be presented include principally the Sudanian Unstriped Grass Rat and Nile Rat (Arvicanthis spp.), the Fat Sand Rat (Psammomys obesus), the degu (Octodon degus) and the 13-lined ground squirrel (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus). The retina and optic nerve in several of these species demonstrate unusual resilience in the face of neuronal injury, itself an interesting phenomenon with potential translational value.

A comparison of the orexin receptor distribution in the brain between diurnal Nile grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus) and nocturnal mice (Mus musculus)

The neuropeptide orexin/hypocretin regulates a wide range of behaviors and physiology through its receptors OX1R and OX2R, or HCRTR-1 and HCRTR-2. Although the distributions of these receptors have been established in nocturnal rodents, their distributions in the brain of diurnal species have not been studied. In the present study, we examined spatial patterns of OX1R and OX2R mRNA expression in diurnal Nile grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus) by in situ hybridization and compared them with those in nocturnal mice (Mus musculus). Both receptors showed similar spatial patterns between species in most brain regions. However, species-specific expression was found in several regions that are mainly implicated in regulation of sleep/wakefulness, emotion and cognition. OX1R expression was detected in the caudate putamen and ventral tuberomammillary nucleus only in grass rats, while it was detected in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial division, posteromedial part only in mice. The distribution of OX2R mRNA was mostly consistent between the two species, although it was more widely expressed in the ventral tuberomammillary nucleus in grass rats compared to mice. These results suggest that neuronal pathways of the orexin system differ between chronotypes, and these differences could underlie the distinct profiles in behaviors and physiology between diurnal and nocturnal species.

Utilization of Diurnal Rodents in the Research of Depression

Preclinical Research Most neuropsychiatric research, including that related to the circadian system, is performed using nocturnal animals, mainly laboratory mice and rats. Mood disorders are known to be associated with circadian rhythm abnormalities, but the mechanisms by which circadian rhythm disruptions interact with depression remain unclear. As the circadian system of diurnal and nocturnal mammals differs, we previously suggested that the utilization of diurnal animal models may be advantageous for understanding these relations. During the last 10 years, we and others established the validity of several diurnal rodent species as a model for the interactions between circadian rhythms and depression. Diurnal rodents respond to photoperiod manipulation in a similar way to humans, the behavioral outcome is directly related to the circadian system, and treatment that is effective in patients is also effective in the model. Moreover, less effective treatments in patients are also less effective in the model. We, therefore, suggest that using diurnal animal models to study circadian rhythms-related affective disorders, such as depression, will provide new insights that will hopefully lead to the development of more effective treatments. Drug Dev Res 77 : 347-356, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Nocturnal Activity in a Diurnal Rodent (Arvicanthis Niloticus): The Importance of Masking

It is known that day-active Nile grass rats, Arvicanthis niloticus, increase the amount of activity in the night relative to that in the day when provided with running wheels. This was confirmed in the present study. Animals without a wheel displayed 69.0% of their general activity in the L phase of a 12:12 h light-dark cycle; animals provided with wheels had only 48.6% of their wheel revolutions in the light. The contribution of direct (masking) responses to light to the increased nocturnality of animals with wheels was examined in two experiments. In experiment 1, masking was tested by exposing the animals to repeated cycles of 30 min of entraining light and 30 min of a different, usually dimmer light, during the L phase of a 12:12 h light-dark cycle. For animals with wheels, there was more running during the 30-min pulses of dim light or darkness than during the 30-min periods of entraining light. In contrast, for animals without wheels, there was more general activity during the 30-min periods of entraining light than during the 30-min pulses of dim light or darkness. In experiment 2, the animals were first exposed to a 12:12 h light-dark cycle and then put on a 1:10:1:12 h LDLD skeleton photoperiod. Animals with wheels increased their running during the subjective day of the skeleton photoperiod compared to that in the actual day of the 12:12 h light-dark cycle. Animals without wheels showed similar levels of general activity during the subjective day of the skeleton photoperiod and the actual day of the 12:12 h cycle. These experiments demonstrate that when Nile rats have running wheels, their increased nocturnal activity is associated with an increased suppression of locomotion in direct response to light. It is possible that changes in masking responses to light may be an essential and integral component of switching between diurnal and nocturnal activity profiles.

Mammalian Diurnality: Some Facts and Gaps

A major factor contributing to the evolution of mammals was their ability to be active during the night, a niche previously underused by terrestrial vertebrates. Diurnality subsequently reemerged multiple times in a variety of independent lineages. This paper reviews some recent data on circadian mechanisms in diurnal mammals and considers general themes that appear to be emerging from this work. Careful examination of behavioral studies suggests that although subtle differences may exist, the fundamental functions of the circadian system are the same, as seems to be the case with respect to the molecular mechanisms of the clock. This suggests that responses to signals originating in the clock must be different, either within the SCN or at its targets or downstream from them. Some features of the SCN vary from species to species, but none of these has been clearly associated with diurnality. The region immediately dorsal to the SCN, which receives substantial input from it, exhibits dramatically different rhythms in nocturnal lab rats and diurnal grass rats. This raises the possibility that it functions as a relay that transforms the signal emitted by the SCN and transmits different patterns to downstream targets in nocturnal and diurnal animals. Other direct targets of the SCN include neurons containing orexin and those containing gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and both of these populations of cells exhibit patterns of rhythmicity that are inverted in at least one diurnal compared to one nocturnal species. The patterns that emerge from the data on diurnality are discussed in terms of the implications they have for the evolution and neural substrates of a day-active way of life.

Neuropeptide S- and Neuropeptide S receptor-expressing neuron populations in the human pons

Neuropeptide S (NPS) is a regulatory peptide with potent pharmacological effects. In rodents, NPS is expressed in a few pontine cell clusters. Its receptor (NPSR1) is, however, widely distributed in the brain. The anxiolytic and arousal-promoting effects of NPS make the NPS–NPSR1 system an interesting potential drug target in mood-related disorders. However, so far possible disease-related mechanisms involving NPS have only been studied in rodents. To validate the relevance of these animal studies for i.a. drug development, we have explored the distribution of NPS-expressing neurons in the human pons using in situ hybridization and stereological methods and we compared the distribution of NPS mRNA expressing neurons in the human and rat brain. The calculation revealed a total number of 22,317 ± 2411 NPS mRNA-positive neurons in human, bilaterally. The majority of cells (84%) were located in the parabrachial area in human: in the extension of the medial and lateral parabrachial nuclei, in the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus and around the adjacent lateral lemniscus. In human, in sharp contrast to the rodents, only very few NPS-positive cells (5%) were found close to the locus coeruleus. In addition, we identified a smaller cell cluster (11% of all NPS cells) in the pontine central gray matter both in human and rat, which has not been described previously even in rodents. We also examined the distribution of NPSR1 mRNA-expressing neurons in the human pons. These cells were mainly located in the rostral laterodorsal tegmental nucleus, the cuneiform nucleus, the microcellular tegmental nucleus region and in the periaqueductal gray. Our results show that both NPS and NPSR1 in the human pons are preferentially localized in regions of importance for integration of visceral autonomic information and emotional behavior. The reported interspecies differences must, however, be considered when looking for targets for new pharmacotherapeutical interventions.

Acute effects of light on the brain and behavior of diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus and nocturnal Mus musculus

Photic cues influence daily patterns of activity via two complementary mechanisms: (1) entraining the internal circadian clock and (2) directly increasing or decreasing activity, a phenomenon referred to as "masking". The direction of this masking response is dependent on the temporal niche an organism occupies, as nocturnal animals often decrease activity when exposed to light, while the opposite response is more likely to be seen in diurnal animals. Little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying these differences. Here, we examined the masking effects of light on behavior and the activation of several brain regions by that light, in diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus (Nile grass rats) and nocturnal Mus musculus (mice). Each species displayed the expected behavioral response to a 1h pulse of light presented 2h after lights-off, with the diurnal grass rats and nocturnal mice increasing and decreasing their activity, respectively. In grass rats light induced an increase in cFOS in all retinorecipient areas examined, which included the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the ventral subparaventricular zone (vSPZ), intergeniculate leaflet (IGL), lateral habenula (LH), olivary pretectal nucleus (OPT) and the dorsal lateral geniculate (DLG). In mice, light led to an increase in cFOS in one of these regions (SCN), no change in others (vSPZ, IGL and LH) and a decrease in two (OPT and DLG). In addition, light increased cFOS expression in three arousal-related brain regions (the lateral hypothalamus, dorsal raphe, and locus coeruleus) and in one sleep-promoting region (the ventrolateral preoptic area) in grass rats. In mice, light had no effect on cFOS in these four regions. Taken together, these results highlight several brain regions whose responses to light suggest that they may play a role in masking, and that the possibility that they contribute to species-specific patterns of behavioral responses to light should be explored in future.

Intergeniculate leaflet lesions result in differential activation of brain regions following the presentation of photic stimuli in Nile grass rats

The intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) plays an important role in the entrainment of circadian rhythms and the mediation of acute behavioral responses to light (i.e., masking). Recently, we reported that IGL lesions in diurnal grass rats result in a reversal in masking responses to light as compared to controls. Here, we used Fos as a marker of neural activation to examine the mechanisms by which the IGL may influence this masking effect of light in grass rats. Specifically, we examined the patterns of Fos activation in retinorecipient areas and in brain regions that receive IGL inputs following 1-h light pulses given during the early night in IGL-lesioned and sham-operated grass rats. Three patterns emerged: (1) IGL lesions had no effect on the Fos response to light, (2) IGL lesions resulted in a reversal in Fos responses to light, and (3) IGL lesions resulted in a lack of a Fos response to light. Of specific interest were the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and the olivary pretectal nucleus (OPT), both of which are retinorecipient and connect reciprocally with the IGL. Light-induced Fos expression in the SCN was unaffected by IGL lesions, whereas the OPT exhibited a significant reduction in Fos expression following a light pulse in animals with IGL lesions. Altogether, our results suggest that the OPT, but not the SCN, exhibits a reversal in Fos responses to light following IGL lesions that reverse masking responses in diurnal grass rats. Our results suggest that interconnections between the IGL and downstream brain areas (e.g., OPT) may play a role in determining the direction of the behavioral response to light.

Sex differences in circadian timing systems: implications for disease

Virtually every eukaryotic cell has an endogenous circadian clock and a biological sex. These cell-based clocks have been conceptualized as oscillators whose phase can be reset by internal signals such as hormones, and external cues such as light. The present review highlights the inter-relationship between circadian clocks and sex differences. In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) serves as a master clock synchronizing the phase of clocks throughout the body. Gonadal steroid receptors are expressed in almost every site that receives direct SCN input. Here we review sex differences in the circadian timing system in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPG), the hypothalamic-adrenal-pituitary (HPA) axis, and sleep-arousal systems. We also point to ways in which disruption of circadian rhythms within these systems differs in the sexes and is associated with dysfunction and disease. Understanding sex differentiated circadian timing systems can lead to improved treatment strategies for these conditions.

Fos expression in arousal and reward areas of the brain in grass rats following induced wakefulness

In the diurnal grass rat nocturnal voluntary wakefulness induces Fos expression in specific cellular populations of arousal and reward areas of the brain. Here, we evaluated whether involuntary wakefulness would result in similar patterns of Fos expression. We assessed this question using male grass rats that were sleep deprived for 6h by gentle stimulation (SD group), starting 2h before lights off (12:12 LD cycle). Then, we examined expression of Fos in cholinergic cells of the basal forebrain (BF), as well as in dopaminergic cells of the reward system, and compared these results to those obtained from an undisturbed control group. Different from previous results with grass rats that were voluntary awake, the BF of SD animals only showed a significant increase in Fos expression in non-cholinergic neurons of the medial septum (MS). These observations differ from reports for nocturnal rodents that are sleep deprived. Thus, our results show that voluntary and induced wakefulness have different effects on neural systems involved in wakefulness and reward, and that the effects of sleep deprivation are different across species. We also investigated whether other arousal promoting regions and circadian and stress related areas responded to sleep deprivation by changing the level of Fos expression. Among these areas, only the lateral hypothalamus (LH) and the ventro lateral preoptic area showed significant effects of sleep deprivation that dissipated after a 2h period of sleep recovery, as it was also the case for the non-cholinergic MS. In addition, we found that Fos expression in the LH was robustly associated with Fos expression in other arousal and reward areas of the brain. This is consistent with the view that the arousal system of the LH modulates neural activity of other arousal regions of the brain, as described for nocturnal rodents.

Neural activation in arousal and reward areas of the brain in day-active and night-active grass rats

In the diurnal unstriped Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus) access to a running wheel can trigger a shift in active phase preference, with some individuals becoming night-active (NA), while others continue to be day-active (DA). To investigate the contributions of different neural systems to the support of this shift in locomotor activity, we investigated the association between chronotype and Fos expression during the day and night in three major nuclei in the basal forebrain (BF) cholinergic (ACh) arousal system - medial septum (MS), vertical and horizontal diagonal band of Broca (VDB and HDB respectively) -, and whether neural activation in these areas was related to neural activity in the orexinergic system. We also measured Fos expression in dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic cells of two components of the reward system that also participate in arousal - the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and supramammillary nucleus (SUM). NAs and DAs were compared to animals with no wheels. NAs had elevated Fos expression at night in ACh cells, but only in the HDB. In the non-cholinergic cells of the BF of NAs, enhanced nocturnal Fos expression was almost universally seen, but only associated with activation of the orexinergic system for the MS/VDB region. For some of the areas and cell types of the BF, the patterns of Fos expression of DAs appeared similar to those of NAs, but were never associated with activation of the orexinergic system. Also common to DAs and NAs was a general increase in Fos expression in non-dopaminergic cells of the SUM and anterior VTA. Thus, in this diurnal species, voluntary exercise and a shift to a nocturnal chronotype changes neural activity in arousal and reward areas of the brain known to regulate a broad range of neural functions and behaviors, which may be also affected in human shift workers.

Daily rhythms in PER1 within and beyond the suprachiasmatic nucleus of female grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus)

Although circadian rhythms of males and females are different in a variety of ways in many species, their mechanisms have been primarily studied in males. Furthermore, rhythms are dramatically different in diurnal and nocturnal animals but have been studied predominantly in nocturnal ones. In the present study, we examined rhythms in one element of the circadian oscillator, the PER1 protein, in a variety of cell populations in brains of diurnal female grass rats. Every 4 h five adult female grass rats kept on a 12-h light/dark (LD) cycle were perfused and their brains were processed for immunohistochemical detection of PER1. Numbers of PER1-labeled cells were rhythmic not only within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the locus of the primary circadian clock in mammals, but also in the peri-suprachiasmatic region, the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, the central amygdala, and the nucleus accumbens. In addition, rhythms were detected within populations of neuroendocrine cells that contain tyrosine hydroxylase. The phase of the rhythm within the SCN was advanced compared with that seen previously in male grass rats. Rhythms beyond the SCN were varied and different from those seen in most nocturnal species, suggesting that signals originating in the SCN are modified by its direct and/or indirect targets in different ways in nocturnal and diurnal species.

Rhythms in expression of PER1 protein in the amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of the diurnal grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus)

In the diurnal rodent Arvicanthis niloticus (grass rats) the pattern of expression of the clock genes and their proteins in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is very similar to that seen in nocturnal rodents. Rhythms in clock gene expression have been also documented in several forebrain regions outside the SCN in nocturnal Ratus norvegicus (lab rats). To investigate the neural basis for differences in the circadian systems of diurnal and nocturnal mammals, we examined PER1 expression in the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST-OV), and in the basolateral (BLA) and the central (CEA) amygdala of male grass rats kept in a 12:12 light/dark cycle. In the BNST-OV, peak levels of PER1 expression were seen early in the light phase of the cycle, 12h out of phase with what has been reported for nocturnal lab rats. In the BLA the pattern of PER1 expression featured sustained high levels during the day and low levels at night. PER1 expression in the CEA was also at its highest early in the light phase, but the effect of sampling time was not statistically significant (p<0.06). The results are consistent with the hypothesis that differences between nocturnal and diurnal species are due to differences in neural systems downstream from the SCN.

Prolactin-releasing peptide

Prolactin-releasing peptide (PrRP) was initially isolated from the bovine hypothalamus as an activating component that stimulated arachidonic acid release from cells stably expressing the orphan G protein-coupled receptor hGR3 (Hinuma et al. 1998) [also known as GPR10 (Marchese et al. 1995), or UHR-1 for the rat orthologue (Welch et al. 1995)]. Initially touted as a prolactin-releasing factor (therefore aptly named prolactin-releasing peptide), the perspective on the function of this peptide in the organism has been greatly expanded. Over 120 papers have been published on this subject since its initial discovery in 1998. Herein I review the state of knowledge of the PrRP system, its putative function in the organism, and implications for therapy.

A comparative analysis of the distribution of immunoreactive orexin A and B in the brains of nocturnal and diurnal rodents

Background

The orexins (hypocretins) are a family of peptides found primarily in neurons in the lateral hypothalamus. Although the orexinergic system is generally thought to be the same across species, the orexins are involved in behaviors which show considerable interspecific variability. There are few direct cross-species comparisons of the distributions of cells and fibers containing these peptides. Here, we addressed the possibility that there might be important species differences by systematically examining and directly comparing the distribution of orexinergic neurons and fibers within the forebrains of species with very different patterns of sleep-wake behavior.

Methods

We compared the distribution of orexin-immunoreactive cell bodies and fibers in two nocturnal species (the lab rat, Rattus norvegicus and the golden hamster, Mesocricetus auratus) and two diurnal species (the Nile grass rat, Arvicanthis niloticus and the degu, Octodon degus). For each species, tissue from the olfactory bulbs through the brainstem was processed for immunoreactivity for orexin A and orexin B (hypocretin-1 and -2). The distribution of orexin-positive cells was noted for each species. Orexin fiber distribution and density was recorded and analyzed using a principal components factor analysis to aid in evaluating potential species differences.

Results

Orexin-positive cells were observed in the lateral hypothalamic area of each species, though there were differences with respect to distribution within this region. In addition, cells positive for orexin A but not orexin B were observed in the paraventricular nucleus of the lab rat and grass rat, and in the supraoptic nucleus of the lab rat, grass rat and hamster. Although the overall distributions of orexin A and B fibers were similar in the four species, some striking differences were noted, especially in the lateral mammillary nucleus, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus and flocculus.

Conclusion

The orexin cell and fiber distributions observed in this study were largely consistent with those described in previous studies. However, the present study shows significant species differences in the distribution of orexin cell bodies and in the density of orexin-IR fibers in some regions. Finally, we note previously undescribed populations of orexin-positive neurons outside the lateral hypothalamus in three of the four species examined.

Individual differences in rhythms of behavioral sleep and its neural substrates in Nile grass rats

Laboratory populations of grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus) housed with a running wheel show considerable variation in patterns of locomotor activity. At the extremes are "day-active" (DA) animals with a monophasic distribution of running throughout the light phase and "night-active" (NA) animals exhibiting a biphasic pattern with an extended peak at the beginning of the dark phase and a brief peak shortly before lights-on. Here, the authors use this intraspecific variation to explore interactions between circadian and homeostatic influences on sleep and the effects of these interactions on the activity of brain regions involved in sleep regulation. Male animals were singly housed with running wheels in a 12:12 LD cycle, videotaped for 24 h, and perfused at ZT 4 or 16. Behavioral sleep was scored from the videotapes, and brains were processed for cFos immunoreactivity (cFos-ir). Sleep duration within the light and dark phases was higher in NA and DA animals, respectively, but these groups did not differ with respect to total sleep. In both groups, sleep bouts were shortest in the light phase and longest between ZT 20 and ZT 23. In the ventrolateral preoptic area (VLPO), cFos-ir was higher at ZT 16 than at ZT 4 in DA but not NA grass rats, and it was correlated with behavioral sleep at ZT 16 but not ZT 4. In OXA neurons, cFos-ir was high at ZT 4 in DA grass rats and at ZT 16 in NA grass rats, and it was correlated with behavioral sleep at both times. In the lower subparaventricular zone (LSPV), cFos-ir was higher at ZT 16 in both DA and NA animals, and it was unrelated to behavioral sleep. Thus, patterns of cFos-ir in the LSPV and OXA neurons were most tightly linked to time and sleep, respectively, whereas cFos-ir in the VLPO was influenced by an interaction between these 2 variables.

Circadian regulation of sleep in mammals: Role of the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Despite significant progress in elucidating the molecular basis for circadian oscillations, the neural mechanisms by which the circadian clock organizes daily rhythms of behavioral state in mammals remain poorly understood. The objective of this review is to critically evaluate a conceptual model that views sleep expression as the outcome of opponent processes-a circadian clock-dependent alerting process that opposes sleep during the daily wake period, and a homeostatic process by which sleep drive builds during waking and is dissipated during sleep after circadian alerting declines. This model is based primarily on the evidence that in a diurnal primate, the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus), ablation of the master circadian clock (the suprachiasmatic nucleus; SCN) induces a significant expansion of total daily sleep duration and a reduction in sleep latency in the dark. According to this model, the circadian clock actively promotes wake but only passively gates sleep; thus, loss of circadian clock alerting by SCN ablation impairs the ability to sustain wakefulness and causes sleep to expand. For comparison, two additional conceptual models are described, one in which the circadian clock actively promotes sleep but not wake, and a third in which the circadian clock actively promotes both sleep and wake, at different circadian phases. Sleep in intact and SCN-damaged rodents and humans is first reviewed, to determine how well the data fit these conceptual models. Neuroanatomical and neurophysiological studies are then reviewed, to examine the evidence for direct and indirect interactions between the SCN circadian clock and sleep-wake circuits. Finally, sleep in SCN-ablated squirrel monkeys is re-examined, to consider its compatibility with alternative models of circadian regulation of sleep. In aggregate, the behavioral and neurobiological evidence suggests that in rodents and humans, the circadian clock actively promotes both wake and sleep, at different phases of the circadian cycle. The hypersomnia of SCN-ablated squirrel monkeys is unique in magnitude, but is not incompatible with a role for the SCN pacemaker in actively promoting sleep.

A daily rhythm in mating behavior in a diurnal murid rodent Arvicanthis niloticus

The time of day at which mating occurs is dramatically different in diurnal compared to nocturnal rodents. We used a diurnal murid rodent, Arvicanthis niloticus, to determine if inverted rhythms in responsiveness to hormones contribute to this difference. Male and hormone-primed female grass rats were tested for mating behavior at four different times of day (ZT 5, 11, 17, 23; ZT 0=lights-on). In females, there was considerable inter-individual variability with respect to patterns of responsiveness to hormones. Overall, the lordosis quotient (LQ) was rhythmic with a single peak just before lights-on (ZT 23); however, while roughly half of the females (7/15) exhibited this clear daily rhythm, the remaining animals (8/15) had relatively high LQs that did not change as a function of time. Males had their shortest ejaculation latencies and their highest number of ejaculations at ZT 23. Rhythms in mount frequency and post-ejaculatory refractory period were bimodal, with peaks around lights-on and -off (ZT 23 and 11). This temporal pattern of mounting behavior closely parallels previously documented patterns of general activity, whereas rhythms in the more reflexive components of sex behavior (LQ and ejaculation) had more restricted peaks that coincided with just the onset of rhythms in general activity. These rhythms in sexual behavior are essentially reversed relative to those previously documented in lab rats.

Fos-immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus: dependency on the diurnal rhythm, sleep, gender, and estrogen

Diurnal variations and sleep deprivation-induced changes in the number of Fos-immunoreactive (Fos-IR) neurons in various hypothalamic/preoptic nuclei were studied in the rat. The nuclei implicated in sleep regulation, the ventrolateral preoptic (VLPO), median preoptic (MnPO), and suprachiasmatic (SCN, dorsomedial subdivision) nuclei, displayed maximum c-fos expression in the rest (light) period. Sleep deprivation (S.D.) suppressed Fos-IR in the dorsomedial subdivision of SCN but failed to alter Fos in the VLPO. Fos-IR increased in the VLPO during recovery after S.D. A nocturnal rise in Fos expression was detected in the arcuate (ARC), anterodorsal preoptic (ADP) and anteroventral periventricular (AVPV) nuclei whereas the lateroanterior hypothalamic nucleus (LA) and the ventrolateral subdivision of SCN did not display diurnal variations. S.D. stimulated Fos expression in the ARC, ADP, and LA. Statistically significant, albeit modest, differences were noted in the number of Fos-IR cells between males and cycling female (estrus/diestrus) in the VLPO, MnPO, ARC, LA, and AVPV, and the female ADP did not display diurnal variations. Ovariectomy (OVX) was followed by marked reduction in Fos expression in the VLPO, SCN, and AVPV, and the diurnal rhythm decreased in the VLPO, and vanished in the dorsomedial SCN, and AVP. Estrogen administration to OVX female rats stimulated Fos expression in most nuclei, and the lost diurnal variations reoccurred. In contrast, castration of male rats had little effect on Fos expression (slight rises in diurnal Fos in the ARC and ventrolateral SCN). The results suggest that Fos expression is highly estrogen-dependent in many hypothalamic nuclei including those that have been implicated in sleep regulation.

Diurnal and nocturnal rodents show rhythms in orexinergic neurons

Orexin (ORX) A and B (hypocretins) are excitatory neuropeptides produced by neurons of the lateral hypothalamus that have been implicated in the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle. In rats, Fos (the product of the cfos gene) expression shows daily rhythms in areas involved in sleep and wakefulness and orexinergic neurons show elevated Fos expression during the night. The present study directly compared the daily pattern of Fos expression in orexinergic neurons in diurnal (A. niloticus; grass rats) and nocturnal (R. norvegicus; lab rats) rodents. Animals kept on a 12:12 light-dark cycle were perfused at six different Zeitgeber times (ZT), with lights on at ZT 0: 1, 5, 13, 17, 20 and 23. In both nocturnal and diurnal rodents orexinergic neurons showed rhythms in Fos expression, with more Fos seen during the active phase of each species. In the diurnal species, Fos expression in cells of the lateral hypothalamus that do not produce ORX was elevated at ZT 20, a time when these animals sleep, and was low at ZT 13, a time of peak of activity. These results provide further evidence for a link between activity in orexinergic neurons and wakefulness and that in grass rats, other neurons of the lateral hypothalamus may work in an antagonistic fashion with respect to orexinergic neurons to regulate wakefulness in this diurnal species.

Indirect projections from the suprachiasmatic nucleus to the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus: a dual tract-tracing study in rat

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contains a master clock for most circadian rhythms in mammals, including daily sleep-wake cycles. The ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO) plays a key role in sleep generation and, as such, might be an important target of the SCN circadian signal. However, direct SCN projections to the VLPO are limited, suggesting that most of the SCN output to the VLPO might be conveyed indirectly. We examined this possibility by microinjecting selected known major targets of SCN efferents with biotinylated dextran-amine and/or cholera toxin B subunit, followed by analyses of retrograde labelling in the SCN and anterograde labelling in the VLPO. Retrograde labelling results confirmed that the medial preoptic area, subparaventricular zone, dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus and posterior hypothalamic area all received projections from the SCN; these projections arose predominantly from the shell, as opposed to the core, of the SCN. Anterograde labelling results indicated that these same nuclei also projected to the VLPO, mainly its medial and ventral aspects. Comparison of the results of injections of similar sizes across different target groups indicated that the rostral part of the medial preoptic area and the caudal part of the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus were particularly noteworthy for the abundance of both SCN source neurons and efferent fibres and terminals in the VLPO. These results suggest that the SCN might provide indirect input to the VLPO via the medial preoptic area and the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus, and that these indirect neuronal pathways might play a major role in circadian control of sleep-wake cycles.

Circadian organization in a diurnal rodent, Arvicanthis ansorgei Thomas 1910: chronotypes, responses to constant lighting conditions, and photoperiodic changes

Little information is available on circadian organization in diurnal mammals. In the present study, the daily patterns of wheel-running activity were described in a diurnal rodent, Arvicanthis ansorgei Thomas 1910, as assessed by karyological analysis. Among 108 animals born in the colony and studied under a 12:12 light-dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.), the authors determined the timing of daily activity (i.e., mean onsets and offsets of pattern of locomotor activity) and the level of wheel-running activity performed during daytime versus nighttime. The activity pattern was essentially diurnal in 84% of individuals, 46% being active only during the light period +/- 1 h (activity onsets and offsets at 6:20 a.m. and 7:40 p.m., respectively) and 38% being diurnal with a period of nocturnal activity longer than 1 h (activity onsets and offsets at 5:40 a.m. and 9:30 p.m., respectively). Of the 108 animals, 16% expressed a nocturnal activity with diurnal overlaps no longer than 1 h. In 6 diurnal individuals first exposed to constant light and then to constant dim red light, the endogenous period was shortened from 24.6 +/- 0.1 to 24.0 +/- 0.1 h, respectively. The numbers of wheel revolutions per day and during the active period remained unchanged between the two lighting conditions. In response to different photoperiodic changes from 16:08 to 08:16 light-dark cycles, the phase angle of photic synchronization, estimated by the daily onset of wheel-running activity in 6 diurnal animals, showed marked changes, its timing occurring 2 h before and 0.5 h after the onset of light under short and long photoperiods, respectively. The numbers of wheel revolutions per 24 h and during the active period were modified similarly according to photoperiodic changes. Finally, in 5 diurnal animals exposed to a 12:12 light-dark cycle, the daily pattern of general locomotor activity, determined by telemetry, was not modified by wheel availability. The data indicate that A. ansorgei is an interesting experimental model to understand the regulation of the circadian timing system in day-active species.

Fos rhythms in the hypothalamus of Rattus and Arvicanthis that exhibit nocturnal and diurnal patterns of rhythmicity

This study compared patterns of Fos expression within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the region immediately dorsal to the SCN (the lower subparaventricular zone, LSPV), and the supraoptic nucleus (SON) of grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus) and lab rats (Rattus norvegicus). Among grass rats we also compared individuals exhibiting nocturnal and diurnal patterns of wheel running. In the SCN of both groups of grass rats, as well as laboratory rats, Fos was elevated during the light compared to the dark portions of the day, and was expressed in 7-12% of cells containing vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP). Fos was higher in the LSPV during the night compared to the day in both forms of grass rats but not in laboratory rats. In the SON, Fos rose from day to night in the diurnal grass rats and in laboratory rats, but not in nocturnal grass rats. These patterns are consistent with the hypothesis that VIP cells in the SCN function similarly in nocturnal and diurnal rodents, but that the SON and the region dorsal to the SCN are associated with intra and interspecific differences in rhythmicity, respectively.

Phase response curve and light-induced fos expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and adjacent hypothalamus of Arvicanthis niloticus

This article describes the phase response curve (PRC), the effect of light on Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-IR) in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), and the effect of SCN lesions on circadian rhythms in the murid rodent, Arvicanthis niloticus. In this species, all individuals are diurnal when housed without a running wheel, but running in a wheel induces a nocturnal pattern in some individuals. First, the authors characterized the PRC in animals with either the nocturnal or diurnal pattern. Both groups of animals were less affected by light during the middle of the subjective day than during the night and were phase delayed and phase advanced by pulses in the early and late subjective night, respectively. Second, the authors characterized the Fos response to light at circadian times 5, 14, or 22. Light induced an increase in Fos-IR within the SCN during the subjective night but not subjective day; this effect was especially pronounced in the ventral SCN, where retinal inputs are most concentrated, but was also evident in other regions. Both light and time influenced Fos-IR within the lower subparaventricular area. Third, SCN lesions caused animals to become arrhythmic when housed in a light-dark cycle as well as constant darkness. In summary, Arvicanthis appear to be very similar to nocturnal rodents with respect to their PRC, temporal patterns of light-induced Fos expression in the SCN, and the effects of SCN lesions on activity rhythms.

Calbindin and Fos within the suprachiasmatic nucleus and the adjacent hypothalamus of Arvicanthis niloticus and Rattus norvegicus

The suprachiasmatic nucleus is the site of the primary circadian pacemaker in mammals. The lower sub paraventricular zone that is dorsal to and receives input from the suprachiasmatic nucleus may also play a role in the regulation of circadian rhythms. Calbindin has been described in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of some mammals, and may be important in the control of endogenous rhythms. In the first study we characterized calbindin-expressing cells in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and lower sub-paraventricular zone of nocturnal and diurnal rodents. Specifically, Rattus norvegicus was compared to Arvicanthis niloticus, a primarily diurnal species within which some individuals exhibit nocturnal patterns of wheel running. Calbindin-immunoreactive cells were present in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of Arvicanthis and were most concentrated within its central region but were relatively sparse in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of Rattus. Calbindin-expressing cells were present in the lower sub-paraventricular zone of both species. In the second study we evaluated Fos expression within calbindin-immunoreactive cells in nocturnal Rattus and in Arvicanthis that were either diurnal or nocturnal with respect to wheel-running. All animals were kept on a 12:12 light/dark cycle and perfused at either 4h after lights-on or 4h after lights-off. In the suprachiasmatic nucleus in both species, Fos expression was elevated during the day relative to the night but less than 1% of calbindin cells contained Fos in Arvicanthis, compared with 13-17% in Rattus. In the lower sub-paraventricular zone of both species, 9-14% of calbindin cells expressed Fos, and this proportion did not change as a function of time. Among Arvicanthis, the number of calbindin expressing neurons in the lower sub-paraventricular zone was influenced by an interaction between the wheel running patterns (nocturnal vs diurnal) and time of day. Thus, the number of calbindin-positive cells within the suprachiasmatic nucleus differed in Arvicanthis and Rattus, whereas the number of calbindin-positive cells within the lower sub-paraventricular zone differed in nocturnal and diurnal Arvicanthis. Our examination of R. norvegicus and A. niloticus suggests potentially important relationships between calbindin-containing neurons and whether animals are nocturnal or diurnal. Specifically, rats had more Fos expression in calbindin containing cells in the suprachiasmatic nucleus than Arvicanthis. In contrast, Arvicanthis exhibiting diurnal and nocturnal patterns of wheel-running differed in the number of calbindin-containing cells in the lower sub-paraventricular zone, dorsal to the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Rhythms in Fos expression in brain areas related to the sleep-wake cycle in the diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus

Most mammals show daily rhythms in sleep and wakefulness controlled by the primary circadian pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Regardless of whether a species is diurnal or nocturnal, neural activity in the SCN and expression of the immediate-early gene product Fos increases during the light phase of the cycle. This study investigated daily patterns of Fos expression in brain areas outside the SCN in the diurnal rodent Arvicanthis niloticus. We specifically focused on regions related to sleep and arousal in animals kept on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle and killed at 1 and 5 h after both lights-on and lights-off. The ventrolateral preoptic area (VLPO), which contained cells immunopositive for galanin, showed a rhythm in Fos expression with a peak at zeitgeber time (ZT) 17 (with lights-on at ZT 0). Fos expression in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus (PVT) increased during the morning (ZT 1) but not the evening activity peak of these animals. No rhythm in Fos expression was found in the centromedial thalamic nucleus (CMT), but Fos expression in the CMT and PVT was positively correlated. A rhythm in Fos expression in the ventral tuberomammillary nucleus (VTM) was 180 degrees out of phase with the rhythm in the VLPO. Furthermore, Fos production in histamine-immunoreactive neurons of the VTM cells increased at the light-dark transitions when A. niloticus show peaks of activity. The difference in the timing of the sleep-wake cycle in diurnal and nocturnal mammals may be due to changes in the daily pattern of activity in brain regions important in sleep and wakefulness such as the VLPO and the VTM.

Daily rhythms of Fos expression in hypothalamic targets of the suprachiasmatic nucleus in diurnal and nocturnal rodents

Little is known about the differences in the neural substrates of circadian rhythms that are responsible for the maintenance of differences between diurnal and nocturnal patterns of activity in mammals. In both groups of animals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) functions as the principal circadian pacemaker, and surprisingly, several correlates of neuronal activity in the SCN show similar daily patterns in diurnal and nocturnal species. In this study, immunocytochemistry was used to monitor daily fluctuations in the expression of the nuclear phosphoprotein Fos in the SCN and in hypothalamic targets of the SCN axonal outputs in the nocturnal laboratory rat and in the diurnal murid rodent, Arvicanthis niloticus. The daily patterns of Fos expression in the SCN were very similar across the two species. However, clear species differences were seen in regions of the hypothalamus that receive inputs from the SCN including the subparaventricular zone. These results indicate that differences in the circadian system found downstream from the SCN contribute to the emergence of a diurnal or nocturnal profile in mammals.